Author Archives: admin


Growing Sales Of To Drive The Human Platelet Lysate Market – Scientect

Rising funding for research & development activities, increasing number of research centers, and growing partnerships between research centers, biotechnology companies, and academic institutes for basic research are the prominent driving factors for the growth of thehuman platelet lysate market.

Also, increasing demand for animal-free serum media is a key catalyzer for the growth of the human platelet lysate market. Human platelet lysates, a growth supplement for in-vitro cell culture, are a suitable alternative to fetal bovine serum, and expected to find application in various therapeutics. The global human platelet lysate market is set to progress at a decent CAGR of around 4% over the period of 2019 to 2029.

Get Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/16789

Company Profiles

Get To Know Methodology of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/16789

Key Takeaways from Human Platelet Lysate Market Study

Manufacturers can focus on developing countries such as India that offer significant gains in terms of revenue, through the sale of human platelet lysates at an economical cost,says a PMR analyst.

Increase in Life Science Research Funding

Various government, private, and commercial organizations are focused on increasing research & development activities for continuous innovation in the field of life sciences. These organizations provide funds for ongoing research projects and pipeline products. In 2013, around 59% of total research & development expenditure in the U.S. was from federal funding agencies. In 2016, the National Institute of Health reported investments of nearly US$ 1.4 Bn toward stem cell research in the field of cell biology and electrical engineering.

Access Full Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/checkout/16789

Want More Insights?

A new report by Persistence Market Research provides unparalleled insights on the evolution of the human platelet lysate market during 2014-2018, and presents demand projections for 2019-2029, on the basis of product type (heparin-free platelet lysates and human platelet lysates with heparin), application (research use and clinical use), and end user (academic and research institutes, biopharmaceutical companies, and other applications), across various prominent regions (North America, Latin America, Europe, East Asia, South Asia. Oceania, and MEA).

Report Highlights:

Explore Extensive Coverage of PMR`sLife Sciences & Transformational HealthLandscape

Persistence Market Research (PMR) is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics andmarket research methodologyto help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At PMR, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Our client success stories feature a range of clients from Fortune 500 companies to fast-growing startups. PMRs collaborative environment is committed to building industry-specific solutions by transforming data from multiple streams into a strategic asset.

Contact us:

Ashish Kolte Persistence Market Research Address 305 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York City, NY 10007 United States U.S. Ph. +1-646-568-7751 USA-Canada Toll-free +1 800-961-0353 Sales[emailprotected] Websitehttps://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

Excerpt from:
Growing Sales Of To Drive The Human Platelet Lysate Market - Scientect

Global and United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market Size, Comprehensive Analysis, Development Strategy, Future Plans and Industry Growth…

Global and United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market Size, Status and Forecast 2020-2026

In 2019, the global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market size was US$ xx million and it is expected to reach US$ xx million by the end of 2026, with a CAGR of xx% during 2021-2026.

United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market is segmented by Type, and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by Type and by Application in terms of revenue and forecast for the period 2015-2026.The Report scope furnishes with vital statistics about the current market status and manufacturers. It analyzes the in-depth business by considering different aspects, direction for companies, and strategy in the industry.

After analyzing the report and all the aspects of the new investment projects, it is assessed the overall research and closure offered. The analysis of each segment in-detailed with various point views; that include the availability of data, facts, and figures, past performance, trends, and way of approaching in the market. The United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market report also covers the in-depth analysis of the market dynamics, price, and forecast parameters which also include the demand, profit margin, supply and cost for the industry.

The report additionally provides a pest analysis of all five along with the SWOT analysis for all companies profiled in the report. The report also consists of various company profiles and their key players; it also includes the competitive scenario, opportunities, and market of geographic regions. The regional outlook on the United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market covers areas such as Europe, Asia, China, India, North America, and the rest of the globe.

In-depth analysis of expansion and growth strategies obtained by Key players and their effect on competition market growth. The research report also provides precise information on your competitors and their planning. All of the above will help you to make a clear plan for top-line growth.

Get sample copy of thisreport @ https://www.lexisbusinessinsights.com/request-sample-148210

Top key players @ Anika Therapeutics, Zimmer Biomet, BioTissue Technologies, DePuy (Johnson & Johnson), Genzyme, CellGenix, EMD Serono, Sanofi Aventis, and Smith & Nephew

The main goal for the dissemination of this information is to give a descriptive analysis of how the trends could potentially affect the upcoming future of United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market during the forecast period. This markets competitive manufactures and the upcoming manufactures are studied with their detailed research. Revenue, production, price, market share of these players is mentioned with precise information.

Global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market: Regional Segment Analysis

This report provides pinpoint analysis for changing competitive dynamics. It offers a forward-looking perspective on different factors driving or limiting market growth. It provides a five-year forecast assessed on the basis of how they United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market is predicted to grow. It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future and helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments.

Key questions answered in the report include:

What will the market size and the growth rate be in 2026?

What are the key factors driving the Global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market?

What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the Global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market?

What are the challenges to market growth?

Who are the key vendors in the Global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market?

What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Global United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market?

Trending factors influencing the market shares of the Americas, APAC, Europe, and MEA.

The report includes six parts, dealing with:

1.) Basic information;

2.) The Asia United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market;

3.) The North American United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market;

4.) The European United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market;

5.) Market entry and investment feasibility;

6.) The report conclusion.

All the research report is made by using two techniques that are Primary and secondary research. There are various dynamic features of the business, like client need and feedback from the customers. Before (company name) curate any report, it has studied in-depth from all dynamic aspects such as industrial structure, application, classification, and definition.

The report focuses on some very essential points and gives a piece of full information about Revenue, production, price, and market share.

United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market report will enlist all sections and research for each and every point without showing any indeterminate of the company.

Reasons for Buying this Report

This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics

It provides a forward looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth

It provides a six-year forecast assessed on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow

It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future

It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors

It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments

TABLE OF CONTENT:

1 Report Overview

2 Global Growth Trends

3 Market Share by Key Players

4 Breakdown Data by Type and Application

5 United States

6 Europe

7 China

8 Japan

9 Southeast Asia

10 India

11 Central & South America

12 International Players Profiles

13 Market Forecast 2019-2025

14 Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions

15 Appendix

Get Complete Brochure @ https://www.lexisbusinessinsights.com/request-sample-148210

About Us:

Statistical surveying reports is a solitary goal for all the business, organization and nation reports. We highlight huge archive of most recent industry reports, driving and specialty organization profiles, and market measurements discharged by rumored private distributors and open associations. Statistical surveying Store is the far reaching gathering of market knowledge items and administrations accessible on air. We have statistical surveying reports from number of driving distributors and update our gathering day by day to furnish our customers with the moment online access to our database. With access to this database, our customers will have the option to profit by master bits of knowledge on worldwide businesses, items, and market patterns

Contact Us:

Lexis Business Insights

Aaryan

(Business Development Manager)

US: +1 210 907 4145

APAC: +91 9867799788

6851 N Loop

1604 W San Antonio,

TX 78249

[emailprotected]

http://www.lexisbusinessinsights.com

Go here to see the original:
Global and United States Stem Cell Cartilage Regeneration Market Size, Comprehensive Analysis, Development Strategy, Future Plans and Industry Growth...

Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics : to Present Data Linking MRI Measures to Functional Improvement in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) -…

NEW YORK, Aug. 25, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: BCLI), a leading developer of adult stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, announced today the acceptance of a clinical abstract documenting an association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures and functional improvement in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The data, to be presented as a poster on September 11-13 at the forthcoming MSVirtual2020 meeting the eighth joint meeting of the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) and the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) will inform analysis of clinical outcomes in the Company's ongoing Phase 2 trial of NurOwn (MSC-NTF cells) in patients with progressive MS.

"Although disability improvement is an important measure of function in individuals with progressive MS, the MRI features that correlate with disability improvement had not previously been explored," noted Tanuja Chitnis, M.D., FAAN, Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, Senior Neurologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Director of the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigations in MS at the Brigham (CLIMB Study). "In this analysis, we have demonstrated a correlation between specific brain and spinal cord MRI measures and observed functional improvements in progressive MS patients. We are grateful to the joint ACTRIMS/ECTRIMS abstract committee for allowing us to present these data, which we hope will facilitate analysis of clinical trial outcomes that specifically evaluate functional improvements in progressive MS."

Dr. Chitnis and colleagues evaluated MRI features of 48 participants in the SysteMS substudy of the CLIMB study, a nested cohort selected to match the inclusion criteria of the Phase 2 NurOwn trial in progressive MS (NCT03799718). The participants underwent brain and lesion volumetric analysis, as well as mean upper cervical cord (MUCCA) analysis, 12-24 months following baseline 3 Tesla MRI. These analyses generated 34 MRI data measures performed by ICOMETRIX, which the investigators compared in patients with improved function versus those with worsening or stable function, as measured by 9-hole peg test (9HPT) or timed-25-foot-walk (T25FW) scores, two well-established measures of function in progressive MS.

Seventeen patients had improved 9HPT scores from baseline to 12-24 months later, compared to 29 with worsened or stable 9HPT scores over that same period. Whole brain volume at baseline (improved 9HPT: 150551 vs. stable-worse 9HPT: 147162; p=0.069; t-test) and follow-up (improved: 1501.55552.039 vs. stable-worse: 1461.30463.562; p=0.03; t-test) differed between the two 9HPT groups, as did gray matter volume at follow-up (improved 1505.059 50.961 vs. stable-worse 865.5741.352; p=0.063: t-test). Eighteen patients had an improved T25FW score, compared to 27 whose score worsened or remained stable over the 12-month period. Deep white matter FLAIR/T2 lesion volume at baseline (improved: 0.430.507 vs. stable-worse: 0.8270.561; p=0.03; t-test) and follow-up (improved: 0.4290.503 vs. stable-worse: 0.8640.603; p=0.02) differed between the two T25FW groups. The investigators did not observe any association between MUCCA and functional improvement measures.

Chaim Lebovits, Chief Executive Officer of BrainStorm stated "The important MRI correlations with measures of functional improvement in this matched natural history cohort will provide helpful context as we evaluate the clinical outcomes from our ongoing Phase 2 trial of NurOwn in patients with progressive MS and hopefully bring us a step closer to offering a new treatment option to individuals living with this devastating disease."

About NurOwn

The NurOwn technology platform (autologous MSC-NTF cells) represents a promising investigational therapeutic approach to targeting disease pathways important in neurodegenerative disorders. MSC-NTF cells are produced from autologous, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that have been expanded and differentiated ex vivo. MSCs are converted into MSC-NTF cells by growing them under patented conditions that induce the cells to secrete high levels of neurotrophic factors (NTFs). Autologous MSC-NTF cells can effectively deliver multiple NTFs and immunomodulatory cytokines directly to the site of damage to elicit a desired biological effect and ultimately slow or stabilize disease progression.

About BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. is a leading developer of innovative autologous adult stem cell therapeutics for debilitating neurodegenerative diseases. The Company holds the rights to clinical development and commercialization of the NurOwn technology platform used to produce autologous MSC-NTF cells through an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement. Autologous MSC-NTF cells have received Orphan Drug status designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). BrainStorm has fully enrolled a phase 3 pivotal trial in ALS

(NCT03280056); this trial is investigating repeat-administration of autologous MSC-NTF cells at six U.S. sites supported by a grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM CLIN2-0989). The pivotal study is intended to support a filing for FDA approval of autologous MSC-NTF cells in ALS. BrainStorm is also conducting an FDA-approved phase 2 open-label multicenter trial in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The phase 2 study of autologous MSC-NTF cells in patients with progressive MS (NCT03799718) started enrollment in March 2019.

For more information, visit the company's website at http://www.brainstorm-cell.com.

Safe-Harbor Statement

Statements in this announcement other than historical data and information, including statements regarding future clinical trial enrollment and data, constitute "forward-looking statements" and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.'s actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements. Terms and phrases such as "may", "should", "would", "could", "will", "expect", "likely", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "predict", "potential", and similar terms and phrases are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. The potential risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, BrainStorm's need to raise additional capital, BrainStorm's ability to continue as a going concern, regulatory approval of BrainStorm's NurOwn treatment candidate, the success of BrainStorm's product development programs and research, regulatory and personnel issues, development of a global market for our services, the ability to secure and maintain research institutions to conduct our clinical trials, the ability to generate significant revenue, the ability of BrainStorm's NurOwn treatment candidate to achieve broad acceptance as a treatment option for ALS or other neurodegenerative diseases, BrainStorm's ability to manufacture and commercialize the NurOwn treatment candidate, obtaining patents that provide meaningful protection, competition and market developments, BrainStorm's ability to protect our intellectual property from infringement by third parties, heath reform legislation, demand for our services, currency exchange rates and product liability claims and litigation,; and other factors detailed in BrainStorm's annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q available athttp://www.sec.gov. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on BrainStorm's fo/rward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this press release. We do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or assumptions if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, unless otherwise required by law. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

CONTACTS

Investor Relations:Corey Davis, Ph.D. LifeSci Advisors, LLC Phone: +1 646-465-1138 cdavis@lifesciadvisors.com

Media:Paul Tyahla SmithSolve Phone: + 1-973-713-3768 Paul.tyahla@smithsolve.com

SOURCE Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc

Read the original post:
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics : to Present Data Linking MRI Measures to Functional Improvement in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) -...

Mustang Bio: Slow, Steady Progress Towards Multiple Gene And CAR-T Therapy Goals – Seeking Alpha

Investment Thesis

Mustang Bio share price performance since joining Nasdaq. Source: TradingView

Mustang Bio (MBIO) is looking like an increasingly attractive investment opportunity within the gene and CAR-T therapy space.

Mustang is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortress Bio, and operates the same strategy as its parent company, identifying promising therapeutic candidates at research centers and medical establishments and in-licensing them or acquiring an ownership interest, in exchange for funding research and development, and milestone and royalty payments in the event the candidates are eventually out-licensed or brought to market.

Mustang has an experienced management team and is focused on developing next-generation therapies for patients with cancer and rare genetic diseases, working alongside the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital ("St. Jude") on a lentiviral vector treatment of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency ("XSCID"), and with City of Hope National Medical Center ("COH"), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center ("Fred Hutch") and Nationwide Children's Hospital ("Nationwide") on a number of CAR-T therapies targeting hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.

Mustang leases a 27,000 square foot cell processing and translational research facility situated on the University of Massachusetts ("U-MASS") Medical School campus and is progressing 8 candidates in total, all of which have completed or entered phase 1 clinical trials. As such, the company has numerous milestones upcoming in the remainder of this year and throughout the next 24-month period.

Mustang Bio near-term goals. Source: corporate presentation.

The company's MB107 and MB207 XSCID treatments are both due to enter pivotal trials in 2020, with a real chance of becoming the new standard of care for this ultra-rare disease in which affected patients rarely live beyond infancy without treatment, whilst its CAR-T programs - which target far larger markets, will present data readouts related to ongoing trials of patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma ("NHL"), Prostate Cancer, and Acute Myeloid Lymphoma ("AML") in early 2021.

Meanwhile, in Q320 Mustang plans to submit an IND filing for CD20-targeting candidate MB106, for NHL and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ("CLL"), and present first data from its NHL trial in Q420, and treat the first patient in a multi-center trial of CD-123-targeting MB-102 in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm ("BPDCN"), acute myeloid lymphoma ("AML"), and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (hrMDS) in Q320.

In Q420, Mustang will also leverage City of Hope's IND for MB108, a C134 oncolytic virus, for a combination trial with its IL13R2-specific candidate MB101, targeting glioblastoma multiform ("GBM").

CAR-T therapy is a highly competitive space, with a host of big pharma firms and early stage biotechs chasing approvals for a range of different modalities, hence there is no guarantee that Mustang can win a race to market, or even if it does, that it can convert an approval into meaningful sales volumes. The only 2 CAR-T treatments to have been approved to date, Gilead's Yescarta and Novartis' Kymriah, made <$750m of sales between them in FY19.

In truth, however, Mustang/Fortress would be most likely look to out-license an approved treatment, and from an investor's perspective, progression to late-stage CAR-T trials would provide price catalysts that could double or triple the current share price, as well as bringing the prospect of a money-spinning acquisition into play, such as Gilead's (GILD) $11.9bn deal to acquire Kite Therapeutics in August 2017, or Celgene's (CELG) $9bn purchase of Juno Therapeutics in 2018.

In the near term, Mustang's XSCID opportunity is its best prospect for approval, and although this market may be small, with just 20 newly-diagnosed patients per annum, it will constitute a significant win for the company and its partners, and vindicate Mustang's approach.

Mustang's shares gained 124% back in April 2019 when the company released positive trial data relating to 8 patients who successfully cleared previous infections and had begun to grow normally, after receiving Mustang/St Jude's therapy.

Share price performance of Fortress Bio, Mustang Bio, other Fortress affiliates (OTC:CKPT), (ATXI) and TG Therapeutics (TGTX). Source: TradingView.

As we can see above, Fortress Bio, its listed affiliates Avenue Therapeutics (ATXI), Checkpoint Therapeutics (OTC:CKPT) and another company, TG Therapeutics (TGTX), led by Michael D. Weiss - Fortress' Executive Vice Chairman and Board member - have enjoyed mixed fortunes over the past 5 years.

Whilst Avenue shares are up 94% on the promise of its schedule IV (low potential for abuse) Tramadol pain treatment, and TG Therapeutics up 85% as its flagship MS and cancer drugs ublituximab and umbrasilib inch towards approval, Fortress itself, Mustang and solid tumor treatment developer Checkpoint Therapeutics are down 24%, 73% and 71% respectively.

Whilst it would be misleading to compare companies targeting very different indications, it may be instructive to note that Fortress' overall approach involves regularly tapping investors for funding via share offerings - Mustang has an at-the-market offering agreement in place to sell up to $75m of its securities - and its development cycles - as you might expect for early stage drug-developers - can be very slow - a frustrating combination for investors.

On balance, however, I rate Mustang's CAR-T pipeline as promising based on its diversity and impressive early data and in comparison with the progress being made by rival companies, and the front-running MB-107 and MB-207 opportunity provides an obvious route to market within the next 12-18 months, providing a strong near-term catalyst to support the progress of the more lucrative opportunities.

Ultimately, I believe that Fortress, its portfolio of companies and management team are beginning to demonstrate that they are capable of rewarding patient investors, and given all of the above, I feel bullish about Mustang's upside potential.

In the rest of this article I will take a deeper dive look at the company and its candidates, and attempt to provide justification for my thesis that, as Fortress' portfolio company's development cycles progress, they tend to reward their long-term stock holders, thanks to a disciplined and painstaking approach that is well suited to the biotech industry.

Mustang Bio was incorporated in Delaware in March 2015, and is headquartered in Worcester, Massachusetts. The company began trading on the Nasdaq in August, 2017, debuting at a price of $11. At the time of writing, Mustang's shares trade at $3.58, representing a 207% decline.

Mustang is led by Manuel Litchman, MD, who joined the company in 2017 from biotech Arvinas (ARVN), where he helped advance the company's pipeline of protein-degradation therapeutics, working in collaboration with Merck (MRK) and Genentech. Prior to that, Litchman spent 18 years at Novartis (NOVN) focused on its oncology pipeline.

Nearly all of Mustang's senior management team have joined since 2019, and combine a wealth of biotech and big-pharma experience. Chief Technology Officer Knut Niss joined Mustang from Biogen (BIIB), where he worked on hematopoietic stem cell and lentiviral gene therapy programs, and Head of Regulatory Affairs Lynn Bayless also joined from Biogen, developing phase 3 drug candidate programs, and has also overseen development programs at Voyager Therapeutics (VYGR) and Shire.

Mustang's various licensing agreements with St. Jude, COH, Fred Hutch and Nationwide are complex but are generally based upon an up-front payment, ongoing milestone payments, and in most cases, royalty sharing agreements should commercialization be achieved.

Fortress Biotech owns 29.9% of Mustang (according to Fintel), and City of Hope has a 5.1% holding, however Fortress controls a voting majority of Mustang's stock, meaning it is able to control or significantly influence all matters requiring approval by stockholders, and also receives an annual grant of 2.5% of any equity or debt financing carried out by Mustang, adding to overall shareholder dilution.

Mustang is certainly well-funded however, so investors need not be too concerned. The company reported cash of $85.4m in Q220 (according to its 10Q submission), total assets of $96.8m, and total liabilities of just $25.8m. In the first 6 months of 2020, Mustang's net losses were $26.4m, which suggests that the company may not require further funding until 2022, although costs are likely to ramp up as the company embarks on more of its own clinical trials, as opposed to leveraging the work of its early-stage development partners.

Mustang candidates, partners and development schedule. Source: company presentation.

Earlier this month, Mustang's thinly traded - and therefore volatile - stock leapt 16% on the news that the FDA had awarded Rare Pediatric Disease Designation to its lead gene therapy candidate, MB107, for treatment of XSCID, and granted the company a priority review voucher that can be used to accelerate a future application, or sold to a third party.

XSCID is a genetic disease that causes disturbed development of functional T cells and B cells making patients - usually newborn males - extremely vulnerable to all types of infectious disease, hence it's being termed as "Bubble Boy" disease. Patients with XSCID who remain untreated usually do not survive beyond their first year of life.

The current standard of care treatment for XSCID is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant ("HSCT"), which works most effectively when there is a matched sibling donor. This only occurs 15% of the time on average, however (according to a Mustang corporate presentation), and when unavailable, mortality rates can fall to ~50% if there are severe infections present at the time HSCT is initiated, whilst even a successful treatment can cause life-long complications.

Mustang licensed its gene therapy treatment MB-107 in August 2018 from St Jude Children's Research Hospital for a $1m up front payment plus an annual maintenance fee of $0.1 million, up to $13.5 million of milestone payments, and royalty payments in the mid-single digits on all net sales of the product if it secures FDA approval.

Lentiviruses - which are responsible for AIDS and other diseases - work by inserting DNA into a host cell's genome, but can be adapted to act as a vector and insert beneficial genes into cells. Using lentiviral transduction of hematopoietic stem cells, MB107 is able to insert a normal copy of the mutated c gene present in XSCID into patients, which leads to the encoding of a normal c receptor chain, allowing patients' immune systems to stage a recovery.

The results of the first early stage trials have been impressive. 24 patients were treated, either at St Jude's, or as part of a single-center trial at the National Institutes of Health ("NIH"). Eight of these patients have been followed for a period of 3-7 years, with 7 experiencing increased host T cells chimerism from 0-2% to 28-93%, and normalized IgM levels, with 4 able to discontinue immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Additionally, patients were able to recover from illnesses including norovirus and malabsorption, and growth retardation.

MB 107 clinical outcomes show promise. Source: company presentation.

Mustang has since developed a refined enhanced transduction ("ET") procedure using 2 transduction enhancers: LentiBoost 1:100 and dimethyl prostaglandin 2 (dmPGE2; 1mM), which has shown a substantial clinical improvement over baseline, and significant biomarker improvement.

The company expects to begin a pivotal trial of newly diagnosed XSCID patients before the end of the year, subject to FDA approval, and will file an Investigational New Drug ("IND") application for a pivotal trial of a second product, designated MB-207 in previously transplanted patients, also before the end of the year. This trial will enroll 20 patients and compare results to matched historical control patients who have undergone a second HSCT.

XSCID is diagnosed in ~20 new patients per annum and Mustang has proposed a reimbursement model where payers could pay for success, following the example of Orchard Therapeutics' Strimvelis treatment, approved for a similar condition, SCID, in 2016. Mustang has hinted at a price-point of $2m for MB-107/MB-207 in the past, which could be paid out over a period of 10 years+ as the patient recovers from the disease.

It is also possible that Mustang could uncover a "reservoir" of ~400 US and ~650 overseas patients whose HSCT treatments have failed, and enhanced screening for the disease may also increase the overall market for XSCID treatments.

Development hasn't all been straightforward for Mustang and there is still a way to go to prove that its enhanced therapy can be safe and effective over a prolonged period, but at this stage, the signs point to an eventual approval in 2022.

MB-107 was acquired in part to provide a faster route to market than Mustang's CAR-T portfolio, and as well as providing a much needed treatment upgrade for a devastating disease, it ought to pique investor's excitement sufficiently to give Mustang further fundraising opportunities, at a higher price, without damaging its reputation.

Mustang has signed an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement with Fred Hutch to develop MB-106, a CAR-T therapy targeting CD20, a commercially validated target for B-cell lymphomas, including NHL, which has shown an in vivo anti-tumor effect which compares favorably with CD-19-targeting therapies.

Together, Mustang and Fred Hutch have developed an optimized cell-processing technique for MB-106, which had originally shown limited efficacy in the first 3 cohorts of a phase 1/2 trial. Under an amended IND, using the lowest dose possible (due to the expected increase in potency of the CAR-T cells), and a chemotherapy regime of cyclophosphamide + fludarabine, the first patient dosed - suffering from follicular lymphoma - achieved a complete response, with no cytokine release syndrome or neurologic toxicity reported.

Fred Hutch intends to enroll up to 30 patients on this trial, whilst Mustang plans to submit its own IND in the first quarter of 2021, and initiate a clinical trial in patients with NHL, and CLL. These are large markets: ~70,000 people are diagnosed with NHL in the US annually, and the disease causes 19,000 mortalities per annum.

Around 45% of NHL cases are untreatable with current therapies, with the exception, in some cases, of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant ("allo-SCT"). allo-SCT carries a significant risk of morbidity or mortality however, hence, Mustang will hope to position MB-106 as an alternative treatment option, as well as a second or third-line treatment for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas.

MB-105 is being developed for the treatment of prostate and pancreatic cancer, targeting the prostate stem cell antigen ("PSCA") that tends to be overexpressed on solid tumors. The first patient enrolled in a phase 1 trial being conducted by COH experienced a significant reduction in PSA at day 28. A third cohort of the trial is currently underway, and further data is expected in Q121. Meanwhile, Mustang is awaiting a funding decision over an initiation of its own trial, in pancreatic cancer, and plans to submit an IND in Q421.

Prostate (164,000 new cases per annum in US), and pancreatic (55,000) cancers are highly prevalent and there are few advanced stage CAR-T therapies in development with Autolus (my July note here) perhaps presenting the biggest challenge to Mustang. Additionally, PSCA is also expressed in bladder, placenta, colon, kidney, and stomach cancers, making it an attractive target.

MB-101 targets the membrane-bound protein IL13Ra2 and was licensed from COH in 2017, alongside MB-102, in a deal that may provide up to $14.5 million to COH based on 8 development milestones, plus royalty payments in the mid-single-digit percentages of net sales should the products become commercialized. Mustang made payments to COH totaling $0.3m in the first 6 months of 2020.

IL13Ra2 is considered an attractive target for brain cancers and is over-expressed on the surface of >50% of glioblastomas - the most common form of brain and central nervous system cancers.

A phase 1 dose-escalation study involving 60 patients has now completed, and COH/Mustang have subsequently identified 3 potential areas of interest. A pilot trial is planned for Q320, using CAR-T therapy alone in leptomeningeal disease, which affects cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), whilst 2 combination trials are also planned. The first is in combination with C-134 oncolytic virus (Mustang candidate MB-108) for treatment of glioblastoma multiform ("GBM"), and the second in combination with checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-L1, with a trial slated to begin in Q220.

GBM is diagnosed in ~11,800 patients in the US annually, and Mustang is the only company currently working on a CAR-T therapy to address this illness.

MB-102 targets CD-123, and addresses BPDCN, AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome ("MDS"). These diseases affect around 500-1,000, 20,000 and 15,000 patients in the US respectively, and median survival rates are generally less than 1 year.

Mustang's IND for MB-102 was approved in Q319, and the company expects to dose its first patient in BPDCN in Q320, using optimized CAR-T cells, and with a reduced dose of 50% of that used by COH in its trials, which have shown promising results, with 2 complete responses in AML, and 1 in BPDCN.

MB-102 has secured an orphan drug designation for treatment of BPDCN, and has presented a manageable toxicity profile to date, with no grade 4 or above incidents reported. CD-123 is a competitive space for CAR-T therapies, with one approved treatment for BPDCN, Stemline's Elzonris, which made sales of $43.2m in FY19.

Finally, Mustang has paid COH $0.8m and will contribute R&D costs of up to $2.4m for MB-104, a CS1 (NK cell receptor regulating immune functions) targeting treatment for multiple myeloma, whilst MB-103 is undergoing phase 1 trials at COH for metastatic breast cancer, using the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ("HER2"), with Mustang contributing $0.3m towards R&D as part of a wider $14.9m deal, plus mid-single digit royalty payments.

As mentioned in my intro, Mustang and its parent Fortress are more likely to reward the patient investor, although, owing to the regular news flow from trials and progress with regulators, there are generally short-term price catalysts for more active traders to consider.

Regular fund-raisings and dilution can be frustrating, but Mustang's strong management team has the experience and know-how to be able to convert promising early stage candidates into late-stage ones, in my view.

Mustang has no fewer than 8 "shots at goal", plenty of funding, and an influential Board that is practicing a similar development strategy - acting as a middleman between research and medical institutions and regulatory authorities and big pharma - at a host of other companies, some of whose share prices have demonstrated very strong upside as its candidates have blossomed.

CAR-T candidates are particularly difficult to develop and haven't set the market on fire in recent years, but there is no doubt that the major pharma companies will still be prepared to pay a huge premium to acquire promising treatments - the cost of a successful treatment being acquired by a rival is almost as great as the cost of purchasing a treatment that ultimately fails to make it to commercialization.

Since I have some faith in Mustang's/Fortress approach and based on the progress of the candidates' described above, and the very low current price of Mustang shares compared to their Nasdaq trading debut, I recommend that risk-on biotech investors carefully consider opening a position.

Analysts are setting a consensus price target of $10. I would be surprised if this was achieved within the next 12 months, but I would also be surprised if the share price has not doubled in that period on slow and steady progression towards later stage trials for a handful of its candidates and the increasing likelihood of an approval for an XSCID treatment.

Gain access to all of the market research and financial analytics used in the preparation of this article plus exclusive content and pharma, healthcare and biotech investment recommendations and research / analytics by subscribing to my channel,Haggerston BioHealth.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in MBIO over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Read more here:
Mustang Bio: Slow, Steady Progress Towards Multiple Gene And CAR-T Therapy Goals - Seeking Alpha

Scientists discover protein linked to depression and brain disorders – The Irish Times

It is expected this breakthrough will. . . lead to earlier diagnosis and better treatments for people with certain brain disorders, says Dr Vijay Tiwari at Queens University Belfast.

Earlier diagnosis and better treatments for people with depression and certain brain disorders may be possible following a research breakthrough involving Belfast-based scientists.

They have found how a specific protein plays a crucial role in the generation of neurons the nerve cells that relay electrical signals it the brain. This was made possible by focusing on a specific time and location during brain development, and how its disruption can lead to intellectual disability and depression in adults.

A research team led by Queens University Belfast (QUB) in collaboration with the Centre for Regenerative Therapies at Dresden University in Germany have published their findings in the journal Genes & Development.

It is expected this breakthrough will have a major impact on our fundamental understanding of brain development and lead to earlier diagnosis and better treatments for people with certain brain disorders, said Dr Vijay Tiwari, who is based at the Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine at QUB.

Our study reveals the key role this protein plays during the birth of probably one of the most important cells in our body the neuron.

Brain development is a highly complex process that involves generating various types of cells at defined time points and locations during embryonic development, he explained. Any kind of interference during these processes is known to cause diseases including a range of intellectual disabilities.

Among these brain cell types, neurons are the working unit of the brain, designed to transmit information to other nerve cells and various tissues in the body, such as the muscles as well as storage of memory in our brain, he added.

While the field has rapidly advanced, the mechanisms creating the birth of neurons from their mother cells, called neural stem cells, in time and space during development has not been well understood until now.

To conduct their study, the researchers looked at brain samples to closely determine the development of various cell types within the brain.

The study showed how the presence of a specific protein (called Phf21b), within a defined time window of brain development and in a specific location in the brain, signals the birth of neurons from neural stem cells in the right place and at the right time, said Dr Tiwari, who is a molecular biologist working in neuroscience.

The researchers found that removal of Phf21b stopped production of neurons from neural stem cells and led to severe defects in brain development. They also found the importance of this protein, in particular in the folding of DNA in cells going on to form neurons.

Understanding how a cell type in the brain is born at a specific point and in a specific place during development is crucial in our understanding how neurological issues arise later in life. We hope this discovery will pave the way for earlier diagnosis, earlier interventions and better treatment for people with a brain disorder, such as depression, he said.

Their research suggested screening for certain genetic variants would enable earlier diagnosis, in contrast to a scenario where depression in adults is not usually detected until a person is seriously depressed.

Read the original post:
Scientists discover protein linked to depression and brain disorders - The Irish Times

Burger Reviews BTK Inhibitors and Beyond in Frontline CLL – Targeted Oncology

During a virtual Case Based Peer Perspectives event, Jan A. Burger, MD, PhD, professor, Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX, discussed testing and the treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), based on the a case of 71-year-old female patient.

Targeted OncologyTM: What testing would you order to confirm diagnosis if you saw this patient in the clinic?

BURGER: We need to establish the diagnosis by flow cytometry and then we would do, at a minimum, FISH cytogenetics and, ideally, the mutational status. Cytogenetics can change, but mutational status usually doesnt change. If thats been established somewhere outside [of your clinic], then you dont have to repeat that test.

Its important to repeat cytogenetics if you talk about the relapse setting. But here, were treating in the frontline setting, and she was tested. She was found to be IGHV unmutated and [positive for] del(11q). That, traditionally, has been regarded as a higher-risk disease status because these patients respond OK to standard chemotherapy, but they have short remissions and survival times with FCR [fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (Rituxan)], BR [bendamustine plus rituximab], and those kinds of regimens compared with low-risk patients, such as those [who are positive for] deletion 13q and have IGHV mutated disease.

In terms of these sequences, when you see a patient with lymphocytosis, you send for flow cytometry, and part of the flow cytometry panel can test for additional markers, CD38 and ZAP-70. We have it [at MD Anderson], but Im not sure if there are any outside routine flow cytometry labs reporting CD38 positivity or negativity or ZAP-70. These markers used to be very popular 10 years or so ago when IGHV-mutation status was not so commonly done and was more complicated to get. Nowadays, theres a shift with sending a sample directly for IGHV-mutation testing.

If you have that and the routine CLL FISH panel, then you have a good amount of information about your patient to say this is high-, low-, or an intermediate-risk disease. I think the main purpose for doing these is, first, to identify [patients with] high-risk disease who have a deletion 17p [del(17p)] or TP53 mutations. If its a young patient, you want to know that to [be able to] avoid chemotherapy. If its a young patient, [you may want to] send those patients for evaluation for stem cell transplant. For some patients, that is still something that eventually needs to be considered for those with del(17p).

What systemic therapy would you offer?

If you have treated with ibrutinib [Imbruvica] and youre comfortable with that, I dont think at this time there is a strong reason to change. In selected patients, it might be reasonable to try switching them from one [agent] to the other. But right now, for this patient, consensus says a BTK [Bruton tyrosine kinase] inhibitor is a good treatment.

Both ibrutinib and acalabrutinib [Calquence] can be used as single agents or in combination with CD20 antibodies. Weve done a clinical study with ibrutinib where patients were randomized to receive monotherapy versus a combination with rituximab, and the outcome was virtually identicalwhere patients had the exact same progression-free survival [PFS] with a single agent versus the combination with a CD20 antibody.1

CD20 antibodies with BTK inhibitors dont seem to add benefit in terms of survival if you go with the long-term BTK inhibitor treatment and if youre not planning to stop your treatment at some point. What they do is they get patients into remission faster and you clear the disease faster if you add a CD20 antibody, but then you stop after 6 months. You continue your BTK inhibitor, and patients do great 2, 3, and 4 years later. Then, you dont see any effect in terms of longer-term PFS or overall survival [OS] from the addition of the CD20 antibody.

What data support the use of single-agent ibrutinib in patients with untreated CLL?

There are data from the RESONATE-2 study [NCT01722487], which randomized patients between ibrutinib and chlorambucil. This study was designed at the time when chlorambucil monotherapy was still the standard of care. Patients were randomized 1:1, and patients with del(17p) were excluded.2

What is nice about this study is that we have a long follow-up now.3 At the 5-year follow-up, you see this major difference in terms of PFS [HR, 0.146; 95% CI, 0.098-0.218]. There is also an overall survival benefit [HR, 0.450; 95% CI, 0.266-0.761].

What [we saw was] that patients with del(11q) seemed to have a better PFS than those patients who lack del(11q) when they are treated with ibrutinib. Patients with del(11q) who are treated with chemotherapy do not do as well as those who lack this cytogenetic abnormality. The same is true here for [IGHV] mutational status.

The PCYC-1102-CA study [NCT01105247] opened around 2010, and we now have 7 to 8 years of follow-up. If you use a BTK inhibitor in the frontline setting, you can expect that most patients are going to do well for an extended period of time. At 5, 6, and 7 years or longer, 70% to 80% of patients are still in remission and have not died.4

Another randomized study that created some waves [is the E1912 study (NCT02048813)]. Weve been big proponents of FCR, which was the comparator arm [of this trial] versus ibrutinib. Patients receive either 6 cycles FCR or continuous ibrutinib [with rituximab] for the first 6 cycles.5

That study showed that compared with FCR, there was a significant increase in PFS [HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.57; P <.0001] but also in OS benefit from the BTK inhibitorcontaining regimen [HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.79; P = .009].

Would you say ibrutinib is the standard of care for treatment of CLL in the frontline setting?

Ibrutinib monotherapy, I would say, is the standard of care, but ibrutinib plus rituximab can be used. Some of you use it and, based on the data we just saw, the FDA has now officially approved it.6 It doesnt mean you must use rituximab.

What other ibrutinib combinations are available?

The ALLIANCE trial [NCT01886872] had a single-agent ibrutinib arm versus ibrutinib plus rituximab versus bendamustine plus rituximab.7 When you have patients randomized to receive ibrutinib/rituximab versus ibrutinib as a single agent, the [Kaplan-Meier survival] curves are basically identical, and thats what we got as well in a slightly diff erent patient population, mostly relapsed patients. In terms of PFS, rituximab doesnt seem to add very much when you go with continuous ibrutinib treatment. You see the difference for bendamustine/rituximab, with which patients have significantly shorter PFS.

I think the theme is the same over and over again with these randomized studies. With the new targeted agents, such as the BTK inhibitors and venetoclax [Venclexta], we see the same pattern. The new agents are doing better than our traditional chemoimmunotherapy.

ILLUMINATE [NCT02264574] is the study comparing ibrutinib/obinutuzumab [Gazyva] with another chemoimmunotherapy regimen, which has been somewhat popular for older populations, more frail patients for whom you dont want to use FCR or BR. You traditionally use chlorambucil alone and then more recentlyits combined with CD20 antibodies. The patients were randomized to either [ibrutinib/obinutuzumab] versus chlorambucil/obinutuzumab treatment.8

The results show a major PFS benefits for patients on the BTK inhibitor [HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.37; P < .0001]. There was a big difference for genetically high-risk patients [HR, 0.15; P < .0001] or patients who had bulky disease.

What other BTK inhibitors would you consider here?

Now were going to the second-generation BTK inhibitor, acalabrutinib [Calquence], which is somewhat more selective and doesnt inhibit some other kinases that ibrutinib does. Its a new BTK inhibitor with not as much long-term follow-up data available.

[In the phase 3 ELEVATE TN trial (NCT02475681)], you have 3 arms: single-agent acalabrutinib, acalabrutinib combined with obinutuzumab, and the comparator arm of chlorambucil/obinutuzumab. 9 If you give that to treatment-nave patients, those receiving BTK inhibitor alone or with the CD20 antibody do well. Its debatable if the PFS difference is significant, but clearly, the BTK inhibitortreated patients do much better than those receiving chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab.

[If you look at the] subgroups of patients benefitting from the BTK inhibitor treatment versus obinutuzumab/chlorambucil, it basically shows that all subgroups have benefit. Some may be a little more than others...but I think particularly patients that we traditionally called high risk are the ones who benefit the most from new agents. Theres less difference if you go into the lowrisk patient populations.

Are there data supporting the use of a BCL2 inhibition?

The other frontline option involves venetoclax, and thats coming from this CLL14 trial [NCT02242942]. Patients were receiving venetoclax/obinutuzumab or chlorambucil/obinutuzumab, and this is a finite treatment for 12 months. These are patients who were older and who have some comorbidities. Deletion(17p) was not excluded.10

There is a major difference in PFS favoring the new targeted agent venetoclax. Now its approved for the frontline treatment of selected patients,11 but you can also see in comparison to the BTK inhibitors [that] the follow-up is relatively short of 3 years.

With venetoclax, you get more complete remissions and some of these remissions are MRD [minimal residual disease] negative. As long as these differences are not translating into a survival benefit, those are just numbers.

Would you recommend venetoclax after the first line?

I dont think theres a reason to make that change [from BTK inhibitors] because venetoclax has its own issues in terms of how its used and adverse effects [AEs]. For that questionmaybe [we ask [is] venetoclax better in terms of outcome than a BTK inhibitor?

Its difficult to be better than the BTK inhibitor in the frontline CLL setting, and you need a very long follow-up to show any differences if there are any.

A substantial number of patients [treated with venetoclax] receive MRD-negative remissions with this combination. MRD negativity doesnt mean patients are cured. There is drop off in PFS, so MRD negativity doesnt mean those patients will survive and never need treatment again. Most likely, those patients eventually will lose MRD and eventually have disease progression and need treatment again. I think for those studies based on frontline venetoclax for 12 months, we just have to stay tuned and wait for what the long-term outcome is going to be.

What are the AEs of venetoclax?

You see more AEs that are reminiscent of chemotherapy days, where patients get more cytopenia. Its well established that venetoclax is myelosuppressive. Certainly, neutropenia can be seen, and less frequently, thrombocytopenia and anemia. If you treat a patient with venetoclax with or without a CD20 antibody, then you have to prepare for some patients having issues with neutropenia and some who cannot be fully dose-escalated because of those cytopenias.

If the patient was younger, would you treat differently?

My answer would be no. I dont see any difference. This patient was 71 years old. We wouldnt use chemoimmunotherapy.

Somebody voted no. I think thats interesting because its something Im interested in [finding out about]. Im wondering if we have to accept treating patients with BTK inhibitorsfor very long periods or if we can maybe try it at least as an alternative treatment just for a certain period of time until we have the best response. Then, some patients maybe stop. I think thats interesting for a clinical trial.

Outside of clinical trials, Im not so sure. We have no data. But if you have a low-risk patient and you want to stop after 2 years and just see what happens, you need to tell the patient we dont know whats going to happen and you have to watch that patient more closely. If its a patient with del(17p), a high-risk patient who was very symptomatic, I wouldnt do that. But in low-risk patients, I think its an interesting question and not totally unreasonable.

Over time, we will find new solutions. Everybodys working on transitioning BTK inhibitorsto limited-duration treatments for many reasons. Its not the optimal situation to have patients on kinase inhibitors for 5, 10, or 20 years. Right now, its a long-term treatment until we have better treatments.

References:

1. Burger JA, Sivina M, Jain N, et al. Randomized trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2019;133(10):1011-1019. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-10-879429

2. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2425-2437. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509388

3. Burger JA, Barr PM, Robak T, et al. Long-term effi cacy and safety of fi rst-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study. Leukemia. 2020;34(3):787-798. doi:10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x

4. Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib treatment for fi rst-line and relapsed/ refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: fi nal analysis of the pivotal phase Ib/II PCYC- 1102 study. Clin Cancer Res. Published online March 24, 2020. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2856

5. Shanafelt TD, Wang XV, Kay NE, et al. Ibrutinib and rituximab provides superior clinical outcome compared to FCR in younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): extended follow-up from the E1912 Trial. Blood. 2019;134(suppl 1):33. doi:10.1182/blood-2019-126824

6. FDA approves ibrutinib plus rituximab for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. News release. FDA. April 21, 2020. Accessed July 27, 2020. https://bit.ly/3jV1hGW

7. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2517-2528. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1812836

8. Moreno C, Greil R, Demirkan F, et al. Ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in fi rst-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iLLUMINATE): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):43-56. Published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):e10. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30788-5

9. Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1278-1291. Published correction appears in Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1694. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30262-2

10. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(23):2225-2236. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1815281

11. FDA approves venetoclax for CLL and SLL. News release. FDA. May 15, 2019.Accessed July 27, 2020. https://bit.ly/3jLnEOU

Read the original:
Burger Reviews BTK Inhibitors and Beyond in Frontline CLL - Targeted Oncology

Adapting ideas from quantum physics to calculate alternative interventions for infection and cancer – Science Codex

CLEVELAND - Published in Nature Physics, findings from a new study co-led by Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University teams show for the first time how ideas from quantum physics can help develop novel drug interventions for bacterial infections and cancer.

The research team demonstrated that principles of quantum control, a field of quantum physics used in computing applications, can be translated and applied to biological problems. They constructed a mathematical algorithm that can be used to design and speed-up specific interventions to prevent or overturn drug resistance.

Typically cells in the presence of drugs evolve according to Darwinian natural selection: mutants that are resistant to the drug can outcompete their susceptible neighbors, dominating the population. Counterintuitively, one can also co-opt this process to achieve the opposite result, ultimately defeating drug resistance. For example, a mutation that causes resistance to one drug may cause extreme susceptibility to another, a phenomenon known as collateral sensitivity.

"If that mutant is initially only a small fraction of the population, we can use the first drug to encourage its dominance, and then apply the second drug to rapidly wipe out the infection," said physician-scientist Jacob Scott, MD, DPhil, a practicing radiation oncologist at Cleveland Clinic and co-senior author on the study, referencing findings from a study his group published earlier this year. "But we also know that the first stage can be slow: mutations occur at random times, and waiting long enough until the mutant fully takes over could compromise treatment effectiveness and patient outcomes. The time it takes to ensure these interventions are successful has been a significant limitation to adopting evolutionary medicine into clinical practice."

Speeding up this process is where quantum physics can provide inspiration. "The randomness of mutations in evolution has intriguing mathematical parallels to the randomness of quantum phenomena," according to Prof. Michael Hinczewski, a theoretical biophysicist at Case Western Reserve University and co-senior author. "This randomness makes it challenging to reliably and quickly drive a quantum system from one state to another. Solving this driving problem is an essential ingredient in certain kinds of quantum computing. Our new study exploits these parallels, translating a particular quantum technique known as counterdiabatic driving into the language of evolutionary biology."

"Imagine trying to get a system to follow a desired path from an initial to a final state over a short time--whether this path is a sequence of quantum states or varying proportions of mutants in an evolving population," said Prof. Hinczewski. "Counterdiabatic driving is a form of dynamic correction, providing just enough external intervention to keep the system on the path at every instant no matter how fast the protocol."

The researchers created a mathematical algorithm to calculate this intervention in evolutionary medicine applications. The algorithm's output is a prescription for dynamically altering the drug dosages or types to stay on the target path. The team demonstrated their technique by using it to manipulate evolution in simulations of living cells. These simulations were based on experimental data from an earlier study on a set of mutants showing varying degrees of resistance to anti-malarial drugs.

Counterdiabatic driving changed the proportion of mutants, affecting the population's overall drug sensitivity, faster and with better control than could be expected using current experimental methods in evolutionary medicine.

Given the team's promising findings, the next phase of their research will be to conduct direct experimental testing of the approach. As the first example of counterdiabatic driving in a biological context, the researchers are hopeful that their work could provide a foundation for a novel area of study: quantum-inspired biological control. The researchers plan to apply these ideas to other biological systems that share similarities with evolution, such as stem cell development and ecology.

Continued here:
Adapting ideas from quantum physics to calculate alternative interventions for infection and cancer - Science Codex

Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Checkout the Unpredictable Future: Industry Applications, Competitors growth prospects, Industry…

Reportspedia published a new report, titled, Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market. GlobalDegenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics MarketPast, Present & Forecast Research 2020-2027 presents all-inclusive analysis & fundamental insights segmented by top companies, product type, geographical regions, applications & end-users. This brief breakdown provides 360-degree & complete Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics overview stating the opportunities, developmental factors, constraints & risks analysis. The forecast industry situations are presented based on past & present Smith Machines industry situations & growth rate.

Get Free Sample Copy:

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/others/2015-2027-global-degenerative-disc-disease-therapeutics-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/60614#request_sample

Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market research report offers details about Industry Chain structure, Market Competition, Market Size, and Share, SWOT Analysis, Technology, Cost, Consumer Preference, Development and Trends, Regional Forecast, Company and Profile, and Product and Service.

LIST OF KEY COMPANIES PROFILED:

Samumed LLC DiscGenics Inc U.S. Stem Cell Inc BioRestorative Therapies Inc Biopharm GmbH AnGes Inc Bone Therapeutics SA Kolon TissueGene Inc Mesoblast Yuhan Corp Osiris Therapeutics Inc

This analysis includes a detailed share analysis of the key players. It also unveils the growth of the Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market participants along with their current statuses and key developments. The growth strategies employed by these players are also assessed in the report and are prognosticated to facilitate the study of the competitive landscape of the global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market.

Geographically, this Research report focuses on market share, and growth opportunities in key regions such as United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, and India.

Ask For Discount:

https://www.reportspedia.com/discount_inquiry/discount/60614

Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Segment by Type:

ALLOB AMG-0101 BRTX-100 OTICR-01 Others

Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Segment by Application:

Clinic Hospital Homecare

The report objectives to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry

Inquire Before Buying:

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/others/2015-2027-global-degenerative-disc-disease-therapeutics-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/60614#inquiry_before_buying

The Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics report provides insights in the following areas:

Table of Content:

Get Full Table of Content:

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/others/2015-2027-global-degenerative-disc-disease-therapeutics-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/60614#table_of_contents

Why Reportspedia:

See the original post here:
Global Degenerative Disc Disease Therapeutics Market Checkout the Unpredictable Future: Industry Applications, Competitors growth prospects, Industry...

Review of Trials Currently Testing Stem Cells for Treatment of Respiratory Diseases: Facts Known to Date and Possible Applications to COVID-19 -…

This article was originally published here

Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2020 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10033-6. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic clinical and preclinical studies using cultured cells are on the rise, especially now that the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a public health emergency of international concern, in January, 2020. Thus, this study aims to review the outcomes of ongoing clinical studies on stem cells in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). The results will be associated with possible applications to COVID-19. Only three clinical trials related to stem cells are considered complete, whereby two are in Phase 1 and one is in Phase 2. Basically, the ongoing studies on coronavirus are using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow or the umbilical cord to demonstrate their feasibility, safety, and tolerability. The studies not related to coronavirus are all in ARDS conditions; four of them are in Phase 1 and three in Phase 2. With the COVID-19 boom, many clinical trials are being carried out using different sources with an emphasis on MSC-based therapy used to inhibit inflammation. One of the biggest challenges in the current treatment of COVID-19 is the cytokine storm, however MSCs can prevent or mitigate this cytokine storm through their immunomodulatory capacity. We look forward to the results of the ongoing clinical trials to find a treatment for the disease. Researchers around the world are joining forces to help fight COVID-19. Stem cells used in the current clinical studies are a new therapeutic promise for COVID-19 where pharmacological treatments seem insufficient.Graphical Abstract.

PMID:32827081 | DOI:10.1007/s12015-020-10033-6

Visit link:
Review of Trials Currently Testing Stem Cells for Treatment of Respiratory Diseases: Facts Known to Date and Possible Applications to COVID-19 -...

Orchard Therapeutics Announces Clinical Data Presentations at the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation…

BOSTON and LONDON, Aug. 24, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Orchard Therapeutics (Nasdaq: ORTX), a global gene therapy leader, today announced presentations at the upcoming 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), taking place virtually from August 29 - September 1, 2020. New interim data from OTL-203, an investigational gene therapy for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-I), will be shared as part of an invited oral presentation titled Gene Therapy in Leucodystrophies and Other Metabolic Disorders.

The presentations are listed below and the full preliminary program is available online at the EBMT Annual Meeting website. Presentations will be available to registered attendees for virtual viewing throughout the duration of the live meeting and content will be accessible online following the close of the meeting.

Invited Oral Presentation Details

E7-2: Gene Therapy in Leucodystrophies and Other Metabolic Disorders Session: Gene Therapy for Inherited Disorders 2020 Presenter: M. Ester Bernardo, M.D., Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), Italy Date and time: Monday, August 31, 2020, 4:50-5:10pm CET/10:50-11:10am ET

ePoster Details

Ex-vivo Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA* Poster Session & Number: Gene Therapy; ePoster A214

Lentiviral Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Gene Therapy (HSPC-GT) For Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD): Clinical Outcomes From 33 Patients Poster Session & Number: Gene Therapy; ePoster O075

About Orchard Orchard Therapeutics is a global gene therapy leader dedicated to transforming the lives of people affected by rare diseases through the development of innovative, potentially curative gene therapies. Our ex vivo autologous gene therapy approach harnesses the power of genetically modified blood stem cells and seeks to correct the underlying cause of disease in a single administration. In 2018, Orchard acquired GSKs rare disease gene therapy portfolio, which originated from a pioneering collaboration between GSK and the San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy in Milan, Italy. Orchard now has one of the deepest and most advanced gene therapy product candidate pipelines in the industry spanning multiple therapeutic areas where the disease burden on children, families and caregivers is immense and current treatment options are limited or do not exist.

Orchard has its global headquarters in London and U.S. headquarters in Boston. For more information, please visit http://www.orchard-tx.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Availability of Other Information About Orchard Investors and others should note that Orchard communicates with its investors and the public using the company website (www.orchard-tx.com), the investor relations website (ir.orchard-tx.com), and on social media (Twitter and LinkedIn), including but not limited to investor presentations and investor fact sheets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. The information that Orchard posts on these channels and websites could be deemed to be material information. As a result, Orchard encourages investors, the media, and others interested in Orchard to review the information that is posted on these channels, including the investor relations website, on a regular basis. This list of channels may be updated from time to time on Orchards investor relations website and may include additional social media channels. The contents of Orchards website or these channels, or any other website that may be accessed from its website or these channels, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains certain forward-looking statements about Orchards strategy, future plans and prospects, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include express or implied statements relating to, among other things, Orchards business strategy and goals, and the therapeutic potential of Orchards product candidates, including the product candidate or candidates referred to in this release. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Orchards control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. In particular, these risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: the severity of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orchards business, including on clinical development and commercial programs; the risk that any one or more of Orchards product candidates, including the product candidate or candidates referred to in this release, will not be approved, successfully developed or commercialized; the risk of cessation or delay of any of Orchards ongoing or planned clinical trials; the risk that Orchard may not successfully recruit or enroll a sufficient number of patients for its clinical trials; the risk that prior results, such as signals of safety, activity or durability of effect, observed from preclinical studies or clinical trials will not be replicated or will not continue in ongoing or future studies or trials involving Orchards product candidates; the delay of any of Orchards regulatory submissions; the failure to obtain marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authorities for any of Orchards product candidates or the receipt of restricted marketing approvals; and the risk of delays in Orchards ability to commercialize its product candidates, if approved. Given these uncertainties, the reader is advised not to place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Other risks and uncertainties faced by Orchard include those identified under the heading "Risk Factors" in Orchards quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as subsequent filings and reports filed with the SEC. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release reflect Orchards views as of the date hereof, and Orchard does not assume and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

*Patient was treated by the Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital (RMCH) under a Specials license, granted by the UK government for the use of an unlicensed pharmaceutical product in situations of high unmet need when there is no other treatment option available. Orchard holds the license to the MPS-IIIA investigational gene therapy product (OTL-201) and is funding the ongoing proof-of-concept clinical trial being conducted at RMCH, which utilizes the same technology and procedures that were used to treat this first MPS-IIIA patient.

Contacts

Investors Renee Leck Director, Investor Relations +1 862-242-0764 Renee.Leck@orchard-tx.com

Media Molly Cameron Manager, Corporate Communications +1 978-339-3378 media@orchard-tx.com

Read the rest here:
Orchard Therapeutics Announces Clinical Data Presentations at the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation...