Category Archives: Stem Cell Medical Center


Tisa-cel CAR-T reinfusion lacks durability for younger patients with B … – Healio

February 28, 2023

3 min read

Krupski C, et al. Abstract LBA4. Presented at: Tandem Meetings | Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR, Feb. 15-19, 2023; Orlando.

Disclosures: Krupski reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the abstract for all other researchers relevant financial disclosures.

ADD TOPIC TO EMAIL ALERTS

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

A small percentage of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received a second infusion of tisagenlecleucel had clinically meaningful responses, data from a retrospective study showed.

Despite the drug appearing to be safe and well-tolerated, findings presented at Tandem Meetings | Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR revealed only transient responses to repeat therapy with the CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, including mostly nondurable remissions.

We have shown that reinfusion with [tisagenlecleucel] is not a definitive therapy, Christa Krupski, DO, MPH, professor in the department of pediatrics at University of Cincinnati and pediatric bone marrow transplant physician at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, told Healio. The remissions it produces are unlikely to be long lasting, so physicians who treat these patients will need to have something else in mind before moving forward.

Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah, Novartis) also known as tisa-cel has historically produced initial complete responses among approximately 80% of younger patients with B-cell ALL, Krupski said.

Those who experience disease progression after CAR-T have few treatment options, one of which is a second tisa-cel infusion. Prognosis is poor after this treatment, with the limited data available showing response rates to reinfusion ranging from 28% to 52%, Krupski said during a presentation.

Additionally, previous research suggested that patients with a short duration of B-cell aplasia after CAR-T infusion are susceptible to disease relapse.

Typically, the manufacturer has enough cells and produces a second dose of the agent that is kept in reserve, but little data exist regarding the effectiveness of reinfusion for patients who relapse after CAR-T, Krupski said.

A few patients at Krupskis center experienced loss of B-cell aplasia early after CAR-T infusion and received reinfusions with a second dose of tisa-cel.

We were unable ... to get them back into remission, or even get them to a point of B-cell aplasia again, she said, adding that her group was unsure if the poor results were attributable to the patients they treated or a lack of robustness with the overall approach of tisa-cel reinfusion.

This is what sparked our interest, and we have used our membership in the Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium to harness data from many centers and get some meaningful results, Krupski said.

Krupski used the Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium a group of 15 institutions that perform CAR-T for younger patients and collect data on patient outcomes to collect data on 42 younger patients (median age at first CAR-T infusion, 12.5 years; range, 0-26) with B-cell ALL who received reinfusion of tisa-cel at one of 13 participating sites.

Twenty-four patients (57%) received tisa-cel infusion for B-cell aplasia loss while having an ongoing complete response during their first CAR-T infusion. Seventeen patients (41%) received reinfusion for having detectable disease at day 28 after infusion. The remaining patient received reinfusion for having no response to the first infusion.

Median time between tisa-cel infusions was 173 days (range, 52-521).

The complete response rate 28 days after tisa-cel reinfusion served as the studys primary outcome measurement. Secondary outcome measurements included rates of reestablishing B-cell aplasia, OS and EFS after tisa-cel reinfusion.

Median follow-up was 496 days (range, 150-1,335).

Researchers reported a 1-year OS rate of 84% after reinfusion with tisa-cel for the entire study group.

Reinfusion with tisa-cel conferred a 41% EFS rate at 1 year.

Treatment-related toxicities appeared manageable overall, according to investigators. Twenty-four percent of patients developed cytokine release syndrome, with only 2% of cases being grade 3 or higher.

Investigators reported limited neurotoxicity after tisa-cel reinfusion (overall incidence, 7%; grade 3 or higher, 2%).

Reinfusion served as definitive therapy requiring no further treatment for five of the 24 patients who received tisa-cel reinfusion for B-cell aplasia loss while in complete remission.

Eleven of 17 patients who received a second infusion for treatment of disease progression had detectable disease 28 days after treatment, compared with six patients reported as minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative 28 days after infusion. Four of the patients with MRD-negative disease eventually experienced disease relapse.

The results confirm what Krupski and colleagues expected based on limited available data and their own experience: The use of tisa-cel reinfusion has limited effectiveness and should be given as a bridge toward another definitive therapy or with a strategy regarding next steps in mind.

This is especially true for patients who can tolerate hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, because delaying providing a second infusion of tisa-cel instead could miss a window of opportunity to provide a curative option, Krupski said.

[Physicians] dont want to falsely put our hope in something that is ultimately not going to be of benefit to the patient, she told Healio.

Krupski said the studys findings will change the way she approaches management of patients who have early relapse or loss of B-cell aplasia after tisa-cel infusion.

The main takeaway is that if you're going to consider a second infusion ... then it should not be looked at as definitive therapy, Krupski said. It needs to be a bridge to something, and that something, in my opinion, is a transplant for definitive therapy.

ADD TOPIC TO EMAIL ALERTS

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

More:
Tisa-cel CAR-T reinfusion lacks durability for younger patients with B ... - Healio

Contract Manufacturing Market to Witness Substantial Growth of … – InvestorsObserver

Contract Manufacturing Market to Witness Substantial Growth of USD 362.72 Million with Healthy CAGR of 6.95% by 2029, Size, Share, Trends, Growth and Competitors Insight

BOSTON, March 02, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Data Bridge Market research has recently released expansive research titled Contract Manufacturing Market which guarantees you will remain better informed than your competition. This study provides a broader perspective of the marketplace with its comprehensive market insights and analysis, which eases surviving and success in the market. A steadfast Contract Manufacturing market research report serves to be a very momentous component of business strategy. This report provides important information, which assists to identify and analyze the needs of the market, the market size, and the competition with respect to the Contract Manufacturing industry. When the market report is accompanied by precise tools and technology, it helps tackle a number of uncertain challenges for the business. This market research report is one of the key factors used in maintaining competitiveness over competitors. Contract manufacturing market report supports the business to take better decisions for the successful future planning in terms of current and future trends in a particular product or industry.

Data Bridge Market Research analyses a growth rate in the contract manufacturing market in the forecast period 2022-2029. The expected CAGR of the contract manufacturing market tends to be around 6.95% in the mentioned forecast period. The market was valued at USD 211.9 million in 2021, and it would grow upto USD 362.72 million by 2029 . In addition to the market insights such as market value, growth rate, market segments, geographical coverage, market players, and market scenario, the market report curated by the Data Bridge Market Research team also includes in-depth expert analysis, patient epidemiology, pipeline analysis, pricing analysis, and regulatory framework.

Download Sample PDF of the Contract Manufacturing Market @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-contract-manufacturing-market

The contract manufacturing market is expected to witness significant growth during the forecast period. An increase in offshoring, especially in emerging countries, and the changing regulatory landscape, are the prominent trends currently present in the market. Considering the COVID-19 era, it brought in unparalleled demand for diagnostic tests, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), ventilators, and other critical medical supplies.

Under contract manufacturing , the firms provide services such as production of goods by firm, under the label or brand of another firm. In other words, contract manufacturing is managing of one companys resources by the other company to manufacture its products. A pharma contract manufacturing company provides an array of services to drug companies, including drug development, drug manufacturing and commercial production, and documentation of compliance with FDA regulatory requirements.

The Global Market Is Analyzed in Depth in the Latest Study. Taking into account the current level of competition and its projected evolution over the next few years.

Rapidly increasing demands, a rise in industrialization, consumer awareness, growing sectors, and technical improvements are fueling the expansion of the global Contract Manufacturing market. Sales and revenue in this sector have increased at an exponential rate. The market's size and growth are both expected to increase thanks to the factors driving the market's expansion over the projected period.

Leading businesses in the worldwide Contract Manufacturing market are investing heavily in R&D in order to build a larger client base and expand their share of the market by reintroducing improved products to consumers. All of the companies' strategy, as well as their financial health, revenue, gross margin, and growth rate, are detailed in the study.

The Contract Manufacturing Market is Dominated by Firms Such as

Download the Complete Research Study Here in PDF Format @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/checkout/buy/enterprise/global-contract-manufacturing-market

Investing in this study would grant you access to valuable information, including:

Opportunities

The rising demand for cardiovascular devices as a result of increasing cases of associated conditions is attributed to the growth of outsourcing of these devices. Moreover, the high complexity of cardiovascular devices and the need for technical expertise result in higher outsourcing of these devices.

The rising mergers and acquisitions are creating much opportunities in the global contract manufacturing market. For instance, in October 2018, Nordson Corporation acquired Clada Medical Devices, a design & development firm primarily focused on balloon catheters. This enhanced the design & development capabilities of the company, which further supports the companys position as a prominent contract manufacturer for OEMs across the interventional & surgical device landscape.

Key Market Segments Covered in Contract Manufacturing Industry Research

Service

Type

End User

Browse More About This Research Report @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-contract-manufacturing-market

Key Industry Drivers:

In addition, the demand for medicines and medical devices is increasing due to factors such as the widespread use of non-invasive surgery. To meet this growing demand, OEMs outsource manufacturing of non-core manufacturing activities to help reduce labor costs, free capital, increase employee productivity, and improve manufacturing lead times

Manufacturing biologics using multiple products of plants has proven to be economically efficient and safe, as the risks associated with product carry-over are negligible or non-negligible. Supports the growth of. Rapid changes in the supply chain may be unmanageable due to the tightly regulated medical device industry. Medical device manufacturers selling products in the United States do not need to report actual or potential supply chain bottlenecks to the FDA

Contract Manufacturing Market Regional Analysis/Insights:

The major countries covered in the contract manufacturing marketreport are the U.S., Canada and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Rest of Europe in Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), Brazil, Argentina and Rest of South America as part of South America

America is dominating the market in the forecast period due to the large number of healthcare services and demand of products for huge storage and repository

Asia-Pacific is considered the most lucrative period due to the increasing number of biobanks and hospitals in the region. Table of Contents:

Get the Full Table of Contents @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-contract-manufacturing-market

Explore More Reports:

About Data Bridge Market Research:

An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!

Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavours to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process. Data Bridge is an aftermath of sheer wisdom and experience which was formulated and framed in the year 2015 in Pune.

Data Bridge Market Research has over 500 analysts working in different industries. We have catered more than 40% of the fortune 500 companies globally and have a network of more than 5000+ clientele around the globe. Data Bridge adepts in creating satisfied clients who reckon upon our services and rely on our hard work with certitude. We are content with our glorious 99.9 % client satisfying rate.

Contact Us:

Data Bridge Market Research US: +1 888 387 2818 UK: +44 208 089 1725 Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475 Email:- corporatesales@databridgemarketresearch.com

More:
Contract Manufacturing Market to Witness Substantial Growth of ... - InvestorsObserver

FDA Approvals, Highlights, and Summaries: Internal Medicine – Medscape Reference

Neurology Relyvrio (sodium phenylbutyrate/taurursodiol)

Sodium phenylbutyrate/taurursodiol is indicated for treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in adults. The precise mechanism is unknown. Sodium phenylbutyrate is a histone deacetylase inhibitor shown to upregulate heat-shock proteins and act as a small molecular chaperone, thereby ameliorating toxicity from endoplasmic reticulum stress. Taurursodiol recovers mitochondrial bioenergetics deficits through several mechanisms, including by preventing translocation of the Bax protein into the mitochondrial membrane, thus reducing mitochondrial permeability and increasing the cells apoptotic threshold. The precise mechanism of action in patients with ALS is unknown.

Approval was based on the CENTAUR trial. The phase 2 CENTAUR trial (n = 89 treatment; n = 48 placebo) showed patients treated with sodium phenylbutyrate/taurursodiol had slower progression of disease compared to those randomized to placebo. Also, the ALS functional rating scale revised (ALSFRS-R) score showed the highest score preservation in fine motor skill subscales. N Engl J Med. 202 Sep 3:383(10):919-930

The open-label extension (OLE) of the CENTAUR trial included 56 participants from the treatment group (ie, early start group) and 34 from the placebo group. In the early start group subjects, the risk of any key event was 47% lower (p = 0.003), and the risk of death or tracheostomy or permanent assisted ventilation was 49% lower (p = 0.007). Also, first hospitalization was 44% lower in this group (p = 0.03). J Neurol Neruosurg Psychiatry. 2022 May 16;93(8):871-875

The CENTAUR OLE showed the median survival in the early start group was 25 months compared to 18.5 months for the group starting treatment during the extension. Muscle Nerve. 2021 Jan;63(1):31-39

Ublituximab is a CD20-directed monoclonal antibody indicated for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease.

Approval was supported by results from the ULTIMATE I (n = 549) and ULTIMATE II (n = 545) trials. Compared with teriflunomide, ublituximab resulted in lower annualized relapse rates and fewer brain lesions on MRI than teriflunomide over a period of 96 weeks but did not result in a significantly lower risk of worsening of disability. In the ULTIMATE I trial, the annualized relapse rate was 0.08 with ublituximab and 0.19 with teriflunomide (p < 0.001); in the ULTIMATE II trial, the annualized relapse rates were 0.09 and 0.18, respectively (p = 0.002). N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 25;387(8):704-714

Elivaldogene autotemcel is a one-time gene therapy designed to add functional copies of the ABCD1 gene into a patients own hematopoietic stem cells, resulting in the production of the adrenoleukodystrophy protein (ALDP). It is indicated to slow the progression of neurologic dysfunction in boys aged 4 to 17 years with early, active cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD), a rare, X-linked, peroxisomal disorder that affects production of ALDP.

Accelerated approval from the FDA was supported by interim results from the phase 2/3 STARBEAM study, which concluded that elivaldogene autotemcel may be an effective alternative to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in boys with early stage CALD. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1630-1638

Ganaxolone is a GABAA receptorpositive modulator. It binds specifically to GABAA receptors to enhance their inhibitory effects. It is indicated for seizures associated with cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) deficiency disorder (CDD) in patients aged 2 years and older. CDD, a rare developmental epileptic encephalopathy, is largely a disease of pediatric and young adult patients.

Approval was based on the phase 3 MARIGOLD trial. Patients treated with ganaxolone (n = 49) showed a median 30.7% reduction in 28-day major motor seizure frequency, compared to a 6.9% reduction for those receiving placebo (n = 51) (p=0.0036). In the open-label extension study, patients treated with ganaxolone for at least 12 months (n = 48) experienced a median 49.6% reduction in major motor seizure frequency. Prescribing Information

Other neurology approvals

DaTscan (ioflupane I 123) New indication as an adjunct to other diagnostic evaluations for striatal dopamine transporter visualization using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain imaging in adult patients with suspected Lewy body dementia

Adlarity (donepezil transdermal) New transdermal patch indicated for treatment of mild, moderate, and severe Alzheimer dementia; originally approved as tablet and oral disintegrating tablet

Hyftor (sirolimus topical) New dosage form indicated for treatment of facial angiofibroma associated with tuberous sclerosis in patients aged 6 years and older

Fintepla (fenfluramine) New indication for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (previously approved for seizures associated with Dravet syndrome) in patients aged 2 years and older

Ultomiris (ravulizumab) C5 complement inhibitor, new indication for generalized myasthenia gravis

Radicava ORS (edaravone) New oral suspension dosage form for adults with ALS

Dextromethorphan/bupropion is a new fixed-dose combination product indicated for treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). Dextromethorphan is an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. The tablet is formulated to increase the bioavailability and half-life of dextromethorphan by utilizing the bupropion component to increase plasma dextromethorphan concentrations by inhibiting its metabolism.

In the phase 3 GEMINI (glutamatergic and monoaminergic modulation in depression) study, there were significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to placebo starting 1 week after treatment initiation. J Clin Psychiatry 2022 May 30;83(4)

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist. The orexin neuropeptide signaling system plays a role in wakefulness. Blocking the binding of wake-promoting neuropeptides orexin A and orexin B to receptors OX1R and OX2R is thought to suppress wake drive. Daridorexant is indicated for adults with insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance.

Approval was based on two phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg, or placebo (study 1; n = 930); or daridorexant 25 mg, daridorexant 10 mg, or placebo (study 2; n = 307) every evening for 3 months. The primary endpoints were change from baseline in wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), measured by polysomnography, at months 1 and 3. In study 1, the daridorexant 25-mg and 50-mg doses showed a statistically significant improvement in all endpoints, compared to placebo, at both month 1 and month 3 (p<0.0001). In study 2, the daridorexant 25-mg dose showed statistically significant improvement in WASO at month 1 (p=0.0001) and month 3 (p=0.0028) compared to placebo. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Feb;21(2):125-139

Other psychiatry approvals

Vraylar (cariprazine) New indication for adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder

Xelstrym (dextroamphetamine transdermal) New transdermal patch indicated for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and children aged 6 years and older

Nalmefene Opioid antagonist reintroduced to the US market for management of known or suspected opioid overdose

Qelbree (viloxazine) Indication for ADHD expanded to include adults

Igalmi (dexmedetomidine) New buccal dosage form and indication for acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder

Zulresso (brexanolone) Indication for postpartum depression expanded to include adolescents aged 15 years and older

Olipudase alfa is indicated for noncentral nervous system manifestations of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) in adults and children. It is a recombinant enzyme for replacement therapy. ASMD is a lysosomal storage disease that results from reduced activity of the enzyme acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), caused by pathogenic variants in the sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1 (SMPD1) gene. ASM degrades sphingomyelin to ceramide and phosphocholine. ASM deficiency causes intra-lysosomal accumulation of sphingomyelin (and cholesterol and other cell membrane lipids) in various tissues.

Approval of olipudase alfa was established by the ASCEND and ASCEND-Peds trials. The ASCEND trial assessed 31 adults with ASMD type A/B or type B and their percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and spleen volume. The olipudase alfa group demonstrated improved lung function and reduced splenomegaly compared to the placebo group from baseline to week 52 (increased predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, 22% vs 3%; spleen volume, 39% decrease vs 0.5% increase). In the ASCEND-Peds trial, 9 patients treated with olipudase alfa who were able to perform test at baseline saw improvement in lung performance from baseline to week 52 (mean increase of 33% predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide). Genet Med. 2022 Jul;24(7):1425-1436 and Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1543-1550

Teplizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) antigen, which is coexpressed with the T-cell receptor (TCR) on the surface of T-lymphocytes. It is indicated to delay the onset of stage 3 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in adults and children aged 8 years and older who currently have stage 2 T1DM.

FDA approval was based on a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 76 at -risk children and adults. The study demonstrated that a single 14-day regimen of daily IV infusions of teplizumab in 44 patients delayed clinical T1DM by a median of 2 years compared to 32 participants who received placebo (p = 0.006). N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):603-613

Data from 3 years of follow-up (median 923 days) showed 50% of the teplizumab group remained diabetes free, compared to 22% of the placebo group (p = 0.01). Those who received teplizumab had a greater average C-peptide AUC compared to those given placebo, reflecting improved beta-cell function (1.96 vs 1.68 pmol/mL; p = 0.006). C-peptide levels declined over time in the placebo group, but they stabilized in patients who received teplizumab (p = 0.0015). Sci Transl Med. 2021 Mar 3;13(583)

Tirzepatide is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It acts by dually targeting glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). GIP is an incretin hormone that induces insulin secretion in response to a meal (primarily by hyperosmolarity of glucose in the duodenum) to facilitate the metabolism of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. GLP-1 receptor agonists increase insulin secretion in the presence of elevated blood glucose, suppress glucagon postprandially, delay gastric emptying to decrease postprandial glucose, and decrease glucagon secretion.

The SURPASS clinical trials investigated the use of tirzepatide. SURPASS-2 was an open-label, 40-week, phase 3 trial. The comparison by Frias et al of tirzepatide versus semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (SURPASS-2) found that tirzepatide at all doses was noninferior and superior to semaglutide in lowering HbA1c. Tirzepatide was also superior to semaglutide in body-weight reductions. N Engl J Med 2021 Aug 5;385(6):503-515

Other endocrinology approvals

Tymlos (abaloparatide) New indication to increase bone density in men with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture or patients who have failed on or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy

Olpruva (sodium phenylbutyrate) New oral pellets for suspension indicated as an adjunct to dietary protein restriction and essential amino acid supplementation for the chronic management of patients who weigh at least 20 kg with urea cycle disorders involving deficiencies of carbamylphosphate synthetase (CPS), ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC), or argininosuccinic acid synthetase (AS)

Imcivree (setmelanotide) Indication for chronic weight management in patients aged 6 years and older with obesity caused by certain genetic disorders expanded to include Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Qsymia (phentermine/topiramate) Indication for chronic weight management expanded to include adolescents aged 12 years and older with an initial BMI in the 95th percentile or greater for age and sex

Mavacamten is a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor indicated for symptomatic New York Heart Association class II-III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to improve exercise capacity and symptoms in adults. Mavacamten modulates the number of myosin heads that can enter on actin (power-generating) states, thus reducing the probability of force-producing (systolic) and residual (diastolic) cross-bridge formation. Excess myosin actin cross-bridge formation and dysregulation of the super-relaxed state are mechanistic hallmarks of HCM.

Approval of mavacamten was based on results from the multicenter, phase 3 EXPLORER-HCM trial (n = 251). Of 123 patients randomly assigned to mavacamten, 92 (75%) completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at baseline and week 30; and of the 128 patients randomly assigned to placebo, 88 (69%) completed the KCCQ at baseline and week 30. At 30 weeks, the change in KCCQ-OS (overall summary) score was greater with mavacamten than with placebo (mean score, 14.9 vs 5.4; difference +9.1; p<0.0001), with similar benefits across all KCCQ subscales. The proportion of patients with a very large change (KCCQ-OS 20 points or more) was 36% in the mavacamten group versus 15% in the placebo group, with an estimated absolute difference of 21%. These gains returned to baseline after treatment was stopped. Lancet. 2021 Jun 26

Other cardiology approvals

Furoscix (furosemide) New formulation and administration method: SC delivery by on-body infusor for treatment of congestion due to fluid overload in adults with NYHA class II/III CHF

Jardiance (empagliflozin) Indication to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death plus hospitalization in adults with heart failure (HF) broadened to include HF with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction.

Xigduo XR (dapagliflozin/metformin) New indication approved to reduce risk of CV death and hospitalization for HF in adults with T2DM who have HF (NYHA class II-IV) with reduced ejection fraction.

Deucravacitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor. TYK2 pairs with JAK1 to mediate multiple cytokine pathways and pairs with JAK2 to transmit signals shown in cell-based assays. The precise mechanism linking inhibition of TYK2 enzyme to therapeutic effectiveness is unknown. It is indicated for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy.

Approval was supported with results from the POETYK PSO-1 trial. At week 16, the PASI 75 (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index showing at least 75% reduction of symptoms from baseline) response rates were significantly higher with deucravacitinib than with placebo or apremilast (58.4% vs 12.7% vs 35.1%; p<0.0001). The static physicians global assessment score 0 / 1 (sPGA 0/1) also favored deucravacitinib (53.6% vs 7.2% vs 32.1%; p<0.0001). Efficacy improved beyond week 16 and was maintained through week 52. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Jul 9

Spesolimab is an anti-interleukin-36 (IL-36) monoclonal antibody. Binding to the IL-36 receptor decreases release of proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways in patients with inflammatory dermatoses. It is indicated for treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares.

Evidence from the Effisayil 1 trial supported the approval. The Effisayil 1 trial assessed 53 adults with GPP based on the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) pustulation score at 1 week after receiving spesolimab or placebo. At the end of 1 week, the spesolimab treatment group saw improved pustulation. In patients treated with spesolimab, GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 was observed in 54% compared to 6% in the placebo group. GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 was 43% with spesolimab compared to 11% for placebo. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(26):2431-2440

DaxibotulinumtoxinA is the first peptide-formulated, long-acting neuromodulator approved for temporary improvement of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines in adults. As a botulinum toxin, it blocks cholinergic transmission at neuromuscular junctions by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine.

Approval was supported by the SAKURA phase 3 trial, which included more than 2700 adults who received approximately 4200 treatments. The median duration of effect was 6 months, with some patients maintaining results at 9 months, compared to 3-4 months with other botulinum toxins. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):48-54

Tapinarof is a first-in-class aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist for treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults. Efficacy of tapinarof in psoriasis is attributed to its binding and activation of AhR, a ligand-dependent transcription factor, leading to the downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-17.

Approval was based on the PSOARING clinical trials, which compared use versus topical placebo. Approximately 35-40% of patients who received active drug had clear or almost clear scores after 12 weeks, as compared to 6% of patients on placebo. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2219-2229

Abrocitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor indicated for refractory moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults whose disease is not adequately controlled with other systemic therapies or for whom those therapies are inadvisable. JAK1 inhibitors reduce interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 signaling.

Approval was based on the JADE COMPARE trial, which compared abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once daily, dupilumab 300 mg SC every other week (after a 600-mg loading dose), and placebo. Additionally, all patients received topical therapy. An IGA response at week 12 was observed in 48.4% of patients in the 200-mg abrocitinib group, 36.6% in the 100-mg abrocitinib group, 36.5% in the dupilumab group, and 14% in the placebo group (p<0.001 for both abrocitinib doses vs placebo). An eczema area and severity index-75 (EASI-75) response at week 12 was observed in 70.3%, 58.7%, 58.1%, and 27.1%, respectively (p<0.001 for both abrocitinib doses vs placebo). The 200-mg dose, but not the 100-mg dose, of abrocitinib was superior to dupilumab with respect to itch response at week 2. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1101-1112

Alpelisib is the first drug approved for patients aged 2 years and older with severe manifestations of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) who require systemic therapy. Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome is part of this spectrum of diseases. FDA approval of alpelisib was supported by real-world evidence from the open-label EPIK-P1 trial. A retrospective chart review showed patients treated with alpelisib had reduced target lesion volume and improvement in PROS-related symptoms and manifestations. After 24 weeks, 27% of patients (10/37) achieved a confirmed response to treatment, defined as 20% or greater reduction in the sum of PROS target lesion volume. Also, 23 of 31 patients (74%) showed some reduction in target lesion. Prescribing Information

Baricitinib is the first systemic treatment to gain FDA approval for adults with severe alopecia areata. Baricitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that blocks phosphorylation and activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), which modulate intracellular activity, including gene expression involved in the inflammatory pathway.

Approval was based on two phase 3 trials, BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2. In BRAVE-AA1, 22% of the 184 patients who received baricitinib 2 mg and 35% of the 281 patients who received 4 mg achieved adequate scalp hair coverage, compared to 5% of the 189 patients who received placebo. In BRAVE-AA2, 17% of the 156 patients who received baricitinib 2 mg and 32% of the 234 patients who received 4 mg achieved adequate scalp hair coverage, compared to 3% of the 156 patients who received a placebo. Results were statistically significant for each treatment group compared to placebo (p<0.001). N Engl J Med 2022 May 5;386(18):1687-1699

Ruxolitinib topical cream gained approval in July 2022 for treatment of adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older with nonsegmental vitiligo. Approval was based on data from two phase 3 trials (TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2) that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib cream compared to vehicle in more than 600 people.

Topical ruxolitinib resulted in significant improvements in vitiligo area scoring index (VASI), which represent improvements in facial and total body repigmentation, at week 24 (primary analysis) compared to vehicle and in an open-label extension at week 52.

Results at week 24, which were consistent across both studies, showed approximately 30% of patients treated with topical ruxolitinib achieved at least 75% improvement from baseline in facial repigmentation (F-VASI75), the primary endpoint, compared to approximately 8% and 13% of patients treated with vehicle in TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2, respectively. At week 52, approximately 50% of ruxolitinib-treated patients achieved F-VASI75.

Additionally, at week 24, more than 15% of patients treated with topical ruxolitinib achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in F-VASI (F-VASI90), compared to approximately 2% of patients treated with vehicle. At week 52, the percentage of ruxolitinib-treated patients who achieved F-VASI90 doubled to approximately 30%. Medscape Medical News

Other dermatology approvals

Dupixent (dupilumab) New indication approved for adults with prurigo nodularis

Rinvoq (upadacitinib) JAK inhibitor that gained approval by the FDA for refractory moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, including adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older

Skyrizi (risankizumab) New indication approved for adults with active psoriatic arthritis

Zoryve (roflumilast topical) New dosage form approved for adults and adolescents with plaque psoriasis

Juvederm Volbella XC (hyaluronic acid, non-animal stabilized) New indication approved for dermal filler for improvement of infraorbital hollowing

NexoBrid (anacaulase) Proteolytic enzymes indicated for eschar removal (debridement) in adults with deep partial-thickness and/or full-thickness thermal burns

Omidenepag isopropyl is a prodrug of omidenepag and a selective prostaglandin E2 (EP2) receptor agonist, which increases aqueous humor drainage. Omidenepag isopropyl is indicated for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension.

Approval was supported by data from a phase 3 open-label trial, RENGE, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of omidenepag isopropyl ophthalmic solution 0.002% in 125 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Omidenepag isopropyl ophthalmic solution demonstrated noninferiority to timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% in the duration of the 52-week study. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021 65:810819

Additionally, prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy in patients with glaucoma has been reported not to be caused by EP2 receptor agonists but, rather, to be a cosmetic problem with prostaglandin F receptor (FP) agonists. Alleviation of periorbitopathy symptoms were reported after switching from an FP agonist to omidenepag isopropyl. Objective deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus improved by 76% at 7 months, and subjective questionnaires reported improvement in 95%. J Ocul Pharamcol Ther. 2022 Oct 31

Vabysmo (faricimab) First bispecific antibody for treatment of adults with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Faricimab targets 2 distinct pathways angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A). By inhibiting VEGF-A, faricimab suppresses endothelial cell proliferation, neovascularization, and vascular permeability. By inhibiting Ang-2, faricimab promotes vascular stability and desensitizes blood vessels to the effects of VEGF-A. Ang-2 levels are increased in some patients with nAMD and DME.

Approval was based on the phase 3 TENAYA and LUCERNE studies for wet AMD and the YOSEMITE and RHINE studies for DME. The multicenter trial sites (n = 271) randomly assigned patients with wet AMD (TENAYA: n = 334 faricimab; n = 337 aflibercept) (LUCERNE: n = 331 faricimab; n = 327 aflibercept) to determine noninferiority. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline. BCVA with faricimab was noninferior to aflibercept in both studies, and ocular adverse events were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept. Lancet 2022 Jan 21

The YOSEMITE and RHINE studies (353 worldwide sites) randomized adults with vision loss due to center-involving diabetic macular edema to receive intravitreal faricimab 6 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6 mg per personalized treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks up to week 100. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year. Patients were randomly assigned to faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE, n = 315; RHINE, n = 317), faricimab PTI (n = 313; n = 319), or aflibercept every 8 weeks (n = 312; n = 315). Vision gains and anatomic improvements with faricimab were achieved with adjustable dosing up to every 16 weeks. Lancet 2022 Jan 21

Tebentafusp is the first drug approved for treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adults with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). It is a first-in-class bispecific protein comprising a soluble T-cell receptor (TCR) fused to an anti-CD3 immune-effector function that specifically targets gp100, a lineage antigen expressed in melanocytes and melanoma. Immune-mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer (ImmTAC) molecules bind cells that present a peptide derived from an antigen of interest, and they recruit T-cells to lyse the target cells.

Approval of tebentafusp was based on the results of the phase 3 IMCgp100-202 clinical trial, which evaluated overall survival (OS) of tebentafusp compared to investigators choice (either pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine) in patients with previously untreated mUM. The trial randomized 378 patients in a 2:1 ratio to either tebentafusp or investigators choice. Results demonstrated OS was 73% in the tebentafusp group compared to 59% in the investigators-choice group (82% pembrolizumab; 13% ipilimumab; 6% dacarbazine) at 1 year (p<0.001). Progression-free survival was also significantly higher in the tebentafusp group than in the control group (31% vs. 19% at 6 months; p=0.01). N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1196-1206

Other ophthalmology approvals

Iheezo (chloroprocaine ophthalmic) New topical ophthalmic gel indicated for ocular surface anesthesia

Acuvue Theravision with Ketotifen (ketotifen, drug-eluting contact lens) Daily disposable contact lenses indicated for the prevention of ocular itch caused by allergic conjunctivitis and to provide vision correction in patients aged 11 years and older who do not have red eyes, who are suitable for contact lens wear, and who do not have more than 1.00 D of astigmatism

Beovu (brolucizumab intravitreal) New indication approved for diabetic macular edema

Iyuzeh (latanoprost) Preservative-free ophthalmic solution approved for elevated intraocular pressure

Terlipressin is a synthetic vasopressin with twice the selectivity for V1 receptors compared to V2 receptors. V1 vasopressin receptors are abundantly expressed in the mesenteric arteries as compared to other vascular areas, whereas V2 receptors are expressed in the renal tubules. The primary actions of V1 and V2 are stimulation of vasoconstriction and water resorption, respectively, resulting in decreased portal blood inflow and reduced portal hypertension. It is indicated to improve kidney function in adults with hepatorenal syndrome with rapid reduction in kidney function.

Approval by the FDA in September 2022 was established by the CONFIRM trial, a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial that included patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-1) and rapidly worsening renal function. This trial accessed percentage of patients with improved renal function via verified HRS reversal, without need for renal replacement therapy for 10 days after treatment. Verified HRS reversal was observed in 32% of those treated with terlipressin compared to 17% of those in the placebo group (p = 0.0006). Deaths due to respiratory disorders were higher in the terlipressin group compared to the placebo group after 90 days (11% vs 2%). Use of terlipressin is not recommended in patients with hypoxia (SpO2 <90%), and oxygenation levels should be monitored during treatment. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):818-828

Microbiota rectal is a live biotherapeutic delivered rectally to provide a broad consortium of diverse microbes to the gut to reduce recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) after antibiotic treatment.

Approval was based on the PUNCH CD3 phase 3 clinical trial. Adults who had at least 1 CDI recurrence with a positive stool assay for C difficile and who were previously treated with standard-of-care antibiotics were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive a subsequent blinded, single-dose enema of microbiota or placebo. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as the absence of CDI diarrhea within 8 weeks of study treatment. In 267 patients who received blinded treatment (n = 180, microbiota; n = 87, placebo), successful treatment was 70.6% versus 57.5% with microbiota and placebo, respectively. More than 90% of the participants who achieved treatment success at 8 weeks had sustained response through 6 months in both the microbiota and the placebo groups. Drugs. 2022 Oct;82(15):1527-1538

Vonoprazan is a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) for treatment of H pylori in combination with clarithromycin and/or amoxicillin. It suppresses basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell through inhibition of the H+, K+-ATPase enzyme system in a potassium-competitive manner. The combinations are supplied as prepackaged 15-day dosage regimens.

Approval of vonoprazan double (DT) and triple (TT) therapies was based on the phase 3 PHALCON-HP trial. Each proved noninferior to lansoprazole triple therapy in patients with H pylori not resistant to ampicillin or clarithromycin: vonoprazan TT (84.7%; p<0.0001) and vonoprazan DT (78.5%; p=0.0037) vs lansoprazole TT (78.8%). Am J Gastroenterol 2021 Oct;116(S634)

Other gastroenterology approvals

Rinvoq (upadacitinib) New indication for moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults who had inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or more TNF blockers

Dupixent (dupilumab) New indication approved for adults and adolescents for eosinophilic esophagitis

Skyrizi (risankizumab) New indication approved for adults with Crohn disease

Lenacapavir is a first-in-class, twice-yearly capsid inhibitor indicated for treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant infection. Lenacapavir directly binds to the interface between capsid protein (p24) subunits in hexamers, thereby interfering with multiple essential steps of the viral lifecycle, including capsid-mediated nuclear uptake of HIV-1 proviral DNA, virus assembly and release, and capsid core formation.

Approval was supported by data from the phase 2/3 CAPELLA trial, which evaluated lenacapavir in combination with an optimized background regimen in people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. At week 26, a viral load of less than 50 copies/mL was reported in 81% of the patients in cohort 1 (blinded lenacapavir) and in 83% in cohort 2 (open-labeled lenacapavir. N Engl J Med. 2022 May 12;386;(19):1793-1803

Other infectious disease approvals

Jynneos (smallpox and monkeypox vaccine) is approved by the FDA as a 2-dose subcutaneous injection for prevention of smallpox and monkeypox disease in adults aged 18 years and older who are at high risk for smallpox or monkeypox infection. Because of limited global supply of the vaccine during the 2022 outbreak, emergency use authorization (EUA) was granted for adults to receive a lower 2-dose intradermal dosage. Additionally, the EUA allows children at risk to receive a 2-dose subcutaneous regimen.

Xofluza (baloxavir marboxil) Indication expanded for acute uncomplicated influenza in otherwise healthy patients to include children as young as 5 years

View post:
FDA Approvals, Highlights, and Summaries: Internal Medicine - Medscape Reference

5 Takeaways From House GOP’s First Hearing on COVID-19 – Heritage.org

Long-awaited congressional investigations into COVID-19 are underway, with results so far that are wide ranging and informative.

Among those testifying during the initial inquiry under the Houses new Republican leadership were Dr. Lawrence Tabak, acting director of the National Institutes of Health; Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Dr. Robert Califf, administrator of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Here are five particularly noteworthy revelations, based on the transcript of sworn testimony in the hearing held Feb. 8 by two House subcommittees.

1. COVID-19 Vaccines Dont Prevent Transmission of Virus

Walensky, director of the CDC, confirmed that the vaccines largely were ineffective in preventing viral transmission from person to person.

Rep. Larry Bucshon, R-Ind., a physician, drilled down onthe rationalefor the Biden administrations vaccine mandates, including the mandate for foreign travelers. In his exchange with Walensky, Bucshon observed that we have just now discussed the fact that we know that [vaccination] doesnt prevent transmission.

It will prevent the individual from getting really sick, Bucshon said of vaccination against COVID-19, but it doesnt prevent the risk of someone coming into the country and spreading it to other people.

So, it does prevent severe disease and death. It doesnt prevent transmission as well as it did for prior variants [of COVID-19], but it does still prevent some, Walensky responded.

For the record: The Houserecently repealedthe Biden administrations vaccine mandate for foreign travelers as well as its mandate for members of the military.

2. CDC Stands by Masking Students at School

Walensky continued to recommend the masking of schoolchildren.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., noted a dearth of reliable studies in the professional literature that demonstrate the efficacy of face masks against COVID-19. Rodgers cited Cochrane Reviews recent comprehensive examination of professional studies on the use of face masks and other nonpharmaceutical interventions to control the spread of disease.

Concerning medical or surgical masks and COVID-19, the authors of the Cochrane Review studyconcluded:

Compared with wearing no mask in the community studies only, wearing a mask may make little or no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness/Covid-like illness (9 studies; 276,917 people); and probably makes little or no difference in how many people have flu/Covid confirmed by a laboratory test (6 studies; 13,919 people).

Conceding that this was an important study, Walensky went on to say: But the Cochrane Review only includes randomized clinical trials. And as you can imagine, many of the randomized clinical trials that were included in that were for other respiratory viruses, not COVID-19. Some of them were for COVID, just to be clear.

But it is very different for COVID-19, she said, because you have a virus that is different from the flu, potentially different from SARS or MERS, [and it] transmits before you actually have symptoms.

For the record: A randomized, controlled study, such as those included in the Cochrane Review, is the gold standard for scientific research.

While questioning Walensky, Rodgers noted that the school masking policy exacted a serious emotional, mental, and physical toll on schoolchildren. The Washington Republican observed that the CDC is currently the only national or international public health agency that recommends masking 2-year-old children.

Rodgers asked for a timeline for updating CDC guidance during the pandemic.

Walensky replied: You know, our masking guidance doesnt really change with time. What it changes with is disease. So, when there is a lot of disease in a community, we recommend that those communities and those schools mask. When there is less disease in the community, we recommend that those masks come off.

For the record: During this exchange, Walensky didnt present or refer to any scientific study that supports the efficacy of masking schoolchildren.

3. Did America Fund Disputed Coronavirus Research in Wuhan?

Whether the U.S. funded gain of function research at Chinas Wuhan Institute of Virology remains a mystery.

Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., noted that Section 2315 of Congress omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2023 bans government funding of certain types of research involving pathogens of pandemic potential. The purpose is to outlaw federal funding for gain of function research that strengthens viruses, particularly in China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran.

Tabak, acting director of the National Institutes of Health, noted in his testimony that in gain-of-function research, scientists engineer a virus and try to make it more transmissible and more pathogenic.

Tabak told lawmakers that NIH isnt conducting that type of research and hasnt funded it in the past, except for research into influenza in the Netherlands many years ago.

But in a series of follow-up questions, Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Ariz., reopened the issue of gain-of-function research into coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab in China andthe roleof EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that got substantial funding from NIH.

Lesko noted that NIH was unable to secure EcoHealths records of mice experiments at the Wuhan lab to determine the potential of infection for humans. Tabak responded that NIH terminated EcoHealths funding because the nonprofit had failed to provide adequate documentation of the experiments.

They are no longer funded by NIH to do anything, Tabak said of EcoHealth Alliance.

Lesko pressed the key point: Yes, I guess what I am saying is that if youif wecouldnt get the reports accurately, how can you definitively say that there was no [U.S.] funding of this?

Lesko pointed to EcoHealth Alliances continued failure to submit the proper reports for over two years and NIHs failure to conduct proper oversight over EcoHealths work in Wuhan.

Tabak responded that the administrative problems were genuine and were being corrected, but he emphasized that the viruses under study in EcoHealths subproject were genetically distinct from SARS-CoV-2, the scientific name for the novel coronavirus that caused COVID-19.

4. Inadequate Testing for Natural Immunity

Rep. Neal Patrick Dunn, R-Fla., also a physician, emphasized that diagnostic testing was another key failure in the federal governments response to COVID-19.

T cells, or T lymphocytes, developed from stem cells in the bone marrow, fight pathogens, and are a critical component of the human immune system.

We have known for over 10 years that the principal source of immunitythe principal mediator of immunity to coronavirusesare in T cells, not B cells, Dunn said, adding:

However, to this day, we lack coverage for any cellular immunity testing in this countrythat is, the T-cell testing that you see. NIH and CDC have ignored this kind of testing, despite the fact that we know this. This is the way the coronaviruses are principallyto the degree that we have long-lasting immunity from any coronavirus, it is mediated in T cells. Still, no coverage.

Tabak acknowledged Dunns point and responded that NIH is looking into T-cell testing.

5. Failure to Take Full Advantage of Therapeutics

Dunn also cited the initial shortage of therapeutics recommended by federal officials for early outpatient treatment of COVID-19.

I mean, we had guidance nationally [from CDC] that basically said, If you test positive, go home, quarantine, wait until your lips turn blue, and then go to the hospital and maybe we can save you. That was it, the Florida Republican said.

Dunn noted that broad spectrum antivirals to combat COVID-19 were in wide use in other countries. In Japan, he said, patients had access to favipiravir, an antiviral drug that had undergone 96 clinical trials.

Califf, the FDA administrator, responded that he would look into the quality of the trials for favipiravir and follow up.

Dunn reminded Califf: Japanese trials are pretty high-quality medicine.

Next Up: The Wuhan Lab Leak

Given the Department of Energys recent conclusion that the deadly pandemiclikely originatedin a leak from the research lab in Wuhan, congressional investigators will dig deeper. How cooperative government witnesses will be is an open question.

Beyond the origins of COVID-19, abroad rangeof related issues merits Congress attention, including theattempted suppressionof legitimate scientific dissent.

At the outset of this first House hearing, Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., noted that between March 18, 2021, and Nov. 30, 2022, he and his colleagues sent 14 letters to NIH requesting information, and most have gone completely unanswered.

The most recent letter requested that NIH not destroy any evidence related to the pandemic.

A commonand bipartisantheme of the hearing was the need to restore public trust in public health. Given the experience of the past three years, only an aggressivecongressional oversight agendacan begin to rebuild that trust.

Its a monumental task.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

See the rest here:
5 Takeaways From House GOP's First Hearing on COVID-19 - Heritage.org

Tech Inventions That Changed The Health Industry Forever – SlashGear

Medical imaging is not, of course, a single technology, but an umbrella term for a bunch of different methods of getting a handle on what's going on within our bodies. One example might be a combination of these methods, like the Explorer total-body scanner, which performs both PET and CT scans. Without these advancements, we'd be devoting a lot more resources to palliative care. The tech in question includes x-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds, and each has changed the diagnostic landscape in its own way.

But x-rays themselves aren't just a diagnostic tool. They are used to guide surgeons, monitor the progress of therapies, and inform treatment strategies for the use of medical devices, cancer treatments, and blockages of various sorts. In 1896, the then-hyphenated New-York Times mocked Wilhelm Conrad Rntgen's medical application of X-ray imaging as an "alleged discovery of how to photograph the invisible." Five years later, Rntgen won the Nobel Prize in Physics. A century later, X-rays have replaced invasive surgeries and guesswork as a core diagnostic tool for doctors at every level.

Less a new imaging technology than a brilliant implementation of existing methods, computed tomography (CT) uses cross-sectional X-ray images acquired from various angles and computer algorithms to rapidly create a navigable, three-dimensional image of small or large parts of the body. Because it's based on X-rays, CT scans are better at imaging bones than soft tissues. CT scans provide many of the same benefits as other medical imaging methods, enhanced for many purposes by their speed and superior imaging of bones.

Go here to see the original:
Tech Inventions That Changed The Health Industry Forever - SlashGear

Citius Pharmaceuticals Announces Efficacy and Safety Data for its I/ONTAK (E7777) Phase 3 Study for Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma to be…

Citius Pharmaceuticals Announces Efficacy and Safety Data for its I/ONTAK (E7777) Phase 3 Study for Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma to be Presented at the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting  PR Newswire

Originally posted here:
Citius Pharmaceuticals Announces Efficacy and Safety Data for its I/ONTAK (E7777) Phase 3 Study for Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma to be...

Stem Cell Transplantation Program – DanaFarber Cancer Institute

Stem cell/bone marrow transplant offers some patients with blood cancers and blood disorders the possibility of a cure, and others a longer period of disease-free survival. Founded in 1972, our Adult Stem Cell Transplant Program is one of the largest and most experienced in the world.

Our stem cell/bone marrow transplant program performs approximately 500 transplants each year and has performed more than 11,180 transplants in the programs history. This includes more than 5,500 allogeneic transplants and more than 5,100 autologous transplants. This experience makes a difference for our patients.

Our patients' outcomes regularly exceed expected outcomes as established by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, which reports and analyzes outcomes for recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In the most recent report (2020), only 10% of centers achieved this outcome level. Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center was the largest center to achieve this outcome.

Stem cell/bone marrow transplant can be an effective treatment for a variety of hematologic malignancies, bone marrow failure syndromes, and rare and congenital blood disorders. We are experienced in stem cell transplant for a variety of hematologic malignancies, bone marrow failure syndromes, and rare and congenital blood disorders. This includes:

We perform both autologous and allogeneic stem cell/bone marrow transplants.

For allogeneic patients (i.e., those requiring donor stem cells), we offer:

Reduced-intensity transplants use lower doses of chemotherapy and have been a major factor in extending stem cell/bone marrow transplants for older adults up into their 70s. Our program has transplanted more than 5,000 patients over 55 years old. Our Older Adult Hematologic Malignancies Program provides dedicated support for older patients.

From exceptional medical care to support with housing and other logistics, we offer many services to international patients:

Learn more about international referrals and services.

Read more here:
Stem Cell Transplantation Program - DanaFarber Cancer Institute

What is a Bone Marrow Transplant (Stem Cell Transplant)? – Cancer.Net

A bone marrow transplant is a medical treatment that replaces your bone marrow with healthy cells. The replacement cells can either come from your own body or from a donor.

A bone marrow transplant is also called a stem cell transplant or, more specifically, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Transplantation can be used to treat certain types of cancer, such as leukemia, myeloma, and lymphoma, and other blood and immune system diseases that affect the bone marrow.

Stem cells are special cells that can make copies of themselves and change into the many different kinds of cells that your body needs. There are several kinds of stem cells and they are found in different parts of the body at different times.

Cancer and cancer treatment can damage your hematopoietic stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are stem cells that turn into blood cells.

Bone marrow is soft, spongy tissue in the body that contains hematopoietic stem cells. It is found in the center of most bones. Hematopoietic stem cells are also found in the blood that is moving throughout your body.

When hematopoietic stem cells are damaged, they may not become red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. These blood cells are very important and each one has a different job:

Red blood cells carry oxygen throughout your body. They also take carbon dioxide to your lungs so that it can be exhaled.

White blood cells are a part of your immune system. They fight pathogens, which are the viruses and bacteria that can make you sick.

Platelets form clots to stop bleeding.

A bone marrow/stem cell transplant is a medical procedure by which healthy stem cells are transplanted into your bone marrow or your blood. This restores your body's ability to create the red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets it needs.

There are different types of bone marrow/stem cell transplants. The 2 main types are:

Autologous transplant. Stem cells for an autologous transplant come from your own body. Sometimes, cancer is treated with a high-dose, intensive chemotherapy or radiation therapy treatment. This type of treatment can damage your stem cells and your immune system. That's why doctors remove, or rescue, your stem cells from your blood or bone marrow before the cancer treatment begins.

After chemotherapy, the stem cells are returned to your body, restoring your immune system and your body's ability to produce blood cells and fight infection. This process is also called an AUTO transplant or stem cell rescue.

Allogenic transplant. Stem cells for an allogenic transplant come from another person, called a donor. The donor's stem cells are given to the patient after the patient has chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. This is also called an ALLO transplant.

Many people have a graft-versus-cancer cell effect during an ALLO transplant. This is when the new stem cells recognize and destroy cancer cells that are still in the body. This is the main way ALLO transplants work to treat the cancer.

Finding a donor match is a necessary step for an ALLO transplant. A match is a healthy donor whose blood proteins, called human leukocyte antigens (HLA), closely match yours. This process is called HLA typing. Siblings from the same parents are often the best match, but another family member or an unrelated volunteer can be a match too. If your donors proteins closely match yours, you are less likely to get a serious side effect called graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In this condition, the healthy transplant cells attack your cells.

If your health care team cannot find a donor match, there are other options.

Umbilical cord blood transplant. In this type of transplant, stem cells from umbilical cord blood are used. The umbilical cord connects a fetus to its mother before birth. After birth, the baby does not need it. Cancer centers around the world use cord blood. Learn more about cord blood transplants.

Parent-child transplant and haplotype mismatched transplant. Cells from a parent, child, brother, or sister are not always a perfect match for a patient's HLA type, but they are a 50% match. Doctors are using these types of transplants more often, to expand the use of transplantation as an effective cancer treatment.

The information below tells you the main steps of AUTO and ALLO transplants. In general, each process includes collecting the replacement stem cells, the patient receiving treatments to prepare their body for the transplant, the actual transplant day, and then the recovery period.

Often, a small tube may be placed in the patient's chest that remains through the transplant process. It is called a catheter. Your health care team can give you chemotherapy, other medications, and blood transfusions through a catheter. A catheter greatly reduces the amount of needles used in the skin, since patients will need regular blood tests and other treatments during a transplant.

Please note that transplants are complex medical procedures and sometimes certain steps may happen in a different order or on a different timetable, to personalize your specific care. Ask your health care whether you will need to be in the hospital for different steps, and if so, how long. Always talk with your health care team about what to expect before, during, and after your transplant.

Step 1: Collecting your stem cells. This step takes several days. First, you will get injections (shots) of a medication to increase your stem cells. Then your health care team collects the stem cells through a vein in your arm or your chest. The cells will be stored until they are needed.

Step 2: Pre-transplant treatment. This step takes 5 to 10 days. You will get a high dose of chemotherapy. Occasionally, patients also have radiation therapy.

Step 3: Getting your stem cells back. This step is your transplant day. It takes about 30 minutes for each dose of stem cells. This is called an infusion. Your health care team puts the stem cells back into your bloodstream through the catheter. You might have more than one infusion.

Step 4: Recovery. Your doctor will closely monitor your cells' recovery and growth and you will take antibiotics to reduce infection. Your health care team will also treat any side effects. Read more details below about recovering from a bone marrow transplant.

Step 1: Donor identification. A matched donor must be found before the ALLO transplant process can begin. Your HLA type will be found through blood testing. Then, your health care team will work with you to do HLA testing on potential donors in your family, and if needed, to search a volunteer registry of unrelated donors.

Step 2: Collecting stem cells from your donor. Your health care team will collect cells from either your donors blood or bone marrow. If the cells are coming from the bloodstream, your donor will get daily injections (shots) of a medication to increase white cells in their blood for a few days before the collection. Then, the stem cells are collected from their bloodstream. If the cells are coming from bone marrow, your donor has a procedure called a bone marrow harvest in a hospital's operating room.

Step 3: Pre-transplant treatment. This step takes 5 to 7 days. You will get chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy, to prepare your body to receive the donor's cells.

Step 4: Getting the donor cells. This step is your transplant day. Your health care team puts, or infuses, the donors stem cells into your bloodstream through the catheter. Getting the donor cells usually takes less than an hour.

Step 5: Recovery. During your initial recovery, you will get antibiotics to reduce your risk of infection and other drugs, including medications to prevent and/or manage GVHD. Your health care team will also treat any side effects from the transplant. Read more details below about bone marrow transplant recovery.

Recovery from a bone marrow/stem cell transplant takes a long time. Recovery often has stages, starting with intensive medical monitoring after your transplant day. As your long-term recovery moves forward, you will eventually transition to a schedule of regular medical checkups over the coming months and years.

During the initial recovery period, it's important to watch for signs of infection. The intensive chemotherapy treatments that you get before your transplant also damage your immune system. This is so your body can accept the transplant without attacking the stem cells. It takes time for your immune system to work again after the transplant. This means that you are more likely to get an infection right after your transplant.

To reduce your risk of infection, you will get antibiotics and other medications. If you had an ALLO transplant, your medications will include drugs to prevent and/or manage GVHD. Follow your health care team's recommendations for how to prevent infection immediately after your transplant.

It is common to develop an infection after a bone marrow transplant, even if you are very careful. Your doctor will monitor you closely for signs of an infection. You will have regular blood tests and other tests to see how your body and immune system are responding to the donor cells. You may also get blood transfusions through your catheter.

Your health care team will also develop a long-term recovery plan to monitor for late side effects, which can happen many months after your transplant. Learn more about the possible side effects from a bone marrow transplant.

Your doctor will recommend the best transplant option for you. Your options depend on the specific disease diagnosed, how healthy your bone marrow is, your age, and your general health. For example, if you have cancer or another disease in your bone marrow, you will probably have an ALLO transplant because the replacement stem cells need to come from a healthy donor.

Before your transplant, you might need to travel to a center that does many stem cell transplants. Your doctor may need to go, too. At the center, you will talk with a transplant specialist and have a medical examination and different tests.

A transplant will require a lot of time receiving medical care away from your daily life. It is best to have a family caregiver with you. And, a transplant is an expensive medical process. Talk about these questions with your health care team and your loved ones:

Can you describe the role of my family caregiver in taking care of me?

How long will I and my caregiver be away from work and family responsibilities?

Will I need to stay in the hospital? If so, when and how long?

Will my insurance pay for this transplant? What is my coverage for my follow-up care?

How long will I need medical tests during my recovery?

A successful transplant may mean different things to you, your family, and your health care team. Here are 2 ways to know if your transplant worked well.

Your blood counts are back to safe levels. A blood count measures the levels of red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets in your blood. At first, the transplant makes these numbers very low for 1 to 2 weeks. This affects your immune system and puts you at a risk for infections, bleeding, and tiredness. Your health care team will lower these risks by giving your blood and platelet transfusions. You will also take antibiotics to help prevent infections.

When the new stem cells multiply, they make more blood cells. Then your blood counts will go back up. This is one way to know if a transplant was a success.

Your cancer is controlled. Curing your cancer is often the goal of a bone marrow/stem cell transplant. A cure may be possible for certain cancers, such as some types of leukemia and lymphoma. For other diseases, remission of the cancer is the best possible result. Remission is having no signs or symptoms of cancer.

As discussed above, you need to see your doctor and have tests regularly after a transplant. This is to watch for any signs of cancer or complications from the transplant, as well as to provide care for any side effects you experience. This follow-up care is an important part of your recovery.

It is important to talk often with your health care team before, during, and after a transplant. You are encouraged to gather information, ask questions, and work closely with your health care team on decisions about your treatment and care. In addition to the list above, here are some possible questions to ask. Be sure to ask any question that is on your mind.

What type of transplant would you recommend? Why?

If I have an ALLO transplant, how will we find a donor? What is the chance of finding a good match?

What type of treatment will I have before the transplant?

How long will my pre-transplant treatment take? Where will this treatment be given?

Can you describe what my transplant day will be like?

How will a transplant affect my life? Can I work, exercise, and do regular activities?

What side effects could happen during treatment, or just after?

What side effects could happen years later?

What tests will I need after the transplant? How often?

Who can I talk to if I am worried about the cost?

How will we know if the transplant worked?

What if the transplant does not work? What if the cancer comes back?

Side Effects of a Bone Marrow Transplant (Stem Cell Transplant)

Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy

Donating Bone Marrow is Easy and Important: Here's Why

Bone Marrow Transplants and Older Adults: 3 Important Questions

Why the Bone Marrow Registry Needs More Diverse Donors and How to Sign Up

Be the Match: About Transplant

Be the Match: National Marrow Donor Program

Blood & Marrow Transplant Information Network (BMT InfoNet)

National Bone Marrow Transplant Link (nbmtLINK)

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Learn About Transplant as a Treatment Option

Read more from the original source:
What is a Bone Marrow Transplant (Stem Cell Transplant)? - Cancer.Net

Implanting a Patient’s Own Reprogrammed Stem Cells Shows Early Positive Results for Treating Dry AMD – Everyday Health

Specially treated stem cells derived from a single individual have been successfully implanted into that same individuals eyes in a first-of-its-kind clinical trial testing ways to treat advanced dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The therapy, currently in its first phase of testing to ensure that its safe for humans, involves harvesting and processing a persons blood cells and using them to replace the persons retinal cells that had succumbed to AMD, a leading cause of vision loss globally.

The procedure was performed by researchers from the National Eye Institute (NEI), a branch of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, and from the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. The NIH researchers have been working on the new treatment for a decade.

The scientists, who previously demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the therapy in rats and pigs, took blood cells from the patient and, in the laboratory, converted them into patient-derived induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. These immature, undifferentiated cells have no assigned function in the body, which means they can assume many forms. The researchers programmed these particular iPS cells to become retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, the type that die in AMD and lead to late-stage dry AMD.

In healthy eyes, RPE cells supply oxygen to photoreceptors, the light-sensing cells in the retina at the back of the eyeball. The death of RPE cells virtually dooms the photoreceptors, resulting in vision loss. The idea behind the new therapy is to replace dying RPE cells with patient-derived induced iPS ones, strengthening the health of the remaining photoreceptors.

Before being transplanted, the iPS-derived cells were grown in sheets one cell thick on a biodegradable scaffold designed to promote their integration into the retina. The researchers positioned the resulting patch between atrophied host RPE cells and the photoreceptors using a specially created surgical tool.

The patient received the transplanted cells during the summer and will be followed for a year as researchers monitor overall eye health, including retina stability, and whether any inflammation or bleeding develop, says Kapil Bharti, PhD, a senior investigator at the NEI and for the clinical trial.

Safety data are critical for any new drug, says Gareth Lema, MD, PhD, a vitreoretinal surgeon at New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, a division of the Mount Sinai Health System. Stem cells have added complexity in that they are living tissue, Dr. Lema says. Precise differentiation is necessary for them to fulfill their intended therapeutic effect and not cause harm."

This therapy also requires a surgical procedure to implant the cells, Lema says, adding that its an exquisitely elegant surgery, but introduces further risk of harm. For those reasons, he says, Patients must know that ocular stem cell therapies should only be attempted within the regulated environment of a nationally registered clinical trial.

The rules of a clinical trial dont generally allow specifics to be discussed this early in the process, says Dr. Bharti. Announcing that we were able to successfully transplant the cells now hopefully allows us to recruit more patients, since we can take up to 12 in this phase, he says. We also hope that it will give some optimism to patients with dry AMD and to researchers studying it.

It took seven months to develop the implanted cells, says Bharti, and although the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the clinical trial in 2019, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic delayed the start by two years, he says.

Macular degeneration comprises several stages of disease within the macula, the critical portion of the retina responsible for straight-ahead vision. Aging causes retinal cells to deteriorate, generating debris, or drusen, within the macula, setting the stage for early (aka dry) AMD. Geographic atrophy represents a more advanced stage. If the disease progresses to the relatively rare wet AMD, so named for the leaking of blood into the macula, central vision can be snuffed out.

Risk of AMD increases with age, particularly among people who are white, have a history of smoking, or have a family history of the disease.

Treatment to slow wet AMDs progression includes eye injections with anti-VEGF (or VEGF-A for vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists), a medication that halts the growth of unstable, leaky blood vessels in the eye. Some people may undergo photodynamic therapy, which combines injections and laser treatments.

Currently, there is no cure for dry AMD; it cant be reversed. Nor are there treatments to reliably stop its onset or progression for everyone at every stage of the disease. (Research has confirmed that a specialized blend of vitamins and minerals, available over the counter as AREDS, or Age-Related Eye Disease Studies supplements, reduces the risk of AMDs progression from intermediate to advanced stages.)

There are other, ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of dry AMD. Regenerative Patch Technologies, in Menlo Park, California, for example, is a little further along in testing a different stem cell treatment. Patients have been followed for three years, and 27 percent have shown vision improvement, says Jane Lebkowski, PhD, the companys president. There are a number of AMD clinical trials ongoing in the U.S., and patients should ask their ophthalmologists about trials that might be appropriate.

ClinicalTrials.gov, the NIHs clinical trials database, lists close to 300 AMD clinical trials at various stages in the United States.

Ferhina Ali, MD, MPH, a retinal specialist at the Westchester Medical Center in Valhalla, New York, who isnt involved in the trial, describes the newest stem cell therapy as elegant and pioneering. These are early stages but there is tremendous potential as a first-in-kind surgically implanted stem cell therapy and as a way to achieve vision gains in dry macular degeneration, Dr. Ali says.

Bharti says that in laboratory animals the implanted cells behaved as retinal cells should maintaining the retinas integrity. Over the next few years, he and his colleagues will determine whether they function effectively in humans.

Does that mean, however, that the same AMD disease process that destroyed the original retinal cells could destroy the transplanted ones? It takes 40 to 60 years to damage human cells, Bharti says, and if we get that long with the transplanted cells, well take it.

See original here:
Implanting a Patient's Own Reprogrammed Stem Cells Shows Early Positive Results for Treating Dry AMD - Everyday Health