CAR T-cell therapy Why it’s too soon to speculate about a ‘cure’ for multiple myeloma – HealthNewsReview.org

Kathlyn Stone is an associate editor at HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @KatKStone.

An experimental immunotherapy treatment for multiple myeloma from a biotech company in China captured wide attention at the just-concluded American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting.

Weve been following news reports from the meeting closely since it kicked off last Friday:

ASCOs news release on the new treatment, a form of CAR T-cell therapy, noted that the phase 1 results are preliminary and that the small trial was short-term. But then it blew past those cautions by speculating that the treatment could send multiple myeloma into long-term remission and might represent a cure for this incurable disease. The treatment costs werent included, either.

Andrae Vandross, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at UCLA and a contributor to HealthNewsReview.org, said the news release had some important details, such as a discussion of adverse events, particularlycytokine release syndrome (CRS), which affected many patients.

But overall, I wish more attention was paid to the fact that this small trial was to examine safety and efficacy and that much more needs to be done to make statements regarding clinically meaningful impact on disease, Vandross said.

The shortcomings of the news release can be found repeated in some of the news coverage.

Reuterss story, Chinese cell therapy effective in small multiple myeloma trial didnt explain harms well nor mention costs.

FierceBiotechs article played up the horse race aspect of the pharmaceutical industry where competing companies race to get media and investor attention for their preliminary research, ASCO dark horse Nanjing Legend Biotech shines with promising CAR-T data. But costs didnt make it into the discussion.

Nor was the price tag mentioned in The Scientists piece, CAR T-Cell trials boast promising results.

Deborah Korenstein, MD, an internist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, who did attend the meeting, found some of the reports on the CAR-T study lacking.

None of these articles mentions cost, though CAR-T therapy is very expensive. They do note that the follow-up is short-term so far, though they also talk about long-term remission (in the case of the Reuters piece) or cure (in the ASCO press release), which at the very least sends a mixed message.

NBC News piece, CAR-T Cancer Approach Has Surprising Success in Multiple Myeloma, reflects some of this mixed messaging.After reporting that the results were impressive and remarkable and that the study brings hope of a possible cure, the NBC story eventually broaches the issues of adverse effects and costs: The treatment is expected to cost $200,000 to $300,000, and whos going to pay for that is a big issue, according to a study author.

What does Korenstein think news organizations and public relations people could do better?

Stick to the evidence at hand, avoid speculating about outcomes that havent been determined, and make sure that potential harms are described as thoroughly as benefits.

Certainly there is no evidence so far to support those claims about longer term outcomes. They say it in a hedgy way but to me they shouldnt be mentioning it at all. They also play down the fact that the huge majority of patients had CRS, even if it was often not severe which is generally defined as requiring hospitalization. Its not clear here what severe means.

Dr. Korenstein disclosed that her spouse consults for Vedanta Biosciences.

Kevin Lomangino is the managing editor of HealthNewsReview.org. He tweets as @KLomangino. You'll be tempted

This week we begin a slow roll-out of a new offer of help to those

Today kicks off the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the world's

Original post:
CAR T-cell therapy Why it's too soon to speculate about a 'cure' for multiple myeloma - HealthNewsReview.org

Novartis touts new T-cell therapy data in race for FDA approval – Reuters

ZURICH Novartis on Wednesday touted new data from its T-cell therapy CTL019, saying it is on a par with results of experimental molecules from Kite Pharma and Juno Therapeutics that also target aggressive blood cancers.

Three months after infusion, the overall response rate (ORR)among 51 adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was 45 percent, Novartis said, with 37 percent complete responses (CR), or no sign of disease.

Novartis aims for $1 billion in annual sales for CTL019, a drug made by taking T cells from a patient, reprogramming them in the lab to fight cancer, and re-infusing them. The field is crowded, with Kite and Juno also hunting for approval for drugs whose per-patient costs could top $500,000.

"When you look across the three competitors' data sets, they're all in a similar range of responses," Novartis drug development chief Vas Narasimhan said in an interview. "What's critical is to see the data sets fully mature... and look at the overall safety profile."

Narasimhan said no deaths were linked to CTL019, though three patients died from disease progression within 30 days of infusion. Seven suffered severe neurological events.

While so-called "CAR-T therapies" from Novartis, Kite and Juno are now last resorts for patients who have failed other treatments, more doctors are growing convinced they have promise. Globally, there are some 183 CAR-T trials underway.

In March, Novartis filed CTL019 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for fast-track approval in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in young patients. The FDA has scheduled a July 12 public meeting for that.

Novartis could file for FDA approval in DLBCL, the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults, around October, with European filings planned about the same time.

Rival Kite Pharma's experimental drug axi-cel is also under expedited U.S. review against advanced NHL, with additional trials underway in leukaemia patients.

Kite has said 41 percent of NHL patients responded to axi-cel treatment at the six-month cutoff, with 36 percent in complete response.

Though Juno Therapeutics has suffered significant setbacks -- patient deaths forced it to abandon its lead CAR-T molecule this year -- the company released fresh data last week on another drug, JCAR017, against NHL.

Novartis is studying why some patients respond to CTL019 while others' cancers avoid detection.

Additional trials are planned, including with newer CAR-Ts combined with other drugs.

"There's just a lot of science that's yet to be understood," Narasimhan said. "I hope we have better answers next year ... for what's going on in the non-responders."

(Reporting by John Miller, editing by Louise Heavens)

VIENTIANE Dozens of fertility clinics have mushroomed in land-locked Laos after scandals over commercial surrogacy have spurred wealthier southeast Asian neighbors to ban the controversial procedure since 2015.

Automakers could help prevent accidental deaths of small children left in hot cars by installing devices to remind drivers to check their back seats for passengers before getting out, three U.S. lawmakers sponsoring a safety measure said on Wednesday.

View original post here:
Novartis touts new T-cell therapy data in race for FDA approval - Reuters

Bioquark Hopes to Bring Dead Back to Life Using Stem Cell Therapy – India West

A Philadelphia-based company along with an Indian orthopedic surgeon has said it will start a new type of stem cell therapy that claims it can bring people back from the dead.

Bioquark, led by chief executive Ira Pastor, said it will begin conducting trials of the therapy later in the year in an undisclosed country in Latin America, according to a New York Post report.

Pastor and Indian orthopedic surgeon Himanshu Bansal had initially hoped to run tests in India in 2016 but the Indian Council of Medical Research pulled the plug on their plans and asked them to take the trials elsewhere, the Post reported.

Most countries officially declare someone dead when there is irreversible loss of brain function. The Bioquark therapy boasts it can reboot the brain.

The company said it will begin testing on humans, with no plans to experiment on animals.

Scientists plan to examine individuals aged between 15 and 65 who have been declared brain dead from a traumatic brain injury, the report noted, citing a published study.

The three-stage process starts with harvesting stem cells from the patients own blood before injecting them back into their body. Next, the patient is given a dose of peptides injected into their spinal cord. The final step is a 15-day course of laser and median nerve stimulation while monitoring the patient with MRI scans.

Bansal practices in New Delhi.

Link:
Bioquark Hopes to Bring Dead Back to Life Using Stem Cell Therapy - India West

President Trump Reappoints NIH Director Francis Collins Who Supports Embryonic Stem Cell Research – LifeNews.com

President Donald Trump has decided to appoint the director of the National Institutes of Health even though pro-life advocates called on Francis Collins to be replaced because of his support for embryonic stem cell research that involves the destruction of human life.

Last month, 40 Republicans in the House of Representatives wrote president Trump urging him to get rid of NIH director Francis Collins because of his support for the practice, which is opposed by pro-life organizations.

While we deeply respect Dr. Collins Christian faith and commitment to public service, the stances that Dr. Collins has taken in the past regarding embryonic stem cell research and human cloning are not life-affirming and directly conflict with the pro-life direction of your new presidency, the GOP lawmakers wrote. It is because of this troubling paradox that we ask you to re-consider his leadership role at NIH.

While pro-life advocates strongly support scientific research, they oppose embryonic stem cell research because the only way to obtain embryonic stem cells is to destroy unique human beings just days after conception. On the other hand, ethical adult stem cell research has produced cures or treatments for well over 100 diseases or medical conditions and involves no destruction of human life. Embryonic stem cell research has still yet to treat a single human being successfully.

But Trump has decided to keep Collins in place:

Collins is a pioneer in the field of genetics who has directed the NIH since August 2009, after successfully leading the nations effort to map the human genome. He was among several dozen Obama administration officials who Trump aides had asked to stay in their jobs at least temporarily for the purpose of continuity.

Trump made the announcement about Collins on Tuesday.

The NIH is a division of the Department of Health and Human Services and is made up of 27 different institutes and centers. Its also known as the nations medical research agency.

Trump has proposed cutting the overall NIH budget from $31.8 billion to $26 billion.

Congressman Jim Banks of Indiana told LifeNews hes not happy about the decision.

Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures.

I am disappointed in the Trump Administrations decision to keep Dr. Francis Collins as head of the NIH. Dr. Collins support of embryonic stem cell research, along with his comments that cloned embryos do not deserve the same moral protections as naturally generated embryos, make him a less than an ideal fit for a pro-life administration. I am hopeful that Dr. Collins will turn away from embryo-killing research as he continues his tenure as NIH Director.

Collins has led the NIH since 2009, when he was unanimously confirmed by the Senate.

The Obama administration forced Americans to pay for embryonic stem cell research involving the destruction of human life. National Institutes of Health chief Francis Collins approved taxpayer funding of dozens of lines of embryonic stem cells. The cells can only be obtained by destroying unborn children days after conception at which point human embryos are unique human beings.

Obama issued an executive order overturning the limits President Bush put in place on any new embryonic stem cell research funding. Bush directed federal dollars mostly to adult stem cells that are already helping patients now.

The Family Research Council responded to the Obama administrations move by saying that adult stem cells are already helping diabetes patients.

Of course, when it comes to juvenile (type I) diabetes, adult stem cells have already shown success at treating diabetes patients, the pro-life group noted.

It added, Interestingly, none of the human embryonic stem cell lines approved thus far are from the original group of 21 lines that had been receiving NIH funding, only one (H1one of the original five Thomson lines) has been submitted for approval, with only two other lines from Cellartis supposedly to be submitted for review.

This is surprising given that the vast majority of human embryonic stem cell research has been done with those previous lines, thus forcing most embryonic stem cell researchers to start over on experiments with new lines the group continued.

It also shows that this gold rush is just that, an attempt to grab more money built on embryo destruction, not built on science, FRC concluded.

Read the original post:
President Trump Reappoints NIH Director Francis Collins Who Supports Embryonic Stem Cell Research - LifeNews.com

Stem cell researcher takes on the brain’s fight against age-related diseases – USC News

What happens to the stem cells in our brains as we age? Albina Ibrayeva, a PhD student in the USC Stem Cell laboratory of Michael Bonaguidi, addresses this question as she tries to understand how the brain naturally fights against aging and suggests promising therapeutic avenues for treating age-related neurodegeneration, disease and disorders.

I love science. As an undergraduate student back in Kazakhstan, I constantly sought ways to put my knowledge into practice. During my sophomore year, I interned at the National Center for Biotechnology in Astana. This experience enabled me to work with some of the brightest minds dedicated to scientific research in my country and showed me the meaningfulness of a career in biomedical research. Since then, I knew that I wanted to be a scientist.

I won a scholarship and was accepted to graduate school at USC, first to study biomedical engineering as a masters student, then the biology of aging as a PhD student. In 2015, I joined Michael Bonaguidis lab. So here I am, excited and really passionate about contributing to a not-so-distant future where research and medicine advance all humans well-being.

USC is one of the worlds top research universities, especially for someone who is studying neuroscience, stem cells and aging. The synergy among the LAC-USC Medical Center, the Alzheimers Disease Research Center, the Geriatric Studies Center, the Alzheimers Therapeutic Research Institute, the Laboratory of NeuroImaging, the Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute and USCs stem cell research center provides one of the best avenues to do great research and advance clinical and basic science.

Not only I am blessed to work at USC, but also I like the fact that we are surrounded by the best universities, such as Caltech and the University of California campuses in L.A., San Diego, San Francisco and Santa Barbara with whom we collaborate. California is known to be the most progressive place on Earth in science, technology and innovation. That is why I think I am in the right place, where I too can contribute to science and research on aging and its effects.

After graduating from the USC PhD program, I would like to work as a professor and researcher at a U.S. university. It is one of my dreams to be able to share my knowledge and being a professor would allow me to do so, while continuing my research to benefit U.S. health care and the science of aging.

Research, of course, is and will remain a big part of my life. Science is there to help people who are suffering from different diseases and disorders. In particular, stem cell research has a great potential for its therapeutic application across fields. Science can be really challenging. However, at the same time it is really exciting, and I am a firm believer that science is changing and will change the world, if given a chance.

In high school, I was a professional volleyball player. But then I realized that I dont want to pursue a career in sports, but science.

Sometimes it is hard to stay active, especially when all day long you are analyzing your data, conducting experiments and running simulations on your computer. But whenever I have free time, I try to spend it being as active as possible. I try to hike at least once a week. The Santa Monica Mountains are the best place to hike, with their breathtaking views of the Pacific Ocean, native California grasslands, famous Malibu beaches, and even some historical and cultural sites of Native American life. This is what makes me happy outside of science.

More stories about: Aging, First-Generation Students, Research, Stem Cells

Newly arrived scientist contributes brain power to stem cell research at USC.

One of 11 new postdoctoral fellows receives support from USC and Mexicos equivalent of the National Science Foundation.

Stem cell researcher Michael Bonaguidi considers the science and fiction behind a new movie about a man who wants to live forever.

Global study reveals thinning of gray matter in brain regions responsible for inhibition and emotion.

Excerpt from:
Stem cell researcher takes on the brain's fight against age-related diseases - USC News

Sowing Stem Cells: Lab-Grown Organoids Hold Promise for Patient Treatments – UCSF News Services

Illustration by Camila Carlow

Ophir Klein is growing teeth,which is just slightly less odd than what Jeffrey Bush is growing tissues that make up the face. Jason Pomerantz is growing muscle; Sarah Knox is growing salivary glands; and Edward Hsiao is printing 3-D bone using a machine that looks about as complex as a clock radio.

Together, these members of the UC San Francisco facultyare cultivating organs of the craniofacial complex the skull and face which too often go terribly wrong during fetal development. Deformities of these bones or soft tissues, the most common of birth defects, can cut life short by blocking the airway or circulation. Or they can disfigure a face so profoundly that a child strugglesto see, hear, or talk. Perhaps most painful of all, such deformities render children physically other, potentially leading to a lifetime of corrective surgeries and social isolation.

As director of the UCSF Program in Craniofacial Biology, Klein orchestrates a multisite research endeavor to translate basic science findings in tissue regeneration into improved treatments for these kids. Using stem cells from patients with craniofacial deformities, Klein, Bush, Pomerantz, Knox, Hsiao, and their colleagues are growing tiny functioning segments of organs, called organoids, to figure out exactly when and how in fetal development such design flaws occur.

Read a digital flipbook of the entire summer issue of UCSF Magazine, featuring this and other stories.

They are among scientists across UCSF who are cultivating cellular systems such as miniature brains and breasts from patient cells. They serve as dioramas of disease models derived from human cells either displacing or complementing the mouse models that have served science well, though inexactly, for manyyears. The effort is one of the most obvious and viable payoffs to date from stem cell science. With these organoids, physicians and scientists can not only trace the pathways of normal and abnormal development, but also test drugs and other treatments for their effectiveness in humans. Organoids are also one tiny step toward the ultimate goal of generating complete organs, as a way to circumvent rejection issues and save the lives of those who now die waiting for transplants.

As the reservoirs of human development, stem cells take it upon themselves to tirelessly renew and differentiate into the myriad cell types required to build out a body from an embryo. In creating an organoid, typical construction metaphors do not apply. There are no building blocks to nail, stack, or solder and no job-site supervisor barking orders. Thats not how biology works, says Zev Gartner, PhD, an associate professor of pharmaceutical chemistry.

It is a self-organizing process, he explains, a process that starts in the womb with embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or, in the case of organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). iPSCs are mature cells that are stripped back to their earliest stage of development using a process devised by UCSF Professor of Anatomy Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, who won a Nobel Prize for discovering the process. To make organoids, iPSCs are put through a series of solutions, then added to a gel that mimics the squishy 3-D cellular matrix of the embryo. The gel provides the right conditions for them to get to work.

Take an organ like the lung. Its basic functional units are a tube and a sac, and outside that sac are capillaries that allow gas exchange. Hundreds of millions of tubes and sacs make a lung, explains Gartner. You can make the little sacs and the tubes in a dish as an organoid model. But we dont know how to drive the self-organization of those units into much more complex, elaborate, highly ramified structures. The fundamental limitation of organoids is that they lack the vasculature that brings nutrient-laden blood to fuel the evolution of the larger structure.

Gartner notes that people who work with stem cells tend to focus on either regenerative medicine or disease modeling. Those interested in disease make models of tissues so that they can understand how diseases work, while those interested in regenerative medicine try to make models of healthy tissue that couldbe transplanted. Gartner straddles both camps. He grows breast organoids. The mammary gland is great because we can simultaneously think about these two phenomena as two sides of the same coin, he says. One is regenerative medicine through self-organization, and the other is understanding the progression of breast cancer through a breakdown in self-organization.

So theres potentially a triple payoff in stem cell science: By deducing how a breast forms itself, Gartner might figure out how to grow the entire organ. By tracing how cancer throws a wrench in the works, he may be able to target ways to stop that process. And by growing a human organ in a dish, he avoids making cross-species assumptions or putting animals or humans at risk in testing potential drugs to cure breast cancer, greatly accelerating the push toward a cure.

On Kleins team, Jeffrey Bush, PhD, an assistant professor of cell and tissue biology, looks at organoids through the lens of disease.

The organoids he grows model craniofrontonasal syndrome a birth defect that is caused by a mutation in a single gene and that dramatically impacts the shape of the face and head. He knows from studies reproducing craniofrontonasal syndrome in mice that the first place something goes wrong is in a cell type called the neuroectoderm. To create an organoid to study this, he obtained skin cells from Pomerantz, an associate professor of surgery, who has patients with the syndrome who were willing to donate tissue samples. Such collaborations between basic scientists and clinicians are key to bringing research out of the lab and into patient care.

We studied this simple system to see how this mutation affected the organization of these cells, says Bush. His group has filmed cells as they rush about to self-organize when theyre mixed together. In those films, he explains, you can see that the mutated cells, which are dyed red, segregate from the normal cells, which are green they are like oil and water. In other words, the mutated cells completely disrupt the behavior of all the cells. By contrast, in the films of cells without the mutation, all the cells circulate easily among one another, like fish in an aquarium. This understanding has allowed Bush to begin to think about a drug that blocks this separation. He has several promising candidates that his team will test in pregnant mice. Right now, he says, there isnt a single drug that we can use for any kind of structural birth defects. If we could show that a medication blocks the effects of this mutation, it would serve as proof of principle that something besides surgery can be done. But we would have to know that it was safe for mother and child and that we could catch it early enough.

Jason Pomerantz, MD, a plastic surgeon, falls into the regeneration camp. His clinical work is typified by a recent eight-hour operationon a 17-year-old boy with Crouzon syndrome, a severely disfiguring condition affecting every organ in the craniofacial structure muscle, bone, and skin. My patient is excited for the outcome, but not about the process, says Pomerantz, surgical director of the UCSF Craniofacial Center. For three months, the patient will wear a large metal frame on his head with wires that will pull the bones in his face forward. Prior to the surgery, the boys face was nearly concave, collapsed inward at the nose.

Yet bone is not all Pomerantz needs to work with to restructure a face. The subtle bends, creases, and curves of expressionthat make a face ones own are the work of tiny muscles.Right now we can move a big muscle say, from the thighto the face so that people can smile, he says. But we cant reconstruct the fine ones that enable people to move their eyebrows up or move the eyeballs around. That requires little muscles. This is where we can make headway with stem cell biology.

We have actually made a humanized organ in an animal, he continues, pointing to a picture of a mouse on his wall. Pomerantz is now considering incubating small human muscles in animals for use in his patients faces. In a recent project, he inserted stem cells from human muscles into a mouse whose own muscle stem cells had been incapacitated. He then perturbed the muscle to stimulate regeneration. As the muscle healed, the cells created new muscle tissue, which the mouses nerves innervated to make a functioning muscle. Its exactly the size of the muscles Pomerantz needs for full articulation of expression and function in a human face or hand.

Muscles are part of a vast and intricate system strewn throughoutthe body. Teeth, on the other hand, are islands unto themselves. Teeth intrigue me from a regeneration perspective, says OphirKlein, MD, PhD, chair of the Division of Craniofacial Anomalies, the Hillblom Professor of Craniofacial Anomalies, the Epstein Professor of Human Genetics, and a resident alumnus. They are discrete organs all the parts are there. More intriguing still is the fact that many rodents have the ability to grow their front teeth continuously. Elephants and walruses also have ever-growing tusks, and even some primates lemurs can regrow their teeth.

In studying species that can [regrow teeth], we hope to unlock the regenerative potential in our own cells.

Ophir Klein, MD, PhD

Chair of the Division of Craniofacial Anomalies

A tooth can be regenerated in parts. Stem cells can be used to grow the root, and then a crown can be added to complete the tooth. To generate a whole organ at once, Kleins colleagues are planning to partner with bioengineers who can produce a biocompatible material that could serve as a framing device to jump-start the creation of dentin, one of the hard components of a tooth. If they start with the right cells, then the scaffolding will give the cellsthe shape information they need to create the right design. But even that isnt Kleins endgame. In my lab, were interested in figuring out why humans cant regrow teeth, he says. In studying species that can, we hope to unlock the regenerative potential in our own cells that might be turned off.

Kleins work to generate teeth is inspired by his patients with ectodermal dysplasia, a congenital disorder characterized by lack of sweat glands, hair, or teeth. Being able to generate the roots of teeth would be remarkable for these patients, since the rest can be done with a crown. Right now, they must be fitted with dentures.

Klein is also taking another tack to help these patients. We completed a clinical trial of a drug that basically goosed up the development of the organs when they werent forming properly, he says. The drug a protein developed by Swiss collaborators of Kleins, based on studies of embryonic mice, who develop theseorgans in early- to mid-gestation was given to infants with the disorder right after birth. The trial was unsuccessful. Now, scientists in Germany are running a trial of the same drug, giving it instead to mothers carrying babies with this genetic disorder. The scientists will try to gauge what the best timing is for delivering the drug.

Whats great about this drug is that it doesnt seem to have any effects on any other organs besides teeth,hair, and sweat glands, says Klein. Drugs for other conditions are far riskier, because they affect pathways that are important inthe development of many organs.

Sarah Knox, PhD, an assistant professor of cell and tissue biology, is using stem cells to figure out howto regenerate salivary glands compromised by radiation treatments for head and neckcancers or by craniofacial deformities. Her focus is on how the environment contributes to the activation and maintenance ofthe gland. The salivary gland, like all organs, is continuously replenishing the supply ofcells and tissues it needs to function. Knoxs research shows that the gland takesdirectional cues from nearby nerve cells not only to remain functional, but also to continuously replace itself. Her organoids are made of cells from a patient and nerve cells (ganglia) from a fetal mouse. We are trying to explore the relationship between the stem cells and the nerves, she says. How do the nerves know the tissue is there? How do the nerves provide instruction and feedback? Individual cells die off and new cells have to replace them. Organoids are giving us insight as to where those new cells are coming from and how we keep repopulating [them] all our lives.

As head of the UCSF Program in Craniofacial Biology which is based in the School of Dentistry and the Division of Genetics in the School of Medicine Klein stands at one of sciences most compelling crossroads: regenerative medicine and genetics. Far in the future, both fields have potential that seem like science fiction today. We live in a world where people die waiting for organ transplants. What if we could pull these organoids from their petri dish and supply them with the fuel they need to become full-blown organs? Such a feat would necessitate either a host embryo perhaps from apig, because pigs have organs the size of human organs or some other biological foundation. Some scientists are hoping to jump-start organ development with scaffolding, or cells engineered to speed the developmental process. Others are zeroing in on the genome, particularly in kids with craniofacial anomalies caused by just one mutation, like craniofrontonasal syndrome; for example, a tool called CRISPR could allow scientists to splice that gene out and replace it with a normal gene. But the tool has yet to be used in humans, let alone a human fetus.

Ethical questions pepper either route. At their best, stem cells regenerate tissues; at their worst, they go rogue and grow into a tumor. Yet with gene editing tools like CRISPR, you literally have the potential to change the species, says Klein. And in both scenarios, the cells can act with unforeseen off-target effects. Klein and his colleagues are in continual discussion about the repercussions of their work with the director of UCSF Bioethics, Barbara Koenig, RN, PhD 88. Gene therapy is an example of an exciting new treatment that cured one serious pediatric illness severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome (SCID) but the genes unwittingly led to the development of leukemia, explains Koenig. Genetic and stem cell interventions must be painstakingly studied before application. And, once they are ready, who will regulate them? Thereare many questions yet to be answered. The challenges are most extreme when we talk about modifying an egg or sperm cell, where the changes are passed on to the next generation.

So Klein and his colleagues proceed with caution, curiosity, and awe. The next decade will be an incredibly exciting time, says Klein. With continual advances in human genetics and developmental and cell biology, we hope to be able to make drugs and use genetic tools to appreciably change the lives of our patients.

Bone grows like a runaway train in Edward Hsiaos patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The slightest bump or injury can set off a spurt of bone growth that can fuse their vertebrae, lock their joints, or even freeze up their rib cages, leaving them unable to breathe.

No one, to date, has successfully engineered bone. Hsiao, MD, PhD, is hoping to spark the process with the help of a 3-D printer from Organovo, a firm that specializes in bioprinting technology. From iPSCs, he can make many of the essential ingredients of bone, including mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages. We are putting cells into the equivalent of an ink. Then we will print the structures with the ink, let the ink dissolve, and leave the cells, explains Hsiao. The hope is that the cells can then recapitulate the normal developmental process.

If the approach is successful, Hsiao hopes to use the resulting models to test drugs and other treatments to halt or prevent bone deformities. Down the line, his progress also stands to transform bone and joint replacements. Through his work with FOP, hes uncovered one mechanism that drives rapid bone growth. In these patients, we know that mature bone formation can happen in as quickly as two weeks, so it is possible to grow bone in an adult. We need to understand how to modulate that, says Hsiao. Someday, my dream would be to be able to identify the cells we need, give someone a drug that induces the right genes and recruits the right cells to the correct site, and have the cells rebuild the joint from scratch.

More here:
Sowing Stem Cells: Lab-Grown Organoids Hold Promise for Patient Treatments - UCSF News Services

Does the sex of a cell matter in research? – News from Tulane

Dr. Franck Mauvais-Jarvis is a leading voice in the debate to bring sex parity to pre-clinical research. Photo by Paula Burch-Celentano.

Over the last decade, many drugs that have been pulled from the market due to toxicity were withdrawn because they affected women more than men. It turns out, the studies that brought the drugs to market were designed using only male cells and animal models, a common flaw a Tulane endocrinologist is working to help correct. We really need to study both sexes, says Dr. Franck Mauvais-Jarvis, a leading voice in the debate to bring sex parity to pre-clinical research. The focus on a single sex threatens to limit the impact of research findings as results may be relevant to only half of the population. Mauvais-Jarvis, a professor of endocrinology at Tulane University School of Medicine, is the lead author of a newly published article in the journal Cell Metabolism to help scientists who study obesity, diabetes or other metabolic diseases better account for inherent sex differences in research. While the National Institutes of Health recently mandated researchers consider sex as a biological variable by including both sexes in pre-clinical research, there is little guidance in designing studies to fully consider sex differences in underlying biological mechanisms. The article outlines the causes of sex differences in research models and the methods for investigators to account for these factors. Mauvais-Jarvis goal is to help investigators better understand that sex differences are not simply a superficial aspect of research that only account for different sets of hormones. He maintains that male and female are two different biological systems. Sex differences are at the core of the mechanism for biological traits and disease, Mauvais-Jarvis says. We believe that the incorporation of appropriately designed studies on sex differences in metabolism and other fields will accelerate discovery and enhance our ability to treat disease. This is the fundamental basis of precision medicine. The article is co-authored by Drs. Arthur Arnold and Karen Reue, two experts in the genetics of sex differences at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Read the original here:
Does the sex of a cell matter in research? - News from Tulane

Type of sugar may treat atherosclerosis, mouse study shows – Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Visit the News Hub

Trehalose triggers cellular housekeeping in artery-clogging plaque

A new study shows that a type of natural sugar called trehalose triggers an important cellular housekeeping process in immune cells that helps treat atherosclerotic plaque. The image shows a cross section of a mouse aorta, the main artery in the body, with a large plaque. Straight red lines toward the upper left are the wall of the aorta. Yellow areas are where housekeeping cells called macrophages are incinerating cellular waste.

Researchers have long sought ways to harness the bodys immune system to treat disease, especially cancer. Now, scientists have found that the immune system may be triggered to treat atherosclerosis and possibly other metabolic conditions, including fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes.

Studying mice, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have shown that a natural sugar called trehalose revs up the immune systems cellular housekeeping abilities. These souped-up housecleaners then are able to reduce atherosclerotic plaque that has built up inside arteries. Such plaques are a hallmark of cardiovascular disease and lead to an increased risk of heart attack.

The study is published June 7 in Nature Communications.

We are interested in enhancing the ability of these immune cells, called macrophages, to degrade cellular garbage making them super-macrophages, said senior author Babak Razani, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of medicine.

Macrophages are immune cells responsible for cleaning up many types of cellular waste, including misshapen proteins, excess fat droplets and dysfunctional organelles specialized structures within cells.

In atherosclerosis, macrophages try to fix damage to the artery by cleaning up the area, but they get overwhelmed by the inflammatory nature of the plaques, Razani explained. Their housekeeping process gets gummed up. So their friends rush in to try to clean up the bigger mess and also become part of the problem. A soup starts building up dying cells, more lipids. The plaque grows and grows.

In the study, Razani and his colleagues showed that mice prone to atherosclerosis had reduced plaque in their arteries after being injected with trehalose. The sizes of the plaques measured in the aortic root were variable, but on average, the plaques measured 0.35 square millimeters in control mice compared with 0.25 square millimeters in the mice receiving trehalose, which translated into a roughly 30 percent decrease in plaque size. The difference was statistically significant, according to the study.

The effect disappeared when the mice were given trehalose orally or when they were injected with other types of sugar, even those with similar structures.

Found in plants and insects, trehalose is a natural sugar that consists of two glucose molecules bound together. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for human consumption and often is used as an ingredient in pharmaceuticals. Past work by many research groups has shown trehalose triggers an important cellular process called autophagy, or self-eating. But just how it boosts autophagy has been unknown.

In this study, Razani and his colleagues show that trehalose operates by activating a molecule called TFEB. Activated TFEB goes into the nucleus of macrophages and binds to DNA. That binding turns on specific genes, setting off a chain of events that results in the assembly of additional housekeeping machinery more of the organelles that function as garbage collectors and incinerators.

Trehalose is not just enhancing the housekeeping machinery thats already there, Razani said. Its triggering the cell to make new machinery. This results in more autophagy the cell starts a degradation fest. Is this the only way that trehalose works to enhance autophagy by macrophages? We cant say that for sure were still testing that. But is it a predominant process? Yes.

The researchers are continuing to study trehalose as a potential therapy for atherosclerosis, especially since it is not only safe for human consumption but is also a mild sweetener. One obstacle the scientists would like to overcome, however, is the need for injections. Trehalose likely loses its effectiveness when taken orally because of an enzyme in the digestive tract that breaks trehalose into its constituent glucose molecules. Razani said the research team is looking for ways to block that enzyme so that trehalose retains its structure, and presumably its function, when taken by mouth.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant numbers K08 HL098559 and R01 HL125838; the Washington University Diabetic Cardiovascular Disease Center and Diabetes Research Center, grant number P30 DK020579; The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital; and the Wylie Scholar Award from the Vascular Cures Foundation.

Sergin I, Evans TD, Zhang X, Bhattacharya S, Stokes CJ, Song E, Ali S, Dehestani B, Holloway KB, Micevych PS, Javaheri A, Crowley JR, Ballabio A, Schilling JD, Epelman S, Weihl CC, Diwan A, Fan D, Zayed MA, Razani B. Exploiting macrophage autophagy-lysosomal biogenesis as a therapy for atherosclerosis. Nature Communications. June 7, 2017.

Washington University School of Medicines 2,100 employed and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient-care institutions in the nation, currently ranked seventh in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

See the original post:
Type of sugar may treat atherosclerosis, mouse study shows - Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Cancer cells send signals boosting survival and drug resistance in other cancer cells – Medical Xpress

June 6, 2017 In this image of a human breast tumor, a cluster of malignant cells that have become resistant to chemotherapy are shown in red. Credit: NCI

Researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine report that cancer cells appear to communicate to other cancer cells, activating an internal mechanism that boosts resistance to common chemotherapies and promotes tumor survival.

The findings are published online in the June 6 issue of Science Signaling.

Six years ago, Maurizio Zanetti, MD, professor in the Department of Medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine and a tumor immunologist at Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, published a paper in PNAS suggesting that cancer cells exploit an internal mechanism used by stressed mammalian cells, called the unfolded protein response (UPR), to communicate with immune cells, notably cells derived from the bone marrow, imparting them with pro-tumorigenic characteristics.

The UPR is activated in response to unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulating in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)an organelle that carries out several metabolic functions in the cells and the site where proteins are built, folded and sent for secretion. The UPR can often decide cell death or survival.

In their new paper, Zanetti and colleagues say cancer cells appear to take the process beyond just affecting bone marrow cells, using transmissible ER stress (TERS) to activate Wnt signaling in recipient cancer cells. Wnt is a cellular signaling pathway linked to carcinogenesis in many types of cancer.

"We noticed that TERS-experienced cells survived better than their unexperienced counterparts when nutrient-starved or treated with common chemotherapies like bortezomib or paclitaxel," said Jeffrey J. Rodvold, a member of Zanetti's lab and first author of the study. "In each instance, receiving stress signals caused cells to survive better. Understanding how cellular fitness is gained within the tumor microenvironment is key to understand cooperativity among cancer cells as a way to collective resilience to nutrient starvation and therapies."

When cancer cells subject to TERS were implanted in mice, they produced faster growing tumors.

"Our data demonstrate that transmissible ER stress is a mechanism of intercellular communication," said Zanetti. "We know that tumor cells live in difficult environments, exposed to nutrient deprivation and lack of oxygen, which in principle should restrict tumor growth. Through stress transmission, tumor cells help neighboring tumor cells to cope with these adverse conditions and eventually survive and acquire growth advantages."

Importantly, he said the research may explain previous findings by other groups showing that individual tumor cells within a uniform genetic lineage can acquire functionally different behaviors in vivo. In other words, some cells acquire greater fitness and extended survivalanother way to generate intra-tumor heterogeneity, which currently represents one of the major obstacles to cancer treatment. This implies that mutations peppered throughout the cancer genome of an individual are not the only source of intra-tumor heterogeneity.

Zanetti said researchers and physicians need to consider these changing cellular dynamics in the tumor microenvironment in developing both a better understanding of cancer and more effective treatments.

Explore further: Cancer cells co-opt immune response to escape destruction

More information: Science Signaling (2017). DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aah7177

Researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine report that tumor cells use stress signals to subvert responding immune cells, exploiting them to actually boost conditions beneficial to cancer growth.

A new study has identified a mechanism used by tumors to recruit stem cells from bone and convert them into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that facilitate tumor progression. This work, which pinpoints the specific biochemical ...

A very high mortality rate is associated with ovarian cancer, in part due to difficulties in detecting and diagnosing the disease at early stages before tumors have spread, or metastasized, to other locations in the body.

Researchers from Oregon Health and Science University and Oregon State University have found that aspirin may slow the spread of some types of colon and pancreatic cancer cells. The paper is published in the American Journal ...

Tumor growth is dependent on interactions between cancer cells and adjacent normal tissue, or stroma. Stromal cells can stimulate the growth of tumor cells; however it is unclear if tumor cells can influence the stroma.

Researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine report that cancer cells appear to communicate to other cancer cells, activating an internal mechanism that boosts resistance to common chemotherapies and ...

A research study led by University of Minnesota engineers gives new insight into how cancer cells move based on their ability to sense their environment. The discovery could have a major impact on therapies to prevent the ...

The chemotherapy drug capecitabine gives patients a better quality of life and is as effective at preventing breast cancer from returning as the alternative regimen called CMF, when given following epirubicin. These are the ...

When you dine on curry and baked apples, enjoy the fact that you are eating something that could play a role starvingor even preventingcancer.

Scientists at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden report that cancer cells and normal cells use different 'gene switches' in order to regulate the expression of genes that control growth. In mice, the removal of a large regulatory ...

Doctors are reporting unprecedented success from a new cell and gene therapy for multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that's on the rise. Although it's early and the study is small35 peopleevery patient responded and all ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more from the original source:
Cancer cells send signals boosting survival and drug resistance in other cancer cells - Medical Xpress

‘Immunoswitch’ particles may be key to more-effective cancer immunotherapy – Phys.Org

June 7, 2017 T cells (red) and tumor cells (green) incubated with control particles (left) or immunoswitch particles (right). T cells that have latched on to tumor cells are indicated by green arrows. Credit: Alyssa Kosmides, Johns Hopkins Medicine

Scientists at Johns Hopkins have created a nanoparticle that carries two different antibodies capable of simultaneously switching off cancer cells' defensive properties while switching on a robust anticancer immune response in mice. Experiments with the tiny, double-duty "immunoswitch" found it able to dramatically slow the growth of mouse melanoma and colon cancer and even eradicate tumors in test animals, the researchers report.

The findings, described online June 7 in ACS Nano, could lead to ways to boost the effectiveness and promise of immunotherapies in people with cancer, the investigators say.

"Immunotherapies have significant potential and yet room for improvement," says Jonathan P. Schneck, M.D., Ph.D., professor of pathology in the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine's Institute for Cell Engineering and a member of the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center. "The improvement here was to make, for the first time, a nanoparticle that can interact simultaneously with multiple types of cells in the complex tumor microenvironment, dramatically increasing its effectiveness."

Schneck and study co-leader Alyssa K. Kosmides, a graduate student in his laboratory, explain that several cancer treatments designed to stimulate a patient's immune system to fight the disease have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including three known as checkpoint inhibitors. Those drugs help overcome cancer cells' ability to evade a person's immune system by using antibodies to shut down proteins on tumor cell surfaces that hide them from immune cells.

However, they point out, checkpoint inhibitors work only in a relatively limited number of patients and against a small number of cancers so far. Follow-up studies show that overall response rates against melanoma, bladder cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-small cell lung cancer is around 30 percent, and complete response rates, resulting in eradication of a patient's tumors, are as low as 5 percent.

But combining multiple forms of immunotherapy in doses high enough to be effective can cause severe, even life-threatening, side effects.

For their study, the Johns Hopkins researchers combined two different immunotherapy strategies on manmade nanoparticles about 1,000 times smaller in diameter than a human hair, similar to drug-delivery platforms already in use in some cancer therapies, including chemotherapies such as Doxil, Abraxane and Myocet.

Nanoparticles have clear advantages over free drug, Kosmides explains, such as their "enhanced permeability and retention effect," which causes nanosized particles to be taken up more readily by tumor cells than by healthy cells. Additionally, each particle can hold dozens of antibodies at once, which dramatically raises the local concentration of antibodies. This makes them more effective and reduces the chances of side effects, she says.

"Nanoparticles provide more bang for your buck," Schneck says.

Using paramagnetic iron particles about 100 nanometers in diameter, the researchers placed two different kinds of antibodies on them: one blocks a protein called programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which cancer cells use to cloak themselves from immune cells; another that stimulates T cells, a type of immune cell that fights cancer. By combining these two functions, Schneck explains, the goal was to effectively switch off a tumor's immune-inhibiting ability while simultaneously switching on the immune system's capacity to attack.

In mice injected with mouse melanoma cells, which grew into tumors over the course of several days, only mice who subsequently received the "immunoswitch" particles had significantly delayed tumor growth and longer survival compared to those who received the control treatments or no treatment.

Specifically, the immunoswitch-treated mice had tumors nearly 75 percent smaller than animals that received no treatment, whereas soluble antibody only reduced tumor growth by approximately 25 percent. Half of immunoswitch-treated mice were still alive after 30 days, whereas all untreated mice died by day 22.

"The double-duty immunoswitch particles were clearly more effective than a mixture of nanoparticles that each targeted just one protein and acted in a synergistic fashion, but we don't yet know why," says Schneck. "It may be that the immunoswitch particles' success comes from bringing T cells and their targeted tumor cells into close proximity."

The researchers say they found even more dramatic results in a mouse model of colon cancer. In those experiments, about half the mice had a complete regression of tumors and about 70% could be considered long-term survivors, living more than 55 days.

Looking for the mechanism behind the immunoswitch particles' positive effects, further experiments showed that the particles appear to bring cancer cells and the immune cells that fight them together more easily, providing a synergy that's not possible even with the same two antibodies on separate particles. The immunoswitch particles also were retained in tumor cells significantly longer than soluble antibodies, offering more time for them to work, Schneck and Kosmides say.

The researchers add that they plan to work on improving the immunoswitch particles by searching for more effective combinations of antibodies to include on the platform. Because the particles are magnetic, they also plan to test whether results can be improved by using magnets to guide the particles and keep them at the tumor site.

Explore further: Researchers develop new tumor-shrinking nanoparticle to fight cancer, prevent recurrence

More information: "Dual Targeting Nanoparticle Stimulates the Immune System to Inhibit Tumor Growth", ACS Nano, pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.6b08152

A Mayo Clinic research team has developed a new type of cancer-fighting nanoparticle aimed at shrinking breast cancer tumors, while also preventing recurrence of the disease. In the study, published today in Nature Nanotechnology, ...

Macrophages are a type of white blood cell that can engulf and destroy cancer cells. A research group led by Professor MATOZAKI Takashi, Associate Professor MURATA Yoji, and YANAGITA Tadahiko (Kobe University Department of ...

Targeting a molecule called B7-H4which blocks T-cells from destroying tumor cellscould lead to the development of new therapies that boost the immune system's ability to fight cancer, according to a review published ...

EPFL scientists have improved the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by blocking two proteins that regulate the growth of tumor blood vessels.

In several types of cancer, elevated expression of the chemokine receptor CCR4 in tumors is associated with poor patient outcomes. Communication through CCR4 may be one mechanism that cancer cells use to create a pro-tumor ...

MIT researchers have devised a way to make tumor cells more susceptible to certain types of cancer treatment by coating the cells with nanoparticles before delivering drugs.

Scientists at Johns Hopkins have created a nanoparticle that carries two different antibodies capable of simultaneously switching off cancer cells' defensive properties while switching on a robust anticancer immune response ...

Recent research from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln may help future engineers of digital components get two (or more) for the space of one.

Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory have developed a new way to track dynamic molecular features in soft materials, including the high-frequency molecular vibrations that transmit ...

Before new nanoparticles or other nanomedicines can be injected into the human body, a whole series of tests must be conducted in the laboratory, then in living cells, and in the end on humans. But often the results obtained ...

An engineer with the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science at The University of Texas at Dallas has designed a novel computing system made solely from carbon that might one day replace the silicon transistors ...

(Phys.org)A team of researchers with the National Center for Nanoscience and Technology in China has developed what it is calling a skin-like triboelectric nanogenerator (STENG). In their paper published in the journal ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Visit link:
'Immunoswitch' particles may be key to more-effective cancer immunotherapy - Phys.Org