Author Archives: admin


Glantz: Taking the ‘bad man’ test | Local News – The Times Herald

The official definition of the witching hour is when witches -- or magicians, ghouls, Republican senators and other demons -- are said be at their most powerful.

Thats the myth, the folklore.

The reality is that the witching hour is when we wake up in the middle of the night and our minds are clear enough to be haunted by our own bitter realities.

Unanswerable questions, many about futures we cant control, ravage the brain.

I was hit with one so immediate this past week that not even my home remedy sneaking downstairs for some old Sopranos episodes could make it right.

The question was this: Am I a bad person?

Here are three examples, hot off the presses, that had me wondering:

Andy Reid Much of Eagles Nation has forgiven and forgotten the specifics of the Reid Era here. They instead focus on the general success between 1999 and 2012.

But not me. I remember high hopes repeatedly dashed, and the seasons that ended in despair.

I invested too much in time, emotion and money (season ticket holder) -- to be stranded at the altar again and again and again.

Maybe some forget the feeling of having their hearts eaten out that were then met with the subsequent kick in our collective gut when Reid would act smug and indifferent during postgame press conferences.

Even when mishaps (dropped passes, missed tackles) werent directly his fault, Reids standard line was it begins with me.

Fine, Andy, you wanted the blame, you got it. I would have told you so if they let me to drive you to the airport when you left town.

Why, then, would I or anyone else who bleeds green root for Reid to have success elsewhere?

There was no worse scenario than his new team, the Kansas City Chiefs, winning a Super Bowl when he didnt do it in Philly after all those years of knocking on the door without finding a way to kick it in.

When we finally got it done two years ago, some of the edge was taken off. Still, when the Chiefs reached the big dance this year, I became a temporary fan of the opposing San Francisco 49ers.

Truth be told, I am more than a little bit angry with the end result (particularly the touchdown that wasnt a touchdown) and irked by all the glad tidings for Reid around the Delaware Valley.

Bad person?

Self-vote: Yeah, sigh, I am. Its not like he tried to lose big games here (it just seemed like it).

Iowa Caucuses I have been a detractor of the overall primary system for a long time, and my criticism begins with the disproportionate role little Iowa plays in the process.

I wrote all about it in my Sunday column a month or two ago, but I never could have imagined the Monday meltdown that will leave the final tally with an asterisk.

The root cause of the chaos was the already silly caucus process being further complicated with some second-round scenario that was clearly over the heads of those Iowa straw-chewers to comprehend.

While the good news is that this is probably the last we will see of the Iowa Caucuses, and maybe even Iowa getting to bat leadoff and set the pace as it has been doing, despite clearly not being a gauge of Americas diversity (its well over 90 percent lilywhite, for example) the embarrassment for the Democratic party could prove to be colossal.

Bad person?

Self-vote: Nope, not at all. A little bit of vindication is good for the soul.

Rush Limbaugh The right-wing AM Talk Radio host revealed that he is terminally ill.

If you are waiting for tears, keeping waiting.

I understand the man may have had a job to do, sort of in the Howard Stern shock jock sense, and that he may or may not have even meant half the hateful things he was saying.

But listeners many with pea brains accepted his postulating as fact.

And he knew it.

And he kept on spewing his garbage -- ironically losing his own hearing, so he couldnt even hear himself anymore.

If we are truly mired in a modern day Civil War, one in which lives (i.e. Heather Heyer) have been lost, Limbaugh is a general in the militia that fired the first shots (albeit away from the fray while on his bully pulpit).

It could be said that there would have been no coming of your president (not mine), without Limbaugh among others laying the groundwork.

No wonder Limbaugh got the Presidential Medal of Freedom the other night.

Hard to believe, though, considering this is the same person who called Iraq War veterans subsequently opposed to the war phony soldiers.

Then again, this prize was given to him by the phoniest of soldiers, one who got out of Vietnam with phantom bone spurs.

Like your president (not mine), Limbaugh built his empire on lies and half-truths.

Consider that Polifact rated Limbaughs on-air statements as either mostly false or pants on fire at a rapid-fire rate of 84 percent, with only a mere 5 percent registering as true.

While a lot of his false statements are about climate change, we are also talking about someone who continually degraded President Barack Obama with racially charged innuendoes calling him (and Oprah Winfrey) uppity, etc. and who compared NFL games to showdowns between black gangs.

He also said actor Michael J. Fox was exaggerating his Parkinsons disease in an ad for stem cell research.

I wonder if hed like some of that stem cell research for himself now? Maybe he is just exaggerating his symptoms.

Take the high road? Not this so-called snowflake. Its all low road here in Gordonville.

Bad person?

Self-vote: Abstain.

Originally posted here:
Glantz: Taking the 'bad man' test | Local News - The Times Herald

Stanford loses emotional game in Boulder, 81-74 – Rule Of Tree

Basketball, like life, sometimes isnt fair.

Covering Stanford, Ive had the pleasure of speaking with Oscar da Silva over the past few years. Its been well-publicized that he can speak six languages, and that hes serious about his classes, and that he conducts stem cell research. But theres so much more to him.

His game ended early today, and it was scary. As he hustled back to prevent a fast break bucket, charging full speed ahead was Colorados Evan Battey, one of the beefier forwards in the conference. The two collided around the restricted area, and as they flew to the ground, Batteys forearm forcibly slammed da Silvas head into the hardwood. It was inadvertent, but you could immediately tell it was serious. Oscar left the game on a stretcher.

You should hear the way that his teammates talk about him, or even see the way they look at him. When Jaiden Delaire flourished earlier in the year, he spoke about the impact Oscars had on him. It wasnt about how hes learned his moves or picked up a trick or two. Rather, he spoke about the tone that Oscar sets every day with his work-ethic and the way that he carries himself. Jerod Haase didnt have any captain last year, so bestowing that title on da Silva and Daejon Davis this year is a serious honor. Theyre like big brothers to their teammates.

This team has a deep bond. Jerod Haase is the father figure, who on multiple occasions has been on the verge of tears talking about how much he cares for his guys. The whole squad and staff visited Oscars hometown of Munich, mingling with his parents and younger brother in the Bavarian capital. Oscar spoke about how special it was to have his two worlds intersect like that, and all involved had a great experience.

Its hard to play a game after something like that happens to someone you care about so much. The two teams locked arms at half court during the stoppage, and players handled it in various ways. Daejon Davis had to sit on the bench in the immediate aftermath. Battey was distraught, approaching Haase in tears to apologize.

This was always going to be a difficult game for Stanford. They havent won in Boulder since 2012, and the Buffs are one of the conferences best teams this year. With Bryce Wills still nursing his injury from Thursday, a short Stanford rotation got even shorter. They even had to go to Sam Beskind, a former walk-on. But for some 30 minutes, none of that appeared to matter.

Stanford built an 11 point halftime advantage through superb play defensively, even without the conferences best defender. After Colorado hit their first shot of the game, they subsequently went on a 7+ minute field goal drought. Nothing came easy for them. They finished the first half shooting 28% from the field and 23% from deep.

The final moments of the opening period were wacky. Up by six points and with the clock ticking down, Tyrell Terry threw up a three point shot and appeared to kick his leg out. The ref whistled Colorado for a foul, and Colorado coach Tad Boyles justifiable anger earned him a technical. Terry hit all 5 foul shots.

The lead grew to as many as 16 in the second half. Much of this came more on the backs of unusual suspects like Jaiden Delaire and Isaac White, as da Silva and Davis were hampered with foul trouble. At the time of da Silvas injury, Stanford led 41-30 with some 16 minutes on the clock. The lead wouldnt be enough.

It wasnt like they didnt battle, because they definitely had fight in them. But they didnt have the same edge. Their defense that was so good in the first half suddenly found itself getting picked apart. Colorado made all 8 of their three point attempts after halftime, and that just proved to be too much for the short-handed and heavy-hearted Cardinal.

Their toughness is one positive takeaway, but not the lone one. After a couple months of shaky play and even drawing a healthy scratch, Jaiden Delaire showed out in a big way. The sophomore forward scored 19 points off the bench in a variety of ways, including 2 triples. When hes confident, Stanford is on another level. Isaac White added 4 threes himself off the pine. Even Beskind, who seldom sees action, seemed to blend in well enough.

Last year, Oscar had a bit of a slump during the non-conference stretch. He broke out of it in a big way in mid-December, and Daejon was there to provide an explanation: finals. Oscar had spread himself thin, taking a number of classes with challenging exams. His mind had been on biology and chemistry as much as it had been on basketball. da Silva grinned, as he never would have admitted such a thing. The whole scene was refreshing. Much in the vein of an Andrew Luck or Bryce Love, hes the ideal of a Stanford student-athlete.

Hopefully, this was all just a scare and Oscar will simply need time to rest up and recuperate. Per Stanford basketball, his head laceration required stitches, but were still waiting on the results from the concussion protocol. Either way, the outcome of this game doesnt at all feel like the most important thing today.

Follow this link:
Stanford loses emotional game in Boulder, 81-74 - Rule Of Tree

Hanging Medal On Limbaugh, Trump Honors Overt Hate Speech – The National Memo

Rush Limbaugh is a demagogue, an incendiary and malevolent media figure who traffics in the worst of racism and misogyny, coarsens the civic discourse and mainstreams baseless conspiracy theories. Borrowing the playbook of a 1930s Catholic priest whose radio show reveled in anti-Semitism and fascism, Limbaugh is the Father Coughlin of our age. His radio show is vile.

On Tuesday, President Donald J. Trump awarded Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which had previously been reserved for people whose lives and work lifted the nation people such as Rosa Parks, Jonas Salk and Walter Cronkite. By awarding it to Limbaugh, the president has saluted a bigot and enshrined his ideology as a national treasure.

Many political scientists and news media pundits would still like to believe that the Trump presidency rests largely on economic upheaval, on the sense of dislocation and alienation in working-class regions that have seen well-paying jobs lost to globalization and automation. And there is, no doubt, a despair in those regions that can be traced to the loss of financial security. But those workers are too easily persuaded that their plight is the fault of Mexicans and Muslims, that their jobs went to unqualified black or brown laborers.

And Limbaugh is their media hero, a man whose decades on the radio moved his dedicated followers to call themselves Dittoheads. And what inspired commentary sends them into such rapturous agreement? Heres one Limbaugh nugget: I think its time to get rid of this whole National Basketball Association. Call it the TBA, the Thug Basketball Association, and stop calling them teams. Call em gangs. Heres another: Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

The presidency of Barack Obama sent Limbaugh into reactionary overdrive; he was a committed birther, and he derided any Obama policy that expanded government benefits even when most of the beneficiaries were white as reparations. In one rant during Obamas first term, Limbaugh claimed that Obamas presidency represented the opportunity for people of color to use their power as a means of retribution. Thats what Obamas about. Hes angry, hes gon cut this country down to size, hes gon make it pay for its mistreatment of minorities.

Limbaugh also has full reservoirs of misogyny with which to drench women who dare seek equal treatment under the law. When a Georgetown University student named Sandra Fluke testified before Congress, seeking to have health insurance cover contraceptives, Limbaugh went on a vicious tear, denouncing her as a slut and a prostitute. He made the term feminazi a mainstream slur describing any woman who believes that she should have full citizenship. Feminism, he once declared, was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.

To round out his repertoire of abhorrent and baseless attacks, he once mocked the actor Michael J. Fox, who suffers from Parkinsons disease, on the air, accusing him of exaggerating his symptoms. Fox had made a political ad in support of stem cell research, which scientists said might lead to a cure for Parkinsons, and viewers could see his pronounced tremors. He is moving all around and shaking, and its purely an act, Limbaugh insisted.

Of course, all that bigotry and bullying made him the perfect recipient of an award from Trump, who has channeled the same base impulses to power his way to the presidency. Indeed, Limbaugh helped pave the way for Trump. The talk radio meister made insults, cheap provocations and racist assaults on people of color commonplace even entertaining for a certain voting bloc. They were ready to welcome the bombastic reality TV host.

When Trump entered the political arena as a birther insisting that Obama was not born in the United States and was therefore illegitimate his base was already primed for it. When Trump was caught on audio tape bragging that he had sexually assaulted women, Limbaugh had already laid the groundwork for a presidency dismissive of common decency.

By awarding Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Trump has not succeeded in cheapening the award. Its distinctions will endure. But he has elevated Limbaughs racism, misogyny and free-floating malevolence, enshrining them as centerpieces of his presidency.

Read more here:
Hanging Medal On Limbaugh, Trump Honors Overt Hate Speech - The National Memo

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics to Announce Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Provide a Corporate Update – Yahoo Finance

NEW YORK, Feb. 10, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:BCLI), a leading developer of adult stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, today announced that the Company will hold a conference call to update shareholders on financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2019, and provide a corporate update, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, February 18, 2020.

BrainStorms President & CEO, Chaim Lebovits, will present the full year 2019 corporate update, after which, participant questions will be answered. Joining Mr. Lebovits to answer investment community questions will be Ralph Kern, MD, MHSc, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Medical Officer, and Preetam Shah, PhD, Chief Financial Officer.

Participants are encouraged to submit their questions prior to the call by sending them to: q@brainstorm-cell.comand questions should be submitted by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday, February 17 2020.

The investment community may participate in the conference call by dialing the following numbers:

Those interested in listening to the conference call live via the internet may do so by visiting the Investors & Media page of BrainStorms website at http://www.ir.brainstorm-cell.com and clicking on the conference call link.

A webcast replay of the conference call will be available for 30 days on the Investors & Media page of BrainStorms website:

About NurOwn

NurOwn (autologous MSC-NTF cells) represent a promising investigational approach to targeting disease pathways important in neurodegenerative disorders. MSC-NTF cells are produced from autologous, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that have been expanded and differentiated ex vivo. MSCs are converted into MSC-NTF cells by growing them under patented conditions that induce the cells to secrete high levels of neurotrophic factors. Autologous MSC-NTF cells can effectively deliver multiple NTFs and immunomodulatory cytokines directly to the site of damage to elicit a desired biological effect and ultimately slow or stabilize disease progression. NurOwn is currently being evaluated in a Phase 3 ALS randomized placebo-controlled trial and in a Phase 2 open-label multicenter trial in Progressive MS.

About BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.is a leading developer of innovative autologous adult stem cell therapeutics for debilitating neurodegenerative diseases. The Company holds the rights to clinical development and commercialization of the NurOwnCellular Therapeutic Technology Platform used to produce autologous MSC-NTF cells through an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement as well as through its own patents, patent applications and proprietary know-how. Autologous MSC-NTF cells have received Orphan Drug status designation from theU.S. Food and Drug Administration(U.S.FDA) and theEuropean Medicines Agency(EMA) in ALS. Brainstorm has fully enrolled the Phase 3 pivotal trial in ALS (NCT03280056), investigating repeat-administration of autologous MSC-NTF cells at six sites in the U.S., supported by a grant from theCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine(CIRM CLIN2-0989). The pivotal study is intended to support a BLA filing for U.S.FDAapproval of autologous MSC-NTF cells in ALS. Brainstorm received U.S.FDAclearance to initiate a Phase 2 open-label multi-center trial of repeat intrathecal dosing of MSC-NTF cells in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (NCT03799718) inDecember 2018and has been enrolling clinical trial participants sinceMarch 2019. For more information, visit the company'swebsite.

Safe-Harbor Statement

Statements in this announcement other than historical data and information, including statements regarding future clinical trial enrollment and data, constitute "forward-looking statements" and involve risks and uncertainties that could causeBrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.'sactual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements. Terms and phrases such as "may", "should", "would", "could", "will", "expect", "likely", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "predict", "potential", and similar terms and phrases are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. The potential risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, BrainStorms need to raise additional capital, BrainStorms ability to continue as a going concern, regulatory approval of BrainStorms NurOwn treatment candidate, the success of BrainStorms product development programs and research, regulatory and personnel issues, development of a global market for our services, the ability to secure and maintain research institutions to conduct our clinical trials, the ability to generate significant revenue, the ability of BrainStorms NurOwn treatment candidate to achieve broad acceptance as a treatment option for ALS or other neurodegenerative diseases, BrainStorms ability to manufacture and commercialize the NurOwn treatment candidate, obtaining patents that provide meaningful protection, competition and market developments, BrainStorms ability to protect our intellectual property from infringement by third parties, heath reform legislation, demand for our services, currency exchange rates and product liability claims and litigation,; and other factors detailed in BrainStorm's annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q available athttp://www.sec.gov. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on BrainStorm's forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this press release. We do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or assumptions if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, unless otherwise required by law. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

Story continues

CONTACTS

Investor Relations:Preetam Shah, MBA, PhDChief Financial OfficerBrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.Phone: 862-397-8160pshah@brainstorm-cell.com

Media:Sean LeousWestwicke/ICR PRPhone: +1.646.677.1839sean.leous@icrinc.com

Here is the original post:
BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics to Announce Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Provide a Corporate Update - Yahoo Finance

Regenerative Medicine Market Analysis By Product Type, Therapeutic Category, Region And Forecast Till 2025 : Grand View Research Inc. – MENAFN.COM

(MENAFN - GetNews) According to report published by Grand View Research, The global regenerative medicine market size was estimated at USD 2.60 million in 2018 and is expected to witness a CAGR of 11.6% throughout the forecast period.

The global regenerative medicine market size is expected to reach USD 5.60 billion by 2025, expanding at a CAGR of 11.6% over the forecast period, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. Regenerative medicines are expected to have a significant impact in healthcare to treat specific indications and chronic conditions. Therefore, high prevalence of cancer, neurodegenerative, orthopedic, and other aging-associated disorders coupled with increasing global geriatric population is driving the market growth. Moreover, rising prevalence of inheritable genetic diseases is anticipated to fuel the demand in the field of biotechnology field.

Market players are engaged in implementing novel protocols for the release of novel therapeutics. For instance, in July 2018, Convelo Therapeutics launched regenerative medicines for the treatment of various neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis.Agreements models initiated by the companies coupled with commercialization in emerging countries fuels the growth. For instance, in March 2018, Hitachi Chemical signed an agreement with the Daiichi Sankyo and SanBio Group to conduct clinical manufacturing of regenerative medicines developed by respective companies for Japanese and U.S. markets.

Regenerative medicine is anticipated to witness great attention in healthcare sector due to its wide range of applications and significant advancements tissue engineering, stem cells, gene therapy, drug discovery, and nanotechnology. For example, 3D printing is preferred over scaffold with stem cells to restore structure and functional characteristics of biological specimens.

Dermatology is estimated to hold the largest market share in terms of revenue in 2018, owing to the availability of various products and their application in simple and chronic wound healing. Oncology therapeutic category on the other hand, is projected to expand at the fastest CAGR during the forecast period owing to the presence of strong pipeline of regenerative medicines for cancer treatment.

North America held the largest regenerative medicine market share in terms of revenue in 2018 and is projected to continue its dominance in near future. A significant number of universities and research organizations investigating various stem cell-based approaches for regenerative apposition in U.S. is anticipated to propel the growth.

Request a sample Copy of the Regenerative Medicine Market Research Report @ https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/regenerative-medicine-market/request/rs1

Key Takeaways Of The Report :

Therapeutics emerged dominant among product segments in 2018 due to high usage of primary cell-based therapies along with advances in stem cell and progenitor cell therapies

Implementation of primary cell-based therapies in dermatological, musculoskeletal, and dental application results in highest share of this segment

Stem cell and progenitor cell-based therapies are anticipated to witness rapid growth due to high investments in stem cell research and increasing number of stem cell banks

With rise in R & D and clinical trials, key players are offering consulting services leading to lucrative growth of the services segment

Asia Pacific is projected to witness the fastest CAGR during the forecast period due to rapid adoption of cell-based approaches in healthcare and emergence of key players

Key players operating in the regenerative medicine market including AstraZeneca; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Pfizer Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Integra LifeSciences Corporation; and Eli Lilly and Company

Have Any Query? Ask Our Experts @ https://www.grandviewresearch.com/inquiry/4557/ibb

Grand View Research has segmented the global regenerative medicine market on the basis of product type, therapeutic category, and region:

Regenerative Medicine Product Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014 - 2025)

Therapeutics & Devices

Primary Cell-bases Therapeutics

Dermatology

Musculoskeletal

Surgical

Dental

Others

Stem Cell & Progenitor Cell-based Therapeutics

Autologous

Allogeneic

Others

Cell-based Immunotherapies

Gene Therapies

Tools

Banks

Services

Regenerative Medicine Therapeutic Category Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014 - 2025)

Regenerative Medicine Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014 - 2025)

North America

Europe

Asia Pacific

Latin America

Middle East & Africa

Browse Related Reports:

Biopreservation Market : https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/biopreservation-market

Molecular Cytogenetics Market : https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/molecular-cytogenetics-market

About Grand View Research

Grand View Research provides syndicated as well as customized research reports and consulting services on 46 industries across 25 major countries worldwide. This U.S.-based market research and consulting company is registered in California and headquartered in San Francisco. Comprising over 425 analysts and consultants, the company adds 1200+ market research reports to its extensive database each year. Supported by an interactive market intelligence platform, the team at Grand View Research guides Fortune 500 companies and prominent academic institutes in comprehending the global and regional business environment and carefully identifying future opportunities.

Media Contact Company Name: Grand View Research, Inc. Contact Person: Sherry James, Corporate Sales Specialist - U.S.A. Email: Send Email Phone: 1-415-349-0058, Toll Free: 1-888-202-9519 Address: 201, Spear Street, 1100 City: San Francisco State: California Country: United States Website: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/regenerative-medicine-market

MENAFN1002202000703268ID1099679792

See the article here:
Regenerative Medicine Market Analysis By Product Type, Therapeutic Category, Region And Forecast Till 2025 : Grand View Research Inc. - MENAFN.COM

Cambridge Science Festival showcases new research at the forefront of healthcare and medicine – Cambridge Network

All events are free. Other topics covered include the impact of new and emerging global infectious diseases such as coronavirus; innovative new methods for detecting ovarian cancer; the promises and pitfalls of gene editing; the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs; the worlds second HIV cure; and using stem cells to regenerate damaged tissues.

Using state-of-the-art technology, researchers are now able to grow organoids miniature versions of organs. In Mini-organs in a dish: how organoids are revolutionising research (12 March), Dr Emma Rawlins, The Gurdon Institute, explains how organoids are grown and discusses why this new technology is so important for biomedical research.

Dr Rawlins said: Scientists have been growing animal and human cells in the laboratory for more than 60 years. While these lab-grown cells are a powerful research tool, providing the basis for important developments in modern medicine, including some cancer drugs, anti-HIV therapies and vaccines, they are grown in very artificial conditions and therefore dont resemble any cells in our bodies. Ten years ago, Professor Hans Clevers and colleagues in the Netherlands invented a more complex cell culture system in which mini-organs, or organoids, could be grown. This discovery has led to a worldwide revolution in cell growth.

Scientists in Cambridge are at the forefront of this research, and mini-guts, livers, lungs, kidneys, placentas and even brains are growing in labs all over the city. This ability to study cells in a more natural setting provides many new and interesting research opportunities. Organoid technology has already been used to study human embryonic development, to test personalised treatments for cystic fibrosis and to replace some of the animals used in drug testing. Scientists are now exploring its potential for growing replacement organs, repairing damaged genes and providing personalised treatments for other diseases.

Researchers are also exploring whether they can print biomaterials to repair organs amongst other healthcare benefits. In 3D printing for healthcare (14 March), Dr Yan Yan Shery Huang, Department of Engineering, gives an overview on how 3D printing technologies could transform the way implants are produced, drugs are screened or perhaps even how damaged organs are repaired.

3D printing is already making impacts on patients needing artificial limbs, where the plastic-based prosthesis can be made 'personalised' to shapes and sizes, with relatively low-cost and short production time, Dr Huang said. For 3D printed personalised implants it is more technologically demanding; although, non-biological material-based implants are making their ways to the market and patients, such as 3D printed dental implants and implants for bone structural reconstruction.

Research is now focused on overcoming challenges in using 3D printing for biological materials and even living materials like cells. Applications are focused on two main streams: bioprinting for tissue and organ function replacements, including printing a scaffold for a heart, a human ear, and a blood vessel-permeated-bioreactor; and bioprinting for drug testing pseudo-models of different levels of complexities, from brain to muscles have already been created. Research is continuing, with the aim to reduce and replace animal studies and to improve the predictive power of the models.

Hardening of the arteries is a widespread condition that is a major cause of cardiovascular disease, including heart attacks and stroke. Stroke is also linked to vascular dementia and is one of the nations major causes of adult disability there is a stroke every five minutes in the UK and costs the economy 26b per annum. This figure is expected to triple by 2035. Despite the huge impact that hardened arteries have for human health, there are still no cures. In More than a blocked pipe: the hardening of arteries and their role in stroke and heart attacks (18 March), Dr Nick Evans, Department of Medicine, and Professor Melinda Duer, Department of Chemistry, discuss their combined efforts to find better diagnoses and treatments. They reveal new research and findings on how hardened arteries can be diagnosed more precisely through PET (positron emission tomography), which is proving to be an excellent way to assess carotid calcification in patients and could lead to potential new drug treatment.

Speaking ahead of the event, Professor Duer said: To stop artery calcification, we need to stop the mineral from forming in the artery wall in the first place. We have very recently discovered that a molecule known as poly(ADP ribose), produced by cells in the artery wall that are stressed from fatty deposits around them, is responsible for initiating the formation of the mineral deposits. poly(ADP ribose) gathers calcium and sticks it to the collagen and other molecules in the artery wall, so concentrating the calcium into specific spots in the artery wall which then allows mineral to form. The exciting treatment possibility is to stop stressed cells from making poly(ADP ribose) if it works, it will be the first drug treatment for vascular calcification.

Dr Evans added: Our newly presented research also shows how we can identify the microcalcification in patients using PET and how it gives us an understanding of the different processes causing atherosclerotic plaques (the hardening of arteries) to become damaged and trigger clots to form that cause a stroke.

Scientists and researchers at the forefront of tackling ovarian cancer are also making breakthroughs. In Tackling ovarian cancer: turning the tide on one of the toughest cancers (19 March), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute (CRUK CI), the Department of Radiology and AstraZeneca discuss how they are rapidly turning the tide on ovarian cancer using innovative new detection methods and through new treatments, such as Olaparib which was made available in the UK in December 2019.

The new detection methods currently being researched by CRUK CI include liquid biopsy, a process that uses advanced genomic technologies to extract cancer tumour DNA fragments from patients blood plasma. The process offers earlier detection and is far less invasive for patients. Another method is virtual biopsy using state-of-the-art imaging techniques, which is also being researched by the Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge.

The final day of the Festival, Sunday 22nd March, is dedicated to health with over 50 events hosted across Cambridge Biomedical Campus (CBC). Events include Gene editing: rewriting the future! Dr Alasdair Russell, CRUK CI, talks about the CRISPR genome editing revolution, its promise and its pitfalls. In The story of HIV Public Health England and partner organisations discuss the history of HIV in England and show how we have come so far in the diagnosis, treatment and care of people living with the illness. During Open science at the Jeffrey Cheah biomedical centre, visitors can learn more about the new kids on the block on the CBC and chat with scientists about stem cells, infectious diseases, cancer and new therapies. Tours of Royal Papworth Hospital offer a look inside one of the worlds leading heart and lung hospitals and a chance to meet the outstanding teams involved in delivering patient care.

Further related health-related events:

Bookings open on Monday 10 February at 11am.

The full programme can downloaded via Cambridge Science Festival>>>

Image: Talking science with the Department of Materials Science and MetallurgyCredit: Domininkas Zalys

Keep up to date with the Festival on social media via Facebook and Twitter #CamSciFest and Instagram.

This years Festival sponsors and partners are Cambridge University Press, AstraZeneca, Illumina, TTP Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge Epigenetix, Cambridge Science Centre, Cambridge Junction, IET, Hills Road 6th Form College, British Science Week, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Academy for Science and Technology, and Walters Kundert Charitable Trust. Media Partners: BBC Radio Cambridgeshire and Cambridge Independent.

Read the rest here:
Cambridge Science Festival showcases new research at the forefront of healthcare and medicine - Cambridge Network

Biotech companies leading the way with exosome human clinical trials – Born2Invest

Testing a new therapeutic in human subjects for the first time is a major step in the translation of any novel treatment from the laboratory bench to clinical use.

When the therapeutic represents a paradigm shift, reaching this milestone is even more significant.

After years of planning, preparation and hard work to establish a base camp, starting human clinical trials is the first step towards the summit itself: gaining regulatory approval for product sales.

Exosomes tiny packets of proteins and nucleic acids (e.g. mRNA and miRNA) released by cells, that have powerful regenerative properties ranging from promoting wound healing to stimulating brain injury recovery following stroke represent just such a paradigm-shifting potential advance in human medicine.

The first commercial exosome therapeutics conference was held in Boston in September 2019 and over 15 companies participated.

This conference signals the emergence of exosomes as a new class of regenerative medicine products.

So far, just one or two of the companies working in the novel field of exosome-based therapies have reached the pivotal point and transitioned into human clinical trials. In this article we survey the field, starting with the pace-setters.

During the past few years, a handful of universities and research hospitals have carried out small scale, first-in-human Phase I clinical trials using exosomes. In each case where the study results are available, the exosome treatment was found to be safe and well-tolerated.

But the field has hotted up in the past few months, with the first companies reaching the pivotal point of testing exosome-based products in people.

On 28th January 2020, Melbourne-based Exopharm announced the first dosing under its first human clinical trial, becoming the first company to test exosomes potential for healing wounds in people.

The PLEXOVAL Phase I study will test Exopharms Plexaris product, a cell-free formulation of exosomes from platelets, which in preclinical animal studies have shown a regenerative effect, improving wound closure and reducing scarring.

The main readouts of the PLEXOVAL study the results of which are expected to be available sometime after mid-2020 will be safety, wound closure and scarring.

Joining Exopharm at the front of the pack is Maryland-based United Therapeutics.

Founded in 1996, United Therapeutics specialises in lung diseases and has a portfolio of FDA-approved conventional small molecule and biologic drugs on the market for a range of lung conditions.

On 26th June 2019, United Therapeutics announced approval for a Phase I trial (NCT03857841) of an exosome-based therapy against bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BDP), a condition common in preterm infants that receive assisted ventilation and supplemental oxygen.

Recruitment has commenced but dosing has not been announced. The study is due to conclude by December 2021. BDP is characterised by arrested lung growth and development, with health implications that can persist into adulthood.

Human clinical trials of a stem cell therapy for BDP, by Korean stem cell company Medipost, are already underway. However as with many stem cell therapies recent animal studies have shown that is the exosomes released by stem cells that are responsible for the therapeutic effect.

United Therapeutics therapy, UNEX-42, is a preparation of extracellular vesicles that are secreted from human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The company has not released any information about how its exosomes are produced or isolated.

A little behind the two leaders, three other companies have announced their aim to initiate their first clinical trials of exosome therapeutics within the next 12 months.

Launched in 2015, Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Codiak has long been considered among the leaders in developing exosome-based therapies.

Rather than exploiting the innate regenerative potential of select exosome populations, Codiak is developing engineered exosomes that feature a defined therapeutic payload. The companys initial focus has been to target immune cells, leveraging the immune system to combat cancer.

The company plans to initiate clinical trials of its lead candidate, exoSTING, in the first half of 2020. The therapeutic is designed to trigger a potent antitumor response from the patients own immune system, mediated by T cells. A second immuno-oncology candidate, exoIL-12, is due to enter clinical trials in the second half of 2020, the company says.

In nearby New Jersey, Avalon Globocare is also developing engineered exosomes. Its lead product, AVA-201, consists of exosomes enriched in the RNA miR-185, which are produced using engineered mesenchymal stem cells.

In animal tests, miR-185 suppressed cancer cell proliferation, invasion and migration in oral cancer. In July 2019, the company announced plans to start its first exosome clinical trial before the close of 2019. As of February 2020, however, no further announcement regarding this clinical trial has been made.

Avalon has also made no further announcement on a second planned clinical trial, also intended to start during the fourth quarter of 2019, of a second exosome candidate, AVA-202.

These angiogenic regenerative exosomes, derived from endothelial cells, can promote wound healing and blood vessel formation, the company says. The planned Phase I trial was to test AVA-202 for vascular diseases and wound healing.

Meanwhile, Miami-based Aegle Therapeutics plans to begin a Phase I/IIa clinical trial of its exosome therapy, AGLE-102, during 2020. AGLE-102 is based on native regenerative exosomes isolated from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

After initially focussing on burns patients, in January 2020 to company announced had raised the funds to commence an FDA-cleared clinical trial of AGLE-102 to treat dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, a rare paediatric skin blistering disorder. The company says it plans to commence this clinical trial in the first half of 2020.

A number of companies are in the preclinical phase of exosome therapy research.

Some of these companies have been set up specifically to develop exosome-based products. In the UK, Evox co-founded by University of Oxford researcher Matthew Wood in 2016 is developing engineered exosomes to treat rare diseases.

The company has developed or sourced technology that allows it to attach proteins to exosomes surface, or to load proteins or nucleic acids inside the exosome, to deliver a therapeutic cargo to a target organ.

Its lead candidate targets a lysosomal storage disorder called Niemann-Pick Disease type C, using exosomes that carry a protein therapeutic cargo. Evox says it plans to submit the Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the FDA during 2020, paving the way for the first clinical trial. It currently has five other candidates, for various indications, at the preclinical stage of development.

In Korea, Ilias and ExoCoBio are developing exosome therapeutics. Ilias founded by faculty from the Korean Advance Institute of Science and Technology specialises in loading large protein therapeutics into exosomes.

It is currently carrying out preclinical research toward treating sepsis, preterm labour and Gauchers disease. ExoCoBio is focusing on the native regenerative capacity of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells, including to treat atopic dermatitis.

New companies continue to enter the exosome space. In August 2019, Carmine Therapeutics was launched, with the aim to develop gene therapies that utilize exosomes from red blood cells to deliver large nucleic acid cargoes. The company is targeting the areas of haematology, oncology and immunology.

Meanwhile, a wave of companies originally set up to develop live stem cell therapies are diversifying into stem cell derived exosome production and research.

It is now generally acknowledged that stem cell exosomes are the main therapeutically active component of stem cells, and that medical products based on exosomes will be safer to apply, and easier and cheaper to make and transport, than live cell therapies.

Originally established to produce neural stem cells for other research organisations, Aruna Bio has developed proprietary neural exosomes that can cross the blood brain barrier.

The company is now developing an exosome therapy for stroke. In October 2019, the Athens, Georgia-based company said had raised funding to support the research and development to enable its first IND application to the FDA in 2021.

In the UK, ReNeuron has also focussed on stroke, and has several clinical trials underway assessing its CTX stem cells to promote post stroke rehabilitation. The company is also working with third parties to investigate the drug- and gene therapy delivery potential of exosomes derived from CTX stem cells.

Switzerland-based Anjarium is also developing an exosome platform to selectively deliver therapeutics.20 The company is focussing on engineering exosomes loaded with therapeutic RNA cargo and displaying targeting moieties on its surface.

California-based Capricor has commenced clinical trials of a cardiosphere-derived stem cell therapy for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

At an earlier phase, its regenerative exosome therapy CAP-2003 is in pre-clinical development for a variety of inflammatory disorders including DMD.

A number of other stem cell companies, including TriArm, Creative Medical, AgeX Therapeutics and BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics, are reported to be investigating exosome-based therapies derived from their stem cell lines.

Exopharms position as a frontrunner in bringing exosomes into humans is no lucky accident. The companys operations are based around its unique, proprietary method for manufacturing and isolating exosomes, known as LEAP technology.

As academics and observers of the exosome field have pointed out, reliable and scalable exosome manufacture has threatened to be a major bottleneck that limits the translation of exosome therapeutics into clinical use. The standard laboratory-scale method for collecting the exosomes produced by cultured cells has been to spin the liquid cell culture medium in an ultracentrifuge, or pass it through a fine filter.

The most common technique used so far, the ultracentrifuge, has major scalability limitations. Issues include the high level of skill and manual labour required, the time-intensive nature of the process, and the associated costs of reagents and equipment. It is impossible to imagine collecting enough exosomes for a late stage clinical trial this way.

Another issue is the low purity of the exosomes collected. These techniques sort the contents of cell culture medium by their mass and/or size. Although the exosomes are concentrated, they could be accompanied by other biological components present in the cell culture medium that happen to be a similar size or mass to the exosome.

Importantly, a biotechnology company needs a proprietary step in the process to make a proprietary product over which it has exclusivity. Exopharms LEAP technology is a good example of a proprietary manufacturing step. Ultracentrifuge is not a proprietary process.

So the big players in the emerging exosome field have generally placed a strong emphasis on developing their manufacturing and purification capability.

Exopharm developed a chromatography-based purification method, in which a patent-applied-for inexpensive functionalised polymer a LEAP Ligand is loaded into a chromatography column. The LEAP Ligand sticks to the membrane surface of exosomes passed through the column. Everything else in the cell culture medium mixture is simply washed away. The pure exosome product is then eluted from the column and collected for use. As well as being very scalable, the technique is versatile. LEAP can be used to produce a range of exosome products, by isolating exosomes from different cell sources.

Codiak, similarly, says it has developed scalable, proprietary chromatography-based methods to produced exosomes with comparable identity, purity, and functional properties as exosomes purified using methods such as ultracentrifugation. Chromatography is a flow-based technique for separating mixtures. In an April 2019 SEC filing, the company said it is establishing its own Phase 1/2 clinical manufacturing facility, which it is aiming to have fully-operational by first half 2020.

Avalon GloboCare teamed up with Weill Cornell Medicine to develop a standardised production method for isolating clinical-grade exosomes. Aegle also says it has a proprietary isolation process for producing therapeutic-grade exosomes. And Evox emphasises the GMP compliant, scalable, commercially viable manufacturing platform it has developed.

At Exopharm, the manufacturing technique that has allowed the company to leap ahead of the pack and into human clinical trials is its proprietary LEAP platform. Overcoming the exosome production and isolation bottleneck was exactly the problem the companys scientists set out to solve when Exopharm formed in 2013.

In addition to the Plexaris exosomes, isolated from platelets, currently being tested in human clinical trials, Exopharm is progressing toward human clinical trials of its second product, Cevaris, which are exosomes isolated from stem cells.

Exosomes are now under development by around 20 companies across the world. The leaders in the field are now entering clinical trials with both nave exosome products and engineered exosome products. A number of cell therapy companies are also moving across into the promising exosome product space.

The coming years promise dynamic changes, with partnerships and eventually product commercialization. Exopharm is a clear leader in this emerging field.

(Featured image by Darko Stojanovic from Pixabay)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words believe, project, estimate, become, plan, will, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

Read more here:
Biotech companies leading the way with exosome human clinical trials - Born2Invest

Colombian Wound Care Market Research Report: By Product, Wound Type, End – User, Distribution Channel – Industry Analysis and Forecast to 2024 -…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Colombian Wound Care Market Research Report: By Product, Wound Type, End - User, Distribution Channel - Industry Analysis and Forecast to 2024" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Registering a CAGR of 3.6% during the forecast period (2019-2024), the Colombian wound care market is predicted to reach $93.9 million by 2024, witnessing a substantial increase in its revenue from $76.1 million in 2018.

Taking the geography of the country into consideration, the largest market share in the Colombian wound care market is expected to be held by the state of Cundinamarca. This is mainly ascribed to the increasing research & development activities and rising expenditure on healthcare due to supportive government policies and initiatives. Other states, such as Bolivar, Atlntico, Valle del Cauca, Santander, and Antioquia also hold significant shares in the market on account of the surging incidence of traumatic injuries, burns, and diabetic wounds as well as rising geriatric population.

The Colombian wound care market is witnessing growth due to the rising focus on healthcare services. The wound care facilities in Colombia are witnessing a surge in demand as both the public and private organizations are increasing healthcare coverage. An article published in the Health and Human rights journal in 2016, mentioned that in the country, the healthcare coverage witnessed a remarkable increase during 1991-2016; starting from 25% population in 1992, the health cover facilities were available to 96% population in 2016. This is indicative of the rising focus of the government on providing excellent healthcare facilities and means to the residents of the country.

Stem cell therapy in wound management is becoming the trend in the Colombian wound care market. Extensive research on stem cells has established their remarkable regenerative abilities, which may help in speeding up the wound healing process. A biotechnology company, BioXcellerato LLC, has its treatment center in Colombia by the name of Torre Medica El Tesoro that provides stem cell treatment for various cosmetic and other conditions. Further, it is involved in stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine research for finding prospective treatments for wound and other skin disorders.

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1. Research Background

1.1 Research Objectives

1.2 Market Definition

1.3 Research Scope

1.3.1 Market Segmentation by Type

1.3.2 Market Segmentation by Wound Type

1.3.3 Market Segmentation by End User

1.3.4 Market Segmentation by Distribution Channel

1.3.5 Market Segmentation by Geography

1.3.6 Analysis Period

1.3.7 Market Data Reporting Unit

1.3.7.1 Value

1.3.7.2 Volume

1.4 Key Stakeholders

Chapter 2. Research Methodology

2.1 Secondary Research

2.2 Primary Research

2.2.1 Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents

2.2.1.1 By industry participant

2.2.1.2 By company type

2.3 Market Size Estimation

2.4 Data Triangulation

2.5 Assumptions for the Study

Chapter 3. Executive Summary

Chapter 4. Introduction

4.1 Market Definition

4.2 Regulatory Overview

4.3 Market Dynamics

4.3.1 Trends

4.3.2 Drivers

4.3.3 Restraints

4.3.4 Opportunities

4.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Chapter 5. Colombia Wound Care Market

5.1 By Type

5.2 By Wound Type

5.3 By End User

5.4 By Distribution Channel

5.5 By State

5.6 By City

Chapter 6. Competitive Landscape

6.1 Company Benchmarking

6.2 Strategic Developments of Key Players

Chapter 7. Company Profiles

7.1 B. Braun Melsungen AG

7.2 BSN medical GmbH

7.3 Coloplast A/S

7.4 3M Company

7.5 Acelity L.P. Inc.

7.6 Smith & Nephew PLC

7.7 ConvaTec Group PLC

7.8 Paul Hartmann AG

7.9 Mlnlycke Health Care AB

7.10 Hollister Incorporated

7.11 Tecnoquimicas SA

7.12 Beiersdorf AG

7.13 Johnson & Johnson

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/p28fze

More:
Colombian Wound Care Market Research Report: By Product, Wound Type, End - User, Distribution Channel - Industry Analysis and Forecast to 2024 -...

Patients guide to stem cell treatments top 10 list …

For better or worse, I am in the unique position of being a stem cell scientist and also a former cancer patient. Looking on the bright side this gives me a unique perspective on things compared to many of my colleagues.

I know there are thousands of people out there looking for more practical information about stem cell therapies and treatments. These folks understandably are using the Internet to look for some clear, good info on stem cell treatments either for themselves or their loved ones. Too often the info that is out there is either wrong, partially misleading, biased, or overly complex.

So in this post I want to address this need for trustworthy factual information and no-nonsense perspectives. I am speaking as a scientist, patient advocate and cancer survivor in the form of 10 key realties list belowto help you guide your way through the jungle of stuff out there about stem cells. As mentioned above, I have now updated this post for 2016 as some things have changed in big waysin just the past few years. Keep in mind this is not medical advice and you should absolutely talk to your personal doctor with whom you should make your own decisions.

1) Stem cells are often essentially a type of drug and possibly permanent in your body after a transplant.Yeah, stem cells can be extremely unusual drugs, but they are often drugs even if some argue they arent. The FDA considers them drugs in many cases. In other cases, such as the use of bone marrow stem cells used for orthopedic conditions, stem cells may not be drugs. Unlike other drugs, once a patient receives a stem cell drug, it will not necessarily simply go away like other drugs because a stem cell drug consists of living cells that often behave in unpredictable ways. What this means is if the stem cells are doing bad things your doctor has no way to stop it. You have no way to stop it. Also because stem cells are alive they can grow inside your body, move around, and change. This can be helpful or harmful, but the big point is that it is not something that is controllable or reversible.

2) Side effects.Like any medical product, even aspirin,stem cells treatments will have side effects. Not maybe. Definitely. Our hope is the side effects will be relatively mild and so mild that you dont even notice. Different kinds of stem cells have variable risk profiles, but if someone tells you that the stem cell treatment they are selling has no risks then that is a big red flag and I would walk away. They are either woefully lacking in knowledge or arent being honest with you. Sometimes clinics will either on their websites or in person acknowledge risks almost as sort of a disclaimer, but then theyll tell more casually that there arent really any risks. A common statement is The only risk is that it wont work. Thats false.

3)The only stem cell treatment explicitly approved by the FDA for use in the U.S. consists of versions of bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.What this means is that any other stem cell treatment you see advertised on Facebook or Google or elsewhere that indicates it will be given to you inside the U.S. is not FDA approved. The exceptions to this are if it is part of an FDA-approved clinical trial or it is using stem cells in a procedure that meets other criteria (e.g. being both homologous use and minimally manipulatedyeah I know these are jargon terms).

4)If you venture outside the U.S. for a stem cell treatment, use extra caution, but in 2016 also be very careful inside the U.S.Whether you travel abroad or closer to home, have a knowledgeable physician inside the U.S. guiding you, preferably your primary care doctor who mot often are not going to buy into hype. We have to avoid the trap of thinking that only the U.S. can offer advanced medical treatments and these days many American patients get their stem cell transplants here in the U.S. from dubious clinics.

5)Stem cells are not a cure-all.I am as excited as anybody about the potential of stem cells to treat a whole bunch of diseases and injuries, but they are not some kind of miracle cure for everything. When a doctor offers to inject some kind of stem cells into a patient either into the bloodstream or into a specific place that is injured such as a shoulder, we just do not know at this point if it will do any good with the exception of bone marrow transplant. You should start getting worried if the clinic tells you that one kind of stem cell such as fat, bone marrow, or amniotic stem cells can treat many different conditions. Theres no science behind that kind of claim. Stem cells are not a panacea.

Patients often mention to me that the doctors offering stem cell treatments told them that the treatments are proven safe.or that your own stem cells cannot harm youor that adult stem cells are harmless. I often tell people to think about how much research and how many questions they ask when looking to get a new car. You should bring at least that level of intensity (ideally much more) to getting info about stem cell transplants too as the stakes are even higher.Be skeptical. Ask many questions and if you arent convinced, then dont do it.

6)Dont let celebrities be your guide to medical care.The number of famous people getting stem cell treatments is increasing including sports stars and politicians. Dont let what these folks do influence what you decide to do about your health. Just because they are famous do not believe for one minute that they are any more informed than you or your personal doctor about medical treatments or stem cells. If anything I think sometimes famous people are more reckless with their health than average people like you and me.

7)Reach out to scientists as a source of info.As a scientist I am always happy to hear from people outside the scientific community with questions about stem cells and other research. I cant speak for all stem cell scientists but you might be surprised at how likely it is that if you send them a very short, clear email with one or two questions that they will respond and be helpful. We cant or shouldnt offer medical advice, but we can give our perspectives on stem cell research and its clinical potential, etc. Just do not cold call scientists as you are unlikely to find them that way and even if you do, they may be cranky. Email. If they dont reply try someone else and dont be offended they we didnt answer. Often times we may not answer because we are super busy. For instance, I often get more than 100 emails a day.

8)The people selling you non-FDA approved stem cell treatments want your money.As such they will do their best to convince you that their treatment is safe and effective. The more convincing they are then the more money they make. They may offer patient testimonials either from patients who truly believe they were helped or from people who are paid to say the treatment helped them. The bottom line is that the sellers of dubious stem cell treatments are generally in it for the big bucks. Admittedly I do think that some of these providers truly believe stem cells are helpful, but youll never see even them offering to give patients the cells at cost. These are instead very much for-profit operations.

9) NEWJust because something is called a stem cell clinical trial doesnt mean it really is and being listed on clinicaltrials.gov means a lot less than it used to.I am contacted weekly or even daily at times by patients or their families and they are rightly focused on getting information that they can trust. Many stem cell clinics call the treatments that they offer by the name clinical trial and thats often misleading. In the standard meaning of clinical trial the experimental therapy being tested has the FDAs approval to be used in the study, there are data supporting the study, and those doing the trial do not charge patients to be in it. You shouldnt have to pay to be a guinea pig. I think thats almost always going to be unethical on the part of those giving it. I often suggest that people turn to the federal website clinicaltrials.gov for information and that is still a great resource, but be aware that many pseudo-clinical trials are popping up on there that are really mostly about making money. They do not have FDA approval in many cases and there are other issues of concern. So even on that website use caution.

10)The most important thing is information/data and you have a right to see it before treatment.Before you or a loved one get a stem cell treatment, ask two key questions. First, is the treatment FDA approved and if not, why not? Second, can you please show me the data that proves your treatment is safe and effective? See what kind of answer you get. If they demonize the FDA or invoke a plot by big pharma to block stem cells then that is a warning flag. If they refuse to show you data, then that is a big red warning flag. They may say it is confidential or that it is not published yet, but as a patient you have a right to see the data, assuming they have any data at all.

These facts will likely change over the coming years, but right now I think they represent reality. I know as patients we need hope, but these unapproved stem cell treatments will at best take your money for nothing, and at worst will endanger you or your loved ones.

The post above is for information only and is not medical advice. All medical decisions should be made by patients in consultation with their personal physicians.

Originally posted here:
Patients guide to stem cell treatments top 10 list ...

Blood In The Joint – Economic Times

When a major injury occurs, the joint swells. Part of the swelling is good, and part is bad. Lets look at what can be done to optimize the outcome.

Joint swelling after an injury is usually due to blood vessels being broken as tissue tears. These tears leak blood into the joint, which already holds about a milliliter of synovial (joint) fluid. Blood contains both healing factors and inflammatory agents, the latter mainly white blood cells. The swollen joint becomes inflamed, heated by the rush of blood into the joint spaces, and additionally swollen with the extracellular fluid that surrounds cells in normal tissue. This chicken soup of bioactive factors sends siren calls to the stem cells located throughout the body. These stem cells mobilize to the joint, fulfilling a range of key functions to stimulate the healing response.

So: What are the fluids that we want to have in the joint and which ones do we not want there?

As with most of biology, there are positive and negative aspects to each response. The white blood cells are primarily responsible for the inflammatory response and produce pain and more swelling. On the positive side, however, white cells are scavengers. They consume any foreign body or bacteria, clearing our injured tissues of some of the detritus produced when collagen tissue is ruptured.

The red blood cells carry oxygen to the damaged and healing tissue. Oxygen is required for most tissues to repair themselves. Sometimes, as with hyperbaric chambers, additional oxygen is provided to accelerate the healing. Red blood cells, however, have a toxic effect on articular cartilage, which is normally avascular (i.e., lacking blood vessels). Repeated exposure to these cells (hemarthrosis) becomes toxic to articular cartilage, leading to arthritic joints. People suffering from hemophilia, for example, have frequent episodes of bleeding into their joints, due to their deficient clotting mechanism, and unfortunately, frequently get joint arthritis.

Still smaller particles, called platelets, are packed with granules that contain potent growth factors. The platelets release their growth factor packets at the site of collagen injury. These factors stimulate the healing response, much as anabolic steroids stimulate muscle building. Other bioactive factors in the platelet granules are chemotacticmeaning they send out signals that recruit other cell types, such as macrophages, which eat the torn tissues and damaged cells. They induce the first type of macrophage to become Type II macrophages, which are directly involved in tissue repair. Several of these bioactive factors are the most potent stem cell recruitment compounds ever discovered. Since everyone has billions of stem cells living on their blood vessels, these factors do a great job of ramping up the healing response.

Now the question becomes: When you injure your joint and the joint swells, should the doctors draw off the blood and fluid? The answer is sometimes yesif it makes you feel better and lessens the pain from the swelling. But your doctor should then spin the aspirate down in a centrifuge, removing the white and red blood cells and concentrating the platelets. These platelets, with their multiple growth factor packets, can then be reinjected into the joint.

The next question is: Should all injured joints be injected with bioactive factors to accelerate healing? The answer is coming, as our research in this field continues. My intuition is yes: We will not let injured joints become arthritic if we can change the course of the injury from devastating to just inconvenient with a rapid return to normal. If we aim to reach age 100 playing the sports we love, we cant afford to let sports injuries become fatal for the joints.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

Read the original post:
Blood In The Joint - Economic Times