Author Archives: admin


Was Trump’s Regeneron ‘Cure’ Developed Using Stem Cells and Fetal Tissues? – Snopes.com

As governments fight the COVID-19 pandemic, Snopes is fighting an infodemic of rumors and misinformation, and you can help. Read our coronavirus fact checks. Submit any questionable rumors and advice you encounter. Become a Founding Member to help us hire more fact-checkers. And, please, follow the CDC or WHO for guidance on protecting your community from the disease.

As the world raced to find a treatment that would alleviate the global pressure of the coronavirus pandemic, U.S. President Donald Trump contracted the virus in early October 2020 and developed COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. In the days following his diagnosis and public release from Walter Reed Hospital, where he received world-class treatment, Trump touted the powers of a miracle drug called Regeneron, which he promised to make available to the American people.

A video shared in tweet by the president on Oct. 7 claimed that Regeneron was a cure.

I spent four days there [at Walter Reed] and I went in, I wasnt feeling so hot. And within a very short period of time, they gave me Regeneron. Its called Regeneron. And other things too but I think this was the key. But they gave me Regeneron, and it was like, unbelievable. I felt good immediately. I felt as good three days ago as I do now.

So, I just want to say, we have Regeneron. We have a very similar drug from Eli Lilly, and theyre coming out and were trying to get them on an emergency basis. Weve authorized it. Ive authorized it. And if youre in the hospital and youre feeling really bad, I think were going to work it so that you get them and youre going to get them free.

Shortly after the president praised what he deemed a cure for his COVID-19 infection, some social media users pushed the claim that the drug Trump was given was developed using fetal tissue a practice in direct conflict with the administrations pro-life platform.

To clarify, Trump was treated with REGN-COV2, a novel anti-viral antibody cocktail created by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, a New York-based company that has openly stated it uses stem cell and fetal tissues as part of its research and development on new pharmaceutical treatments. This knowledge, and open support from a pro-life president, incited social media pushback from users who argued that the companys use of stem cells and fetal tissues for scientific research goes against pro-life platforms and policies.

REGN-COV2 is a combination of two human-made proteins, or monoclonal antibodies, known as REGN10933 and REGN10987. These two monoclonal antibodies were specifically designed to block the ability of SARs-CoV-2 to infect human cells. The biotechnology company further went on to describe the development of REGN-COV2 as follows:

To develop REGN-COV2, Regeneron scientists evaluated thousands of fully-human antibodies produced by the companys VelocImmune mice, which have been genetically modified to have a human immune system, as well as antibodies identified from humans who have recovered from COVID-19. The two potent, virus-neutralizing antibodies that form REGN-COV2 bind non-competitively to the critical receptor binding domain of the viruss spike protein, which diminishes the ability of mutant viruses to escape treatment and protects against spike variants that have arisen in the human population.

While it is true that Regeneron has used stem cells for some of its research, no human stem cells or human embryonic stem cells were used in the development of REGN-COV2, according to Alexandria Bowie, a spokesperson for the company. An April 2020 statement issued by Regeneron confirmed that research using stem cells helps its scientists model complex diseases, test new drug candidates, and lead to scientific insights that may help spur the creation of new medicines but the company contends that embryonic cells were not used in the production of REGN-CO2.

In short: we did not use human stem cells or human embryonic stem cells in the development of REGN-COV2, Bowie told Snopes in an email.

But its not quite that cut and dried.

In the research and development of pharmaceutical therapeutics, many companies turn to what is known as a cell line. These are cultures of human or animal cells that are derived from a living organism and cultured and propagated repeatedly, and, in some cases, used indefinitely. The development of REGN-COV2 utilized HEK293T a cell line that is derived from human fetal embryonic kidney tissues to create a pseudovirus that mimics a spike Protein found in SARS-CoV-2 in order to test the drugs ability to neutralize and ultimately treat the novel coronavirus.

HEK293s are considered immortalized cells (not stem cells) and are a common and widespread tool in research labs. This cell line was originally derived by adenovirus transformation of human embryonic kidney cells in 1977, explained Bowie, adding that HEK293 were further transformed at Stanford in the 1980s with SV40 large T antigen, a solution that is used by researchers to initiate and maintain DNA replication necessary for creating cell lines.

Fetal tissues were not directly used n the development of REGN-COV2, but cell lines from decades-old embryonic kidney tissues were. Fetal tissues are used to develop cell lines. Embryonic stem cells, on the other hand, are different than adult stem cells in that they are undifferentiated and regenerative cells, which means that they have not been assigned a key task in the human body. As such, researchers have uncovered ways to direct their use in creating human tissues that allow for a variety of uses, including testing new pharmaceuticals.

Opposition to the use of fetal tissue and embryonic stem cell research has been at the heart of the pro-life platform due to the way in which these cells are obtained and its association with using living fetuses either inside (in utero) or outside of the uterus (ex utero). Pro-life groups like March for Life have even gone so far as to pressure the Trump administration to halt funding for research that requires aborted fetal organs and tissues. In summer 2019, the president required any federally funded research using fetal tissue to undergo an ethics review, and has since stocked his cabinet with other similarly-minded officials.

REGN-COV2 is currently in late-stage clinical trials for various populations, including non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients as well as for the potential prevention in individuals who may have had close household exposure to COVID-19. According to a news release published on Sept. 29, the company announced that the antibody cocktail was shown to reduce the viral load and alleviate symptoms in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. REGN-COV2 also showed positive trends in reducing medical visits. However, it is important to note that the research included a relatively small sample size of just 275 patients.

The greatest treatment benefit was in patients who had not mounted their own effective immune response, suggesting that REGN-COV2 could provide a therapeutic substitute for the naturally-occurring immune response. These patients were less likely to clear the virus on their own and were at greater risk for prolonged symptoms, said Regeneron President and Chief Scientific Officer Dr. George D. Yancopoulos in a statement.

As of Oct. 12, Regeneron had submitted an emergency use authorization (EUA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in early October, and noted REGN-COV2s early, promising clinical data paired with the continued, pressing unmet need of COVID-19 meets the FDA standard for emergency use authorization.

Regeneron told Snopes that it cant speculate on potential timing for an EUA. We will update when such is available.

See the rest here:
Was Trump's Regeneron 'Cure' Developed Using Stem Cells and Fetal Tissues? - Snopes.com

The complicated story of Trump’s COVID treatment, stem cells and abortion politics – Baptist News Global

The irony cannot be missed: A Rose Garden event to announce the nomination of a Supreme Court justice widely expected to tilt the court toward limiting access to abortion became a super-spreader event for coronavirus, which infected many of the dignitaries gathered there. And the miracle cure touted by the president himself was made possible in some way by the scientific use of aborted fetal tissue.

Since the announcement that President Donald Trump was treated with an experimental cocktail of drugs that he said has made him feel better than he has in 20 years, attention has increasingly focused on how one of those treatments a cocktail of antibodies manufactured by Regeneron was developed and tested. And the same may be true for the other drug used on Trump and other coronavirus patients, Remdesivir.

Two ironic facts have risen to the surface and have been confirmed by multiple sources, however: (1) The new molecular treatment was developed and/or tested in some way involving cells originally derived from an aborted fetus; and (2) the very kind of research that made this therapy possible was shut down by the Trump administration within the past year.

The very kind of research that made this therapy possible was shut down by the Trump administration within the past year.

Critics cite these facts as evidence of hypocrisy by abortion opponents who for years have lambasted stem cell research as barbaric and immoral but now are willing to laud a miracle drug made possible by that very research.

On the other hand, some pro-life advocates dispute the actual use of aborted cells in the research or claim the original cells were obtained so long ago that there is no moral jeopardy in the modern drug.

One Dallas-based medical ethicist noted privately: I understand that many vaccines in the past included a cell line derived from the lung tissue of aborted fetuses, but I have also read that the cell line is either so attenuated or even absent that even the Catholic Church has withdrawn its objections.

And therein lies the nuance of this situation.

Amid these competing claims and an effort by Regeneron to carefully thread the needle of disclosure the MIT Technology Review published an article Oct. 7 by Antonio Regalado that minced no words:

This week, President Donald Trump extolled the cutting-edge coronavirus treatments he received as miracles coming down from God. If thats true, then God employs cell lines derived from human fetal tissue.

The MIT article continues to explain that the antibody treatment Trump received was developed with the use of a cell line originally derived from abortion tissue, according to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the company that developed the experimental drug.

And heres where things get quite technical.

According to the MIT journal and other published sources, the molecules in the treatment Trump received are manufactured in cells from a hamsters ovary not in human cells. However, cells originally derived from a fetus were used in another way. According to Regeneron, laboratory tests used to assess the potency of its antibodies employed a standardized supply of cells , whose origin was kidney tissue from an abortion in the Netherlands in the 1970s.

These cells have been immortalized, which means they have been reproduced, divided and shared many times through the years, so that the line of cells used today is, in a way, a descendant of the original cells obtained from the aborted kidney tissue.

Because the cells were acquired so long ago, and have lived so long in the laboratory, they are no longer thought of as involving abortion politics.

Thus the MIT journal concludes: The two antibodies Regeneron eventually put forward as an experimental treatment, which may have saved Trumps life, would have been selected using exactly such tests. Because the cells were acquired so long ago, and have lived so long in the laboratory, they are no longer thought of as involving abortion politics.

In June 2019, the Trump administration blocked federal funding for new scientific research using fetal tissue derived from abortions.

Promoting the dignity of human life from conception to natural death is one of the very top priorities of President Trumps administration, the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement.

And then this important line: Intramural research that requires new acquisition of fetal tissue from elective abortions will not be conducted.

The Trump administration policy hailed widely as a victory for the anti-abortion cause restricted new acquisition of fetal tissue.

The New York Times quoted an administration official who said the presidents acceptance of this coronavirus treatment should not be seen as a contradiction. The administrations policy on fetal tissue research specifically excluded cell lines made before June 2019, said the official, who did not wish to be identified because he was not authorized to speak about the matter. Scientific products made using cell lines that existed before then would not implicate the administrations policy on the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions, the official said.

The fact that most anti-abortion advocates have remained silent about this apparent contradiction also was addressed by the MIT journal: Most likely, their hypocrisy was unwitting. Many types of medical and vaccine research employ supplies of cells originally acquired from abortion tissue. It would have taken an expert to realize that was the case with Trumps treatment.

In June 2019, the journal Nature reported on the Trump administrations ban on fetal-tissue research that receives federal funding, especially through the National Institutes of Health.

Scientists employ fetal tissue to explore topics as diverse as infectious disease, human development and disorders of the eye.

The administration said it will set up an ethics-review board to evaluate each NIH grant application that would support research with fetal tissue, which is collected from elective abortions. But the government has already decided against renewing its contract with a laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco, that uses fetal tissue to study HIV, Nature reported. The announcement comes after a sustained push by abortion opponents to limit scientific research with fetal tissue despite warnings from researchers that using the tissue is the only way to study some health problems. Scientists employ fetal tissue to explore topics as diverse as infectious disease, human development and disorders of the eye.

The journal quoted UCSF chancellor Sam Hawgood saying this government decision was politically motivated, shortsighted and not based on sound science. Todays action ends a 30-year partnership with the NIH to use specially designed models that could be developed only through the use of fetal tissue to find a cure for HIV.

The New York Times reported that the ethics board set up to review proposed uses of fetal stem cells in research met for the first time in July and in August, the board rejected 13 of the 14 proposals it reviewed; the approved proposal relied on tissue that had already been acquired.

The ethical debate over this kind of research is not going away and, in fact, could escalate as work continues on COVID-19 vaccines.

The New York Times quoted David Prentice, vice president of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, who wrote in September: One concern regarding the ethical assessment of viral vaccine candidates is the potential use of abortion-derived cell lines in the development, production or testing.

Prentices own analysis found 13 vaccine candidates that rely in some way on fetal cell lines.

In response, the Times quoted James Sherley, a research scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute and director of the adult stem cell company Asymmetrex, who said this kind of research is not morally responsible. There are alternatives there are lots of ways that dont require the death of anyone.

Additional reporting on this issue has been published in Science magazine and Input magazine.

Related articles:

Is this election all about abortion? It depends on who you ask

See more here:
The complicated story of Trump's COVID treatment, stem cells and abortion politics - Baptist News Global

BrainStorm to Present at the 2020 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa – PRNewswire

NEW YORK, Oct. 12, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: BCLI), a leading developer of adult stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, today announced Stacy Lindborg, Ph.D., Executive Vice President and Head of Global Clinical Research, will deliver a presentation at the 2020 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa, being held virtually October 12-16, 2020.

Dr. Lindborg's presentation will be in the form of an on-demand webinar that will be available beginning today. Those who wish to listen to the presentation are required to register here. At the conclusion of the 2020 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa, a copy of the presentation will also be available in the "Investors and Media" section of the BrainStorm website under Events and Presentations.

About the 2020 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa

The conference will feature 80+ on-demand company presentations by leading public and private companies, highlighting their technical and clinical achievements over the past 12 months in the areas of cell therapy, gene therapy, gene editing, and tissue engineering. Registrants will have access to 15+ expert-led panels and workshops including a mix of both live and on-demand sessions. The conference will be delivered in a virtual format over the course of five days October 12-16. There is also a premier partnering system, partneringONE, allowing registrants to plan 11 meetings with other attendees. For a list of presenting companies, refer to https://www.meetingonthemesa.com/company-presentations/.

AboutBrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.is a leading developer of innovative autologous adult stem cell therapeutics for debilitating neurodegenerative diseases. The Company holds the rights to clinical development and commercialization of the NurOwn technology platform used to produce autologous MSC-NTF cells through an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement. Autologous MSC-NTF cells have received Orphan Drug status designation from theU.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) and theEuropean Medicines Agency(EMA) for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). BrainStorm has fully enrolled a Phase 3 pivotal trial in ALS (NCT03280056), investigating repeat-administration of autologous MSC-NTF cells at sixU.S.sites supported by a grant from theCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine(CIRM CLIN2-0989). The pivotal study is intended to support a filing forU.S.FDA approval of autologous MSC-NTF cells in ALS. BrainStorm also recently receivedU.S.FDA clearance to initiate a Phase 2 open-label multicenter trial in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The Phase 2 study of autologous MSC-NTF cells in patients with progressive MS (NCT03799718) started enrollment inMarch 2019. For more information, visit the company's website atwww.brainstorm-cell.com.

Contacts Investor Relations: Corey Davis, Ph.D. LifeSci Advisors, LLC Phone: +1 646-465-1138 [emailprotected]

Media:Paul Tyahla SmithSolve Phone: + 1.973.713.3768 [emailprotected]

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1166536/BrainStorm_Logo.jpg

SOURCE Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc

Home

See more here:
BrainStorm to Present at the 2020 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa - PRNewswire

Human heart organoids provide unmatched insight into cardiac disease and dysfunction – BioWorld Online

Two teams of researchers have developed miniature models of the human heart that beat and function like the full-size organ. The team from Michigan State University (MSU) and Washington University in St. Louis developed a human heart organoid (hHO) that recapitulates embryonic heart development, providing an unmatched view into congenital heart defects. The organoid created by the researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and Clemson University mimics the tissue dysfunction that occurs following a heart attack.

Organoids are self-assembling, 3D multicellular constructs that exhibit organ properties and structure to various degrees. Several processes have been developed to create them in recent years.

The MSU teams heart includes all the primary types of heart cells, as well as functional chambers and vascular tissues. These minihearts constitute incredibly powerful models in which to study all kinds of cardiac disorders with a degree of precision unseen before, said Aitor Aguirre, the studys senior author and assistant professor of biomedical engineering at MSUs Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering.

Results of the groups work created quite a stir when it appeared on the preprint server bioRxiv and highlights were presented at the 2020 International Society for Stem Cell Research Annual Meeting. Weve received a lot of calls from researchers who want to use our process, Aguirre told BioWorld. The NIH and the American Heart Association provided funding for the study.

To create the approximately 1-mm diameter hHOs, the team combined several approaches developed over the last decade. They start with induced pluripotent cells ordinary cells from adults that are induced by the introduction of several genes to become pluripotent stem cells or master cells. The team then provides chemical signals that stimulate the cells to differentiate and mimic the process used in fetal development to create a heart.

In 15 to 20 days, the developmentally directed approach takes an undifferentiated ball of cells and gets to the point that the heart beats, has chambers, has cells organized in the way those cells are organized in the heart. At a molecular and cellular level, we are creating a heart, Aguirre noted.

The process is much simpler and easier to recreate than tissue engineering, as hundreds can be created simultaneously with minimal operator involvement and without the need for expensive machinery. Aguirre said the equipment required would be present already in any standard cell laboratory.

Currently, the team is using the miniaturized model heart to study developmental heart disorders. Thats crucial because, while congenital heart affects 1% of all newborns, there have been no good ways to study fetal heart development. You cant tell a pregnant woman, we want to take a biopsy, so its hard to study first-hand, Aguirre explained. With this process, the team can replicate much of fetal heart development without using fetal cells, bypassing all ethical concerns.

Since the publication of their initial results, Aguirre and his team have made further advances to more closely model the human heart. By further improving the development conditions, the researchers are now giving the organoids structural and locational cues needed to organize themselves better. Those new conditions have led to the formation of two chambers with heart looping, creating a shape that resembles a sausage more than a ball. In addition, they are growing hearts that are more sophisticated and demonstrate functioning of a somewhat older heart.

The researchers also are working on the development of vasculature that will enable the minihearts to grow larger and to create a multiorgan system in vitro that would be especially useful in studying pediatric cardiopulmonary development. Beyond gaining a better understanding of the basics of early heart development, the team hopes the model will provide greater insight into the impact of various chemicals and conditions, including environmental contaminants, maternal diabetes and medications.

The South Carolina process

Researchers at the MUSC and Clemson University took a somewhat different approach to creation of their human cardiac organoid. Like the MSU team, they began with induced pluripotent stem cells that divide and self-assemble. The spherical organoids are fabricated in vitro using four defined cell types that range in maturity from early stage to adult in ratios found in the heart. The process gives the microtissue a range of functionality but does not reproduce the developmental process of a heart.

The greater maturity of some of the tissue has an advantage for the teams research, however. The South Carolina contingent has focused on creating heart organoids that parallel the physiological conditions present during and immediately following a heart attack. Their work recently appeared in Nature Biomedical Engineering.

The model demonstrates the key features of pathological metabolic shifts, fibrosis and calcium handling. Furthermore, our transcriptomic analysis showed that there are comparable disease characteristics that are similar to that of the diseased adult heart, lead author Dylan Richards, a graduate of the MUSC Clemson bioengineering program and now a computational biologist at The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, told BioWorld.

To model the heart after a heart attack, we used low oxygen culture to create an oxygen-diffusion gradient in cardiac organoids combined with noradrenaline stimulation, Richards said. This method resulted in a structural and functional gradient, similar to that of a heart after a heart attack (dying tissue in the middle surrounded by dysfunctional regions surrounded by functional regions).

Using the model, the team found that the experimental drug JQ1 reduces the fibrotic and arrhythmic properties seen in diseased post-heart attack organoids. They also demonstrated that doxorubicin, commonly used in breast cancer treatment, had greater cardiotoxic impact in diseased hearts, in keeping with previous findings of greater risk associated with the chemotherapy in women with pre-existing cardiovascular disease.

The team is looking at drug-exacerbated cardiotoxicity and COVID-19-induced cardiac diseases. It will also be enhancing the model to include immune cells, to better understand the role the immune system plays in restructuring heart tissue after damage from oxygen-deprivation.

Continue reading here:
Human heart organoids provide unmatched insight into cardiac disease and dysfunction - BioWorld Online

Sickle Cell Disease Association of America and Aruvant Sciences Forge New Partnership to Educate Around Gene Therapy – Herald-Mail Media

HANOVER, Md. and NEW YORK, Oct. 12, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The Sickle Cell Disease Association of America (SCDAA) and Aruvant Sciences are proud to announce a new partnership to create educational programs to increase awareness of gene therapy as a potential curative treatment option for sickle cell disease patients. This collaboration will help SCDAA continue to deliver on its mission, while assisting Aruvant in learning more about the needs of sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. Under the agreement, Aruvant will collaborate with SCDAA to host local and national educational events and develop materials for a public-awareness campaign.

"In partnership with SCDAA, we are working to educate patients about gene therapy, while gaining critical insights from the patient community for our ARU-1801 SCD development program," said Will Chou, M.D., chief executive officer (CEO) of Aruvant. "Now is a perfect time to work with SCDAA to educate the community about gene therapy since we have an open and enrolling phase 1/2 clinical trial for our potentially curative experimental gene therapy, ARU-1801."

Sickle cell disease affects 100,000 individuals in the United States, disproportionately affecting African Americans with one in 500 African Americans suffering from the disease. This inherited disease affects the production of hemoglobin, a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen throughout the body. The disease occurs when people inherit a mutation from each of their parents which causes people with SCD to not have normal, healthy adult hemoglobin in their red blood cells and instead have an abnormal hemoglobin called sickle hemoglobin. SCD can cause frequent episodes of severe pain, weakness and other serious complications. Fetal hemoglobin is an "anti-sickling" hemoglobin that is present before birth in the red blood cells. After birth, the gene that makes fetal hemoglobin turns off, which mostly stops the production of fetal hemoglobin. More fetal hemoglobin in the blood can mean fewer episodes of sickling and pain.

"In partnership with Aruvant, we can provide the critical education needed for our community to understand gene therapy and how these promising new treatments work to treat and maybe cure this genetic disease that impacts so many in our community," said Beverley Francis-Gibson, SCDAA president and CEO. "Partnering with companies like Aruvant is critical to help us support the research that could change the lives of many sickle cell disease patients."

Aruvant and SCDAA's educational events will review gene therapy and ongoing research, including discussion around Aruvant's MOMENTUM study. This clinical trial is examining a one-time investigational treatment, ARU-1801, to increase levels of fetal hemoglobin in patients with severe sickle cell disease, with the hope of fewer episodes of sickling and pain. Aruvant provided funding for SCDAA's 48th Annual National Convention 2020 which begins tomorrow, October 13, and will continue through October 17. To register, please visit https://bit.ly/SCDAA2020Convention.

The MOMENTUM StudyAruvant is currently conducting the MOMENTUM study, which is evaluating ARU-1801, a one-time only potentially curative gene therapy for patients with SCD. The MOMENTUM study is currently enrolling, and more information may be found at http://www.momentumtrials.com.

About Sickle Cell Disease Association of AmericaSickle Cell Disease Association of America advocates for people affected by sickle cell conditions and empowers community-based organizations to maximize quality of life and raise public consciousness while advancing the search for a universal cure. The association and more than 50 member organizations support sickle cell research, public and professional health education and patient and community services. Visit http://www.sicklecelldisease.org.

About Aruvant SciencesAruvant Sciences, part of the Roivant family of companies, is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing gene therapies for the treatment of rare diseases, with an initial focus on helping patients suffering from sickle cell disease. The company's lead candidate, ARU-1801, is an investigational lentiviral gene therapy for sickle cell disease. ARU-1801 incorporates a patented modified gamma-globin into autologous stem cells, with the aim of restoring normal red blood cell function through increased levels of fetal hemoglobin. The high potency of the modified gamma globin enables ARU-1801 engraftment with only reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Preliminary clinical data from an ongoing Phase 1/2 study in patients with sickle cell disease demonstrated continuing durable reductions in disease burden. For more information on the clinical study, please visit http://www.momentumtrials.com and for more on the company, please visitwww.aruvant.com.

Read more from the original source:
Sickle Cell Disease Association of America and Aruvant Sciences Forge New Partnership to Educate Around Gene Therapy - Herald-Mail Media

Caliber Pain is Featured as a 2020 Top NYC Patient Rated Pain Management Practice by Find Local Doctors – PR Web

I am truly dedicated to helping my patients decrease pain, improve mobility and increase their overall quality of life. Being recognized by Find Local Doctors as a 2020 Top Patient Rated Doctor is such a huge honor, says Dr. Michael Fakhry

NEW YORK (PRWEB) October 09, 2020

Caliber Pain is New York Citys leading pain management practice, specializing in customized solutions for musculoskeletal pain and mobility issues. These board-certified physicians, led by Dr. Michael Fakhry, employ a multidisciplinary approach combined with the latest non-surgical, evidence-based interventional procedures at their state-of-the-art AAAHC accredited facility in Manhattan. Caliber Pain has gained the attention of Find Local Doctors for the consistent, exceptional reviews they have received from patients. An easy-to-navigate online directory, Find Local Doctors helps consumers connect with local physicians who are highly-qualified and reputable.

Caliber Pain offers interventional treatments and regenerative medicine for a wide variety of injuries and pain issues and are committed to using a multidisciplinary approach to treating patients. They focus on each individual patients needs and goals, from restoring simple mobility issues to the relief of chronic and complex pain conditions. The medical team creates well-rounded treatment plans that include multiple disciplines and procedures, combining injection therapy such as PRP and STEM cell regenerative treatments), ketamine infusions, physical therapy, nerve blocks, spinal cord stimulation and other options to ensure patients have short and long-term pain management. The experienced specialists at Caliber Pain utilize the latest medical technology and work closely with patients, from the initial diagnosis to mapping out an effective treatment program. Many reviews of this practice have mentioned the highly knowledgeable, compassionate staff and the attentive care they received.

I am truly dedicated to helping my patients decrease pain, improve mobility and increase their overall quality of life. Being recognized by Find Local Doctors as a 2020 Top Patient Rated Doctor is such a huge honor, says Dr. Michael Fakhry

More about Dr. Michael Fakhry:

Dr. Michael Fakhry is an interventional pain management specialist who is double board-certified in anesthesiology and pain medicine. Dr. Fakhry graduated from the accelerated BA/MD joint program with Rutgers University and Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. He then completed his residency in anesthesiology at NYU Medical Center in Manhattan. Following his residency, he completed his fellowship in interventional pain management at NYU where he trained at both academic and public hospitals. Dr. Fakhry is a leader in his field and has published research in numerous medical journals and presented at national and international conferences. Caliber Pain is located at 737 Park Avenue 1C in New York, NY, and can provide a same day diagnosis and interventional pain treatments. Call (212) 203-5987, or visit http://www.caliberpain.com today to schedule your appointment for effective pain management.

Share article on social media or email:

Read the rest here:
Caliber Pain is Featured as a 2020 Top NYC Patient Rated Pain Management Practice by Find Local Doctors - PR Web

Report of the president: Appointments and promotions | Stanford News – Stanford University News

APPOINTMENTS WITHOUT LIMIT OF TIME:

DeSimone, Joseph, Professor of Radiology and of Chemical Engineering, effective September 1, 2020

Hernandez-Boussard, Tina, Associate Professor of Medicine, and by courtesy, of Surgery, effective November 1, 2020

Rose, Sherri, Associate Professor of Medicine, effective August 1, 2020.

Setsompop, Kawin, Associate Professor of Radiology, effective November 1, 2020

PROMOTIONS WITHOUT LIMIT OF TIME:

Bauer, Andrew, Associate Professor of Anthropology, effective September 1, 2020

Collins, Steven, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering, effective November 1, 2020

Dixon, Scott, Associate Professor of Biology, effective January 1, 2021

Feng, Liang, Associate Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, effective October 1, 2020

Goldbogen, Jeremy, Associate Professor of Biology, effective January 1, 2021

Gweon, Hyowon, Associate Professor of Psychology, effective September 1, 2020

Huh, June, Professor of Mathematics, effective September 1, 2020

Pasa, Sergiu, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, effective August 1, 2020

Rivas-Davila, Juan, Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, effective September 1, 2020

Seetah, Krish, Associate Professor of Anthropology, effective August 1, 2020

Simard, Julia, Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, and by courtesy, of Medicine, effective January 1, 2021

Stanford, Douglas, Associate Professor of Physics, effective September 1, 2020

Yan Xia, Associate Professor of Chemistry, effective September 1, 2020

PROMOTION FOR A CONTINUING TERM:

Srivastava, Sakti, Professor (Teaching) of Surgery, effective October 1, 2020

OTHER APPOINTMENTS:

Achour, Sara, Assistant Professor (subject to Ph.D.) of Computer Science, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2024

Allende Santa Cruz, Claudia, Assistant Professor of Economics in the Graduate School of Business, for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2025

Banik, Steven, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2025

Bouland, Adam, Assistant Professor of Computer Science, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2024

Chaudhari, Akshay, Assistant Professor (Research) of Radiology, for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2024, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Clark, Susan, Assistant Professor of Physics, for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2025

Fletcher, Brian, Associate Professor (Teaching) of Law, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023

Geldsetzer, Pascal, Assistant Professor of Medicine, for the period November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2024

Kasowski, Maya, Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Pathology, and by courtesy, of Genetics, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 20, 2024

Kozleski, Elizabeth, Professor (Research) of Education, for the period August 31, 2020 through August 30, 2025, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Liu, Fang, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2024

Mason, Daniel, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2024

Sharaf, Naima, Assistant Professor of Biology, for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2025

Trivedi, Mudit, Assistant Professor (subject to Ph.D.) of Anthropology, for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2025

OTHER PROMOTIONS:

Blanchet, Jose, Professor of Management Science and Engineering, effective September 1, 2020

Gipper, Brandon, Associate Professor of Accounting in the Graduate School of Business, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023

Hbert, Benjamin, Associate Professor of Finance in the Graduate School of Business, for the period August 1, 2020 through July 31, 2023

Heilshorn, Sarah, Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, and by courtesy, of Chemical Engineering and of Bioengineering, effective August 1, 2020

Spakowitz, Andrew, Professor of Chemical Engineering and of Materials Science and Engineering, effective September 1, 2020

Yang, Peter, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, effective October 1, 2020

OTHER REAPPOINTMENTS:

Auclert, Adrien, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024

Bacchetta, Rosa, Associate Professor (Research) of Pediatrics, for the period August 1, 2020 through April 30, 2025, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Baiocchi, Michael, Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health and, by courtesy, of Statistics and of Medicine, for the period September 1, 2021 through August, 2022

Battiato, Ilenia, Assistant Professor of Earth System Science, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023

Bernert, Rebecca, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022

Bocolo, Luigi, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023

Boettiger, Alistair, Assistant Professor of Developmental Biology, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023

Brandman, Onn, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, for the period September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020

Chan, David, Assistant Professor of Medicine, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2023

Chaudhuri, Ovijit, Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, for the period August 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020

Clement, Julien, Assistant Professor of Organizational Behavior in the Graduate School of Business, for the period July 17, 2022 through July 16, 2023

Cuesta Rodriguez, Jos, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2026

Dubra, Alfredo, Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021

Duncan, Laramie, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023

Dunn, Laura, Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, for the period September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020

Dylan, Dodd, Assistant Professor of Pathology and of Microbiology and Immunology, for the period August 16, 2022 through August 15, 2023

Ellsworth, William, Professor (Research) of Geophysics, for the period October 4, 2020 through October 3, 2025, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Feldman, Brian, Assistant Professor of Physics, for the period September 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021

Fetter, Dan, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025

Frock, Richard, Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022

Fung, Lawrence, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, for the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024

Gao, Xiaojing, Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, for the period April 1, 2024 through March 31, 2025

Garcia, Antero, Assistant Professor of Education, for the period January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023

Gorle, Catherine, Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2024

Grillet, Nicolas, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, for the period April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024

Gross, Eric, Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2022

Gu, Xun, Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and, by courtesy, of Materials Science and Engineering, for the period June 1, 2022 through May 31, 2023

Heaney, Catherine, Associate Professor (Teaching) of Psychology and of Medicine, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025

Hebert, Benjamin, Associate Professor of Finance in the Graduate School of Business, for the period August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024

Hoffman, Mark, Assistant Professor of Sociology, for the period October 16, 2023 through October 15, 2024

Honigsberg, Colleen, Associate Professor of Law, for the period June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2025

Hu, Yang, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, for the period December 1, 2020 through November 30, 2021

Huang, Possu, Assistant Professor of Bioengineering, for the period October 1, 2020 through August 31, 2022

Huang, Ting Ting, Associate Professor (Research) of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, for the period November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2021, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Iyer, Usha, Assistant Professor of Art and Art History, for the period June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2024

Jagannathan, Prassana, Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, for the period January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023

Jaiswal, Siddhartha, Assistant Professor of Pathology, for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2022

Kaltschmidt, Julia, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, for the period April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022

Kantor, Roanne, Assistant Professor of English, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023

Kasowski, Maya, Assistant Professor of Medicine, and by courtesy, of Genetics, for the period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025

Keca, Srdan, Assistant Professor of Art and Art History, for the period September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024

Konermann, Silvana, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, for the period October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024

Konings, Alexandra, Assistant Professor of Earth System Science, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2023

Kronengold, Charles, Assistant Professor of Music, for the period January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022

Kundaje, Anshul, Assistant Professor of Genetics and of Computer Science, for the period December 1, 2020 through November 30. 2022

Kwon, Marci, Assistant Professor of Art and Art History, for the period August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024

Larson, Bradley, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period August 1, 2023 through July 30, 2024

Linderman, Scott, Assistant Professor of Statistics, for the period June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2025

Long, Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Pathology, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 1, 2023

Mai, Danielle, Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, for the period January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024

Mannix, Andrew, Assistant Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, for the period August 1, 2024 through July 31, 2025

Martinez-Martin, Nicole, Assistant Professor (Research) of Pediatrics, for the period December 1, 2023 through November 30, 2024, coterminous with continued salary and research funding from sponsored projects

Morten, Melanie, Assistant Professor of Economics, for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022

Mross, Michaela, Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, for the period September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024

Newman, Aaron, Assistant Professor of Biomedical Data Science, for the period August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022

Palacios, Julia, Assistant Professor of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science, for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2024

Read the original here:
Report of the president: Appointments and promotions | Stanford News - Stanford University News

UTSW Scientist: ‘We Need More Women Thinking Creatively in the Lab and Pushing Science Forward’ – dallasinnovates.com

[Image: Oleksandr Bushko/istockphoto]

Its rare to have a woman winning a Nobel Prize, much less two women on the same day and three in the same year, a UTSW spokesperson told us as the news rolled out about this years winners.

American biochemist Jennifer Doudna and French Emmanuelle Charpentier became the first women to jointly win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry on Tuesday. They are the sixth and seventh women to ever win that prize. American astrophysicist Andrea Ghez, along with two others, won the Nobel Prize in physics for their discoveries about black holes on Monday.

UTSW scientist Eric Olson spent the day on a Zoom call with Nobel Prize winner Doudna earlier this week. Olson, who uses CRISPR technology in studies that might one day repair many of the mutations that cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy, called the prize great news.

Doudna and her colleague Charpentier have revolutionized science, biotechnology, and medicine with the development of CRISPR as a gene-editing tool, says Olson, who is the director of UTSWs Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine and professor and chair of molecular biology.

UT Southwesterns Dr. Eric Olson works with longtime collaborator Dr. Jay Schneider, an adjunct associate professor of internal medicine-cardiology. [Photo: UTSW]

CRISPR forms the basis of a primitive bacterial immune system, which they cleverly adapted to modify the genomes of any organism in a simple and efficient manner, Olson explains.

There are many ways CRISPR gene editing can benefit humanity, he says. The technology is already enabling the elimination of genetic mutations that cause devastating human diseases, Olson says. The breakthrough discovery of Doudna and Charpentier exemplifies the power of basic science to change the world in powerful ways.

The UTSW professor also co-founded Exonics Therapeutics, a Massachusetts-based biotech company that uses CRISPR technology licensed from UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, that acquired in 2019 by Vertex Pharmaceuticals in a deal roughly valued at $1 billion. The scientist launched Exonics in February 2017 to advance and commercialize his research. The company develops treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other genetic neuromuscular diseases.

Olson works with Professor Rhonda Bassel-Duby, Ph.D., a highly cited researcher who helps run the Olson laboratory.

UT Southwestern Professor Rhonda Bassel-Duby [Photo: UTSW]

Bassel-Duby says its wonderful that the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to two woman who richly deserve the prize. She hopes the award encourages young women to consider a career in science: Doing scientific research is one of the most enriching and fulfilling professions. We need more women thinking creatively in the lab and pushing science forward, Bassel-Duby says.

Olson and Bassel-Duby work alongside longtime collaborator Jay Schneider, an M.D. and Ph.D. who is an adjunct associate professor of internal medicine-cardiology.

Olson holds the Annie and Willie Nelson Professorship in Stem Cell Research, the Pogue Distinguished Chair in Research on Cardiac Birth Defects, and The Robert A. Welch Distinguished Chair in Science.

Sign up to keep your eye on whats new and next in Dallas-Fort Worth, every day.

Take a look back on the stories that grabbed our readers' attention last month.

FusionFlight, which received a $50,000 seed investment in 2016, has built and tested "the world's smallest and most powerful jet-powered drone with vertical take-off and landing capabilities."

There are plenty of things to do withyourphysically distanced time. Here are a few from our curated selection.

Taysha Gene Therapies, which has been operating in stealth with UT Southwestern, is off to a fast start with a pipeline of 15 gene therapy programs. Together with UTSW, the combined platform could be"an engine for new cures."

Taysha Gene Therapies, which was been operating in stealth with UT Southwestern until this April, plans to use the financing to advance its initial cohort of lead programs into its clinic. By the end of 2021, Taysha expects to file four Investigational New Drug applications.

Read more from the original source:
UTSW Scientist: 'We Need More Women Thinking Creatively in the Lab and Pushing Science Forward' - dallasinnovates.com

Everything you need to know about the Kim Kardashian vampire facial – Emirates Woman

Octobers The Bravery Issue Download Now In terms of beauty, other than going under the knife it doesnt get much braver than the vampire facial.

PRP is the term often used for the increasingly popular platelet-rich plasma facial rejuvenation treatment. As the cosmetic industry has continued to develop, you no longer need to go under the knife to see amazing results. Treatments involving lasers and injections can still be daunting however, especially if youre using these for the first time. Platelet Rich Plasma facial rejuvenation treatment (PRP) is one such treatment, commonly referred to as the vampire facial which was made famous by Kim Kardashian in 2013. Aptly named, as the treatment requires blood to be drawn, then put through a special machine to separate the red cells from the nutrient-rich and regenerative plasma. This plasma is then injected into the facial skin, where it is supposedly meant to encourage collagen production and soften fine lines.

Its an incredibly popular treatment globally, which is reflected in the increase in treatment requests within the UAE. American Board Certified Dermatologist Dr Lana Kashlan of CosmeSurge Dubai has witnessed this increase directly. While the sight of the so-called vampire facial can be daunting, Dr Kashlan actually says its one of the safest treatments you can do. So, if youre looking to take a bold step in your beauty regime, this could be the time to do it as Dr Kashlan breaks down exactly what goes into PRP treatment and what you can expect from it.

PRP is a treatment that is really popular with my patients. Its earned the nickname of the Vampire Facial because it involves drawing the patients own blood and extracting the plasma from the blood and re-introducing the plasma to the skin. The platelets have within them growth factors which are proteins that stimulate different biochemical processes in the skin. Specifically, PRP is a great way to stimulate collagen production and improve the microcirculation to the skin. So typically, we draw a patients blood, process the blood to extract the plasma and then either inject or microneedle the plasma into the skin. We can also use PRP to stimulate hair growth on the scalp and I use it to improve dark circles under the eyes. The procedure is pain-free because we use a topical anaesthetic.

PRP is one of my favourite treatments because it improves the quality of the skin with very little downtime and is incredibly safe. Were using your own plasma so there is no foreign material and no risk of allergic reactions. PRP doesnt replace fillers or Botox because the result is different. Fillers are used to replace volume loss and Botox erases lines and wrinkles. PRP works in conjunction with these.

Like most skin treatments, you do want to avoid the sun before and after PRP for at least one week. Additionally, active skin irritations, like eczema or herpes infections are contraindications for PRP.

Typically, patients will have mild redness and swelling in the first 24-48 hours of PRP. Usually one week after treatment, patients will start to notice that their skin looks brighter and more even-toned and feels smoother. This is what we refer to as the PRP Glow. But the real benefits come from repeated sessions where you can see a reduction in pore size, wrinkles and fine lines.

I think deeper chemical peels like Dermamelan and laser-resurfacing procedures like the Erbium laser require a bit more bravery. These procedures are incredibly safe but they have a fair amount of downtime: redness, swelling, and peeling of the skin. This can require someone to either block out their professional and social calendar or be bold and continue their usual activities in spite of a little downtime.

I find that there is a higher level of appreciation for beauty in the Arab world than in the US. Both women and men in the Middle East recognize that taking care of their skin and enhancing their beauty is part of their overall health and wellness. There is a true sense of pride in looking after ones appearance. Because of this, there is definitely a heightened sense of awareness when it comes to the latest procedures when I compare my patients in the UAE to my patients in the US. In Dubai, my patients come in asking for the latest treatments by name. I would say my patients in Dubai are definitely braver and bolder when it comes to beauty and skincare. This can be a good thing or a bad thing. When treatments are done under the guidance of a qualified dermatologist or plastic surgeon, there is nothing to fear. Unfortunately, too often, I see patients who have been botched by other doctors who performed procedures that patients either didnt need or performed them incorrectly. So, I always encourage people to be cautious and to do their research before undergoing any cosmetic procedure.

Images: Getty

See the original post:
Everything you need to know about the Kim Kardashian vampire facial - Emirates Woman

Interventional Pain Management Specialist Dr. Kaliq Chang with Atlantic Spine Center offers tips on emerging treatment using your body’s own cells -…

Dr. Kaliq Chang

WEST ORANGE, N.J. (PRWEB) October 08, 2020

Among the wide array of treatments available for chronic back pain, one is emerging thats distinct because it uses your bodys own cells to help you heal. Its called PRP, or platelet-rich plasma.

With two decades of research largely supporting PRPs benefits for conditions such as shoulder and knee pain, growing evidence suggests the minimally invasive treatment can also safely improve highly common lower back pain, says Kaliq Chang, MD, of Atlantic Spine Center.

PRP Platelet-rich plasma treatment involves taking a small sample of your blood and placing it in a machine called a centrifuge, which separates blood components. The plasma, or liquid, part of your blood is then placed in a syringe and injected into the painful area of your back while a special x-ray helps pinpoint where its needed most, Dr. Chang explains.

Within weeks, PRP treatment often results in significantly less back pain and a greater ability to perform everyday activities, he says.

More and more patients with lingering low back pain are inquiring about PRP to help rid them of the problem, adds Dr. Chang, an interventional pain management specialist. While additional data is still needed, its great to be able to tell them that PRP is becoming yet another sturdy tool in our arsenal of treatments to help beat back pain.

How does PRP work? Blood contains many substances that help promote the bodys healing process, and PRP treatment was developed on this premise, Dr. Chang says. As the so-called building blocks of blood, platelets which also help form scabs on abrasions, for example contain chemicals known as growth factors that support healing.

Also in platelets are proteins that trigger stem cells which can change into any type of cell to move toward an injured area. Growth factors and proteins work together to repair damaged tissue and make new, healthy tissue, Dr. Chang explains.

While our bodies normally carry out wound healing naturally, PRP injections concentrate those restorative cells at just the place we need them and in larger amounts, he says. In the lower back, this means damaged areas around the spine receive a much-needed boost to speed healing.

Back conditions PRP can help PRP isnt ideal for all types of low back pain, but your doctor after a thorough exam and workup may decide its a worthy option. What types of back problems can PRP treatment benefit? Pain caused by:

Degenerative disc disease, which are worn-down vertebral discs Muscle strains Damaged ligaments and tendons Muscle fibrosis

Two or three PRP treatments spaced over several months are optimal and seem to improve pain and function in the lower back more than a single treatment, Dr. Chang notes.

After an injection, you can expect to have some mild soreness near the injection site that lasts for a few days. Since PRP works by stimulating your natural healing response, it generally takes a few weeks before you start seeing the benefits. Because PRP is derived from your own blood, you cannot reject the cells a clear advantage, Dr. Chang says.

PRP treatments may also be combined with other approaches, such as physical therapy, to maximize the feel-good effects.

Mounting research suggests PRP is a safe, fast and powerful way to help facilitate healing in a hardworking area of our body the lower back, Dr. Chang says. Were happy to have a new and exciting way to help patients get back to their everyday activities with less pain and more joy.

Atlantic Spine Center is a nationally recognized leader for endoscopic spine surgery with several locations in NJ and NYC. http://www.atlanticspinecenter.com, http://www.atlanticspinecenter.nyc

Kaliq Chang, MD, is an interventional pain management specialist, double board-certified in interventional pain management and anesthesiology, at Atlantic Spine Center.

Share article on social media or email:

See original here:
Interventional Pain Management Specialist Dr. Kaliq Chang with Atlantic Spine Center offers tips on emerging treatment using your body's own cells -...