Author Archives: admin


Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Markets, 2016-2019 & 2026 – Stimulation of the Intrinsic Vascular Cell to Provide Ample Industry…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Market Analysis 2019" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus market is growing at a CAGR of 17.32% from 2018 to 2026.

Factors such as rise in technological advancements and increase in usage of combination therapies are driving the market growth. Though, occurrence of immune reaction to the virus-based treatments caused by repeated administration of therapeutics to treat cancer and Staggering expense related to oncolytic virus therapy are projected to inhibit the growth of the market. Moreover, stimulation of the intrinsic vascular cell may provide ample opportunities for the market growth.

By application, melanoma segment acquired significant growth in the market because most of the cancer therapies are developed for melanoma cancers. Increasing prostate cancer cases are also leading to the strong growth rate in prostate cancer therapies in recent years which is driving the market growth.

The key vendors mentioned are PsiOxus Therapeutics, Cold Genesys, TILT Biotherapeutics, SillaJen Biotherapeutics, Genelux Corporation, Vyriad, Lokon Pharma, TILT Biotherapeutics and Sorrento Therapeutics.

Key Questions Answered in this Report

Key Topics Covered

1 Market Synopsis

2 Research Outline

3 Market Dynamics

3.1 Drivers

3.2 Restraints

4 Market Environment

4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers

4.2 Bargaining power of buyers

4.3 Threat of substitutes

4.4 Threat of new entrants

4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Market, By Type

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Adenoviruses-Based Oncolytic viruses

5.3 HSV-Based Oncolytic Viruses

5.4 Newcastle Disease Virus-Based Oncolytic Viruses

5.5 Vaccinia Virus-Based Oncolytic Viruses

5.6 Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Based Oncolytic Viruses

6 Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Market, By Application

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Breast Cancer

6.3 Melanoma

6.4 Ovarian Cancer

6.5 Prostate cancer

7 Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Market, By Geography

7.1 Introduction

7.2 North America

7.3 Europe

7.4 Asia-Pacific

7.5 South America

7.6 Middle East & Africa

8 Strategic Benchmarking

9 Vendors Landscape

9.1 PsiOxus Therapeutics

9.2 Cold Genesys

9.3 TILT Biotherapeutics

9.4 SillaJen Biotherapeutics

9.5 Genelux Corporation

9.6 Vyriad

9.7 Lokon Pharma

9.8 TILT Biotherapeutics

9.9 Sorrento Therapeutics

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/sbxykh

See more here:
Global Cell Therapies & Oncolytic Virus Markets, 2016-2019 & 2026 - Stimulation of the Intrinsic Vascular Cell to Provide Ample Industry...

Leading from the front in cell therapy – – pharmaphorum

In these videos, senior stakeholders from Kite, a Gilead Company, describe how a culture of innovation and partnership help it lead from the front in the team sport of cell therapy.

Dick Sundh, Anne Kerber, and Bethany Dudek reflect on the leadership focus of the company and outline how Kite aims to become the cell therapy leader of Europe.

Embodying leadership in cell therapy

On my very first day at Kite one of my colleagues said to me Dick, theres only one thing you need to remember; cell therapy is a team sport, says Dick Sundh, Head of Europe for Kite, a Gilead Company, as he describes the process of building the organisations cell therapy business in Europe.

Kite has been at the forefront of cell therapy development and, since the first European approvals of CAR T cell therapies in 2018, the company has been establishing the necessary European infrastructures to deliver cell therapies in the region, and manufacture at scale.

According to pharma veteran Sundh, the job has proven to be an interesting challenge and Kite has broken new ground in establishing the foundations required to enable access to cell therapies. We are learning every day along with our partners and medical institutions across Europe.

And its not only about the science, but about embodying leadership qualities by demonstrating the companys core values on a daily basis. When healthcare professionals and employees feel you truly care about patients you have a real opportunity to become a true leader.

Sundh explains that Kites situation is unique; operating as a separate business unit within one of the worlds largest pharma companies, Gilead Sciences.

Its about expanding the footprint for cell therapy in Europe. We have the best of both worlds because we have a big pharma company in the background with resources where we need it. Otherwise were independent and allowed to go as fast and as innovatively as we want to. Teamwork is at the heart of everything we do.

I feel very passionate and privileged about being part of redefining not only how we understand oncology, but how we treat it.

Delivering the potential of cell therapies

Anne Kerber, Vice President, Head of Clinical Development in Europe at Kite, a Gilead Company, describes the clinical process the company is undertaking to deliver on the potential of individualised cell therapies for patients with rare forms of blood cancer, who face ongoing unmet needs.

In her role, Kerber draws on her experience as a qualified haematologist/oncologist to inform her work with a diverse range of research partners across Europe, in the clinical development of cell therapies. We work closely with many healthcare professionals and see a high level of commitment from physicians to enrol in clinical trials; we understand that, for them, partnership, education and learning is key.

Having followed the development journey of cell therapies for several years, Kerber has gone on to work with healthcare professionals to build their knowledge of cell therapies for use in their own clinical research.

Kerber stresses the importance of teamwork in developing cell therapies, particularly in light of their complex manufacturing processes when compared to more conventional treatments.

Becoming closely involved with the experiences of patients on their treatment journey is another important part of Kerbers remit these are specialist therapies and as such the company has a much closer relationship with their stakeholders than would be the case with a conventional medicine.

In cell therapy, collaboration is very important and each person in the chain has a critical role to play in ensuring patients receive these therapies at the right time.

Translating innovation in quality systems into clinical delivery

Bethany Dudek, Executive Director, Head of Quality at Kite, a Gilead Company, describes the complex quality control processes that are required to deliver cell therapies to the exacting standards required.

Dudek and her team oversees everything from inspection of incoming apheresis white blood cells collected from patients using a specialised process to obtain vital T-cells to testing and releasing the final product once it has been manufactured.

Cell therapies are bespoke treatments derived from a persons own T-cells, genetically modified to recognise tumour cells, then returned to the individual patient to trigger their immune system to target certain cancers.

Once we receive the apheresis, its a continuous process until we get to the final product and its important that the quality organisation and manufacturing supply chain work closely as a team to get the product back to the hospital and to the patient.

The remit of the quality team also includes overseeing how the cell therapy product is delivered to patients, which requires the qualification of treating hospitals to undertake this process. This particular step is unique to cell therapies and ensures that treating hospitals understand how to receive and store the product at each stage, as well as maintaining the vital chain of custody throughout.

Its exciting because it allows us to collaborate more closely with our European colleagues at Gilead and Kite as well as healthcare professionals in the clinic. It helps us get the treatment to the patient, ensuring optimal quality.

According to Dudek, the leadership of Kites parent company Gilead has been central to allowing these highly specialised cancer therapies to reach patients in Europe.

The support from Gilead has been very important for our support to healthcare providers and to the centres that provide our product to patients.

We learn alongside colleagues, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders how to bring these innovative therapies to the people who need them.

Follow this link:
Leading from the front in cell therapy - - pharmaphorum

Neon Therapeutics Announces New Strategic Focus on Novel T Cell Programs – GlobeNewswire

Lead program, NEO-PTC-01, is a personalized neoantigen adoptive T cell therapy candidate to address refractory solid tumors

Corporate restructuring effected to focus resources while exploring strategic options

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Nov. 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Neon Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: NTGN)today announced its new strategic focus on the development of its novel neoantigen-based T cell programs, in conjunction with a corporate restructuring. Neon will focus its efforts on the advancement of both personal and precision neoantigen-targeted T cell therapy candidates. Neons most advanced program is NEO-PTC-01, its personal neoantigen-targeted T cell therapy candidate consisting of multiple T cell populations targeting the most therapeutically relevant neoantigens from each patients tumor. Neon expects to file a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) in Europe by the end of 2019 to evaluate NEO-PTC-01 in patients with metastatic melanoma who are refractory to checkpoint inhibitors.

Prioritizing development of novel T cell therapies will leverage our years of expertise and learnings in pioneering neoantigen science, while positioning Neon to best deliver new therapies that could potentially improve patient outcomes and bring value to shareholders. The strategic restructuring will enable us to focus resources to execute on this vision. We acknowledge this decision impacts many talented employees who helped build Neon into a leader in neoantigen-based-therapies and we are grateful for their many contributions, said Hugh ODowd, Neons Chief Executive Officer.

NEO-PTC-01 leverages Neons neoantigen platforms, including RECON, its machine-learning bioinformatics platform, and NEO-STIM, its proprietary process to directly prime, activate and expand neoantigen-targeting T cells ex vivo. Neon believes that this approach will allow NEO-PTC-01, a non-engineered product that leverages peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as starting material, to specifically target each patient's individual tumor with T cells that can drive a robust and persistent anti-tumor response.

The initial clinical development of NEO-PTC-01 will be focused on demonstrating monotherapy activity targeting metastatic solid tumors that are refractory to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Following the planned submission of a CTA by the end of 2019, the company plans to initiate a Phase 1 dose escalation clinical trial in second-line metastatic melanoma in collaboration with the Netherlands Cancer Institute. The second planned indication for NEO-PTC-01 is second-line metastatic ovarian cancer, with potential to expand to other solid tumor types and potential development in the United States.

NEO-PTC-01 has the potential to unlock the potency of cell therapy in solid tumors with several key advantages that overcome the challenges of other cell therapy approaches. In pre-clinical development and in several patient samples, we have demonstrated the ability to produce multiple enriched neoantigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell populations, including both memory and de novo T cell responses, that killed patient-specific tumors by targeting their tumor neoantigens. We believe that neoantigen targets will provide the tumor specificity required to develop safe, effective and durable T cell therapies for the treatment of solid tumors, said Richard Gaynor, M.D., Neons President of Research and Development.

Neon is also advancing a precision T cell therapy program targeting shared neoantigens in genetically defined patient populations. This process utilizes off-the-shelf targets with a patients own PBMCs to develop a novel cell-based immunotherapy enabling rapid deployment for each patient. The lead program from this approach, NEO-STC-01, is a T cell therapy candidate targeting shared RAS neoantigens initially in pancreatic cancer and is currently in preclinical development.

Corporate Restructuring

As part of this new strategic focus, Neon is reducing its workforce by approximately 24% of its current headcount. At this time, Neon will cease undertaking new additional spending commitments related to its cancer vaccine programs, NEO-PV-01 and NEO-SV-01. The company will continue to conduct follow-up from its NT-002 clinical trial of NEO-PV-01 in first-line patients with untreated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, with plans to report clinical data from this trial in the third quarter of 2020. Neon also plans to cease future enrollment in its NT-003 trial in metastatic melanoma. Neon believes these actions will improve its potential to bring value to patients, employees and shareholders. As part of these cost reduction efforts, Neon intends to explore strategic options.

Neon expects that the restructuring and other cost-saving efforts will result in approximately $35 million in annualized cost savings. Neon estimates that it will incur approximately $1.5 million of pre-tax charges for severance and other costs related to the restructuring in 2019. With this restructuring, Neon now expects that its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will enable it to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into the third quarter of 2020.

There can be no assurance that Neons restructuring and other cost-saving efforts will be sufficient to continue the development of NEO-PTC-01 or its other programs through completion of the planned or ongoing clinical trials, nor that Neons exploration of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction being entered into or consummated. Neon has not set a timetable for completion of this strategic review process and Neon does not intend to comment further unless or until its board of directors has approved a definitive course of action, the review process is concluded, or it determines that disclosure is required or appropriate.

About Neon Therapeutics

Neon Therapeuticsis a biotechnology company developing novel neoantigen-targeted T cell therapies, dedicated to transforming the treatment of cancer by directing the immune system towards neoantigens. Neon is using its neoantigen platform to develop both personal and precision neoantigen-targeted T cell therapy candidates. Neons most advanced program is NEO-PTC-01, its personal neoantigen-targeted T cell therapy candidate consisting of multiple T cell populations targeting the most therapeutically relevant neoantigens from each patients tumor. Neon expects to file a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) in Europe by the end of 2019 to evaluate NEO-PTC-01 in patients with metastatic melanoma who are refractory to checkpoint inhibitors.

For more information, please visitneontherapeutics.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements ofNeon Therapeutics, Inc.within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, but may not be limited to, express or implied statements regarding our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our product candidates; the potential timing and advancement of our clinical trials; the potential timing and manner of data readouts from our ongoing and planned clinical trials; the design and potential efficacy of our therapeutic approaches; our plans to explore strategic alternatives; financial plans and projections, including its restructuring and other cost-saving efforts and impact on cash runway; and our ability to replicate results achieved in our preclinical studies or clinical trials in any future studies or trials. Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on managements current expectations and beliefs of future events, and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those set forth in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: uncertainties related to the initiation, timing and conduct of studies and other development requirements for our product candidates; the risk that any one or more of our product candidates will not be successfully developed and commercialized; the risk that the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials may not be predictive of future results in connection with future studies or trials; the risk that Neons collaborations will not continue or will not be successful; risks related to our ability to protect and maintain our intellectual property position; risks related to our capital requirements, use of capital and unexpected expenditures, including our ability to manage operating expenses or obtain funding to support planned business activities or to explore and establish strategic alternative transactions; risks related to our ability to attract and retain personnel; and risks related to the ability of our licensors to protect and maintain their intellectual property position. For a discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties, and other important factors, any of which could cause Neons actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see the section entitled Risk Factors in Neons most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, as well as discussions of potential risks, uncertainties, and other important factors in Neons other filings with theSecurities and Exchange Commission. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release, and Neon undertakes no duty to update this information unless required by law.

Investor Contact:Will OConnor, Stern Investor Relationswill@sternir.com212-362-1200

Media Contact:Stephanie Simon,Ten Bridge Communicationsstephanie@tenbridgecommunications.com617-581-9333

View post:
Neon Therapeutics Announces New Strategic Focus on Novel T Cell Programs - GlobeNewswire

New cell therapy player launches with $57M from marquee investors to go after ‘definitive’ tumor targets – Endpoints News

A crew of Amgen and Kite vets is publicly throwing their new startup into the cell therapy hat though they are saying little outside of the basics and $57 million in Series A cash.

The Column Group, Vida Ventures, Samsara BioCapital and Nextech Invest are backing A2 Biotherapeutics quest to find new ways of engaging immune cells in selectively attacking cancer. To do so, the biotech is working with two target classes: peptide MHC targets and targets that are irreversibly lost in tumor cells. The former builds on an increasingly popular strategy of locating neoantigens for T cells to home in on, while the latter is inspired by a mechanism used by natural killer cells.

A2 Biotherapeutics has potent, highly selective binders that we combine into molecular constructs to integrate multiple signals and potentially provide a large therapeutic window, said CSO Alexander Kamb, who co-founded the biotech after a stint as SVP of research at Amgen. They could be antibody and T-cell receptor fragments, according to its statement.

Scott Foraker, his former colleague at the Big Biotech, recently signed on as president and CEO.

Working out of Agoura Hills, California, their team of 40 expects to usher the first product candidate into the clinic next year. Its four programs in development span cancer testis antigen for solid tumors; targets lost antigens for solid tumors; neoantigens for head and neck cancer; and neoantigens for pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancer.

It also plans on constructing a manufacturing facility arguably the most important core competency that differentiates one cell therapy player from another in 2020 with the mindset of ultimately producing its own commercial supply. The site would support an autologous approach, though A2 Bio didnt specify what kind of cells it would use as the source.

Their lead in technical ops is Michelle Kreke, who was credited for leading chemistry, manufacturing and controls for the pioneering CAR-T Yescarta.

Read the original here:
New cell therapy player launches with $57M from marquee investors to go after 'definitive' tumor targets - Endpoints News

Zelluna Immunotherapy and Glycostem Therapeutics announce partnership to develop allogeneic TCR-NK therapies – BioSpace

Oslo and Oss, Norway and the Netherlands, November 19, 2019 - Zelluna Immunotherapy, a biopharma company developing T-cell receptor (TCR) guided adoptive cell therapy products for the treatment of multiple solid cancers, and Glycostem Therapeutics BV, a clinical stage and leading Natural Killer (NK) cell manufacturing company, today announce that they have entered into a development, license and supply agreement. This collaboration will focus on the development and manufacture of allogeneic TCR guided NK-cell therapies (TCR-NKs) for the treatment of patients with cancer.

This partnership between Zelluna and Glycostem represents a critical milestone in Zellunas aim to transform cell therapy treatments by enabling more patients to be treated effectively, rapidly and safely. It is the industrys first commercial development partnership of TCR-NK cells for treating cancer aiming at the rapid translation of our proprietary TCR-NK approach, said Miguel Forte, CEO, Zelluna. Zelluna selected Glycostem as a partner for the delivery of TCR-NK therapies for their expertise in NK-cell science, GMP manufacturing and clinical testing of NK-cell products. The development of TCR-NK programs will run in parallel to Zellunas autologous TCR-T development programs, including its lead autologous T-cell product entering the clinic next year. Zellunas vision of cell therapies continues to be autologous and allogeneic products delivering much needed patient benefit.

Currently, NK-cell based therapies such as CAR-NKs are receiving considerable interest from the wider cell therapy community. Through the partnership with Glycostem, Zelluna is enabling its proprietary TCR-NK approach with the potential to target a broader repertoire of tumor associated antigens by targeting NK-cells with TCRs for treatment of patients with solid cancers.

Zelluna will lead the development and commercialization of TCR-NK products with its TCRs and TCR development competence. Glycostem will contribute by manufacturing clinical grade umbilical cord derived NK-cells, NK-cell expertise, product process development, and clinical and commercial supply. Zelluna and Glycostem will be able to manufacture upfront a large number of patient doses to store and ship to clinical sites upon demand in an off-the-shelf manner.

We are very proud to be collaborating with Zelluna, a transformative TCR cell therapy company to jointly develop allogeneic TCR-NK products for the benefit of hard to treat patients. This partnership will enable Glycostems NK-cells to deliver increased efficacy against solid tumors in a TCR-NK product using Zellunas TCR targeting mechanism, said Troels Jordansen, CEO, Glycostem. This is further confirmation of the significant interest in NK-cell products and an external validation of Glycostems abilities which supports our commercial and scientific ambitions; taking cellular immunotherapy to the next level.

About Zelluna Immunotherapy

Zelluna Immunotherapy is a company developing transformative T cell receptor (TCR) based cellular immunotherapies for the treatment of solid cancers. The company is developing a unique portfolio of tumor specific TCRs that target the MHC class II pathway to broadly engage the host immune system to provide a safe, efficient and durable clinical response. The company is developing therapies based on the effector functions of autologous T cells (TCR-T) and allogeneic NK cells (TCR-NK). Both of these platforms have their unique advantages and provides the opportunity to attack cancers from multiple angles and improve access to these advanced therapies to a large patient population. For more information, please visit http://www.zelluna.com.

About Glycostem

Netherlands-based Glycostem Therapeutics BV, a clinical stage biotech company, develops allogeneic cellular immunotherapy to treat several types of cancer. By harnessing the power of stem cell-derived Natural Killer (NK) cells, Glycostems products are a safe alternative to CAR-T-cells. Glycostems lead product, oNKord(R), is manufactured from allogeneic raw material and is available off-the shelf. Thanks to its nine patent families, longstanding technical expertise and resources, as well as Orphan Drug Designation, Glycostem has secured a leadership position in the global NK-cell market. oNKord(R) is produced in a closed system in Glycostems state-of-the-art and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) licensed production facility in the Netherlands, from which it can be distributed globally. The production technology includes ex vivo generation of high numbers of NK-cells with a high degree of purity for clinical applications. oNKord(R) successfully passed phase I clinical trial (elderly and frail AML - Acute Myeloid Leukemia - patients), providing solid safety data and strong indication of clinical activity, including response on MRD (Minimal Residual Disease). Results indicate that oNKord(R) may be safely infused in AML patients. Glycostem is furthermore developing a range of CAR-NK products in-house and in cooperation with amongst other global partners MolMed SPA (BIT:MLM).

Go here to read the rest:
Zelluna Immunotherapy and Glycostem Therapeutics announce partnership to develop allogeneic TCR-NK therapies - BioSpace

Latest Research : Personalized Cell Therapy Market Size, CAGR Status, Market Trends, Analysis and Forecast 2019-2028 – Daily Criticism

A New Business Strategy report released byMarketresearch.biz, titled- Global Personalized Cell Therapy Market Robust Growth, Revenue Estimation During forthcoming years. This Global Personalized Cell Therapy market report brings data for the estimated year 2019 and forecasted till 2028 in terms of both, value (US$ MN) and volume (MT). The report also consists of forecast factors, macroeconomic factors, and a market outlook of the Personalized Cell Therapy market. The study is conducted using top-down and bottom-up approaches and further analyzed using analytical tools such as porters five force analysis and uncover Opportunities, Challenges, restraints, and rising trends of the Global Personalized Cell Therapy market. This survey report also states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue, and gross margins.Some of the Major Companies Profiled in the reports with SWOT Analysis areCytori Therapeutics Inc, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals Inc, Saneron CCEL Therapeutics Inc, MolMed S.p.A., Vericel Corporation, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Cell Medica, MediGene AG, TxCell.

Quick Snapshot Of Personalized Cell Therapy Market Comprehensive Research Report Offering:

This intelligent report represents the statistical data in the form of tables, charts, and info-graphics to assess the market, its growth and development, and market trends of the Global Personalized Cell Therapy Market during the projected period.

For Better Understanding, Download Free Sample PDF Brochure of Personalized Cell Therapy Market Research Report @https://marketresearch.biz/report/personalized-cell-therapy-market/request-sample

Focus on Segments and Sub-section of the Personalized Cell Therapy Market Illuminated Below:

Geographic Regional Analysis:North America(United States, Canada),Europe(Germany, Spain, France, UK, Russia, and Italy),Asia-Pacific(China, Japan, India, Australia, and South Korea),Latin America(Brazil, Mexico, etc.),The Middle East and Africa(GCC and South Africa)

Segmentation Analysis by technique, therapeutic area, and region-

Global personalized cell therapy market segmentation, by technique:

Platelet TransfusionsBone Marrow TransplantationPacked Red Cell TransfusionsOrgan TransplantationGlobal personalized cell therapy market segmentation, by therapeutic area:

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeurological DisordersInflammatory DiseasesDiabetesCancer

In addition, the years considered for the study are as follows:

Historical year 2013-2018 | Base year 2018 | Forecast period 2019 to 2028

The research report contains value chain analysis, which provides a comprehensive view of the Personalized Cell Therapy market. Porters Five Forces analysis of the Personalized Cell Therapy market has been included to understand the competitive scenario. The report highlights market attractiveness analysis, wherein end-users are benchmarked based on their market size, growth rate, and attractiveness.

The report provides detail complete examination along with Global Personalized Cell Therapy Market definitions, characterizations, delivering reports, cost structures, advancement strategies, and plans. Information provided in the report utilizes outlines, diagrams, pie graphs, and other pictorial formats that enhance its understanding of changing trends, dynamics, economic shifts, key statistics, and business scope.

Enquire Here Or Share Your Questions/CustomizationsFor More Details On this ReportWith Our Industry Experts @https://marketresearch.biz/report/personalized-cell-therapy-market/#inquiry

Customize report of Global Personalized Cell Therapy Market as per client requirement also available. Please connect with our sales team ([emailprotected]), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs.

Key Reasons to Purchase Personalized Cell Therapy Industry Market Report

-> To gain insightful analyses of the market and have a comprehensive understanding of the Personalized Cell Therapy and its commercial landscape.

-> Assess the Personalized Cell Therapy production processes, major issues, and solutions to mitigate the development risk.

-> To understand the most affecting driving and restraining forces in the Personalized Cell Therapy market and its impact on the global market.

-> Learn about the market strategies that are being adopted by your competitors and leading organizations.

-> To understand the future outlook and prospects for Personalized Cell Therapy Market.

Most important Highlights of TOC:

1 Introduction of Personalized Cell TherapyMarket

1.1 Overview of the Market

1.2 Scope of Report

2 Exclusive Summary

3 Research Methodology

3.1 Primary Interviews

3.2 Data Mining

3.3 Validation

3.4 List of Statistics

4 Personalized Cell Therapy Market Segment & Geographic Analysis

4.1 By Type [2013-2028]

4.2 By Application [2013-2028]

4.3 By Region [2013-2028]

5 Personalized Cell Therapy Market Outlook

5.1 Overview

5.2 Market Dynamics

5.2.1 Opportunities

5.2.2 Restraints

5.2.3 Drivers

5.3 Porters Five Force Model

5.4 Value Chain Analysis

6 Personalized Cell Therapy Market Competitive Landscape

6.1 Overview

6.2 Key Development Policies

6.3 Company Market Standing

Read Out CompleteTOC ofPersonalized Cell Therapy Market@https://marketresearch.biz/report/personalized-cell-therapy-market/#toc

At the Last, the Personalized Cell Therapy industry report focuses on data sources, viz. primary and secondary sources, market breakdown and data triangulation, market size estimation, research programs, and design, research approach and methodology, and the publishers disclaimer.

Thanks for reading this article; we can also provide individual chapter wise or region wise section report version like North America, Europe or Asia, Latin America Middle East & Africa according to your requirement.

About Us

MarketResearch.biz is a global market research and consulting service provider specialized in offering a wide range of business solutions to their clients including market research reports, primary and secondary research, demand forecasting services, focus group analysis and other services. We understand that how data is important in todays competitive environment and thus, we have collaborated with industrys leading research providers who work continuously to meet the ever-growing demand for market research reports throughout the year.

Contact Us:

Mr. Benni Johnson

Prudour Pvt. Ltd.

420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170,

United States

Tel:+ 1-347-826-1876

Website:https://marketresearch.biz/

Go here to see the original:
Latest Research : Personalized Cell Therapy Market Size, CAGR Status, Market Trends, Analysis and Forecast 2019-2028 - Daily Criticism

What Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Should Know About the FDA’s Approval of Brukinsa – Curetoday.com

The Food and Drug Administration approved Brukinsa to treat relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma, but what does this mean for patients?

MCL is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that represents about 3% to 10% of all NHL cases in the United States, affecting approximately 15,000 patients.

The issue with MCL is that it is an aggressive lymphoma, the five-year median overall survival is about five years, and it is regarded, as for most patients, incurable, Dr. Lee Greenberger, chief scientific officer of The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS), said in an interview with CURE. Therefore, most patients given initial therapy with MCL are expected to relapse and need additional therapy. Hence, new therapies are critically needed.

How Brukinsa WorksThe FDAs approval of Brukinsa is based on the results of two clinical trials. The first included 86 patients with MCL and examined how many patients had complete or partial shrinkage of their tumors after they received the therapy. The findings showed that 84% of patients had their tumors shrink and the time between the initial response to therapy and disease progression or relapse, also known as median duration of response, was 19.5 months. The second trial, which included 32 patients, also showed tumor shrinkage in 84% of patients and median duration of response was 18.5 months.

Brukinsa is an oral drug known as a Brutons tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. BTK inhibitors, such as Imbruvica (ibrutinib) and Calquence (acalabrutinib), block the BTK protein which may prevent malignant B cells from growing, and these types of medications have already proven to be effective in treating patients with MCL.

The efficacy of these three agents is roughly similar, although the overall response rate and complete response rate is numerically higher with Brukinsa ... it is not clear that these differences are statistically distinct, Greenberger said. (This approval) gives patients another option that might be useful if intolerance to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib occurs. It is possible that Brukinsa will have a superior safety profile compared to ibrutinib.

Side effects experienced while taking Brukinsa included decreased white blood cells that fight against infection, decreased platelet count, upper respiratory tract infection, decreased hemoglobin (oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells), rash, bruising, diarrhea and cough.

While taking the medication, patients should use sun protection because there is risk of other malignancies including skin cancers, according to the FDA.

On the safety side, the frequency of serious atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) is less common with Brukinsa (2%) versus ibrutinib (approximately 6%)versus acalabrutinib (1%), Greenberger said. (However), these comparisons need to be made with caution because no side-by-side comparison are available.

The Future of Mantle Cell LymphomaPatients with relapsed MCL tend to develop resistance to Imbruvica roughly 30% of patients in initial therapy and 20% to 50% of patients after responding to therapy. It is not clear why resistance to (Imbruvica) is so common (in MCL) compared to other diseases treated with (Imbruvica), such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Greenberger said.

Therefore, it is important to develop new therapies for patients to try once their disease becomes resistant, he explained. resistance mechanism could also be distinct and perhaps less frequent with Brukinsa, especially if a patient can tolerate the medicine better than other agents and do not reduce the dose of Brukinsa while on therapy.

Researchers working on current clinical trials are investigating combination therapies, including those that combine Imbruvica, Calquence and Brukinsa with chemotherapy agents, in several blood cancers. The LLS is funding some work on this in the MCL space and is conducting additional research with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, a type of immunotherapy, in these patients. The goal is to further decrease cancer burden and increase the time patients are disease-free, Greenberger said.

Read CUREs original coverage of the FDAs approval of Brukinsa for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Visit link:
What Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Should Know About the FDA's Approval of Brukinsa - Curetoday.com

Applying AI and CRISPR to stem cells to improve regenerative medicine – FierceBiotech

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) generated from a persons own adult cells can grow into complex organs that help scientists test drugs or even transplant into patients. However, directing stem cells into forming desired, functional organs in the lab remains challenging.

Now, in a study published in the journal Cell Systems, researchers from Gladstone Institutes in collaboration with Boston University (BU) described using machine learning to better understand how to use CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing tools to control iPSC organization.

By coaxing these stem cells into forming specific arrangements, the researchers believe they could create functional organs for research or therapeutic purposes.

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceBiotech!

Biopharma is a fast-growing world where big ideas come along every day. Our subscribers rely on FierceBiotech as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data in the world of biotech and pharma R&D. Sign up today to get biotech news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

While researchers have managed to develop iPSCs into many different cell types but not necessarily functional 3D organs, mainly because they have struggled to manipulate the spatial patterns of stem cells, which define the tissues they eventually grow into. Some have resorted to 3D printing, but it isnt always successful, as cells often migrate away from their printed locations.

Despite the importance of organization for functioning tissues, we as scientists have had difficulty creating tissues in a dish with stem cells, Ashley Libby, a co-first author of the new study, said in a statement. Instead of an organized tissue, we often get a disorganized mix of different cell types.

The researchers previously showed that knocking down two genes, ROCK1 and CDH1, affected the layout of iPSCs in lab dishes. The proteins they encode help regulate interactions between cells, making them ideal candidates to alter the cellular organization of an iPSC group.

But there are so many variables to considerincluding the timing and level of each gene knockdown, the duration and the proportion of cells to work onthat make testing all the combinations by human almost impossible. So, they turned to machine learning for help.

RELATED:Growing transplantable arteries from stem cells

They used a CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system that could be triggered by adding the antibiotic doxycycline. To help link changes to specific arrangements of the iPSCs, the cells were also engineered to fluoresce in different colors when they lost ROCK1 or CDH1.

Researchers at Gladstone tested different doses and timing of gene blockade. How changes in cell subpopulations affected the observed pattern was captured, and the BU computational scientists fed the results to a machine learning algorithm, which was hence trained to classify patterns according to their similarity and infer ways of how ROCK1 and CDH1 affect iPSC organization.

Our machine-learning model allows us to predict new ways that stem cells can organize themselves, and produces instructions for how to recreate these predictions in the lab, the studys co-first author Demarcus Briers said in a statement.

The model simulated specific experimental conditionssuch as when, where and how to add drugs to the iPSCsthat could yield unique patterns in silico. Then, the team put those suggested conditions to test.

It was successful. The researchers were able to generate concentric circles to two layers of stem cell populations in a bulls-eye pattern, they reported.

We've shown how we can leverage the intrinsic ability of stem cells to organize, Todd McDevitt, the studys senior author, said in a statement. This gives us a new way of engineering tissues, rather than a printing approach where you try to physically force cells into a specific configuration.

RELATED:Nose drop with adult stem cells restores sense of smell in mice

Stem cells are a key venue for regenerative research, either for studying disease and potential treatment or for transplant. Last year, scientists from the University of Edinburgh used 3D scaffolds made of polycaprolactone to carry embryonic stem cells and iPSCs, and successfully generated functional liver tissues that help diseased mice break down the amino acid tyrosine. A research team at the Morgridge Institute for Research recently used a drug called RepSox to help iPSCs form better smooth muscle cells as building blocks for functional arteries.

For the Gladstone-BU team, the researchers are planning to expand the model to include other genes to get an even wider pool of possible cell configurations. On top of that, rather than just making flat patterns as in this study, their goal is to design 3D shapes or organs.

We're now on the path to truly engineering multicellular organization, which is the precursor to engineering organs, said McDevitt. When we can create human organs in the lab, we can use them to study aspects of biology and disease that we wouldn't otherwise be able to.

See the article here:
Applying AI and CRISPR to stem cells to improve regenerative medicine - FierceBiotech

1st SCD Trial Patient Shows CTX001 Gene Editing to be Safe, Effective – Sickle Cell Anemia News

CTX001 safely and effectively increased the levels of fetal hemoglobin and prevented vaso-occlusive crisesin the first severesickle cell disease(SCD) patient receiving the therapy, according to preliminary data from a Phase 1/2 clinical trial.

CTX001 is a CRISPR-based gene editing therapy developed byCRISPR TherapeuticsandVertex Pharmaceuticals as a potential treatment for hemoglobin-associated diseases, includingSCD and beta-thalassemia.

It uses the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system to genetically modify a patients hematopoietic (bone marrow) stem cellsto produce high levels of fetal hemoglobin in red blood cells, which are then delivered back to the patient as part of a stem cell transplant.

The CRISPR-Cas9 system, which is similar to the editing system used by bacteria as a defense mechanism, allows researchers to edit parts of the genome by adding, removing, or changing specific sections of DNA.

Fetal hemoglobin, the main form of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin in the human fetus and newborn, largely disappears between six months to one year after birth, being replaced by its adult form.

Since the adult form is the one containing the defective component of hemoglobin in people with SCD and beta-thalassemia, an artificial increase of fetal hemoglobin has the potential to compensatefor the defective hemoglobin produced by these patients and reduce or prevent theirsymptoms.

The open-label, multi-center Phase 1/2 CLIMB-SCD-121 study (NCT03745287) is currently evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a single administration of CTX001 in people ages 18 to 35 with severe SCD.

The trial, which is expected to enroll up to 45 people, is stillrecruiting at 12 clinical sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Participants will be followed for approximately two years after treatment, and have the opportunity to enter a long-term follow-up study.

Before receiving CTX001, participants will undergo myeloablativechemotherapy, a strategy that kills cells in the bone marrow, thereby lowering the number of blood-forming cells. This way, the stem cell transplant will have more chances to rebuild a healthy bone marrow.

Researchers will first determine when the transplanted modified cells begin to produce mature blood cells in the patients, a process known as engraftment. After confirmation of engraftment, safety and effectiveness will be assessed as part of the trials primary and secondary goals.

One primary goal is to assess the proportion of people with an increase of at least 20% in the production of fetal hemoglobin, starting six months after CTX001 treatment. This increase must be sustained for more than three months at the time of analysis.

Among secondary goals is determining whether CTX001 reduces the annualized rate of vaso-occlusive crises.

In February, CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex announced the enrollment of the first patient in the CLIMB-SCD-121 study, who was recruited in the U.S. and received CTX001 in mid-2019.

Now, the companies have shared the preliminary four-month data of this patient, a 33-year-old woman who had experienced seven vaso-occlusive crises per year the annualized rate of the two years before her enrollment in the trial.

Results showed that she had a confirmed engraftment 30 days after receiving CTX001 treatment. Four months after treatment, no vaso-occlusive crises were reported and she had stopped blood transfusion treatments.

After four months, her total hemoglobin levels were 11.3 g/dL, fetal hemoglobin levels had increased from 9.1% to 46.6%, and the percentage of fetal hemoglobin-producing red blood cells had increased from 33.9% to 94.7%.

CTX001s early safety profile was consistent with that previously reported for myeloablative chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplant. The woman experienced three serious adverse events, all of them resolved and considered to be unrelated to treatment.

Positive preliminary data were also announced for the first patient with beta-thalassemia receiving CTX001 in the Phase 1/2 CLIMB-Thal-111 study (NCT03655678).

We are very encouraged by these preliminary data [which] support our belief in the potential of our therapies to have meaningful benefit for patients following a one-time intervention, Samarth Kulkarni, PhD, CRISPR Therapeutics CEO, said in a press release.

A webcast and presentation about these preliminary results are available on the companys website.

The data are remarkable and demonstrate that CTX001 has the potential to be a curative CRISPR/Cas9-based gene-editing therapy for people with sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia, said Jeffrey Leiden, MD, PhD, Vertexs chairman, president, and CEO.

Leiden added that the trial is still in its early phase and that he looks forward to its final results.

Early this year, CTX001 receivedfast track statusfor the treatment of sickle cell disease by theU.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is expected to accelerate CTX001s development and regulatory approval process.

Marta Figueiredo holds a BSc in Biology and a MSc in Evolutionary and Developmental Biology from the University of Lisbon, Portugal. She is currently finishing her PhD in Biomedical Sciences at the University of Lisbon, where she focused her research on the role of several signalling pathways in thymus and parathyroid glands embryonic development.

Total Posts: 94

Margarida graduated with a BS in Health Sciences from the University of Lisbon and a MSc in Biotechnology from Instituto Superior Tcnico (IST-UL). She worked as a molecular biologist research associate at a Cambridge UK-based biotech company that discovers and develops therapeutic, fully human monoclonal antibodies.

Continue reading here:
1st SCD Trial Patient Shows CTX001 Gene Editing to be Safe, Effective - Sickle Cell Anemia News

Decoding the building blocks of life: bit bio races toward a sustainable source of human cells – Proactive Investors UK

The ability to turn human cells into anything we want sounds like the stuff of science fiction. But one Cambridge biotech says it's cracked the code

A sustainable source of human stem cells is one of the holy grails of modern medicine.

With applications as broad as re-growing failed organs, fighting cancer, and stopping animal testing, stem cell therapy is predicted to be worth US$35bn by 2023.

Now, Cambridge startup bit bio, has a new approach to re-coding skin cells from adult humans, and rewinding the clock to give them the power of stem cells, and then turn them into whatever we want them to be all without the controversial involvement of human embryos.

This, says neurosurgeon and founder Dr Mark Kotter, will democratise stem cells, so that anyone can use them, at any time.

The private sector is already placing big bets on the technology, with start-ups in the space raising as much as US$16mln in recent funding rounds.

Kotter says that our inability to produce enough human stem cells to match our need puts troubling limits on research and drug development.

In drug discovery, the biggest bottleneck is the mismatch between animal models and animal cell lines used for drug discovery, and then human setting used in the clinical trial, he explains.

Around 3% of new drugs make it all the way through trials and to market, he says, and the biggest reasons treatments tend to fail in clinical study is that they are either toxic to humans, or they dont work.

The only solution is to bring the human element back to the early stages, says Kotter.

If new therapies were tested on human tissue first, it would reduce or even bypass the need to test on animals, as well as speeding up development.

Kotter founded bit bio, formerly known as Elpis BioMed, in 2016, in addition to startup Meatable, which produces meat by growing cultures in the lab, rather than rearing animals for the table.

The time is now for bit bio, because what it is doing has only been possible since a Nobel Prize-winning discovery twelve years ago, which turned the world of stem cell research upside down.

Kyoto University researcher Shinya Yamanaka proved that it was possible to take a mature human skin cell and reprogram it to be like the stem cell of an embryo.

Until this revelation, stem cell research had been dogged by controversy and expense, as scientists had to use human embryos and umbilical cords as a source of stem cells, and then simulate complex conditions inside the womb in order to make them develop into the cells they desired.

One big problem in early cell reprogramming was that stem cells are incredibly alert to invading DNA and silences any foreign material it detects.

This meant that past attempts run a different program inside a cell often failed, because the cell destroyed it.

What happened next was a moment of "serendipity" in the lab, says Kotter.

Through trial and error, bit bio found they could use certain safe harbours where information is protected within cells, to stop theinterference.

By taking the genetic switch for gene silencing and placing it inside a safe harbour, and then separately running the new cell program inside another safe harbour, scientists found they could override gene silencing in order to change the cell type.

This approach is what Kotter says makes bit bio unique.

The lab can produce up to a kilogram of human cells now, and its tech platform OptiOx has also proved that it can generate two human cell types with 100% accuracy.

Kotter says that now the range of cells able to be produced matters more than the quantity.

The company is now focused on discovering what separates one type of cell from another, which Kotter says will allow the firm to decode the building blocks of life.

To this end, bit bio is using machine learning to analyse the differences between every type of human cell, from bone marrow cells to liver cells, and create a reference map for all the different types.

Once the research is complete, the company hopes it willbe able to generate any type of human cell, at scale, and with ultimate precision.

Preparations are underway for a Series A funding round, and Kotter says that he is determined not to sell the business, having already rejected offers from would-be buyers.

Bit bio though is in an area hot with competition, which moves quickly.

A US$16mln Series A mega funding round was recently announced in October by another Cambridge start-up, Mogrify, which is hoping to master direct cell reprogramming and turn blood cells straight into brain cells, or any other type.

Mogrify uses big data to identify the small molecules needed to convert, maintain and culture a target cell type.

While both companies were finalists in the 2018 Cambridge Startup of the Year award, bit bio was the one to scoop the prize.

One aspect that separates the two companies is that Mogrify uses its technology to turn cells directly into other cell types, rather than using it to rewindto the stem cell phase, which is when cells can reproduce very quickly,

Kotter says that this stem cell phase focusis whatallows bit bio to havea stable supply of human cells.

If bit bio completes a similar, or even bigger, fundraise, it could advance the fledgling firm from seed to stem, in its attempt to stabilise a production line for essential cell technology.

See more here:
Decoding the building blocks of life: bit bio races toward a sustainable source of human cells - Proactive Investors UK