Category Archives: Stem Cell Clinic


Cell Therapy Market Trend,COVID-19 Impact,Current Industry Figures With Demand By Countries And Future Growth – PRnews Leader

LOS ANGELES, United States: QY Research has recently published a research report titled, Global Cell Therapy Market Report, History and Forecast 2015-2026, Breakdown Data by Companies, Key Regions, Types and Application. This report has been prepared by experienced and knowledgeable market analysts and researchers. It is a phenomenal compilation of important studies that explore the competitive landscape, segmentation, geographical expansion, and revenue, production, and consumption growth of the global Cell Therapy market. Players can use the accurate market facts and figures and statistical studies provided in the report to understand the current and future growth of the global Cell Therapy market.

The report includes CAGR, market shares, sales, gross margin, value, volume, and other vital market figures that give an exact picture of the growth of the global Cell Therapy market.

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global Cell Therapy market.

Key questions answered in the report:

TOC

1 Market Overview of Cell Therapy 1.1 Cell Therapy Market Overview 1.1.1 Cell Therapy Product Scope 1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook 1.2 Global Cell Therapy Market Size Overview by Region 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 1.3 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Region (2015-2026) 1.4 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Region (2015-2020) 1.5 Global Cell Therapy Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026) 1.6 Key Regions, Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.1 North America Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.2 Europe Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.3 Asia-Pacific Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.4 Latin America Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.5 Middle East & Africa Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 2 Cell Therapy Market Overview by Type 2.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Type: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 2.2 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 2.3 Global Cell Therapy Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 2.4 Stem Cell 2.5 Non-Stem Cell 3 Cell Therapy Market Overview by Application 3.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Application: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 3.2 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 3.3 Global Cell Therapy Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 3.4 Hospital 3.5 Clinic 4 Global Cell Therapy Competition Analysis by Players 4.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size (Million US$) by Players (2015-2020) 4.2 Global Top Manufacturers by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Cell Therapy as of 2019) 4.3 Date of Key Manufacturers Enter into Cell Therapy Market 4.4 Global Top Players Cell Therapy Headquarters and Area Served 4.5 Key Players Cell Therapy Product Solution and Service 4.6 Competitive Status 4.6.1 Cell Therapy Market Concentration Rate 4.6.2 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 5 Company (Top Players) Profiles and Key Data 5.1 Gilead Sciences 5.1.1 Gilead Sciences Profile 5.1.2 Gilead Sciences Main Business 5.1.3 Gilead Sciences Products, Services and Solutions 5.1.4 Gilead Sciences Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.1.5 Gilead Sciences Recent Developments 5.2 Novartis 5.2.1 Novartis Profile 5.2.2 Novartis Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.2.3 Novartis Products, Services and Solutions 5.2.4 Novartis Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.2.5 Novartis Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19 5.3 Osiris 5.5.1 Osiris Profile 5.3.2 Osiris Main Business 5.3.3 Osiris Products, Services and Solutions 5.3.4 Osiris Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.3.5 Vericel Corporation Recent Developments 5.4 Vericel Corporation 5.4.1 Vericel Corporation Profile 5.4.2 Vericel Corporation Main Business 5.4.3 Vericel Corporation Products, Services and Solutions 5.4.4 Vericel Corporation Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.4.5 Vericel Corporation Recent Developments 5.5 Vcanbio 5.5.1 Vcanbio Profile 5.5.2 Vcanbio Main Business 5.5.3 Vcanbio Products, Services and Solutions 5.5.4 Vcanbio Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.5.5 Vcanbio Recent Developments 5.6 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics 5.6.1 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Profile 5.6.2 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Main Business 5.6.3 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Products, Services and Solutions 5.6.4 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.6.5 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Recent Developments 5.7 JCR Pharmaceuticals 5.7.1 JCR Pharmaceuticals Profile 5.7.2 JCR Pharmaceuticals Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.7.3 JCR Pharmaceuticals Products, Services and Solutions 5.7.4 JCR Pharmaceuticals Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.7.5 JCR Pharmaceuticals Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19 5.8 Beike Biotechnology 5.8.1 Beike Biotechnology Profile 5.8.2 Beike Biotechnology Main Business 5.8.3 Beike Biotechnology Products, Services and Solutions 5.8.4 Beike Biotechnology Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.8.5 Beike Biotechnology Recent Developments 5.9 Golden Meditech 5.9.1 Golden Meditech Profile 5.9.2 Golden Meditech Main Business 5.9.3 Golden Meditech Products, Services and Solutions 5.9.4 Golden Meditech Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.9.5 Golden Meditech Recent Developments 5.10 Guanhao Biotech 5.10.1 Guanhao Biotech Profile 5.10.2 Guanhao Biotech Main Business 5.10.3 Guanhao Biotech Products, Services and Solutions 5.10.4 Guanhao Biotech Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.10.5 Guanhao Biotech Recent Developments 6 North America 6.1 North America Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 6.2 United States 6.3 Canada 7 Europe 7.1 Europe Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 7.2 Germany 7.3 France 7.4 U.K. 7.5 Italy 7.6 Russia 7.7 Nordic 7.8 Rest of Europe 8 Asia-Pacific 8.1 Asia-Pacific Cell Therapy Market Size by Region 8.2 China 8.3 Japan 8.4 South Korea 8.5 Southeast Asia 8.6 India 8.7 Australia 8.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific 9 Latin America 9.1 Latin America Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 9.2 Mexico 9.3 Brazil 9.4 Rest of Latin America 10 Middle East & Africa 10.1 Middle East & Africa Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 10.2 Turkey 10.3 Saudi Arabia 10.4 UAE 10.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa 11 Cell Therapy Market Dynamics 11.1 Industry Trends 11.2 Market Drivers 11.3 Market Challenges 11.4 Market Restraints 12 Research Finding /Conclusion 13 Methodology and Data Source 13.1 Methodology/Research Approach 13.1.1 Research Programs/Design 13.1.2 Market Size Estimation 13.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 13.2 Data Source 13.2.1 Secondary Sources 13.2.2 Primary Sources 13.3 Disclaimer 13.4 Author List

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.

Originally posted here:
Cell Therapy Market Trend,COVID-19 Impact,Current Industry Figures With Demand By Countries And Future Growth - PRnews Leader

Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market Leading Players Expected to Witness the Highest Growth 2025 | AVIVA BioSciences, AdnaGen,…

The Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market report offers a complete research study that includes accurate estimations of market growth rate and size for the forecast period 2020-2026. It offers a broad analysis of market competition, regional expansion, and market segmentation by type, application, and geography supported by exact market figures. The all-inclusive market research report also offers Porters Five Forces Analysis and profiles some of the leading players of the global Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market. It sheds light on changing market dynamics and discusses about different growth drivers, market challenges and restraints, and trends and opportunities in detail. Interested parties are provided with market recommendations and business advice to ensure success in the global Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Top Key Key Players Covered In This Report: AVIVA BioSciences, AdnaGen, Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Silicon Biosystems

Get Free PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://www.supplydemandmarketresearch.com/home/contact/1507021?ref=Sample-and-Brochure&toccode=SDMRME1507021

Leading players of the Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market are analyzed taking into account their market share, recent developments, new product launches, partnerships, mergers or acquisitions, and markets served. We also provide an exhaustive analysis of their product portfolios to explore the products and applications they concentrate on when operating in the Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market. Furthermore, the report offers two separate market forecasts one for the production side and another for the consumption side of the Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market. It also provides useful recommendations for new as well as established players of the Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Final Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this Market.

Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market Type (Autologous Stem Cell Transplants, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Syngeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Other) Application (Hospital, Clinic, Medical Research Institution, Other) Global Trends and Forecasts to 2025

Industry Insights

The Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX % during the forecast period 2018-2025.

The Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market is segmented on the basis of Type and Application. The Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market is segmented based on the basis of typeAutologous Stem Cell Transplants, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Syngeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Other. By Application, it is classified as Hospital, Clinic, Medical Research Institution, Other. The regional outlook on the Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market covers regions, such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of the World. Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market for each region is further bifurcated for major countries including the U.S., Canada, Germany, the U.K., France, Italy, China, India, Japan, Brazil, South Africa, and others.

Report Scope:

The Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market report scope covers the in-depth business analysis considering major market dynamics, forecast parameters, and price trends for the industry growth. The report forecasts market sizing at global, regional and country levels, providing comprehensive outlook of industry trends in each market segments and sub-segments from 2017 to 2024. The market segmentations include

Globaland United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Type

Autologous Stem Cell Transplants, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Syngeneic Stem Cell Transplants, Other

In the same way, the study has divided by applications

Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Application

Hospital, Clinic, Medical Research Institution, Other

Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Region

The report scope also includes competitive landscape covering the competitive analysis, strategy analysis and company profiles of the major market players. The companies profiled in the report includeAVIVA BioSciences, AdnaGen, Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Silicon Biosystems

Report Highlights

How this report will add value to your organisation

This report provides the in-depth analysis of the complete value chain from the raw material suppliers to the end users. We have critically analysed following parameters and their impact in the industry:

1. Improvement in top line and bottom line growth

Analysis trend & forecasts by end use markets will help you to understand how the growth in consumption is expected in next 5 years and what will be the key factors that will support the growth. This will help to make a clear plan for the top line growth. Price analytics will also play a crucial role in making a plan for top line growth.

Raw material and other input factors analysis will help to plan effectively for the bottom line.

2. Competitive intelligence

In a competitive marketplace, up-to-date information can make the difference between keeping pace, getting ahead, or being left behind. A smart intelligence operation can serve as an early-warning system for disruptive changes in the competitive landscape, whether that change is a rivals new product or pricing strategy or the entrance of an unexpected player into your market.

We also provide you with information that allows you to anticipate what your competitors are planning next. For example, you might gain information on a new product they are getting ready to launch or new services they will add to the business. Hiring us to handle this information collection saves you time and energy, allowing you to focus on your own business while still gaining the necessary knowledge to keep track of competitors.

3. Identification of prospective customers and their satisfaction level with the current supplier:

We have provided the long list of customers and analysed them critically, based on various parameters such as consumption, market type, sustainable business etc. this will help your organisation to develop relations with the consumers. Also, we have identified the factors in which the others customer will switch to you.

Report Customizations

The customization research services cover the additional custom report features such as additional regional and country level analysis as per the client requirements.

Grab Best Discount on Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report [Single User | Multi User | Corporate Users] @ https://www.supplydemandmarketresearch.com/home/contact/1507021?ref=Discount&toccode=SDMRME1507021

About SDMR: We have a strong network of high powered and experienced global consultants who have about 10+ years of experience in the specific industry to deliver quality research and analysis. Having such an experienced network, our services not only cater to the client who wants the basic reference of market numbers and related high growth areas in the demand side, but also we provide detailed and granular information using which the client can definitely plan the strategies with respect to both supply and demand side.

Contact Us: Mr. Charles Lee 302-20 Misssisauga, Valley, Missisauga, L5A 3S1, Toronto, Canada Phone Number: +1-276-477-5910 Email- [emailprotected]

Original post:
Global and United States Cancer Stem Cell Therapy Market Leading Players Expected to Witness the Highest Growth 2025 | AVIVA BioSciences, AdnaGen,...

Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market Share, By Product Analysis, Ap – News by aeresearch

Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market report is to provide accurate and strategic analysis of the Profile Projectors industry. The report closely examines each segment and its sub-segment futures before looking at the 360-degree view of the market mentioned above. Market forecasts will provide deep insight into industry parameters by accessing growth, consumption, upcoming market trends and various price fluctuations.

The recent study on the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market offers a detailed scrutiny of the key growth catalysts, restraints, and opportunities that are deemed critical to the overall progression of the market over the forecast duration. Additionally, the document offers an in-depth analysis of the various industry segments to help readers in understanding the top revenue prospects of this business vertical.

As per trusted projections, the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market is slated accumulate notable returns, registering a CAGR of XX% over 20XX-20XX.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/331612

In recent times, global economy has plummeted due to the Covid-19 outbreak. The global crisis has affected production and demand across various industries by disrupting the entire supply chain and its financial impact on firms. While some businesses are have shown signs of immunity, others are expected to face challenges post the pandemic. Our deep dive analysis aims to answer all queries of clients, thereby allowing stakeholders to indulge in thorough revenue generation sprees despite the market uncertainties.

Key pointers of the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market report:

Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market segments covered in the report:

Regional bifurcation:

North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)

Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)

Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia)

South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia)

Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Product gamut:

Application scope:

Competitive landscape:

Table of Contents

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/331612

Read the original post:
Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market Share, By Product Analysis, Ap - News by aeresearch

Months after achieving unicorn status, Orca steers into the fast lane with an RMAT designation for cell therapy candidate – Endpoints News

A few months after its last big catch a $192 million Series D and rare unicorn status Orca Bio has reeled in the FDAs regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designation for its experimental cell therapy to treat blood stem cell transplant patients.

Orca, one of this years Endpoints 11 startups, was founded by three entrepreneurs who were intrigued by Irv Weissmans cell purification work while studying at Stanford. Novartis then Sandoz had purchased Weissmans spinout SyStemix in the 90s, then scrapped it due to practical challenges. But Jeroen Bekaert, Ivan Dimov and Nate Fernhoff saw potential there.

Now, the biotech has RMAT and orphan drug designation to steer its cell therapy candidate Orca-T through the clinic. RMAT designation comes with the benefits of both fast track and breakthrough therapy designations.Orca-T entered a Phase I/II trial in patients undergoing stem cell transplants for various blood cancers last November, according to an NIH filing. The biotech expects to read out data from that trial this December at the annual American Society of Hematology meeting.

The RMAT and ODD for Orca-T is uplifting news for patients with various blood cancers including acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myelofibrosis, Dimov said in a statement.

While a hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the best option for some patients with blood cancer, the procedure can lead to dangerous complications, such as graft-versus-host disease, in which immune cells from the donor attack the patients healthy cells. Orca-T is designed to reprogram the diseased blood system, by matchinga specific composition of stem and immune cells to the immunological needs of a patient.

Orcas recent Series D brought its total raise to about $300 million, and came in as the companys valuation surpassed $1 billion. Plus, the biotech touts Weissman, former Novartis CEO Joe Jimenez, and Lyell head and former NCI chief Rick Klausner as its advisors.

Dimov spoke with Endpoints Newslast month about the inspiration behind the biotechs 2016 launch:

It almost seems unethical from a human perspective because some of the initial results suggest highly curative effects and the whole thing was shut down for over a decade because of some of these challenges of practically implementing these things and deploying them. So that was sort of the key driver for us to get started. And we always knew we wanted to fulfill that dream all the way through and not really stop at a certain stage and leave it for someone else.

See more here:
Months after achieving unicorn status, Orca steers into the fast lane with an RMAT designation for cell therapy candidate - Endpoints News

EdiGene Gets $67 Million Infusion to Bring Gene Editing to the Clinic – BioSpace

EdiGene raked in approximately $67 million in a series B financing round to further their genome-editing pipeline and expand the team. The Beijing-based biotech is currently leading the gene editing wave in China with four platforms steadily advancing.

Launched in 2015, EdiGenes pipeline was created around CRISPR gene editing technology. Right now, its fastest progressing projects are ET-01 for severe -thalassemia, a hereditary blood disease, and U Car-T ET-02 for cancer. CEO Dong Wei said thisround will help them transform their pipeline into clinical stage, drawing them closer to their goal of bringing innovative and high-quality gene-editing therapies to patients in need.

Their ET-01 therapy uses gene-editing technology to edit BCL11A erythroid enhancer in hematopoietic stem cells. The aim is to increase fetal hemoglobin levels in red blood cells for severe -thalassemia patients. These patients have few options and are desperate for better treatments.

For their second lead candidate, ET-02, EdiGene is leveraging their partner Immunochinas proprietary CAR-T to create a therapy that can edit immuno-rejection molecules in T cells from healthy donors to treat cancer patients.

CEO Dong Wei said of their partnerships potential, We believe that allogenic T-cell therapeutics has tremendous potential, by offering innovative T-cell therapies off the shelf with more effective quality control and lower cost.

EdiGene also has some in vivo therapies in research phase that use an RNA base editing approach using LEAPER technology. Their front-runner aims to treat Hurler Syndrome, the most severe form of mucopolysaccharidosis, a rare lysosomal storage disease resulting in a wide variety of symptoms caused by damage to several organ systems. They are also working on targeted therapeutics focused on solid tumor treatment.

The biotech has raised approximately $100 million in the last two years. This latest round of financing was led by 3H Health investment, with participation from new investors: Sequoia Capital China, Alwin Capital and Kunlun Capital. Previous partners IDG Capital, Lilly Asia Venture, Huagai Capital and Green Pine Capital Partners also joined in.

We are very pleased to have the support and partnership from our investors, which propels the company to an exciting new stage, said Wensheng Wei, Scientific Founder of EdiGene. Together with the investors, we look forward to translating cutting-edge gene editing technologies into innovative therapies, bringing hope and health to patients and their families.

EdiGene was recognized last year by CYZone, a leading innovation service platform, as one of their 2019 Top 50 Healthcare Innovation Enterprises in China.

Original post:
EdiGene Gets $67 Million Infusion to Bring Gene Editing to the Clinic - BioSpace

CAR T-cell Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia – OncoZine

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (AML), also called acute myeloblastic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, is an aggressive, fast-growing, heterogenous group of blood cancers that arise as a result of clonal expansion of myeloid hematopoietic precursors in the bone marrow. Not only are circulating leukemia (blast) cells seen in the peripheral blood, but granulocytopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia are also common as proliferating leukemia cells interfere with normal hematopoiesis.

Approximately 40-45% of younger and 10-20% of older adults diagnosed with AML are cured with current standard chemotherapy. However, the outlook for patients with relapsed and/or refractory disease is gloomy. Relapse following conventional chemotherapy remains is a major cause of death.

The process of manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. [1] T-cells (represented by objects labeled as t) are removed from the patients blood. [2] Then in a lab setting the gene that encodes for the specific antigen receptors is incorporated into the T-cells. [3] Thus producing the CAR receptors (labeled as c) on the surface of the cells. [4] The newly modified T-cells are then further harvested and grown in the lab. [5]. After a certain time period, the engineered T-cells are infused back into the patient. This file is licensed by Reyasingh56 under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.Today, the only curative treatment option for patients with AML is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or allo-HSCT, which through its graft-vs.-leukemia effects has the ability to eliminate residual leukemia cells. But it is an ption for only a minority. And despite a long history of success, relapse following allo-HSCT is still a major challenge and is associated with poor prognosis.

In recent years, rresearchers learned a lot about the genomic and epigenomic landscapes of AML. This understanding has paved the way for rational drug development as new drugable targets, resulting in treatments including the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) gemtuzumab ozogamycin (Mylotarg; Pfizer/Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories).

CAR T-cell Therapies Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells therapies, using a patients own genetically modified T-cells to find and kill cancer, are one of the most exciting recent developments in cancer research and treatment.

Traditional CAR T-cell therapies are an autologous, highly personalised, approach in which T-cells are collected from the patient by leukopheresis and engineered in the laboratory to express a receptor directed at a cancer antigen such as CD19. The cells are then infused back into the patient after administration of a lymphodepletion regimen, most commonly a combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Durable remissions have been observed in pediatric patients with B-ALL and adults with NHL.

CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapies, have, over the last decade, yielded remarkable clinical success in certain types of B-cell malignancies, and researchers have made substantial efforts aimed at translating this success to myeloid malignancies.

While complete ablation of CD19-expressing B cells, both cancerous and healthy, is clinically tolerated, the primary challenge limiting the use of CAR T-cells in myeloid malignancies is the absence of a dispensable antigen, as myeloid antigens are often co-expressed on normal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), depletion of which would lead to intolerable myeloablation.

A different approach Because autologous CAR T-cell therapies are patient-specific, each treatment can only be used for that one patient. Furthermore, because CAR T-cells are derived from a single disease-specific antibody, they are, by design, only recognized by one specific antigen. As a consequence, only a small subset of patients with any given cancer may be suited for the treatment.

This specificity means that following leukopheresis, a lot of work needs to be done to create this hyper personalised treatment option, resulting in 3 5 weeks of manufacturing time.

The manufacturing process of CAR T-cell therapies, from a single academic center to a large-scale multi-site manufacturing center further creates challenges. Scaling out production means developing processes consistent across many collection, manufacturing, and treatment sites. This complexity results in a the realitively high cost of currently available CAR T-cell therapies.

To solve some of the concerns with currently available CAR T-cell therapies, researchers are investigating the option to develop allogenic, off-the-shelf Universal CAR T-cell (UCARTs) treatments that can be mass manufactured and be used for multiple patients.

Allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy are generally created from T-cells from healthy donors, not patients. Similar to the autologous approach, donor-derived cells are shipped to a manufacturing facility to be genetically engineered to express the antibody or CAR, however, in contrast to autologous CAR T-cells, allogeneic CAR T-cells are also engineered with an additional technology used to limit the potential for a graft versus host reaction when administered to patients different from the donor.

One unique benefit ofn this approach is that because these therapies hey are premade and available for infusion, there is no requirement to leukopheresis or a need to wait for the CAR T-cells to be manufactured. This strategy also will benefit patients who are cytopenic (which is not an uncommon scenario for leukemia patients) and from whom autologous T-cell collection is not possible.

Pioneers Among the pioneers of developing allogeneic CAR-T therapies are companies including Celyad Oncology, Cellectis, Allogene Therapeutics, and researchers at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in colaboration with Kite/Gilead.

Researchers at UCLA were, for example, able to turn pluripotent stem cells into T-cells through structures called artificial thymic organoids. These organoids mimic the thymus, the organ where T-cells are made from blood stem cells in the body.

Celyad Oncology Belgium-based Celyad Oncology is advancing a number of both autologous and allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies, including proprietary, non-gene edited allogeneic CAR T-cell candidates underpinned by the companys shRNA technology platform. The shRNA platform coupled with Celyads all-in-one vector approach provides flexibility, versatility, and efficiency to the design of novel, off-the-shelf CAR T-cell candidates through a single step engineering process.

In July 2020, the company announced the start of Phase I trials with CYAD-211, Celyads first-in-class short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-based allogeneic CAR T candidate and second non-gene edited off-the-shelf program. CYAD-211 targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and is engineered to co-express a BCMA-targeting chimeric antigen receptor and a single shRNA, which interferes with the expression of the CD3 component of the T-cell receptor (TCR) complex.

During the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Virtual Scientific Program in May 2020, the company presented updates from its allogeneic programs, including additional data from the alloSHRINK study, an open-label, dose-escalation Phase I trial assessing the safety and clinical activity of three consecutive administrations of CYAD-101, an investigational, non-gene edited, allogeneic CAR T-cell candidate engineered to co-express a chimeric antigen receptor based on NKG2D (a receptor expressed on natural killer (NK) cells that binds to eight stress-induced ligands and the novel inhibitory peptide TIM TCR Inhibitory Molecule), for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

The expression of TIM reduces signalling of the TCR complex, which is responsible for graft-versus host disease.every two weeks administered concurrently with FOLFOX (combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

The safety and clinical activity data from the alloSHRINK trial in patients with mCRC demonstrated CYAD-101s differentiated profile as an allogeneic CAR T-cell candidate. Furthermore, the absence of clinical evidence of graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) for CYAD-101 confirms the potential of non-gene edited approaches for the development of allogeneic CAR-T candidates.

Interim data from the alloSHRINK trial showed encouraging anti-tumor activity, with two patients achieving a confirmed partial response (cPR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, including one patient with a KRAS-mutation, the most common oncogenic alteration found in all human cancers. In addition, nine patients achieved stable disease (SD), with seven patients demonstrating disease stabilization lasting more than or equal to three months of duration.

Based on these results, clinical trials were broadened to include evaluating CYAD-101 following FOLFIRI (combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan) preconditioning chemotherapy in refractory mCRC patients, at the recommended dose of one billion cells per infusion as an expansion cohort of the alloSHRINK trial. Enrollment in the expansion cohort of the trial is expected to begin during the fourth quarter of 2020.

Cellectis Cellectis is developping a universal CAR T-cell (UCART) platform in an attempy to create off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapies. The companys pipeline includes UCART123, a CAR T-cell therapy designed to targets CD123+ leukemic cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The investigational agent is being studied in two open-label Phase I trials: AML123 studying the therapys safety and efficacy in an estimated 156 AML patients, and ABC123 studying the therapys safety and activity in an estimated 72 patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

UCART22 Another investigational agent in clinical trials is UCART22 which is designed to treat both CD22+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Cellectis reported that UCART22 is included in an open-label, dose-escalating Phase I trial to study its safety and activity in relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-ALL patients.

UCART22 harbors a surface expression of an anti-CD22 CAR (CD22 scFv-41BB-CD3z) and the RQR8 ligand, a safety feature rendering the T-cells sensitive to the antibody rituximab. Further, to reduce the potential for alloreactivity, the cell surface expression of the T-cell receptor is abrogated through the inactivation of the TCR constant (TRAC) gene using Cellectis TALEN gene-editing technology.[1]

Preclinical data supporting the development of UCART22 was presented by Marina Konopleva, M.D., Ph.D. and her vteam during the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting. [1]

Cellectis is also developing UCARTCS1 which is developed to treat CS1-expressing hematologic malignancies, such as multiple myeloma (MM). UCARTCLL1 is in preclinical development for treating CLL1-expressing hematologic malignancies, such as AML.

Cellectis and Allogene Therapeutics, another biotech company involved in the developmen t of CAR T-cell therapies, are developing ALLO-501, another CAR T-cell therapy which targets CD19 and is being developed for the the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Allogene Therapeutics is also developing ALLO-715, an investigational CAR T-cell therapy targeting the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and ALLO-819, which targets CD135 (also called FLT3), for treating relapsed or refractory AML.

Allogene, in collaboration with both Cellectis, Pfizer (which has a 25% stake in Allogene) and Servier have numerous active open-label, single-arm Phase I trials for an off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR-T therapy UCART19* in patients with relapsed or refractory CD19+ B-ALL. Participating patients receive lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with alemtuzumab, followed by UCART19 infusion. Adults patients with R/R B-ALL are eligible.

The PALL aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of UCART19 to induce molecular remission in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in 18 pediatric patients.

The CALM trial is a dose-escalating study evaluating the therapys safety and tolerability in 40 adult patients; and a long-term safety and efficacy follow-up study in 200 patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies.

Allogene reported preliminary proof-of-concept results during the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in December 2018.

Data from the first 21 patients from both the PALL (n=7) and CALM (n=14) Phase I studies were pooled. The median age of the participating patients was 22 years (range, 0.8-62 years) and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-6). Sixty-two percent of the patients (13/21) had a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Of the 17 patients who received treatment with UCART19 and who received lymphodepletion with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, 14 patients (82%) achieved CR/CRi, and 59% of them (10/17) achieved MRD-negative remission.

In stark contrast, the four patients who only received UCART19 and fludarabine and cyclophosphamide without alemtuzumab did not see a response and minimal UCART19 expansion.

Based on these results, researchers noted that apparent importance of an anti-CD52 antibody for the efficacy of allogeneic CAR-T therapies. In addition, safety data also looked promising. The trial results did not include grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity and only 2 cases of grade 1 graft-versus-host disease (10%), 3 cases of grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome which were considered manageable (14%), 5 cases of grade 3 or 4 viral infections (24%), and 6 cases of grade 4 prolonged cytopenia (29%).

Precision Biosciences Precision Biosciences is developing PBCAR0191, an off-the-shelf investigational allogeneic CAR T-cell candidate targeting CD19. The drug candidate is being investigated in a Phase I/IIa multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel assignment, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or R/R B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The NHL cohort includes patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive subtype of NHL, for which Precision has received both Orphan Drug and Fast Track Designations from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

A clinical trial with PBCAR0191 Precision Biosciences is exploring some novel lymphodepletion strategies in addition to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Patients with R/R ALL, R/R CLL, R/R Richter transformation, and R/R NHL are eligible. Patients with MRD+ B-ALL are eligible as well. This trial is enrolling patients.

In late September 2020, Precision BioSciences, a clinical stage biotechnology amd Servier, announced the companies have added two additional hematological cancer targets beyond CD19 and two solid tumor targets to its CAR T-cell development and commercial license agreement.

PBCAR20A PBCAR20A is an investigational allogeneic anti-CD20 CAR T-cell therapy being developed by Precision Biosciences for the treartment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and patients with R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or R/R small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). The NHL cohort will include patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive subtype of NHL, for which Precision BioSciences has received orphan drug designation from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

PBCAR20A is being evaluated in a Phase I/IIa multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion clinical trial in adult NHL and CLL/SLL patients. The trial will be conducted at multiple U.S. sites.

PBCAR269A Precision Biosciences is, in collaboration with Springworks Therapeutics, also developing PBCAR269A, an allogeneic BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy candidate being evaluated for the safety and preliminary clinical activity in a Phase I/IIa multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-dose, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study of adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In this trial, the starting dose of PBCAR269A is 6 x 105 CAR T cells/kg body weight with subsequent cohorts receiving escalating doses to a maximum dose of 6 x 106 CAR T cells/kg body weight.

PBCAR269A is Precision Biosciencess third CAR T-cell candidate to advance to the clinic and is part of a pipeline of cell-phenotype optimized allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies derived from healthy donors and then modified via a simultaneous TCR knock-out and CAR T-cell knock-in step with the =companys proprietary ARCUS genome editing technology.

The FDA recently granted Fast Track Designation to PBCAR269A for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma for which the FDA previously granted Orphan Drug Designation.

TCR2 Therapeutics TCR2 Therapeutics is developing a proprietary TRuC (TCR Fusion Construct) T-cells designed to harness the natural T cell receptor complex to recognize and kill cancer cells using the full power of T-cell signaling pathways independent of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA).

While succesful in hematological malignancies, CAR T-cells therapies have generally struggled to show efficacy against solid tumors. Researchers at TCR2 Therapeutics believe this is is caused by the fact that CAR T-cell therapies only utilize a single TCR subunit, and, as a result, do not benefit from all of the activation and regulatory elements of the natural TCR complex. By engineering TCR T-cells, which are designed to utilize the complete TCR, they have demonstrated clinical activity in solid tumors. However, this approach has also shown major limitations. TCR T-cells require tumors to express HLA to bind tumor antigens. HLA is often downregulated in cancers, preventing T-cell detection. In addition, each specific TCR-T cell therapy can only be used in patients with one of several specific HLA subtypes, limiting universal applicability of this approach and increasing the time and cost of patient enrollment in clinical trials.

In an attempt to solve this problem, researchers at TCR2 Therapeutics have developped a proprieatarry TRuC-T Cells which are designed to incorporate the best features of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies and overcome the limitations. The TRuC platform is a novel T cell therapy platform, which uses the complete TCR complex without the need for HLA matching.

By conjugating the tumor antigen binder to the TCR complex, the TRuC construct recognizes highly expressed surface antigens on tumor cells without the need for HLA and engage the complete TCR machinery to drive the totality of T-cell functions required for potent, modulated and durable tumor killing.

In preclinical studies, TCR2 Therapeutics TRuC T-cells technology has demonstrated superior anti-tumor activity in vivo compared to CAR T-cells therapies, while, at the same time, releasing lower levels of cytokines. These data are encouraging for the treatment of solid tumors where CAR T-cells have not shown significant clinical activity due to very short persistence and for hematologic tumors where a high incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome remains a major concern.

TCR2 Therapeutics product candidates include TC-210 and TC-110.

TC-210 is designed to targets mesothelin-positive solid tumors. While its expression in normal tissues is low, mesothelin is highly expressed in many solid tumors. Mesothelin overexpression has also been correlated with poorer prognosis in certain cancer types and plays a role in tumorigenesis. TC-210 is being developed for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, malignant pleural/peritoneal mesothelioma and cholangiocarcinoma.

The companys TRuC-T cell targeting CD19-positive B-cell hematological malignancies, TC-110, is being developed to improve upon and address the unmet needs of current CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapies. The clinical development TC-110 focus on the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Preclinical data demonstrates that TC-110 is superior to CD19-CAR-T cells (carrying either 4-1BB or CD28 co-stimulatory domains) both in anti-tumor activity as well as the level of cytokine release which may translate into lower rates of adverse events. The development of TC-110 starts with autologous T-cells collection by leukopheresis. These T-cells undergo genetic engineering to create TRuC-T cells targeting CD19.

This strategy combines the best features of CAR T-cells and the native T-cell receptor. It is open for R/R NHL and R/R B-ALL.

AUTO1 Auto1 is an autologous CD19 CAR T-cell investigational therapyis being developped by Autolus Therapeutics. The investigational drug uses a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) called CAT with a lower affinity for CD19 and a faster off-rate compared to the FMC63 scFv used in other approved CD19 CAR T-cell therapies. The investigational therapy is designed to overcome the limitations in safety while maintaining similar levels of efficacy compared to current CD19 CAR T-cell therapies.

Designed to have a fast target binding off-rate to minimize excessive activation of the programmed T-cells, AUTO1 may reduce toxicity and be less prone to T-cell exhaustion, which could enhance persistence and improve the T-cells abilities to engage in serial killing of target cancer cells.

In 2018, Autolus signed a license agreement UCL Business plc (UCLB), the technology-transfer company of UCL, to develop and commercialize AUTO1 for the treatment of B cell malignancies. AUTO1 is currently being evaluated in two Phase I studies, one in pediatric ALL and one in adult ALL.

CARPALL trial Initial results from the ongoing Phase I CARPALL trial of AUTO1 were presented during European Hematology Association 1st European CAR T Cell Meeting held in Paris, France, February 14-16, 2019.

Enrolled patients had a median age of 9 years with a median of 4 lines of prior treatment. Seventeen patients were enrolled, and 14 patients received an infusion of CAR T cells. Ten of 14 patients had relapsed post allogeneic stem cell transplant. Eight patients were treated in second relapse, 5 in > second relapse and 3 had relapsed after prior blinatumomab or inotuzumab therapy. Two patients had ongoing CNS disease at enrollment.

This data confirmed that AUTO1 did not induces severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (Grade 3-5). Nine patients experienced Grade 1 CRS, and 4 patients experienced Grade 2 CRS. No patients required tociluzumab or steroids. As previously reported, one patient experienced Grade 4 neurotoxicity; there were no other reports of severe neurotoxicity (Grade 3-5). The mean cumulative exposure to AUTO1 CAR T-cells in the first 28 days as assessed by AUC was 1,721,355 copies/g DNA. Eleven patients experienced cytopenia that was not resolved by day 28 or recurring after day 28: 3 patients Grades 1-3 and 8 patients Grade 4. Two patients developed significant infections, and 1 patient died from sepsis while in molecular complete response (CR).

With a single dose of CAR T cells at 1 million cells/kg dose, 12/14 (86%) achieved molecular CR. Five patients relapsed with CD19 negative disease. Event free survival (EFS) based on morphological relapse was 67% (CI 34-86%) and 46% (CI 16-72%) and overall survival (OS) was 84% (CI 50-96%) and 63% (CI 27-85%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

CAR T cell expansion was observed in all responding patients (N=12), with CAR T cells comprising up to 84% of circulating T cells at the point of maximal expansion. The median persistence of CAR T-cells was 215 days.

The median duration of remission in responding patients was 7.3 months with a median follow-up of 14 months. Five of 14 patients (37%) remain in CR with ongoing persistence of CAR T-cells and associated B cell aplasia.

Fate Therapeutics FT819 is an off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy targeting CD19 being developed by Fate Therapeutics. The T-cells are derived from a clonal engineered master induced pluripotent stem cell line (iPSCs) with a novel 1XX CAR targeting CD19 inserted into the T-cell receptor alpha constant (TRAC) locus and edited for elimination of T-cell receptor (TCR) expression.

Patients participating in the companys clinbical trial will receive lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Some patients will also receive IL-2. Patients with R/R ALL, R/R CLL, R/R Richter transformation, and R/R NHL are eligible. Patients with MRD+ B-ALL are eligible as well.

At the Annual Meeting of the American Societ of Hematology held in December 2019, researchers from Fate Therapeutics presented new in vivo preclinical data demonstrating that FT819 exhibits durable tumor control and extended survival. In a stringent xenograft model of disseminated lymphoblastic leukemia, FT819 demonstrated enhanced tumor clearance and control of leukemia as compared to primary CAR19 T-cells. At Day 35 following administration, a bone marrow assessment showed that FT819 persisted and continued to demonstrate tumor clearance, whereas primary CAR T cells, while persisting, were not able to control tumor growth. [2]

CAR-NK CD19 Allogeneic cord blood-derived Natural Killer (NK) cells are another off-the-shelf product that does not require the collection of cells from each patient.

Unlike T-cells, NK-cells do not cause GVHD and can be given safely in the allogeneic setting. At MD Anderson Cancer Center, Katy Rezvani, M.D., Ph.D, Professor, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, and her team broadly focuses their research on the role of natural killer (NK) cells in mediating protection against hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and strategies to enhance killing function against various cancer.

As part of their research, the team has developed a novel cord blood-derived NK-CAR product that expresses a CAR against CD19; ectopically produces IL-15 to support NK-cell proliferation and persistence in vivo; and expresses a suicide gene, inducible caspase 9, to address any potential safety concerns.

In this phase I and II trial researchers administered HLA-mismatched anti-CD19 CAR-NK cells derived from cord blood to 11 patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive cancers (non-Hodgkins lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL]). NK cells were transduced with a retroviral vector expressing genes that encode anti-CD19 CAR, interleukin-15, and inducible caspase 9 as a safety switch. The cells were expanded ex vivo and administered in a single infusion at one of three doses (1105, 1106, or 1107 CAR-NK cells per kilogram of body weight) after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The preliminarry resilts of the trials confirmed that administration of CAR-NK cells was not associated with the development of cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or graft-versus-host disease, and there was no increase in the levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6, over baseline.

The study results also demonstrated that of the 11 patients who were treated, 8 patients (73%) had a response. Of these patients, 7 (4 with lymphoma and 3 with CLL) had a complete remission ICR), and 1 had remission of the Richters transformation component but had persistent CLL. Noteworthy was that responses were rapid and seen within 30 days after infusion at all dose levels. The infused CAR-NK cells expanded and persisted at low levels for at least 12 months. The researchers also noted that a majority of the 11 participating patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive cancers had a response to treatment with CAR-NK cells without the development of major toxic effects.[3]

Note * Servier will hold ex-US commercial rights. Servier is the sponsor of the UCART19 trials.

Clinical trials alloSHRINK Standard cHemotherapy Regimen and Immunotherapy With Allogeneic NKG2D-based CYAD-101 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells NCT03692429 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of UCART123 in Patients With Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AMELI-01) NCT03190278 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of UCART123 in Patients With BPDCN (ABC123) NCT03203369 Study of UCART19 in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (PALL) NCT02808442 Dose Escalation Study of UCART19 in Adult Patients With Relapsed / Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (CALM) NCT02746952 Dose-escalation Study of Safety of PBCAR0191 in Patients With r/r NHL and r/r B-cell ALL NCT03666000. Dose-escalation Study of Safety of PBCAR20A in Subjects With r/r NHL or r/r CLL/SLL NCT04030195 A Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of PBCAR269A in Study Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma NCT04171843 TC-110 T Cells in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia NCT04323657 Phase 1/2 Trial of TC-210 T Cells in Patients With Advanced Mesothelin-Expressing Cancer NCT03907852 CARPALL: Immunotherapy With CD19 CAR T-cells for CD19+ Haematological Malignancies NCT02443831 Umbilical & Cord Blood (CB) Derived CAR-Engineered NK Cells for B Lymphoid Malignancies NCT03056339

Reference [1] Petti F. Broadening the Applicability of CAR-T Immunotherapy to Treat the Untreatable. OncoZine. October 24, 2019 [Article] [2] Wells J, Cai T, Schiffer-Manniou C, Filipe S, Gouble A, Galetto R, Jain N, Jabbour EJ, Smith J, Konopleva M. Pre-Clinical Activity of Allogeneic Anti-CD22 CAR-T Cells for the Treatment of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Blood (2017) 130 (Supplement 1): 808. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.808.808 [3] Chang C, Van Der Stegen S, Mili M, Clarke R, Lai YS, Witty A, Lindenbergh P, Yang BH, et al. FT819: Translation of Off-the-Shelf TCR-Less Trac-1XX CAR-T Cells in Support of First-of-Kind Phase I Clinical Trial. Blood (2019) 134 (Supplement_1): 4434.https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-130584 [4] Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R, Nassif Kerbauy L, Overman B, Thall P, Kaplan M, Nandivada V, Kaur I, Nunez Cortes A, Cao K, Daher M, Hosing C, Cohen EN, Kebriaei P, Mehta R, Neelapu S, Nieto Y, Wang M, Wierda W, Keating M, Champlin R, Shpall EJ, Rezvani K. Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):545-553. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910607. PMID: 32023374; PMCID: PMC7101242.

Featured image: T-cells attacking a cancer cell. Photo courtesy: Fotolia/Adobe 2016 2020. Used with permission.

See the rest here:
CAR T-cell Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - OncoZine

Bone Therapeutics’ allogeneic cell therapy product, ALLOB, shows 90% fusion rate at 24 months in Phase IIa study in lumbar spinal fusion -…

Gosselies, Belgium, 14 October 2020, 7am CEST BONE THERAPEUTICS(Euronext Brussels and Paris: BOTHE), the cell therapy company addressing unmet medical needs in orthopedics and other diseases, today announces positive 24-month follow-up results for the Phase IIa study with the allogeneic cell therapy product, ALLOB, in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion procedures.

The 24-month data show a high percentage of successful lumbar vertebrae fusion of 90%. Patients also continue to experience important clinical improvements in function and pain, from as early as six months after treatment, up to the 24-month follow-up period.

Degenerative spine disorders have a major impact on the quality of life of patients. These impacts include decreases in the stability of the spine and pain in motion,said Dr. Alphonse Lubansu, M.D., Head of the Spinal Clinic, Erasme University Hospital, Universit libre de Bruxelles. The 24 month follow-up data of this Phase IIa clinical trial have demonstrated that patients treated with ALLOB in spinal fusion procedure show a high incidence in fusion, and benefit from a sustained, clinically meaningful improvement in function and pain throughout the 24 months following treatment together with a good safety profile. These results show that ALLOB in combination with the standard spine fusion surgery could be a promising treatment option to address the currently unmet needs of these patients.

This positive data forlumbar spinal fusion complementsthe strong Phase I/IIa results from ALLOB in patients with delayed union fractures,said Miguel Forte, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Bone Therapeutics. These studies provide promising clinical evidence for the potential ofBone Therapeuticsunique allogeneic cell therapy platform to address high unmet medical needs in orthopaedics and bone related disorders. We will now hold discussions with global regulators and our partners to explore a variety of options for the next stages of clinical development for ALLOB in different orthopedic indications, while pursuing the phase IIb study of ALLOB in difficult tibial fractures.In addition, theclinical results provide further evidence for the expansion of ALLOB and our platform of differentiated MSCs to other indications.

The multi-center, open-label proof-of-concept Phase IIa study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ALLOB administered, procedure in which an interbody cage with bioceramic granules mixed with ALLOB is implanted into the spine to achieve fusion of the lumbar vertebrae. The main endpoints of the 24-month follow-up analysis included safety and radiological assessments to evaluate vertebrae fusion (continuous bone bridges) and clinical assessments to evaluate improvement in patients functional disability as well as reduction in back and leg pain. The study evaluated 30 patients treated with ALLOB, 29 patients attended the 24-month visit.

Radiological data was collected from CT-scans at 24 months and assessed by three external readers. It showed a successful fusion of the lumbar vertebrae in 27 out of 30 patients (90%). In addition, the remaining 3 patients showed radiological evidence of bone formation. Treatment with ALLOB also resulted in a clear and statistically significant clinical improvement in function and reduction in pain over the 24-month follow-up period. Functional disability improved from the pre-treatment baseline to 24-month by a mean score of 60% (p<0.001) on the Oswestry Disability Index(1). Back and leg pain were strongly reduced by 57 to 62% (p<0.001) and 68 to 70% (p<0.001) respectively compared to pre-treatment baseline. Treatment with ALLOB was generally well-tolerated by the patients, consistent with previous reported results.

(1)The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is an index derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to measure a patients permanent functional disability. This validated questionnaire was first published by Jeremy Fairbank et al. in Physiotherapy in 1980. ODI score of 0%-20%: minimal disability; 21%-40%: moderate disability; 41%-60%: severe disability; 61%-80%: crippled; 81%-100%: bed bound.

About Spinal Fusion

Due to ageing populations and sedentary lifestyles, the number of people suffering from degenerative spine disorders continues to increase. Today, spinal fusion procedures are performed to relieve pain and improve patient daily functioning in a broad spectrum of degenerative spine disorders. Spinal fusion consists of bridging two or more vertebrae with the use of a cage and graft material, traditionally autologous bone graft or demineralised bone matrix placed into the intervertebral space for fusing an unstable portion of the spine and immobilizing a painful intervertebral motion segment. Over 1,000,000 spinal fusion procedures are performed annually in the US and EU, of which half at lumbar level and the market is growing at a rate of 5% per year. Although spinal fusion surgery is routine, non-fusion, slow progression to fusion and failure to eliminate pain are still frequent with up to 35% of patients not being satisfied with their surgery.

About ALLOB

ALLOB is the Companys off-the-shelf allogeneic cell therapy platform consisting of human allogeneic bone-forming cells derived from cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from healthy adult donors, offering numerous advantages in product quality, injectable quantity, production, logistics and cost as compared to an autologous approach. To address critical factors for the development and commercialisation of cell therapy products, Bone Therapeutics has established a proprietary, optimised production process that improves consistency, scalability, cost effectiveness and ease of use of ALLOB. This optimized production process significantly increases the production yield, generating 100,000 of doses of ALLOB per bone marrow donation. Additionally, the final ALLOB product will be cryopreserved, enabling easy shipment and the capability to be stored in a frozen form at the hospital level. The process will therefore substantially reduce overall production costs, simplify supply chain logistics, improve patient accessibility and facilitate global commercialisation. The Company will implement the optimized production process for all future clinical trials with ALLOB.

About Bone Therapeutics

Bone Therapeutics is a leading biotech company focused on the development of innovative products to address high unmet needs in orthopedics and other diseases. The Company has a, diversified portfolio of cell and biologic therapies at different stages ranging from pre-clinical programs in immunomodulation to mid-to-late stage clinical development for orthopedic conditions, targeting markets with large unmet medical needs and limited innovation.

Bone Therapeutics is developing an off-the-shelf next-generation improved viscosupplement, JTA-004, which is currently in phase III development for the treatment of pain in knee osteoarthritis. Consisting of a unique combination of plasma proteins, hyaluronic acid a natural component of knee synovial fluid, and a fast-acting analgesic, JTA-004 intends to provide added lubrication and protection to the cartilage of the arthritic joint and to alleviate osteoarthritic pain and inflammation. Positive phase IIb efficacy results in patients with knee osteoarthritis showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief compared to a leading viscosupplement.

Bone Therapeutics core technology is based on its cutting-edge allogeneic cell therapy platform with differentiated bone marrow sourced Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) which can be stored at the point of use in the hospital. Currently in pre-clinical development, BT-20, the most recent product candidate from this technology, targets inflammatory conditions, while the leading investigational medicinal product, ALLOB, represents a unique, proprietary approach to bone regeneration, which turns undifferentiated stromal cells from healthy donors into bone-forming cells. These cells are produced via the Bone Therapeutics scalable manufacturing process. Following the CTA approval by regulatory authorities in Europe, the Company is ready to start the phase IIb clinical trial with ALLOB in patients with difficult tibial fractures, using its optimized production process. ALLOB continues to be evaluated for other orthopedic indications including spinal fusion, osteotomy, maxillofacial and dental.

Bone Therapeutics cell therapy products are manufactured to the highest GMP standards and are protected by a broad IP (Intellectual Property) portfolio covering ten patent families as well as knowhow. The Company is based in the BioPark in Gosselies, Belgium. Further information is available atwww.bonetherapeutics.com.

For further information, please contact:

Bone Therapeutics SA Miguel Forte, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer Jean-Luc Vandebroek, Chief Financial Officer Tel: +32 (0)71 12 10 00 investorrelations@bonetherapeutics.com

For Belgian Media and Investor Enquiries: Bepublic Catherine Haquenne Tel: +32 (0)497 75 63 56 catherine@bepublic.be

International Media Enquiries: Image Box Communications Neil Hunter / Michelle Boxall Tel: +44 (0)20 8943 4685 neil.hunter@ibcomms.agency / michelle@ibcomms.agency

For French Media and Investor Enquiries: NewCap Investor Relations & Financial Communications Pierre Laurent, Louis-Victor Delouvrier and Arthur Rouill Tel: +33 (0)1 44 71 94 94 bone@newcap.eu

For US Media and Investor Enquiries: LHA Investor Relations Yvonne Briggs Tel: +1 310 691 7100 ybriggs@lhai.com

Certain statements, beliefs and opinions in this press release are forward-looking, which reflect the Company or, as appropriate, the Company directors current expectations and projections about future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions could adversely affect the outcome and financial effects of the plans and events described herein. A multitude of factors including, but not limited to, changes in demand, competition and technology, can cause actual events, performance or results to differ significantly from any anticipated development. Forward looking statements contained in this press release regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. As a result, the Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release any update or revisions to any forward-looking statements in this press release as a result of any change in expectations or any change in events, conditions, assumptions or circumstances on which these forward-looking statements are based. Neither the Company nor its advisers or representatives nor any of its subsidiary undertakings or any such persons officers or employees guarantees that the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements are free from errors nor does either accept any responsibility for the future accuracy of the forward-looking statements contained in this press release or the actual occurrence of the forecasted developments. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.

Read more from the original source:
Bone Therapeutics' allogeneic cell therapy product, ALLOB, shows 90% fusion rate at 24 months in Phase IIa study in lumbar spinal fusion -...

Biopharma Money on the Move: October 7-14 – BioSpace

Find out which biopharma companies are raking in the cash this week, as companies from around the globe provide updates on their financing rounds and IPOs.

Evotec

The UAE dropped a load of cash to become a 5.6% stakeholder into Germanys Evotec with $236 million worth of shares purchased by their sovereign wealth fund, Mubadala Investment Company. Not one to be left out, existing investor Novo increased its stake to 11% by throwing in another $59 million, bringing Evotecs haul to about $295 million. Evotec is a drug discovery alliance and development partnership company out of Hamburg, Germany. With revenues nearly quadrupling over the last five years and a goal of 10% yearly growth in the future, its no surprise these investors want in big. Evotec plans to use the cash to reach its goals by growing, particularly in the U.S. and Europe as they ramp up global ops.

SQZ Biotech

Allied with Roche to develop new cancer cell therapies, SQZ has turned its focus to the NYSE. With a preliminary goal of $75 million for its IPO, theyve applied for listing as SQZ. While traditional cell therapies require a depletion of the immune cells to improve efficacy, SQZ claims to avoid those limitations with a proprietary technology that, as its name touts, squeezes cells through a microfluidic chip to open the cell membrane and allow the therapeutic load inside. They also tout a huge leg up in manufacturing 24-hour turnaround in comparison with a month or more for current therapies. Plus, without the pre-conditioning to weaken immune systems, SQZs technology aims to shorten hospital stays. The IPO earnings are intended to finance their groundbreaking cancer and infectious disease research.

Galecto Biotech

Just two weeks after completing a $64 million Series D round, Galecto Biotech rounds the corner and goes after the public market, hoping to raise $100 million in its IPO. If successful, the Copenhagen-based company will have totaled over $250 million in financing in just the last two years. Galectos focus is on a wide range of fibrotic disease, with its lead project, GB0139 for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, currently in a Phase IIb trial. The Series D and the new funding from this IPO will go toward getting the program through to approval and commercialization.

Codiak BioSciences

After filing to go public for a second time after withdrawing in 2019, Codiak finally hit the market with an $83 million IPO, falling short of its $100 million originally sought when filed in September. The bulk of the funds will be used to advance its lead program ExoSTING through a phase study in advanced or metastatic, recurrent solid tumors, support discover and preclinical R&Dand expand its engEx technology that supports its programs. Another $10 million will go into its second program, exoIL-12, through a Phase I trial in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

EdiGene

A Series B of $67 million takes EdiGenes track record up to $100 million raised in the last two years. The Beijing-based biotech is currently leading the gene-editing wave in China with four platforms steadily advancing. The company's top candidate is a treatment for hereditary blood disease, with the next in line being a CAR-T treatment for cancer. CEO Dong Wei hopes their T cell therapeutics can help make a higher quality, lower cost option for patients and their families.

Cedilla Therapeutics

Small molecule-focused Cedilla wraps up a $57.6 million Series B round to drug the undruggable. The funding will go into preclinical work on its first two oncology candidates, which are being kept hush hush for now. They also have about five or six oncology programs running that are years away from the clinic. In addition to the Series B, Cedilla is bringing Casdin CIO and founder Eli Casdin and Boxer senior VP Dominik Naczynski onto its board of directors.

RayzeBio

Debuting with $45 million in Series A money, biotech newbie RayzeBio is ready to defeat cancer with radiopharmaceuticals. With a vision to be the first radiopharma platform in the market, RayzeBio has seven active programs and would like to see one development candidate by the second half of 2021. Radiopharmaceuticals have intrigued the biotech sphere lately, but securing a reliable supply of therapeutic radioisotopes has been a hang up. But recently the industry has devised alternate ways to generate Actinium-225, which is the radioisotope RayzeBio is working with. This new development spurred the drive to launch RayzeBio with the intent to penetrate specific tumor targets. The fledgling biotech is now rolling up its sleeves to get to work with the goal of being first.

Priothera Limited

To get more clinical data on its highly-promising therapy for high risk AML patients, Priothera closed on a $35 million USD Series A. The company's drug mocravimod should enhance the curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treating AML. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is currently the only potentially curative approach for AML patients, but has a high mortality rate. This therapy appears promising for improving survival outcomes. Priothera acquired mocravimod from KYORIN Pharmaceutical.

Ori Biotech

Ori Biotech wants to speed up the innovation of cell and gene therapies via its manufacturing platform, and this weeks $30 million Series A is certainly a step in reaching that goal. Typically, a drug discovery pipeline can take an average of a decade to get from lab to patient. Oris platform closes, automates and standardizes manufacturing for cell and gene therapy developers so the company can move its treatments from pre-clinical to scale commercially. This novel automation will reduce cost of goods and the footprint. In addition to taking its platform to the market, Ori is also expecting to double its 8-head employee count in four months, and double that again by next year.

Kanaph Therapeutics

Kanaph beefs up its initial $8 million start in 2019 with a $21 million Series B in South Korea. This round of funding will go toward expediting the clinical development of Kanaphs pipelines, chiefly its TMEkine molecules platform for immuno-oncology and bi-specific Fc fusions for the treatment of retinal disease. Preclinical studies are anticipated to be completed at the end of this year or beginning of next year, and are ready for the next steps.

Rappta Therapeutics

Novo Seeds plants its stake in emerging biotech Rappta Therapeutics in a $10.5 million Series A round. Rapptas primary focus is developing first-in-class anti-cancer drugs that work by activating protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). The PP2A enzyme is a key tumor suppressor which has historically been tricky to target with drugs. Rappta has derived a unique understanding of the protein along with propriety tools to allow therapeutic reactivation of PP2A, which offers the potential of multiple therapies with this as the platform for a new class of anti-cancer drugs. Jeroen Bakker, Principal at Novo Seeds, will join Rapptas board. Novartis Venture Fund, Advent Life Sciences and one family office also participated in the round.

Lixte Biotechnology

Previously listed on the OTCQB, Lixte is ready to take it to Nasdaq with a $9 million offering of 1.5 million shares at a price range of $5.75 to $6.75. The NY-based biotech has developed two active series LB-100 and LB-200. The current focus is on the LB-100, which targets several types of cancer and has potential for vascular and metabolic diseases. A Phase I trial has already been completed and demonstrated antitumor activity in humans. LB-100 is now in Phase Ib/II.

The rest is here:
Biopharma Money on the Move: October 7-14 - BioSpace

Consensus paper: current state of first- and second-line therapy in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. – UroToday

The therapy of advanced (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has recently experienced tremendous changes. Several new treatments have been developed, with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibition being the backbone of therapy. Diverse immunotherapy combinations change current first-line standards. These changes also require new approaches in subsequent lines of therapy. In an expert panel, we discussed the new treatment options and how they change clinical practice. While first-line immunotherapies introduce a new level of response rates, data on second-line therapies remains poor. This scenario poses a challenge for clinicians as guideline recommendations are based on historical patient cohorts and agents may lack the appropriate label for their in guidelines recommended use. Here, we summarize relevant clinical data and consider appropriate treatment strategies.

Future oncology (London, England). 2020 Sep 23 [Epub ahead of print]

Peter J Goebell, Philipp Ivanyi, Jens Bedke, Lothar Bergmann, Dominik Berthold, Martin Boegemann, Jonas Busch, Christian Doehn, Susanne Krege, Margitta Retz, Gunhild von Amsberg, Marc-Oliver Grimm, Viktor Gruenwald

Division of Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany., Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, D-30625, Hannover, Germany., Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany., University Hospital Frankfurt, Medical Clinic II, D-60590, Frankfurt, Germany., Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland., Department of Urology, University Hospital Mnster, D-48149, Mnster, Germany., Department of Urology, Charit-University Medicine, D-10117, Berlin, Germany., Urologikum Lbeck, D-23566, Lbeck, Germany., Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology & Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, D-45136, Essen, Germany., Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, D-81675, Munich, Germany., Department of Oncology & Hematology, University Cancer Center Hamburg & Martini-Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany., Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, D-07747, Jena, Germany., Interdisciplinary GU Oncology, Clinic for Medical Oncology & Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Essen, D-45147, Essen, Germany.

PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32964728

Original post:
Consensus paper: current state of first- and second-line therapy in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. - UroToday

Around Town: Life is a series of choices a look at California’s ballot propositions – VVdailypress.com

By Pat Orr | Special to the Victorville Daily Press

Tomorrow marks the start of mailing a ballot to every registered voter in California. And so it begins: The onslaught of mailers, ads, prevarications and outright lies that now constitute campaigns for our votes. If there was ever a year to do your own research, this is it.

The political parties want you to believe this is the most important election in our history, but they say that every four years. What can be important is that we have jobs, taxes, new government spending, crime and racial-preference laws before us in California to vote on.

The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown cannot be underestimated on the attitudes of California voters. Our nave view that the government knows what it is doing has been sorely tested even more than usual.

Proposition 14 is a straightforward request for your approval to issue $5.7 billion in new bonds to fund stem cell research. I ask why this is not funded by big pharma who, along with their academic research partners, will reap the profits from any breakthrough treatments? This bond will cost taxpayers $7.8 billion in principal and interest. Is it good for mankind? Yes, it could be. Is it good for taxpayers? You decide.

Proposition 15 is the attack on Proposition 13s property tax protection passed 40 years ago. Commonly called the Split-roll Initiative, it would revalue commercial property to generate millions from business property owners. This is one issue that the lock-down has helped clarify. This new tax law would cause more business closures and accelerate the departure of businesses who can escape. To intensify the issue further, new work-at-home rules are making large corporate offices obsolete. Couple that with the death of shopping malls and you have a looming business property foreclosure disaster that Prop 15 will only hasten. Voters have turned against 15 despite the hackneyed ads that claim, this is for the schools. Hey, schools are closed!

Proposition 16 is a weird attempt in this social climate to allow our state to legally discriminate in university admissions, public employment or contracting. We banned discrimination in California once. Now to fight racism, the liberals want to bring legalized institutional racism back. This will never stand up in court if it passes.

Proposition 17 would give 40,000 formerly incarcerated individuals now on parole the right to vote. Proponents see the inability to vote as an example of systemic racism because they claim that two-thirds of parolees are Black or Latino.

Proposition 18 will let 17-year-olds vote in primary elections if they will be 18 before the General Election. This will stop those pesky other parties, like Republicans and Libertarians, from getting a candidate in the top two primary ever again.

Proposition 19 will make it easier for those over 55 to transfer their property tax base to another home. This has overwhelming support particularly as we see so many folks displaced by wildfires this year that must rebuild or relocate. A yes vote is supported by Realtors statewide.

Proposition 20 makes crime a crime again. Theft valued between $250 and $950 will become a felony again if you vote yes on Prop 20. This may reduce the shoplifting plague that has been visited on retailers since the law was changed to allow offenders to steal up to $800 with a slap on the wrist. Every shop owner will vote yes on 20.

Proposition 21 is one more attempt to pass statewide rent control. It failed before and will fail again. Can you imagine there ever being any empty apartments to rent if there was rent control?

Proposition 22 is another issue totally reframed by the COVID-19 lockdown. It is the unions attempt to force independent contractors to become employees. Aimed at ride-share drivers and a host of other gig-economy workers, it is a naked attempt to get new union members. We all have become dependent on food, grocery and drug deliveries so there is zero chance this will pass this year. The value of letting people choose their own work life has become clear and essential for all of us.

Proposition 23 would require a licensed physician on-site at every dialysis clinic. This is good for the big chain clinics, not so good for places like the Victor Valley where the extra cost may force clinics to close.

Proposition 24 strengthens consumer privacy laws. This proposition creates a new state agency full of highly paid managers and unionized state workers to protect your personal credit information from being bought and sold. You decide if the return on investment is worth it.

Proposition 25 is an attempt to enable voters to end the catch-and-release game in the justice system right now. A yes vote keeps our cashless bail system in place under current state law. A no vote returns us to the system wherein the court sets bail requiring assets or cash to secure release until trial.

Meanwhile, every Victor Valley community has a local ballot issue to decide this year. Apple Valley (Measure 0) and Victorville (Measure P) are both asking voters to approve an additional 1% increase in the sales tax to be retained for municipal expenses like police, fire, parks and road maintenance. The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on local sales tax revenue is significant. The state has signaled it will not be helping with any additional income, so it is either increase revenue or cut more services. We have always been a law-and-order-oriented region, so I expect both measures to pass.

In Hesperia Measure N is an attempt to modify land use and density rules to help keep Hesperia from becoming overbuilt and out-of-character projects from being built in the city.

Adelantos Measure R is a new tax on vacant land parcels that can range from $50-$600 a year depending upon how the property is zoned. I doubt investors or home builders are excited by the prospect of a new tax on unused dirt right now. Has the city made the case to voters they need the money based on past prudent spending?

Measure V is only for Spring Valley Lake residents and it would, if passed, create a new Community Services District. There are long-time residents on both sides of the issue. I expect the vote to be close and trust a majority of SVL voters have paid enough attention to really weigh the pros and cons of creating this new entity.

We all will vote on Measures J and K, which purportedly modernizes the County Charter (J) and imposes a one four-year term limit and salary reduction on our supervisors (K).You should know that J was put on the ballot by the supervisors, while K was put on the ballot by voter petition. Translation: These two may have conflicting provisions.

A yes vote on Measure U repeals the County Fire Tax for those folks living in County Fire Protection District Service Zone 5. The issue here is that many residents in this zone already pay fire fees to other fire agencies and the County sort of snuck up on this area and included it in their tax levy. You will know from your tax bill and your ballot if this issue applies to your property.

This commentary does not reflect the official position of the Daily Press Editorial Board or ownership.

Contact Pat Orr at avreviewopinion@gmail.com.

Originally posted here:
Around Town: Life is a series of choices a look at California's ballot propositions - VVdailypress.com