Author Archives: admin


Global Apoptosis Assays Market Set To Grow At Healthy CAGR Of 11.10% By 2027||Abcam plc, Research And Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Sartorius AG, Biotium,…

Apoptosis Assays market report provides the best research offerings and the required critical information when it is about looking for new product trends or competitive analysis of an existing or emerging market. With this business report companies can hone their competitive edge again and again. The report comprises of expert insights on global industries, products, company profiles, and market trends. Users can gain unlimited, company-wide access to a comprehensive catalog of industry-specific market research from this industry analysis report. The global Apoptosis Assays marketing document examines industries at a much higher level than a market study.

Apoptosis assays marketis expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027. Data Bridge Market Research analyses that the market is growing with a CAGR of 11.10% in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027 and is expected to reach USD 8.80 billion by 2027.

Download Sample PDF Copy of Report + All Related Graphs @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-apoptosis-assays-market

The major players covered in the apoptosis assays market report are Merck Group, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., BD, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Promega, Abcam plc, Research And Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Sartorius AG, Biotium, Inc., Creative Bioarray, GE Healthcare, Danaher Corporation, Geno Technology Inc, GeneCopoeia, Inc, Bio-Techne, PerkinElmer, Promega, General Electric and BioTek among other domestic and global players.

Segmentation:Global Apoptosis Assays Market

Apoptosis Assays MarketBy Product

(Assay Kits, Reagents, Microplates, Instruments),

Apoptosis Assays Market By Technology

(Flow Cytometry, Cell Imaging & Analysis Systems, Spectrophotometry, Other Detection Technologies),

Apoptosis Assays Market By End User

(Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies, Hospital and Diagnostic Laboratories, Academic and Research Institutes),

Apoptosis Assays Market By Application

(Drug Discovery & Development, Clinical & Diagnostic Applications, Basic Research, Stem Cell Research),

Apoptosis Assays MarketBy Country

(U.S., Canada, Mexico, Germany, Italy, U.K., France, Spain, Netherland, Belgium, Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, Rest of Europe, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Enquire Here Get customization & check discount for report @:https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-apoptosis-assays-market

Global Apoptosis Assays Market Drivers & Restraints:

The increasing cell-based research will help in escalating the growth of the apoptosis assays market.

The increasing incidence and prevalence of chronic and infectious diseases, development of apoptosis-modulating drugs, rising funding for cancer research, growing population suffering from chronic and autoimmune diseases are some of the factors expected to drive the growth of the apoptosis assays market in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027.

On the other hand, the growing adoption of apoptosis assays in developing markets will create several opportunities that will lead to the growth of the apoptosis assays market in the above mentioned period.

Lack of skilled personnel for research and development of apoptosis assays will likely to hamper growth of the apoptosis assays market in the above mentioned period.

Table of Contents:

Know More About Apoptosis assays market @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-apoptosis-assays-market

Key points for analysis

About Us:

Data Bridge Market Researchset forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge Market Research provides appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Data Bridge adepts in creating satisfied clients who reckon upon our services and rely on our hard work with certitude. GetCustomizationandDiscounton Report by emailingsopan.gedam@databridgemarketresearch.com. We are content with our glorious 99.9 % client satisfying rate.

Contact:

Data Bridge Market Research US: +1 888 387 2818 UK: +44 208 089 1725 Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475 Email:Corporatesales@databridgemarketresearch.com

Read more:
Global Apoptosis Assays Market Set To Grow At Healthy CAGR Of 11.10% By 2027||Abcam plc, Research And Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Sartorius AG, Biotium,...

Jill Biden signals White House resolve on cancer research: This is the fight of our lives – The Cancer Letter

Ned Sharpless: I want to begin by thanking Dr. Biden for joining us today. Its great to have the first lady visit the NCI.

We all need this morale boost: 2020 has been a pretty rough year. This global tragedy of the public health has been hard on an agency whose mission is devoted to advancing the public health, so we really appreciate your interest and I want to express our heartfelt thanks.

Despite the challenges of the last year, it has been a remarkably productive time for cancer research and a remarkably productive time at the NCI. We are seeing progress against cancer at a faster rate than at any time in human history:

Lots of new great scientific advances that translate into new ways to diagnose, prevent, and treat cancer,

Important advances in cancer screening and prevention, and improvements in how we do clinical trials,

Record numbers of FDA approvals for new drugs and devices for cancer, and, importantly,

A steadily dropping annual cancer mortality.

Cancer mortality in the U.S. has been declining since the early 1990s, but in the last few years the pace of that progress has sharply accelerated, with the largest year-over-year declines in cancer mortality in the history of our statistics occurring in the last two years in a row!

As you know, Feb. 4 is World Cancer Day, which focuses on Intl Progress Against Cancer. NCI is proud to work with many international partners throughout the world to address cancer on a global scale and that work is coordinated by our outstanding Center for Global Health.

In 2021, the National Cancer Institute is partnering with others across the community to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the National Cancer Act, legislation that established some of the programs that form the backbone of todays cancer research enterprise. So, its really a good time to reflect on whats been accomplished and how much work remains.

Its all too clear that despite this progress I mentioned, this has not been good enough. We still have too many Americans dying of cancer, and we have too little progress against certain types of cancer like pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma. And even when we have treatments for these cancers that are able to cure some of these patients, often these treatments are really toxic and leave patients with lifelong survivorship challenges.

And now we have this new problem against that backdrop of the pandemics effect on cancer diagnosis and cancer care. The pandemic has closed hospitals and clinics throughout the country. And because of this, there have been many delays in screenings, diagnosis, and treatments, and we believe these delays incurred may translate into worse outcomes for people with cancer over the next decade.

So, a main challenge right now for the NCI is to get over the disruption caused by the pandemic and to get back on that great pace of progress in cancer research. We will face this challenge and declare together that nothing will stop us, nothing will stop us in our work on behalf of people with cancer.

And I know that Dr. Biden is very much with us in this challenge. The first lady, as everyone knows, has been a longtime advocate for cancer research and for people with cancer. Her interest in the topic began in the 1990s when friends were diagnosed with breast cancer. And I think we are all aware of Beau Bidens battle with glioblastoma, succumbing to that disease in 2015 and the impact this has had on the president and first lady.

In fact, I think it was this private tragedy of the Biden family that led to a really great public act, the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot, which came about under the leadership of then-Vice President Biden. The NCI staff here today, took that vision and ran with it, bringing together stakeholders across the research community to work towards the goals he set for us.

To date, this has led to the launching of more than 240 exciting new programs and initiatives aimed at the laudable goal of rapidly accelerating cancer progress. It includes things like expanding our ability to treat cancer by awakening the immune system.

The Moonshot has worked on new approaches to fight childhood cancer. And there are Moonshot initiatives aimed at improving cancer care and underserved populations so that all patients can benefit from cancer progress and this is really just scratching the surface. There are many more great programs in the Moonshot. It is our fervent hope and belief at the NCI that this remarkable effort to improve the lives of all people with cancer will live up to Beaus memory. So Dr. Biden, thank you again for coming today and we were so eager to hear your remarks.

Jill Biden: Thank you, Dr. Sharpless, and your remarks are so heartwarming to me. Ned, were so grateful to have an accomplished researcher, academic inventor, physician, and author at the head of our nations premier cancer research institution. So, thank you for your leadership.

And Dr. Collins, thank you for joining us today as well and for your years of service at NIH in three administrations now. On behalf of both the president and me, I also want to thank you and the NIH for helping to create the vaccines and the treatments that are going to save so many lives and help our nation recover. And were just so lucky to have you.

So, its a pleasure to visit the National Cancer Institute virtually today. And Im grateful to be coming to you from the White House today as your first lady. Its the honor of a lifetime, but I know that even more than that, its a responsibility to serve the American people.

And from coast to coast, we face so many diverse and complicated challenges and yet when I was second lady and in my travels across the country over the last few years, Ive seen again and again, that there is one challenge that unites us all, one thread of pain that runs through every community, North and South, rich and poor, in the best of times, the depths of this pandemicand thats cancer.

The first time I heard the diagnosis for someone I loved, I was in my early 40s and the year it happened, not one, but actually four of my friends found out that they had breast cancer. And cancer took the life of both my parents. My sister had to have an auto-stem cell transplant and then, there was our son, Beau, as you referred to. Cancer touches us all and because of that, your work touches us all.

Youve brought the Cancer Moonshot to where it is today. Youve dedicated years to studying our immune systems and supporting clinical trials. Youve lifted up community-based clinics and treatment research. Youve led breakthroughs and discovered new ways to test.

And though this last year has been so difficult, NCI has risen to meet the challenge, uncovering how this pandemic has affected rates and figuring out how to continue this work, your work, because cancer doesnt stop for COVID. For more than 50 years, this organization, your organization has pioneered this frontier. Thanks to you, countless lives have been saved, countless families are whole, and there is more hope than ever for every person who is touched by this disease.

So, on behalf of the president and me, thank you, on behalf of every family who has faced cancer and a very grateful nation, thank you. We are so proud of everything that youre doing here, and now Im more excited to learn about the work that youre doing, so let me pass it back to Ned.

Sharpless: Thank you. To give you a flavor of some of the great work that goes on at the NCI, we have three of our researchers here to tell you about their areas of cancer investigation.

The first is Dr. Worta McCaskill-Stevens. Worta is a medical oncologist and chief of our Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group. And then well hear from Dr. Stephanie Goff, who is a surgical oncologist at the National Cancer Institute. And then finally, from Dr. Ligia Pinto, whos a scientist at NCIs Frederick National Lab.

I thought wed start by hearing about patient outreach and engagement, and this is getting patients from underserved populations into clinical trials. For example, as you can imagine, a big problem in cancer research is translating these exciting new advances in cancer therapy and cancer prevention into real-world progress for all patients. This means reaching cancer patients in rural communities and underserved populations. And its really critical that we figure out how to do this.

And so, Ive asked Dr. McCaskill-Stevens here to come to tell you about the NCORP Network. Worta, will you take it over?

Worta McCaskill-Stevens: Thank you, Dr. Biden and welcome to the National Cancer Institute. Thank you, Ned.

Clinical trials provide the scientific pathway to treatment. However, clinical trials are much more than science. They are about science helping people. Through clinical trials, our aim is to enable the advances in cancer research and to make sure that theyre applied as broadly as possible. We wont have done our job if the outstanding research that we conduct is only enjoyed by a few.

But it all begins by improving access and diligently seeking ways in which we can increase participation in clinical trials. One way that we do this is to take the trials where the people are, and this brings me to the NCI Community Oncology Research Program, which provides access to clinical trials in communities where adults and children with cancer and those who are at risk of cancer live.

The NCI NCORP program is an academic and community partnership in which clinical trials related to the management of symptoms, prevention, screening, the delivery of care, quality of life and disparities and treatment are conducted.

NCORP has 46 community sites, 14 of these sites are focused in areas throughout the country that have large areas of rural patients and racial and ethnic minorities. Over 4,000 physicians participate in this network at over 1,000 sites that reflect very diverse oncology practices.

Enrollment into NCORP traverses over 43 states and includes Puerto Rico in Guam. Enrollment from the NCORP is almost one half of the enrollment in the NCI National Clinical Trials Network, which enrolls over 20,000 patients per year. Enrollment at the local NCORP sites allows those sites to be up-to-date on research tools and for their staff to contribute to the progress against cancer.

Weve learned a lot from the community sites. This has led us to great insights about the importance, for example, of understanding chronic diseases, diabetes, and hypertension, which is so prevalent in underserved communities. Also, to appreciate interactions of socioeconomic factors of social injustice when enrolling, and to have us consider these factors in our trial designs. Allow me to share with you an example of a recent trial that has been practice-changing.

This is the TAILORx trial. This is the trial that assigned individualized options for treatment. This was the first and the largest of NCIs precision cancer trials. It enrolled over 2,000 woman, 16% of which were minors and most of these women came from rural areas and community settings. This trial showed us that only about 20% of the women with early-stage breast cancer benefited from chemotherapy after surgery. These data affect and apply to 50% of breast cancer in the United States.

This trial, due to its size, the duration, and the fact that it had hypothesis testing, the fact that women may receive less therapy, could only have been conducted within the NCI. We now know using a molecular test that we can identify those women who only need endocrine therapy to reduce their risks of recurrence. These women now dont have to have chemotherapy side effects such as nausea, fatigue, risk of infection, or hair loss. These women can be cured and go back to their families and to their work.

So, that woman in rural America doesnt have to drive many miles to have the chemotherapy. Access to this and other very important clinical trials, we think, is a very important step in the direction of health in cancer therapy. Thank you.

Biden: Thanks. Can you tell me, how do people find out about your trials? Is it through their oncologists and how do you get the word to all the oncologists across this nation?

McCaskill-Stevens: Well, this is actually a network and one of the unique things about the NCORP is that they really connect with their communities. When they come in they bring the specific demographics and understand their patients. They have connections within the community so that the referral patterns come to them.

The NCI also does a great job of providing information to the public about clinical trials. Information comes from our societal meetings, and because its an academic-community partnership, much information is shared at those meetings and those direct contacts with those individuals, those organizations.

Biden: Well, Ive seen a lot of the need for the information to get out to the rural communities as Ive traveled around this country. And really one of the major places that I actually saw a need forlike youre saying, the chemotherapy clinicwas the Navajo nation and how they had no chemotherapy center. And they were traveling two hours to go get chemotherapy and then to travel home.

So, I think we just have to do a better job disseminating information out to communities about whats available to help people, because I think people are desperate for information on people who have cancer. Thank you for all that youre doing. I really appreciate it.

Sharpless: The dissemination of information about clinical trials is a real challenge because its often hard to match patients to the right trial and its something weve really worked on very hard. And having the ability to enroll patients at 1,100 sites nationally has, I think, made that somewhat easier, but theres still challenges that exist. Thanks, Worta.

Next, Id like to have you hear about some really exciting NCI intramural science on how to treat cancer. This involves this topic of cellular immunotherapy, which sounds like science fiction, but the idea is you use a patients own T cells to sweep them up, in a way, and give them back to the patients, reinfuse them to treat their cancer and this technology really was pioneered at the National Cancer Institute. And so Id like to invite Dr. Stephanie Goff to tell you about her exciting work in this area, Stephanie?

Stephanie Goff: Thank you, Dr. Sharpless, and thank you, Dr. Biden. As the daughter of a teacher, its a real honor for me to be able to present my work to you, and a virtual welcome to building 10. Dr. Collins refers to the NIH as the National Institutes of Hope and every place like that needs a house and so this is the house of hope here in Bethesda, where were able to take care of the patients that enroll in all of the clinical trials, across the institutes and centers.

We practice the medicine of tomorrow here and we take that responsibility very seriously. There are approximately 1,600 different clinical trials happening at the clinical center right now. And even in this challenging pandemic year that we just finished, 45 new clinical trials were started by investigators in the NCI and we were able to see over 1,500 new patients from all 50 states and territories.

And the work that we do here is the work that we refer to as first-in-human. So, its really after those long hours and nights in the lab, its when those moments that a theory becomes a reality when youre able to see it work for the first time in a patient and those moments are magical.

I was fortunate enough to train here and now have been able to come back and work side-by-side with my mentor, Dr. Steven Rosenberg, who has been pursuing this concept of immunotherapy quite literally my entire life. And what hes been pursuing is, can we get the immune cells of our body to learn how to see cancer? And because of the pandemic, so many people now understand a little bit about how T cells see things, particularly viruses.

We have a lot of amateur immunologists blooming these days, but can we get T cells to see a patients cancer? And if they can do that, can they make it go away? His career has been one built on bench-to-bedside. That cycle of learning that we all do. When we take something from the lab, we try it in patients once its safe. And then we see if we can get it to work. We learn from the successes, we learn from the failures, and then we go back and we try again.

He started that work in patients with metastatic melanoma, a very rare disease, but a very deadly one. And he learned that by stimulating all the T cells in the body with a drug called interleukin-2, which was one of the first immunotherapies to be approved, that he could make peoples tumors go away.

And it wasnt just away for a little while, it was away forever. There was a small portion of patients, maybe 4-5%, but they would live the rest of their lives cancer-free, normal lives, no more chemotherapy, no more additional drugs.

And so, as our tools got better, as Dr. Collins and the work that he did on the human genome became possible, we became able to see tumors much more clearly in a way that we couldnt do before, because the problem is that our immune systems are actually designed to ignore our bodies. We dont want them attacking all the tissues that we have, not to attack our breast or our thigh or our pancreas.

But when that tissue starts to go bad, when it becomes a cancer, what is it that makes it switch? How can we get the immune system to engage? And it turns out when you look down at the very, very fundamental level, at the DNA, when that change is enough to make that cell no longer look like the person that it lives in, thats when the immune system can kick in.

So, if we can find those cells, what can we learn from them? And how can we give them back to patients? Because if we can harness that, then we can just set the body on top of itself. The Achilles heel of that cancer is that it has changed and made itself visible.

I was teaching a course in basic immunology and cancer immunology to a group of breast cancer advocates, when a woman who was suffering from widespread metastatic cancer caught me and said that she wanted to join us as a patient volunteer.

And we did some stuff first to make sure that we werent going to be wasting her time, because time is such a valuable and precious commodity. And once it became clear that she was eligible, I took her to the operating room, I took a small tumor off her chest wall, and we were able to study that tumor in a number of ways.

We were able to look at the DNA changes in her tumor and we were able to test the T cells that lived there. And it turns out that takes us some time and her cancer was worsening, she was having to increase her pain medication, the lymph nodes in her armpit had started to press on her nerves, such that she couldnt use her arm.

And we finally had the cells ready. She came to us in Bethesda, she was here with us for about three weeks and she was convinced the treatment was working even while she was here. Now, Im a little bit more suspect than that and I wanted to watch and wait and see, but it turns out she was right.

Five years later, shes disease-free. She has taken up ocean kayaking. So shes using that arm with no problems and she hasnt had to have another single treatment for her cancer since then. She teases me though that I wont say that shes cured. Ill continue to say though, that she has no evidence of disease.

I could tell you a handful of stories like that, but the reality is there are far more families, as you well know, that dont have happy endings. And I, and so many of us carry those stories with us during the late nights and weekends in the lab and on the ward, because the NCI gives us the space and time to create tomorrows medicine and thats really what were all here for. So, thank you for paying attention to the work thats going on at the NCI. And on behalf of all my colleagues here in Bethesda, welcome.

Biden: Having lived through cancer with so many members of my family and Beau, its just amazing what youre doing and the hope that youre giving to families. Because I know with Beaus cancer, I mean, we tried everything and its just, like youre saying, youre trying all different things and youre giving families hope, and you have no idea how much that means. Thanks.

Sharpless: Thank you, Stephanie. That was terrific. I thought next Id like you to hear, Dr. Biden, a little bit about our work were doing related to SARS-CoV-2, to the coronavirus pandemic. It may not be obvious why the National Cancer Institute would work on coronavirus, but about 30% of cancers worldwide are caused by viruses. And so, theres been a long interest in virology at the NCI.

HIV, the virus that causes AIDS was co-discovered at the National Cancer Institute as was the first effective therapeutic for HIV. And then, John Schiller and Doug Lowy, who are still quite active NCI researchers invented the vaccine against Human Papillomavirus, which shows the significant expertise of the NCI in vaccinology.

Importantly, relevant to SARS-CoV-2, we have this really great serology lab, which studies antibody levels in the blood, run by Dr. Pinto at Frederick National Lab, which had been working on HPV serology with the WHO. Frederick International Lab is the largest federal biomedical research facility, run by the NCI.

And so, when the pandemic began, it was relatively straightforward for the NCI to pivot that serology lab on HPV to SARS-CoV-2 and this is how I think we played a crucial role in the fight against COVID. So, let me get Ligia to tell you about what her team has been doing as part of the coronavirus research effort.

Ligia Pinto: Thank you, Dr. Sharpless, Dr. Biden. Id like to share with you some of the key highlights of the exciting work on COVID-19 serology that we have been doing at the Frederick National Laboratory and the NCI. Frederick National Lab is a Federally Funded Research and Development Center with the infrastructure and the expertise to rapidly respond to public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

First, Id like to tell you a little bit about myself. Im originally from Portugal and I came to the NCI to do my PhD in immunology almost 30 years ago. My initial plan was to return to Portugal, but I decided to stay because of the incredible research opportunities at the NCI and in the United States in general. Our group works on serology. Let me tell you why we think its important and why this work is being done by cancer researchers.

Serology is the measurement of antibodies in blood predicting response to infection or vaccination. For COVID-19, serology tests are a critical public health tool for identifying individuals who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or were vaccinated, and therefore maybe protected against the new infection. In order to inform public health decisions, antibody tests need to be reliable and highly accurate.

My laboratory at the Frederick National Lab has leveraged our expertise in studying immune responses to Human Papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer vaccines to develop serology tests and standards that are relevant to understanding SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune responses to the virus.

Because of this expertise at the beginning of the pandemic in April, when many serology tests were being developed, the FDA asked us to assist in evaluation of commercially available antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2, leading to evaluating more than 100 of these tests for the FDA. We have been able to do this thanks to a fantastic trans-governmental collaboration.

It has included several government agencies and academic medical centers. The FDA has used our performance evaluation data along with the other information to address some of these tests and reject others. Other critical tools for serology testing are standards. It enables comparison of antibody responses between different vaccines and other antibody studies.

In the spirit of the World Cancer Day, we had already developed standard reagents for our work on HPV and cervical cancer vaccines in cooperation with the National Institutes for Biological Standards and Control and the World Health Organization. And now, we have developed a serology standard for SARS-CoV-2. We are making it available to anyone in the scientific community.

Lastly, we have rapidly implemented a new initiative called Serological Sciences Network, SeroNet. This is one of the largest coordinated efforts across 25 of the nations top biomedical research institutions, where we have organized work collaboratively to study immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.

We believe that this collaborative network is an outstanding resource for tackling the emerging challenges associated with new viral variance, and understanding their potential impact on antibody testing and vaccine efficacy.

Two lessons that we have learned in all these efforts are that collaboration and sharing are key to making rapid advances. Thank you so much, Dr. Biden.

Biden: Thank you.

Sharpless: Well, so thats a sort of brief couple of snapshots of whats going on at the National Cancer Institute. Theres so much more work in both our intramural funded program and our extramural funded portfolio that wed love to tell you about, and we hope we get a chance to have you back sometime to talk more, but we really, really, really appreciate your doing this. It means so much to the National Cancer Institute to have you come and visit, and its so exciting for everyone at the NCI and we very much appreciate it.

Biden: Oh gosh. Thank you, Ned. And thank you to everyone who shared their stories today and what youve been doing. Its just incredible and I have to agree that you are the Institute of Hope, because so many people in this country are patients of cancer or have someone they love thats dealing with cancer, and Joe and I have worked in this space for a long time. I have personally worked with families and caregivers.

One thing I think that we found in the Obama-Biden administration was the benefit of collaboration and how much that meant, whether it was through all the agencies of the government just working together.

And so, I hope that you know of our commitmentof Joes commitment and my commitmentto carry on that work and to really be a partner with you and everybody at NIH, NCI, because weve got to work to fight cancer as we know it. I mean, we have to, because its not a red issue, a blue issue. Its a human issue, it affects all Americans.

So, I want to thank you just really, for all that youre doing. And as you said, Im a teacher and Im a professor of English and writing. So, I want to end with a little poetry today, something beautiful, because, obviously, what youre doing is so beautiful.

So, the poet, Gwendolyn Brooks, another life lost to cancer, wrote:

We are each others harvest:

We are each others business:

Go here to see the original:
Jill Biden signals White House resolve on cancer research: This is the fight of our lives - The Cancer Letter

Tiny sensor technique reveals cellular forces involved in tissue generation – Brown University

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] A new technique developed by Brown University researchers reveals the forces involved at the cellular level during biological tissue formation and growth processes. The technique could be useful in better understanding how these processes work, and in studying how they may respond to environmental toxins or drug therapies.

As described in the journal Biomaterials, the technique makes use of cell-sized spheres made from a highly compliant polymer material, which can be placed in laboratory cultures of tissue-forming cells. As the tissue-formation process unfolds, microscope imaging of the spheres, which are stained with fluorescent dye, reveals the extent to which they are deformed by the pressure of surrounding cells. A computational algorithm then uses that deformation to calculate the forces at work in that cellular microenvironment.

We know that mechanical forces are important stimuli in tissue formation and development, but actually measuring those forces is pretty difficult, said Eric Darling, an associate professor of medical science, engineering and orthopedics at Brown. These spheres that weve developed give us an extremely sensitive technique for measuring those forces over time in the same sample. And we can do this with multiple samples at a time on a 96-well plate, so its a high-throughput method as well.

The research was a collaboration between Darlings lab and the lab of Haneesh Kesari, an assistant professor of engineering at Brown and an expert in solid mechanics. Darling and graduate student Robert Gutierrez developed the spheres and performed cell culture experiments with them, while Kesari and graduate student Wenqiang Fang developed the computational algorithm to calculate the forces.

The spheres are made from a polymer called polyacrylamide. The spheres have no apparent effect on the behavior of the newly forming tissues, Darling said, and the polyacrylamide material has mechanical properties that are highly consistent and tunable, which made it possible to make spheres soft enough to deform measurably when exposed to cellular forces.

The key to this is having a highly controlled material, with a very precise shape as well as finely tuned and uniform mechanical stiffness, Kesari said. If we know the properties of the spheres, then we can take pictures of how their shapes change and back out the forces necessary to make those changes.

As a proof of concept, the researchers performed a series of experiments to measure forces involved in mesenchymal condensation a process in which stem cells cluster together and eventually differentiate into tissue-specific cell types. The process is central to the formation of teeth, bones, cartilage and other tissue.

In one experiment, the team included the force-sensing spheres in cultures of cells were coming together to form multicellular balls. Microscope images of the cultures were taken every hour for 14 hours, enabling the team to track changes in the forces involved in each culture over time. The experiments showed that the forces involved in mesenchymal condensation were highly variable for the first 5 or so hours of the process, before settling down into a much steadier force profile. This was the first time such force dynamics had ever been measured, the researchers say.

To help verify that the spheres were truly sensitive to cellular forces, the team repeated the experiment using cultures treated with a cytoskeletal inhibitor, a drug that weakens the tiny contractile motors inside a cell. As expected, the spheres detected markedly weaker forces in the cultures treated with the drug.

In another set of experiments, the researchers added the sensor spheres to preformed cellular masses to observe how the spheres were taken up into the mass. Some of the spheres had been treated with a collagen coating, which enables cells to bind with the sensors, while others were uncoated.

We were able to see differences in the force profiles between the coated and uncoated spheres, Darling said. Overall there was a large compressive force, but with the coated cells we could see the cells interacting with the spheres directly, pulling on them and exerting a tensile force as well.

Darling says hes hopeful the technique could reveal fundamental details about how tissue-forming processes work. In the future, it may also be used screen drugs aimed at modulating these processes, or to test the effects of environmental toxins. It could also be useful in tissue engineering.

If we want to grow cartilage, it might be helpful to know that the types of forces that these cells are exerting on each other because we might be able to apply an external force that matches or complements that force profile, Darling said. So in addition to fundamental discovery, I think there is some translational potential for this down the road.

The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AR063642), National Science Foundation (2018260690) and a Brown University Research Seed Award.

Continue reading here:
Tiny sensor technique reveals cellular forces involved in tissue generation - Brown University

Leukemia in children: Symptoms, causes, treatment, outlook, and more – Medical News Today

Leukemia is a type of cancer that affects the blood. The two most common types in children are acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myelogenous leukemia.

In a person with leukemia, blood cells are released into the bloodstream before they are fully formed, so there are fewer healthy blood cells in the body.

Below, we describe the types of childhood leukemia, the symptoms, and the treatments. We then look at when to contact a doctor, what questions to ask, and where to find support.

Childhood leukemia is the most common form of cancer in children. It affects up to 3,800 children under the age of 15 in the United States each year.

Leukemia occurs when bone marrow releases new blood cells into the bloodstream before they are fully mature.

These immature blood cells do not function as they should, and eventually, the number of immature cells overtakes the number of healthy ones.

Leukemia can affect red and white blood cells and platelets.

The bone marrow produces stem cells. A blood stem cell can become a myeloid stem cell or a lymphoid stem cell.

Lymphoid stem cells become white blood cells. Myeloid stem cells can become:

Leukemia is typically acute or chronic, and chronic types are rare in children. They can include chronic myeloid leukemia or chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Most childhood leukemias are acute, meaning that they progress quickly and need treatment as soon as possible.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common type in children, accounting for 75% of childhood leukemia cases.

It affects cells called lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell.

In a person with ALL, the bone marrow releases a large number of underdeveloped white blood cells called blast cells. As the number of these increases, the number of red blood cells and platelets decreases.

There are two subtypes of ALL: B-cell and T-cell.

In most childhood cases of ALL, the cancer develops in the early forms of B-cells. The other type, T-cell ALL, typically affects older children.

Research from 2020 reports that the majority of people diagnosed with ALL are under 18 and typically between 2 and 10 years old.

The American Cancer Society report that children under 5 years old have the highest risk of developing ALL and that this risk slowly declines until a person reaches their mid-20s.

The outlook for ALL depends on the subtype, the persons age, and factors specific to each person.

Myeloid leukemias account for approximately 20% of childhood leukemia cases, and most myeloid leukemias are acute.

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) affects white blood cells other than the lymphocytes. It may also affect red blood cells and platelets.

AML can begin in:

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) accounts for approximately 12% of leukemia cases in children.

This rare type is neither acute nor chronic. JMML begins in the myeloid cells, and it typically affects children younger than 2 years.

Symptoms can include:

The symptoms of leukemia may be nonspecific similar to those of other common childhood illnesses.

A doctor will ask how long the child has been experiencing the symptoms, which can include:

Children may experience specific symptoms depending on the type of blood cell that the leukemia is affecting.

A low number of red blood cells can cause:

A low number of healthy white blood cells can cause infections or a fever with no other sign of an infection.

A low platelet count can cause:

Various factors can increase a childs risk of leukemia, and most are not preventable.

The following genetic conditions can increase the risk of leukemia:

Also, having a sibling with leukemia may increase the risk of developing it.

These can include exposure to:

If a child has symptoms that might indicate leukemia, a doctor may perform or request:

A bone marrow aspiration involves using a syringe to take a liquid sample of bone marrow cells. The doctor may give the child a drug that allows them to sleep through this test.

During the diagnostic process, a person might ask:

The doctor may recommend a variety of treatments for childhood leukemia, and the best option depends on a range of factors specific to each person.

The treatment usually consists of two phases. The first aims to kill the leukemia cells in the childs bone marrow, and the second aims to prevent the cancer from coming back.

The child may need:

Before or during treatment, a person might ask the doctor:

Questions to ask after the treatment might include:

Children who have undergone leukemia treatments require follow-up care, as the treatments often cause late effects.

These can develop in anyone who has received treatment for cancer, and they may not arise for months or years after the treatment has ended.

Treatments that can cause late effects include:

These complications may affect:

The late effects that may come can also depend on the type of treatment and the form of leukemia.

Because many leukemia symptoms can also indicate other issues, it can be hard to know when to contact a doctor.

Overall, it is best to seek medical advice if a child shows symptoms or behaviors that are not normal for them.

If a child has received a leukemia diagnosis, the effects can extend to parents, other family members, caregivers, and friends.

A person can find support and additional resources from:

The following organizations based in the United Kingdom also provide support and guidance:

Childhood leukemia can affect mental health, as well as physical health.

Learn more about mental health resources here.

According to the American Cancer Society, most children with leukemia have no known risk factors. There is no way to prevent leukemia from developing.

Because there are very few lifestyle-related or environmental causes of childhood leukemia, it is very unlikely that a caregiver can do anything to help prevent the disease.

A childs outlook depends on the type of leukemia. It is important to keep in mind that current estimates do not take into account recent advances in technology and medicine.

For example, the most recent 5-year survival rate estimates reflect the experiences of children who received their diagnoses and treatments more than 5 years ago.

The American Cancer Society report that the 5-year survival rate for children with ALL is 90%. The same rate for children with AML is 6570%.

Childhood leukemia is typically acute, which means that it develops quickly. As a result, a person should contact a doctor if they notice any of the symptoms.

The most common type of childhood leukemia is ALL, representing 3 out of 4 leukemia cases in children.

Treatment may include a combination of chemotherapy, targeted drugs, immunotherapy, stem cell transplants, surgery, and radiation.

The prognosis depends on the type of leukemia and the childs age.

This diagnosis can affect mental as well as physical health, and the effects can extend to caregivers, family members, and friends. Many different resources are available for support.

Read more:
Leukemia in children: Symptoms, causes, treatment, outlook, and more - Medical News Today

Global Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements Directory 2020: Company AZ, Headline Value, Stage of Development at Signing, Deal Component Type,…

February 05, 2021 07:13 ET | Source: Research and Markets

Dublin, Feb. 05, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements 2010-2020" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Global Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements 2010-2020 report provides comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the stem cell partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides a detailed understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter Stem Cell partnering deals. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and proceed to commercialization of outcomes.

This report provides details of the latest Stem Cell agreements announced in the life sciences since 2010.

The report takes the reader through a comprehensive review Stem Cell deal trends, key players, top deal values, as well as deal financials, allowing the understanding of how, why and under what terms, companies are entering Stem Cell partnering deals.

The report presents financial deal term values for Stem Cell deals, listing by headline value, upfront payments, milestone payments and royalties, enabling readers to analyse and benchmark the financial value of deals.

One of the key highlights of the report is that over 650 online deal records of actual Stem Cell deals, as disclosed by the deal parties, are included towards the end of the report in a directory format - by company A-Z, stage of development, deal type, therapy focus, and technology type - that is easy to reference. Each deal record in the report links via Weblink to an online version of the deal.

In addition, where available, records include contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Whilst many companies will be seeking details of the payment clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases and databases do not.

A comprehensive series of appendices is provided organized by Stem Cell partnering company A-Z, stage of development, deal type, and therapy focus. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each deal on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in Stem Cell partnering and dealmaking since 2010.

Report scope

Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements includes:

In Global Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements 2010-2020, the available deals are listed by:

Key Topics Covered:

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in Stem Cell dealmaking 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Stem Cell partnering over the years 2.3. Most active Stem Cell dealmakers 2.4. Stem Cell partnering by deal type 2.5. Stem Cell partnering by therapy area 2.6. Deal terms for Stem Cell partnering 2.6.1 Stem Cell partnering headline values 2.6.2 Stem Cell deal upfront payments 2.6.3 Stem Cell deal milestone payments 2.6.4 Stem Cell royalty rates

Chapter 3 - Leading Stem Cell deals 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Top Stem Cell deals by value

Chapter 4 - Most active Stem Cell dealmakers 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Most active Stem Cell dealmakers 4.3. Most active Stem Cell partnering company profiles

Chapter 5 - Stem Cell contracts dealmaking directory 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Stem Cell contracts dealmaking directory

Chapter 6 - Stem Cell dealmaking by technology type

Chapter 7 - Partnering resource center 7.1. Online partnering 7.2. Partnering events 7.3. Further reading on dealmaking

Appendices

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/c8ppmy

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Visit link:
Global Stem Cell Partnering Terms and Agreements Directory 2020: Company AZ, Headline Value, Stage of Development at Signing, Deal Component Type,...

Perales Examines the Impact of COVID-19 on Recipients of Cellular Therapies for Cancer – OncLive

Following stem cell transplant or treatment with CAR T-cell therapies, patients with hematologic malignancies and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tend to have favorable outcomes, especially if they are diagnosed in complete remission (CR) and further out from their cell infusion, according to Miguel-Angel Perales, MD, underscoring that care should not be delayed despite the ongoing pandemic.

Delayed therapy results in patients with relapse or progression of disease who did not receive the intended cellular therapy; [weve seen this happen] in 34% of cases, Perales, chief of the Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), said during a presentation delivered at the 2021 AACR Virtual Meeting on COVID-19 and Cancer.1 Given that we can avoid the risk of nosocomial transmission, I think this clearly indicates that we should be careful about how we manage these patients and not try to delay their care.

In his talk, Perales highlighted registry data detailing the impact of the pandemic on cellular treatment in patients with cancer, outcomes of patients who were infected with the virus and received hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the impact of virus-related delays in care.

Data reported to the ASH Research Collaborative COVID-19 Registry for Hematology, a global reference tool available to the public, showed that as of January 15, 2021, a total of 813 malignant and non-malignant cases of COVID-19 were reported, with just over 500 cases reported in the United States alone.2

When looking at cellular therapies received prior to a diagnosis with the virus, 10 patients had received CAR T-cell therapies (6 recovered, 4 died), 46 patients had undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation (34 recovered, 7 died, 5 had unknown outcome), and the majority, or 78 patients, had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (67 recovered, 7 died, 4 had unknown outcome).

An earlier analysis of data collected from this registry showed that among the first 250 patients for whom data were collected, the overall mortality rate was 28% (95% CI, 23%-34%).3 However, in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection, the mortality rate was even higher, at 42% (95% CI, 34%-50%). This is a condition that has significantly impacted our patients with hematologic malignancies, noted Perales.

Another registry, of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), requires the inclusion of outcomes of patients who have undergone transplantation or received CAR T cells.4 As of January 15, 2021, data for 1258 patients from 195 centers were reported to the registry and showed that 50.08% of patients had undergone allogeneic transplantation and 44.66% had undergone autologous transplantation. Only a small percentage of patients received cell therapy, according to Perales.

The age of patients at the time of infection ranged from less than 20 years to older than 70 years, with the majority of patients between the ages of 60 years and 69 years. When looking at infections by region, 29.35% of cases were reported in the Midwest, 23.44% were reported in the Northeast, and 22.73% were reported in the South. The majority of cases occurred within the first 2 years of their infusion. A total of 614 casesalmost half of all patientshad their infection resolve, while 58 experienced improvement; 187 patients had died.

In a subsequent paper, investigators examined risk factors associated with death from COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic transplantation based on data from the CIBTR registry.5 Results from the multivariate analysis showed that age greater than 50 years (P = .016), male gender (P = .006), and COVID-19 infection in less than 12 months following transplantation (P = .019) were all significantly associated with increased risk of death.

Interestingly, race and ethnicity were not significant in this series, noted Perales. Similarly, when we look at patients [who have undergone] autologous transplant, the only factor that we saw was the diagnosis of lymphoma versus myeloma. Other factors were not significant.

In another analysis, investigators examined outcomes of patients following transplant who were infected with the virus at MSKCC. Of the first 77 patients diagnosed between March 15, 2020 and May 7, 2020, 37 had undergone autologous transplant, 35 had undergone allogeneic transplant, and 5 had received CAR T-cell therapy.6

The disease distribution was as expected, according to Perales. Thirty-eight percent of patients had plasma cell disease, 23% had acute leukemia, 23% had aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), 5% had Hodgkin lymphoma, 4% had chronic myeloid leukemia, 4% had myelodysplastic syndrome, and 3% had indolent NHL.

When you look at day [of infection] post infusion, you see there was a significant range, said Perales. In fact, the number of patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 several months or even years after their cell therapy. These are the demographics of 77 patients, but this is representative of the patients that we transplant at our center.

Notably, 44% of patients did not have any comorbidities. Investigators also examined the home medications that patients were receiving at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis. Here, 10 patients were receiving steroids, 18 were receiving immunomodulatory agents, 4 were receiving anticoagulation agents, and 14 were receiving immunosuppressive drugs.

Almost half, or 48%, of patients had mild COVID-19 infection, so they were not admitted to the hospital. Twenty-six percent of patients had moderate infection, and thus, were admitted to the hospital, while 22% had severe infection and were either admitted to the intensive care unit or died.

In that group, the majority of them actually had active malignancy, unlike the other 2 groups where the majority actually were in remission, said Perales. Patients who required high levels of oxygen [were often those who] had active malignancy.

Results from a univariate analysis looking at the predictors of disease severity revealed significant associations between the presence of comorbidities and infiltrates on imaging at the time of diagnosis. Overall, however, we were able to see favorable outcomes with patients after COVID-19 infection, said Perales. Two-thirds of patients actually had a resolution. We did see 14 deaths, which represented 18% of patients. This was 41% of patients who were admitted, but particularly those with an active malignancy.

Among patients who were admitted to the hospital but had a malignancy that was in remission, the mortality rate was 21%. This was due, in part, to the fact that in many cases, patients or their family members decided to forego aggressive medical care.

Additional data revealed that COVID-19 was linked with a drop in lymphocyte populations across the board, added Perales. Notably, lymphopenia with COVID-19 was not found to impair long-term immune reconstitution in patients who had undergone bone marrow transplant.

When looking at survival in patients after infection with COVID-19, overall outcomes were found to be favorable.

Investigators also examined the risk of nosocomial infections in patients who had undergone transplantation or received cellular treatment in light of the pandemic. They looked at a series of 44 cases.

In March 2020, 2 healthcare workers were exposed at MSKCC and 3 patients had documented COVID-19 infection. One patient was receiving treatment in the inpatient setting, but the patient did have frequent visits from family members, according to Perales. So, its unclear when or how the exposure occurred, Perales said. The patient ended up dying.

Two additional patients may have been exposed in the donor room while they were collecting the stem cell from the autologous transplant, added Perales. One patient eventually died from the virus.

Again, its unclear whether these patients were infected in the center or in the community, as COVID-19 was very prevalent at the time, said Perales. Importantly, we have not seen any additional cases of potential or definite COVID-19 nosocomial infection since March 2020 at our center.

When examining the impact of the pandemic on treatment delays, in March 2020, investigators started to prospectively collect data from patients whose transplant or cellular therapy was delayed as a result of the impact of the virus on resources at the hospital, particularly the capability of using intensive care unit beds.1

Results showed that 85 patients delayed treatment; of those patients, 29 have not received their intended cellular treatment. Sixteen were supposed to receive autologous transplant, 12 were supposed to undergo allogeneic transplant, and 1 was supposed to receive CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 56 patients who eventually proceeded to treatment, 62% received autologous transplant, 67% received allogeneic transplant, and 86% received CAR T-cell therapy. The biggest reason for not proceeding to treatment with autologous transplant and CAR T-cell therapy was because they were deferred due to good disease control. Other reasons included was because of a new comorbidity (12%) or they died from the virus. The most prominent reason for not proceeding to allogeneic transplant during the pandemic was progression of disease (42%).

We conclude that patients who are recipients of allogeneic transplant, and particularly those with acute leukemia, as much as possible should proceed to their indicated therapy and not be delayed, concluded Perales.

Go here to see the original:
Perales Examines the Impact of COVID-19 on Recipients of Cellular Therapies for Cancer - OncLive

Stem Cell Market is Expected to Grow with an Impressive CAGR till 2027 | Players Vcanbio, Boyalife, Beikebiotech KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper – KSU…

Industry Overview

Global Stem Cell Market would witness significant growth in the coming years and is expected to grow at the rate of substantial compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during the forecast period.The market is expected to grow due to different factors that has been having the major impact combining drivers, restraints and opportunities. The application areas of this industry and its growth in the different geographies are major factors behind the market growth. The report covers the market from almost all the aspects either driving or restraining the market growth. High-end analysis has been provided in the report depending on the factors such as Porters five forces analysis, competitive landscape, SWOT and PEST analysis, including the Stem Cell market dynamics. These all factors have been minutely examined and extensively covered under the scope of the study.

To avail Sample Copy of the report @

https://decisivemarketsinsights.com/stem-cell-market/90099362/request-sample

Based on the type of product, the global Stem Cell market segmented into Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Embryonic Stem Cell Adult Stem Cell Others

Based on the end-use, the global Stem Cell market classified into Diseases Therapy Healthcare

And the major players included in the report are CCBC Vcanbio Boyalife Beikebiotech

Regional Insights

The geographical segmentation provided in the report includes North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Rest of the World (RoW). Further, the breakdown of these geographies covers the U.S., Mexico and Canada under the scope of North America region; whereas Europe covers the UK, Italy, Germany, France, Russia and Rest of Europe. On the basis of Asia Pacific region, it covers China, India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia and Rest of Asia Pacific. The major geographies and its countries are mapped by products and by applications to come to an accurate scenario in order to map the market.

To inquire before purchasing the report, visit @

https://decisivemarketsinsights.com/stem-cell-market/90099362/pre-order-enquiry

Stem Cell Market Analysis

Basis above findings and observations, our team has derived a robust CAGR of xx% from 2020 to 2027, expected to have a spiralling rise enfolding in next five to seven years. The dollar value of the above market is expected to showcase a rise which is highly appreciated and accepted in formulating go-to-market strategies, product launches, mergers and acquisitions also knowing the shift in the revenue sources of clients. Our team at Decisive Markets Insights depicts market numbers coupled with volume and price trend analysis, by studying the adjacent markets.

Competitive Landscape

The key players of the market have been mapped under the scope of the study to understand the Stem Cell market scenario from their perspective as well. We have tracked their business strategies, product lines, recent developments and financials to understand their position in the market as well as the market share. We have provided financials of all the public limited companies and market share analysis mentioning their market share as per the feasibility. These factors are important to understand in order to understand the ongoing competition in the market as well as the forecast model.

To inquire about the Discount available with the report, visit @

https://decisivemarketsinsights.com/stem-cell-market/90099362/request-discount

Want to Leverage Your Dollar Value?

Consider Decisive Markets Insights for this Report which would Help Impact Your Revenues Positively

Mapping the customer in 3P grid comprising of Purpose, Planning and Positioning, thereby delivering a solution by keeping the prospecting client at the sweet spot The market research report includes all of the markets valuable elements, such as sales growth, product pricing & analysis, growth opportunities, and recommendations for addressing market challenges The report covers all the primary mergers & acquisitions, alliances, and collaborations that have generated additional opportunities for market players or in some cases, challenges This study offers the latest product news, trends, and updates from the industrys leading players who have leveraged their market position. It also offers strategic plans and standards to arrive at informed business decisions adopted by the main players, thereby advocating your go to market strategies. In addition, it offers insights into the dynamics of customer behaviour that can help the organisation better curate market strategies

Key Highlights of the Report to be Considered before the Purchase

Stem Cell Market is mapped and analyzed from 360 Degree perspective analyzing all the factors that would impact the market Supply and demand end have been examined properly to come to a conclusion The market has been mapped from both manufacturers as well consumers end Data Triangulation method has been followed in order to arrive at an accurate market number Driving factors, restraining factors and opportunities have been covered Market Segmentation up to three or four level provided in the report Each segments market dynamics and trends have been mentioned across application and geographical areas Country level Analysis have been also covered under the By Geography Chapter A snapshot provided for quick market review Extensive Research Methodology followed to analyze the market

Some added Key Points of the Report:

Porters Five Analysis, PEST Analysis, Market Attractiveness Analysis, SWOT Analysis, and Value Chain Analysis, and are some of the added key points mentioned under the scope of the report.

**Note: Year End Discount If you purchase the report this year: Flat 15% instant discount 20% discount on 2nd report 1 Year consultation and 10 % free customization

Kindly contact us and our expert will get back to you within 30 minutes:

Decisive Markets Insights Sunil Kumar Sales Head Email sales@decisivemarketsinsights.com US +18317045538 UK +44125663604

View original post here:
Stem Cell Market is Expected to Grow with an Impressive CAGR till 2027 | Players Vcanbio, Boyalife, Beikebiotech KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper - KSU...

Theratechnologies’ Lead Peptide Drug Conjugate TH1902 Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for the Treatment of Sortilin-expressing Cancers

MONTREAL, Feb. 04, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Theratechnologies Inc. (Theratechnologies) (TSX: TH) (NASDAQ: THTX), a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies, is pleased to announce that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to TH1902 as a single agent for the treatment of patients with sortilin positive recurrent advanced solid tumors that are refractory to standard therapy.

Excerpt from:
Theratechnologies’ Lead Peptide Drug Conjugate TH1902 Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for the Treatment of Sortilin-expressing Cancers

Otonomy to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results and Provide Corporate Update

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 04, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Otonomy, Inc. (Nasdaq: OTIC), a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of innovative therapeutics for neurotology, today announced it will report financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2020 and provide a corporate update at 4:30 p.m. ET on February 11, 2021.

Excerpt from:
Otonomy to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results and Provide Corporate Update