Category Archives: Stem Cell Medicine


Cell Therapy for Cartilage Regeneration Gets a Boost With Hyaluronic Acid Enriched Chondrocytes in a 3D Tissue Engineering Platform – Business Wire

TOKYO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regenerative therapy to treat knee joint damages gets a boost with a breakthrough technology of growing ideal type of cartilage cells including chondroprogenitors and mesenchymal stem cells enriched with hyaluronic acid (HA), reported by Dr Shojiro Katoh, President, Edogawa Hospital in The KNEE journal (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.02.019). Edogawa Evolutionary Laboratory of Science (EELS) researchers accomplished this feat using a 3D tissue engineering scaffold, without externally added HA or growth factors. They hope this technology will improvise the clinical outcome of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) and Matrix Assisted Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) treatments.

Regenerative medicine applications for articular cartilage repair require growing chondrocytes taken from patients own joint, in the lab, followed by transplantation to the disease affected portion, enable them restore, replace, rejuvenate or regenerate the cartilage in ACI or MACI procedures, practiced by orthopedicians and arthroscopy surgeons worldwide. The lab environment makes the chondrocytes, many a time, grow as fibrocartilage, whereas, hyaline cartilage is the ideal type of tissue required, which contributes to weight bearing function of the joint. Having proven hyaline cartilage growth in vitro (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2020.03.006) and their in vivo efficacy (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2017.01.003), EELS team has now proven that stem cell like progenitors and mesenchymal stem cells residing in the human cartilage could be grown without artificial reprogramming or animal proteins or feeder layers (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.01.005).

Hyaluranon (HA) in the matrix is essential for homeostasis of cartilage, which is injected to treat cartilage damages in clinics and in the lab, added from external sources to support chondrocyte culture. On the contrary, Dr Katoh`s team used a polymer scaffold that retains chondrocyte secreted HA to enhance their growth as a tissue, yielding higher HA content. This is another milestone in regenerative medicine, as it produces chondrocytes that are most suitable for clinical transplant with potentials for better healing and value addition to existing ACI and MACI procedures, after relevant clinical validation.

Further studies on miRNA-140, another essential cartilage component and the technologys anti-aging capabilities are underway to address debilitating joint diseases affecting millions worldwide in this method termed EELS-TALC, (Enriched with Essentials and Lapped in Scaffold, Transplant-suitable Autologous Leveraged Chondrocytes) in collaboration among EELS, JBM Inc and GN Corporation.

Read more:
Cell Therapy for Cartilage Regeneration Gets a Boost With Hyaluronic Acid Enriched Chondrocytes in a 3D Tissue Engineering Platform - Business Wire

Scar-Forming Cells Switch to Producing New Neurons that Promote Functional Recovery in Mice after Spinal Cord Injury – Genetic Engineering &…

Researchers at UT Southwestern (UTSW) and Indiana University have used genetic engineering techniques to trigger the production of functional nerve cells from scar-forming cells in mouse spinal cords, in response to spinal cord injury (SCI). The studies showed that neurogenic reprogramming of the spinal NG2 glial cells led to functional improvements in the animals after SCI, with the newly formed neurons rebuilding neuronal circuits.

The team hopes the achievement could point to new therapeutic approaches that could one day help the hundreds of thousands of people worldwide who suffer a spinal cord injury each year. The researchers, led by Chun-Li Zhang, PhD, professor of molecular biology and a W.W. Caruth, Jr. scholar in biomedical research at UTSW, reported their results in a paper in Cell Stem Cell, in which they concluded: Our results reveal a cellular and molecular mechanism underlying neural injury-induced cell plasticity that can be exploited for adult neurogenesis and relay formation in a region that has largely lost the ability to regenerate. Their report is titled, In vivo reprogramming of NG2 glia enables adult neurogenesis and functional recovery following spinal cord injury.

Cells in some body tissues proliferate after injury, replacing dead or damaged cells as part of healing. The brain itself does have limited capacity to produce new nerve cells, and this is possible thanks to progenitor cells that turn on distinct regenerative pathways. Adult neurogenesis in the brain plays critical roles in maintaining homeostasis and responding to neurological conditions, including injuries, Zhang and colleagues explained.

Chun-Li Zhang, PhD [UT Southwestern Medical Center]However, the spinal cord typically does not generate new neurons after injury, and this is a key barrier to recovery from SCI. Because the spinal cord acts as a signal relay between the brain and the rest of the body, Zhang added, this inability of the spinal cord to self repair permanently halts communication between these two areas, leading to paralysis, loss of sensation, and sometimes life-threatening consequences, such as an inability to control breathing or heart rate.

Using the knowledge of limited brain neurogenesis as inspiration, the researchers looked for cells that might have similar potential for regeneration in the spinal cord. Working with a mouse model of spinal cord injury, they looked in the animals injured spinal cords for a marker, DCX, that is normally found in immature neurons. DCX is normally expressed in neuroblasts and immature neurons and can serve as a reliable marker for adult neurogenesis, the team wrote. It is highly expressed in the developing spinal cord but completely turned off in the adult. Interestingly, they identified this marker in the spinal cord specifically after injury, and also tracked the marker to the non-neuronal NG2 glia cells, which produced it in response to SCI.

NG2 glia serve as progenitors for oligodendrocytes, cells that produce the insulating myelin layer that surrounds neurons. NG2 glia are also recognized as forming glial scars following injury. In response to injury, NG2 glia increase their numbers and become a major component of the glial scar, the scientists noted.

But the work by Zhangs team also showed that when the spinal cord in mice was injured, these glial cells transiently adopted molecular and morphological markers of immature neurons. To determine what caused the NG2 glia to change, the researchers focused on SOX2, a stem cell protein induced by injury. To understand how SCI induces cell reprogramming, we focused on SOX2, a stem cell factor essential for neurogenesis and neural development, the authors explained. our immunohistochemistry showed a 3.6-fold increase in the number of SOX2+ cells and the intensity of SOX2 expression in each cell surrounding the lesion site of the adult mouse spinal cord Most intriguingly, nearly all (94%) of the SCI-induced DCX+ cells co-expressed SOX2.

When the scientists then genetically manipulated NG2 cells to inactivate the gene that makes the SOX2 protein, they saw far fewer immature neurons in the days following SCI, suggesting that SOX2 plays a key role in helping NG2 glia make these new immature neurons. However, they also found that even with normal levels of SOX2, these immature neurons never matured into replacements for those affected by the injury. SCI only induces a transient phenotypic switch of NG2 glia to DCX+ cells, which eventually fail to become mature neurons, they wrote.

Zhang and his colleagues then used a different genetic manipulation technique to make NG2 glia overproduce SOX2. They found that in the weeks after spinal cord injury, mice with SOX2-overproducing NG2 glia generated tens of thousands of new mature neurons. Further investigation showed that these neurons integrated into the injured area, making the new connections with existing neurons that are necessary to relay signals between the brain and body.Even more promising, suggested Zhang, is that this genetic engineering led to functional improvements after spinal cord injury.

Encouragingly, animals engineered to overproduce SOX2 in their NG2 glia performed markedly better on motor skills weeks after spinal cord injury, when compared with animals that produced normal amounts of SOX2. The reasons for this improved performance seemed to be multifold. Not only had the animals generated neurons that appeared to take over for those damaged during injury, but they also had far less scar tissue at the injury site that could hinder recovery, Zhang explained. reprogramming of NG2 glia leads to generation of new neurons and reduction of glial scars, both of which may contribute to functional improvements after SCI, the team noted.

New spinal neurons converted from glia. [UT Southwestern Medical Center]They hope the results could lead to new strategies for identifying and developing safe and effective ways to overproduce SOX2 in human spinal cord injury patients, as an approach to helping repair injuries with new neurons, while reducing scar tissue formation. These results reveal a latent neurogenic potential of somatic glial cells, which can be leveraged for regenerative medicine, they concluded in their paper.

The field of spinal cord injury has extensively researched trying to heal the damage with stem cells that produce new neurons, but what were proposing here is that we may not need to transplant cells from the outside, Zhang said. By encouraging NG2 glia to make more SOX2, the body can make its own new neurons, rebuilding from within.

View post:
Scar-Forming Cells Switch to Producing New Neurons that Promote Functional Recovery in Mice after Spinal Cord Injury - Genetic Engineering &...

Moderna Hires Harvard Stem Cell Researcher Jonathan Hoggatt as Director of Hematology: What You Need to Know – Yahoo Finance

TipRanks

Its time to check in with the macro picture, to get an idea of just where markets are headed in the coming months. Thats what a JPMorgan global research team, headed up by Joyce Chang, has been doing. The JPM team starts by noting the sell-off in US Treasury bonds last week, pushing up yields as investors acted in response to inflationary fears. However, the rise in bond yields steadied on Friday, and Changs team does not believe that inflation is the great bugaboo its made out to be; her team sees a combination of economic growth and fiscal stimulus creating a virtuous circle of consumer spending fueling more growth. They write, Our global economics team is now forecasting US nominal GDP to average roughly 7% growth over this year and next as targeted measures have been successful in addressing COVID-19 and economic activity is not being jeopardized. Global growth will exceed 5%... What this means, in JPMs view, is that the coming year should be good for stocks. Interest rates are likely to remain low, in the firms estimation, while inflation should moderate as the economy returns to normal. JPMs stock analysts have been following the strategy team, and seeking out the stocks they see as winners over the next 12 months. Three of their recent picks make for an interesting lot, with Strong Buy ratings from the analyst community and over 50% upside potential. Weve used the TipRanks database to pull the details on them. Lets take a look. On24 (ONTF) The first JPM pick were looking at here is On24, the online streaming service that offers third parties access for scaled and personalized networked events. In other words, On24 makes its streaming service available for other companies to use in setting up interactive features, including webinars, virtual events, and multi-media experiences. The San Francisco-based company boasts a base of more than 1900 corporate users. On24s customers engage online with more than 4 million professionals every month, for more than 42 million hours every year. As can be imagined, On24 saw a surge of customer interest and business in the past year, as virtual offices and telecommuting situations expanded and the company has now used that as a base for going public. On24 held its IPO last month, and entered the NYSE on February 3. The opening was a success; 8.56 million shares were put on the market at $77 each, well above the $50 initial pricing. However, shares have taken a beating since, and have dropped by 36%. Nevertheless, JPMs Sterling Auty thinks the company is well-placed to capitalize on current trends. The COVID-19 pandemic, we believe, has changed the face of B2B marketing and sales forever. It has forced companies to move most of their sales lead generation into the digital world where On24 is typically viewed as the best webinar/webcast provider. the 5-star analyst wrote. Even post-pandemic we expect the marketing motion to be hybrid with digital and in-person being equally important. That should drive further adoption of On24-like solutions, and we expect On24 to capture a material share of that opportunity. In line with these upbeat comments, Auty initiated coverage of the stock with an Overweight (i.e., Buy) rating, and his $85 price target suggests it has room for 73% upside over the next 12 months. (To watch Autys track record, click here.) Sometimes, a company is just so solid and successful that Wall Streets analysts line up right behind it and that is the case here. The Strong Buy analyst consensus rating is unanimous, based on 8 Buy-side reviews published since the stock went public just over a month ago. The shares are currently trading for $49.25 and their $74 average price target implies an upside of 50% from that level. (See On24s stock analysis at TipRanks.) Plug Power, Inc. (PLUG) And moving over to the reusable energy sector, well take a look at a JPM green power pick. Plug Power designs and manufactures hydrogen power cells, a technology with a great deal of potential as a possible replacement for traditional batteries. Hydrogen power cells have potential applications in the automotive sector, as power packs for alt-fuel cars, but also in just about any application that involves the storage of energy home heating, portable electronics, and backup power systems, to name just a few. Over the past year, PLUG shares have seen a tremendous surge, rising over 800%. The stock got an additional boost after Joe Bidens presidential election win and his platform promises to encourage Green Energy. But the stock has pulled back sharply recently, as many over-extended growth names have. Poor 4Q20 results also help explain the recent selloff. Plug reported a deep loss of $1.12 per share, far worse than the 8-cent loss expected, or the 7-cent loss reported in the year-ago quarter. In fact, PLUG has never actually reported positive earnings. This company is supported by the quality of its technology and that techs potential for adoption as industry moves toward renewable energy sources but we arent there yet, despite strides in that direction. The share price retreat makes PLUG an attractive proposition, according to JPM analyst Paul Coster. In the context of the firm's many long-term growth opportunities, we believe the stock is attractively priced at present, ahead of potential positive catalysts, which include additional pedestal customer wins, partnerships and JVs that enable the company to enter new geographies and end-market applications quickly and with modest capital commitment, the analyst said. At present, PLUG is a story stock, appealing to thematic investors as well as generalists seeking exposure to Renewable Energy growth, and Hydrogen in particular. Costers optimistic comments come with an upgrade to PLUGs rating - from a Neutral (i.e., Hold) to Overweight (Buy) - and a $65 price target that indicates a possible 55% upside. (To watch Costers track record, click here.) Plug Power has plenty of support amongst Costers colleagues, too. 13 recent analyst reviews break down to 11 Buys and 1 Hold and Sell, each, all aggregating to a Strong Buy consensus rating. PLUG shares sell for $39.3 and have an average price target of $62.85, which suggests a 60% one-year upside potential. (See Plugs stock analysis at TipRanks.) Orchard Therapeutics, PLC (ORTX) The last JPM stock pick well look at is Orchard Therapeutics, a biopharma research company focused on the development of gene therapies for the treatment of rare diseases. The companys goal is to create curative treatments from the genetic modification of blood stem cells treatments which can reverse the causative factors of the target disease with a single dosing. The companys pipeline features two drug candidates that have received approval in the EU. The first, OTL-200, is a treatment for Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD), a serious metabolic disease leading to losses of sensory, motor, and cognitive functioning. Strimvelis, the second approved drug, is a gammaretroviral vector-based gene therapy, and the first such ex vivo autologous gene therapy to receive approve by the European Medicines Agency. It is a treatment for adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA-SCID), when the patient has no available related stem cell donor. In addition to these two EU-approved drugs, Orchard has ten other drug candidates in various stages of the pipeline process, from pre-clinical research to early-phase trials. Anupam Rama, another of JPMs 5-star analysts, took a deep dive into Orchard and was impressed with what he saw. In his coverage of the stock, he notes several key points: Maturing data across various indications in rare genetic diseases continues to de-risk the broader ex vivo autologous gene therapy platform from both an efficacy / safety perspective Key opportunities in MLD (including OTL-200 and other drug candidates) have sales potential each in the ~$200-400M range Importantly, the overall benefit/risk profile of Orchards approach is viewed favorably in the eyes of physicians. At current levels, we believe ORTX shares under-reflect the risk-adjusted potential of the pipeline... The high sales potential here leads Rama to rate the stock as Outperform (Buy) and to set a $15 price target, implying a robust 122% upside potential in the next 12 months. (To watch Ramas track record, click here.) Wall Street generally is in clear agreement with JPM on this one, too. ORTX shares have 6 Buy reviews, for a unanimous Strong Buy analyst consensus rating, and the $15.17 average price target suggests a 124% upside from the current $6.76 trading price. (See Orchards stock analysis at TipRanks.) Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Continue reading here:
Moderna Hires Harvard Stem Cell Researcher Jonathan Hoggatt as Director of Hematology: What You Need to Know - Yahoo Finance

Stem Cell Banking Market Report 2021 | Growth and Opportunities Analysis – BioSpace

The demand within the global stem cell banking market is growing on account of advancements in the field of regenerative medicine. The medical fraternity has become extremely focused towards the development of artificial tissues that can infuse with the human body. Furthermore, medical analysis and testing has gathered momentum across biological laboratories and research institutes. Henceforth, it is integral to develop stem cell samples and repositories that hold relevance in modern-day research. The need for regenerative medicine emerges from the growing incidence of internal tissue rupture. Certain types of tissues do not recover for several years, and may even be damaged permanently. Therefore, the need for stem cell banking is expected to grow at a significant pace.

In a custom report, TMR Research digs into the factors that have aided the growth of the global stem cell banking market. The global stem cell banking market can be segmented on the basis of bank size, application, and region. The commendable developments that have incepted across the US healthcare industry has given a thrust to the growth of the North America stem cell banking market.

Get Brochure of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=6111

Global Stem Cell Banking Market: Notable Developments

The need for improved regenerative medication and anatomy has played an integral role in driving fresh developments within the stem cell banking market.

Gallant has emerged as a notable market entity that has remained as the torchbearer of innovation within the global stem cell banking market. The company has recently launched stem cell banking for dogs, and has attracted the attention of the masses. As people become increasingly concerned about their pets, the new move by Gallant shall help the company in earning the trust of the consumers. Moreover, it can move several notches higher on the innovation index.

Cells4Life has also remained at the forefront of developments within the global stem cell banking market. After suffering backlash for its error in cord blood stem cell promotion, the company is expected to use effective public relation strategies to regain its value in the market.

Global Stem Cell Banking Market: Growth Drivers

Development of improved facilities for storage of stem cells has played an integral role in driving market demand. Furthermore, the unprecedented demand for improved analysis of regenerative medications has also created new opportunities within the global stem cell banking market. Medical research has attracted investments from global investors and stakeholders. The tremendous level of resilience shown by biological researchers to develop stem cell samples has aided market growth. Henceforth, the total volume of revenues within the global stem cell banking market is slated to multiply.

Buy this Premium Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/checkout?rep_id=6111&ltype=S

Commercialization of stem cell banks has emerged as matter of concern for the healthcare industry. However, this trend has also helped in easy storage and procurement of cells stored during the yester years of children. Presence of sound procedures to register at stem cell banks, and the safety offered by these entities, has generated fresh demand within the global market. New regional territories are opening to the idea of stem cell banking. Several factors are responsible for the growth of this trend. Primarily, improvements in stem cell banking can have favourable impact on the growth of the healthcare industry. Moreover, the opportunities for revenue generation associated with the development of functional stem cell banks has aided regional market growth.

The global stem cell banking market is segmented on the basis of:

Source

Get Table of Content of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=6111

About TMR Research

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to business entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experienced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

Contact:

Rohit Bhisey

TMR Research,

3739 Balboa St # 1097,

San Francisco, CA 94121

United States

Tel: +1-415-520-1050

Visit Site: https://www.tmrresearch.com/

View original post here:
Stem Cell Banking Market Report 2021 | Growth and Opportunities Analysis - BioSpace

Global Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing Market (2020 to 2025) – Featuring Lonza Group, Merck & Novartis Among Others – ResearchAndMarkets.com -…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing: Global Markets" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This research report presents an in-depth analysis of the global cell therapy biomanufacturing market by product type, application and region. The report discusses the key inhibitors to the growth of cell therapy biomanufacturing. The report discusses the role of participants in the supply chain from manufacturers to researchers. The report analyzes key companies operating in the global cell therapy biomanufacturing market. In-depth patent analysis in the report will provide a look at the existing and coming technological trends.

In this report, the cell therapy biomanufacturing market is segmented by product type, application and region. Based on product type, the market is segmented into source of cells (T-cells, Dendritic cells, tumor cells and stem cells), and type of therapy (autologous cell therapies, allogeneic cell therapies). The market by application is categorized into cardiovascular diseases, bone repair, neurological disorders, skeletal muscle repair, cancer and others. The market by region is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and ROW.

An increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases, rise in the demand for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, and further development of stem cell therapy approaches are driving the market's growth. However, market restraints include the bottlenecks experienced by manufacturers during commercialization of cell therapies and the high costs associated with cell therapies. The rise in the development of allogeneic cell therapy is expected to drive the market's growth. Allogeneic cell therapy involves chemo radiotherapeutic conditioning therapy that is followed by transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells as well as lymphocytes isolated from allogeneic healthy donors for treatment of various chronic diseases. (Allogeneic means from "one person to another," vs. autologous, which means from "one person back to the same person after processing.")

Companies Mentioned

Report Includes:

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Summary and Highlights

Chapter 3 Market and Technology Background

Chapter 4 Market Trends and Challenges

Chapter 5 Market Breakdown by Product Type

Chapter 6 Market Breakdown by Application

Chapter 7 Market Breakdown by Region

Chapter 8 Regulatory Structure

Chapter 9 Company Profiles

Chapter 10 Appendix: References

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/747t6w

View original post here:
Global Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing Market (2020 to 2025) - Featuring Lonza Group, Merck & Novartis Among Others - ResearchAndMarkets.com -...

Off-the-Shelf NK Immunotherapy Is Safe and Promising in B-Cell NHL With Chemotherapy and Transplant – Targeted Oncology

Early antitumor activity was seen with cord bloodderived natural killer (NK) immunotherapy in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to early results from a phase 2 trial (NCT03019640) presented in a poster during the 2021 Transplant & Cellular Therapy Meetings.

The investigators evaluated the potential of the novel cellular cord bloodderived NK immunotherapy in patients with B-cell NHL who are undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. They chose CB units for NK cell expansion on artificial antigen presenting cells and without human leukocyte antigens (HLA) matching to provide increased expansion and make the treatment off-the-shelf capable.

The study enrolled patients who were aged 15 to 70 with B-cell NHL, excluding primary central nervous system lymphoma, who were candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Patients were required to have adequate end-organ function, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and prior apheresis of 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/Kg in order to be eligible.

Those with prior whole brain irradiation, active hepatitis B, evidence of cirrhosis or high-grade liver fibrosis, active infection, HIV infection, or received radiation therapy within the past month were excluded from joining the trial.

Patients were given intravenous (IV) carmustine over 2 hours 12 days prior to transplant, IV etoposide twice daily over 3 hours and IV cytarabine twice daily over 1 hour for days 11 to 8 prior to transplant, IV melphalan over 30 minutes 7 days prior to transplant, oral lenalidomide (Revlimid) once daily for days 7 through 2 prior to transplant. Additionally, patients who are CD20-positive received IV rituximab (Rituxan) over 3 hours for days 13 through 7 prior to transplant.

Then patients received cord bloodderived expanded allogeneic NK cells intravenously over 1 hour on day 5 prior to ASCT. Five days following ASCT, patients started received daily subcutaneous filgrastim.

The primary end point was 30-day treatment-related mortality (TRM) and secondary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival, and NK cell persistence.

Study authors, led by Yago L. Nieto, MD, PhD, in the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, provided an update on data for 20 of the enrolled patients in the study. Patients were enrolled between December 2017 and July 2020. One patient experienced rapid tumor progression during culture of NK cells and thus was not treated in the study.

The median age of the 19 treated patients was 60 years (range, 33-70) with the majority (73.7%) being male and having diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 84.2%); the 3 remaining patients had mantle cell lymphoma (n = 2) or follicular lymphoma (n = 1). More than two-thirds (68.4%) of patients had relapsed disease whereas the 2 patients with MCL were being treated in the frontline setting and 4 patients had primary refractory disease. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range, 1-4).

Response assessed through PET at ASCT was a complete response for 78.9%, partial response for 15.8%, and progressive disease for 5.3%. Nine patients had 1/6 HLA match of cord blood at DR, 6 had 1/6 match at B, 3 had 1/6 match at A, and 1 had 2/6 match at B and DR.

Cord bloodderived NK cells were expanded a median of 1552-fold (range, 317-4767) with the infused NK product comprising a CD3-CD16+CD56+ phenotype for a median of 98.9% (range, 97.6%-99.5%) of the cells. The cord bloodderived NK cells had a median viability of 96.5% (range, 92%-98%). In the peripheral blood, NK cells were detectable for a mean of 2 weeks (range, 2-3).

For weeks 1 through 3, the cord bloodderived NK cells showed a higher percentage of NKG2D and NKp30 activation receptors than the patients own NK cells; the study authors noted that this indicated an effector phenotype. Additionally, NK persistence was found not to be impacted by the degree of HLA mismatch.

At a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 4-340), the RFS rate was 68% and the OS rate was 84%. Eleven of the 16 patients (68.8%) with DLBCL are still in remission.

The study authors concluded that expanded and highly purified cord bloodderived NK immunotherapy was safe and promising in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in patients with B-cell NHL.

Reference:

Nato Y, Kaur I, Hosing C, et al. Immunotherapy with ex vivo-expanded cord blood (CB)-derived nk cells combined with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for B-cell non-hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). Presented at: 2021 Transplant & Cellular Therapy Meetings; February 8-12, 2021; Virtual. LBA15.

See original here:
Off-the-Shelf NK Immunotherapy Is Safe and Promising in B-Cell NHL With Chemotherapy and Transplant - Targeted Oncology

Braunschweig Makes the Case for Earlier Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy in DLBCL – OncLive

CAR T-cell therapy has shown robust responses and curative potential in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), regardless of cytogenetics or age, said Ira Braunschweig, MD, who added that the early use of tocilizumab (Actemra) and steroids has made it all the more likely that the modality could be moved to the up-front setting.

Its important to distinguish [between] the options a patient with aggressive lymphoma has, [particularly when it comes to] distinguishing between options that could help them versus options that can cure them, and CAR T-cell therapy stands alone as an option that could cure patients, said Braunschweig.

In an interview withOncLiveduring the 2020 Institutional Perspectives in Cancer webinar onhematologic malignancies, Braunschweig, director of the Stem Cell Transplant Program, clinical program director of Hematologic Malignancies at Montefiore Medical Center, and associate professor in the Department of Medicine (Oncology) at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discussed the utility of CAR T-cell therapy in lymphoma and the rationale behind moving the modality to the up-front setting.

Braunschweig Its difficult to say, as far as efficacy, which [product] is better than the other because theyve never been compared head-to-head and probably never will be. It does seem that tisagenlecleucel [can be given as an] outpatient [therapy], which is nice.

Based on the data we have so far, we know that [these patients] respond very favorably [compared] with other subgroups. A [patient with] double hit or triple[-hit lymphoma] is not someone who will not respond [to the therapy], which is extremely encouraging.

We learned that axi-cel is as good as advertised, and [comparable with] what we saw on the clinical trial. Patients do not have to be in perfect condition to be able to tolerate and benefit from [the product], which is extremely importantnot every one of our patients is a marathon runner.

There was no difference between the older and younger populations [in terms of] response, which is also very encouraging, because we treat a lot of older patients. [Knowing] that [the product] is effective in that group [of patients] as well is great.

[CAR T-cell therapy is a fantastic option for] a [patient with] primary refractory or multiply relapsed [disease] or [a patient with] relapsed [disease] posttransplant. For a certain number of patients, [CAR T-cell therapy] will likely be a curative therapy. [CAR T-cell therapy] has been truly a game changer for these patients.

For a chemotherapy-sensitive patient, autologous transplant is still the standard of care, largely, in part because we have decades of experience with those patients. When we get to a primary refractory patient, it would seem that CAR T-cell therapy is the clear choice. Only a few years ago, we used to offer a [patient with] relapsed [disease] post-autologous transplant an allogeneic transplant, and there are data that that treatment could be curative for such a patient.

However, we have to recognize that there is a lot of graft-versus-host-disease and ongoing health issues [that accompany] allogeneic transplant. With CAR T-cell therapy, if [patients] get through the first couple of weeks of toxicities, theres a lot less of a concern about their long-term health. In fact, with CAR T-cell therapies, data are coming out that we can treat these toxicities effectively without worrying about abrogating the antitumor response, which makes it even more attractive.

There are data that early tocilizumab can, at the first fevers, abrogate the CRS toxicity without abrogating the antitumor effect. Even [early use of] steroids, which are lymphocyte killers, is supported by data for neurotoxicity and does not seem to abrogate the antitumor response. If we could [treat patients even] earlier [with these interventions] and not have them become confused, or [enter a certain coma level], that could be even better.

Once we know that its extremely effective for [patients with] relapsed/refractory [disease], and we know that its effective for [patients with] high-risk genetic genetics, perhaps we could offer those patients up-front CAR T-cell therapy after some cytoreduction with chemotherapy as a consolidation approach.

If we know a patient has a high risk of relapse, it makes perfect sense to offer [CAR T-cell therapy] to them up front. Its an effective therapy for those patients. If we know that theyre ultimately going to fail [treatment], then why wouldnt we [offer it to them up front? For those patients that could be cured with R-CHOP, R-CHOP is still probably the way to go. [Well have to] figure out whos not going to do well with R-CHOP [and may be a candidate for CAR T-cell therapy up front].

[Theres research evaluating] dual targets. Can we combine novel agents with CAR T-cell therapy to increase its effectiveness? Maybe well offer more than one infusion of CAR T-cell therapy. If so, there might be a tandem CAR T-cell therapy one day. Those things are being looked at.

The most important point is that a [patient with] multiply relapsed [or] even refractory lymphoma [should be considered for CAR T-cell therapy] as a curative option for treatment.

We have a robust CAR T-cell therapy unit. Weve treated the first [patient] in the nation with the FDA-approved [brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus)] for mantle cell lymphoma with excellent results, and we have ongoing trials with CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma as well.

Original post:
Braunschweig Makes the Case for Earlier Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy in DLBCL - OncLive

Creative Medical Technology Holdings Files Patent on Prevention of Organ Transplant Rejection using ImmCelz – PRNewswire

PHOENIX, Feb. 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --(OTC CELZ) Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. announced today filing of a patent application covering the use of ImmCelz regenerative cell therapy for preventing rejection of transplanted organs. ImmCelz is a cellular therapy that prevents pathological immunity and inflammation while at the same time inducing regeneration of damaged tissue. Mechanistically ImmCelz has been shown to function through stimulation of T regulatory cells1 and producing the regenerative protein Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)2. The patent demonstrates that ImmCelz may have the potential to inhibit chronic graft rejection, which is the major cause of organ loss.

"The concept of immunological tolerance has been around for more than a Century since the days of Peter Medawar," said Dr. Amit Patel, Board Member of the Company and co-inventor of the patent. "Unfortunately, transplant recipients, which include some of my patients, need to take global immune suppressive medication to reduce immune-mediated rejection of the organ. These medications, despite having made organ transplantation a reality, have potential side effects including various infections due to suppression of immunity. ImmCelz is being developed to induce immunological tolerance, which if achieved would allow for organ transplantation without need for continuous immune suppression."

Sales of immune suppressants, which are used after transplants to prevent patients from rejecting their organs exceeded 4 billion dollars in 20183.

"To date the Company has reported therapeutic activity of ImmCelz in models of rheumatoid arthritis4, stroke5, type 1 diabetes6, kidney failure7 and liver failure8," said Timothy Warbington, President and CEO of the Company. "Demonstration of enhancing graft survival in organ transplantation allows for a whole new area of medical progress. Our scientists suggest the superior efficacy of ImmCelz for organ transplantation is that the cellular therapy suppresses rejection, while at the same time regenerates the organ after transplantation. It is known that the process of transplantation causes harm to the organ."

"It is our goal to continue to broaden our intellectual property portfolio by patenting technologies that our scientific team determines to be worthwhile and in the area of our core concentration," Mr. Warbington said further.

About Creative Medical Technology Holdings Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. is a commercial stage biotechnology company specializing in regenerative medicine/stem cell technology in the fields of immunotherapy, urology, neurology and orthopedics and is listed on the OTC under the ticker symbol CELZ. For further information about the company, please visit http://www.creativemedicaltechnology.com.

Forward Looking Statements OTC Markets has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This news release may contain forward-looking statements including but not limited to comments regarding the timing and content of upcoming clinical trials and laboratory results, marketing efforts, funding, etc. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions and, therefore, involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements. See the periodic and other reports filed by Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.

Creativemedicaltechnology.com http://www.StemSpine.com http://www.Caverstem.com http://www.Femcelz.com http://www.ImmCelz.com http://www.OvaStem.com

1Creative Medical Technology Holdings Identifies Mechanism of Action of ImmCelz Stroke Regenerative Activity (prnewswire.com) 2Creative Medical Technology Holdings Identifies and Files Patent on Novel Mechanism of ImmCelz Therapeutic Activity (prnewswire.com) 3Organ Transplant Immunosuppressant Drugs Market Size Report, 2026 (grandviewresearch.com) 4Creative Medical Technology Holdings Reports Positive Preclinical Data on ImmCelz Immunotherapy Product in Rheumatoid Arthritis Model | BioSpace 5Creative Medical Technology Holdings Identifies Mechanism of Action of ImmCelz Stroke Regenerative Activity (prnewswire.com) 6Creative Medical Technology Holdings Announces Positive Data and Patent Filing Using ImmCelz to Treat Type 1 Diabetes (prnewswire.com) 7Creative Medical Technology Holdings Files Patent based on Positive Data on Renal Failure using ImmCelz Regenerative Immunotherapy (prnewswire.com) 8Creative Medical Technology Holdings Announces Reversion of Liver Failure Using ImmCelz Personalized Cellular Immunotherapy in Preclinical Model | Nasdaq

SOURCE Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc.

Home

Here is the original post:
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Files Patent on Prevention of Organ Transplant Rejection using ImmCelz - PRNewswire

Lineage to Host Virtual OPC1 Investor & Analyst Day on February 22, 2021 – Business Wire

CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (NYSE American and TASE: LCTX), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing allogeneic cell therapies for unmet medical needs, today announced it will be hosting a virtual Investor and Analyst Day on February 22, 2021 at 1:30pm PT / 4:30pm ET to discuss the companys OPC1 program for acute spinal cord injury. Lineage management will be joined by therapeutic area expert Edward Wirth, III, M.D., Ph.D., for an update on OPC1, an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) transplant designed to provide clinically meaningful improvements in motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injuries (SCI). The OPC1 program has been partially funded by a $14.3 million grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) and has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation and Orphan Drug designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Jason McCarthy, Ph.D., Senior Managing Director, Biotechnology, Maxim Group, LLC will moderate the event and interested parties can register for the event directly on the Solebury Trout Events Page.

Interested investors can access the live webcast on the Events and Presentations section of Lineages website. Additional videos are available on the Media page of the Lineage website.

We are fortunate to have Dr. Wirth available to review the clinical data collected to date and discuss the opportunity to use oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants to aid recovery following a severe spinal cord injury. Dr. Wirth also will discuss our recently announced partnership with Neurgain Technologies, Inc. to evaluate an improved delivery system designed to allow for more precise administration of cells with shorter cessation of a patients respiration, stated Brian Culley, CEO. Ed has broad experience with the development of cell-based therapies for spinal cord injury and neurological disorders and notably, led the team which conducted the first human pluripotent stem cell spinal cord transplant in the United States.

Therapeutic Expert: Edward Wirth, III, M.D., Ph.D.

Dr. Wirth currently serves as the Chief Medical Officer at Aspen Neuroscience, Inc., a company working to develop best-in-class autologous cell therapies for neurological diseases such as Parkinson disease. Dr. Wirths specialties include clinical trials, translational research, stem cells, cell-based therapies, magnetic resonance imaging, spinal cord injury and neurological disorders.

Dr. Edward Wirth completed the M.D./Ph.D. program at the University of Florida (UF) in 1994. He elected to remain at UF to conduct postdoctoral research and subsequently joined the faculty in 1996. From 1997 to 2002, Dr. Wirth led the UF team that performed the first human pluripotent stem cell spinal cord transplant in the United States. This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of implanting cell line-derived spinal cord cells into patients with post-traumatic syringomyelia (a complication of spinal cord injury). From 2002 to 2004, Dr. Wirth held academic appointments at Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center and at the University of Chicago. From 2004 to 2011, he served as Medical Director for Regenerative Medicine at Geron Corporation, where he led the worlds first clinical trial of a hESC-derived transplant. In 2013 he joined Asterias Biotherapeutics and served as its Chief Translational Officer from 2013 to 2015 and Chief Medical Officer from 2015 to 2019. At Asterias, Dr. Wirth led the expansion and completion of the clinical trial which demonstrated the initial clinical safety and activity of OPC1 in patients with subacute spinal cord injuries. He briefly served as Chief Medical Officer of Lineage Cell Therapeutics, which acquired Asterias in March 2019, before joining Aspen Neuroscience as its Chief Medical Officer.

About Spinal Cord Injuries

A spinal cord injury (SCI) occurs when the spinal cord is subjected to a severe crush or contusion and frequently results in severe functional impairment, including limb paralysis, aberrant pain signaling, and loss of bladder control and other body functions. There are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries annually in the U.S. There are no FDA-approved drugs specifically for the treatment of SCI. The cost of a lifetime of care for a severe spinal cord injury can be as high as $5 million.

About Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel cell therapies for unmet medical needs. Lineages programs are based on its robust proprietary cell-based therapy platform and associated in-house development and manufacturing capabilities. With this platform Lineage develops and manufactures specialized, terminally differentiated human cells from its pluripotent and progenitor cell starting materials. These differentiated cells are developed to either replace or support cells that are dysfunctional or absent due to degenerative disease or traumatic injury or administered as a means of helping the body mount an effective immune response to cancer. Lineages clinical programs are in markets with billion dollar opportunities and include three allogeneic (off-the-shelf) product candidates: (i) OpRegen, a retinal pigment epithelium transplant therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration, a leading cause of blindness in the developed world; (ii) OPC1, an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries; and (iii) VAC, an allogeneic dendritic cell therapy platform for immuno-oncology and infectious disease, currently in clinical development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. For more information, please visit http://www.lineagecell.com or follow the Company on Twitter @LineageCell.

View original post here:
Lineage to Host Virtual OPC1 Investor & Analyst Day on February 22, 2021 - Business Wire

Novartis, Gates Foundation pursue a simpler gene therapy for sickle cell – STAT

Novartis and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are joining forces to discover and develop a gene therapy to cure sickle cell disease with a one-step, one-time treatment that is affordable and simple enough to treat patients anywhere in the world, especially in sub-Saharan Africa where resources may be scarce but disease prevalence is high.

The three-year collaboration, announced Wednesday, has initial funding of $7.28 million.

Current gene therapy approaches being developed for sickle cell disease are complex, enormously expensive, and bespoke, crafting treatments for individual patients one at a time. The collaboration aims to instead create an off-the-shelf treatment that bypasses many of the steps of current approaches, in which cells are removed and processed outside the body before being returned to patients.

advertisement

Sickle cells cause is understood. The people it affects are known. But its cure has been elusive, Jay Bradner, president of the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, told STAT.

We understand perfectly the disease pathway and the patient, but we dont know what it would take to have a single-administration, in vivo gene therapy for sickle cell disease that you could deploy in a low-resource setting with the requisite safety and data to support its use, he said. Im a hematologist and can assure you that in my experience in the clinic, it was extremely frustrating to understand a disease so perfectly but have so little to offer.

advertisement

Sickle cell disease is a life-threatening inherited blood disorder that affects millions around the world, with about 80% of affected people in sub-Saharan Africa and more than 100,000 in the U.S. The mutation that causes the disease emerged in Africa, where it protects against malaria. While most patients with sickle cell share African ancestry, those with ancestry from South America, Central America, and India, as well as Italy and Turkey, can also have the hereditary disease.

The genetic mutation does its damage by changing the structure of hemoglobin, hampering the ability of red blood cells to carry oxygen and damaging blood vessels when the misshapen cells get stuck and block blood flow. Patients frequently suffer painful crises that can be fatal if not promptly treated with fluids, medication, and oxygen. Longer term, organs starved of oxygen eventually give out. In the U.S., that pain and suffering is amplified when systemic and individual instances of racism deny Black people the care they need.

Delivering gene therapy for other diseases has been costly and difficult even in the best financed, most sophisticated medical settings. Challenges include removing patients cells so they can be altered in a lab, manufacturing the new cells in high volume, reinfusing them, and managing sometimes severe responses to the corrected cells. Patients also are given chemotherapy to clear space in their bone marrow for the new cells.

Ideally, many of those steps could be skipped if there were an off-the-shelf gene therapy. That means, among other challenges, inventing a way to eliminate the step where each patients cells are manipulated outside the body and given back the in vivo part of the plan to correct the genetic mutation.

Thats not the only obstacle. For a sickle cell therapy to be successful, Bradner said, it must be delivered only to its targets, which are blood stem cells. The genetic material carrying corrected DNA must be safely transferred so it does not become randomly inserted into the genome and create the risk of cancer, a possibility that halted a Bluebird Bio clinical trial on Tuesday. The payload itself mustnt cause such problems as the cytokine storm of immune overreaction. And the intended response has to be both durable and corrective.

In a way, the gene delivery is the easy part because we know that expressing a normal hemoglobin, correcting the mutated hemoglobin, or reengineering the switches that once turned off normal fetal hemoglobin to turn it back on, all can work, Bradner said. The payload is less a concern to me than the safe, specific, and durable delivery of that payload.

For each of these four challenges delivery, gene transfer, tolerability, durability there could be a bespoke technical solution, Bradner said. The goal is to create an ensemble form of gene therapy.

Novartis has an existing sickle-cell project using CRISPR with the genome-editing company Intellia, now in early human trials, whose lessons may inform this new project. CRISPR may not be the method used; all choices are still on the table, Bradner said.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals has seen encouraging early signs with its candidate therapy developed with CRISPR Therapeutics. Other companies, including Beam Therapeutics, have also embarked on gene therapy development.

The Novartis-Gates collaboration is different in its ambition to create a cure that does not rely on an expensive, complicated framework. Novartis has worked with the Gates Foundation on making malaria treatment accessible in Africa. And in October 2019, the Gates Foundation and the National Institutes of Health said together they would invest at least $200 million over the next four years to develop gene-based cures for sickle cell disease and HIV that would be affordable and available in the resource-poor countries hit hardest by the two diseases, particularly in Africa.

Gene therapies might help end the threat of diseases like sickle cell, but only if we can make them far more affordable and practical for low-resource settings, Trevor Mundel, president of global health at the Gates Foundation, said in a statement about the Novartis collaboration. Its about treating the needs of people in lower-income countries as a driver of scientific and medical progress, not an afterthought.

Asked which is the harder problem to solve: one-time, in vivo gene therapy, or making it accessible around the world, David Williams, chief of hematology/oncology at Boston Childrens Hospital, said: Both are going to be difficult to solve. The first will likely occur before the therapy is practically accessible to the large number of patients suffering the disease around the world.

Williams is also working with the Gates Foundation, as well as the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Massachusetts General Hospital, on another approach in which a single injection of a reagent changes the DNA of blood stem cells. But there are obstacles to overcome there, too, that may be solved by advances in both the technology to modify genes and the biological understanding of blood cells.

Bradner expects further funding to come to reach patients around the world, once the science progresses more.

There is no plug-and-play solution for this project in the way that mRNA vaccines were perfectly set up for SARS-CoV-2. We have no such technology to immediately redeploy here, he said. Were going to have to reimagine what it means to be a gene therapy for this project.

General Assignment Reporter

Liz focuses on cancer, biomedical engineering, and how patients feel the effects of Covid-19.

Trending

Comparing the Covid-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer, Moderna, and

Comparing the Covid-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson

The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became

The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became a leading technology in the Covid vaccine

The Covid-19 Tracker

The Covid-19 Tracker

Recommended

FDA warns AcelRx of misleading ads for its pain

FDA warns AcelRx of misleading ads for its pain drug Dsuvia

After a controversial Alzheimers drug review, FDAs Woodcock rejects

After a controversial Alzheimers drug review, FDAs Woodcock rejects proposal to firewall agency review staff

Pharmalittle: WHO approves AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine; North Korean hackers

Pharmalittle: WHO approves AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine; North Korean hackers target Pfizer vaccine data

Read more from the original source:
Novartis, Gates Foundation pursue a simpler gene therapy for sickle cell - STAT