Author Archives: admin


Stem Cell Clinic > Articles by: admin

Stem Cell Banking Market Report 2021 | Growth and Opportunities Analysis – BioSpace

By Stem Cell Medicine

The demand within the global stem cell banking market is growing on account of advancements in the field of regenerative medicine. The medical fraternity has become extremely focused towards the development of artificial tissues that can infuse with the human body. Furthermore, medical analysis and testing has gathered momentum across biological laboratories and research institutes. Henceforth, it is integral to develop stem cell samples and repositories that hold relevance in modern-day research. The need for regenerative medicine emerges from the growing incidence of internal tissue rupture. Certain types of tissues do not recover for several years, and may even be damaged permanently. Therefore, the need for stem cell banking is expected to grow at a significant pace.

In a custom report, TMR Research digs into the factors that have aided the growth of the global stem cell banking market. The global stem cell banking market can be segmented on the basis of bank size, application, and region. The commendable developments that have incepted across the US healthcare industry has given a thrust to the growth of the North America stem cell banking market.

Get Brochure of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=6111

Global Stem Cell Banking Market: Notable Developments

The need for improved regenerative medication and anatomy has played an integral role in driving fresh developments within the stem cell banking market.

Gallant has emerged as a notable market entity that has remained as the torchbearer of innovation within the global stem cell banking market. The company has recently launched stem cell banking for dogs, and has attracted the attention of the masses. As people become increasingly concerned about their pets, the new move by Gallant shall help the company in earning the trust of the consumers. Moreover, it can move several notches higher on the innovation index.

Cells4Life has also remained at the forefront of developments within the global stem cell banking market. After suffering backlash for its error in cord blood stem cell promotion, the company is expected to use effective public relation strategies to regain its value in the market.

Global Stem Cell Banking Market: Growth Drivers

Development of improved facilities for storage of stem cells has played an integral role in driving market demand. Furthermore, the unprecedented demand for improved analysis of regenerative medications has also created new opportunities within the global stem cell banking market. Medical research has attracted investments from global investors and stakeholders. The tremendous level of resilience shown by biological researchers to develop stem cell samples has aided market growth. Henceforth, the total volume of revenues within the global stem cell banking market is slated to multiply.

Buy this Premium Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/checkout?rep_id=6111&ltype=S

Commercialization of stem cell banks has emerged as matter of concern for the healthcare industry. However, this trend has also helped in easy storage and procurement of cells stored during the yester years of children. Presence of sound procedures to register at stem cell banks, and the safety offered by these entities, has generated fresh demand within the global market. New regional territories are opening to the idea of stem cell banking. Several factors are responsible for the growth of this trend. Primarily, improvements in stem cell banking can have favourable impact on the growth of the healthcare industry. Moreover, the opportunities for revenue generation associated with the development of functional stem cell banks has aided regional market growth.

The global stem cell banking market is segmented on the basis of:

Source

Get Table of Content of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=6111

About TMR Research

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to business entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experienced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

Contact:

Rohit Bhisey

TMR Research,

3739 Balboa St # 1097,

San Francisco, CA 94121

United States

Tel: +1-415-520-1050

Visit Site: https://www.tmrresearch.com/

View original post here:
Stem Cell Banking Market Report 2021 | Growth and Opportunities Analysis - BioSpace

Global Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing Market (2020 to 2025) – Featuring Lonza Group, Merck & Novartis Among Others – ResearchAndMarkets.com -…

By Stem Cell Medicine

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing: Global Markets" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This research report presents an in-depth analysis of the global cell therapy biomanufacturing market by product type, application and region. The report discusses the key inhibitors to the growth of cell therapy biomanufacturing. The report discusses the role of participants in the supply chain from manufacturers to researchers. The report analyzes key companies operating in the global cell therapy biomanufacturing market. In-depth patent analysis in the report will provide a look at the existing and coming technological trends.

In this report, the cell therapy biomanufacturing market is segmented by product type, application and region. Based on product type, the market is segmented into source of cells (T-cells, Dendritic cells, tumor cells and stem cells), and type of therapy (autologous cell therapies, allogeneic cell therapies). The market by application is categorized into cardiovascular diseases, bone repair, neurological disorders, skeletal muscle repair, cancer and others. The market by region is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and ROW.

An increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases, rise in the demand for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, and further development of stem cell therapy approaches are driving the market's growth. However, market restraints include the bottlenecks experienced by manufacturers during commercialization of cell therapies and the high costs associated with cell therapies. The rise in the development of allogeneic cell therapy is expected to drive the market's growth. Allogeneic cell therapy involves chemo radiotherapeutic conditioning therapy that is followed by transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells as well as lymphocytes isolated from allogeneic healthy donors for treatment of various chronic diseases. (Allogeneic means from "one person to another," vs. autologous, which means from "one person back to the same person after processing.")

Companies Mentioned

Report Includes:

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Summary and Highlights

Chapter 3 Market and Technology Background

Chapter 4 Market Trends and Challenges

Chapter 5 Market Breakdown by Product Type

Chapter 6 Market Breakdown by Application

Chapter 7 Market Breakdown by Region

Chapter 8 Regulatory Structure

Chapter 9 Company Profiles

Chapter 10 Appendix: References

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/747t6w

View original post here:
Global Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing Market (2020 to 2025) - Featuring Lonza Group, Merck & Novartis Among Others - ResearchAndMarkets.com -...

Mouth Sores from Chemo: Symptoms, Causes, and Treatments – Healthline

By Stem Cell Treatment

While youre receiving treatment for cancer, some of the drugs you take can cause painful sores to develop inside your mouth. You can also get them if youve had a bone marrow (stem cell) transplant as part of your cancer care.

Although they often heal on their own, these mouth sores can make it uncomfortable to eat and talk. Well discuss what you can do to relieve the pain and prevent them from getting worse.

Mouth sores can be a common side effect of cancer treatment. The condition, known as stomatitis or mucositis, is an inflammation of the tissues inside your mouth.

Whitish, ulcer-like sores can form on your cheeks, gums, lips, tongue, or on the roof or floor of your mouth. Even if you dont develop mouth ulcers, you may have patches that feel inflamed and painful, as if theyve been burned.

Anyone who is receiving chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a bone marrow (stem cell) transplant can develop mouth sores as a side effect of these treatments.

If you have dry mouth or gum disease, or if your teeth and gums are not well taken care of, you may be at a higher risk of getting mouth sores during your treatment. Women and people who smoke or drink alcohol are also at a higher risk, according to the Oral Cancer Foundation.

If youre receiving chemotherapy, the sores could begin forming anywhere from 5 days to 2 weeks after your treatment. Depending on the specific cause, the sores could go away on their own in a few weeks, or they could last longer.

Its important to find ways to manage your pain and to watch for signs of an infection. Cancer-related mouth sores can lead to weight loss, dehydration, and other serious complications.

Cancer cells can grow very quickly. The aim of cancer treatment is to stop or slow down that growth. The cells in the mucous membranes lining your mouth are also fast-growing cells, so cancer treatments affect them, too.

Cancer treatments also keep the cells in your mouth from being able to repair themselves efficiently when theyre damaged.

Radiation therapy can also damage the glands in your mouth that make saliva. A dry mouth is more susceptible to infections that cause mouth sores.

Chemotherapy and radiation can both change the microbiome in your mouth, upsetting the balance between good and bad bacteria. The growth of harmful bacteria in your mouth can also lead to mouth sores.

Sometimes cancer treatments suppress your immune system, which may make it more likely that youll get a bacterial, viral, or fungal infection that causes mouth sores. An older infection (such as the herpes simplex virus) can also suddenly flare up again.

If youve had a bone marrow (stem cell) transplant, sores may be a sign that youve developed a condition known as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

When this happens, the cells in your body are attacking the transplanted cells as though they were an unhealthy invader. According to research published in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, short-term (acute) GVHD occurs in 50 to 70 percent of stem cell transplant cases and longer-term (chronic) GVHD is seen in 30 to 50 percent of cases.

The form of GVHD that causes mouth sores is usually mild, and doctors often treat it with corticosteroid medications.

Its important to talk with your doctor if you develop mouth sores after a stem cell transplant, as some kinds of GVHD can turn serious if left untreated.

There is a good chance that youll experience mouth sores at some point during your cancer treatment. Researchers estimate that 20 to 40 percent of those who have chemotherapy and 80 percent of those who have high-dose chemotherapy will develop mucositis afterward.

Still, there are steps you and your cancer care team can take to lower your risk, reduce the severity of the sores, and promote faster healing.

About a month before your cancer treatment begins, schedule an appointment with your dentist to make sure your teeth and gums are healthy. If you have cavities, broken teeth, or gum disease, its important to come up with a dental treatment plan to take care of these conditions so they dont lead to infections later, when your immune system may be vulnerable.

If you wear braces or dentures, ask your dentist to check the fit and remove any part of the device you dont need during your treatment.

Its very important to maintain good oral hygiene practices throughout your treatment to lower your risk of infection. Brush and floss gently but regularly, avoiding any painful areas. You can also ask your dentist whether a mouth rinse with fluoride is advisable in your case.

For certain kinds of chemotherapy (bolus 5fluorouracil chemotherapy and some high-dose therapies), your healthcare team may give you ice chips to chew for 30 minutes before your treatment. This type of cold therapy can lower your risk of getting mouth sores later.

During treatment of some blood cancers, doctors may give you injections of palifermin, also known as human keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1), to prevent mouth sores.

If youre scheduled to receive high-dose chemotherapy or radiotherapy, your cancer care team may prepare your mouth using low-level laser therapy beforehand to keep you from getting mouth sores.

For people who have radiation therapy for head and neck cancers, doctors may prescribe this medicated mouthwash to minimize mouth sores.

The length of time your mouth sores may last depends on the specific cancer treatment youve had. Here are some estimates broken down by treatment:

You may notice symptoms anywhere between a few days and a few weeks after your cancer treatment. Heres what you may see and feel as mucositis develops:

You may notice that the sores become slightly crusty as they heal. Its important to keep track of your symptoms and let your oncologist know if the sores arent healing on their own.

Contact your doctor right away if you:

Untreated mouth sores can lead to malnutrition, dehydration, and life-threatening infections.

There are a few different ways that you can help mouth sores heal and avoid prolonger pain or an infection.

While the sores are healing, its very important to keep the inside of your mouth clean to prevent an infection from developing.

The National Cancer Institute recommends that you gently clean your teeth every 4 hours and just before you go to sleep at night. Here are a few tips to consider:

If the pain from mouth sores is interfering with your ability to eat and drink, your doctor may treat the condition with a opioid mouthwash or one containing doxepin or lidocaine.

To ease discomfort and keep your mouth from feeling dry, you may want to try rinsing with a mild saltwater or baking soda solution. Heres how to make each of them:

Your cancer care team may recommend that you use a lubricating liquid (artificial saliva) to moisten the inside of your mouth if dryness is a problem. These liquids are usually gel-like. They coat your mouth with a thin film to help ease discomfort and promote healing.

Some people have found it useful to rinse with a blend of medications called the magic mouthwash. Formulas for this mouthwash vary, but most of them include a combination of medications to treat different symptoms, including:

Magic or miracle mouthwash solutions usually have to be prescribed by a doctor and prepared by a pharmacist, although some people mix up an over-the-counter version at home.

There isnt enough research to say for sure whether magic mouthwash works. If you think youd like to try it, talk with your oncologist or a healthcare professional about whether its a good idea for you.

Here are a few more things you can try at home that may help ease pain from mouth sores:

Mouth sores are one of the most common side effects of cancer treatment. Shortly after chemotherapy, radiation, or transplant treatments, painful, ulcer-like sores can form on the inside of your mouth.

These sores may go away on their own. If they dont, its important to seek medical treatment for them because they can lead to very serious complications.

Before you start cancer treatments, visit a dentist to make sure your teeth and gums are healthy. Keeping up good dental hygiene practices during and after cancer treatment will help limit mouth sores.

If the sores are keeping you from eating and drinking, talk with your oncologist about medications could relieve the pain and speed up the healing process, so you can enjoy a better quality of life during treatment.

Its really important to keep track of any sores in your mouth so you can reach out to your healthcare team if they dont improve. Sores that deepen or worsen can lead to serious even life-threatening complications.

Read more:
Mouth Sores from Chemo: Symptoms, Causes, and Treatments - Healthline

ThermoGenesis Holdings Begins a Year of Celebration of its 35th Anniversary in the Cell Banking and Cell Therapy Industry – PRNewswire

By Stem Cell Treatment

RANCHO CORDOVA, Calif., Feb. 17, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc.("ThermoGenesis" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: THMO), a market leader in automated cell processing tools and services in the cell and gene therapy field, announced today that the Company will kick off a year of celebration of its 35th anniversary by aligning its future corporate strategy in offering cell processing systems and services to meet the large-scale cellular manufacturing needs of the increasing number of therapies to be developed over the next decade.

ThermoGenesis has built a solid reputation in the cell banking and cell therapy field. The Company was originally founded in 1986 during a pivotal time, when the stem cell and gene therapy industry was in its infancy. In the early-1990s, ThermoGenesis' original founder, Phil Coelho, formed a long-term collaboration with Dr. Pablo Rubinstein of the New York Blood Center, the father of all cord blood stem cell banking. Together, they invented, patented, and obtained FDA clearance for the first "functionally closed" system for concentrating and isolating stem cells from fresh cord blood samples as well as the protocol for long term cryopreservation of those stem cells to insure retrieval decades later. These breakthrough methods were widely adopted and enabled the cord blood banking industry to grow, expand, and become commercially viable today.

These earliest inventions and protocols were followed by the launch of ThermoGenesis' fully automated BioArchive smart cryopreservation system in 1999 and later its AXP automated cell harvesting system in 2005. These fully automated systems have been adopted by over 130+ leading cord blood transplant centers and other stem cell institutes such as MD Anderson, Cleveland Clinic, Duke University, New York Blood Center in 40+ countries. These systems remain "state-of-the-art" almost 20 years later.

"In the past 20 years, ThermoGenesis and its affiliated companies have helped to advance and shape the landscape of the cell banking industry," said Chris Xu, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of ThermoGenesis. "Cell based therapies have become one of the fastest growing sectors in medicine with over 1,000 clinical trials underway in CAR-T cell therapy alone. As we enter the Company's 35th anniversary, we remain committed to staying as the world's leading technology provider for the cell and gene therapy field."

About ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc.

ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc. develops, commercializes, and markets a range of automated technologies for CAR-T and other cell-based therapies. The Company currently markets a full suite of solutions for automated clinical biobanking, point-of-care applications, and automated processing for immuno-oncology, including its semi-automated, functionally-closed CAR-TXpressplatform, which streamlines the manufacturing process for the emerging CAR-T immunotherapy market. For more information about ThermoGenesis, please visit:www.ThermoGenesis.com.

Company Contact:Wendy Samford 916-858-5191 [emailprotected]

Investor Contact:Paula Schwartz,Rx Communications 917-322-2216 [emailprotected]

SOURCE ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc.

Home

See more here:
ThermoGenesis Holdings Begins a Year of Celebration of its 35th Anniversary in the Cell Banking and Cell Therapy Industry - PRNewswire

Meet the women hoping to recruit more stem cells donors from Black communities – CTV News

By Stem Cell Treatment

SASKATOON -- An effort to increase stem cell donors within Black communities across Canada is being driven by a group of women whove had difficulty finding full genetic matches themselves.

Genetic matches are crucial for patients in need of stem cell transplants, such as those with leukemia and lymphoma, and matches are more commonly found within their own racial, ethnic and ancestral groups.

But the new Black Donors Save Lives campaign notes that fewer than two per cent of those in the Canadian Blood Services stem cell donor registry are Black.

And that decreases their chance of finding a match, campaign lead Sylvia Okonofua told CTVNews.ca in a phone interview. It becomes a numbers game for Black people on the stem cell waiting list, where its like finding a needle in a hay stack for them.

The recent University of Regina biochemistry graduate, with sights on becoming a hematologist, timed the virtual campaign to kick off during Black History Month.

It was overall frustrating to know that a patient from my community is so much less likely than other patients to be helped, she told CTVNews.ca. When you see that your people have a really, really low chance of being helped out, it takes you aback.

Okonofua noted part of the campaign uses TikToks, shareable infographics, and even an original song to get the message out and reach a wide audience.

And she said part of the outreach involves having Black stem cell recipients talk about their experiences with the health-care system and speak to the historical mistrust the Black community has towards the medical community.

She founded her campus chapter of Stem Cell Club, a non-profit organization with chapters across Canada which recruits Canadians as potential stem cell donors.

Registration for Black Donors Save Lives can be done online, where participants between the ages of 17 to 35 can fill out a questionnaire and have a swab kit mailed to their address. After they swab the inside of their cheeks and send the sample back, if there is a person in need, 90 per cent of donors will be asked to donate stem cells very similar to the way a person would be giving blood.

But a big difference is the donor is given a growth hormone a week before donation in order to increase the number of stem cells, as well as the process taking four to six hours.

Alternatively, one out of 10 donors will be asked if theyd like to donate stem cells via bone marrow surgery, which can take place over a day.

In 2017, Reve Agyepong experienced firsthand the lack of Black stem cell donors, to treat her sickle cell disease, which involve red blood cells becoming misshapen, which can block blood vessels and lead to damage to bones, brain, kidneys, and lungs, and can ultimately be fatal.

But Agyepong, who was born in Edmonton to Ghanaian parents, was fortunate to receive a stem cell transplant from her sister.

It is such a blessing to have a match within your own family because the percentages are just so low, she told CTVNews.ca by email. I am so fortunate to have found a match in my family or else transplant would have been off the table for me.

In fact, only one in four patients who need a stem cell transplant are able to find a matched donor within their family, with Black patients being less than half as likely as white patients to find a unrelated person they match with on a donor registry, according to the campaign.

For Jamaican-Canadian Dorothy Vernon-Brown, who helped inspire this months campaign, the current efforts are deeply personal. In 2013, she was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia and was heartbroken to discover there were no stem cell matches in Canada's registry or internationally.

She ultimately received stem cells from her sister, who was a half-match, and has been spreading information to Black Canadians ever since, through her own advocacy group, Donor Drive for Dorothy.

Stem cell transplantation is a miracle for patients, and I wish people knew how easy it is to be a stem donor, she recounted on a Twitter thread for another stem cell awareness campaign. You could give someone an opportunity like my sister gave me, to be around and live the life I want. People want to live, so if that gift is in your hands, I appeal to you to see it as something significant to do in your life.

Okonofua and Vernon-Browns efforts are being aided by Dr. Warren Fingrut, a hematologist whos the director of the aforementioned Stem Cell Club.

He told CTVNews.ca in an email hes seen firsthand far too many patients from ethnic and racial minority groups in situations where they dont have fully-matched donors and are forced to seek other treatments.

I find this heart wrenching and I am very motivated to work to address this, Fingrut said.

That led to him founding his non-profit a decade ago, which has gone on to recruit more than 20,000 Canadians as stem cell donors, with more than 55 per cent being non-white. But in cases such as Vernon-Brown and others, those figures need to be much higher.

We started running national campaigns last year, focused on the recruitment of diverse peoples as donors, as well as males who are also preferred by transplant physicians (all else being equal) as they are associated with better outcomes for patients, Fingrut explained.

The campaign is also being done in partnership with several other groups, including the Katelyn Bedard Bone Marrow Association, Black Physicians of Canada, Black Medical Students Association of Canada and the National Black Law Students Association of Canada.

This campaign is one example of an initiative in the health-care sector, which seeks to address racial disparity impacting the care of Black patients, he wrote, noting Black people face many such disparities in access to care, and we want to see others in the health-care sector working with Black Canadians to tackle these issues and address them, in collaboration with Black communities.

Okonofua hopes next Black History Month, theyll be able to have in-person swabbing events in places of worship, community hubs, and cultural gatherings to show how easy it is.

Fingrut said this the first time his group has specifically engaged with one racial group and hopes to expand it to other ethnic and racial communities including South Asians, Indigenous peoples, and those of mixed ancestry in the near future.

More here:
Meet the women hoping to recruit more stem cells donors from Black communities - CTV News

CAR T-Cell Therapy Carves Out a Role in Multiple Myeloma – OncLive

By Stem Cell Treatment

Autologous and allogeneic BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapies are leading to deep and durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma, with a low incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, explained Yi Lin, MD, PhD, who added that with a pending biologics license application (BLA), the field should start to consider which patients, who dont fit the typical clinical trial eligibility criteria, might be a candidate for the treatment in real-world practice.

On September 22, 2020, the FDA granted a priority review designation to a BLA for idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; bb2121) for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least 3 previous therapies, based on data from the pivotal phase 2 KarMMa trial (NCT03361748).

When [these approaches are] available in practice, well have to look at the FDA label, said Lin. Putting that in context with the trial experience and also with what were learning in standard-of-care practice in lymphoma and leukemia, what we will need to understand beyond the approved indication [in a certain] line of therapy is really patient characteristics, such as comorbidities and so on, because we would likely not be restricted by trial criteria anymore. Understanding what a safe condition to use CAR T-cell therapy in while still preserving the efficacy of the product [is something well have to determine].

In an interview withOncLiveduring the 2020 Institutional Perspectives in Cancer webinar on multiple myeloma,Lin, consultant, Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, consultant, Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, assistant professor of medicine and oncology, Mayo Clinic, discussed promising data with CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma.

Lin: Cilta-cel [ciltacabtagene autoleucel; JNJ-68284528]and ide-cel are already in pivotal trials. With ide-cel, the BLA has been submitted to the FDA, so were anticipating review in early 2021. Cilta-cel is also getting ready for BLA submission to the FDA as well. Potentially in 2021, we may have these BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapies available in standard-of-care practice.

In these trials of heavily pretreated patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and penta-refractory disease, a single infusion of the CAR T [cells is leading to] very high overall response rates. A high percentage of these patients are having deep responses and reaching complete remission [CR] or stringent CR. A good proportion of those patients are also experiencing MRD [minimal residual disease]negative disease. In myeloma, those are relevant metrics in terms of having more durable responses, and were seeing that [thats true with] CAR T-cell therapy as well.

The median PFS [progression-free survival] is around 8.8 months for ide-cel, and the 12-month PFS rate for cilta-cel is close to 77%. Thats very exciting for a patient who has had continuous treatment. We have heard anecdotal reports from these patients on the CAR T-cell therapy trials that when theyre in remission, when theyre recovering post CAR T-cell therapy, its the best they have felt. Its almost like before they had myeloma. Some of these metrics are being formally measured as quality-of-life outcomes in the pivotal trial. Weve seen some of that reported as well in poster format at the 2020 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Those data are very important to consider.

bb21217 is very interesting, because its one of these next-generation approaches were looking at to improve upon CAR T-cell therapy. There are a lot of emerging data regarding the phenotype of CAR T cells in myeloma, including other hematologic malignancies, [in that] the T cell that has more of a nave with memory potential phenotype may contribute to better persistence and more active T cells. Thats one of the ways that bb21217 is trying to approach that.

During manufacturing, theyre exposing the T cells to a PI3K inhibitor to drive the phenotype functions of B cells. Were seeing that with the CAR T cell thats generated from patients on the study, the profiles of the CAR T-cell product do have more presence of these cells [compared with other products]. Its still a little too early to say how the long-term clinical response will look, but initial results, in terms of response rates, are very encouraging.

Thats certainly a possibility. Weve seen the data with ALLO-715; its very early yet. That study only has about 3 months of follow-up, but what weve seen has been very encouraging. The potential advantage of allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy [is that because] youre generating [the allogeneic product] from a healthy donor, the T-cell function or the T-cell health or fitness might be better [than that of an autologous product from a patient with myeloma].

You can also make [the product] ahead of time, so it would be more ready off-the-shelf, but that comes with challenges. You are infusing T cells from somebody else, so there could be a risk for graft-versus-host-disease [GVHD], which we have seen with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This particular product comes with a lot of additional gene editing approaches to try to address that, and so far of about 31 patients who have been dosed, we havent seen any alarming signals for GVHD. These CAR T cells persist and are measurable in patients, which is also very encouraging, and were seeing early signals for response. Were not seeing any concerns yet for the high incidence of more severe CRS, neurotoxicity, or infections.

It will be interesting to see how it is adopted in the market. Ive certainly heard concerns from others in the field that were not quite seeing a plateau in terms of PFS as we have seen in lymphoma. We have to keep in mind that these are very heavily pretreated patients that are studied on trials. I suspect, based on how the trials are designed, that the potential position of where it would be with the final FDA-approved indication would be after 3 lines of prior therapy and exposure to a proteasome inhibitor, IMiD [immunomodulatory drug], and a monoclonal antibody. If it is truly adopted for patients who would be eligible and have access to treatment centers, it could potentially buy them at least a period of time where they dont need any therapies.

Though, we still have patients on these studies that are 2 years out or more in continued remission. I suspect because of how BCMA CAR T-cell therapy worksits really targeting a surface antigen, its not targeting particular cell signaling pathways, and we are seeing responses across other cytogenetic risksthat it wouldnt necessarily impact how well it could function in real-world practice, but thats something that well need to learn as it becomes available.

Its certainly very encouraging to see that, across the CAR T-cell therapy studies, we have not generally seen a very high signal in terms of grade 3 or more severe CRS or neurotoxicity that would require ICU level monitoring. [Such scenarios have] generally [occurred] in single-digit percentages in less than 10% of cases.

There may be some component of how these CARs are designed. There may be some elements of the nature of the myeloma disease that contributes to this, but were also evolving in our understanding of when interventions like tocilizumab (Actemra) and steroids could be safely used to walk that balance between not losing response but preventing more severe toxicities. Within each protocol, the threshold for using tocilizumab and steroids do vary. Generally, there is a move towards using these drugs earlier in the onset of those symptoms, so patients dont have to suffer through the more severe late effects. Theres a variable percentage of patients who get [these interventions], but its a higher percentage than in the earlier studies.

I was most excited to see Allogenes allogeneic product. Whats reassuring is that generally we are seeing response signals, but its a little too early to tell whether that will translate into an advantage in clinical response compared with the current generation CAR T cells. There are lots of products to keep an eye on, but its hard to pick a lead yet.

With the bispecific antibodies, were now seeing some reports from non-BCMA approaches. With a number of BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibody-drug conjugates, we do need to move into the non-BCMA space fairly quickly. Its very exciting to see pretty high early response rate signals from those approaches as well. CAR T-cell therapies targeting those same antigens are also starting [to be developed], so probably by the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, well hear some results from those studies as well. Immunotherapy approaches are moving very quickly in myeloma, and its always exciting to have those options for our patients.

Its never too early to think about patient selection. Its quite common that patients with myeloma need to get bridging therapy or continue some type of therapy while their autologous CAR T cells are being made. How that may impact or potentially be used to optimize the response of CAR T-cell therapy is not formally studied in a trial. Well learn from real-world practice. In terms of patient access to this product, is there a potentially broader range of conditions and comorbidities where CAR T-cell therapy can still be safely given with a reasonable expectation of response?

GPRC5D and FcRH are the ones that are currently [being developed for] bispecific approaches. CAR T-cell therapy trials will be starting or have recently started [with those targets] as well. Thus far, based on the expression of these targets, they seem to have very limited off-target toxicities. Fingers crossed. Well continue to truly see that profile in the clinical trial settings. Those are the [targets] to really watch out for.

The very first report of CAR T activity in myeloma was with a CD19-directed approach. Theres still some continued effort to see if a combination of CD19 and BCMA have a role in myeloma. To that end, there are some combinations of BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy approaches with and CD38 or CS1. Ultimately, the novel targets are the ones to watch out for and likely will have a role, if we do see a desirable response, very quickly after BCMA-directed approaches.

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepts for priority review Bristol Myers Squibb and bluebird bio application for anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; bb2121). News release. Bristol Myers Squibb and bluebird bio, Inc. September 22, 2020. Accessed February 8, 2021.https://bit.ly/2G0K3Iq.

Visit link:
CAR T-Cell Therapy Carves Out a Role in Multiple Myeloma - OncLive

Stem Cell Manufacturing Market 2021 | Research With Size, Growth, Manufacturers, Key Segment, Analysis, Development Status, Segments and 2027…

By Stell Cell Research

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Report from DBMR highlights deep analysis on market characteristics, sizing, estimates and growth by segmentation, regional breakdowns& country along with competitive landscape, players market shares, and strategies that are key in the market. The exploration provides a 360 view and insights, highlighting major outcomes of the industry. These insights help the business decision-makers to formulate better business plans and make informed decisions to improved profitability. In addition, the study helps venture or private players in understanding the companies in more detail to make better informed decisions.

Stem cell manufacturing is forecasted to grow at CAGR of 6.42% to an anticipated value of USD 18.59 billion by 2027 with factors like rising awareness towards diseases like cancer, degenerative disorders and hematopoietic disorders is driving the growth of the market in the forecast period of 2020-2027.

Download Exclusive Sample (350 Pages PDF) Report: To Know the Impact of COVID-19 on thisIndustry@https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-stem-cell-manufacturing-market&AB

Stem cell manufacturing has shown an exceptional penetration in North America due to increasing research in stem cell. Increasing research and development activities in biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector is creating opportunity for the stem cell manufacturing market.

The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market 2020 research provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Share analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures are also analyzed.

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Segematation By Product (Stem Cell Line, Instruments, Culture Media, Consumables), Application (Research Applications, Clinical Applications, Cell and Tissue Banking), End Users (Hospitals and Surgical Centers, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies, Clinics, Community Healthcare, Others)

List of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Report are

Thermo Fisher Scientific Merck KGaA BD JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd Organogenesis Inc Osiris Vericel Corporation AbbVie Inc AM-Pharma B.V ANTEROGEN.CO.,LTD Astellas Pharma Inc Bristol-Myers Squibb Company FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd ViaCyte,Inc VistaGen Therapeutics Inc GlaxoSmithKline plc ..

Complete Report is Available (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Graphs, and Chart)@https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-stem-cell-manufacturing-market&AB

The report can help to understand the market and strategize for business expansion accordingly. In the strategy analysis, it gives insights from marketing channel and market positioning to potential growth strategies, providing in-depth analysis for new entrants or exists competitors in the Stem Cell Manufacturing industry. This report also states import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue and gross margins. For each manufacturer covered, this report analyzes their Stem Cell Manufacturing manufacturing sites, capacity, production, ex-factory price, revenue and market share in global market.

The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Trends, development and marketing channels are analysed. Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed and overall research conclusions offered.

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Scope and Market Size

Stem cell manufacturing market is segmented on the basis of product, application and end users. The growth amongst these segments will help you analyse meagre growth segments in the industries, and provide the users with valuable market overview and market insights to help them in making strategic decisions for identification of core market applications.

Based on product, the stem cell manufacturing market is segmented into stem cell lines, instruments, culture media and consumables. Stem cell lines are further segmented into induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells, multipotent adult progenitor stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, neural stem cells. Instrument is further segmented into bioreactors and incubators, cell sorters and other instruments.

On the basis of application, the stem cell manufacturing market is segmented into research applications, clinical applications and cell and tissue banking. Research applications are further segmented into drug discovery and development and life science research. Clinical applications are further segmented into allogenic stem cell and autologous stem cell therapy.

On the basis of end users, the stem cell manufacturing market is segmented into hospitals and surgical centers, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, research institutes and academic institutes, community healthcare, cell banks and tissue banks and others.

Healthcare Infrastructure growth Installed base and New Technology Penetration

Stem cell manufacturing market also provides you with detailed market analysis for every country growth in healthcare expenditure for capital equipment, installed base of different kind of products for stem cell manufacturing market, impact of technology using life line curves and changes in healthcare regulatory scenarios and their impact on the stem cell manufacturing market. The data is available for historic period 2010 to 2018.

The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market is highly fragmented and the major players have used various strategies such as new product launches, expansions, agreements, joint ventures, partnerships, acquisitions, and others to increase their footprints in this market. The report includes market shares of stem cell manufacturing market for global, Europe, North America, Asia Pacific and South America.

Key Insights in the report:

Historical and current market size and projection up to 2025

Market trends impacting the growth of the global taste modulators market

Analyze and forecast the taste modulators market on the basis of, application and type.

Trends of key regional and country-level markets for processes, derivative, and application Company profiling of key players which includes business operations, product and services, geographic presence, recent developments and key financial analysis

For More Information or Query or Customization Before Buying, Visit @https://databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-stem-cell-manufacturing-market&AB

Opportunities in the market

To describe and forecast the market, in terms of value, for various segments, by region North America, Europe, Asia Pacific (APAC), and Rest of the World (RoW)

The key findings and recommendations highlight crucial progressive industry trends in the Stem Cell manufacturing Market, thereby allowing players to develop effective long term strategies

To strategically profile key players and comprehensively analyze their market position in terms of ranking and core competencies, and detail the competitive landscape for market leaders Extensive analysis of the key segments of the industry helps in understanding the trends in types of point of care test across Europe.

To get a comprehensive overview of the Stem Cell manufacturing market.

With tables and figures helping analyses worldwide Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Forecast this research provides key statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market. There are 15 Chapters to display the Stem Cell Manufacturing market.

Chapter 1, About Executive Summary to describe Definition, Specifications and Classification of Stem Cell Manufacturing market, By Product Type, by application, by end users and regions.

Chapter 2, objective of the study.

Chapter 3, to display Research methodology and techniques.

Chapter 4 and 5, to show the Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Analysis, segmentation analysis, characteristics;

Chapter 6 and 7, to show Five forces (bargaining Power of buyers/suppliers), Threats to new entrants and market condition;

Chapter 8 and 9, to show analysis by regional segmentation[North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific etc ], comparison, leading countries and opportunities; Regional Marketing Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis

Chapter 10, to identify major decision framework accumulated through Industry experts and strategic decision makers;

Chapter 11 and 12, Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Trend Analysis, Drivers, Challenges by consumer behavior, Marketing Channels

Chapter 13 and 14, about vendor landscape (classification and Market Ranking)

Chapter 15, deals with Stem Cell Manufacturing Market sales channel, distributors, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and data source.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia or Oceania [Australia and New Zealand]

Contact Us:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

Email:Corporatesales@databridgemarketresear

See the article here:
Stem Cell Manufacturing Market 2021 | Research With Size, Growth, Manufacturers, Key Segment, Analysis, Development Status, Segments and 2027...

Tissue regeneration: Reserve or reverse? – Science Magazine

By Stell Cell Research

A cross section of mouse small intestine, showing intestinal crypts and villi, is visualized with immunofluorescence microscopy (nuclei in red, and F-actin, which marks the cytoskeleton, in blue). Intestinal stem cells reside at the base of crypts, where they maintain cell turnover.

Tissues with high intrinsic turnover, such as the skin and intestinal lining, rely on resident stem cells, which generate all native cell types. Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are highly sensitive to damage, although they recover quickly. It is unclear whether this recovery (i.e., regeneration) occurs from less sensitive pools of reserve stem cells (1) or whether ISC progeny undergo reverse differentiation into stem cells (2). Recent studies in diverse organs highlight that dedifferentiation of specified cell types is a pervasive and dominant means for tissue regeneration. The findings have broad implications because all tissues experience some cell attrition over a lifetime, and knowing how tissues replenish those losses may help in preventing or treating organ failure. Moreover, it remains unclear whether incomplete differentiation, a common feature of cancer, reflects normal tissue plasticity, and it is unclear whether stem cells that arise by dedifferentiation may spawn cancers.

ISCs expressing leucine-rich repeatcontaining G proteincoupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) lie at the bottom of small bowel crypts (3). In the course of homeostatic tissue turnover, their immediate progeny adopt alternative enterocyte or secretory fates, then fill the crypts with replicating progenitors that migrate away from ISCs. Cell division ceases at the crypt tops, where postmitotic cells begin a 3- to 5-day journey along intestinal villi. When ISCs sustain irreparable damage, some source in the crypt must regenerate new ISCs. Other adult epitheliasuch as airways, prostate, and liverare organized differently from the intestine and from each other (see the figure). These epithelia also restore cells lost by damage or attrition, even though at rest they turn over at least a hundred times more slowly than the intestinal lining.

Airway epithelial structure varies from trachea to small bronchioles, and distinct progenitors in different segments produce assorted secretory and ciliated cell types. In the lining of human and mouse upper airways, flat basal cells lie beneath a layer of columnar differentiated cells and adjacent to submucosal myoepithelial glands. Stem cell activity in normal tissue turnover maps to a subpopulation of keratin 5 (Krt5)expressing basal cells (4). The trachea and bronchi are vulnerable to diverse injuries, including targeted destruction of Krt5+ stem cells and pervasive mucosal damage from noxious inhalants or viruses.

Adult human and mouse prostate glands also contain columnar luminal and flat KRT5+ basal cells. Distinct unipotent progenitors maintain both populations, and castration induces massive luminal cell loss. Androgen reexposure restores prostate mass within weeks, which implies the presence of castration-resistant progenitors. However, an unequivocal stem cell pool has not been identified. The liver also has notable regenerative abilities after chemical or surgical injury. The emerging consensus is that this organ lacks a dedicated stem cell compartment and recovers from damage through dedifferentiation of mature hepatocytes and biliary cells (5, 6).

Stem cell activity in vivo is demonstrated most persuasively by introducing into a tissue a permanent color or fluorescent label whose expression depends on Cre recombinasemediated excision of a STOP cassette. When Cre activity is restricted to stem cells, all the progeny of those cells exclusively carry the label. ISCs and tracheal stem cells were thus identified because targeted Cre activity in LGR5+ or KRT5+ mouse cells labeled the respective full lineages (3, 4). Investigation of tissue regeneration requires ablation of a stem cell compartment, followed by tracking of the restored ability to produce sufficient numbers of all native stem cell progeny. The canon of tissue repair rests heavily on such lineage-tracing experiments, but one limitation is that Cre recombinase is not often confined to a single defined cell type. This challenge lies at the heart of competing models for tissue recovery after lethal cell injuries.

Dividing cells take up labels such as [3H]thymidine or fluorescent histone 2B and shed these labels as they replicate further or their daughters die. In the intestine, however, rare cells located near the fourth tier from the crypt base retain [3H]thymidine for weeks. Given once-popular ideas that stem cells must be few in number and retain one immortal DNA strand when they replicate, +4 label-retaining cells (LRCs) were described as ISCs. In support of that idea, lineage tracing from Bmi1, a locus thought to be restricted to nonreplicating +4 LRCs, elicited an ISC-like response in vivo (7).

Physiologic cell turnover and recovery from injury occur from different cellular sources in diverse epithelia (intestine, upper airway, and prostate gland). Homeostatic turnover is driven by the stem cell pool, and tissue restoration from injury occurs through transient expansion and dedifferentiation of specified mature cells.

To reconcile the evidence for ISC properties in both LGR5+ crypt base columnar cells (CBCs) and +4 LRCs, researchers postulated that abundant CBCs serve as frontline ISCs, whereas the smaller +4 LRC population contains dedicated reserves. Indeed, intestinal turnover is unperturbed when LGR5+ CBCs are ablated because other crypt cells' progeny continue to repopulate villi and an LGR5+ ISC compartment is soon restored (1). Multiple candidate markers of +4 LRCs that regenerate ISCs after injury have been proposed (8). Although these cells are too few to explain the typical scale and speed of ISC restoration, the prospect of two stem cell pools carried the additional allure of a sound adaptive strategy in a tissue that requires continuous self-renewal.

ISC differentiation is, however, not strictly unidirectional. Cre expression in absorptive or secretory cell types tags those cells selectively, but upon ablation of LGR5+ CBCs, the label appears throughout (9). These observations imply that differentiated daughter cells have reverted into ISCs. Moreover, Bmi1 expression was found to mark differentiated crypt endocrine cells (10), and putative +4 markers are expressed in many crypt cells including LGR5+ CBCs. Accordingly, when Cre is expressed from these loci, the traced lineage might simply reflect CBC activity in resting animals and reverse differentiation of crypt cells after ISC ablation. But is dedifferentiation a rare and physiologically inconsequential event or the predominant mode of stem cell recovery? Dedifferentiation may obviate the need to invoke a dedicated reserve population, or it is possible that ISC recovery may reflect both dedifferentiation and contributions from a reserve stem cell population.

To investigate these issues, researchers activated a fluorescent label in LGR5+ CBCs and waited for this label to pass into progeny cells before ablating CBCs (11). Thus, only the CBCs that recover by dedifferentiation should be labeled, and any cells arising from reserve ISCs should not. Nearly every restored crypt and CBC was fluorescent, with substantial contributions from both enterocytes and secretory cells (11). Cells captured early in the restorative process coexpressed mature-cell and ISC genes, which is compatible with recovery by dedifferentiation. Another study found that damaged ISCs are reconstituted wholly by the progeny of LGR5+ CBCs (8). Thus, dedifferentiation would seem to be the principal mode of ISC regeneration, and prior conclusions about +4 ISCs likely reflect unselective Cre expression.

Different tissues might deploy distinct regenerative strategies, and recent studies in mouse airway, prostate, intestinal, and liver epithelia provide insightful lessons. After ablation of KRT5+ airway stem cells, specified secretory and club cell precursors were found to undergo clonal multilineage expansion and accounted for up to 10% of restored KRT5+ cells in vivo (12). Chemical or viral damage was subsequently reported to induce migration and dedifferentiation of submucosal gland myoepithelial cells into the basal layer to reconstitute the surface lining, including KRT5+ stem cells (13). Thus, dedifferentiation into native stem cells occurs upon injury to both airway and intestinal linings in mice.

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of mouse prostate glands recently revealed distinct gene expression profiles in 3% of luminal cells, which are more clonogenic than others, express putative stem cell markers, and hence qualify as a pool enriched for native stem-like cells (14). After androgen reexposure following castration, however, the scale and distribution of cell replication and the location of restored clones were incompatible with an origin wholly within that small pool. Rather, the principal source of gland reconstitution in vivo, including new KRT5+ basal cells, was the dominant population of differentiated luminal cells (14). These observations parallel those in the liver, where recovery of organ mass after tissue injury occurs by renewed proliferation of mature resting hepatocytes (5), abetted by expansion of bile duct cells that transdifferentiate into hepatocytes (6). Cell plasticity is thus widespread, whether tissues have or lack native stem cell compartments.

Reverse differentiation in the intestine, airways, and prostate gland was generally observed after near-total elimination of resident stem or luminal cells, an extreme and artificial condition. However, several observations suggest that this dedifferentiation reflects a physiologic process designed to maintain a proper cell census. Contact with a single KRT5+ airway stem cell prevents secretory and club cell dedifferentiation in vitro (12), and tracheal submucosal glands exhibit limited stem cell activity even in the absence of injury (13). Live imaging of intestinal crypts reveals continuous and stochastic exit from and reentry into the ISC compartment (15), implying that barriers for differentiation or dedifferentiation are inherently low. However, the primary purpose of dedifferentiating airway, intestinal, liver, and prostate cells is not to enable tissue recovery. Therefore, they should be regarded as facultative stem cells; that is, they have other physiologic functions and realize a latent stem cell capacity only under duress.

This distinction from reserve stem cells is not merely semantic. Emphasis in regenerative therapy research belongs on any cell population with restorative potential; in vivo findings now direct attention away from putative reserve cells and toward dedifferentiation as a common means for tissue recovery. The absence of dedicated reserves and the inherent cellular ability to toggle between stem and differentiated states also inform cancer biology. Because mutations realize oncogenic potential only in longlived cells, both frontline and reserve stem cells represent candidate sources of cancer, in contrast to differentiated cells, which are generally short-lived. However, oncogenic mutations that arise in differentiated cells could become fixed upon dedifferentiation, thus enabling tumor development.

Notably, stem cell properties and interconversion with their progeny are not stereotypic. ISCs divide daily into two identical daughters, whereas hematopoietic stem cell replication is infrequent and asymmetric. Severe loss of blood stem cells does not elicit substantial dedifferentiation and is rescued only by adoptive stem cell transfer. Immature secretory precursors dedifferentiate more readily than terminally mature airway cells (12), whereas fully differentiated cells fuel liver and prostate regeneration. Cell plasticity in each case is determined by local signals. Unknown factors from KRT5+ tracheal stem cells, for example, suppress secretory cell dedifferentiation (12), and specific factors secreted from the prostate mesenchyme stimulate luminal cell dedifferentiation (14). The intestinal mesenchyme probably senses ISC attrition to trigger tissue recovery, but the spatial and molecular determinants remain unknown. Outstanding challenges are to identify the signaling pathways that ensure a stable cell census and to harness diverse regenerative responses to ameliorate acute tissue injuries or prevent organ failure. Knowing the cellular basis for stem cell recovery in different contexts brings us closer to those goals.

Read this article:
Tissue regeneration: Reserve or reverse? - Science Magazine

Global Scaffold Technology Market Is Expected to Reach USD 2.16 billion by 2028 : Fior Markets – GlobeNewswire

By Stell Cell Research

February 18, 2021 13:00 ET | Source: Fior Markets

Newark, NJ, Feb. 18, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As per the report published by Fior Markets, theglobal scaffold technology market is expected to grow from USD 1.05 billion in 2020 and to reach USD 2.16 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 9.45% during the forecast period 2021-2028.

The driving factors to the growth of the scaffold technology market are an increase in the requirement of organ transplantations and reconstruction procedures for the body across the globe. Scaffold technology is extensively utilized in order to imitate the construction of tissues. It is done in order to form a three-dimensional structure that enhances transplantation methods, resulting in an increase in the growth of the market. Scaffold technology plays an essential part in the regeneration and restoration of infected tissues in tissue engineering. Scaffold technology has various benefits in three-dimensional printing like the inclusion of growth factors, porosities, co-culture of multiple cells, and construction of composite geometries.

Tissue culture is depicted in a 3D arrangement with the help of scaffold technology. The technology is broadly used to provide cultural assays in three-dimension. Scaffold technology is a department of Tissue Engineering that overcomes the limitations made by two-dimensional cell culture. The three-dimensional cultural assays include cell to matrix interactions, cell migration assays, and cell to cell interactions. Scaffold technology mimics primary cells to use different tissues. It is done in order to mimic defective tissues from the scaffold biomaterials that are deeply porous. It works under cell biology that regulates three-dimensional cell structure.

An increase in the utilization of biomaterials that involves composites and polymers leads to the increase of fabrication of scaffold. It propels the market by encouraging the extensive use of scaffold technology in tissue engineering. Technological innovations and advancements related to reconstructive operational methods promote enhanced incorporation of scaffold technology. This promotes the usage of scaffold technology in the reconstructive processes. Moreover, continuous research and development programs in order to produce three-dimensional substrates result in an increased application of the technology in drug delivery. Also, inclination towards three-dimensional cell tissue culture from two-dimensional systems is expected to accelerate the growth of the market over the forecast period.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT AThttps://www.fiormarkets.com/report-detail/419247/request-sample

Key players operating in the global scaffold technology market include REPROCELL Inc., Tecan Trading AG, Molecular Matrix Inc., Xanofi, 3D Biotek LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. and Merck KGaA. To gain a significant market share in the global scaffold technology market, the key players are now focusing on adopting strategies such as product innovations, mergers & acquisitions, recent developments, joint ventures, collaborations, and partnerships.

The nanofiber-based scaffolds segment is expected to show the highest share over the forecast periodThe type segment includes nanofiber based scaffolds, micropatterned surface microplates, polymeric scaffolds and hydrogels. The nanofiber-based scaffolds segment is expected to show the highest share in the global scaffold technology market over the forecast period. The nanofiber-based scaffolds have threadlike compositions that consist of pores. It is created with the help of the electro spinning method to promote the development of synthetic functional tissues in tissue engineering. Such synthetic tissues follow the typical extracellular pattern in tissues. It is beneficial in improving tissue engineering with the help of extracellular model of the tissue.

The stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering segment had the highest share of 56.04% in 2020 The application segment includes drug discovery, stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, & tissue engineering. The stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering segment had the highest share of 56.04% in 2020 in the global scaffold technology market. The factors that contributed to the growth of the market are an extensive utilization of scaffold technology in colorectal surgeries, periodontology, abdominal wall repair, soft tissue tumor repair, aesthetic surgeries and wound healing. In order to improve the regeneration system, the blend of tissue repair scaffold along with antimicrobial agent is employed. Thus, it is anticipated to enhance reconstructive methods that include a huge probability of failure of reconstructed tissue. Hence, tissue-engineering in a controlled structure is a significant factor in the growth.

Browse full report with TOC athttps://www.fiormarkets.com/report/scaffold-technology-market-by-type-nanofiber-based-scaffolds-419247.html

Regional Segment Analysis of The Scaffold Technology Market

On the basis of geography, the global scaffold technology market is classified into North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, and Middle East and Africa. North America had the largest share of 23.86% in 2020. The factors that contributed to the growth of the region are an increase in the investments in order to extend the applicability of scaffold technology, advanced healthcare structure as well as a growth in stem cell research along with regenerative medicine. Increasing investments by the prominent market players in order to increase the utilization of regenerative medicine and three-dimensional constructs in numerous applications has resulted in the growth of the market.

Request for Customization:https://www.fiormarkets.com/enquiry/request-customization/419247

About the report: The global scaffold technology market is analyzed on the basis of value (USD billion). All the segments have been analyzed on global, regional and country basis. The study includes an analysis of more than 30 countries for each segment. The report offers in-depth analysis of driving factors, opportunities, restraints, and challenges for gaining the key insight of the market. The study includes porters five forces model, attractiveness analysis, raw material analysis, and competitor position grid analysis.

For Instant Purchase:https://www.fiormarkets.com/checkout.html?reportid=419247&type=single

Customization of the Report:

The report can be customized as per client requirements. For further queries, you can contact us onsales@fiormarkets.comor +1-201-465-4211. Our executives will be pleased to understand your requirements and offer you the best-suited reports.

About Fior Markets

Fior Markets is a futuristic market intelligence company, helping customers flourish their business strategies and make better decisions using actionable intelligence. With transparent information pool, we meet clients objectives, commitments on high standard and targeting possible prospects for SWOT analysis and market research reports. Fior Markets deploys a wide range of regional and global market intelligence research reports including industries like technology, pharmaceutical, consumer goods, food and beverages, chemicals, media, materials and many others. Our Strategic Intelligence capabilities are purposely planned to boost your business extension and elucidate the vigor of diverse industry. We hold distinguished units of highly expert analysts and consultants according to their respective domains. The global market research reports we provide involve both qualitative and quantitative analysis of current market scenario as per the geographical regions segregated and comprehensive performance in different regions with global approach. In addition, our syndicated research reports offer a packaged guide to keep companies abreast of the upcoming major restyle in their domains. Fior Markets facilitates clients with research analysis that are customized to their exact requirements, specifications and challenges, whether it is comprehensive desk research, survey work, composition of multiple methods, in-detailed interviewing or competitive intelligence. Our research experts are experienced in matching the exact personnel and methodology to your business need.

Contact Us

Avinash D Head of Business Development Phone:+1-201-465-4211 Email:sales@fiormarkets.com Web:www.fiormarkets.com

To Know More Market Research Reports and Industry Analysis, Visit our Associate Website: https://marketandresearch.biz

Related Reports Endocrine Testing Market - https://www.fiormarkets.com/report/endocrine-testing-market-by-technology-immunoassay-tandem-mass-418823.html Epigenetics Drugs & Diagnostic Technologies Market - https://www.fiormarkets.com/report/epigenetics-drugs-diagnostic-technologies-market-by-product-418825.html Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Market - https://www.fiormarkets.com/report/blood-glucose-monitoring-systems-market-by-product-continuous-418818.html Capillary and Venous Blood Sampling Devices Market - https://www.fiormarkets.com/report/capillary-and-venous-blood-sampling-devices-market-by-418819.html

See the rest here:
Global Scaffold Technology Market Is Expected to Reach USD 2.16 billion by 2028 : Fior Markets - GlobeNewswire

Recombinant Growth Factors to Account for Over 45% of Overall Demand through 2031: Persistence Market Research – PRNewswire

By Stell Cell Research

NEW YORK, Feb. 18, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Cell culture supplements are the backbone of culturing methods and techniques in mammalian and microbial cell culture. Routinely performed cell-based assays and cell expansion processes require several growth factors to boost cell growth in the culture. Recombinant cell culture supplements serve an array of applications, such as stem cell research, drug discovery, oncology research, and regenerative medicine. Recombinant cell culture supplements and growth factors are used for culturing stem cells for expansion and differentiation into other cell types. Stem cell research is growing and adoption is increasing with time. Recombinant cell culture supplements such as albumin and transferrin are key components of mammalian cell culture. Increasing bioprocessing activities for production of novel biologics are likely to upswing the growth of the recombinant cell culture supplements market over the coming years.

These days, a majority of supplements used in research and manufacturing are produced using recombinant technology. Recombinant supplements play an important role in gene and cell therapy. Cell therapy requires to grow the cells outside the human body, i.e. in-vitro, and, recombinant cell culture supplements are inevitable for such applications. Due to rapid development within the biopharmaceutical industry, recombinant cell culture supplements are anticipated to witness significant demand through 2031.

According to a latest report published by Persistence Market Research, the global recombinant cell culture supplements market was valued at US$ 441 Mn in 2020, and is predicted to witness an impressive CAGR of over 6% during the forecast period (2021 2031).

Key Takeaways from Recombinant Cell Culture Supplements Market Study

Get the Sample PDF of the Report: https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/31310

"Increasing drug discovery and preference for recombinant technology for bio- production will upswing the global recombinant cell culture supplements market," says an analyst of Persistence Market Research.

Get Full Access of Report: https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/checkout/31310

Collaborations & Acquisitions Key Strategies amongst Market Players

Prominent players in the recombinant cell culture supplements market are firming their product ranges through acquisitions and reaching out to emerging markets. Increasing investments and manufacturing capacity expansion are expected to favour the growth the global market over the forecast period

Various players in the recombinant cell culture supplements market are focusing on growth strategies such as acquisitions and collaborations.

What Does the Recombinant cell culture supplements Market Report Cover?

Persistence Market Research offers a unique perspective and actionable insights on the recombinant cell culture supplements market in its latest study, presenting historical demand assessment of 2016 2020 and projections for 2021 2031, on the basis of product (recombinant growth factors, recombinant insulin,recombinant albumin, recombinant transferrin,recombinant trypsin, recombinant aprotinin, recombinant lysozyme, and others), application (stem cell therapy, gene therapy,bioprocess application,vaccine development, and others), source (animals, microorganisms, andhumans), and end user (academic and research institutes,biopharmaceutical companies,cancer research centers, and contract research centers (CROs)), across seven key regions of the world.

Browse Research Release at:https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/recombinant-cell-culture-supplements-market.asp

Browse End-to-end Market: IndustrialAutomation

Related Reports:

Cell Culture Media Market:

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/cell-culture-media-market.asp

Cell Culture Freezing Market:

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/cell-culture-freezing-market.asp

About Persistence Market Research

Overview:

Persistence Market Research (PMR)is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics and market research methodology to help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At Persistence Market Research, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Contact

Rajendra Singh Persistence Market Research U.S. Sales Office: 305 Broadway, 7th Floor New York City, NY 10007 +1-646-568-7751 United States USA - Canada Toll-Free: 800-961-035 Email: [emailprotected] Visit Our Website:https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

Content Source:https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/mediarelease/recombinant-cell-culture-supplements-market.asp

SOURCE Persistence Market Research Pvt. Ltd.

Originally posted here:
Recombinant Growth Factors to Account for Over 45% of Overall Demand through 2031: Persistence Market Research - PRNewswire

→←