Jim Durgeloh, 59, was desperate to avoid surgery. After a    career as a construction contractor and hours of leisure time    spent on a motorcycle around his Longview, Wash., home, he was    facing an operation to replace his left hip.  
    Thats pretty invasive, he said, nervous about a surgery that    would require being cut open and implanted with an artificial    hip; Jims brother had died from complications after a similar    operation. In the search for an alternative, he and his wife,    Janet, happened upon the website for La Jolla-based StemGenex    Medical Group, which touts itself as the worlds first and only Stem Cell Center of    Excellence.  
    But what caught the Durgelohs attention were the words of Rita    Alexander, its chief administrative officer and a founder.  
    Alexander wrote that she had suffered debilitating rheumatoid    arthritis until a stem cell treatment sent her into remission.    Today it remains my passion to advocate for those diagnosed    with debilitating illnesses to have access to cutting edge stem    cell treatment, she wrote.  
    Rita was very inspiring, Janet Durgeloh says.  
    Durgelohs doctor in Washington was skeptical about the therapy    offered by StemGenex. He didnt think it was going to work,    Durgeloh says. The therapy isnt approved by the Food and Drug    Administration, which says such treatments are not based on scientific evidence and can be    unsafe. Then there was the cost: about $15,000, not including    airfare. That wasnt covered by Durgelohs insurance, which    would have paid for his hip replacement.  
    But on a recent Wednesday morning, the Durgelohs were at the    DoubleTree hotel in Del Mar, where their bill was paid by    StemGenex. Durgeloh was still wearing a bandage on his midriff,    where a StemGenex doctor had performed liposuction to obtain    stem cells that subsequently were reinjected into his body,    ostensibly to regenerate his damaged bones and tissues. They    were preparing to fly home, infused with the hope communicated    by the clinic staff, who seemed very optimistic, Durgeloh    told me.  
    A lawsuit in San Diego federal court    suggests that StemGenex may have given the Durgelohs nothing    but hope. Three StemGenex patients  two with diabetes and one    with lupus  say they were misled by the medical groups    marketing pitch to pay $14,900 each in 2015 and 2016 for    therapies that have had no effect.  
    The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, claims that    StemGenex has made its money by targeting the ill and the    elderly with false, fabricated and purposefully misleading    claims about patient satisfaction. Selena Moorer, a lupus    patient from Florida, and her two co-plaintiffs say StemGenex    has no reasonable basis for its marketing claim that the Stem    Cell Treatments were effective to treat diseases as    advertised. The lawsuit names StemGenex, Alexander and Andre    Lallande, the groups chief medical officer, as defendants. The    company denies the claims made in the lawsuit.  
    Durgelohs treatment was typical of the procedures offered as    stem cell therapy. He says he received injections directly into    his hips, his ailing knees and his back, with whatever was left    over suffused into his body via an IV drip.  
    Whats most important to know is that theres no accepted    scientific evidence that treatments using cells from adipose    fat tissue layers work.  
    But as we reported last year, many clinics    offering the treatments capitalize on the publics impression    that stem cells have become some sort of medical miracle.    Dr. Mehmet Oz warned his vast television    audience about this misconception in February, when he aired a    lengthy undercover investigation of stem cell clinics and    called for government regulation. StemGenex wasnt mentioned in    the piece.  
    StemGenex, in its reply to the Moorer lawsuit, asserts    that the plaintiffs cannot prove that its representations    regarding the efficacy of its stem cell treatments are actually    false. The plaintiffs, it continues, do not cite to a single    scientific study that disproves [StemGenexs] advertised    claims.  
    StemGenex may not have to prove that in a court of law, but    thats not the way federal regulation works. At nearly $15,000    a pop, the companies should have to show a treatment works.  
    The FDA has been grappling with this very point in pondering    how to regulate the burgeoning industry. There are more than    500 clinics offering stem cell treatments in the U.S., according to a survey released last year by    stem cell scientist Paul Knoepfler of UC Davis and bioethicist    Leigh Turner of the University of Minnesota.  
    Right now, theres no consensus how these clinics should be    regulated.  
    In 2015, UC San Diego researchers described stem cell treatment    as medicines Wild West. As Hermes    Taylor-Weiner and Joshua Graff Zivin observed, Because FDA    guidelines are ambiguous, stem-cell clinics have in effect been    operating without regulation.  
    The proliferation of the clinics has forced the FDA to take a    closer look.  
    The government agency maintains that using stem cells extracted    from a patients fat requires licensing as a drug, device or    biological product, which means the clinics have to    demonstrate the products are safe and effective, possibly via a    clinical trial.  
    The clinics obviously disagree. Steven Brody, chief scientific    officer of StemGenex, testified at an FDA hearing in September    that if the FDA took a hands-off approach, this would help our    patients have access to stem cell therapies.  
    Earlier this month, the New England Journal of Medicine reported the    devastating outcome for three elderly women injected with    fat-derived stem cells directly into their eyeballs by a clinic    in Florida as a treatment for macular degeneration. The    treatment left the patients totally or mostly blind.  
    Stem cell clinics typically are cagey about what patients    should expect. They neither claim their treatments are    effective nor explicitly state that theyre unfounded,    Taylor-Weiner and Zivin observed. Their language is    intentionally imprecise and exploits the vulnerability of    patients with debilitating diseases.  
    Indeed, a disclaimer on the StemGenex home page states, Stem    cell therapy is not FDA approved, and, StemGenex Medical    Group and affiliates do not claim that treatment using    autologous stem cells are a cure for any condition, disease, or    injury.  
    Thats a striking admission for a treatment costing nearly    $15,000 out-of-pocket and might help explain why health    insurers shun the treatments.  
    The emotional video testimonials from patients posted on the    StemGenex website carry disclaimers that the results    experienced by those patients may not be typical or expected.     You should not expect to experience these results.  
    When I asked Jamie Schubert, a StemGenex spokeswoman, to point    me to a scientific study or any other evidence that its    treatments work, she replied that anecdotal feedback from    patients indicates that their symptoms have improved and their    quality of life has increased.  
    There are other red flags. One of the medical groups    physicians, plastic surgeon Scott Sessions, was placed on three    years probation by the California Medical Board in February.    He was accused of negligence related to cosmetic    surgery and other procedures he performed on two patients at an    unrelated facility in 2011 and 2013.  
    Schubert told me Wednesday that Dr. Sessions has informed us    that he is in compliance with all requirements of the    probationary terms of the medical board. But the very next    day, his name, photograph and bio had disappeared from the    StemGenex website. Sessions didnt respond to a request for    comment.  
    The same thing happened with the logo of the American Board of    Surgery, which had been prominently displayed on the StemGenex    site, implying the company had the certification boards seal    of approval. After I mentioned to Schubert that a board    official told me that display was a complete misuse of our    logo, it vanished. Schubert called it an error.  
    Peoples health needs are not suitable for unregulated Wild    West experimentation, and anecdotal feedback isnt proof that    cutting edge treatments are safe and effective. The course    couldnt be clearer for the FDA and state medical regulators    across the country: If these stem cell clinics are endangering    their customers health and draining their pocketbooks for    quack remedies, shut them down.  
    Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. Follow    @hiltzikm on Twitter, see his Facebook    page, or email michael.hiltzik@latimes.com.  
    Return to Michael Hiltzik's    blog.  
View original post here:
The stem cell therapies offered by this La Jolla clinic aren't FDA ... - Los Angeles Times