Category Archives: Stem Cell Medicine


Recruiting Faculty in Molecular and Cellular Biology – Nature.com

We invite applications for faculty at the levels of Assistant and Associate Professor within the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM). BCM is located within the Texas Medical Center in Houston, a premier research and clinical environment.

We are seeking motivated investigators in broad areas of normal and cancer biology, including but not limited to gene regulation, epigenetics, and synthetic biology. BCM offers competitive startup packages and our researchers are supported by outstanding core facilities providing access to dedicated expertise in Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Profiling, Advanced and Vital Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Stem Cell Culture, Live Bioimaging, Metabolomics, and more.

Our Department offers a collegial, collaborative environment and maintains a long-standing tradition of strong support for new faculty. Recruited faculty have the opportunity to join as members of the NCI-designated Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BCM is located in the heart of the Texas Medical Center in Houston and is affiliated with surrounding educational institutions, including the University of Texas Medical School, the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Rice University.

Applications received by November 1, 2020 will receive priority.

Please send a cover letter, a CV and a 2-4 page summary of research interests to:

MCB_communications@bcm.edu.

Baylor College of Medicine is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action/Equal Access Employer

Read the original here:
Recruiting Faculty in Molecular and Cellular Biology - Nature.com

California’s $7.8 Billion Proposition 14 Could Expand Conflicts of Interest in Stem Cell Research | K. Lloyd Billingsley – The Beacon

K. Lloyd Billingsley Tuesday September 15, 2020 1:15 PM PDT

Proposition 14, according to Californias legislative analyst, Authorizes Bonds to Continue Funding Stem Cell and Other Medical Research. A yes vote means the state could sell $5.5 billion in general obligation bonds primarily for stem cell research. As David Jensen notes at Capitol Weekly, theres a bit more to it.

The $5.5 billion would extend the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), created by the $3 billion Proposition 71 in 2004. This measure, authored by real estate developer Robert Klein, promised life-saving cures for Parkinsons Alzheimers and other diseases. A ballpark figure for the number of certified life-saving cures and therapies CIRM produced in 16 years is zero. Proposition 71 also promised more than $1 billion for state coffers, but as Jensen notes, royalties to date have totaled only $462,433. CIRM failed to accomplish its stated goal, and now it wants to conduct research on therapy delivery and aging as a pathology along with vital research opportunities, not related to stem cells.

Proposition 14 would enlarge the CIRM board from 29 to 35 members. As Jensen explains, that creates more possibilities for conflicts of interest, a long-standing issue for the agency.

In 2012, for example, the prestigious Institute of Medicine found that more than 90 percent of CIRM funding went to institutions with representatives on the CIRM governing board. Proposition 14 enlarges that board and also increases the costs to Californians.

According to the legislative analyst, we estimate the total cost to pay off the bonds would be $7.8 billion$5.5 billion for the principal and $2.3 billion for the interest. State costs would average about $260 million per year for about 30 years.

The analyst also explains a way voters can prevent this spending. A no vote means the state could not sell $5.5 billion in general obligation bonds. If voters reject Proposition 14, David Jensen explains, CIRM will begin shutting its doors this winter.

Go here to read the rest:
California's $7.8 Billion Proposition 14 Could Expand Conflicts of Interest in Stem Cell Research | K. Lloyd Billingsley - The Beacon

GA sues therapists after making $6.4 Million on unproven products – ValdostaToday.com

Release:

Carr Sues Elite Integrated Medical for Deceptive Claims Made to Elderly and Disabled Consumers Regarding Stem Cell Therapy

ATLANTA, GA Attorney General Chris Carr today filed suit against Elite Integrated Medical, LLC, formerly known as Superior Healthcare of Woodstock, LLC d/b/a Superior Healthcare Group, Superior Healthcare Sandy Springs, and Superior Healthcare Morrow, along with its owner, Justin Paulk, (collectively Elite) for allegedly violating the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA) by making false and misleading claims about the regenerative medicine products they offered to Georgia consumers.

The use of unproven products or therapies can be harmful to consumers health and/or set them back thousands of dollars without affording them any results, said Attorney General Chris Carr. Our office will continue to hold accountable businesses that make unsubstantiated claims and violate the law.

The complaintcontends that Elite made over $6.4 million by using aggressive marketing techniques and high-pressure sales tactics to convince at least 842 consumers, most of whom were elderly and/or disabled, to purchase expensive, unproven medical treatments that are not covered by Medicare or health insurance. The office seeks injunctive relief, consumer restitution and civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation of the FBPA and up to $10,000 per FBPA violation committed against elderly and/or disabled consumers.

According to the complaint, Elite represents that it has a staff of medical doctors who provide its products to patients, when in fact, medical doctors administer a very limited number of product injections. The vast majority of patients interact only with chiropractors and nurse practitioners, and most of the injections are administered by nurse practitioners.

The Attorney Generals office also alleges that Elite acted deceptively by featuring on its website a customer testimonial from a purported customer who is actually an owner of Elites advertising agency, without disclosing the material connections between itself and this person or the fact that this customer received his treatments for free.

It should be noted that the Attorney Generals Office has also reached a settlement with Grow Smart Marketing, LLC and its two owners, who were responsible for writing content for Elite Integrated Medicals website, social media ads, and emails about upcoming seminars. The settlement requires the company to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims on behalf of its clients who market stem cell therapy products to Georgia consumers and to pay restitution to the state.

Warnings and Tips for Consumers

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned consumers of the potential dangers associated with unapproved stem cell, exosome and other products marketed as regenerative medicine products, which include administration site reactions; the ability of cells to move from placement sites and change into inappropriate cell types or multiply; failure of cells to work as expected; and the growth of tumors. Using unapproved regenerative medicine products that have no proven clinical benefit could also end up delaying a proper diagnosis or discouraging patients with serious illnesses from getting safe and effective treatments.

The FDA encourages consumers who are considering regenerative medicine therapies to consider the following advice and information:

See original here:
GA sues therapists after making $6.4 Million on unproven products - ValdostaToday.com

NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Report 2020 (COVID-19 Impact Analysis) By Segmentations, Key Company Profiles & Demand Forecasts to…

NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market has been riding a progressive growth trail over the recent past. The first two quarters of the year 2020 have however witnessed heavy disruptions throughout all the industry facets, which are ultimately posing an unprecedented impact on NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy market. Although healthcare & life sciences industry as a whole is witnessing an influx of opportunities in selected sectors, it remains a matter of fact that some of the industry sectors have temporarily scaled back. It becomes imperative to stay abreast of all the recent updates and predict the near future wisely.

The report primarily attempts to track the evolution of growth path of market from 2019, through 2020, and post the crisis. It also provides long-term market growth projections for a predefined period of assessment, 2015 2026. Based on detailed analysis of industrys key dynamics and segmental performance, the report offers an extensive assessment of demand, supply, and manufacturing scenario. Upsurge in R&D investments, increasing sophistication of healthcare infrastructure, thriving medical tourism, and rapidly introducing innovations in NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy and equipment sector are thoroughly evaluated.

For Better Understanding, Download FREE Sample Copy of NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Report @https://www.crediblemarkets.com/sample-request/nk-cell-therapy-and-stem-cell-therapy-market-398330

Key players in the global NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy market covered in Chapter 4:

Chipscreen Biosciences Innate Pharma SA Osiris Therapeutics Chiesi Pharmaceuticals Molmed JCR Pharmaceutical Altor BioScience Corporation Affimed NV Takeda Pharmaceutical Pharmicell Medi-post NuVasive Anterogen

In Chapter 11 and 13.3, on the basis of types, the NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy market from 2015 to 2026 is primarily split into:

NK Cell Therapy Stem Cell Therapy

In Chapter 12 and 13.4, on the basis of applications, the NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy market from 2015 to 2026 covers:

Hospital & clinics Regenerative medicine centers Diagnostic centers Research institutes Others

Geographically, the detailed analysis of consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate, historic and forecast (2015-2026) of the following regions are covered in Chapter 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13:

United States, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Netherlands, Turkey, Switzerland, Sweden, Poland, Belgium, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Columbia, Chile, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa and Rest of the World

Direct Purchase NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report @https://www.crediblemarkets.com/reports/purchase/nk-cell-therapy-and-stem-cell-therapy-market-398330?license_type=single_user

Some Points from Table of Content

Global NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Report 2020 by Key Players, Types, Applications, Countries, Market Size, Forecast to 2026

Chapter 1Report Overview

Chapter 2 Global Market Growth Trends

Chapter 3 Value Chain of NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market

Chapter 4 Players Profiles

Chapter 5 Global NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Regions

Chapter 6 North America NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 7 Europe NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 8 Asia-Pacific NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 9 Middle East and Africa NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 10 South America NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 11 Global NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Segment by Types

Chapter 12 Global NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Segment by Applications

Chapter 13 NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecast by Regions (2020-2026)

Chapter 14 Appendix

Impact of Covid-19 in NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market: Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost every country around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy market in 2020. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor/outdoor events restricted; over forty countries state of emergency declared; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market volatility; falling business confidence, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future.

Points Covered in the Report

The points that are discussed within the report are the major market players that are involved in the market such as market players, raw material suppliers, equipment suppliers, end users, traders, distributors and etc.

The complete profile of the companies is mentioned. And the capacity, production, price, revenue, cost, gross, gross margin, sales volume, sales revenue, consumption, growth rate, import, export, supply, future strategies, and the technological developments that they are making are also included within the report. This report analyzed 12 years data history and forecast.

The growth factors of the market are discussed in detail wherein the different end users of the market are explained in detail.

Data and information by market player, by region, by type, by application and etc., and custom research can be added according to specific requirements.

The report contains the SWOT analysis of the market. Finally, the report contains the conclusion part where the opinions of the industrial experts are included.

Contact for Any Query or Get Customized Report @ https://www.crediblemarkets.com/enquire-request/nk-cell-therapy-and-stem-cell-therapy-market-398330

Contact Us

Credible Markets Analytics

99 Wall Street 2124 New York, NY 10005

US Contact No: +1(929)-450-2887

Email: [emailprotected]

Thanks for reading this article you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe, MEA or Asia Pacific.

View original post here:
NK Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy Market Report 2020 (COVID-19 Impact Analysis) By Segmentations, Key Company Profiles & Demand Forecasts to...

LifeGaines Medical and Aesthetics Center in Boca Raton Helps Patients Stay Young and Healthy – Yahoo Finance

TipRanks

So far, September has been a wild ride of ups and downs. Following the recent bout of volatility, stocks have ticked higher again. But as uncertainty regarding another rescue program and the presidential election continues to linger, where does the market go from here? Weighing in for Oppenheimer, Chief Investment Strategist John Stoltzfus argues that any market dips appear relatively contained and orderly, and present longer-term investors the chance to find babies that got thrown out with the bathwater. He noted, For nervous investors the recent downdraft has presented opportunity to take some profits without FOMO (fear of missing out).As for the tech heavyweights that powered the markets five-month charge forward, the strategist believes current expectations that technology stocks will remain under pressure for some time seem exaggerated. Stoltzfus adds that the core of technology stocks did not appear terribly rich in price considering that developments in technology and innovation have yet to show signs of plateauing in the current cycle.Taking Stoltzfus outlook into consideration, our focus turned to stocks that Oppenheimer analysts are bullish on. The firm's pros see triple-digit upside potential in store for three tickers in particular. Running the names through TipRanks database, we wanted to find out what makes each so compelling.MediWound Ltd. (MDWD)Developing cutting-edge products, MediWound wants to address unmet needs in the fields of severe burn and chronic wound management. With an important government contract secured, Oppenheimer has high hopes for this name.Back in January, MDWD announced that the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) had entered into a contract to procure $16.5 million of NexoBrid, its drug designed to remove eschar in adults with deep partial and full-thickness thermal burns (a process called debridement), for an emergency stockpile. According to management, the first delivery is set for Q3 2020.On top of this, the company filed the NexoBrid Biologics License Application (BLA) with the FDA for eschar removal in adults with deep partial-thickness and full-thickness thermal burns in June. MDWDs U.S. commercial partner, Vericel, is preparing for an immediate launch upon approval.Representing Oppenheimer, 5-star analyst Kevin DeGeeter points out that Given the filing involved participation from three partiesMDWD, U.S. commercial partner Vericel and funding partners at BARDAand was completed against the backdrop of public sector work-from-home mandates, we view meeting stated timelines as a material milestone and derisking event for MDWD shares... we believe NexoBrid is on track for 1H21 launch.Should the therapy ultimately be approved, MDWD is entitled to a $7.5 million milestone payment from Vericel. We believe the combination of existing cash and the $7.5 million milestone payment from VCEL upon NexoBrid approval should fund operations at least into 2H23, DeGeeter added.DeGeeter also points out that MDWD plans to open 25-30 sites in U.S. and Israel to support the Phase 2 study of EscharEx, its product for chronic wounds. Although COVID-19 resulted in a delay, the analyst thinks the current timeline of 1H21 is achievable.To this end, DeGeeter rates MDWD an Outperform along with a $7 price target. Should his thesis play out, a potential twelve-month gain of 117% could be in the cards. (To watch DeGeeters track record, click here)All in all, other analysts echo DeGeeters sentiment. 4 Buys and no Holds or Sells add up to a Strong Buy consensus rating. With an average price target of $6.63, the upside potential comes in at 106%. (See MDWD stock analysis on TipRanks)UroGen Pharma (URGN)Primarily focused on uro-oncology, UroGen Pharma develops advanced non-surgical treatments to improve the lives of patients. As the launch of one of its products is progressing well, Oppenheimer thinks that now is the time to get on board.Writing for the firm, analyst Leland Gershell points to UGN-101 as a key component of his bullish thesis. UGN-101, which has now been formally launched in the U.S. under the commercial name Jelmyto, was designed as a treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (LG UTUC). The analyst highlights that Jelmytos launch is already off to a solid start, as eight patients had received 20 doses of the drug in June.Jelmyto sales were $371,000 in its first month of launch, but more important was management's commentary that over 100 urology practice sites are treatment-ready for the product, and that patient demand has not been visibly impacted by COVID-19, Gershell explained.Adding to the good news, permanent C- and J-codes, which are expected in October and January 2021, respectively, could bolster sales, in Gershells opinion. The label could also be updated to reflect completed OLYMPUS data.It should be noted that patient and physician engagement could remain diminished through YE20, and restrictions around elective surgeries could persist, according to Gershell. That said, he argues that LG UTUC's lack of surgical urgency could imply treatment deferral for several months, whereas Jelmyto's ability to be administered in an outpatient setting could expedite treatment, favoring adoption.If that wasnt enough, UGN-102, its mitomycin gel that targets low-grade intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (LG IR-NMIBC), is set to enter pivotal testing before the end of 2020. Looking at previously released data, the therapy achieved a 65% complete response (CR) rate at three months following onset of treatment. To offset any potential COVID-19 impact on enrollment, URGN has increased the number of clinical trial sites outside of the U.S., in those countries where virus-related clinical delays have not cropped up,Gershell added.Summing it all up, Gershell commented, We believe shares trade at a discount to the value of Jelmyto and UGN-102, and that revenue growth will support stock upside over the next 12 months.To this end, Gershell stands with the bulls, reiterating an Outperform rating. At $48, his price target brings the upside potential to 123%. (To watch Gershells track record, click here)What does the rest of the Street have to say? 3 Buy ratings and 1 Hold have been issued in the last three months. As a result, URGN receives a Strong Buy consensus rating. In addition, the $44 average price target suggests 104% upside potential. (See URGN stock analysis on TipRanks)Ayala Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AYLA)Last but not least we have Ayala Pharmaceuticals, which is focused on developing targeted therapies for cancers in which Notch activation is a known tumor driver. Based on the progress across its development pipeline, Oppenheimer sees big gains in store.Oppenheimer analyst Jay Olson thinks AYLAs technology makes it a stand-out. Its two candidates, AL101 and AL102, which are in-licensed from Bristol Myers, are gamma-secretase inhibitors that target aberrant activation of Notch signaling in cancer cells.Notch signaling plays an important role in normal cell development, and perturbations can cause malignant transformation. We believe Notch targeted therapies hold promise in addressing unmet clinical needs, Olson commented.The analyst added, The Notch mutational landscape is diverse, and the underlying science is evolving. AYLA is building a bioinformatics database around Notch to better characterize and identify Notch-activating mutations. Additionally, AYLA is collaborating with partners developing diagnostic tests for Notch-activating mutations, both at DNA and RNA levels. We believe these initiatives benefit AYLA in the long term by identifying responders and expanding the addressable patient population.Despite the challenges presented by COVID-19, critical catalysts remain on track. The company is set to present new interim data from the Phase 2 ACCURACY open-label study of AL101 in R/M ACC at the mini oral head and neck cancer section of ESMO. Looking at the available data, a recent interim analysis in one cohort showed 69% DCR.As for the second cohort, it is evaluating a 6mg once-weekly dosing of AL101. We view the efficacy and safety data from the 6mg dosing cohort as important for the registration-enabling studies, and we anticipate similar interim data readout in 1H21, Olson said.Adding to the good news, AYLA is on track to kick off patient dosing in the Phase 2 TENACITY study of AL101 in R/M TNBC by YE20 after the IND was cleared by the FDA in April. In 2021, AYLA plans to initiate two additional Phase 2 studies including AL102 for desmoid tumors and AL101 for r/r T-ALL.Springworks Therapeutics recently announced the completion of patient enrollment of the Phase 3 DeFi trial of nirogacestat in desmoid tumors with topline data expected mid-2021, which should provide read-across to AYLA's AL102 program, Olson noted.Given all of the above, Olson opined, We're encouraged by AYLA's advantages along several dimensions, including its drug candidates, cancer indication selection, and focus on identifying Notch-activating mutations while developing diagnostics. AYLA's Notch targeted approach should address unmet clinical needs for patients with rare but aggressive cancers.It should come as no surprise, then, that Olson stayed with the bulls. To this end, he kept an Outperform rating and $23 price target on the stock, implying 123% upside potential. (To watch Olsons track record, click here)Looking at the consensus breakdown, 2 Buys and 1 Hold have been published in the last three months. Therefore, AYLA gets a Moderate Buy consensus rating. Based on the $19.83 average price target, shares could climb 92% higher in the next year. (See AYLA stock analysis on TipRanks)To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Go here to see the original:
LifeGaines Medical and Aesthetics Center in Boca Raton Helps Patients Stay Young and Healthy - Yahoo Finance

New research connects the hormones we’re born with to lifetime risk for immunological diseases – MSUToday

Differences in biological sex can dictate lifelong disease patterns, says a new study by Michigan State University researchers that links connections between specific hormones present before and after birth with immune response and lifelong immunological disease development.

Published in the most recent edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study answers questions about why females are at increased risk for common diseases that involve or target the immune system like asthma, allergies, migraines and irritable bowel syndrome. The findings by Adam Moeser, Emily Mackey and Cynthia Jordan also open the door for new therapies and preventatives

This research shows that its our perinatal hormones, not our adult sex hormones, that have a greater influence on our risk of developing mast cell-associated disorders throughout the lifespan, says Moeser, Matilda R. Wilson Endowed Chair, professor in the Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences and the studys principle investigator. A better understanding of how perinatal sex hormones shape lifelong mast cell activity could lead to sex-specific preventatives and therapies for mast cell-associated diseases.

Mast cells are white blood cells that play beneficial roles in the body. They orchestrate the first line of defense against infections and toxin exposure and play an important role in wound healing, according to the study, Perinatal Androgens Organize Sex Differences in Mast Cells and Attenuate Anaphylaxis Severity into Adulthood.

However, when mast cells become overreactive, they can initiate chronic inflammatory diseases and, in certain cases, death. Moesers prior research linked psychological stress to a specific mast cell receptor and overreactive immune responses.

Moeser also previously discovered sex differences in mast cells. Female mast cells store and release more inflammatory substances like proteases, histamine and serotonin, compared with males. Thus, female mast cells are more likely than male mast cells to kick-start aggressive immune responses. While this may offer females the upper hand in surviving infections, it also can put females at higher risk for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

IBS is an example of this, says Mackey, whose doctoral research is part of this new publication.

While approximately 25% of the U.S. population is affected by IBS, women are up to four times more likely to develop this disease than men.

Moeser, Mackey and Jordans latest research explains why these sex-biased disease patterns are observed in both adults and prepubertal children. They found that lower levels of serum histamine and less-severe anaphylactic responses occur in males because of their naturally higher levels of perinatal androgens, which are specific sex hormones present shortly before and after birth.

Mast cells are created from stem cells in our bone marrow, Moeser said. High levels of perinatal androgens program the mast cell stem cells to house and release lower levels of inflammatory substances, resulting in a significantly reduced severity of anaphylactic responses in male newborns and adults.

We then confirmed that the androgens played a role by studying males who lack functional androgen receptors, says Jordan, professor of Neuroscience and an expert in the biology of sex differences.

While high perinatal androgen levels are specific to males, the researchers found that while in utero, females exposed to male levels of perinatal androgens develop mast cells that behave more like those of males.

For these females, exposure to the perinatal androgens reduced their histamine levels and they also exhibited less-severe anaphylactic responses as adults, says Mackey, who is currently a veterinary medical student at North Carolina State University.

In addition to paving the way for improved and potentially novel therapies for sex-biased immunological and other diseases, future research based will help researchers understand how physiological and environmental factors that occur early in life can shape lifetime disease risk, particularly mast cell-mediated disease patterns.

While biological sex and adult sex hormones are known to have a major influence on immunological diseases between the sexes, were learning that the hormones that we are exposed to in utero may play a larger role in determining sex differences in mast cell-associated disease risk, both as adults and as children, Moeser said.

For more information on Moesers research, go to the Gastrointestinal Stress Biology Laboratory. Also, visit the MSU College of Veterinary Medicines website for more about its research efforts.

(Note for media: Please include the following link to the study in all online media coverage: https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/09/10/1915075117)

Link:
New research connects the hormones we're born with to lifetime risk for immunological diseases - MSUToday

The Tax Watchers: How would you spend other people’s money? – Fairfield Daily Republic

Gay Eckman, The Tax Watchers

We are being asked in November to approve Proposition 14 an issue of $5.5 billion in general obligation bonds for California Stem Cell Research, Treatments and Cures.

Californians approved Proposition 71 for $3 billion in bonds in 2004 and the creation of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine. The institutes appointed board members are charged with reviewing stem cell research and therapy proposals and selecting who will receive grants and for how much. This board also has the responsibility to oversee those grants. Operation of the institute itself technically has no oversight at all.

Proposition 14 is essentially a continuation of Proposition 71, which is out of money.

Robert Klein II, a staunch advocate for stem cell research whose personal fortune came from real estate, was the principal author of Proposition 71, and even though he now serves only in an advisory capacity to the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, has once again authored Proposition 14 of 2020. Simply speaking Proposition 14 of 2020 is a continuation and mark-up of what the voters approved in 2004.

Klein, like many others back in 2004, believed embryonic stem cells might provide a miracle cure for almost everything. The federal government however had placed severe restrictions on the lines of embryonic stem cells available for research. But as a shrewd businessman, he could avoid these restrictions with a California project and could use the California initiative process to leverage millions of his own into billions of public dollars in support of this cause.

Klein claimed the advances made through his initiative would be self-supporting by stipulating a portion of receipts earned from the cures would be returned to the states general fund in 15 years and for about $5 billion of Californians money (including interest to bond holders), the general fund has received $352,560. Not a single federally approved therapy has resulted from stem cell science from the institute under Proposition 71.

Federal restrictions on embryonic stem cell research pertinent to drafting of Proposition 71 in 2004 were totally eliminated in 2009. Harnessing the hoped-for potential of stem cells remains elusive, and according to the Food and Drug Administration, these therapies do include risks. Stem cell research will not end . . . the National Institutes of Health and myriad charities aligned with specific diseases or conditions will continue with stem cell research. Their knowledge is more focused and better suited to solve these problems and utilizes the best medical science worldwide, including California scientists.

If Proposition 14 passes, California voters are risking $5.5 billion plus bond interest that could have been used for immediate needs such as education, housing and medical care. General obligation commitments take precedence over other funds we would like to spend or possibly even take away from what we planned to spend.

Do not be fooled again. Vote no on Proposition 14.

Gary Eckman is a member of the Central Solano Citizens/Taxpayer Group.

See the original post here:
The Tax Watchers: How would you spend other people's money? - Fairfield Daily Republic

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market- Industry Analysis and Forecast (2020-2027) – Kewaskum Statesman News Journal

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Marketwas valued US$ XX Mn in 2019 and is expected to reach US$ XX Mn by 2027, at a CAGR of 24.5% during a forecast period.

Market Dynamics

The Research Report gives an in-depth account of the drivers and restraints in the stem cell reconstructive market. Stem cell reconstructive surgery includes the treatment of injured or dented part of body. Stem cells are undifferentiated biological cells, which divide to produce more stem cells. Growing reconstructive surgeries led by the rising number of limbs elimination and implants and accidents are boosting the growth in the stem cell reconstructive market. Additionally, rising number of aged population, number of patients suffering from chronic diseases, and unceasing development in the technology, these are factors which promoting the growth of the stem cell reconstructive market. Stem cell reconstructive is a procedure containing the use of a patients own adipose tissue to rise the fat volume in the area of reconstruction and therefore helping 3Dimentional reconstruction in patients who have experienced a trauma or in a post-surgical event such as a mastectomy or lumpectomy, brain surgery, or reconstructive surgery as a result of an accident or injury. Stem cell reconstructive surgeries are also used in plastic or cosmetic surgeries as well. Stem cell and regenerative therapies gives many opportunities for development in the practice of medicine and the possibility of an array of novel treatment options for patients experiencing a variety of symptoms and conditions. Stem cell therapy, also recognised as regenerative medicine, promotes the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives.

The common guarantee of all the undifferentiated embryonic stem cells (ESCs), foetal, amniotic, UCB, and adult stem cell types is their indefinite self-renewal capacity and high multilineage differentiation potential that confer them a primitive and dynamic role throughout the developmental process and the lifespan in adult mammal. However, the high expenditure of stem cell reconstructive surgeries and strict regulatory approvals are restraining the market growth.

The report study has analyzed revenue impact of covid-19 pandemic on the sales revenue of market leaders, market followers and disrupters in the report and same is reflected in our analysis.

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market Segment analysis

Based on Cell Type, the embryonic stem cells segment is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs), derived from the blastocyst stage of early mammalian embryos, are distinguished by their capability to distinguish into any embryonic cell type and by their ability to self-renew. Owing to their plasticity and potentially limitless capacity for self-renewal, embryonic stem cell therapies have been suggested for regenerative medicine and tissue replacement after injury or disease. Additionally, their potential in regenerative medicine, embryonic stem cells provide a possible another source of tissue/organs which serves as a possible solution to the donor shortage dilemma. Researchers have differentiated ESCs into dopamine-producing cells with the hope that these neurons could be used in the treatment of Parkinsons disease. Upsurge occurrence of cardiac and malignant diseases is promoting the segment growth. Rapid developments in this vertical contain protocols for directed differentiation, defined culture systems, demonstration of applications in drug screening, establishment of several disease models, and evaluation of therapeutic potential in treating incurable diseases.

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market Regional analysis

The North American region has dominated the market with US$ XX Mn. America accounts for the largest and fastest-growing market of stem cell reconstructive because of the huge patient population and well-built healthcare sector. Americas stem cell reconstructive market is segmented into two major regions such as North America and South America. More than 80% of the market is shared by North America due to the presence of the US and Canada.

Europe accounts for the second-largest market which is followed by the Asia Pacific. Germany and UK account for the major share in the European market due to government support for research and development, well-developed technology and high healthcare expenditure have fuelled the growth of the market. This growing occurrence of cancer and diabetes in America is the main boosting factor for the growth of this market.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive analysis of the Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market including all the stakeholders of the industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market size and trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers all the aspects of the industry with a dedicated study of key players that includes market leaders, followers and new entrants. PORTER, SVOR, PESTEL analysis with the potential impact of micro-economic factors of the market has been presented in the report. External as well as internal factors that are supposed to affect the business positively or negatively have been analysed, which will give a clear futuristic view of the industry to the decision-makers.

The report also helps in understanding Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market dynamics, structure by analysing the market segments and projects the Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market size. Clear representation of competitive analysis of key players by Application, price, financial position, Product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence in the Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market make the report investors guide. Scope of the Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market, By Sources

Allogeneic Autologous o Bone Marrow o Adipose Tissue o Blood Syngeneic Other Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market, By Cell Type

Embryonic Stem Cell Adult Stem Cell Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market, By Application

Cancer Diabetes Traumatic Skin Defect Severe Burn Other Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market, By End-User

Hospitals Research Institute Others Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market, By Regions

North America Europe Asia-Pacific South America Middle East and Africa (MEA) Key Players operating the Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market

Osiris Therapeutics NuVasives Cytori Therapeutics Takeda (TiGenix) Cynata Celyad Medi-post Anterogen Molmed Baxter Eleveflow Mesoblast Ltd. Micronit Microfluidics TAKARA BIO INC. Tigenix Capricor Therapeutics Astellas Pharma US, Inc. Pfizer Inc. STEMCELL Technologies Inc.

Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market Request For View Sample Report Page : @https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/54688

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info: Name: Vikas Godage Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD. Email:sales@maximizemarketresearch.com Website:www.maximizemarketresearch.com

Read more here:
Global Stem Cell Reconstructive Market- Industry Analysis and Forecast (2020-2027) - Kewaskum Statesman News Journal

Plinabulin Granted FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia – Targeted Oncology

A Breakthrough Therapy designation was granted to plinabulin as treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) from both the FDA in the United States and Chinas Center for Drug Evaluation of the National Medical Products Administration, announced BeyondSpring Inc, developer of the drug, in a press release.1

Should this agent be approved, it would fulfill a significant unmet medical need for CIN.

"Receipt of Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA acknowledges both the significant unmet need among patients with CIN and the highly encouraging clinical results generated by Plinabulin, said Douglas Blayney, MD, global principal investigator for the CIN studies pf Plinabulin and professor of Medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine, in a statement.

This should expedite Plinabulins move into the clinic, which is beneficial for patients. The currently approved CIN prevention agents are all G-CSF-based and not available to all patients. Even with the use of G-CSFs, over 80 percent of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy may still experience Grade 4 neutropenia, which could lead to severe infection, hospitalization, and even death. Thus, CIN still represents an unmet medical need.

The designation was based on findings from the phase 3 PROTECTIVE-2 clinical trial (NCT03294577), which achieved a clinically meaningful primary end point of prevention of severe neutropenia. In combination with pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), plinabulin was significantly better at achieving the primary end point (P <.01). The safety profile also appeared well-tolerated with few adverse events of grade 4 severity in the combination arm compared with the control.

These results are supported by other studies in CIN that have confirmed early action of plinabulin in week 1 by protecting neutrophils in various cancer types with a variety of chemotherapy agents. This is complementary to week 2 neutrophil protection with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs).2

The superiority study, PROTECTIVE-2, was designed to assess both the safety and efficacy of plinabulin as treatment of patients with breast cancer treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) in a 21-day cycle. Plinabulin was administered in a 40 mg dose on day 1 with a 6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim on day 2, while pegfilgrastim was administered in the control arm at 6 mg dose as well on day 2. TAC is considered a high-risk chemotherapy regimen associated with neutropenia.

BeyondSpring announced the interim findings of this study in June 2020, which demonstrated a significant enhancement of G-CSFs with the plinabulin combination, which supports the potential for superiority of this treatment compared with pegfilgrastim alone.

The primary end point of severe neutropenia prevention in cycle 1 demonstrated a P value<.01. The key secondary end points of this study included duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 (P<.05) and duration of severe neutropenia in the first 8 days of cycle 1 (P <.05). The achievement of these end points demonstrates the agents ability to provide early protection against severe neutropenia induced by chemotherapy.

The rate of grade 4 neutropenia for TAC and pegfilgrastim is observed in 83% to 93% of patients, according to the interim findings.

Plinabulin is a first-in-class differentiated immune and stem cell modulator. The agent is currently in late-stage clinical development for its opportunity to improve overall survival in patients with cancer, as well as to alleviate CIN. Plinabulin and G-CSFs have complementary mechanisms of action for preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.1

"The clinical profile Plinabulin has shown truly represents a breakthrough in the CIN space since G-CSFs," said Ramon Mohanlal, MD, PhD, MBA, chief medical officer, and executive vice president, Research and Development, BeyondSpring, in a statement. We look forward to continuing to work with the FDA as we advance the development of Plinabulin to address this urgent medical need.

References

1. BeyondSpring receives breakthrough therapy designations from both US FDA and China NMPA for plinabulin in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia indication. News Release. BeyondSpring. September 8, 2020. Accessed September 10, 2020

2. BeyondSpring Announces Positive Topline Interim Results from PROTECTIVE-2 (Study 106) Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Superiority of Plinabulin in Combination with Neulasta for Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia Prevention. News Release. BeyondSpring. June 15, 2020. Accessed September 10, 2020. https://bit.ly/2YDJbiQ

Read the rest here:
Plinabulin Granted FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia - Targeted Oncology

New Data Further Reinforce Genentech’s Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) as a Highly Effective Treatment for People With Multiple Sclerosis – BioSpace

Sept. 11, 2020 05:00 UTC

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Genentech, a member of the Roche Group (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY), today announced new data that show Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) is a highly effective treatment option for people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who experienced a suboptimal response to their prior disease modifying therapy (DMT). Subgroup analysis from the two-year open-label Phase IIIb CASTING study also demonstrates that patients benefit across a wide range of disease related and demographic subgroups, regardless of prior treatment background. Findings will be presented at MSVirtual2020, the 8th Joint Meeting of the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) and the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).

For a wide range of people with MS who experienced a suboptimal response to prior treatment, we continue to see evidence that Ocrevus provides significant benefit in slowing disease progression, said Levi Garraway, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development. New real-world Ocrevus data show high persistence and adherence to the only B-cell therapy with a twice-yearly dosing schedule, which we know can be very important to both people with MS and their physicians.

Phase IIIb open-label CASTING study

Approximately 75% of RRMS patients (492/658) had no evidence of disease activity (NEDA; brain lesions, relapses and worsening of disability) two years after switching to twice-yearly Ocrevus treatment (with prespecified MRI re-baselining at 8 weeks) in the primary analysis of the CASTING study. Patients enrolled in the study had prior suboptimal response to at least six months of treatment with up to two DMTs. The analysis also showed the proportion of patients achieving NEDA remained consistently high across all measured patient subgroups, including baseline MRI activity, relapse activity, disability level, age and the number of prior DMTs. Further, 78% of patients treated with only one prior DMT compared with 70% of patients treated with two prior DMTs achieved NEDA.

Additionally, patients treated with Ocrevus experienced an improvement in the majority of symptoms measured by SymptoMScreen after two years. SymptoMScreen is a patient-reported outcome tool to assess symptom severity across twelve domains. The most pronounced significant improvements (p<0.001) were seen in sensory symptoms, fatigue and vision, which are important for daily living.

CONFIDENCE real-world safety study

A 97% treatment persistence for Ocrevus patients at 18 months, and strong adherence to infusions every six months, was seen in an interim analysis of more than 1,600 patients in the ongoing German CONFIDENCE study. Separate data from a U.S. commercial claims database that support high persistence and sustained adherence to Ocrevus treatment will also be presented.

Ocrevus longer-term safety data

New safety data as of January 2020 will be presented, representing 5,680 patients with RMS and PPMS and 18,218 patient-years of exposure to Ocrevus, across all Ocrevus clinical trials. These findings further demonstrate the consistently favorable benefit:risk profile of Ocrevus over seven years.

With rapidly growing real-world experience and more than 170,000 people treated globally, Ocrevus has twice-yearly (six-monthly) dosing and is the first and only therapy approved for RMS (including relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS] and active, or relapsing, secondary progressive MS [SPMS], in addition to clinically isolated syndrome [CIS] in the U.S.) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). Ocrevus is approved in 92 countries across North America, South America, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, as well as in Australia, Switzerland and the European Union.

About multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease that affects nearly one million people in the United States, for which there is currently no cure. MS occurs when the immune system abnormally attacks the insulation and support around nerve cells (myelin sheath) in the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves, causing inflammation and consequent damage. This damage can cause a wide range of symptoms, including muscle weakness, fatigue and difficulty seeing, and may eventually lead to disability. Most people with MS experience their first symptom between 20 and 40 years of age, making the disease the leading cause of non-traumatic disability in younger adults.

Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is the most common form of the disease and is characterized by episodes of new or worsening signs or symptoms (relapses) followed by periods of recovery. Approximately 85 percent of people with MS are initially diagnosed with RRMS. The majority of people who are diagnosed with RRMS will eventually transition to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), in which they experience steadily worsening disability over time. Relapsing forms of MS (RMS) include people with RRMS and people with SPMS who continue to experience relapses. Primary progressive MS (PPMS) is a debilitating form of the disease marked by steadily worsening symptoms but typically without distinct relapses or periods of remission. Approximately 15 percent of people with MS are diagnosed with the primary progressive form of the disease. Until the FDA approval of Ocrevus, there had been no FDA approved treatments for PPMS.

People with all forms of MS experience disease activity inflammation in the nervous system and permanent loss of nerve cells in the brain even when their clinical symptoms arent apparent or dont appear to be getting worse. An important goal of treating MS is to reduce disease activity as soon as possible to slow how quickly a persons disability progresses. Despite available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), some people with RMS continue to experience disease activity and disability progression.

About Ocrevus(ocrelizumab)

Ocrevus is the first and only therapy approved for both RMS (including clinically isolated syndrome, RRMS and active, or relapsing, SPMS) and PPMS, with dosing every six months. Ocrevus is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to target CD20-positive B cells, a specific type of immune cell thought to be a key contributor to myelin (nerve cell insulation and support) and axonal (nerve cell) damage. This nerve cell damage can lead to disability in people with MS. Based on preclinical studies, Ocrevus binds to CD20 cell surface proteins expressed on certain B cells, but not on stem cells or plasma cells, suggesting that important functions of the immune system may be preserved.

Ocrevus is administered by intravenous infusion every six months. The initial dose is given as two 300 mg infusions given two weeks apart. Subsequent doses are given as single 600 mg infusions.

Important Safety Information

What is Ocrevus?

Ocrevus is a prescription medicine used to treat:

It is not known if Ocrevus is safe or effective in children.

Who should not receive Ocrevus?

Do not receive Ocrevus if you have an active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Do not receive Ocrevus if you have had a life threatening allergic reaction to Ocrevus. Tell your healthcare provider if you have had an allergic reaction to Ocrevus or any of its ingredients in the past.

What is the most important information I should know about Ocrevus?

Ocrevus can cause serious side effects, including:

These infusion reactions can happen for up to 24 hours after your infusion. It is important that you call your healthcare provider right away if you get any of the signs or symptoms listed above after each infusion.

If you get infusion reactions, your healthcare provider may need to stop or slow down the rate of your infusion.

Before receiving Ocrevus, tell your healthcare provider about all of your medical conditions, including if you:

Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements.

What are the possible side effects of Ocrevus?

Ocrevus may cause serious side effects, including:

Most common side effects include infusion reactions and infections.

These are not all the possible side effects of Ocrevus.

Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to the FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088.

For more information, go to http://www.Ocrevus.com or call 1-844-627-3887.

For additional safety information, please see the full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide.

About Genentech in neuroscience

Neuroscience is a major focus of research and development at Genentech and Roche. Our goal is to pursue groundbreaking science to develop new treatments that help improve the lives of people with chronic and potentially devastating diseases.

Genentech and Roche are investigating more than a dozen medicines for neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, stroke, Alzheimers disease, Huntingtons disease, Parkinsons disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and autism spectrum disorder. Together with our partners, we are committed to pushing the boundaries of scientific understanding to solve some of the most difficult challenges in neuroscience today.

About Genentech

Founded more than 40 years ago, Genentech is a leading biotechnology company that discovers, develops, manufactures and commercializes medicines to treat patients with serious and life-threatening medical conditions. The company, a member of the Roche Group, has headquarters in South San Francisco, California. For additional information about the company, please visit http://www.gene.com.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200910006081/en/

See the rest here:
New Data Further Reinforce Genentech's Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) as a Highly Effective Treatment for People With Multiple Sclerosis - BioSpace