Category Archives: Stell Cell Research


Global Regenerative Medicine Market (2020 to 2025) – Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast – ResearchAndMarkets.com -…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Regenerative Medicine Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2020-2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global regenerative medicine market grew at a CAGR of around 16% during 2014-2019. Looking forward, the publisher expects the global regenerative medicine market to continue its strong growth during the next five years.

Regenerative medicine refers to a branch of biomedical sciences aimed at restoring the structure and function of damaged tissues and organs. It involves the utilization of stem cells that are developed in laboratories and further implanted safely into the body for the regeneration of damaged bones, cartilage, blood vessels and organs. Cellular and acellular regenerative medicines are commonly used in various clinical therapeutic procedures, including cell, immunomodulation and tissue engineering therapies. They hold potential for the effective treatment of various chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and cardiovascular disorders (CVDs), osteoporosis and spinal cord injuries.

The increasing prevalence of chronic medical ailments and genetic disorders across the globe is one of the key factors driving the growth of the market. Furthermore, the rising geriatric population, which is prone to various musculoskeletal, phonological, dermatological and cardiological disorders, is stimulating the market growth. In line with this, widespread adoption of organ transplantation is also contributing to the market growth. Regenerative medicine minimizes the risk of organ rejection by the body post-transplant and enhances the recovery speed of the patient.

Additionally, various technological advancements in cell-based therapies, such as the development of 3D bioprinting techniques and the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the production of regenerative medicines, are acting as other growth-inducing factors. These advancements also aid in conducting efficient dermatological grafting procedures to treat chronic burns, bone defects and wounds on the skin. Other factors, including extensive research and development (R&D) activities in the field of medical sciences, along with improving healthcare infrastructure, are anticipated to drive the market further.

Companies Mentioned

Key Questions Answered in This Report:

Key Topics Covered:

1 Preface

2 Scope and Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Introduction

4.1 Overview

4.2 Key Industry Trends

5 Global Regenerative Medicine Market

5.1 Market Overview

5.2 Market Performance

5.3 Impact of COVID-19

5.4 Market Forecast

6 Market Breakup by Type

6.1 Stem Cell Therapy

6.1.1 Market Trends

6.1.2 Market Forecast

6.2 Biomaterial

6.2.1 Market Trends

6.2.2 Market Forecast

6.3 Tissue Engineering

6.3.1 Market Trends

6.3.2 Market Forecast

6.4 Others

6.4.1 Market Trends

6.4.2 Market Forecast

7 Market Breakup by Application

7.1 Bone Graft Substitutes

7.1.1 Market Trends

7.1.2 Market Forecast

7.2 Osteoarticular Diseases

7.2.1 Market Trends

7.2.2 Market Forecast

7.3 Dermatology

7.3.1 Market Trends

7.3.2 Market Forecast

7.4 Cardiovascular

7.4.1 Market Trends

7.4.2 Market Forecast

7.5 Central Nervous System

7.5.1 Market Trends

7.5.2 Market Forecast

7.6 Others

7.6.1 Market Trends

7.6.2 Market Forecast

8 Market Breakup by End User

8.1 Hospitals

8.1.1 Market Trends

8.1.2 Market Forecast

8.2 Specialty Clinics

8.2.1 Market Trends

8.2.2 Market Forecast

8.3 Others

8.3.1 Market Trends

8.3.2 Market Forecast

9 Market Breakup by Region

9.1 North America

9.2 Asia Pacific

9.3 Europe

9.4 Latin America

9.5 Middle East and Africa

10 SWOT Analysis

11 Value Chain Analysis

12 Porters Five Forces Analysis

13 Price Analysis

14 Competitive Landscape

14.1 Market Structure

14.2 Key Players

14.3 Profiles of Key Players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/erd0e3

Read the original:
Global Regenerative Medicine Market (2020 to 2025) - Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast - ResearchAndMarkets.com -...

Stem Cell Media Market Projected to Witness Vigorous Expansion by 2027 – The Think Curiouser

Bigmarketresearch, one of the worlds prominent market research firms has released a new report on GlobalStem Cell Media Market.The report contains crucial insights on the market which will support the clients to make the right business decisions. This research will help both existing and new aspirants for Stem Cell Media market to figure out and study market needs, market size, and competition. The report talks about the supply and demand situation, the competitive scenario, and the challenges for market growth, market opportunities, and the threats faced by Top key players.

The global Stem Cell Media market is expected to witness a promising growth in the next few years. The rising level of competition among the leading players and the rising focus on the development of new products are likely to offer promising growth opportunities throughout the forecast period. The research study on the global Stem Cell Media market offers a detailed overview, highlighting the key aspects that are expected to enhance the growth of the market in the near future. The key segmentation and the competitive landscape of the market have also been mentioned at length in the research study.

Get Free Sample PDF Copy of Stem Cell Media with Figures, Graphs and Tocs:https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-sample/3432325?utm_source=PRL&utm_medium=Wasim

The report also includes the impact of ongoing global crisis i.e.COVID-19on the Stem Cell Media market and what the future holds for it. The published report is designed using a vigorous and thorough research methodology andbigmarketresearchis also known for its data accuracy and granular market reports.

This report studies the Stem Cell Media market status and outlook of Global and major regions, from angles of players, countries, product types and end industries; this report analyzes the top players in global market, and splits the Stem Cell Media market by product type and applications/end industries. These details further contain a basic summary of the company, merchant profile, and the product range of the company in question. The report analyzes data regarding the proceeds accrued, product sales, gross margins, price patterns, and news updates relating to the company.

Market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities have been discussed in detail.Market players have been discussed and profiles of leading players including: Thermo Fisher STEMCELL Technologies Merck Millipore Lonza GE Healthcare Miltenyi Biotec Corning CellGenix Takara PromoCell

The key product type,the Stem Cell Media market is primarily split into Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture Hematopoietic Stem Cell Culture Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture

Based on type, the global market is segmented into the following sub-markets with annual revenue for 2015-2025 (historical and forecast) included in each section.

The end users/applications listed in the report are: Scientific Research Industrial Production

Based on application, the global market is segmented into the following sub-markets with annual revenue for 2019-2025 (historical and forecast) included in each section.

Get the Full Research Report Copy of Stem Cell Media With 10% Off by using Coupon Code [ORG123WA]:https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-for-discount/3432325?utm_source=PRL&utm_medium=Wasim

This report estimates the market size in terms of volume and value. This has been broken down into component regions and further into countries within those regions. This report covers North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific and South America.

The report helps to identify the main Stem Cell Media market players. It assists in analyzing Stem Cell Media market competitive environment, including company overview, company total revenue, market opportunities, value, production sites and facilities, SWOT analysis, product details. The study also reveals the sales, revenue and market share for each market player included in this report for the period of 2015-2020. It also helps to ascertain the growth drivers and future prospects for the forecast timeline.

Conclusively, this report is a one stop reference point for the industrial stakeholders to get Stem Cell Media market forecast of till 2025. This report helps to know the estimated market size, market status, future development, growth opportunity, challenges, and growth drivers of by analyzing the historical overall data of the considered market segments.

You May Also Like Our Other Trending Reports:

Read More:https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/report/3565591/global-ferrite-magnets-sale-insights-market?utm_source=PRL&utm_medium=Wasim

About Us:

Big Market Research has a range of research reports from various domains across the world. Our database of reports of various market categories and sub-categories would help to find the exact report you may be looking for.

Contact us: Mr. Abhishek Paliwal 5933 NE Win Sivers Drive, #205, Portland, OR 97220 United States Direct: +1-971-202-1575 Toll Free: +1-800-910-6452 E-mail:[emailprotected]

See original here:
Stem Cell Media Market Projected to Witness Vigorous Expansion by 2027 - The Think Curiouser

Cell Isolation Market Research and Analysis by Expert: import/export details, Cost Structures and statistics till 2027 – KYT24

Cell Isolation Market Report

The research study on the Global Cell Isolation Market is a thorough investigation of the value and supply chain of the market and offers all-inclusive data about the industry. The report also covers insightful information about pricing, cost, value, capacity, gross revenue, and profit margins with reference to historical analysis and forecast estimation. The report also strives to identify demands and trends in different sectors of the Cell Isolation market in major geographies of the world.

The Cell Isolation market has witnessed dynamic changes in trends and demands owing to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The report provides a detailed outlook on how the pandemic has affected the key segments of the Cell Isolation industry. The report includes an in-depth impact analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic on the overall Cell Isolation industry and covers a futuristic impact scenario.

Get a sample of the report @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/sample-enquiry-form/2237

The report studies the market dynamics to identify and scrutinize the strategic initiatives and tactics undertaken by the industry players in order to gain a robust footing in the market and to achieve a substantial global position. It provides exhaustive analysis and imparts insightful data to help the readers understand the Cell Isolation industry in detail and gain a competitive advantage over other players. The report also provides strategic recommendations to new and emerging players to help them formulate better entry and investment strategies.

The report covers extensive analysis of the key market players in the market, along with their business overview, expansion plans, and strategies. The key players studied in the report include:

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Beckman Coulter, Becton, Dickinson and Company, GE Healthcare, Merck KgaA, Miltenyi Biotec, pluriSelect, STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Terumo BCT and Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. who are investing a lot in research and development to bring in innovations to carve a niche market for themselves and get an advantage over their competitors.

The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the Cell Isolation market inclusive of product portfolio, categories, applications, and a comprehensive analysis of the value chain structure. The study investigates several factors influencing the growth of the market and provides a competitive advantage to the readers.

The Cell Isolation market report is an investigative study that provides insights into opportunities, limitations, and barriers encountered by the companies that influence or hinder the growth of the industry. Overall the report provides valuable information and an overview of the market scenario to gain a better understanding of the market.

Request a discount on the report @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/discount-enquiry-form/2237

Product (Revenue in USD Billion, 2018 2026)

Cell Type (Revenue in USD Billion, 2018 2026)

Technique (Revenue in USD Billion, 2018 2026)

Application (Revenue in USD Billion, 2018 2026)

End Use (Revenue in USD Billion, 2018 2026)

The report covers an extensive regional analysis and market estimation in each region and covers key geographical regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa.

To read more about the report, visit @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/cell-isolation-market

Key Point Summary of the Report:

Thank you for reading our report. For further queries, please connect with us to know more about the report and its customization. Our team will ensure the report is customized accurately to meet your requirements.

Take a look at other reports from Reports and Data on PR Newswire:

Spine Biologics Market: Spine Biologics Market to Reach USD 2,629.6 Million By 2027 | CAGR: 3.9%

Isobutanol Market: Isobutanol Market to Reach USD 1555.8 Million By 2027 | CAGR: 6.4%

Hematology Analyzers and Reagents Market: Hematology Analyzers and Reagents Market to Reach USD 12.10 Billion By 2027

Isobutanol Market: Isobutanol Market to Reach USD 1555.8 Million By 2027 | CAGR: 6.4%

About Us:

Our in-house experts assist our clients with advice based on their proficiency in the market that helps them in creating a compendious database for the clients. Our team offers expert insights to clients to guide them through their business ventures. We put in rigorous efforts to keep our clientele satisfied and focus on fulfilling their demands to make sure that the end-product is what they desire. We excel in diverse fields of the market and with our services extending to competitive analysis, research and development analysis, and demand estimation among others, we can help you invest your funds in the most beneficial areas for research and development. You can rely on us to provide every significant detail you might need in your efforts to make your business flourish.

Contact Us:

John Watson

Head of Business Development

Reports and Data|Web:www.reportsanddata.com

Direct Line:+1-212-710-1370

E-mail:[emailprotected]

Connect with us:Blogs|LinkedIn|Twitter

See original here:
Cell Isolation Market Research and Analysis by Expert: import/export details, Cost Structures and statistics till 2027 - KYT24

MorphoSys to Present Data on Tafasitamab at the ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition – PharmiWeb.com

DGAP-News: MorphoSys AG / Key word(s): Miscellaneous 04.11.2020 / 23:15 The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Media Release Planegg/Munich, Germany, November 4, 2020

MorphoSys to Present Data on Tafasitamab at the ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition

MorphoSys AG (FSE: MOR; Prime Standard Segment; MDAX & TecDAX; NASDAQ: MOR) today announced that multiple abstracts regarding the company's proprietary key asset tafasitamab have been accepted for poster presentations and online publication at the upcoming 62nd ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition from December 05-December 08, 2020. Tafasitamab is MorphoSys' CD19-directed antibody which was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s).

"We are pleased that pre-clinical data from MorphoSys' research department as well as clinical data from trials investigating our proprietary antibody tafasitamab were selected for presentation at the upcoming virtual ASH Meeting and Exposition," commented Dr. Malte Peters, Chief Research and Development Officer at MorphoSys. "Our seven accepted abstracts provide insights into our scientific and clinical activities to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tafasitamab in B-cell lymphoma. They highlight our commitment to unlock the full potential of tafasitamab and continue to broaden the development of our key asset as a therapeutic option for patients with high unmet medical needs."

MorphoSys will host a virtual booth for registered ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition attendees.

Abstracts accepted for presentation at ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition include:

E-Poster presentations:

LONG-TERM SUBGROUP ANALYSES FROM L-MIND, A PHASE II STUDY OF TAFASITAMAB (MOR208) COMBINED WITH LENALIDOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA Abstract number: 140314 Publication number: 3021 Session: 626. Aggressive Lymphoma (Diffuse Large B-Cell and Other Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas)-Results from Prospective Clinical Trials Poster presentation: Monday, December 7, 2020

A PHASE IB, OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED STUDY TO ASSESS SAFETY AND PRELIMINARY EFFICACY OF TAFASITAMAB (MOR208) OR TAFASITAMAB + LENALIDOMIDE IN ADDITION TO R-CHOP IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA: ANALYSIS OF THE SAFETY RUN-IN PHASE Abstract number: 139788 Publication number: 3028 Session: 626. Aggressive Lymphoma (Diffuse Large B-Cell and Other Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas)-Results from Prospective Clinical Trials Poster presentation: Monday, December 7, 2020

THE COMBINATION OF TAFASITAMAB AND RITUXIMAB INCREASES CYTOTOXICITY AGAINST LYMPHOMA CELLS IN VITRO Abstract number: 140381 Publication number: 2095 Session: 625. Lymphoma: Pre-Clinical-Chemotherapy and Biologic Agents Poster presentation date: Sunday, December 6, 2020

BLOCKADE OF THE CD47/SIRP CHECKPOINT POTENTIATES THE ANTI-TUMOR EFFICACY OF TAFASITAMAB Abstract number: 139582 Publication number: 3008 Session: 625. Lymphoma: Pre-Clinical-Chemotherapy and Biologic Agents Poster presentation date: Monday, December 7, 2020

Abstracts published online:

EFFICACY OF TAFASITAMAB (MOR208) COMBINED WITH LENALIDOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA IN THE L-MIND STUDY Abstract number: 140294 Publication number: 3918

ESTIMATION OF LONG-TERM SURVIVAL WITH TAFASITAMAB + LENALIDOMIDE IN RELAPSED/ REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA Abstract number: 140398 Publication number: 3928

MAINTAINED CD19 EXPRESSION IN DLBCL PATIENTS AFTER TAFASITAMAB THERAPY IN THE L-MIND STUDY WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF EXON SKIPPING OR SOMATIC MUTATIONS Abstract number: 139149 Publication number: 3723

The abstracts will also be available online in a supplemental issue of Blood. Please refer to the ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition online program (https://www.hematology.org) for full session details and data presentation listings.

About Tafasitamab Tafasitamab is a humanized Fc-modified cytolytic CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody. In 2010, MorphoSys licensed exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize tafasitamab from Xencor, Inc. Tafasitamab incorporates an XmAb(R) engineered Fc domain, which mediates B-cell lysis through apoptosis and immune effector mechanism including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP).

Monjuvi(R) (tafasitamab-cxix) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s).

In January 2020, MorphoSys and Incyte entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement to further develop and commercialize tafasitamab globally. Monjuvi(R) is being co-commercialized by Incyte and MorphoSys in the United States. Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights outside the United States.

A marketing authorization application (MAA) seeking the approval of tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide in the EU has been validated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and is currently under review for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, who are not candidates for ASCT.

Tafasitamab is being clinically investigated as a therapeutic option in B-cell malignancies in a number of ongoing combination trials.

Monjuvi(R) is a registered trademark of MorphoSys AG. XmAb(R) is a registered trademark of Xencor, Inc.

Important Safety Information What are the possible side effects of MONJUVI? MONJUVI may cause serious side effects, including:

- Infusion reactions. Your healthcare provider will monitor you for infusion reactions during your infusion of MONJUVI. Tell your healthcare provider right away if you get chills, flushing, headache, or shortness of breath during an infusion of MONJUVI.

- Low blood cell counts (platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells). Low blood cell counts are common with MONJUVI, but can also be serious or severe. Your healthcare provider will monitor your blood counts during treatment with MONJUVI. Tell your healthcare provider right away if you get a fever of 100.4 F (38 C) or above, or any bruising or bleeding.

- Infections. Serious infections, including infections that can cause death, have happened in people during treatments with MONJUVI and after the last dose. Tell your healthcare provider right away if you get a fever of 100.4 F (38 C) or above, or develop any signs and symptoms of an infection.

The most common side effects of MONJUVI include:

- Feeling tired or weak

- Diarrhea

- Cough

- Fever

- Swelling of lower legs or hands

- Respiratory tract infection

- Decreased appetite

These are not all the possible side effects of MONJUVI. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088.

Before you receive MONJUVI, tell your healthcare provider about all your medical conditions, including if you:

- Have an active infection or have had one recently.

- Are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. MONJUVI may harm your unborn baby. You should not become pregnant during treatment with MONJUVI. Do not receive treatment with MONJUVI in combination with lenalidomide if you are pregnant because lenalidomide can cause birth defects and death of your unborn baby.

- You should use an effective method of birth control (contraception) during treatment and for at least 3 months after your final dose of MONJUVI.

- Tell your healthcare provider right away if you become pregnant or think that you may be pregnant during treatment with MONJUVI.

- Are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. It is not known if MONJUVI passes into your breastmilk. Do not breastfeed during treatment for at least 3 months after your last dose of MONJUVI.

You should also read the lenalidomide Medication Guide for important information about pregnancy, contraception, and blood and sperm donation.

Tell your healthcare provider about all the medications you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for Monjuvi, including Patient Information, for additional Important Safety Information.

About MorphoSys MorphoSys (FSE & NASDAQ: MOR) is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of exceptional, innovative therapies for patients suffering from serious diseases. The focus is on cancer. Based on its leading expertise in antibody, protein and peptide technologies, MorphoSys, together with its partners, has developed and contributed to the development of more than 100 product candidates, of which 27 are currently in clinical development. In 2017, Tremfya(R), developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and marketed by Janssen Biotech, Inc., for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, became the first drug based on MorphoSys' antibody technology to receive regulatory approval. In July 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval of MorphoSys' proprietary product Monjuvi(R) (tafasitamab-cxix) in combination with lenalidomide in patients with a certain type of lymphoma.

Headquartered near Munich, Germany, the MorphoSys group, including the fully owned U.S. subsidiary MorphoSys US Inc., has ~500 employees. More information at http://www.morphosys.com or http://www.morphosys-us.com.

Monjuvi(R) is a registered trademark of MorphoSys AG. Tremfya(R) is a registered trademark of Janssen Biotech, Inc.

MorphoSys Forward-Looking Statements This communication contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the MorphoSys group of companies, including the expectations regarding Monjuvi's ability to treat patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the further clinical development of tafasitamab-cxix, including ongoing confirmatory trials, additional interactions with regulatory authorities and expectations regarding future regulatory filings and possible additional approvals for tafasitamab-cxix as well as the commercial performance of Monjuvi. The words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict," "project," "would," "could," "potential," "possible," "hope" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. The forward-looking statements contained herein represent the judgment of MorphoSys as of the date of this release and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which might cause the actual results, financial condition and liquidity, performance or achievements of MorphoSys, or industry results, to be materially different from any historic or future results, financial conditions and liquidity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, even if MorphoSys' results, performance, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which it operates are consistent with such forward-looking statements, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods. Among the factors that may result in differences are MorphoSys' expectations regarding risks and uncertainties related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to MorphoSys' business, operations, strategy, goals and anticipated milestones, including its ongoing and planned research activities, ability to conduct ongoing and planned clinical trials, clinical supply of current or future drug candidates, commercial supply of current or future approved products, and launching, marketing and selling current or future approved products, the global collaboration and license agreement for tafasitamab, the further clinical development of tafasitamab, including ongoing confirmatory trials, and MorphoSys' ability to obtain and maintain requisite regulatory approvals and to enroll patients in its planned clinical trials, additional interactions with regulatory authorities and expectations regarding future regulatory filings and possible additional approvals for tafasitamab-cxix as well as the commercial performance of Monjuvi, MorphoSys' reliance on collaborations with third parties, estimating the commercial potential of its development programs and other risks indicated in the risk factors included in MorphoSys' Annual Report on Form 20-F and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these uncertainties, the reader is advised not to place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of publication of this document. MorphoSys expressly disclaims any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements in this document to reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, unless specifically required by law or regulation.

For more information, please contact:

04.11.2020 Dissemination of a Corporate News, transmitted by DGAP - a service of EQS Group AG. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

The DGAP Distribution Services include Regulatory Announcements, Financial/Corporate News and Press Releases. Archive at http://www.dgap.de

Here is the original post:
MorphoSys to Present Data on Tafasitamab at the ASH Virtual Annual Meeting and Exposition - PharmiWeb.com

The Many Model Systems of COVID-19 – The Scientist

Earlier this year, as transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic, started to pick up speed, researchers around the world hurried to find model systems that could provide insight into disease spread, host immune responses, and possible treatments.

When the pandemic first started, nobody really knew what was going to be the best model, says Amanda Martinot, a veterinary pathologist at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine.

The most widely available candidates were mice, which are easily housed and so well-researched that there are tons of tools available for studying nearly every aspect of their biology. But as researchers suspected, based on previous incompatibility of mice and other coronaviruses, the animals present challenges when it comes to studying SARS-CoV-2. The virus uses a human receptor called ACE2 to get into cells, but mouse ACE2 is different enough that the virus doesnt readily bind it.

Scientists have overcome the issue using two separate strategies: generating transgenic animals that express the human receptor and modifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus to make it better able to bind mouse ACE2.

Even with the success of those approaches, investigators have also been on the lookout for other options. Ferrets, for instance, are useful for studying viral transmission and viral replication in the upper respiratory tract and have been used by several groups for SARS-CoV-2 experiments. Some researchers have also turned to hamsters, which have been used in the past to study other viruses, including the coronaviruses responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome.

Hamsters are known in virology for their permissiveness to all kinds of viral infection really, and, as a rule of thumb, I would say if something doesnt work in a mouse, you may as well try a hamster, says Jakob Trimpert, a postdoc at the Free University of Berlin. And if youre lucky, it works there. Along with collaborators, hes been using several species of hamsters to study SARS-CoV-2 infections and potential therapeutics.

The hamster ACE2 receptor is compatible with SARS-CoV-2, and the animals develop clear clinical indicators of disease, he explains. For instance, Syrian hamsters(Mesocricetus auratus), one of the hamster species most commonly used in virus research worldwide, get mild SARS-CoV-2 infections, but their main symptomweight lossis reproducible and possible to measure. These animals also have severe pneumonia that is detectable via lung pathology. Trimpert and his colleagues used both transcriptomics and proteomics to evaluate the animals immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a study they published on July 20.

Many alveolar air spaces (white) are collapsed during a SARS-CoV-2 lung infection in a Syrian hamster (right). They are not collapsed in an uninfected hamsters lung (left).

Amanda martinot, tufts cummings school of veterinary medicine

Hamsters have been the best model so far for showing us any clinical disease, says Martinot. They develop weight loss, and they develop a fulminant pneumonia where its affecting sometimes over fifty percent of their lung, she adds. They also will recover if given time, but the pathology we feel is more representative of what you might see in humans. Martinot, Dan Barouch, who directs the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and other collaborators recently published a study showing that a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protected against weight loss and pneumonia in Syrian hamsters.

This species, also known as the golden Syrian hamster, has some drawbacks, too, Trimpert says. Theyre big, for one, weighing in at 150160 grams fully grown, in contrast to adult mice, which tip the scales at about 3035 grams. Syrian hamsters are also aggressive toward each other and sometimes the people taking care of them. Their size and aggression mean that they often have to be housed alone in larger cages, which makes them more expensive to keep.

The biggest issues, according to Trimpert, are the poor quality of the sequenced genomemany genes are just missingand the lack of molecular tools that work in hamsters. To circumvent these problems, Trimpert and his colleagues are resequencing and annotating the Syrian hamster genome.

Because the weight loss in Syrian hamsterstheir only easily observable clinical symptomis quite mild, its also a drawback, particularly when testing therapies or vaccines, Trimpert tells The Scientist. If you need thirty hamsters in order to get statistical significance . . . that is a huge practical problem.

The researchers are skirting this issue by beginning work with another species, Roborovski dwarf hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii), which are smaller than mice and less aggressive than Syrian hamsters. The dwarf hamsters also get much sicker than their larger relatives following SARS-CoV-2 infection, developing massive blood clots in the lungs, which are often present in severe cases of COVID-19 in people as well. Most of these hamsters eventually die of the complications of the infection, which, according to Trimpert, indicates that they might be a good model of severe disease in humans.

A human intestinal organoid (with nuclei labeled in blue and cell shape outlined in green) infected with SARS-CoV-2 (labeled in red)

Joep Beumer

Getting a better picture of what is happening in people is a common goal. Eric Song, an MD/PhD student in Akiko Iwasakis lab at Yale School of Medicine, wanted to determine what effect SARS-CoV-2 was having on the brain. He and his colleagues used a humanized mouse model, in which a promoter drives the expression of human ACE2 in epithelial cells, in a study released as a preprint earlier this year. They found that SARS-CoV-2 could infect the central nervous system in the mice, but it still wasnt clear whether those findings translated to human patients.

To probe that question, the researchers turned to brain organoidscultured, miniature organs that resemble the developing brain and contain neuronal and glial cell types derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Not only did SARS-CoV-2 infect the organoids, infection also appeared to cause cell death, a finding corroborated by another study in brain organoids published by separate group September 23. Song and his colleagues also found antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the cerebrospinal fluid of people with COVID-19 and evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the post-mortem brains of COVID-19 patients.

The team used three complementary methods to account for the limitations of each, Song tells The Scientist.There is room for all the different models that are in play, he adds. With human samples, you can only take really a snapshot of the sickest patients because thats the only time you will be getting a post-mortem sample, but combined with the mouse and the organoid model, youre able to study [the] kinetics and the dynamic process of viral invasion. Things like organoids really help us access tissues that we would not otherwise have access to.

Immunologist and developmental biologist Hans Clevers of Utrecht University in the Netherlands and colleagues are leveraging that access with gut organoids. Rather than deriving the organoids from iPSCs, though, they use multipotent stem cells taken from any adult epithelial tissue. In some ways the strategy is more limited: gut epithelial cells can only make mini guts, for instance, in contrast to iPSC-derived organoids, which can become lots of different tissues. On the other hand, they grow forever, Clevers says. iPSC-based organoids, you make them and then you have to use them for an experiment because they stop growing the moment you start specifying them.

His group published a study on July 3 investigating whether or not SARS-CoV-2 can target the gut, a hypothesis based on the expression of ACE2 in the intestinal lining and the gastrointestinal symptoms that many COVID-19 patients experience. Their work in human small intestinal organoids confirmed that the virus does enter the cells of the intestinal lining, replicate, and cause changes in gene expression.

Now, Clevers and his colleagues are using organoids to test possible COVID-19 therapeutics. Chloroquine is an example of a drug that looked promising for blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection when researchers tried it in conventional cell culturein that case, cells derived from African green monkey kidneys and grown in one layer on a dish, he says. But, as theyve shown in a new study thats been submitted for peer review, in the gut organoid model chloroquine is ineffective against SARS-CoV-2, just as it is in patients. According to Clevers, this latest finding indicates that an extra screening step in organoids following the identification of a promising drug in a traditional cell culture system could provide another layer of information before moving into preclinical animal models or the clinic.

Cell lines are cheap, they grow fast, and most robotic strategies for screening have been designed for cells growing in two dimensions, Clevers says. There are multiple efforts now around the world to come up with the machines to do similar high throughput screens with 3D. With the organoids, its a little bit more complex to analyze because theyre not flat, he explains, but the type of organoids they generate in his lab grow quickly. He predicts that organoids will come to be used more widely because their physiology recapitulates that of humans so well, but that theyll never replace animals.

Along with hamsters, nonhuman primates are one of the main models that researchers studying COVID-19 therapeutics use. SARS-CoV-2 readily infects primates, such as macaques, due to the compatibility of their ACE2 receptor, but they do not show disease symptoms, says Martinot. The nonhuman primate experience of COVID-19 seems to be most similar to the mildly symptomatic cases of most people who are infected, she adds. They develop regions of pathology in their lungs that are detectable with a microscope, but its not enough to make them sick, and observing that kind of disease in a person is unlikely because these animals are euthanized early in infection to allow researchers to track any changes.

It would be nice to have a primate model of severe disease, says Barouch. Nobody has been able to develop one so far, but models are always in development.

And symptom presentation isnt everything. These animals are harder to access and harder to house than rodents, but they are a wonderful model for vaccine research and for evaluating . . . the adaptive immune response to COVID-19, Martinot says, at least in part because there are so many existing tools researchers can leverage. Reagents that are available for evaluating the immune response [in people] work in monkeys, and so we can very carefully monitor the nonhuman primate for the development of antibodies, cytokine responses, and T-cell responses, she adds.

You always want to pick your best model for your specific question, Martinot tells The Scientist. But depending on what kind of question youre asking, or what kind of drug youre testing, you really have to choose the model that best fits your ability to answer those questions in a very accurate and reproducible way.

The World Health Organizations Research & Development Blueprint Team has been working on this since February. The team reviews progress and coordinates efforts on animal models of COVID-19 with the primary goal of advancing the development of COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines. On September 23, some group members and a handful of other researchers published a review detailing the work thats been done to model SARS-CoV-2 infections in animalsparticularly, mice, hamsters, ferrets, and nonhuman primatesand highlighting how findings in animals correspond to disease progression in people.

The development and use of these models is not a linear process, and theyre under constant revision, says Barouch, who is part of the WHO working group. When there is human data, then that allows back validation or refinement of the model . . . so there has to be a continuous feedback from models to clinical trials and back.

In things that are so new, like SARS-CoV-2, it may well be that there is more than one useful animal model, Trimpert says. We should be open and flexible, especially in emergency situations like this.

Read more:
The Many Model Systems of COVID-19 - The Scientist

Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Brief Analysis and Application, Growth by 2026 | Biological Industries, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich…

LOS ANGELES, United States: The report is an all-inclusive research study of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market taking into account the growth factors, recent trends, developments, opportunities, and competitive landscape. The market analysts and researchers have done extensive analysis of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market with the help of research methodologies such as PESTLE and Porters Five Forces analysis. They have provided accurate and reliable market data and useful recommendations with an aim to help the players gain an insight into the overall present and future market scenario. The Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor report comprises in-depth study of the potential segments including product type, application, and end user and their contribution to the overall market size.

Get PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1611144/global-soybean-trypsin-inhibitor-market

In addition, market revenues based on region and country are provided in the Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor report. The authors of the report have also shed light on the common business tactics adopted by players. The leading players of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market and their complete profiles are included in the report. Besides that, investment opportunities, recommendations, and trends that are trending at present in the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market are mapped by the report. With the help of this report, the key players of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market will be able to make sound decisions and plan their strategies accordingly to stay ahead of the curve.

Competitive landscape is a critical aspect every key player needs to be familiar with. The report throws light on the competitive scenario of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market to know the competition at both the domestic and global levels. Market experts have also offered the outline of every leading player of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market, considering the key aspects such as areas of operation, production, and product portfolio. Additionally, companies in the report are studied based on the key factors such as company size, market share, market growth, revenue, production volume, and profits.

Key Players Mentioned in the Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Research Report: Biological Industries, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich (Merck), Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR), STEMCELL, Cayman Chemical, Worthington Biochemical, Geno Technology, Abcam

Types: Purity Above 90% Purity Above 95% Other

Applications: Scientific Research Industrial Production Other

The Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market report has been segregated based on distinct categories, such as product type, application, end user, and region. Each and every segment is evaluated on the basis of CAGR, share, and growth potential. In the regional analysis, the report highlights the prospective region, which is estimated to generate opportunities in the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market in the forthcoming years. This segmental analysis will surely turn out to be a useful tool for the readers, stakeholders, and market participants to get a complete picture of the global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor market and its potential to grow in the years to come.

Key questions answered in the report:

Request for customization in Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1611144/global-soybean-trypsin-inhibitor-market

Table of Contents:

1 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor 1.2 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales Growth Rate Comparison by Type (2021-2026) 1.2.2 Purity Above 90% 1.2.3 Purity Above 95% 1.2.4 Other 1.3 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Segment by Application 1.3.1 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 2026 1.3.2 Scientific Research 1.3.3 Industrial Production 1.3.4 Other 1.4 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Size Estimates and Forecasts 1.4.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Revenue 2015-2026 1.4.2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales 2015-2026 1.4.3 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 2026 1.5 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Industry 1.6 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Trends

2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 2.2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 2.3 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Average Price by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 2.4 Manufacturers Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Manufacturing Sites, Area Served, Product Type 2.5 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Global Top 5 and Top 10 Players Market Share by Revenue 2.5.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) 2.6 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 2.7 Primary Interviews with Key Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Players (Opinion Leaders)

3 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Retrospective Market Scenario by Region 3.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2015-2020 3.2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2015-2020 3.3 North America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Facts & Figures by Country 3.3.1 North America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.3.2 North America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.3.3 U.S. 3.3.4 Canada 3.4 Europe Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Facts & Figures by Country 3.4.1 Europe Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.4.2 Europe Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.4.3 Germany 3.4.4 France 3.4.5 U.K. 3.4.6 Italy 3.4.7 Russia 3.5 Asia Pacific Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Facts & Figures by Region 3.5.1 Asia Pacific Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Region 3.5.2 Asia Pacific Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Region 3.5.3 China 3.5.4 Japan 3.5.5 South Korea 3.5.6 India 3.5.7 Australia 3.5.8 Taiwan 3.5.9 Indonesia 3.5.10 Thailand 3.5.11 Malaysia 3.5.12 Philippines 3.5.13 Vietnam 3.6 Latin America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Facts & Figures by Country 3.6.1 Latin America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.6.2 Latin America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.6.3 Mexico 3.6.3 Brazil 3.6.3 Argentina 3.7 Middle East and Africa Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Facts & Figures by Country 3.7.1 Middle East and Africa Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.7.2 Middle East and Africa Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales by Country 3.7.3 Turkey 3.7.4 Saudi Arabia 3.7.5 U.A.E 4 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Historic Market Analysis by Type 4.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales Market Share by Type (2015-2020) 4.2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Revenue Market Share by Type (2015-2020) 4.3 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Price Market Share by Type (2015-2020) 4.4 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End

5 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Historic Market Analysis by Application 5.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales Market Share by Application (2015-2020) 5.2 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Revenue Market Share by Application (2015-2020) 5.3 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Price by Application (2015-2020)

6 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Business 6.1 Biological Industries 6.1.1 Corporation Information 6.1.2 Biological Industries Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.1.3 Biological Industries Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.1.4 Biological Industries Products Offered 6.1.5 Biological Industries Recent Development 6.2 Thermo Fisher Scientific 6.2.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation Information 6.2.2 Thermo Fisher Scientific Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.2.3 Thermo Fisher Scientific Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.2.4 Thermo Fisher Scientific Products Offered 6.2.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific Recent Development 6.3 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) 6.3.1 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) Corporation Information 6.3.2 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.3.3 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.3.4 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) Products Offered 6.3.5 Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) Recent Development 6.4 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) 6.4.1 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) Corporation Information 6.4.2 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.4.3 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.4.4 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) Products Offered 6.4.5 Oxford Biomedical Research (OBR) Recent Development 6.5 STEMCELL 6.5.1 STEMCELL Corporation Information 6.5.2 STEMCELL Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.5.3 STEMCELL Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.5.4 STEMCELL Products Offered 6.5.5 STEMCELL Recent Development 6.6 Cayman Chemical 6.6.1 Cayman Chemical Corporation Information 6.6.2 Cayman Chemical Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.6.3 Cayman Chemical Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.6.4 Cayman Chemical Products Offered 6.6.5 Cayman Chemical Recent Development 6.7 Worthington Biochemical 6.6.1 Worthington Biochemical Corporation Information 6.6.2 Worthington Biochemical Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.6.3 Worthington Biochemical Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.4.4 Worthington Biochemical Products Offered 6.7.5 Worthington Biochemical Recent Development 6.8 Geno Technology 6.8.1 Geno Technology Corporation Information 6.8.2 Geno Technology Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.8.3 Geno Technology Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.8.4 Geno Technology Products Offered 6.8.5 Geno Technology Recent Development 6.9 Abcam 6.9.1 Abcam Corporation Information 6.9.2 Abcam Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 6.9.3 Abcam Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 6.9.4 Abcam Products Offered 6.9.5 Abcam Recent Development

7 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Manufacturing Cost Analysis 7.1 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Key Raw Materials Analysis 7.1.1 Key Raw Materials 7.1.2 Key Raw Materials Price Trend 7.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials 7.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure 7.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor 7.4 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Industrial Chain Analysis

8 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers 8.1 Marketing Channel 8.2 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Distributors List 8.3 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Customers

9 Market Dynamics 9.1 Market Trends 9.2 Opportunities and Drivers 9.3 Challenges 9.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis

10 Global Market Forecast 10.1 Global Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Estimates and Projections by Type 10.1.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Type (2021-2026) 10.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Type (2021-2026) 10.2 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Estimates and Projections by Application 10.2.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Application (2021-2026) 10.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Application (2021-2026) 10.3 Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Estimates and Projections by Region 10.3.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Region (2021-2026) 10.3.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor by Region (2021-2026) 10.4 North America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 10.5 Europe Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 10.6 Asia Pacific Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 10.7 Latin America Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 10.8 Middle East and Africa Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 11 Research Finding and Conclusion

12 Methodology and Data Source 12.1 Methodology/Research Approach 12.1.1 Research Programs/Design 12.1.2 Market Size Estimation 12.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 12.2 Data Source 12.2.1 Secondary Sources 12.2.2 Primary Sources 12.3 Author List 12.4 Disclaimer

In Order to place the Purchase Query Click Here: https://www.qyresearch.com/settlement/pre/1611144/global-soybean-trypsin-inhibitor-market

About Us:

QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), experts resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

See original here:
Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Market Brief Analysis and Application, Growth by 2026 | Biological Industries, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich...

Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies Market Analysis with Market Size, Industry Share, trends and Forecast to 2026 – The Think Curiouser

The worldwide Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies Market statistical surveying report is an inescapable research report that contacts the most imperative parts of the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies platform that is important to be gotten a handle on by an expert or even a layman. The research covers the current market size of theCell and Tissue Culture Supplies marketand its growth rates based on 5-year history data along with the company profile of key players/manufacturers such as Stemcell Technologies, Wheaton Industries, GE Healthcare, Thermo Fisher Scientific, VWR International, Merck KGaA, Lonza Group, Corning, Promocell GmbH, Eppendorf AG. The statistical surveying report illuminates one with respect to a few of the imperative perspectives, for example, an outline of the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies item, the development factors improving or hampering its advancement, application in the different fields, major ruling organizations, veritable certainties, monetary circumstance, and topographical examination.

To Understand How Covid-19 impact on this industry. Get Free Sample Report:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/sample/cell-and-tissue-culture-supplies-market.html

Based on the present techniques and trends, the global Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market report provides a thoroughly analyzed and predicted forecast regarding the upcoming growth of the market. The report conjointly categorizes the market into the main product andthe sub-segments Vaccine Production, Biopharmaceutical Production, Toxicity Testing, Gene Therapy, Drug Screening Development, Cancer Research, Other of the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market is depicted in the report. The market report also explains the major alteration in the product version, its production technology, and development that may be caused due to a little variation in the product profile.

The global Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market is one of the booming markets with a well-established zone worldwide. The global market has been completely focusing on the advancement in groundbreaking technologies and listening to the customers preferences; which lead to the vast and continuous increase in its growth rate. The global Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market provides a huge platform with lots of opportunities for different industries in different regions to emerge and establish globally.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study at::https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/market-analysis/cell-and-tissue-culture-supplies-market.html

The global report provides detailed key points that have significant effects on the global development of the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market. It provides the current status as well as future aspects over the market development. The report is generated after in-depth research and thorough analysis of the development in various sectors of the market that needs technological ideas, hypothetical analysis, and its applicability. The factors that significantly improve and demote the market growth; deep justification of the markets previous data; along with the current analyzed data; and the future development of the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market are included in the report. The Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market report also delivers a theoretical-based study regarding the financial instabilities in terms of the demand and the supply.

There are 15 Chapters to display the Global Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market

Chapter 1,Applications of Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies, Definition, Specifications, and Classification of Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies, Market Segment by Regions; Chapter 2,Manufacturing Process, Industry Chain Structure, Manufacturing Cost Structure, Raw Material, and Suppliers; Chapter 3,R&D Status and Technology Source, Technical Data and Manufacturing Plants Analysis of Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies, Capacity, and Commercial Production Date, Manufacturing Plants Distribution, Raw Materials Sources Analysis; Chapter 4,Overall Market Analysis, Capacity Analysis, Sales Analysis, Sales Price Analysis; Chapter 5 and 6,Regional Market Analysis that includes the United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea & Taiwan, (by Type); Chapter 7 and 8,The Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies Segment Market Analysis (by Application) Major Manufacturers Analysis of Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies ; Chapter 9,Regional Market Trend, Market Trend Analysis, Market Trend by Product Type Consumable Products, Instruments, Market Trend by Application; Chapter 10,International Trade Type Analysis, Regional Marketing Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis; Chapter 11,The Consumers Analysis of Global Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies ; Chapter 12,Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source; Chapter 13, 14, and 15,Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, and data source.

Enquire Here Get customization&check discount for report @https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/inquiry/cell-and-tissue-culture-supplies-market

Reasons To Buy This Report:

To conclude, the Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies market report will provide the clients with a high-yielding market analysis assisting them to understand the market status and come up with new market avenues to capture hold of the market share.

About Us:

Syndicate Market Research has a range of research reports from various domains across the world. Our database of reports of various market categories and sub-categories would help to find the exact report you may be looking for.

Contact us:

Email ID:[emailprotected]

TOLL-FREE:+1 347 535 0815

Go here to see the original:
Cell and Tissue Culture Supplies Market Analysis with Market Size, Industry Share, trends and Forecast to 2026 - The Think Curiouser

Voters asked to approve $5.5 billion for stem cell research – Madison.com

FILE - In this March 16, 2012, file photo, researcher Terry Storm works in a stem cell research lab at the Lorry I. Lokey Stem Cell Research Building on the Stanford University campus in Palo Alto, Calif. The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine has doled out nearly $3 billion for stem-cell research since 2004. Now, with the institute running out of money, its advocates are asking California voters to approve Proposition 14, to give it a $5.5 billion cash infusion.

FILE - In this Feb. 16, 2007 file photo, then-California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, center, is surrounded by supporters of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, during a news conference in Burlingame, Calif., to announce the recipients of grants from CIRM. The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine has doled out nearly $3 billion for stem-cell research since 2004. Now, with the institute running out of money, its advocates are asking California voters to approve Proposition 14, to give it a $5.5 billion cash infusion.

By JOHN ROGERS Associated Press

LOS ANGELES (AP) The future of California's first-of-its-kind stem cell research program is in the hands of voters, who will decide whether it deserves a $5.5 billion infusion of borrowed bond money to keep functioning.

A yes vote on Proposition 14 on Tuesday's ballot would approve such a bond sale, bailing out the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which was created by a similar $3 billion bond measure in 2014 but is now nearly broke.

With dozens of clinical trials involving the use of stem cells to treat cancer, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, paralysis, autoimmune diseases and other conditions underway at universities across California, supporters say it is crucial to keep that money flowing.

Trials that use human embryonic derived stem cells to treat diabetes, to treat blindness and to treat spinal cord injury, those trials are early but already showing signs of patient benefit," said professor Larry Goldstein, who directs the stem cell research program at the University of California, San Diego. Losing those trials would be a terrible tragedy for those patients.

Opponents say the state simply can't afford to take on that kind of debt during a pandemic-induced economic crisis. What's more, they say, there isn't as much need for California to bankroll stem cell research now that the federal government and private investors have turned their attention to it.

Excerpt from:
Voters asked to approve $5.5 billion for stem cell research - Madison.com

A Review of Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Parkinson Disease – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Researchers discuss the development and potential of stem cellbased therapies in the treatment of Parkinson disease.

In assessing treatment for Parkinson disease (PD), the current standard of care involves levodopa, potentially in combination with carbidopa, to address the loss of dopamine known to occur as the condition progresses. However, several innovations in therapy for PD have occurred in recent years, particularly deep brain stimulation and the potential use of stem cells.

Discussing in a review published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, researchers Zhaohui Liu, PhD, MSc, and Hoi-Hung Cheung, PhD, sought to discuss the development of new therapeutic strategies that have led to the initiation of exploratory clinical trials, particularly the application of stem cells for the treatment of PD.

Delving into the use of stem cellbased treatments in PD, the researchers say that several important pathways have emerged as targets for potential therapeutic intervention.

Conventional therapeutic strategies for relieving the symptomatic stages of PD remain, but with new genetic insights, it may be possible to use preventive neuroprotective treatments for people at risk of developing PD, they highlight. In parallel with efforts to prevent and control symptomatic PD, researchers are also investigating stem cells as replacements for diseased neurons or degenerated tissues.

As they note, dopaminergic (DA) cell transplantation is believed to be the most promising cell replacement therapy. Aligned with this approach, a recent novel treatment showcased the plausibility of reprogramming the skin cells of a single patient with PD to take on the characteristics of DA neurons and replace damaged brain cells. In their findings, the patient exhibited improvements in quality of life and day-to-day activities requiring motor skills. However, as this treatment was performed on only 1 person, the researchers cautioned that larger, diverse clinical studies are needed to demonstrate further efficacy and long-term results.

Other notable stem cellbased treatments include:

Although we are not yet examining a disease-modifying treatment, stem cell transplantation has the potential to be at the forefront of such PD treatments in the future, conclude the researchers. The transplantation process and the procedures required for its optimization are still not fully understood, and further research is required to achieve treatment for PD.

Reference

Liu Z, Cheung H-H. Stem cell-based therapies for Parkinson disease. Int J Mol Sci. Published online October 29, 2020. doi:10.3390/ijms21218060

Continued here:
A Review of Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Parkinson Disease - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

10 health and science-focused races to watch on election night – STAT

WASHINGTON The presidential race is top of mind as election season draws to a close Tuesday. But theres plenty more at stake, and many congressional races, ballot initiatives, and even local elections across the country carry significant implications for the future of health and science.

Congressional Democrats hope not only to expand their House majority but also to capture control of the Senate, which, if coupled with a Joe Biden victory, could pave the way for aggressive health insurance and drug pricing reforms.

Many voters will also decide on substantial reforms via statewide initiative or ballot proposal. Numerous states are weighing plans to decriminalize or legalize marijuana and other drugs. Other states are looking to tighten restrictions or raise taxes for e-cigarette and tobacco purchases.

advertisement

Further down the ballot, Democrats are also hoping to capture control of several state legislatures, which have served as local laboratories for health care policymaking on issues including drug pricing, Medicaid expansion, surprise billing, price transparency, and more.

Below, STAT outlines 10 congressional races or ballot initiatives across the country with major ramifications for the future of health and science.

advertisement

Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican, is seen as one of the pharmaceutical industrys staunchest allies in Congress. Hes among the leading recipients of drug industry PAC contributions, and hes authored legislation that would strengthen intellectual property protections for U.S. corporations, likely making it easier for drug makers to preserve exclusivity on blockbuster drugs.

Tillis has paid for it politically. Hes the lone target of Patients for Affordable Drugs Action, the political advocacy group backed by the Texas billionaire activists John and Laura Arnold. Democratic campaign groups have relentlessly attacked him for his ties to the drug industry.

North Carolina is a critical swing state, and Tillis fate is very likely tied to Trumps. But his loss would leave the drug industry without a key D.C. ally, and signal that drug prices remain as potent a campaign issue as they were in 2018.

Democrats are typically long shots in Kansas, but Barbara Bollier, a trained physician and former Republican, has run a competitive race focused largely on health care issues like Covid-19, drug prices, Medicaid expansion, surprise billing, and access to abortion. She doesnt currently practice medicine, but if she ekes out a win, shed be the first female M.D. elected to the Senate.

Her opponent, Roger Marshall, is a doctor himself, and a longtime supporter of physician-owned hospitals. In keeping with the health care-themed race, hes also campaigning on his medical background, including his recent volunteer work treating Covid-19 patients and continued advocacy for repealing the Affordable Care Act. Marshall, however, has faced several controversies, including insensitive comments about Medicaid beneficiaries in 2017, a maskless, indoor campaign appearance amid a local coronavirus outbreak, and questions about whether his family might benefit financially from his push to deregulate physician-owned hospitals.

This district, like the Senate race in Kansas, is a reminder that for much of the country, the health care debate doesnt revolve around Medicare for All, despite the consistent focus on single-payer health care throughout the Democratic primary.

The Democratic candidate, Cameron Webb, is a practicing physician and former Obama administration aide whod be the first Black doctor elected to Congress (besides non-voting delegates from U.S. territories). Unlike many 30-something Democratic up-and-comers, he doesnt support Medicare for All. If Webb can use his health care background to help flip a red-leaning seat, it would hammer home that Democrats can still win even on comparatively centrist health care platforms.

For all the fuss made the last several years over drug pricing and surprise billing legislation in Washington, its state legislatures, not Congress, that have had at least some success enacting health industry overhauls. Its little surprise that industry groups, including drug manufacturers, have contributed millions of dollars to the campaigns of nearly 2,000 state lawmakers across the country.

Keep on eye on the battles for control of the Minnesota state Senate and both legislative chambers in Pennsylvania, Arizona, and North Carolina. If Democrats win control, it could set up fascinating health policy fights in 2021 and 2022.

After approving a ballot measure funding stem cell research in 2004, Californians are facing the choice whether to re-up state support for the scientific field. Proponents argue that selling billions of additional bonds is not only a way to invest in research that could lead to new treatments, but that it will help fuel the states economy by propping up academic centers and biotech companies. Opponents contend the state has more pressing needs than the public funding of stem cell research and question how some of the initial funding was spent. Plus, this is not 2004. The initial measure was backed by voters at a time when the Bush administration was limiting federal support for certain stem cell research. Now, there is lots of taxpayer money, as well as philanthropic and venture capital, flooding into the field.

A number of states are considering tax increases for tobacco and e-cigarette products, following years of controversy focused on the burgeoning vape industry and one of its major players, Juul, which has come under fire for aggressively marketing its products to underaged users.

Oregon is looking to curtail cigarette use and generate revenue for public health programs via a sharp hike in taxes on a pack of cigarettes from $1.33 to $3.33. If the initiative, known as Measure 108, passes, it would also establish a tax on vape products.

In Oklahoma, Question 814 will determine whether voters consent to diverting some money from the states Tobacco Settlement Endowment Fund to help fund the Medicaid expansion that voters there approved in June.

Quinn Nystrom, a 34-year old insulin affordability advocate, is challenging Republican Rep. Pete Stauber in Minnesotas 8th District. Nystrom is hoping a campaign laser-focused on drug pricing can propel her to Congress. Her election is a long shot Stauber is wildly popular and has the backing of Trump, who carried by more than 15 points in 2016. If she wins, however, the victory would send a resounding message that drug pricing is a mobilizing issue for both Democratic and Republican voters.

More than two decades after California launched the countrys first medical marijuana program, the policy could continue its expansion even into deeply conservative states. South Dakota and Mississippi voters have the option of approving medical marijuana ballot measures, as the issue is no longer as divisive as it once was and warnings that allowing people to use marijuana for medical purposes could lead to health problems and lawlessness havent been borne out.

Beyond medical marijuana, voters in South Dakota, Montana, New Jersey, and Arizona will decide whether to legalize marijuana for recreational use among adults. And in Oregon, voters will weigh whether to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of drugs, including cocaine and heroin, while funding addiction treatment and harm reduction services. Separately, voters in Oregon and the District of Columbia will decide on first-of-their-kind initiatives on psychedelics. Oregons measure would legalize medicinal use of psilocybin, the active compound in psychedelic mushrooms, and D.C.s would decriminalize the possession of psychedelic plants.

In her bid to unseat the Republican Rep. Lee Zeldin in a Long Island district, Democrat Nancy Goroff has touted her scientific bona fides. The chemist at Stony Brook University has attacked Zeldin and linked him to the Trump administrations handling of the coronavirus pandemic. If she pulls off the win, it could be a signal that voters are frustrated with the administrations dismissal of scientific evidence and experts. Still, the race is listed as lean Republican in the Cook Political Reports ratings of House races.

Voters in two states Colorado and Louisiana will be voting on two proposals that could restrict abortions. Colorados Proposition 115 would prohibit abortion after 22 weeks of gestation, and Louisiana is deciding on whether the states constitution should be amended with language that would prevent the document from being used to protect abortion rights in the future.

Abortion is once again front and center after Justice Amy Coney Barretts confirmation to the Supreme Court last month. Barrett didnt definitely say during her confirmation hearings that she would overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that provided legal protection for abortion in the U.S. However, activists have pointed to some of her support for anti-abortion groups while she was a law professor at the University of Notre Dame as evidence that she would.

State-level abortion policies vary widely; fewer than half of U.S. states explicitly protect peoples right to the procedure. Even on its own, Colorados proposition could make a nationwide impact. The state is one of just six that does not restrict access to abortion after 20 gestational weeks; one of the few physicians in the country who is willing and able to provide abortions to people and families after that point operates in that state.

Washington Correspondent

Lev Facher covers the politics of health and life sciences.

Washington correspondent

Nicholas Florko is a Washington correspondent for STAT, reporting on the the intersection of politics and health policy. He is the author the newsletter "D.C. Diagnosis."

General Assignment Reporter

Andrew is a general assignment reporter.

General Assignment Reporter

Kate is a general assignment reporter.

Trending

Public officials: Heed the will of the people in

Public officials: Heed the will of the people in the middle hour of the coronavirus crisis

It may be time to reset expectations on when

It may be time to reset expectations on when well get a Covid-19 vaccine

The Road Ahead: Charting the coronavirus pandemic over the

The Road Ahead: Charting the coronavirus pandemic over the next 12 months and beyond

Recommended

Is it time for the FDA to be independent?

Is it time for the FDA to be independent?

Gilead faces pressure to relinquish valuable FDA voucher awarded

Gilead faces pressure to relinquish valuable FDA voucher awarded with remdesivir approval

Public officials: Heed the will of the people in

Public officials: Heed the will of the people in the middle hour of the coronavirus crisis

Excerpt from:
10 health and science-focused races to watch on election night - STAT