Author Archives: admin


SQZ Biotechnologies Announces $2 Million Grant From the National Institutes of Health to Develop a Novel, Scalable Cell Replacement Therapy for…

WATERTOWN, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SQZ Biotechnologies (NYSE: SQZ), focused on unlocking the full potential of cell therapies for multiple therapeutic areas, today announced that it has been awarded a $2 million SBIR Phase II grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, a division of the National Institutes of Health. Awarded through a competitive process, the two-year grant will support the development of cell engineering methods that are designed to reprogram a patients own immune cells directly into dopamine-producing neurons, a potential novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of Parkinsons disease.

Directly creating dopamine-producing neurons by reprogramming a patients own immune cells would be a major breakthrough and could support a new Parkinsons disease treatment paradigm, said Jonathan Gilbert, Ph.D., Vice President and Head of Exploratory Research at SQZ Biotechnologies. Unlike alternative allogeneic cell replacement approaches in development for Parkinsons disease, by using a patients own cells, treatment might not require chronic immunosuppression. Moreover, in altering cell fate with RNA-based cell engineering methods, no changes to the genome are likely to occur that could carry long-term risks.

Reprogramming a patients cells to replace lost or diseased cells has significant therapeutic potential. Beyond Parkinsons Disease, applications for cell replacement therapies include Multiple Sclerosis and Type 1 diabetes. However, traditional expensive, time-intensive, and inefficient cell reprogramming methods has hindered clinical progress and patient impact.

At the 2021 International Society for Stem Cell Research annual meeting, the company presented preclinical data showing that proprietary Cell Squeeze technology can be used to generate neurons from induced human pluripotent stem cells through the delivery of an mRNA encoding for a fate-specifying transcription factor.

With the support of the NIH grant, and building upon our experience in multiplex engineering of immune cells, SQZ researchers will attempt to generate dopaminergic neurons directly from somatic cells. The Cell Squeeze technology may allow for a unique complex combination of transcription factors, dosing, and timing.

About SQZ Biotechnologies SQZ Biotechnologies Company is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on unlocking the full potential of cell therapies for patients around the world and has active programs in Oncology, Autoimmune and Infectious Diseases, as well as additional exploratory initiatives to support future pipeline growth. The companys proprietary Cell Squeeze technology offers the unique ability to deliver multiple biological materials into many cell types to engineer what we believe can be a broad range of potential therapeutics. With demonstrated production timelines under 24 hours and the opportunity to eliminate preconditioning and lengthy hospital stays, our approach could significantly broaden the therapeutic range and accessibility of cell therapies. The companys first therapeutic applications seek to generate target-specific immune responses, both in activation for the treatment of solid tumors and infectious diseases, and in immune tolerance for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. For more information, please visit http://www.sqzbiotech.com.

Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements relating to events our platform development, our product candidates, project funding, preclinical and clinical activities, progress and outcomes, development plans, manufacturing, clinical safety and efficacy results, therapeutic potential, market opportunities and disease prevalence. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations. Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to several risk factors. Such factors include, among others, risks and uncertainties related to our limited operating history; our significant losses incurred since inception and expectation to incur significant additional losses for the foreseeable future; the development of our initial product candidates, upon which our business is highly dependent; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and clinical activities; our need for additional funding and our cash runway; the lengthy, expensive, and uncertain process of clinical drug development, including uncertain outcomes of clinical trials and potential delays in regulatory approval; our ability to maintain our relationships with our third party vendors and strategic collaborators; and protection of our proprietary technology, intellectual property portfolio and the confidentiality of our trade secrets. These and other important factors discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2021 and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements represent management's estimates as of this date and we undertake no duty to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of current events, or otherwise, unless required by law.

Certain information contained in this press release relates to or is based on studies, publications, surveys and other data obtained from third-party sources and our own internal estimates and research. While we believe these third-party sources to be reliable as of the date of this press release, we have not independently verified, and we make no representation as to the adequacy, fairness, accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from third-party sources.

Read the original here:
SQZ Biotechnologies Announces $2 Million Grant From the National Institutes of Health to Develop a Novel, Scalable Cell Replacement Therapy for...

Lineage Announces Pipeline Expansion to Include Auditory Neuronal Cell Therapy for Treatment of Hearing Loss – Yahoo Finance

Expansion of Pipeline Into a Third Neuronal Cell Type Builds on Existing Capabilities

Intellectual Property Has Been Filed Covering Composition and Methods for Generating Auditory Neuronal Progenitors

Hearing Loss Afflicts More Than 5% of the Population; More Than 430 Million People

CARLSBAD, Calif., March 21, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (NYSE American and TASE: LCTX), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing allogeneic cell therapies for unmet medical needs, today announced that the Company is expanding its novel cell therapy pipeline to include a new investigational product candidate, an auditory neuronal cell transplant for the treatment of hearing loss, with an initial focus on the treatment of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders. To support this new therapeutic effort, Lineage has filed for intellectual property covering the composition and methods for generating auditory neuronal progenitors which may be capable of functioning as sensory neurons and the connecting neuronal ganglion cells of the ear, and to methods of treatment that employ these cells for the potential treatment of auditory neuropathy. According to the World Health Organization, hearing loss currently afflicts over 5% of the worlds population, or more than 430 million people, and by 2050 it is estimated that one in every ten people, or more than 700 million people, will have disabling hearing loss.

"Hearing loss is a major sensory deficit which affects an enormous number of individuals worldwide, yet current approaches leave much room for improvement. I am pleased to be advising Lineage and providing insights and experience in the launch of this new endeavor and working toward developing cell-based solutions for this condition," stated Stefan Heller, Ph.D., Edward C. and Amy H. Sewall Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine ISCBRM.

Story continues

"We are excited to announce this new, internally-developed initiative for Lineage, and to do it so quickly following the partnership we announced with Roche and Genentech for our lead program, OpRegen, in a deal worth up to $670M USD," added Brian Culley, Lineage CEO. "Many patients with sensorineural hearing loss are poorly addressed, cannot benefit from cochlear implants, and/or have no FDA-approved treatment options. Similar to OpRegen, which has demonstrated to be able to replace and restore retinal pigment epithelium cells in patients with vision loss, and OPC1, which similarly replaces oligodendrocytes for the treatment of spinal cord injury, replacing auditory neurons or augmenting an existing but damaged auditory neuron population may provide a benefit beyond the reach of alternate approaches such as prostheses. We believe auditory neuronal transplants represent a unique opportunity to leverage our knowhow and capabilities in cellular differentiation into a fourth indication with a large unmet need. In addition to the speed with which the team created this new program from our internal technology, we have done so with a modest investment of capital so far, because we were able to take advantage of our established manufacturing infrastructure and broad knowhow in the expansion and differentiation of pluripotent cells. This is another example of the efficiency and versatility of our technology platform, which is gaining broader awareness, and which offers us a favorable competitive position in the emerging fields of regenerative medicine and anti-aging technologies."

Auditory neuropathy is a hearing disorder in which the inner ear successfully detects sound but has a problem with sending signals from the ear to the brain. Current state of the art medical knowledge suggests that auditory neuropathies play a substantial role in hearing impairments and deafness. Hearing depends on a series of complex steps that change sound waves in the air into electrical signals. The auditory nerve then carries these signals to the brain. Outer hair cells help amplify sound vibrations entering the inner ear from the middle ear. When hearing is working normally, the inner hair cells convert these vibrations into electrical signals that travel as nerve impulses to the brain, where the brain interprets the impulses as sound. Auditory neuropathy can be caused by a number of factors including: (i) damage to the auditory neurons that transmit sound information from the inner hair cells specialized sensory cells in the inner ear to the brain; (ii) damage to the inner hair cells themselves; (iii) inherited genes with mutations or suffering damage to the auditory system, either of which may result in faulty connections between the inner hair cells and the auditory nerve, which leads from the inner ear to the brain; or (iv) damage to the auditory nerve itself. Researchers are still seeking effective treatments for those affected with auditory neuropathy.

About Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel cell therapies for unmet medical needs. Lineages programs are based on its robust proprietary cell-based therapy platform and associated in-house development and manufacturing capabilities. With this platform Lineage develops and manufactures specialized, terminally differentiated human cells from its pluripotent and progenitor cell starting materials. These differentiated cells are developed to either replace or support cells that are dysfunctional or absent due to degenerative disease or traumatic injury or administered as a means of helping the body mount an effective immune response to cancer. Lineages clinical programs are in markets with billion dollar opportunities and include four allogeneic ("off-the-shelf") product candidates: (i) OpRegen, a retinal pigment epithelium transplant therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration, which is now being developed under a worldwide collaboration with Roche and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group; (ii) OPC1, an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries; (iii) VAC2, a dendritic cell therapy produced from Lineages VAC technology platform for immuno-oncology and infectious disease, currently in Phase 1 clinical development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and (iv) ANP1, an auditory neuronal progenitor cell therapy for the potential treatment of auditory neuropathy. For more information, please visit http://www.lineagecell.com or follow the Company on Twitter @LineageCell.

Forward-Looking Statements

Lineage cautions you that all statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this press release, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, in some cases, can be identified by terms such as "believe," "aim," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "design," "intend," "expect," "could," "can," "plan," "potential," "predict," "seek," "should," "would," "contemplate," "project," "target," "tend to," or the negative version of these words and similar expressions. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the collaboration and license agreement with Roche and Genentech and activities expected to occur thereunder, the upfront, milestone and royalty consideration payable to Lineage and Lineages planned use of proceeds therefrom; the potential benefits of treatment with OpRegen, the potential success of other existing partnerships and collaborations, the broad potential for Lineages regenerative medicine platform and Lineages ability to expand the same; Lineages plans to advance its spinal cord injury, oncology and auditory neuron programs and announce new disease settings where it plans to deploy its technology; the projected timing of milestones of future studies, including their initiation and completion, the projected timing of interactions with the FDA to discuss product designation, manufacturing plans and improvements, and later-stage clinical development; the potential opportunities for the establishment or expansion of strategic partnerships and collaborations and the timing thereof, and the potential for Lineages investigational allogeneic cell therapies to generate clinical outcomes beyond the reach of traditional methods and provide safe and effective treatment for multiple, diverse serious or life threatening conditions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Lineages actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this press release, including, but not limited to, the risk that competing alternative therapies may adversely impact the commercial potential of OpRegen, which could materially adversely affect the milestone and royalty payments payable to Lineage under the collaboration and license agreement, the risk that Roche and Genentech may not be successful in completing further clinical trials for OpRegen and/or obtaining regulatory approval for OpRegen in any particular jurisdiction, the risk that Lineage might not succeed in developing products and technologies that are useful in medicine and demonstrate the requisite safety and efficacy to achieve regulatory approval in accordance with its projected timing, or at all; the risk that Lineage may not be able to manufacture sufficient clinical and, if approved, commercial quantities of its product candidates in accordance with current good manufacturing practice; the risks related to Lineages dependence on other third parties, and Lineages ability to establish and maintain its collaborations with these third parties; the risk that government-imposed bans or restrictions and religious, moral, and ethical concerns about the use of hES cells could prevent Lineage or its partners from developing and successfully marketing its stem cell product candidates; the risk that Lineages intellectual property may be insufficient to protect its products; the risk that the COVID-19 pandemic or geopolitical events may directly or indirectly cause significant delays in and substantially increase the cost of development of Lineages product candidates, as well as heighten other risks and uncertainties related to Lineages business and operations; risks and uncertainties inherent in Lineages business and other risks discussed in Lineages filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Lineages forward-looking statements are based upon its current expectations and involve assumptions that may never materialize or may prove to be incorrect. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further information regarding these and other risks is included under the heading "Risk Factors" in Lineages periodic reports with the SEC, including Lineages most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and its other reports, which are available from the SECs website. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. Lineage undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as required by law.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220321005294/en/

Contacts

Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. IR Ioana C. Hone (ir@lineagecell.com) (442) 287-8963

Solebury Trout IR Mike Biega (Mbiega@soleburytrout.com) (617) 221-9660

Russo Partners Media Relations Nic Johnson or David Schull Nic.johnson@russopartnersllc.com David.schull@russopartnersllc.com (212) 845-4242

Read the original here:
Lineage Announces Pipeline Expansion to Include Auditory Neuronal Cell Therapy for Treatment of Hearing Loss - Yahoo Finance

Impact of maintenance therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in early and delayed transplant – Newswise

Based on phase 3 trials, maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become the standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM). We examined the trends in maintenance therapy in a large group of patients (2530) transplanted at a single institution over two decades. Majority (n=1958; 77%) had an ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis (early ASCT). Maintenance was employed in 39% of the patients; 42% among early ASCT and 30.5% among delayed ASCT. Most common maintenance approach was an IMiD (61%), followed by a PI (31%), or a PI+IMiD (4%). Patients with high-risk FISH received PI-based maintenance more frequently. The PFS was superior with maintenance (36 vs. 22 months,p<0.001); 37 vs. 25 months for early ASCT (p<0.001) and 29 vs. 17 months for delayed ASCT (p=0.0008). OS from ASCT was higher with maintenance for the whole cohort at 93 vs. 73 months (p<0.001). OS from diagnosis was also better for the whole cohort with maintenance therapy, 112 vs. 93 months (p<0.001). The improvement in PFS and OS was seen in high-risk and standard risk disease. The experience with maintenance therapy post ASCT for myeloma in a non-clinical trial setting confirms the findings from the phase 3 trials.

Read the original:
Impact of maintenance therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in early and delayed transplant - Newswise

iTolerance, Inc. Closes $17.1 Million Convertible Note Financing to Advance Development of Innovative Regenerative Medicines for Transplantation…

The Company's proprietary biotechnology-derived Strepavidin-FasL fusion protein/biotin-PEG microgel platform technology, iTOL-100, has demonstrated in animal models of Type 1 Diabetes the ability to induce local immune tolerance and allow long-term engraftment of insulin-producing allogenic pancreatic islet cells without the need for chronic life-long immunosuppression

Lead program, iTOL-101, being developed as a potential breakthrough in curing Type 1 Diabetes

Second lead program, iTOL-102, is also being developed as another potential breakthrough in curing Type 1 Diabetes leveraging stem cell derived pancreatic islet

MIAMI, FL / ACCESSWIRE / March 21, 2022 / iTolerance, Inc. ("iTolerance" or the "Company"), an early stage regenerative medicine company developing technology to enable tissue, organoid or cell therapy without the need for life-long immunosuppression, today announced the closing of its convertible note financing in which the Company raised a total of approximately $17.1 million in gross proceeds. The Company plans to use proceeds from the financing to translate the production of iTOL-100 from the academic labs to commercial manufacturing for use in its planned pre-clinical and clinical trials and for other general corporate purposes.

"As a start-up life sciences company, raising $17.1 million is a noteworthy endorsement from investors and bolsters our confidence in the potential of our proprietary platform technology. With this capital in hand, we are focused on executing next steps in de-risking our manufacturing processes and positioning ourselves to successfully advance into and through pre-clinical studies to support a Phase 1/2 clinical study for iTOL-101," commented Dr. Anthony Japour, Chief Executive Officer of iTolerance. "We believe our platform technology is a potential game changer for patients with Type 1 Diabetes and the physicians who treat them. Additionally, this technology can be applied to a number of cellular therapies for chronic conditions."

Story continues

The Company's iTOL-100 platform technology is a biotechnology-derived Strepavidin-FasL fusion protein, a synthetic form of the naturally occurring protein FasL, mixed with a biotin-PEG microgel (SA-FasL microgel) that potentially allows convenient and effective co-administration with implanted cells or organoids to induce local immune tolerance without the need for life-long immunosuppression. In pre-clinical studies, iTOL-100 has been shown to establish durable, localized immune tolerance, allowing the implanted tissue, organoid or cell therapy to function as a replacement for damaged native cells.

iTolerance's lead program iTOL-101 is being developed as a potential cure for Type 1 Diabetes. Using the iTOL-100 platform technology, allogenic pancreatic islets are co-implanted and in pre-clinical studies have shown immune acceptance and long-term function of the graft with control of blood glucose levels and restoration of insulin secretion without the need for immunosuppression. The Company is moving forward with pre-clinical studies to support a Phase 1/2 study in Type 1 Diabetes.

The Company's second lead program, iTOL-102, utilizes the iTOL-100 platform technology to induce local immune tolerance and leverages significant advancements in stem cell-derived pancreatic islets which allows an inexhaustible supply of insulin-producing cells as a potential cure for Type 1 Diabetes without the need for life-long immunosuppression.

About iTolerance, Inc.

iTolerance is an early stage privately held regenerative medicine company developing technology to enable tissue, organoid or cell therapy without the need for life-long immunosuppression. Leveraging its proprietary biotechnology-derived Strepavidin-FasL fusion protein/biotin-PEG microgel (SA-FasL microgel) platform technology, iTOL-100, iTolerance is advancing a pipeline of programs using both allogenic pancreatic islets and stem cells that have the potential to cure diseases. The Company's lead program, iTOL-101 is being developed for Type 1 Diabetes and in a pre-clinical non-human primate study, pancreatic islet cells co-implanted with iTOL-101 exhibited long-term function with control of blood glucose levels and restoration of insulin secretion without the use of chronic immune suppression. The Company's second lead candidate, iTOL-102, is leveraging significant advancements in stem cells to derive pancreatic islets which allows an inexhaustible supply of insulin-producing cells. Utilizing iTOL-100 to induce local immune tolerance, iTOL-102 has the potential to be a cure for Type 1 Diabetes without the need for life-long immunosuppression. Additionally, the Company is developing iTOL-201 for liver failure and iTOL-301 as a potential regenerative protein and cell therapy that leverages stem cell sources to produce proteins or hormones in the body in conditions of high unmet need without the need for life-long immunosuppression. For more information, please visit itolerance.com.

Investor Contact Jenene Thomas Chief Executive Officer JTC Team, LLC T: 833.475.8247 iTolerance@jtcir.com

SOURCE: iTolerance, Inc.

View source version on accesswire.com: https://www.accesswire.com/693757/iTolerance-Inc-Closes-171-Million-Convertible-Note-Financing-to-Advance-Development-of-Innovative-Regenerative-Medicines-for-Transplantation-Without-the-Need-for-Life-Long-Immunosuppression

Originally posted here:
iTolerance, Inc. Closes $17.1 Million Convertible Note Financing to Advance Development of Innovative Regenerative Medicines for Transplantation...

‘Without you there is no cure’ – Teenager’s call for stem cell donors in mission to support Anthony Nolan Trust – Shields Gazette

Abbie Young was 16 when she was given the devastating news that her body was suffering from severe Aplastic Anaemia.

With her bone marrow failing, medics at Newcastles Royal Victoria Infirmary Ward 3 were in a race against time to find a stem cell donor who could give her a fighting chance.

Abbie, now 18, is on the road to recovery thanks to the Anthony Nolan Trust.

To say thank you for saving her life, the Harton Academy pupil is aiming to help boost the charitys work by hosting a fundraising day at school on Friday, April 8.

Abbie, who hopes to become an Anthony Nolan youth ambassador, is aiming to encourage others to sign up as stem cell donors and help save lives.

She said: I just feel really grateful that someone out there took the time to sign up to the stem cell register and that one choice someone made, has saved my life.

I know some kids die waiting for a donor, so I will always be forever grateful for what my donors did and to the Anthony Nolan Trust.

Read More

The teenager discovered her bone marrow was failing her after her mum became concerned over the number of bruises her daughter had. Abbie was diagnosed in January 2020.

Mum Caroline, 49, said: We went to the doctors who sent Abbie to South Tyneside Hospital for blood tests.

Abbie was at the hospital on the Friday (January 10), then by Saturday morning we had a knock on the door and there was an ambulance outside, they had come for Abbie.

They took us to Sunderland hospital and her dad followed up in the car, where they did more tests, they thought she had leukaemia, so we were transferred straight to the RVI.

According to information from Great Ormond Street Hospital, severe Aplastic Anaemia only affects around 30 to 40 children in the UK each year.

After Abbies older siblings, brother Sam, 26, and sister Kate, 21, were found not to be matches, a donor from Germany was found with the charitys help.

Abbies first transplant was in May 2020, but with the country in Covid lockdown, the stem cells had to be frozen due to restrictions.

The first transplant failed, believed in part due to the stem cells having been frozen.

The Anthony Nolan Trust stepped in and a second donor was found, but the cells were not frozen this time at the request of the hospital.

Caroline added: It is so hard when it's your child's life is suddenly put into the hands of a stranger. You're waiting for someone you don't know to come forward and help save your child's life.

The teenager underwent her second transplant in July 2020 and following a number of blood transfusions, the treatment started to work.

But due to complexities, she needed to have a top-up from her second donor at a later date.

Throughout Abbies treatment, which also included several doses of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and the top-up donation dose, she needed to stay confined in a bubble with only Caroline, dad Karl and nursing staff for company.

Abbie, of Beacon Glade, told the Gazette she felt like shed lost her purpose while receiving treatment and that losing her hair felt like the worst day of my life.

She explained: I was in denial about the whole thing. I knew I was bruising easily, but I didn't want to do anything about it. I was in denial about everything.

"I knew people lost their hair with treatment but I thought I'd be the one who didn't. Then I did and I was devastated.

I just felt like I had lost my purpose. When I lost my hair, it felt like the worst day of my life, I had had also put on quite a bit of weight.

Following her treatment and a number of blood and platelet transfusions, Abbie was finally able to ring the bell on leaving Ward 3 in August 2020; but she still needed to shield to give her body the best chance of survival.

Now, shes studying Biology, Chemistry and Psychology at A-Level and focusing on supporting the life-saving charity with her fundraising mission.

At time of writing and with weeks to go until her fundraising day at school more than 1,500 has been donated to her JustGiving page.

On her page, she said: Without you there is no cure. For someone with blood cancer, a stem cell transplant could be their last chance of survival.

Mum Caroline added: The hospital, the staff on Ward 3, were brilliant and the nurses were amazing. They were more like friends than medical professionals.

"At the time, you couldn't mix with anyone, so they were a good support to us as a family and to Abbie.

Abbie's school has also been supportive. Sir Ken, who is the school's executive head teacher, would call every day and ask how she was.

When it happened, teachers would drop off books for Abbie and they were even talking about a teacher going into a bubble, so that they could invigilate her for her GCSE exams. But the exams never happened because of Covid.

"We will be forever grateful for everyone's support.

More:
'Without you there is no cure' - Teenager's call for stem cell donors in mission to support Anthony Nolan Trust - Shields Gazette

Radical increase in the effectiveness of breast cancer immunotherapy – EurekAlert

Discovered the essential role of a new factor, LCOR, in enabling cancer cells to present tumour antigens on their surfaces

A study published in the journal Nature Cancer, carried out within the Cancer Programme at the Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM-Hospital del Mar) by the Cancer Stem Cells and Metastasis Dynamics Laboratory, led by Dr. Toni Celi-Terrassa, and the Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Therapy, coordinated by Dr. Joan Albanell, with the participation of international centres, has discovered an approach that radically increases the success of immunotherapy in one of the most aggressive types of tumours, triple-negative breast cancer. This subtype, although accounting for only 15% of cases, is one of the most rapidly progressing and affects younger patients. In this work, researchers found that tumour stem cells are the main cause of immunotherapy resistance in this subtype of breast cancer. The reason is that these cells are invisible to the immune system, making immunotherapy ineffective. In addition, the study offers a promising solution to this situation by using a new therapeutic approach in preclinical models that makes cancer stem cells visible to the immune system so that it can then eliminate the tumour.

This subpopulation of more aggressive cells may represent between 5% and 50% of the entire tumour population in triple-negative breast cancer. They have low levels of LCOR factor, which plays a key but previously unknown role in allowing cells to present antigens on their surface, molecules that enable the immune system to differentiate normal cells from tumour cells and attack the latter. Consequently, in the case of tumour stem cells, the low presence of this LCOR factor makes them invisible to the body's defences. As a result, these cells are resistant to breast cancer immunotherapy, which has a relatively low success rate in current clinical practice.

A mechanism that provokes treatment resistance

This ability of tumour stem cells to remain invisible to the immune system allows them to withstand immunotherapy treatment. As Dr. Toni Celi-Terrassa explains, "We have seen how, despite immunotherapy treatment, these cells survive and have the ability to generate resistance, which is linked to their ability to hide from the immune system, allowing them to evade immunotherapy."

Using mouse models, the researchers have demonstrated how this situation is reversed when the LCOR gene is activated in this type of cell, setting in motion the machinery that allows the immune system to detect the tumour. It involves reconfiguring the tumour to make it completely visible and, therefore, sensitive to immunotherapy, transforming it from invisible to visible, says Ivn Prez-Nez, a pre-doctoral researcher in the Cancer Stem Cells and Metastasis Dynamics Laboratory and first author of the study. The researchers were able to see how, by combining this approach with immunotherapy, the treatment response rate was total, and all tumours were eliminated, curing the mice in the long term. This prevents both the recurrence of cancer and the generation of resistance.

Pioneering study on the use of messenger-RNA therapy in cancer and immunotherapy

Inspired by the technology used in the design of messenger-RNA vaccines for COVID-19, the researchers decided to use a similar strategy to transport and deliver LCOR gene RNA into tumour cells and trigger its function. Biological nanovesicles, small bag-like structures formed in the cells, were developed to carry this information and were shown to do so successfully, preventing the tumour stem cells from remaining invisible.

"What we are doing is making the immune system see the tumour cell better. Unlike healthy cells, malignant cells have a much higher load of recognised 'foreign' antigens, which are not inherent to the immune system. In this way, the bodys natural defences will recognise, attack and eliminate the malignant cells, explains Dr. Celi-Terrassa. In this sense, he points out that We have discovered how to make this type of breast cancer respond to immunotherapy in preclinical models, making these cells visible thanks to the use of the antigen-presenting mechanism, thereby boosting the immunotherapy response and its efficiency.

This strategy may be applicable to other types of breast cancer tumours and other tumour types, although safety studies and clinical trials in humans are needed first. Even so, according to Dr. Joan Albanell, co-leader of the study, director of the Cancer Research Programme at IMIM-Hospital del Mar and head of the Oncology Department at Hospital del Mar, this approach does open up new possibilities. "What is important is that the experimental results demonstrate an unprecedented sensitisation of triple-negative breast cancer to immunotherapy, making resistant tumours virtually curable", says Dr Albanell, also a professor at the UPF. This unequivocally motivates us to investigate therapeutic strategies that may culminate in clinical trials, and to explore whether it could be applicable to other tumours, he concludes.

The use of LCOR in combination with immunotherapy has generated a patent and a spin-off company will be created to develop this. "The project led by Dr. Celi-Terrassa and Dr. Albanell is a paradigmatic example of research in immune therapies that will be boosted in the near future by the new Immuno-oncology Division that we are creating at the IMIM", explains Dr. Joaqun Arribas, director of the IMIM-Hospital del Mar and author of the study.

The study was made possible thanks to a CLIP grant from the US Cancer Research Institute and funding from the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII). Thanks also go to the Spanish Association Against Cancer (Asociacin Espaola contra el Cncer; AECC), the Fero Foundation and CIBERONC, a centre to which the two researchers who led the study also belong.

Immunotherapy in cancer and breast cancer

Immunotherapy is one of the most promising treatments for eradicating tumours and curing cancer. Unfortunately, for breast cancers it is only approved in the triple-negative breast cancer subtype, where the outcomes are still far from what is expected from immunotherapy. Making immunotherapy work in breast cancer would be a great therapeutic opportunity for the breast cancer population, making it a very good option for more advanced and metastatic cases. It should be remembered that metastatic breast cancer, despite significant and continuous advances, is still not curable in the majority of patients.

Precision diagnosis, immunotherapy, personalised medicine and cutting-edge cancer research at Hospital del Mar

At Hospital del Mar, cancer is addressed through the diagnostic tools necessary to achieve a precision diagnosis that makes it possible to plan and offer patients personalised and individualised therapeutic options according to their particular circumstances. At the same time, there is a commitment to a patient-centred care model through pioneering and benchmark work in multidisciplinary functional units specific to each type of tumour. The units, comprising professionals specialising in each cancer type, offer the best therapeutic options in a model of shared decision-making with the patient. Nurse managers guide patients through the diagnostic and therapeutic process. This quality care is combined with groundbreaking cancer research at the Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) and an extensive programme of clinical trials. The research areas focus on furthering immunotherapy and liquid biopsy, searching for biomarkers and new therapeutic targets, and developing new surgery and radiotherapy strategies to improve efficacy and the quality of life of patients. This research generates almost 200 articles in scientific publications each year, two out of three of which are in high-impact journals. This state-of-the-art care and research are the basis for teaching excellence at the Hospital del Mar Campus.

Reference article

Prez-Nez I, Rozaln C, Palomeque JA, Sangrador I, Dalmau M, Comerma L, Hernndez-Prat A, Casadevall D, Menendez S, Liu DD, Shen M, Berenguer J, Rius Ruiz I, Pea R, Montas JC, Alb MM, Bonnin S, Ponomarenko J, Gomis RR, Cejalvo JM, Servitja S, Marzese DM, Morey Ll, Voorwerk L, Arribas J, Bermejo B, Kok M, Pusztai L, Kang Y, Albanell J, Celi-Terrassa T. LCOR mediates interferon-independent tumor immunogenicity and responsiveness to immune-checkpoint blockade in triple negative breast cancer. Nature Cancer (2022)https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00339-4

LCOR mediates interferon-independent tumor immunogenicity and responsiveness to immune-checkpoint blockade in triple negative breast cancer

17-Mar-2022

Original post:
Radical increase in the effectiveness of breast cancer immunotherapy - EurekAlert

Century Therapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2021 Financial Results and Provides … – The Bakersfield Californian

IND submission for lead program CNTY-101 on track for mid 2022; Phase 1 ELiPSE-1 trial of CNTY-101 in relapsed/refractory lymphoma expected to commence after IND submission

Entered into a strategic collaboration with Bristol Myers Squibbto develop iPSC-derived allogeneic cell therapies

Ended 2021 with cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $358.8M; Cash runway into 2025, including proceeds received from Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with the Collaboration Agreement

PHILADELPHIA, March 17, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Century Therapeutics, Inc., (NASDAQ: IPSC), an innovative biotechnology company developing induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cell therapies in immuno-oncology, today reported financial results and business highlights for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2021.

Throughout 2021, we continued to make steady progress in developing our comprehensive, next-generation iPSC-based cell therapy platform, executed on our powerful discovery engine, and we believe we are positioned to transition to a clinical stage company in 2022. With this foundation in place, we are on track to advance multiple product candidates to the clinic over the next three years, said Lalo Flores, Chief Executive Officer, Century Therapeutics. Additionally, we look forward to continuing our partnership in the years ahead with Bristol Myers Squibb, a global leader in oncology and hematology, to further expand our pipeline of iPSC-derived cell therapy products for treating hematological and solid tumor malignancies. We are committed to maximizing the potential utility of our platform technology and look forward to what we expect to be a very productive year ahead.

Business Highlights

Entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Bristol Myers Squibb in January 2022 to develop and commercialize up to four iPSC-derived, engineered natural killer cell (iNK) and / or T cell (iT) programs for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Under the terms of the agreement, Century received a $100 million upfront payment and Bristol Myers Squibb made a $50 million equity investment in Century Therapeutics common stock. The agreement provides for future program initiation fees and development, regulatory, and commercial milestone payments totaling more than $3 billion plus royalties on product sales.Announced that, subject to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acceptance of its Investigational New Drug (IND) application, the Company plans to initiate a Phase 1 trial, ELiPSE-1, to assess CNTY-101 in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma or indolent lymphoma after at least two prior lines of therapy, including patients who have received prior CAR T cell therapy. In vivo data

demonstrated strong antitumor activity against human lymphoma cell lines with CNTY-101.Announced plans to focus its initial T cell development program on cells. Data

suggest that CAR-iT cells provide an opportunity to deliver allogeneic T cell therapies without risk for graft-versus-host disease. CNTY-102 will be a CAR- iT candidate targeting CD19, and a second antigen for relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma and other B cell malignancies. Added to the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NASDAQ: NBI) in December 2021.

Upcoming Milestones

Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) manufacturing facility expected to be operational in 2022.CNTY-101 IND filing remains on track for mid-2022. Subject to U.S. FDA acceptance of its IND application, the Company plans to initiate the Phase 1 ELiPSE-1 trial of CNTY-101 in relapsed/refractory lymphoma in 2022.Expect to submit an IND for CNTY-103 in 2023. CNTY-103 is Centurys first solid tumor candidate for glioblastoma.

Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2021 Financial Results

Cash Position:Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $358.8 million as of December 31, 2021, as compared to $76.8 million as of December 31, 2020. Net cash used in operations was $89.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $41.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.Research and Development (R&D) expenses: R&D expenses were $75.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily due to an increase in personnel expenses related to increased headcount to expand the Companys R&D capabilities, costs for preclinical studies, costs for laboratory supplies, and facility costs.General and Administrative (G&A) expenses: G&A expenses were $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in personnel related expense due to an increase in employee headcount and an increase in the Companys professional fees as a result of expanded operations to support its infrastructure as well as additional costs to operate as a public company.Net loss: Net loss was $95.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $53.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Financial Guidance

The Company expects full year GAAP Operating Expenses to be between $155 million and $165 million including non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $10 million to $15 million. The Company expects its cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, including proceeds from the Bristol Myers Squibb collaboration agreement, will support operations into 2025.

About Century Therapeutics

Century Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: IPSC) is harnessing the power of adult stem cells to develop curative cell therapy products for cancer that we believe will allow us to overcome the limitations of first-generation cell therapies. Our genetically engineered, iPSC-derived iNK and iT cell product candidates are designed to specifically target hematologic and solid tumor cancers. We are leveraging our expertise in cellular reprogramming, genetic engineering, and manufacturing to develop therapies with the potential to overcome many of the challenges inherent to cell therapy and provide a significant advantage over existing cell therapy technologies.We believe our commitment to developing off-the-shelf cell therapies will expand patient access and provide an unparalleled opportunity to advance the course of cancer care. For more information on Century Therapeutics please visit https://www.centurytx.com/.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of, and made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of, The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release, other than statements of historical facts or statements that relate to present facts or current conditions, including but not limited to, statements regarding our cash and financial resources, our clinical development plans, the development of our U.S. manufacturing facility, and our financial guidance are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may, might, will, should, expect, plan, aim, seek, anticipate, could, intend, target, project, contemplate, believe, estimate, predict, forecast, potential or continue or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this presentation are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified and some of which are beyond our control, including, among others: our ability to successfully advance our current and future product candidates through development activities, preclinical studies, and clinical trials; our reliance on the maintenance of certain key collaborative relationships for the manufacturing and development of our product candidates; the timing, scope and likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals, including final regulatory approval of our product candidates; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations; the performance of third parties in connection with the development of our product candidates, including third parties conducting our future clinical trials as well as third-party suppliers and manufacturers; our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and develop sales and marketing capabilities, if our product candidates are approved; and our ability to maintain and successfully enforce adequate intellectual property protection. These and other risks and uncertainties are described more fully in the Risk Factors section of our most recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at http://www.sec.gov. You should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur, and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in a dynamic industry and economy. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties that we may face. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

For More Information:

Company: Elizabeth Krutoholow investor.relations@centurytx.com

Investors: Melissa Forst/Maghan Meyers century@argotpartners.com

Media: Joshua R. Mansbach century@argotpartners.com

See the original post:
Century Therapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2021 Financial Results and Provides ... - The Bakersfield Californian

The Incredible Story of Emily Whitehead & CAR T-Cell Therapy : Oncology Times – LWW Journals

Emily Whitehead:

Emily Whitehead

Warriors come in all shapes and sizes. Take for example Emily Whitehead, as fresh-faced a 16-year-old as has ever graced the planet. Her eyes nearly sparkle with intellectual curiosity and dreams for a fulfilling future. But Emily is not a typical teen. She is the first pediatric patient in the world to receive CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). She is a singular figure in the annals of medicine. She is a soldier on the front lines of the war on cancer. And like the shot heard round the world, her personal medical assault sparked a revolution in cancer care that continues to power forward.

It has been 10 years since the only child of Thomas and Kari Whitehead of Philipsburg, PA, received an infusion of CAR T cells at the hands of a collaborative medical team from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. That team included, among others, luminary CAR T-cell therapy pioneer, Carl June, MD, the Richard W. Vague Professor in Immunotherapy in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Director of the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies at Penn's Perelman School of Medicine; as well as Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD, Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine (at that time, Director of the Cancer Immunotherapy Program at CHOP) and now Section Chief for Cell Therapy and Transplant at the hospital. He had been working with June on cell therapies since 2000.

Tremendous progress has flowedgushedfrom the effort to save Emily Whitehead; many more lives have been saved around the globe since that fatefulyet nearly fatalundertaking. While all the progress that has come from this story must be our ultimate theme, it cannot be fully appreciated without knowing how it came to be.

In 2010, Emily, then 5 years old, went from a being a healthy youngster one day, to a child diagnosed with ALL. Chemotherapy typically works well in pediatric ALL patients; Emily was one of the exceptions. After 2 years of intermittent chemotherapy, she continued to relapse. And when a bone marrow transplant seemed the only hope left, her disease was out of control and the treatment just wasn't possible. The Whiteheads were told by her medical team in Hershey, PA, nothing more could be done. They were instructed to take Emily home where she could die peacefully, surrounded by family.

But peaceful surrender didn't interest the Whiteheads; they rejected any version of giving up. It ran contrary to Tom Whitehead's vision of her recovery, something he said was revealed to him in the whispers. He saw, in a prophetic whispering dream, that Emily would be treated in Philadelphia. More importantly, he saw she would survive. It is as if it happened yesterday, said Tom, remembering how unrelentingly he called doctors at CHOP and said, We're coming there, no matter what you can or cannot do. We're not letting it end like this.

Since we treated Emily, we have treated more than 420 patients with CAR T cells at CHOP. She launched a whole group to be treated with this therapy; thousands have been treated around the world.Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD

A combination of persistence and perfect timing provided the magic bullet. It was just the day before that CHOP received approval to treat their first pediatric relapsed/refractory ALL patient with CAR T cells in a trial. And standing right there, on the threshold of history, was that deathly sick little girl named Emily.

At that time, only a scant few terminal adult patients had ever received the treatment, which is now FDA-approved as tisagenlecleucel and developed in cooperation with CHOP and the University of Pennsylvania. When three adults were treated, two experienced quick and complete remission of their cancers. Could CAR T-cell therapy perform a miracle for Emily? A lot would ride on the answer.

On March 1, 2012, Emily was transferred to CHOP and a few days later an apheresis catheter was placed in her neck; her T cells were extracted and sent to a lab. Emily received more chemotherapy, which knocked out her existing immune system, and she was kept in isolation for 6 weeks. Waiting.

Finally, over 3 days in April, Emily's re-engineered T cells, weaponized with chimeric antigen receptors, were infused back into her weakening body. But Emily did not rise like a Phoenix from the ashes of ALL. Instead, she sunk into the feverish fire of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and experienced a worse-than-anticipated reaction. The hope for a swift victory seemed to be disappearing.

I can still see Emily's blood pressure dropping down to 53/29, her fever going up to 105F, her body swelling beyond recognition, her struggle to breathe, said Tom, of the most nightmarish period of his life. Doctors induced a coma, and Emily was put on a ventilator. For 14 days, her death seemed imminent. Doctors told us Emily had a one in a thousand chance of surviving, said Tom. They said she could die at any moment. But she didn't.

Medical team members who fought alongside the young patient are unwavering heroes in Emily's story. But at the time of her massive struggle, they too were exhausted and battle-scarred, descending into the quicksand of what could have been a failing trial, grasping for some life-saving branch of stability. They knew if CRS could be overcome, the CAR T cells might work a miracle as they had done for those earlier adult patients. But the CRS was severe. There was no obvious antidote; time was running out.

I recall Dr. June saying he believed Emily was past the point where she could come back and recover, said her father. And he said if she didn't turn around, this whole immunotherapy revolution would be over.

The Whiteheads enjoy Penn State football games not far from their hometown. The family has often taken part in Penn State's THON, a 48-hour dance marathon that raises funds for childhood cancer.

June confirmed to Oncology Times that he and Grupp believed Emily would not survive the night. It was mentioned to the Whiteheads that perhaps they should just concentrate on comfort care measures and stop all the ICU interventions, he recalled. I believed she was going to die on the trial due to all the toxicity. I even drafted a letter to our provost to give a heads up.

When the first patient in a trial dies, that's called a Grade 5 toxicity, June noted. That closes the trial as well. It goes right into the trash bin and you have to start all over again. But fortunately, that letter never left my outbox. We decided to continue one more day, and an amazing event happened.

Grupp, offering context to the mysterious amazing event, said it was clear that Emily's extreme CRS was caused by the infusion of cells that he himself had placed in her fragile body. He said he felt an enormous sense of responsibility and incredible urgency as he watched the child struggle to live.

It was not until the CHOP/Penn team received results from a test profiling cytokines in Emily's body that a new flicker of hope sparked. Though Emily had many cytokine abnormalities, the one most strikingly abnormal, interleukin-6 (IL-6), caught the team's attention. It is not made by T cells, and should not have been part of the critical mix. Though there were very few cytokines that had drugs to target them individually, IL-6 was one that did. So the doctors decided to repurpose tocilizumab, an arthritis drug, as a last-ditch effort at saving their young patient.

We treated Emily with tocilizumab out of desperation, June admitted. Steve [Grupp] has told me that when he went to the ICU with tocilizumab as a rescue attempt for CRS, the ICU docs called him a cowboy. The ICU docs had given up hope for Emily. But she turned aroundunbelievably rapidly. Today, tocilizumab is the standard of care for CRS, and the only drug approved by the FDA for that complication. Emily's recovery was huge for the entire field.

Grupp reflected on the immensity of the moment. If things had gone differently, if Emily had experienced fatal toxicity, it would have been devastating to her family and to the medical team. And it might have ended the whole research endeavor. It would have set us back years and years. The impact that Emily and her family had on the field is nothing short of transformational, he declared.

Since we treated Emily, we have treated more than 420 patients with CAR T cells at CHOP. She launched a whole group to be treated with this therapy; thousands have been treated around the world, Grupp noted. And, if not for Emily, we wouldn't be in the position we are in todaywith five FDA-approved [CAR T-cell] products: four for adults and one for kids. And I think it also important to point out that the very first CAR-T approval, thanks to Emily, was in pediatric ALL.

June noted that between 2010 and the time of Emily's treatment in 2012, My work was running like a shoestring operation. I had to fire people because I couldn't get grants to support the infrastructure of the research. It was thought there was no way beyond an academic enterprise to actually make customized T cells, then mail and deliver them worldwide, he recalled.

But then everything changed. We experienced that initial success; it was totally exciting. It was a career-defining moment and the culmination of decades of research. It led to a lot of recognition, both for my contribution and for the team here at the University of Pennsylvania and at CHOP.

Today, hundreds of pharmaceutical and biotech companies are developing innovations. Hundreds of labs are making next-generation approaches to improve in this area, June noted. Today, I'm a kid in a candy shop because all kinds of things are happening. We have funding thanks to the amazing momentum from Emily. She literally changed the landscape of modern cancer therapy.

Grupp said the continuing CAR T-cell program at CHOP offers evidence of success in a broad perspective. There are two things to look at, he offered. The first is how well patients do with their therapy in terms of getting into remission. A month after getting their cells, are they in remission or not? A study with just CHOP patients showed that more than 90 percent met that bar (N Engl J Med 2014; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222). Worldwide, the numbers appear to be in the 80 percent range (N Engl J Med 2018; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866). So, I would say it is a highly successful therapy.

We now have trials using different cell types, like natural killer cells, monocytes, and stem cells, noted Carl June, MD, at Penn's Perelman School of Medicine. An entirely new field has opened because of our initial success. This is going to continue for a long time, making more potent cells that cover all kinds of cancer.

The other big question, Grupp noted: How long does remission last? We are probably looking at about 50 percent of patients remaining in remission long-term, which is to say years after the infusion. The farther out we go, the fewer patients there are to look at because it just started with Emily in 2012, reminded Grupp. We have Emily now 10 years out, and other patients who are at 5, 6, 7, 8 years out, but most were treated more recently than that. We need to follow them longer.

June said registries of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy are being kept worldwide by various groups, including the FDA. CAR T-cell therapy happened fastest in the U.S., but it's gained traction in Japan, Europe, Australia, and they all have databases. The U.S. database for CAR T cells will probably be the best that exists, because the FDA requires people treated continue follow-up for at least 15 years, he explained.

This will provide important information about any long-term complications, and the relapse rate. If patients do get cancer again, will it be a new one or related to the first one we treated? We will follow the outcomes, he noted. Clinicians are teaching us a lot about how to use the informationat what stage of the disease the therapy is best used, and which patients are most likely to respond. This can move us forward.

June mentioned that Grupp is collaborating with the Children's Oncology Group ALL Committee led by Mignon Loh, MD, at the University of California in San Francisco.

They are conducting a national trial to explore using CAR T cells as a frontline therapy in newly diagnosed patients, he detailed. Emily was treated when she had pounds and pounds of leukemia in her body; ideally we don't want to wait so long. There are a lot of reasons to believe it would work as a frontline therapy and spare patients all the complications of previous chemotherapy and/or radiation. The good news is that the clinical trial is under way, and I suspect we may know the answer within 2 years.

The only true measure of success in Emily's case is the state of her health. When asked if she is considered cured, June said, All we can do is a lot of prognostication. We know with other therapies in leukemia, the most similar being bone marrow transplants, if you go 5 years without relapsing, basically you are considered cured. We don't know with CAR T cells because Emily is the first one. We have no other history. But she's at a decade now, and in lab data we cannot find any leukemia in her. So by all of the evidence we haveand by looking in the magic eight ballI believe Emily is cured.

One might think that going through such a battle for life would be enough for any one person, any one family. But for Emily and her parents, her survival was just the beginning of a larger assault. All of them saw the experience as a way to provide interest in continuing research, education for patients as well as physicians, and an extension of hope to other patients about to succumb to a cancerous enemy.

Tom thought back to one particular occasion, all those years ago, when Emily finally slept peacefully through the night in her hospital bed. I should have felt nothing but relief, but I heard a mother crying in the hallway. Her child, who has been in the room next door, had died that morning, he recalled. I am constantly reminded of how fortunate we are. There are so many parents fighting for their children who do not have a good outcome.

As soon as Emily regained her strength and resumed normal childhood activities, the family began travelling with members of the medical team, joining in presentations at meetings and conferences throughout the world. They wanted to give a human face to the potential of CAR T-cell therapy, and as such they willingly became a powerful tool to raise understanding and essential research dollars. In 2016, the Whiteheads founded the Emily Whitehead Foundation (www.emilywhiteheadfoundation.org) ...to help fund research for new, less toxic pediatric treatments, and to give other families hope.

We decided to hold what we called the Believe Ball in 2017. We asked lots of companies to sponsor a child who had received CAR T-cell treatment to come with their family to the ball at no cost to them. Each company's representative would be seated with the child and family they sponsored, and would meet the doctors and scientists involved in the research, as well as members of industry and pharma, to see exactly where research dollars are going. We implored these companies to move the cancer revolution forward with sponsorship. When it all shook out, we had around 35 CAR T-cell families together for the first time, said Tom.

He noted proudly that since the foundation's debut, donations have been consistent and now have totaled an impressive $1.5 million.

When the Emily Whitehead Foundation had a virtual gala recently, it awarded a $50,000 grantthe Nicole Gularte Fight for Cures Ambassador Awardto a young researcher working to get another trial started. The award is named for a woman who found her way to CAR T-cell trials at Penn through the Whitehead Foundation. The treatment extended her life by 5 years during which time Gularte became an advocate for other cancer patients, travelled with the Whiteheads, and made personal appearances whenever she thought she could be of help or inspiration. Eventually, she would relapse and succumb, but she assured Tom Whitehead, These were 5 of the best years of my life. I think my time here on Earth was meant to help cancer research move forward.'

While raising funds for progress is important, the Whiteheads' work is not just about bringing in money. It's also about education.

We want to send a message to all oncologists; they need to be more informed about these emerging treatments when their patients ask for help, Tom noted. In the beginning of CAR T-cell therapy, a lot of doctors were against it. It's hard to believe, but some still are, though not as much. We need more education so that oncologists give patients a chance to get to big research hospitals for cutting-edge treatments before everything else has failed.

June said he regularly interacts with patients Tom or the foundation refer to him. Such unawareness happens with all new therapies, he noted. The people most familiar with them are at academic medical centers. But only about 10 percent of patients actually go to academic centers, the rest are in community centers where newer therapies take much longer to roll out, he explained.

So much of Emily's life has been chronicled through the eyes of observers. But since her watershed medical intervention, she has grown into a well-travelled, articulate young woman who talks easily about her life. I used to let my father do all the talking, but I am finding my own voice now, she said, having granted an interview to Oncology Times.

I'm currently 16 years old and I'm a junior at high school. Just like when I was younger, cows are my favorite animals, she offered with a laugh. I still love playing with our chihuahua, Luna. In school, I love my young adult literature class because I really like reading. Besides that, I like art and film. And I'm in really good health today.

She mentioned her health casually, almost as an afterthought. I really don't have any memory of my treatment at this point, she revealed, but, the experiences that I've had since then have really shaped who I am. Traveling is a huge part of my life now and something I look forward to. We've been to conferences at a lot of distant places. I'm so grateful that I get to travel with my family and make these memories that I will have forever, while still being able to advocate for less toxic treatment options and raising money for cancer research. All of that is really important to me.

Reminded that she has already obtained fame as pediatric patient No. 1 for CAR T-cell therapy, Emily considered her status for a moment then commented, I don't really like to base the progress of the therapy on my story and what I went through. Instead, I like to take my experience and use it to advocate for all patients so that what happened to me does not have to be repeated and endured by another family. My hope is that CAR T-cell therapy will become a frontline treatment option and be readily available, so pediatric patients can get back to a normal life as soon as possible. I want to tell people if conventional treatments do not work, other options do exist. Overall, I am grateful that I can encourage others to keep fighting. That's the main thing; I am grateful.

After a brief pause, Emily continued, I always tell oncologists and scientists that the work they are doing is truly saving children's lives. It allows these kids to grow up, be with their friends and families, take vacations, play with their dogs, and someday go to college, just like me. They are not only saving patients' lives, they are saving families. The work they do does not go unnoticed or unappreciated. Again, I am really so grateful.

Appreciation is a two-way street, and June said he and his team appreciate and draw inspiration from Emily on a daily basis. Her picture hangs on the wall of our manufacturing center, June stated. Some of the technicians who were in high school when Emily was infused are now manufacturing CAR T cells. They learned so much from Emily's experience; she continues to be a big motivator. She's helped my team galvanize and see that the work can really benefit people.

Grupp said the success that is embodied in Emily Whitehead has spurred additional successes, and new inroads in CAR T-cell therapy. There are more applications now, especially in other blood cancerslymphoma and myeloma, in addition to leukemia. We've seen a lot of expansion there.

He noted a national trial is under way for an FDA-approved therapy called idecabtagene vicleucel, which can benefit multiple myeloma patients. All other CAR Ts target the same target, CD19. But this goes after an entirely different target, BCMA. The fact that we now have approval in something that isn't aimed at CD19 is very exciting. And there are others coming right behind it.

The field also has seen further expansion ...into adults being treated safely, because initially there was concern that these drug therapies were too powerful for safe treatment in older adults, detailed Grupp. Now we know that is clearly not the case, and that is great news, particularly because multiple myeloma most often occurs in people over 60.

The use of CAR T cells in solid tumors continues to be challenging, although Grupp noted, We have certainly seen hints of patients with solid tumors having major responses and going into remission with CAR T cells. It is still a small handful of patients, so we haven't perfected the recipe for solid tumors yet. But I am absolutely confident we will have the answers in a very short numberperhaps 2-4of years.

June said, since Emily's infusion, CAR T cells have matured and gotten better. There are many ways that has happened, he informed. We have different kinds of CAR designs to improve and increase the response rates, to decrease the CRS, or to target other kinds of bone marrow cancers. One that is not curable with a lot of therapies is acute myeloid leukemia (AML), so we have a huge group at Penn and CHOP working on AML specifically. And there is the whole field of solid cancer; we have teams working on pancreatic, prostate, breast, brain, and lung cancer now.

In addition to targeting different types of cancer, June said contemporary research is also exploring the use of different types of cells. Our initial CAR T trial used T cells, and that is what all the FDA-approved CARs are. But we now have trials using different cell types, like natural killer cells, monocytes, and stem cells. An entirely new field has opened because of our initial success. This is going to continue for a long time, making more potent cells that cover all kinds of cancer, not just leukemia and lymphoma.

Is this the beginning of the end of cancer? Is this that Holy Grail called a cure to cancer? It's a question June has pondered.

Some people do think that, he answered. They believe the immune system is the solution. And that's a huge statement. President Biden has made a big investment in this work, with the Cancer Moonshot. He's accelerated this research at the federal level. But we just don't know how long it is going to take. Fortunately, a lot of good minds are working hard to make an end to cancer a reality.

As the battle grinds on, June said he applies something he's learned over time, with reinforcement from Tom and Kari Whitehead. They were bulldogs. When it came to getting treatment for Emily, they just wouldn't take no for an answer. They demonstrated the importance of never giving up. That's what happened; they would not surrender. I think that is why Emily is alive today.

Valerie Neff Newitt is a contributing writer.

The Emily Whitehead Foundation and the Whitehead family take extraordinary advantage of a variety of media to reach patients and physicians and optimize educational opportunities.

See the original post here:
The Incredible Story of Emily Whitehead & CAR T-Cell Therapy : Oncology Times - LWW Journals

Ray Resection as a Personalized Surgical Technique for Progressive Hand Macrodactyly in a 60-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review -…

Hand macrodactyly is a very scarce deformity. It was first described over 200 years ago and was characterized as local gigantism of one or multiple digits. Benign bone overgrowth, massive increase of soft tissue volume, and nerve involvement are associated with hand macrodactyly have been consistently reported in the literature. Often, macrodactyly affects one or more digits and is further classified as static or progressive, depending on the growth pattern, and as sporadic or syndromic, according to its genetic predisposition. Surgical treatment for hand macrodactyly remains a complex issue even for expert hand surgeons. In most of the cases, macrodactyly is diagnosed during early childhood and can be appropriately managed with minimal and well affordable surgical approaches that stabilize its fast progression. However, adults with progressive hand macrodactyly develop advanced deformities leading to severe functional deterioration and aesthetic hand dysmorphia. The purpose of this report is to document the management and surgical approach of the oldest published case, a 60-year-old adult patient with neglected progressive hand macrodactyly despite previous surgical attempts for disease stabilization. A personalized preoperative planning was created, which included ray resection involving the fourth metacarpal and fourth finger along with extensive debulking of the overgrown fatty soft tissue and carpal tunnel release. At six months follow-up, the patient reported an excellent aesthetic and functional outcome.

The term macrodactyly is a descriptive term derived from the Greek words macro meaning long and dactyl meaning finger. Macrodactyly of the hand represents a very rare congenital deformity of unknown etiology, which constitutes less than 1% of congenital disorders in the upper extremity [1]. To our knowledge, hand macrodactyly affects approximately 1 out of 100,000 live births and can appear either as a sporadic (isolated form) or as part of a hereditary deformity syndrome (syndromic form) [2]. There are two distinct types of macrodactyly depending on the functional status of the hand. Static macrodactyly is the first type of macrodactyly, with affected fingers being roughly one and a half times the size compared to a normal finger [3]. Besides, static macrodactyly is present at birth and abnormal fingers grow in line with normal fingers [3]. Progressive macrodactyly constitutes the second type, causing continuous bony overgrowth even after skeletal maturity, with digits growing at a much faster rate compared to normal ones [3]. Oftentimes, the dysmorphic appearance of hand macrodactyly causes functional disability in the majority of cases along with cultural stigma, which might have a negative psychological impact on the patient [4].

A plethora of surgical interventions have been described mainly in young patients to cure static and prevent progressive hand macrodactyly, such as debulking procedures, epiphysiodesis, and osteotomies [1]. The purpose of this report is to document the personalized strategy for surgical reconstruction of a neglected progressive hand macrodactyly in an elder 60-year-old male patient - the oldest individual that we are aware of to have been surgically treated based on our literature search - and our efforts to obtain a functional hand with a good aesthetic outcome.

A 60-year-old male individual was presented to our department to seek consultation for his hand macrodactyly. The patients condition was diagnosed in early childhood as a sporadic isolated anomaly affecting moderately the middle and severely the ring fingers. According to his medical records, he underwent two minimal soft tissue debulking surgeries on the third interdigital space when he was 4 and 37 years old, respectively. Initially, he reported that his hypertrophic left middle and ring fingers became more painful and less functional recently, albeit he could manage it until then. The thumb, index, and little fingers were normal. Despite his hand deformity, the patient has been a professional guitar player for at least 40 years. During the last three years, he was complaining of progressive disproportionate growth of his middle and ring fingers (Figure 1). He was further experiencing numbness, tingling, and ache at the tip of all his left digits accompanied with a painful sensation of fullness on the affected fingers. Phalens test was positive, and electrophysiological tests were indicative of carpal tunnel syndrome due to median nerve compression. However, the ulnar nerve was not found entrapped through Guyon's canal. Likewise, the movements of middle and ring fingers were extremely restricted due to soft tissue hypertrophy and stiffness of his metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints. The flexion of his two gigantic fingers was severely deteriorated due to malalignment of joints and angled phalanges. X-rays revealed excessive hand osteoarthritis with the presence of large bone spurs (osteophytes) and joint space narrowing between all phalanges of the third and fourth fingers. Therefore, a debulking reconstruction surgery of the overgrown fatty tissue and ray resection of the most enlarged fourth finger were performed along with carpal tunnel release.

Under axillary block anesthesia and application of a pneumatic tourniquet, a racket-shaped incision was made around the base of the fourth metacarpal. The extensor and flexor tendons (flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus) as well as interosseous and lumbrical muscles of the fourth finger were detached and transected carefully to prevent tendon injuries of the remaining normal digits. Exposure of the digital neurovascular bundle of the third and fifth fingers was well visualized, mobilized, and preserved. Radial and ulnar digital nerves of the fourth finger were found enlarged and were easily recognized due to their increased thickness. Subsequently, nerve endings were carefully implanted within the surrounding soft tissue to avoid as much as possible the formation of painful neuromas. With a surgical oscillating saw, a transection at the base of the fourth metacarpal was performed. Subsequently, surgical debulking of the extensive soft tissue was implemented (Figure 2), and hemostasis of blood vessels leakage was achieved with an electrocautery. Eventually, median nerve decompression was achieved with a palmar incision to divide the transverse carpal ligament. The surgical procedure was performed by a senior consultant hand surgeon and a hand fellow orthopaedic surgeon. The postoperative plan consisted of temporary splinting and early supervised physiotherapy.

Postoperatively, the patient was complaining of phantom pain, which was well tolerated with a two-week prescription of acetaminophen and NSAIDs. Eventually, the phantom pain was resolved entirely eight weeks after surgery [5]. At the six-month follow-up, the patient reported a great recovery with excellent functional and aesthetic satisfaction (Figure 2). His grip strength and hand mobility improved with at least 30 of better flexion range for third metacarpophalangeal joint and so did abduction-adduction for his index, ring, and small fingers.

Until recently, pathogenesis of osseous and fibrofatty overgrowth in hand macrodactyly is not clearly identified and still no consensus exists on its treatment. Therefore, hand macrodactyly poses a significant surgical challenge. which often requires the expertise of experienced hand surgeons to manage effectively [6].

It has been reported that significant nerve enlargement is usually observed during surgical approach of affected digits with morphological and neurophysiological impairment of the median nerve that requires carpal tunnel release [7]. In the present case, the third and fourth rays were affected with simultaneous enlargement of the radial and ulnar digital nerve of the fourth finger. However, electrophysiological testing depicted entrapment of the median nerve but not of the ulnar nerve. Lipomatosis of peripheral nerves (fibrolipomatous proliferation within the nerve) accompanied with osseous enlargement and hypertrophic changes on osteochondral tissue leads not only to compressive neuropathy but also to disabling ankylosis of innervated joints [8].

Genetic studies have demonstrated that hand macrodactyly can be a clinical manifestation of three major overgrowth syndromes: the Proteus syndrome (mosaic mutations in the AKT1 gene), the PIK3CA-related overgrowth syndrome (mutations in the PIK3CA oncogene), and the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (mutations in somatic PTEN tumor suppressor gene). According to Cui et al., somatic mutations in PIK3CA oncogene were observed within bone marrow stem cells from patients diagnosed with hand macrodactyly [9]. These specific mutations enhance activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and deregulate bone homeostasis, leading to hyperplastic bone formation [9]. Moreover, Cui et al. demonstrated that downregulation of distal-less homeobox 5 gene (DLX5) which induces Runx2-mediated osteogenesis and P13K-mediated bone overgrowth could be inhibited by the administration of BYL719 [9]. Subsequently, the administration of this novel therapeutic agent in early-stage disease could appropriately reverse progressive hand macrodactyly [9].

Progressive macrodactyly is an extremely challenging disease as no surgery is able to cure the underlying condition. Most patients, even if operated early in life, require multiple debulking procedures in accordance with the present case report. Concurring to the literature, only few published reports demonstrate potential strategies and surgical treatment options for progressive hand macrodactyly without a clear consensus on treatment guidelines, as shown in Table 1 [5,10]. Children with static hand macrodactyly can be appropriately treated with minimal surgical interventions such as stripping or resection of the local nerve, debulking, closing-wedge osteotomies, and phalangeal epiphysiodesis [10,11]. A very innovative surgical technique was proposed by Kobraei et al. to prevent fast skeletal overgrowth and avoid digits amputation in progressive hand macrodactyly [12]. According to the authors, a radical dissection of the diseased gross digital nerve in two cases with thumb (radial digital nerve) and ring finger (ulnar digital nerve) overgrowth was performed until healthy nerve stump was found [12]. The gaps were reconstructed with a processed nerve allograft between normal edges [12]. To authors view, an early application of this novel surgical approach could yield functional and aesthetic digits with remarkable sensory outcomes and significant deceleration of the disease [12].

The largest case series study considering clinical characteristics and surgical management of 90 hand macrodactyly cases was conducted by Wu et al. [2]. According to their study, multiple digit involvement is up to 2.6 times more frequent than a single-digit disease, which is in line with our patient who had his middle and ring fingers enlarged. In the case series report by Wu et al., most of the affected digits (79.4%) involved were in the median nerve innervation surface [2]. However, in the present case report, the patient had a ring finger macrodactyly, which corresponds to the ulnar nerve area, with no signs of ulnar nerve compression. In addition, the study by Wu et al. included young patients aged between six months and five years. The vast majority of patients were treated with soft tissue reconstruction or minimal phalangeal osteotomies and only two out of 90 cases had an amputation [2]. Consequently, function-preserving surgeries are performed instead of amputation when hand macrodactyly is effectively treated during early-stage compared to advanced-stage disease.

Based on recent bibliography, Jacobs et al. presented the most advanced case of a 55-year-old female patient diagnosed with Proteus syndrome and macrodactyly of her right-hand thumb, middle, and index fingers [5]. The individualized surgical plan included amputation of the thumb and index rami and removal of trapezoid, trapezium, and scaphoid bones [5]. Consequently, the resulted wrist instability was treated with transosseous ligament reconstruction [5]. Good aesthetic and functional results were comparable to that in our patient who was treated with a lesser ray resection technique. To the best of our knowledge, the present case report depicts the surgical management of the oldest patient (60-year-old male) with progressive isolated macrodactyly among the published cases in recent literature. In addition, we strongly believe that efficient stabilization during early-stage disease would have prevented the development of severe chronic osteoarthritis in the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the third and fourth fingers, which add more disability to a macrodactyly hand.

Hand macrodactyly is usually visible at birth and patients experience overgrowth symptoms during early childhood. Consequently, an early and effective surgical management is strongly recommended to prevent chronic progression and development of severe secondary degenerative bone changes in macrodactyly fingers, such as ankyloses, narrowing of joints, and formation of osteophytes. Patients suffering from hand macrodactyly can significantly benefit from early surgical stabilization of the condition instead of late and more aggressive interventions such as amputation.

In the present case, surgical interventions at an early stage proved ineffective, and the patient developed severe and disabling hand deformities due to the progressive subtype of hand macrodactyly. Most of the macrodactyly cases seem to stabilize at skeletal maturity, and it is unusual to see this degree of progressive bony overgrowth. Nevertheless, a personalized surgical technique including ray resection and debulking reconstruction surgery was proposed for this neglected case with great aesthetic and functional outcomes.

More here:
Ray Resection as a Personalized Surgical Technique for Progressive Hand Macrodactyly in a 60-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review -...

Cell Therapy Market is Expected to Grow by USD 20.2 Billion Progressing at a CAGR of 14.5% By Forecast 2027 – Digital Journal

TheGlobal Cell Therapy Marketwas worth USD7.8 billion in 2021, according to a new analysis released by Maximize Market Research, and is expected to rise to USD 20.2 billion by 2027, with a CAGR of 14.5% percent over the forecast period. From the markets perspective, its ever-changing trends, industrial environment, existing market features, and the current short-term and long-term influence on the market

the research will aid decision-makers in developing the outline and strategies for organisations by region.

The implantation of a human cell to replace or repair damaged tissue or cells is known as cellular therapy. Therapy typically consists of live cells that are safely injected, implanted, or grafted into the patients body to have a therapeutic effect. T-cell and stem cell treatment are two types of cell therapy that are used to combat cancer via cell mediated immunity or to repair damaged tissues. For patients with long-term ailments, cell therapy has become a popular treatment option.

Cell Therapy Market Scope and Dynamics:

The Maximize Market Research report contains a detailed study of factors that will drive and restrain the growth of the Cell Therapy Market Globally. Significant advances in cell therapy, a growing emphasis on regenerative medicine, increased R&D activities in the life sciences sector to develop advanced cellular therapies, and the rising prevalence of cancer, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune disorders, and neurological diseases are all driving the global cell therapy market revenue growth.

Other significant factors driving global market revenue growth include increased awareness and commercialization of stem cell therapies, an increase in the number of clinical trials of new cell therapies, an increase in the use of human cells in cell therapy research and development, and an increase in cellular therapy manufacturing under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) supervision. Increased government investments in the healthcare industry, as well as increased collaborations between pharmaceutical and biotechnology behemoths and leading research institutes for the development of advanced cellular therapies for cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other severe chronic diseases, are expected to boost global cell therapy market revenue growth in the coming years.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Cell Therapy Market:

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the majority of biopharmaceutical companies, but several cellular treatment development companies have seen a significant negative impact, which can be related to logistical issues as well as the manufacturing models used in this field. Furthermore, large and reliable funding is required to ensure successful commercial translation of cell-based medicines, a factor that was negatively impacted in 2020, affecting market growth even more.

Request For Free Sample @https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/126471

Cell Therapy Market Region Insights:

Regional analysis is another highly comprehensive part of the research and analysis study of the global Cell Therapy Market presented in the report. The global cell treatment market is dominated by North America. In 2020, North America held a total market share of 14.5%percent, as new institutions and institutes invest in R&D to propel cell therapy forward. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, and Yale Steam Cell Center are among the main universities in the United States that are involved in new research in cell regenerative technologies. During the forecasted period, Asia Pacific is expected to increase at a significant rate of 14.5%percent. China, South Korea, and Japan are spending extensively in regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies. Certain government-funded institutes are devoted to R&D with the goal of pushing the market forward.

What does the report include?

The study on the Global Cell Therapy Market includes qualitative characteristics such as drivers, constraints, and opportunities . The research looks at the current and future rivals in the Global Cell Therapy Market, as well as their product development strategies. The study examines the market in both qualitative and quantitative terms, and it is separated into three segments: component, deployment type, organisation size, and industry. Furthermore, the report provides comparable statistics for the key regions. For each of the above-mentioned segments, actual market sizes and predictions have been presented.

Cell Therapy Market Segmentation:

Global Cell Therapy Market, by Therapy Type:

Autologous Allogeneic

Global Cell Therapy Market, by Cell Type:

T-Cell Stem Cell

Global Cell Therapy Market, by Application:

Malignancies Musculoskeletal Disorder Autoimmune Disorder Dermatology Others

Global Cell Therapy Market, by End User:

Hospitals and clinics Academics and Research Institutes

By Region:

North America Europe Asia Pacific South America Middle East and Africa

Key Players in Cell Therapy Market:

Kolon TissueGene Inc. Anterogen Co. Ltd. JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. Castle Creek Biosciences, Inc. The Future of Biotechnology, MEDIPOST Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. PHARMICELL Co., Ltd Tameika Cell Technologies, Inc. Cells for Cells NuVasive, Inc. Vericel Corporation Celgene Corporation Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Merck KGaA Danaher Corporation Becton, Dickinson, and Company Lonza Group Sartorius AG Terumo BCT Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA

To Get a Detailed Report Summary and Research Scope of Cell Therapy MarketClick here @https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/cell-therapy-market/126471/

About Maximize Market Research:

Maximize Market Research, a global market study firm with a dedicated team of specialists and data, has conducted thorough research on the Cell Therapy Market. Maximize Market Research is well-positioned to assess and predict market size while also taking into account the competitive landscape of the various industries. Maximize Market Research has a strong unified team of industry professionals and analysts across sectors to guarantee that the whole industry ecosystem, as well as current developments, new trends, and futuristic the technology effect of uniquely particular industries is taken into consideration.

Contact Maximize Market Research:

3rd Floor, Navale IT Park, Phase 2

Pune Banglore Highway, Narhe,

Pune, Maharashtra 411041, India

[emailprotected]

Read the original:
Cell Therapy Market is Expected to Grow by USD 20.2 Billion Progressing at a CAGR of 14.5% By Forecast 2027 - Digital Journal