Author Archives: admin


The Arthritis Therapeutics Market Is Estimated To Grow 1.5x During … – InvestorsObserver

The Arthritis Therapeutics Market Is Estimated To Grow 1.5x During By 2027: Fact.MR Analysis

Rockville , March 06, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The global arthritis therapeutics market would expand 1.5 times from 2020 to 2027 . Patients in Europe and North America would push demand for therapeutics. They are looking for early diagnosis to prevent fatalities.

Rising prevalence of arthritis is a key factor fueling the arthritis therapeutics market. Increased funding from private and government agencies for development of new therapies would also augment sales.

Download Sample Copy of This Report: https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=S&rep_id=4355

Key Takeaways:

Growth Drivers:

Key Companies Profiled by Fact.MR

Get Customization on this Report for Specific Research Solutions : https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=RC&rep_id=4355

Competitive Landscape:

As per Fact.MR, the arthritis therapeutics market would be dominated by a few key companies. They are focusing on research and development activities. They are also striving to come up with novel drugs to strengthen their position in the industry.

For instance,

Research centers worldwide are striving to come up with novel therapeutics to offer better treatment options. Manufacturers are promising new product and pipeline project launches. They are also creating novel awareness campaigns, especially in remote areas.

For instance, in 2018, the National Library of Medicine published a new treatment for osteoarthritis. It mentioned that treatment is possible with mesenchymal stem cell therapy.

Around 500 government-registered clinical trials are evaluating the safety and efficiency of adult stem cells. These include the umbilical cord, pluripotent, and mesenchymal stem cells, to treat osteoarthritis.

According to data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), around 78.4 million adults in the USA would live with doctor-diagnosed arthritis by 2040. From 2013 to 2015, there were 58.5 million adults with the disease. Hence, demand for innovative therapeutics would expand by 2027.

Technological advancements in the field of arthritis would further augment demand. Easy availability of better treatment options would also create new opportunities.

In June 2021, the USA Food and Drug Administration announced the sanction of CyMedica's IntelliHub system. It is designed to treat pain caused by debilitating knee arthritis. Hence, fast track approvals by government agencies would help the market to expand.

However, risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might limitdevelopment in the arthritis therapeutics market. Their side effects include dizziness, stomach ulcers, and allergic reactions. Coupled with this, availability of drugs for the treatment of arthritis would hamper demand for therapeutics.

Based on distribution channels, hospital pharmacies account for a significant share of the global market. Increasing patients visiting hospitals for arthritis treatment would bode well for the segment. Easy availability of a wide variety of arthritis medications at these pharmacies would also drive sales.

More Valuable Insights on Arthritis Therapeutics Market

In the up-to-date study, Fact.MR reveals key factors expected to boost development in the global arthritis therapeutics market during the forecast period (2019 to 2027). The analysis also provides an in-depth study of opportunities and drivers projected to propel sales of arthritis therapeutics through detailed segmentation as follows:

Type:

Drug Class:

Route of Administration

Distribution Channel:

Regions:

Quick Buy & Expand Your Horizons: https://www.factmr.com/checkout/4355

Key Questions Covered in the Arthritis Therapeutics Market Report

Explore Fact. MRs Coverage in the Healthcare Domain

Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market: The global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market reached US$ 23.42 billion in 2022. The market would surpass a valuation of US$ 33.30 billion by 2032. It would further surge at a CAGR of 4.5% from 2022 to 2032.

Bilateral Osteoarthritis Treatment Market: The market for bilateral osteoarthritis treatment would expand at a rapid pace over the forecast period. Rising prevalence of bilateral osteoarthritis across the globe would drive demand in the market.

Axial Spondyloarthritis Market: Rising incidence of axial spondyloarthritis is propelling growth in the global axial spondyloarthritis market. Prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis in North America would elevate by 2030.

Genetic Disorder Therapeutics Market : According to US Food & Drug Administration, nearly 7,000 genetic diseases affects more than 30 million people. Around 75%-80% of genetic diseases are caused by a single-gene defect, and some of genetic diseases affects children.

About Fact.MR

We are a trusted research partner of 80% of fortune 1000 companies across the globe. We are consistently growing in the field of market research with more than 1000 reports published every year. The dedicated team of 400-plus analysts and consultants is committed to achieving the utmost level of our clients satisfaction.

Subscribe Our Weekly Newsletter for the Latest Updates : Fact.MR Talks

Contact: US Sales Office 11140Rockville Pike Suite 400 Rockville, MD20852 United States Tel: +1 (628) 251-1583, +353-1-4434-232 (D) E: sales@factmr.com

Follow Us: LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube

Follow this link:
The Arthritis Therapeutics Market Is Estimated To Grow 1.5x During ... - InvestorsObserver

At Baltimore County jail, youth held in rat-infested, sewage-flooded … – WYPR

Youth charged as adults and held at the Baltimore County Detention Center face unsanitary and dangerous conditions that violate multiple federal laws, according to a new report by the Maryland Office of the Public Defender.

The children are held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, Deborah St. Jean, director of the Maryland Office of the Public Defenders Juvenile Protection Division, described in a letter this week to county, state and federal officials.

She wrote that cells are regularly flooded with contaminated toilet water and debris and infested with rodents. The youth also have limited access to medical care, laundry, and showers.

The details stem from a visit lawyers with the Juvenile Protection Division made to the jail in November.

Many of the students expressed that they've been feeling depressed, had trouble sleeping, said Alyssa Fieo, one of the lawyers who spoke with children at the jail. They wanted time out of their cells. They wanted to interact with other youth, other students.

If the children were held at a juvenile detention facility instead of the adult jail, they would have those sorts of interactions with their peers, Fieo explained.

Children who are charged as adults can be held in adult jails pending trial, though federal laws require them to be kept separate from adults in those facilities. In Maryland, that often means they are held in solitary confinement.

However, state law discourages even children charged as adults from being held in adult facilities, St. Jean wrote in her letter. She cites a rule directing courts to send juveniles to juvenile facilities unless they are released while awaiting trial, the Department of Juvenile Services lacks capacity for the children at its facilities, or the court determines that sending the children to juvenile detention centers would create a safety risk.

St. Jean urged the county to immediately transfer all youth at BCDC to juvenile facilities.

There were at least 19 youth at the jail as of Thursday, according to Jenny Egan, who leads the Office of the Public Defenders juvenile division in Baltimore City.

Baltimore County Executive Johnny Olszewskis administration is carefully reviewing the letter and the concerning allegations raised and will closely evaluate current policies and provide a thorough response, spokeswoman Erica Palmisano wrote in an email.

The rest is here:
At Baltimore County jail, youth held in rat-infested, sewage-flooded ... - WYPR

Dr. Torka on the Role of Pirtobrutinib in R/R MCL – OncLive

Pallawi Torka, MD, assistant attending physician, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the clinical implications of the FDA approval of pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca) in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

On January 27, 2023, the FDA approved pirtobrutinib in adult patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a BTK inhibitor. The approval was backed by findings from the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial (NCT03740529), in which treatment with the agent at 200 mg daily led to an overall response rate of 50%, including a 13% complete response rate.

Pirtobrutinib represents an additional BTK inhibitor option for patients with MCL, especially older patients in whom CAR T-cell therapy may not be an option, Torka says. Prior to the FDA approval of pirtobrutinib, once patients with MCL relapsed on first-line therapy, they typically received a BTK inhibitor followed by CAR T-cell therapy after they relapsed on the BTK inhibitor, Torka explains. Brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus; brexu-cel) was approved by the FDA in 2020 for adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, based on findings from the phase 2 ZUMA-2 trial (NCT02601313).

Before switching from a BTK inhibitor to CAR T-cell therapy, most patients need bridging therapy, especially those who are receiving treatment at a community cancer center and need to wait to be referred to a site that administers CAR T-cell therapy, Torka notes. Bridging therapy for patients with MCL can include venetoclax (Venclexta) or additional chemotherapy agents such as bendamustine, Torka says. Now, pirtobrutinib can also be considered as a bridging therapy, as it is not toxic to stem cells and does not cause adverse effects to T cells, Torka emphasizes.

Another advantage of pirtobrutinib is its toxicity profile, Torka explains. In the BRUIN trial, 36% of patients received the agent for at least 6 months, and 10% received it for at least 1 year. Additionally, 4.7% of patients required adverse effect (AE)related dose reductions, and 32% of patients needed AE-related pirtobrutinib interruptions. AEs of grade 3 or higher included fatigue, edema, musculoskeletal pain, arthritis or arthralgia, abdominal pain, dyspnea, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, peripheral neuropathy, and hemorrhage.

In older adults with MCL who often have few therapeutic options, pirtobrutinib provides an extra option that can help patients live longer with minimal AEs, Torka concludes.

Read more:
Dr. Torka on the Role of Pirtobrutinib in R/R MCL - OncLive

Cardiac Tissue Chips to Fly to the ISS – ISS National Lab

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER (FL), March 10, 2023 Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, with one in every four adult deaths attributed to it. To improve treatments for cardiovascular disease on our planet, scientists are taking their research off planet. Prolonged spaceflight can result in many of the same physiological changes associated with aging, only at a much quicker rate. This makes the International Space Station (ISS) a valuable platform for research on conditions associated with the aging process, like cardiovascular disease.

To that end, researchers from Johns Hopkins University are leveraging the microgravity environment of the ISS National Laboratory to better understand how the heart functions as a means to develop new ways to treat heart disease and improve patient care on Earth.

We are trying to understand how cardiovascular disease progresses over time and also better understand how astronaut health is affected by prolong spaceflight, said Deok-Ho Kim, a professor of Biomedical Engineering at The Johns Hopkins University.

Launching on SpaceXs 27th Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) mission, the investigation will use tissue chips in space to study how microgravity affects cardiac function. Previous research has shown that microgravity not only induces structural changes within cardiac cells but also affects how the cells beat. In this investigation, the research team will monitor the contractile force of cardiac tissues in space in real time to help better understand how cardiovascular disease progresses over time. The team will also test therapeutics to evaluate how well cardiac function is preserved in microgravity.

The project is funded by the National Institutes of Healths National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) through the Tissue Chips in Space initiative in collaboration with the ISS National Lab. Tissue chips are small devices engineered to model the structure and function of human tissue. By taking tissue chips to space, researchers can observe microgravity-induced changes in human physiology relevant to disease, which could lead to novel therapies for patients on Earth. The research team is launching 24 tissue chips that contain cardiac cells differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).

We are going to examine the rate at which these cardiac tissues beat over the period of one month and compare that to ground-based experiments to test out the effectiveness of new therapeutics, Kim said.

The SpaceX CRS-27 mission is targeted for launch from Kennedy Space Center no earlier than March 14 at 8:30 p.m. EDT. This mission will include more than 15 ISS National Lab-sponsored payloads. To learn more about all ISS National Lab-sponsored research on SpaceX CRS-27, please visit our launch page.

Download a high-resolution image for this release: SpaceX CRS-27: Johns Hopkins Cardiac Research

Media Contact: Patrick ONeill904-806-0035PONeill@ISSNationalLab.org

# # #

About the International Space Station (ISS) National Laboratory:The International Space Station (ISS) is a one-of-a-kind laboratory that enables research and technology development not possible on Earth. As a public service enterprise, the ISS National Lab allows researchers to leverage this multiuser facility to improve life on Earth, mature space-based business models, advance science literacy in the future workforce, and expand a sustainable and scalable market in low Earth orbit. Through this orbiting national laboratory, research resources on the ISS are available to support non-NASA science, technology and education initiatives from U.S. government agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector. The Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS) manages the ISS National Lab, under Cooperative Agreement with NASA, facilitating access to its permanent microgravity research environment, a powerful vantage point in low Earth orbit, and the extreme and varied conditions of space. To learn more about the ISS National Lab, visit http://www.ISSNationalLab.org.

# # #

Link:
Cardiac Tissue Chips to Fly to the ISS - ISS National Lab

HOMOLOGY MEDICINES, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (form 10-K) – Marketscreener.com

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results ofoperations should be read in conjunction with our "Selected ConsolidatedFinancial Data" and our consolidated financial statements, related notes andother financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks anduncertainties such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. As aresult of many important factors, including those set forth in the sectioncaptioned "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, ouractual results could differ materially from the results described in, or impliedby, these forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage genetic medicines company dedicated to transforming thelives of patients suffering from rare genetic diseases with significant unmetmedical needs by addressing the underlying cause of the disease. Our proprietaryplatform is designed to utilize our human hematopoietic stem cell-derivedadeno-associated virus vectors, or AAVHSCs, to precisely and efficiently deliversingle administration genetic medicines in vivo through a nuclease-free geneediting modality, gene therapy, or gene therapy to express antibodies platform,or GTx-mAb, which is designed to produce antibodies throughout the body. Ourclinical programs include: HMI-103, an investigational gene editing candidate inclinical development for the treatment of patients with phenylketonuria, or PKU;HMI-203, an investigational gene therapy candidate in clinical development forthe treatment of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), or Huntersyndrome; and HMI-102, an investigational gene therapy candidate in clinicaldevelopment for the treatment of adult patients with PKU, for which patientenrollment is currently paused. We are in Investigational New Drug Application,or IND, -enabling studies with our lead GTx-mAb gene therapy candidate, HMI-104,for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, or PNH,and are actively seeking a partner for HMI-204, a gene therapy candidate formetachromatic leukodystrophy, or MLD. Our diverse set of AAVHSCs allows us toprecisely target, via a single injection, a wide range of disease-relevanttissues, including the liver, central nervous system, or CNS, including theability to cross the blood-brain-barrier, peripheral nervous system, or PNS,bone marrow, cardiac and skeletal muscle and the eye. Our genetic medicinesplatform is designed to provide us the flexibility to choose the method webelieve is best suited for each disease we pursue, based on factors such as thetargeted disease biology, the biodistribution of our AAVHSCs to key tissues andthe rate of cell division the disease-relevant tissues exhibit. Ourproduct-development strategy is to continue to develop in parallel gene therapyand gene editing product candidates. We believe our technology platform willallow us to provide transformative cures using either modality.

The unique properties of our proprietary family of 15 AAVHSCs enable us to focuson a method of gene editing called gene integration, through the replacement ofan entire diseased gene in the genome with a whole functional copy by harnessingthe naturally occurring deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, repair process ofhomologous recombination, or HR. We believe our HR-driven gene editing approachwill allow us to efficiently perform gene editing at therapeutic levels withoutunwanted on- and off-target modifications to the genome, and to directly measureand confirm those modifications in an unbiased manner to ensure only theintended changes are made. By utilizing the body's natural mechanism ofcorrecting gene defects, we also avoid the need for exogenous nucleases, orbacteria-derived enzymes used in other gene editing approaches to cut DNA, whichare known to significantly increase the risk of unwanted modifications to thegenome.

New preclinical data supporting the immunosuppression regimen incorporated inboth the HMI-103 and HMI-203 clinical trials was presented at WORLDSymposium in2023. In non-human primates, or NHPs, our data demonstrated that modulatingT-cell activity using tacrolimus together with dexamethasone is important inreducing B- and T-cell activity, nAb formation, and maintaining transgeneexpression following rAAV administration in NHPs. These results support the useof a dexamethasone and tacrolimus immunosuppressive regimen in our ongoing geneediting clinical trial with HMI-103 (pheEDIT) in adults with phenylketonuria(NCT05222178) and gene therapy trial with HMI-203 (juMPStart) in adults withHunter syndrome (MPS II) (NCT05238324).

Clinical-Stage Product Candidates

HMI-103: Gene Editing Candidate for the Treatment of Patients with PKU

In January 2023, we announced the dosing of the first participant in our Phase 1pheEDIT clinical trial with HMI-103, our lead gene editing candidate indevelopment for the treatment of classical PKU, with additional patients inscreening across ten active clinical trial sites with more expected to beinitiated throughout 2023. We expect to provide initial data from the pheEDITtrial mid-year 2023.

The pheEDIT clinical trial is an open-label, dose-escalation study evaluatingthe safety and efficacy of a single I.V. administration of HMI-103 and isexpected to enroll up to nine patients in up to three dose cohorts, ages 18-55years old, who have been diagnosed with classical PKU due to phenylalaninehydroxylase, or PAH, deficiency. In addition to safety endpoints, the trialmeasures serum phenylalanine, or Phe, changes. The trial incorporates animmunosuppressive regimen that includes a T-cell inhibitor used in combinationwith a steroid-sparing regimen. Prior to dosing, participants complete an 82-day

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

screening/run-in period to help us account for and more closely understandday-to-day Phe fluctuations. If positive safety and efficacy results areestablished in adults, we plan to then enroll younger patients in subsequentHMI-103 clinical trials.

We have received Fast Track Designation for HMI-103 from the U.S. Food and DrugAdministration, or FDA, for the treatment of neurocognitive and neuropsychiatricmanifestations of PKU secondary to PAH deficiency. Also, we have received orphandesignation from the European Commission, or EC, and orphan drug designationfrom the FDA, for HMI-103 for the treatment of PAH deficiency.

We have presented preclinical data on the mechanism of action of our optimizedHMI-103 gene editing candidate, which is designed to harness the body's naturalDNA repair process of HR to replace the disease-causing PAH gene with afunctional PAH gene and liver-specific promoter and to maximize PAH expressionin all transduced liver cells through episomal expression. We observedsignificant Phe reduction following a single I.V. administration of the murinesurrogate of HMI-103 in the PKU disease model out to 43 weeks (end of study). Inthis preclinical PKU model, the murine surrogate of HMI-103 was ten times morepotent than non-integrating gene therapy vector HMI-102. Additionally, weobserved on-target integration and no off-target integration following a singleI.V. administration of HMI-103 in a humanized liver model, as determined by agenome-wide integration assay. Using quantitative molecular methods, we alsodemonstrated achievement of gene integration efficiencies in the humanizedmurine liver model that corresponded with Phe correction in the PKU murinemodel.

HMI-203: Investigational Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Adult Patients withMPS II (Hunter Syndrome)

In October 2021, we announced the initiation of a Phase 1 trial with HMI-203, aninvestigational gene therapy in development for the treatment of adults withHunter syndrome. The juMPStart trial currently has five clinical sites in theU.S. and Canada with more expected to be initiated, and initial data areexpected in the second half of 2023.

The juMPStart clinical trial is an open-label, dose-escalation study evaluatingthe safety and efficacy of a single I.V. administration of HMI-203 and isexpected to enroll up to nine male patients in up to three dose cohorts, ages18-45 years old, who have been diagnosed with Hunter syndrome and are currentlyreceiving enzyme replacement therapy, or ERT. Qualitative data on unmet medicalneeds obtained from ERT-treated adult MPS II patients and/or their caregivershelped inform our trial design. Patients and caregivers reported that weekly ERTinfusions, surgeries and supportive therapies inadequately address range ofmotion and mobility, pain, and hearing loss, that there are burdens associatedwith ERT and other therapies, including frequency and duration of treatment, andpainful and extended recoveries, that there is a high degree of anxietyregarding prognosis, longevity, need for more invasive surgeries, and financialchallenges and that the expectations for a potential one-time gene therapyinclude the ability to maintain their current quality of life with ERTindependence. Also, key opinion leaders surveyed supported our planned designfor the juMPStart clinical trial, including our plan to discontinue ERT. Inaddition to safety endpoints, the trial will measure plasma I2S activity,urinary glycosaminoglycan, or GAG, levels, ERT discontinuation and otherperipheral disease endpoints. If positive safety and efficacy results areestablished in adults, we plan to then enroll younger patients in subsequentHMI-203 clinical trials.

We have received orphan designation from the EC and orphan drug designation fromthe FDA, for HMI-203 for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Huntersyndrome).

Based on in vivo preclinical studies in a murine model of Hunter syndrome, asingle I.V. administration of HMI-203 resulted in robust biodistribution andhuman I2S enzyme expression, leading to significant reductions in heparansulfate GAG levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, brain, liver, heart, spleen, lungand kidney, compared with the vehicle-treated disease model. HMI-203 also led tosignificant reductions in skeletal deformities compared with vehicle.

HMI-102: Investigational Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Adult Patients withPKU

On August 15, 2022, we paused the enrollment of our pheNIX clinical trial withHMI-102, a gene therapy candidate in development for the treatment of adultswith PKU, in order to focus resources and efforts on our Phase 1 pheEDITclinical trial evaluating in vivo gene editing candidate HMI-103 for PKU, whichis currently recruiting for the adult PKU patient population. Though we haveobserved biologic activity in our pheNIX trial, including decreases in serum Pheand increases in tyrosine, or Tyr, this prioritization offers the potential forus to generate data, including with a new immunosuppression regimen with ashorter course of steroids and a T-cell inhibitor as part of the pheEDITprotocol, utilizing our product candidate HMI-103, sooner than would be possibleto resume enrollment at pheNIX trial sites. We will continue to monitor allpatients enrolled in the pheNIX long-term extension study.

Earlier-Stage Product Candidates

In August 2021, we named a clinical development candidate for PNH, HMI-104, fromour GTx-mAb platform. This platform represents an additional way that we areleveraging our AAVHSCs in an effort to deliver one-time in vivo gene

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

therapy to express and secrete antibodies from the liver, which we believe mayallow us to target diseases with larger patient populations. In support of thisprogram, we generated and presented preclinical data targeting complementprotein 5, demonstrating preclinical proof-of-concept in PNH. A single I.V. doseof an AAVHSC GTx-mAb showed expression of full-length antibodies from the liverconsistent with levels associated with anti-C5 therapeutics, sustained androbust Immunoglobulin G, or IgG, expression in vivo in a humanized murine livermodel and a murine NOD-SCID model, and in vivo vector-expressed C5 mAb hadpotent functional activity as shown by an ex vivo hemolysis assay. Additionally,we observed sustained expression of C5 mAb in the presence of murine and humanneonatal fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptor, or FcRn. We continue to advanceHMI-104, which is currently in IND-enabling studies.

We completed IND-enabling studies with HMI-202, an investigational gene therapyfor the treatment of patients with MLD. Applying the learnings from theseIND-enabling studies, in August 2022, we announced the details of HMI-204, anoptimized, in vivo, one-time gene therapy product candidate for the treatment ofMLD. Following a single I.V. administration in the MLD murine model, thisoptimized candidate, which uses one of our proprietary AAVHSC capsids, crossedthe blood-brain-barrier to the CNS and reached key peripheral organs involved inMLD. This resulted in expression of human ARSA, or hARSA, levels in multiplebrain regions and cell types above the minimum level of enzyme needed to correctthe MLD disease phenotype, hARSA activity levels in the brain predictive offunctional assay improvements and hARSA activity in the serum. Additionally,these optimizations led to significant improvements in vector yield and superiorpackaging for the product candidate. We continue to actively seek a partner toadvance this program.

Oxford Biomedica Solutions Transaction

On March 10, 2022, we closed a transaction with Oxford Biomedica Solutions LLC(f/k/a Roadrunner Solutions LLC), or OXB Solutions, Oxford Biomedica (US), Inc.,or OXB, and Oxford Biomedica plc, or OXB Parent, and collectively with OXB,Oxford, pursuant to the Equity Securities Purchase Agreement, or the PurchaseAgreement, dated as of January 28, 2022, by and among Homology, OXB Solutionsand Oxford, whereby, among other things, we and Oxford agreed to collaborate tooperate OXB Solutions, which provides AAV vector process development andmanufacturing services to biotechnology companies, which we refer to as theOxford Biomedica Solutions Transaction, or the OXB Solutions Transaction. OXBSolutions incorporates our proven 'plug and play' process development andmanufacturing platform, as well as our experienced team and high-quality GMPvector production capabilities that we built and operated since 2019. Wecontinue to leverage these process development and manufacturing capabilitieswhile reducing our costs and maintaining preferred customer status for themanufacturing capacity to support our product candidates. We believe thequality, reliability and scalability of our gene therapy and gene editingmanufacturing approach is a core competitive advantage crucial to our long-termsuccess.

Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement and a contribution agreement, orthe Contribution Agreement, entered into between us and OXB Solutions prior tothe closing of the OXB Solutions Transaction, or the Closing, we agreed toassign and transfer to OXB Solutions all of our assets that are primarily usedin the manufacturing of AAV vectors for use in gene therapy or gene editingproducts, but excluding certain assets related to manufacturing or testing ofour proprietary AAV vectors, or collectively, the Transferred Assets, inexchange for 175,000 common equity units in OXB Solutions, or Units, and OXBSolutions assumed from us, and agreed to pay, perform and discharge when due,all of our duties, obligations, liabilities, interests and commitments of anykind under, arising out of or relating to the Transferred Assets.

Effective as of the Closing, we sold to OXB, and OXB purchased from us, 130,000Units, or the Transferred Units, in exchange for $130.0 million. In connectionwith the Closing, OXB contributed $50.0 million in cash to OXB Solutions inexchange for an additional 50,000 Units. Immediately following the Closing, (i)OXB owned 180,000 Units, representing 80 percent (80%) of the fully dilutedequity interests in OXB Solutions, and (ii) we owned 45,000 Units, representing20 percent (20%) of the fully diluted equity interests in OXB Solutions.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of OXBSolutions, or the OXB Solutions Operating Agreement, which was executed inconnection with the Closing, at any time following the three-year anniversary ofthe Closing, (i) OXB will have an option to cause us to sell and transfer toOXB, and (ii) we will have an option to cause OXB to purchase from us, in eachcase all of our equity ownership interest in OXB Solutions at a price equal to5.5 times the revenue for the immediately preceding 12-month period, subject toa maximum amount of $74.1 million. Pursuant to the terms of the OXB SolutionsOperating Agreement, we are entitled to designate one director on the board ofdirectors of OXB Solutions, currently Albert Seymour, our President and ChiefExecutive Officer. Further, Tim Kelly, our former Chief Operating Officer,serves as the Chief Executive Officer and chairman of the board of OXBSolutions.

Concurrently with the Closing, we entered into certain ancillary agreements withOXB Solutions including a license and patent management agreement whereby OXBSolutions granted certain licenses to us, a supply agreement, or the SupplyAgreement, for a term of three years which includes certain annual minimumpurchase commitments, a lease assignment pursuant to which we assigned all ofour right, title and interest in, to and under our facility lease to OXBSolutions, a sublease

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

agreement whereby OXB Solutions subleased certain premises in its facility tous, as well as several additional ancillary agreements.

License Agreements

In April 2016, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with City of Hope,or COH, pursuant to which COH granted us an exclusive, sublicensable, worldwidelicense, or the COH License, to certain AAV vector-related patents and know-howowned by COH to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize products andservices covered by such patents and know-how in any and all fields. On August6, 2021, we received notice from COH that we did not accomplish at least one ofthe partnering milestones by the applicable deadline, as set forth in the COHLicense. This notice does not affect our exclusive license in the field ofmammalian therapeutics, including all human therapeutics, associateddiagnostics, and target validation, or the Mammalian Therapeutic Field, where weretain exclusive rights. Instead, the notice served as written notice that theexclusive license granted pursuant to the COH License in all fields except theMammalian Therapeutic Field converted from exclusive to non-exclusive effectiveas of September 20, 2021, which was forty-five days from the receipt of notice.In connection with the conversion, any royalty obligations and sublicensee feesrelating to fields outside of the Mammalian Therapeutic Field shall be reducedby a certain percentage. This change to our exclusive worldwide license with COHdoes not impact any of our current therapeutic product development candidates indevelopment, including HMI-102, HMI-103, HMI-203, HMI-204 and HMI-104, nor willit impact any potential future therapeutic product development candidates.

Management Team and Financial Overview

Our management team has a successful track record of discovering, developing andcommercializing therapeutics with a particular focus on rare diseases. Since ourinception in 2015, we have raised approximately $721 million in aggregate netproceeds through our initial public offering, or IPO, in April 2018, follow-onpublic offerings of common stock in April 2019 and April 2021, proceeds from thesale of common stock under an "at-the-market" sales agreement, equityinvestments from pharmaceutical companies, preferred stock financings and ouragreement with Oxford. Included in our net proceeds is a $130.0 million up-frontcash payment from our agreement with Oxford, $50.0 million from a formercollaboration partner, comprised of an up-front payment of $35.0 million and a$15.0 million equity investment, and a $60.0 million equity investment fromPfizer Inc., or Pfizer, through a private placement transaction. We will requireadditional capital in order to advance our product candidates through clinicaldevelopment and commercialization. We believe that our compelling preclinicaldata, initial positive clinical data with HMI-102, scientific expertise,product-development strategy, manufacturing platform and process which weleveraged to establish OXB Solutions, and robust intellectual propertystrengthen our position as a leader in the development of genetic medicines.

On April 6, 2021, we completed a follow-on public offering of our common stock.We sold 6,596,306 shares of our common stock at a price of $7.58 per share andreceived net proceeds of $49.7 million, after deducting offering expenses. Underthe terms of the underwriters' agreement, we also granted an option exercisablefor 30 days to purchase up to an additional 989,445 shares of our common stockat a price of $7.58 per share. The underwriters did not exercise this option.The offering closed on April 9, 2021. The shares were sold pursuant to oureffective shelf registration statement on Form S-3, as amended, and a relatedprospectus supplement filed with the SEC on April 8, 2021.

We were incorporated and commenced operations in 2015. Since our incorporation,we have devoted substantially all of our resources to organizing and staffingour Company, business planning, raising capital, developing our technologyplatform, advancing HMI-102, HMI-103 and HMI-203 through IND-enabling studiesand into clinical trials, advancing HMI-202 and HMI-104 into IND-enablingstudies, researching and identifying additional product candidates, developingand implementing manufacturing processes and manufacturing capabilities,building out our manufacturing and research and development space, enhancing ourintellectual property portfolio and providing general and administrative supportfor these operations. To date, we have financed our operations primarily throughthe sale of common stock, through the sale of preferred stock, through fundingfrom our collaboration partner and through proceeds received as a result of ourtransaction with OXB Solutions.

To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expectto generate any revenue from the sale of products in the foreseeable future, ifat all. We recognized $3.2 million and $34.0 million in collaboration revenuefor the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Collaborationrevenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 included the recognition ofapproximately $30.8 million of deferred revenue and reimbursements incurredunder the collaboration and license agreement with Novartis, for which Novartisgave written notice of termination on February 26, 2021.

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net lossesfor the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $5.0 million and $95.8million, respectively. On March 10, 2022, we closed our transaction with OXBSolutions and recorded a gain of $131.2 million on the sale of our manufacturingbusiness (see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewherein this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the OXBSolutions

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transaction). As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had anaccumulated deficit of $429.1 million and $424.1 million, respectively.

Our total operating expenses were $136.5 million and $129.9 million for theyears ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As a result of the OXBSolutions Transaction, our quarterly operating expenses did decrease in thesecond quarter of 2022 and for the remaining quarters of 2022 as we implementedour program prioritization plan and experienced operational cost savings relatedto personnel expenses, professional fees, consulting expenses and other costs.As a result of our agreement with Oxford, we are purchasing process developmentservices and manufacturing production runs from OXB Solutions. Therefore, weexperienced an increase in these costs with an offsetting decrease in the totalcosts to run our previously-owned manufacturing facility, includingemployee-related costs for the manufacturing employees who transitioned to thenew company. We also had a modest workforce reduction commensurate with thepipeline prioritization in the second half of 2022.

In 2023, we expect our total operating expenses to decrease over the prior yearas we continue to implement our program prioritization plan. However, researchand development expenses associated with our ongoing development activitiesrelated to our product candidates will increase. For instance, we anticipatethat expenses associated with our Phase 1 pheEDIT clinical trial with HMI-103,our Phase 1 juMPStart clinical trial with HMI-203, and development activitiesassociated with HMI-104, our GTx-mAb product candidate for PNH, will increase.However, we anticipate reduced research and development expenses associated withour Phase 1/2 pheNIX clinical trial with HMI-102 as we have paused futurepatient enrollment, as well as reduced expenses associated with our optimizedMLD program which we have paused and are actively pursuing partneringopportunities, and reductions in other operational costs includingpersonnel-related expenses, professional fees, consulting and other costs. Wewill continue to incur costs associated with operating as a public company.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the developmentof our current and any future product candidates and our platform and technologyand because the extent to which we may enter into collaborations with thirdparties for development of any of our product candidates is unknown, we areunable to predict the timing and amount of increased operating expenses andcapital expenditures associated with completing the research and development ofour product candidates. Our future operating requirements will depend on manyfactors, including:

the costs, timing, and results of our ongoing research and development efforts,including clinical trials;

the costs, timing, and results of our research and development efforts forcurrent and future product candidates in our gene therapy and gene editingpipeline;

the costs and timing of process development scale-up activities, and theadequacy of supply of our product candidates for preclinical studies andclinical trials through CMOs, including OXB Solutions;

the costs and timing of preparing, filing, and prosecuting patent applications,maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending anyintellectual property-related claims, including any claims by third parties thatwe are infringing upon their intellectual property rights;

the effect of competitors and market developments; and

our ability to establish and maintain strategic collaborations, licensing orother agreements and the financial terms of such agreements for our productcandidates.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investmentsas of December 31, 2022 will enable us to fund our current projected operatingexpenses and capital expenditure requirements into the fourth quarter of 2024,including additional development activities related to our Phase 1 pheEDITclinical trial with HMI-103, our Phase 1 juMPStart clinical trial with HMI-203,IND-enabling activities relating to HMI-104, the continued optimization of ourmanufacturing processes through process development services with OXB Solutionsand the expansion of our intellectual property portfolio. We have based theseestimates on assumptions that may prove to be imprecise, and we may use ouravailable capital resources sooner than we currently expect. See "Liquidity andCapital Resources." Adequate additional funds may not be available to us onacceptable terms, or at all. For example, the trading prices for our and otherbiopharmaceutical companies' stock have been highly volatile as a result ofmacroeconomic conditions, developments in our industry and the COVID-19pandemic. As a result, we may face difficulties raising capital through sales ofour common stock and any such sales may be on unfavorable terms. See "RiskFactors-The COVID-19 pandemic has and could continue to adversely impact ourbusiness, including our preclinical studies and clinical trials." in Item 1A ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, our ability to raise capital maybe further impacted by global macroeconomic conditions including as a result ofinternational political conflict, supply chain issues and rising inflation andinterest rates. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the saleof equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of ourstockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may includeliquidation or other preferences that adversely affect rights as a stockholder.Any future debt financing or preferred equity or other financing, if available,may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting ourability to take

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expendituresand may require the issuance of warrants, which could potentially dilute theownership interests of our stockholders.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, orlicensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuablerights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or productcandidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we areunable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed,we may be required to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate our product developmentprograms or any future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop andmarket product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and marketourselves.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with drugdevelopment, we are unable to predict when or if we will be able to achieve ormaintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenue from productsales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or areunable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable tocontinue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or terminateour operations.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

As the COVID-19 pandemic affected global healthcare systems as well as majoreconomic and financial markets, we adopted several procedures focused onensuring the continued development of our product candidates and protecting thehealth, wellbeing and safety of our workforce. We continue to work with trialsites to mitigate COVID-19-related disruptions to our clinical trials. However,despite our best efforts, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic resultedin delays in enrolling our Phase 1/2 pheNIX clinical trial, and may result indelays or disruptions to any of our other current or planned clinical trials inthe future. In addition, many clinical sites are under-resourced as a result ofthe COVID-19 pandemic and other factors, impacting the sites ability to advanceclinical trials in a timely manner.

While the pandemic has not significantly impacted our results of operations, thesituation remains dynamic and it is difficult to reasonably assess or predictthe full extent of the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have onour business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See"Risk Factors- The COVID-19 pandemic has and could continue to adversely impactour business, including our preclinical studies and clinical trials." in Item 1Aof this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Components of Our Results of Operations

Revenue

To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expectto generate any revenue from the sale of products in the foreseeable future. Werecorded $3.2 million in collaboration revenue for the year ended December 31,2022, related to the Stock Purchase Agreement with Pfizer (see Note 15 to ourconsolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K for additional information regarding revenue recognition discussions).

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses since inception have consisted solely of research anddevelopment costs and general and administrative costs.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for ourresearch activities, including our discovery efforts, and the development of ourproduct candidates, and include:

salaries, benefits and other related costs, including stock-based compensationexpense, for personnel engaged in research and development functions;

expenses incurred under agreements with third parties, including contractresearch organizations, or CROs, and other third parties that conduct research,preclinical activities and clinical trials on our behalf as well as CMOs,including OXB Solutions, that manufacture our product candidates for use in ourpreclinical testing, our clinical trials with HMI-102, HMI-103 and HMI-203 andadditional potential future clinical trials;

costs of outside consultants, including their fees and related travel expenses;

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the costs of laboratory supplies and acquiring, developing and manufacturingpreclinical study and clinical trial materials; and

allocated expenses for rent and other operating costs.

We expense research and development costs as incurred.

Research and development activities are central to our business model. We expecttotal research and development expenses in 2023 to decrease compared to ourresearch and development expenses incurred in 2022 as we continue to implementour program prioritization plan. However, we expect our research and developmentexpenses associated with our ongoing development programs and initiatives willincrease. For instance, we anticipate that expenses associated with pheEDIT, ourPhase 1 clinical trial with HMI-103 for the treatment of PKU will increase,expenses associated with juMPStart, our Phase 1 clinical trial with HMI-203 forthe treatment of Hunter syndrome will increase, and IND-enabling activitiesassociated with HMI-104, our GTx-mAb product candidate for the treatment of PNH,will increase. However, we anticipate reduced research and development expensesassociated with our Phase 1/2 pheNIX clinical trial with HMI-102 as we havepaused future patient enrollment, as well as reduced expenses associated withour optimized MLD program for which we are actively pursuing partneringopportunities, and reductions in other operational costs includingpersonnel-related expenses, consulting and other costs. As a result of ouragreement with Oxford, we will incur expenses for process development servicesand manufacturing product runs provided by OXB Solutions.

We cannot determine with certainty the duration and costs of future clinicaltrials or preclinical studies of our product candidates in development or anyother future product candidate we may develop or if, when, or to what extent wewill generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any productcandidate for which we obtain marketing approval. We may never succeed inobtaining marketing approval for any product candidate. The duration, costs andtiming of clinical trials and development of our product candidates indevelopment and any other future product candidate we may develop will depend ona variety of factors, including:

the scope, rate of progress, expense and results of current clinical trials, aswell as of any future clinical trials, and other research and developmentactivities that we may conduct;

uncertainties in clinical trial design and patient enrollment rates;

any delays in clinical trials as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic;

the actual probability of success for our product candidates, including thesafety and efficacy results, early clinical data, competition, manufacturingcapability and commercial viability;

significant and changing government regulation and regulatory guidance;

the timing and receipt of any marketing approvals; and

Originally posted here:
HOMOLOGY MEDICINES, INC. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (form 10-K) - Marketscreener.com

For a range of unmet medical needs, India offers a fantastic opportunity to push cell and gene therapies: B .. – ETHealthWorld

Shahid Akhter, editor, ETHealthworld, spoke to B N Manohar, MD and CEO, Stempeutics Research, to know more about the challenges and opportunities associated with stem cell therapy.

Medical Therapies: ChallengesThe increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer and the emergence of a more virulent form of the existing indications have posed many challenges to the existing medical therapies. As a result, the industry and medical community are looking for something novel that can reverse the disease's trend and determine whether it is possible to repair and regenerate diseased tissues, organs, or cells.

Cellular Therapy: Market and OpportunitiesThe Indian bioeconomy was about $80 billion in 2021. The bioeconomy consists of revenues generated from various segments like vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics, Covid vaccine and Covid testing, which was about 14.5 billion dollars in 2021. In biotherapeutics, the revenue was about $10 billion. But these revenues are coming from biosimilars and biologics. The revenue generated from cell and gene therapies in India is very small.

The landscape of cellular therapies outside India has changed dramatically over the past few years and is likely to continue to do so over the next decade. There is a big opportunity for India to showcase cell and gene therapies for many unmet medical needs, and I strongly feel cell and gene therapy will be an emerging area of science and stem cells will be a major branch of medical treatments and will be a standard of cure and practise in the years to come. India has the opportunity to become a leading global player for stem cell products and services, and the government needs to react with speed in implementing a clear policy for cell therapy. Also, India can become a good manufacturing hub for cellular therapy.

Stem Cell Therapy: Care to Cure The current medicines available today only address the symptoms, making it only a symptomatic treatment. The medicines are not addressing the root cause of the disease. For example, in diabetes, the beta islet cell degenerates due to genetic defects or other issues, resulting in insufficient insulin production and the need for insulin injections.But we are not fixing the root cause of the disease, where we had to regenerate the degenerated cells. Here, cell and gene therapies tried to address the root cause of the disease, thereby regenerating the beta islet cells so that we do not have to take repeat insulin injections.

So far, we have been using stem cells like MSCs (mesenchymal stromal cells), which are available in various parts of the body. Currently, Stempeutic's major focus is on bone marrow-derived MSCs. We have got a patented technology for isolating MSCs from bone marrow. We have the technology to multiply, expand, and ultimately produce the end product. But the current trend is moving towards engineered cells. So far, we are working on non-engineered stem cells or on god-given stem cells and figuring a way to use them for multiple indications. Now, to further improve the overall efficacy of the cell therapy product, we are working on engineering MSCs so that they can overexpress the relevant growth factors and cytokines, which are required for treating the required indications.

Stempeutics: Journey so farStempeutics is a leading regenerative medicine company with a stem cell platform technology for the treatment of immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases. We have been working in this field for the last 14 years. We are an MSC company. We focus on mesenchymal stem cells or mesenchymal stromal cells. In the last 14 years, we have been working on R&D, preclinical studies, and clinical studies to see what the potency of these MSCs is. Also, we have undertaken numerous studies in terms of testing the safety profile of this compound. We tried many indications, and ultimately, we succeeded on 2 of them: one is the peripheral vascular disease called clinical limb ischemia (CLI), and the other is knee osteoarthritis (OA).

After going through multiple phases of DCGI-approved clinical trials, the Stempeucel product has been granted manufacturing and marketing approval for the treatment of CLI and OA by the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI). Stempeucel becomes the first allogeneic cell therapy product to be approved for commercial use in India and the first stem cell product to be approved globally for CLI indications. Stempeucel product has been licenced to Cipla for CLI indication (marketed under the brand name Regenacip) and to Alkem Labs for OA indication (marketed under the brand name StemOne) for the India territory.

Stempeutics has put India on the world map of regenerative medicine. The first company to develop a drug, which was designed and developed by Indian scientists, wasStempeucel has strong patent protection, with more than 20 granted across the globe. The core Stempeucel patent has been granted in the USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Japan, China, Singapore, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and the Philippines. Stempeucel has been classified as an "advanced therapy medicinal product" by the European Medicinal Agency and designated as an orphan drug for the treatment of CLI due to Buergers Disease. Stempeutics is the first company to come up with a cell-based drug that has gone from bench to bedside. Additionally, it is the first company to have taken the product from concept to being commercially available for treating patients.

Now that we have commercialised two indications in India (CLI and knee OA), Stempeutics is seeking partners for further clinical development and commercialization of Stempeucel in the US, Europe, and Japan for the knee OA product, whose prevalence is huge globally. In knee OA, we are taking patients who are grades 2 or 3 on the X-ray or MRI scale. Existing treatment options focus on providing temporary pain relief and reducing inflammation during the early stages of the disease without affecting its course. Stempeucel-OA has the potential to provide best-in-class pain reduction, improve stiffness, improve physical function, improve quality of life, and have the potential to regenerate or maintain cartilage and stall further disease progression for Grade 2 and Grade 3 osteoarthritis patients based on the Kellgren and Lawrence radiographic criteria.

We are happy that we could commercialise our product, Stempeucel, in India. Now our goal is to take this product from India to developed markets like the US, Europe, and Japan. In that context, we have initiated conversations with the US FDA, the EMA in Europe, and the PMDA in Japan. There are a few challenges in terms of commercialising the product in developed markets, but we are trying to improve our product based on the inputs shared by these regulators on our chemistry, manufacturing, and control.

Stem Cell: ChallengesThe three key challenges we are facing are:

Here is the original post:
For a range of unmet medical needs, India offers a fantastic opportunity to push cell and gene therapies: B .. - ETHealthWorld

Experts discuss innovative advances driving healthcare transformation at ‘Future of Medicine 2023’ – Devdiscourse

Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], March 10 (ANI/NewsVoir): Health and wellness knowledge platform, Happiest Health, hosted the 'Future of Medicine 2023', the first annual summit that shared insights from leading minds in medicine, research, and technology, to foster innovation in the healthcare industry. Happiest Health brought together expert speakers who discussed emerging trends in healthcare such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), human gut microbiome theories, stem cell genomics, bioinformatics and other fundamental pillars of healthcare on the cusp of shaping the future of health and medicine. Speaking at the inaugural event, Ashok Soota, Chairman, of Happiest Health said, "Our vision with 'Future of Medicine' is to create an interactive experience that encourages industry leaders to explore the potential at the intersection of cutting-edge science and technology to improve human health. If we are to work towards a healthier tomorrow, the healthcare industry needs to collaborate to redefine the notion of wellness and medicine, the healthcare delivery model and the way various fields align to improve health outcomes and save more lives."

"Healthcare and medicine are entering a completely new sphere. Technology like AI/ML and the availability of data from medical devices will create a paradigm shift in healthcare from disease-focused to a health-care-centric model," said Dr Paul Salins, Managing Director, Narayana Hrudayalaya Multispecialty Hospital & Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, and Vice Chairman, Skan Research Trust in his keynote address. "AI, ML, and data will now do the heavy lifting of diagnosis, taking much of the burden off doctors. This shift will enable doctors to focus on giving patients the level of compassion and care they need over long term. The model of wellness and healthcare will transform from treating illnesses to managing wellness. Hospitals will rely more on physicians than specialists, and holistic modes of treatment will play a stronger role, over symptomatic treatment." Dr Jyoti Nangalia, Clinician Scientist and Consultant Haematologist, Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, UK explained, "The mutations in blood cells make each blood cell unique, leaving us with a clear way to study age-related markers. This can help to detect onset of cancer or possibly find undetected cancer. Understanding the breadth of trajectories to adult blood cancers is still unknown, so studies like this can help improve the outcomes for blood cancers and blood disorders."

With the paradigm shift of healthcare, as more universal data is available through AI/ ML and medical devices, there will also be a shift in health-seeking behaviour-people will look more towards managing their own health as compared to how to treat their illnesses. This increases the relevance of India's Ayurveda medicine as a new modern healthcare ecosystem. Dr Narendra Pendse, Member BOG, Trans-disciplinary University, Bangalore, Medical Advisor, Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative medicine (I-AIM), Bangalore called for synergy and dialogue to break silos between all fields of medicine to explore whether the emerging field of Ayurveda biology can contribute to the advancement of Indian health science. "In the current world, where we can factor in macro-environment into health using technology and tools, Ayurveda can deliver personalised care at a mass scale, accounting for variations in geography and unique genetic make-up of each person. We need to build bridges between pure science, allopathy, naturopathy and Ayurveda to give everyone a sense of health and balance," he said.

AI and ML capabilities are already shaping the future of medicine and are at the centre of many innovative offerings that will soon become a mainstay in the not-so-distant future. The summit concluded with an interactive panel discussion on the usage of AI and medical devices for smart healthcare. Among the speakers were Graeme Brown, (Chief Business Officer, Quadram Institute Bioscience), Prof. Arjan Narbad (Transactional Microbiome Group Leader, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, England), Dr Yogesh Schouche (Principal Investigator of National Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science), Dr Jyoti Nangalia (Clinician Scientist and Consultant Haematologist, Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, UK), Dr Narendra Pendse (Rheumatologist, Ayurveda, /Member BOG, Trans-disciplinary University, Bangalore, Medical Advisor, Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative medicine (I-AIM), Bangalore), Prof. Sanjeev Jain (Principal Investigator, SKAN projects at NIMHANS) and Vishal Bali, (Executive Chairman, Asia Healthcare Holdings). The discussions focused on how advancements in various fields of research are pointing to a new future for medicine, such as how next-gen sequencing is providing a better understanding of psychiatry and mental wellness, how mutations in blood can help predict diseases such as blood cancer, and how the human microbiome is emerging as a new dimension to understand the role of gut health for both body and mind. Another point of emphasis was on how inter-disciplinary collaboration across the globe and across sectors and fields will be crucial for the future of medicine. While the medical sector is familiar with collaboration, but there are issues such as intellectual property rights, which are contentious.

In line with the intent to become the leading forum for the public to hear first-hand from leading healthcare experts, The Future of Medicine will be an annual summit. "To make a tangible difference to the healthcare industry, industry leaders must keep a pulse on emerging trends. Collaboration and conversation around offering integrated solutions spanning modern science and traditional therapies drive path-breaking advancements. Our hope is for 'Future of Medicine' to become an avenue for industry leaders to regularly connect and share new knowledge that enhances the healthcare ecosystem for a healthier tomorrow." said Anindya Chowdhury, President & CEO, of Happiest Health.

Happiest Health is a global health & wellness knowledge enterprise promoted by Ashok Soota. Happiest Health provides credible and trustworthy health and wellness knowledge with views from globally renowned experts and doctors. The primary knowledge platforms are the daily newsletter, knowledge website, and newly launched monthly print magazine, and knowledge app. Happiest Health embraces scientific knowledge with a keen focus on medical breakthroughs providing kinder, gentler therapies including cell-based treatments. It also has deep coverage of integrated medicine including Ayurveda, homeopathy and naturopathy. Happiest Health's focus on wellness is holistic and energizing. They live by their Mission Statement: "Better Knowledge. Better Health." and convey its benefits to all.

For more information please visit: http://www.happiesthealth.com. This story has been provided by NewsVoir. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of this article. (ANI/NewsVoir)

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Continued here:
Experts discuss innovative advances driving healthcare transformation at 'Future of Medicine 2023' - Devdiscourse

New Solutions Continue to Show Up in the Lymphoma Treatment … – Targeted Oncology

The field of treatment for patients with lymphoma diseases like follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphomas [DLBCL] has undergone some significant changes with the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, but challenges and questions remain.

In an interview with Targeted OncologyTM, Matthew Matasar, MD, chief of the division of blood disorders at the Rutgers Cancer Institute and professor at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, discussed the major highlights of treatment for this patient population in newer treatments like mosunetuzumab [Lunsumio], which was approved by the FDA for patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.1 Moreover, he breaks down recent data for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and what new studies mean for this patient population now, and into the future.2

What is a top highlight for the field of follicular lymphoma?

For follicular lymphoma, we have important updates on the activity and durability of responses with the treatment with mosunetuzumab. Mosunetuzumab is a novel bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3, creating an immune synapse with healthy T cells. This has been described in prior [meetings] and publications and clearly is an active medicine in patients with multimodal follicular lymphoma, with overall response rates [ORR] of 80% and complete response [CR] rates of 60%.

The important question, however, is how durable are these responses? We now have maturing data, with a median follow up now of 27 months, we see that the median duration of response, CR, and even median progression-free survival [PFS] have not yet been reached, which for me, emphasizes the point that not only is this agent highly active in relapsed FL, but the responses are quite durable.We need further follow up and certainly we have a lot more to learn, but we're looking forward to it's likely FDA approval and our ability to prescribe it in the clinic.

What about for patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma?

In the area of non-Hodgkin lymphoma aggressive B-cell lymphoma, I presented work that we conducted with colleagues at the Dana Farber and City of Hope. Looking at improving treatments [in the] second line [for patients with] large cell lymphoma that are eligible for stem cell transplant. We know that even in this era of CAR T-cell therapy there are a subset of patients who should receive and benefit from platinum based chemoimmunotherapy with planned auto transplant in consolidation. [This is for those] with later relapsing large cell lymphoma those who ever relapse greater than 12 months beyond completion of first line therapy. That being said, the standard of care treatment has a sub optimal ORR to CR rate and we clearly need to do better for such patients.

What new data is there for this patient population?

We presented our phase 2 study called Pola-R-ICE, which incorporates the use of polatuzumab vedotion [and RICE (rituximab [Rituxan], ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide)], the antibody drug conjugate targeting CD79B, in combination with RICE for patients with relapsed large cell lymphoma who were eligible for subsequent consolidated stem cell transplant.2 Briefly, in the study patients received 2 or 3 cycles of the Pola-R-ICE treatment and those who had chemo-sensitive disease went on to receive a standard of care auto transplant, and then after transplant would receive polutuzumab monotherapy to complete a total of 6 doses. So, 3 doses if they got 3 cycles beforehand and 4 if they only required 2.

We showed high activity for this combination in this patient population despite a high-risk patient population putting many patients that currently would be shunted towards the CAR-T program, because of primary refractory or early relapsing disease. We nonetheless showed high ORR and CR rates and the ability to get patients to transplant. The data are still maturing, and we're looking to see what the impact of the consolidative treatment is going to look like in terms of durability of response, but very encouraging results that we were able to present.

What are your hopes for the future of treatment for patients with lymphoma?

In follicular lymphoma, clearly, we are coming upon the era of bispecific antibodies, with mosunetuzumab and competitive molecules that are being developed in this space as well. We're likely to find ourselves in a situation where we have multiple options in the treatment of [patients with] follicular lymphoma with bispecific antibodies. Important questions will remain, however, including both the durability of these agents as well as the optimal sequencing and which patients should be getting CAR T-cell therapy, which patients be getting bispecific antibodies, and how do these agents work in sequence? And how can we optimize the course of care for a patient navigating through follicular lymphoma?

In DLBCL, there's clearly still a lot of work to be done in clarifying the optimal second line treatment program for patients who should be receiving the stem cell transplant, as well as further innovation that's required in terms of novel ways of assessing response. [Other questions remain such as] should we be incorporating [minimal residual disease] decision making into the transplant decision making apparatus? And how can we best incorporate other novel therapies into multi agent programs, again, with the intention of improving outcomes for our patients with highest risk disease.

REFERENCES

1. FDA approves Genentechs Lunsumio, a first-in-class bispecific antibody, to treat people with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. News release. December 23, 2022. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://bit.ly/3WJw6B3

2. Herrera A, Chen L, Crombie J, et al. Polatuzumab vedotin combined with r-ice (polar-ice) as second-line therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma.. Blood(2022) 140 (Supplement 1): 10651067. doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-165699

See the article here:
New Solutions Continue to Show Up in the Lymphoma Treatment ... - Targeted Oncology

Multiple Myeloma Month: A Ceres woman’s journey to treatment – Olean Times Herald

WELLSVILLE March is designated Multiple Myeloma Month MM, the second most prevalent form of blood cancer, causes malignant plasma cells to accumulate in bone marrow.

To raise awareness and put a face behind the statistics, the theme for Multiple Myeloma Month this year is #MYelomaStory.

The National Cancer Institute estimates that more than 34,470 people living in the United States were diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2022. This number includes Kimberly Miller of Ceres, who is the receptionist at the Wilmot Cancer Institute Oncology and Infusion Center at Jones Memorial Hospital.

Millers story began in August 2022, when she started experiencing intense pain in her lower back, hip and groin. After a phone call to her Olean-based primary care provider (PCP), she was told it sounded like diverticulitis and she was advised to go to the emergency room.

That was frustrating because even with my limited medical knowledge, I knew I did not have diverticulitis, she said. I decided to wait a week and see if it got better.

The pain did not get better; it continued to get worse. When it reached the point that she could barely lift her leg to get up into the car, she called her primary care provider again, requesting an appointment to discuss her symptoms. She was again advised that she had diverticulitis; however, her PCP ordered an x-ray of her hips and spine. When the results came back, the nurse told her the images showed no acute findings.

Seeking relief from the agonizing back pain, Miller decided to seek out a chiropractor. She took the x-ray results to her appointment, and was surprised when the doctor explained in detail that what was stated as no acute findings, was actually more acute than was reported.

The chiropractor would not treat her until she had an MRI, so she called her PCP and finally got the appointment she had been requesting. She would see her primary care provider on Sept. 29.

However, on Sept. 25, the pain became so unbearable that her husband, Ed, took her to the closest emergency room, where she had an abdominal CT and a spinal CT. With no family history of cancer, she was shocked when the results came back and she was diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

It has settled in my spine, she said, noting that the cancer eats holes in bone.

From Olean, she was taken by ambulance to Buffalo General Hospital where she met with the Great Lakes Cancer team. To make her treatment more convenient, Miller was referred to Dr. Yasar Shad, an oncologist at the Wilmot Olean Oncology and Infusion Center on West State Street.

Millers treatment so far has included four cycles of chemotherapy, five sessions of radiation, and a spinal surgery.

I began radiation treatment in Olean, in mid-October, and chemotherapy on Nov. 9, she said. Dr. Shad and his staff have been a huge blessing to me through chemotherapy, and countless doctor appointments in Rochester.

She also met with a neurosurgeon, Dr. Pierre Girgis, to deal with the brittle bones and spine fractures. She had kyphoplasty surgery on her spine on March 1.

Now in her fifth cycle of chemo, Miller is anticipating an appointment with the UR Medicine Stem Cell Transplant Team to prepare for a stem cell transplant in April.

Because stem cell transplants take the immune system back to that of a newborn baby, recovery includes at least 90 days of quarantine at home, she said. I have heard very good things about the SCT process and how many patients go into remission afterward.

She said she is thankful for all of the support she has received from staff at Jones Memorial Hospital, Strong Memorial Hospital and the Wilmot Cancer Center at Strong.

I know I have many, many people praying for me, and being able to get the treatment I need closer to home has been a blessing, she said.

View original post here:
Multiple Myeloma Month: A Ceres woman's journey to treatment - Olean Times Herald

Temporal evolution and differential patterns of cellular reconstitution … – Nature.com

Childhood cancer and its treatment compromise immune functions bearing implications for the risk of infections and effectiveness of revaccinations. A plethora of studies describe the immune reconstitution after allogeneic HSCT and provide recommendations for infection prophylaxis and revaccination strategies. According to the frequency of the disease, analyses of the immune recovery after the end of therapy in pediatric patients who did not undergo HSCT focused on ALL. In this context, an early report by Alanko et al. described the recovery of blood B-lymphocytes and serum immunoglobulins7. The authors found that, based on these parameters, a sufficiently functioning immune system was established 6months after cessation of chemotherapy and concluded that prophylactic antibiotics can be withdrawn and immunizations started. In a subsequent publication, the same group later described a differential and age-dependent recovery of blood T cell subsets posttherapy9. Although their analysis showed a mean reversion to normal values by 6months, some individual patients continued to have subnormal values for up to 1year after therapy, some of whom exhibited increased susceptibility to infections. Such observations were largely confirmed in later studies in ALL11,14,19,20. Some of these analyses showed that in comparison, B-cells were reduced more significantly and for longer periods than T-cells. In a long-term follow-up, van Tilburg and colleagues showed that whereas naive B and T cells exhibited a relatively fast recovery, memory B-cells regenerated significantly slower and memory T-cells did not fully recover during the entire 5-year follow-up12. In a more recent large study including 116 participants, Williams and colleagues underlined that immune reconstitution differs between lymphocyte compartments21. Concerning the influence of treatment intensity, Ek et al. found that immune reconstitution after childhood ALL was most severely affected in the high-risk group10.

The immune reconstitution after therapy for solid tumors in children and adolescents has been characterized less extensively as compared to ALL.

In an early orienting pilot study, Cranendonk et al. retrospectively determined the effects of various chemotherapeutic drug regimens on the numbers of different blood cell types in 131 children treated for solid tumors. Apart from the general cytoreductive effects during treatment, they observed that, in the majority of the children, the lymphocyte count became normal between 1 and 12months after cessation of therapy22. Later, Alanko and coworkers focused on the hematologic and immunologic recovery in a small analysis including 11 children who had been treated for HD (n=3), Nephroblastoma (n=4), Burkitt`s Lymphoma (n=2), clear cell sarcoma (n=1) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n=1). The group described that the lymphocyte counts of most patients normalized during the first 12months after therapy. The recovery in patients with HD or Burkitt`s lymphoma was slower than in patients with nephroblastoma and radiotherapy appeared to prolong immune reconstitution15. In a later investigation, Kovacs and colleagues assessed immune recovery in 88 children receiving chemotherapy for ALL (n=43), lymphoma (n=15), bone tumors (n=20), and other solid tumors (n=10). The group determined serum immunoglobulin levels (Ig), natural killer activity (NK), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and T and B cell proliferation 1year after cessation of therapy. They found, that cytotoxic therapy can lead to long-term depression of the immune system, which was most prominent in patients with ALL.

For adults with HD, a treatment-associated marked long-term dysregulation of T-cell subset homeostasis has long been described17 and it had been shown that radiation therapy decreases the absolute CD4 T-cell counts23. As a consequence, antibody responsetopneumococcal vaccinewas profoundly impaired in patients who had received intensive treatment for HD24.

Comparable larger studies in pediatric cohorts have not been performed.

To illustrate varying characteristics of the cellular reconstitution after completion of chemotherapy in pediatric patients with ALL and other disease entities, we here present a comparative analysis of the course of total leukocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts from 4months before until twelve months after therapy in a large pediatric cohort of n=132 patients who had been treated for ALL, HD and ES. Depending on the underlying disease and the resulting treatment regimens and modalities, we describe significant differences mainly affecting the total lymphocyte counts.

In contrast to earlier reports10, we found no differences in the cellular reconstitution between patients with ALL belonging to the HR group and those belonging to the MR or SR group. This might be explained, however, by the relatively small proportion of patients with HR in this study.

In particular, we saw a marked and prolonged post-therapeutic lymphocyte depression in patients with HD and ES as compared to patients with ALL. Lymphopenia was most distinct in individuals with HD who had received radiation therapy. This appears obvious because in the vast majority of cases the radiation field comprised the mediastinum and thus the thymic region with direct influence on T lymphocyte regeneration. In patients with HD, these findings are in line with earlier investigations in adult cohorts17,23,24.

In addition to these entity, treatment, and modality specific differences in cellular reconstitution, we observed a clear age dependency with patients aged11years showing an earlier recovery of the total lymphocyte count than patients aged 1218years. An age dependency of the post-therapeutic immune reconstitution has been proposed in different contexts in some earlier studies9,25 whereas others did not report comparable differences12. Considering the lower median age of patients with ALL compared to patients with HD and ES, this finding could contribute to the differences in lymphocyte reconstitution described between the disease entities in this study.

Overall, our study underlines that immune reconstitution after chemotherapy for childhood cancer highly depends on the underlying disease entity, the therapeutic regimen, and treatment modality as well as patient age and differs significantly between ALL and solid tumors. These discrepancies might at least in part be a consequence of the less intensive maintenance therapy applied in ALL but not in HD or ES. However, at the same time, current recommendations for infection prophylaxis and revaccination in childhood cancer have been mainly derived from pediatric patients with ALL4,26,27,28, are still rather uniform, and do not consider potential differences for patients with solid tumors. In pediatric patients, who have been treated for childhood cancers without autologous or allogeneic HSCT, infection prophylaxis is generally withdrawn between 3- and 6months2,3, and inactivated vaccines are administered from 3months and live vaccines from 6months after cessation of conventional antineoplastic therapy4.

The results of our study could potentially contribute to discussions about adjusting the recommendations and establishing differentiated disease-, therapy- and modality-specific guidelines considering the differences in cellular reconstitution and in particular the clear and long-lasting effect of irradiation on lymphocyte total counts.

We are aware that our study bears some limitations. Above all, due to the retrospective design, we could not investigate any additional immunological parameters and therefore focused on absolute leukocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte blood counts as surrogate parameters of immunological recovery. Moreover, we could not draw any clinical correlations, especially between the evolution of cell counts and infectious complications. In addition, the recent implementation of the bispecific T cell engager blinatumomab in the treatment protocols might further influence and thus alter cellular reconstitution after therapy in patients with ALL.

As a consequence, future joint large studies are essential to cover these aspects in a disease- and treatment-specific manner. For a few treatment protocols, such investigations have already been initiated.

Continue reading here:
Temporal evolution and differential patterns of cellular reconstitution ... - Nature.com