Amid uncertain future, state’s stem cell agency loses transformational leader – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Californias stem cell agency is on the hunt for a new president and CEO after the surprise announcement this week that C. Randal Mills will be departing the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. He will leave at the end of June.

Mills, who has headed the agency for three years, will become the next president and CEO of the National Marrow Donor Program. CIRM is replacing him on an interim basis with Maria Millan, M.D., the agencys vice president of therapeutics.

The state agency will soon begin a search for a permanent replacement, said Jonathan Thomas, CIRMs chairman. Millan is a candidate to fill that position, with Mills strong endorsement.

Mills is noted for reorganizing CIRM to provide greater systemic support for translating basic research into clinical science, and to provide quicker and more helpful responses to researchers seeking funding.

His initiative, called CIRM 2.0, was a response to criticism that the agency, funded with $3 billion in California bond money in 2004, has been too slow in getting treatments to patients.

Agency-supported treatments are now being tested in medical centers throughout the state, including San Diego County. Most prominently, CIRM has established an alpha stem cell clinic at UC San Diego. It is the cell therapy arm of UCSDs Sanford Stem Cell Clinical Center.

Mills said he decided to leave because the National Marrow Donor Program, which he was familiar with, resonated with his own goals of making personal connections with patients.

Before joining CIRM in 2014, Mills was president and CEO of Osiris Therapeutics, developer of a pediatric stem cell drug called Prochymal, used to treat a complication of bone marrow transplants called graft vs. host disease.

If you look at my office, the walls are covered with pictures of the children that we treated who went through bone marrow transplantation, Mills said. Getting to know them, and getting to know their families that had a tremendous effect.

The unexpected announcement drew surprise and concern from stem cell researchers and observers. As admirers of CIRM 2.0, they expressed uncertainty about what direction the agency would take. And with the $3 billion beginning to run out, looking for a new source of funding will be a top concern of Mills successor.

Confidence

But Mills said Wednesday the agency will do well.

If me leaving CIRM is a problem, then I didnt do a good job at CIRM, Mills said. Whether its because Im going to be the head of the National Marrow Donor Program or I get hit by a car, the success of this organization, or any organization thats healthy and functional, should never pivot on one person, Mills said. Ive assembled a team at CIRM that I have absolute, absolute confidence in.

Mills said he would be surprised if Millan didnt turn out to be the agency boards overwhelming choice to be his permanent successor. She assisted in developing the agencys strategic plan and helped it run smoothly, he said.

In 2015, Mills named Millan as senior director of medical affairs and stem cell centers, one of three appointments to CIRMs leadership team. Before joining CIRM, she was vice president and acting chief medical officer at StemCells, Inc. Before that, Millan was director of the Pediatric Liver and Kidney Transplant Program at Stanford University School of Medicine.

Millan said the agencys strategic plan is working, and taking the agency where it needs to go. That plan was developed to guide researchers, doctors and companies over the predictable hurdles they encounter in translating basic research into therapies testable in the clinic and that companies would want to commercialize.

Weve already done the challenging piece of identifying the how how to get to the mission, which is to accelerate these stem cell treatments to those with unmet medical needs, Millan said. Team members are all aligned in accomplishing these goals One cant help but be more energized and motivated to execute on the strategic plan.

About 30 stem cell clinical trials are under way that the agency has funded at one stage or another in research and development.

Jonathan Thomas, the CIRM chairman, said Mills has done what he promised when joining CIRM, and the agency is operating markedly better, in productivity, speed and efficiency.

He has made it, through CIRM 2.0 and beyond, a humming machine that is operating on all cylinders, Thomas said. In doing that, hes worked extensively and highly collaboratively with Maria (Millan) and the rest of the team. That has made CIRM an even better operation than it ever was. So we are in extremely good shape right now to go forward.

Goals accomplished

Jeanne Loring, a CIRM-funded stem cell scientist at The Scripps Research Institute, said Mills made the agency friendlier and more predictable for the scientists it funds.

The first and most dramatic thing he did was to end the process of independent grants, Loring said. Under that process, each grant proposal was considered on its own, with no consideration for success under a previous grant for an earlier stage of the research.

It was always very troubling to people, I think, that they could do very well with CIRM money on an early-stage grant, and that would earn them nothing in a further application to continue the work, Loring said.

As part of CIRM 2.0, Mills emphasized that once projects were accepted for funding, CIRM would become a partner with the scientists to help them accelerate research and development, and ultimately commercialization.

Loring leads a team researching the use of stem cells for Parkinsons therapy. The cells are collected from the patients to be treated, making them a genetic match. They are then genetically reprogrammed to resemble embryonic stem cells, and then matured into the brain cells destroyed in Parkinsons.

Lorings team was awarded $2.4 million in 2016 from CIRM to advance its research. A next-stage grant to translate the research to a clinically ready approach would need about $7 million, Loring said. The work is part of Summit for Stem Cell, a nonprofit alliance of scientists, doctors, patients and Parkinsons disease community supporters.

Veteran stem cell watcher David Jensen praised Mills on his blog, California Stem Cell Report.

"Dr. Mills made substantial contributions to the agency during his tenure, improving both efficiency of the grant making process and transparency of CIRM's operations, Jensen quoted stem cell observer John M. Simpson of Consumer Watchdog as saying.

Simpson added that as CIRM draws down the rest of its $3 billion with no new funding in sight, its not surprising that Mills would accept another job.

Paul Knoepfler, a CIRM-funded stem cell scientist and blogger, wrote Tuesday that Mills had a big positive impact on CIRM and helped it go to the next level.

About the only thing I wasnt a fan of in terms of his leadership was my perception of his negativity toward the FDA and toward FDA oversight of stem cells, and how that manifested at CIRM during his time there, Knoepfler wrote. But good people can strongly disagree on policy.

bradley.fikes@sduniontribune.com

(619) 293-1020

Read the original post:
Amid uncertain future, state's stem cell agency loses transformational leader - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Scientists turn human induced pluripotent stem cells into lung cells … – Science Daily


Science Daily
Scientists turn human induced pluripotent stem cells into lung cells ...
Science Daily
Scientists have announced two major findings that further our understanding of how stem cells become organs: the ability to grow and purify the earliest lung ...

and more »

Read the original here:
Scientists turn human induced pluripotent stem cells into lung cells ... - Science Daily

RoosterBio Launches the Regenerative Medicine Industry’s First Xeno-Free hMSC Cell Banks to Advance and Simplify … – PR Web (press release)

Frederick, Maryland (PRWEB) May 04, 2017

At a CAGR of 23.2% and estimated revenue of $68B by 2020, the Regenerative Medicine (RM) industry continues to call for new tools designed to accelerate this aggressive growth. Based on strong RM market demand, RoosterBio Inc today announces the launch of xeno-free (XF) human bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (hMSC) products.

The RoosterVial-XF line of products are cryopreserved human bone marrow-derived MSCs, designed to serve as manufacturing starting materials, and are offered in various high volume formats, including 1, 10 and 50 million cells per vial. These first-in-class xeno-free hMSC cell bank product offerings expand RoosterBios development grade product portfolio and are complementary to RoosterBios other industry-leading stem cell bioprocessing systems.

First generation cell therapies traditionally relied on bovine serum in their manufacturing processes. As the industry evolves, the market is seeking more sophisticated XF tools and processes. RoosterBio is bringing these XF design requirements into its biomanufacturing product configurations with the goal of reducing regulatory burden and enhancing the long-term safety profile of cell-based therapies. By incorporating XF starting materials at early stages of product development, RM scientists can perform more clinically relevant work, resulting in an expedited path towards clinical testing programs.

Jon A Rowley, RoosterBios Chief Technology Officer, states, Were very excited to launch this product line, particularly as it relates to advancing the RM industry. Last year, we launched XF bioprocess media, and now were introducing the XF cell banks to complete the system. Together, these products give our customers all the tools they need to develop their RM products, whether they are developing cellular therapies, cell-based gene therapies, hMSC-derived exosomes, or bioprinted engineered tissues.

The release of these products reinforces RoosterBios ongoing mission to support the acceleration of the Regenerative Medicine industry.

To learn more about RoosterBio Inc., please contact us at +1 301-360-3545 or info(at)roosterbio(dot)com.

About RoosterBio, Inc.: RoosterBio, Inc. is a privately held stem cell tools and technology company focused on accelerating the development of a sustainable regenerative medicine industry, one customer at a time. RoosterBios products are high volume, affordable, and well-characterized adult human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hMSCs) paired with highly engineered media systems. RoosterBio has simplified and standardized how stem cells are purchased, expanded, and used in development, leading to marked time and costs savings for customers. RoosterBios innovative products are ushering in a new era of productivity and standardization into the field, accelerating the road to discovery in Regenerative Medicine. For more information on RoosterBio and adult stem cells, please visit http://www.roosterbio.com, follow on twitter (@RoosterBio), or read our corporate blog (http://www.roosterbio.blogspot.com).

Share article on social media or email:

Read more from the original source:
RoosterBio Launches the Regenerative Medicine Industry's First Xeno-Free hMSC Cell Banks to Advance and Simplify ... - PR Web (press release)

Cellular Biomedicine Group: A Transpacific Cell Therapy Company – Investing.com

Cellular Biomedicine Group (NASDAQ:) has seven preclinical CAR-T programs and two Phase I clinical trials using its CD19 CAR-T therapy in China, making it the only US-traded CAR-T company in this market. It has rights to the Dendristim lung cancer vaccine. In addition, it is adapting its osteoarthritis (OA) treatment ReJoin as an allogeneic product, AlloJoin, which will be developed in the US after an IND in 2017 or 2018.

Chinese CAR-T trials ongoing

The company has two ongoing Phase I studies using its CD19 CAR-T therapy for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). None of the major CAR-T developers currently running trials in the US and Europe have initiated studies in China, positioning CBMG as an early entrant into the market. Data are expected for the trials in Q417.

AlloJoin: Off-the-shelf OA cell therapy

AlloJoin is a cell line derived from human adipose-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. The companys autologous version of these cells (ReJoin) previously showed improvement in cartilage growth (p=0.007) in patients with knee OA in an early clinical trial. CBMG is developing AlloJoin as an off-the-shelf version of this product and received a grant of $2.29m from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine to support US development. The interim results from the Phase I trial (n=18) reported no serious adverse events and the most common adverse events were pain (77%) and swelling (52%). The trial is expected to be complete in Q317.

Chinese GMP cell production

One of the unique strengths of the company is its efficient manufacturing. It has three GMP-certified facilities in China, with significantly improved production costs compared to US facilities. CBMG estimates it can provide 10,000 doses of cells per year for the Chinese market (export of human cells from China is highly restricted). This capacity has recently attracted a partnership with GE Healthcare Life Science China to develop control processes for cell manufacturing.

To read the entire report Please click on the pdf File Below

Visit link:
Cellular Biomedicine Group: A Transpacific Cell Therapy Company - Investing.com

GARM Now Offering Elite Athletes Stem Cell Treatment with US Olympic Orthopedic Surgeon – Benzinga

Global Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, known as GARM, is now offering stem cell therapy for elite athletes with a US Olympic orthopedic surgeon Glenn Terry MD. The treatments are being offered in the Caribbean with extremely high cell counts for the highest effectiveness.

Roatan, Honduras (PRWEB) May 04, 2017

Global Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, known as GARM, is now offering stem cell therapy for elite athletes with US Olympics doctor Glenn Terry MD. The treatments are being offered in the Caribbean with extremely high cell counts for the highest effectiveness. Call (877) 737-0441 for more information and scheduling.

Regenerative medicine treatment at GARM is performed with one's own adipose tissue. The tissue is rich with stem cells, and with processing amounts to well over 500 million stem cells per treatment. Board Certified expert Dr. Glenn Terry provides the treatments along with Dr. James Andrews.

Dr. Terry and Dr. Andrews are virtually household names in the US, having provided treatments for innumerable athletes in the NFL, MLB, NBA, WWE, PGA, NCAA and many Olympic athletes. Dr. Andrews has been featured in USA Today, HBO, ESPN, all the national networks and has trained hundreds of expert orthopedic surgeons. Dr. Terry was the Head US Olympic Physician for several games, and co-founded the venerable Hughston Sports Medicine Clinic in Georgia.

The adipose SVF stem cell treatments are performed in one setting. Over 500 million stem cell counts are achieved with the treatments, and culturing is not necessary. The therapy works exceptionally well for joint arthritis, knee meniscal tears, degenerative disc disease, ligament sprains, rotator cuff injuries and other sports injuries. Even sports specific injuries like turf toe and throwing overuse injuries respond amazingly well.

GARM is currently offering a complimentary phone consultation and MRI review. Direct flights are available to Roatan from several US cities including Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, NYC, Toronto and Montreal. Call (877) 737-0441 for more information and scheduling.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/stem-cell-therapy/elite-athletes/prweb14274741.htm

Link:
GARM Now Offering Elite Athletes Stem Cell Treatment with US Olympic Orthopedic Surgeon - Benzinga

California Today: Waiting on the Promise of Stem Cells – New York Times


New York Times
California Today: Waiting on the Promise of Stem Cells
New York Times
In 2004, voters approved Proposition 71, a bond measure amounting to $6 billion with interest, which created a stem cell agency to help fund research. It was in part a response to limits on federal funding for stem cell research imposed by the ...

Excerpt from:
California Today: Waiting on the Promise of Stem Cells - New York Times

Scientists Want to Grow Your Music-Blasted Ears Some New Parts – Gizmodo

Ear organoid with hair cells in blue. Image: Indiana University School of Medicine

Hearing loss can be inevitable for some older folks, as well as for their music blasting, phone screen-staring grandchildren. Naturally, many of those whove lost their hearing are keen on getting it back, somehow, with things like hearing aids and cochlear implants.

But what if your doctor could just turn some of your own bodys cells back into sound-sensing hair cells, and transplant them right back into your head?

A team of scientists at Indiana University might be getting closer to that future, using pluripotent stem cells, cells from the body that can be turned back into blank slate cells. The researchers were able to use these cells to create functioning pieces of the inner ear, chock full of hair cells and neurons. True stem cell hearing loss treatment is a long way off, but the result is, as far as they can tell, the first time anyones created hair cells from human pluripotent stem cells. So, a step in that direction.

Its exciting, study co-authors Jeffrey Holttold Gizmodo If were going to use these approaches in the clinic well want to start with human stem cell tissue.

Hearing loss can come from damage to elongated hair cells inside the ear that help with detecting sounds and relaying them to your brain. While some animals regenerate them, humans dont, and we can damage them from loud noises and aging.Scientists have been looking for methods like stem cells and gene therapies to repair them.

For their new study, the researchers started with human stem cells, arranged them in a sort of organic gel matrix like chunks of fruit in Jell-O, and tagged them with a fluorescent gene that would produce a glowing signature if theyd successfully produced certain cell types. They turned the stem cells into little pieces of inner ear by applying proteins at just the right time in a step-by-step process, and after a few weeks of tending to their cellular masses, were able to demonstrate that the little globs had developed into part of an ear. That included hair cells that both looked and acted properly, as well as neurons that send sound signals to the brain, according to results published yesterday in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

If you apply these signals at the wrong time you can potentially generate a brain instead of an inner ear, study author Karl Koehler told Gizmodo. The real breakthrough is that we figured out the exact timing to do each one of these [protein] treatments.

The researchers didnt implant the cells into a human patient or anything, but they still took a hugely important step. The idea, to be able to one day take a tube of blood and make your hair cells and implant is really exciting. I think its the future, Eric Topol, Founder and Director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in California who was not involved in the study, told Gizmodo. Its a biological remedy to hearing loss.

It will take a long time to actually get to the transplanting stage, warned Holt and Koehler, and its been slow going. Other studies have used mouse cells or have been very preliminary, said Koehler. Its difficult to say whether or not well be able to use stem cell-derived cells to rebuild the inner ear.

Plus, these kinds of discussions always come along with ethical concerns. The World Health Organization suggests that over half of the worlds cases of deafness are preventable. Still, theres an entire American Deaf culture and identity that could be forgotten when we do research like this. Not all deaf people want to regain their hearing, according to reporting done by The Atlantic. I reached out to the National Association of the Deaf whose bioethics committee is looking at the paper, but does not have a response at this time.

Even if treatments like this are a long way off, growing these cells could be important for research, says Holtmainly to continue doing experiments. Its hard to get human inner ear hair cells otherwise. We cant get them from the patients and most people dont want to give up an ear for our experiments.

[Nature Biotechnology]

Read the original:
Scientists Want to Grow Your Music-Blasted Ears Some New Parts - Gizmodo

Stem cells were one of the biggest controversies of 2001. Where are they now? – Vox

Remember stem cells? They were one of the biggest scientific controversies during the early years of George W. Bushs presidency.

At the time, scientists had realized thatembryonic stem cells had the incredible capacity to transform into virtually any cell in the human body and so could potentially lead to new treatments or cures for a multitude of illnesses. On the other hand, extracting these stem cells required destroying human embryos, an action opposed by some pro-life individuals.

EMBRYONIC stem-cell THERAPIES ARE GETTING TESTED IN ACTUAL PATIENTS

The stem-cell debate got really heated. But then ... it just sort of fizzled out from public view. So whatever happened to stem cells?

A couple of things helped lessen the controversy. By the late 2000s, researchers discovered other ways to createcells similar to embryonic stem cells without destroying human embryos, a promising advance that helped defuse the culture-war aspect. Then, in 2009, Obama somewhat loosened the Bush-era restrictions on federal funding for stem-cell research and thecompromise seemed to quiet both sides down a fair amount.

So, lately, scientists have been patiently continuing their stem-cell research in a less noisy atmosphere. And that work has actually led to a few advances like restoring some sight in 10 patients with vision diseases. But the stem-cell controversy is far from dead. Researchers still might need cells from embryos to create certain treatments. If it turns out that non-embryonic stem cells aren't good enough, that could re-ignite the culture wars. So here's a guide to the debate:

Shinya Yamanaka (right) receiving flowers from Sweden's ambassador to Japan in 2012, after it was announced that Yamanaka won a Nobel Prize in medicine. (Jiji Press/AFP/Getty Images)

Embryonic stem cells attracted scientific attention because they have the potential to grow into virtually any cell in the human body say, insulin-producing cells for people with diabetes, brain cells for people with Parkinsons, or even wholenew organs to replace faulty ones.

But for many people, there was one huge ethical problem: creating them required destroying an embryo. That's why, in 2001,George W. Bush decided to limit federal funding of research to a list of 60 pre-existing embryonic stem-cell lines (so as to discourage the destruction of any more embryos). Many scientists viewed the rules as too strict. Hence the controversy.

Obama SOMEWHAT relaxed Bushs restrictions on embryonic stem cells

But then in 2007, Japanese scientistShinya Yamanaka and his colleagues managed to coax cells from adult humans into embryo-like flexibility. In other words, they were able to create cells that seemed to resemble embryonic stem cells but that didn't require destroying an embryo. (These new cells were named induced pluripotent stem cells, IPSCs.) Other researchers began finding that adult stem cells have similar, but more limited, properties, too.

Meanwhile, the politics shifted. In 2009, Barack Obama came into office and signed anexecutive order that somewhat relaxed Bushs restrictions on embryonic stem cells. Under the new rules, the federal government would fund work on new stem-cell lines, but only if they had been made from leftover embryos from fertility clinics andwith non-federal money. That compromise seemed tohelp thecontroversy settledown.

A figure of visual ability after an embryonic-stem-cell-derived treatment (red line) in patients with macular degeneration over the course of 360 days. (Schwartz et al., The Lancet, October 15, 2014)

While the controversy has calmed down, stem-cell research is taking off and scientists are making advances with both embryonic and non-embryonic cells.

Much of the initial research on stem-cell therapies has focused on eye treatments. (That's because stem-cell therapies can be unpredictable and have sometimes lead to tumors in previous experiments. A tumor in an eye would be relatively easier to deal with and remove than tumors hidden deeper inside the body.)

In October 2014, researchers from the company Advanced Cell Technology (now called Ocata Therapeutics)showed that they had created new retina cells from embryonic stem cells for 18 patients who were going blind. Afterward, 10 of them had improved eyesight. Another group of researchers in Japan is trying to do the same thing with non-embryonic cells (those aforementioned IPSCs).

10 PEOPLE WHO WERE GOING BLIND HAD Improved eyesight AFTER EMBRYONIC STEM-CELL THERAPY

Other embryonic stem-cell research has focused on developing cells that can help treat spinal-cord injuries. A company called Geron startedsafety tests in such patients in 2010.

Although a few groups are continuing to work on embryonic stem cells, many are now focusing on non-embryonic stem cells like IPSCs because they're less contentious. "Everyone jumped very, very quickly on the IPS[C] bandwagon because it was eligible for federal funding, and then also any of the controversy [regarding embryos] was dropped," says Susan Solomon, CEO of the nonprofit New York Stem Cell Foundation.

But Solomon also thinks researchers have moved away from embryonic stem cells too quickly. "We felt that it was way too early to do that," she adds. Her organization still studies embryonic stem cells, among others in part because they may be able to do things that non-embryonic stem cells can't. It's just too early to tell.

It's important to note that despite all the overhype over the years, stem-cell science has been moving at the same slow pace as most scientific fields. There are still no FDA-approved treatments that use either embryonic stem cells or IPSCs. And that means that controversy over whether embryonic stem cells are needed for science and medicine is still unresolved.

(Shutterstock)

That said, the fight over stem cells hasn't gone away forever. And there's likely to be more conflict in the future.

Even after the Obama administration relaxed the rules on funding stem-cell research, there are still plenty of hurdles. For example, federal funding is currently prohibited for research on embryonic stem-cell lines made through a technique calledSCNT or cloning, which requires creating embryos in the lab.

This technique could one day prove useful because it can turn a person's own cells into a customized embryonic stem-cell line and would therefore stop people's immune systems from rejecting stem-cell treatments.

In 2013 and 2014, two groups published the firstdemonstrations of this technique with human cells. But all such research in the US must be done with private funds.

On top of all of this, some states directly ban some or all stem-cell research within their borders no matter who's paying for it:

Note: Minnesota has a vague law on the books that's currently interpreted to mean that embryonic stem-cell research is ok. Missouri's law is a bit self-conflicting. For more details, check out The Hinxton Group's site, which includes quotations from the relevant regulations themselves.

"We went from more of a legislative vacuum to our current patchwork quilt, with legislation enacted in all of the jurisdictions where interest groups had enough clout to get the job done," Alan Regenberg, Director of Outreach and Research Support at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, told me in an email.

Several things could bring the stem-cell fight back. For example, a clinical trial could come out with some really impressive results on some sort of stem-cell treatment renewing the debate over whether regulations should be loosened. Conversely, a social conservative could run for president and bring up the ethical issues on the campaign trail. And no matter who lands in the White House in 2016, its reasonable to expect some major changes in federal policy and fast. Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama implemented their rules within the first year in office.

In 2013, Obama's stem-cell policy survived Supreme Court case Sherley v. Sebelius.

A piece on the first embryonic stem-cellmedical trials in people, by Sarah Boseley at the Guardian

Update: Clarified the current interpretation of Minnesota's stem cell laws and changed the map to match.

More:
Stem cells were one of the biggest controversies of 2001. Where are they now? - Vox

Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market Analysis and Growth Forecast by Applications, Types and Competitors to … – DailyNewsKs

Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market research report is a professional and in-depth study on the current state. The Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Industry analysis is provided for the international market including development history, competitive landscape analysis, and major regional development status.

Browse more detail information about Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market at:http://www.360marketupdates.com/10613660

Next part of the Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market sheds light on the production, production plants, their capacities, global production and revenue are studied. Also, the Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market growth in various regions and R&D status are also covered.

Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market report key players-Astellas Pharma Inc/ Ocata Therapeutics, STEMCELL Technologies, BIOTIME, INC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, CellGenix, ESI BIO, PromoCell, Lonza, Kite Pharma, Cynata, Sumanas, LifeCell, Geron And Many Others

Get Sample PDF of report@ http://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/request-sample/10613660

Further in the report, Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market is examined for price, cost and gross revenue. These three points are analysed for types, companies and regions. In prolongation with this data sale price for various types, applications and region is also included.

Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market split by Product Type-Adult Sources, Fetal Sources Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market split by Application Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Biology Research, Tissue Engineering, Toxicology Testing Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market Segment by Regions-North America, China, Europe, Southeast Asia, Japan, India

With the help of supply and consumption data, gap between these two is also explained. To provide information on competitive landscape, this report includes detailed profiles of Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market key players.

Have any query? Ask our expert @ http://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/10613660

Other Major Topics Covered in Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) market report are as follows:

Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders: Marketing Channel, Direct Marketing, Indirect Marketing, Marketing Channel Development Trend, Market Positioning, Pricing Strategy, Brand Strategy, Target Client, Distributors/Traders List. Market Effect Factors Analysis: Technology Progress/Risk; Substitutes Threat; Technology Progress in Related Industry; Consumer Needs/Customer; reference Change; Economic/Political Environmental Change. Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market Forecast 2017-2021: Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Capacity, Production, Revenue Forecast 2017-2021; Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Production, Consumption Forecast by Regions 2017-2021; Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Production Forecast by Type 2017-2021; Global Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Consumption Forecast by Application 2017-2021; Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Price Forecast 2017-2021.

In this Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market analysis, traders and distributors analysis is given along with contact details. For material and equipment suppliers also, contact details are given. New investment feasibility analysis is included in the report.

Continue reading here:
Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC) Market Analysis and Growth Forecast by Applications, Types and Competitors to ... - DailyNewsKs

Beta Cell Growth Finding May Lead to Improved Therapies for Diabetics – Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (press release)

Scientists at theUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine usedsingle-cell RNA sequencing to map out pathways that regulate cell growth that could be exploited to trick them to regenerate.

Pancreatic cells help maintain normal blood glucose levels by producing insulin, the master regulator of energy (glucose). Impairment and the loss of cells interrupts insulin production, leading to types 1 and 2 diabetes.The team's study ("Pseudotemporal Ordering of Single Cells Reveals Metabolic Control of Postnatal Cell Proliferation") is published in Cell Metabolism.

"If we can find a drug that makes cells grow, it could improve blood sugar levels in people with diabetes," said Maike Sander, M.D., professor in the Department of Pediatrics and Cellular and Molecular Medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine. "These people often have residual cells, but not enough to maintain normal blood glucose levels."

The body generates cells in utero and they continue to regenerate after birth. But as people age, cell regeneration diminishes. The predominant way to grow new cells is through cell division; but cells capable of dividing are rare, compromising less than 1% of all cells. Scientists have been investigating molecular pathways that govern cell growth in hopes of finding new therapies that would help people regain blood glucose control after the onset of diabetes.

In their work, Dr. Sander's team identified the pathways that are active when cells divide, providing insight into possible drug targets. The investigators were able to profile molecular features and metabolic activity of individual cells to determine how dividing cells differ from nondividing cells.

"No one has been able to do this analysis because the 1% or less of cells that are dividing are masked by the 99% percent of cells that are not dividing," said Dr. Sander. "This in-depth characterization of individual cells in different proliferative states was enabled by newer technology. It provides a better picture of what sends cells into cell division and clues we can use to try to develop drugs to stimulate certain pathways."

Whether stimulating cells to grow will result in therapeutic interventions for diabetes is still to be seen, but this new information opens the door to find out, she added.

Originally posted here:
Beta Cell Growth Finding May Lead to Improved Therapies for Diabetics - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (press release)