Author Archives: admin


Dr. Dietrich on the Current Treatment Landscape of MCL – OncLive

Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, discusses the current treatment landscape of mantle cell lymphoma.

Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, physician, Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, assistant professor of internal medicine, University of Central Florida, discusses the current treatment landscape of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Treatment options have drastically evolved in recent years for MCL, which remains an aggressive and complex subtype of lymphoma, Dietrich says. Disease risk assessment and a patients performance status help inform the optimal first-line treatment, Dietrich adds. First-line treatment options include combination chemotherapy and rituximab (Rituxan) for in clinically fit and higher risk patients, and de-escalation chemotherapy strategies for patients with low-risk disease or a poor performance status, Dietrich explains.

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has carved out a role in the treatment of patients with high-risk disease. However, it is unclear how impactful ASCT will remain in the future with the emergence of better subsequent therapies, Dietrich continues. For now, ASCT is still recommended for many patients, along with maintenance rituximab for patients after initial induction chemotherapy, Dietrich concludes.

See the article here:
Dr. Dietrich on the Current Treatment Landscape of MCL - OncLive

Stem Cells Turn Into Bone When Sound Waves Are Near – TechTheLead

Share

Share

Share

Email

A breakthrough made by Australian researchers might change the way doctors treat a broken or missing bone. Turns out stem cells can turn into bone if certain conditions are met.

Normally, bone can be made only of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which are biologically found in the bone marrow.

Extracting them from there is a difficult and painful procedure while doing so at scale is beyond tricky.

But this could change any moment now after Australian researchers found that stem cells can be converted into bone when a certain type of sound waves are used.

Tests had previously shown that low frequency vibrations were great at inducing cell differentiation but the process took over a week and the results were mixed at best.

Nobody had bothered to look into high frequency sound waves until now. RMIT researchers took a microchip capable of dispersing sound waves in the Mhz range and turned it at MSCs in silicon oil on a culture plate.

The team noticed that after exposing the cells to 10MhZ signals for 10 minutes daily for five days, the markers indicating the bone conversion appeared.

We can use the sound waves to apply just the right amount of pressure in the right places to the stem cells, to trigger the change process, said Leslie Yeo, co-lead researcher on the study. Our device is cheap and simple to use, so could easily be upscaled for treating large numbers of cells simultaneously vital for effective tissue engineering.

This discovery, detailed in the journalSmall, eliminates the need of drugs to make stem cells behave this way. Moreover, the MSCs can be pulled from a variety of places, like fast tissue, not just bone marrow.

By injecting them into the body in case of an injury or disease, they can start working on a new bone faster and more efficient.

Watch These Goldfish Drive a Wheeled Platform!

Paralyzed Man Sends Tweet With Brain Chip In a Worlds First

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp

Subscribe to our website and stay in touch with the latest news in technology.

You will soon receive relevant content about the latest innovations in tech.

There was an error trying to subscribe to the newsletter. Please try again later.

See the rest here:
Stem Cells Turn Into Bone When Sound Waves Are Near - TechTheLead

Maryland Cancer Moonshot Initiative Promises $216 Million for Research and Treatment Conduit Street – Conduit Street

Maryland will be committing $216 million to expand and accelerate cancer detection, screening, prevention, treatment, and research through Governor Larry Hogans recently announced Maryland Cancer Moonshot Initiative.

Governor Larry Hogan explained the personal significance of the initiative in a press release:

The reality is that cancer is a disease that has touched nearly every one of us, through family or loved ones, saidGovernor Hogan. On the day I found out I was cancer-free, I pledged that as long as I am governor and long after, I will stand with all those who are fighting this terrible disease. That is why today, I am announcing the Maryland Cancer Moonshot, to dramatically accelerate all of our efforts to detect, prevent, treat, and find a cure for cancer, so that more lives can be saved. This is a watershed moment in the fight against cancer in our state and the region.

The substantial initial investment is a part of Governor Hogans fifth supplemental budget and will include funding for the following:

Greenebaum Cancer Center:$100 million for the expansion of the University of Maryland Medical Systems Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCCC) in downtown Baltimore to providestate-of-the-art inpatient and outpatient cancer services. UMGCCC, which is a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, treats approximately 3,000 new patients annually. This investment completes the states commitment to the project.

Prince Georges Comprehensive Cancer Center:$67 million to fully fund the construction of a new comprehensive cancer center on the campus of the newUniversity of Maryland Capitol Region Medical Centerin Largo. This best-in-class cancer will be a premiere clinical and research center to serve the residents of Prince Georges County and the region. The state funding includes a $27 million commitment by the governor, a $13.5 million commitment by the Maryland Senate and a $26.5 million commitment by the Maryland House of Delegates.

Cancer Research:$25 million for the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University to accelerate cancer research projects.

Pediatric Cancer Research:$1 million to support expanding pediatric cancer research at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Stem Cell Research Fund:$20.5 million for the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (MSCRF) to catalyze investment in regenerative medicine projects to develop novel cures and groundbreaking treatments for prevalent cancers.

Maryland Tech Council:$2.5 million for the BioHub Maryland Initiative to expand the states life sciences and biotechnology research workforce, with a focus on talent development, upskilling opportunities, and outreach to students in underserved communities. Maryland is proud to be home to one of thetop biotech clustersin the United States.

Read the full press release.

Like Loading...

Read the original here:
Maryland Cancer Moonshot Initiative Promises $216 Million for Research and Treatment Conduit Street - Conduit Street

Orchard Therapeutics Extends Runway into 2024, Focusing HSC Gene Therapy Platform Exclusively on Severe Neurometabolic Diseases and Research Platform…

Libmeldy European launch momentum building with multiple MLD patients treated and strong recognition of value proposition; U.S. BLA filing of OTL-200 on track for late 2022 / early 2023

Broad research platform presents opportunities for larger indications and partnerships; preclinical POC data in NOD2 Crohns disease expected by year end and IND filing planned in 2024

Plan to seek strategic alternatives for primary immunodeficiency programs, including OTL-103 in WAS

Refined portfolio and 30% proposed workforce reduction extend cash runway into 2024

BOSTON and LONDON, March 30, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Orchard Therapeutics (Nasdaq: ORTX), a global gene therapy leader, today announced its intention to focus its hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy platform exclusively on severe neurometabolic diseases and early research programs while also reporting its financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2021. These actions are intended to extend the companys cash runway into 2024 and focus operations on the highest value programs in its portfolio.

Moving forward, Orchard will continue its investment in Libmeldy (atidarsagene autotemcel) / OTL-200 for metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) to help sustain recent commercial momentum in Europe, as well as to support regulatory and future commercial activities for a potential U.S. approval and launch. The company also will continue to advance clinical development of OTL-203 for mucopolysaccharidosis type I Hurlers syndrome (MPS-IH) and OTL-201 for mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (MPS-IIIA). The focus on these neurometabolic programs is expected to allow Orchard to leverage the clinical validation of HSC gene therapy demonstrated with Libmeldy and capture significant commercial synergies, especially given the immense unmet needs in these diseases. Promising early-stage research programs that apply the HSC gene therapy approach in NOD2 Crohns disease, hereditary angioedema (HAE) and progranulin mutated frontotemporal dementia (GRN-FTD) also will remain an important part of the portfolio going forward given their promise in larger indications and as a possible source of future partnerships.

In light of our experiences and knowledge gained in this current and rapidly evolving market environment for gene therapy, our plan is to concentrate resources on programs that have the potential to make a remarkable difference to patients while also providing sustainable value to the business to enable the achievement our long-term vision, said Bobby Gaspar, M.D., Ph.D., chief executive officer. As launch momentum for Libmeldy continues to build in Europe and we prepare for a regulatory filing in the U.S., a focused strategy that utilizes a common infrastructure for future neurometabolic disease launches is critical to our success as a commercial gene therapy company.

Latest Key Milestones

To advance its portfolio of gene therapies for neurometabolic disorders and investigate future applications for the HSC approach, Orchard has provided an updated list of expected milestones:

Libmeldy Recent Highlights

Portfolio and Organizational Updates

To support the companys refined strategic focus and provide runway extension into 2024, Orchard intends to discontinue its investment in and seek alternatives for its programs in rare primary immune deficiencies. These include OTL-103 for the treatment of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), OTL-102 for X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (X-CGD) and Strimvelis, a gammaretroviral vector-based gene therapy approved in Europe for adenosine deaminase severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID).

Regarding the regulatory status of the OTL-103 program in the U.S., Orchard recently received written feedback from the FDA. The company believes the path to a potential BLA filing may require additional time and further investment.

Gaspar continued, We recognize the significant need that persists for many patients suffering from these rare diseases of the immune system, and we sympathize with the individuals, families and healthcare providers affected by these announcements, as well as our clinical partners and colleagues who worked so hard to advance these programs. These therapies have shown the potential for significant benefit for many patients treated in the clinical studies and we will continue to look for alternative ways to advance them, which could include commercial partnerships.

As a result of these updates, the company has proposed to reduce its current workforce by approximately 30%, which will result in a restructuring charge in 2022. Collectively, the actions announced today are expected to extend the companys existing cash runway into 2024.

Fourth Quarter 2021 Financial Results

Research and development expenses were $23.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $22.6 million in the same period in 2020. R&D expenses include the costs of clinical trials and preclinical work on the companys portfolio of investigational gene therapies, as well as costs related to regulatory, manufacturing, license fees and milestone payments under the companys agreements with third parties, and personnel costs to support these activities. The company expects R&D expenses to decline beginning in the second quarter of 2022 due to the portfolio updates and workforce reduction announced today as well as the completion of activities to support the OTL-200 BLA submission.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $13.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $16.2 million in the same period in 2020. The decline from 2020 resulted primarily from lower cash and share-based personnel costs to align with the current filing timelines and commercialization plans. In 2022, the company expects SG&A expenses to decline from 2021 due to the workforce reduction announced today, partially offset by increasing commercialization expenses to support Libmeldy, including preparations for a potential U.S. launch in 2023.

Net loss was $36.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $ 33.6 million in the same period in 2020. The company had approximately 125.7 million ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021.

Cash, cash equivalents and investments as of December 31, 2021, were approximately $220.1 million, with $33.0 million of debt outstanding, compared to $191.9 million and $25.0 million of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2020. Following the actions announced today, the company now expects that its existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will fund its anticipated operating and capital expenditure requirements into 2024.

Conference Call & Webcast Information

Orchard will host a conference call and live webcast with slides today at 8:00 a.m. ET to discuss the updates to its business strategy. The conference call will be broadcast live in listen-only mode under "News & Events" in the Investors & Media section of the company's website at http://www.orchard-tx.com, and a replay will be archived on the Orchard website following the presentation. To ask a question, please dial (866) 987-6504 (U.S. domestic) or +1 (602) 563-8620 (international) and refer to conference ID 9445456. Please dial in at least 15 minutes in advance to ensure a timely connection to the call.

About Libmeldy / OTL-200

Libmeldy (atidarsagene autotemcel), also known as OTL-200, has been approved by the European Commission for the treatment of MLD in eligible early-onset patients characterized by biallelic mutations in the ARSA gene leading to a reduction of the ARSA enzymatic activity in children with i) late infantile or early juvenile forms, without clinical manifestations of the disease, or ii) the early juvenile form, with early clinical manifestations of the disease, who still have the ability to walk independently and before the onset of cognitive decline. Libmeldy is the first therapy approved for eligible patients with early-onset MLD.

The most common adverse reaction attributed to treatment with Libmeldy was the occurrence of anti-ARSA antibodies. In addition to the risks associated with the gene therapy, treatment with Libmeldy is preceded by other medical interventions, namely bone marrow harvest or peripheral blood mobilization and apheresis, followed by myeloablative conditioning, which carry their own risks. During the clinical studies of Libmeldy, the safety profiles of these interventions were consistent with their known safety and tolerability.

For more information about Libmeldy, please see the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) available on the EMA website.

Libmeldy is approved in the European Union, UK, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. OTL-200 is an investigational therapy in the U.S.

Libmeldy was developed in partnership with the San Raffaele-Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget) in Milan, Italy.

About Orchards Investigational Primary Immune Deficiency Portfolio

Primary immune deficiencies (PIDs) are a group of rare, genetic disorders in which the immune system does not function properly, leading to frequent infections and other disease manifestations that can be life-threatening. Orchards PID portfolio includes HSC gene therapies in development for the treatment of Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (WAS), X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (X-CGD), and Adenosine deaminase severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID). More than 100 PID patients have received one of Orchards investigational gene therapy products, with 11 years follow-up in the earliest treated patients. The majority of patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes and there was no evidence of monoclonal expansion, leukoproliferative complications or emergence of replication competent lentivirus.

About Strimvelis

Strimvelis(autologous CD34+enriched cell fraction that contains CD34+cells transduced with retroviral vector that encodes for the human ADA cDNA sequence)is a gammaretroviral vector-based gene therapy approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016. It was the firstex vivoautologous gene therapy approved by the EMA. Strimvelishas not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Strimvelis is indicated for the treatment of patients with severe combined immunodeficiency due to adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA-SCID), for whom no suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- matched related stem cell donor is available. Strimvelis is intended solely for autologous use and must be given in a specialized hospital by a doctor who is experienced in treating patients with ADA-SCID and in using this type of medicine.

Serious adverse reactions include autoimmunity (e.g., autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune aplastic anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, autoimmune thrombocytopenia and Guillain-Barr syndrome). The most commonly reported adverse reaction was pyrexia.

For more information about Strimvelis, please see the EU Summary of Product Characteristics available on theEMA website.

About Orchard Therapeutics

At Orchard Therapeutics, our vision is to end the devastation caused by genetic and other severe diseases. We aim to do this by discovering, developing and commercializing new treatments that tap into the curative potential of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy. In this approach, a patients own blood stem cells are genetically modified outside of the body and then reinserted, with the goal of correcting the underlying cause of disease in a single treatment.

In 2018, the company acquired GSKs rare disease gene therapy portfolio, which originated from a pioneering collaboration between GSK and the San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy in Milan, Italy. Today, Orchard is advancing a pipeline spanning pre-clinical, clinical and commercial stage HSC gene therapies designed to address serious diseases where the burden is immense for patients, families and society and current treatment options are limited or do not exist.

Orchard has its global headquarters in London and U.S. headquarters in Boston. For more information, please visitwww.orchard-tx.com, and follow us onTwitterandLinkedIn.

Availability of Other Information About Orchard Therapeutics

Investors and others should note that Orchard communicates with its investors and the public using the company website (www.orchard-tx.com), the investor relations website (ir.orchard-tx.com), and on social media (twitter.com/orchard_tx and http://www.linkedin.com/company/orchard-therapeutics), including but not limited to investor presentations and investor fact sheets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. The information that Orchard posts on these channels and websites could be deemed to be material information. As a result, Orchard encourages investors, the media, and others interested in Orchard to review the information that is posted on these channels, including the investor relations website, on a regular basis. This list of channels may be updated from time to time on Orchards investor relations website and may include additional social media channels. The contents of Orchards website or these channels, or any other website that may be accessed from its website or these channels, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

Forward-looking Statements

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements about Orchards strategy, future plans and prospects, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as anticipates, believes, expects, plans, intends, projects, and future or similar expressions that are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include express or implied statements relating to, among other things, Orchards business strategy and goals, the therapeutic potential of Orchards products and product candidates, including the products and product candidates referred to in this release, Orchards expectations regarding the timing of regulatory submissions for approval of its product candidates, including the product candidates referred to in this release, the timing of interactions with regulators and regulatory submissions related to ongoing and new clinical trials for its product candidates, the timing of announcement of clinical data for its product candidates, the likelihood that such data will be positive and support further clinical development and regulatory approval of these product candidates, the likelihood of approval of such product candidates by the applicable regulatory authorities, the size of the potential markets for Libmeldy and Orchards other product candidates, the expected benefits to Orchards business as a result of the organizational updates referred to in this release, the adequacy of the companys manufacturing capacity and plans for future investment, and the companys financial condition and cash runway into 2024. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Orchards control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. In particular, these risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: that the cost of discontinuing or partnering programs may be higher than expected; the risk that Orchard will not realize the anticipated benefits of its new strategic plan or the expected cash savings; the risk that any one or more of Orchards product candidates, including the product candidates referred to in this release, will not be approved, successfully developed or commercialized; the risk of cessation or delay of any of Orchards ongoing or planned clinical trials; the risk that Orchard may not successfully recruit or enroll a sufficient number of patients for its clinical trials; the risk that prior results, such as signals of safety, activity or durability of effect, observed from preclinical studies or clinical trials will not be replicated or will not continue in ongoing or future studies or trials involving Orchards product candidates; the delay of any of Orchards regulatory submissions; the failure to obtain marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authorities for any of Orchards product candidates or the receipt of restricted marketing approvals; the risk of delays in Orchards ability to commercialize its product candidates, if approved; the risk that the ongoing and evolving COVID-19 pandemic could affect the company's business; and the risk that the market opportunity for Libmeldy and its other product candidates may be lower than estimated. Given these uncertainties, the reader is advised not to place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Other risks and uncertainties faced by Orchard include those identified under the heading "Risk Factors" in Orchards most recent annual or quarterly report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as subsequent filings and reports filed with the SEC. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release reflect Orchards views as of the date hereof, and Orchard does not assume and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Data (In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (in thousands) (Unaudited)

Contacts

Investors Renee Leck Director, Investor Relations +1 862-242-0764 Renee.Leck@orchard-tx.com

Media Benjamin Navon Director, Corporate Communications +1 857-248-9454 Benjamin.Navon@orchard-tx.com

Read the original post:
Orchard Therapeutics Extends Runway into 2024, Focusing HSC Gene Therapy Platform Exclusively on Severe Neurometabolic Diseases and Research Platform...

Stem Cell Assay Market Size In 2022 with Top Countries Data : What is the CAGR scope of the Stem Cell Assay market in the forthcoming period? | Latest…

Stem Cell Assay Market In 2022 (Growth Insights) : The high demand for Stem Cell Assay which is used in various applications such as Regenerative Medicine & Therapy Development, Drug Discovery and Development, Clinical Research and Others will drive the Stem Cell Assay market.

According to this latest study, In 2022 the growth of Stem Cell Assay Market will have significant change from previous year. Over the next five years the Stem Cell Assay Market will register a magnificent spike in CAGR in terms of revenue, In this study, 2021 has been considered as the base year and 2022 to 2026 as the forecast period to estimate the market size for Stem Cell Assay.

Global Stem Cell Assay Market 2022 Research Report provides key analysis on the market status of the Stem Cell Assay manufacturers with best facts and figures, meaning, definition, SWOT analysis, expert opinions and the latest developments across the globe. The Report also calculate the market size, Stem Cell Assay Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share, cost structure and growth rate. The report considers the revenue generated from the sales of This Report and technologies by various application segments and Browse Market data Tables and Figures spread through 110 Pages and in-depth TOC on Stem Cell Assay Market.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the global Stem Cell Assay market:

Sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic had led to the implementation of stringent lockdown regulations across several nations resulting in disruptions in import and export activities of Stem Cell Assay.

In COVID-19 outbreak, Chapter 2.2 of this report provides an analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the global economy and the Stem Cell Assay industry, Chapter 3.7 covers the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 from the perspective of the industry chain. In addition, chapters 7-11 consider the impact of COVID-19 on the regional economy.

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.

TO UNDERSTAND HOW COVID-19 IMPACT IS COVERED IN THIS REPORT REQUEST SAMPLE

Global Stem Cell Assay Market Development Strategy Pre and Post COVID-19, by Corporate Strategy Analysis, Landscape, Type, Application, and Leading 20 Countries covers and analyzes the potential of the global Stem Cell Assay industry, providing statistical information about market dynamics, growth factors, major challenges, PEST analysis and market entry strategy Analysis, opportunities and forecasts. The biggest highlight of the report is to provide companies in the industry with a strategic analysis of the impact of COVID-19. At the same time, this report analyzed the market of leading 20 countries and introduce the market potential of these countries.

Get a Sample PDF of report https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/18676462

Top Key Players Operative in Stem Cell Assay Market

Key Insights In Stem Cell Assay Market?

The Global Stem Cell Assay market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2021 and 2026. In 2021, the market is growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players; the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

Projected Market size & Growth rate (CAGR) of Stem Cell Assay market:

In 2020, the global Stem Cell Assay market size was USD million and it is expected to reach USD million by the end of 2026, with a magnificent compound annual growth rate between 2021 and 2026.

Analysis Of Stem Cell Assay Market In 2022:

The market in North America is expected to grow considerably during the forecast period. The high adoption of advanced technology and the presence of large players in this region are likely to create ample growth opportunities for the market. The market in North America is expected to hold the largest market share, whereas the APAC region is projected to provide significant opportunities in this market and is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period.

Despite the presence of intense competition, due to the global recovery trend is clear, investors are still optimistic about this area, and it will still be more new investments entering the field in the future.

Driving Factors for the growth of the Stem Cell Assay Market:

The Increasing use of Stem Cell Assay in Regenerative Medicine & Therapy Development, Drug Discovery and Development, Clinical Research is driving the growth of the Stem Cell Assay market across the globe.

Scope Of Stem Cell Assay Market:

Stem Cell Assay market is segmented by Type, and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global Stem Cell Assay market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by Type and by Application in terms of revenue and forecast for the period 2015-2026.

Get a Sample Copy of the Stem Cell Assay Market Report 2021

Report further studies the market development status and future Stem Cell Assay Market trend across the world. Also, it splits Stem Cell Assay market Segmentation by Type and by Applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.

Leading segment based on product type?

Applications of Stem Cell Assay Market?

Chapters 7-26 focus on the regional market. We have selected the most representative 20 countriesfrom197 countries in the world and conducted a detailed analysis and overview of the market development of these countries.

This Stem Cell Assay Market Research/Analysis Report Contains Answers to your following Questions

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/18676462

Major Points from Table of Contents

Global Stem Cell Assay Market Research Report 2021-2026, by Manufacturers, Regions, Types and Applications

1 Introduction 1.1 Objective of the Study 1.2 Definition of the Market 1.3 Market Scope 1.3.1 Market Segment by Type, Application and Marketing Channel 1.3.2 Major Regions Covered (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Mid East & Africa) 1.4 Years Considered for the Study (2015-2026) 1.5 Currency Considered (U.S. Dollar) 1.6 Stakeholders

2 Key Findings of the Study

3 Market Dynamics 3.1 Driving Factors for this Market 3.2 Factors Challenging the Market 3.3 Opportunities of the Global Stem Cell Assay Market (Regions, Growing/Emerging Downstream Market Analysis) 3.4 Technological and Market Developments in the Stem Cell Assay Market 3.5 Industry News by Region 3.6 Regulatory Scenario by Region/Country 3.7 Market Investment Scenario Strategic Recommendations Analysis

4 Value Chain of the Stem Cell Assay Market

4.1 Value Chain Status 4.2 Upstream Raw Material Analysis 4.3 Midstream Major Company Analysis (by Manufacturing Base, by Product Type) 4.4 Distributors/Traders 4.5 Downstream Major Customer Analysis (by Region)

Get a Sample Copy of the Stem Cell Assay Market Report 2021

5 Global Stem Cell Assay Market-Segmentation by Type 6 Global Stem Cell Assay Market-Segmentation by Application

7 Global Stem Cell Assay Market-Segmentation by Marketing Channel 7.1 Traditional Marketing Channel (Offline) 7.2 Online Channel

8 Competitive Intelligence Company Profiles

9 Global Stem Cell Assay Market-Segmentation by Geography

9.1 North America 9.2 Europe 9.3 Asia-Pacific 9.4 Latin America

9.5 Middle East & Africa

10 Future Forecast of the Global Stem Cell Assay Market from 2021-2026

10.1 Future Forecast of the Global Stem Cell Assay Market from 2021-2026 Segment by Region 10.2 Global Stem Cell Assay Production and Growth Rate Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 10.3 Global Stem Cell Assay Consumption and Growth Rate Forecast by Application (2021-2026)

11 Appendix 11.1 Methodology 12.2 Research Data Source

Continued.

Purchase this report (Price 4000 USD for a single-user license) https://www.360researchreports.com/purchase/18676462

About Us:

360 Research Reports is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At 360 Research Reports, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact Us: Web : https://360researchreports.com Email: [emailprotected] Organization: 360 Research Reports Phone: +44 20 3239 8187/ +14242530807

For More Related Reports Click Here :

Anticancer Drugs Market Size In 2022 : 3.7% CAGR with Top Countries Data, Which product segment is expected to garner highest traction within the Anticancer Drugs Industry? | In-depth 95 Pages Report

Medical Batteries Market Size In 2022 : 2.6% CAGR with Top Countries Data, What is estimated to be the valuation of the global Medical Batteries Industry by 2026? | In-depth 99 Pages Report

Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm Market Size In 2022 : 6.8% CAGR with Top Countries Data, What is estimated to be the valuation of the global Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm Industry by 2026? | In-depth 119 Pages Report

Read the original here:
Stem Cell Assay Market Size In 2022 with Top Countries Data : What is the CAGR scope of the Stem Cell Assay market in the forthcoming period? | Latest...

Technologies and tools to decipher cell surface glycans as onco-developmental and stem cell markers of man and mouse – Imperial College London

Joint Oncology/IRDB Imperial Seminar Series, Thursday 24.03.22 @ 13.30, hosted by Dr David MacIntyre.

We are delighted to have Professor Ten Feizi, Director of The Glycosciences Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction at Imperial College.

Professor Feizi gained her MB BS in 1961 and MD in 1969 at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School. Thereafter, she held fellowships from MRC and US Arthritis Foundation as guest investigator in the laboratories of Richard Krause and Henry Kunkel at Rockefeller University, and Elvin A Kabat at Columbia Medical Center in New York.

In 1985, Ten Feizi and colleagues introduced the innovative neoglycolipid (NGL) technology for linking a glycan sequence to a lipid molecule as a means of immobilization on matrices and probing for binding by diverse glycan recognition systems. In 2002, this became the basis of the first glycoarray system designed to encompass entire glycomes. This is currently still the most diverse glycoarray system in the world, revolutionizing the molecular dissection of glycan-recognition systems in health, in infectious and inflammatory disorders and cancer. Notable among the assignments are the host cell attachment sites for simian virus 40 (SV40),Toxoplasma gondiiand the pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 influenza virus; elucidation of the structures of F77, the elusive prostate cancer antigen; and R10G a marker of induced human pluripotent stem cells.

More here:
Technologies and tools to decipher cell surface glycans as onco-developmental and stem cell markers of man and mouse - Imperial College London

Visionary Progress | The UCSB Current – The UCSB Current

A retinal stem cell patch developed through a collaboration of researchers at UC Santa Barbara, University of Southern California and California Institute of Technology continues to make progress in its bid to secure approval from the Food and Drug Administration. The latest milestone? Results finding that after two years, not only can the implant survive, but also it does not elicit clinically detectable inflammation or signs of immune rejection, even without long-term immunosuppression.

What really makes us excited is that there is some strong evidence to show that the cells are still there two years after implantation and theyre still functional, said Mohamed Faynus, a graduate student researcher in the lab of stem cell biologist Dennis O. Clegg, and a co-author on a paper published in the journal Stem Cell Reports. This is pretty important, because if the goal is to treat blindness, we want to make sure that the retinal pigment epithelium cells that we put in there are still doing the job theyre supposed to.

A treatment in development since 2013, the California Project to Cure Blindness Retinal Pigment Epithelium 1 (CPCB-RPE1) patch consists of a monolayer of human stem cell-derived RPE cells cultured on an ultrathin membrane of biologically inert parylene. The goal for this patch is to replace deteriorating cells in the retinas of those who have age-related macular degeneration, one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide for people over 50. The condition affects the macula the part of the retina responsible for central vision. People with AMD experience distortions and loss of vision when looking straight ahead.

The researchers have made strides with the patch since its inception, guiding it through clinical trials for use with the dry form of AMD. If the implant works, the new cells should take up the functions of the old ones, and slow down or prevent further deterioration. In the best-case scenario, they could restore some lost vision.

The first sets of trials concentrated on establishing the safety of the patch and collecting any data on its effectiveness. The group, in a one-year follow-up published last year in the journal Translational Vision Science & Technology, concluded the outpatient procedure they were developing to implant the patch could be performed routinely and that the patch was well-tolerated in individuals with advanced dry AMD. Early results were promising: Of the 15 patients in the initial cohort, four demonstrated improved vision in the treated eye, while five experienced a stabilization of their vision. Visual acuity continued to decline in the remaining six, and the researchers are working to understand why.

Having implanted the patches in live volunteers, however, the researchers no longer had a direct means for assessing the patches function and any changes in the longer term.

Its a lot more difficult and complicated to do that a clinical trial setting, Faynus said. But we can figure things out by proxy if something is working. So for example, if a patients vision was getting worse and is now getting better, thats worth noting.

But the team had other questions that couldnt necessarily be answered by proxy. Had the cells maintained their identity and thus, their function? Was the patch still in place and were the donor cells surviving? Were there any signs of immune rejection, a common and serious concern for any patient receiving an implant? If they could answer these questions, they would not only be able to take next steps with the patch, they would gain significant knowledge in general for the field of regenerative medicine.

Thanks to the generosity of one patient in the trials, the group would get their chance to find out. Named Subject 125, she passed away at the age of 84 from pneumonia two years after receiving the implant, leaving her eyes and a rare opportunity for the team to check the progress of their patch.

We are very grateful to the brave patients who volunteered in our clinical trial, said Clegg, who holds the Wilcox Family Chair in Biomedicine. Without them, we could not advance the science into what could be an effective therapy for millions of people.

A Key Test To address their questions, the team had to first identify the cells in the general area of the patch.

Now that we had these sections of tissue, how do we demonstrate that the cells on the membrane were RPE cells? Faynus said. That was one of our key questions. Beyond that, they had to identify whether the cells were from the donor or the recipient, and whether they were functional.

Through a careful process of staining and immunoreactivity testing, the team determined that the cells were in fact RPE donor cells, confirming that the cells on the patch hadnt migrated and that the cells were oriented in the optimal, polarized position a sign that they had maintained a healthy, functional form, according to Faynus.

The whole point of us implanting the cells was for them to perform the many functions that RPE cells do, Faynus said. One of those functions in particular is the breakdown of debris and the recycling of vital cellular material.

Every day you open your eyes, and light gets inside the eye, which triggers a whole cascade of events, Faynus explained. One of these being the shedding of photoreceptor outer segments. Without the constant recycling of this material conducted by the RPE cells, he continued, it is thought that proteins and lipids accumulate, forming deposits called drusen, a hallmark of AMD.

In addition, the team found that after two years, the presence of the patch hadnt triggered other conditions associated with implantation, such as the aggressive formation of new blood vessels or scar tissue that could cause a detachment of the retina. Importantly, they also found no clinical sign of the inflammation that can indicate an immune response to the foreign cells even after the patient was taken off immunosuppressants two months post-implantation.

This is the first study of its kind and it indicates that the implanted RPE cells can survive and function, even in what could be a toxic environment of a diseased eye, Clegg said.

Having passed the initial phase of trials, the team is now gearing up to begin Phase 2, which more specifically assesses the effectiveness of the patch. They have also made improvements to the shelf life of the patch, a technological advance they document in the journal Nature. In it, they describe a cryopreservation process that simplifies storage and transport of the cultured cells.

Cryopreservation of the therapy significantly extends the products shelf-life and allows us to ship the implant on demand all over the world, thus making it more accessible to patients across the globe, said Britney Pennington, a research scientist in the Clegg Lab, and lead author of the Nature paper.

Looking to the future, the Clegg Lab and colleagues are exploring combining multiple cell types on the patch.

AMD progresses through several stages, Faynus explained. When the RPE cells degenerate, he continued, the photoreceptors and varying other retinal cells that are supported by the RPE quickly follow suit. To treat patients at varying stages of the disease, we need to consider the remaining cell types. If we can create composite implants that support many of the impacted cells, we can hopefully rescue a patients vision despite the severity of the disease.

View post:
Visionary Progress | The UCSB Current - The UCSB Current

The Top Colleges To Study Medicine In India – CEOWORLD magazine

The concept of Medicine has been in India for a long time. Born in Varanasi in 1200, Sushruta is considered the Father of Surgery. His treatise, the Sushruta Samhita, is said to be the foundational text of Ayurveda. Fast forward a few centuries, India has made enough progress to keep up with the times. Youll find some of the worlds best medical colleges in India. Medical colleges in India are famed for the quality of their faculty, facilities, and research infrastructure.

The top colleges to study Medicine in India are:

the worlds first reconstructive surgery for leprosy (1948) the first successful open-heart surgery in India (1961) the first kidney transplant in India (1971) the first bone marrow transplantation in India (1986) and the first successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplant in India (2009)

Notable alumni: Ajit Varki co-director of the Glycobiology Research and Training Center at the University of California Mahendra Bhandari Padma Shri awardee who made substantial contributions to urology, robotic surgery, and medical ethics

Notable alumni: Brian J.G. Pereira CEO of Visterra, Inc. Bhupathiraju Somaraju Cardiologist and Padma Shri awardee

Notable alumni: Maharaj Kishan Bhan Pediatrician and Padma Bhushan recipient Soumya Swaminathan Chief Scientist at the WHO

Read the original post:
The Top Colleges To Study Medicine In India - CEOWORLD magazine

Role of Stem-Cell Transplantation in Leukemia Treatment

Stem Cells Cloning. 2020; 13: 6777.

1Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

1Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

1Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

2Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

1Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

2Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Gashaw Dessie Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia, Phone: Tel +251-97-515-2796, Email dessiegashaw@yahoo.com

Received 2020 May 15; Accepted 2020 Jul 25.

Stem cells (SCs) play a major role in advanced fields of regenerative medicine and other research areas. They are involved in the regeneration of damaged tissue or cells, due to their self-renewal characteristics. Tissue or cells can be damaged through a variety of diseases, including hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies. In regard to this, stem-cell transplantation is a cellular therapeutic approach to restore those impaired cells, tissue, or organs. SCs have a therapeutic potential in the application of stem-cell transplantation. Research has been focused mainly on the application of hematopoietic SCs for transplantation. Cord blood cells and human leukocyte antigenhaploidentical donors are considered optional sources of hematopoietic stemcell transplantation. On the other hand, pluripotent embryonic SCs and induced pluripotent SCs hold promise for advancement of stem-cell transplantation. In addition, nonhematopoietic mesenchymal SCs play their own significant role as a functional bone-marrow niche and in the management of graft-vs-host disease effects during the posttransplantation process. In this review, the role of different types of SCs is presented with regard to their application in SC transplantation. In addition to this, the therapeutic value of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell transplantation is assessed with respect to different types of leukemia. Highly advanced and progressive scientific research has focused on the application of stem-cell transplantation on specific leukemia types. We evaluated and compared the therapeutic potential of SC transplantation with various forms of leukemia. This review aimed to focus on the application of SCs in the treatment of leukemia.

Keywords: stem cell, leukemia, transplantation

Stem cells (SCs) are undifferentiated cells that can be differentiated into other types of cell andalso have the potential to proliferate and self-renew to producenew SCs. In mammals, there are two broad type of SC. Embryonic SCs (ESCs) are present in the early life of the embryo and isolated from the inner cell massor morula of the blastocyst (future germ layer, such as endoderm, ectoderm, or mesoderm of the embryo).14 The surrounding section of the morula is known as the trophoblast, which can develop to the future placenta. Adult SCs (ASCs) are found in various tissue types of developed mammals.5 ASCs are useful for tissue regeneration and repair after severe injuries.1,6

SC populations may behave abnormally or be altered by genetic or environmental factor, resulting in the development of cancer. Leukemia comprises a group of hematologic disorders that usually begin in the bone marrow and resultin a high number of abnormal blood cells. It is the result of deregulation of normal hematopoietic SC (HSC) development by genetic mutation that produces a cell population known as leukemic SCs (LSCs). The generation of blood cells depends on the regulation of differentiation and proliferation characteristics of HSCs.7 Deregulated differentiation and proliferation activity of HSCs, including chromosomal translocation and somatic mutation, leads to different hematologic disorders. There are four major abnormalities identified under LSCs: such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL),8 chronic LL (CLL) and chronic ML (CML).4 Leukemia and lymphoma (Hodgkins lymphoma [HL] and non-HL [NHL]) are the two major types of blood cancers that result from uncontrolled proliferation of white blood cells, and were the first to be treated clinically using HSC transplantation (HSCT).1,9-11 In addition, HSCT is used as a therapeutic option for many nonhematopoietic malignancies, aplastic anemia, and certain inherited disorders like severe thalassemia, sickle-cell disease, and other inherited metabolic disorders. Historically, HSCs were obtained only from bone marrow, but are now mostly harvested from peripheral blood after mobilization through administration of hemaTtopoietic growth factor and from the umbilical cord blood (UCB) of newborns.4,9

SC-based therapies become the major concern of researchers after the first effective bone-marrow transplant in 1968.12 Globally, food and drug administrations design regulations on the application of SC therapies. An increase in scientific knowledge of cell-differentiation pathways has promoted the application of SC therapy.12 Since the application of SC therapy emerged as a new insight into cellular therapeutic potential, food and drug administrations have continuously driven awareness and designed regulation with regard to SC therapies. SCs serve as a novel cellular therapeutic approach in the field of regenerative medicine to treat various disorders.13 In addition to renewing and proliferating themselves, they are capable of differentiation to specialized functional cells.14 This enables them to substitute various injured cells, such as cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells.15 In addition, regenerative medicine has significant therapeutic potential through the application of SCT to restore impaired blood cells.16

HSCT has broad application in treating different malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Researchers have noted that >40,000 HSCTs are performed every year to treat these disorders.17 In this context, autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) are the best known and most applicable.18 There are SC types that have the capability of being the source for SCTs. Bone-marrow SCs are the major sources for treating hematologic and nonhematologic disorders.19 Similarly, peripheral blood CD34+ cell have hematopoiesis potential for HSCT.20 With respect to recent scientific advancement,HSCs are generated from pluripotent ESCs that require the transition state from endothelial to hematopoietic progenitor cells to resolve HLA-mismatched problem.21 The recent investigation done by Serap et al (2019) and his colleagues hypothesized that achievement of effective HSCT may also associate with non-hematopoietic progenitor cells, very small embryonic-like SCs (VSELSCs).22 They differentiate into HSCs in vitro.23 With specific forward reprogramming protocols, induced pluripotent SCs (iPSCs) have therapeutic potential to generate hemato-endothelial progenitor (HEP) cells.

Co-administration of chemotherapy along with auto-SCT leads to a decrease in the level of regulatory T-cells. In response to the dysregulated immune system, biological characteristics of mesenchymal SCs (MSCs) contribute to hematopoietic reconstitution and an efficient HSC engraftment.24,25 On the other hand, bone marrow derived MSCs are other components of hematopoietic niche.26 Therefore, this review assessed different types of SCs that are utilized as the source and as support of SC transplantation. In addition, we also summarized the role of allogeneic and auto-SCT in the treatment of various types of leukemia.

The involvement of ESCs is the new therapeutic insights having a regenerative potential to restore impaired tissue or cells.27 ESCs are the source of SCs for cellular transplantation therapies; however, they may also lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation which also results in the development of cancers.28 The challenges of using these cells are their characteristic features of chromosomal abnormality and mutation during in vitro.29 Regard to this, c-MYC oncogene may be expressed that results in cancer cells than their cellular therapeutic significant.29 They require a safety concern due to their teratoma formation.30 Although they have teratoma effect, ESCs have a significant role in the transplantation process.28 Human ESCs (hESCs) serve as the source of development of cellular lineages through signaling pathways.13 Recently, protocols have been on the way to be designed to generate HSCs from pluripotent ESCs in vitro. The generation of HSCs from those pluripotent ESCs requires a transition from endothelial to hematopoietic progenitor cells to resolve HLAmismatching.21 The hematopoietic transcription factor Runx1 promotes the commitment of hematopoietic cellular lineages by activating the expression of Runx1a. NOTCH signaling enhances the transition state, while the TGF-signaling pathway inhibit it.31 Recently, generation of HSCs was achieved by Wang et al from hESCs andhumaniPSCs (). The commitment stages that had been examined by those scientists confirmed the synthesis of hematopoietic cells from hESCs.32 In support of this, recently the ESC gene SLL4was identified and used as a therapeutic target for leukemia. Because of its importance in the ESC fate, SALL4 expression need to be reactivated during the reprogramming process of mouse embryonic fibroblasts to be converted into iPSCs. Under normal condition, SALL4 is expressed highly in CD34+CD38 HSCs and llittle in CD34+CD38 + hematopoietic progenitor cells. Therefore, the main application behind this ESC gene product is as key player in hematopoietic differentiation. Consequently, downregulation of this gene could be considered a therapeutic option for leukemia.33

Role of different types of SCs in SC transplantation. MSCs were the nonhematopoietic source utilized to reduce GVHD (reduce risk of graft failure by secreting soluble factors with anti-inflammatory properties), efficient HSCs support to engraftment of transplant, hematologic reconstitution, and to improve the HSCT outcome. HSCs can be generated from the hematoendothelial transition process from HESCs to HiPSCs, and commonly from bone-marrow SCs, PBSCs, and umbilical cord blood. The pluripotent potential of VSELSCs also enables to generate HSCs.

Abbreviations: GVHD, graft-vs-host disease; HESCs, human embryonic SCs; HSCs, hematopoietic SCs; HSCT, hematopoietic SC transplantation; HiPSCs, human induced pluripotent SCs; MSCs, mesenchymal SCs; PBSC, peripheral blood SC; VSELSCs, very small embryonic-like SCs.

iPSCs were introduced as an alternative SC-based therapy method in 2006, by Takahashi and Yamanaka.34 Reprogramming of SCs through the integration of viruses with these cells induces differentiation capability in various tissue types.35 These are pSCs, which are generated from adult somatic cells through in vitro experimental investigation.36 They are synthesized in vitro by reprogramming mature mouse fibroblast cells through epigenetic modification.34 In human beings, production of iPSCs was started through the introduction of four genes SOX2, MYC, OCT4, and KLF4 into matured somatic fibroblasts37 and other human somatic cells.38 The genes are induced in these cells through the encoded retrovirus.39 The ability of iPSCs to expand into multicellular lineages enables them to be a potential SC-therapy method. Various types of patient-specific SCs have been synthesized from their expansion process in vitro.40 Research has revealed their cellular therapeutic significance in various hematologic malignancies, such as CML, MDS, AML,22 and BCR-ABLmyeloproliferative neoplasms.41 Donor blood cells are reprogrammed to iPSCs to generate patient-specific SCs.40 With specific forward-reprogramming protocols, iPSCs have the therapeutic potential to generate hematoendothelial progenitor cells. Lange et al demonstrate the possible generation of hematopoietic progenitor cells by combinatorial expression of transcription factors SCL, LMO2, GATA2, and ETV242 (). Moreover, researchers have been trying to generate hematopoietic progenitor cells from PSCs. Shan et al described possible strategies for generation of HSCs from human mesenchymal cells with hematopoietic potential (). They revealed the derivation or generation of hematopoietic progenitor cells from mouse PSCs using in vitro induction methods. Therefore, iPSCs can be have possible therapeutic potential in SCT; however, they present safety concerns, due to their teratoma formation.30 Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow or umbilical cord reveals rejection, due to the effect of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and disease relapse, which restricts its applicability. In cases of auto-HSCT, there is no risk of rejection, but there remain leukemic cells that induce disease relapse. Collectively, these disadvantages of bone-marrow HSCT mandate alternative sources of HSCs aiming to reduce GVHD, disease relapse, and bone marrowfailure syndrome. Considering this, iPSCs represent a suitable source to generate HSCs in vitro with limited immunogenicity.43 These have a major advantage over bone-marrow and cord types, since their autologous transplantation from iPSCs does not induce GVHD.44

Bhartiya et al characterized VSELSCs as the true SCs and the subset of different SC population, such as HSCs, ovarian SCs and MSCs. They express the OCT4A antigenic marker in their nucleus.30 The pluripotency features of VSELSCs enhance their expansion in vitro using the pyrimidoindole-derivative molecule UM171,45 and in turn are utilized for expansion of CD34+ HSCs.46 VSELSCs are involved in homeostatic processes, because they are found in quiescent stage, and later they differentiate into ASCs. They differentiate into HSCs in vitro.23 VSELSCs can be generated from primordial germ cells and undergo further differentiation into HSCs47 (). Bone marrowderived VSELSCs may not have features characteristic of hematopoietic progenitor SCs, but they can retain hematopoietic features through external-stress growth factors.48 The transcriptional factors Oct4A), Nanog, and Rex1 are found in VSELSCs, but they are not expressed in HSCs.22 Treatment of immunocompromised ALL8 patients with granulocyte colonystimulating factorincreases mobilization of VSELSCs to the peripheral circulation.49 Dissemination of VSELSCs to the circulation promotes the regeneration of tissue.49 A recent investigation done by Serap et al hypothesized that achievement of effectiveHSCT may be associated with nonhematopoietic progenitor cells VSELSCs.22 The expression of transcription factors and pluripotent markers may contribute to their therapeutic potential in SC transplantation. Demonstrations on immunocompromised mice have shown that VSELSCs have a lower teratoma effect.47 Similarly, an investigation done on animal models showed that they have the capability to differentiate into HSCs.46

Bone marrowderived MSCs are important to regenerate injured tissue.50 Recently, MSCs have served as a new cellular therapy method in the field of regenerative medicine.13 They inhibit cancer-cell proliferation through secretion and inhibition of Dkk1- and Wnt-signaling pathways, respectively.51 Besides this, MSCs alter the immune system to regenerate damaged tissue and decrease inflammation.52 GVHD is one of the complications of both auto-SCT and allo-SCT during treatment.53 This posttransplantation complication is associated with immunologic intolerance.53 Indeed, MSCs have been shown to support the engraftment of autologously or allogeneically transplanted HSCs by secreting soluble factors or immunomodulators, such as TGF1 and HGF which inhibit the proliferation of CD4+ TH1, TH17, CD8+ T, and natural-killer cells, leading to prevention of GVHD.6,24,26 Therefore, GVHD that occurs after HSCT can be treated by coinfusion with MSCs.54 Bone marrowderived MSCs are components of the hematopoietic niche. Additionally, they have the capability to regulate the hematopoiesis process through interactionand communicating with HSCs and progenitor cells55 ().

Donor availability is a very important issue, particularly in patients from ethnic minorities. A haploidentical donor and CB allow allo-HSCT in the majority of transplant-eligible patients.UCB is a well-established cellular product source for hematopoietic reconstitution and transplantation.37 It is derived from fetal tissue and acts as a potential source of progenitor SCs to synthesize matured HSCs16 (). The lower complication rate of GVHD and less stringent HLA-matching requirements make it a valuable source of HSCs.56 It is more highly enriched with HSCs/progenitor cells than peripheral blood with regard to colony-forming unitgranulocyte/macrophage progenitors and CD34+-cell content.57

The effect of HLA mismatching is less severe in mismatched UCB transplantation than unrelated peripheral and bone marrowblood transplantation;58 therefore, higher numbers of mismatched donors may donate to save lives. Compatibility at the DRB1-allele and HLA-A and -B antigen level is better for UCB transplantation to be selected traditionally without consideration of HLA-C.59 UCB has significance for allo-HSCT transplantation, because it requires lower HLA matching than for unrelated donors.59 In AML, unrelated CB transplantation has failed, due to nonrelapse mortality.60 However, the cost of CB delaying engraftment and risk of infection are still challenges in its application for hematologic diseases, including leukemia.61,62

In cases of rapid requirement of allograft and absence of an HLA-matched donor, HLA-haploidentical SC transplantation is considered a therapeutic option.63 Peripheral and bone-marrow SCs can be donated from these family members if they have one common haplotype.64 HLA-haploidentical cells are considered an optional source for HSCT.65 In haploidentical transplantation, the graft contains lower of T-cell content to diminish GVHD.66 Outcomes of haploidentical HSCT may be affected by innate immune cells like T cells and natural-killer cells.67 In high-risk acute leukemia, the applicabilion of HLA-haploidentical HSCT is elevated.65 However, outcomes of nonrelapse mortality and GVHD may be increased from haploidentical HSCT with higher HLA mismatching including from partially related donors, as the content of T-cell is replete.68

A soft, gelatinous tissue, bone marrow is used as the source of peripheral HSCs.69 Researchers have argued that both bone marrow and peripheral blood are major sources of SCs. SCASCs generated from bone marrow are known as bone-marrow SCs,37 having clinical significance in restoring damaged cardiac tissue through gene therapy.70 Also, they can be a potential source for auto-HSCT..37 There is an improvement in GVHD in patients with bone-marrow SC transplantation compared to peripheral blood SCs (PBSCs).19 Bone marrowSC transplantation is utilized in various hematologic malignancies, such as AML, ALL, and CML. The use of bone-marrow transplantation from compatible donors is the most effective treatment for CML.71 Allogenic bone-marrow transplantation is an effective alternative treatment option for patients who are resistant to chemoradiation therapy and have a higher probability of relapse.72 The physician removes marrow from the donors hip bone using surgical procedures, including anesthesia, sterile needles, and syringes, and replaces the donated bone marrow within 46 weeks. As the level of T cell compare in both bone-marrow transplantation and PBSCs, the concentration of T cells is reduced in bone-marrow transplantation.19

Recent SC-transplantation protocols state that mobilization of HSCs from bone marrow to peripheral blood is an effective treatment method in the majority of transplanted patients.73 Although bone marrow is major source of SCs, a hematopoietic growth factor found in PBSCs showed that these are also another possible source of SCs.74 PBSCs from bone marrow are a valuable source in restoring hematologic disorders.69 The potential effect of PBSCs depends on hematopoietic development and enhancement of immunologic profiles, and hence they are a valuable source of HSCs to treat hematologic disorders. Peripheral blood CD34+ cells have hematopoietic potential for SCT.20 Javarappa et alpurified hematopoietic progenitor cells from CD4+ peripheral blood cellsafter which the cells differentiated into megakaryocytes and myeloid-lineage cells75 (). PBSCs serve as a valuable SC source if mobilization is supported by granulocyte colonystimulating factor.19 They are applicable in autolo-SCT in the treatment of multiple myeloma.76 The utilization of peripheral SCs as a source of SCs may induce the occurrence of GVHD.77 Even if they have such effects, the immune system has been enhanced, due to elevation of T-cell secretion. On the contrary, the elevation of T cells may also cause GVHD development;19 however, PBSC collection in children may expose them to metabolic complications, including hypocalcemia and hypoglycemia.78

The tight control in proliferation and differentiation of HSCs has significant value for the synthesis of blood cells.7 Multipotent HSCs are responsible for cell division and proliferation.79 Somatic mutation of T cells during DNA methylation and posttransplantation alteration are risk factors for ALL.8,80 CML is a hematologic disorder induced by reverse chromosomal translocation on t(9;22)(q34;q11)81 and BCRABL oncogene effects on proliferative myelogenous cells.82 Mutated gene BCRABL, has a tyrosine-kinase effect and induces the release of highly proliferative myelogenous cells from bone marrow.81 The MYC gene is another oncogene that induces gene expression and has a proliferative effect on hematopoietic progenitor cells.83 In addition to this gene, BCL2 is another mutated gene that inhibits programmed cell death. As such, cancerous cells proceed with their continued proliferation and leukemic cells are released from the tissue where they were generated.84 Hitzler et al reported that a mutation of the GATA1 gene in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia affects hematopoietic transcriptional factor. On the other hand, chromosomal translocation of t(7;11)(p15;p15) HSCs lead to the integration of genes, including HOXA9 and NUP98, which also leads to distortion in the transcriptional process of hematopoietic precursor cells.85 Aberration of the transcriptional process in these cells induces abnormal cell proliferation, which may lead to AML.85 Overproliferation of lymphoblasts within bone marrow can also result in the pathogenesis of ALL.8,49

Emphasis on the eradication of hematologic malignancies has shifted from cytotoxic chemotherapy to donors immune cells.86 HSCT is utilized by 20,000 people in the US every year.87 It is applicable in treating patients with rare diseases, such as AML,22 ALL,8 CML, Burkitts lymphoma, HL, and NHL,11 and other hematologic malignancies.88 Although it serves as an alternative treatment method, HSCT still has a relapse risk among 40%80% of recipients.89 Both auto-HSCT and allo-HSCTare the main alternative cellular therapeutic methods to treat leukemia. Auto-HSCT is the appropriate and applicable therapeutic option for multiple myeloma1,18 and HL.11 Charles et al explained that auto-HSCT was more frequently utilized by European and North American countries than allo-HSCT to treat myeloma. A lower mortality rate for myeloma is seen with auto-HSCT. Auto-HSCT is an established treatment approach if myeloma is at an acute stage, but for older patients it requires extra improvement.90 The occurrence of GVHD among myeloma patients who undergo allo-HSCT is 50% compared to 5%20% of occurrence of auto-SCTpatients91 (). As such, fewer GVHD effects have been seen in auto-SCT n treating multiple myeloma and HL.11 Furthermore, in HIV-related lymphoma, auto-HSCT is considered an applicable therapeutic option in both relapsed HL1 and relapsed NHL patients.18,92

Comparison of allogeneic and autologous stem-cell transplantation with hematologic disorders. Autologous stem-cell transplantation has been utilized as a treatment protocol to treat MM and HL, due to its initial response, low relapse sensitivity, and positive positron-emission tomography (+PET). Patients at higher risk or progress of AML are treated with allo-HSCT. Chronic phase 1 (CP1), TKI intolerance, and blast crisis enables allo-HSCT to be a standard treatment option for the treatment of CML. Allo-HSCT is also a treatment option for NHL patients presenting with complete remission 1 and 2 (CR1 and CR2) indications and also relapse after auto-HSCT. Although they have graft-vs-leukemic toxic effects, they are a significant alternative cell-based therapy to treat hematologic malignancies.

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukaemia; HL, Hodgkins lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma; NHL, non-HL.

On the other hand, allo-HSCT is a curative treatment approach for severe AML93 It has been confirmed that hematologic toxicity is lower in these recipient patients. Allo-HSCT has also been used as a treatment option for acute lymphoid leukemia and multiple myeloma.1,23,94 Though alternative treatments remain undefined, it is a valuable treatment tool for hematologic malignancies. Reduced-intensity conditioning after allo-HSCT has been seen in Spain.95 The toxic effect of allo-HSCT is associated with graft-vs-leukemia reactions. Chronic myelogenous leukemia patients show lower relapse rate than other allogeneically transplanted leukemia patients.96 The therapeutic landscape of CML has shifted dramatically with developments tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the BCRABL1 hybrid oncoprotein and block the constitutive activity of tyrosine kinase. The course of CML is typically triphasic, with an early indolent chronic phase (CP), followed by an accelerated phase and a blast (crisis phase (BP).97,98 For selection of appropriate TKIs, of CML patients should be tested for BCRABL1 kinasedomain mutation (mutation profile), disease phase, and patient comorbidities. For example, if the patient has such mutations as Y253H, E255K/V, or F359C, physicians recommend dasatinib or bosutinib as TKI. On the other hand, if patients are in an advanced disease phase (BP) or CML-CP (with T315I mutation), third-generation ponatinib is preferred over imatinib.99103 However, allo-HSCT remains a therapeutic option for patients in CML-CP whose CML has progressed after at least two TKIs and after trialing ponatinib therapy (for T315I mutation) to reduce the CML burden, and for the effectiveness of the transplantation.99,100,102 An improvement in immunologic tolerance and lowered GVHD effect mean allo-HSCT is the only curative treatment option for CML-BP104 (). Similarly to CML, highly complicated and severe AML is effectively treated with allo-HSCT.22 Complications of AML may lead to higher mortality and morbidity rates, which may be due to chronic GVHD among patients >50 years old.105 Pediatric ALL patients presenting with indications of higher relapse risk are treated (10% of treatment) with allo-HSCT.106

ALL patients who develop high relapse risk are indications for treatment with allo-HSCT.107 Allo-HSCT is a standard treatment method for ALL patients who are at higher risk.108 The use of allo-HSCT has lower toxicity in young patients.86 Allo-HSCT has lower relapse risk than auto-HSCT in multiple myeloma.18 Graft-vs-tumor reactions in hematologic malignancies depend on the donors T cells and donor lymphocyte infusions. The decision to perform allo-HSCT depends mainly on reduced intensity conditioning.109 Researchers haverecommended that the use of allo-HSCT should depend on strong clinical data; however, 28%49% of allo-HSCT patients develop relapse risks for disease.110 Moreover, allo-HSCT has been widely applied as a therapeutic option in both HL and NHL.11

SCs play a major role in cell-based therapy to treat both hematologic and nonhematologic malignant disorders. They are mainly involved in the application of transplantation. Adult SCs (bone-marrow SCs), PBSCs, and UCB are the major potential sources of HSCs used during SC transplantation. Similarly, apart from ethical issues associated with disruption of inner cell mass, ESCs and ELSCs are also sources of HSCs as a therapeutic option to be utilized in SC transplantation. The generation of HSCs from iPSCs through hematopoieticendothelial transition will be therapeutic options during times of inadequate availability of compatible donors. On the other hand, non-HSCs and MSCs are possible to use as coinfusion to support engraftment of transplants, hematologic reconstitution, and manage GVHD posttransplantation. Auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT are the major cellular therapeutic options to treat leukemia. The lower relapse risk, blast crisis, TKI-intolerant patients in the CP and at higher risk of disease, and higher relapse risk are indications to utilize allo-HSCT rather than auto-HSCT to treat different types of leukemia. Likewise, primary refractory sensitivity to relapse and positive PET are basic indications to prefer auto-HSCT to allo-HSCT in treating both multiple myeloma and HL. Therefore, allo-HSCT is a more applicable standard cellular therapeutic option than auto-HSCT for many classes of leukemia.

The authors acknowledge Mrs Yonas Akalu for proofreading, language editing, and grammatical corrections to improve this review article.

Allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell transplantation; auto-HSCT, autologous HSCT; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; ESCs, embryonic SCs; iPSCs, induced pluripotent SCs;MSCs, mesenchymal SCs; PBSCs, peripheral blood SCsVSELSCs, very small embryonic-like SCs.

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether in conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation, or all those areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval to the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

48. !!! INVALID CITATION !!!

Read the rest here:
Role of Stem-Cell Transplantation in Leukemia Treatment

Nano-Improvements to Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Show Success – AZoNano

An article published in the journal Biomaterials shows that [emailprotected]2 nanoparticles (NPs) synthesized with a short bacteriophage-selected mesenchymal stem cell(MSC) targeting peptide allowed the MSCs to take up these NPs. NP-modified MSCs produced greatly improved therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis(RA) using stem cells.

Study:Highly effective rheumatoid arthritis therapy by peptide-promoted nanomodification of mesenchymal stem cells. Image Credit:Emily frost/Shutterstock.com

RA, which is marked by progressive joint degeneration andsynovial inflammation, is one ofthe primary widespread inflammatory arthritis thataffectsaround 1 % of the global population, however, it currently lacks an effective treatment.

Glucocorticoids (GCs), disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)are the three maintypes of medicationscurrently used in clinical practice.

GCs and NSAIDscan help with joint pain and stiffness, but they may cause side effects such asheart problems, osteoporosis, infections andgastric ulcers.

Standard DMARDs, like methotrexate (MTX), can lessen swelling by inhibiting the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and have little effect on cartilage degeneration. MTX, on the other hand, has a short plasma half-lifeand a poor concentration of the drug in the inflammatory region of the body.

Other side effects may also include liver and kidney damage, bone marrow depletion, and gastrointestinal problems. Biological DMARDs have been rapidly developed in recent years, thoughtheir action slows the progression of structural damage by reducing inflammation and have issues including drug resistance and the potential to cause significant infections and malignant tumors.

Multilineage differentiation, inflammatory site and immunomodulationhoming are all features of MSCs. These distinctivecharacteristicsallowMSCs to become apotential treatmentfora variety ofinflammatory and degenerativediseases, including the treatment of RA,through cell therapy. Unfortunately, over 50 % of patients do not react to MSC treatment, and the therapeutic benefit of MSCs is only temporary.

Firstly, MSCs are susceptible to the inflammatory milieu and so lose their functions of immune-regulationwhen disclosed in an inflamed joint. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are thought to be engaged in the inflammation development of RA and hence damaging to MSCs, as seen by the gradualdecline in the quantity of MSCs in RA patients' synovial fluid.

Secondly, while the direct impacts of MSCs on tissue regeneration in RA are unknown, an evidentclinical experiment found that MSC injections increased hyaline cartilage regeneration in RA patients. Nevertheless, the unregulated distinction of MSCs can alsoresult in the development of tumors andthe inability of cartilage repair.

As a result, it is important for an optimal stem cell strategy to include MSCs that have the ability to preserve their bio functions and chondrogenically develop to regenerate cartilage under the oxidative stress caused by RA.

According to thisstudy, RA therapy could be enhanced byshort targeting peptide-promoted nanomodification of MSCs. To begin with, [emailprotected]2 NPs wereproduced due to some of theirelements' appealing features. Mn and Cu both are critical trace components in the human body, and they play a keyrole in the production of natural Mnsuperoxide dismutase (SOD) and Cu-ZnSOD, respectively.

Cu and Mn can also encourage stem cell chondrogenesis. The study further explains the modification of [emailprotected]2 NPs with MSC-targeting peptides to increase the passage of the nanoparticles into MSCs since transporting nanomaterials into modifications of MSCs is still a difficult task.

To make [emailprotected]2/MET NPs, [emailprotected]2 NPs were injected with metformin. Lastly, MSCs were allowedto take up these NPs and utilizethem to effectively limit synovial inflammation and maintain cartilage structure, alleviating arthritic symptoms greatly.

This study demonstrates that VCMM-MCSs werecreated by engineering MSCs with catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)- like activity using dynamically MSC-targeting [emailprotected]2/MET NPs.

The biological features of these cells required in stem cell treatment, such as chondrogenesis, anti-inflammation, cell migration, and increased survival under oxidative stress, were improved by VCMM-MCSs.

Consequently, the VCMM-MSCs injections reduced cartilage damage andsynovial hyperplasiain adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) as well as collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) models, substantially reducing arthritic symptoms. Since oxidative stress is present in numerous degenerative and inflammatory disorders, this strategy of altering MSCs with NPs could be applied to treat a number of other disorders as well as to achieve faster tissue healing using stem cell therapy.

Lu, Y., Li, Z. et al. (2022). Highly effective rheumatoid arthritis therapy by peptide-promoted nanomodification of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961222001132?via%3Dihub

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Visit link:
Nano-Improvements to Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Show Success - AZoNano