Author Archives: admin


Stem Cell Concentration System Market Covid-19 Impact On 2020 In-depth Industry Size, Analysis, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2026: EmCyte, Terumo,…

Methodical research based conclusions drawn in the report presented by Orbis Pharma Reports on Stem Cell Concentration System market is designed and articulated on the basis of thorough analytical study, extensive research endeavors as well as minute detail compilation, prolonged observation that eventually result in optimal comprehension as well as systematic decoding of the Stem Cell Concentration System market. A thorough methodical research synopsis on the aforementioned Stem Cell Concentration System market based on Orbis Pharma Reports expert analysts suggest that this well-orchestrated documentation is an output of high end research initiatives and an amalgamation and flawless evaluation of a series of elements, events, triggers that are obtained by various tools that gradually shape the growth curve in global Stem Cell Concentration System market.

Get PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: https://www.orbispharmareports.com/sample-request/47447

This dedicated, well-planned report mindfully crafted by Orbis Pharma Reports is based on various market analytical tools such as PESTEL and SWOT analysis that thoroughly instigate strength and confidence in the potential marketing strategies that reciprocate and direct the Stem Cell Concentration System market towards optimistic growth in global Stem Cell Concentration System market.

Major Company Profiles operating in the Stem Cell Concentration System Market:

EmCyte Terumo Perkin Elmer Zimmer Biomet Teleflex Argos Technologies Avita Medical Arthrex

By the product type, the market is primarily split into:

Syringes Bone Marrow Collection Needles Anticoagulant and Concentrating Devices Others

By the application, this report covers the following segments:

Hospital Clinic Diagnostic Laboratories

A thorough review of drivers, restraints and challenges have been considered in detail to derive logical conclusions concerning future growth scope in the aforementioned market has also been pinned in this section of the report presented by Orbis Pharma Reports pertaining to Stem Cell Concentration System market.

The current status of the Stem Cell Concentration System market is thoroughly influenced by the current pandemic crisis of COVID-19 outbreak that has hit the market adversely, whereby several prominent economies are undergoing a massive transformation after having witnessed a sharp plummeting impact on growth prognosis in the past few months.

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.orbispharmareports.com/enquiry-before-buying/47447

This ready-to-refer market presentation elaborating on various touchpoints about the Stem Cell Concentration System market is accurately designed and distributed by Orbis Pharma Reports highlighting prevalent market states and conditions, all in place to suit the best interests of the readers, such that enabling them to abandon previous notions and orchestrate new business deals, based on existing market status to ensure vigorous growth in Stem Cell Concentration System market.

As the report makes judicious advances based on aforementioned inferences about Stem Cell Concentration System market presented by Orbis Pharma Reports, backing upon best in industry practices, it carefully unfurls ample light on elements such as current, historic, as well as future growth rendering prospects characteristic to the market growth trends limited to Stem Cell Concentration System market.

The report presented by Orbis Pharma also involves crucial evidence based references on various market circumstances as well as protuberant segments encompassing type and applications that increase high end growth and revenue generation in the global Stem Cell Concentration System market in the forthcoming years.

Access Complete Report @ https://www.orbispharmareports.com/covid-19-impact-on-2020-2026-global-and-regional-stem-cell-concentration-system-industry-production-sales-and-consumption-status-and-prospects-professional-market-research-report-standard-version/

About Us :

At Orbispharma we curate the most relevant news stories, features, analysis and research reports on the important challenges undertaken by the pharmaceutical and related sectors. Our editorial philosophy is to bring you sharp, focused and informed perspective of industries, the end users and application of all upcoming trends into the pharma sector. Orbispharma believes in conversations that can bring a change in one of the most crucial economic sectors in the world. With these conversations we wish our customers to make sound business decisions with right business intelligence.

Contact Us :

4144N Central Expressway, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75204, U.S.A. +1 (972)-362-8199 [emailprotected]

See the rest here:
Stem Cell Concentration System Market Covid-19 Impact On 2020 In-depth Industry Size, Analysis, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2026: EmCyte, Terumo,...

Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Industry Size, Growth, Analysis and Forecast to 2026 Osiris Therapeutics Inc, US Stem Cell Inc, Yuhan…

The global report on Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics market presents, through a comprehensive analysis, the newly published research study that provides key industry insights and a competitive advantage for multiple stakeholders. Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics report shows existing business research, future as well as emerging prospects, sales growth, potential investment, market size, pricing and profitability.

Major Players Covered in this Report are: Osiris Therapeutics Inc, U.S. Stem Cell Inc, Yuhan Corp, Biopharm GmbH, Kolon TissueGene Inc, AnGes Inc, Samumed LLC, Mesoblast, DiscGenics Inc, Bone Therapeutics SA, BioRestorative Therapies Inc

Final Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.

Request a Sample Copy to Understand the Impact of COVID-19 on Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics [emailprotected] https://www.marketgrowthinsight.com/sample/134704

The research on the Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics market 2020 offers a basic overview of the industry including concepts, classifications, applications and the structure of the supply chain. The Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Report is given for global markets as well as trends in growth, competitive landscape analysis and the development status of key regions. Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics industry Development policies and plans will be discussed as well as processes of manufacturing and cost structures will also be analysed. In addition, Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics report includes import/export usage, supply and demand Statistics, expense, price, revenue and gross margins.

Geographically, the detailed analysis of consumption, revenue, Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics market share and growth rate, historic and forecast (2015-2026) of the following regions are covered:

North America (United States, Canada, Mexico) Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Others) Asia-Pacific (China, Australia,South Korea,Japan, India, Southeast Asia, Others) Middle East and Africa (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria, Others) South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia, Chile, Others)

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium [emailprotected] https://www.marketgrowthinsight.com/discount/134704

The Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Report establish a range of primary and secondary research techniques to collect both quantitative and qualitative data on global and regional heads. Using different Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics industry-best analytical techniques, the overwhelming quantity of business data thus obtained is filtered and narrowed down to the Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics information that matter most to businesses operating in the sector or planning to enter.

The Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics study projects practicability analysis, SWOT analysis, and various other information about the leading companies operating in the Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market provide a detailed systematic account of the competitive environment of the industry with the aid of thorough company profiles. However, Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics research examines the impact of current market success and future growth prospects for the industry.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics are as follows:

Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics research provides answers to the following key questions:

About Us-

Market Growth Insight 100% Subsidiary of Exltech Solutions India, is a one stop solution for market research reports in various business categories. We are serving 100+ clients with 30000+ diverse industry reports and our reports are developed to simplify strategic decision making, on the basis of comprehensive and in-depth significant information, established through wide ranging analysis and latest industry trends.

Contact Us:

Direct Line:+1 3477675477 (US) Email:[emailprotected] Web:https://www.marketgrowthinsight.com

See the original post:
Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Industry Size, Growth, Analysis and Forecast to 2026 Osiris Therapeutics Inc, US Stem Cell Inc, Yuhan...

MaaT Pharma to Announce Clinical Data with its Lead Microbiota Biotherapeutic in Intestinal Acute GvHD at Virtual 46th Annual Meeting of the European…

LYON, France--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MaaT Pharma announced today that clinical data from 11 patients treated with the companys lead microbiome restoration biotherapeutic, MaaT013, will be presented in an e-poster at the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) to be held virtually from August 29 September 1, 2020. MaaT013 is an enema formulation of a microbiota biotherapeutic characterized by a consistent richness of microbial species derived from pooled healthy donors to treat patients with intestinal acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (aGvHD) following allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT). MaaT Pharma provided MaaT013 to hospitals as part of its compassionate use program for patients who had previously received and failed up to five previous systemic treatments for GvHD. MaaT Pharma will share the results through a press release on Monday, August 31, 2020.

As the event is held virtually this year, the presentation will take the form of an e-poster with commentary. The abstract of the presentation is available using the following link, https://www.professionalabstracts.com/ebmt2020/iPlanner/#/presentation/5171.

e-Poster presentation details:

Title: Successful and Safe Treatment of Intestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GvHD) with Pooled-Donor Full Ecosystem Microbiota Biotherapeutics Presenter: Dr. Florent Malard, Associate Professor of Hematology at the Saint-Antoine Hospital and Sorbonne University Session Name: e-Experimental Transplantation Date/Time: Saturday, August 29, 2020 / 12:30 PM 06:30 PM CET Location: e-Poster area

After the e-presentation, MaaT Pharma will provide the poster on the company website under News.

In addition to the compassionate use program, MaaT Pharma is currently investigating MaaT013 in a multi-center, single-arm, open-label, Phase II clinical trial called HERACLES to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MaaT013 in gastrointestinal-predominant, steroid-refactory, acute GvHD (GI SR-aGvHD) patients (NCT03359980). The acute form of GvHD is a serious, often fatal syndrome typically involving the gut, skin and liver. MaaT Pharma has established the most complete approach to restoring patient-microbiome symbiosis in the gut to improve efficacy of cancer treatments and survival outcomes in life-threatening diseases. MaaT013 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

About MaaT Pharma

MaaT Pharma, a clinical stage company, has established the most complete approach to restoring patient-microbiome symbiosis to improve survival outcomes in life-threatening diseases. Committed to treating cancer and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, MaaT Pharma has already achieved proof of concept in acute myeloid leukemia patients and a Phase 2 clinical trial in acute GvHD is ongoing. Supporting the further expansion of our pipeline into larger indications, we have built a powerful discovery and analysis platform, GutPrint, to evaluate drug candidates, determine novel disease targets and identify biomarkers for microbiome-related conditions. Our therapeutics are produced through a standardized cGMP manufacturing and quality control process to safely deliver the full diversity of the microbiome. MaaT Pharma benefits from the commitment of world-leading scientists and established relationships with regulators to spearhead microbiome treatment integration into clinical practice.

More here:
MaaT Pharma to Announce Clinical Data with its Lead Microbiota Biotherapeutic in Intestinal Acute GvHD at Virtual 46th Annual Meeting of the European...

The Inside Story Of Biotechs Barnum And His Covid Cures – Forbes

Billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiongs radical cancer treatments made him one of the wealthiest physicians on Earth. Now the master of medical marketing believes his drug therapies could defeat the crisis of our time.

Patrick Soon-Shiong knows when he realized that the Covid-19 pandemic was going to pose a serious threat. It was February 24, and the part-owner of the L.A. Lakers was at the Staples Center in Los Angeles for Kobe Bryants memorial service.

With sudden, untimely demise on his mind, he found himself thinking about the emerging pandemic. Even though Covid-19 hadnt yet caused a single reported death in the United States, Soon-Shiong was worried. He recalls turning around to California Governor Gavin Newsom and telling him, Were in trouble.

His sense of urgency hasnt gone away. If I thought I was scared on February 24, he says, Im more scared now. The reason, he explains, is that what weve learned is that this virus acts like cancer. He says he has left his house only once since Bryants memorial, and that was to film a video about the coronavirus for the Los Angeles Times, which he bought, along with The San Diego Union-Tribune, for $600 million two years ago. I shut myself off from the world, he says.

And so one of the planets richest medical doctors, who made a $6.7 billion fortune developing breakthrough treatments for cancer and diabetes, seeks to battle the pandemic. The weapons in his arsenal: the cancer treatments he has spent the past decade and a half developing. Hes aiming them at all aspects of the coronavirus, from a vaccine to treatments for mild cases to therapies targeted toward patients on ventilators.

Its an enormously ambitious plan from a man who has often been accused of being a hype artist. In an earlier incarnation, Soon-Shiong was a respected surgeon and professor at UCLA Medical School, but throughout his wildly successful entrepreneurial second act, he has been derided as more showman than scientist, thought guilty of overinflating results and taking undue credit. A few years ago, for example, he boasted about using a breast cancer drug to treat a patient with cervical cancerbut other groups were already seeing similar successes. As we wrote in a 2014 cover story, While hes undeniably brilliant, Soon-Shiong is equally undeniably a blowhard.

But he also has fierce defenders of his approach to both cancer and Covid-19, including former Senate majority leader Harry Reid, who says the 68-year-old South Africaborn doctor saved my life in 2019 by providing an experimental treatment for his stage IV pancreatic cancer. Researchers say his methods are conceptually grounded in good science, though the verdict on his work will ultimately depend on results.

Weve been tracking and seeing an increase in the number of these cell-based therapies, whether theyre being repurposed from oncology or even other disease conditions, says Esther Krofah, a senior analyst who monitors the clinical development pipeline for Covid-19 vaccines and therapies for the Milken Institute. A number of themfrom large pharmaceuticals and small biotech startups alikeare going into clinical trials. For many of the latter, the pandemic offers a chance to show what their treatments can do in a shorter time frame than cancer drugs typically require. For small companies, its a worthwhile exercise to see if its successful, Krofah says.

It may seem counterintuitive, but advances in knowledge about the immune system, and how it might help kill cancer, have real applications for infectious diseases. To me, a cancer cell and a virus-infected cell are one and the same, says Dr. Wayne Marasco, an immunologist at Harvard Medical School who is currently researching coronavirus treatments. The immune system, he adds, seems to think the same way. Which is a good reason to take Patrick Soon-Shiong seriously.

Born in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, in 1952, Soon-Shiong is no stranger to the intersection of the immune system, cancer and infectious disease. Having graduated from medical school at age 22, he focused his early surgical career on transplants and cancer, both of which involve a complex pas de deux with the immune system. Crossing disciplines, he says, led him to look at the body as a system, not a single little cell. We are a biological system.

Such interdisciplinary thinking may be what led to the medicine that made his fortune: Abraxane, which took an existing chemotherapy drug, Toxol, but wrapped it in protein that made it easier to deliver to tumors. Its now used to treat advanced cases of lung, breast and pancreatic cancer. In 1998, to develop Abraxane, he purchased Fujisawa, a small, publicly traded business that sold injectable generic drugs. Soon-Shiong used its revenues to quickly move Abraxane through the regulatory process. The FDA approved it in 2005, and in 2007 Soon-Shiong split the business in two, spinning out a company called Abraxis that focused on the new cancer drug. He sold the generics business to Fresenius in 2008 for $4.6 billion. Two years later, he sold Abraxis to Celgene for $4.5 billion. Celgene, itself acquired by Bristol Myers Squibb in November 2019, reports that sales of Abraxane exceed $1 billion annually.

Soon-Shiong at Nants Los Angeles headquarters in 2017. I see [the complexity of the immune system] like an orchestra, but the challenge is to separate the violin from the cello from the drums.

The complex business deals that went into Abraxane, however, left Soon-Shiong with a reputation as more of a wheeler-dealer than a scientist, as we noted in 2014. Back then, he posted to Twitter under the grandiose handle @solvehealthcare, but today he simply uses his name. Over several recent Zoom conversations, he evinces very little showmanship. Hes visibly tired, exhibiting the most excitement when he starts talking about intricate scientific details. Im burning out a little bit, he candidly admits, adding that hes been getting only about four to six hours of sleep a night since February. Over that time, he says, his companies have concentrated on both continuing to develop his cancer treatments and working to employ them against Covid-19. He peppers his statements about his companys approach to both cancer and the coronavirus with qualifiers about the results of pending studies, carefully avoiding seeming to overpromise.

Soon-Shiong has multiple interrelated businesses organized in a complex corporate structure that would have puzzled the Byzantines. But his Covid-19 efforts come from the two companies he founded that work on developing cancer immunotherapies: NantKwest, a publicly traded outfit based in San Diego, and the privately held ImmunityBio.

Cancer immunotherapy is based on the notion that the bodys own immune system can be stimulated to treat the disease. That idea dates to the 19th century, when scientists first observed tumors getting smaller after patients developed a type of skin infection. This led to some of the first experiments in which the immune system of cancer patients was stimulated. Early efforts proved difficult to reproduce, though, and the field got sidetracked by advances in chemotherapy and radiation. Interest spiked anew in 1959, when a paper showed that the tuberculosis vaccine inhibited tumor growth in mice. After decades of intense research, the first cancer immunotherapy was approved by the FDA in 1986.

Other types of immunotherapies followed, ranging from purified antibodies that attack cancer to drugs that turn off the chemical switches that let tumor cells hide from the immune system. The latest advances involve CAR-T cell therapy, which first gained FDA approval in 2017 and involves genetically engineering immune cells from patients so that they attack certain targets found in tumor cells.

Founded in 2002, Soon-Shiongs company NantKwest focuses on developing so-called natural killer (NK) cells, which the immune system uses to destroy virally infected cells as well as early-stage tumors. The company has been working to develop a line of off-the-shelf NK cells called NK-92, which can be used to treat certain cancers as well as viral infections.

The company, which has yet to post any meaningful revenue, has lost nearly $400 million since it went public at $25 a share (a $2.6 billion market cap) in 2015. The stock has recently traded in the $10.50 range, off a bottom of around $1 a share in 2019. One reason for the stocks surge, says Jefferies analyst Biren Amin, is the companys reported research into the coronavirus pandemic. The second, he suggests, involves former Senator Reids cancer treatment, which made use of the companys products.

Harry Reid, who represented Nevada in the upper chamber from 1987 to 2017, was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2018 and started chemotherapy that July. He didnt respond well. I was so sick they stopped the chemo that October, he says. In July 2019, a scan of his liver showed that the cancer had spread. That meant his only option was more chemotherapy. Around the same time, Joe Kiani, founder and CEO of Irvine, Californiabased health IT company Masimo, met with Soon-Shiong to discuss acquiring $50 million worth of assets from NantHealth. During that initial meeting, the conversation turned to Soon-Shiongs other projects, which later led Kiani to phone the former senator. I called up Harry and I said, Look, I just left this meeting. This person could have the cure. I dont know if he does, but what do you have to lose? Reach out to him and see what happens, Kiani recalls.

Two weeks later, Soon-Shiong and a doctor from NantKwest named Leonard Sender were working with Reid, using treatments from NantKwest as well as Soon-Shiongs ImmunityBio. Those treatments arent yet officially approved but were permitted under the FDAs compassionate-use rules. Reid was treated with a combination of Abraxane, NantKwests natural killer cells and a drug from ImmunityBio called N-803, which stimulates the immune system to produce its own killer cells. Soon-Shiong compares it to the triangle offense often employed by the Lakers. In November 2019, Reid reported that his scans were completely clear, showing no signs of cancer. I admire Dr. Soon-Shiong a great deal, he tells Forbes. Both for what hes done for me personally and what hes done for the health-care delivery system in this country.

Former Senator Harry Reid, pictured the same month he began treatment for pancreatic cancer with Soon-Shiong, says being in remission a few months later was kind of like a miracle.

Reids is an extraordinary story, as pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest forms of the disease. Within five years of diagnosis, it kills some 90% of patients, accounting for 7% of cancer deaths globally. Jeopardy! host Alex Trebek, who also suffers from pancreatic cancer, has received the same treatment, as have two other unidentified patients. But Sender cautions against declaring a cure. Its too early to tell, because this is a very nasty form of cancer, he says. Thats why NantKwest is now focused on a new randomized clinical trial, he adds, which is looking to recruit nearly 300 pancreatic cancer patients with advanced forms of the disease. Those who sign up will be given a course of treatment similar to the one Reid received.

As part of these treatments development, Soon-Shiong has spent the past five years working with the National Cancer Institute. His companies have a collaborative agreement with the NCI involving several types of treatments, including NK-92 and N-803, as well as some vaccines against two kinds of tumors. Dr. Jeffrey Schlom, chief of the NCIs laboratory of tumor immunology and biology, recalls being in sync with Soon-Shiong from the start. At our first official creative meeting, we presented our slides of our approach, he says. And then he got up and presented his approach, and they were almost identical. Schloms group has since published in peer-reviewed journals 15 papers regarding Soon-Shiongs treatments, in both preclinical and clinical settings.

Since February, NantKwest and ImmunityBio have redirected some of their attention toward the coronavirus pandemic, using a number of weapons in their collective arsenal. The first is a vaccine, based on the system Soon-Shiongs companies are developing for cancer, that has already shown positive results against Covid-19 in a study involving mice. Its also being studied in monkeys as a part of the federal governments Operation Warp Speed. As for human trials, Soon-Shiong says hes ready to go. My timeline is now dependent on the FDA letting me get out of the gate, he says. Im in the gate, the bell hasnt rung and the racehorse is frothing at the mouth.

This vaccine is delivered to the body in a common cold virus called an adenovirus that has been stripped of all the parts that can cause harm to people or trigger the body to attack it. That modified virus contains two individual segments of the Covid-19 coronavirus: the spike protein, the surface protein on the virus that triggers an antibody response; and a nucleocapsid protein, which is found in the center of the virus. Most of the more than 100 vaccines that are currently in clinical development for Covid-19 focus on the spike protein to generate an immune response. Soon-Shiong thinks that wont be enough, though, which is why hes including the nucleocapsid protein. My concern is that the spike protein mutates, he says. Its mutated even through this pandemic.

Beyond potential mutations, another concern about merely eliciting an antibody response is that from the data seen so far, antibodies to the Covid-19 virus just dont last very long. Levels of antibodies in the blood are really low after a few months, says Marasco, whos not associated with Soon-Shiongs companies or their vaccine research. I think its uncertain how long immunity will remain after successful vaccination. Using the nucleocapsid protein couldnt hurt, he adds, and it could elicit not only antibodies but virus-killing T-cells as well.

The second weapon is the application of NantKwests NK-92 and ImmunityBios N-803 against Covid-19. NK-92 is being adapted to directly attack virus-infected cells, while the N-803 stimulates the patients immune system to produce its own natural killer cells against the virus. The treatments might be used either together or separately depending on the particular patient, Soon-Shiong says. Human trials of these treatments have already begun. Its a fantastic thing that theyre applying them to infectious disease to see how patients fare, says Gigi Gronvall, an immunologist at Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, who is not involved in the research. The concept is great, she adds, cautiously, but we need to see what the data says.

The third weapon NantKwest and ImmunityBio are developing to combat Covid-19 involves the use of mesenchymal stem cells, which are derived from bone marrow. This type of stem cell has been investigated over the past decade for diseaseslike Covid-19that can cause the bodys immune system to go into overdrive and attack itself. This treatment would be for the most severely sick Covid-19 patients, who are experiencing a cytokine storm, in which the immune system overreacts. Small-scale studies have suggested this might be an effective treatment, and several companies, including Melbourne, Australiabased Mesoblast, are already in late-stage clinical trials for severe Covid-19 patients. Soon-Shiongs companies are working with hospitals to recruit patients for human trials.

If Soon-Shiongs approaches to Covid-19 bear fruit in clinical trials, the next step may prove harder still: getting those treatments to needy patients. This is especially so for the vaccine, because at the moment neither NantKwest nor ImmunityBio has the resources to scale up manufacturing. Im now behind the eight ball, Soon-Shiong admits, because theres no way I could have 100 million doses unless somebody supports me. Maybe I have a million doses or 2 million doses. He expresses some frustration at the government: Billions of dollars are going to companies that have billions [in] revenues. Hes not wrong about that. In July, pharma giant Pfizer (2019 revenue: $51.8 billion) received a $2 billion federal contract to manufacture a vaccine its developing.

Things are brighter for the companies N-803 and NK-92 products, as NantKwest has the ability to manufacture at scale, but these treatments will face certain competition from others being developed by a number of pharmaceutical companies. I think there are a lot of alternatives that are more practical than a cellular therapy for an acute infectious disease, Marasco says, though he does acknowledge that the companies plans to use stem cells against the more severe cases of disease have potential.

Despite his frustrations, Soon-Shiong appears determined to do his part in the health-care industrys war against the coronavirus. This is the crisis of our time, he says. Its almost existential. The United States could have 20 to 30 million infected. You could have a million deathsthis is not a joke.

Link:
The Inside Story Of Biotechs Barnum And His Covid Cures - Forbes

FINNCAP’S LIFE SCIENCES REPORT INDICATES CELL AND GENE THERAPY SECTOR IS DRIVING THE NEXT WAVE OF INNOVATION IN PHARMA – PharmiWeb.com

Breakthrough in delivery for cell and gene therapy products has led to a wave of M&A activity as big pharma aims not to miss out on the future of medicine

AIM healthcare index at the centre of innovation, has risen 6% YTD compared with the AIM all share, which has declined 7%

finnLife 50 index has also risen 6% in 2020 led by gains in Synairgen (+2,930%), Avacta (+654%), Omega Diagnostics (+322%) and Tiziana Life Sciences (+283%)

London 25 August 2020 Healthcare companies employing and developing cell and gene therapy (C>) are driving the next wave of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry, leading to increased M&A activity as big pharma aims not to miss out on the future of medicine. The AIM healthcare index has been at the centre of this innovation, rising 6% YTD compared with the AIM all share, which has declined 7%.

These are the findings of finnCaps new quarterly Life Sciences sector report, Rude Health.

Rather than just treating a disease and its symptoms, C> can target the underlying cause of a disease, with long-term benefits and curative potential. C> is now being realised on an applicable level, with many products already approved and the FDA expects to approve 10-20 products a year by 2025.

The financials of the sector are reflective of this rapid progress. In 2018, the market value of C> was $536 million - $1.07 billion; but by 2026 it is set to have a valuation of up to$35.4 billion. Given the high proportion of start-ups in the sector, M&A activity is on the rise, as evidenced by the $3 billion Astellas spent in January 2020 to acquire Audentes Therapeutics, specialists in genetics medicines.

In 2014/2015, M&A activity in the sector was $5 billion; by 2018/2019 it had surged 880% to $49 billion. Much of this is driven by big pharma firms not wanting to fall behind their smaller, more versatile competition, as they did with monoclonal antibody technology. Consequently, they have engaged with M&A to speed up and enhance their own R&D efforts.

The report notes that innovators in C> will be well placed to take part in the land grab that will follow as a result of continued advancements in the sector, and highlights now as a good time for investors and pharmaceutical companies to become involved as the sector is rapidly maturing past its high potential research and development stage with an established pipeline of therapies already being developed.

Some of the key reasons why the report considers the C> sector to be an attractive one for investment are:

Pharmas next wave of innovation. C>s can be potentially curative treatment options as they usually target the underlying cause of disease. In the long term, these therapies could become the backbone of treatment regimens, and solutions to various unmet needs.

Deals. Big Pharma had to play catch-up with monoclonal antibody technology and seems determined not to make the same mistake with C>, as reflected in the high deal activity and high deal values seen within this space.

Sector maturation. Advances in the sector mean that the C> sector is beginning to mature beyond the R&D stage and into commercialisation, with some products already approved, and with a very large future pipeline of therapies.

Revenue.Therapies in this space can command high prices, allowing for high revenue generation, even from rare diseases and limited patient populations.

Despite its vital role in the future of medicine, C> also comes with challenges. The report highlights that the manufacture of C>s is difficult given they are, by definition, personalised for the patient. This means they cannot be batch produced for distribution to multiple patients as more traditional medicines can. For example, Zolgensma, which treats those with motor neurone disease, is priced at $2.1 (1.6) million per therapy, making it the most expensive drug treatment ever.

The report also notes how the payment process for C> requires a reworking of reimbursement systems not used to outlaying so much money up front for a treatment with long-term benefits/curative potential versus continuous, and lower payments for ongoing medicine treatment.

The technologies the report shines a spotlight include CAR-T therapy, stem cell therapy, CRISPR, RNA therapies, among various others.

Arshad Ahad, Research Analyst, Life Sciences, at finnCap, commented:Few technologies in the life sciences sector hold as much promise as Cell and Gene Therapy, with its ability to provide long-term benefits and curative potential. These technologies have been seen as the future of medicine for many years, and now we are closer than ever to that future becoming a reality. If Cell and Gene therapy does become the backbone of treatment regimes in the future, similar to the rise of monoclonal antibodies, then the companies involved are developing expertise in a critical part of the life sciences industry, which should confer a significant competitive advantage as the sector matures further. Now is therefore a good time to invest in the future.

View original post here:
FINNCAP'S LIFE SCIENCES REPORT INDICATES CELL AND GENE THERAPY SECTOR IS DRIVING THE NEXT WAVE OF INNOVATION IN PHARMA - PharmiWeb.com

Regulating advanced therapies: Q&A with patent lawyer David Silverstein – Pharmaceutical Technology

Axinn partner and patent attorney David Silverstein. Credit: Axinn. What challenges do cell and gene therapies pose to regulators? Credit: Shutterstock.

Sign up here for GlobalData's free bi-weekly Covid-19 report on the latest information your industry needs to know.

Innovation is a key focus of the pharma industry. This has led to dramatic improvements in the treatment options available to at-need patients. Due to technological innovation and the development of cell and gene therapies, it is now possible to use CAR-T treatments to cure certain types of cancers and particular patient populations. in

Although these innovations drive medicine forward, they pose a significant challenge to regulators. These bodies need to stay abreast of the many new, emerging trends in the industry and figure out how best to assess these novel products for safety, efficacy and value.

Axinn partner and patent attorney with more than 15 years of experience looking at regulatory matters related to the pharma market David Silverstein discusses why cell and gene therapies are such an important development for the industry. However, he also notes how advanced therapies have challenged regulators, particularly linked to the rise in unlicensed clinics administering unapproved regenerative therapies.

Allie Nawrat: What makes cell and gene therapies such an exciting and important development for the pharma industry?

David Silverstein: If you had to analogise it as martial arts, there are traditional ways of treating diseases with small molecules, for example, and that is more like karate it is force against force, forcing the body to do something.

Whereas cell and gene therapies are more like judo, where you use the opponents momentum to your advantage.

To me, these therapies use the strength of the body; evolution has given us the fantastic cellular mechanisms, and cell and gene therapies tap into them.

Its just a much more targeted and efficient way to bring about the result youre after, rather than forcing some foreign small molecule into the cell, and triggering effect.

We are better off for small molecules, but the next step in the evolution of medicine is selling gene therapy.

AN: What challenges have cell and gene therapies created for regulators?

DS: It is a paradigm shift for regulators. Originally, regulators emerged out of the need to ensure that tonics being sold on roadside stands were safe and actually effective, so they are accustomed to dealing with that type of industry. Those products are much easier to describe, characterise and make, than these large, more complicated biological products.

The obvious challenges are around how do you categorise them? You cant just put them all in the same bucket; stem cells are different than gene therapy delivered by a virus. So [there are issues] with the agency just getting its head around that. What are the critical differences that need to be established so that we can evaluate these appropriately? So were not just painting with a broad brush and treating them all the same.

The other challenges [relate to] all the unapproved regenerative therapies. It is a significant [problem]. Studies have shown that [unqualified] people have been discovered administering unlicensed stem cell therapies. [This situation has arisen from] patients who either have exhausted traditional therapies and theyre just desperate to try anything to patients who dont trust what the government and regulators are telling them.

The FDA is struggling with enforcement actions against them; the lack of oversight and regulation on these can lead to fatal results.

AN: How have regulators, and particularly the FDA, responded to the emergence of cell and gene therapies?

DS: In the past several years, the FDA has gotten very motivated. In 2016 and 2017, key FDA guidances came out about the regulation of these products. The FDA had designated 2020 as the year of increased enforcement activity to get under control these unapproved labs that are administering unapproved and potentially dangerous preventative therapies but, unfortunately, Covid-19 has thrown a wrench in their gears.

Well see how priorities shift after this year currently Covid-19 is rightfully in the centre but I dont know if the FDA is going to lose interest or shift its priorities away from regulating these products and engaging in enforcement.

AN: What are the special intellectual property considerations around these advanced therapies?

DS: The challenges are that as these are products of nature you have to be careful and make sure the products different enough so you dont fall afoul of the Supreme Courts case law on patentable subject matter.

Another challenge is the importance of trade secrets. A lot of people when they think about how do you protect these products and manufacture these products, they jump right to patents. But with these kind of products, its important for a stakeholder to take into account trade secret protection. It is an alternative to patent protection. It, of course, complements patent portfolio; but you can protect things with trade secrets that you couldnt protect with patents.

Often I advise clients to segment their manufacturing workflow, so that there isnt one single group or individual who knows every step of the manufacturing process. This is a highly competitive industry and theres a lot of mobility with people changing jobs. Even without getting to malfeasance of people trying to steal trade secrets, you need to think about what knowledge is in peoples heads. You can control it by breaking up your work group so that theyre collaborating together, but no one group knows every step of the process.

AN: What impact has the regulators reactions had on advancing cell and gene therapy innovation?

DS: In the last 10 years, [there has been] an uptick in industry emphasis on them and innovation. This is in part because the regulatory landscape is becoming clearer. If companies know what rules they need to play by, then they can properly assess the risks and rewards of investing in research projects.

Here is the original post:
Regulating advanced therapies: Q&A with patent lawyer David Silverstein - Pharmaceutical Technology

The Road To Scale: Challenges Facing the Implementation of Animal-Free Recombinant Proteins Into Stem Cell Supply Chains – Technology Networks

Protein engineering techniques can be used to produce more potent animal-free growth factors as highlighted by the higher level of Nanog expression in iPSCs cultured with an optimized form of the key growth factor TGF-1 (RHS), when compared with cells cultured with the mammalian-cell expressed protein (LHS). Credit: Stemnovate

Read Time:

Most industries today are under pressure to switch to more ethical and sustainable animal-free alternatives, and now the trend is coming to stem cell labs. As stem cell applications accelerate towards the clinic, novel drug discovery platforms are rapidly scaled, and new transformative stem cell-based technologies such as cultured meat arise, there is a drive to switch to animal-free cell culture media. This move is essential to facilitate future regulatory approval for advanced therapies, and enable pharma and biotech companies to ethically, reproducibly and cost-effectively scale stem cell-based innovations. Most stem cell scientists today use recombinant growth factor and cytokine proteins in their chemically-defined media to supply their cultures with the necessary biological signals required for maintenance of pluripotency, cell proliferation and differentiation into specific cell lineages. However, the fundamental biochemistry and manufacturing processes of these protein messengers can often be overlooked. But as scientists are trying to establish new animal-free systems to support the scale-up of their stem cell applications, the properties and challenges inherent in these proteins are becoming more prominent and frankly a headache for many.

Highlighted here are three key challenges facing pharma and biotech companies as they embark on the path to implementing animal-free systems, from the perspective of two protein scientists. 1.Why batch consistency is kingAs stem cell therapies gear up to make the leap from bench to clinic and the promise of stem cell biology in drug discovery and other industrial applications is realized, more subtle and still largely inexplicable challenges in optimizing growth factor and cytokine supply chains for defined media are being identified why when you change from one supplier or even batch of a recombinant protein do stem cells need weaning onto that protein, or dont tolerate the change? Is this a fundamental lack of batch consistency across the supply chain or is there an underlying biological basis?

At the minute, there is simply not enough data to answer this definitively. While we are starting to tease apart these questions, it highlights the need for greater innovation within the recombinant protein supply chain to bring best practice and innovation from other areas to improve the robustness of the global supply chain and encourage great openness and scrutiny of fundamental biochemical quality early in process development.

Questions we should ask include: are we seeing heterogeneity in post-translational modifications, which is well documented in monoclonal antibody manufacturing? Can synthetic biology or protein engineering be used to optimize proteins and engineer out features contributing to this variation?

For now, and until we have answers, its a good idea to source proteins from reputable suppliers that have rigorous standards for batch quality testing and meticulously scrutinize all biochemical and bioactivity data provided. 2.Cost of goods as a barrier to scaleTo bring innovative stem cell applications to market, pharma and biotech companies need to be able to seamlessly scale their cultures, meet regulatory requirements and achieve a sensible and sustainable process cost. Where recombinant proteins are needed in cell culture media, they are usually the greatest contributor to cost of goods.

Well-defined industry challenges catalyze change and the stem cell field is seeing renewed focus on much needed innovation in complex bioactive protein production to meet the needs for animal-free, highly reproducible proteins. Protein engineering technology, enhanced cell-based and cell-free expression systems, such as bacteria, yeast and even plants, coupled with improvements to downstream processing systems are just some of the latest innovations in this space. Previously, there have been concerns over the ability of simpler systems to form correctly folded and bioactive recombinant proteins. However, it is clear that many of these barriers can be overcome to produce highly pure growth factors and cytokines at scale. Others are striping back chemically-defined media protocols to determine the essential growth factors and cytokines needed for their cell type. For example, homebrews of key growth factors to reduce costs - Paul Burridge and his team at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine have pioneered a cost-effective B8 chemically-defined media for weekend-free hiPSC culture at just 3% of the price of commercially available media. Now the challenge is to take the learnings from academic studies such as these and translate them into industrial processes. Meating the price of lab-grown steaksYou cannot discuss the cost of growth factors without mentioning the daunting step-change and barrier facing the fast-evolving cultured meat market. Here, highly optimized animal-free growth factor production systems will be required to provide the economies of scale needed to deliver kilogram-ton quantities at a fraction of the price in order to bring these lab-grown meat alternatives to consumers. After all, it just isnt viable for companies to be spending hundreds of dollars on each liter of culture media - instead, this needs to be reduced to ~$1/liter. 3.Animal-free or ADCF? Now that is the questionDespite animal-free/animal-derived component free (ADCF) growth factors and cytokines becoming increasing important, there are no standard definitions for these terms across the industry, with many protein manufacturers supporting the sector by defining their own internal standards. For the clinical space, the United States Pharmacopeia and International Organization for Standardization have published a framework for classifying raw materials used in cell therapy manufactureinto four different tiers based on their risk. Under this classification, ancillary materials used in the manufacture of cell-based therapies and tissue-engineered products, such as recombinant growth factors and cytokines, are considered low risk so fall into tiers 1 and 2 with an ADCF level of manufacturing defined as all components, sub-components and consumables do not contain materials derived from animals. To support the wider sector, not just those at the transition to the clinic, clarity over definitions and transparency from manufacturers will help to define and overcome the challenges faced and allow the promise of stem-cell derived innovations to be delivered.

Article Authors:

Beata Blaszczyk, Senior Scientist, Qkine

Dr Catherine Elton, CEO and Founder, Qkine

See the original post here:
The Road To Scale: Challenges Facing the Implementation of Animal-Free Recombinant Proteins Into Stem Cell Supply Chains - Technology Networks

3D Cell Culture Systems in Cancer Organoids Reveal Drug Efficacy that is Undetectable in Traditional 2D Monolayer Systems – b3c newswire

Wednesday, 26 August 2020 09:00 Hits: 523

CARDIFF, UK, August 26, 2020 / B3C newswire / -- A new paper exploring the application of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in the study of novel inhibitors of stem cell activity has recently been published in the journal PLOS ONE (Badder et al., 2020).

The study utilised 3D image-based morphometric analysis to quantify over 600 different features from individual organoids following treatment with inhibitors of the tankyrase protein (TNKSi). While the morphometric analysis approach mirrored the trend seen in traditional biochemical assays, importantly this more sophisticated method was able to detect subtle alterations in growth and morphology in response to TNKSi with much greater accuracy. This leads to the conclusion that whilst traditional biochemical assays still have value in detecting compounds that merit further investigation in early stage drug discovery, combining these with 3D morphological analysis could be the key to unlocking the full potential of organoids in predictive drug testing at a much larger scale.

The study was led by Cellesce founding director Professor Trevor Dales Cardiff University-based academic research group working together with Cellesce and other partners. It describes the derivation of a novel set of colorectal cancer PDOs. The PDO models are then used as a platform to test the response of colorectal cancer to Wnt pathway modulation using small molecule TNKSi. The work utilises a range of analysis techniques and highlights 3D quantitative image analysis in particular as having the potential to greatly enhance the high throughput prediction of compound efficacy in pre-clinical testing.

In recent years, there has been a shift within the drug discovery industry to focus on the development of compounds targeting cancer stem cell populations within tumours. Historically, conventional chemotherapeutics have aimed to target the tumour bulk, to kill as many tumour cells as possible; the effects of which are usually to drive tumour regression in the short-term, albeit with greater side-effects - and a high chance of patient relapse. It is now widely understood that, in order to permanently prevent tumour growth, the initiating cancer stem cell population must be removed or inhibited. In the patient, this might have a relatively small impact initially on overall tumour size, but a longer term more effective treatment caused not by killing the cells, but by a more subtle change in the behaviour of the cells within the tumour.

The study of such targeted compounds has led to demand for better predictive model systems. While historical drug discovery has relied heavily on the predictive power of 2D cancer cell lines, their lack of cellular heterogeneity and relevant phenotypic behaviour leaves them largely unsuited for the study of cancer stem cell inhibitors, and far from ideally placed for anti-cancer drug development in general.

PDOs which retain intra-tumoral complexity and, crucially, stem cell function - are now gaining increasing momentum as predictive in vitro models in the drug discovery field, with the potential to reduce compound attrition rates and development costs, ultimately increasing the number of successful compounds available for use in the clinic. A more complex model, the study argues, demands a more comprehensive method of analysis that is capable of capturing the complete range of changes that may occur in response to treatment.

The paper can be accessed here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235319

Notes to editors

The organoid lines generated for this study are licensed for sale by Cellesce in large scale validated batches produced using Cellesces patented bioprocess. Cellesce PDOs:

About Cellesce Cellesce is a biotechnology company that has developed a patented bioprocessing technology for the propagation of organoids in culture. Cellesce is focused on the supply of standardised and well-characterised cancer organoids for large-scale applications such as compound screening, where significant quantities of reproducible batches are required.

PDOs are three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures that can self-organise intoex vivo'mini-organs. They facilitate the study of tumour pathology to enable cancer drug discovery. Organoids more faithfully replicate in vivo tumours compared to conventional 2D cell line cultures and can provide more relevant pharmacological responses to therapeutic agents. By using organoids in drug discovery screening assays, scientists can identify active compounds for further progression earlier in the drug discovery process and weed out less attractive compounds before incurring higher downstream costs.

The Cellesce team is based in state-of-the-art laboratory space in the Cardiff Medicentre. Cellesce operates according to the highest ethical standards to ensure appropriate confidentiality and regulatory requirements.

Twitter: @Cellesce

Contacts

Cellesce Paul Jenkins, Chief Executive This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or Victoria Marsh Durban, Lead Scientist This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.or William Allbrook,Marketing Director This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Keywords: Drug Discovery; Tankyrases; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Organoids; Antineoplastic Agents; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cell Line; Cancer Stem Cells Inhibitors;

Published by B3C newswire

More here:
3D Cell Culture Systems in Cancer Organoids Reveal Drug Efficacy that is Undetectable in Traditional 2D Monolayer Systems - b3c newswire

Demand for Myelofibrosis Treatment Market to Witness Rapid Surge During the Period 2016 2022 – Scientect

Myelofibrosis or osteomyelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative disorder which is characterized by proliferation of abnormal clone of hematopoietic stem cells. Myelofibrosis is a rare type of chronic leukemia which affects the blood forming function of the bone marrow tissue. National Institute of Health (NIH) has listed it as a rare disease as the prevalence of myelofibrosis in UK is as low as 0.5 cases per 100,000 population. The cause of myelofibrosis is the genetic mutation in bone marrow stem cells. The disorder is found to occur mainly in the people of age 50 or more and shows no symptoms at an early stage. The common symptoms associated with myelofibrosis include weakness, fatigue, anemia, splenomegaly (spleen enlargement) and gout. However, the disease progresses very slowly and 10% of the patients eventually develop acute myeloid leukemia. Treatment options for myelofibrosis are mainly to prevent the complications associated with low blood count and splenomegaly.

The global market for myelofibrosis treatment is expected to grow moderately due to low incidence of a disease. However, increasing incidence of genetic disorders, lifestyle up-gradation and rise in smoking population are the factors which can boost the growth of global myelofibrosis treatment market. The high cost of therapy will the growth of global myelofibrosis treatment market.

To remain ahead of your competitors, request for a sample [emailprotected]

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/11341

The global market for myelofibrosis treatment is segmented on basis of treatment type, end user and geography:

To receive extensive list of important regions, Request Methodology here @

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/11341

As myelofibrosis is considered as non-curable disease treatment options mainly depend on visible symptoms of a disease. Primary stages of the myelofibrosis are treated with supportive therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy. However, there are serious unmet needs in myelofibrosis treatment market due to lack of disease modifying agents. Approval of JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib in 2011 is considered as a breakthrough in myelofibrosis treatment. Stem cell transplantation for the treatment of myelofibrosis also holds tremendous potential for market growth but high cost of therapy is foreseen to limits the growth of the segment.

On the basis of treatment type, the global myelofibrosis treatment market has been segmented into blood transfusion, chemotherapy, androgen therapy and stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. Chemotherapy segment is expected to contribute major share due to easy availability of chemotherapeutic agents. Ruxolitinib is the only chemotherapeutic agent approved by the USFDA specifically for the treatment of myelofibrosis, which will drive the global myelofibrosis treatment market over the forecast period.

Geographically, global myelofibrosis treatment market is segmented into five regions viz. North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Middle East & Africa. Northe America is anticipated to lead the global myelofibrosis treatment market due to comparatively high prevalence of the disease in the region.

Some of the key market players in the global myelofibrosis treatment market are Incyte Corporation, Novartis AG, Celgene Corporation, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Ulc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., AllCells LLC, Lonza Group Ltd., ATCC Inc. and others.

You Can Request for TOC Here @

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/toc/11341

Explore Extensive Coverage of PMR`s

Life Sciences & Transformational HealthLandscape

About us:

Persistence Market Research (PMR) is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics andmarket research methodologyto help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At PMR, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Our client success stories feature a range of clients from Fortune 500 companies to fast-growing startups. PMRs collaborative environment is committed to building industry-specific solutions by transforming data from multiple streams into a strategic asset.

Contact us:

Naved Beg Persistence Market Research Address 305 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York City, NY 10007 United States U.S. Ph. +1-646-568-7751 USA-Canada Toll-free +1 800-961-0353 Sales[emailprotected] Websitehttps://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

Read more:
Demand for Myelofibrosis Treatment Market to Witness Rapid Surge During the Period 2016 2022 - Scientect

Autologous Cell Therapy Market Along With Covid-19 Impact Analysis and Business Opportunities Outlook 2027 – Scientect

Transparency Market Research (TMR)has published a new report titled, Autologous cell therapy Market Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast, 20192027. According to the report, the globalautologous cell therapy marketwas valued atUS$ 7.5 Bnin2018and is projected to expand at a CAGR of18.1%from2019to2027.

Get PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=715

Overview

Rise in Prevalence of Neurological Disorders & Cancer and Others to Drive Market

REQUEST FOR COVID19 IMPACT ANALYSIS https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=715

Bone Marrow Segment to Dominate Market

Neurology Segment to be Highly Lucrative Segment

Hospitals Segment to be Highly Lucrative Segment

North America to Dominate Global Market

Competitive Landscape

Read our Case study at :https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/casestudies/innovative-medical-device-manufacturing-start-up

The global autologous cell therapy market has been segmented as follows:

More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research 1.https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bronchitis-treatment-market-to-reach-us-4-7-bn-by-2026high-prevalence-of-air-pollution-drives-growth-transparency-market-research-301003635.html

2.https://www.biospace.com/article/personal-mobility-devices-market-rising-in-various-regions-owing-to-increased-geriatric-population/

Here is the original post:
Autologous Cell Therapy Market Along With Covid-19 Impact Analysis and Business Opportunities Outlook 2027 - Scientect