Category Archives: Stem Cell Treatment


This veteran-backed NASCAR team is heading to Daytona – We Are The Mighty

It's shake and bake, veteran style. NASCAR is well known for being military friendly. When the green flag waves at Daytona this weekend, it will usher in the new NASCAR season with a really special story. The crown jewel event is the Daytona 500. On Saturday, the day before the 500, there is a race called the NASCAR Racing Experience 300 which ushers in the Xfinity Series season. One of the cars racing to win the 300 should be the favorite of all military supporters around the country.

The Our America Dream Team car won't have the familiar sponsors you see on all the other race cars. Instead, they will feature veteran-owned businesses as the car trades rubber with all the cars on the track.

How is this possible? The team crowdfunded to raise money so they could race. In return for donations, veteran-owned businesses will be featured on the car racing around one of the world's most famous race tracks during one of racings marquee weekends.

The car will be driven by Colin Garrett. Garrett said, "I'm so grateful for the support from everyone who's backed the team. We're excited that fans and military-owned small businesses will be able to see the car on the track and feel proud, knowing they had a hand in us racing. When I started racing, my dad said he wanted me to find a way to use it to make a difference, so I could look back on it and know I helped someone. I wasn't quite 15 at the time and didn't really get it, but now I do. Working with the military community is the perfect fit, and it's cool that it ties in with my brothers' Army careers."

Team owner Sam Hunt added, "It feels good to know we're racing for something bigger than ourselves. We love racing, but the National Awareness Campaign makes it mean so much more."

Lisa Kipps-Brown, the marketing strategist behind the team who took time to answer questions about the team.

WATM: Where did the idea of "Our American Dream Team" come from?

Kipps-Brown: Two ideas converged to create "Our American Dream Team:"

We realized that the American Dream that we believe in and are chasing is often hard for those in the military community to achieve. Since we wanted to expand our National Awareness Campaign for 2020, helping those who have given so much achieve their own American Dream was the perfect fit to complement what we were already doing with Racing For Heroes. We decided to take a leap of faith and commit to crowdfunding the team to replace as much corporate sponsorship money as possible, which would free us up to promote issues important to the military community and companies owned by Veterans and military spouses.

WATM: Tell us a little about the team owner?

Kipps-Brown: 26-year-old Sam Hunt dreamed of starting a NASCAR team after racing throughout his childhood. After he graduated from college, the late J.D. Gibbs, whom Sam knew through his family, gave Sam his first two cars to help him get started. Sam started his team in 2018, living in his van behind the shop and couch surfing with friends to be able to afford the business. He and driver Colin Garrett started racing together that year in the K&N Pro Series, and realized they had something special working together.

WATM: Tell us about your driver?

Kipps-Brown: Unlike most NASCAR drivers, 19-year-old Colin Garrett didn't grow up racing karts or in a racing family. Yet, in just his third season of racing, he was historic South Boston (VA) Speedway's 2017 Limited Sportsman Division Champion and broke the track's qualifying speed record twice. In 2018 he started racing with team owner Sam Hunt in the K&N Pro Series and continued racing Super Late Model. What started out as a 3-race deal with Sam turned into a great fit, and they raced K&N together the rest of the 2018 season and all of 2019. In the fall of 2019, they decided they wanted to make the leap to the Xfinity Series.

WATM: Do you have any connections to the military? Why did they partake in this endeavor?

Kipps-Brown: Both of Colin's brothers are Active Duty Army, one currently deployed to Korea. One of Sam's best friends is a Navy SEAL. I am a milspouse whose husband is retired Navy with 26 years of service, 3 of which were in the Vietnam War. Combating Veteran suicide and helping service members transition back to civilian life is an issue that's personally important to them. Colin knows it could be his brothers who need help, and I have experienced how difficult the transition can be for Veterans and military families.

WATM: How hard was it to raise money?

Kipps-Brown: We knew it was a long shot, but we also had faith that we could do it. We believed in the loyalty of grassroots NASCAR fans and the power of large numbers of people who could give any amount. Nothing was too small. Our friends, family, and existing fans kicked it off for us, backing the team because they believed in us and our dream. We ended up raising enough to not only race in Daytona, but also pay for stem cell treatments for a Veteran through Racing For Heroes. Crowdfunding needs a crowd, though, and we're really just now tapping into the power of the military community.

WATM: What were the biggest obstacles?

Kipps-Brown: Connecting with the crowd was by far our biggest obstacle. People are jaded, and for good reason. They've seen too many people use Veterans' issues to further their own cause without giving anything back to the community. The most important connection so far has been when Stephanie Brown, founder of The Rosie Network, introduced us to Marine veteran Greg Boudah, founder of The Jewelry Network. The Jewelry Network, where Veterans buy jewelry, became a sponsor on the car for Daytona, and Greg has been instrumental in getting the grassroots movement going. He's activated his network of vetrepreneurs like Chris (Smurf) McPhee (retired Green Beret - Green Beret Media) and Michael Whitlow (Marine veteran - Vetbuilder) to help us get the word out. Once people get to know us, they realize we're part of the military family, that we're not just asking for money, and we really do want to make a difference. When we get over that hurdle, everyone responds with excitement.

WATM: How many veteran businesses donated?

Kipps-Brown: We have about 50 Veteran Business Advocates so far. When a vet- or milspouse-owned business gives and provides their logo, we promote them on our website, tell their story on our Facebook page, and provide a Veteran Business Advocate badge for their website. It's an opportunity for them to participate in a national NASCAR marketing campaign, something that would normally never be available to small businesses. There's never been anything like this done before, and we have plans in the works for other ways of helping grow military-owned businesses. Stay tuned 🙂

WATM: How did you get involved with this? What other outside help did they get.

Kipps-Brown: It's really been me, Colin's dad, and the staff of my web & marketing strategy company, Glerin Business Resources. I started working with Colin and his dad in November of 2018. A couple of months after that Racing For Heroes happened to contact me, wanting to hire me to develop a National Awareness Campaign for them.

When I visited them at Virginia International Raceway and saw all they do, I was literally in tears. I couldn't believe the extent of their free services, and the fact that they were holistic was even better. I remembered how hard it was for my husband when he retired, losing that sense of mission and knowing he was part of something that made a difference. I just couldn't bear the thought of taking money away from their programs. I called Colin's dad, Ryan, as soon as I left, and he readily agreed to roll Racing For Heroes into the work I was doing with them.

Just after that, he and I began working with Steve Sims, author of Bluefishing: The Art of Making Things Happen, as our business coach. Steve's encouragement, input, and challenging us to think differently were instrumental in the evolution of the team.

I think the fact that this whole campaign started with a call from Racing For Heroes is so cool; it's really an organic effort that was constantly changing throughout the season. We're proud that a movement that started in a small, rural town in Virginia has gone national and is becoming a disrupter in the racing industry.

WATM: Tell us about the race the car will be in?

Kipps-Brown: The NASCAR Racing Experience 300 is the most prestigious NASCAR Xfinity Series of the year. The 300-mile race is held at Daytona International Speedway the day before the Daytona 500, and is broadcast live on TV and radio.

WATM: Are there future plans for any other races?

Kipps-Brown: We intend to race as many Xfinity races on the national stage this year as we can fund, and we plan to be prepared to run the full 2021 season. Colin will also be running NASCAR Super Late Model and Late Model at the grassroots level, like his home track South Boston Speedway. The smaller tracks actually give him a better opportunity to interact directly with fans, which is great for helping communicate the free services available.

The NASCAR Racing Experience 300 rolls out at 2:30 p.m. EST this Saturday, February 15th. Tune in and cheer on the Our America Dream Team!

More information on the team and its cause can be found here.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Read more:
This veteran-backed NASCAR team is heading to Daytona - We Are The Mighty

Actinium to Highlight Targeted Conditioning Portfolio at 2020 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Annual Meeting; Phase 3 SIERRA Trial Preliminary…

NEW YORK, Feb. 13, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE AMERICAN: ATNM) ("Actinium") announced today that presentations from its targeted conditioning portfolio have been accepted for presentation at the 2020 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy (TCT) Meetings, which brings together thousands of transplant professionals from over 500 transplant centers worldwide. TCT is being held February 19-23, 2020 at the Marriott World Center in Orlando, Florida. Notably, data from the pivotal Phase 3 SIERRA trial of Iomab-B have been selected for an oral presentation.

"We are excited that Iomab-B and the SIERRA trial have once again been selected as an oral presentation at TCT," said Dr. Mark Berger, Chief Medical Officer of Actinium. "We look forward to highlighting the potential benefit that Iomab-B can provide to a patient population with active disease who are otherwise ineligible for BMT. We are confident these findings will be received with great enthusiasm. TCT, which assembles leading transplant physicians from top centers in the United States and worldwide, is the ideal venue to showcase the extremely encouraging findings from the SIERRA trial thus far. In addition, our other conference activities are expected to provide significant exposure for this important trial and invaluable interactions with BMT thought leaders. Through the SIERRA trial, we aspire to change the treatment paradigm for older patients with relapsed or refractory AML to make potentially curative BMT via Iomab-B the standard of care for this patient population that continues to have poor outcomes."

Actinium's TCT Presentations:

Late Breaking Oral Presentation:

Poster Presentation:

About the SIERRA TrialThe SIERRA trial (Study ofIomab-B inElderlyRelapse/RefractoryAcute Myeloid Leukemia) is the only randomized Phase 3 trial that offers BMT (Bone Marrow Transplant) as an option for older patients with active, relapsed or refractory AML or acute myeloid leukemia. BMT is the only potentially curative treatment option for older patients with active relapsed or refractory AML and there is no standard of care for this indication other than salvage therapies. Iomab-B is an ARC (Antibody Radiation-Conjugate) comprised of the anti-CD45 antibody apamistamab and the radioisotope I-131 (Iodine-131). The 20 active SIERRA trial sites in the U.S. and Canada represent many of the leading bone marrow transplant centers by volume. For more information, visit http://www.sierratrial.com.

About Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings (TCT) TCT, formerly known as the BMT Tandem Meetings, are the combined annual meetings of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) and the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).Each year the conference brings together several thousand investigators, clinicians, researchers, nurses and other allied health professionals from over 500 transplant centers from over 50 countries around a full scientific program focused on bone marrow transplant and cellular therapies.

About Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE: ATNM)Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing ARCs or Antibody Radiation-Conjugates, which combine the targeting ability of antibodies with the cell killing ability of radiation. Actinium's lead application for our ARCs is targeted conditioning, which is intended to selectively deplete a patient's disease or cancer cells and certain immune cells prior to a BMT or Bone Marrow Transplant, Gene Therapy or Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT) such as CAR-T to enable engraftment of these transplanted cells with minimal toxicities. With our ARC approach, we seek to improve patient outcomes and access to these potentially curative treatments by eliminating or reducing the non-targeted chemotherapy that is used for conditioning in standard practice currently. Our lead product candidate, I-131 apamistamab (Iomab-B) is being studied in the ongoing pivotal Phase 3Study ofIomab-B inElderlyRelapsed orRefractoryAcute Myeloid Leukemia (SIERRA) trial for BMT conditioning. The SIERRA trial is over fifty percent enrolled and promising single-agent, feasibility and safety data has been highlighted at ASH, TCT, ASCO and SOHO annual meetings. I-131 apamistamab will also be studied as a targeted conditioning agent in a Phase 1/2 anti-HIV stem cell gene therapy with UC Davis and is expected to be studied with a CAR-T therapy in 2020. In addition, we are developing a multi-disease, multi-target pipeline of clinical-stage ARCs targeting the antigens CD45 and CD33 for targeted conditioning and as a therapeutic either in combination with other therapeutic modalities or as a single agent for patients with a broad range of hematologic malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma. Ongoing combination trials include our CD33 alpha ARC, Actimab-A, in combination with the salvage chemotherapy CLAG-M and the Bcl-2 targeted therapy venetoclax. Underpinning our clinical programs is our proprietary AWE (Antibody Warhead Enabling) technology platform. This is where our intellectual property portfolio of over 100 patents, know-how, collective research and expertise in the field are being leveraged to construct and study novel ARCs and ARC combinations to bolster our pipeline for strategic purposes. Our AWE technology platform is currently being utilized in a collaborative research partnership with Astellas Pharma, Inc. Website: https://www.actiniumpharma.com/

Forward-Looking Statements for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

This press release may contain projections or other "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company which the Company undertakes no obligation to update. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or estimated future results, including the risks and uncertainties associated with preliminary study results varying from final results, estimates of potential markets for drugs under development, clinical trials, actions by the FDA and other governmental agencies, regulatory clearances, responses to regulatory matters, the market demand for and acceptance of Actinium's products and services, performance of clinical research organizations and other risks detailed from time to time in Actinium's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including without limitation its most recent annual report on form 10-K, subsequent quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q and Forms 8-K, each as amended and supplemented from time to time.

Contacts:

Investors:Hans Vitzthum LifeSci Advisors, LLCHans@LifeSciAdvisors.com(617) 535-7743

Media:Alisa Steinberg, Director, IR & Corp Commsasteinberg@actiniumpharma.com(646) 237-4087

SOURCE Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

http://www.actiniumpharma.com/

See more here:
Actinium to Highlight Targeted Conditioning Portfolio at 2020 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Annual Meeting; Phase 3 SIERRA Trial Preliminary...

(2020-2026) Latest Report shows drastic growth for Stem Cell Therapy Market: Which factor will limit market growth?| Osiris Therapeutics, NuVasive,…

Research report on global Stem Cell Therapy market 2020 with industry primary research, secondary research, product research, size, trends and Forecast.

The report offers highly detailed competitive analysis of the Global Stem Cell Therapy industry, where the business and industry growth of leading companies are thoroughly evaluated on the basis of production, product portfolio, recent developments, technology, geographical footprint, and various other factors. The authors of the report have also provided information on future changes in the competitive landscape and the expected nature of competition in the global Stem Cell Therapy industry. This will help players to prepare themselves well for any unforeseen situations in the industry competition and give a tough competition to other players in the global Stem Cell Therapy industry.

Click here! For Updated Sample Copy of this [emailprotected]: https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1436410/global-Stem-Cell-Therapy-market

As part of geographic analysis of the global Stem Cell Therapy market, the report digs deep into the growth of key regions and countries, including but not limited to North America, the US, Europe, the UK, Germany, France, Asia Pacific, China, and the MEA. All of the geographies are comprehensively studied on the basis of share, consumption, production, future growth potential, CAGR, and many other parameters.

The following players are covered in this report:Osiris TherapeuticsNuVasiveChiesi PharmaceuticalsJCR PharmaceuticalPharmicellMedi-postAnterogenMolmedTakeda (TiGenix)Stem Cell Therapy Breakdown Data by TypeAutologousAllogeneicStem Cell Therapy Breakdown Data by ApplicationMusculoskeletal DisorderWounds & InjuriesCorneaCardiovascular DiseasesOthers

Regions Covered in the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market:

The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada) South America (Brazil etc.) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Highlights of the Report Accurate market size and CAGR forecasts for the period 2020-2025 Identification and in-depth assessment of growth opportunities in key segments and regions Detailed company profiling of top players of the global Stem Cell Therapy market Exhaustive research on innovation and other trends of the global Stem Cell Therapy market Reliable industry value chain and supply chain analysis Comprehensive analysis of important growth drivers, restraints, challenges, and growth prospects

What the Report has in Store for you?

Get Customized Report in your Inbox within 24 hours @https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1436410/global-Stem-Cell-Therapy-market

Table of Contents

Report Overview:It includes six chapters, viz. research scope, major manufacturers covered, market segments by type, Stem Cell Therapy market segments by application, study objectives, and years considered.

Global Growth Trends:There are three chapters included in this section, i.e. industry trends, the growth rate of key producers, and production analysis.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Share by Manufacturer:Here, production, revenue, and price analysis by the manufacturer are included along with other chapters such as expansion plans and merger and acquisition, products offered by key manufacturers, and areas served and headquarters distribution.

Market Size by Type:It includes analysis of price, production value market share, and production market share by type.

Market Size by Application:This section includes Stem Cell Therapy market consumption analysis by application.

Profiles of Manufacturers:Here, leading players of the global Stem Cell Therapy market are studied based on sales area, key products, gross margin, revenue, price, and production.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Value Chain and Sales Channel Analysis:It includes customer, distributor, Stem Cell Therapy market value chain, and sales channel analysis.

Market Forecast Production Side: In this part of the report, the authors have focused on production and production value forecast, key producers forecast, and production and production value forecast by type.

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from the huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become a brand of quality assurance in the consulting industry.

Original post:
(2020-2026) Latest Report shows drastic growth for Stem Cell Therapy Market: Which factor will limit market growth?| Osiris Therapeutics, NuVasive,...

2nd Annual Cell Therapy Bioprocessing Conference | Boston, MA, USA – June 25-26, 2020 | Network with Key Professionals Addressing the Strategies of…

Dublin, Feb. 12, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "2nd Annual Cell Therapy Bioprocessing Conference" conference has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Over the last decade, the field of cell therapy has rapidly grown, and it holds enormous promise for treating many diseases. In the conference of 2017, specific risks and benefits were assessed of the cell culture and cell therapy bio-manufacturing for the cure of these diseases.

There are still factors like manufacturing maze, investment, logistics and regulatory challenges which prevents the cell and gene therapies to be widely used.

2nd Annual Cell Therapy Bioprocessing Conference will put together a unique platform to provide the exact solutions to these robust manufacturing and bioprocessing challenges, taking place in Boston-USA on 25th & 26th June 2020.

Key Highlights

Why Attend?

Agenda

Day 1: Thursday June 25th

CELL CULTURE TO CELL THERAPY

Self-regulated bioprocessing through bioreactor system for monitored 3D cell culture09:00 - 09:30

Multi-omics study on CHO cell lines engineering and bioprocessing09:30 - 10:00

Solution provider presentation10:00 - 10:30

Morning refreshment and One on One Networking10:30 - 11:20

CELL THERAPY BIOPROCESSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Next generation engineered T cells for cell therapy11:20 - 11:50 Jan Joseph Melenhorst, Adjunct Associate Professor, Upenn

Automation of cellular therapies: challenges and solutions11:50 - 12:20

Solution provider presentation12:20 - 12:50

Lunch and One on One Networking12:50 - 13:50

Development of Stem Cell Derived Exosomes for Clinical Applications13:50 - 14:20 Ian McNiece, Vice President, Aegle Therapeutics

Bioprocessing of recombinant adenoassociated virus production by fluorescence spectroscopy14:20 - 14:50

Afternoon refreshment and One on One Networking14:50 - 15:20

PROCESS MONITORING & QUALITY CONTROL

Process development of antigen-specific T cells16:10 - 16:40 Patrick J. Hanley, Director of GMP for Immunotherapy, The Children's Research Institute

Establishing iPSC cell banks derived using reagents and workflows optimized for cell therapy manufacturing16:40 - 17:10

Glycolysis restriction through fermentation technology to preserve T-cell functions and checkpoint therapy17:10 - 17:40

Closing remarks by Chairperson17:40 - 17:45

Drinks reception17:45 - 18:45

End of Conference18:45 - 18:45

Day 2: Friday June 26th

Scale up of allogeneic cell therapy manufacturing in single-use bioreactors: Challenges, insights and solutions09:00 - 09:30

Cell therapy: progress in manufacturing and assessments of potency09:30 - 10:00

Solution provider presentation10:00 - 10:30

Morning refreshment and One on One Networking10:30 - 11:20

Panel Discussion: Autologous vs Allogenic11:20 - 11:50

Quality control and effective purification methods for cell therapy product lines11:50 - 12:20

Solution provider presentation12:20 - 12:50

Lunch and One on One Networking12:50 - 13:50

LOGISTICS, REGULATORY & INVESTMENT

Building a leading edge supply chain, while maintaining flexibility13:50 - 14:20 Devyn Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Sigilon Therapeutics

Raw and starting material control for cell-based medicines14:20 - 14:50

FDA guidelines for regulatory issues involved cell therapy manufacturing14:50 - 15:20

Closing remarks by Chairperson15:20 - 15:25

End of Conference15:25 - 15:25

For more information about this conference visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/jhs3n8

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Link:
2nd Annual Cell Therapy Bioprocessing Conference | Boston, MA, USA - June 25-26, 2020 | Network with Key Professionals Addressing the Strategies of...

CRISPR Therapeutics Provides Business Update and Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results – Yahoo Finance

-Enrollment ongoing in clinical trials of CTX001 for patients with severe hemoglobinopathies-

-Enrollment ongoing in clinical trial of CTX110, targeting CD19+ malignancies-

-Enrollment has begun in clinical trial of CTX120, targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-

ZUG, Switzerland and CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Feb. 12, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- CRISPR Therapeutics(CRSP), a biopharmaceutical company focused on creating transformative gene-based medicines for serious diseases, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2019.

In 2019, CRISPR Therapeutics achieved important milestones and momentum across key programs. We announced positive interim safety and efficacy data from the first two patients in our ongoing CTX001 clinical trials, one patient with beta thalassemia and one patient with sickle cell disease. These preliminary data support our belief in the potential of CTX001 to have meaningful benefit for patients following a one-time intervention, said Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of CRISPR Therapeutics. In addition, we advanced our first allogeneic CAR-T cell therapy, CTX110, targeting CD19+ malignancies and, building on this progress, today announced that we have begun enrolling patients in a clinical trial for our second allogeneic CAR-T therapy, CTX120, targeting BCMA for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Dr. Kulkarni added: 2020 has the potential to be a pivotal year in our companys growth. We expect to conduct clinical trials in five indications, and we anticipate new data from our immuno-oncology and hemoglobinopathies programs. Our continued progress brings us closer to potentially providing transformative therapies to patients with serious diseases.

About CTX001TMCTX001 is an investigational ex vivo CRISPR gene-edited therapy that is being evaluated for patients suffering from TDT or severe SCD in which a patients hematopoietic stem cells are engineered to produce high levels of fetal hemoglobin (HbF; hemoglobin F) in red blood cells. HbF is a form of the oxygen-carrying hemoglobin that is naturally present at birth and is then replaced by the adult form of hemoglobin. The elevation of HbF by CTX001 has the potential to alleviate transfusion requirements for TDT patients and painful and debilitating sickle crises for SCD patients.

CTX001 is being developed under a co-development and co-commercialization agreement between CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex.

About CTX110TMCTX110 is a healthy donor-derived gene-edited allogeneic CAR-T therapy targeting cluster of differentiation 19, or CD19, for the treatment of CD19+ malignancies. A wholly-owned asset of CRISPR Therapeutics, CTX110 is in a clinical trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of CTX110 in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. The multi-center, open-label clinical trial is designed to enroll up to 95 patients and investigate several dose levels of CTX110.

About CTX120TMCTX120 is a healthy donor-derived gene-edited allogeneic CAR-T therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen, or BCMA. A wholly-owned asset of CRISPR Therapeutics, CTX120 is in a clinical trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of CTX120 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The multi-center, open-label clinical trial is designed to enroll up to 80 patients and investigate several dose levels of CTX120.

About CTX130TMCTX130 is a healthy donor-derived gene-edited allogeneic CAR-T therapy targeting CD70, an antigen expressed on hematologic cancers. A wholly-owned asset of CRISPR Therapeutics, CTX130 is in development for the treatment of both solid tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma, and T-cell and B-cell hematologic malignancies.

About CRISPR TherapeuticsCRISPR Therapeutics is a leading gene editing company focused on developing transformative gene-based medicines for serious diseases using its proprietary CRISPR/Cas9 platform. CRISPR/Cas9 is a revolutionary gene editing technology that allows for precise, directed changes to genomic DNA. CRISPR Therapeutics has established a portfolio of therapeutic programs across a broad range of disease areas including hemoglobinopathies, oncology, regenerative medicine and rare diseases. To accelerate and expand its efforts, CRISPR Therapeutics has established strategic partnerships with leading companies including Bayer, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and ViaCyte, Inc. CRISPR Therapeutics AG is headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, with its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, CRISPR Therapeutics, Inc., and R&D operations based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and business offices in San Francisco, California and London, United Kingdom. For more information, please visit http://www.crisprtx.com.

Story continues

CRISPR Forward-Looking StatementThis press release may contain a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including statements regarding CRISPR Therapeutics expectations about any or all of the following: (i) the safety, efficacy and clinical progress of CRISPR Therapeutics various clinical programs including CTX001, CTX110, CTX120 and CTX130; (ii) the status of clinical trials (including, without limitation, the timing of filing of clinical trial applications and INDs, any approvals thereof and the timing of commencement of clinical trials), development timelines and discussions with regulatory authorities related to product candidates under development by CRISPR Therapeutics and its collaborators; (iii) the number of patients that will be evaluated, the anticipated date by which enrollment will be completed and the data that will be generated by ongoing and planned clinical trials, and the ability to use that data for the design and initiation of further clinical trials; (iv) the integration of Casebia Therapeutics; (v) the intellectual property coverage and positions of CRISPR Therapeutics, its licensors and third parties as well as the status and potential outcome of proceedings involving any such intellectual property; (vi) the sufficiency of CRISPR Therapeutics cash resources; ; (vii) the expected benefits of CRISPR Therapeutics collaborations, including those with Bayer, KSQ, ProBioGen, StrideBio and Vertex; and (viii) the therapeutic value, development, and commercial potential of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technologies and therapies. Without limiting the foregoing, the words believes, anticipates, plans, expects and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. You are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Although CRISPR Therapeutics believes that such statements are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees and they are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. Actual performance and results may differ materially from those projected or suggested in the forward-looking statements due to various risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the potential for initial and preliminary data from any clinical trial (including CTX001, CTX110, CTX120 and CTX130) not to be indicative of final trial results; the risk that the initial data from a limited number of patients may not be indicative of results from the full planned study population; the outcomes for each CRISPR Therapeutics planned clinical trials and studies may not be favorable; that one or more of CRISPR Therapeutics internal or external product candidate programs will not proceed as planned for technical, scientific or commercial reasons; that future competitive or other market factors may adversely affect the commercial potential for CRISPR Therapeutics product candidates; uncertainties inherent in the initiation and completion of preclinical studies for CRISPR Therapeutics; availability and timing of results from preclinical studies; whether results from a preclinical trial will be predictive of future results of the future trials; uncertainties about regulatory approvals to conduct trials or to market products; uncertainties regarding the intellectual property protection for CRISPR Therapeutics technology and intellectual property belonging to third parties, and the outcome of proceedings (such as an interference, an opposition or a similar proceeding) involving all or any portion of such intellectual property; the risk that the CRISPR Therapeutics business and Casebia Therapeutics business will not be integrated successfully; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Risk Factors" in CRISPR Therapeutics most recent annual report on Form 10-K, and in any other subsequent filings made by CRISPR Therapeutics with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Existing and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. CRISPR Therapeutics disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this press release, other than to the extent required by law.

Investor Contact:Susan Kimsusan.kim@crisprtx.com

Media Contact:Rachel EidesWCG on behalf of CRISPR617-337-4167 reides@wcgworld.com

Read more:
CRISPR Therapeutics Provides Business Update and Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results - Yahoo Finance

Editing a -globin repressor binding site restores fetal hemoglobin synthesis and corrects the sickle cell disease phenotype – Science Advances

INTRODUCTION

-Hemoglobinopathies (SCD and -thalassemia) are severe anemias characterized by abnormal or reduced production of hemoglobin (Hb) chains. SCD and -thalassemia are the most common monogenic disorders with an incidence of 1 per 318,000 live births worldwide. In -thalassemia, the reduced production of chains causes -globin precipitation and insufficiently hemoglobinized red blood cells (RBCs). In SCD, the 6GluVal substitution leads to Hb polymerization and RBC sickling, which is responsible for vaso-occlusive crises, hemolytic anemia, and organ damage.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is the only definitive cure for patients affected by SCD or -thalassemia. Transplantation of autologous, genetically modified HSCs represents a promising therapeutic option for patient lacking a compatible HSC donor (1). Pioneering clinical trials based on lentiviral (LV)based gene addition approaches demonstrated a clinical benefit in -thalassemic patients with residual -globin production (+-thalassemia). However, this treatment is, at best, partially effective in correcting the clinical phenotype of severe 0-thalassemia (no residual -globin production) and SCD patients, where higher levels of therapeutic globin are required to restore correct globin chain balance and inhibit HbS polymerization (26).

The clinical severity of -hemoglobinopathies is alleviated by the co-inheritance of genetic mutations causing a sustained fetal -globin chain production at adult age, a condition termed hereditary persistence of fetal Hb (HPFH) (7). Elevated fetal -globin levels reduce globin chain imbalance in -thalassemias and exert a potent anti-sickling effect in SCD. Compared with current LV-based gene addition approaches, therapeutic strategies aimed at forcing a -globinto-globin switch (8) have the advantage of guaranteeing high-level expression of the endogenous -globin genes and, in the case of SCD, reduction of the S-globin synthesis.

HPFH mutations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with HbF levels of up to 40% of the total Hb were identified at positions 200, 175, 158, and 115 upstream of the HBG1 and HBG2 transcription start sites (TSSs) (Fig. 1A). These mutations either generate de novo DNA motifs recognized by transcriptional activators (9, 10) or disrupt the binding sites for transcriptional repressors. In particular, HPFH mutations in the 200 and 115 regions reduce the binding of LRF and BCL11A transcriptional repressors, respectively, thus inhibiting -globin silencing (11, 12). In addition, SNPs at position 158 of both HBG -globin promoters are associated with enhanced -globin expression (1317). These SNPs might either identify a putative transcriptional repressor binding site or create a binding site for a transcriptional activator. An ideal and universal strategy to correct the clinical phenotype of patients with -hemoglobinopathies would be to introduce HPFH mutations in the -globin promoters via homology-directed repair (11), which, however, is inefficient in HSCs (18). Here, we mimicked HPFH mutations by disrupting known or putative binding sites for transcriptional repressors in the -globin promoters using a CRISPR-Cas9based genome editing strategy that takes advantage of the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology (MH)mediated end joining (MMEJ)mediated DNA repair mechanisms to induce insertions and deletions (InDels) within the -globin repressor DNA binding motifs. In particular, we show that efficient disruption of known (200) or putative (158) binding sites via CRISPR-Cas9 leads to HbF derepression and thus mimics the effect of HPFH mutations and SNPs in erythroid cell lines and in RBCs derived from SCD patients hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Targeting the LRF-binding site corrects the SCD cell phenotype and is effective in repopulating HSPCs.

(A) Schematic representation of the -globin locus on chromosome 11, depicting the hypersensitive sites of the locus control region (white boxes) and the HBE1, HBG2, HBG1, HBD, and HBB genes (colored boxes). The sequence of the HBG2 and HBG1 identical promoters (from 210 to 100 nucleotides upstream of the HBG TSS) is shown below. Black arrows indicate HPFH mutations described at HBG1 and/or HBG2 promoters, with the percentage of HbF in heterozygous carriers of HPFH mutations (42). The highest HbF levels were generally observed in individuals carrying SCD (*) or -thalassemia mutations (**). LRF- and BCL11A-binding sites [as described in (11)] are highlighted by orange and green boxes, respectively. The 114/102 13-bp HPFH deletion is indicated by an empty box. Red arrows indicate the gRNA cleavage sites. (B to E) Globin expression analyses were performed in mature erythroblasts differentiated from Cas9-GFP+ HUDEP-2 cells. Results are shown as means SEM of three to four independent experiments. (B) RT-qPCR quantification of (G + A)- and -globin transcripts. mRNA levels were expressed as percentage of ( + ) globins, after normalization to -globin mRNA levels. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of HbF+ cells. (D) RP-HPLC analysis of globin chains. -Like globin expression was normalized to -globin. Representative RP-HPLC chromatograms are reported together with the expression of -globin chains (in brackets). The ratio of chains to non chains was similar between HBG-edited and control samples. (E) ChIP-qPCR analysis of H3K27Ac at HBB and HBG promoters in 197-edited HUDEP-2 cells and control AAVS1edited samples (day 5 of differentiation, n = 3). ChIP was performed using an antibody against H3K27Ac and the corresponding control immunoglobulin G (IgG). ****P 0.0001, ***P 0.001, **P 0.01, and *P 0.05 (unpaired t test). SSC, side scatter. (F) ChIP-qPCR analysis of LRF at HBG promoters in 197-edited and control AAVS1edited K562 cells (n = 2 biologically independent experiments). ChIP was performed using an antibody against LRF. Two different primer pairs were used to amplify the HBG promoters (A and B). KLF1 and DEFB122 served as positive and negative controls, respectively.

We designed guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting the 200 LRF-binding site (197, 196, and 195) and the 158 region (158, 152, and 151) (Fig. 1A). In parallel, we used a gRNA targeting the 115 region (115) that was reported to induce HbF reactivation by generating a 13base pair (bp) deletion spanning the BCL11A-binding site (19) and a control gRNA targeting the unrelated AAVS1 locus. Plasmid delivery of individual gRNAs and a Cas9green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion in the erythroleukemia cell line K562 revealed a similar editing efficiency for the gRNAs targeting the 200 region, whereas the 158 gRNA showed the highest editing efficiency at the 158 region. High cleavage efficiency was also observed for the 115 and AAVS1 gRNAs (fig. S1A).

We next used the HUDEP-2 adult erythroid cell line to evaluate -globin derepression following disruption of the 200, 158, and 115 regions. After plasmid transfection, bulk populations of Cas9-GFP+ HUDEP-2 cells were differentiated into mature erythroblasts. Overall, genome editing efficiency was ~80% for all the gRNAs tested, with the exception of the 158 gRNA (50 4%; fig. S1B). The editing frequency was similar at days 0 and 9 of erythroid differentiation, thus showing that edited cells were not counterselected during erythroid maturation (fig. S1B). The presence of a 158 C>T heterozygous SNP in the HBG2 promoter resulted in a reduced editing of HBG2 compared to HBG1 with the gRNA 158 (40 6% versus 68 1%; fig. S1C). Similar editing frequencies at the HBG1 and HBG2 promoters were observed with the other gRNAs (fig. S1C). Deep sequencing analysis revealed that virtually all the editing events altered the LRF- and BCL11A-binding sites in 200 and 115 edited samples, respectively, mostly through small deletions (fig. S1D). In a fraction of -globin loci, simultaneous cleavage of the HBG promoters resulted in the deletion of the intervening 4.9-kb genomic region and loss of the HBG2 gene, with a frequency ranging from 9 1% to 16 3% (fig. S1E).

Editing of the HBG promoters did not alter erythroid cell differentiation, as assessed by morphological analysis, and flow cytometry and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of erythroid markers (fig. S2, A to C). Disruption of the 200 region increased the production of -globin transcripts and a parallel decrease of adult -globin and -globin mRNA synthesis (Fig. 1B and fig. S2D). Similar changes were observed upon targeting the 115 region, while a lower -globin reactivation was observed upon targeting the 158 region (Fig. 1B and fig. S2D). -Globin mRNA levels were not significantly different among HBG-edited and control samples (fig. S2D). Flow cytometric analysis of cells edited at 197, 196, and 195 positions revealed a high frequency of HbF-expressing cells (F cells) (79 1%, 71 1%, and 78 1%). Similar results were obtained by disrupting the 115 region (71 3%), while a lower percentage of F cells (43 5%) was obtained in the 158 edited samples (Fig. 1C). Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) confirmed the significant increase in -globin with concomitant decrease of -globin production following editing of the 200 and the 115 regions, while 158 edited cells displayed a milder increase in -globin levels (Fig. 1D). Targeting the LRF-binding site resulted in high HbF levels, accounting for up to 28 1% of the total Hb in 197 samples, as determined by cation-exchange HPLC (CE-HPLC). Cells edited with the 115 gRNA showed comparable HbF reactivation (24 3%), while 158 edited cells showed HbF levels of only 5 2% (fig. S2E). HbF mainly contained A (HBG1) rather than G (HBG2) chains, which could be explained by loss of HBG2 caused by the 4.9-kb deletion (fig. S2F). Moreover, cells carrying the 4.9-kb deletion may reactivate more potently -globin expression, as the HBG1-HBG2 intervening sequence might contain cis regulatory elements that repress HBG transcription. HBG-edited HUDEP-2 showed a normal chain/non chain ratio, indicating that the increased production of -globin chains compensated for the reduction of -globin synthesis (Fig. 1D).

Disruption of the LRF-binding site at both HBG promoters was associated with increased H3K27 acetylation (H3K27Ac), a marker of active regulatory elements (Fig. 1E). Concomitantly, H3K27Ac tended to be reduced at the HBB gene in 197 edited cells compared to control samples (Fig. 1E). As LRF binding cannot be detected at the HBG promoters in wild-type HUDEP-2 cells expressing low HbF levels (11), we evaluated LRF binding in HbF+ K562 edited using the 197 gRNA (66% of editing efficiency) or the AAVS1 control gRNA (72% of editing efficiency). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)qPCR experiments showed a twofold reduction in LRF binding in 200-edited cells.

To test the anti-sickling properties of induced -globin synthesis in a clinically relevant model, we edited the -globin repressor binding sites in CD34+ HSPCs obtained from SCD patients by plerixafor mobilization (20). We first optimized a selection-free, ribonucleoprotein (RNP)based protocol (21) to efficiently edit the HBG promoters in CD34+ HSPCs. The use of chemically modified single gRNAs in combination with a transfection enhancer oligonucleotide resulted in the editing of up to 75% of the alleles using the gRNAs targeting the 200 region (fig. S3A). SCD HSPCs were then transfected with RNP complexes containing either the gRNAs targeting the HBG promoters or the control AAVS1 gRNA. Following erythroid differentiation, genome editing efficiency in bulk populations of mature erythroblasts achieved values of 80% in cells transfected with 197, 196, 195, and 115 gRNAs (Fig. 2A and fig. S3B). Editing frequency with the 158 gRNA was variable because of the presence of the C>T SNP at that position in a fraction of the SCD donors (Fig. 2A and fig. S3B). Genome editing efficiency was similar between the HBG2 and HBG1 promoters, except for samples harboring the 158 SNP and treated with the 158 gRNA (fig. S3B). Of note, the deletion of the 4.9-kb intervening region between HBG2 and HBG1 promoters was not detected in any of the edited primary samples (fig. S3C). This discrepancy between deletion efficiency in HUDEP-2 and HSPCs was also observed in previous studies targeting the 115 region (19, 22) and might be ascribed to a higher expression of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in HUDEP-2 cells [transfected with plasmids and FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting)sorted on the basis of Cas9-GFP expression] that favors the simultaneous cleavage of the HBG promoters (23). However, we cannot exclude that transformed cell lines might be more prone to illegitimate repair and can cope easily with large deletions.

(A) Deep sequencing analysis of genome editing events in mature erythroblasts derived from adult SCD and CB healthy donor HSPCs. The InDel profile was unchanged between SCD and healthy donor cells. Frequencies of substitutions (subst), insertions (ins), and deletions (del) are shown as percentages of total InDels. The proportion of >1-bp deletions associated or not with MH motifs is indicated. The frequency of >1-bp deletions associated with MH motifs was significantly lower for the 196 gRNA compared to the 197 (P 0.01) and 195 (P 0.001) gRNAs. Data are expressed as means SEM (n = 3 to 4, two to three donors). (B) Genome editing efficiency in BFU-E and CFU-GM progenitors derived from edited SCD HSPCs as evaluated by TIDE. Data are expressed as means SEM (n = 2 to 5, two SCD donors). (C) Genome editing in single BFU-E and CFU-GM colonies derived from SCD HSPCs as evaluated by TIDE. We plotted the number of edited HBG promoters. In the 158 sample, the donor did not harbor the 158 SNP. (D) InDel profiles generated by each gRNA as analyzed by deep sequencing. The length of MH motifs associated with specific InDels is indicated. Data are expressed as means SEM (n = 3 to 4, two to three donors). (E) Genome editing efficiency in subpopulations of 197- and 196-edited CB-derived HSPCs. Cells were FACS-sorted based on the expression of CD34, CD133, and CD90, and genome editing efficiency was determined in committed (CD34+CD133), early (CD34+CD133+CD90), and primitive (CD34+CD133+CD90+) progenitors. We plotted the data of three independent experiments starting from unsorted HSPCs with low, medium, and high genome editing efficiency (three donors).

Control and edited SCD HSPCs were plated in clonogenic cultures [colony-forming cell (CFC) assay], allowing the growth of erythroid [burst-forming uniterythroid (BFU-E)] and granulomonocytic [colony-forming unitgranulomonocytic (CFU-GM)] progenitors. Genome editing efficiency was comparable in pools of BFU-Es and CFU-GMs that showed a similar InDel profile (Fig. 2B and fig. S3D). Clonal analysis of single CFCs revealed that >85% of hematopoietic progenitors were edited at the target sites, with ~86 and ~67% of BFU-Es and CFU-GMs, respectively, displaying 3 edited HBG promoters (Fig. 2C). Transfection with the full RNP complex reduced the number of hematopoietic progenitors by 10 to 50% compared to transfection of Cas9 protein alone (fig. S3E).

Previous reports have suggested that HSCs, the target of therapeutic genome editing, are preferentially edited via the NHEJ mechanism (24, 25). On the contrary, MMEJ repair pathway, which takes place through annealing of short stretches of identical sequence flanking the double-strand break (DSB), may be less active (24, 25). Therefore, for each gRNA, we evaluated the frequency of mutations with or without MH motifs as a proxy for the relative contribution of MMEJ- and NHEJ-mediated events. In HSPC-derived erythroid bulk populations, among the editing events, deletions were predominant, and a variable fraction of them (30 to 50%) were associated with the presence of MH motifs in the target sequence (Fig. 2A). In particular, MMEJ events at the LRF-binding site can be likely caused by the presence of two stretches of four cytidines (Fig. 1A and table S1). Among the total InDels, the frequency of events associated with MH motifs was significantly higher for the 197 (38 3%) and 195 (32 1%) gRNAs than for the 196 gRNAs (23 1%). The gRNAs targeting the LRF-binding site induced distinct InDel profiles: 196- and 195-edited cells harbored mainly 1-bp insertions and 1- to 2-bp deletions, while the 197 gRNAs generated the largest fraction of >2-bp deletion events, of which ~45% were associated with MH motifs (Fig. 2D and table S1). Virtually all the editing events generated by the 197, 196, and 195 gRNAs disrupted the LRF-binding site (table S1). Of note, the proportion of nucleotides in the LRF-binding site that were lost as a result of editing was higher in 197 than in 196 and 195 samples (fig. S4). As expected, the 115 gRNA caused disruption of the BCL11A-binding site (19). In these samples, 13-bp deletions partially spanning the BCL11A-binding site were associated with an 8-bp MH motif and likely mediated by MMEJ (fig. S4 and table S1) (19). Last, the 158 gRNA generated mostly 1-bp insertions and small deletions around the cleavage site (Fig. 2D, fig. S4, and table S1). To evaluate CRISPR-Cas9mediated genetic modification of the CD34+ cell fraction containing more primitive HSPCs, HBG promoter editing was assessed in FACS-isolated HSPC subpopulations (26), after transfection of the 197 and 196 gRNAs, associated with high and low frequencies of deletions associated with MH motifs, respectively. Editing frequencies were comparable between primitive CD34+/CD133+/CD90+ and early CD34+/CD133+/CD90 progenitors and between CD34+/CD133 committed progenitors and unsorted CD34+ cells even in the case of a limited genome editing efficiency, with a similar InDel profile across the different CD34+ cell subpopulations (Fig. 2E and fig. S5). It is noteworthy that deletions potentially generated via MMEJ occurred even in the more primitive, HSC-enriched populations (fig. S5).

To evaluate HbF reactivation and correction of the SCD cell phenotype upon HBG promoter editing, bulk populations of SCD HSPCs were terminally differentiated into enucleated RBCs. Editing of the HBG promoters did not affect erythroid differentiation, as evaluated by flow cytometry and RT-qPCR analysis of stage-specific erythroid markers and RBC enucleation and by morphological analysis (fig. S6, A to C). Editing of the 200 region led to increased levels of -globin mRNAs, which accounted for 48 3% of total -like globin transcripts in cells transfected with the 197 gRNA (Fig. 3A). -Globin mRNA levels were not significantly different among HBG-edited and control samples (fig. S6D). The proportion of F cells in cells transfected with the 197, 196, and 195 gRNAs was 81 1%, 74 2%, and 74 2%, respectively (Fig. 3B). Analysis of 197- and 196-edited erythroblasts sorted by cytofluorimetry based on the intensity of HbF expression revealed a positive correlation between InDel frequency and extent of -globin production, indicating that the efficacy of HbF reactivation likely increases when targeting a higher number of HBG promoters per cell (fig. S6, E and F). Editing of the 115 region led to HBG derepression and a proportion of 80 2% of F cells, while -globin reactivation was less pronounced in the 158 samples (55 5% of F cells; Fig. 3, A and B). It is noteworthy that for the 158 gRNA, HBG derepression was still modest in RBCs derived from HSPCs harboring >85% of edited HBG promoters (Fig. 3, A and B), suggesting that the 158 region contains a sequence that modestly contributes to inhibition of -globin expression in adult cells. This is consistent with the mild increase in HbF known to be associated with the 158 SNPs. However, an alternative hypothesis is that these SNPs generate a DNA motif recognized by a still unknown transcriptional activator; thus, the mechanism of action remains unclear. RP-HPLC showed a significant increase in -globin chain expression and a reciprocal reduction in S-globin levels in the RBC progeny of 200- and 115-edited HSPCs, with no evidence of imbalance in the /non globin chain synthesis (Fig. 3C). In 197-edited cells, the increase in -globin chains and the reduction of S-globin levels resulted in an inversion of the / globin ratio. Comparable A- and G-globin levels were detected in most of the samples analyzed, consistent with the absence of 4.9-kb deletions. However, in 115-edited cells, HbF was mainly composed of A-globin (fig. S6G). Unexpectedly, in the 115 samples, the relative frequency of the various editing events was different between HBG1 and HBG2 promoters, with 13-bp deletions occurring more frequently in HBG2 than in HBG1, while HBG1 editing events were mainly smaller deletions (table S2). This difference in the editing of HBG1 and HBG2 was unexpected and does not obviously explain the altered A/G ratio in 115-edited samples. CE-HPLC confirmed that editing of the 200 region produced an Hb profile comparable to asymptomatic heterozygous carriers, with HbF representing up to 47 3% of the total Hb tetramers (197 samples; Fig. 3D). Total Hb levels were comparable between RBCs derived from HBG-edited and control HSPCs (fig. S6H).

(A) (G + A)- and S-globin transcript levels detected by RT-qPCR in primary mature erythroblasts. Values are expressed as percentage of ( + S)-globin mRNAs after normalization to -globin. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of HbF+ cells in RBC populations derived from control and HBG-edited SCD HSPCs. (C) RP-HPLC quantification of -, S-, and -globin chains. -Like globin expression was normalized to -globin. The ratio of chains to non chains was similar between control and HBG-edited samples. Data are expressed as means SEM. (D) Quantification of total HbF (HbF + AcHbF), HbS, and HbA2 by CE-HPLC. We plotted the percentage of each Hb type over the total Hb tetramers. (E and F) In vitro sickling assay of RBCs derived from edited SCD HSPCs under hypoxic conditions (0% O2). (E) Representative photomicrographs of RBCs derived from control and HBG-edited SCD HSPCs at 0% O2. Scale bar, 20 m. (F) Proportion of non-sickled RBCs (0% O2). (A to F) Data are expressed as means SEM (n = 3 to 7, two SCD donors). ****P 0.0001, ***P 0.001, **P 0.01, and *P 0.05 versus AAVS1 sample (unpaired t test).

To assess the effect of HbF reactivation on the sickling phenotype, we performed an in vitro deoxygenation assay that induces sickling of RBCs under hypoxia. At an oxygen concentration of 0%, ~80% of control SCD RBCs acquired a sickled shape (Fig. 3, E and F). Targeting of the 158 region essentially failed to rescue the SCD phenotype (29 13% of nonsickling RBCs; Fig. 3F). In 115-edited samples, HbF reactivation prevented the sickling of 56 9% of RBCs (Fig. 3F). A marked correction of the SCD phenotype was achieved upon disruption of the LRF-binding site, with 69 6% (196) to 79 7% (197) of cells that maintained a biconcave shape under hypoxia (Fig. 3F). Even gRNAs generating predominantly 1- to 2-bp InDels (195 and 196) induced -globin levels that were sufficient to inhibit sickling in a large fraction of RBCs. These results show that editing of the repressor binding sites in the HBG promoters leads to reactivation of HbF sufficient to revert the sickling phenotypes in erythrocytes differentiated from CD34+ HSPCs derived from SCD patients.

Last, in bulk populations of edited SCD erythroblasts, deep sequencing of top-scoring off-targets identified by GUIDE-seq (27) in 293T cells (fig. S7A) showed low to undetectable off-target activity at most of the sites. An average InDel frequency of ~20% was observed in cells edited with the 196 gRNA within an intergenic site located on chromosome 12 (OT-196.1) (fig. S7B). This site lies ~15-kb away from the nearest gene and does not map to known regulatory elements involved in hematopoiesis.

We next evaluated editing efficiency in repopulating HSPCs. Mobilized healthy donor HSPCs were transfected with 197, 196, 115, or AAVS1 gRNAs. We achieved an average editing efficiency of 77.3 3.7%, 87.4 4.6%, and 89.6 2.8% for the 197, 196, 115 gRNAs, respectively, as measured in in vitro cultured HSPCs, and BFU-E and CFU-GM pools (input cells). Untreated and edited cells were injected into NSG immunodeficient mice, and 16 weeks after transplantation, we analyzed the engraftment of human hematopoietic cells and editing efficiency. The engraftment of control and HBG-edited cells was not statistically different, as analyzed in bone marrow, spleen, and thymus (Fig. 4A), with no skewing toward a particular lineage in any of the samples (fig. S8). Editing efficiency in human cells in the bone marrow and spleen, respectively, was 43.0 9.3% and 33.4 4.0% (197), 60.3 6.1% and 62.0 1.7% (196), and 47.6 4.2% and 58.2 3.1% (115) (Fig. 4B). The 197 gRNA showed a similar InDel profile in the input and in the engrafted human cells, with most of MH motifassociated events occurring at a comparable frequency (Fig. 4C). For the 196 gRNA, events associated to MH motifs were significantly reduced in vivo but were already present at a low frequency in the input populations (Fig. 4C) concordantly with the data obtained in mature erythroblasts in vitro (Fig. 2D). Virtually all editing events disrupt the LRF-binding sites in 197 and 196 samples (Fig. 4C). Last, the frequency of the MH motifassociated 13-bp deletion tended to be lower in the progeny of repopulating HSPCs compared to the input samples, as previously reported (Fig. 4C) (24). Together, these results show that the LRF-binding site can be efficiently targeted in engrafting HSPCs.

(A) Engraftment of human cells in NSG mice transplanted with untreated (UT) and edited mobilized healthy donor CD34+ cells (n = 4 mice for each group) 16 weeks after transplantation. Engraftment is represented as percentage of human CD45+ cells in the total murine and human CD45+ cell population, in bone marrow (BM), spleen, thymus, and blood. Values shown are means SEM; *P 0.05 versus untreated [one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. (B) Editing efficiency in the bone marrow and spleen-derived human CD45+ progeny of repopulating HSPCs, as evaluated by Sanger sequencing and TIDE analysis. The proportion of edited alleles in the input HSPC populations (: HSPCs cultured for 6 days in HSPC medium; : BFU-E; : CFU-GM) is indicated (input). Values shown are means SEM. Each data point represents an individual mouse. (C) Genome editing efficiency in the input populations and in bone marrow and spleen-derived human CD45+ populations edited with the 197, 196, or 115 gRNAs, as evaluated by Sanger sequencing and TIDE analysis. The main events associated with MH-motifs are indicated. Values shown are means SEM (n = 4 mice per group). ***P 0.001, **P 0.01, and *P 0.05 versus input (unpaired t test).

Therapeutic approaches aimed at increasing HbF levels could rely on the down-regulation of nuclear factors involved in -globin silencing. However, knockdown of the transcriptional repressor LRF increases HbF expression but delays erythroid differentiation (28). Here, we used a CRISPR-Cas9 strategy to disrupt the cis regulatory element involved in LRF-mediated fetal globin silencing and mimic the effect of HPFH mutations. By using three different gRNAs targeting the LRF-binding site, we achieved a robust, virtually pancellular HbF reactivation and a concomitant reduction in S-globin levels, recapitulating the phenotype of asymptomatic SCD-HPFH patients (29, 30). Notably, a proportion of HbF >30% in 70% of RBCs has been proposed as the minimal requirement to inhibit HbS polymerization and mitigate the clinical SCD manifestations (30). RBCs derived from edited HSPCs displayed HbF levels sufficient to significantly ameliorate the SCD cell phenotype. It is noteworthy that this approach can potentially be applied also to -thalassemias, where elevated fetal -globin levels could compensate for -globin deficiency.

The development of a selection-free, optimized editing protocol allowed us to obtain a high editing frequency at the LRF-binding site in primary human HSPCs and in HSC-enriched cell populations, which, unexpectedly, showed editing events potentially generated by both NHEJ and MMEJ. However, similarly to the homology-directed repair mechanism (18) [used to correct disease-causing mutations (3133)], the MMEJ repair pathway occurs in actively dividing cells (34). Therefore, we could not exclude that MMEJ might not be efficient in the quiescent repopulating HSCs (24, 25). Xenotransplantation of HSPCs edited using the gRNAs targeting the LRF- or the BCL11A-binding sites demonstrated a high editing efficiency in repopulating HSPCs and no impairment of their multilineage potential. Similarly to recent studies (24, 35), we observed the persistence in vivo of the 13-bp deletion in the 115 region (although at a lower frequency compared to in vitro cultured HSPCs), which is predicted to be mediated by MMEJ. Upon targeting of the BCL11A enhancer, Wu and colleagues (25) observed a stronger reduction in the frequency of editing events possibly due to MMEJ. In our study, upon targeting of the 200 region, some, but not all, deletions associated with MH motifs and potentially generated via MMEJ were detected at a significantly lower frequency in engrafting HSPCs compared to in vitro cultured HSPCs. Together, these studies suggest that, although at a lower frequency compared to in vitro cultured hematopoietic progenitors, MMEJ can occur in vivo in repopulating HSPCs, in which, however, NHEJ is likely the most active repair pathway. However, as MH motifassociated editing events are only computationally predicted to be due to MMEJ, we cannot exclude that a fraction of these events are caused by NHEJ and therefore can occur in repopulating HSPCs.

It is noteworthy that larger deletions typically generated by the 197 edits and associated with an efficient disruption of the LRF-binding sites occur also in vivo. Moreover, even short InDels generated mainly by NHEJ (e.g., 196 gRNA) and detected in repopulating HSPCs are productive in terms of HbF derepression and correction of the SCD cell phenotype. Together, these results show that this strategy can be effective in engrafting HSPCs.

Should the observed editing frequency be confirmed in vivo in patients, this approach would guarantee the efficiency required to achieve clinical benefit in SCD and -thalassemia. The clinical history of allogeneic HSC transplantation for both diseases suggests that a limited fraction of genetically corrected HSCs would be sufficient to achieve a therapeutic benefit given the in vivo selective survival of corrected RBCs or erythroid precursors (3641).

Disrupting either the LRF- or the BCL11A-binding site in the HBG promoters induced significant HbF production. Given the independent role of LRF and BCL11A in -globin repression (28), combined strategies aimed at evicting simultaneously both repressors from the -globin promoters could have an additive effect on HbF reactivation. Albeit a Cas9-nucleasebased strategy targeting both the 115 and 200 regions would probably trigger the deletion of the 115-to-200 intervening sequence [that would be detrimental for promoter activity; (42)], this study paves the way for the use of novel DSB-free editing strategies [e.g., base editing (43)] to simultaneously disrupt both LRF and BCL11A repressor binding sites in the -globin promoters.

Overall, our study provides proof of concept for a novel approach to treat SCD by targeting a repressor binding site in the -globin promoters to induce derepression of fetal Hb and a concomitant decrease in HbS synthesis. The same strategy could be beneficial also in the case of -thalassemia, potentially providing a more economical gene therapy approach compared to the use of LV vectors to deliver a functional -globin gene. LV manufacturing is complex and very expensive (44). Our genome editing approach requires the delivery of RNA/protein reagents that might be less expensive than LV production and thus would allow the broader use of gene therapy for -hemoglobinopathies.

Clinical translation of this genome editing approach requires the development of nontoxic large-scale transfection protocols based on clinical-grade reagents and demonstration of precise editing in a number of HSPCs at least comparable to the efficacious doses predicted by allogeneic transplantation data (i.e., 2 106 to 3 106 HSPCs/kg).

We used CRISPOR (45) to design gRNAs targeting the 200 and 158 regions of the HBG promoters (Table 1). For gRNA expression in erythroid cell lines, oligonucleotide duplexes containing the gRNA protospacers were ligated into Bbs Idigested MA128 plasmid (provided by M. Amendola, Genethon, France). For RNP delivery to HSPCs, we used chemically modified synthetic single gRNAs harboring 2-O-methyl analogs and 3-phosphorothioate nonhydrolyzable linkages at the first three 5 and 3 nucleotides (Synthego) at a concentration of 180 M. Two-part cr:tracrRNA gRNAs were composed of a tracrRNA (IDT) and a custom crRNA (IDT) assembled in equimolar concentrations to produce a 180 M duplex (Table 1).

Protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) are highlighted in bold.

K562 were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Lonza) containing glutamine and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Lonza), Hepes (Life Technologies), sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), and penicillin and streptomycin (Life Technologies). HUDEP-2 cells (46) were cultured and differentiated, as previously described (47). Flow cytometric analysis of CD36, CD71, and GYPA surface markers and a standard May-Grnwald Giemsa staining were performed to monitor erythroid differentiation.

K562 and HUDEP-2 cells were transfected with 4 g of a Cas9-GFPexpressing plasmid (pMJ920, Addgene) and 0.8 g (K562) and 1.6 g (HUDEP-2) of gRNA-containing plasmid. We used AMAXA Cell Line Nucleofector Kit V (VCA-1003) and U-16 and L-29 programs (Nucleofector II) for K562 and HUDEP-2, respectively. GFP+ HUDEP-2 cells were sorted using SH800 Cell Sorter (Sony Biotechnology).

We obtained human cord blood (CB) CD34+ HSPCs from healthy donors. CB samples eligible for research purposes were obtained because of a convention with the CB bank of Saint Louis Hospital (Paris, France). Human adult SCD CD34+ HSPCs were isolated from Plerixafor mobilized SCD patients (NCT 02212535 clinical trial, Necker Hospital, Paris, France). We obtained granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)mobilized adult HSPCs from healthy donors. Written informed consent was obtained from all adult subjects. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the regional investigational review board (reference: DC 2014-2272, CPP Ile-de-France II Hpital Necker-Enfants malades). HSPCs were purified by immunomagnetic selection with AutoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec) after immunostaining with the CD34 MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi Biotec).

Forty-eight hours before transfection, CD34+ cells (106 cells/ml) were thawed and cultured in the HSPC medium containing StemSpan (STEMCELL Technologies) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), 250 nM StemRegenin1 (STEMCELL Technologies), and the following recombinant human cytokines (PeproTech): stem cell factor (SCF) (300 ng/ml), Flt-3L (300 ng/ml), thrombopoietin (TPO) (100 ng/ml), and interleukin-3 (IL-3) (60 ng/ml).

gRNAs were assembled at room temperature with a 90 M Cas9-GFP protein (provided by De Cian) in RNP complexes using a ratio of 2:1 (gRNA:Cas9). Human CD34+ cells (1 106 to 2 106) were transfected with RNP particles using the P3 Primary Cell 4D-Nucleofector X Kit S or L (Lonza), respectively, and the AMAXA 4D CA137 program (Lonza) together with 90 M transfection enhancer (IDT), unless otherwise stated.

Transfected human HSPCs were differentiated into mature RBCs using a three-step protocol (48). From day 0 to day 6, cells were grown in a basal erythroid medium supplemented with the following recombinant human cytokines: SCF (100 ng/ml; PeproTech), IL-3 (5 ng/ml; PeproTech), EPO Eprex (3 IU/ml; Janssen-Cilag), and 106 M hydrocortisone (Sigma). From day 6 to day 9, cells were cultured onto a layer of murine stromal MS-5 cells in a basal erythroid medium supplemented with EPO Eprex (3 IU/ml). Last, from day 9 to day 19, cells were cultured on a layer of MS-5 cells in a basal erythroid medium without cytokines. Erythroid differentiation was monitored by May Grnwald-Giemsa staining; flow cytometric analysis of CD36, CD71, and GYPA erythroid surface markers; and DRAQ5 staining of nucleated cells.

Healthy donor CB-derived CD34+ HSPCs (106) were transfected as described above and plated at a concentration of 500,000/ml in StemSpan (STEMCELL Technologies) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), 250 nM StemRegenin1 (STEMCELL Technologies), and the following recombinant human cytokines (PeproTech): SCF (300 ng/ml), Flt-3L (300 ng/ml), TPO (100 ng/ml), and IL-3 (60 ng/ml). Eighteen hours after transfection, cells were stained with antibodies recognizing CD34 [CD34 phycoerythrin (PE)Cy7, 348811; BD Pharmingen], CD133 (CD133 PE, 130-113-748, Miltenyi Biotec), and CD90 (CD90 PE-Cy5, 348811, BD Pharmingen). Cells were sorted using FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). Sorted and unsorted populations were cultured at a concentration of 5 105/ml in a cytokine-enriched medium (described above) for 4 days before collection for DNA extraction.

The number of hematopoietic progenitors was evaluated by clonal CFC assay. HSPCs were plated at a concentration of 1 103 cells/ml in a methylcellulose-containing medium (GFH4435, STEMCELL Technologies) under conditions supporting erythroid and granulomonocytic differentiation. BFU-E and CFU-GM colonies were scored after 14 days. BFU-Es and CFU-GMs were randomly picked and collected as bulk populations (containing at least 25 colonies) or as individual colonies (35 to 45 colonies per sample) to evaluate genome editing efficiency.

Genome editing was analyzed in HUDEP-2 cells at days 0 and 9 of erythroid differentiation and in CB and adult mobilized HSPC-derived erythroid cells at days 6 and 14 of erythroid differentiation, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from control and edited cells using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies), Quick-DNA/RNA Miniprep (ZYMO Research), or DNA Extract All Reagents Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturers instructions. To evaluate NHEJ efficiency at gRNA target sites, we performed PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and TIDE analysis (tracking of InDels by decomposition) (49) or ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool (Synthego) (Table 2) (50).

F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Digital droplet PCR was performed using EvaGreen mix (Bio-Rad) to quantify the frequency of the 4.9-kb deletion. Short (~1 min) elongation time allowed the PCR amplification of the genomic region harboring the deletion. Control primers annealing to a genomic region on the same chromosome (chr 11) were used as DNA loading control (Table 3).

Following PCR amplification of the target sequences with the Phusion High-Fidelity polymerase with GC Buffer (New England BioLabs), amplicons were purified using Ampure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). Illumina-compatible barcoded DNA amplicon libraries were prepared using the TruSeq DNA PCR-Free kit (Illumina). PCR amplification was then performed using 1 ng of double-stranded ligation product and Kapa Taq polymerase reagents (KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit, Kapa Biosystems). After a purification step using Ampure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), libraries were pooled and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2500 (paired-end sequencing 130 130 bases) (Table 4).

For the on-target sites, read pairs were assembled using FLASH. We used a custom python tool suite to count and characterize InDels that were classified in different types: 1-bp deletions, >1-bp deletions non-MH (not associated with MH motifs), >1-bp deletions MH (associated with MH motifs), 1-bp insertions, and >1-bp insertions and substitutions. A tunable window around the cleavage site (typically of 10 bp) was defined to minimize false-positive InDels, and comparison between treated and control samples was used to call InDels due to treatment versus sequencing errors. For the off-target sites, targeted deep sequencing data were analyzed using CRISPRESSO (51).

Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T/17 cells (2.5 105) were transfected with 500 ng of a SpCas9-expressing plasmid, together with 250 ng of each single-guide RNAcoding plasmid or an empty pUC19 vector (background control), 10 pmol of the bait dsODN (designed according to the original GUIDE-seq protocol), and 50 ng of a pEGFP-IRES-Puro plasmid, expressing both enhanced GFP (EGFP) and the puromycin resistance genes. One day after transfection, cells were replated and selected with puromycin (1 g/ml) for 48 hours to enrich for transfected cells. Cells were then collected, and genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and sheared to an average length of 500 bp with the Bioruptor Pico Sonication System (Diagenode). Library preparation was performed using the original adapters and primers according to previous work (27). Libraries were sequenced with a MiSeq sequencing system (Illumina) using an Illumina MiSeq Reagent kit V2-300 cycles (2 150-bp paired-end). Raw sequencing data (FASTQ files) were analyzed using the GUIDE-seq computational pipeline (52). Identified sites were considered bona fide off-targets if a maximum of seven mismatches against the on-target were present and if they were absent in the background control. The GUIDE-seq datasets are available in the BioProject repository under the accession number PRJNA531587.

Total RNA was extracted from differentiated HUDEP-2 (day 9) and primary mature SCD erythroblasts (day 13) using an RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturers instructions. Mature transcripts were reverse-transcribed using SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-qPCR (Invitrogen) with oligo(dT) primers. RT-qPCR was performed using an iTaq Universal SYBR Green master mix (Bio-Rad) and a Viia7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (Table 5).

RP-HPLC analysis was performed using a NexeraX2 SIL-30AC chromatograph and the LC Solution software (Shimadzu). Globin chains were separated by HPLC using a 250 mm 4.6 mm, 3.6-m Aeris Widepore column (Phenomenex). Samples were eluted with a gradient mixture of solution A (water/acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid, 95:5:0.1) and solution B (water/acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid, 5:95:0.1). The absorbance was measured at 220 nm.

CE-HPLC analysis was performed using a NexeraX2 SIL-30 AC chromatograph and the LC Solution software (Shimadzu). Hb tetramers were separated by HPLC using two cation-exchange columns (PolyCAT A, PolyLC, Columbia, MD). Samples were eluted with a gradient mixture of solution A [20 mM Bis-Tris and 2 mM KCN (pH 6.5)] and solution B [20 mM Bis-Tris, 2 mM KCN, and 250 mM NaCl (pH 6.8)]. The absorbance was measured at 415 nm. The calculation of total Hb levels was performed by integration of the areas under the Hb peaks followed by comparison with a standard Hb control (Lyphochek Hemoglobin A2 Control, Bio-Rad).

Differentiated HUDEP-2 cells were fixed and permeabilized using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Pharmingen) and stained with an antibody recognizing HbF [an allophycocyanin (APC)conjugated anti-HbF antibody, MHF05, Life Technologies or a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)conjugated anti-HbF antibody, 552829, BD Pharmingen]. HSPC-derived RBCs or erythroblasts were fixed in cold 0.05% glutaraldehyde and permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100. After incubation with Fcr Blocking Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec), cells were stained with an FITC-conjugated anti-HbF antibody (552829, BD Pharmingen).

Flow cytometric analysis of CD36, CD71, and GYPA erythroid surface markers was performed using a V450-conjugated anti-CD36 antibody (561535, BD Horizon), an FITC-conjugated anti-CD71 antibody (555536, BD Pharmingen), and a PE-Cy7conjugated anti-GYPA antibody (563666, BD Pharmingen). We used the nuclear dye DRAQ5 (eBioscience) to evaluate the proportion of enucleated RBCs.

To determine genome editing efficiency in erythroid subpopulations, cells were labeled with a PE-Cy7conjugated anti-GYPA antibody (563666, BD Pharmingen) and an FITC-conjugated anti-HbF antibody (552829, BD Pharmingen), as described above. GYPA+ cells were sorted on the basis of HbF expression using FACSAria II (BD Biosciences).

Flow cytometry analyses were performed using Fortessa X20 (BD Biosciences) or Gallios (Beckman Coulter) flow cytometers. Data were analyzed using the Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter) or the FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).

ChIP experiments to detect H3K27Ac were performed as previously described (53). After 5 days of differentiation, 197 and AAVS1 HUDEP-2 bulk populations were collected for ChIP assays. Briefly, chromatin was cross-linked for 10 min at room temperature with 1% formaldehyde-containing medium. Nuclear extracts were sonicated using the Bioruptor Pico Sonication System (Diagenode). Chromatin obtained from 2 106 cells was immunoprecipitated at 4C overnight using an antibody (1 g per 106 cells) against H3K27Ac (ab4729, Abcam) or a control immunoglobulin G (sc-2025, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Chromatin cross-linking was reversed at 65C for at least 4 hours, and DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). We used quantitative SYBR Green PCR (Applied Biosystems) and the Viia7 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to evaluate H3K27Ac enrichment at different genomic loci (Table 6). ChIP experiments to detect LRF were performed as previously described (11) in 197- and AAVS1-edited K562 bulk populations (Table 7).

HSPC-derived SCD RBCs were exposed to an oxygen-deprived atmosphere (0% O2), and the time course of sickling was monitored in real time by video microscopy, capturing images every 20 min for at least 80 min using an AxioObserver Z1 microscope (Zeiss) and a 40 objective. Images of the same fields were taken throughout all stages and processed with ImageJ to determine the percentage of nonsickled RBCs per field of acquisition in the total RBC population. Cells (~300 to 3300) were counted per condition (1500 cells on average).

Nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency gamma (NSG) mice (NOD.CgPrkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wj/SzJ, Charles River Laboratories, St Germain sur lArbresle, France) were housed in a specific pathogenfree facility. Mice at 6 to 8 weeks of age were conditioned with busulfan (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) injected intraperitoneally (25 mg/kg body weight/day) 24, 48, and 72 hours before transplantation. Control or edited mobilized healthy donor CD34+ cells (106 cells per mouse) were transplanted into NSG mice via retro-orbital sinus injection. Neomycin and acid water were added in the water bottle. At 16 weeks after transplantation, NSG recipients were sacrificed. Cells were harvested from femur bone marrow, thymus, and spleen; stained with antibodies against murine or human surface markers [murine CD45, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; human CD45, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; human CD3, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; human CD14, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; human CD15, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA; human CD19, Sony Biotechnologies, San Jose, CA, USA; human CD235a (CD235a-APC), BD Pharmingen]; and analyzed by flow cytometry using a Gallios analyzer and the Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). All experiments and procedures were performed in compliance with the French Ministry of Agricultures regulations on animal experiments and were approved by the regional Animal Care and Use Committee (APAFIS#2101-2015090411495178 v4).

Paired t tests were performed to compare genome editing efficiencies in erythroid subpopulations sorted based on HbF expression. Unpaired t tests were performed for all the other analyses. Statistical analyses were carried out using Prism4 software (GraphPad). We used the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare frequency of deletion generated at each nucleotide by the different gRNAs. The threshold for statistical significance was set to P < 0.05.

Acknowledgments: We thank R. Kurita and Y. Nakamura for contributing the HUDEP-2 cell line, L. Douay for the erythroid differentiation protocol, G. Pavani for the optimization of editing protocol in HSPCs, B. Wienert for providing assistance and protocol for the LRF ChIP, O. Alibeau and C. Bole for the DNA sequencing, E. Brunet for the discussion, and E. Duvernois-Berthet for the script used for InDel characterization. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (ERC-2015-AdG, GENEFORCURE), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE18-0004, ANR-11-INBS-0014-TEFOR, ANR-17-CE13-0016-i-MMEJ, and ANR-10-IAHU-01 Investissements davenir program), the Paris Ile-de-France Region under DIM Thrapie gnique initiative, and Genopole (CHAIRE JUNIOR FONDAGEN). Author contributions: L.W. and G.F. designed and conducted the experiments and wrote the paper. T.F., G.H., A.Ca., C.W., V.M., and A.Ch. designed and conducted the experiments. C.M. analyzed off-target NGS data. A.D.C. provided reagents. F.M., M.A., I.A.-S., A.Ce., W.E.N., J.-P.C., C.G., and M.C. contributed to the design of the experimental strategy. A.M. conceived the study, designed the experiments, and wrote the paper. Competing interests: A.M. and L.W. are inventors on a patent application related to this work filed by INSERM (PCT/EP2019/074131, 10 September 2019). The authors declare that they have no other competing interests. Data and materials availability: The GUIDE-seq datasets are available in the BioProject repository under the accession number PRJNA531587. All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Read the original post:
Editing a -globin repressor binding site restores fetal hemoglobin synthesis and corrects the sickle cell disease phenotype - Science Advances

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report 2020 by Detailed Segmentation, SWOT Analysis, Demand Analysis and Forecast To 2024 – Instant Tech News

Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy MarketThis research report provides detailed study accumulated to offer Latest insights about acute features of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market. The report contains different market predictions related to market size, revenue, production, CAGR, Consumption, gross margin, price, and other substantial factors. While emphasizing the key driving and restraining forces for this market, the report also offers a complete study of the future trends and developments of the market. It also examines the role of the leading market players involved in the industry including their corporate overview, financial summary and SWOT analysis.It presents the 360-degree overview of the competitive landscape of the industries. Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market is showing steady growthand CAGR is expected to improve during the forecast period.

Manufacturer DetailMedivet Biologics LLCVETSTEM BIOPHARMAJ-ARMU.S. Stem Cell, IncVetCell TherapeuticsCelavet Inc.Magellan Stem CellsKintaro Cells PowerAnimal Stem CareAnimal Cell TherapiesCell Therapy Sciences

Product Type SegmentationDogsHorses

Industry SegmentationVeterinary HospitalsResearch Organizations

Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market report provides you with detailed insights, industry knowledge, market forecasts and analytics. The report on the global Animal Stem Cell Therapy industry also clarifies economic risks and environmental compliance. Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy market report assists industry enthusiasts including investors and decision makers to make confident capital investments, develop strategies, optimize their business portfolio, innovate successfully and perform safely and sustainably.

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Regional Analysis Includes:

Major Points Covered in TOC:

Key Questions Answered in the Report Include:

(*If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.)

About Us:

Qurate Business Intelligence delivers unique market research solutions to its customers and help them to get equipped with refined information and market insights derived from reports. We are committed to providing best business services and easy processes to get the same. Qurate Business Intelligence considers themselves as strategic partners of their customers and always shows the keen level of interest to deliver quality.

Contact Us:Web:www.qurateresearch.comE-mail:[emailprotected]Ph: US +13393375221, IN +919881074592

Qurate Business Intelligence delivers unique Market research solutions to its customers and help them to get equipped with refined information and Market insights derived from reports. We are committed to providing best business services and easy processes to get the same. Qurate Business Intelligence considers themselves as strategic partners of their customers and always shows the keen level of interest to deliver quality.

Excerpt from:
Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report 2020 by Detailed Segmentation, SWOT Analysis, Demand Analysis and Forecast To 2024 - Instant Tech News

GENE CORRECTED STEM CELL THERAPY TO TREAT CYSTIC FIBROSIS DEVELOPED AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY – NewsPatrolling

Chennai February 12, 2020:A team of researchers at Stanford University has used the gene editing tool commonly known as CRISPR to repair the gene that causes cystic fibrosis in airway stem cells, which they say is a critical step to develop a gene therapy for the disorder.

The researchers showed that the repaired airway stem cells could give rise to other airway cells and could produce functional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein, which is faulty in cystic fibrosis patients. The study represents a proof of concept for the repair of genes that cause airway disorders. A study describing these results was published online inCell Stem Cellon December 12, 2019. Postdoctoral scholar Sriram Vaidyanathan, PhD is the first co-lead author and Matthew Porteus, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics is the lead co-senior author. Other co-lead authors include Ameen Salahudeen, MD, PhD, Zachary Sellers, MD, PhD, Dawn Bravo PhD. Other co-senior authors include Tushar Desai, MD, Jayakar Nayak, MD, PhD and Calvin Kuo MD,PhD.

A devastating childhood disease:Cystic fibrosis affects about 75,000-100,000 people globally. CF patients suffer from chronic lung infections that eventually cause lung failure and death. In addition, patients may also suffer from problems in several other organs. CF patients have an average life expectancy of about 40 years. CF is a fatal disease caused by mutations in a single gene (the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)). The CFTR gene encodes an ion channel that transports chloride in cells that express the gene. In CF patients, the channel is non-functional and chloride transport is blocked. This results in a build-up of thick mucus in the airways and also results in damage to other organs such as the pancreas.

The quest for a cure:Gene therapy has been attempted to treat several genetic diseases such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia over the past two decades with some individual successes. The discovery of CRISPR enabled the precise manipulation of genes and made it feasible to develop gene therapies for many more diseases. CRISPR was most readily applied to develop cures for blood disorders such as sickle cell disease because of our increased familiarity with blood stem cells and our ability to readily culture and transplant them into patients. Indeed, the first clinical trials to test the use of CRISPR to treat sickle cell disease, a blood disorder, have already started even though the technology is relatively new.

Although CF was one of the first diseases for which gene therapy was attempted, attempts have been unsuccessful so far. The development of CRISPR renewed hopes for a gene therapy for CF. The application of CRISPR to treat lung disorders such as CF was challenging because methods to apply CRISPR to effectively edit airway stem cells had not been developed. The team consisting of Dr. Vaidyanathan, Dr. Porteus and colleagues have developed a method to correct one CF causing mutation (DF508) which affects over 70% of patients in the US and Europe. This publication describes the correction of a commonly observed CF causing mutation with efficiencies over >40% in airway stem cells. This is over a 100-fold improvement over previous work correcting the same mutations in other cell types and makes it possible to correct CF causing mutations in a clinically applicable manner. Further work is necessary to perfect the transplantation of edited airway stem cells in the airways to develop a durable treatment for CF.

Not just a disease that affects Caucasians:In addition to Dr. Vaidyanathan, another co-first author and two of the co-corresponding authors leading this work are people of Indian origin. However, CF is not widely recognized as a disease that affects Indians. CF has been described in Indian patients previously.2,3However, the exact number of CF patients in India is still unknown and the mutations that affect them are also not well characterized. It is likely that India has the largest number of CF patients in the world. It is also likely that most of them are undiagnosed and die before the age of 5. One study quantified the presence of CF in people of Indian origin in Canada and estimated the prevalence to be 1 in 9200 compared to 1 in 6600 among the general population between the ages of 0-14 years.4In fact, Dr. Vaidyanathan has come across patients at Stanford University who received a diagnosis for CF after significant delay. In some cases, CF was even deemed unlikely because the patients were not of European origin. This is rather unfortunate because the quality of life and life expectancy of CF patients can be significantly improved if treatment is started early in life. This new gene therapy approach thus holds the promise to treat CF patients globally once a method to transplant airway stem cells is optimized.

Read more from the original source:
GENE CORRECTED STEM CELL THERAPY TO TREAT CYSTIC FIBROSIS DEVELOPED AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY - NewsPatrolling

Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Booming by Size, Revenue, Trend and Top Companies 2026 – Instant Tech News

New Jersey, United States, The report titled, Stem Cell Therapy Market Size and Forecast 2026 in Verified Market Research offers its latest report on the global Stem Cell Therapy market that includes comprehensive analysis on a range of subjects like competition, segmentation, regional expansion, and market dynamics. The report sheds light on future trends, key opportunities, top regions, leading segments, the competitive landscape, and several other aspects of the Stem Cell Therapy market. Get access to crucial market information. Market players can use the report back to peep into the longer term of the worldwide Stem Cell Therapy market and convey important changes to their operating style and marketing tactics to realize sustained growth.

Global Stem Cell TherapyMarketwas valued at USD 86.62 million in 2016 and is projected to reach USD 221.03million by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 10.97% from 2017 to 2025.

Get | Download Sample Copy @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=24113&utm_source=ITN&utm_medium=002

Top 10 Companies in the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Research Report:

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Competitive Landscape

Competitive landscape of a market explains strategies incorporated by key players of the market. Key developments and shift in management in the recent years by players has been explained through company profiling. This helps readers to understand the trends that will accelerate the growth of market. It also includes investment strategies, marketing strategies, and product development plans adopted by major players of the market. The market forecast will help readers make better investments.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Drivers and Restrains

This section of the report discusses various drivers and restrains that have shaped the global market. The detailed study of numerous drivers of the market enable readers to get a clear perspective of the market, which includes market environment, government policies, product innovations, breakthroughs, and market risks.

The research report also points out the myriad opportunities, challenges, and market barriers present in the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market. The comprehensive nature of the information will help the reader determine and plan strategies to benefit from. Restrains, challenges, and market barriers also help the reader to understand how the company can prevent itself from facing downfall.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Segment Analysis

This section of the report includes segmentation such as application, product type, and end user. These segmentations aid in determining parts of market that will progress more than others. The segmentation analysis provides information about the key elements that are thriving the specific segments better than others. It helps readers to understand strategies to make sound investments. The Global Stem Cell Therapy Market is segmented on the basis of product type, applications, and its end users.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Regional Analysis

This part of the report includes detailed information of the market in different regions. Each region offers different scope to the market as each region has different government policy and other factors. The regions included in the report are North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. Information about different region helps the reader to understand global market better.

Ask for Discount @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=24113&utm_source=ITN&utm_medium=002

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Stem Cell Therapy Market

1.1 Overview of the Market 1.2 Scope of Report 1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research

3.1 Data Mining 3.2 Validation 3.3 Primary Interviews 3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Stem Cell Therapy Market Outlook

4.1 Overview 4.2 Market Dynamics 4.2.1 Drivers 4.2.2 Restraints 4.2.3 Opportunities 4.3 Porters Five Force Model 4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Solution

6.1 Overview

7 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Vertical

7.1 Overview

8 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Geography

8.1 Overview 8.2 North America 8.2.1 U.S. 8.2.2 Canada 8.2.3 Mexico 8.3 Europe 8.3.1 Germany 8.3.2 U.K. 8.3.3 France 8.3.4 Rest of Europe 8.4 Asia Pacific 8.4.1 China 8.4.2 Japan 8.4.3 India 8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific 8.5 Rest of the World 8.5.1 Latin America 8.5.2 Middle East

9 Stem Cell Therapy Market Competitive Landscape

9.1 Overview 9.2 Company Market Ranking 9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles

10.1.1 Overview 10.1.2 Financial Performance 10.1.3 Product Outlook 10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix

11.1 Related Research

Request Customization of Report Complete Report is Available @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/Stem-Cell-Therapy-Market/?utm_source=ITN&utm_medium=002

Highlights of Report

About Us:

Verified market research partners with clients to provide insight into strategic and growth analytics; data that help achieve business goals and targets. Our core values include trust, integrity, and authenticity for our clients.

Analysts with high expertise in data gathering and governance utilize industry techniques to collate and examine data at all stages. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact Us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes Call: +1 (650) 781 4080 Email: [emailprotected]

TAGS: Stem Cell Therapy Market Size, Stem Cell Therapy Market Growth, Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecast, Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis, Stem Cell Therapy Market Trends, Stem Cell Therapy Market

See the rest here:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Booming by Size, Revenue, Trend and Top Companies 2026 - Instant Tech News

Astex Pharmaceuticals Announces US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Acceptance for Review of an NDA for the Combination Oral Hypomethylating Agent…

DetailsCategory: Small MoleculesPublished on Wednesday, 12 February 2020 17:52Hits: 163

PLEASANTON, CA, USA I February 11, 2020 I Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., based in Japan, today announced that the U.S. FDA has accepted for Priority Review its NDA for oral C-DEC (cedazuridine and decitabine) as a treatment for adults with previously untreated intermediate- and high-risk MDS including CMML. The NDA submission is based on data from the ASCERTAIN phase 3 study which evaluated the 5-day decitabine exposure equivalence of oral C-DEC and IV decitabine.

We are very pleased that the FDA has accepted our NDA for Priority Review, said Dr Mohammad Azab, MD, president & chief medical officer of Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Subject to FDA review and regulatory approval, oral C-DEC may offer a new option for patients with MDS and CMML that saves them the burden of 5-day IV infusions every month during their treatment period. We are grateful to all the patients, investigators and other healthcare providers, and partner research and manufacturing organizations, who contributed to the clinical development program of oral C-DEC.

The FDA grants Priority Review to applications for drugs that, if approved, would provide significant improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of serious conditions. The Priority Review designation means FDAs goal is to take action on an NDA application within six months (compared to the ten months under standard review).

Oral C-DEC is an investigational compound and is not currently approved in any country.

Astexs parent company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. previously announced that, subject to regulatory approvals, commercialization of oral C-DEC in the U.S. and Canada will be conducted by Taiho Oncology, Inc. and Taiho Pharma Canada, Inc. respectively. Astex, Otsuka and Taiho are all members of the Otsuka group of companies.

About C-DEC (Cedazuridine 100 mg and Decitabine 35 mg) Fixed-Dose Combination

C-DEC is a novel, orally administered fixed dose combination of cedazuridine, an inhibitor of cytidine deaminase,1 with the anti-cancer DNA hypomethylating agent, decitabine.2 By inhibiting cytidine deaminase in the gut and the liver, C-DEC is designed to allow for oral delivery of the approved DNA hypomethylating agent, decitabine, at exposures which emulate exposures achieved with the approved intravenous form of decitabine administered over 5 days.3

C-DEC has been evaluated in a phase 1/2 pharmacokinetics-guided dose escalation and dose confirmation study in patients with MDS and CMML (see https://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02103478) and a pivotal phase 3 study (ASCERTAIN) (see https://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03306264) conducted at investigator sites in the US and Canada and designed to confirm the results from the phase 1/2 study. The phase 3 study is now being extended to include patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unsuitable to receive intensive induction chemotherapy.

In September 2019 Astex announced that C-DEC had received orphan drug designation for the treatment of MDS and CMML from the U.S. FDA.

The concept of using cedazuridine to block the action of cytidine deaminase is also being evaluated in a low dose formulation of cedazuridine and decitabine for the treatment of lower risk MDS (see https://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03502668).

About the Phase 3 ASCERTAIN Study

The study was designed as a randomized crossover study comparing oral C-DEC (cedazuridine 100 mg and decitabine 35 mg fixed-dose combination tablet given once daily for 5 days on a 28-day cycle) to IV decitabine (20 mg/m2 administered as a daily, 1-hour IV infusion for 5 days on a 28-day cycle) in the first 2 cycles with patients continuing to receive oral C-DEC from Cycle 3 onwards. The data from the ASCERTAIN study was presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Meeting in Orlando, Florida in December 2019 by Dr Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, professor and chief of section of myelodysplastic syndromes, Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, on behalf of the study investigators.4 The data demonstrated that the ASCERTAIN study met the primary endpoint of total 5-Day decitabine Area-Under-The-Curve (AUC) equivalence of oral C-DEC and IV decitabine. Safety findings from the study were consistent with those anticipated with IV decitabine, with no significant differences in the incidence of most common adverse events between oral C-DEC and IV decitabine in the first 2 randomized cycles. The most common adverse events of any grade >20% regardless of causality in patients in the first 2 randomized cycles who received oral C-DEC were thrombocytopenia (43.8%), neutropenia (35.4%), anemia (36.9%), and fatigue (23.8%). The ASH presentation can be downloaded from the Astex website at https://astx.com/media-center/presentations-and-publications/ASTX727 ASCERTAIN Presentation - ASH - December 2019

About Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

Myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by dysplastic changes in myeloid, erythroid, and megakaryocytic progenitor cells, and associated with cytopenias affecting one or more of the three lineages. U.S. incidence of MDS is estimated to be 10,000 cases per year, although the condition is thought to be under-diagnosed.5,6 The prevalence has been estimated to be from 60,000 to 170,000 in the U.S.7 MDS may evolve into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in one-third of patients.8 The prognosis for MDS patients is poor; patients die from complications associated with cytopenias (infections and bleeding) or from transformation to AML. CMML is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy characterized by accumulation of abnormal monocytes in the bone marrow and in blood. The incidence of CMML in the U.S. is approximately 1,100 new cases per year,9 and CMML may transform into AML in 15% to 30% of patients.10 The hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacitidine are effective treatment modalities for hematologic cancers and are FDA-approved for the treatment of higher-risk MDS and CMML. These agents are administered by IV infusion, or by large-volume subcutaneous injections.

About Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Astex is a leader in innovative drug discovery and development, committed to the fight against cancer. Astex is developing a proprietary pipeline of novel therapies and has multiple partnered products in development under collaborations with leading pharmaceutical companies. Astex is a wholly owned subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., based in Tokyo, Japan.

Otsuka is a global healthcare company with the corporate philosophy: Otsukapeople creating new products for better health worldwide. Otsuka researches, develops, manufactures and markets innovative and original products, with a focus on pharmaceutical products for the treatment of diseases and nutraceutical products for the maintenance of everyday health.

For more information about Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. please visit: http://www.astx.com

For more information about Otsuka Pharmaceutical, please visit: http://www.otsuka.com/en/

For more information about Taiho Pharmaceutical, please visit: https://www.taihooncology.com/

References

SOURCE: Astex Pharmaceuticals

Read more here:
Astex Pharmaceuticals Announces US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Acceptance for Review of an NDA for the Combination Oral Hypomethylating Agent...