Category Archives: Stem Cell Clinic


Distanced from a pricing controversy, Jeff Aronin steers one of his biotechs to Nasdaq with a familiar regulatory strategy tied to a big bet -…

Bob Nelsen had been quietly wondering how to eradicate viruses for years, before one day in 2015, he welcomed a pair of immunologists into the ARCH Venture Partners offices on the 34th floor of Seattles Wells Fargo Building.

Louis Picker and Klaus Frh, professors at Oregon Health & Science University, had by then spent 5 years running around the country in search of funding for their startup, TomegaVax, and Frh, at least, was nearing wits end. The Gates Foundation was interested but told them they needed other investors. Investors told them to come back with more data, pharmaceutical executives said theyre in the wrong game too little money to be made fighting infectious disease. Still, a well-connected board member named Bob More landed them a meeting with the coveted venture capitalist, and so, in a narrow conference room overlooking the Puget Sound, Picker prepared to again explain the idea he had spent 15 years on: re-engineering a benign microbe into the first vaccines for HIV and better ones for hepatitis and tuberculosis.

This lightbulb went on his head, Picker recalled in a recent interview. Most of them just didnt get it. And Bobs hit.

By that point, Nelsen was more than just a venture capitalist. Scraggly and greying but no less opinionated at 52, he was mobbed at biotech conferences, having earned a reputation for crass wisdom and uncanny foresight, for making big bets on big ideas that changed medicine. Those ideas included DNA sequencing, which he first cut a check for in the 90s, and leveraging the immune system to tackle cancer. He earned millions making billion-dollar companies.

Yet for years he had harbored an almost singular obsession: I hate viruses, he told Forbes in 2016. He told me he was pissed off at them. The obsession drove him to his first biotech investment in 1993, for an inhalable flu vaccine approved a decade later and still in use. And it drove him to invest in CAR-T as a potential cure for HIV, years before it proved a wildly effective treatment for some cancers.

Now, listening to Picker talk about T cells and antibodies and the curious biology of cytomegalovirus, Nelsen began wondering if it was time for another bet. Pickers technology was not only promising, he reasoned, it could be the basis of a company that changed how researchers approached viruses. Instead of trying to come up with an antidote for every pathogen, you could do what cancer researchers had learned to do, and harness the immune system to do the work for you.

This wasnt a popular opinion at the time. Its like the least trendy idea in the world, Nelsen told me. People would say, Why the hell are you going into infectious disease?

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

SUBSCRIBE SIGN IN

Continued here:
Distanced from a pricing controversy, Jeff Aronin steers one of his biotechs to Nasdaq with a familiar regulatory strategy tied to a big bet -...

AbbVie backs an Italian startup focused on autoimmune diseases; BioTheryX advances AML drug with $35M D round – Endpoints News

Bob Nelsen had been quietly wondering how to eradicate viruses for years, before one day in 2015, he welcomed a pair of immunologists into the ARCH Venture Partners offices on the 34th floor of Seattles Wells Fargo Building.

Louis Picker and Klaus Frh, professors at Oregon Health & Science University, had by then spent 5 years running around the country in search of funding for their startup, TomegaVax, and Frh, at least, was nearing wits end. The Gates Foundation was interested but told them they needed other investors. Investors told them to come back with more data, pharmaceutical executives said theyre in the wrong game too little money to be made fighting infectious disease. Still, a well-connected board member named Bob More landed them a meeting with the coveted venture capitalist, and so, in a narrow conference room overlooking the Puget Sound, Picker prepared to again explain the idea he had spent 15 years on: re-engineering a benign microbe into the first vaccines for HIV and better ones for hepatitis and tuberculosis.

This lightbulb went on his head, Picker recalled in a recent interview. Most of them just didnt get it. And Bobs hit.

By that point, Nelsen was more than just a venture capitalist. Scraggly and greying but no less opinionated at 52, he was mobbed at biotech conferences, having earned a reputation for crass wisdom and uncanny foresight, for making big bets on big ideas that changed medicine. Those ideas included DNA sequencing, which he first cut a check for in the 90s, and leveraging the immune system to tackle cancer. He earned millions making billion-dollar companies.

Yet for years he had harbored an almost singular obsession: I hate viruses, he told Forbes in 2016. He told me he was pissed off at them. The obsession drove him to his first biotech investment in 1993, for an inhalable flu vaccine approved a decade later and still in use. And it drove him to invest in CAR-T as a potential cure for HIV, years before it proved a wildly effective treatment for some cancers.

Now, listening to Picker talk about T cells and antibodies and the curious biology of cytomegalovirus, Nelsen began wondering if it was time for another bet. Pickers technology was not only promising, he reasoned, it could be the basis of a company that changed how researchers approached viruses. Instead of trying to come up with an antidote for every pathogen, you could do what cancer researchers had learned to do, and harness the immune system to do the work for you.

This wasnt a popular opinion at the time. Its like the least trendy idea in the world, Nelsen told me. People would say, Why the hell are you going into infectious disease?

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

SUBSCRIBE SIGN IN

Visit link:
AbbVie backs an Italian startup focused on autoimmune diseases; BioTheryX advances AML drug with $35M D round - Endpoints News

After Big Pharma abandoned infectious diseases, 5 biotech contrarians decided to go all in. Then Covid-19 changed everything – Endpoints News

Bob Nelsen had been quietly wondering how to eradicate viruses for years, before one day in 2015, he welcomed a pair of immunologists into the ARCH Venture Partners offices on the 34th floor of Seattles Wells Fargo Building.

Louis Picker and Klaus Frh, professors at Oregon Health & Science University, had by then spent 5 years running around the country in search of funding for their startup, TomegaVax, and Frh, at least, was nearing wits end. The Gates Foundation was interested but told them they needed other investors. Investors told them to come back with more data, pharmaceutical executives said theyre in the wrong game too little money to be made fighting infectious disease. Still, a well-connected board member named Bob More landed them a meeting with the coveted venture capitalist, and so, in a narrow conference room overlooking the Puget Sound, Picker prepared to again explain the idea he had spent 15 years on: re-engineering a benign microbe into the first vaccines for HIV and better ones for hepatitis and tuberculosis.

This lightbulb went on his head, Picker recalled in a recent interview. Most of them just didnt get it. And Bobs hit.

By that point, Nelsen was more than just a venture capitalist. Scraggly and greying but no less opinionated at 52, he was mobbed at biotech conferences, having earned a reputation for crass wisdom and uncanny foresight, for making big bets on big ideas that changed medicine. Those ideas included DNA sequencing, which he first cut a check for in the 90s, and leveraging the immune system to tackle cancer. He earned millions making billion-dollar companies.

Yet for years he had harbored an almost singular obsession: I hate viruses, he told Forbes in 2016. He told me he was pissed off at them. The obsession drove him to his first biotech investment in 1993, for an inhalable flu vaccine approved a decade later and still in use. And it drove him to invest in CAR-T as a potential cure for HIV, years before it proved a wildly effective treatment for some cancers.

Now, listening to Picker talk about T cells and antibodies and the curious biology of cytomegalovirus, Nelsen began wondering if it was time for another bet. Pickers technology was not only promising, he reasoned, it could be the basis of a company that changed how researchers approached viruses. Instead of trying to come up with an antidote for every pathogen, you could do what cancer researchers had learned to do, and harness the immune system to do the work for you.

This wasnt a popular opinion at the time. Its like the least trendy idea in the world, Nelsen told me. People would say, Why the hell are you going into infectious disease?

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

SUBSCRIBE SIGN IN

Read the rest here:
After Big Pharma abandoned infectious diseases, 5 biotech contrarians decided to go all in. Then Covid-19 changed everything - Endpoints News

Ayahuasca inspires another biotech startup at ATAI; Mylan TB drug gets green light in India – Endpoints News

We have one more startup to add to the list before we call it a day. ATAI Life Sciences, which likes to dabble with psychedelics in developing new therapies, has another mind bender in the works. Theyve kickstarted a new company to delve into formulations of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) the active ingredient in ayahuasca for new drugs to use in the mental health field. DMT acts as a partial agonist on a variety of 5-HT receptors, they say, which makes it a good candidate for patients not attracted to the potent brew featured on certain South American journeys. These novel products are expected to simplify in-clinic administration and allow greater pharmacokinetic control of the psychedelic experience and its overall duration, said Srinivas Rao, chief scientific officer of ATAI. Patients may even be able to attend psychotherapy sessions later the same day.

Mylan has received the green light from regulators in India for its tuberculosis drug pretomanid. Its only the third treatment for drug-resistant forms of the disease to be approved in more than 40 years, following J&Js bedaquiline and Otsukas delamanid. India accounts for roughly 25% of the worlds tuberculosis cases, and Covid-19 has raised fears that previous efforts to curtail TB will be hampered. The WHO said in May that an additional 1.4 million people could die from TB within the next five years as a direct result of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation has sealed several partnerships with Roche, Shionogi, J&Js Janssen and Eisaito launch a biobank sharing program. Part of the Diagnostics Accelerator, the initiative aims to develop better biomarker tests by analyzing blood and cerebral spinal fluid specimens from Alzheimers patients in earlier clinical trials.

The Ohio State University has spun a company out of Zhiwei Hus lab, providing the seed funding to run more preclinical studies and scale up manufacturing for his next-generation tissue factor (TF) immunotherapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer, among others. CincyTech, a local fund in Cincinnati, led the financing for Eikonoklastes Therapeutics, which is run by former Myonexus exec Bruce Halpryn.

Read this article:
Ayahuasca inspires another biotech startup at ATAI; Mylan TB drug gets green light in India - Endpoints News

Cell Therapy Market Size, Opportunities And Forecast Analysis To 2026| Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Osiris – Owned

QY Research has Published Latest Trending Report on Global Cell Therapy Market

Los Angeles, United State, The report titledGlobal Cell Therapy Marketis one of the most comprehensive and important additions to QY Researchs archive of market research studies. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the global Cell Therapy market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the global Cell Therapy market. Market participants can use the analysis on market dynamics to plan effective growth strategies and prepare for future challenges beforehand. Each trend of the global Cell Therapy market is carefully analyzed and researched about by the market analysts.

Request Sample Report and Full Report TOC:https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1555639/global-cell-therapy-market

The Essential Content Covered in the GlobalCell Therapy Market Report:

* Top Key Company Profiles. * Main Business and Rival Information * SWOT Analysis and PESTEL Analysis * Production, Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin * Market Share and Size

Global Cell Therapy Market is estimated to reach xxx million USD in 2020 and projected to grow at the CAGR of xx% during 2020-2026. According to the latest report added to the online repository of QY Research the Cell Therapy market has witnessed an unprecedented growth till 2020. The extrapolated future growth is expected to continue at higher rates by 2025.

Top Players of Cell Therapy Market are Studied: , Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Osiris, Vericel Corporation, Vcanbio, Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics, JCR Pharmaceuticals, Beike Biotechnology, Golden Meditech, Guanhao Biotech

The report provides a 6-year forecast (2020-2026) assessed based on how the Cell Therapy market is predicted to grow in major regions likeUSA, Europe, Japan, China, India, Southeast Asia, South America, South Africa, Others.

Segmentation by Type:, Stem Cell, Non-Stem Cell

Segmentation by Application: Hospital, Clinic

Reasons to Buy this Report:

Table of Contents

1 Market Overview of Cell Therapy 1.1 Cell Therapy Market Overview 1.1.1 Cell Therapy Product Scope 1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook 1.2 Global Cell Therapy Market Size Overview by Region 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 1.3 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Region (2015-2026) 1.4 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Region (2015-2020) 1.5 Global Cell Therapy Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026) 1.6 Key Regions, Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.1 North America Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.2 Europe Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.3 Asia-Pacific Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.4 Latin America Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.5 Middle East & Africa Cell Therapy Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 2 Cell Therapy Market Overview by Type 2.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Type: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 2.2 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 2.3 Global Cell Therapy Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 2.4 Stem Cell 2.5 Non-Stem Cell 3 Cell Therapy Market Overview by Application 3.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size by Application: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 3.2 Global Cell Therapy Historic Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 3.3 Global Cell Therapy Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 3.4 Hospital 3.5 Clinic 4 Global Cell Therapy Competition Analysis by Players 4.1 Global Cell Therapy Market Size (Million US$) by Players (2015-2020) 4.2 Global Top Manufacturers by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Cell Therapy as of 2019) 4.3 Date of Key Manufacturers Enter into Cell Therapy Market 4.4 Global Top Players Cell Therapy Headquarters and Area Served 4.5 Key Players Cell Therapy Product Solution and Service 4.6 Competitive Status 4.6.1 Cell Therapy Market Concentration Rate 4.6.2 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 5 Company (Top Players) Profiles and Key Data 5.1 Gilead Sciences 5.1.1 Gilead Sciences Profile 5.1.2 Gilead Sciences Main Business 5.1.3 Gilead Sciences Products, Services and Solutions 5.1.4 Gilead Sciences Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.1.5 Gilead Sciences Recent Developments 5.2 Novartis 5.2.1 Novartis Profile 5.2.2 Novartis Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.2.3 Novartis Products, Services and Solutions 5.2.4 Novartis Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.2.5 Novartis Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19 5.3 Osiris 5.5.1 Osiris Profile 5.3.2 Osiris Main Business 5.3.3 Osiris Products, Services and Solutions 5.3.4 Osiris Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.3.5 Vericel Corporation Recent Developments 5.4 Vericel Corporation 5.4.1 Vericel Corporation Profile 5.4.2 Vericel Corporation Main Business 5.4.3 Vericel Corporation Products, Services and Solutions 5.4.4 Vericel Corporation Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.4.5 Vericel Corporation Recent Developments 5.5 Vcanbio 5.5.1 Vcanbio Profile 5.5.2 Vcanbio Main Business 5.5.3 Vcanbio Products, Services and Solutions 5.5.4 Vcanbio Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.5.5 Vcanbio Recent Developments 5.6 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics 5.6.1 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Profile 5.6.2 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Main Business 5.6.3 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Products, Services and Solutions 5.6.4 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.6.5 Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Recent Developments 5.7 JCR Pharmaceuticals 5.7.1 JCR Pharmaceuticals Profile 5.7.2 JCR Pharmaceuticals Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.7.3 JCR Pharmaceuticals Products, Services and Solutions 5.7.4 JCR Pharmaceuticals Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.7.5 JCR Pharmaceuticals Recent Development and Reaction to Covid-19 5.8 Beike Biotechnology 5.8.1 Beike Biotechnology Profile 5.8.2 Beike Biotechnology Main Business 5.8.3 Beike Biotechnology Products, Services and Solutions 5.8.4 Beike Biotechnology Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.8.5 Beike Biotechnology Recent Developments 5.9 Golden Meditech 5.9.1 Golden Meditech Profile 5.9.2 Golden Meditech Main Business 5.9.3 Golden Meditech Products, Services and Solutions 5.9.4 Golden Meditech Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.9.5 Golden Meditech Recent Developments 5.10 Guanhao Biotech 5.10.1 Guanhao Biotech Profile 5.10.2 Guanhao Biotech Main Business 5.10.3 Guanhao Biotech Products, Services and Solutions 5.10.4 Guanhao Biotech Revenue (US$ Million) & (2015-2020) 5.10.5 Guanhao Biotech Recent Developments 6 North America 6.1 North America Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 6.2 United States 6.3 Canada 7 Europe 7.1 Europe Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 7.2 Germany 7.3 France 7.4 U.K. 7.5 Italy 7.6 Russia 7.7 Nordic 7.8 Rest of Europe 8 Asia-Pacific 8.1 Asia-Pacific Cell Therapy Market Size by Region 8.2 China 8.3 Japan 8.4 South Korea 8.5 Southeast Asia 8.6 India 8.7 Australia 8.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific 9 Latin America 9.1 Latin America Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 9.2 Mexico 9.3 Brazil 9.4 Rest of Latin America 10 Middle East & Africa 10.1 Middle East & Africa Cell Therapy Market Size by Country 10.2 Turkey 10.3 Saudi Arabia 10.4 UAE 10.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa 11 Cell Therapy Market Dynamics 11.1 Industry Trends 11.2 Market Drivers 11.3 Market Challenges 11.4 Market Restraints 12 Research Finding /Conclusion 13 Methodology and Data Source 13.1 Methodology/Research Approach 13.1.1 Research Programs/Design 13.1.2 Market Size Estimation 13.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 13.2 Data Source 13.2.1 Secondary Sources 13.2.2 Primary Sources 13.3 Disclaimer 13.4 Author List

About US

QY Research is a leading global market research and consulting company. Established in 2007 in Beijing, China, QY Research focuses on management consulting, database and seminar services, IPO consulting, industry chain research and custom research to help our clients in providing non-linear revenue model and make them successful. We are globally recognized for our expansive portfolio of services.

Continued here:
Cell Therapy Market Size, Opportunities And Forecast Analysis To 2026| Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Osiris - Owned

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2017 2025 – Bulletin Line

Evaluation of the Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market

The presented study maps the growth trajectory of the global Animal Stem Cell Therapy market by thoroughly assessing the various factors that are expected to influence the future prospects of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market. According to the report published by PMR, the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market is poised to attain a value of ~US$ XX Mn/Bn by the end of 2029 with a CAGR growth of ~XX% during the forecast period (2019-2029).

A complete evaluation of the trends, market drivers, opportunities, and challenges faced by market players operating in the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market is provided in the report. Further, an overview and introduction of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market is included to ensure that the readers have a seamless experience while going through the contents of the report.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/samples/14941

Critical insights included in the report:

Competitive Outlook

The competitive outlook assessment provides an in-depth understanding related to the business proceeding of top-tier market players in the global Animal Stem Cell Therapy market. The product portfolio, sales strategy, marketing & promotional strategy, and sales footprint of each market player is scrutinized thoroughly in the report. Some of the leading players evaluated in the report include:

The report segments the global Animal Stem Cell Therapy market on the basis of region, product type, and end use.

Key Participants

The key participants in the animal stem cell therapy market are Magellan Stem Cells, ANIMAL CELL THERAPIES, Abbott Animal Hospital, VETSTEM BIOPHARMA, Veterinary Hospital and Clinic Frisco, CO, etc. The companies are entering into the collaboration and partnership to keep up the pace of the innovations.

The report covers exhaustive analysis on:

Regional analysis for Market includes

Report Highlights:

Request Report Methodology @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/methodology/14941

Regional Analysis

The market scenario in each region along with a comprehensive assessment of the micro and macro-economic factors that are forecasted to impact the market growth in these regions is included in the report.

End Use Assessment

The market study offers accurate and in-depth analysis of the various end uses of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy along with a yearly comparison of the market share and revenue growth of each end use.

Important queries addressed in the report:

For any queries get in touch with Industry Expert @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/ask-an-expert/14941

Why Opt for PMR?

Read more:
Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2017 2025 - Bulletin Line

This is What He and His Family Are Working Towards- Former Ferrari Head Todt Reveals He Saw Michael Schumacher Last Week – Essentially Sports

Gauging the progress made by Formula 1 legend, Michael Schumacher, as far as his health is concerned, often seems like a losing battle. The Schumacher family has mostly been very private about the 7-time world champions condition and health ever since he suffered a horrific skiing accident, about 6 and a half years ago.

Last month, reports indicated that the F1 legends stem cell surgery was put on hold due to the pandemic. Since then, there has been no update about Schumis health. Until now.

Former Ferrari CEO Jean Todt, who is a rather close acquaintance to Schumacher, gives fans some reason for optimism.

According to Dailymail, the former CEO of Ferrari said, I saw Michael last week. He is fighting. I hope that the world will be able to see him again. This is what he and his family are working towards.

It may not be a lot in terms of an update, but well savor whatever information we can get about the F1 legend. We wish him a speedy recovery and hope to see him soon enough.

Todt obviously shares a very special connection with Schumi. Todt occupied the role of the Team Principal at Scuderia Ferrari, and he was responsible for bringing Michael in to Ferrari in 1996.

Schumacher, at the time, had won back-to-back world titles with Benetton.

The duo of Todt and Schumacher saw the Maranello-based outfit through their most successful years in the sport of Formula 1.

For five consecutive seasons, Schumacher dominated F1 and won back-to-back world titles. His brilliance also led The Prancing Horse to win 5 back-to-back Constructors championship titles as well.

Thereafter, Todt was promoted to the role of CEO of the Ferrari brand for four years (2004-08). Now he is part of the UN Secretary-Generals special envoy for road safety.

As for Michael, he continued at Ferrari for two more seasons, finishing 3rd and 2nd respectively. After that, the German driver retired from F1 for 3 years.

But the love for the sport couldnt keep him out for long, and he was back for a second stint with Mercedes.

However, that move didnt go to plan and Schumi retired for a second time after the 2013 season. This time for good.

See the original post here:
This is What He and His Family Are Working Towards- Former Ferrari Head Todt Reveals He Saw Michael Schumacher Last Week - Essentially Sports

Two Immunotherapies Converted Into Single Therapy for Certain Blood Cancers – Technology Networks

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have combined two types of immunotherapy into a single treatment that may be more effective and possibly safer than current immunotherapies for blood cancers. Shown is a type of immune cell called a memory-like natural killer cell (right) attacking a leukemia cell (left). In the new study, the researchers modified the natural killer cells to help them find the leukemia cells more effectively. Credit: Julia Wagner

Read Time:

Some of the most promising advances in cancer treatment have centered on immunotherapies that rev up a patients immune system to attack cancer. But immunotherapies dont work in all patients, and researchers have been searching for ways to increase their effectiveness.

Now, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have combined two immunotherapy strategies into a single therapy and found, in studies in human cells and in mice, that the two together are more effective than either alone in treating certain blood cancers, such as leukemia. Evidence also suggests that the new approach could be safer than one of the most recent cellular immunotherapies to be approved by the FDA, called CAR-T cell therapy, in which the immune systems T cells are engineered to target tumor cells. Cell-based immunotherapies are most commonly used against blood cancers but can be harnessed against some solid tumors as well, such as prostate and lung tumors and melanoma.

The study appears online in the journal Blood.

In the new research, the scientists have harnessed the technology used to engineer CAR-T cells and, instead of modifying specialized immune cells called T cells, they have used similar technology to alter different immune cells called natural killer (NK) cells. The resulting immunotherapy combines the benefits of both strategies and may reduce the side effects that are sometimes seen in CAR-T cell therapy. In some patients, for example, CAR-T cell therapy causes a cytokine storm, a life-threatening overreaction of the immune system.

Immunotherapies show great promise for cancer therapy, but we need to make them more effective and more safe for more patients, said co-senior authorTodd A. Fehniger, MD, PhD, a professor of medicine. This combined approach builds on the treatment strategy that we developed for leukemia patients using natural killer cells. We can supercharge natural killer cells to enhance their ability to attack cancer cells. And at the same time, we can use the genetic engineering approaches of CAR cell therapy to direct the natural killer cells to a tumor target that would normally be overlooked by NK cells. It fundamentally changes the types of cancer that NK cells could be used to treat, both additional blood cancers and potentially solid tumors as well.

In past work, Fehniger and his colleagues showed that they could collect a patients own NK cells, expose the cells to a specific recipe of chemical signals that prime the cells to attack tumors, and then return the primed cells to patients for therapy. This chemical exposure is a sort of basic training for the cells, according to the investigators, preparing the NK cells to fight the cancer. When the cells are then returned to the body, they remember their training, so to speak, and are more effective at targeting the tumor cells. Because their training has given the NK cells a memory of what to do when they encounter tumor cells, the researchers dubbed them memory-like NK cells.

In small clinical trials conducted atSiteman Cancer Centerat Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, such cells were effective in putting some patients with leukemia into a lasting remission, but they didnt work for everyone. Some tumor cells still evaded the memory-like NK cells, despite the cells basic training. To help the cells find the tumor cells, so their basic training can kick in and kill the correct target, the researchers modified the memory-like NK cells with the same CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) molecule that is typically used to target T cells to tumor cells. The CAR molecule is flexible and can be modified to direct the cells to different tumor types, depending on the proteins on the surfaces of the cancer cells.

The resulting hybrid cells were more effective in treating mice with leukemia than memory-like NK cells alone, leading to longer survival for mice treated with CAR memory-like NK cells. The researchers also found the therapy to be effective despite the fact that the mice were given relatively low doses of the cells.

One aspect of this study I find most exciting is how nicely these hybrid NK cells expand in the mice to respond to their tumors, said co-senior authorMelissa Berrien-Elliott, PhD, an instructor in medicine. We can provide a tiny dose and see an incredible amount of tumor control. To me, this highlights the potency of these cells, as well as their potential to expand once in the body, which is critical for translating these findings to the clinic.

Fehniger also pointed out that an advantage of NK cells in general and for biological reasons that the scientists are still working to understand NK cells dont trigger a dangerous immune response or the long-term side effects that T-cell therapy can cause in attacking the patients healthy tissues, a condition called graft-versus-host disease.

In all of the clinical trials exploring any type of NK cells, we dont see the troublesome side effects of cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity that we see with CAR-T cells that can profoundly affect patients, Fehniger said. These side effects can be life-threatening and require intensive care. Were still working to understand how NK cells are different. But if you can get the benefits of CAR-T cells with few if any of the side effects, thats a reasonable line of research to pursue. Another benefit of this safer therapy is the potential to give these cells to patients at an earlier stage in their disease, rather than using them as a last resort.

Other groups have developed CAR-NK cells, but a major difference is that other groups NK cells came from donated cord blood or induced stem cells, rather than adult donors or the patients themselves.

The other groups have artificially differentiated stem cells into something that resembles an NK cell, Fehniger said. With that strategy, theres no guarantee that those cells will have all the properties of typical mature NK cells. In contrast, were starting with adult NK cells, so were more confident that they will have all the inherent properties and behavior of adult NK cells, which we have already shown to be effective in certain types of cancer patients, especially those with leukemia. Inducing memory properties adds to their persistence and effectiveness against many cancer types.

Over the next several years, we would like to be able to scale up this process to produce enough cells for a first-in-human clinical trial, and investigate their effectiveness in different types of human blood cancers, he said.

Reference: Gang, et al. (2020). CAR-modified memory-like NK cells exhibit potent responses to NK-resistant lymphomas. Blood. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020006619

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

View original post here:
Two Immunotherapies Converted Into Single Therapy for Certain Blood Cancers - Technology Networks

Herd immunity: Is it the answer to stopping the spread of COVID-19? – 12news.com KPNX

PHOENIX Herd immunity:That isa phrase we have heard and reada lot lately in the debate over the best way to stop the spread of COVID-19.

Arizona is deep inthe coronavirus pandemic if you ask health experts. Over the last fewweeks,the number of cases in the Grand Canyon State have exploded.

Arizonans have been asked by state healthofficialsto physical distance, wear a mask and wash their handsin an effort tostem the tide of the virus.

However, there are some people that believe that is not the right approach, citing it keeps us from gaining herd immunity.

But what is herd immunity? And will it work against the coronavirus?

DeeptaBhattacharya, associate professor of immunobiology at the University of Arizona, explainedherd immunity is when a significant portion of a population is exposed to a virus and becomes immune toit.

Herd immunity is when enough people haveacquiredresistance to the infections that transmission is slowed down so that very few new infections are reported as a result,Bhattacharya said.

Bhattacharya saidherd immunityis usually achieved when about 70% of the population gains that resistance.

What we are seeing now, even in the hardest of hardest hit spots...only about 20 percent of people have been infected by the virus and show some signs of immunity to it, Bhattacharya said.

Experts say there are two ways to accomplish herd immunity: With a vaccine or naturally.

Bhattacharya said scientists are working on vaccinesthat consists of antibodies that help fight the virus,as well as,vaccines that are made upproteins that allow the human body to make its ownantibodies

The vaccines are basically proteins of the virus. It is not the actual virus but they are proteins of the virusthat you are immunized against andso thenyourownbodyis makingantibodiesagainst those proteins, so if youre ever exposed to the virus naturally youll already have thoseantibodiesthat can prevent it from getting into your cells,Bhattacharya explained.

Whilea number ofcompanies are racing to develop and test avaccine,we are still months and perhaps years from a viablecureforCOVID-19.Andsome might be wonderingwhy we did not just try to accomplish herd immunity naturally.

Doctors from the Mayo Clinic sayherd immunity can be accomplished if a virus is spreadthroughout a communitybecause people naturally develop antibodies against the virus.

Scientists say there are some issues with developing herd immunitynaturallyfor COVID-19.

For one, itis still notclear to researchers if a person who recovered from the virus can maintain immunity.

Second, research has shown some people have contracted the virus more than once.

Further research is needed to determine the protective effect of antibodies to the virus in those who have been infected,according to a Mayo Clinic report.

Nearly 230 million Americans would have to recover fromcoronavirus in order to accomplish herd immunity naturallyand stop the pandemic.

Health experts saya push for natural herd immunity couldlead to overwhelming the health care system and more people dying.

This amount of infection could also lead to serious complications and millions of deaths, especially among older people and those who have chronic conditions, a Mayor Clinic report explained.

All eyes were on Swedenearly on in thepandemicas the countrychose topursue natural herd immunity.The country of about 10 million people did not enact an official lockdown and kept schools open,according to an NBC report.

Sweden reported 78,504 cases and 5,667 deaths related to COVID-19 as of Thursday.The death rate in Sweden is much higher than that of its Nordic neighborsFinland, Norway and Denmark.

Many health experts saythe best approach to combating COVID is continuing to physical distance, wear a mask in public and wash your hands regularly.

Link:
Herd immunity: Is it the answer to stopping the spread of COVID-19? - 12news.com KPNX

Robot That Prints New Skin Could Revolutionise Burns Treatment – PR Web

The Inventia Skin team leading the skin regeneration revolution.

SYDNEY (PRWEB) July 23, 2020

A team including fast-growing Sydney start-up Inventia Life Science, world renowned skin surgeon and former Australian of the Year, Professor Fiona Wood, and leading bioprinting researcher, Professor Gordon Wallace, have received two major investments from the Australian Government to accelerate the development of a robotic device that prints a patients own skin cells directly onto a burn or wound.

The device, codenamed Lig from the Latin to bind, could revolutionise the way we approach wound repair, and place Australia at the forefront of the burgeoning regenerative medicine industry.

Federal Health Minister Hon. Greg Hunt announced that the Governments BioMedTech Horizons program, operated by MTPConnect, will inject funding to take the device into first-in-human clinical trials within two years. Separately, the team also received funding from the Medical Research Future Fund Stem Cell Therapies Mission to collaborate with stem cell expert Professor Pritinder Kaur from Curtin University, to use the Lig device to deliver stem cell based products that could improve skin regeneration.

The skin, our bodys largest organ, is the first point of injury in accidents and some diseases. Damage it significantly and it will slowly heal and most likely leave a scar. However, throughout this process it will be open to infection while it tries to regenerate - a major problem in the bodys first protective barrier.

Inventia Skins Lig robot prints tiny droplets containing the patients skin cells and biomaterials to speed up the regenerative process and create a new layer of skin where it has been damaged. The device uses patented technology developed in Australia by parent company Inventia Life Science and featured in its RASTRUM platform for lab-based medical research and drug discovery. In taking this core technology into the clinic in the Lig robot, Inventia Skin is breaking new ground with some of Australia's leaders in skin regeneration.

When we started Inventia Life Science, our vision was to create a technology platform with the potential to bring enormous benefit to human health. We are pleased to see how fast that vision is progressing alongside our fantastic collaborators. This Federal Government support will definitely help us accelerate even faster, says Dr. Julio Ribeiro, CEO and co-founder of Inventia.

The technology within Lig enables the rapid and precise delivery of multiple cell types and advanced biomaterials to a wound, providing the potential to recreate functional and aesthetically normal skin. This can be achieved in a single procedure, reducing treatment cost and hospital stays, and minimising the risk of infection.

For one of its partners - Professor Fiona Wood, Director of Western Australias Burns Service - it's not the first time that she has looked towards bioengineering to help her patients. Professor Wood pioneered the now clinically approved spray-on skin technique to treat skin burns based on research beginning in 1993, and came to notice in 2002 at the time of the Bali Bombings. Combined with the expertise of Professor Gordon Wallace at the University of Wollongong, one of Australias most eminent researchers in bioprinting and biomaterials, Inventia Skin has a very bright future ahead.

The combination of these grants is an excellent example of the way the Medical Research Future Fund is being applied across the continuum of translational research to commercialisation, leading to better patient outcomes, says Professor Fiona Wood.

Learn more: Further information on the BioMedTech Horizons Program is available here: https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/188-million-to-supercharge-digital-health-technologies

Contact Inventia Skin at info@inventiaskin.com Twitter or LinkedIn @InventiaSkin Australia: 1800 849 128 USA: +1 833 462 5959 Ireland: +353 818 370 035

Share article on social media or email:

Link:
Robot That Prints New Skin Could Revolutionise Burns Treatment - PR Web