Author Archives: admin


Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market 2021 Trends and Leading Players Analysis 2027 Merck, STEMCELL Technologies, Irvinesci, Cell…

Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market is as of late given by Market Research Place that offers current, memorable, and developmental patterns in the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium business. The report investigates the market, which has been classified into five fundamental districts. The concentrate additionally inspects the pre and post COVID impact on the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market at provincial and worldwide level. It has a devoted segment on key producers working on the lookout.

This segment includes the business outline, portion and brand outline, monetary execution, and advancements attempted by the organizations to remain bleeding edge in the opposition. Besides, portion of the overall industry of the main ten players is additionally canvassed in the concentrate so that organizations/endeavors hoping to enter in the market could see their individual situation in contrast with the top players and afterward choose appropriately, their arrangement to activity.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.marketresearchplace.com/report-detail/218956/request-sample

The report expects the possible development of the market by investigating memorable utilization/reception and creation patterns. Subjective bits of knowledge, for example, development advancing components, restriction on the lookout, challenges looked by the players, and openings that can be outfit to build the portion of the overall industry or change the organizations income to acquire higher profitability are covered under the report.

The global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market is divided by type into

The report has been segmented by application into

Some of the notable players in the market include

By region, the market has been segmented into

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.marketresearchplace.com/report/global-stem-cell-and-primary-cell-culture-medium-218956.html

The report is exclusively founded on bits of knowledge accumulated through essential and auxiliary. For optional exploration, the crude information is sifted and checks at each progression so that main validated information is caught and utilized for market inference. These reports give assessed and gauge market size and build yearly development rate for nations and local for every one of the portions and sub-fragments.

Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@marketresearchplace.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

Contact Us Mark Stone Head of Business Development Phone: +1-201-465-4211 Email: sales@marketresearchplace.com

Read more here:
Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market 2021 Trends and Leading Players Analysis 2027 Merck, STEMCELL Technologies, Irvinesci, Cell...

Resilience commits $30M to launch new biotechs out of Harvard with focus on therapeutics, biomanufacturing – FierceBiotech

National Resilience is not running in circles these days. The manufacturing and tech shop appears to have its ducks in a row, and the latest high-profile move is a $30 million commitmentto forming new companies with Harvard researchers.

First up is Circle Therapeutics. The biotech willbring forth a Harvard professor's technology platform with "promising applications in skeletal muscle disorders," the company said Friday.

Resilience might ring a bell: the San Diego-based company will helpModerna manufacture its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Canada. It will also produceDNA products for newly launched gene therapy biotech Intergalactic Therapeutics and recently contributed to stem cell startup Garuda's $72 million series A last month.

As part of the $30 million commitment, Resilience has inked a five-year research and development license with the Ivy League school to develop biologics, vaccines, nucleic acids and cell and gene therapies.

RELATED:Moderna taps National Resilience's new Canadian manufacturing site for COVID-19 vaccine production duties

Resilience's money will go toward faculty-initiated research dedicated to new therapeutic and biomanufacturing technologies formed in Harvard's labs. In turn, Resilience has the option to license technologies that come out of the projects.

Circle will likely be just the first in a clutch of companies formed under the collaboration to bring the new technologies into the clinic and onto the market. The new biotechcomes from the lab of Lee Rubin, Ph.D., whose group has identified targets for spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and is also studying Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and autism.

For six decades since the discovery of the satellite cell, it has not been possible to expand therapeutic numbers of satellite cellsin vitro, until we made real headway on it at Harvard, Rubin said in a statement. Were truly excited for the possible therapeutic impact of our innovations.

Aside from Harvard, Resilience also teamed up with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on biomanufacturing tech and development of new cell, gene and nucleic acid therapies. Terms of the deal, disclosedearlier this week, were kept under wraps.

See more here:
Resilience commits $30M to launch new biotechs out of Harvard with focus on therapeutics, biomanufacturing - FierceBiotech

A New Line of Defense in Blood Cancer: Natural Killer Cell Therapy – Curetoday.com

Bob Schulz knew something was wrong when he had a hard time walking up the hill while golfing in December 2018. At 73, he still walked the 18 holes at the Albuquerque, New Mexico, golf course every week. After a chest X-ray, his doctor sent him to the hospital immediately. Two liters of fluid were removed from Scholzs lungs several times during his four-day hospital stay. Extensive testing revealed malignant pleural effusion, or excess fluid and cancer cells between the tissues separating the lungs from the chest cavity.

Scholz sought a second opinion at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, a 13-hour drive away. There, he received a diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. He and his wife, Cindy, quickly packed up and moved to Houston for six months of R-CHOP chemotherapy, a combination of five drugs infused to kill cancer cells.

After chemotherapy, Scholz thought he was cancer-free, but in late 2020 he lost his voice completely, which sent him back to his oncologist at MD Anderson. A positron emission tomography scan revealed a recurrence of lymphoma in his throat, lung and liver. This time his doctor offered him treatment through a clinical trial for natural killer (NK) cell therapy, a type of infusion therapy that uses the bodys natural killer immune cells or donor NK cells, which are grown into larger quantities and sometimes genetically engineered with additional targeting abilities.

NK cells are a type of white blood cell in the immune system that can kill cancer and virally infected cells. They have the innate ability to recognize and attack cells infected with viruses or cancer cells, says Dr. Sarah Holstein, a multiple myeloma researcher and an associate professor of internal medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. However, cancer cells can sometimes evade NK cells ability to interact with and kill cancer cells. The idea behind NK cell therapy is to augment the bodys natural NK cell response and increase it and, hopefully, lead to a more direct cell-killing effect against the cancer cell, she explains.

Over the past two decades, researchers have studied various ways to do this; for example, by collecting the patients NK cells, growing them and then reinfusing them. When using the patients cells, its called an autologous adoptive transfer. Doctors also are growing cells from donors, called allogeneic adoptive transfer. These cells come from sources such as cell lines, peripheral blood or pluripotent stem cells, which can be found in neonatal foreskin or the umbilical cord, for example. Pluripotent stem cells have the ability to differentiate into many types of mature cells and can develop into NK cells or other needed cell types. One cell in the lab can produce millions of NK cells, says Dr. Paolo Strati, an assistant professor in the department of lymphoma and myeloma and the department of translational molecular pathology at MD Anderson Cancer Center. More recently the field has evolved to study genetically engineered NK cells, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-NK cells, that have the ability to recognize a specific target on the cancer cell.

Following three days of chemotherapy to prepare his immune system, the doctors gave Scholz three infusions of modified NK cells. He finished his treatment in early 2021 and is in remission. Im thankful every day about how fortunate I was to go there. Im thankful to have that kind of a place with treatments with that chance of success, he says.

A Growing Research Field

Dr. Jeffrey Miller, a professor of medicine in the division of hematology, oncology and transplantation at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, has been researching NK cell treatments for more than 25 years. He published a paper in 2005 about administering haploidentical allogeneic NK cells, which were taken from a related donor, to patients. The research showed that the cells can persist and expand in the body and may have a treatment role. His 2014 update, which was published in Blood, included 57 patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Researchers used the immunotoxin interleukin (IL)-2 diphtheria toxin fusion to deplete T regulatory cells and thereby help improve NK cell growth rates. In the study, successful NK cell expansion correlated with remission. Patients were given NK cells, cytokines and lymphodepleting therapy.

There was excitement in the field when we started to see (complete) response rates between 25% and 40% with those updates, Miller says. These were patients who progressed after standard therapy and had no other options. The response allowed some patients to become eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplants, even when they were not previously eligible.

Today, researchers are trying different trial designs, including an NK multidose strategy from allogeneic cells. We couldnt do it when we had to collect cells from individual donors. That only gave us one cell dose, Miller explains. Allogeneic cells can be expanded much faster, allowing for multiple doses and freezer storage until needed. Some trials are now giving up to six weekly doses of these off-the- shelf cell products, and doctors can infuse the cells in an cell expansion correlated with remission. Patients were given NK cells, cytokines and lymphodepleting therapy.

There was excitement in the field when we started to see (complete) response rates between 25% and 40% with those updates, Miller says. These were patients who progressed after standard therapy and had no other options. The response allowed some patients to become eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplants, even when they were not previously eligible.

Today, researchers are trying different trial designs, including an NK multidose strategy from allogeneic cells. We couldnt do it when we had to collect cells from individual donors. That only gave us one cell dose, Miller explains. Allogeneic cells can be expanded much faster, allowing for multiple doses and freezer storage until needed. Some trials are now giving up to six weekly doses of these off-the- shelf cell products, and doctors can infuse the cells in an outpatient clinic instead of during a hospital stay. The cells are thawed at the bedside and given, and the patients are watched for a few hours for allergic reactions, Miller says.

The idea behind multidosing is that NK cells dont persist in the body for as long as T cells, which are used in CAR-T cell therapy. Think of it as a living drug, Holstein says. Once you put them in, those engineered cells persist and continue to fight against the tumor, should there be any remaining tumor cells that flare up again. Researchers dont think the NK cells can live as long as T cells, but we dont know if they need to live that long. Perhaps theyre super effective early on and we dont need them to persist, Holstein says.

In her multiple myeloma research, Holstein led a study that explored the use of off-the-shelf NK cell therapy given shortly after the time of a stem cell transplant. There are data showing that early recovery of the patients own NK cells after a stem cell transplant is associated with improved outcomes. It is hypothesized that this early recovery of NK cells is contributing to the killing off of residual myeloma cells, she says. By giving multiple doses of off-the-shelf NK cells or allogeneic cells researchers are hoping to boost the effect, ensuring that theres enough time for NK cells to attack any errant myeloma cells during the critical bone marrow recovery time. At this time, were not sure yet if this approach is effective, Holstein explains.

Although more recent trials are studying multiple dosing, earlier trials such as Holsteins used one dose. Thats partly because it was difficult to grow enough cells for multiple doses per patient, even using donor cells. Nancy Gessmann was 59 years old when she enrolled in Holsteins earlier trial in 2017.

She hadnt heard of multiple myeloma before back problems and a fever sent her to her primary care doctor in Harlan, Iowa, in 2016. After receiving her diagnosis, Gessmann sought treatment an hour away at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, where she received chemotherapy followed by a stem cell transplant in May 2017.

During her 18 days in the hospital for the transplant, she received a single dose of allogeneic NK cells as part of Holsteins phase 1 study, along with a series of seven cytokine shots (they help stimulate the NK cells) to help the cells expand. It gave me hope that if there was anything out there that could help me, it was worth trying, she explains. Aside from feeling tired after the transplant and growth factor shots which are given to aid the therapy Gessmann does not think she experienced any side effects from the NK cell infusion.

With the clinical trial, I had the opportunity to possibly help myself, my family and others. I benefited from clinical research done by others before me with stem cell transplants and chemotherapies. Others helped my treatment plan and made it easier for me. Im paying it forward, Gessmann says.

CAR-T Versus NK Cell Therapy

NK cell therapy may have advantages over T cells. Infused CAR-T cells will recognize a cancer cell and attack it. One attack method involves releasing toxins called cytokines, which can lead to a hyperinflammatory state known as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). CRS is caused when a large number of cytokines, proteins made by some immune cells, are quickly released into the blood from immune cells. They can lead to CRS symptoms such as fever, but patients can also experience low blood pressure, low blood oxygen and neuro- toxicities such as difficulty finding words, and severe issues such as a seizure or coma. About 10% of patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy for lymphoma experience severe CRS, and 40% experience severe neurotoxity. Its a real problem; hence, we need to look into different treatments, Strati says.

NK cells potentially can be less toxic than, and as effective as, T-cell therapy. Treatment for me was extremely easy, and the results were great, Scholz says. It wasnt like serious chemotherapies. I didnt feel real good for a couple of days, but it was minor. There were no repercussions from treatment.

The good thing about NK cells compared with T cells, Miller says, is that NK cells dont induce graft-versus-host disease, which is when infused allogeneic T cells attack the patients healthy cells. NK cells are missing the mechanism in T cells that cause it. For NK therapy, as far as we know, no known neurotoxicity or CRS has been reported in any consistent way today, Miller says.

The CAR technology also is being used for some NK cell treatments. With CAR, we engineer NK cells in the lab, Strati says. We make them able to recognize specific proteins on top of lymphoma. Using donor cells, both CAR-T and CAR NK cells can be available to patients more quickly than the patients cells.

The first in-human trial in the United States with CAR NK cells was for relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B lymphoid malignancies. The trial encoded NK cells to recognize CD19 and express cytokine IL-15 to improve persistence. Results were published in a 2020 New England Journal of Medicine study, and it continues to receive a lot of attention, Holstein says. The phase 1 and 2 study showed proof of concept that CAR-NK therapy is possible and effective. Of the 11 patients, 8 had a response and 7 had a complete remission.

The Future of NK Cell Therapy

Researchers developed data for NK cells having a similar cancer-killing strategy but different recognition pattern as T cells, leading to a crazy interest in NK cells, Miller says. Until the past decade, people mostly ignored NK cells.

Its not just academic labs pursuing them but also cell companies with their own constructs and expansion strategies. The field opened up considerably with the ability to grow billions of cells for off-the-shelf usage in the past 10 years.

Given the multibillion dollar market for anticancer anti- body therapy and the ability of cell therapy companies to genetically manipulate cells with CARs, I would expect were going to see somebody close to clinical approval in the next three to five years, Miller says.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, dont forget tosubscribe to CUREs newsletters here.

Link:
A New Line of Defense in Blood Cancer: Natural Killer Cell Therapy - Curetoday.com

Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market By Type (Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bone Marrow Transplant, Adipose Tissue Stem Cells) and By…

250 Pages Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market Survey by Fact MR, A Leading Business and Competitive Intelligence Provider

Rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy has been demonstrated to induce profound healing activity, halt arthritic conditions, and in many cases, reverse and regenerate joint tissue. Today, bone marrow transplant, adipose or fat-derived stem cells, and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (human umbilical cord tissue) are used for rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy.

The Market Research Survey by Fact.MR, highlights the key reasons behind increasing demand and sales of Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy.Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy market driversand constraints, threats and opportunities, regional segmentation and opportunity assessment, end-use/application prospects review are addressed in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy market survey report. The survey report provides a comprehensive analysis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy market key trends and insights on Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy market size and share.

To Get In-depth Insights Request for Brochure here https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=B&rep_id=1001

Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market: Segmentation

Tentatively, the global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market can be segmented on the basis of treatment type, application, end user and geography.

Based on treatment type, the global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market can be segmented into:

Based on application, the global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market can be segmented into:

Based on distribution channel, the global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market can be segmented into:

Key questions answered in Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market Survey Report:

Request Customized Report as Per Your Requirements https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=RC&rep_id=1001

Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market: Key Players

The global market for rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy is highly fragmented. Examples of some of the key players operating in the global rheumatoid arthritis stem cell therapy market include Mesoblast Ltd., Roslin Cells, Regeneus Ltd, ReNeuron Group plc, International Stem Cell Corporation, TiGenix and others.

The report is a compilation of first-hand information, qualitative and quantitative assessment by industry analysts, inputs from industry experts and industry participants across the value chain.

Essential Takeaways from the this Market Report

Enquire Before Buying Here https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=EB&rep_id=1001

The Report Covers Exhaustive Analysis On:

Explore Fact.MRs Coverage on theHealthcareDomain:

Hemostasis Valves MarketAccording to the latest research by Fact.MR, the Hemostasis Valves Market is set to witness steady growth during 2021-2031. The increasing advancement in the hemostasis valves industry will offer lucrative opportunities and an increasing number of interventional procedures is propelling the market growth.

Cosmetic Dentistry MarketThe global cosmetic dentistry market is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period of 2021-2031. This growth is factored in due to the rising consumer awareness and well-defined grooming interest in the aesthetical value of oral care.

Creatinine Testing MarketCreatinine testing involves the measurement of the level of creatinine, which is a product of muscle creatine catabolism and is thus a reliable indicator of kidney function by an indication that a rise in the level of creatinine may indicate Acute Kidney Injury or Chronic Kidney Disease.

About Fact.MR

Market research and consulting agency with a difference! Thats why 80% of Fortune 1,000 companies trust us for making their most critical decisions. We have offices in US and Dublin, whereas our global headquarter is in Dubai. While our experienced consultants employ the latest technologies to extract hard-to-find insights, we believe our USP is the trust clients have on our expertise. Spanning a wide range from automotive & industry 4.0 to healthcare & retail, our coverage is expansive, but we ensure even the most niche categories are analyzed. Reach out to us with your goals, and well be an able research partner.

Contact:US Sales Office: 11140 Rockville Pike Suite 400 Rockville, MD 20852 United States Tel: +1 (628) 251-1583 E-Mail:[emailprotected]

Corporate Headquarter:Unit No: AU-01-H Gold Tower (AU), Plot No: JLT-PH1-I3A, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

The post Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market By Type (Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bone Marrow Transplant, Adipose Tissue Stem Cells) and By Application (Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy) Forecast to 2021-2031 appeared first on The Swiss Times.

Read the original:
Rheumatoid Arthritis Stem Cell Therapy Market By Type (Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bone Marrow Transplant, Adipose Tissue Stem Cells) and By...

Dr. Kahl on the Potential Utility of Frontline CAR T-Cell Therapy in MCL – OncLive

Brad S. Kahl, MD, discusses the potential utility of frontline CAR T-cell therapy in mantle cell lymphoma.

Brad S. Kahl, MD, professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Oncology Division, Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, discusses the potential utility of frontline CAR T-cell therapy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

CAR T-cell therapy has the potential to move into earlier lines of treatment, including the frontline setting, in MCL; however, longer follow-up is needed with CAR T-cell therapy in the relapsed/refractory setting before frontline clinical trials can be explored, Kahl says. Currently, CAR T-cell therapy is demonstrating high response rates at 12 and 18 months of follow-up in the relapsed/refractory setting, but it is unknown whether these responses will remain durable at 3 or 5 years.

Positive 3-year data in the relapsed/refractory setting could provide the clinical rationale to evaluate CAR T-cell therapy in the frontline setting, Kahl says. Pending these results, CAR T-cell therapy could replace autologous stem cell transplant as consolidative therapy or offer a standard option for patients with high-risk biologic features, such as TP53 mutations, Kahl concludes.

More here:
Dr. Kahl on the Potential Utility of Frontline CAR T-Cell Therapy in MCL - OncLive

Orchard Therapeutics Outlines Comprehensive Presence at the European Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Congress – Yahoo Finance

Nine accepted abstracts demonstrate broad potential of the companys HSC gene therapy approach to treat severe neurodegenerative diseases and immunological disorders

BOSTON and LONDON, Oct. 13, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Orchard Therapeutics (Nasdaq: ORTX), a global gene therapy leader, today announced the acceptance of nine abstracts at the upcoming European Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Congress (ESGCT) taking place virtually from October 19-22.

Clinical and pre-clinical data from across the companys hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy portfolio will be featured in two oral and seven poster presentations, including an update on the ongoing proof-of-concept study of OTL-201 for the treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (MPS-IIIA, also known as Sanfilippo syndrome type A), pre-clinical data from OTL-204 in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), as well as proof-of-principle for longitudinal monitoring of vector integration sites using Liquid Biopsy Integration Site sequencing (LiBIS-seq).

Additionally, Orchards scientific advisory board member and clinical collaborator Alessandra Biffi, M.D., professor of pediatrics, University of Padua and chief of the Pediatric Onco-hematology Unit of Padua Hospital, will be giving an invited presentation on the HSC gene therapy landscape for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, which will include an overview of several of the companys investigational programs.

The presentations are listed below, and the full program is available online on the ESGCT website. All times are Central European Summer Time (CEST).

Oral Presentation Details:

Haematopoietic reconstitution dynamics of mobilized peripheral blood- and bone marrow-derived haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells after gene therapy Presenting Author: Andrea Calabria, Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: OR049 Date/Time: Friday, October 22, 2021 at 10:01 CEST

Longitudinal monitoring of vector integration sites in in vivo GT approaches by Liquid-Biopsy-Integration-Site-Sequencing Presenting Author: Daniela Cesana, Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: OR058 Date/Time: Friday, October 22, 2021 at 12:46 CEST

Story continues

Poster Presentation Details:

All posters will be available on demand starting October 19, 2021 on the ESGCT website.

Development of an ex vivo Gene Therapy for Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Presenting Author: Yuri Ciervo, Ph.D., division of pediatric Hematology,Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Womans and Child Health Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Abstract Number: P077

Optimized Lentiviral Transduction Process for ex vivo CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy Drug Product Manufacture Presenting Author: Saranya Elavazhagan, Orchard Therapeutics Abstract Number: P271

Clinical Trial Update: Ex-vivo autologous stem cell gene therapy in MPSIIIA Presenting Author: Brian Bigger, Ph.D., University of Manchester Abstract Number: P361

Dissecting bone remodelling mechanisms and hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy impact in Mucopolysaccharidosis type I Hurler bone defects Presenting Author: Ludovica Santi, Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: P157

Hematopoietic reconstitution and lineage commitment in HSC GT patients are influenced by the disease background Presenting Author: Andrea Calabria, Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: P181

Kinetics and composition of haematopoietic stem/progenitors mobilized cells upon G-CSF and Plerixafor administration in transplant donor or patients undergoing autologous gene therapy Presenting Author: Luca Basso-Ricci, San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: P174

Role of peripheral blood circulating haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during physiological haematopoietic maturation and after gene therapy Presenting Author: Pamela Quaranta, San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy Abstract Number: P186

About Orchard Therapeutics At Orchard Therapeutics, our vision is to end the devastation caused by genetic and other severe diseases. We aim to do this by discovering, developing and commercializing new treatments that tap into the curative potential of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy. In this approach, a patients own blood stem cells are genetically modified outside of the body and then reinserted, with the goal of correcting the underlying cause of disease in a single treatment.

In 2018, the company acquired GSKs rare disease gene therapy portfolio, which originated from a pioneering collaboration between GSK and the San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy in Milan, Italy. Today, Orchard has a deep pipeline spanning pre-clinical, clinical and commercial stage HSC gene therapies designed to address serious diseases where the burden is immense for patients, families and society and current treatment options are limited or do not exist.

Orchard has its global headquarters in London and U.S. headquarters in Boston. For more information, please visit http://www.orchard-tx.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Availability of Other Information About Orchard Investors and others should note that Orchard communicates with its investors and the public using the company website (www.orchard-tx.com), the investor relations website (ir.orchard-tx.com), and on social media (Twitter and LinkedIn), including but not limited to investor presentations and investor fact sheets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. The information that Orchard posts on these channels and websites could be deemed to be material information. As a result, Orchard encourages investors, the media, and others interested in Orchard to review the information that is posted on these channels, including the investor relations website, on a regular basis. This list of channels may be updated from time to time on Orchards investor relations website and may include additional social media channels. The contents of Orchards website or these channels, or any other website that may be accessed from its website or these channels, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

Contacts

Investors Renee Leck Director, Investor Relations +1 862-242-0764 Renee.Leck@orchard-tx.com

Media Benjamin Navon Director, Corporate Communications +1 857-248-9454 Benjamin.Navon@orchard-tx.com

See the original post here:
Orchard Therapeutics Outlines Comprehensive Presence at the European Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Congress - Yahoo Finance

Taking aim at the brain, Takeda strikes up cell therapy R&D alliance with Immusoft – MedCity News

The first cell therapies made from a patients own cells were cancer treatments T cells engineered to hit tumors. Immusoft is taking a similar approach with a different type of immune cell, aiming to deliver these cell therapies into the brain. The biotech startup is still preclinical, but Takeda Pharmaceutical sees enough promise to begin a research and development alliance that could yield new treatments for rare neurometabolic diseases.

Seattle-based Immusoft develops its treatments by reprogramming B cells, a type of white blood cell. The process for making this treatment is nearly identical to that of CAR T, the first autologous cancer cell therapies. Blood is collected from the patient and the desired immune cells are selected. Those cells are engineered, then multiplied in a lab. After the process produces enough cells, that treatment is infused into the patient.

Besides the type of cell that is used, the key difference between CAR T and Immusofts approach is the engineering step. In CAR T, this stage involves engineering T cells to recognize a particular antigen on tumors. For Immusoft, this step means programing B cells with DNA that enables them to produce large amounts of therapeutic protein. Immusoft calls its technology Immune System Programing, or ISP.

Takeda and Immusoft did not specify the diseases they aim to address under their new alliance, though the companies said the collaboration will focus on delivering therapies across the blood-brain barrier, the protective layer that keeps certain substances, including some drugs, from reaching the organ. By reaching the brain, these B cell therapies have the potential to address a range of neurological disorders.

We continue to build our internal capabilities as well as partner with innovative companies early on in the discovery process to advance our next-generation gene and cell therapy ambitions for rare genetic and hematologic diseases, Takeda Rare Diseases Drug Discovery Unit Head Madhu Natarajan said in a prepared statement. Working together with Immusoft, we hope to validate their ISP technology for [central nervous system] delivery of innovative therapeutics for rare neurometabolic diseases.

Rare neurometabolic disease is already one of the areas of focus for Immusoft. The rare enzyme deficiency Hurler syndrome is the target for its most advanced internal program, ISP-001. That cell therapy candidate is on track for an investigational new drug application filing by the end of this year, according to the companys website.

According to deal terms announced Wednesday, Takeda will pay Seattle-based Immusoft an upfront payment as well as research funding. The specific amounts were not disclosed. When the drug candidates covered under the partnership reach preclinical development, Takeda may elect to choose an unspecified number of them to continue their development. The Japanese pharma giant would owe option fees plus milestone payments tied to the progress of those programs. The companies gave no specific breakdown of those payments, other than to say the total value could top $900 million if all options are exercised and all milestones are achieved.

Working with B cells offer several advantages over other approaches to treating disease. Gene therapies delivered via engineered viruses cant be re-dosed because the antibodies that patients develop to the virus will render subsequent doses ineffective. By using a patients own cells, Immusoft aims to produce therapies that can be dosed multiple times. Also, gene therapies made by collecting a patients stem cells require a preconditioning step that knocks out the immune system to make room for the transplanted stem cells to grow. This step opens the door to a range of potential complications. Takedas recent dealmaking shows the pharma giants interest in avoiding therapies that employ viral delivery. In unveiling a multi-program alliance with Poseida Therapeutics on Tuesday, the pharma giant cited the biotechs non-viral technologies.

There are other companies developing ways to engineer B cells into new therapies. South San Francisco-based Walking Fish Therapeutics unveiled a $50 million Series A round of funding last month to support its research, still preclinical. Be Biopharma of Boston emerged nearly a year ago with a $52 million Series A financing.

Immusofts research so far has produced a preclinical drug pipeline spanning both rare and common diseases. Besides the Hurler syndrome candidate, the other rare disease programs include potential treatments for muscle-wasting disorders amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy; the metabolic disease Hunter syndrome; and Pompe and Gaucher diseases, both enzyme deficiency disorders. Immusofts common disease research is still in the discovery stage. For common diseases, Immusoft is developing treatments for cardiovascular disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, and Parkinsons disease.

Image by Jolygon via Getty Images

Originally posted here:
Taking aim at the brain, Takeda strikes up cell therapy R&D alliance with Immusoft - MedCity News

Dr. Erba on the Evolution of Treatment in MCL – OncLive

Harry Paul Erba, MD, PhD, discusses the evolution of treatment in mantle cell lymphoma.

Harry Paul Erba, MD, PhD, instructor, clinical investigator, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, member, Duke Cancer Institute, director, Leukemia Program and Phase I Development in Hematologic Malignancies, Duke Health, discusses the evolution of treatment in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Similar to acute myeloid leukemia, the goal of therapy in MCL should be the key focus from treatment initiation. For example, a younger patient with limited comorbidities should be considered for curative-intent therapy or treatment with a time-limited regimen to elicit deep responses and prolonged progression-free survival, Erba says.

High-dose cytarabine-based therapies, such as the Nordic regimen known as maxi-CHOP, and autologous stem cell transplant could be considered for patients with MCL, Erba explains. Oral therapies, including BTK inhibitors, are also available options for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL or older patients who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy, Erba concludes.

Continued here:
Dr. Erba on the Evolution of Treatment in MCL - OncLive

Newer Agents for DLBCL Show Potential for Earlier Use in the Course of Treatment – Targeted Oncology

The most common frontline treatment for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine sulfate, and prednisone (CHOP). However, approximately 1 in 3 patients relapse after CHOP, and alternative therapies are still needed.

According to Jason Westin, MD, the leader of the DLBCL research team at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the strategies for DLBCL treatment have not changed drastically since the mid 1970s. Additionally, more information is needed as to why patients relapse after CHOP.

For patients who are CHOP resistant, the standard of care is strong chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant. However, according to Westin, more personalized and targeted therapies are needed.

In an interview with Targeted OncologyTM, Westin discussed the future of DLBCL treatment in both the frontline and later-line settings, along with current unmet clinical needs.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: Can you give a background on current treatments in DLBCL?

WESTIN: DLBCL is the most common lymphoid cancer in adults, it's diagnosed in about 30,000 people each year in the US. And the treatments of that most common lymphoid cancer have been effectively stuck in the 1970s and the 1990s. We use a combination chemotherapy approach called CHOP, which was originally prescribed in 1976. We've changed a lot in life from 1976 to now, but we're still using this old combination chemotherapy in the curative setting for lymphoma. So obviously, new approaches are needed.

What does the current DLBCL treatment landscape?

Most patients are treated with the combination chemotherapy CHOP, and that cures approximately 2/3 of patients. It's a fairly effective standard therapy. However, at least 1 out of 3 people need additional treatments, and we don't do as well in the relapse setting as we'd like. So, we're constantly trying to innovate and improve that frontline setting and get beyond the 2/3 cure rate with initial treatments, and that will take a better understanding of why those 1/3 don't respond to CHOP, and a better understanding of the biology of what makes them resistant to treatments.

Do we know anything right now about the mechanisms of resistance to CHOP?

We know some, but I argue that we don't nearly know as much as we think we do. We understand the biology in the sense of understanding which mutation is present, or what type of gene signature. But often, the actual reason as to why a given patient doesn't respond to CHOP is very poorly understood. Patients that have the same biopsy, same genetic signature, some of those patients are cured and some of those patients are resistant. And it's difficult to predict prior to therapy which of those patients are resistant.

For patients that are resistant to CHOP, what options exist for them?

The standard of care for the past 20 years for those resistant to CHOP has been strong chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant. Beyond the second line setting right now, there are a number of FDA approved agents for patients with relapsed BLBCL, and many of those FDA approved agents are being studied in combination CHOP and rituximab [Rituxan; R-CHOP].

What clinical needs are still unmet in this patient population?

The needs that are still unmet are finding more personalized therapies, specifically for those patients who are not cured with R-CHOP. But I would argue even in those patients who are currently cured with R-CHOP, that we don't want to use 1970s, chemotherapy in 2050. We want to be able to have personalized approaches and be able to move beyond effectively sledgehammer kind of blunt force instruments and use more precision medicine. So, we clearly need to do better urgently for the folks who are currently resistant or not responsive to chemotherapy. But I'd argue in the long run we need to do better across the board.

Do you see more aggressive approaches like autologous stem cell transplant and targeted therapies moving to the frontline setting in the future? Or do you think they'll remain a second- and third-line option?

I think that CAR T cells have the potential to move to the frontline for a subset of patients, for those that are not going to be responsive to our standard treatments. I think that's an approach that has merit, to try and use a powerful weapon at an earlier time point. I don't think stem cell transplant will do that. But I do think some of the other targeted therapies, the antibody drug conjugates, the bispecific antibodies, antibodies in combination with other immune therapies do potentially have a role to play in the frontline setting.

Where do you see the DLBCL space going in the next 5 to 10 years?

Well, I'd love to say things will be dramatically different. But we could have said that at any point over the last 20 years and would have been wrong. There are multiple ongoing studies looking at ways to improve the frontline setting. But innovation is more likely in the relapse space, which then filters up to the frontline space. And I think that the CAR T-cell studies showing potential advantages in the second line will change the landscape for patients who have relapsed after R-CHOP in the next 5 to 10 years to favor using CAR T-cell therapy. I think based on having that better cure fraction in the relapse space, more innovation may be possible in the frontline space. And so therefore doing studies that are not handcuffed to the 1970s chemotherapy for fear of not giving a patient the old curative therapy and missing a potential window for cure, I think that will allow us to do more innovative studies. I've done a handful of clinical trials using targeted therapy combinations prior to chemotherapy. And what we've shown in those studies is the response rates are very high. And patients tolerate it very well. And so that's still on a clinical trial stage. But it does show the potential that these targeted treatments can work better in newly diagnosed patients and potentially forego the need for chemotherapy.

I think the R-CHOP plus combination trial designs a failure. And I think that more innovative trial designs are needed. But clinical research still remains the best weapon we have to fight cancer in general and specifically DLBCL.

Go here to read the rest:
Newer Agents for DLBCL Show Potential for Earlier Use in the Course of Treatment - Targeted Oncology

Worldwide Cell Therapy Consumables Industry to 2031 – Featuring Bio-Techne, Irvine Scientific and Sartorius Among Others – PRNewswire

DUBLIN, Oct. 12, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Cell Therapy Consumables Market by Type of Consumable, Type of Cell Therapy, Scale of Operation, Type of End-User and Key Geographical Regions: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2021 - 2031" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This report features an extensive study on the consumable providers within the cell therapy industry. The study also includes an elaborate discussion on the future potential of this evolving market.

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there has been an evident increase in the number of cell and gene therapy products being evaluated in early phases of development. This can further be validated by the observed upsurge in the number of investigational new drug (IND) applications. In fact, more than 800 IND applications have been filed for ongoing clinical studies, indicating remarkable scientific progress and therapeutic promise of these breakthrough drug candidates. However, manufacturing of cell therapies is a complex and capital-intensive process fraught with a wide range of challenges. Some of the key concerns of contemporary innovators include raw material supply constraints, current facility limitations, high cost of ancillary materials (buffers, growth factors and media) used in upstream processes, regulatory and compliance-related issues, and inconsistencies related to quality attributes of the final product. Further, the onset of recent COVID-19 pandemic has created additional challenges for therapy developers, in terms of procuring the required raw materials, by disrupting well-established supply chains.

Recent reports indicate that the global demand for human serum albumin (a key component of cell culture media for use in a multitude of therapeutic and emerging biotech areas) has increased at an annual rate of 10%-15%. On the contrary, the use of animal components is highly disregarded by the US FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), and other regulatory bodies on the grounds that they pose an undesirable risk of transmitting infectious agents, such as prions (mad cow disease) and virus (HIV), as well as enable high batch-to-batch variation. Consequently, serum-free and xeno-free media have proven to be a promising alternative to serum derived components. In order to produce quality cellular therapies, several drug developers prefer to rely on third-party service providers for the supply of raw materials, such as cell culture medium, cell isolation kits and cell separation reagents.

Presently, over 60 service providers are actively engaged in providing consumable/raw material products for the production of cell therapies. The current consolidated market landscape is primarily dominated by the presence of large players, capturing a substantial proportion of the market share. In the recent past, many of the aforementioned service providers have also forged strategic alliances and/or acquired other players, in order to further enhance their respective service offerings. Given that the demand for cell therapies is indubitably rising, the corresponding opportunity for cell therapy consumable service providers is expected to witness steady growth, over the next decade.

Amongst other elements, the report features:

Key Questions Answered

Key Topics Covered:

1. PREFACE

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE 4.1. Chapter Overview 4.2. Cell Therapy Kit Providers: List of Players 4.3. Cell Therapy Media Providers: List of Players 4.4. Cell Therapy Reagent Providers: List of Players 4.5. Analysis by Type of Consumable, Type of Cell Therapy and Application Area (Grid Representation)

5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS 5.1. Chapter Overview 5.2. Key Assumptions and Parameters 5.3. Methodology 5.4. Company Competitiveness: Kit Providers 5.5. Company Competitiveness: Media Providers 5.6. Company Competitiveness: Reagent Providers

6. BRAND POSITIONING OF KEY INDUSTRY PLAYERS 6.1. Chapter Overview 6.2. Scope and Methodology 6.3. Bio-Techne 6.4. Miltenyi Biotec 6.5. Sartorius 6.6. STEMCELL Technologies 6.7. Thermo Fisher Scientific

7. COMPANY PROFILES 7.1. Chapter Overview 7.2. Miltenyi Biotec 7.2.1. Company Overview 7.2.2. Product Portfolio 7.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.3. STEMCELL Technologies 7.3.1. Company Overview 7.3.2. Product Portfolio 7.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.4. Bio-Techne 7.4.1. Company Overview 7.4.2. Product Portfolio 7.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.5. Irvine Scientific 7.5.1. Company Overview 7.5.2. Product Portfolio 7.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.6. Thermo Fisher Scientific 7.6.1. Company Overview 7.6.2. Product Portfolio 7.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.7. Sartorius 7.7.1. Company Overview 7.7.2. Product Portfolio 7.7.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.8. BD Biosciences 7.8.1. Company Overview 7.8.2. Product Portfolio 7.8.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.9. Lonza 7.9.1. Company Overview 7.9.2. Product Portfolio 7.9.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.10. CellGenix 7.10.1. Company Overview 7.10.2. Product Portfolio 7.10.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.11. Corning 7.11.1. Company Overview 7.11.2. Product Portfolio 7.11.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

8. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND INITIATIVES 8.1. Chapter Overview 8.2. Partnership Models 8.3. Cell Therapy Consumables: Recent Partnerships and Collaborations 8.4. Cell Therapy Consumables: Recent Expansions

9. LIKELY PARTNER ANALYSIS FOR CELL THERAPY CONSUMABLE PROVIDERS 9.1. Chapter Overview 9.2. Scoring Criteria and Key Assumptions 9.3. Scope and Methodology 9.4. Key Potential Strategic Partners for Cell Therapy Consumable Providers 9.3.1. Likely Partner Opportunities for Dendritic Cell Therapy Consumable Providers 9.3.2. Likely Partner Opportunities for NK Cell Therapy Consumable Providers 9.3.3. Likely Partner Opportunities for Stem Cell Therapy Consumable Providers 9.3.4. Likely Partner Opportunities for T-Cell Therapy Consumable Providers

10. DEMAND ANALYSIS 10.1. Chapter Overview 10.2. Scope and Methodology 10.3. Global Demand for Cell Therapy Consumables 10.4. Global Demand for Cell Therapy Consumables for Planar Processes 10.5. Global Demand for Cell Therapy Consumables for Suspension Processes 10.6. Analysis by Scale of Operation 10.7. Analysis by Region

11. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS 11.1. Chapter Overview 11.2. Forecast Methodology 11.3. Global Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031 11.4. Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031: Distribution by Type of Consumable 11.5. Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031: Distribution by Type of Cell Therapy 11.6. Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031: Distribution by Scale of Operation 11.7. Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031: Distribution by Type of End-User 11.8. Outsourced Cell Therapy Consumables Market, 2021-2031: Distribution by Geography

12. UPCOMING TRENDS AND FUTURE GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES 12.1. Chapter Overview 12.2. Emerging Trends Related to Cell Culture Media 12.3. Automation of Cell Therapy Manufacturing Processes 12.4. Single Use Systems and Technologies in Cell Therapy Manufacturing

13. IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON CELL THERAPY CONSUMABLES MARKET 13.1. Chapter Overview 13.2. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cell Therapy Consumables Market 13.3. Impact on Future Market Opportunities for Cell Therapy Consumable Providers 13.4. Current Opinions and Key Initiatives of Key Players 13.5. Recuperative Strategies for Developer Businesses 13.5.1. Strategies for Implementation in the Short / Mid Term 13.5.2. Strategies for Implementation in the Long Term

14. CONCLUDING REMARKS 14.1. Chapter Overview

15. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS 15.1. Chapter Overview 15.2. Anant Kamath, Chief Operating Officer, Cellular Engineering Technologies 15.2.1. Cellular Engineering Technologies: Key Highlights 15.2.2. Interview Transcript 15.3. Vishal G. Warke, Director R&D, Cell Culture and Immunology, HiMedia Laboratories and Gauri W. Page, Assistant R&D Manager, Animal Cell Culture, Himedia Laboratories 15.3.1. HiMedia Laboratories: Key Highlights 15.3.2. Interview Transcript

16. APPENDIX I: TABULATED DATA

17. APPENDIX II: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/2t5jj1

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Read more here:
Worldwide Cell Therapy Consumables Industry to 2031 - Featuring Bio-Techne, Irvine Scientific and Sartorius Among Others - PRNewswire