Category Archives: Adult Stem Cells


Stem Cell And Regenerative Therapy Market Industry Outlook, Growth Prospects and Key Opportunities – Kentucky Journal 24

The global stem cell and regenerative medicines market should grow from $21.8 billion in 2019 to reach $55.0 billion by 2024 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.4% for the period of 2019-2024.

Report Scope:

The scope of this report is broad and covers various type of product available in the stem cell and regenerative medicines market and potential application sectors across various industries. The current report offers a detailed analysis of the stem cell and regenerative medicines market.

The report highlights the current and future market potential of stem cell and regenerative medicines and provides a detailed analysis of the competitive environment, recent development, merger and acquisition, drivers, restraints, and technology background in the market. The report also covers market projections through 2024.

Request For Report sample @ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/sample/11723

The report details market shares of stem cell and regenerative medicines based on products, application, and geography. Based on product the market is segmented into therapeutic products, cell banking, tools and reagents. The therapeutics products segments include cell therapy, tissue engineering and gene therapy. By application, the market is segmented into oncology, cardiovascular disorders, dermatology, orthopedic applications, central nervous system disorders, diabetes, others

The market is segmented by geography into the following regions: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East and Africa. The report presents detailed analyses of major countries such as the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Germany, the U.K. France, Japan, China and India. For market estimates, data is provided for 2018 as the base year, with forecasts for 2019 through 2024. Estimated values are based on product manufacturers total revenues. Projected and forecasted revenue values are in constant U.S. dollars, unadjusted for inflation.

Request For Report Discounts @ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/discount/11723

Report Includes:

28 data tables An overview of global markets for stem cell and regenerative medicines Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2018, estimates for 2019, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024 Details of historic background and description of embryonic and adult stem cells Information on stem cell banking and stem cell research A look at the growing research & development activities in regenerative medicine Coverage of ethical issues in stem cell research & regulatory constraints on biopharmaceuticals Comprehensive company profiles of key players in the market, including Aldagen Inc., Caladrius Biosciences Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Gamida Cell Ltd. and Novartis AG

Summary

The global market for stem cell and regenerative medicines was valued at REDACTED billion in 2018. The market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of REDACTED to reach approximately REDACTED billion by 2024. Growth of the global market is attributed to the factors such as growingprevalence of cancer, technological advancement in product, growing adoption of novel therapeuticssuch as cell therapy, gene therapy in treatment of chronic diseases and increasing investment fromprivate players in cell-based therapies.

In the global market, North America held the highest market share in 2018. The Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The growing government funding for regenerative medicines in research institutes along with the growing number of clinical trials based on cell-based therapy and investment in R&D activities is expected to supplement the growth of the stem cell and regenerative market in Asia-Pacific region during the forecast period.

Reasons for Doing This Study

Global stem cell and regenerative medicines market comprises of various products for novel therapeutics that are adopted across various applications. New advancement and product launches have influenced the stem cell and regenerative medicines market and it is expected to grow in the near future. The biopharmaceutical companies are investing significantly in cell-based therapeutics. The government organizations are funding research and development activities related to stem cell research. These factors are impacting the stem cell and regenerative medicines market positively and augmenting the demand of stem cell and regenerative therapy among different application segments. The market is impacted through adoption of stem cell therapy. The key players in the market are investing in development of innovative products. The stem cell therapy market is likely to grow during the forecast period owing to growing investment from private companies, increasing in regulatory approval of stem cell-based therapeutics for treatment of chronic diseases and growth in commercial applications of regenerative medicine.

Products based on stem cells do not yet form an established market, but unlike some other potential applications of bioscience, stem cell technology has already produced many significant products in important therapeutic areas. The potential scope of the stem cell market is now becoming clear, and it is appropriate to review the technology, see its current practical applications, evaluate the participating companies and look to its future.

The report provides the reader with a background on stem cell and regenerative therapy, analyzes the current factors influencing the market, provides decision-makers the tools that inform decisions about expansion and penetration in this market.

More Info of Impact Covid19 @ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/covid-19-analysis/11723

Excerpt from:
Stem Cell And Regenerative Therapy Market Industry Outlook, Growth Prospects and Key Opportunities - Kentucky Journal 24

Radiation to treat pediatric cancers may have lasting impact on heart and metabolic health – Science Codex

Bottom Line: Adult survivors of childhood abdominal and pelvic cancers who had been treated with radiation therapy experienced abnormalities in body composition and had worse cardiometabolic health compared with the general population.

Journal in Which the Study was Published: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

Author: Carmen Wilson, PhD, assistant member in the Epidemiology and Cancer Control department at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Background: "Body composition abnormalities and cardiometabolic impairments are of concern among survivors given that in the general population, these conditions increase the risk of developing life-threatening diseases including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes," said Wilson. The impacts of radiation therapy on metabolic health have been previously reported for survivors of pediatric leukemia, brain tumors, and hematopoietic stem cell transplants, but the impacts on survivors of pediatric abdominal and pelvic tumors remained unclear, she said.

How the Study was Conducted: In this study, Wilson and colleagues assessed 431 adult survivors of pediatric abdominal or pelvic solid tumors who had been previously treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. The median age of participants during the study was 29.9 years. The most frequent childhood diagnoses were neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, and germ cell tumor, and the median age of participants at diagnosis was 3.6 years. Approximately 37 and 36 percent of participants had received abdominal and pelvic radiation therapy, respectively, as part of their treatment.

To assess the impacts of radiation therapy, the authors compared the participants' body composition, metabolic abnormalities, and physical function to those of the general population, using age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched data from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Results: Wilson and colleagues found that compared with data from NHANES, the survivors in their study were significantly more likely to have insulin resistance (33.8 percent vs. 40.6 percent), high triglycerides (10.02 percent vs. 18.4 percent), and low levels of high-density lipoproteins, commonly referred to as "good cholesterol" (28.9 percent vs. 33.5 percent). There were no significant differences in the levels of low-density lipoproteins ("bad cholesterol") between survivors and the general population.

The analyses also demonstrated that survivors of abdominal and pelvic solid tumors had lower relative lean body mass than the general population and that the lower relative lean body mass was associated with the dose of prior abdominal or pelvic radiation. Lean body mass, which measures the non-fat content of the body, is related to basal metabolic rate; therefore, an individual with lower lean body mass burns fewer calories while resting than someone with higher lean body mass, Wilson explained.

There was no significant difference in relative fat body mass between survivors and the general population; however, survivors who had high relative fat mass had reduced quadricep strength and poor physical performance (as measured by a sit-and-reach test and distance covered during a six-minute walk) compared with survivors who had low relative fat mass.

Author's Comments: "It is possible that abdominal and pelvic-directed radiation therapy damages postural muscles or subtly impairs sex hormone production, ultimately affecting muscle mass," said Wilson. She explained that radiation therapy has been shown to cause muscle injury, resulting in muscle fiber loss and loss of muscle regenerative cells, in animal studies. Wilson added that lifestyle choices may also impact relative lean mass and cardiometabolic health among survivors.

Wilson suggested that future research could examine the impact of radiation therapy and other cancer treatments on fat distribution across the body since increased abdominal obesity has been shown to be a better predictor of adverse health effects than measures of overall obesity.

In addition, Wilson is interested in exploring how interventions directed at lifestyle behaviors could improve lean mass and decrease fat mass among survivors of pediatric cancers. "While it may not be possible to avoid radiation therapy as a key treatment for many solid tumors, early research suggests that resistance training interventions in survivors increase lean mass," said Wilson. "Further work is needed to see if training would also impact cardiometabolic impairments in this population."

Study Limitations: A limitation of the study is that cardiometabolic outcomes may have been measured differently in the study cohort compared with those surveyed by NHANES.

Here is the original post:
Radiation to treat pediatric cancers may have lasting impact on heart and metabolic health - Science Codex

Opportunities in the Global Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPS Cell) Industry – PRNewswire

DUBLIN, Aug. 11, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Global Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPS Cell) Industry Report" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Since the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) a large and thriving research product market has grown into existence, largely because the cells are non-controversial and can be generated directly from adult cells. It is clear that iPSCs represent a lucrative market segment because methods for commercializing this cell type are expanding every year and clinical studies investigating iPSCs are swelling in number.

Therapeutic applications of iPSCs have surged in recent years. 2013 was a landmark year in Japan because it saw the first cellular therapy involving the transplant of iPSCs into humans initiated at the RIKEN Center in Kobe, Japan. Led by Masayo Takahashi of the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology (CDB), it investigated the safety of iPSC-derived cell sheets in patients with macular degeneration. In another world-first, Cynata Therapeutics received approval in 2016 to launch the world's first formal clinical trial of an allogeneic iPSC-derived cell product (CYP-001) for the treatment of GvHD. Riding the momentum within the CAR-T field, Fate Therapeutics is developing FT819, its off-the-shelf iPSC-derived CAR-T cell product candidate. Numerous physician-led studies using iPSCs are also underway in Japan, a leading country for basic and applied iPSC applications.

iPS Cell Commercialization

Methods of commercializing induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are diverse and continue to expand. iPSC cell applications include, but are not limited to:

Since the discovery of iPSC technology in 2006, significant progress has been made in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. New pathological mechanisms have been identified and explained, new drugs identified by iPSC screens are in the pipeline, and the first clinical trials employing human iPSC-derived cell types have been initiated. The main objectives of this report are to describe the current status of iPSC research, patents, funding events, industry partnerships, biomedical applications, technologies, and clinical trials for the development of iPSC-based therapeutics.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Report Overview

2. Introduction

3. History of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCS)

4. Research Publications on IPSCS

5. IPSCS: Patent Landscape

6. Clinical Trials Involving IPSCS

7. Funding for IPSC

8. Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: An Overview

9. Human IPSC Banking

10. Biomedical Applications of IPSCS

11. Other Novel Applications of IPSCS

12. Deals in the IPSCS Sector

13. Market Overview

14. Company Profiles

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/kpc95y

About ResearchAndMarkets.com ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Read more here:
Opportunities in the Global Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPS Cell) Industry - PRNewswire

Human Embryonic Stem Cells market to see major growth by 2026 | Lonza Group Ltd., Life Technologies Corporation, NuVasive Inc., TiGenix NV, Sumanas,…

Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells Market Report is a professional and depth study on the present state also focuses on the major drivers, business strategists and effective growth for the key players. It provides accurate market figures and forecasts that have been calculated with the use of advanced primary and secondary research techniques. It includes deep segment analysis of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market where the main focus is on segments by product and application. It also offers a detailed analysis of the regional growth of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market , taking into consideration important market opportunities available across the world. Even the vendor landscape is highly focused upon with comprehensive profiling of leading companies operating in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market.

The COVID-19 outbreak is now traveling around the world, leaving a trail of destruction in its wake. This report discusses the impact of the virus on leading companies in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market sector.

Access PDF Version of this Report at: https://www.amplemarketreports.com/sample-request/covid-19-outbreak-global-human-embryonic-stem-cells-industry-1881855.html

The following Companies as the Key Players in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells Market Research Report are: Lonza Group Ltd., Life Technologies Corporation, NuVasive Inc., TiGenix N.V, Sumanas, Aastrom Biosciences, Cynata Therapeutics Ltd., Genlantis, Anterogen Co., Ltd, CellTherapies P/L, BioRestorative Therapies Inc., Vericel Corporation, BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc., Cesca Therapeutics Inc., Kite Pharma Inc., PromoCell, Orthofix International N.V., Ocata Therapeutics Inc., Beike Biotechnology

The report includes a detailed segmentation study of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market, where all of the segments are analyzed in terms of market growth, share, growth rate, and other vital factors. It also provides the attractiveness index of segments so that players can be informed about lucrative revenue pockets of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market. The extensive evaluation of segments provided in the report will help you to direct your investments, strategies, and teams to focus on the right areas of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market.

In this research study, the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market is segmented according to product type and application.

Major Types are follows: Adult Sources, Fetal Sources, Others.

Major Application are follows: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Tissue repair damage, Autoimmune diseases, As gene therapy vectors..

The report also brings to light the growth prospects of leading regional markets and factors supporting their advancement.

Major Regions are: North America (Covered in Chapter 7 and 14), United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe (Covered in Chapter 8 and 14), Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia.

Click to view Tables, Charts, Figures, TOC, and Companies Mentioned in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells Market Report at-https://www.amplemarketreports.com/report/covid-19-outbreak-global-human-embryonic-stem-cells-industry-1881855.html

Take a look at some of the important sections of the report:

Market Overview: Readers are informed about the scope of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market and different products offered therein. The section also gives a glimpse of all of the segments studied in the report with their consumption and production growth rate comparisons. In addition, it provides statistics related to market size, revenue, and production.

Production Market Share by Region: Apart from the production share of regional markets analyzed in the report, readers are informed about their gross margin, price, revenue, and production growth rate here.

Company Profiles and Key Figures: In this section, the authors of the report include the company profiling of leading players operating in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market. There are various factors considered for assessing the players studied in the report: markets served, production sites, price, gross margin, revenue, production, product application, product specification, and product introduction.

Manufacturing Cost Analysis: Here, readers are provided with detailed manufacturing process analysis, industrial chain analysis, manufacturing cost structure analysis, and raw materials analysis. Under raw materials analysis, the report includes details about key suppliers of raw materials, price trend of raw materials, and important raw materials.

Market Dynamics: The analysts explore critical influence factors, market drivers, challenges, risk factors, opportunities, and market trends in this section.

Get Full Report Now at https://www.amplemarketreports.com/buy-report.html?report=1881855&format=1

We follow industry best practices and primary and secondary research methodologies to prepare our market research publications. Our analysts take references from company websites, government documents, press releases, and financial reports and conduct face-to-face or telephonic interviews with industry experts for collecting information and data. There is one complete section of the report dedicated to the authors list, data sources, methodology/research approach, and publishers disclaimer. Then there is another section that includes research findings and conclusion.

We can customize the report as per your requirements. Our analysts are experts in Human Embryonic Stem Cells market research and analysis and have a healthy experience in report customization after having served tons of clients to date. The main objective of preparing the research study is to inform you about future market challenges and opportunities. The report is one of the best resources you could use to secure a strong position in the Human Embryonic Stem Cells market.

About Ample Market Research

Ample Market Research provides comprehensive market research services and solutions across various industry verticals and helps businesses perform exceptionally well. Attention to detail, consistency, and quality are elements we focus on. However, our mainstay remains to be knowledge, expertise, and resources to make us industry players.

Our mission is to capture every aspect of the market and offer businesses a document that makes solid grounds for crucial decision making.

Contact Us

Ample Market Research & Consulting Private Limited

William James

Media & Marketing Manager

Address: 3680 Wilshire Blvd, Ste P04 1387 Los Angeles, CA 90010

Call: +1 (530) 868 6979

Email: [emailprotected]

Website: http://www.amplemarketreports.com

Johnathan is Sr.Content Writer in Levee Report , He Expertise in Business Research

Excerpt from:
Human Embryonic Stem Cells market to see major growth by 2026 | Lonza Group Ltd., Life Technologies Corporation, NuVasive Inc., TiGenix NV, Sumanas,...

Stem Cell Banking Market Industry Analysis & Forecast (2019-2026) by Type, Service, Application and Geography. – Good Night, Good Hockey

Stem Cell Banking Market was valued US$ XX Mn in 2018 and is expected to reach US$ XX Mn by 2026, at a XX% CAGR of around during a forecast period.

REQUEST FOR FREE SAMPLE REPORT:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/13540

A stem cell bank is a facility, which stores stem cells for future use. Stem cell banking is the process of conserving stem cells at temperatures below the freezing point. These cells used for the treatment of Parkinsons syndrome, cancer, diabetes, heart diseases, and others.

The major driving factors of the market growth are an increase in research and development activities in regards to applications of stem cells and a rise in the prevalence of fatal chronic diseases. The large number of births occurring worldwide and growth in GDP & disposable income are expected to further boost the market growth. Additionally, an initiative taken by organizations and companies to spread awareness in regards to the benefits of stem cells and untapped market in the developing regions are expected to fuel the market growth. However, high processing & storage costs and lack of acceptance and awareness in developing economies adversely affect market growth.

The report covers the segments in the pontoon boat market such as tube, service, and application. Based on service type, the sample preservation & storage segment is expected to hold maximum market share during the forecast period due to the increasing adoption of stem cell banking services in key countries, growing numbers of stem cell banks across developing countries, increasing public consciousness about the therapeutic applications of stem cells.

By application, the personalized banking applications segment is the fastest-growing segment owing to increasing adoption of precision medicine across established countries, the growing prevalence of blood & immune system-related disorders among new-borns & children, &growing public worries regarding the clinical abuse of stored stem cell samples.

North America is expected to hold the largest market share during the forecast period. The increasing network of stem cell banking services, ongoing support of stem cell lines for various disease treatment, new technological developments in the field of stem cell collection & preservation techniques, increasing public-private investments for stem cell researches, rising number of stem cell transplantation procedures are pouring the growth of the Stem Cell Banking Market in North America.

LifeCodexx AG, a Provider of non-invasive prenatal DNA testing in Europe, declared its partnership with LifeCell International Pvt. Ltd., an Indian mother & baby preventive health care Type, to bring PrenaTesT, qNIPT testing for the first time to India. The qNIPT technology, which detects the presence of foetal trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) from maternal blood, received CE marking (European Conformity) in December 2016.

Cordlife Group Limited and China Cord Blood Corporation announced that the two companies collaborated in order to support patients across the China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Indonesia, India, the Philippines, and Malaysia to identify suitable cord blood matching units for stem cell therapy.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive analysis of the Global Stem Cell Banking Materials Market including all the stakeholders of the industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market size and trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers all the aspects of the industry with a dedicated study of key players that includes market leaders, followers and new entrants by region.

PORTER, SVOR, PESTEL analysis with the potential impact of micro-economic factors by region on the market have been presented in the report. External as well as internal factors that are supposed to affect the business positively or negatively have been analyzed, which will give a clear futuristic view of the industry to the decision-makers.

The report also helps in understanding Global Stem Cell Banking Materials Market dynamics, structure by analyzing the market segments and project the Global Stem Cell Banking Materials Market size. Clear representation of competitive analysis of key players by type, price, financial position, product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence in the Global Stem Cell Banking Materials Market make the report investors guide. Scope of the report Stem Cell Banking Market:

Stem Cell Banking Market, by Type:

Umbilical Cord Stem Cell Adult Stem Cell Embryonic Stem Cell Stem Cell Banking Market, by Service Type

Storage Analysis Processing Collection & Transportation Stem Cell Banking Market, by Application

Cerebral Palsy Thalassemia Cancer Diseases Diabetes Autism Stem Cell Banking Market, by region

North America Europe APAC Latin America MEA Key Players Stem Cell Banking Market:

1. CCBC 2. CBR Systems, Inc. 3. ViaCord 4. Esperite 5. Vcanbio 6. Boyalife 7. LifeCell 8. Crioestaminal 9. RMS Regrow 10. Cryo-cell 11. Cordlife Group 12. PBKM FamiCord 13. Cells4life 14. Beikebiotech 15. StemCyte 16. Cellsafe Biotech Group 17. PacifiCord 18. Americord 19. Krio 20. Familycord 21. CryoStemcell

Browse Full Report with Facts and Figures Report at:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/stem-cell-banking-market/13540/

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info:

Name: Vikas Godage

Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD.

Email: sales@maximizemarketresearch.com

Contact: +919607065656/ +919607195908

Website:www.maximizemarketresearch.com

Continued here:
Stem Cell Banking Market Industry Analysis & Forecast (2019-2026) by Type, Service, Application and Geography. - Good Night, Good Hockey

Salles Speaks to the Potential Benefit of the Tafasitamab Combo in the R/R DLBCL Setting – Targeted Oncology

On July 31, 2020, the FDA granted accelerated approval to the combination of tafasitamab (Monjuvi) and lenalidomide (Revlimid) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.1

The approval was granted based on findings from the phase 2 L-MIND trial that assessed the safety and efficacy of the combination of tafasitamab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who had received 2 prior lines of therapy, including a CD20-directed therapy, and who are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

In this trial, the trial induced an objective response rate of 60%, with complete responses in 43%. The median duration of response was 21.7 months and 72% had a response lasting at least a year.2

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months with a 50% PFS rate at 1 year and 46% at 18 months. The median overall survival was not reached but 74% were alive at 1 year and 64% at 18 months.

With the observational Re-MIND study, the investigators confirmed the benefit that tafasitamab added to the combination by comparing real-world responses with lenalidomide alone to those in the L-MIND trial. Patients who received lenalidomide alone comparatively had an objective response rate of 34.2% with complete responses in 13.2%. The median PFS was 4.0 months with the monotherapy and the median overall survival was 9.4 months.3

I think its great news for patients with lymphoma and we hope we can offer this form of therapy to them soon and I think this is real progress in the field, Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, told Targeted Oncology about his perspective on the recent approval.

In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Salles, who is professor at the University of Lyon and chair of the Department of Hematology at Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud in France, and who will soon be moving to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York as chief of the Lymphoma Service, explained the unmet needs in DLBCL that may be filled by this new option in the treatment armamentarium and the findings that led to the approval of the combination.

Targeted Oncology: Could you describe the unmet needs in DLBCL that led to the investigation of this combination?

Salles: So DLBCL is the most frequent lymphoma entity. Now more than 30,000 patients are affected [with DLBCL] each [year in the United States].

For patients that are younger and without comorbidities, salvage chemotherapy followed by a stem cell transplant is a standard of care. However, about half of the patients do not respond to salvage chemotherapy. And even after autologous transplant, half of the patients will relapse. And for the other patients that are not transplant eligible, we usually use palliative chemotherapy such as rituximab (Rituxan) and bendamustine or other rituximab and cytotoxicbased regimen. And if those patients fail this salvage regimen, we usually cant go on too long with other regimens, since we are hampered by the cytotoxicity of these different regimens. So there is a real need to improve the outcome of patients that have failed the first line of therapy in DLBCL.

Obviously in the field we have seen CAR T-cell therapy emerging in the recent years. And this has been a major progress, but its a progress that is also hampered by the difficulty of accessing CAR therapy, you need to have this treatment in specialized centers, a significant amount of grade 3/4 adverse effects that are specific to CAR T-cell therapycytokine release syndromes, neurological events, and cytopenias may occur. And it's also not necessarily a treatment for which all patients can be eligible because for patients with a rapidly growing disease there is a waiting time to get the CAR T reinfused and some patients cannot [wait through the manufacturing process]. So, there are clearly some unmet needs.

We have seen polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy), which can be combined with bendamustine and rituximab, and was approved recently and selinexor (Xpovio) also recently [was approved], but they don't necessarily fulfill the whole unmet need in the field.

Could you give some background on the mechanism of action for tafasitamab and why this combination was explored in this setting?

So, tafasitamab is a CD19 fFc-enhanced monoclonal antibody that will mobilize the effector cells such as NK cells and macrophages and enhance their cytotoxic activity against tumor cells. As a single agent, it has demonstrated safety and modest efficacy, but there was a rationale based on this mechanism of action to combine it with lenalidomide, which has been shown previously to enhance the NK activity and in vitro studies have demonstrated the potential of this combination.

The L-MIND study was a study evaluating [this combination] in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL that were non-transplant eligible. The combination of lenalidomide administered in 21 out of 28-day cycles, with tafasitamab injected, initially weekly, and then every 2 weeks. This combination period lasted one year then tafasitamab alone was then administered every 2 weeks in patients that benefited from this combination.

What did the L-MIND study show?

The main results of the studies that have been published recently in Lancet Oncology had shown that there was a response rate of around 60%. So, the majority of patients responded to this form of combination, and 43% of the patients achieved a complete response, which was usually rapidly achieved at the time of the third cycle of therapy. What was really meaningful is the duration of response, which has been reported recently is in the range of 21 months, which is remarkable for this kind of therapy in this population of patients.

The adverse events after receiving this treatment were essentially hematologic, a few rashes, a few gastrointestinal symptomswhich are usual when you administer lenalidomide to patients. We had about 50% of the patients experiencing grades 3/4 neutropenia, about 20% experiencing thrombocytopenia, and a few other adverse events and they were manageable for the majority of patients. Furthermore, while this event occurs essentially during the first year of the treatment for those responders that continued on tafasitamab alone, there were very few events that were observed in these patients showing that the majority of these events were really linked to the administration of lenalidomide.

The patients in the study had a prolonged overall survival also, demonstrating that there was a benefit for this population. So it's an interesting combination, which is a chemotherapy-free combination that can be used in those patients that are non-transplant eligible, according to the approval label, and are already at their first failure after R-CHOP, and obviously at later lines if needed.

How did the observational Re-MIND study contribute to the findings for the benefit achieved by the combination in this setting?

The Re-MIND study was a comparison of observational data regarding the use of lenalidomide as a single agent in the same populations as the L-MIND study. A comparison was made then between the patients recruited in the trial and the patients that received lenalidomide in real life. And what the Re-MIND study has shown was that clearly, there was an increase over response rates, CR rates, and PFS for those patients that received the combination, clearly showing that tafasitamab was adding a potential therapeutic benefit compared to those patients that received lenalidomide alone, further confirming the synergy of the combination.

What are some of the safety concerns that you've seen with this combination? And how can these adverse events be managed?

The adverse events that we see are essentially hematologic with about 50% of patients experiencing a grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and about 20%, thrombocytopenia. Most of them are reversible and we have recently updated the trial showing that the frequency of neutropenia during the first year of treatment is around 1.1 per patient year, and the frequency of thrombocytopenia is about 0.2 per patient year.4 It's events that we know how to manage and in most cases, they don't require hospitalization, they don't require transfusion. This is clearly an ambulatory treatment. The other adverse effects are those relating to lenalidomidea few rashes, gastrointestinal symptoms, but nothing that we can't manage easily in these patients. Obviously, I will say that this regimen is well tolerated. There are very few febrile neutropenias, a few infections. And I think it's a regimen that is particularly suitable for those patients that are non-transplant eligible.

Given the safety profile of this combination of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, this regimen is particularly suitable for a large proportion of patients with DLBCL. We do know that the median age of occurrence of DLBCL is in the late 60s and there are many, many patients that are over 70 and that are not usually transplant eligible. Clearly this is a great opportunity for patients to receive this non cytotoxic regimen.

What is your perspective of how this combination will fit into the overall treatment paradigm for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and what do you think is the overall impact of this approval?

I think it will be a new treatment option for patients with non-transplant eligible DLBCL and those patients could be offered to receive this regimen either at first relapse after R-CHOP or if they fail the first salvage conventional chemo. This treatment then can be proposed to many patients. And there are also those patients that were transplant eligible but will fail to respond to salvage therapy or those who relapse after transplant and then became eligible to receive this combination.

So, I am confident there is a large proportion of patients that can benefit from this option. And I see it as one of the major options in the relapsed/refractory setting for those patients who are not designated to go down the path of transplant or who have failed this path. And I think this is important.

What is unknown at this time is how this regimen will be combined or how it will sequence with CAR T programs. We have no experience, or very limited experience, of patients receiving this regimen before CAR T. But there is anecdotal evidence that this can be achieved. So, whether it can be used or bridging or not, I think we have insufficient data and because it targets the same antigen at CAR T, which is CD19 there clearly should be some precaution in order to use this regimen before CAR T. But, we need to have more data in this field. For those patients that had failed CAR T-cell therapy, substantial proportions, about 30% of them, may have lost CD19 expression and then may not be eligible anymore for this regimen. There is, however, a substantial proportion of patients that retains CD19 and in whom tafasitamab/lenalidomide can be used as a treatment option.

So, I believe it will be one of the regimens that will be rapidly used by many physicians and proposed to patients as one of the options that we have in this setting.

References:

1. FDA Approves Monjuvi (tafasitamab-cxix) in Combination With Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). News release. MorphoSys AG and Incyte. July 31, 2020. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://bit.ly/3fgyqZZ

2. Salles G, Duell J, Barca EG, et al. Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(7):978-988. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30225-4

3. Zinzani PL, Rodgers T, Marino D, et al. RE-MIND study: Comparison of tafasitamab + lenalidomide (L-MIND) vs lenalidomide monotherapy (real-world data) in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Presented at: European Hematology Association Virtual Congress; June 11-21, 2020. Abstract S238.

4. Salles G, Duell J, Gonzlez-Barca E, et al. Long-term outcomes from the phase II L-MIND study of Tafasitamab (MOR208) plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Presented at: European Hematology Association Virtual Congress; June 11-21, 2020. Abstract EP1201.

Originally posted here:
Salles Speaks to the Potential Benefit of the Tafasitamab Combo in the R/R DLBCL Setting - Targeted Oncology

Stem Cell And Regenerative Therapy Market: Global Forecast over COVID-19 2024 – eRealty Express

globalstem cell and regenerative medicines marketshould grow from $21.8 billion in 2019 to reach $55.0 billion by 2024 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.4% for the period of 2019-2024.

Report Scope:

The scope of this report is broad and covers various type of product available in the stem cell and regenerative medicines market and potential application sectors across various industries. The current report offers a detailed analysis of the stem cell and regenerative medicines market.

The report highlights the current and future market potential of stem cell and regenerative medicines and provides a detailed analysis of the competitive environment, recent development, merger and acquisition, drivers, restraints, and technology background in the market. The report also covers market projections through 2024.

The report details market shares of stem cell and regenerative medicines based on products, application, and geography. Based on product the market is segmented into therapeutic products, cell banking, tools and reagents. The therapeutics products segments include cell therapy, tissue engineering and gene therapy. By application, the market is segmented into oncology, cardiovascular disorders, dermatology, orthopedic applications, central nervous system disorders, diabetes, others

The market is segmented by geography into the following regions: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East and Africa. The report presents detailed analyses of major countries such as the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Germany, the U.K. France, Japan, China and India. For market estimates, data is provided for 2018 as the base year, with forecasts for 2019 through 2024. Estimated values are based on product manufacturers total revenues. Projected and forecasted revenue values are in constant U.S. dollars, unadjusted for inflation.

Request for Report Sample:https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/sample/11723

Report Includes:

28 data tables An overview of global markets for stem cell and regenerative medicines Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2018, estimates for 2019, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024

Details of historic background and description of embryonic and adult stem cells Information on stem cell banking and stem cell research A look at the growing research & development activities in regenerative medicine Coverage of ethical issues in stem cell research & regulatory constraints on biopharmaceuticals Comprehensive company profiles of key players in the market, including Aldagen Inc., Caladrius Biosciences Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Gamida Cell Ltd. and Novartis AG

Summary

The global market for stem cell and regenerative medicines was valued at REDACTED billion in 2018. The market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of REDACTED to reach approximately REDACTED billion by 2024. Growth of the global market is attributed to the factors such as growingprevalence of cancer, technological advancement in product, growing adoption of novel therapeuticssuch as cell therapy, gene therapy in treatment of chronic diseases and increasing investment fromprivate players in cell-based therapies.

In the global market, North America held the highest market share in 2018. The Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The growing government funding for regenerative medicines in research institutes along with the growing number of clinical trials based on cell-based therapy and investment in R&D activities is expected to supplement the growth of the stem cell and regenerative market in Asia-Pacific region during the forecast period.

Reasons for Doing This Study

Global stem cell and regenerative medicines market comprises of various products for novel therapeutics that are adopted across various applications. New advancement and product launches have influenced the stem cell and regenerative medicines market and it is expected to grow in the near future. The biopharmaceutical companies are investing significantly in cell-based therapeutics. The government organizations are funding research and development activities related to stem cell research. These factors are impacting the stem cell and regenerative medicines market positively and augmenting the demand of stem cell and regenerative therapy among different application segments. The market is impacted through adoption of stem cell therapy. The key players in the market are investing in development of innovative products. The stem cell therapy market is likely to grow during the forecast period owing to growing investment from private companies, increasing in regulatory approval of stem cell-based therapeutics for treatment of chronic diseases and growth in commercial applications of regenerative medicine.

Products based on stem cells do not yet form an established market, but unlike some other potential applications of bioscience, stem cell technology has already produced many significant products in important therapeutic areas. The potential scope of the stem cell market is now becoming clear, and it is appropriate to review the technology, see its current practical applications, evaluate the participating companies and look to its futur

The report provides the reader with a background on stem cell and regenerative therapy, analyzes the current factors influencing the market, provides decision-makers the tools that inform decisions about expansion and penetration in this market.

More Info of Impact[emailprotected]https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/covid-19-analysis/11723

More here:
Stem Cell And Regenerative Therapy Market: Global Forecast over COVID-19 2024 - eRealty Express

Edited Transcript of ALLO.OQ earnings conference call or presentation 5-Aug-20 12:30pm GMT – Yahoo Finance

Aug 6, 2020 (Thomson StreetEvents) -- Edited Transcript of Allogene Therapeutics Inc earnings conference call or presentation Wednesday, August 5, 2020 at 12:30:00pm GMT

Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Communications Officer

Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Co-Founder, President, CEO & Director

Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - CFO

Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Medical Officer and Executive VP of Research & Development

H.C. Wainwright & Co, LLC, Research Division - Analyst

Canaccord Genuity Corp., Research Division - Principal & Senior Healthcare Analyst

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division - Executive Director & Senior Analyst

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Allogene Therapeutics' Second Quarter 2020 Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) Please be aware that today's conference call is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the call over to Christine Cassiano, Chief Communications Officer. Ms. Cassiano, please go ahead.

Christine Cassiano, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Communications Officer [2]

Thank you, operator, and good morning. Before market opened today, Allogene issued a press release that provides a corporate update and financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2020. This press release is available on our website at http://www.allogene.com.

We remind listeners that today's call is being webcast on our website and will be available for replay. Joining me on the call today are Dr. David Chang, President and Chief Executive Officer; Dr. Rafael Amado, Executive Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer; and Dr. Eric Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer.

We continue to conduct calls from different locations, so we appreciate your patience should we have any technical difficulties.

During today's call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. These may include statements regarding the success and timing of our ongoing and planned clinical trials, data presentations, regulatory filings, future research and development efforts, manufacturing capabilities, and 2020 financial guidance, among other things.

These forward-looking statements are based on current information, assumptions and expectations that are subject to change. These statements may involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described in our periodic filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and Allogene disclaims any obligation to update these statements.

I'll now turn the call over to Dr. David Chang.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David D. Chang, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Co-Founder, President, CEO & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Christine. Good morning, and thank you for joining us on our second quarter conference call. The last few months have been very exciting for Allogene as we unveil the first clinical data from our AlloCAR T portfolio at ASCO. We were very pleased with the initial data from the ongoing ALPHA trial with ALLO-501 and what it means for our allogeneic platform as it paves the way for the development of ALLO-501A, which we expect to enter into a potential pivotal Phase II trial in 2021. Key findings from our initial Phase I data presentation include that ALLO-501 with ALLO-647 as a part of the lymphodepletion regimen was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities, graft-versus-host disease or Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome in heavily pretreated patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

We continue to believe that our anti-CD52 antibody, ALLO-647, will be one of the important components in our ability to achieve the promise of AlloCAR T therapies. Initial data from the ALPHA trial supports our strategy with a higher dose of ALLO-647 being associated with a higher complete response rate.

Of the 8 patients who received a higher dose of ALLO-647 of 90-milligram, 5 or 63% had a partial response and 4 or 50% achieved a complete remission. While we await the additional follow-up on patients to assess the durability of response, especially those who are lymphodepleted with 90-milligram dose of ALLO-647, it is worth noting a couple of the important learnings that came out of the initial review of the Phase I data beyond what might be expected from a dose-escalation study.

I believe I can speak for Rafael in this as well, in that, as oncologists, it is critical to identify and understand the type of patients that have the potential to respond to a therapy and which do not. In the ALPHA data presented at ASCO, we observed a meaningful anti-tumor activity across multiple tumor histologists and patient baseline characteristics, the one exception being patients who are refractory to previous autologous CAR-T therapy. Initial data from ALPHA suggests such patients may have intrinsic resistance to CAR-T and we are keen to explore the science underpinning this resistance. Across all doses of ALLO-501 and ALLO-647, the overall and complete response rate in CAR-T-naive patients was 75% and 44%, respectively. Although follow-up was limited, these efficacy data are comparable to those reported from autologous CAR-T trial.

Lastly, this initial readout gave us a small peek at what may be one of the most exciting benefits of allogeneic cell therapy, on-demand treatment and the ability to redose patients. Overall, the time from enrollment to start of treatment average is 5 days. Early experience with redosing has been very encouraging. One case study we presented was a 62-year-old male patient with stage 3 follicular lymphoma, who had been refractory to 3 prior lines of therapy. His first AlloCAR T treatment was with 120 million cells of ALLO-501 and a 39-milligram dose of ALLO-647. He achieved a partial response at month 1, but progressed at month 2. Shortly after progression, he was retreated with another 120 million cells of ALLO-501, and this time, with the 90-milligram dose of ALLO-647. This retreatment led to a deeper response and the patient achieved a complete remission, which was ongoing as of the data cutoff.

While there is still much to be done in terms of understanding the potential for redosing, we, along with our clinical investigators and scientific advisory board are very excited to continue this exploration to optimize treatment outcome. We believe we are in an enviable position with the ability to utilize ALLO-501 ALPHA trial to inform our ongoing studies as we proceed in parallel with our ALLO-501A ALPHA2 trial.

From an efficiency standpoint, this is a great benefit as we plan for a potential pivotal Phase II trial of ALLO-501A in 2021. You will recall that ALLO-501A is our anti-CD19 AlloCAR T construct in which the rituximab recognition domain have been removed in order to allow a broader population of patients to receive therapy. We are pleased to report that we are successfully advancing our abbreviated dose escalation of ALPHA2. We have completed a cell dose level 1 cohort with lymphodepletion using the 90-milligram dose of ALLO-647 in combination with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and are now dosing patients in the higher cell dose cohort. Rafael will provide more details on the design of ALPHA2 trial.

Enrollment has also continued in the universal trial of ALLO-715 targeting BCMA. The strategy and trial design of UNIVERSAL is in many ways similar to what we have done with ALLO-501. We have recently completed the initial dose-escalation portion of UNIVERSAL which evaluated 3 different cell doses of ALLO-715. The study is continuing to involve patients to evaluate additional doses, different lymphodepletion regimens, including those that utilize a higher dose of ALLO-647 and treatment expansions. Our plan remains to present initial data from the UNIVERSAL trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in fourth quarter at a medical meeting.

Lastly, as we review the progress we have made across our AlloCAR T platform, we are increasingly enthusiastic about the potential for ALLO-316, our anti-CD70 candidate and breaking down the various to solid tumors. CD70 expression can be found in solid tumors such as lung cancer, glioblastoma and renal cell carcinoma as well as hematologic malignancies, and with adequate preclinical safety, which makes this an exceptional target.

RCC, in particular, is known for being responsive to immune-mediated treatment. Hence, we believe it could potentially be responsive to CAR-T therapy. Patients with localized renal cell cancer undergo nephrectomy. However, 30% to 40% of the patients developed metastasis with a 5-year median survival rate less than 15% to 20%. While there has been industry progress in treating patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a VEGF pathway targeting therapies and checkpoint inhibitors, many patients have come to this treatment-resistant disease.

Based on our excitement for this program, we have rapidly progressed ALLO-316, and we'll be filing an IND in renal cell carcinoma by the end of this year with a plan to initiate clinical trial in 2021. Operationally, we continue to manage our activities in the face of a challenging external environment.

Work from home has become a norm for most of our employees. We have also grouped our teams at Allogene, so those who need to be on-site for lab work had ample space to do so. This has allowed us to continue to advance all of our key clinical and preclinical programs, and I would like to thank our employees for their dedication and engagement during these difficult times.

We believe we are moving closer to our goal to have allogeneic cell therapy follow the success of autologous CAR-T therapy, while providing major benefits in time, convenience, reliability, scale and breadth of malignancies that can be targeted. Our efforts to validate aspects of our AlloCAR T platform sets the stage for our ability to advance multiple AlloCAR T candidates in the near term to midterm.

Longer term, the progress of autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T therapies are making beyond relapsed and refractory patients, including a recent approval in mantle cell lymphoma served to forge the path for how we might quickly expand indications for our AlloCAR T therapy, including ALLO-501A.

As we look to transform the field of cell therapy, our research team continued their work to identify and progress next-generation tools and technologies. And we expect these efforts to keep us at the forefront of innovation as this important therapeutic modality has the potential to serve many patients in need.

I will now turn the call over to Rafael for further updates on our research and development activities.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rafael G. Amado, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Medical Officer and Executive VP of Research & Development [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, David, and I hope you are all staying safe. I'm extremely pleased to report that the initial data from our Phase I ALPHA trial from ALLO-501 presented in an oral session at the virtual ASCO meeting in May exceeded our expectations.

Responses were observed across all cell doses and tumor histologies, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, with an overall response rate of 63% and a complete response rate of 37%. With a median follow-up of 3.8 months, 9 of the 12 responding patients or 75% remained in response until the data cutoff. Included in their overall efficacy analysis are 3 patients who were refractory to prior autologous CAR-T therapy. The best response for these patients was disease progression within 3 months. None of these patients responded to AlloCAR T therapy. In CAR-T naive patients, the ORR was 75% and the CR rate was 44%.

As David noted, a higher dose ALLO-647 was associated with a higher complete response rate of 50%, deeper lymphodepletion and delayed host T cell recovery, while sparing neutrophils and platelets. One of the ongoing responders was a patient with an initial PR who progressed by month 2. This was a patient that David referred to earlier, who achieved a complete response after retreatment with the same dose of ALLO-501, a 90-milligram dose of ALLO-647.

I would like now to put this data into context. Firstly, the enrolled population was heavily pretreated. The median number of regimens was poor. 95% have stage 3 or stage 4 disease, and 86% of the 22 patients were refractory to the last regimen as defined by progression within 12 months of therapy. We treated a mix of follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. This was done to collect as much information as possible in this Phase I study. We were able to gain clear signals of activity in both patients subsets.

You may recall from our ASCO investor meeting that we juxtaposed our initial data from the CAR-T naive patients in the ALPHA study with the results published from a range of autologous CAR-T studies. The point of that analysis was not to make direct comparisons that this study's varying composition, size, Phase II development, enrollment criteria and a number of other parameters, but rather to illustrate what may be possible with our CAR T. The results of this analysis showed clear similarities between autologous and AlloCAR-T in response rates at this early time point. While these promising initial findings will need to be confirmed with more patient experience and longer follow-up times, we believe we have answered yes to several important questions that the ALPHA trial aimed to address, namely, ALLO-501 can be successfully manufactured; ALLO-501 can be safely administered without causing clinically relevant graft-versus-host disease; ALLO-647 can be safely administered and it leads to dose-dependent lymphodepletion that associates with ALLO-501 expansion; and ALLO-501 can provide complete responses across multiple histologies.

Beyond these questions, we've also gained important understanding as to which patients may not respond to AlloCAR T therapy, how we may be able to improve patient outcomes with redosing, which continues in the current protocol and how to optimize lymphodepletion. In addition, the promising safety profile demonstrated by ALLO-501 and ALLO-647 opened up the potential to explore dosing in the outpatient setting.

Overall, these findings enhance our enthusiasm for what may ultimately be possible with the AlloCAR-T therapy platform. We look forward to our next data readout from the ALPHA trial, which we expect to be in late 2020 or early 2021.

Meanwhile, our Phase I/II ALPHA2 study is actively enrolling patients. ALPHA2 is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study of ALLO-501A in non-HLA-matched adult patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Patients with follicular lymphoma are excluded. Patients must have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including an anthracycline and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.

While prior autologous CAR-T therapy is ALLO, if the tumor remains CD19-positive in patients who previously responded to autologous CD19 CAR-T therapy, we are considering whether to enroll autologous CAR-T patients as we learn more from the ALPHA trial experience about the outcome of patients who had a meaningful response to autologous treatment.

The primary objective of Phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of ALLO-501 in combination with ALLO-647, cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Key secondary objectives include ALLO-501A cell kinetics, ALLO-647 pharmacokinetics and depth and duration of host lymphocyte depletion.

The study will replicate certain aspects of the ALPHA study to corroborate the findings from that trial. We initiated dosing with ALLO-501A at 40 million AlloCAR T positive cells, a dose cohort that was abbreviated to a single patient. The trial will follow a 3-plus-3 design with patients enrolling a dose level 2 cohort of 120 million cells, and a dose level cohort of 360 million AlloCAR T cells. We're using a total dose of 90 milligrams of ALLO-647 administered concomitantly with flu/cy. We continue to target moving into the Phase II portion of this study in 2021.

Our additional clinical focus is our Anti-BCMA AlloCAR T cell therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We have a 3-pronged clinical strategy targeting BCMA. UNIVERSAL, our Phase I trial with ALLO-715 is well underway, and we are on track to report initial data from this trial in the fourth quarter of this year. This study was initially designed to explore optimal dosing of all the components of the lymphodepletion regimen, including ALLO-647, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with patients receiving ALLO-715 at 1 of 3 doses: 40 million, 160 million and 320 million cells in a 3-plus-3 dose-escalation design.

As David noted, we have recently completed the initial dose-escalation portion of the UNIVERSAL trial using 39 milligrams of ALLO-647 and enrolling in other lymphodepletion cohorts, which admit fludarabine. The endpoints being assessed are safety, tolerability, death and duration of lymphodepletion, cell expansion and antitumor activity, including minimal residual disease rate.

Given the complexities of this disease and propensity for disease progression for patients with multiple myeloma, we are excited to explore regimens, which include both lower and higher doses of ALLO-647. We also look forward to applying all the lessons learned across our platforms, such as redosing as we evaluate ways to optimize therapy for this patient population in need of novel treatment.

The other 2 prongs of our BCMA strategy include exploring the use of a gamma secretase inhibitor in combination with ALLO-715 and investigating our TurboCAR technology platform to potentially enhance the efficacy of an anti-BCMA CAR T therapy in myeloma.

Since our last earnings call, we have advanced a regulatory discussion on how to best evaluate the combination of ALLO-715 with the gamma secretase inhibitor, nirogacestat, from our partners at SpringWorks Therapeutics. We expect to file an IND to support the clinical evaluation of this combination this year. The innovation behind TurboCAR could be a breakthrough as this technology has the potential to expand AlloCAR T cell viability and efficacy while reducing CAR-T cell dose requirement and overcoming exhaustion. These properties may enable CAR-T therapies in harder to treat hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. ALLO-605 will be our first TurboCAR clinical candidate. We are excited about what this technology may mean for next-generation AlloCAR-T therapy in multiple myeloma and anticipate submitting an IND for ALLO-605 in 2021.

At the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Annual Meeting in May, we presented preclinical findings on our TurboCAR technology. The versatility of this technology could allow us to harness the signaling of different cytokines. And we believe TurboCAR could eventually become a standard for AlloCAR T platform.

As our clinical teams focus on clinical trial progression for ALLO-501, ALLO-501A and ALLO-715, our research teams continue to progress our preclinical activities. Our preclinical work on ALLO-316, our anti-CD70 candidate, continues as we look to traverse the use of cell therapy from hematologic malignancies into solid tumors. Our ALLO-316 IND is planned by the end of this year in treatment-resistant renal cell carcinoma with the potential to study other malignancies in the future.

In addition to the above, preclinical work continues on candidates, such as ALLO-819, an investigational AlloCAR-T therapy targeting Flt3 as a novel treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia as well as earlier stage technologies, such as our induced pluripotent stem cell program.

We are relentless in our pursuit to bring AlloCAR T therapy to patients and are very excited by the strong momentum we've achieved across both our clinical and preclinical pipeline. I look forward to continuing to provide updates at scientific congresses.

While we continue to leverage our internal capabilities and our existing partners, we will also pursue innovation externally as we advance additional pipeline candidates and next-generation technology.

I'd like to now turn the call over to Eric to review financials.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eric Thomas Schmidt, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - CFO [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Rafael, and good morning. Let me start by thanking all of you on the call or those who may listen in later to the replay, for your ongoing support of Allogene in our efforts to bring AlloCAR T therapy to patients.

That support was particularly evident during our recent financing, which benefited from the participation of many new and existing shareholders. In June, we closed a follow-on offering that raised $632.5 million in gross proceeds prior to deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by us. Included in this figure is the exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock.

As a result and as noted in our SEC filings and second quarter press release issued earlier today, our financial position is stronger than ever, with cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2020. In the second quarter, our research and development expenses were $47.3 million, which included $8 million of noncash stock-based compensation expense. General and administrative expenses were $15.9 million for the second quarter of 2020, which includes $8.8 million of noncash stock-based compensation expense. Our net loss for the second quarter of 2020 was $61 million or $0.53 per share including noncash stock-based compensation expense of $16.8 million.

I am pleased to report that our build-out for our Newark manufacturing facility is continuing in full force. Thus far, we have experienced only minor delays as a result of the pandemic, and we remain on track to bring the manufacturing facility online in 2021. We maintain an expectation that our full year 2020 net losses will be between $260 million and $280 million, which includes an estimated noncash stock-based compensation expense of $70 million to $75 million and excludes any impact from potential business development activities.

With that, we will now open the call for your questions.

================================================================================

Questions and Answers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operator [1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Operator Instructions)

Our first question comes from Phil Nadeau with Cowen and Company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip M. Nadeau, Cowen and Company, LLC, Research Division - MD & Senior Research Analyst [2]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abiding by the one-question rule, I was wondering if you could give us a bit more detail on what we should expect from the Q4 data release from the UNIVERSAL trial? Are we likely to just see results from that initial dose escalation portion with the 39-milligram of ALLO-647? Or is it possible that we could get data from the additional cohorts?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David D. Chang, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Co-Founder, President, CEO & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So Phil, first of all, good morning, and I hope for those who are in the east coast weathering the storm well. I hear that it has passed and things are getting better. The question that you're asking about what to expect for the 715 data presentation at the year-end, I'm going to refer to the part 2, Rafael to answer the details. Rafael?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rafael G. Amado, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Medical Officer and Executive VP of Research & Development [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have, as David mentioned and I mentioned in the initial remarks, finished the dose escalation, so that was at 3 plus 3. We didn't have any DLT. We also put some patients, as I mentioned in my remarks, in the CA cohort as well. And we will treat some patients at 90 milligrams. The total number of patients that will make it into the end of the year presentation is still to be determined, but I think you can probably get an idea of how many patients, if you compare what we presented at ASCO so there would be a number thereabouts similarly to that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip M. Nadeau, Cowen and Company, LLC, Research Division - MD & Senior Research Analyst [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And maybe just one follow-up. Can you give us an idea of the -- actually, the duration of follow-up for the patients that will be in that initial data release?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rafael G. Amado, Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. - Chief Medical Officer and Executive VP of Research & Development [6]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You have to calculate what the median follow-up will be, but I think it's difficult to know. Obviously, the patients who have started at 40 million will have a much longer follow-up than the patients that started at the later doses. But that's a number that I think we will come up with once we do the analysis. We don't have that number right now.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operator [7]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Operator Instructions)

Continue reading here:
Edited Transcript of ALLO.OQ earnings conference call or presentation 5-Aug-20 12:30pm GMT - Yahoo Finance

Edited Transcript of XNCR.OQ earnings conference call or presentation 4-Aug-20 8:30pm GMT – Yahoo Finance

Monrovia Aug 5, 2020 (Thomson StreetEvents) -- Edited Transcript of Xencor Inc earnings conference call or presentation Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 8:30:00pm GMT

Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & Chief Medical Officer

Xencor, Inc. - Co-Founder, CEO, President & Director

Xencor, Inc. - Associate Director and Head of Corporate Communications & IR

Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & CFO

Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP of Research & Chief Scientific Officer

SVB Leerink LLC, Research Division - MD of Emerging Oncology & Senior Research Analyst

Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG, Research Division - Analyst

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2020 Xencor Conference Call. (Operator Instructions)

Now I would like to turn the call to your speaker today, Charles Liles, Head of Investor Relations.

Charles Liles, Xencor, Inc. - Associate Director and Head of Corporate Communications & IR [2]

Thank you, and good afternoon.

Earlier today, we issued a press release which outlines the topics we plan to discuss today. The press release is available at http://www.xencor.com. Today on our call, Bassil Dahiyat, President and Chief Executive Officer, will provide updates regarding COVID-19 and our partnerships; Allen Yang, Chief Medical Officer, will review recently presented clinical data; John Desjarlais, Chief Scientific Officer, will provide updates from preclinical development; and John Kuch, Chief Financial Officer, will review financial results. And then we will open up the call for your questions.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that, during the course of this conference call, Xencor management may make forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the company's future financial and operating results. Future market conditions, the plans and objectives of management for future operations, the company's partnering efforts, capital requirements, future product offerings, research and development programs and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on these topics. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on our current expectations and beliefs and are based on information currently available to us. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, those factors contained in the Risk Factors section of our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

With that, let me pass the call over to Bassil.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bassil I. Dahiyat, Xencor, Inc. - Co-Founder, CEO, President & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, Charles, and good afternoon, everyone.

Xencor's approach to creating antibody and cytokine therapeutics is centered around our XmAb protein engineering platform. By making small changes to an antibody's structure, specifically in its Fc domain, we can improve its natural functions and performance and create new mechanisms of therapeutic action. The plug-and-play nature of our suite of XmAb Fc domains allows us to engineer nearly any antibody to have improved activity, longer half-life or bispecific structure. This flexibility and portability enables us to take multiple shots on goal simultaneously in the clinic and generate proof-of-concept data to guide which programs will independently advance, which will partner and which will terminate.

We're focusing our R&D on the expansion and use of our XmAb bispecific platform to create antibodies that bind 2 or more different targets simultaneously and also to engineer cytokines with structures optimized for particular therapeutic use. Now we're currently running 6 Phase I clinical studies evaluating such XmAb bispecific antibodies.

Now before I update on some of our partnerships, we want to provide a brief update on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operation. The pandemic did not significantly disrupt patient enrollment to Xencor's 6 ongoing clinical trials during the second quarter. However, our study initiations for vibecotamab, as we've previously disclosed, have been delayed as many clinical sites have delayed the trial start-up process.

We had modestly slowed enrollment in the CD3 bispecific antibody studies attributable to COVID-19 and no effect on our studies for the 3 tumor microenvironment activator molecules. Now as is still the case today as it was 3 months ago, unfortunately, the situation is very fluid and we'll continue to update it as soon as appropriate.

Now within the company, we've implemented a number of measures to protect the health and safety of our employees and of our community. These include some laboratory operation adjustments, symptom self-assessment guidelines and weekly SARS-CoV-2 virus testing at our facility. We are maintaining a requirement for all non-laboratory employees to work remotely.

Okay. Now on to partnerships. A core part of our business is to complement our internal portfolio of -- internal development portfolio with partnering. These partnerships generate payments from the licensing of XmAb technologies, the clinical advancing of XmAb candidates as well as royalties from sales of approved products. There were no COVID-19 impacts here during the second quarter as we continue to earn revenues from partners like Alexion and Gilead, but we will continue to monitor potential impacts, of course.

Partnerships like these really highlight the plug-and-play nature of the suite of XmAb Fc domains we've created. With the small changes to the Fc structure that we've engineered, we can for nearly any antibody improve the activity, half-life or readily create bispecific structures. We have 11 ongoing partnerships for XmAb technology, which have resulted now in 2 marketed products, 7 clinical stage candidates and more in the earlier stages of development. The most significant recent development among our partners occurred just this past Friday. With the early FDA approval of MorphoSys' tafasitamab, which they licensed from us in 2010, when it was known as XmAb 5574. It's an antibody that we created and put our XmAb cytotoxic Fc domain onto. We also initiated its clinical development, running the Phase I trial. It's trade name is now Monjuvi. It's a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody indicated in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffused large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low-grade lymphoma and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant. This approval is the first for second-line treatment of DLBCL from the FDA.

Now we couldn't be happier here at Xencor as this approval expands the options for patients with this difficult-to-treat blood cancer. Monjuvi will be co-commercialized in the U.S. by MorphoSys and Incyte, and the European marketing authorization application for tafasitamab is currently under review by the EMA.

Now from time to time, we enter into research collaborations that include the creation of novel XmAb bispecific antibodies to be advanced by partners. Amgen's a prime example. AMG 509 is Amgen's STEAP1 x CD3 XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibody. Now that was developed under our collaboration with them. They're developing AMG 509 for patients with prostate cancer and Ewing sarcoma, and a Phase I study is currently recruiting for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Now the first bispecific antibody that Amgen developed under this collaboration is AMG 424, a CD38 x CD3 bispecific antibody that they evaluated in a Phase I study in patients with multiple myeloma. Amgen terminated the program in the second quarter and indicated the program was stopped for adverse events that were likely CD38 target-related. Under the terms of the agreement, the rights to the CD38 program, including AMG 424, revert to Xencor and the company is currently assessing the asset's potential for further development, including treating different patient populations and applying mitigating treatments for the adverse events.

Now the plug-and-play nature of our XmAb technologies enables additional partners like Alexion and Vir to advance their programs, needing very little resources directly from us. Our strategy is to selectively license access to our XmAb technologies for creating and developing antibodies with improved properties. Alexion's ULTOMIRIS, a C5 complement inhibitor uses Xtend technology for longer half-life. The program continues to receive marketing authorizations worldwide, the last of which was the European approval for adult and children with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, this June. In addition to evaluating ULTOMIRIS in a broad late stage development program, Alexion is currently conducting a randomized controlled Phase III study in hospitalized patients with advanced COVID-19.

Our partnership with Vir Biotech shows the broad applicability of our technology in areas such as viral infectious disease. Vir has non-exclusive access to our Xtend Fc technology to extend the half-life of VIR-7831 and VIR-7832, both novel antibodies that they're investigating as potential treatments for patients with COVID-19. They plan to submit an IND for VIR-7831 and commence a Phase II/III clinical trial program in August, and they plan to initiate a study evaluating VIR-7832 later this year.

I'll now turn it over to John Desjarlais, who will provide an update on some of our preclinical programs and our new discovery and development collaboration with Atreca. John?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John R. Desjarlais, Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP of Research & Chief Scientific Officer [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Thanks, Bassil.

Yes, and Xencor's XmAb bispecific Fc domains were specifically created to enable the rapid design and simplified development of bispecific antibodies to combine 2 or more different targets. First-in-class that we have developed were CD3 bispecific antibodies that contain 1 anti-tumor binding domain and 1 CD3 binding domain. Engagement of CD3 on T cells promotes recruitment and activation of T cells against the tumor cells. The activator receptor on T cells doesn't have to be limited to CD3, though. For example, we are also investigating bispecific antibodies that target CD28, a key co-stimulatory receptor on T cells. Importantly, we designed these CD28 engagers to activate only when bound to tumor cells, with the goal of avoiding the superagonism that led to the disastrous clinical experience of other companies targeting CD28 nearly 15 years ago.

More near term, however, we have developed a mixed valency format, our XmAb 2+1 bispecific antibody with 2 domains that bind a tumor target and a single domain that binds CD3. These antibodies may preferentially kill tumor cells with high target expression and may potentially avoid low-expressing normal cells, taking advantage of a property called avidity. We believe these properties will be particularly important for many solid tumor targets.

We presented preclinical data from 3 internally developed 2+1 bispecifics at the second session of the AACR meeting in late June. Preclinical models show strong selective tumor killing from 2+1 programs that target PSMA mesothelin and ENPP3, the last of which is an underexplored tumor antigen overexpressed on renal cell carcinomas. These targets, although they tend to be strongly expressed on prostate cancer, ovarian cancer and kidney cancer, respectively, can also have some normal tissue expression, suggesting there are good applications for this new format.

The ENPP3 program, XmAb30819, is the most advanced of these. Preclinical data indicate that XmAb30819 binds preferentially to tumor cells compared to normal cells and effectively recruits T cells to kill tumor cells selectively. It demonstrates strong reversal tumor growth in tumor xenograft models, and it was well tolerated with expected pharmacodynamics in an antibody-like half-life in nonhuman primates. We are planning to file an IND for XmAb30819 in 2021.

Finally, last month, we formalized a collaboration with Atreca to research, develop and commercialize CD3 engaging bispecific antibodies to novel targets. Atreca's unique discovery platform complements our protein engineering capabilities by providing novel tumor-selective antibodies and targets to couple with our CD3 bispecific platform. Up to 2 joint programs will be mutually selected for further development and commercialization with each partner sharing costs and profits equally. Each company will lead one of the joint programs. The agreement also allows for each partner to pursue up to 2 programs independently. This collaboration offers both Xencor and Atreca with several opportunities to advance novel first-in-class CD3 bispecific antibodies for the potential treatment of patients with cancer.

With that, Allen Yang will review our clinical portfolio. Allen?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allen S. Yang, Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & Chief Medical Officer [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, John.

In May, we provided initial dose escalation data from our ongoing Phase I study evaluating XmAb20717 in patients with advanced solid tumors. XmAb20717 is a dual PD-1, CTLA-4 checkpoint-inhibiting bispecific antibody. We have tuned the antibodies affinities for PD-1 and CTLA-4 for selective engagement of T cells expressing both targets, which distinguishes it from combination therapy and most bispecific checkpoint inhibitors.

T cells that have multiple checkpoint expression are typically found more in the tumor microenvironment than in the periphery. All of our tumor microenvironment activators, as we call them, seek to more effectively reactivate these tumor-reactive T cells than existing therapies. This design is meant to drive improved tolerability at higher doses compared to the dosing of separate anti-CTLA-4 and anti PD-1 antibodies, for example, which has delivered better responses at the cost of tolerability.

In our first 6 dose escalation cohorts, we observed that XmAb20717 to be generally well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients. Consistent with our hypothesis of inhibiting both PD-1 and CTLA-4, we observed robust dose-dependent increases in biomarkers of T cell activation and pharmacodynamic activity consistent with blockade of both receptors. It was also encouraging to observe cases of clinical activity as we moved into the higher doses cohorts, which we detailed in the press release in May. Based on these data, we opened expansion cohorts in several tumor types at 10 milligrams per kilogram as well as additional dose escalation cohorts starting at 15 milligrams per kilogram as we did not reach the maximum tolerated dose. Expansion cohorts for patients with melanoma and advanced non-small cell lung cancer are fully enrolled. We look forward to sharing continued progress from the 20717 program as well as our other tumor microenvironment targeting bispecific antibody programs in Phase I studies.

XmAb2314 targets PD-1 and the co-stimulatory receptor, ICOS, and XmAb22841, which targets the checkpoint CTLA-4 and LAG-3, the latter which has begun dosing patients in combination with pembrolizumab.

Moving on to our clinical stage T cell engagers. These are tumor-targeted bispecific antibodies that contain both the tumor antigen binding domain and the cytotoxic T cell binding domain, specifically CD3 binding domain. These CD3 bispecifics activate T cells at the site of the tumor in order to potentially kill malignant cells. We continue to dose patients in our Phase I studies of vibecotamab, which targets CD123 and acute myeloid leukemia and plamotamab which targets CD20 in B-cell malignancies. And as we have previously disclosed, we plan to initiate additional clinical programs, subject to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, likely next year.

We also continue to dose patients in the Phase I study of tidutamab, which targets the somatostatin receptor 2, and we expect that we will present initial data from these ongoing -- this ongoing study in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the second half of this year.

Finally, we're developing a suite of cytokines, which are immune signaling protein that are built on the XmAb bispecific Fc domain and incorporate the Xtend technology. Using our Fc domain and tuning the potencies enabled cytokines with improved drug like properties, such as slower receptor mediated clearance and longer half-life and potentially superior tolerability. Our first cytokine program and lead in our collaboration with Genentech is XmAb24306, which they call RG6323. It's an IL-15/IL-15 receptor alpha complex fused with our bispecific Fc domain. It targets the expansion and activation of T cells and natural killer cells.

Genentech is currently enrolling patients in a Phase I study evaluating XmAb24306 and quickly moving in combination with atezolizumab their anti-PD-L1 antibody. We plan to explore a number of our own combination studies pending completion of the initial dose escalation study. We also look forward to keeping you informed about all our clinical programs as they progress.

Now I'll hand the call over to John Kuch who will review the second quarter and first 6 months financial results. John?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John J. Kuch, Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & CFO [6]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Allen.

Xencor continues to maintain its strong financial position, which enables us to support our portfolio of clinical research stage bispecific antibody and cytokine drug programs. Our diversified portfolio of partnerships and collaborations continue to provide us with upfront payments, milestones and royalties, important sources of nondiluted capital. With the FDA approval of MorphoSys Monjuvi last Friday, we will receive a $25 million milestone payment which we will recognize as revenue in the third quarter. As a reminder, we are also eligible to receive royalties on worldwide net sales in the high single to low double-digit percent range and additional development, regulatory and sales milestone payments.

At June 30, 2020, our cash, cash equivalents, marketable and equity securities totaled $587.4 million compared to $601.3 million at December 31, 2019. The decrease reflects cash used to fund operating activities in the first 6 months of 2020, offset by upfront payments, milestone payments and royalties from our partnership and licensing arrangements.

For the second quarter of 2020, revenues were $13.1 million compared to $19.5 million for the same period in 2019. These revenues include royalty revenue from Alexion and licensing revenue from Gilead compared to the same period in 2019

where revenues primarily reflect research collaboration revenue from Genentech and Astellas and milestone revenue from Alexion.

For the first 6 months of 2020, revenues were $45.5 million compared to $131.4 million for the same period in 2019. Our revenues in 2020 include royalty revenue from Alexion, milestone revenue from MorphoSys and licensing revenue from our Gilead and Aimmune collaborations compared to licensing and collaboration revenue earned from Genentech and Astellas in 2019.

Research and development expenditures for the second quarter of 2020 were $43.5 million compared to $33.3 million for the same period in 2019. After the first 6 months in 2020, they were $77.4 million compared to $61.5 million for the same period in 2019. The increases in R&D is primarily due to increased spending on our plamotamab and XmAb20717 clinical programs as well as our preclinical IL-2 cytokine program, XmAb27564 and our preclinical ENPP3 x CD3 2+1 bispecific antibody program, XmAb30819, both of which we have advanced into IND-enabling activities. We note that there was lower spending in 2020 on our XmAb24306 and obexelimab programs.

General and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2020 were $7.2 million compared to $5.8 million in the same period in 2019. For the first 6 months in 2020, G&A expenses were $14.4 million compared $11.3 million for the same period in 2019. Additional spending here is primarily due to increased staffing and spending on professional fees.

The net loss for the second quarter of 2020 was $35 million or $0.61 on a fully diluted per share basis compared to a net loss of $16 million or $0.28 on a fully diluted per share basis for the same period in 2019. The higher net loss reported in 2020 is primarily due to lower partnership and collaboration revenue and higher R&D expenses in 2020.

For the first 6 months in 2020, net loss was $43.1 million or $0.76 on a fully diluted per share basis compared to net income of $64 million or $1.10 on a fully diluted per share basis for the same period in 2019.

Our net loss for the first 6 months of 2020 compared to the net income reported for same period in 2019 is primarily due to revenue recognition from our Genentech collaboration 2019.

Noncash stock-based compensation expense for the first 6 months of 2020 was $14.7 million compared to $15.2 million for the same period in 2019. Total shares outstanding were 57.2 million as of June 30, 2020, compared to 56.5 million as of June 30, 2019.

Based on current operating plans, Xencor expects to have cash to fund research and development programs and operations into 2024. Xencor expects to end 2020 with between $525 million and $575 million in cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and equity securities.

With that, we'd now like to open up the call for your questions. Operator?

================================================================================

Questions and Answers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operator [1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Operator Instructions)

Our first question is from Ted Tenthoff with Piper Sandler.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edward Andrew Tenthoff, Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division - MD & Senior Research Analyst [2]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So congratulations on the tafasitamab approval. I'm wondering -- give us a sense of what the royalties are and whether there are other future milestones beyond the approval milestone for other indications and things like that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bassil I. Dahiyat, Xencor, Inc. - Co-Founder, CEO, President & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sure. Thanks. And I hope you're staying safe, Ted, out with that tropical storm in New York along with all the other new Yorkers.

So the royalties are high single to low double digit, and they're tiered. That's the most detail we're allowed to share at this point. They're worldwide royalty, so you can see they're worldwide sales, regardless of whether the company selling is Incyte or MorphoSys and, of course, Incyte is ex U.S. commercial rights. There are significant milestones for both developments in other indications within oncology as well as non oncology, though there's no development going on for that at the moment that we're aware of. So there's other oncology indication, regulatory -- development regulatory milestones and there are sales milestones.

John, do you want to give a little bit of granularity on the magnitude of those?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John J. Kuch, Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & CFO [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. The sales milestones are $50 million, and the other development, regulatory are anywhere in the $50 million, $75 million range.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bassil I. Dahiyat, Xencor, Inc. - Co-Founder, CEO, President & Director [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, depending on which ones we...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John J. Kuch, Xencor, Inc. - Senior VP & CFO [6]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read more:
Edited Transcript of XNCR.OQ earnings conference call or presentation 4-Aug-20 8:30pm GMT - Yahoo Finance

Global Adrenoleukodystrophy Treatment Trends and Highlights – Bulletin Line

Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a rare genetic condition that causes the buildup of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) in the brain. The defective gene in ALD, commonly referred to as a genetic mutation, can cause several different but related conditions: adrenomyelopathy (AMN), Addisons disease, and the most common and most devastating form cerebral ALD. Cerebral ALD strikes boys between ages 4 and 10, leading to permanent disability and death usually within four to eight years.

Signs and symptoms of the adrenomyeloneuropathy type appear between early adulthood and middle age. Affected individuals develop progressive stiffness and weakness in their legs (paraparesis), experience urinary and genital tract disorders, and often show changes in behavior and thinking ability. Most people with the adrenomyeloneuropathy type also have adrenocortical insufficiency. In some severely affected individuals, damage to the brain and nervous system can lead to an early death.

For detailed analysis on the symptoms of Global Adrenoleukodystrophy Pipeline Analysis browse through https://univdatos.com/report/global-adrenoleukodystrophy-pipeline-analysis-2019

The diagnosis of the disease includes genetic counseling, differential diagnosis, biochemical and molecular diagnosis. Genetic counseling must be offered to the parents of affected boys, adult males, and women with X-ALD and their family to detect: carriers who can be offered prenatal diagnosis, and asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic men or women who can benefit from therapeutic interventions. Regular follow-up in presymptomatic males can prevent serious morbidity and mortality.

Despite significant mortality risk, allogeneic HCT remains the only therapeutic intervention that can arrest the progression of cerebral demyelination in X-ALD, provided the procedure is performed very early, i.e., when affected boys or men have no or minor symptoms due to cerebral demyelinating disease. In the future, transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells that have been genetically corrected with a lentiviral vector before re-infusion might become an alternative to autologous HCT, once the very encouraging results obtained in the first two treated patients would have been extended to a larger number of patients with cerebral X-ALD.

For detailed analysis on the management in Global Adrenoleukodystrophy Pipeline Analysis browse through https://univdatos.com/report/global-adrenoleukodystrophy-pipeline-analysis-2019

There are currently only two available treatments for childhood cerebral ALD: Lorenzos oil and stem cell transplantation, using either umbilical cord stem cells or bone marrow stem cells. Both treatment approaches have shown promise and been effective for some boys with ALD, but they also both have drawbacks. The therapeutic pipeline of Adrenoleukodystrophy consists of approximately 9+ products in different stages of development. Currently, 3+ drugs are in Phase III development and major drugs are in the late stage.

Request for Sample of the report browse through https://univdatos.com/request_form/form/170

Some of the key players include Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation; Bluebird bio; Magenta Therapeutics; MedDay Pharmaceuticals; Minoryx Therapeutics; NeuroVia; Orpheris; ReceptoPharm; SOM Biotech; and Viking Therapeutics. Several M&As along with partnerships have been undertaken by these players to facilitate costumers with hi-tech and innovative products.

Top Company Profiles

Feel free to contact us for any queries https://univdatos.com/request_form/form/170

Customization Options:

The Adrenoleukodystrophy pipeline analysis report can be customized to the country level or any other competitive segment. Besides this, UMI understands that you may have your own business need, hence we also provide fully customized solutions to clients.

About Us:

UnivDatos Market Insights (UMI), is a passionate market research firm and a subsidiary of Universal Data Solutions. Rigorous secondary and primary research on the market is our USP, hence information presented in our reports is based on facts and realistic assumptions. We have worked with 200+ global clients, including some of the fortune 500 companies. Our clientele praises us for quality of insights, In-depth analysis, custom research abilities and detailed market segmentation.

Contact us:

UnivDatos Market Insights (UMI)

Email: [emailprotected]

Web: https://univdatos.com

Ph: +91 7838604911

Read more from the original source:
Global Adrenoleukodystrophy Treatment Trends and Highlights - Bulletin Line