Author Archives: admin


Types of leukemia: Prevalence, treatment options, and prognosis – Medical News Today

Leukemia is a type of cancer that affects the blood and bone marrow, where blood cells are formed. All types of leukemia cause rapid, uncontrolled growth of abnormal bone marrow and blood cells.

The main differences between the types include how fast the disease progresses and the types of cells it affects.

There are four main types of leukemia, which we describe in detail below:

Lymphocytic leukemia affects the lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell. Myeloid leukemia can affect the white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets.

According to the National Cancer Institute, roughly 1.5% of people in the United States will receive a leukemia diagnosis at some point.

In this article, explore the four main types, their symptoms, the treatment options available, and the outlook.

The full name of this type of cancer is acute lymphocytic leukemia, and acute means that it grows quickly. Lymphocytic means that it forms in underdeveloped white blood cells called lymphocytes.

The disease starts in the bone marrow, which produces stem cells that develop into red and white blood cells and platelets.

In a healthy person, the bone marrow does not release these cells until they are fully developed. In someone with ALL, the bone marrow releases large quantities of underdeveloped white blood cells.

There are several subtypes of ALL, and the subtype may influence the best course of treatment and the prognosis.

One subtype is B-cell ALL. This begins in the B lymphocytes, and it is the most common form of ALL in children.

Another subtype is T-cell ALL. It can cause the thymus, a small organ at the front of the windpipe, to become enlarged, which can lead to breathing difficulties.

Overall, because ALL progresses quickly, swift medical intervention is key.

As research from 2020 acknowledges, healthcare providers still do not know what causes ALL. It may occur due to genetic factors or exposure to:

Although genetic factors may play a role, ALL is not a familial disease.

Learn more about ALL here.

ALL is the most common form of leukemia in children.

The risk of developing it is highest in children under 5 years old. The prevalence slowly rises again in adults over 50.

ALL symptoms can be nonspecific difficult to distinguish from those of other illnesses.

They may include:

In a person with AML, the bone marrow makes abnormal versions of platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells called myeloblasts.

The full name of this disease is acute myeloid leukemia, and acute refers to the fact that it is fast-growing.

It forms in one of the following types of bone marrow cell:

Doctors classify AML by subtype, depending on:

AML can be difficult to treat and requires prompt medical attention.

Learn more about AML here.

The most common risk factor is myelodysplastic syndrome, a form of blood cancer that keeps the body from producing enough healthy blood cells.

Other factors that increase the risk of developing AML include:

Most people who develop AML are over 45. It is one of the most common types of leukemia in adults, though it is still rare, compared with other cancers.

It is also the second most common form of leukemia in children.

Symptoms of AML can vary and may include:

CLL is the most common form of leukemia among adults in the U.S. and other Western countries.

There are two types. One progresses slowly, and it causes the body to have high levels of characteristic lymphocytes, but only slightly low levels of healthy red blood cells, platelets, and neutrophils.

The other type progresses more quickly and causes a significant reduction in levels of all healthy blood cells.

In someone with CLL, the lymphocytes often look fully formed but are less able to fight infection than healthy white blood cells. The lymphocytes tend to build up very slowly, so a person might have CLL for a long time before experiencing symptoms.

Learn more about CLL here.

Genetic factors are the most likely cause. Others might include:

CLL is rare in children. It typically develops in adults aged 70 or over. However, it can affect people as young as 30.

CLL typically causes no early symptoms. When symptoms are present, they may include:

Also, 5090% of people with CLL have swollen lymph nodes.

CML is a slow-growing type of leukemia that develops in the bone marrow.

The full name of CML is chronic myeloid leukemia. As the American Cancer Society explain, a genetic change takes place in the early forms of the myeloid cells, and this eventually results in CML cells.

These leukemia cells then grow, divide, and enter the blood.

CML occurs due to a rearrangement of genetic material between the chromosomes 9 and 22.

This rearrangement fuses a part of the ABL1 gene from chromosome 9 with the BCR gene from chromosome 22, called the Philadelphia chromosome. The result of this fusion is called BCR-ABL1.

BCR-ABL1 produces a protein that promotes cell division and stops apoptosis, the process of cell death, which typically removes unneeded or damaged cells.

The cells keep dividing and do not self-destruct, resulting in an overproduction of abnormal cells and a lack of healthy blood cells.

This occurs during the persons lifetime and is not inherited.

CML typically affects adults. People aged 65 and older make up almost half of those who receive a CML diagnosis.

The symptoms of CML are unclear, but they may include:

The symptoms may vary, depending on the type of leukemia. Overall, a person should get in touch with a doctor if they experience:

Learn more about the symptoms of leukemia here.

Treatment for ALL typically involves three basic phases: induction, consolidation, and maintenance. We describe these in detail below.

Treatment for AML involves the first two phases. The induction phase may include treatment with the chemotherapy drugs cytarabine (Cytosar-U) and daunorubicin (Cerubidine) or idarubicin (Idamycin). The doctor may also recommend targeted drugs.

The goal of this phase is to kill the leukemia cells, causing the cancer to go into remission, using chemotherapy.

The doctor may recommend:

People having chemotherapy may need to see their doctors frequently and spend time in the hospital, due to the risk of serious infections and complications.

This phase of the treatment lasts for about 1 month.

Even if the treatment so far has led to remission, cancer cells may be hiding in the body, so more treatment is necessary.

The consolidation phase may involve taking high doses of chemotherapy. A doctor may also recommend targeted drugs or stem cell transplants.

This phase, consisting of ongoing chemotherapy treatments, usually lasts for 2 years.

Since CLL tends to progress slowly, and its treatment can have unpleasant side effects, some people with this condition go through a phase of watchful waiting before starting the treatment.

For a person with CML, the focus is often on providing the right treatment for the phase of the illness. To do this, a doctor considers how quickly the leukemia cells are building up and the extent of the symptoms. Stem cell transplants can be effective, but further treatment is necessary.

Overall, the initial treatment tends to include monoclonal antibodies, targeted drugs, and chemotherapy.

If the only concern is an enlarged spleen or swollen lymph nodes, the person may receive radiation or surgery.

If there are high numbers of CLL cells, the doctor may suggest leukapheresis, a treatment that lowers the persons blood count. This is only effective for a short time, but it allows the chemotherapy to start working.

For people with high-risk disease, doctors may recommend stem cell transplants.

A persons prognosis depends on the type of leukemia.

Learn more about survival rates for people with leukemia here.

About 8090% of adults with ALL experience complete remission for a while during treatment. And with treatment, most children recover from the disease.

Relapses are common in adults, so the overall cure rate is 40%. However, factors specific to each person play a role.

The older a person is when they receive an AML diagnosis, the more difficult it is to treat.

More than 25% of adults who achieve remission live for 3 years or more after treatment for AML.

A person may live for a long time with CLL.

Treatments can help keep the symptoms under control and prevent the disease from spreading. However, there is no cure.

Stem cell transplants can cure CML. However, this treatment is very invasive and is not suitable for most people with CML.

The United Kingdoms National Health Service estimate that 70% of males and 75% of females live for at least 5 years after receiving a CML diagnosis.

The earlier a person receives the diagnosis, the better their outlook.

Leukemia is a type of cancer that affects the blood and bone marrow. It can affect people of all ages.

There are four main types of leukemia. They differ based on how quickly they progress and the types of cells they affect.

Treatments for all types of leukemia continue to improve, helping people live longer and more fully with this condition.

Excerpt from:
Types of leukemia: Prevalence, treatment options, and prognosis - Medical News Today

Jasper Therapeutics Announces Launch of New Clinical Trial with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Evaluate JSP191 in Sickle Cell Disease -…

REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jasper Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company focused on hematopoietic cell transplant therapies, today announced the launch of a Phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate JSP191, Jaspers first-in-class anti-CD117 monoclonal antibody, as a targeted, non-toxic conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic transplant for sickle cell disease (SCD). Jasper Therapeutics and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) have entered into a clinical trial agreement in which NHLBI will serve as the Investigational New Drug (IND) sponsor for this study.

SCD is a lifelong inherited blood disorder that affects hemoglobin, a protein in red blood cells that delivers oxygen to tissues and organs throughout the body. Approximately 300,000 infants are born with SCD annually worldwide, and the number of cases is expected to significantly increase. Currently, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only cure available for SCD.

"This clinical trial agreement with the NHLBI expands the development of JSP191 for transplant conditioning and could bring curative transplants to more patients in need," said Kevin N. Heller, M.D., Executive Vice President, Research and Development, of Jasper Therapeutics. "We look forward to collaborating with the NHLBI and learning more about the potential for JSP191 in patients living with sickle cell disease."

About JSP191

JSP191 (formerly AMG 191) is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody in clinical development as a conditioning agent that clears hematopoietic stem cells from the bone marrow. JSP191 binds to human CD117, a receptor for stem cell factor (SCF) that is expressed on the surface of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The interaction of SCF and CD117 is required for stem cells to survive. JSP191 blocks SCF from binding to CD117 and disrupts critical survival signals in stem cells leading to cell death. This creates space in the bone marrow for engraftment of donor or gene-corrected transplanted stem cells.

Preclinical studies have shown that JSP191, as a single agent, safely depletes normal and diseased hematopoietic stem cells, including in animal models of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and sickle cell disease (SCD). Treatment with JSP191 creates the space needed for transplanted normal donor or gene-corrected hematopoietic stem cells to successfully engraft in the host bone marrow. To date, JSP191 has been evaluated in more than 90 healthy volunteers and patients.

JSP191 is currently being evaluated in two separate Jasper Therapeutics-sponsored clinical studies in hematopoietic cell transplant. The first clinical study is evaluating JSP191 as a sole conditioning agent in a Phase 1/2 dose-escalation and expansion trial to achieve donor stem cell engraftment in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant for SCID. Blood stem cell transplantation offers the only potentially curative therapy for SCID. JSP191 is also being evaluated in combination with another conditioning regimen in a Phase 1 study in patients with MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are receiving hematopoietic cell transplant. For more information about the design of these clinical trials, visit http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02963064 and NCT04429191).

Additional studies are planned to advance JSP191 as a conditioning agent for patients with other rare and ultra-rare monogenic disorders and autoimmune diseases.

About Jasper Therapeutics

Jasper Therapeutics is a biotechnology company focused on the development of novel curative therapies based on the biology of the hematopoietic stem cell. The companys lead compound, JSP191, is in clinical development as a conditioning antibody that clears hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow in patients undergoing a hematopoietic cell transplant. This first-in-class conditioning antibody is designed to enable safer and more effective curative hematopoietic cell transplants and gene therapies. For more information, please visit us at jaspertherapeutics.com.

Excerpt from:
Jasper Therapeutics Announces Launch of New Clinical Trial with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Evaluate JSP191 in Sickle Cell Disease -...

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Set to Reach USD 214.5 Million by 2024 – The Courier

The global stem cell therapy market is expected to witness a CAGR of 10.6% during the forecast period 2019-2024, and is also anticipated to reach USD 214.5 million by 2024. Growing awareness related to the therapeutic potency of stem cells, development of infrastructure related to stem cell banking and processing, development of advanced genome-based cell analysis techniques, and increasing private-public investment for the development of stem cell therapies are driving the growth of the stem cell therapy market.

Get a free copy of sample report: https://www.vynzresearch.com/healthcare/stem-cell-therapy-market/request-sample

Supportive regulations to drive the growth of the stem cell therapy market

Supporting regulations across developing countries, increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, technological advancement in healthcare, cellular therapies are the major advancements in transforming healthcare and identification of new stem cell lines are also fueling the growth of the stem cell therapy market.

Diseases such as osteoarthritis, multiple sclerosis, heart failure, hearing loss and cerebral palsy are some of the diseases that could be treated using stem cell therapies. For instance, according to the WHO by 2050, it is estimated 900 million people will have disabling hearing loss. Moreover, 60 percent of childhood hearing loss is due to preventable causes.

Allogenic stem cell therapy market to hold the larger share in the market

There are two types of stem cell therapy, allogeneic and autologous. Of both, allogenic segment account for the larger share and is also predicted to grow at the faster rate in the coming years in the market due to its extensive therapeutic applications, increasing commercialization of allogeneic products, easy production scale-up process, and growing number of clinical trials related to allogeneic therapies.

The stem cell therapy market has been segmented by therapeutic application into gastrointestinal diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, surgeries, cardiovascular diseases, and wound and injuries. Musculoskeletal disorders category contributed the largest revenue in the market due to increasing prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and bone & joint diseases, increasing availability of stem cell-based products for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, and growing patient preference for effective & early treatment strategies.

Do you have any specific research requirement? Ask for customization: https://www.vynzresearch.com/healthcare/stem-cell-therapy-market/customize-report

The global stem cell therapy market has also been segmented by cell source into adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell, cord blood cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Of all the categories, the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells are increasingly being used for therapeutic applications.

North America offers huge opportunities for stem cell therapy industry players

The North American stem cell therapy market will remain the largest during the forecast period. The region is further predicted to observe the fastest growth during the forecast period in the global market owing to technological upgradation and large capital invested in the research and development activities. Moreover, increasing number of clinical trials to evaluate therapeutic potential of products, increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, the growing patient base for target diseases, growing public awareness related to the therapeutic potency of therapy, and increasing public-private funding & research grants for developing safe and effective stem cell therapy products are also supporting the growth of the North American stem cell therapy market.

Investing in research and development is the key strategy adopted by the market players

Major players in the industry are investing in the development of innovative and new products, which is strengthening their position in the stem cell therapy market. In February 2018, MEDIPOST announced that FDA has approved its stem cell-based Alzheimers disease drug, NEUROSTEM for clinical trials. Similarly, in March 2017, Osiris Therapeutics launched Prestige Lyotechnology, a method for storage of living cells and tissues.

Some of the key players operating in the stem cell therapy industry are Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., RTI Surgical, Inc., MEDIPOST Co., Ltd., Nuvasive, Inc., Pharmicell Co., Ltd., Holostem Terapie Avanzate Srl, JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Anterogen Co., Ltd., and Allosource.

More from VynZ Research

Global Stem Cell Banking Market Analysis and Forecast to 2024

The global stem cell banking market is growing at a CAGR of 9.1% during the forecast period reaching USD 10.5 billion by 2024, due to the development of novel technologies of storage, preservation and processing. Stem cell banking is the method of accumulating cord blood, extorting and cryogenically freezing its stem cells for forthcoming use. Cord blood stem cells are used for treating blood diseases such as sickle cell disease, leukemia, and thalassemia. The global stem cell banking market is growing at a significant rate due to the development of novel technologies of storage, preservation and processing. The market has witnessed a high demand for placenta stem cells over the last few years, due to the increasing public awareness regarding the therapeutic prospective of stem cells.

Explore more at: https://www.vynzresearch.com/healthcare/stem-cell-banking-market/request-sample

Global Protein Expression Market Analysis and Forecast to 2024

The global protein expression market was evaluated at USD 1,873.1 million in 2018. The protocol for expression of proteins makes use of expression vectors, competent cells, reagents, instrument, and services. The reagents are the estimated to hold the largest share due to large volume used in the bio-experiments. The significant growth in the protein expression industry is primarily due to the increasing funds from government and non-government organization for protein research, the soaring prevalence of chronic diseases, rising life science industry.

Explore more at: https://www.vynzresearch.com/healthcare/protein-expression-market/request-sample

U.S. Protein Expression Market Analysis and Forecast to 2024

The U.S. protein expression market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.6% during the forecast period with its market size predicted to reach USD 1.2 billion by 2024. The U.S. protein expression market is primarily driven by the factors such as the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing investment for recombinant protein expression, advancement in technology for expression systems, increasing geriatric population, and robust growth of the life sciences industry in the country. Prokaryotic expression systems and mammalian cell expression systems are the major contributors to the protein expression industry in the region.

Explore more at: https://www.vynzresearch.com/healthcare/us-protein-expression-market/request-sample

Contact Us:

VynZ Research

Call: +91-996-028-8381

Toll Free (U.S. and Canada): +1-888-253-3960

Email: enquiry@vynzresearch.com

Connect with Us: LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter

Read more:
Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Set to Reach USD 214.5 Million by 2024 - The Courier

Keep it Flowing: Combating COVID-19 Blood Shortages in Cancer Treatment – Curetoday.com

When Marie Fuesel was treated for leukemia eight years ago, she needed donated blood products more than 100 times.

Theyd give me my chemotherapy, Id stay in the hospital for a week, then Id go home, get really sick and have to come back in for blood and platelets, says Fuesel, 53, a retired insurance agent who lives in suburban Chicago. I spent over 100 days in the hospital over eight months. The disease and treatments (affect the bone marrow and production of red and white blood cells and platelets), so many transfusions were required to achieve remission.

After eight months of chemotherapy, followed by a year on the targeted drug Sprycel (dasatinib) as part of a clinical trial, Fuesel went into remission. She no longer needs transfusions, but she still appreciates the need for blood donors. I wouldnt be alive if the blood wasnt available when it was needed, she says.

Back then, blood shortages werent common, but they are now. The stay-at-home orders at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of numerous blood drives, and safety concerns arising from its spread have prompted some frequent donors to stay away from donation centers.

Thats been a source of worry for oncologists. Patients with cancer use nearly one-quarter of the nations blood supply, according to the American Red Cross, and donated blood is a vital resource in the treatment of hematologic cancers. Patients who receive stem cell transplants often need transfusions of oxygen-carrying red blood cells, infection-fighting white blood cells and platelets to control bleeding. Blood transfusions are common in the supportive care of patients undergoing chemotherapy that suppresses production of all the blood cells that results in anemia, because they relieve symptoms that ensue, such as fatigue and shortness of breath.

Between March and June 2020, 37,000 blood drives were canceled, according to the American Red Cross. The impact of the blood shortage varied across the nation but has hit some cities particularly hard. The New York Blood Center, for example, which supplies New York City

hospitals, reported in December 2020 that it had just three days of supply on hand, down from the five- to seven-day supply it normally has.

Ongoing shortages are forcing cancer centers to change some of their procedures for using donated blood. We all recognize that we are in the midst of a public health crisis and that we all have to do our part, says Dr. Mikkael Sekeres, chief of hematology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and a physician liaison in hematology at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center.

In response to COVID-related blood shortages, several cancer centers adjusted their policies for transfusing blood. Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, for example, developed a blood shortage action plan, according to Dr. Kaaron Benson, director of the blood bank at Moffitt. It basically meant dropping some of the thresholds we would normally use for transfusion, Benson says.

Moffitt has not needed to implement the plan yet, but if it does, Benson says, the change would most likely have the biggest effect on patients with leukemia and lymphoma who are given platelets as a preventive strategy. Provided theyre not bleeding or engaging in activities that increase the risk of bleeding, studies have shown you can allow the platelet threshold to drop from our standard of 10,000 per microliter to 5,000, she says.

The technique was first suggested in a 1991 journal article and has since been widely accepted as an appropriate change to make during blood shortages, Benson says.

In recent years, many oncologists have set lower thresholds for red blood cell transfusions another change that has eased the strain on blood supply. They used to routinely order transfusions for patients with hemoglobin levels below 10 grams per deciliter. That number dropped to between 7 and 8 grams per deciliter after a series of studies showed that infusing red blood cells at the higher threshold did not improve treatment outcomes.

During the pandemic, Moffitt and other cancer centers are also delaying some stem cell transplants and elective surgeries, so that blood used during those procedures can be kept on hand for patients who urgently need it, such as trauma patients or those needing emergent surgery. But those decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, so patients should maintain a frequent dialogue with their oncologists to determine the best plan for managing their symptoms during the pandemic.

Patients with multiple myeloma, for example, can benefit from stem cell transplants, but its usually not urgent, says Dr. Stephanie Lee, a hematologist and professor at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. We have very good treatments for multiple myeloma, so we can continue to give patients chemotherapy for weeks or months, Lee says.

However, she explains, patients with leukemia who need stem cell transplants may be advised to undergo the procedure as quickly as possible, even during the pandemic, because delaying it could cause the cancer to grow and become resistant to treatment.

And some patients with cancer who are simultaneously fighting other diseases should receive all the blood and platelet transfusions they need to manage their cancer, as well as to address any risks posed by chronic conditions. If you have heart disease, and your hemoglobin drops even further, youre more likely to get angina or suffer a heart attack, Sekeres says. So, for those people with serious comorbidities, we are more aggressive in transfusing blood products.

Growing the Donor Pool

Stephenie Perry, who works as the business operations coordinator for the American Red Cross of Northwest Georgia, knows firsthand the value of donated blood. Perry is a survivor of Hodgkin lymphoma who needed several transfusions during her treatment, which consisted of a round of chemotherapy and two stem cell transplants.

Perry, 31, has been in remission since February 2018, but sometimes her red blood cell count still runs low and she needs another blood transfusion. I feel sluggish, and when I stand up, I get really dizzy, says Perry, who lives in Rome, Georgia. When I get a transfusion, its like someone has just given me a shot of energy.

How can patients adapt when blood shortages mandate less frequent transfusions? Lifestyle changes can make a big difference, Sekeres says. If a patient is becoming progressively anemic, and its someone who usually goes for a 2-mile walk every day, maybe theyll reduce it to 1 mile or cut (exercise) altogether, he says.

Some patients may be eligible for iron infusions, which can relieve symptoms of fatigue and lengthen the period between infusions, says Abbey Fueger, clinical trial nurse navigator for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

In addition, there are other small changes that can lessen the risk of anemia and improve symptoms. Some physicians are trying to limit blood draws for patients and recommending nutritional supplements that might help them feel better and lengthen the time between infusions, she says.

Meanwhile, an effort is underway to expand the pool of potential blood donors. In April, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) addressed blood shortages brought on by COVID-19 by easing up on some of its restrictions on who can donate. For example, people who are at risk of contracting HIV, and those who have a recent tattoo or piercing or possible exposure to an infected individual no longer have to wait one year to give blood. The new waiting period is three months.

The FDA also dropped the waiting period for donors who have traveled to malaria-endemic countries from one year to three months. And it no longer recommends that blood centers turn away donors who lived in certain European countries during the era when Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, a rare and fatal degenerative brain disorder, was thought to be spreading.

The hospital community is rallying around the cause, holding blood drives of their own and encouraging family members of patients to donate blood.

During the first few months of the pandemic, Fuesel helped put together five small blood drives in her town of Orland Park, Illinois. They were so successful the American Red Cross and a local news broadcaster asked her to help run the seventh annual Great Chicago Blood Drive. So, she did, and on Jan. 13, that event collected 330 units of blood at the Orland Park location and more than 2,000 units at other drives around the city.

For donors who might be nervous about giving blood during a pandemic, Fuesel has a message: Its safe and important. All the beds are spaced apart, and there are different stations when you walk in for getting your temperature checked and using hand sanitizer, Fuesel says. I know these are hard times, but it doesnt cost anything to give your blood. Its a way to help.

The rest is here:
Keep it Flowing: Combating COVID-19 Blood Shortages in Cancer Treatment - Curetoday.com

Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease – Science

Machine learning for medicine

Small-molecule screens aimed at identifying therapeutic candidates traditionally search for molecules that affect one to several outputs at most, limiting discovery of true disease-modifying drugs. Theodoris et al. developed a machine-learning approach to identify small molecules that broadly correct gene networks dysregulated in a human induced pluripotent stem cell disease model of a common form of heart disease involving the aortic valve. Gene network correction by the most efficacious therapeutic candidate generalized to primary aortic valve cells derived from more than 20 patients with sporadic aortic valve disease and prevented aortic valve disease in vivo in a mouse model.

Science, this issue p. eabd0724

Determining the gene-regulatory networks that drive human disease allows the design of therapies that target the core disease mechanism rather than merely managing symptoms. However, small molecules used as therapeutic agents are traditionally screened for their effects on only one to several outputs at most, from which their predicted efficacy on the disease as a whole is extrapolated. In silico correlation of disease network dysregulation with pathways affected by molecules in surrogate cell types is limited by the relevance of the cell types used and by not directly testing compounds in patient cells.

In principle, mapping the architecture of the dysregulated network in disease-relevant cells differentiated from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and subsequent screening for small molecules that broadly correct the abnormal gene network could overcome this obstacle. Specifically, targeting normalization of the core regulatory elements that drive the disease process, rather than correction of peripheral downstream effectors that may not be disease modifying, would have the greatest likelihood of therapeutic success. We previously demonstrated that haploinsufficiency of NOTCH1 can cause calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), the third most common form of heart disease, and that the underlying mechanism involves derepression of osteoblast-like gene networks in cardiac valve cells. There is no medical therapy for CAVD, and in the United States alone, >100,000 surgical valve replacements are performed annually to relieve obstruction of blood flow from the heart. Many of these occur in the setting of a congenital aortic valve anomaly present in 1 to 2% of the population in which the aortic valve has two leaflets (bicuspid) rather than the normal three leaflets (tricuspid). Bicuspid valves in humans can also be caused by NOTCH1 mutations and predispose to early and more aggressive calcification in adulthood. Given that valve calcification progresses with age, a medical therapy that could slow or even arrest progression would have tremendous impact.

We developed a machine-learning approach to identify small molecules that sufficiently corrected gene network dysregulation in NOTCH1-haploinsufficient human iPSC-derived endothelial cells (ECs) such that they classified similar to NOTCH1+/+ ECs derived from gene-corrected isogenic iPSCs. We screened 1595 small molecules for their effect on a signature of 119 genes representative of key regulatory nodes and peripheral genes from varied regions of the inferred NOTCH1-dependent network, assayed by targeted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Overall, eight molecules were validated to sufficiently correct the network signature such that NOTCH1+/ ECs classified as NOTCH1+/+ by the trained machine-learning algorithm. Of these, XCT790, an inverse agonist of estrogen-related receptor (ERR), had the strongest restorative effect on the key regulatory nodes SOX7 and TCF4 and on the network as a whole, as shown by full transcriptome RNA-seq.

Gene network correction by XCT790 generalized to human primary aortic valve ECs derived from explanted valves from >20 patients with nonfamilial CAVD. XCT790 was effective in broadly restoring dysregulated genes toward the normal state in both calcified tricuspid and bicuspid valves, including the key regulatory nodes SOX7 and TCF4.

Furthermore, XCT790 was sufficient to prevent as well as treat already established aortic valve disease in vivo in a mouse model of Notch1 haploinsufficiency on a telomere-shortened background. XCT790 significantly reduced aortic valve thickness, the extent of calcification, and echocardiographic signs of valve stenosis in vivo. XCT790 also reduced the percentage of aortic valve cells expressing the osteoblast transcriptional regulator RUNX2, indicating a reduction in the osteogenic cell fate switch underlying CAVD. Whole-transcriptome RNA-seq in treated aortic valves showed that XCT790 broadly corrected the genes dysregulated in Notch1-haploinsufficient mice with shortened telomeres, and that treatment of diseased aortic valves promoted clustering of the transcriptome with that of healthy aortic valves.

Network-based screening that leverages iPSC and machine-learning technologies is an effective strategy to discover molecules with broadly restorative effects on gene networks dysregulated in human disease that can be validated in vivo. XCT790 represents an entry point for developing a much-needed medical therapy for calcification of the aortic valve, which may also affect the highly related and associated calcification of blood vessels. Given the efficacy of XCT790 in limiting valve thickening, the potential for XCT790 to alter the progression of childhood, and perhaps even fetal, valve stenosis also warrants further study. Application of this strategy to other human models of disease may increase the likelihood of identifying disease-modifying candidate therapies that are successful in vivo.

A gene networkbased screening approach leveraging human disease-specific iPSCs and machine learning identified a therapeutic candidate, XCT790, which corrected the network dysregulation in genetically defined iPSC-derived endothelial cells and primary aortic valve endothelial cells from >20 patients with sporadic aortic valve disease. XCT790 was also effective in preventing and treating a mouse model of aortic valve disease.

Mapping the gene-regulatory networks dysregulated in human disease would allow the design of network-correcting therapies that treat the core disease mechanism. However, small molecules are traditionally screened for their effects on one to several outputs at most, biasing discovery and limiting the likelihood of true disease-modifying drug candidates. Here, we developed a machine-learning approach to identify small molecules that broadly correct gene networks dysregulated in a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) disease model of a common form of heart disease involving the aortic valve (AV). Gene network correction by the most efficacious therapeutic candidate, XCT790, generalized to patient-derived primary AV cells and was sufficient to prevent and treat AV disease in vivo in a mouse model. This strategy, made feasible by human iPSC technology, network analysis, and machine learning, may represent an effective path for drug discovery.

Visit link:
Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease - Science

AlloVir Research Presented at the 2021 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meeting Digital Experience – Business Wire

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AlloVir (Nasdaq: ALVR), a late clinical-stage cell therapy company, today announced results of a subgroup analysis from a Phase 2, proof-of-concept study (CHARMS) evaluating the companys lead product candidate, Viralym-M (ALVR105), an allogeneic, off-the-shelf, multi-virus specific investigational T-cell therapy (VST), in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients with virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (V-HC). These data are being presented in an oral presentation during the Transplantation & Cellular Therapy (TCT) Meeting of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) and the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Additionally, two separate oral presentations characterize the high economic and clinical burden of V-HC and double-stranded (ds) DNA viral infections in allo-HSCT recipients. Preclinical data was also presented in a poster presentation on ALVR109, AlloVirs virus-specific T-cell therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19.

The data from the Phase 2 CHARMS study highlight Viralym-M's potential to treat and possibly prevent multiple viral infections and viral diseases. The findings presented at TCT show that this novel virus-specific T cell therapy has the potential to rapidly and effectively resolve macroscopic hematuria in allo-HSCT recipients with virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis a disease that currently has no effective treatment options and causes significant morbidity and increased risk of mortality, said Agustin Melian, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Medical Sciences of AlloVir. We have recently initiated our Phase 3, pivotal study of Viralym-M for the treatment of virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and look forward to advancing this therapy through development for patients in need.

Data of Viralym-M in fifty-eight allo-HSCT recipients with at least one treatment-refractory viral infection caused by BK virus (BKV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), and/or JC virus (JCV) were evaluated in the CHARMS Phase 2 study. The subgroup analysis presented at TCT included 26 patients who received intravenous VST infusions for the treatment of V-HC due to infection with BKV (n=23), AdV (n=2) and BKV and AdV (n=1). Infusions were well tolerated with mild, grade 1, de novo skin rash from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurring in 15% of patients (n=4). In the 20 patients with available V-HC grading, resolution of macroscopic hematuria was observed in 60% and 80% of patients at two- and six-weeks post-infusion, respectively. In comparison, resolution of macroscopic hematuria was observed in <10% and 30% of patients at weeks two and six, respectively, in a contemporary cohort of allo-HSCT recipients (n=33) with V-HC who were not treated with Viralym-M.

Health economic outcomes data was also presented in two separate oral presentations at the conference. The two presentations analyzed U.S. claims data to compare health care reimbursement, health resource utilization, and clinical outcomes in pediatric and adult allo-HSCT recipients with V-HC and those without V-HC, and allo-HSCT recipients with or without dsDNA infections, respectively. Both studies found that allo-HSCT recipients with V-HC and those with any dsDNA infection had higher reimbursement costs, increased hospital and ICU length of stay, and increased hospital readmission rates. The presence of V-HC or any dsDNA viral infection was associated with a higher risk of mortality.

In addition, a poster presentation at the conference demonstrated the in vitro effector and safety profile of ALVR109, an allogeneic, off-the-shelf investigational VST therapy designed to target SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the severe and life-threatening viral disease, COVID-19. These data suggest the potential for using these VSTs to treat COVID-19 in hospitalized high-risk patients to prevent the development of severe disease. A clinical trial evaluating these banked, off-the-shelf SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells has been initiated at the Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), Texas Children's Hospital, and Houston Methodist Hospital.

Viral Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

In healthy individuals, virus-specific T cells (VSTs) from the bodys natural defense system provide protection against numerous disease-causing viruses. However, in patients with a weakened immune system these viruses may be uncontrolled. Viral diseases are common and can cause potentially devastating and life-threatening consequences in immunocompromised patients. For example, up to 90% of patients will reactivate at least one virus following an allogeneic stem cell transplant and two-thirds of these patients reactivate more than one virus, resulting in significant and prolonged morbidity, hospitalization, and premature death. Typically, when viruses infect immunocompromised patients, standard antiviral treatment does not address the underlying problem of a weakened immune system and therefore many patients suffer with life-threatening outcomes such as multi-organ damage and failure, and even death.

Viralym-M

Viralym-M (ALVR105) is an allogeneic, off-the-shelf, multi-virus specific investigational T-cell therapy targeting five devastating viral pathogens: BK virus, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus 6. Viralym-M has the potential to transform care for transplant recipients as well as individuals who are at high risk for opportunistic viral infections by reducing or preventing disease morbidity and dramatically improving patient outcomes. Three pivotal and proof-of-concept clinical (POC) trials are ongoing and actively recruiting patients in indications such as treatment of virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and multi-virus prevention following allo-HSCT, and preemptive treatment of BK viremia in adult kidney transplant recipients. Additional pivotal and POC trials are expected to initiate for the treatment of CMV and the treatment of AdV in allo-HSCT recipients and in CMV for solid organ transplant recipients, respectively. For more information on the ongoing clinical trials visit clinicaltrials.gov.

Viralym-M has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as well as PRIority MEdicines (PRIME) and Orphan Drug Designations (ODD) from the European Medicines Agency.

About AlloVir

AlloVir is a leading late clinical-stage cell therapy company with a focus on restoring natural immunity against life-threatening viral diseases in pediatric and adult patients with weakened immune systems. The companys innovative and proprietary technology platforms leverage off-the-shelf, allogeneic, multi-virus specific T-cells targeting devastating viruses for patients with T-cell deficiencies who are at risk from the life-threatening consequences of viral diseases. AlloVirs technology and manufacturing process enables the potential for the treatment and prevention of a spectrum of devastating viruses with each single allogeneic cell therapy. The company is advancing multiple mid- and late-stage clinical trials across its product portfolio. For more information visit http://www.allovir.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including, without limitation, statements regarding AlloVirs development and regulatory status of our product candidates, the planned conduct of its preclinical studies and clinical trials and its prospects for success in those studies and trials, and its strategy, business plans and focus. The words may, will, could, would, should, expect, plan, anticipate, intend, believe, estimate, predict, project, potential, continue, target and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on managements current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and important factors that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this press release, including, without limitation, those related to AlloVirs financial results, the timing for the initiation and successful completion of AlloVirs clinical trials of its product candidates, whether and when, if at all, AlloVirs product candidates will receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or other foreign regulatory authorities, competition from other biopharmaceutical companies, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AlloVirs product development plans, supply chain, and business operations and other risks identified in AlloVirs SEC filings. AlloVir cautions you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. AlloVir disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any such statements to reflect any change in expectations or in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release represent AlloVirs views only as of the date hereof and should not be relied upon as representing its views as of any subsequent date.

The rest is here:
AlloVir Research Presented at the 2021 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meeting Digital Experience - Business Wire

Orchard Therapeutics talks the benefits of HSC therapy – BioProcess Insider

Having raised $150 million, Orchard hopes to expand its therapy pipeline into larger indications and says its HSC approach is not limited to the vector it uses.

The firm has said the funding will also aid the launch of gene therapy Libmeldy in Europe. Last year, the firm received approval for the one-time treatment which is used to treat children with metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD).

Though often viewed as a single technology, the delivery mechanism, the vector, and the type of cell modified in gene therapy can conjure different approaches. Libmeldy is an ex vivo Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) gene therapy. The company told us HSCs are central to Orchards other products in its pipeline.

Image/iStock: CIPhotos

It also asserted that despite the use of a lentiviral vector, HSC is the facilitating technology in its gene therapy as it is not limited to the vector used.

We insert a working copy of the gene into the genome of HSCs, and once engrafted, these genetically modified cells can lead to multiple corrected cell types in the blood stream including white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, and tissue macrophages, SVP, Leslie Meltzer told BioProcess Insider. Importantly, the progeny of HSCs can migrate into multiple organ systems including the brain and GI tract.

The firm uses a lentiviral vector where genes can be inserted, deleted, or modified. Orchard told us lentiviral vectors are an appealing choice because of its ability to stably integrate the genome and be passed on to all the progeny.

HSCs are particularly appealing because of their intrinsic ability to self-renew which means that these cells serve as the repository of stem cells is expected for the lifetime of the individual, said Meltzer.

To expand into larger indications, Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) will be used to improve efficiency and the firm tout manufacturing as a critical step to transforming the capabilities of HSC.

We are focused on improving the HSC gene therapy manufacturing process through important technology innovations, including a scalable stable vector producing cell line, transduction enhancing compounds and a fully closed, automated drug product process.

With growing clinical data available, the firm is confident HSC gene therapy has the potential to make a durable impact in devastating disorders of the central nervous system.

More here:
Orchard Therapeutics talks the benefits of HSC therapy - BioProcess Insider

Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market Is Projected To Reach 240.7 Million US$ By 2026 | Key Players, Market Dynamics, Market Trends, And Forecast. KSU |…

The Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market Was Valued at 129.52 million US$ in 2019 and Is Projected to Reach 240.7 million US$ By 2026, At A CAGR of 9.3 percentage During the Forecast Period. In This Study, 2019 Has Been Considered as The Base and 2020 to 2026 as the Forecast Period to Estimate the Market Size for Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market

Deep analysis about market status (2016-2019), competition pattern, advantages and disadvantages of products, industry development trends (2019-2026), regional industrial layout characteristics and macroeconomic policies, industrial policy has also been included. From raw materials to downstream buyers of this industry will be analyzed scientifically, the product value chain and sales distribution channel will be presented as well. This report will help you to establish comprehensive overview of the Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market

To avail the sample report for free: https://www.bonafideresearch.com/samplereport/93000002

The Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market can be split based on product types, major applications, and important regions.

By Cell Type: 1. Allogeneic Stem Cells 2. Autologous Stem Cells

By Investment: 1. Treatment 2. Research

By End-use: 1. Veterinary Hospitals 2. Veterinary Clinics 3. Veterinary Research Institutes

By Region 1. North America 1.1. U.S. 1.2. Canada 2. Europe 2.1. Germany 2.2. France 2.3. UK 2.4. Italy 2.5. Rest of Europe 3. Asia Pacific 3.1. China 3.2. Japan 3.3. India 3.4. Rest of Asia Pacific 4. Latin America 4.1. Brazil 4.2. Mexico 4.3. Rest of Latin America 5. Middle East & Africa 5.1. GCC 5.2. Rest of Middle East & Africa

Major Companies Present in the market

VetStem Biopharma Inc, Cell Therapy Sciences, Aratana Therapeutics Inc, Regeneus Ltd, Medivet Biologics LLC, Medivet Biologics LLC, Vetbiologics, Stemcellvet, Magellan Stem Cells, Medrego.

To Access Complete Report: https://www.bonafideresearch.com/product/93000002

Table of contents

1. Introduction 1.1. Market Scope and Segmental Definition 1.2. Assumptions & Limitation 2. Research Methodology 2.1. Research Approach & Data Sources 2.2. Forecasting Model 3. Executive Summary 3.1. Top Line Market Estimation 3.2. Future Outlook 4. Market Forces 4.1. Key Industry Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities 4.2. Industry Trends 5. Market Outlook (Current size & future market estimates) By Cell Type: 1. Allogeneic Stem Cells 2. Autologous Stem Cells

By Investment: 1. Treatment 2. Research 6. Market Outlook by Application (Current size & future market estimates) By End-use: 1. Veterinary Hospitals 2. Veterinary Clinics 3. Veterinary Research Institutes 7. Market Outlook by Regions (Current size & future market estimates) 1. North America 1.1. U.S. 1.2. Canada 2. Europe 2.1. Germany 2.2. France 2.3. UK 2.4. Italy 2.5. Rest of Europe 3. Asia Pacific 3.1. China 3.2. Japan 3.3. India 3.4. Rest of Asia Pacific 4. Latin America 4.1. Brazil 4.2. Mexico 4.3. Rest of Latin America 5. Middle East & Africa 5.1. GCC 5.2. Rest of Middle East & Africa 8. Competitive Landscape 8.1. Market Share/Market Ranking Analysis 8.2. Competitive Market Scenario (New Product Innovations, Key Strategic Moves & Partnerships, Start-ups Ecosystem) 9. Company Profiles

Contact Us: Bonafide Research Steven Thomas, AM Content Marketing sales@bonafideresearch.com Americas: +1 201 793 8545(NA) Europe: +44 20 86385593 APAC: +91 7878231309 https://www.bonafideresearch.com/

About us: Bonafide Research is one of the fastest growing market research and consulting company. We are expert in syndicated research reports & custom research solutions across the domains. We have been closely working with fortune 500 clients by helping them in tracking the constantly changing market scenario. Bonafide has continuously made efforts to evolve and enhance the report quality with each passing day. In house, we have published 3500+ high quality research reports with major focus on Indian market. Our client base consists of BCG, Ernst & Young, PwC, McKinsey & Company, Inflexion, Nestle, Unilever, Crompton Greaves, SRF, CPF, Aramax.

Go here to read the rest:
Canine Stem Cell Therapy Market Is Projected To Reach 240.7 Million US$ By 2026 | Key Players, Market Dynamics, Market Trends, And Forecast. KSU |...

Outlook on the Cell Therapy Global Market to 2027 – Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecasts – Yahoo Finance

Dublin, Feb. 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Cell Therapy Market by Cell Type, Therapy Type, Therapeutic Area, and End User: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2020-2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global cell therapy market accounted for $7,754. 89 million in 2019, and is expected to reach $48,115. 40 million by 2027, registering a CAGR of 25. 6% from 2020 to 2027.

Cell therapy involves administration of somatic cell preparations for treatment of diseases or traumatic damages. Cell therapy aims to introduce new, healthy cells into a patient's body to replace diseased or missing ones.

This is attributed to the fact that specialized cells, such as brain cells, are difficult to obtain from human body. In addition, specialized cells typically have a limited ability to multiply, making it difficult to produce sufficient number of cells required for certain cell therapies. Some of these issues can be overcome through the use of stem cells. In addition, cells such as blood and bone marrow cells, mature, immature & solid tissue cells, adult stem cells, and embryonic stem cells are widely used in cell therapy procedures.

Moreover, transplanted cells including induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are divided broadly into two main groups including autologous cells and non-autologous cells. Development of precision medicine and advancements in Advanced Therapies Medicinal Products (ATMPS) in context to their efficiency and manufacturing are expected to be the major drivers for the market. Furthermore, automation in adult stem cells and cord blood processing and storage are the key technological advancements that fuel growth of the market for cell therapy.

In addition, growth in aging patient population, The rise in cell therapy transplantations globally, and surge in disease awareness drive growth of the global cell therapy market. Furthermore, The rise in adoption of human cells over animal cells for cell therapeutics research, technological advancements in field of cell therapy, and increase in incidences of diseases such as cancer, cardiac abnormalities, and organ failure are the key factors that drive growth of the global market.

Moreover, implementation of stringent government regulations regarding the use of cell therapy is anticipated to restrict growth of the market. On the contrary, surge in number of regulations to promote stem cell therapy and increase in funds for research in developing countries are expected to offer lucrative opportunities to the market in the future.

The global cell therapy market is categorized on the basis of therapy type, therapeutic area, cell type, end user, and region. On the basis of therapy type, the market is segregated into autologous and allogenic. By therapeutics, it is classified into malignancies, musculoskeletal disorders, autoimmune disorders, dermatology, and others.

The global cell therapy market is categorized on the basis of therapy type, therapeutic, cell type, end user and region. On the basis of therapy type, the market is segregated into autologous and allogenic. By therapeutic area, it is classified into malignancies, musculoskeletal disorders, autoimmune disorders, dermatology, and others. On the basis of cell type, it is segregated into stem cell therapy and non-stem cell type. On the basis of end user, it is segregated into hospital & clinics and academic & research institutes. On the basis of region, the market is studied across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and LAMEA.

Key Benefits

Story continues

The study provides an in-depth analysis of the global cell therapy market along with the current trends and future estimations to elucidate the imminent investment pockets.

Comprehensive analysis of factors that drive and restrict the market growth is provided in the report.

Comprehensive quantitative analysis of the industry from 2019 to 2027 is provided to enable the stakeholders to capitalize on the prevailing market opportunities.

Extensive analysis of the key segments of the industry helps in understanding the forms and types of cell therapy used across the globe.

Key market players and their strategies have been analyzed to understand the competitive outlook of the market.

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1. Report Description 1.2. Key Benefits for Stakeholders 1.3. Key Market Segments 1.4. Research Methodology 1.4.1. Secondary Research 1.4.2. Primary Research 1.4.3. Analyst Tools & Models

Chapter 2: Executive Summary 2.1. Key Findings of the Study 2.2. Cxo Perspective

Chapter 3: Market Overview 3.1. Market Definition and Scope 3.2. Key Findings 3.2.1. Top Player Positioning 3.2.2. Top Investment Pockets 3.2.3. Top Winning Strategies 3.3. Porter'S Five Forces Analysis 3.4. Impact Analysis 3.4.1. Drivers 3.4.1.1. Technological Advancements in the Field of Cell Therapy 3.4.1.2. The Rise in Number of Cell Therapy Clinical Studies 3.4.1.3. The Rise in Adoption of Regenerative Medicine 3.4.2. Restraint 3.4.2.1. Developing Stage and Pricing 3.4.3. Opportunity 3.4.3.1. High Growth Potential in Emerging Markets 3.5. Impact of Covid-19 on Cell Therapy Market

Chapter 4: Cell Therapy Market, by Cell Type 4.1. Overview 4.1.1. Market Size and Forecast 4.2. Stem Cell 4.2.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 4.2.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 4.2.3. Market Size and Forecast, by Type 4.2.3.1. Bone Marrow, Market Size and Forecast 4.2.3.2. Blood, Market Size and Forecast 4.2.3.3. Umbilical Cord-Derived, Market Size and Forecast 4.2.3.4. Adipose-Derived Stem Cell, Market Size and Forecast 4.2.3.5. Others (Placenta, and Nonspecific Cells), Market Size and Forecast 4.3. Non-Stem Cell 4.3.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 4.3.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region

Chapter 5: Cell Therapy Market, by Therapy Type 5.1. Overview 5.1.1. Market Size and Forecast 5.2. Autologous 5.2.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 5.2.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 5.2.3. Market Analysis, by Country 5.3. Allogeneic 5.3.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 5.3.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 5.3.3. Market Analysis, by Country

Chapter 6: Cell Therapy Market, by Therapeutic Area 6.1. Overview 6.1.1. Market Size and Forecast 6.2. Malignancies 6.2.1. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 6.2.2. Market Analysis, by Country 6.3. Musculoskeletal Disorders 6.3.1. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 6.3.2. Market Analysis, by Country 6.4. Autoimmune Disorders 6.4.1. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 6.4.2. Market Analysis, by Country 6.5. Dermatology 6.5.1. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 6.5.2. Market Analysis, by Country 6.6. Others 6.6.1. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 6.6.2. Market Analysis, by Country

Chapter 7: Cell Therapy Market, by End-user 7.1. Overview 7.1.1. Market Size and Forecast 7.2. Hospitals & Clinics 7.2.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 7.2.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 7.2.3. Market Analysis, by Country 7.3. Academic & Research Institutes 7.3.1. Key Market Trends and Opportunities 7.3.2. Market Size and Forecast, by Region 7.3.3. Market Analysis, by Country

Chapter 8: Cell Therapy Market, by Region 8.1. Overview 8.2. North America 8.3. Europe 8.4. Asia-Pacific 8.5. LAMEA

Chapter 9: Company Profiles 9.1. Allosource 9.1.1. Company Overview 9.1.2. Company Snapshot 9.1.3. Operating Business Segments 9.1.4. Product Portfolio 9.1.5. Key Strategic Moves and Developments 9.2. Cells for Cells 9.2.1. Company Overview 9.2.2. Company Snapshot 9.2.3. Operating Business Segments 9.2.4. Product Portfolio 9.3. Holostem Terapie Avanzate Srl 9.3.1. Company Overview 9.3.2. Company Snapshot 9.3.3. Operating Business Segments 9.3.4. Product Portfolio 9.4. Jcr Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. 9.4.1. Company Overview 9.4.2. Company Snapshot 9.4.3. Operating Business Segments 9.4.4. Product Portfolio 9.4.5. Business Performance 9.4.6. Key Strategic Moves and Developments 9.5. Kolon Tissuegene, Inc. 9.5.1. Company Overview 9.5.2. Company Snapshot 9.5.3. Operating Business Segments 9.5.4. Product Portfolio 9.5.5. Key Strategic Moves and Developments 9.6. Medipost Co. Ltd. 9.6.1. Company Overview 9.6.2. Company Snapshot 9.6.3. Operating Business Segments 9.6.4. Product Portfolio 9.6.5. Business Performance 9.7. Mesoblast Ltd 9.7.1. Company Overview 9.7.2. Company Snapshot 9.7.3. Operating Business Segments 9.7.4. Product Portfolio 9.7.5. Business Performance 9.8. Nuvasive, Inc. 9.8.1. Company Overview 9.8.2. Company Snapshot 9.8.3. Operating Business Segments 9.8.4. Product Portfolio 9.8.5. Business Performance 9.9. Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. 9.9.1. Company Overview 9.9.2. Company Snapshot 9.9.3. Operating Business Segments 9.9.4. Product Portfolio 9.10. Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. 9.10.1. Company Overview 9.10.2. Company Snapshot 9.10.3. Operating Business Segments 9.10.4. Product Portfolio

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/bja7iz

Follow this link:
Outlook on the Cell Therapy Global Market to 2027 - Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecasts - Yahoo Finance

Australia’s best performing IVF clinics revealed – Queensland Times

Exclusive: It is often the last resort for parents desperate for a baby - and one that is not only expensive but shrouded in secrecy.

But now for the first time, would-be parents will have access to the performance rates of Australia's individual IVF clinics - allowing greater transparency about success rates.

Couples will also be able to predict their chance of having a baby through IVF by entering their age and clinical details into a calculator on the YourIVFSuccess website.

The online aid means prospective parents will be able to get the same information presented the same way about every clinic, all in one place.

The statistics underpinning the tool - which will be live from Monday - come from the University of New South Wales's (UNSW) Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Data Base which records every IVF procedure ever undertaken in Australia.

Of the 76 clinics that had been operating long enough to have their clinic success rates published, 92 per cent consented to have their results on the Website.

Couples can compare IVF clinic outcomes for the first time. Picture: iStock

Four measures of a clinics performance will be reported including the overall chance of having a baby from any egg retrieval and the chance of having a baby from the first ever egg retrieval.

For each measure the website compares the individual clinics performance to the national average success rate and it also compares success by age group given the age is such an important factor.

One in six Australian couples of reproductive age experience difficulties conceiving a child and Centre Alliance Senator Stirling Griff who led the charge for the release of the performance information said until now the industry had operated "as a secret society".

Data held by the UNSW showed in 2017 the worst performing IVF clinic in Australia had a birthrate of just 9.3 per cent, while at the top performing clinic, more than a third of women took home a baby after treatment.

Until now the identity of those clinics had been kept secret.

Women younger than 30 have a 40 per cent chance of having a baby using IVF but for women over the age of 44, the live birthrate is just 0.8 per cent for a fresh cycle and 7.8 per cent for frozen embryos.

Senator Sterling Griff led the charge for the release of the performance information. Picture: AAP

Senator Griff forced action on the issue in 2019 by proposing a law that would force clinics to publish the data.

"The reason I did it was that there were many instances of people I knew who changed clinic after a period of time and achieved success with going to a new clinic and so you start to think, why, what's the issue here?" he said.

The $500 million industry is a huge cash cow and a News Corp investigation found some providers were charging parents desperate for a child three times the Medicare fee for IVF and nearly twice the AMA fee while keeping them in the dark on performance rates.

The IVF industry took part in developing the new tool which was worked up by the UNSW and funded by the federal government.

"The YourIVFSuccess website will help people estimate their chances of success through this treatment so that they can make the decisions which are right for them," he said.

UNSW fertility expert academic Professor Georgina Chambers who developed the website said the four measures give a good overview of a clinic's average success rates.

"But clinics treat different types of patients, and therefore patients should always consult with their doctor to discuss your own chances of treatment success and what treatment is right for them," she said.

The chosen measures where developed so that they did not incentivise poor clinical practice.

"Australia is one of the safest countries in the world and we would not want to see more embryos being replaced to improve success rates or clinics only treating very good prognosis patients," she said.

Maree Pickens, the CEO of patient support group Access Australia, welcomed the new website but said her organisation would be advising patients league tables were not a fair and accurate representation of the care and service provided by all clinics.

"It's more than just success rates. An important consideration for many people is their clinic has to be accessible and convenient and offer services that allow them to fit their treatments and all the tests that they need to have into their working life, or if they've got children," she said.

Dr Luk Rombauts the president of the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand said it was "unbelievably hard to compare units".

"Some clinics might specialise in seeing women that have already done IVF, they failed somewhere else maybe in a cheaper clinic and now they want to pursue further treatment and if that's the type of population you're treating you of course can't expect that that clinic will have the best success rates," he said.

Fertility doctor Dr Fleur Cattrall, from Virtus Health, who has also had an IVF baby welcomed the transparency.

"Anything that will inform our patients is helpful but it doesn't replace a personal conversation with a fertility specialist taking into account all your personal fertility factors," she said.

"The website doesn't take into account the male's fertility factors, the length of time couples have been trying for or how low ovarian reserves are or if you need IVF for genetic reasons," Dr Cattrall said.

Dr Cattrall said the publishing of a league table of success rates could discriminate against those clinics that take on higher risk patients.

The site includes success rates for 2017 and 2018 but later this year will be updated with 2019 data.

From 2022 it will be publishing the clinical pregnancy rates for 2021 and will be updated every six months.

It has been a long, heartbreaking and expensive 12-year journey for Heidi and Dean Stevens to realise the dream of becoming parents.

Mrs Stevens suffered endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome as well as unexplained infertility.

Six miscarriages, three rounds of IVF and five implantations later baby Elsa was born in 2019 and her little sister Sianna was born last year.

"Elsa because she was obviously frozen and Sianna because Elsa had a sister Anna (in the movie Frozen)," Mrs Stevens, 42 said.

What the Werrington Down's couple in Sydney's west learned along the way is that not all IVF clinics are the same.

Mrs Stevens' embryos had to undergo genetic testing to ensure a disease she carries - a degenerative gene known as HSP (Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia) which has a 50/50 chance of being passed onto her offspring and which has paralysing side effects - wasn't passed on.

Dean and Heidi Stevens with their daughters Elsa-Jodi, aged two, and Sianna, aged five months. Picture: Richard Dobson

But different clinics have different technology and processes for the Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) which she was unaware of.

"The technology is vastly different, the previous clinic did the PGD tested on day three of the six cell embryo by extracting two cells to do the genetic testing, but of those embryos I didn't' fall pregnant," Mrs Stevens said.

The couple switched to Genea, which had a different technology for testing embryos, and had their first successful pregnancy in the first round.

"Genea didn't test until day five and the embryo was not physically touched, and the test was done on stem cells spat out by the embryo, so they never touched my embryos," Mrs Stevens said.

"My A grade embryo is Elsa today, she was never interfered with, was implanted and was my first successful pregnancy," she said.

"My miracle is here," she said through tears.

Mrs Stevens welcomes the transparency that will come with the new website.

"I think it is a compelling fundamental to the process, had I been able to pull out blanket information that compared apples with apples, I could have shortened my process and I could have honed in on my options more closely.

"Having the transparent information upfront, we would have taken a different path. It's about informed decisions and being able to look at it side-by-side is really important."

Originally published as Australia's best performing IVF clinics revealed

See the original post here:
Australia's best performing IVF clinics revealed - Queensland Times