Groundbreaking Ultrasound Guided Injectable Course To Premier at Los Angeles Multi-Specialty Cosmetic Academy Meeting 2020 – Yahoo Finance

LOS ANGELES, March 2, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The world's most innovative medical aesthetic leaders will join together on March 26-29th at the Four Seasons Beverly Hills to share the latest discoveries, trends, and techniques shaping the industry. It will also be one of world's first meetings to offer an ultrasound guided course related to injectables.

"Ultrasound technology is the wave of the future for both guiding us in injection safety and also managing complications," says Dr. Kian Karimi, course chairman and double-board certified facial plastic and head and neck surgeon. "I am so proud that LA-MCA 2020 will be pioneering this groundbreaking application of technology."

The conference is hosted by Los Angeles Multi-Specialty Cosmetic Academy (LA-MCA), an acclaimed medical educational congress comprised of over 70 top tier physicians, practitioners, and medical device manufacturers.

The new course will utilize ultrasound technology to give a complete insight into facial anatomy, thereby increasing the safety of injectable treatments and reducing the hazards of technical complications and adverse events. Dr. Steve Weiner and Dr. Young Cho will demonstrate how to use ultrasound imaging while injecting to avoid intravascular injections and alsoto identify, treat, and prevent complications.

The summit's keynote speaker will be a renowned expert in addiction medicine, Dr. Keith Heinzerling. He'll be discussing the development of psychedelic-assisted therapies and the scientific exploration of how altered states of consciousness can be harnessed to change behavior and improve brain health. Dr. Heinzerling is the director of the Pacific Treatment & Research In Psychedelics (TRIP) Program of the Pacific Neuroscience Institute. He'll be giving a glimpse into the future of how psychedelics will change behavioral and psychological medicine as we know it.

"This is a think tank of the top doctors who are all there to share the latest techniques and technologies with their peers," says Dr. Karimi.

LA-MCA is comprised of internationally acclaimed medical providers including Ben Talei, MD, Sheila Nazarian, MD, and John Diaz, MD.

The forum will host a variety of live demos including injectable and thread lifting techniques, platelet, plasma, and stem cell therapy, the next generation of lasers, and emerging cosmetic technologies.

A hands-on human cadaver dissection workshop will give select attendees an intimate opportunity to explore facial anatomy in order to produce excellent results and avoid complications in their own patients.

CONTACT: info@jillianwilsonmarketing.com

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/groundbreaking-ultrasound-guided-injectable-course-to-premier-at-los-angeles-multi-specialty-cosmetic-academy-meeting-2020-301013796.html

SOURCE Dr. Kian Karimi

Go here to see the original:
Groundbreaking Ultrasound Guided Injectable Course To Premier at Los Angeles Multi-Specialty Cosmetic Academy Meeting 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Variability the norm for the support of pediatric patients with HSCT – NewsDio

ORLANDO, Florida It is not the wild west, but there are significant variations between treatment centers in supportive care for children who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and some of the variations can negatively affect the results.That was the central theme of a session at the annual transplant and cell therapy meeting here that focused on divergent practices among US transplant centers. UU. In relation to diet, when it is safe to return to school and when to revaccinate children who have reconstituted immune systems.

Food for thoughtFor example, the neutropenic diet, which is still used in some centers, is a remnant from the first days of bone marrow transplants, when the risks were not well understood and where transplant recipients were protected in aseptic or sterile environments, said Cynthia Taggart, RD, of the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in Ohio.

"The history of the neutropenic diet is based on logic, prudent practice and reasonable theoretical logic, but there is no evidence to support this idea," he said.

The decidedly Spartan neutropenic diet does not allow fresh fruits or vegetables, requires that meat and fish be cooked at a reasonable price and does not allow cold meats or shared foods."In the last 20 years there has been a lot of research showing that we don't have a common name for the neutropenic diet, we really don't know when to start the neutropenic diet, and then we often have our own opinions on what we should allow our patients to have or not have, "said Taggart.He noted studies comparing diet regimes that found no advantage or even possible detriments to a neutropenic diet compared to a more forgiving diet based on food safety principles, such as cooking meat at a minimum temperature of 165 F (73.9 C).

Cynthia Taggart

For example, a retrospective study of 726 patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, Illinois, where the neutropenic diet was discontinued in 2006, showed a higher rate of infections, especially after grafting among HSCT recipients who ate a neutropenic diet in comparison with those who ate a general hospital diet. Patients with neutropenic diet had more frequent diarrhea and urinary infections and an increase in graft-versus-host disease grade 2-4 (GVHD), although there were no significant differences in survival rates. (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18: 1385-1390).

In 2019, Taggart and his colleagues published the results of a controlled study before and after in pediatric patients and consecutive young adults who underwent HSCT at their center in 2014.From January to June of that year, all patients underwent a traditional neutropenic diet, and from July 1 until the end of the year they received a modified bone marrow transplant diet (BMT). The researchers evaluated both subjective measures (e.g., food cravings, limiting factors for eating and quality of life) and objective measures (e.g., rates of bloodstream infections, GVHF, mortality, days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and norovirus infections) (Blood marrow transplant Biol. 2019; 25: 1382-1386).The patients were happier with the less restrictive diet, and the researchers found that there were no significant differences in the first 100 days in any of the objective measures mentioned above, "so it made no difference in what diet they were and improved satisfaction of the patient when he received a diet based on food safety instead of a neutropenic diet, "said Taggart.At its center, patients and caregivers receive information on food safety principles, including cleaning hands, utensils and food preparation surfaces with hot soapy water before and after handling food; avoiding cross contamination of ready-to-eat foods by keeping them separated from raw meats; cook food at safe internal temperatures as recorded on a food thermometer; and quickly refrigerating food.

"It is time to get away from the neutropenic diet and work to improve the quality of life of our patients to improve their oral intake while undergoing a transplant," he said.

Back to school?There is no clear consensus on the ideal time to return to school for transplant recipients, said Neel S. Bhatt, MBBS, MPH, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

For example, the National Medical Marrow Donor Program states that "depending on the type of transplant and recovery, a child may return to school with several months of transplant. Other children may return to school a year or more after the transplant. ".

In contrast, the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium states that "in general, once T cells grow back and function properly, all isolation precautions can be stopped (and) your child can return to work / school. ".

Dr. Neel Bhatt

Bhatt noted that a cross-sectional survey of the directors of transplant centers of the Center for International Research on Blood and Marrow Transplants (CIBMTR) asking if their centers had a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the back-to-school process showed that , of the 45 directors of pediatric centers that responded, 28 had a POE and the remaining 17 did not.

Of those surveyed with a SOP back to school, one center said there is a minimum of 9 months before an allogeneic transplant recipient can return to school, a second suggests waiting 6 to 12 months after an allogeneic or autologous transplant, and a third reported that he recommended a minimum of 3 months after an autologous transplant, 6 months after an allogeneic transplant of related donors and 12 months after a transplant of unrelated donors.

In addition, the centers varied according to the functional measures that were used to allow the return to school, such as suspending or decreasing medications against GVHD, CD4 cell count, absolute lymphocyte count and other factors such as psychological preparation and fatigue levels

Helping children reintegrate into academic settings can include workshops for school staff that include conferences, group discussions and presentations or hospital visits, and developmentally appropriate peer education programs, with the aim of improving support for The boy who returns.

"Returning to school is an important milestone for survivors after completing therapy. This process of returning to school is complex, and the support of all stakeholders is essential for a successful transition," Bhatt summarized.

Shot in the armWhen it comes to the decision to revaccinate children who have undergone HSCT and with what vaccines, "variability is the norm," said Donna J. Curtis, MD, MPH, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Colorado Children's Hospital in Aurora.

He cited an investigation that showed that before the advent of vaccination guidelines, individual transplant centers created their own, and that even with the guidelines, providers choose to deviate in terms of when to vaccinate, what to give and the rationale for those decisions. .

"Why do we deviate from the guidelines? I want to point out, as everyone knows, that our patients are really complicated," Curtis said.

Dr. Donna Curtis

He said there are both real and perceived gaps in the guidelines that can lead to centers being diverted or ignored, he said, as the populations of more homogeneous patients included in older studies used as evidence; missing data on newer technologies, such as umbilical cord blood transplants, depleted T-cell grafts, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and newer biological agents; and the reality that vaccine recommendations are updated regularly, with new vaccines frequently in practice.

In addition, doctors do not always rely on the guidelines because they change so often, Curtis said, noting that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC / APIC) issues updated guidelines (a often with changing recommendations) annually.

Despite the small variations in the recommendations on time, however, the guidelines issued by major international organizations are very similar, Curtis emphasized. She specifically mentioned the guidelines of the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) of 2017, published in 2019; the 2013 clinical practice guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) for immunocompromised host vaccination; and a 2011 report of the International Consensus Conference on clinical practice in chronic IBD on the vaccination of allogeneic HSCT receptors.

As an example, the ECIL guidelines recommend that children who have undergone an allogeneic or autologous HSCT receive the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine that begins no earlier than 3 months after HSCT, and the Neisseria meningitidis and DTaP vaccine ( diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) (but not the Tdap vaccine) no later than 6 months after HSCT. For other vaccines, there are different recommendations regarding the type of transplant (autologous or allogeneic).

In an interview with Medscape Medical News, Curtis recommended that transplant centers comply with the guidelines of bone marrow transplant organizations whenever possible.

"I think those should be our authorities, the reliable guidelines that we should use as a basis, but because there are gaps in them, each center will have to give its answer on how to apply them," he said. said.

Quality of care at stakeSession assistant Christopher E. Dandoy, MD, MSc, of the Cincinnati Children's Medical Center, told Medscape Medical News that variations in practice can affect the quality of care.

"Unless there is evidence to support a & # 39; true North & # 39; regarding these different processes and practices, it leads us to interpret what we believe we should be doing, and the wide variation in attention leads absolutely to different results, "he said.

"My idea is that we can learn from each other, take advantage of the opportunity to learn what other centers are doing, share data without problems, especially about the important results for families, such as returning to school, that means everything to a child. Therefore, we should be more cognitive and make sure that if there is no evidence, we try to find what works, "he said.

Zachariah DeFilipp, MD, of the Cancer Center of the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, told Medscape Medical News that practice variations such as those described in the session are also common to the practice of HSCT in adults.

"It's also something we've been thinking about," he said. "Many of the traditional transplant recommendations for lifestyle problems have been very conservative, which means that usually when there is a question about & # 39; can I go back to work or go out in public? & # 39 ; the default has been to say & # 39; No & # 39; "

"There is probably little real published evidence to justify those recommendations," DeFillip explained, "and when they were made, we were in a different era of supportive care for our transplant patients. Maybe those were the right decisions at that time, but as transplant has evolved, we probably don't need to be so strict with patients, because some of these recommendations can really affect the patient's quality of life after transplant. "

Taggart did not report a source of funding. Bhatt reported the support of the Seattle Children's Research Fund of CBDC Research & # 39; s. Curtis did not reveal a source of funding. Taggart, Bhatt, Curtis, Dandoy and DeFillip have not disclosed relevant financial relationships.

ASTCT and CIBMTR 2020 cell therapy and transplant meetings: session presented on February 20, 2020.

For more information on Medscape Oncology, join us on Twitter and Facebook

. (tagsToTranslate) medical conferences (t) professional societies (t) Hematologic malignancies (t) hematological disorders (t) hematology (t) cancer (t) malignant neoplasia (t) carcinoma (t) transplant (cell) (t) cell transplant ( t) children (t) child (t) childhood (t) pediatrics (t) children (t) transplant (pediatric) (t) transplant (stem cell) (t) transplant (hematopoietic stem cell) (t) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (t) stem cell transplant

Follow this link:
Variability the norm for the support of pediatric patients with HSCT - NewsDio

Organoids, iPSCs, and advanced cell models: Advancing discovery from basic research to drug discovery – Science Magazine

Various in vitro cell culture assays have been used for decades to evaluate disease pathology and uncover potential therapeutic treatments. Despite many successes with these models, they have critical shortcomings. Growing evidence suggests that models providing more predictive and translational observations are desperately needed. Researchers are now moving from reductionist, 2D monoculture assay models to more complex 3D cell models, such as organoids and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) cultures, in order to better evaluate the dynamic interactions between cells in an environment more closely emulating that of the in vivo milieu, and to assess patient-specific phenotypic effects following drug treatment. Effective, well-characterized, advanced cell models hold promise for improving our understanding of disease pathology and progression, and are critical for the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

During this roundtable webinar, the speakers will:

This webinar will last for approximately 60 minutes.

STEMCELL TechnologiesCambridge, UK

Dr. Simmini is an R&D scientist in the gastrointestinal biology group at STEMCELL Technologies. His group focuses on developing products that support the generation of 3D gastrointestinal organoid cultures both from human primary tissue and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Prior to joining STEMCELL Technologies in 2016, he obtained his Ph.D. in stem cells, developmental biology, and cancer at the University of Utrecht in The Netherlands. During that time, he conducted research with the group of Jacqueline Deschamps at the Hubrecht Institute in Utrecht, where he investigated the molecular mechanisms controlled by transcription factor CDX2 in adult mouse intestinal stem cells and during embryonic development. In 2015, he began postdoctoral research, joining the group of Jan Paul Medema and Louis Vermeulen at the Amsterdam Medical Centre in Amsterdam, where he investigated mechanisms regulating intestinal stem cell proliferation and differentiation in colorectal cancer. He is currently involved in several Horizon 2020 European Research Council projects in different roles: researcher within the INTENS (INtestinal Tissue ENgineering Solution) consortium; partner in the SINERGIA (Advanced technologieS for drug dIscovery and precisioN mEdicine: in vitRo modellinG human physiology and diseAse) project; and supervisor and member of the executive board of the Organovir-ETN (Organoids for Virus Research-European Training Network) grant.

Wellcome Sanger InstituteCambridge, UK

As a staff scientist at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Dr.Hale undertakes basic research projects into hostbacterial interactions while also teaching relevant skills to students and visiting scientists. Her projects include growing and differentiating human induced pluripotent stem cells to either a macrophage-like lineage or as intestinal 3D organoids, then utilizing them to investigate pathogen interactions. The main techniques used are flow cytometry, confocal imaging, high-throughput Cellomics assays, Luminex cytokine assays, and cell culture. The pathogens have varied over the years, but have included Salmonella, Klebsiella, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), Chlamydia, and Leishmania.

UK Dementia Research InstituteCambridge, UK

Dr. Avezov received his Ph.D. in cell research and immunology from the George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences at Tel Aviv University in 2010. He conducted his postdoctoral work at the University of Cambridge Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science and the Cambridge Institute for Medical Research until 2017 with David Ron, FRS. Quantitative cell biology in the context of human disease has been at the core of Dr. Avezovs research. Working at the interface of biomedical research, physics, and mathematical sciences, he developed the cross-disciplinary expertise for probing intracellular chemical and physical processes in real time. This enabled discoveries of unexpected features of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), such as an active ER luminal transport mechanism. These findings provide insights into the roles of the ER and its morpho-regulation in neuronal (patho)physiology. Dr. Avezov is currently a UK Dementia Research Institute Group Leader running an interdisciplinary program that seeks to understand early contributions of fundamental cellular processes ranging from ER transport to neurodegeneration.

Science/AAASWashington, D.C.

Dr. Oberst did her undergraduate training at the University of Maryland, College Park, and her Ph.D. in Tumor Biology at Georgetown University, Washington D.C. She combined her interests in science and writing by pursuing an M.A. in Journalism from the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland, College Park. Dr. Oberst joined Science/AAAS in 2016 as the Assistant Editor for Custom Publishing. Before then she worked at Nature magazine, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Endocrine Society, and the National Institutes of Mental Health.

See original here:
Organoids, iPSCs, and advanced cell models: Advancing discovery from basic research to drug discovery - Science Magazine

Stem Cell Therapy Market Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast up to 2017 2025 – Jewish Life News

TMRR, in its recent market report, suggests that the Stem Cell Therapy market report is set to exceed US$ xx Mn/Bn by 2029. The report finds that the Stem Cell Therapy market registered ~US$ xx Mn/Bn in 2018 and is spectated to grow at a healthy CAGR over the foreseeable period.

The Stem Cell Therapy market research focuses on the market structure and various factors (positive and negative) affecting the growth of the market. The study encloses a precise evaluation of the Stem Cell Therapy market, including growth rate, current scenario, and volume inflation prospects, on the basis of DROT and Porters Five Forces analyses. In addition, the Stem Cell Therapy market study provides reliable and authentic projections regarding the technical jargon.

In this Stem Cell Therapy market study, the following years are considered to project the market footprint:

The content of the Stem Cell Therapy market report includes the following insights:

Request For Discount On This Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=D&rep_id=1787&source=atm

On the basis of solution, the global Stem Cell Therapy market report covers the following solutions:

Key Trends

The key factors influencing the growth of the global stem cell therapy market are increasing funds in the development of new stem lines, the advent of advanced genomic procedures used in stem cell analysis, and greater emphasis on human embryonic stem cells. As the traditional organ transplantations are associated with limitations such as infection, rejection, and immunosuppression along with high reliance on organ donors, the demand for stem cell therapy is likely to soar. The growing deployment of stem cells in the treatment of wounds and damaged skin, scarring, and grafts is another prominent catalyst of the market.

On the contrary, inadequate infrastructural facilities coupled with ethical issues related to embryonic stem cells might impede the growth of the market. However, the ongoing research for the manipulation of stem cells from cord blood cells, bone marrow, and skin for the treatment of ailments including cardiovascular and diabetes will open up new doors for the advancement of the market.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Market Potential

A number of new studies, research projects, and development of novel therapies have come forth in the global market for stem cell therapy. Several of these treatments are in the pipeline, while many others have received approvals by regulatory bodies.

In March 2017, Belgian biotech company TiGenix announced that its cardiac stem cell therapy, AlloCSC-01 has successfully reached its phase I/II with positive results. Subsequently, it has been approved by the U.S. FDA. If this therapy is well- received by the market, nearly 1.9 million AMI patients could be treated through this stem cell therapy.

Another significant development is the granting of a patent to Israel-based Kadimastem Ltd. for its novel stem-cell based technology to be used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other similar conditions of the nervous system. The companys technology used for producing supporting cells in the central nervous system, taken from human stem cells such as myelin-producing cells is also covered in the patent.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Regional Outlook

The global market for stem cell therapy can be segmented into Asia Pacific, North America, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East and Africa. North America emerged as the leading regional market, triggered by the rising incidence of chronic health conditions and government support. Europe also displays significant growth potential, as the benefits of this therapy are increasingly acknowledged.

Asia Pacific is slated for maximum growth, thanks to the massive patient pool, bulk of investments in stem cell therapy projects, and the increasing recognition of growth opportunities in countries such as China, Japan, and India by the leading market players.

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market: Competitive Analysis

Several firms are adopting strategies such as mergers and acquisitions, collaborations, and partnerships, apart from product development with a view to attain a strong foothold in the global market for stem cell therapy.

Some of the major companies operating in the global market for stem cell therapy are RTI Surgical, Inc., MEDIPOST Co., Ltd., Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Pharmicell Co., Ltd., Anterogen Co., Ltd., JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., and Holostem Terapie Avanzate S.r.l.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=1787&source=atm

The Stem Cell Therapy market study answers critical questions including:

All the players running in the global Stem Cell Therapy market are elaborated thoroughly in the Stem Cell Therapy market report on the basis of R&D developments, distribution channels, industrial penetration, manufacturing processes, and revenue. In addition, the report examines, legal policies, and comparative analysis between the leading and emerging Stem Cell Therapy market players.

Customize This Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=CR&rep_id=1787&source=atm

Why choose TMRR?

Original post:
Stem Cell Therapy Market Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast up to 2017 2025 - Jewish Life News

‘It’s outrageous’: Costly cancer drugs thrown out because of one-size-fits-all packaging – CBC.ca

The health-care system is wasting millions of dollars by buying cancer medications that are thrown out because of the way they are packaged by drug makers in one-size-fits-all vials that hold too much for most patients, a study found.

"It's outrageous," said drug policy researcher Alan Cassels, who is familiar with the study.

"We have so many demands on our health-care dollars for drugs and doctors and hospitals and so on. So, to see this kind of waste is appalling."

The wastecosts as much as $102 million over a three-year period, according to the studypublished two years ago in the medical journal Cancer.

"What people don't realize is that wastage is actually a real cost that's borne by the provinces or hospitals [and] ultimately the taxpayers," said Dr. Matthew Cheung, a senior co-author ofthe study and a hematologist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto.

The drugs are administered in very specific doses based on a patient's weight and/or height, then, because of concerns about possible infection from reusing the same vial, nurses discard the rest.

Some hospitals have been trying to reduce waste by sharing vials, but can only do that with patients who need the same drug on the same day, since many of these medications have a short shelf life once opened.

The study looked at 12 high-priced injectable cancer drugs and found that the amount being wasted per vial ranged from zero to 87.5 per cent.

"We realized that drug wastage is actually a huge component of what we're paying. And again, when we're wasting drugs, we're increasing costs without getting any extra benefit," said Cheung.

In the U.K., the government told drug companies in 2016 they must produce some cancer medications in packaging that reduces waste if they wanted to be considered in the bidding process for which drugs it will purchase.

Since making the change, the U.K.'s National Health Service tells Go Public it's saving an estimated 18 million pounds ($31 million Cdn) per year.

Cassels who is part of the Therapeutics Initiative, an independent drug analysis group based in the University of British Columbia's Faculty of Medicine says the same hard-nosed negotiations done in the U.K. need to happen here.

He says the group that negotiates prescription drug prices here the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (PCPA), of which all the provinces are members needs to pressure drugmakers to produce smaller vials and give refunds for what's not used.

Casselssays he expects the drug companies will "lobby and scream and complain," over anything that adds to the cost of production.

"But at the same time, the public agencies have a monopoly in terms of paying for these drugs and they should be able to go to the mat in terms of negotiating the best prices and negotiating refunds if necessary," he said.

He also says the negotiating process also needs to be less secretive. Right now, Canadians are kept in the dark about what the country is paying for these drugs and what specifically is part of the negotiating process.

"The biggest problem with drug prices is sometimes we don't even know what the drug prices are so we don't really know what we're paying for. When you think about other things that we use public money for, like building bridges or roads, those costs are known down to the penny. Whereas in the drug world, oftentimes, the drug costs are completely hidden."

Asked if vial sizes and refunds for unused portions are part of the price negotiations, PCPA tells Go Publicthose talks are "confidential at the request of the manufacturer."

The confidentiality includes pricing information, budget impact estimates, "and other sensitive information is held in confidence and is not disclosed, except in accordance with applicable law or with the consent of the parties," the alliance said.

The provincial agencies that comprise PCPA are, mostly, equally secretive except for B.C., where the Provincial Health Services Authority tells Go Public it typically does ask drugmakers to offer smaller vials.

But, it points out, the vial sizes are set when the drugs are submitted to Health Canada for marketing approval and making a change is a long process. Health Canada didn't respond to questions about that.

When Deb Hebert, who is battling non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, went to get her stem cell-stimulating drug plerixafor injected by the oncology nurse last month, she realized her dose only required about three-quarters of what was in the vial.

"I asked her what was going to happen with the rest of the medication. She told me that it would be discarded," said Hebert, who has been on sick leave since August from her job as a finance administrator at CBCin Calgary while she battles the disease for the third time.

The same thing happened with Hebert's second dose the next day. Each injection used about 75 per cent of a vial. At $7,893 per vial, that works out to a waste of about $3,900 between the two doses.

Sanofi, the company that makes Hebert's medication, says it sells the drug in that vial size because it's a "typical dose for the majority of the patient population," and, it says, to account for any spillage while the drug is being administered.

The company adds, the drug is "preservative-free and therefore does not support multi-dose usage."

Submit your story ideas

Go Public is an investigative news segment on CBC-TV, radio and the web.

We tell your stories, shed light on wrongdoing, and hold the powers that be accountable.

If you have a story in the public interest, or if you're an insider with information, contactGoPublic@cbc.cawith your name, contact information and a brief summary. All emails are confidential until you decide to Go Public.

Follow@CBCGoPublicon Twitter.

See the original post:
'It's outrageous': Costly cancer drugs thrown out because of one-size-fits-all packaging - CBC.ca

AgeX Therapeutics Researchers Publish Paper on the Age Reprogramming of Super-Centenarian Cells – Business Wire

ALAMEDA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AgeX Therapeutics, Inc. (AgeX; NYSE American: AGE), a biotechnology company focused on developing therapeutics for human aging and regeneration, announced a new paper co-authored by two AgeX scientists that could lead to new insights into the fundamental mechanisms of aging and why super-centenarians not only live the longest, but also experience extraordinary healthspans; an extension of the healthy years of life that compresses morbidity to a very short period near the end of life. The paper, Induced pluripotency and spontaneous reversal of cellular aging in supercentenarian donor cells, is published online in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications from Elsevier. The senior author is Dana Larocca, PhD, VP of Discovery Research at AgeX, and the first author is Jieun Lee, PhD, Scientist at AgeX.

Clearly, we can learn a lot about aging and longevity from the longest of the long-lived, the supercentenarians, and we hope that this paper accelerates such research, commented Dr. Larocca. Now that we have converted the cells of one of the longest-lived people in history, a deceased 114-year-old American woman, to a young pluripotent state, researchers can do so with cells from other supercentenarians. The goal is to understand specifically how these extreme agers manage to avoid the major chronic illnesses of aging better than any other age group including centenarians. We can essentially put their cells in a time machine and revert them to an earlier state, then study their biology to help unlock the mysteries of super-longevity. Scientists have long wondered, and now we know that we can indeed reset the developmental state and cellular age in the oldest of the old.

By way of comparison, the paper also describes undertaking a similar process with cells from two other donors: an eight-year-old with a rapid-aging syndrome commonly known as Progeria, and a 43-year-old, healthy disease-free control (HDC) subject. The paper notes that the supercentenarians cells reverted to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells at the same rate as the HDC subject and the Progeria patient. However, there may be some negative impact of extreme age on telomere resetting as this did not occur as frequently in the supercentenarian as in the other two donors.

The donated cells were from the longevity collection, a cell bank established by the NIHs National Institute on Aging.

About AgeX Therapeutics

AgeX Therapeutics, Inc. (NYSE American: AGE) is focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutics for human aging. Its PureStem and UniverCyte manufacturing and immunotolerance technologies are designed to work together to generate highly-defined, universal, allogeneic, off-the-shelf pluripotent stem cell-derived young cells of any type for application in a variety of diseases with a high unmet medical need. AgeX has two preclinical cell therapy programs: AGEX-VASC1 (vascular progenitor cells) for tissue ischemia and AGEX-BAT1 (brown fat cells) for Type II diabetes. AgeXs revolutionary longevity platform induced Tissue Regeneration (iTR) aims to unlock cellular immortality and regenerative capacity to reverse age-related changes within tissues. AGEX-iTR1547 is an iTR-based formulation in preclinical development. HyStem is AgeXs delivery technology to stably engraft PureStem cell therapies in the body. AgeX is developing its core product pipeline for use in the clinic to extend human healthspan and is seeking opportunities to establish licensing and collaboration agreements around its broad IP estate and proprietary technology platforms.

For more information, please visit http://www.agexinc.com or connect with the company on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that are not historical fact including, but not limited to statements that contain words such as will, believes, plans, anticipates, expects, estimates should also be considered forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements and as such should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the business of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiaries particularly those mentioned in the cautionary statements found in more detail in the Risk Factors section of AgeXs Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions (copies of which may be obtained at http://www.sec.gov). Subsequent events and developments may cause these forward-looking statements to change. AgeX specifically disclaims any obligation or intention to update or revise these forward-looking statements as a result of changed events or circumstances that occur after the date of this release, except as required by applicable law.

More here:
AgeX Therapeutics Researchers Publish Paper on the Age Reprogramming of Super-Centenarian Cells - Business Wire

‘Research Week’ Celebrates UC Merced Innovation | Newsroom – UC Merced University News

By Michelle Morgante, UC Merced

UC Merced celebrates Research Week from March 2-6 to highlight the ground-breaking work taking place on campus.

UC Merced celebrates Research Week from March 2-6 to highlight the ground-breaking work taking place at the University of Californias newest campus.

The annual week of events, sponsored by the Office of Research and Economic Development , is an opportunity for all to see the innovative projects emerging from UC Merced.

Research Week is a fantastic opportunity to have an up-close experience with the newest research from across disciplines emerging from our campus work that will shape our future, said Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic Development Sam Traina. We encourage everyone to come out and learn about the great things happening at UC Merced.

The community is invited to participate in events, talks and tours throughout the week. Several events are specifically organized to engage the public:

Addressing Climate Change, presented by the Sierra Nevada Research Institute

Monday, March 2, 10 a.m.-12:15 p.m. in the California Room

Researchers will hold a series of presentations on efforts to address climate change. At 11:45 a.m., the 25-minute film Beyond the Brink - Californias Watershed will be presented. The program includes lunch and a poster session.

Tours of the Merced Vernal Pools and Grassland Reserve are offered as part of Research Week.

Core Facilities Tours

Tuesday, March 3, 1-3 p.m. starting from the Science and Engineering Building 1 Breezeway

The public is invited to participate in tours of the campuss core facilities: the Merced Vernal Pools and Grassland Reserve; the Stable Isotope Laboratory; the Stem Cell Instrumentation Foundry; the Department of Animal Research Services; the Environmental Analytical Laboratory; the Imaging and Microscopy Facility; the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lab; the MERCED (Multi-Environmental Research Computer for Exploration and Discovery) Cluster, and the WAVE (Wide Area Visualization Environment) Lab.

Tours of all facilities except the reserve begin at 1 p.m. and depart every 30 minutes. Tours of the Merced Vernal Pools and Grassland Reserve depart promptly at 1 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. and last 90 minutes. Participation is on a first-come, first-served basis.

It is exciting to be able to open up these important facilities to the local community, Traina said. These spaces, and the instruments and resources they contain, are part of the reason why UC Merced is a top-tier research institution.

Poster Showcase/Merced County Office of Education STEM Fair

Wednesday, March 4, 9:30 a.m.-1 p.m. in the Joseph Edward Gallo Recreation and Wellness Center Gym

The annual exhibit of posters by UC Merced undergraduate and graduate students in all disciplines will be displayed and serve as inspiration to Merced County 5th- through 8th-grade students who have advanced from STEM fairs at the school district level. The STEM Fair is the qualifying event for the California Science and Engineering Fair, and the younger students will present their projects, go on a tour of UC Merced, have lunch with UC Merced researchers and administrators and participate in hands-on science displays by campus scientists. The campus community is encouraged to come see UC Merced students research posters and meet some of Merced Countys brightest young scientists in the STEM Fair.

The Merced County Office of Education STEM Fair is held in conjunction with Research Week.

GradSTORY, presented by RadioBio

Thursday March 5, 10 a.m.-2 p.m.; The Pavilion dining commons

Graduate students will discuss their research and their journeys to graduate school through brief interviews with the proudcers of the RadioBio podcast.

ReCCES Community Reception

Thursday, March 5, 5 p.m.-6:30 p.m., Merced Civic Center-Sam Pipes Room

The Resource Center for Community Engaged Scholarship and the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Center welcome the community to a reception where people can hear from professors conducting community-engaged research and meet undergraduate and graduate students to learn about their involvement in the community. Refreshments provided.

CITRIS Ag-Food Tech Spring Seminar

Friday, March 6, Noon., Classroom and Office Building 2, room 140

Melba Crawford, associate dean of Engineering for Research at Purdue University, is the featured speaker of the Ag-Food Tech Spring Seminar by the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society.

More information about Research Week events can be found online.

See the rest here:
'Research Week' Celebrates UC Merced Innovation | Newsroom - UC Merced University News

The global single-cell analysis market is projected to reach USD 5.6 billion by 2025 from USD 2.1 billion in 2019, at a CAGR of 17.8% – GlobeNewswire

New York, Feb. 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Single-cell Analysis Market by Cell Type, Product, Technique, Application, End User - Global Forecasts to 2025" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p04579530/?utm_source=GNW However, the high cost of single-cell analysis products is expected to restrain the growth of this market to a certain extent during the forecast period.

The academic & research laboratories segment accounted for the largest market share in 2018On the basis of end user, the single-cell analysis market is segmented into academic and research laboratories, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and diagnostic laboratories, and cell banks and IVF centers.The academic and research laboratories segment accounted for the largest market share in 2018.

Factors such as growth in funding for life science research and the increasing number of medical colleges and universities are driving the growth of this end-user segment.

Flow cytometry is the largest technique segment of the single-cell analysis marketBased on technique, the single-cell analysis market is segmented into flow cytometry, NGS, PCR, microscopy, mass spectrometry, and other techniques.The flow cytometry segment accounted for the largest market share in 2018.

The large share of this segment is attributed to the wide usage of flow cytometry in detecting and measuring the physical and chemical characteristics of a population of cells or particles.

North America will continue to dominate the single-cell analysis market in 2025The single-cell analysis market, by region, is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa.In 2018, North America accounted for the largest share of the single-cell analysis market.

The large share of North America can be attributed to the increasing drug development activities in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, rising prevalence of chronic and infectious diseases, and an increase in stem cell research activities.

The breakup of primary participants is as mentioned below: By Company Type - Tier 1: 45%, Tier 2: 30%, and Tier 3: 25% By Designation - C-level: 35%, Director-level: 25%, and Others: 40% By Region - North America: 40%, Europe: 20%, Asia Pacific: 25%, Latin America: 10%, and the Middle East & Africa: 5%

Prominent players in the single-cell analysis market include Becton, Dickinson and Company (US), Danaher Corporation (US), Merck Millipore (US), QIAGEN (Netherlands), Thermo Fisher Scientific (US), General Electric Company (US), 10x Genomics (US), Promega Corporation (US), Illumina (US), Bio-Rad Laboratories (US), Fluidigm Corporation (US), Agilent Technologies (US), NanoString Technologies (US), Tecan Group (Switzerland), Sartorius AG (Germany), Luminex Corporation (US), Takara Bio (Japan), Fluxion Biosciences (US), Menarini Silicon Biosystems (Italy), and LumaCyte (US).

Research Coverage:The report analyzes the single-cell analysis market and aims at estimating the market size and future growth potential of this market based on various segments such as product, cell type, technique, application, end user, and region. The report also provides a competitive analysis of the key players in this market, along with their company profiles, product offerings, recent developments, and key market strategies.

Reasons to Buy the ReportThe report will enrich established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market, which, in turn, would help them garner a greater share of the market. Firms purchasing the report could use one or a combination of the below-mentioned strategies to strengthen their positions in the market.

This report provides insights into: Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the product portfolios of the top players in the single-cell analysis market. The report analyzes this market by product, application, cell type, technique, end user, and region Market Development: Comprehensive information on the lucrative emerging markets by product, application, cell type, technique, end user, and region Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about products, growing geographies, recent developments, and investments in the single-cell analysis market Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, product offerings, and capabilities of leading players in the single-cell analysis marketRead the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04579530/?utm_source=GNW

About ReportlinkerReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________

Here is the original post:
The global single-cell analysis market is projected to reach USD 5.6 billion by 2025 from USD 2.1 billion in 2019, at a CAGR of 17.8% - GlobeNewswire

Hawaii Five-0 To End After 10 Seasons On CBS, Sets Two-Hour Series Finale – Deadline

EXCLUSIVE: CBS Hawaii Five-0 will be coming to an end. The popular action crime drama series will wrap its 10-year, 240-episode run with a two-hour series finale on Friday, April 3.

Primetime-Panic

Your Complete Guide to Pilots and Straight-to-Series orders

Developed by Peter M. Lenkov, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci as a reimagining of Leonard Freemans classic series and shawrun by Lenkov for the shows entire run, Hawaii Five-0 has been a strong profit generator for CBS. In addition to its solid ratings performance, initially on Monday, and as a Friday anchor for the past seven seasons, Hawaii Five-0 has been a big international seller for CBS TV Studios, seen in more than 200 countries. Additionally, it was the last broadcast drama series to score a blockbuster off-network deal, landing $2 million an episode from TNT during its first season on CBS.

Its never easy to say goodbye to a hit franchise that carried on the legacy of the original with such distinction while establishing its own signature style, said Kelly Kahl, President, CBS Entertainment. From episode one, Hawaii Five-0 has been a huge success for us. Thanks to the amazing talents of the producers, writers, cast and crew, it has played a key role for a decade on our schedule and helped establish our powerhouse Friday night. We cannot be prouder of its quality, longevity and are thankful for the passionate fan-devotion it inspired.

Hawaii Five-0 will end its run with its original stars Alex OLoughlin as McGarrett and Scott Caan as Danno. I hear both of their current contracts are up at the end of this season. OLoughlin suffered a serious back injury during the early seasons of the show, and has been dealing with effects from it ever since. There was speculation that he may leave the show two years ago but he stayed on after receiving stem cell treatment. I hear this time around, he felt he could not continue. I hear the network explored continuing Hawaii Five-0 with Caans Danno and a new partner but, ultimately, everyone decided this was the right time to end the series.

This show has been pretty much every waking moment for the last 10 years of my life, said OLoughlin. Everywhere I go on this planet, in every language, I am McGarrett to all these people. What weve done, what weve accomplished, its extraordinary. I cant really put words to express my level of gratitude. Im just glad to have been a part of this, a part of history and Im going to miss it. And to the fans, I dont know how to thank you guys. Thank you for following us the way you have. Im going to miss you. Aloha.

Launching a Hawaii Five-0 reboot had been a top priority for CBS TV Studios for more than a decade. There were multiple unsuccessful attempts with other writers and producers until Lenkov came on board, teaming with Kurtzman and Orci for the pilot. It was the first of a slew of successful reboots Lenkov has delivered for CBS and CBS TV Studios.

Hawaii Five-0 has been such a blessing to me and all of the people who have worked on this incredible show, said Lenkov. I truly learned the meaning of ohana as the viewers embraced us and the people of Hawaii welcomed us with the privilege to film on their shores. I am forever indebted to the creative genius that was Leonard Freeman who gave us such a beautiful story to begin with. And my eternal gratitude to our cast, led by our hero Alex OLoughlin, the writers, the production team, our CBS ohana, and most importantly YOU, the fans, who allowed us to come to work with pride and made our series such a success. Mahalo.

Hawaii Five-0 currently stars OLoughlin, Caan, Ian Anthony Dale, Meaghan Rath, Beulah Koale, Katrina Law, Taylor Wily, Dennis Chun, Kimee Balmilero and Chi McBride.

Like most long-running series, it went through multiple cast transitions. That included the controversial exit of original co-stars Daniel Dae Kim and Grace Park after Season 7. Returning for the two-hour finale are recurring cast members James Marsters (Victor Hesse), William Sadler (John McGarrett) and Mark Dacascos (Wo Fat).

Hawaii Five-0, which consistently wins its time period, has been watched by almost 40 million viewers this season. In addition, the show has ranked in the top 15 or higher of broadcast dramas during its run. Also, Hawaii Five-0, is CBS most social primetime drama, generating 47 million impressions, 3.7 million engagements and 3.8 million video views, season-to-date.

For 10 seasons, Alex, Scott and the rest of the talented Five-0cast have brought fans exciting adventures in a spectacular tropical paradise, said David Stapf, President, CBS Television Studios. We specifically want to thank Peter and the incredibly talented production team for 10 years of consistently outstanding television. The drama has been a great success for the Studio and Network, and as a global franchise for our company. Were pleased to give it a big sendoff and that viewers will have the opportunity to say goodbye to their favorite characters as the final season wraps.

Lenkov executive produces the series with David Wolkove, Matt Wheeler, Kurtzman and Orci.

Link:
Hawaii Five-0 To End After 10 Seasons On CBS, Sets Two-Hour Series Finale - Deadline

Everything you need to know about Myeloma – IOL

By Partnered Content 3h ago

Share this article:

Most of you reading this would have probably never heard of such a disease. My hope is, after taking time to read this, that you will know what myeloma is and have a better understanding of bone marrow cancer in general.

So, lets get started!

Your bone marrow is the factory where all your blood cells are made. This includes red blood cells (they carry the oxygen in your blood), white blood cells (your bodys defence against infections) and platelets (small fragments that prevent and stop bleeding).

The production of these cells by the bone marrow is very well controlled by your body, both in terms of the amount and the type of cells produced. If you have an infection, for instance, your body tells the stem cells in your bone marrow to make more white blood cells to help fight the infection. In such instances, an immature, baby cell gets produced in your bone marrow which then needs to go through various stages of growth and development to become a mature white blood cell. It is then released from the bone marrow into your bloodstream to go and do the job it was destined for, to fight the infection.

This process usually runs quite smoothly, but things can, unfortunately go horribly wrong. Sometimes your body makes a mistake in the production of a white blood cell, almost like a programming error which occurs in the DNA (blueprint) of the cell. It often recognizes its mistake and corrects it, but occasionally this abnormal cell has the ability to hide from your bodys defences, doesnt listen to your bodys commands anymore and can start to increase in number without anything controlling it. This causes a variety of problems and is then called cancer.

Depending on the type of white blood cell and where in its development the programming error occurs, a person can either develop a type of bone marrow cancer (usually leukaemia or myeloma) or lymphoma (glandular cancer), which is also a type of cancer that develops from an abnormal white blood cell.

That brings us to myeloma (also called multiple myeloma or plasma cell myeloma). Myeloma is a type of bone marrow cancer that develops when a programming error occurs in the development of a specific type of white blood cell, called a plasma cell. To understand myeloma better, it is important to understand what role a plasma cell plays under normal circumstances.

They are indeed an integral part of your bodys immune system. Any infection that you may develop gets recognized by your plasma cells. They respond by rapidly producing small proteins called antibodies, which are almost like homing missiles, programmed to go and destroy only that specific virus or bacteria that is making you ill.

After an infection, some of the antibodies remain in your bloodstream and if you are exposed to that exact virus or bacteria again, they are ready to attack immediately, thereby limiting the infection. This is the rationale behind childhood vaccination; to stimulate the production of antibodies which patrol your bloodstream and protect you when you get exposed to infections like measles, polio and many others.

If these plasma cells become cancerous however, they rapidly increase in number, taking over the bone marrow and producing a massive amount of an abnormal antibody which can cause a whole array of problems. This increase in antibody levels in the bloodstream can be measured with a blood test and is also used to monitor the response to treatment.. What are thesymptoms of myeloma?

The abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow overwhelms the normal bone marrow which most commonly leads to an inability to produce enough red blood cells. This is called anaemia. Symptoms of anaemia are related to the bodys inability to carry sufficient oxygen to your organs and include worsening fatigue, shortness of breath and dizziness.

The abnormal plasma cells also have the ability to weaken your bones. This can either be a generalized loss of bone strength (called osteoporosis), or it can lead to numerous holes being eaten in your bones. This can be seen on an X-Ray or other types of scans. It often results in significant bone pain or even worse, severe fractures with minimal- or even no trauma at all.

Bones are rich in calcium, and if they are being eaten away, their calcium content is released into the bloodstream causing an elevated blood calcium level. This can lead to dehydration, kidney failure and numerous other symptoms.

As mentioned before, the plasma cells in the bone marrow releases a massive amount of abnormal antibodies into the bloodstream. They can clog up your kidneys and cause significant- and often irreversible kidney failure. This can seriously complicate the management of the disease.

These are by far the most common features of myeloma:

Anaemia, bone lesions or fractures, hypercalcaemia and kidney failure.There are numerous other symptoms which can occur, albeit less common.

Is myeloma treatable?

Myeloma is indeed a treatable condition, but there are a couple of important treatment principles to understand.

For most people, myeloma is not a curable disease. It can, however, be carefully managed and the aim of treatment is to provide a good quality of life for as many years as possible. No patients disease is the same and where we sometimes have patients with myeloma living in excess of ten years after being diagnosed, other patients are unfortunately less fortunate and have a form of the disease that is resistant to treatment which can take its toll after only a couple of months.

We perform DNA-tests on the cancer cells and look at various other blood results in an attempt to identify those patients with high-risk disease, who potentially need more intense treatment than others.

The goal of treatment is to destroy as many abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow as possible. This leads to recovery of the normal bone marrow and minimises the risk of any further complications, giving the body a chance to recover from any complications caused prior to treatment.

For many decades, the backbone of the treatment for myeloma was a combination of two different type of drugs: Chemotherapy and high dosages of cortisone. This is usually quite well tolerated.

The last couple of years, however, have seen an explosion of newer therapies for the treatment of myeloma. This started years ago with the discovery that Thalidomide, was extremely effective for the treatment of myeloma. Soon, more of these so-called novel therapies were developed, leading to a significant increase in the survival of patients who have access to these drugs.

The latest and most impressive of these treatments are certainly the development of monoclonal antibodies and CAR-T cells, both of which are extremely effective even in high risk or resistant myeloma. There is so much excitement about all the newer therapies, but access remains a challenge in theSouth African market.

A strong collaborative effort is required amongst pharmaceutical companies, government and medical schemes, to improve the current access of newer drugs. Nevertheless, some of these drugs have been around for many years and the costs have come down considerably, making it accessible to more people.

The initial treatment of myeloma generally consists of varying combinations of these drugs depending on the patients age, physical condition and of course, the available funding.

We usually use 3 different drugs in combination (a so-called triplet regimen) which has been proven to be very effective. Once the treatment is started, we take blood regularly to monitor the abnormal antibody levels in the blood which, as mentioned earlier, is a surrogate indicator of the number of cancer cells remaining in the bone marrow.

If we dont see a significant downward trend, the disease is likely resistant to that specific treatment combination and treatment should be adjusted accordingly. However, if the antibody levels come down significantly, we are on the right track and can continue with the same treatment until an optimal response is obtained or the development of side-effects forces us to make an adjustment.

After 4-6 months of treatment, the hope is to see no sign of any abnormal antibodies or cancer cells anymore (we call this a remission), or at least a dramatic reduction. We do however know that although we sometimes dont pick up any sign of residual disease, it is merely because the available tests are not sensitive enough. There will always be some cancer cells that remain.

As a general principle, however, the less residual disease, the longer it usually takes before it causes problems again. Because of this, we usually treat younger patients more aggressively in an attempt to obtain a deeper remission. The biggest difference in younger patients is the use of an autologous stem cell transplant as a 2nd phase of treatment to try and obtain or deepen a remission.

We harvest the patients bone marrow stem cells and keep them frozen until needed. We then administer a single high dose chemotherapy which destroys many of the remaining cancer cells, but in the process, it also destroys the normal bone marrow, without which you cannot survive. The patients stem cells are then thawed and given back to them like a blood transfusion.

After about two weeks of close monitoring in the hospital, the stem cells start to function and the patient subsequently has his/her own bone marrow back, hopefully with significantly less myeloma. The age cut-off for such a procedure is arbitrary because it largely depends on the physical condition of the patient. Most people in South Africa, however, use the age of 70 as a cut off, sometimes a bit older if the patient is in exceptional condition for his/her age.

The median age of people diagnosed with myeloma worldwide is about 70 years. The available data, however, suggests that the median age in South Africa is considerably younger, somewhere around the age of 60 years. Due to this, as well as the problems with drug availability in South Africa, we often rely quite heavily on stem cell transplantation as an important part of treatment. If enough stem cells are harvested and cryopreserved, such a transplant can be repeated on numerous occasions to improve disease control.

After a transplant, as well as for those patients who are not candidates for a transplant, a form of low-intensity maintenance therapy is often started as the next phase of treatment in an attempt to keep the disease under control for as long as possible. This duration varies considerably. We hope for a couple of years, but it is unfortunately sometimes just a couple of months before the disease worsens, after which more intense treatment needs to be restarted again and the above cycle repeats itself. The remission duration gives us a good indication regarding the nature and prognosis of the disease.

There is so much more detail about myeloma to share, but the bottom line is this: Although myeloma is not a curable cancer and can lead to devastating complications, there is good treatment available which can help many patients enjoy a good quality of life for many years.

It is important to diagnose myeloma early, so if you have some of the symptoms mentioned earlier, please contact your General Practitioner for further investigation. If any abnormalities are detected, your GP can refer you to aClinical Haematologist, who specialises in bone marrow cancers and are best equipped to treat your myeloma.

We are all very excited about the future of myeloma treatment and hope that the treating physicians, pharmaceutical companies and government can take hands to ensure proper treatment for all the people in South Africa who suffer from this disease.

This article was compiled by Dr. Hannes Koornhof (Chairman of SACHAS)MBChB, FCP (SA), Dip HIV Man (SA), Cert Clin Haematology (SA) PhysSponsored by JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA(PTY) LTD/(EDMS) BPK. (Reg. No./Regnr. 1980/011122/07); No 2, Medical Road, Halfway House, Midrand, 1685.www.janssen.com.

Medical Info Line: 0860 11 11 17. EM-27036

See original here:
Everything you need to know about Myeloma - IOL