Stem Cell Fraud: A 60 Minutes investigation – CBS News

The Internet is full of websites selling unproven stem cell treatments for incurable illnesses. Scott Pelley confronts one disgraced doctor offering false hope to a family with a disabled child.

The following is a script of "Stem Cell Fraud" which aired on Jan. 8, 2012, and was rebroadcast on Aug. 26, 2012. Scott Pelley is the correspondent. Oriana Zill and Michael Rey, producers.

(CBS News) There's no greater desperation than to be told that you, or your child, has a disease for which there is no hope. Many people with incurable illness look forward to the promise of stem cells. Stem cells have the potential to turn into any kind of cell and, in theory, they could repair damaged cells, though, scientists tell us that we are years away from realizing that dream.

There is no stem cell miracle today, so con men, have moved in to offer the hope that science cannot. Just look online and you will find hundreds of credible looking websites offering stem cell cures in overseas clinics.

Two years ago we began investigating stem cell charlatans. We worked with patients suffering from incurable diseases, and we discovered con men, posing as doctors, conducting dangerous medical experiments.

[Scott Pelley: You know, Mr. Stowe, the trouble is that you're a con man.]

Our report started a federal investigation and since that story, we have been digging into the rapidly growing trade in fake stem cell cures. As we reported last January, we've found something even more alarming: illegal stem cell transplants that are dangerous and delivered to your doorstep. They are scams that often bilk the desperate out of their last dollar of savings and their last ounce of hope.

[Brandon Susser: I know you're tired.]

Adam and Brandon Susser are 11-year-old twins. Adam has cerebral palsy, his brain was damaged by a lack of oxygen before he and his brother were born.

Gary Susser: He's confined to a wheelchair. He needs assistance with all his daily living activities from cleanliness to feeding, to clothing.

Gary and Judy Susser have searched for anything that might improve on the judgment handed down by Adam's doctors.

Gary Susser: The sentence of being a quadriplegic, the sentence of being totally blind, the pronouncement by physicians that we should put him away.

Scott Pelley: Those were the things that his regular doctors were telling you?

Gary Susser: Correct. We were being advised literally, "Put him away. He's gonna destroy your life."

So back in 2003, the Sussers took a chance on the theory of stem cells. Adam was three. They brought him to a doctor in Mexico who injected stem cells with no idea whether they would work.

Judy Susser: We both decided that in the severity of his condition that we'd have to try it.

Apparently, there was no harm and no miracle.

Gary Susser: The progress that he made after that was minimal at best and therefore we didn't see any good coming out of it.

Today, people like the Sussers can find hundreds of sophisticated websites offering stem cell treatments for every hopeless disease.

2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Read this article:
Stem Cell Fraud: A 60 Minutes investigation - CBS News

Stem cell Doctors Troy MI | knee pain treatment Troy MI

Stem cell Doctors Troy MI | knee pain treatment Troy MI

http://mihstem.com/ Stem Cell Seminars http://integrativehealthmi.com/ Stem Cell Website http://integrativehealthmi.com/testim... Video Testimonials

Here's just a taste of what you'll learn at this special live educational seminar: Learn about this remarkable cutting edge healing Stem Cell Doctors in Troy MI, technology that can actually repair damaged tissue in the body through a painless and safe stem cell injection. (Hint: Normal drugs just mask the pain.) According to Michigan Integrative Healths chief medical officer, "Patients can experience a significant decrease in pain and improved range of motion within weeks of just one treatment." When the body heals, the pain naturally goes away. Discover how stem cell injections work...Troy MI, Stem Cell Doctors Troy MI, (This is really fascinating stuff!) We'll explain how they pinpoint the impaired areas, remove the swelling with powerful anti-inflammatory properties and heal them by regenerating new cells and tissue. Why this innovative therapy is helpful for degenerative arthritis, degenerative cartilage and ligaments, bone spurs, degenerative joint disease, bursitis and tendonitis. Stem Cell Clinic in Troy MI, If you suffer from one of these or know someone who is in pain, this could be life-changing. Michigan Integrative Health is one of the first clinics in the area to offer this highly advanced form of therapy.

To reserve your seat at this informative seminar, click on one of the buttons on below or call (844) 644-7836 or (844) MIH-STEM. When you attend, youll receive a special reduced price consultation at the clinic to explore your stem cell therapy options. If you are unable to attend one of these seminar dates, Stem Cell Specialists in Troy MI, please call to schedule a consultation or find out about the next seminar

stem cell knee pain injections Troy MI, stem cell center Troy MI, stem cell center in Troy MI, stem cell doctors in Troy MI, stem cell center in Troy MI, stem cell back therapy in Troy MI, stem cell doctors in Troy MI, stem cell shoulder Troy MI, stem cell back Troy MI, stem cell doctors in Troy MI, Stem cell center Troy MI, stem cell joint Troy MI, stem cell treatment Troy MI, stem cell clinic Troy MI, stem cell shoulder Troy MI, stem cell knee injections in Troy MI, stem cell center Troy MI, stem cell treatment Troy MI, stem cell clinic Troy MI, stem cell joint Troy MI, stem cell center Troy MI, stem cells for back pain Troy MI, Stem Cells for Back Pain in Troy MI, Stem Cells for back pain Doctor in Troy MI, stem cell therapy for back pain reviews Troy MI, Stem cell therapy for back pain Reviews in Troy MI, stem cell back pain clinical trials Troy MI, Stem Cell Back pain Clinical Trails in Troy MI, stem cell for back pain reviews Troy MI, Stem Cell for back pain Reviews in Troy MI, stem cell therapy for spine degeneration Troy MI, Stem Cell Therapy for Spine Degeneration in Troy MI, knee pain when walking Troy MI, knee pain Troy MI, knee pain treatment Troy MI, Knee pain Treatments in Troy MI, Knee pain treatment in Troy MI, knee pain doctors Troy MI, knee pain doctors in Troy MI, The Best knee pain doctor Troy MI, The best knee pain doctors in Troy MI, knee pain specialist Troy MI, knee pain specialist in Troy MI, knee pain relief doctor Troy MI, knee pain relief doctors Troy MI, knee pain treatment Troy MI, knee pain treatment in Troy MI, stem cell pain Troy MI, stem Cell doctor Troy MI, Stem Cell doctor in Troy MI, stem cell joint Troy MI, stem cell clinic in Troy MI, stem cell treatment Troy MI, stem cell back Troy MI, stem cell injections Troy MI, stem cell knee therapy for Troy MI, stem cell clinic in Troy MI, stem cell knee Troy MI, stem cell pain Troy MI, stem cell joint Troy MI, stem cell treatment Troy MI, stem cells injection Troy MI, stem cell knee Troy MI, stem cell injections Troy MI, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read more:
Stem cell Doctors Troy MI | knee pain treatment Troy MI

Knee – Regenexx

Have you been told that steroid injections or invasive surgery are your only options to treat your knee pain? Interventional orthopedics provides a non-surgical alternative that uses your own cells to repair the damage.

Recent research shows that some of the most popularorthopedic kneesurgeriesincluding meniscectomies have no benefit and are not more effective than placebo or sham surgery. Moreover, knee replacement is extremely traumatic and carries associated risks, and even successful surgeries minimally require months of painful rehab to regain strength and mobility. Most surgeries also accelerate degeneration that leads toosteoarthritis and exacerbate the biomechanical problems that initially led to the need for the surgery. Regenexx urges patients suffering from knee injuries or degenerative conditions to consider all of their options.

At Regenexx we invented a new approach to orthopedic care we call Interventional Orthopedics. This approach involves the use of image guidance (flouroscopy and ultrasound) to precisely place high-dose stem cells or platelets from your body directly where they are needed in a specific joint structure. These cells then work in the site of your injury to grow into new, healthy tissue, a process that will only occur if the cells have been placed exactly where they need to go in order to achieve positive outcomes for the patient.This precise approach to orthopedic care cant be replicated by a surgeon or nurse in a chiropractors office. Interventional Orthopedics requires thousands of hours of training following a standardized protocol process to become a licensed Regenexx physician.

The innovative Regenexx procedures restore knee function and mobility and decrease pain without the need for surgery by regenerating damaged tissue. During this outpatient procedure, ourexpert physiciansuseprecise image guidanceto inject custom concentrations ofyour body's natural healing agentsinto the exact areas of damage to tighten and stabilize your knee joint for better function and mobility.

This page contains an extensive library of educational resources on kneeconditions and our patented kneeprocedures created by Regenexx and our founder, Chris Centeno, M.D.. We encourage you to research your options.

GET RELIEF. 855-330-5818

See the original post:
Knee - Regenexx

Stem Cell Clinics – eureka

When is a Stem Cell a Drug?

About a decade ago, stem cell clinics began popping up offering unapproved treatments for all kinds of debilitating and incurable diseases using a patients own fat stem cells.

There are now at least170 such clinics just in the US; many plastic surgeons doing liposuction have gotten on board. Stem cell clinics are even more popular outside the US, where they are part of the booming medical tourism industry. People travel all over the world for these treatments. In these cases the source of the cells and types of handling are not always clearly defined, making these treatments a safety concern.

The stem cell product generation involves collection of adipose tissue through liposuction, and isolation of the adipose stem cells with collagenase or other enzymes to create a stromal vascular fraction (SVF). This SVF is sometimes referred to as The Soup because of the lack of defined characteristics. The isolated product, which includes some stem cells, are then injected back into regions of the body from which the cells were not derived, which are referred to as non-homologous sites. The site of delivery depends on what condition is being treated but most of the potential administration sites (e.g., joints, muscles, circulatory system, central nervous system) are not homologous to the tissue of origin, the adipose tissue.

Fuzzy Guidelines

Some companies claim their treatments are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and tout cures for many incurable diseases and conditions, including Parkinsons disease, multiple sclerosis, autism, inflammation, all types of cancers and aging. But news reports have characterized the treatments as the modern-day version of snake oil, and stem cell organizations such as theCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicineand theInternational Society for Stem Cell Researchalong with the US National Institutes of Health consider many of these clinics dubious and have issued safety warnings to educate the public.The FDA has cautioned consumersto make sure that any stem cell treatment they are considering has been approved by FDA or is being studied under a clinical investigation that has been submitted to and allowed to proceed by FDA.

How can the use of a patients own cells be potentially dangerous? Some of the safety concerns arise from the extent of the manipulation and possible expansion of the cells outside the body. There are also concerns about the quality controls incorporated in the process, the characterization of the mixture, and complications from the administration back to the patient and the administration site.

It is very possible that some of these SVF treatments, especially for tissue pain and minor inflammation, have some level of therapeutic effect by facilitating tissue repair through release of trophic factors and/or induction of repair/regeneration pathways. However, the exact mechanisms are unknown and it is hard to evaluate the record of success of these therapies because stem cell clinics rarely publish data or findings.

Moreover, the FDA guidelines, until recently, were considered ambiguous concerning the classification and use of these autologous therapies. In the US, cell therapies are, legally, considered both biologics and drugs. They fall under the purview of theFood, Drug and Cosmetic Actbecause they mitigate, treat and prevent disease, but they also fall under the Public Health Service Act, sections351and361specifically, because they convey infectious disease.

Category 361 products are self-derived (autologous), minimally manipulated and used in a homologous manner, and do not need an Investigational New Drug (IND) approval, just an Institutional Review Board (IRB), a site registration and local (not FDA) oversight. Category 351 products are those that are more than minimally manipulated or ones that are used in a non-homologous manner. Marketed drug products fall into this 351 category. They require the whole drug development package (an IND, preclinical safety studies, clinical trials and marketing approval) before they can be prescribed to patients.

Not surprisingly, there has been much confusion over the product classification and definitions of these adipose-derived therapies, particularly over the interpretation of the phrases more than minimally manipulated and non-homologous use.

Minimizing Confusion

A year ago, in an effort to minimize interpretations from previous guidance, the FDA released two draft guidance:Minimal Manipulation of Human Cells, Tissues, And Cellular and Tissue-Based ProductsandHuman Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps) from Adipose Tissue: Regulatory Considerations. Both further define minimal manipulation and homologous use and provide many clear examples, some specifically addressing SVF.

In order to consider a cell product minimally manipulated, the processing must be shown not to alter the relevant characteristics or physical state of the tissue. For example, if the original characteristic of adipose tissue is to provide cushioning and support to tissues and organs, insulation, and energy storage capacity, then isolating just the adipose stem cells and removing the extracellular matrix that contributes to the tissues function would be considered more than minimally manipulated.

In order to meet the requirements for homologous use the cell product must be used in a tissue that performs the same basic function as the tissue of origin. For example, adipose tissue does not function in bone and joints and use of adipose tissue to treat bone and joint disease would be generally considered non-homologous use. Ultimately, these guidance provide more description for more-than-minimally manipulated, adipose-derived products and clearly state their non-homologous use meets the definition of a marketed drug product.

The intent of the guidance is to educate and provide clinics and doctors with proposed rules to self-correct and reduce the need for enforcement action once these guidelines are approved.

The Preclinical Process

As a result of these clarifying guidance documents, there are now many stem cell companies working through the process of obtaining regulatory approval for their autologous adipose-derived stem cell therapies. This approval will require product characterization and preclinical safety assessments similar to the expectations of a small-molecule or a biologic drug, which may includein vitroandin vivotesting.

The process can be relatively straight-forward and short-term, but ultimately the extent of testing depends on the cell product source, ex vivo manipulations, and use with other products and therapeutic indication. Navigating this preclinical process requires scientists that are familiar with the intricacies of the regulatory expectations, implementation of the testing requirements and performance of the assessments within the regulatory framework.

Assessing Risks

In this budding field of stem cell therapies, there is a lot of promise and still a lot of unknowns. Even with the most stringent and detailed characterization of the cell product and understanding of mechanisms of action, adverse interactions could occur. That is why these products are assessed with a tiered, risk-based approach designed by the FDA to provide the appropriate level of oversight to protect public health.

One case detailed last year inScientific Americandescribed the unintended consequences of not understanding altered cell characteristics of an isolated cell product and potential adverse interactions from chemical alterations. During a cosmetic treatment in 2009, a woman received some of her own adipose-derived stem cells along with some dermal filler to reduce the wrinkles around her eyes. The dermal filler compoundcalcium hydroxylapatiteis the same compound that stem cell researchers use to drive the undifferentiated stem cells down the bone pathway. In this case, the dermal filler differentiated the stem cells to bone and the patient ended up with bone fragments in the tissues surrounding her eyes, which had to be removed surgically.

This treatment met the requirements of a Category 361 product in that it was minimally manipulated and for autologous homologous use UNTIL it was combined with another product. This (thankfully not life-threatening) example of how stem cell treatments can go awry without proper understanding of product and potential interactions support the need for more safety-based oversight of these novel products.

Despite clarifications to the regulatory guidance and reports of adverse reactions in patients with SVF products, the battle rages on with some stem cell clinics. Physicians and stakeholders involved with autologous stem cell clinics are continuing to challenge the non-homologous use issue, claiming they are not creating drugs and that they are using approved materials. And these clinics continue to practice what they term transformative medicine.

In the end, we must have a better understanding of the cells, their activity and interactions before they are administered to humans. Otherwise, we could be creating more health problems for patients already seeking therapies for untreated conditions.

How to cite:

Jackman, Shawna. Stem Cell Clinics. Eureka blog. Nov 16, 2015. Available:http://eureka.criver.com/stem-cell-clinics/

Original post:
Stem Cell Clinics - eureka

Mayo Clinic finds surprising results on first-ever test of …

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. Researchers at Mayo Clinics campus in Florida have conducted the worlds first prospective, blinded and placebo-controlled clinical study to test the benefit of using bone marrow stem cells, a regenerative medicine therapy, to reduce arthritic pain and disability in knees.

The researchers say such testing is needed because there are at least 600 stem cell clinics in the U.S. offering one form of stem cell therapy or another to an estimated 100,000-plus patients, who pay thousands of dollars, out of pocket, for the treatment, which has not undergone demanding clinical study.

The findings in The American Journal of Sports Medicine include an anomalous finding patients not only had a dramatic improvement in the knee that received stem cells, but also in their other knee, which also had painful arthritis but received only a saline control injection. Each of the 25 patients enrolled in the study had two bad knees, but did not know which knee received the stem cells.

Given that the stem cell-treated knee was no better than the control-treated knee both were significantly better than before the study began the researchers say the stem cells effectiveness remains somewhat uninterpretable. They are only able to conclude the procedure is safe to undergo as an option for knee pain, but they cannot yet recommend it for routine arthritis care.

Our findings can be interpreted in ways that we now need to test one of which is that bone marrow stem cell injection in one ailing knee can relieve pain in both affected knees in a systemic or whole-body fashion, says the studys lead author, Shane Shapiro, M.D., a Mayo Clinic orthopedic physician.

Journalists, sound bites with Dr. Shane Shapiroare available in the downloads below.

MEDIA CONTACT: Kevin Punsky, Mayo Clinic Public Affairs, 904-953-0746, punsky.kevin@mayo.edu

One hypothesis is that the stem cells we tested can home to areas of injury where they are needed, which makes sense, given that stem cells injected intravenously in cancer treatments end up in the patients bone marrow where they need to go, he says. This is just a theory that can explain our results, so it needs further testing.

Another explanation is that merely injecting any substance into a knee offered relief from pain.

That could be, but both this idea and the notion that a placebo effect could be involved would be surprising, given that some patients are still doing very well years after their study treatment ended, says Dr. Shapiro.

He adds that these findings are important because while use of a patients own stem cells for regenerative therapy is extraordinarily popular, the treatments may be untested and are often poorly regulated.

Stem cell clinics often offer expensive treatments for conditions that range from multiple sclerosis, lung and heart disease, to cosmetic treatments, such as facelifts. None of these techniques have been studied because clinics maintain that use of a patients own cells is not a drug.

But, depending on how they are processed and used, stem cells can, in fact, be regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as biological products or drugs requiring rigorous safety and efficacy approval processes. In early September, the FDA held scientific meetings to clarify how to regulate such practices.

Mayo Clinic researchers developed their study with FDA approval.

We feel that if we are going to offer any stem cell procedures to our patients, the science needs to be worked out, Dr. Shapiro says.

The study was conducted in Mayos Human Cell Therapy Lab. Researchers extracted 60 to 90 milliliters of bone marrow from each patient, then filtered it, removed all blood cells, and concentrated it down to 4 to 5 milliliters. The solution, which contained tens of thousands of stem cells, was injected into a patients knee using ultrasound-guided imagery.

We actually counted all of the stem cells with markers that are accepted by the FDA, and we made sure they would be able to survive inside the patient, Dr. Shapiro says. Counting is expensive. Most clinics just draw the cells from bone marrow or fat and inject them back into the patient without checking for stem cells, hoping that patients get better, he says.

Dr. Shapiro and his colleagues are currently designing new studies that will test whether the stem cells home to distant areas of injuries, as well as exploring other implications suggested in their findings.

Study investigators include Mayo Clinic in Florida senior author Mary L. OConnor, M.D., Shari E. Kazmerchak, Michael G. Heckman, and Abba C. Zubair, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. OConnor is now at Yale University.

Funding for this study was from Mayo Clinics Center for Regenerative Medicine.

###

About Mayo ClinicMayo Clinic is a nonprofit organization committed to clinical practice, education and research, providing expert, whole-person care to everyone who needs healing.For more information, visithttp://www.mayoclinic.org/about-mayo-clinicorhttps://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/.

Visit link:
Mayo Clinic finds surprising results on first-ever test of ...

Stem Cell Transplant in Germany: Clinics, Cost, Price …

By agreeing to MEDIGOs Specific Personal Data Policy you agree to the collection, processing and use of your specific personal data you have submitted in the clinic inquiry forms and in your further messages to the clinics, including attachments, as far as this is necessary for rendering the requested services. In addition to the data you have submitted during registration, all data input by you in the context of communication with Providers or other users on the platform, is saved. The processing of this data shall take place exclusively for rendering the requested services.

Please note that we can provide the requested services only if you have consented to the collection, processing and use of your specific personal data.

You have the right at any time to oppose the collecting, processing and use of specific personal data with effect for the future. For this, please send an email with a brief explanation of the revocation to CareTeam@medigo.com and specify your name and email address. Alternatively, you can send your revocation by sending a letter to the following address: MEDIGO GmbH, Rosenthaler Strae 13, 10119 Berlin.

See original here:
Stem Cell Transplant in Germany: Clinics, Cost, Price ...

Stem Cell Therapy in india – Stem Cell Treatment in Uttar …

Welcome to Stem Cell Consults

Stem Cell Center offers a complete scope of stem cell solutions in India for the treatment of various types of diseases. Our main focus is helping people get back to good health through stem cell treatment. Our organization associated with so many hospitals, medical tourism company and also has our own stem cell research labs in India to provide best quality of stem cells in this advanced stem cell treatment field to provide best quality of treatment for all needed patients al over the world.

We also provide complete stem cell lab set up in all over the world and started some other stem cells labs in other countries via our best and experienced team. We have more than 10 years stem cell research experience and treated more than thousand patients for various diseases and even provide stem cell services to various hospitals in all over the world.

We at stem cell center can proudly say that we give the best stem cells in India. Our years of research, hard work and trials have helped us pioneer and accomplish amazing results when required. Your precious cells are processed utilizing our restrictive technology to guarantee they have the best features required for treatment. Undeveloped cell focus are completely anchored, non-lethal and totally without reactions with an excellent probability of homing and tissue or organ.

We are giving advanced Stem Cell Therapy in India where all other medical treatment fail then this stem cell treatment apply to cure such non-treatable maladies or diseases.

As the main healthcare consultant, stem cell center in India takes care of each and every section of the Medical Tourism Trip to entire India. We guarantee, our patients get the best healthcare service by getting in place, the renowned specialty hospitals, latest stem cell treatments, economical housing and alternatives for the patients.

Our organization is giving best stem cell therapy in India and furthermore has perfection in stem cell treatment in Uttar Pradesh, Delhi NCR and all other all major cities of India for the required patients in all those application which can treat by stem cell therapy. We have stem cells in various forms to improve the better recuperation of patient and refer the best stem cell solutions after the evaluation of patient case study by our experts. Our experts in stem cell cooperate with patients however the total understanding to offer you more peace of mind to develop clear evidence based path. We have highly experts in our team and our experts are strong in research and clinical research from the two perspectives.

Our mission is to offer best stem cell therapy at sensible price not only in India but also throughout the entire world so that every required patients can get best stem cell therapy to enhance his life.

Read more:
Stem Cell Therapy in india - Stem Cell Treatment in Uttar ...

@ Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes

Diabetes Diet Breakfast The 3 Step Trick that Reverses Diabetes Permanently in As Little as 11 Days.[ STEM CELL TREATMENT FOR DIABETES ] The REAL cause of Diabetes ( Recommended ),Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes Lastly the intake of foods with numerous sugar end up being moderated. This will chocolates as well sweet foods. At the most sugary foods should be used only two times a week. The culprit for recommending eating mentioned above is to become more soluble linens. What soluble fibers do is regulate and slow around the absorption of glucose. Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes All for this is information and facts are helpful for your own medical professional for keeping track of your regimens and how good it is or is not working a person and any adjustments can easily be made accordingly. Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes When you work out your muscle cell walls become more flexible and invite glucose to obtain inside from the circulation. This in turn lowers your blood sugar. This is one of greatest gripe we have reasons why it could be important to exercise. You did nothing else but exercise alone a person control your sugar. I am aware two people who were highly motivated patients who did this who didnt for you to go on medication. One became a marathon jogger. Talk about motivated.,Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes A symptom is any suggestion of a sickness that is noticed through the patient themselves. The disease is experienced in a subjective tactic. Symptoms of skin problems may be described the actual patient. In comparison a sign is seen when examining the particular person. Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes Knowing this the question naturally arises how i am going to treat my type 2 diabetes without resorting to medications? Just before getting into the details the primary step in this particular process is often a change in mindset. treating diabetes without drugs means no shortcuts hard work along with several hurdles to jump over. Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes Houseknecht G.L. Vanden Heuvel J.P. Moya-Camarena Le.Y. Porocarrero C.P. Peck L.W. Nickel K.P. and Belury E.A. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid normalized impaired glucose tolerance the actual Zucker diabetic fatty fa fa rat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 244 678-682., See what your medical symptoms could mean, and learn about possible conditions.

Read the original:
@ Stem Cell Treatment For Diabetes

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation | Leukemia and …

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation involves transferring the stem cells from a healthy person (the donor) to your body after high-intensity chemotherapy or radiation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used to cure some patients who:

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be a high-risk procedure. The high-conditioning regimens are meant to severely or completely impair your ability to make stem cells and you will likely experience side effects during the days you receive high-dose conditioning radiation or chemotherapy. The goals of high-conditioning therapy are to:

The immune system and the blood system are closely linked and can't be separated from each other. Because of this, allogeneic transplantation means that not only the donor's blood system but also his or her immune system is transferred. As a result, these adverse effects are possible:

The immune reaction, or GVHD, is treated by administering drugs to the patient after the transplant that reduce the ability of the donated immune cells to attack and injure the patient's tissues.SeeGraft Versus Host Disease.

Allogeneic stem cell transplants for patients who are older or have overall poor health are relatively uncommon. This is because the pre-transplant conditioning therapy is generally not well tolerated by such patients, especially those with poorly functioning internal organs. However,reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantsmay be an appropriate treatment for some older or sicker patients.

One goal of allogeneic stem cell transplant is to cause the T lymphocytes in the donor's blood or marrow to take hold (engraft) and grow in the patient's marrow. Sometimes the T lymphocytes attack the cancer cells. When this happens, it's called graft versus tumor (GVT) effect (also called graft versus cancer effect). The attack makes it less likely that the disease will return. This effect is more common in myeloid leukemias than it is in other blood cancers.

Unfortunately, T lymphocytes are the same cells that causegraft versus host disease(GVHD). Because of this serious and sometimes life-threatening side effect, doctors in certain cases want to decrease the number of T lymphocytes to be infused with the stem cells. This procedure, called T-lymphocyte depletion, is currently being studied by researchers. The technique involves treating the stem cells collected for transplant with agents that reduce the number of T lymphocytes.

The aim of T-lymphocyte depletion is to lessen GVHD's incidence and severity. However, it can also cause increased rates of graft rejection, a decreased GVT effect and a slower immune recovery. Doctors must be careful about the number of T lymphocytes removed when using this technique.

Stem cell selection is another technique being studied in clinical trials that can reduce the number of T lymphocytes that a patient receives. Because of specific features on the outer coat of stem cells, doctors can selectively remove stem cells from a cell mixture. This technique produces a large number of stem cells and fewer other cells, including T lymphocytes.

If you're considering allogeneic stem cell transplantation, you'll need a bone marrow donor. First, you and your siblings, if any, will have your blood or a scraping from your inside cheek tested to determine tissue type. A sibling has the potential to match you most closely because you both received your genes from the same parents.

A lab technician examines the surface of the sample tissue cells to identify the proteins that give everyone his or her own unique tissue type, called human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). If the HLA on the donor cells are identical (from identical twins, for example) or similar (such as those from siblings), the transplant is more likely to be successful. On average, you have a one in four chance of having the same HLA type as a sibling. Many patients, therefore, don't have a sibling with the same tissue type.

If a brother or sister doesn't provide a match, your doctor will search registries of volunteer donors such as theNational Marrow Donor Programfor an unrelated donor that matches your tissue type. A donor who's not related to you but who has a similar tissue type is called a matched unrelated donor (MUD).

Stem cells for transplantation are collected from three sources:

Before stem cells are collected from blood or bone marrow, the donor must undergo a thorough physical exam and blood testing for hepatitis viruses, human immunodeficiency disease (HIV) and other infectious agents or viruses.

The most common source of stem cells for transplant is peripheral blood, the blood that flows throughout our veins and arteries.

Bone marrow normally releases a small number of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) into the bloodstream. To obtain enough PBSCs for a transplant, the donor takes a white cell growth factor, such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drug, which increases the number of stem cells by drawing them out of the marrow and into the bloodstream. When a patient's own stem cells are used, both G-CSF and the chemotherapy used to treat the disease usually increase PBSCs. In patients who have myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the drug plerixafor (Mozobil) can be used to mobilize their own stem cells.

The blood is removed from the donor and the cells collected using a process called apheresis, which involves placing a needle in the donor's vein, usually in the arm, similar to administering a blood test. The donor's blood is pumped through an apheresis machine, which separates the blood into four components: red cells, plasma, white cells and platelets. The white cells and platelets, which contain the stem cells, are collected, while the red cells and plasma are returned to the donor. It can take one to two sessions of apheresis to collect enough blood from a MUD. If you are your own donor, it may take more than two sessions.

If enough stem cells can't be retrieved from apheresis, they can be removed directly from the bone marrow. This requires the donor to undergo a minor outpatient surgical procedure.

While the donor is under anesthesia, the surgeon inserts a hollow needle into the donor's pelvic bones just below the waist and removes liquid marrow. This is done a number of times until several pints of marrow are collected. The donor can expect to stay in the hospital for six to eight hours after the procedure to recover from the anesthesia and the acute pain at the needle insertion sites. He or she may feel some lower back soreness for a few days afterward. The donor's body naturally replaces the marrow soon after the procedure. Red cells are also removed, and the donor may experience anemia, which is often treated with iron supplements.

The marrow that's removed (harvested) passes through a series of filters to remove bone or tissue fragments and is then placed in a plastic bag from which it can be infused into the recipient's vein. The marrow is usually given to the patient within a few hours and almost always within 24 hours. If necessary, however, marrow can be frozen and stored and will remain suitable for use for years. If the transplant is autologous, the marrow is usually frozen while the patient undergoes intensive chemotherapy.

A rich source of stem cells for blood cancer patients are the stored stem cells collected from the umbilical cord and placenta after a baby is born, called the cord blood unit. Parents may choose to have the cord blood unit collected after delivery. Healthy parents with healthy children and no transplant candidate in the family can choose to donate their newborn's cord blood to cord blood banks or research programs at participating hospitals. Parents with a child or a family member who could be a candidate for transplantation should discuss with their doctor the potential benefits of saving their newborn's cord blood for possible family use.

Advantages of Using Cord Blood

The advantages of using cord blood stem cells instead of donor peripheral blood or donor marrow stem cells include:

Disadvantages of Using Cord Blood

There can be disadvantages of using cord blood stem cells as well:

The decrease in marrow function often begins to take effect by the second or third day after an allogeneic stem cell infusion. You'll be kept in a protected environment to reduce contact with infectious agents. Generally within two to four weeks after the transplant, the engraftment of donated cells will be apparent from the appearance of normal white cells in your blood. You'll receive periodic transfusions of red cells and platelets until your marrow function has been restored by the transplanted stem cells.

Your doctor will carefully monitor you with physical exams, blood chemistry tests, imaging studies and other tests to ensure that your heart, lungs, kidneys, liver and other major organs are functioning normally. You'll need drugs to prevent GVHD, in addition to blood transfusions. If you're suffering from a poor appetite or diarrhea, you may need to be fed intravenously or through a duodenal tube (called hyperalimentation) to ensure you get adequate nutrition.

Continue reading here:
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation | Leukemia and ...

Is This Stem-Cell Clinic Really Making Cancer Vaccines …

Stem cell treatments usually involve sucking out some of a patients fat tissue, isolating the stem cells within, and reinjecting them into the patients body.

Getty Images

On the first Saturday of March, Kristin Comella put on a white doctors coat and took the stage at the fourth annual conference for the Academy of Regenerative Practices. The founder and president of the academy, Comella also oversees an expanding empire of stem cell clinics that promise patients cures for most anything that ails them. None of those treatmentsfor everything from diabetes and asthma to multiple sclerosis and arthritishave been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

The procedurewhich costs a few thousand dollarsis always pretty much the same, regardless of its purported target. It involves sucking out some of a patients fat tissue with a liposuction needle, isolating the stem cells within, and reinjecting them into the patients body. The simplicity of the procedure is why people like Comella say its insane for the FDA to try to regulate stem cells.

So it was surprising when she announced onstage that her firm, US Stem Cell, had recently begun developing a radically new kind of treatmentthis time, for cancer.

Your stem cells are antigen-presenting cells, Cormella told the audience, in a Facebook live video the company posted of the event. We can make them express a protein from your specific cancer. So, its an individualized cancer vaccine, if you will. US Stem Cell, a publicly traded firm that sells stem cell separation kits and operates one of the largest networks of clinics in the country, achieved this with something called an electroporation protocol, she said.

Electroporation is essentially zapping cells with electricitya microbiology technique used to get drugs, proteins, or, most commonly, DNA into cells. When I hear electroporation, thats equal to genetic modification, says Paul Knoepfler, a stem cell researcher at UC Davis. Thats what we do when we want cells to permanently express a protein.

Knoepfler writes a blog about stem cells, and thats where he surfaced the video on May 9, after an acquaintance tipped him off. Hes sort of a watchdog for the industry. Since 2011, hes tracked the proliferation of unregulated stem cell clinics and followed US Stem Cells cavalier approach to experimenting on its patients, sometimes to disastrous effect. In 2015, one of its clinics injected liposuction-derived stem cells directly into the eyeballs of three elderly women suffering from age-related macular degeneration. All three went blind, two sued, and US Stem Cell settled out of court.

But this, he says, might be the most dangerous thing hes seen yet. If my assumption is correct that theyre introducing DNA, this is up near the top of the riskiest things Ive ever heard a stem cell clinic doing, he says. The big worry here is giving cancer patients another cancer, or a dangerous immune response."

US Stem Cell did not respond to WIREDs questions about the procedure, so its still unclear if it does indeed involve genetic modification and whether any patients have actually been treated with it. In the video Comella only described it as one of the companys current protocols.

What we do know is that the approach sounds similar to a powerful new class of anti-cancer medicines known as CAR-T therapies. They involve extracting a patients immune cells and genetically rewiring them to more effectively recognize and attack cancerous cells in the body. The FDA approved the first CAR-T, Kymriah, in late 2017 after scrutinizing years of data from animal studies and human clinical trials. Novartis claims it spent $1 billion to get the treatment to market.

Compare that with the $6,664 US Stem Cell reported having spent last year on research and development. The companyformerly named Biohearthas nine clinical trials listed on the national registry ClinicalTrials.gov, none of which are actively recruiting and none of which are for cancer treatments. Though listed as the lead investigator on some of the trials, Comella isnt a medical doctor. She received a three-year online PhD in stem cell biology from the Panama College of Cell Sciencea non-accredited virtual university founded by stem cell evangelist Walter Drake, according to reporting by the LA Times. And shes not afraid to spar with the federal government.

Last August the FDA sent a warning letter to US Stem Cell and to Comella, specifically, for significant deviations from good practices. And after Comella responded with a letter of her own, denying FDA has any jurisdiction to regulate her companys activities, the agency followed up with a lawsuit.

On May 9, the FDA along with the Department of Justice filed a complaint seeking a permanent injunction against US Stem Cell and Comella, accusing them of endangering patient safety and failing to meet manufacturing standards for cell therapies. The federal officials also filed a similar lawsuit against another clinicCalifornia Stem Cell Treatment Centerwhich was involved in giving patients an experimental cancer treatment made from a mix of stem cells and a smallpox vaccine inappropriately acquired from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stockpile under the auspices of research. When officials found out they were being administered to patients, US marshals raided the clinic and seized the remaining vials.

Both California Stem Cell Treatment Center and US Stem Cell said in public statements they plan to fight the injunctions, the most aggressive volley yet in the conflict surrounding direct-to-consumer stem cell treatments. At the heart of the clash is the phrase minimally manipulated, which the FDA uses to exempt therapies like bone marrow transplants. Both clinics will likely argue in court that their cell-based treatments fit that description. But Comellas recent statements at the conference could undermine this claim. Electroporation is a tool designed explicitly for cellular manipulation, and theres nothing minimal about it.

See the original post here:
Is This Stem-Cell Clinic Really Making Cancer Vaccines ...