Author Archives: admin


Creative Medical Technology Holdings Announces Successful Application of ImmCelz Immunotherapy for Treatment of Stroke – KPVI News 6

PHOENIX, Dec. 16, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc., (OTC CELZ) announced today positive preclinical data supporting the utilization of its ImmCelz cell based immunotherapy for treatment of stroke. In an animal model of ischemia stroke, the middle cerebral artery ligation model, administration of ImmCelz resulted in 34% reduction in infarct volume, whereas control bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells reduced infarct volume by 21%. Additionally, improvements in functional recovery where observed using the Rotarod test. At 28 days after induction of stroke the animals receiving ImmCelz had superior running time (92% of non-stroke controls) compared to animals which received bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (73% of non-stroke control). Animals that received saline had a running time that was 50% of non-stroke controls.

"The regenerative potential of immune cells that have been programmed by stem cells is a fascinating and novel area of research." Said Dr. Amit Patel, coinventor of ImmCelz, and board member of the Company. "Conceptual advantages of using reprogrammed T cells include higher migratory ability due to smaller size, as well as ability to replicate and potentially form "regenerative memory cells."

"This data, which is covered by our previous filed patents, such as no. 15/987739, Generation of autologous immune modulatory cells for treatment of neurological conditions, demonstrate that immune modulation via this stem cell based method may be a novel and superior way of addressing the $30 billion dollar market for stroke therapeutics1." Said Dr. Thomas Ichim, coinventor of the patent and Chief Scientific Officer of the Company. "The fact that this technology, which has priority back to 2017, is demonstrating such stunning results, motivates us to consider filing an Investigational New Drug Application for use in stroke."

Creative Medical Technology Holdings possesses numerous issued patents in the area of cellular therapy including patent no. 10,842,815 covering use of T regulatory cells for spinal disc regeneration, patent no. 9,598,673 covering stem cell therapy for disc regeneration, patent no. 10,792,310 covering regeneration of ovaries using endothelial progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells, patent no. 8,372,797 covering use of stem cells for erectile dysfunction, and patent no. 7,569,385 licensed from the University of California covering a novel stem cell type.

"While stroke historically has been a major area of unmet medical need, the rise in stroke cases , as well as the fact that younger people are increasingly falling victim to stroke, strongly motivates us to accelerate our developmental programs and to continue to explore participation of Big Pharma in this space." Said Timothy Warbington, President and CEO of the Company. "We are eager to replicate the existing experiments start compiling the dossier needed to take ImmCelz into humans using the Investigational New Drug Application (IND) route through the FDA."

About Creative Medical Technology Holdings

Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. is a commercial stage biotechnology company specializing in stem cell technology in the fields of urology, neurology and orthopedics and trades on the OTC under the ticker symbol CELZ. For further information about the company, please visitwww.creativemedicaltechnology.com.

Forward Looking Statements

OTC Markets has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This news release may contain forward-looking statements including but not limited to comments regarding the timing and content of upcoming clinical trials and laboratory results, marketing efforts, funding, etc. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions and, therefore, involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements. See the periodic and other reports filed by Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on the Commission's website atwww.sec.gov.

Timothy Warbington, CEO CEO@ CreativeMedicalHealth.com

Creativemedicaltechnology.com http://www.StemSpine.com http://www.Caverstem.com http://www.Femcelz.com

1Stroke Management Market Size Forecasts 2026 | Statistics Report (gminsights.com)

Follow this link:
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Announces Successful Application of ImmCelz Immunotherapy for Treatment of Stroke - KPVI News 6

In COVID-19 Clinical Trials, Experts from Baptist Health’s Cancer Institutes Treat Patients With Mild or Severe Symptoms – Baptist Health South…

Offering more hope to patients with COVID-19, cancer experts throughout Baptist Health South Florida are launching new clinical trials. The trials, developed as a result of promising initial emergency and experimental COVID-19 therapies at Miami Cancer Institute on the Baptist Hospital campus in Miami and at the Eugene M. & Christine E. Lynn Cancer Institute at Boca Raton Regional Hospital, span the range of care from the most critically ill to those with mild symptoms.

Guenther Koehne, M.D., Ph.D., director and chief of Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematologic Oncology and Benign Hematology at Miami Cancer Institute.

Its exciting to lead these next-generation clinical trials, said Guenther Koehne, M.D., Ph.D., principal investigator of two of the studies, and director and chief of Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematologic Oncology and Benign Hematology at Miami Cancer Institute. We have learned much about COVID-19 since the pandemic began last winter and our hope is that these trials will lead to tremendous treatment options for patients.

Specialists at both centers are accomplished in many of the techniques and technologies that are doing double-duty as oncology and COVID-19 treatments and pivoted at the start of the pandemic to lead numerous COVID-19 clinical trials.

Trial to Save the Most Critical Patients

Miami Cancer Institute is leading a phase I/IIa clinical trial using mesenchymal stem cells for critically ill patients with COVID-19 induced respiratory failure. Mesenchymal stem cells are derived from umbilical cord lining tissue and aid in healing by regenerating damaged lung tissue. The trial is for hospitalized patients who are receiving oxygen therapy or who are on ventilation support and are not showing improvement.

Early in the pandemic, Miami Cancer Institute treated several patients with mesenchymal stem cells through single-use emergency approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The patients, who were among the most ill COVID-19 patients, recovered.

In our early experience with these umbilical cord lining stem cells, we had very promising results, Dr. Koehne said. We are very hopeful that the clinical trial will give us evidence that this treatment can save the lives of those who experience respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Low-dose Radiation may Reverse Pneumonia

Both Lynn Cancer Institute and Miami Cancer Institute are participating in the PREVENT trial, Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Patients with SARS-COV2 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. With a single, low-dose of thoracic radiation, researchers hope that inflammation in the lungs is reduced and that patients with pneumonia associated with COVID-19 may not need to be placed on a ventilator.

Minesh Mehta, M.D., deputy director and chief of Radiation Oncology at Miami Cancer Institute.

We have seen this treatment option benefit many cancer patients, and the hope is that it also helps those affected by the virus, said Minesh Mehta, M.D., co-principal investigator, deputy director and chief of Radiation Oncology at Miami Cancer Institute.

Patients eligible for the study include hospitalized men and women ages 50 and up who are diagnosed with COVID-19 and pulmonary pneumonia but who are not on ventilators.

This trial gives us the opportunity to administer potentially effective treatment before the need for ICU placement or mechanical ventilation, said Michael Kasper, M.D., co-principal investigator and director of Radiation Oncology at Lynn Cancer Institute.

Radiation therapy has shown a reduction in inflammation in a number of conditions, including viral pneumonia, autoimmune disorders and degenerative joint disorders. At much higher doses, it is also used to treat cancer.

Trial to Shorten Recovery and Reduce Symptoms For Those With Mild Disease

Michael Kasper, M.D., director of Radiation Oncology at Lynn Cancer Institute.

Miami Cancer Institute is also enrolling patients in a phase 2 clinical trial known as BLAZE-4, which continues previous work using a monoclonal antibody, bamlanivimab, to treat patients with milder cases of COVID-19. The Institute participated in the phase 1 study, BLAZE-1, which resulted in Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) status by the FDA.

Bamlanivimab is for patients who are COVID-19 positive but are not hospitalized and have mild symptoms. It must be administered within 72 hours of a positive test result.

The BLAZE-1 study showed a lower subsequent hospitalization rate among those who received the drug versus those who received a placebo, and may reduce the viral load, leading to better outcomes. The BLAZE-4 trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab both on its own and in combination with another monoclonal antibody. The drugs work by prohibiting the spread of the virus to additional cells in the body.

We have reached a new level of sophistication trying to treat the virus before it makes you really sick, Dr. Koehne said. Despite the prospect of having COVID-19 vaccines, which are intended to prevent us from getting sick, we need to stay focused on the treatment of those individuals who are symptomatic from the virus.

Tags: COVID-19, Lynn Cancer Institute, Miami Cancer Institute

Continue reading here:
In COVID-19 Clinical Trials, Experts from Baptist Health's Cancer Institutes Treat Patients With Mild or Severe Symptoms - Baptist Health South...

1st Patients To Get CRISPR Gene-Editing Treatment Continue To Thrive – NPR

Victoria Gray (second from left) with children Jamarius Wash, Jadasia Wash and Jaden Wash. Now that the gene-editing treatment has eased Gray's pain, she has been able be more active in her kids' lives and looks forward to the future. "This is really a life-changer for me," she says. Victoria Gray hide caption

Victoria Gray (second from left) with children Jamarius Wash, Jadasia Wash and Jaden Wash. Now that the gene-editing treatment has eased Gray's pain, she has been able be more active in her kids' lives and looks forward to the future. "This is really a life-changer for me," she says.

The last thing a lot of people want to do these days is get on a plane. But even a pandemic would not stop Victoria Gray. She jumped at the chance to head to the airport this summer.

"It was one of those things I was waiting to get a chance to do," says Gray.

She had never flown before because she was born with sickle cell disease. She feared the altitude change might trigger one of the worst complications of the devastating genetic disease a sudden attack of excruciating pain.

But Gray is the first person in the United States to be successfully treated for a genetic disorder with the help of CRISPR, a revolutionary gene-editing technique that makes it much easier to make very precise changes in DNA.

About a year after getting the treatment, it was working so well that Gray felt comfortable flying for the first time. She went to Washington, D.C., to visit her husband, who has been away for months on deployment with the National Guard.

"It was exciting. I had a window. And I got to look out the window and see the clouds and everything," says Gray, 35, of Forest, Miss.

Gray wore a mask the whole time to protect herself against the coronavirus, kept her distance from other people at the airport, and arrived happily in Washington, D.C., even though she's afraid of heights.

"I didn't hyperventilate like I thought I would," Gray says, laughing as she recounts the adventure in an interview with NPR.

NPR has had exclusive access to follow Gray through her experience since she underwent the landmark treatment on July 2, 2019. Since the last time NPR checked in with Gray in June, she has continued to improve. Researchers have become increasingly confident that the approach is safe, working for her and will continue to work. Moreover, they are becoming far more encouraged that her case is far from a fluke.

At a recent meeting of the American Society for Hematology, researchers reported the latest results from the first 10 patients treated via the technique in a research study, including Gray, two other sickle cell patients and seven patients with a related blood disorder, beta thalassemia. The patients now have been followed for between three and 18 months.

All the patients appear to have responded well. The only side effects have been from the intense chemotherapy they've had to undergo before getting the billions of edited cells infused into their bodies.

The New England Journal of Medicine published online this month the first peer-reviewed research paper from the study, focusing on Gray and the first beta thalassemia patient who was treated.

"I'm very excited to see these results," says Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley, who shared the Nobel Prize this year for her role in the development of CRISPR. "Patients appear to be cured of their disease, which is simply remarkable."

Another nine patients have also been treated, according to CRISPR Therapeutics in Cambridge, Mass., and Vertex Pharmaceuticals in Boston, two companies sponsoring the research. Those individuals haven't been followed long enough to report any results, officials say.

But the results from the first 10 patients "represent an important scientific and medical milestone," says Dr. David Altshuler, Vertex's chief scientific officer.

The treatment boosted levels of a protein in the study subjects' blood known as fetal hemoglobin. The scientists believe that protein is compensating for defective adult hemoglobin that their bodies produce because of a genetic defect they were born with. Hemoglobin is necessary for red blood cells to carry oxygen.

Analyses of samples of bone marrow cells from Gray six months after getting the treatment, then again six months later, showed the gene-edited cells had persisted the full year a promising indication that the approach has permanently altered her DNA and could last a lifetime.

"This gives us great confidence that this can be a one-time therapy that can be a cure for life," says Samarth Kulkarni, the CEO of CRISPR Therapeutics.

Gray and the two other sickle cell patients haven't had any complications from their disease since getting the treatment, including any pain attacks or hospitalizations. Gray has also been able to wean off the powerful pain medications she'd needed most of her life.

Prior to the treatment, Gray experienced an average of seven such episodes every year. Similarly, the beta thalassemia patients haven't needed the regular blood transfusions that had been required to keep them alive.

"It is a big deal because we we able to prove that we can edit human cells and we can infuse them safely into patients and it totally changed their life," says Dr. Haydar Frangoul at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville. Frangoul is Gray's doctor and is helping run the study.

For the treatment, doctors remove stem cells from the patients' bone marrow and use CRISPR to edit a gene in the cells, activating the production of fetal hemoglobin. That protein is produced by fetuses in the womb but usually shuts off shortly after birth.

The patients then undergo a grueling round of chemotherapy to destroy most of their bone marrow to make room for the gene-edited cells, billions of which are then infused into their bodies.

"It is opening the door for us to show that this therapy can not only be used in sickle cell and thalassemia but potentially can be used in other disorders," Frangoul says.

Doctors have already started trying to use CRISPR to treat cancer and to restore vision to people blinded by a genetic disease. They hope to try it for many other diseases as well, including heart disease and AIDS.

The researchers stress that they will have to follow Gray and many other patients for a lot longer to be sure the treatment is safe and that it keeps working. But they are optimistic it will.

Gray hopes so too.

"It's amazing," she says. "It's better than I could have imagined. I feel like I can do what I want now."

The last year hasn't always been easy for Gray, though. Like millions of other Americans, she has been sheltering at home with three of her children, worrying about keeping them safe and helping them learn from home much of the time.

"I'm trying to do the things I need to do while watch them at the same time to make sure they're doing the things they need to do," Gray says. "It's been a tough task."

But she has been able do other things she never got to do before, such as watch her oldest son's football games and see her daughter cheerleading.

"This is really a life-changer for me," she says. "It's magnificent."

She's now looking forward to going back to school herself, learning to swim, traveling more when the pandemic finally ends, and watching her children grow up without them worrying about their mother dying.

"I want to see them graduate high school and be able to take them to move into dorms in college. And I want to be there for their weddings just everything that the normal people get to do in life. I want to be able to do those things with my kids," she says. "I can look forward now to having grandkids one day being a grandmama."

Continued here:
1st Patients To Get CRISPR Gene-Editing Treatment Continue To Thrive - NPR

Impact Analysis of Covid-19 On Stem Cell Therapy Market to Witness Steady Growth 2027 | Magellan, Medipost Co., Ltd, Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Kolon…

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Growth To Increase Manifold By 2027 A fundamental overview of the Stem Cell Therapy Market niche is provided in the Stem Cell Therapy Market report accompanying definitions, classifications, applications along with industry chain framework. The Stem Cell Therapy market report provides a broad assessment of the required market dynamics and the latest trends. It also highlights regional markets, prominent market players, multiple market segments [products, applications, end users, and key regions] and subsectors that broadly consider numerous departments along with applications.

NOTE:Our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe explains that the market will generate remunerative prospects for producers post COVID-19 crisis. The report aims to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario, economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry.

Request a sample copy of the report: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/2848

Top Key Players Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Competition: Magellan, Medipost Co., Ltd, Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Kolon TissueGene, Inc., JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Anterogen Co. Ltd., Pharmicell Co., Inc., and Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc.

The market can be segmented into: By Cell Source:Adult Stem CellsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsEmbryonic Stem CellsOthersGlobal Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Application:Musculoskeletal DisordersWounds and InjuriesCancerAutoimmune disordersOthers

Furthermore, the report acknowledges that in this growing and immediately intensifying market situation, the most recent advertising and marketing details are critical to determining the performance of the forecast period and making an essential choice for the profitability and growth of the Stem Cell Therapy market. Do it. Additionally, the report covers various factors influencing the growth of the Stem Cell Therapy market during the forecast period. Additionally, this particular analysis will also determine its impact on individual segments of the market.

To identify the growth opportunities in the market, the report has been segmented into regions that are growing faster than the overall market. This region was focused on regions with slower growth rates than the global market. Each geographic segment of the Stem Cell Therapy market has been independently investigated, with price, distribution and demand data specifically for North America (US, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), and Asia-region markets. . Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, etc.), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa).

Research purpose:

Provides strategic profiling of key players in the market, comprehensively analyzes core competencies, and derives the competitive landscape of the market.

Provides insight into factors influencing market growth. Stem Cell Therapy market analysis based on various factors such as price analysis, supply chain analysis, Porter Five Force analysis, etc.

It provides detailed analysis of the market structure with forecasts for various segments and sub-segments of the global Stem Cell Therapy market.

Provides a country level analysis of the market in relation to its current market size and future outlook.

Provides country-level analysis of the market by application, product type and sub-segment.

Provides historical and forecast revenue for the market segment and sub-segments in relation to the four major regions and countries in North America, Europe, Asia and other countries.

Track and analyze competitive developments such as joint ventures, strategic alliances, new product development and research and development in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Apply Promo Code CHRISTMAS2020 And Get Instant Discount of USD 1000

**Note: Year End Discount

If you purchase the report this year:

Flat 20% instant discount

25% discount on 2nd report

15 % free customization

Buy This Complete A Business Report: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/buy-now/2848

The chapters covered in the research report are as follows:

Chapter 1, 2: Targets of the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market, encompassing market introduction, product images, market summary, and development scope.

Chapter 3, Chapter 4: Global Market Competition, Sales Volume, and Market Profit by Manufacturer.

Chapters 5, 6, 7: Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Exports, Imports by Regions such as USA, Asia Pacific, China, India, Japan. From 2015 to 2024, we conduct regional market research based on regional sales rate and market share.

Chapters 8, 9, 10: Global Market Analysis by Application, Cost Analysis, Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributor/Trader

Chapters 11, 12: Market Information and Research Conclusions, Appendix and Data Sources.

The market report also primarily identifies additional useful and useful information about the industry, including the Stem Cell Therapy market development trends analysis, return on investment, and feasibility analysis. Additionally, SWOT analysis is distributed in the report to analyze the growth of key global market players in the Stem Cell Therapy market industry.

In addition, the research report investigates:

Competitors and manufacturers in the global market

By product type, application and growth factor

Industry status and outlook for major applications / end users / usage areas

Thanks for reading this article. You can also get individual chapter sections, such as North America, Europe, or Asia, or regional versions of the report.

Contacts Us:

Coherent Market Insights 1001 4th Ave,#3200 Seattle, WA 98154,U.S. Phone: US +1-206-701-6702/UK +44-020 8133 4027 Email: sales@coherentmarketinsights.com

Continue reading here:
Impact Analysis of Covid-19 On Stem Cell Therapy Market to Witness Steady Growth 2027 | Magellan, Medipost Co., Ltd, Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Kolon...

Exploring Increase of Point Mutations Associated with High-Dose Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma – Targeted Oncology

High-dose melphalan (Evomela) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has demonstrated significant efficacy for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. The agent has improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients when administered as upfront therapy to patients aged 66 years or younger.

The median PFS shown with melphalan plus ASCT in a phase IFM/DFCI 2009 study was 50 months versus 26 months when compared with the standard of care treatment regimen lenalidomide (Revlimib), bortezomib (Velcade), and dexamethasone (RVD) alone hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65;P<.001). As the treatment strategy continues to be explored in patients with multiple myeloma, researchers have now begun to investigate an outstanding biological question of whether the alkylating agent causes an increased amount of DNA damage.

An analysis presented during the virtual 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting showed that between the time of diagnosis and relapse, patients treated with high-dose melphalan had an increased number of point mutations. It was unclear from this research how this result translated to treatment selection and sequencing.

In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Mehmet Samur, PhD, senior research scientist, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discussed the investigation of high-dose melphalan following ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma and shared insights into how the ongoing questions can be explored in the future.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: Can you explain what was demonstrated prior with high-dose melphalan followed by ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma?

Sumar: The clinical part of the phase 3 study was published previously. It showed that when you do RVD plus high-dose melphalan following by stem cell treatment, patients do significantly better than patients who get RVD alone. Adding high-dose melphalan increased the PFS benefit by around 12 months.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: Can you provide background on your analysis of Melphalan for patients with multiple myeloma?

Sumar: Melphalan is an alkylating agent. Because of the way the agent works, we always think that it creates more DNA damage. The study that we presented at ASH was questioning whether this was true or not.

We collected DNA sequencing data from patients who were treated with RVD followed by high-dose Melphalan and a bone marrow transplant. We had a total of 25 patients, and we collected data at the time of diagnosis and the time of relapse. To compare this compilation, we also collected data from 43 patients from the IFM/DFCI 2009 study who only received RVD. We also collected data at diagnosis and relapse in the 43 patients. Genomic alterations were compared at diagnosis and relapse for patients who were injected with high-dose Melphalan and RVD versus patients who were only treated with RVD.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What were the findings from this study?

Sumar: We found that patients who got high-dose melphalan plus RVD followed by transplant accumulated more point mutations. To be precise, they accumulated around 10,000 new mutations between diagnosis and relapse at 5 years. For RVD patients, there were around 4500 new point mutations. The study showed that treating patients with high-dose Melphalan is increasing the mutational load by about 2.9-fold at the time of relapse.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What are the implications of these findings?

Sumar: There are a couple of things that we see from our study. One point is that we only saw point mutations. We didnt see any large-scale DNA alterations. This suggests that our patients who are treated with high-dose melphalan are more likely to experience changes.

In terms of the pathways that are mutated, the DNA damage repair pathway is more frequently mutated between diagnosis and relapse in patients treated with high-dose melphalan. We think that if we combine inhibitors that can overcome the selection of DNA damage repair pathway mutations, those patients may get additional benefit from the treatment.

We dont have clear data yet on whether this increased mutational load is something that is bad for patients. Even though these patients have more mutations, overall survival times are similar between the 2 arms. C outcomes are not impacted by the increased number of mutation so far.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What plan are underway to further this research?

Sumar: We are expanding our study in multiple ways. There is no clear data set we can get answers to our ongoing questions yet. We have reached out to our partners around the world to see if we can come up with a cohort to investigation. Also, we are looking at impact of these mutational load increase on other features like secondary cancer rate.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: The understanding of gene mutations in myeloma is evolving. Can you discuss the current role of genomic testing?

Sumar: It has been shown in many studies that genetic testing at diagnosis can tell us which patients are high risk and which are low risk. Studies have also shown that patients who have loss of p53 or with deletion 17p will have bad outcomes.

There was a study published last year in the Journal of Clinical Oncology showing which patients with myeloma would have a lower risk. The study also shows that there are certain genomic features prolong survival time in patients.

We have different genomic tools that we can use to look at these different alterations and assess patient risk. Today, I think people are looking at these alterations from all different angles to plan stratification in upcoming clinical trials.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: In your opinion, what change will we see in the myeloma treatment landscape in the next 5 years?

Sumar: There are a lot of studies looking at new treatment. Everyone is carefully watching out for data on new treatment options like chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and monoclonal antibodies. It looks like these agents are providing benefit to patients, but they are at the very early stages of research.

Reference:Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(14):1311-1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750

More:
Exploring Increase of Point Mutations Associated with High-Dose Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma - Targeted Oncology

Straight from the Heart: Cooper’s Story – WBIR.com

In just one year, 4-year-old Cooper Stansbury has conquered six rounds of Chemotherapy, two stem cell transplants and 14 days of Proton Therapy.

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. In August, we introduced you to 4-year-old Cooper Stansbury.

Law enforcement from around the area came together to encourage him as he's battling cancer.

In November of 2019, Cooper was diagnosed with neuroblastoma.

"I'll never forget that day. That was the worst day of our lives," said Cooper's father, Sam Stansbury. "My wife collapsed. Obviously, she was falling apart and all I wanted to know is what do we do now, what do we do next."

For more than a year, Cooper has endured treatment after treatment.

Cooper has conquered six rounds of Chemotherapy, two stem cell transplants and 14 days of Proton Therapy.

"The Power of Play" helps Cooper stay positive and decreases anxiety.

"Sometimes they do have to go through hard procedures that might hurt or be scary," said East Tennessee Children's Hospital Child Life Specialist Anna Taylor. "So, I can help distract and help them understand why they are going through it and help them cope and get through the procedure."

Cooper's father said "he's tough as nails."

Just like the toy race cars on his track, nothing slows cooper down.

Cooper is now on cycle 4 of immunotherapy.

"To see him now after everything he's gone through," Cooper's father said. "We're very hopeful."

As Cooper continues to fight, his entire family is looking forward to better days and more play days at home.

"I know he is destined for greatness, without a doubt," he said.

Follow this link:
Straight from the Heart: Cooper's Story - WBIR.com

Early Signs of Activity and Tolerability Found in Allogeneic Product UCART22 for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD22+ B-Cell ALL – Cancer Network

The allogeneic off-the-shelf CD22-directed T-cell product, UCART22, showed early signs of activity and no evidence of unexpected toxicities at 2 dose levels for adult patients with relapsed/refractory CD22-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to the results of a study presented during the 2020 ASH Annual Meeting.1

In the phase 1 BALLI-01 (NCT04150497) dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, 2 patients at the 1 x 105 cells/kg dose achieved a complete remission (CR) with incomplete hematologic recovery on day 28. One of these patients attained a minimal residual disease (MRD)positive CR at day 42 followed by subsequent inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa) and then transplant.

One patient at dose level 2, 1 x 106 cells/kg, experienced a significant bone marrow blast reduction at day 28, followed by disease progression.

No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), immune effector cellassociated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), adverse effects (AE) of special interest (AESI), a UCART22-related AE that was grade 3 or higher, or a serious AE (SAE).

UCART22 showed no unexpected toxicities at the doses of 1 x 105 cells/kg and 1 x 106 cells/kg with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion, lead study author Nitin Jain, MD, an assistant professor in the Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, said in a virtual presentation during the meeting. Host immune recovery was observed early, and the addition of alemtuzumab [Lemtrada] to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion is currently being explored with the goal to achieve deeper and more sustained T-cell depletion and to promote expansion and persistence of UCART22.

Standard treatment for adult patients with B-cell ALL includes multiagent chemotherapy with or without allogeneic stem cell transplant. However, 30% to 60% of patients with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL who achieve a CR will relapse, and the expected 5-year survival rate for those with relapsed/refractory disease is approximately 10%.

Previously, UCART19, when paired with lymphodepletion using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab, was found to show efficacy in this patient population.2

CD22 is an FDA-approved therapeutic target in B-cell ALL. UCART22 is an immediately available, standardized, manufactured agent with the ability to re-dose, and its CAR expression redirects T cells to tumor antigens, Jain explained.

Moreover, through its mechanism of action, TRAC becomes disrupted using Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (Talen) technology to eliminate TCR from cell surface and reduce the risk of GVHD. CD52 is also disrupted with the use of Talen to eliminate sensitivity to lymphodepletion with alemtuzumab. Finally, there is a CD20 mimotope for rituximab (Rituxan) as a safety switch, Jain added.

UCART22 has also demonstrated in vivo antitumor activity in immune-compromised mice that were engrafted with CD22-positive Burkitt lymphoma cells in a dose-dependent manner.

In the dose-escalation/dose-expansion BALLI-01 study, investigators are enrolling up to 30 patients in a modified Toxicity Probability Interval design. There are 3 cohorts, which have 2 to 4 patients on each cohort: 1 x 105 cells/kg (dose level 1), 1 x 106 cells/kg (dose level 2), and 5 x 106 cells/kg. The focus of the dose-escalation phase of the trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) before heading into the dose-expansion portion of the trial.

To be eligible for enrollment, patients must have been between 18 and 70 years old, have acceptable organ function, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, at least 90% of B-cell ALL blast CD22 expression, and had previously received at least 1 standard chemotherapy regimen and at least 1 salvage regimen.

End points of the trial included safety and tolerability, MTD/R2PD, investigator-assessed response, immune reconstitution, and UCART22 expansion and persistence.

The lymphodepletion regimens were comprised of fludarabine (at 30 mg/m2 x 4 days) plus cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2 x 3 days); the study has since been amended to include the regimen of fludarabine (at 30 mg/m2 x 3 days), cyclophosphamide (500 g/m2 x 3 days), and alemtuzumab (20 mg/day x 3 days) and is currently enrolling patients.

Following screening, lymphodepletion, and UCART22 infusion, patients underwent an observation period for DLTs with a primary disease evaluation at 28 days; additional efficacy evaluations occurred at 56 days and 84 days. Patients were followed for 2 years and continued to be assessed for long-term follow-up.

As of July 1, 2020, 7 patients were screened, of which 1 patient failed and 6 were therefore enrolled on the study. One patient discontinued therapy before receiving UCART22 due to hypoxia from pneumonitis that was linked with lymphodepletion. Five patients were treated with UCART22 at dose level 1 (n = 3) and dose level 2 (n = 2).

The median age of participants was 24 years (range, 22-52), 3 of the 5 patients were male, and 3 had an ECOG performance status of 0. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-6), and there were a median 35% bone marrow blasts (range, 10%-78%) prior to lymphodepletion.

Three patients had complex karyotype and 2 had diploid cytogenetics. One patient each had the following molecular abnormalities: CRLF2, CRLF2 and JAK2, CDKN2A loss, KRAS and PTPN11, and IKZF1. Only 1 patient had undergone haploidentical transplant. Four patients previously received prior CD19- or CD22-directed therapy, including blinatumomab (Blincyto), inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa), and CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy. At study entry, 3 patients had refractory disease and 2 patients had relapsed disease.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), which were unrelated to study treatment, included hypokalemia, anemia, increased bilirubin, and acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Also not related to UCART22, 3 patients experienced 4 treatment-emergent SAEs: porta-hepatis hematoma, sepsis, bleeding, and sepsis in the context of disease progression. No treatment discontinuations due to a treatment-related TEAE were reported.

The patient who achieved a CR followed by transplant was a 22-year-old male who had undergone 2 prior treatments for B-cell ALL and received UCART22 at a dose of 1 x 105 cells/kg. He did not experience CRS, ICANS, GVHD, nor a SAE, and all TEAEs were grade 1.

Jain also noted that host T-cell constitution was observed in all patients within the DLT observation period. UCART22 was also not detectable through flow cytometry or molecular analysis, the latter of which was at dose level 1 only.

References:

1. Jain N, Roboz GJ, Konopleva M, et al. Preliminary results of BALLI-O1: a phase I study of UCART22 (allogeneic engineered T cells expressing anti-CD22 chimeric antigen receptor) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory anti-CD22+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (NCT04150497). Presented at: 2020 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 4-8, 2020; Virtual. Abstract 163.

2. Benjamin R, Graham C, Yallop D, et al. Preliminary data on safety, cellular kinetics and anti-leukemic activity of UCART19, an allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product, in a pool of adult and pediatric patients with high-risk CD19+ relapsed/refractory b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):896. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-111356.

See the original post here:
Early Signs of Activity and Tolerability Found in Allogeneic Product UCART22 for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD22+ B-Cell ALL - Cancer Network

Epigenetic Changes Implicated in Age-related Diminution in Vision and Its Possible Reversal – JD Supra

The Fountain of Youth -- an enduring aspiration, particularly as the ravages of age reduce human faculties prior to leading inexorably to death. Reduction in sight is the human faculty that can have the greatest effect on quality of life in the aged -- a faculty that begins to decline in the 4th or 5th decade of life and doesn't get better (when it does) without medical intervention.

But what if there were a way to rejuvenate sight? That prospect is the tantalizing suggestion in a paper published on December 2nd entitled "Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision," Nature 588: 124-29*. The basis of the report is the recognition that many of the age-related effects on vision are an example of gene expression differences associated with epigenetic changes in chromosomal DNA. Epigenetics is a phenomenon of gene structure and expression involving small differences in nucleotide bases, typically methylation of cytosine residues at specific (CpG) sites. These changes have been studied in normal development, where gene expression changes arise as different cell types properly differentiate and act as a molecular "clock" reflecting age. The ability to turn back cellular time has been demonstrated by the development of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), wherein terminally differentiated somatic cells (typically fibroblasts) can be turned into pluripotent cells. Pluripotent cells are capable of differentiating into cells of each embryonic germinal layer (ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm), and iPSCs can be produced by expressing four specific genes: OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and MYC. All of these genes encode transcription factors capable of affecting (and effecting) developmentally relevant gene expression. Consequent to this "de-differentiation" occasioned by expression of these genes is a "resetting" of the epigenetic patterns associated with development. In this paper the researchers hypothesized that resetting these epigenetic patterns could also rejuvenate neuroretinal cells to reinvigorate and overcome the ocular nerve damages by glaucoma in an animal model.

Because one of these genes (MYC) is also associated with cancer development (i.e., it is an oncogene) the researchers developed an inducible expression construct that expressed only the OCT4, SOX2, and KLF4 members of the quartet (OSK). (This decision was also informed by the experience of other researchers that continuous expression of all four genes in animal models resulted in teratomas or was fatal within days of introduction.) Their system used a polycistronic (i.e., all the genes in one linear array) construct of all three genes regulated by a tetracycline response element (TRE) promoter in a adeno-associated viral vector. This construct was tested by introduction into fibroblasts from aged (20 month old) mice and gene expression related to aging (i.e., that showed differential expression with age) was evaluated. These studies showed that OSK expression for 5 days resulted in a "youthful" mRNA expression pattern in these genes (without any effect on the terminal differentiation state of the fibroblasts).

The TRE promoter enabled selection for or against expression of the OSK gene cassette; as the authors explain "[t]he TRE promoter can be activated either by reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator (rtTA) in the presence of the tetracycline derivative doxycycline (DOX) ('Tet-On') or by tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA) in the absence of DOX ('Tet-Off')." Simply put, the presence of absence of DOX in the animal's drinking water determined whether the expression cassette is "on" or "off," as illustrated in this figure:

Long-term (10-18 months) expression of this cassette was achieved in both young (5 months-old) and aged mice with no tumorigenesis or other negative side effects being observed.

To test the ability of induced OSK expression to rejuvenate optical nerve cells the researchers examined retinal ganglion cells (RGC, which project axons away from the retina informing the optic nerve) in an optic nerve crush injury model (which mimics the effects of optic nerve injury due to inter alia glaucoma). The construct was delivered by injection into the vitreous humor and resulted in about 37% of the RGCs taking up and expressing the OSK genes in response to DOX administration. A separate cohort of mice were administered versions of the construct where DOX inhibited OSK expression. In these experiments, "the greatest extent of axon regeneration and RGC survival occurred when all three genes were delivered and expressed as a polycistron within the same AAV particle" according to the researchers. In contrast, inhibition of OSK expression in the "Tet-Off" mice showed no axonal growth. Moreover, delivery of the OSK genes individually in separate viral vectors or in pairs also did not show axonal growth, indicating the need for these genes to be expressed together in proper relative amounts provided by the polycistronic construct. The researchers also found OSK expression induced expression of Stat3, a gene know to encourage regeneration. These results were obtained in using 12-month-old mice as well as 1- and 3-month-old mice, which indicated, as the authors note, that "ageing does not greatly diminish the ability of OSK transcription factors to induce axon regeneration." Increased axonal growth from RGCs was found even after crush injury, an effect found with no other treatment modalities.

The researchers then determined whether these reinvigorated RGCs showed changes in DNA methylation patterns. In the absence of DOX-induced OSK expression injury in this model caused an "accelerated" aging pattern, whereas in the presence of DOX-induced OSK expression counteracted this effect according to the results reported in this paper. Interestingly, this preservation of a "youthful" pattern of DNA methylation was found to be enriched at genes "associated with light detection and synaptic transmission." Having shown this association the researchers then investigated whether axonal regeneration required youthful changes in DNA methylation. These experiments were performed by reducing expression of genes that caused DNA demethylation in RGCs (and whose expression was known to be increased in cells expressing OSK) and detecting that axonal regeneration did not occur in these mice even in the presence of DOX-induced OSK expression.

Whether these effects of OSK expression would also be seen in human neurons was investigated using differentiated human neurons in vitro. Neurons harboring an OSK-encoding construct were treated with vincristine (a drug that occasions axon injury) and DOX-induced OSK expression was shown to "counteract[] axonal loss and the advancement of DNA methylation age," showing a 15-fold greater area of proliferation in OSK-expressing cells than control vincristine-treated neural cells. These cells also showed the demethylation-dependent characteristics that were shown in RGCs in the mouse optic nerve crush injury model.

The most clinically significant result disclosed in this paper involved the effect of OSK expression in a glaucoma model in vivo. Intraocular pressure was increased to pathological levels by injecting microbeads unilaterally into the anterior chamber of mouse eye for 21 days. At 4 weeks, after these animals showed correspondingly unilateral decreases in axonal density and the number of RGCs present in the treated eye. The viral vector encoding inducible OSK expression thereafter was introduced by intravitreal injection followed by DOX-induced OSK expression for 4 weeks. Compared with control (introduction of saline or viral vectors not encoding OSK into the microbead-treated eyes) the OSK vector-treated eyes showed "restored axon density equivalent to that in the non-glaucomatous eyes, with no evidence of RGC proliferation." These mice also showed a reversal of vision loss caused by the glaucomatous injury. Together these results indicated that OSK expression could be a therapy for glaucoma in humans.

Finally, the paper reports efforts to determine whether OSK expression could improve age-related (as opposed to injury- or pathology-related) vision problems. In these experiments, 3-and 11-month-old mice were treated by intravitreal injection of DOX-inducible OSK encoding constructs and OSK expression induced for 4 weeks. Twelve-month-old mice showed age-related visual acuity and RGS electrical activity diminution which was reversed by DOX-induced OSK expression. However, these phenotypic changes were not observed to be associated with an increased number of RGCs or axon density, which prompted these researchers to hypothesize that the effect were dependent on changes in gene expression ("transcriptomic changes" as these were termed in the paper). RGCs from treated or untreated 12-month-old mice were isolated and compared with RGCs from 5-month-old mice and expression of 464 genes were found to be altered: expression of almost all (90%) of these genes were found to be restored to youthful levels in OSK-expressing RGCs. The participation of DNA methylation changes in aged RGCs in producing a youthful pattern of gene expression was further assessed and validated using artificial intelligence/machine learning approaches.

The results reported in this paper suggest therapeutic interventions that could improve vision in the aged human population even in the absence of vision-impairing pathologies such as glaucoma. Although cautious to mention that "we do not wish to imply that DNA methylation is the only epigenetic mark involved in this process" and "[i]t is likely to involve other transcription factors and epigenetic modifications," the authors are not blind to the implication that:

[W]e show that it is possible to safely reverse the age of a complex tissue and restore its biological function in vivo. Using the eye as a model system, we present evidence that the ectopic expression of OSK transcription factors safely induces in vivo epigenetic restoration of aged CNS neurons, without causing a loss of cell identity or pluripotency. Instead, OSK promotes a youthful epigenetic signature and gene-expression pattern that causes the neurons to function as though they were young again. The requirement for active demethylation in this process supports the idea that changes in DNA methylation patterns are involved in the ageing process and its functional reversal.

* By researchers from Harvard Medical School, Yale University School of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, and The University of New South Wales Medical School.

Read more here:
Epigenetic Changes Implicated in Age-related Diminution in Vision and Its Possible Reversal - JD Supra

California’s Proposition 14: short in the arm for stem cell research – BioNews

14 December 2020

The recent close-call US presidentialelection grabbed headlines, but no less closely-fought was California's Proposition 14, also on the ballot in October, which will have a huge impact on the future of stem cell research in the state.

The Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative (Prop 14),whichwas on theballotinthe initiated state statutewill allow the state to issue billions of dollars in bonds for its stem cellresearch programme. The vote could not have been closer, with 51 percent of ballots for and 49 percent against.

This initiative will enable financiers to lend US $5.5 billion to a stem cell agency, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) whichthe state's taxpayers will repay with interest over the next three decades. The sizeable bond fund will be allocated to research, human clinical trials and programmes and also for start-up costs for facilities in the stem cell field. About US $1.5 billion of the money will be spent researching neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and dementia. Some of the funds will be allocated to the shared labs programme:state-funded facilities dedicated to conducting studies on human embryonic stem cells. A working groupfocused on improving access to medical treatments will be established, as well astraining and fellowship programmes for undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Stem cell research is in its infancy, with some treatments that have worked in animals now progressing to humantrials. The research is promising, as the ability to generate specialised cells could eventually be used torepair or replace damaged tissues and organs. However, there are ethical controversies surrounding stem cell research, especially regarding embryonic stem cells derived from early human embryos.

In 2001, the conservative Bush administration prohibited federal funding for stem cell research owing to the ethical concerns. This promptedreal estate developer and investor Robert Kleinto initiate the original Proposition 71 which aimed to establish a state constitutional right to conduct stem cell research in California in 2004.It was believed that Prop 71 would propel California as a world leader in stem cell research and 59 percent of Californians voted in favour.

The proposition also established CIRM the only state-funded stem cell research agency in the USA in the California Constitution. Since its inception, it has granted research funds to various institutions and companies including Stanford University and the University of California. So far, it has funded 68 clinical trials (phases 1-3) for a wide range of diseases and conditions, includingcancer, diabetes and many rare disorders.

In 2019, CIRMstarted to run out of funds, and by2020 hadsuspended applications for new projects except US $5 million in emergency funding for COVID-19 research. The Californians for Stem Cell Research, Treatments and Cures political action committee (PAC) responded with a campaign to boost funding via Prop 14. SupportersincludedUS House speaker Nancy Pelosi, California governorGavinNewsom, LA mayor EricGarcetti, the California Democratic Party and several organisations such as ALS Association and the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's research and Huntington's Disease Society of America.

There is also resistance to Prop 14:dissenters feel thattheinitiative has notdelivered its promises after 16 years. Furthermore the original rationale no longer applies asfederal funding is no longer blocked. Former President Barack Obama then removed the restrictions on embryonic stem cell research (a position unchanged by the Trump administration) which means California scientists can apply for (highly competitive) federal research grants.

In the current climate, Prop 14 will exacerbate California's already colossal budget deficits. The coronavirus pandemic has worsened housing crisesand unemployment rates, highly visible in cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles.

As Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, said:'It does nothing to address CIRM's built-in conflicts of interest, or its lack of legislative oversight despite it being an agency supported wholly by public funds. The new proposition makes some things worse; for example, it outsources critically important decisions about ethical standards to an unaccountable national committee... In the meantime, that campaign's shameless over-promising and hype set the stage for the hundreds of under-regulated commercial stem cell clinics now offering unapproved 'treatments' that have caused tumours and blindness...'

It is not surprising that Californians were so torn. Perhaps it's wiser to allocate the pot to more pressing matters like job creation, housing and other urgent needs?

Link:
California's Proposition 14: short in the arm for stem cell research - BioNews

What Patients With Cancer, Survivors Need to Know About the Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 Vaccine – Curetoday.com

Following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)s emergency use authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine on Friday, many patients with cancer who are actively receiving treatment, and those who no longer have signs of active disease, are sure to have questions as to what they should know about the vaccine.

In fact, Dr. Debu Tripathy, chair of Breast Medical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and editor in chief of CURE, said he and his colleagues were getting questions about the distribution of the vaccine prior to its authorization by the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

We have been getting questions more and more frequently; all our patients want to know what the schedule is for when they might get a vaccine, said Tripathy in an interview with CURE.

To address any questions patients with cancer and survivors may have regarding the vaccine, CURE recently spoke with Drs. Debu Tripathy and Roy Chemaly, chief infection control officer and a professor in the department of infectious diseases, infection control and employee health at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

On Monday, the first of many high-risk health care workers started receiving the vaccine across the United States. Many frontline workers will continue to receive it over the next several weeks, including those who work directly with patients with cancer who are at a high risk for infection.

After those frontline workers, there is a process for which patients will begin to receive the vaccine, according to Tripathy.

Patients with underlying conditions as well as patients with cancer who are considered the most vulnerable for contracting the infection will likely be a top priority to receive the vaccine. Those patients would include someone with a hematologic malignancy who has had a stem cell transplant and/or are immunosuppressed. However, there are still some details that need to be ironed out.

We haven't gotten into the nitty gritty in terms of how we're going to divide (the vaccine) to some extent, said Tripathy. We're going to have the physicians be involved in prioritizing this based on their knowledge because they're the ones who know the patients the best.

Chemaly also noted that the vaccine will likely be administered to patients on a case-by-case basis.

Now for cancer patients who are still under active treatment with chemo or radiation, or early after stem cell transplantation, there is no data on how effective the vaccine is, and should it be used, he said. So we're going to be a little bit more cautious and take it case by case to recommend these vaccines to our cancer patients, as we wait for more data to come out from the general population, then see how safe it is and how effective (it is) in order to really extrapolate to our cancer patients.

If a patient is no longer receiving active treatment and there are no signs of active cancer, Chemaly said, they should have a good response to the vaccine, and it will likely be safe for them to receive it as well.

Now, for other patients who (are) still in the follow-up period, not really called survivors of cancer, we're going to probably provide some guidance, for example, for recipients of a stem cell transplantation. If it's been six months from allogeneic transplantation, they're stable and recovering well from after transplant, then it is probably be safe to give it to these patients, he said. Autologous transplant could be three months from the transplantation if they have no active issues, if they are still in remission and they're stable enough to receive a vaccine.

As with any vaccine, Tripathy said, some people will have reactions, but at least there are data from healthy individuals that can be shared with patients with cancer. When those data are shared with patients with cancer, however, there will be some unknowns. For instance, will patients with cancer be able to generate antibodies and develop the same protection, and might there be unique side effects that this patient population will experience.

These are things that we will have to learn as we go, and we will, Tripathy said. As the cancer centers and practices start immunizing their patients, were going to be tracking outcomes on it.

In fact, just like with any drug that receives FDA approval, there will be a process for reporting any side effects that occur when a patient receives the vaccine.

As for the individuals who developed severe allergic reactions to the vaccine in the United Kingdom, Chemaly noted that those individuals had a history of anaphylaxis, or severe allergic reactions to different antigens. And two out of those three individuals who experienced the severe reactions were already carrying an EpiPen (epinephrine), which helps to combat serious allergic reactions.

And we're prepared to intervene if someone develop(s) this kind of reaction when we give the vaccine, Chemaly said.

Everyone not just patients with cancer should expect to follow all the public health measures from wearing a mask to social distancing and frequent hand hygiene for at least another six months to one year even if vaccinated, according to Chemaly.

We need to create herd immunity (because) without herd immunity, we're not going to eliminate this virus, he said. Second, even if (you) get (a) vaccine, (it) doesn't mean (youre) not going to be exposed to the virus in the community or in your workplace. At that point, you may carry the virus and not getting sick from it or get admitted to the hospital but (you) can still transmit the virus to other people. This why masking is still so important.

Chemaly said hes received questions from patients and employees every day about their worry of receiving the vaccine. And while he said its understandable, he assures the public that the trials have been conducted under a microscope, meaning so many eyes have been watching everything that has happened.

No one is hiding anything, he said. Based on that, I advise my patients, my colleagues (and) other health care workers in the health care setting, that, what we know is (the vaccine is) safe and is effective there is no long-term side effect up to two or three months from receiving the vaccine. I, myself, feel very comfortable taking it, and I'm going to be lining up to get the vaccine as soon as it is available.

I think that we are witnessing an incredible moment in history where we rallied to do something that had never been done, and that is to get a vaccine from scratch in less than one year, Tripathy said. That is a pretty astounding technologic feat that not many people would have believed it was possible when all this started that in this short period of time; we did it.

Now, its up to patients to make an informed decision as to whether to get the vaccine, although the available data point to its potential effectiveness.

Nothing works unless you get the vaccine, he said. If you don't get the vaccine, all of this was for nothing.

However, Tripathy acknowledged why some people may be concerned and reluctant to receive the vaccine.

Things have happened in medical history where that might give some people pause, he said. There's a lot of concern about people that are underserved and minorities because there is a history of them not receiving fair treatment when it comes to medicine and clinical trials. And so, we have to go the extra mile to reassure patients. But we can't pretend that we can reassure people 100%. Just like many other decisions you make in life, you take the best information you have and you make a recommendation for other people or for yourself. All we can do is be truthful, present our recommendations and hope that a majority of people do get vaccinated.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, dont forget tosubscribe to CUREs newsletters here.

See the original post:
What Patients With Cancer, Survivors Need to Know About the Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 Vaccine - Curetoday.com