Category Archives: Stem Cell Treatment


Induction Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mixed-Phenotype Acute Leukemia – Cancer Therapy Advisor

A recent analysis of treatment options for patients with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) suggests favorable outcomes may be obtained with frontline therapy using a chemotherapy regimen usually administered to patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results of this analysis were published in Cancer.

In this central review of MPAL outcomes, the Childrens Oncology Group Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage Task Force studied a cohort of 54 patients aged 1 to 30 years with diagnoses of MPAL who were enrolled in clinical trials involving ALL or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatments.

Induction therapies typically consisted of ALL treatment regimens, AML treatment regimens, or a hybrid of both approaches. A variety of postinduction treatment options, with or without HSCT, were also included.

Patients with MPAL who were given ALL (72%) or AML (24%) induction treatments did not significantly differ from each other in reported baseline characteristics.

End-of-induction complete remission was achieved by 72% of patients treated with an ALL induction regimen and by 69% of patient given an AML induction regimen.

Among all patients in the cohort, the 5-year overall survival rate was 77%; among patients who received ALL chemotherapy without HSCT, the 5-year overall survival rate was 84%. The 5-year event-free survival rate was 72% for the total cohort and 75% among those who received ALL chemotherapy without HSCT.

The researchers stated that their findings demonstrated that durable remissions are possible for a subset of patients with MPAL receiving ALL chemotherapy without HSCT consolidation. They also described a forthcoming prospective clinical trial that will test a minimum residual disease-guided treatment approach with ALL therapy and without HSCT in patients with MPAL.

Reference

This article originally appeared on Hematology Advisor

Link:
Induction Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mixed-Phenotype Acute Leukemia - Cancer Therapy Advisor

Why Stem Cell Therapy Might Be Your Answer To Chronic Pain – Patch.com

This article is sponsored by The Art of Pain Management and Regenerative Medicine.

Having performed more than 25,000 procedures throughout the last decade, Dr. Jarrad Teller and Dr. Michael Schina of the Art of Pain Management (AOPM) are just getting started. Ten years ago, Dr. Teller, a chiropractor with degrees in physiotherapy and kinesiology, partnered with Dr. Schina, a vascular and trauma surgeon. Together, the pair has created one of the most successful interventional pain management practices in the tri-state area thanks to their multifaceted approach to patients. Modalities of treatment that are used by AOPM include yoga, meditation, vitamins and herbs, diet programs and spine and joint injections.

"Two years ago, our office began using stem cells to treat arthritic conditions. Previously, injections with cortisone and local anesthetic temporarily relieved a patient's pain. With stem cell injections, the patient's injury began to heal and osteoarthritis improved."

Stem cell therapy utilizes multi-potent cells that are capable of differentiating and growing into various types of tissue in the body. Stem cells act as beacon cells that find areas of inflammation (areas of need in the body) and reprogram the body's own stem cells to regenerate tissue. Stem cell function requires a healthy milieu. That is why blood analysis and correction of abnormalities prior to stem cell therapy is so important.

Osteoarthritis of the spine (neck and back), shoulder, knee, hip and ankle are the most common conditions that AOPM treats. Other conditions for which patients seek treatment include COPD, autoimmune disorders and spinal injuries, in addition to unexplained illnesses.

With traditional pain management that utilizes cortisone injections, yoga, meditation, lifestyle changes and diet, about half of patients fail to improve. This is largely related to the fact that cortisone treats only the patient's symptoms and does nothing to alleviate the underlying osteoarthritis. For the other half of patients, stem cell therapy offers the potential to improve the osteoarthritis by regenerating tissue and may be a viable option.

Art of Pain Management and Regenerative Medicine

3300 Grant Ave. Philadelphia, PA 19114

610-352-1710

See the rest here:
Why Stem Cell Therapy Might Be Your Answer To Chronic Pain - Patch.com

North-east toddler overcomes cancer after pioneering stem cell treatment – Press and Journal

It may finally be a happy Christmas for a brave toddler recovering from a rare combination of cancers after pioneering stem cell treatment.

Amelia Topa, who celebrated her second birthday yesterday, is looking forward to spending the festive period with her family at home in Turriff.

Her parents Kerri Paton, 23, and Igor Topa, 24, were told that raised purple spots across Amelias body could be a sign of something seriously wrong when she was born at Dr Grays Hospital in Elgin.

Amelia was soon after diagnosed with a mix of two types of leukemia acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia and spent Christmas in hospital.

Miss Paton said: Its rare enough to be born with leukaemia but to be born with a mix of two kinds is almost unheard of.

Doctors gave Amelia a bone marrow transplant using stem cells donated by a managed between 16 and 30.

The treatment worked and, by the following autumn, she was home and awaiting the arrival of her baby brother.

But tragedy struck when Amelias grandmother, Angela McNabb, died suddenly from heart failure aged 48 the day before Amelias birthday.

Miss Paton said: My mum was my best friend, she was everything to me.

Mum absolutely loved Amelia and was so close to her.

My major source of support was gone and I hadnt even had the chance to say goodbye. I couldnt believe it. It was so unfair. Last Christmas was heartbreaking.

Things went from bad to worse for the family in February, when tests showed that Amelias cancer had returned.

After intense chemotherapy she was given a second transplant using stem cells from umbilical cord blood flown specially from America at the end of June.

That procedure was a success and the toddler has entered remission.

Having spent Christmas in 2017 in hospital, and in mourning last year, Amelias parents are now looking forward to a happy festive season.

Miss Paton said: Amelia soared through the transplant and shes doing really well now,I couldnt be prouder.

I hope Amelias story will help other families going through cancer there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

Amelia has now been selected to receive the first Cancer Research UK children and young people star award in recognition of the courage she showed since being diagnosed.

The award, supported by TK Maxx, is open to all people under 18s who currently have cancer or who have been treated in the last five years with every child being awarded a trophy, TK Maxx gift card, t-shirt and certificate signed by the likes of Nanny McPhee star Dame Emma Thompson.

Spokeswoman for the charity, Lisa Adams, said: We know that a cancer diagnosis is devastating at any age, but that it can be particularly difficult for a child or young person and their families.

Thats why were calling on families across Scotland to nominate inspirational youngsters for an award so that we can recognise their incredible courage.

Nominations can be made online at cruk.org/childrenandyoungpeople

Read the original post:
North-east toddler overcomes cancer after pioneering stem cell treatment - Press and Journal

Revolutionary stem cell banking and therapy from Celltex gives patients hope – KHOU.com

HOUSTON Diseases like arthritis, multiple sclerosis, ALS, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's have no cure, but with a revolutionary procedure from Celltex patients see a dramatic difference in their livelihood.

Celltex chairman and CEO, David Eller, talked with Deborah Duncan about how the company is leading breakthroughs in regenerative medicine. Celltex has a proprietary technology that isolates, grows and cryopreserves hundreds of millions of one's own stem cells.

Stem cells are extracted from an individual's own fat. It is multiplied and cryopreserved for future therapy, only for the patient. The cells are stored in a U.S.-based, FDA registered lab until treatment. Celltex works with established, certified hospitals in Mexico, until stem cell therapy is legalized in the United States. Treatments are administered by licensed physicians. These stem cells can relieve a variety of chronic conditions and improve quality of life for these patients.

Debbie Bertrand was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2001. The MS made it difficult for her to walk and use her hands. She had numbness in her feet, loss of balance, drop foot and had to use a wheelchair in public.

Bertrand learned about Celltex and banked her stem cells in 2011. She's had several rounds of treatment, and after each treatment, she's seen great improvement.

Bertrand had no side effects from the stem cell therapy. She has reduced the number of MS medications she takes from five to two. She no longer has to use a wheelchair and uses a walker to walk. She has improved so much, she is able to walk 6,000 to 8,000 steps each day. Bertrand has a more normal gait, has better circulation in her hands and feet, and has increased energy, strength and alertness.

To make an appointment with Celltex, call 713-590-1000. For more information, log on to CelltexBank.com.

For more on Celltex's upcoming informational seminars, click here.

To see an online webinar from Celltex, click here.

This content is sponsored by: Celltex.

Link:
Revolutionary stem cell banking and therapy from Celltex gives patients hope - KHOU.com

Kyoto University seeks approval to use stem cells in treatment for damaged knees – The Japan Times

KYOTO Kyoto University said Wednesday it has asked for government approval to conduct a clinical trial that involves transplanting cartilage made from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to treat damaged knee joints.

Under the plan, a team led by Noriyuki Tsumaki, a professor at the university who specializes in cell induction and regulation, will culture iPS cells to create cartilage tissue and transplant it into knees. The university said it submitted the plan to the health ministry on Nov. 7 for a review by its special panel.

The team has already tested the treatment on a rat and found it to be effective. It has also confirmed that the treatment carries low risk of rejection, fibrosis reaction or causing cancer, it said.

A board set up at the university approved the plan in October.

It is hoped that the new treatment will help treat patients who have damaged or degenerated cartilage due to injuries or illnesses.

Cartilage tissue covers joint bones and absorbs shock. A joint cannot move smoothly if part of the cartilage tissue is damaged due to injury or if it turns fibrous due to aging.

While there is a treatment in which normal cartilage tissue is transplanted, it is hard to secure enough tissue and part of the tissue tends to turn fibrous.

See original here:
Kyoto University seeks approval to use stem cells in treatment for damaged knees - The Japan Times

Massive clonal expansion of medulloblastoma-specific T cells during adoptive cellular therapy – Science Advances

Abstract

In both human and murine systems, we have developed an adoptive cellular therapy platform against medulloblastoma and glioblastoma that uses dendritic cells pulsed with a tumor RNA transcriptome to expand polyclonal tumor-reactive T cells against a plurality of antigens within heterogeneous brain tumors. We demonstrate that peripheral TCR V repertoire analysis after adoptive cellular therapy reveals that effective response to adoptive cellular therapy is concordant with massive in vivo expansion and persistence of tumor-specific T cell clones within the peripheral blood. In preclinical models of medulloblastoma and glioblastoma, and in a patient with relapsed medulloblastoma receiving adoptive cellular therapy, an early and massive expansion of tumor-reactive lymphocytes, coupled with prolonged persistence in the peripheral blood, is observed during effective therapeutic response to immunotherapy treatment.

Adoptive T cell therapies using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells have been demonstrably efficacious against several advanced cancers (18). The efficacy of these approaches requires selection of tumor-reactive T cells or ex vivo engineering of antigen-specific T cells using previously identified tumor-specific antigens. Despite these advances, the application of these approaches for brain tumors faces major limitations such as their antigenic heterogeneity and largely uncharacterized tumor-specific antigens. We have pioneered an adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) platform using total tumor RNA (ttRNA)pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) to generate a polyclonal population of 80% CD8+ tumor-specific T cells with the capacity to target refractory intracranial brain tumors in preclinical models of glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, and brainstem glioma (9, 10). Tumor-reactive T cells for ACT are generated without prior knowledge of the relevant tumor rejection antigen(s) yet are highly tumor specific. To monitor the immunologic responses against uncharacterized and patient-specific antigens expressed within tumors, we identified tumor-specific T lymphocytes from the bulk of ex vivo activated T cells through evaluation of T cell receptor (TCR) V repertoire expansion using flow cytometrybased spectratyping, functional analysis of T cell reactivity, and TCR DNA sequencing.

Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using TCR V flow cytometric analysis in detection of lymphoproliferation in the peripheral blood of patients (11, 12). In this study, we first established the TCR V family repertoire in TILs in two preclinical models of brain malignancies, orthotopic molecular subtype group 3 medulloblastoma (NSC) (13) and cortical high-grade glioma (KR158B) (14). Of the 15 families analyzed, we found no significant hyperexpansion of any one family relative to all other TCR V families in untreated intracranial NSC or intracranial KR158B (fig. S1).

We next demonstrate that flow cytometric analysis of TCR V expression can be used to both identify and enrich for the tumor-specific T cells from a bulk population of lymphocytes during ACT against NSC medulloblastoma and KR158B high-grade glioma. This is significant because tumor-associated antigens in brain cancers are largely uncharacterized and tumor-associated antigens in these preclinical models are completely uncharacterized. Despite this, we have identified and expanded the tumor-reactive T lymphocytes against multiple tumor models using ACT. To demonstrate this, C57BL/6 mice bearing orthotopic cerebellar NSC medulloblastoma were treated with ACT (Fig. 1A). Spleens were harvested from treated asymptomatic mice at 30, 50, and 120 days after ACT, and TCR sequencing was conducted on bulk splenocytes. Analysis revealed selective expansion of T cell clones within four TCR V families, TCR V 13-02+, 16-01+, 19-01+, and 24-01+, by 120 days after treatment, as compared to the ex vivo expanded T cells before intravenous infusion (Fig. 1B). Clonal analysis revealed that within the T cells that express TCR V 13-02+, there is an approximate 10-fold clonal T cell expansion of productive frequency in treated mice over time, from 0.168% productive frequency in ex vivo activated T cells to 1.737% productive frequency in mice 120 days after ACT (Fig. 1C).

(A) Experimental layout of ACT in tumor-bearing mice. Intracranial tumorbearing hosts received 9 gray (Gy) total body irradiation for host conditioning followed by adoptive transfer of tumor-reactive T cells and weekly DC vaccines. Hosts also receive hematopoietic stem cell transfer after total body irradiation to protect from bone marrow failure. (B) Splenocytes of treated animals were harvested at 30, 50, and 120 days for long-term survivors, were analyzed for TCR sequencing, and revealed selective expansion of four TCR V families. (C) Intrafamily analysis revealed that TCR V 13-02 family T cells experienced clonal expansion of one clone. Other families did experience clonal expansion. (D) Fifteen TCR V families from bulk tumor-reactive T cells were isolated using FACS, and each family was cocultured against target NSC tumor cells. IFN- secretion was measured as an indication of the recognition of cognate tumor antigen. (E) NSC express a luciferase reporter, allowing for bioluminescent imaging of tumor growth that was conducted in mice treated with ACT. (F) Relative expansion of adoptively transferred T cells in the TCR V 13 family in murine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was measured in concurrence with tumor growth using flow cytometry. (G) Relative expansion of adoptively transferred T cells in the TCR V 4 family in murine PBMCs was also measured as a control as this V family did not demonstrate prior antitumor reactivity. (H) Cerebellar NSC medulloblastoma-bearing mice received ACT with either bulk ex vivo expanded tumor-reactive T cells or tumor-reactive T cells that only express TCR V 13 or V 4. Experiments (D) to (G) were conducted at least three times with 7 to 10 mice per experiment. (H) was conducted twice with n = 7 mice per group.

To determine whether this expansion of TCR V 13+ T cells contributes to efficacy of ACT against this group 3 medulloblastoma, sterile fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used to isolate 15 different TCR V families from the bulk medulloblastoma-specific T cells. Ex vivo activated tumor-reactive T cells from each of the isolated TCR V families were then cocultured against NSC medulloblastoma tumor cells. Supernatant interferon- (IFN-) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to indicate recognition of cognate tumor antigen. As expected, the bulk T cell population secreted IFN- (2681.67 534.618 pg/ml) in response to tumor, while in the sorted populations, only T cells that express TCR V 5.1/5.2+, 6+, 7+, 8.1/8.2+, or 13+ secreted statistically similar amounts of IFN- in response to tumor targets (P = 0.400, 0.100, 0.100, 0.700, and >0.999, respectively) (Fig. 1D). Other TCR V families were unresponsive against NSC tumor cells, secreting little to no IFN-.

We next sought to determine whether the observed expansion of TCR V 13+ T cells correlates with increased survival and efficacy against NSC medulloblastoma. NSC tumors were implanted into the cerebellums of mice, and tumor-bearing mice were treated with ACT using NSC-specific T cells generated from DsRed+ transgenic mice. Tumor growth was monitored over time using bioluminescent imaging (Fig. 1E). Peripheral blood was also sampled and measured for relative frequency of adoptively transferred ex vivo activated antitumor T cells that expressed TCR V 13+ (Fig. 1F). Mice that were responsive to treatment and had long-term survival demonstrated increased relative frequency of TCR V 13+ T cells over time. Other DsRed+ T cells from other TCR V families including TCR V 4+ did not demonstrate lymphocyte expansion (Fig. 1G). Next, we determined whether TCR V 13+ T cells provide protective immunity against NSC medulloblastoma. NSC group 3 medulloblastoma was implanted into the cerebellum of mice, which were then treated with ACT using total bulk ex vivo expanded tumor-reactive T cells (9, 10). Other cohorts received only expanded T cells that express either TCR V 13+, isolated by FACS, which has demonstrated antitumor function, or V 4+, which has not had any prior antitumor reactivity. The group that received only T cells from the TCR V 13+ family had an observed survival benefit equal to the ACT group that received the total bulk tumor-reactive T cells (P = 0.5369) (Fig. 1H). In a subsequent experiment, we adoptively transferred only TCR V 6+, 7+, 8.1/8.2+, or 11+ T cells, but no survival benefit was observed over tumor-only controls (fig. S2). Although previous in vitro experiments show that TCR V 8.1/8.2+ T cells demonstrate antitumor reactivity, adoptive transfer of these cells alone did not provide immunological protection against NSC tumors. This may be due to a lack of in vivo expansion of TCR V 8.1/8.2+ T cells, although this mechanism of escape remains unclear. This further demonstrates that tumor-reactive T cells expressing TCR V 13+ play a major role in the immunological rejection of orthotopic NSC medulloblastoma.

We then conducted experiments to seek out differences in relative frequencies of T cells in spleens of responders versus nonresponders to therapy. Responders were defined as mice that were asymptomatic and demonstrated absence of luminescence signal at day 90, while nonresponders were defined as mice that had become symptomatic and showed tumor growth by bioluminescence after ACT. In splenocytes of mice treated with ACT, responders demonstrated selective in vivo expansion of six TCR V families V 5.1/5.2+, 6+, 7+, 8.1/8.2+, 8.3+, and 13+ relative to nonresponders (Fig. 2A). Spleens of the responders were collected and were sorted via FACS for the adoptively transferred DsRed+ tumorreactive T cells, and then further isolated by each TCR V family. These T cells were then used as effector T lymphocytes in a functionality assay targeting tumor cells. DsRed+ T cells from TCR V 5.1/5.2+, 6+, 8.1/8.2+, and 13+ families retained antitumor reactivity in vivo in long-term survivors (Fig. 2B). Splenic T cells were also harvested from nonresponders to therapy upon detection of intracranial tumor growth by bioluminescent imaging, and DsRed+ T cells from TCR V 5.1/5.2+, 8.1/8.2+, 11+, and 13+ families were FACS-isolated and then used as effector T cells in a functionality assay targeting primary NSC tumor cells (Fig. 2C). TCR V 8.1/8.2+ and 13+ retained their antitumor reactivity when targeted against the NSC cell line, demonstrating that the adoptively transferred T cells maintain their antitumor function upon tumor escape. This indicates that loss of T cell function is likely not responsible for escape from this adoptive immunotherapy platform.

To generate antitumor T cells, total RNA is extracted from tumor cells and electroporated into syngeneic bone marrowderived DCs. These cells are then cocultured with splenocytes from a previously immunized mouse with interleukin-2 for 5 to 7 days generating a polyclonal population of CD8+ T cells. After this ex vivo activation, 107 T cells are adoptively transferred into tumor-bearing mice followed by vaccination with 2.5 105 RNA-pulsed DCs. In the preclinical model of ACT, C57BL/6 mice receive orthotopic tumor followed by host conditioning with total body irradiation and hematopoietic stem cell transfer to protect from bone marrow failure. (A) Mice implanted with cerebellar NSC medulloblastoma were treated with ACT using DsRed+ tumorreactive T cells. Spleens were harvested from all mice, and relative abundance of each TCR V family was measured in both responders and nonresponders. Here, 25 mice are implanted with tumor and treated with ACT. The first five nonresponders that succumb to tumor are taken at humane end point and spleens were analyzed. The five responders are treated mice that demonstrate no evidence of tumor after 120 days. This experiment was repeated twice with the same results as shown. n = 5 to 7 mice per group. (B) Spleens of five asymptomatic long-term survivors were harvested at 90 days after ACT. DsRed+ T cells were isolated and separated by the TCR V family. Each TCR V family was cocultured in vitro against tumor cells, and IFN- secretion was measured. (C) Splenic T lymphocytes were harvested from nonresponders to therapy upon detection of tumor via bioluminescent imaging. DsRed+ T cells were FACS-isolated and sorted into TCR V families and then used as effectors against the primary NSC cell line. IFN- was measured to determine antitumor reactivity.

These experiments were repeated in a KR158B-luc glioma (KR158B stably transfected with luciferase) (14) preclinical model of invasive high-grade glioma, which corroborated the finding that tumor-reactive T cells can be identified by isolation of hyper-expanded TCR V families after ACT and tested ex vivo. We generated KR158B-reactive T cells ex vivo and used FACS to isolate T cells by the TCR V family. Each family was tested for antitumor reactivity against KR158B tumor cells in a coculture assay, and IFN- was detectable from TCR V 5.1/5.2+, 6+, and 8.1/8.2+ T cells (Fig. 3A). In mice treated with ACT against KR158B-luc glioma (using tumor-reactive T cells generated from DsRed+ mice to allow for longitudinal studies), responders demonstrated robust expansion of adoptively transferred TCR V 6+ T cells in the spleen but no other V families (Fig. 3B). The spleens of long-term responders were harvested 120 days after treatment, and DsRed+ T cells were FACS-sorted into TCR V families. Each family was cocultured to target KR158B tumor cells, and IFN- was measured, revealing that T cells in the V 6+ and 8.1/8.2+ families retained antitumor functionality in long-term survivors (Fig. 3C).

(A) Tumor-reactive T cells were generated in vitro and separated into 15 TCR V families using sterile FACS isolation. T cells (4 105) per V family were cocultured against 4 104 KR158B tumor target cells overnight, and supernatant IFN- was measured as an indication of the recognition of cognate tumor antigen. All conditions were conducted in triplicate, and the experiment was repeated an additional three times with the same results. (B) Fifteen mice received ACT using DsRed+ tumorreactive T cells. Relative frequencies of TCR V families within the adoptively transferred DsRed+ T cell population were compared between the first five nonresponders to therapy and five long-term survivors with no signs of tumor. (C) Spleens of the asymptomatic long-term survivors were also harvested for DsRed+ T cells, which were further separated by the TCR V family using FACS. Each TCR V family was cocultured in vitro against tumor cells as above, and IFN- secretion was measured.

To determine whether TCR V 6+ glioma-specific T cells demonstrate relative expansion in the peripheral blood over time, ACT using 3 107 DsRed+ tumorspecific T cells were administered to mice bearing KR158B-luc glioma (KR158B stably transfected with luciferase), and tumor growth was followed after treatment (Fig. 4, A and B). Peripheral blood was also sampled, and relative frequency of DsRed+ KR158B-specific T cells was measured over time. DsRed+ tumorspecific T cells that expressed TCR V 6+ experienced marked expansion in the peripheral blood in mice that responded to therapy but not in those that failed treatment (Fig. 4C). Other DsRed+ T cells from other TCR V families including TCR V 2+ and 8.1/8.2+ did not demonstrate lymphocyte expansion (fig. S3, A and B).

(A) Seven C57BL/6 mice received orthotopic KR158B tumor by implanting 104 tumor cells into the right caudate nucleus of the cortex. (B) This tumor line has a luciferase reporter that allowed for in vivo bioluminescent imaging of tumor growth of mice over time. Relative frequency of (C) TCR V 6+. (D) Intracranial tumorbearing mice received either ACT using bulk tumor-reactive T cell population, ACT using only TCR V 6+ T cells, ACT using only TCR V 8.1/8.2+ T cells, or ACT using only TCR V 6+ and V 8.1/8.2+ T cells. No significant differences in survival was found between bulk ACT and the group that received TCR V 6+ T cells, n = 7 mice per group. (E) Intracranial tumorbearing mice received either ACT, ACT with T cells depleted of V 6+ T cells using FACS, ACT with T cells depleted of TCR V 8.1/8.2+ T cells, or ACT with TCR V 2+ T cells. We found a significant decrease in survival in the group where TCR V 6+ cells were depleted as compared to bulk ACT, *P = 0.0003, n = 7 mice per group.

This strongly suggests that TCR V 6+ T cells are the drivers of antitumor immunity against KR158B glioma. To test this hypothesis directly, we generated ex vivo expanded tumor-specific T cells and isolated either TCR V 6+ or TCR V 8.1/8.2+ cells using FACS. These isolated T cell populations were then used for ACT in KR158B tumorbearing mice, and their survival was compared to a cohort receiving bulk T cells for ACT, which has been previously demonstrably efficacious (Fig. 4D). The prominent survival benefit of ACT was maintained in the group that received only TCR V 6+ T cells (no significant difference in survival was found between the two groups, P = 0.5925) but not TCR V 8.1/8.2+ T cells (tumor P = 0.0152). A group that received both T cell populations had no increase in survival benefit over the ACT control group (Fig. 4D). Conversely, depletion of TCR V 6+ T cells from the tumor-specific cell population before adoptive transfer significantly decreased the survival benefit of ACT (P = 0.0003) (Fig. 4E). Mice that received ACT using tumor-reactive T cells depleted of either TCR V 8.1/8.2+ or TCR V 2+ T cells had no statistically significant difference in median survival compared to the group that received bulk T cells. These data together indicate that TCR V6+ tumor-specific T cells are the functional drivers of antitumor immunity provided by ACT in this specific preclinical model of malignant glioma. These studies also demonstrated that in vivo evaluation of the hyperexpanded T cell V repertoire in responding versus nonresponding cohorts could reveal tumor-specific T cells associated with clinical responsiveness.

In treated mice that eventually succumbed to disease, outgrown tumors were harvested, and the TCR V repertoire was analyzed to determine relative expansion of adoptively transferred T cells. For these experiments, tumor-reactive T cells were generated using DsRed+ mice to enable longitudinal tracking of adoptively transferred cells. In NSC tumor-bearing mice that received ACT, we found no hyperexpansion of any T cell families derived from the adoptively transferred cells (fig. S4A). In KR158B-treated mice, we observed that TCR V 7+ and 8.1/8.2+ DsRed+ T cells experienced a higher frequency of expansion relative to the other TCR V families at the tumor site (fig. S4B). We FACS-isolated these DsRed+ TCR V 6+, 7+, and 8.1/8.2+ T cells from the tumors of mice that failed therapy. When used as effectors in an in vitro functionality assay, we observed that these V 8.1/8.2+ T cells secreted IFN- upon recognition of the in vitro passaged KR158B cell line, indicating that antitumor T cell function was not the cause of escape (fig. S4C). We also isolated other DsRed+ TCR V families including V 7+ T cells from the escaped tumors and found that these T cells did not demonstrate antitumor reactivity (fig. S4C). We then sought to increase survival against KR158B in tumor-bearing mice after treatment with ACT by using combinatorial anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with ACT (Fig. 5A). Groups of mice that received ACT + PD-1 experienced an average of 71.42% long-term survival (range between 60 and 85.7%), a larger proportion than those that received ACT alone (range between 42.8 and 57.1%) (this experiment was repeated a total of three times). As previously discussed above, KR158B-bearing mice that responded to ACT demonstrated an expansion of TCR V 6+ T cells (Fig. 5B). In groups treated with ACT + PD-1, we also observed that responders to therapy exhibited an expansion of TCR V 6+ T cells (Fig. 5C). Although a greater proportion of mice survived in response to ACT + PD-1, the exact mechanism by which this occurs is not yet clear.

(A) Twenty-eight C57BL/6 mice received orthotopic KR158B glioma by implanting 104 tumor cells into the right caudate nucleus and then randomized into four groups. Mice received either no treatment, PD-1 only, ACT only, or ACT + PD-1 (n = 7 mice per group). There was no statistically significant increase in survival between ACT and ACT + PD-1 groups, P = 0.1755. (B) KR158B tumorbearing mice received ACT using DsRed+ tumorreactive T cells alone, or (C) ACT + PD-1. Tumor growth was followed weekly with bioluminescent in vivo imaging. At the same time points, peripheral blood was drawn to follow relative frequencies of DsRed+ TCR V 6+ T cells over time in both groups, n = 7 mice per group.

In patients with durable responses after adoptive immunotherapy with autologous TIL therapy, sequencing of TCR V demonstrated multiple T cell clonotypes in the adoptively transferred cells, but responses were associated with clonotypic expansion of only a select few over time, and these clones persisted in peripheral blood for one or more months after transfer (8, 15, 16). We have an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and feasibility of ACT using autologous ex vivo activated T cells in children with recurrent medulloblastoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) that have failed definitive radiation therapy [Re-MATCH; FDA IND no. BB-14058; Principal Investigator (PI): D.M.]. Patients with recurrent medulloblastoma receive either nonmyeloablative salvage chemotherapy or induction chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and stem cell rescue followed by ACT consisting of ex vivo expanded autologous lymphocyte transfer and amplified tumor RNApulsed DC vaccines (DC + xALT therapy) and autologous peripheral blood stem cells (fig. S5). A patient who underwent induction and consolidation therapy followed by ACT demonstrated long-term progression-free survival (13 months) that exceeded any patient in our historical cohort of recurrent medulloblastoma patients treated with myeloablative chemotherapy and stem cell rescue alone (16). The longitudinal peripheral blood samples as well as ex vivo expanded T cell products were analyzed by TCR DNA sequencing to evaluate TCR V clonal expansion (table S1). Patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were evaluated at pretreatment, in ex vivo expanded tumor-specific T cells, and then at 2, 4, 6, and 16 weeks after T cell infusion. Analysis demonstrated massive and selective expansion of tumor-reactive TCR V clones in the peripheral blood up to 4 months (16 weeks) after treatment (Fig. 6A and table S2).

A patient with recurrent medulloblastoma was treated with ACT using autologous ex vivo activated T cells and experienced long-term survival with >2-year nonprogressing tumor. (A) TCR sequencing was conducted on the patients tumor-reactive T cells and on patient PBMCs taken at 2, 4, 6, and 16 weeks after ACT. All analysis and bioinformatics were conducted by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, WA). Productive frequencies of 59 TCR V families were analyzed. Clonal analysis revealed hyperexpansion of five T cell clones, each expanding to greater than 5% productive frequency in PBMCs 16 weeks after treatment. Combined, these five clones make up 28.72% productive frequency of patient PBMCs. (B) Top four TCR V families with the highest expression at 16 weeks after adoptive T cell transfer were plotted relative to the other 54 families at all time points (TCR V 3, V 5-01, V 9-01, and V 27-01). Clonal analysis of the 1000 clones within each family was conducted, revealing that the expanded families are largely composed of the expansion of a single clone. Each color on the graphs represents a single sequence. (C) TCR V 9-01+ T cells from PBMCs were FACS-isolated and cocultured against tumor RNApulsed autologous DCs or GFP RNApulsed DCs in triplicate. IFN- secretion was measured.

Analysis of PBMCs at 16 weeks after treatment shows hyperexpansion of four TCR V clones expressing unique sequences qAGGTRg.14426B03B02S07L14 (herein referred to as LJ23), lFNRGRn.12644B27S01B02S01L13 (herein referred to as SC30), sASGGPh.23441B09S01B01S05L13 (herein referred to as KD35), and sRISGGVq.526441B05S01B02S05L13 (herein referred to as KI11) (Fig. 6A). These four clones comprised 26.82% of all T cells found in PBMCs at 16 weeks after ACT. This patients lymphocyte counts normalized after therapy, demonstrating an extraordinary expansion of selective T cell clones after therapy and significant remodeling of the peripheral repertoire after therapy. Preexpansion PBMCs as well as ex vivo expanded T cells contain <1% productive frequency of these four clones combined, but all four clones demonstrated massive in vivo expansion after ACT (Fig. 6B). LJ23 is observed in patient PBMCs before ACT at a productive frequency of 0.000077% but expands to 7.7787833% at 16 weeks after ACT (>100,000-fold in vivo expansion). SC30 is observed in patient mononuclear cells (MNCs) before ACT at a productive frequency of 0.002525% and expands to 7.698551% at 16 weeks after treatment (>3000-fold in vivo expansion). KD35 is observed to be at a productive frequency of 0.001377% before treatment but expands to 7.708697% after ACT (>5500-fold in vivo expansion). Last, KI11 is observed at 0.002448% before ACT and expands to 3.619983% after treatment (>1400-fold in vivo expansion) (table S1).

Fifty-nine TCR V families were expressed in this patients PBMCs, revealing that four TCR V families (03+, 05-15+, 09-01+, and 27+) had productive frequencies greater than 5% at 16 weeks after treatment (Fig. 6B). Clonal analysis of each family revealed that each had relative expansion of one dominant clone as outlined in table S2. KD35 T cells, which are in the TCR V 09-01+ family, demonstrated remarkable clonal expansion in patient PBMCs from pretreatment MNCs to bulk tumor-specific T cells, 2, 4, 6, and 16 weeks after T cell transfer (Fig. 6A and table S1). Clone KD35 experienced a remarkable expansion in PBMCs, composed of 7.708697% productive frequency of all T cells and 59.6% of the TCR V 09-01+ family T cells (with no other clone within the 09-01+ reaching >0.5% as seen in Fig. 6B). Since clonal expansion of antigen-specific T cells was an indicator of antitumor reactivity in our preclinical studies, we next wanted to evaluate tumor reactivity of KD35 T cells against the primary tumor. We did not have prior knowledge of the peptide or antigen, which may drive KD35 T cell recognition but were armed with the data that the K35 clone makes up most of the TCR V 9-01+ family T cells. Since monoclonal antibodies for TCR V families are readily available, we isolated TCR V9-01+ family T cells from cryopreserved PBMCs collected at 16 weeks after ACT. These cells were tested for antitumor function and used as effector cells against autologous DCs pulsed with ttRNA isolated from the original patient tumor tissue or control RNA [green fluorescent protein (GFP)]. The use of autologous DCs as surrogate targets allows for all ubiquitously expressed self-antigens to be expressed on the same cell type and control of specificity with the loaded RNA species. IFN- secretion was measured to indicate recognition of cognate tumor antigen. TCR V 9+ T cells secreted IFN- (454 pg/ml), equal amounts to the bulk ex vivo expanded antitumor T cell population that secreted IFN- (543 pg/ml) (P = 0.2321) against tumor RNApulsed DCs. T cells targeted against autologous DCs pulsed with GFP RNA demonstrated selective specificity for tumor antigens (P = 0.002) (Fig. 6C). These results demonstrate the in vivo hyperexpansion of TCR V 9-01+ tumor-reactive T cells and persistence of these tumor-reactive T cells for up to 4 months after treatment in the peripheral blood of a patient achieving long-term disease remission.

A recurrent medulloblastoma patient who underwent ACT but did not respond to therapy (<70 days to progression) was also examined for clonal T cell expansion using TCR V sequencing with interesting results. PBMCs were collected at 1 day before ACT, and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after ACT, and TCR DNA sequencing was conducted. At each time point, the relative productive frequency of the top 1000 clones was determined. At each time point, hyperexpanded TCR clones were found, but most importantly, at each time point, the hyperexpanded clones were different clones from the previous time points. In the previously discussed long-term responder to ACT, we observed the expansion of the same four clones over time. On the contrary, in the nonresponder to therapy, we did not find hyperexpansion of any single clones over time, and no longitudinal detection of hyperexpanded TCR clones was observed (fig. S6).

These data together strongly suggest that clonal expansion of TCR clones in the peripheral blood over time is a predictive biomarker of response to ACT for malignant brain tumors. Functional analysis of the TCR V family for monitoring T cell expansion in peripheral blood of treated patients is now a useful modality that allows the prospective identification and biological characterization of viable tumor-reactive lymphocytes in patients undergoing ACT.

This study describes a method to identify tumor-reactive T cells in ACT against central nervous system malignancies by TCR V spectratyping. We also demonstrate that despite the significant prolongation of life, not all treated hosts experience immunological rejection of their intracranial orthotopic tumors. This study demonstrates that the ex vivo activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes that adoptively transferred retain their antitumor function against the primary tumor, which they were initially activated to target. In these highly heterogeneous tumors, these multimodal immunotherapies are likely to have multiple mechanisms of immune escape. For example, in Fig. 5, the combination of PD-1 with ACT increased the amount of overall long-term survivors, but a proportion of animals still succumbed to disease. Immunotherapy has been demonstrably promising against solid tumors, but it is imperative to determine mechanisms of failure to make more significant impacts against disease. Given our findings, potential actions of tumor escape could include antigen escape variants, which is highly likely in both high-grade gliomas and medulloblastomas, as these are highly heterogeneous tumors. Identification of these mechanisms is imperative to further progress the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy.

Female six- to eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice (stock 000664) and transgenic DsRed mice (stock 006051) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. The investigators adhered to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as proposed by the committee on care of the Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. The facilities at the University of Florida Animal Care Services are fully accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, and all studies were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

As described in our previous publication by Flores et al. (9), tumor-bearing experiments were performed in a C57BL/6 background with two different cell lines implanted intracranially via stereotaxic frame (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). KR158B-luc tumors are intracranial murine astrocytomas (9, 14), and NSC tumors are intracranial murine medulloblastomas (13). Treatment of tumor-bearing mice began with 9-Gy x-ray myeloablation on day 5 after intracranial injection (X-RAD 320, Precision X-ray, North Branford, CT). On day 6 after intracranial injection, mice received 5 104 lineage-depleted hematopoietic stem cells (per the manufacturers protocol, Miltenyi Biotec, catalog no. 130090858) in addition to 107 autologous ex vivo expanded ttRNA T cells via a single intravenous injection in the tail vein. DC vaccine was injected intradermally posterior to the pinna weekly for 3 weeks with 2.5 105 cells beginning day 7 after intracranial injection.

ttRNA isolation was performed with the RNAeasy Mini Kit from QIAGEN (QIAGEN, catalog no. 74104) per the manufacturers protocol for each respective tumor cell line.

DCs were generated from a 9-day differentiation and selection protocol as previously described (9). At day 8 of culture, DCs were electroporated as previously described with 25 g of ttRNA. On day 9 of culture, DCs are available for priming mice, vaccinating tumor-bearing mice, or ex vivo expanding splenocytes to become tumor-reactive T cells.

Generation of autologous tumor-reactive T cells was performed as previously described (9). Nave C57BL/6 mice are primed with 2.5 105 ttRNA-pulsed DCs, and 1 week later, primed splenocytes are expanded in a coculture with ttRNA DCs. Between days 5 and 7 of expansion, 107 T cells were isolated and injected intravenously into tumor-bearing mouse tail veins. In the case of TCR V familyspecific transplants, cells were FACS-sorted for the TCR V family and transplanted to tumor-bearing hosts.

Flow cytometry was performed on FSC/SSC gating on the BD Biosciences FACS Calibur. Cells from transgenic DsRed mice were detected at FL2 and FACS-sorted using the BD Biosciences FACSAria II. Spectratyping TCR V families was performed using a FACSAria II cell sorter with fluorescein isothiocyanateconjugated antibodies from BD Biosciences anti-mouse TCR V Screening Panel (BD Biosciences, catalog no. 557004). Cells were stained per protocol with 20 l of antibody per 106 T cells.

Human PBMCs were isolated with a buffy coat preparation. Human TCR sequencing was performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, WA) through their immunoSEQ Platform. This assay uses a multiplex polymerase chain reaction system to amplify 87 base pairs spanning the rearranged CDR3 VDJ regions. Sequencing is completed using the Illumina platform (17). All data reported were acquired using their immunoSEQ Analyzer 2.0 TCR sequencing.

In vitro experiments that analyzed IFN- release were performed with effector cells and targets in 96-well U-bottom plates. For the example of TCR-specific T cells and KR158B-luc cells, the coculture was performed with a 20:1 ratio of T cells/KR158B-luc cells. IFN- release was measured in picograms per milliliter by IFN- Platinum ELISA (eBiosciences, catalog no. BMS606) to determine degree of antitumor activity. ELISA was performed on harvested and frozen acellular media from the supernatants of the 96-well coculture plates after 1 day of culture.

In vivo imaging of intracranial KR158B-luc tumors was performed using an IVIS Kinetic (PerkinElmer). Mice were imaged every 30 s until the peak photon reading is reached minutes after injection with 100 l of luciferin substrate (Sigma-Aldrich). Bioluminescence for all animals was acquired with 1-s exposure.

Nomenclature of TCRs was adapted from Reilly et al. (14). Briefly, V(D)J rearrangement sequences containing the V gene, CDR3, NDN, and J gene were obtained from Adaptive Biotechnology. The TCR nomenclature is made of five components: (i) the CDR3 amino acid identifier, (ii) the nucleotide sequence identifier, (iii) the TCR V region identifier, (iv) the TCR J region identifier, and (v) the CDR3 length identifier. The lowercase letters at the start and end of the amino acid sequence represent the last amino acids from the V and J segments, respectively, while the uppercase letters represent amino acids that are encoded by the NDN region. The series of numbers following the period represents the nucleotide identifier. Genetic codons are assigned nucleotide identification numbers from the standard codon table. The TCR V and J region identifiers follow the nucleotide sequence identifier, and these gene families were also sequenced by Adaptive Biotechnology. The final component, the CDR3 length identifier, represents the number of amino acids between the C-terminalconserved cysteine of the V region and the phenylalanine of the J region.

Administration of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor (Bio X Cell, catalog no. BP0146) began on the same day as adoptive T cell transfer and continued every 5 days for a total of four doses at 10 mg/kg.

All experiments were analyzed in Prism 7 (GraphPad). The median survival for tumor-bearing animals is 25 to 42 days. Tumor-bearing survival experiments in this manuscript are no less than seven animals per group and analyzed with the Mantel-Cox log-rank test. An unpaired Mann-Whitney rank sum test or an unpaired Students t test was applied for two-group comparisons for in vivo or in vitro experiments, respectively. Significance is determined as P < 0.05. Animal studies were powered to include n = 5 randomized mice per group unless otherwise noted.

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/5/11/eaav9879/DC1

Fig. S1. TILs in untreated mice.

Fig. S2. Adoptive transfer of TCR V6, 7, 8.1/8.2, or 11 does not provide survival benefit against NSC.

Fig. S3. Relative expansion of TCR V families in peripheral blood after ACT.

Fig. S4. Tumor-reactive T cells retain function within tumor.

Fig. S5. ACT in recurrent medulloblastoma and PNET.

Fig. S6. Lack of single clonal expansion over time in nonresponder to ACT.

Table S1. Clonal expansion in patient PBMCs after ACT.

Table S2. Productive frequency of TCR V families in patient MNCs before ACT, ex vivo expanded ttRNA T cells, and at follow-up after T cell infusion.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.

Acknowledgments: Funding: This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01 CA195563 (D.M.), the V Foundation for Cancer Research Translational Research Award (D.M.), the Hyundai Hope On Wheels Quantum Award (D.M.), the American Brain Tumor Association Research Collaboration Grant (C.F.), Alexs Lemonade Stand Young Investigator Grant (C.F.), the Florida Center for Brain Tumor Research Grant (C.F.), the University of Florida Health Cancer Center Predoctoral Award (T.W.), and the Wells Foundation (D.M.). Author contributions: Conceptualization: D.M. and C.F. Data curation: C.F., T.W., B.D.D., G.M., J.Dr., R.A., C.M., J.G., D.S., and C.P. Formal analysis: C.F., T.W., B.D.D., O.Y., C.Y., and J.De. Funding acquisition: D.M., C.F., and T.W. Investigation: C.F., T.W., B.D.D., G.M., J.Dr., R.A., and J.G. Methodology: C.F. and D.M. Project administration: D.M. Resources: C.F. and D.M. Software: Adaptive Biosciences. Supervision: C.F., D.M., J.Kr., J.Ki., G.G., T.D., J.Ku., R.M., and S.G. Validation: C.F., B.D.D., T.W., G.M., J.Dr., R.A., and J.G. Visualization: C.F. and T.W. Writing original draft: C.F. Writing review and editing: C.F., T.W., D.M., and B.D.D. Competing interests: C.F. and D.M. are cofounders of iOncologi Inc., an immuno-oncology biotechnology company. C.F. and D.M. hold interests in iOncologi Inc., a biotechnology company focused on immuno-oncology. C.F. and D.M. have patents that have options to be licensed to iOncologi Inc. filed by the University of Florida (no. 2016303489, filed 29 July 2016; no. 2994241, filed 29 July 2016; no. 16833610.5, filed 29 July 2016; no. 2018-504814, filed 29 July 2016, published 16 August 2018; no. 10-2018-7005904, filed 29 July 2016; no. 18114083.9, filed 5 November 2018; no. PCT/US2016/044718, filed 29 July 2016, published 9 February 2017; no. 62/296,826, filed 18 February 2016; no. 62/296,849, filed 18 February 2016; no. 62/296,866, filed 18 February 2016; no. 62/199,916, filed 31 July 2015; no. 2017382271, filed 21 December 2017; no. 2017382271, filed 21 December 2017; no. 2017382271, filed 21 December 2017; no. 3046095, filed 21 December 2017; no. 2017800785846, filed 21 December 2017; no. 17885383.4, filed 21 December 2017; no. 2019-534399, filed 21 December 2017; no. PCT/US2017/067914, filed 21 December 2017, published 28 June 2018; no. 10-2019-7020802, filed 21 December 2017, no. 16/472,618, filed 21 June 2019; and no. 62/437,582, filed 21 December 2016). All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data including sequencing data may be requested from the authors.

See the original post here:
Massive clonal expansion of medulloblastoma-specific T cells during adoptive cellular therapy - Science Advances

Sickle Cell Disease: Current Treatment and Emerging Therapies – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Lynne D. Neumayr, MD; Carolyn C. Hoppe, MD, MPH; Clark Brown, MD, PhD

2 decades; in 2017, L-glutamine oral powder was approved for the prevention of the acute complications of SCD. During the last several years there has been a dramatic increase in research into treatments that address distinct elements of SCD pathophysiology and even new curative approaches that provide new hope to patients and physicians for a clinically consequential disease that has long been neglected.

Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:-S0

For author information and disclosures, see end of text.

Background

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common, severe disorder that includes congenital hemolytic anemias caused by inherited point mutations in the -globin gene.1 These mutations result in abnormal hemoglobin polymerization, which leads to a cascade of physiologic consequences, including erythrocyte rigidity, vaso-occlusion, chronic anemia, hemolysis, and vasculopathy.1 This change in the behavior of hemoglobin has profound clinical consequences, including recurrent pain episodes (known as sickle cellrelated pain crises or vaso-occlusive crises), hemolytic anemia, multiorgan dysfunction, and premature death.1 Newborn screening, early immunization, and prophylactic penicillin treatment in infants and children, as well as comprehensive management for pain and disease complications, have improved outcomes in these patients; however, the average life expectancy of a patient with SCD remains only about 40 to 50 years.2,3

Globally, it is expected that approximately 306,000 people are born every year with SCD; an estimated 79% of these births occur in sub-Saharan Africa. In the United States, approximately 100,000 people are living with SCD, including approximately 1 in 365 African Americans and 1 in 16,300 Hispanic Americans.4,5

The impact of SCD on patient quality of life (QOL) has been estimated to be greater than that of cystic fibrosis and similar to that of patients undergoing hemodialysis, which is widely recognized as having a severe impact on QOL.6 Impairments are seen across functional and QOL domains and are particularly profound in terms of pain, fatigue, and physical function.7,8

Management of SCD can be intensive, time-consuming, and costly, particularly in patients with recurrent acute pain episodes. On average, patients with SCD experience approximately 3 vaso-occlusive crises each year, of which at least 1 requires inpatient treatment and 1 requires emergency department management without admission.9 Among patients who require admission, the median length of stay is approximately 6 days.9 More than 90% of acute hospital admissions for patients with SCD are due to severe and unpredictable pain crises, and these crises are responsible for 85% of all acute medical care for these patients.10 Estimates of the lifetime care costs for SCD vary dramatically based on underlying assumptions, from approximately $500,000 to nearly $9 million.11,12

Few options are currently available for the management of SCD. Hydroxyurea, which until recently was the only FDA-approved drug for adults with severe SCD genotypes (and is also used off-label for adults with less severe genotypes and children ages 9 months to 2 years), improves the course of SCD and results in substantial cost savings.13,14 Unfortunately, hydroxyurea is underutilized and treatment adherence is poor for a variety of reasons.15 Recently, L-glutamine became the second drug approved for SCD in the United States.16

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is common in patients with SCD for the management of acute complications, and regular or chronic transfusion regimens are used for stroke prevention in at-risk patients. Despite being effective for the management of both acute and chronic complications of SCD,1 transfusion is associated with annual costs exceeding $60,000; it requires routine, costly iron chelation therapy to prevent liver and other organ damage as a result of iron overload; and it is associated with the risk of alloimmunization.12,17 Stem cell transplantation, while potentially curative, is limited by a scarcity of matched donors and the risks for adverse events (AEs) and death.18 Currently under investigation are novel gene therapies that offer considerable hope for a more broadly applicable curative therapy.

This review will first examine our current understanding of the pathogenesis of SCD and explore the broad range of clinical manifestations of this disease. It will then focus on the relatively limited current therapeutic options, recent clinical trials, and near-term therapies for the chronic and acute management of the disease.

The Pathogenesis of SCD

SCD is not a single disorder. Rather, it is a clinical entity that includes a number of heritable hemolytic anemias with widely variable clinical severity and life expectancy. All involve point mutations in the -globin gene, resulting in an abnormal hemoglobin referred to as hemoglobin S (HbS).19 In the most common forms of SCD, which are also the most severe, the patient inherits the sickling gene from both parents and produces HbS exclusively.19 The compound heterozygous forms of SCD are defined by the production of HbS and another abnormal -globin protein.19

The point mutation in the -globin gene results in the substitution of glutamic acid in position 6 with valine in the resulting protein.1 This small change in the amino acid sequence of hemoglobin has profound structural and functional consequences, because under low oxygen conditions, it produces a hydrophobic region in deoxygenated HbS that promotes binding between the 1 and 2 chains of 2 hemoglobin molecules, ultimately resulting in HbS polymerization into rod-shaped structures.

The polymerization of HbS changes both the shape and physical properties of RBCs, resulting in red cell dehydration, increased rigidity, and a variety of deleterious structural abnormalities, including the characteristic sickled RBCs from which the disease gets its name.20 The rigidity of deoxygenated RBCs contributes to vaso-occlusion by impeding their passage through the microcirculation.1 Repeated cycles of tissue hypoxia and reperfusion damage elicits upregulation of adhesion molecules, such as P-selectin and E-selectin, on the vascular endothelium. This promotes adherence of RBCs, white blood cells (WBCs), and platelets, further contributing to a propensity for vaso-occlusive events and a chronic inflammatory state.1,20,21

Hemolytic anemia is an important driver of the pathophysiology of SCD. The average RBC in homozygous SCD survives only approximately 10 to 20 days, compared with 120 days for normal RBCs.22 Destruction and release of the contents of RBCs into the circulation results in progressive endothelial dysfunction and proliferation, which may in part be due to scavenging of nitric oxide (a key regulator of vascular tone) by extracellular hemoglobin.20,23-25 The end result is an impaired vasodilatory response, chronic activation of endothelial cells and platelets, and an ongoing inflammatory state. Exposure of phosphatidylserine, which is normally only found on the inner surface of the RBC membrane, also occurs, and this predisposes cells to premature lysis and promotes the activation of coagulation pathways.26,27 Excess levels of adenosine, often related to stress, are also seen in SCD. Adenosine signaling contributes to the pathophysiology of SCD by stimulating the production of erythrocyte 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate, an intracellular signal that decreases oxygen binding to hemoglobin.28

Clinical Consequences of SCD

SCD is associated with a broad range of acute and chronic complications that have a profound impact on patients, their families, and society. As noted previously, patients with SCD can present with a broad range of manifestations and disease severities depending upon the underlying genetics of their disease; the discussion below primarily refers to the most common homozygous form of the disease.

Acute pain events affect approximately 60% of patients with SCD in any given year.29-31 Such events can begin as early as 6 months of age and may recur throughout the patients life. Acute pain events are responsible for more than three-quarters of hospitalizations in patients with SCD,32 and from the perspective of the patient, they are often considered the most important and disabling consequence of the disease.32,33 Many such events can be managed at home with oral analgesics, hydration, and rest; however, in some cases, patients must be administered opioids in the emergency department or hospital setting to achieve adequate pain control.34 Acute pain events are major contributors to the high healthcare utilization of many patients with SCD.32

Stroke is the most common, and most concerning, long-term risk of homozygous SCD. The risk for stroke in children with SCD is approximately 300 times higher than for children without SCD, and approximately 25% of adults with SCA will have a stroke.20,35 Silent cerebral infarcts occur in 27% of patients by age 6 years and in 37% by age 14 years; the prevalence of silent cerebral infarct in adults is less well defined, although it is likely that progressive injury occurs as patients age.36 Cognitive impairment is seen in 5 to 9 times as many patients with SCD as compared with patients without SCD, likely due to silent repetitive ischemic brain injury.29 The use of transcranial Doppler or MRI to screen patients can help to identify patients who would benefit from additional measures to decrease the frequency and severity of stroke.20

Read more here:
Sickle Cell Disease: Current Treatment and Emerging Therapies - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Vertex plans major Boston expansion to support gene, cell therapy ambitions – FiercePharma

Vertex Pharmaceuticals is preparing to grow even biggeranother 256,000 square feet bigger, to be exact.

The drugmaker is in advanced talks to lease a building in Innovation Square, a research campus in Bostons Raymond Flynn Marine Industrial Park, The Boston Globe reported.

The target is the entire second phase of the new R&D hub that developer Related Beal is building on the South Boston waterfront. Its close to Vertexs existing 1.1 million-square-feet Fan Pier headquarters and would serve as a research and manufacturing facility for gene and cell therapies, according to the newspaper.

Striving for Zero in Quality & Manufacturing

Pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers strive towards a culture of zero zero hazards, zero defects, and zero waste. This on-demand webinar discusses the role that content management plays in pharmaceutical manufacturing to help companies reach the goal of zero in Quality and Manufacturing.

Vertex scoured the greater Boston region for a new foothold, including sites in Cambridge, Waltham and Watertown, but picked the Innovation Square because its one of the most advanced projects in the neighborhood, on track to open in 2021, Vertex CEO Jeffrey Leiden reportedly said.

Expansion at the Innovation Square comes as the biotech giant diversifies beyond its fundamental cystic fibrosis business and into the burgeoning gene and cell therapy arena.

The question became how are we going to grow those programs if were running out of space at Fan Pier? said Leiden, as quoted by the Globe. The answer is a new building.

Leiden is transitioning to executive chairman, handing the baton to Chief Medical Officer Reshma Kewalramani. But before he moves up, a blueprint for Vertexs future growth has been laid out.

RELATED:The top 10 best-paying places to work in biopharma | 7. Vertex Pharmaceuticals

In June, Vertex put down $245 million upfront to acquire Exonics and its gene editing technology, which uses CRISPR to repair dystrophin, the protein missing in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). At the same time, it shelled out $175 million upfront to deepen its ties with CRISPR Therapeutics, also for using CRISPR-Cas9 to develop DMD and myotonic dystrophy Type 1 therapies.

The first project coming out of the CRISPR-Vertex partnership has just shown promise. CTX001, a CRISPR-based therapy for severe blood disorders marked by abnormal hemoglobin, helped a beta thalassemia patient live without transfusions for nine months, and a sickle cell patient was free of the painful vaso-occlusive crises after four months, the pair unveiled last week.

Vertex also agreed to pay $950 million to snatch up Semma Therapeutics and its stem cell treatment for Type 1 diabetes.

RELATED:Vertex, CRISPR's gene-editing treatment for blood disorders shows promise in early data

The new building Vertex plans to lease will house 300 to 400 people, including employees from Exonics and Semma, as well as new hires, Leiden said, according to the Globe. Besides the lab and office space at its Fan Pier HQ, Vertex also has a lease for about 100,000 square feet of space in the Marine Industrial Park for certain logistical and laboratory operations and manufacturing equipment, the companys annual securities filing shows.

On the companys third-quarter earnings call in October, Leiden said the company will continue to do deals on early-stage assets, especially bolt-on deals to furtherits gene editing strategy.

Meanwhile, the cystic fibrosis franchise will continue to provideVertexs revenue backbone for some time. Last month, the company wonFDA approval for Trikafta, a triple combo designed to treat cystic fibrosis patients with a mutated delF508 gene, which is found in 90% of the U.S. cystic fibrosis population.

Original post:
Vertex plans major Boston expansion to support gene, cell therapy ambitions - FiercePharma

You can take my Dads tweets over my dead body – TechCrunch

Editors note:Drew is a geek who first worked at AOL when he was 16 years old and went on to become a senior writer at TechCrunch. He is now the VP of Communications for venture equity fund Scaleworks.

There are a few ways that people use Twitter, but for the most part the ones who have pushed the social platform into the national lexicon are regular users who like to communicate with each other using the thing. Theyre the ones who use it a lot. Theyre the ones who make Twitter go.

Now, mind you, Im an extreme case. I share a lot. Ive shared my cancer diagnoses, my stem cell treatment, new jobs, my wedding. And the loss of my father Barry.

Today, Twitter announced that it will reclaim dormant accounts. That is, if you havent logged into yours for a long time, it is considered inactive and will be included in the reclamation process.

At first I thought that was pretty cool. There are a ton of accounts that get squatted on, forcing new users to use crappy AOL-like names, such as Joe583822. No fun at all. And these accounts arent even in use! As in not active.

No big deal.

But then I saw this:

My heart sank. And I cried. You see, I didnt think about this.Itisa big deal.

My fathers Twitter accountisnt active.He passed away over four years ago. My Dad was a casual tweeter at best. He mostly used it because I, well, overused it. And it was charming. Once in a while hed chime in with a zinger of a tweet and Id share it humbly with the folks who kindly follow me.

He got a kick out of that, and so did I. I still do. I still read his tweets, and from time to time I still share them with you. Its my way, odd or not, of remembering him. Keeping his spirit alive. His tweets are timestamped moments that he shared with the world.

And Twitter is sweeping them up like crumpled-up paper and junk in a dustbin.

Surely, my father isnt the only person who has passed away and left a Twitter account unkept or, as the company puts it, inactive. I can think of a few others. And I get even more upset at the thought of their thoughts disappearing. I might not remember everyone weve lost, but not being able to recall something theyve said or shared in the past is depressing.

When people ask me why I use Twitter so much, its mostly because I see the platform as a living organism. Its not perfect. In fact, its awful sometimes. Lately, a lot of times.

During events and during holidays its almost as if that tiny little app on my phone has a pulse. And a heart. Because of course it does: Its full of human beings with feelings and real thoughts. Thats what makes Twitter Twitter.

And just because someones pulse no longer beats doesnt mean their thoughts no longer matter.

I sincerely hope that Twitter didnt think about this first and reverse course. Perhaps theyll offer a way to memorialize an account. I dont have my dads login. I cant wake up his account to keep it safe. I am truly sad at the thought of losing some of his quirky nerdy tweets.

Especially this one:

My dad thoughtI was the only person on the damn site and I never corrected him or schooled him on Twitter. He used it the way he wanted to, and that reminds me of the person he was. If you take that away from me, then what is Twitter anyway?

Facebook allows you to memorialize someones page and thats pretty great. Unfortunately, my fathers page was deactivated and deleted without my having been consulted. By the time I realized it was gone, Facebook told me there was nothing it could do. It was really traumatizing for me and my other family members. So many interactions there, thoughts, smiles. A timeline. No, a time capsule.

Just gone. Like my dad.

Big tech companies are good at a lot of things, but what they seem to lack is collective empathy and heart. When humans use the things you build and you stop treating them like humans, but rather like bits and bytes and revenue dollars, youve given your soul away. And maybe its just me getting older, but Ive had about enough of it.

To quote the late great Barry Olanoff:

Think about it, Twitter. Do better. Because every time you make me question your humanity, Im one step closer to not being that whale of a user that helped get you here in the first place.

Read the original:
You can take my Dads tweets over my dead body - TechCrunch

Discovery of ‘Tendon Stem Cells’ Could Revolutionize How We Recover From Injuries – Good News Network

Debilitating tendon injuries may soon be a thing of the past now that researchers have discovered the existence of tendon stem cells for the first time.

The buildup of scar tissue makes recovery from torn rotator cuffs, jumpers knee, and other tendon injuries a painful, challenging process, often leading to secondary tendon ruptures.

New research led by Carnegies Chen-Ming Fan and published in Nature Cell Biology reveals the existence of tendon stem cells that could potentially be harnessed to improve tendon healing and even to avoid surgery.

Tendons are connective tissue that tether our muscles to our bones, Fan explained. They improve our stability and facilitate the transfer of force that allows us to move. But they are also particularly susceptible to injury and damage.

LOOK: Revolutionary New Arm Cast is Waterproof, Breathable, and Itch-Free

Unfortunately, once tendons are injured, they rarely fully recover, which can result in limited mobility and require long-term pain management or even surgery. The culprit is fibrous scars, which disrupt the tissue structure of the tendon.

Working with Carnegies Tyler Harvey and Sara Flamenco, Fan revealed all of the cell types present in the Patellar tendon, found below the kneecap, including previously undefined tendon stem cells.

Because tendon injuries rarely heal completely, it was thought that tendon stem cells might not exist, said lead author Harvey. Many searched for them to no avail, but our work defined them for the first time.

Stem cells are blank cells associated with nearly every type of tissue, which have not fully differentiated into a specific functionality. They can also self-renew, creating a pool from which newly differentiated cell types can form to support a specific tissues function. For example, muscle stem cells can differentiate into muscle cells. But until now, stem cells for the tendon were unknown.

CHECK OUT: Researchers Create AI System That Can Predict Epileptic Seizures One Hour Ahead of Time With 99.6% Accuracy

Surprisingly, the teams research showed that both fibrous scar tissue cells and tendon stem cells originate in the same spacethe protective cells that surround a tendon. Whats more, these tendon stem cells are part of a competitive system with precursors of fibrous scars, which explains why tendon healing is such a challenge.

The team demonstrated that both tendon stem cells and scar tissue precursor cells are stimulated into action by a protein called platelet-derived growth factor-A. When tendon stem cells are altered so that they dont respond to this growth factor, then only scar tissue and no new tendon cells form after an injury.

Tendon stem cells exist, but they must outcompete the scar tissue precursors in order to prevent the formation of difficult, fibrous scars, Fan explained. Finding a therapeutic way to block the scar-forming cells and enhance the tendon stem cells could be a game-changer when it comes to treating tendon injuries.

Reprinted from the Carnegie Institution for Science

Heal Your Friends Of Negativity By Sharing The Exciting News To Social Media

Read more:
Discovery of 'Tendon Stem Cells' Could Revolutionize How We Recover From Injuries - Good News Network