Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report 2020 By Size, Share, Trends, Analysis and Forecast to 2026 – Cole of Duty

Allosource

Stem Cell Therapy Market Competitive Analysis:

In addition, the projections offered in this report were derived using proven research assumptions and methods. In this way, the Stem Cell Therapy research study offers a collection of information and analysis for every facet of the Stem Cell Therapy market such as technology, regional markets, applications and types. The Stem Cell Therapy market report also offers some market presentations and illustrations that include pie charts, diagrams and charts that show the percentage of different strategies implemented by service providers in the Stem Cell Therapy market. In addition, the report was created using complete surveys, primary research interviews, observations and secondary research.

In addition, the Stem Cell Therapy market report introduced the market through various factors such as classifications, definitions, market overview, product specifications, cost structures, manufacturing processes, raw materials and applications. This report also provides key data on SWOT analysis, return data for investments and feasibility analysis for investments. The Stem Cell Therapy market study also highlights the extremely lucrative market opportunities that are influencing the growth of the global market. In addition, the study offers a complete analysis of market size, segmentation and market share. In addition, the Stem Cell Therapy report contains market dynamics such as market restrictions, growth drivers, opportunities, service providers, stakeholders, investors, important market participants, profile assessment and challenges of the global market.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Segments:

The report also underscores their strategics planning including mergers, acquisitions, ventures, partnerships, product launches, and brand developments. Additionally, the report renders the exhaustive analysis of crucial market segments, which includes Stem Cell Therapy types, applications, and regions. The segmentation sections cover analytical and forecast details of each segment based on their profitability, global demand, current revue, and development prospects. The report further scrutinizes diverse regions including North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and South America. The report eventually helps clients in driving their Stem Cell Therapy business wisely and building superior strategies for their Stem Cell Therapy businesses.

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=24113&utm_source=COD&utm_medium=003

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Stem Cell Therapy Market

1.1 Overview of the Market1.2 Scope of Report1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology

3.1 Data Mining3.2 Validation3.3 Primary Interviews3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Stem Cell Therapy Market Outlook

4.1 Overview4.2 Market Dynamics4.2.1 Drivers4.2.2 Restraints4.2.3 Opportunities4.3 Porters Five Force Model4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Solution

6.1 Overview

7 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Vertical

7.1 Overview

8 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Geography

8.1 Overview8.2 North America8.2.1 U.S.8.2.2 Canada8.2.3 Mexico8.3 Europe8.3.1 Germany8.3.2 U.K.8.3.3 France8.3.4 Rest of Europe8.4 Asia Pacific8.4.1 China8.4.2 Japan8.4.3 India8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific8.5 Rest of the World8.5.1 Latin America8.5.2 Middle East

9 Stem Cell Therapy Market Competitive Landscape

9.1 Overview9.2 Company Market Ranking9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles

10.1.1 Overview10.1.2 Financial Performance10.1.3 Product Outlook10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix

11.1 Related Research

Get Complete Report @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/Stem-Cell-Therapy-Market/?utm_source=COD&utm_medium=003

About us:

Verified Market Research is a leading Global Research and Consulting firm servicing over 5000+ customers. Verified Market Research provides advanced analytical research solutions while offering information enriched research studies. We offer insight into strategic and growth analyses, Data necessary to achieve corporate goals and critical revenue decisions.

Our 250 Analysts and SMEs offer a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyse data on more than 15,000 high impact and niche markets. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

We study 14+ categories from Semiconductor & Electronics, Chemicals, Advanced Materials, Aerospace & Defence, Energy & Power, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Automotive & Transportation, Information & Communication Technology, Software & Services, Information Security, Mining, Minerals & Metals, Building & construction, Agriculture industry and Medical Devices from over 100 countries.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

US: +1 (650)-781-4080UK: +44 (203)-411-9686APAC: +91 (902)-863-5784US Toll Free: +1 (800)-7821768

Email: [emailprotected]

Tags: Stem Cell Therapy Market Size, Stem Cell Therapy Market Trends, Stem Cell Therapy Market Growth, Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecast, Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis NMK, Majhi Naukri, Sarkari Naukri, Sarkari Result

Our Trending Reports

Metabolomics Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Stem Cell Therapy Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Go here to see the original:
Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report 2020 By Size, Share, Trends, Analysis and Forecast to 2026 - Cole of Duty

Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Diamond-Blackfan Anemia – Hematology Advisor

Hematopoieticstem cell transplantation (HSCT) is safe and efficient in children with Diamond-Blackfananemia (DBA), especially in the absence of a matched sibling donor (MSD) ormatched unrelated donor (UD), according to a study published in BloodAdvances.

DBAis associated with congenital anomalies and cancer predisposition. Treatmentfor DBA includes regular transfusions with chelation and corticoid therapies. Patientsthat remain transfusion dependent are at risk of complications due to ironoverload and rigorous chelation therapy is indicated. HSCT is mainly utilizedin severe DBA cases and those with secondary myelodysplastic syndrome, yetrecent studies suggest HSCT may also be useful to correct the hematologicalphenotype in children and is indicated in transfusion-dependent patients.

Ateam of European researchers conducted an analysis to determine survivaloutcomes in patients with DBA who underwent allogeneic HSCT. Data was collectedfrom 70 children with DBA (<18 years; 44 males) who were registered inGermany or France between 1985 and 2017.

Primary outcomes included engraftment, cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), probability of overall survival (pOS), and the probability of cGVHD-free survival (cGFS).

Medianage at HSCT was 5.5 years, and 26% of patients were aged 10 years or younger atthe time of transplantation. A large number of transplantations (64%) wereperformed from an MSD and most procedures were performed after 1999 (73%). Allpatients achieved primary engraftment.

Thecumulative incidence of grade 2 to grade 4 and grade 3 to grade 4 aGVHD was 24%and 7%, respectively. Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 11%. Nosignificant difference in the incidence of aGVHD comparing MSD and UD HSCT wasobserved. Over time, the probability of cGFS (87%) significantly improved from68% in years earlier than 2000 compared with 94% in 2000 and later (P <.01). cGFS was comparable forpatients who received a transplant from either a MSD or an unrelated donor(UD). However, after 1999, no severe cGVHD or deaths were reported followingMSD-HSCT, whereas the cGFS for 24 patients transplanted from an UD was 87%. Thechange of cGFS in patients transplanted at a younger age compared with olderpatients (<10 years: 90% vs 10-18 years: 78%) was not statisticallysignificant.

Studylimitations included the inability to fully analyze the role of ATG and ATGdosing due to the retrospective nature of the study, the lack of availabilityof genetic testing for all of the patients, and the small sample size ofpatients between the ages of 10 to 18 years.

In summary,these data indicate that HSCT is efficient and safe in young DBA patients and should be considered ifa MSD or matched UD is available. HSCT for transfusion dependency only must becritically discussed in older patients, the authors concluded.

Reference

Strahm B, Loewecke F, Niemeyer CM, et al. Favorable outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood Adv. 2020;4(8):17601769.

See the original post:
Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Diamond-Blackfan Anemia - Hematology Advisor

The Week Ahead In Biotech: Aquestive Awaits FDA Decision, Earnings Flow Slows – Benzinga

Biotech stocks had another up week, with the American Society of Gene & Stem Cell Therapy virtual conference presentations and the ASCO abstracts made available onlineThursday calling the shots. Earnings news flow continued to taper.

Biopharma companies working on vaccines/therapies for COVID-19 continued to provide updates. Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVAX) shares more than doubled, thanks to an announcement concerning a $384 million grant from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

Here are the key catalysts for the unfolding week.

The FDA is due to rule on Aquestive Therapeutics Inc's (NASDAQ: AQST) NDA for apomorphine sublingual film (APL-130277), which is being evaluated for treating off episodes in Parkinson's disease patients. APL-130277 is being developed by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, in partnership with Aquestive.

Entera Bio Ltd (NASDAQ: ENTX) is scheduled to report on Thursday interim three-month top-line biomarker data for the first 50% of the patients enrolled in the Phase 2 osteoporosis clinical trial of EB613.

Oncolytics Biotech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ONCY) is due to present at the ESMO Breast Cancer Conference, interim biomarker data from the AWARE-1 early-stage breast cancer study that is evaluating its pelareorep along with Roche Holdings AG's(OTC: RHHBY) Tecentriq.

See Also: Results From Oxford University's Human Trial Of Coronavirus Vaccine Could Arrive In June; Where Inovio, Moderna Stand

Monday

Milestone Scientific Inc. (NYSE: MLSS) (before the market open)Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corp (NASDAQ: ADMP) (after the close)

Tuesday

Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (NYSE: TARO) (after the close)Ascendis Pharma A/S (NASDAQ: ASND) (after the close)

Wednesday

Mediwound Ltd (NASDAQ: MDWD) (before the market open)China Biologic Products Holdings Inc (NASDAQ: CBPO) (after the close)

Thursday

Entera Bio (before the market open)Medtronic PLC (NYSE: MDT) (before the market open)PAVmed Inc (NASDAQ: PAVM) (after the close)Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ: XENE) (after the close)

ORIC Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ: ORIC)

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read more:
The Week Ahead In Biotech: Aquestive Awaits FDA Decision, Earnings Flow Slows - Benzinga

Venetoclax May Play Role as Salvage Therapy in Multiply Relapsed MCL – Targeted Oncology

Venetoclax (Venclexta) resistance is primarily associated with non-BCL2 gene mutations in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), according to a study published in American Journal of Hematology. The analysis also demonstrated that venetoclax could play a potential role as salvage therapy among patients with MCL with multiple relapses.

This is the first report on the genomic profile of patients with venetoclax-resistant MCL, demonstrating that the acquisition of BCL2 mutations was infrequent and acquisition of TP53, SMARCA4, CELSR3, CCND1, andKMT2D alterations may play a role in disease progression on venetoclax therapy.

Furthermore, in our cohort of venetoclax combined with other agents, the PFS was longer compared to single-agent (8.3 vs 3.5 months), therefore we hypothesize that combination of venetoclax with other agents are promising compared to single-agent venetoclax, however randomized clinical trials would confirm whether venetoclax should be used as single-agent or in combination with other agents in relapsed patients with MCL, wrote lead author Shuangtao Zhao, MD, PhD, assistant professor, Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

The objective response rate (ORR) with venetoclax was 50% (12 of 24), and 21% had a complete response (CR; 5 of 24). Partial responses (PRs) were observed in 29% of patients (7 of 24), and 4 patients were not evaluable for response. Six patients were primary refractory and 2 had stable disease (SD).

The ORR was not significantly different between venetoclax monotherapy (42%) and combination (58%). The median duration of best response was 4 months (range, 1-16).

After a median follow-up of 17 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months. The duration of response among those who had a CR was 8.6 months versus 4 months in those who had a PR (P =.58).

At the time of the last follow-up, 9 patients remained alive, 15 had died and 16 progressed. The median survival post-venetoclax treatment was 7.3 months.

Nine patients received subsequent therapy, and 4 responded, which included 1 CR after rituximab, mesna, Ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide (R-MINE); and 3 PRs, 1 from umbralisib (TGR-1202), 1 from acalabrutinib (Calquence), and 1 from local radiation followed by R-HCVAD chemotherapy. All 4 responders were refractory to the BTK inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib (Imbruvica) prior to venetoclax treatment. Additionally, 2 patients had SD, and 3 did not respond to subsequent therapy.

Five patients had paired samples from whole exome sequencing (WES) before and after progression on venetoclax. Two of these patients had a CR (patients 1 and 2), 2 had a PR (patients 4 and 6), and 1 had SD (patient 7). Overall, investigators conducted WES in 12 samples, including these patients.

Patient 1 received single-agent venetoclax following 6 prior lines of therapy, and upon progression on venetoclax, the patient received R-MINE chemoimmunotherapy for 5 cycles and achieved a CR that was lost to follow-up. Patient 2 received venetoclax in combination with acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (Gazyva), and radiation after 5 prior lines of therapy, which included an allogeneic stem cell transplant and did not receive further therapy after venetoclax.

Patient 4 received venetoclax plus obinutuzumab after 4 prior lines of therapy and received single-agent lenalidomide (Revlimid) plus bortezomib (Velcade) without response. Patient 6 had received venetoclax plus rituximab after 6 prior lines of therapy and received 7 subsequent lines of therapy after progression on the combination regimen. The patient ultimately progressed after receiving an experimental anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, which was rechallenged with venetoclax/obinutuzumab/ibrutinib, obinutuzumab plus MINE, gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, R-HCVAD, and bendamustine/rituximab. Patient 7, who had 7 prior lines of therapy, received venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab plus acalabrutinib, and was treated with 2 lines of subsequent therapy following progression on the venetoclax combination, including abemaciclib (Verzenio) and copanlisib (Aliqopa), which induced a PR before subsequently progressing.

All 5 patients had received prior ibrutinib before receiving the venetoclax treatment. Patients 1 and 2 had transformed MCL, and patients 6 and 7 had blastoid morphology MCL.

Alteration frequencies of certain genes increased by > 2-fold at progression, including TP53 (83% vs. 33%), KMT2D (67% vs. 17%), CELSR3 (67% vs. 17%), CCND1 (67% vs. 17%), KMT2C (50% vs. 17%), and ATM(50% vs. 17%). CDKN2A (67%) and NOTCH2 (50%) were increased at progression as well. A BCL2 mutation was observed in 33% of patients at progression. SMARCA4 mutations were only detected after progression.

Predominant genetic alterations at progression were observed in patient 1 (TP52, NOTCH2), patient 2 (CDKN2A, CCND1, KMT2C, and SMARCA4), patient 4 (TP53, NSD2), patient 6 (TP53, KMT2D, ATM, Bcl2,and NOTCH1) and patient 7 (TP53, CDKN2A, KMT2D, CELSR3, SMARCA4, CCND1 and gain of Bcl2). An increase in tumor mutational burden was also observed, as well as predominance of mutation signature 5 at progression.

Clonal and sub-clonal evolution of mutations associated with clinical venetoclax resistance were demonstrated in patients 2 and 7. Investigators also noted a high degree of intra-tumoral heterogeneity and treatment-induced clonal evolution as resistance.

All 5 patients had expanded TP53, SMARCA4, CELSR3, KMT2D, and KMT2C mutations at progression. Acquired DNA copy number changes were also observed in patients 2 and 7 at progression, including loss of 9p (CDKN2A) and 17p (TP53), and gain of 11p (CCND1). In patient 7, investigators noted an alteration in chromosome 18q21 depicting BCL2 mutation at progression.

The degree of aneuploidy was significantly higher among patients at progression and was noteworthy for copy number gain on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 12, and 18, and deletion was noted at chromosome 15.

For this analysis, data were collected from 24 patients with MCL who were treated with venetoclax salvage therapy, either alone or in combination. Twelve patients received venetoclax as monotherapy, and venetoclax was given in combination with either obinutuzumab in 8 patients, a BTKi with/without obinutuzumab in 3 patients, and chemotherapy in 1 patient. The patients in this study were heavily pretreated.

Our study demonstrates that venetoclax is a potential salvage therapy in multiply relapsed patients with MCL. The majority (92%) patients in this study were exposed to BTKi, 66% were BTKi refractory, and these patients exhibited poor outcomes, wrote Zhao.

Reference

Zhao S, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Navsaria L, et al. Efficacy of venetoclax in high risk relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) outcomes and mutation profile from venetoclax resistant MCL patients [Published Online April 2, 2020].American Journal of Hematology. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25796.

Excerpt from:
Venetoclax May Play Role as Salvage Therapy in Multiply Relapsed MCL - Targeted Oncology

GEMoaB Announces Data Presentations Supporting Key Features of Its UniCAR Platform At the Upcoming American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)…

DRESDEN, Germany, May 15, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- GEMoaB, a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of next-generation immunotherapies for hard-to-treat cancers, today announced acceptance of three presentations on pre-clinical data for its proprietary universal CAR-T platform (UniCAR) targeting acute leukemia and solid tumors at the 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR II) being held from June 22-24.

CAR-T cell therapy holds great promise for treating a wide range of malignancies. Nevertheless, the CAR-T approach faces multiple challenges, including the risk of acute and long-term toxicities, a current lack of suitable targets, insufficient engraftment and persistence and a microenvironment hostile to CAR-T cells especially in solid tumors.

The AACR poster presentations highlight GEMoaB's rapidly switchable universal CAR-T platform, UniCAR. The UniCAR platform promises an improved therapeutic window and increased efficacy and safety over conventional CAR-T therapies in hematological malignancies and solid tumors.

"At this year's AACR meeting II, we are pleased to present important pre-clinical data from our rapidly switchable UniCAR platform," said Armin Ehninger, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer of GEMoaB. "Our data suggest the opportunity to actively target CD123 in acute leukemias as well as PSMA and PD-L1 in solid tumors due to UniCAR's rapid switch on/off capability. In solid tumor models, they also show potentially superior tumor penetration, expansion and persistence capabilities as well as a reduced risk of immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment."

The data further support the ongoing clinical development of UniCAR in hematological malignancies and solid tumors. A Phase IA dose-finding study of the first UniCAR asset, UniCAR-T-CD123, for the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML and ALL is ongoing. A Phase IA study with UniCAR-T-PSMA directed against CRPC and other PSMA-expressing late-stage solid tumors will be initiated by H2 2020.

GEMoaB's poster presentations at AACR II:

AboutGEMoaB

GEMoaB is a privately-owned, clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company that isaiming to become a globally leading biopharmaceutical company. By advancing its proprietary UniCAR, RevCAR and ATAC platforms, the company will discover, develop, manufacture and commercialize next-generation immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer patients with a high unmet medical need.

GEMoaB has a broad pipeline of product candidates in pre-clinical and clinical development for the treatment of hematological malignancies as well as solid tumors. Its clinical stage assets GEM333, an Affinity-Tailored Adaptor for T-Cells (ATAC) with binding specificity to CD33 in relapsed/refractory AML, and GEM3PSCA, an ATAC with binding specificity to PSCA for the treatment of castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and other PSCA expressing late stage solid tumors, are currently investigated in Phase I studies and globally partnered with Bristol-Myers Squibb. A Phase IA dose-finding study of the first UniCAR asset, UniCAR-T-CD123 for treatment of relapsed/refractory AML and ALL is ongoing, UniCAR-T-PSMA against CRPC and other PSMA-expressing late-stage solid tumors, is planned to be tested in a Phase IA study initiated by H2 2020.

Manufacturing expertise, capability and capacity are key for developing cellular immunotherapies for cancer patients. GEMoaB has established a preferred partnership with its sister company Cellex, a world leader in manufacturing hematopoietic blood stem cell products and a leading European CMO for CAR-T cells, co-operating in that area with several large biotech companies.

About UniCAR

GEMoaB is developing a rapidly switchable universal CAR-T platform, UniCAR, to improve the therapeutic window and increase efficacy and safety of CAR-T cell therapies in more challenging cancers, including solid tumors. Standard CAR-T cells depend on the presence and direct binding of cancer antigens for activation and proliferation. An inherent key feature of the UniCAR platform is a rapidly switchable on/off mechanism (less than 4 hours after interruption of TM supply) enabled by the short pharmacokinetic half-life and fast internalization of soluble adaptors termed targeting modules (TMs). These TMs provide the antigen-specificity to activate UniCAR gene-modified T-cells (UniCAR-T) and consist of a highly flexible antigen-binding moiety, linked to a small peptide motif recognized by UniCAR-T.

About ATAC

GEMoaB's platform of Affinity-Tailored Adaptors for T-Cells (ATAC) is characterized by high binding affinity to tumor antigens and lower affinity to the CD3 antigen on effector T-cells, preventing T-cell auto-activation in pre-clinical models. Safety and tolerability of the treatment are also increased by the relatively short serum half-life (60 min). The use of fully humanized antibodies reduces the risk of immunogenicity even in case of chronic dosing. Half-life extended ATACs are in pre-clinical development.

More information can be found at http://www.gemoab.com.

Forward-looking Statements

This announcement includes forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results and matters discussed in the forward looking statements. Forward looking statements include statements concerning our plans, goals, future events and or other information that is not historical information.

The Company does not assume any liability whatsoever for forward-looking statements. The Company assumes that potential partners will perform and rely on their own independent analyses as the case may be. The Company will be under no obligation to update the Information.

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/947610/GEMoaB_Logo.jpg

For further information please contact:Constanze Medack c.medack@gemoab.com; Tel.: +49 351-4466-45027

Investor Contact:Michael Pehl m.pehl@gemoab.com Tel.: +49 351-4466-45030

Read more:
GEMoaB Announces Data Presentations Supporting Key Features of Its UniCAR Platform At the Upcoming American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)...