Want more stem cells and a higher pain tolerance? Try shocking yourself. – Men’s Fitness


Men's Fitness
Want more stem cells and a higher pain tolerance? Try shocking yourself.
Men's Fitness
In turn, the hypothalamus directs outgoing signals to stem cell niches resulting in their release, said study co-author Fletcher White, Ph.D., a neuroscientist at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center in Indianapolis. The researchers found that ...

Continue reading here:
Want more stem cells and a higher pain tolerance? Try shocking yourself. - Men's Fitness

Sunrise stem cell clinic behind blindness cases is largely unregulated – Sun Sentinel

U.S. Stem Cell Clinic is in the spotlight after three patients reportedly lost their eyesight following procedures here.

The Sunrise facility offers stem cell treatments for a range of diseases and chronic disorders and yet it has no medical facility license.

Heres what you might not know: It doesnt need one.

The facility falls under a regulatory loophole. Regulators with Floridas Agency for Health Care Administration, which licenses health care facilities like hospitals and rehabilitation clinics, say they have no authority over stem cell operations. Neither does the Florida Department of Health, which only has regulatory power over personnel like licensed doctors and nurses working in these facilities.

Both state agencies say that authority lies with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Yet even here, guidelines for adipose stem cells (harvested from the clients themselves) are unclear.

The FDA could not discuss whether U.S. Stem Cell has faced or could face a potential investigation, spokeswoman Andrea Fischer said. She said the agency is working on guidelines that will clarify how human cells, tissues and products based on them should be regulated. The agency also been posting consumer warnings for years alerting patients to ask if theyre going to be part of an FDA-regulated clinical study.

We really dont know what standards these [clinics] have to conform to, said Dr. Thomas Albini, an associate professor of clinical ophthalmology at the University of Miamis Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. He recently co-authored a report in the New England Journal of Medicine about the U.S. Stem Cell cases.

If someone were licensed, that license would be on the line, he said.

There were no sanctions against the private, for-profit clinic after three women, in their 70s and 80s, lost their sight in 2015 following procedures where they had fat cells liposuctioned out of their belly area and injected into both of their eyes. The women had macular degeneration, a common disorder which eventually leads to blindness. They each paid $5,000 for the procedure.

Two traveled from out of state, and one came from Floridas west coast. At least two went to U.S. Stem Cell because of clinical trials listed on clinicaltrials.gov, a database managed by the National Institutes of Health, said Albini, who along with a Bascom Palmer colleague treated two of the patients shortly after their clinic visits. Their complications included detached retinas, optic nerve damage and eye hemorrhages.

The clinicaltrials.gov posting now says the study was withdrawn prior to enrollment.

On its website, the Sunrise facility says its team of medical researchers and practitioners can draw stem cells from their clients own fat tissue and reinject them into their bodies. There, the cells regenerative power can beat back medical disorders like Parkinsons, congestive heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis, according to the company.

In a written statement, the company, originally called Bioheart, said neither the clinic nor its affiliate, U.S. Stem Cell Inc., is currently treating eye patients.

Since 2001, our clinics have successfully conducted more than 7,000 stem cell procedures with less than 0.01% adverse reactions reported, the statement said. We are unable to comment further on specific cases due to patient confidentiality or legal confidentiality obligations.

The company declined to produce published papers about its research or any trials it had conducted.

Albini questions whether a true trial ever existed. Typically, participants of a clinical trial dont pay for treatment and continue to be monitored through followup appointments. Neither was the case for the three women who went to U.S. Stem Cell Clinic, Albini said.

He also said no legitimate researcher would do an experimental procedure, with no clinical track record, on both of a patients eyes, risking blindness. These people were way out of their league, he said.

Two of the women sued for negligence, failure to warn, and allegations regarding how the product manufactured from their own bodies was defective. Both settled, and their cases were dismissed. Attorneys for U.S. Stem Cell argued that the cases, as filed, involved medical negligence and, as such, needed to be refiled to conform with state law, according to court records.

Attorney Benjamin Bedard, who handled both dismissal filings, could not be reached for comment.

Albini said the FDA had him speak at a workshop in September regarding its concerns about experimental, unlicensed stem cell clinics.

My understanding is its a billion-dollar industry already, he said. We dont have great treatments for people with these conditions. There are people who want tomorrows medicines today and are willing to pay for it.

Staff researcher Barbara Hijek contributed to this report.

dlade@sunsentinel.com or 954-356-4295

Go here to read the rest:
Sunrise stem cell clinic behind blindness cases is largely unregulated - Sun Sentinel

Medicine | Encyclopedia.com

hemoglobin. Wikimedia Commons (Reytan, GFDL)

nervous system. Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)

heart. Wikimedia Commons (Ewen, CC)

The history of medicine can be traced back as far as Neolithic man, but our understanding of medicine began with the Sumerians. Our knowledge of anatomy began with the Greeks, but truly took hold during the Middle Ages. Modern medicine can be traced back to discoveries made in the 17th century. Thats when William Harvey demonstrated the circulation of blood in the body, quinine was used to treat ... Readmore

The genome project is also helping us understand disease and the human body on a genetic level and led to genetic engineering, which is used to develop pharmaceuticals and new approaches to cancer treatment.

Modern medicine also has given us pharmacology, allowing medical professionals to treat a host of diseases. From acetaminophen, which can treat a headache, to immunosuppressive drugs, which aid in organ transplantation, this growing field offers a multitude of new and effective drugs.

Psychology and psychiatry have also changed much since these sciences first began. People with disorders were often cast away from society or, later, placed in asylums and not treated. Today, psychiatry involves the treatment of many disorders and can involve both physiological and psychological treatments.

See more here:
Medicine | Encyclopedia.com

Plasma and stem cells: The future of regenerative medicine | WEAR – WEAR

Plasma and stem cells: The future of regenerative medicine

Blood platelet injections and stem cell treatments may sound like the future, but physicians at the Andrews Institute are already practicing these forms of regenerative medicine.

Weight lifting mixed with normal wear and tear left Howie Webber in constant pain.

"I probably felt it about four months ago," said Howie. "I did some stretching, thinking I could make it go away, but it just continued to get worse."

That's when Howie went to the doctor and found out he had two options: surgery or regenerative medicine; he picked the latter.

"I just added up the amount of time I'd be out of work and the cost of surgery, plus the copay and this whole thing just seemed like it would be a little faster and a little easier, and it ended up being just that," said Howie.

Physicians at the Andrew's Institute currently offer two different types of regenerative medicine, platelet rich plasma, or PRP and bone marrow aspirate concentrate, or BMAC.

With PRP, physicians take the patient's blood, separate the platelets and inject those platelets back into the patient at the site of injury. The idea is that platelets carry growth factors and molecules to stimulate the healing process.

BMAC utilizes platelets too, but also the patient's bone marrow harvested from the pelvis.

Both regenerative medicine methods have benefits, perhaps the biggest according to Dr. Brett Kindle, is avoiding invasive surgeries.

"If we need surgery, we need surgery, and that's what it is, but if we can avoid it, that often times is very beneficial from a financial standpoint, missing less work, etc.," said Dr. Kindle. "Also from a quality of life, to be able to get back to doing activities in a more timely manner."

The main difference between the two is price and neither are covered by insurance. BMAC costs upwards of $3,000, while PRP costs anywhere from $600 to $800. Howie opted for PRP.

"It hurt for about three days, then within a week I was pain free," said Howie. "Maybe a little discomfort that you would expect, but it wasn't near as bad as it was before."

Howie's issue was with his hamstrings, but Dr. Kindle said both PRP and BMAC can be used to treat a variety of aches and pains.

"Anything in the limbs," said Dr. Kindle. "Shoulders, elbows, hands, wrists, hips, knees, foot, ankle, all of those areas."

Recovery for both PRP and BMAC procedures is typically one to two weeks. Full effects of the injections don't usually kick in until six to eight weeks later. For more information about regenerative medicine or to schedule a consultation with an Andrews Institute physician, call (850) 916-8700.

More:
Plasma and stem cells: The future of regenerative medicine | WEAR - WEAR

Three-pronged approach is key to precision medicine – Medical Xpress

March 23, 2017 by Joseph Bonner

Combining genetic information from a patient's tumor cells with three-dimensional cell cultures grown from these tumors and rapidly screening approved drugs can identify the best treatment approaches in patients for whom multiple therapies have failed, according to a new study led by Weill Cornell Medicine investigators.

Published March 22 in Cancer Discovery, the study brings researchers one step closer to fulfilling the promise of precision medicine, which aims to provide targeted, individualized treatment based on each patient's genetic profile.

"Our goal is to use precision medicine to improve the way clinicians think about cancer therapies as opposed to selecting a therapy that may not be fitted to that patient's cancer," said senior author Dr. Mark Rubin, director of the Englander Institute for Precision Medicine and the Homer T. Hirst III Professor of Oncology in Pathology at Weill Cornell Medicine, and director of the joint precision medicine program at Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center. "Combining genome sequencing with rapid drug screening enables us to nominate new therapies for patients, which we could not have predicted from the genomics alone."

Cancer genetics research has made great strides in the last 20 years, allowing investigators to now identify mutations in tumor cells that are susceptible to treatment. Still, a significant number of cases remain in which genetic mutations cannot indicate to clinicians exactly what drug will be effective in treating a patient's disease, particularly for those with advanced cancers that have failed multiple therapies.

To better treat these patients, Rubin and the research team including co-first authors Dr. Chantal Pauli, a former research fellow in Rubin's lab, and Benjamin Hopkins, a postdoctoral associate in co-author Dr. Lewis C. Cantley's lab developed an approach in which tumor cells taken from patients are grown into three-dimensional cell cultures called tumor-derived organoids. The researchers can then test more than 120 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved cancer drugs against the organoids to determine which drugs show the most promise. After identifying a potential treatment, they transplant the organoid into a mouse to assess how well the tumor responds to the drug. The organoid cell culture system, Rubin said, markedly accelerates the identification of potential therapies compared with current approaches, which depend on growing tumor cells in mice.

"With the organoid system, we can obtain answers in one to two months, compared to six months to a year with mice," Rubin said. "This is critically important for patients with advanced cancer. We need to strive to identify new and more effective therapies in a timely manner."

The video will load shortly

"Dramatic improvements in the ability to grow tumors as organoids outside the body is bringing precision medicine to the next level of precision," added Cantley, the Meyer Director of the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. "It is now possible to grow a wide variety of tumors outside of the body; this allows the precision medicine team to not only obtain full exome and RNA sequencing data, but also test a panel of approved drugs on the same tumor that is growing in the patient. Importantly, this can occur within a time scale that would allow one to make a clinical decision about the next therapy, should the tumor progress on standard of care.

"This approach could revolutionize how cancers are treated in the future," he said, "by providing oncologists with detailed information about the genetic aberrations, the gene expression profiles and the response to drugs of the same tumor that is growing in the patient."

For the study, researchers analyzed tumor-derived cells from four patients who came to the Englander Institute for care. Two of the patients had different forms of uterine cancer, while the other two had different forms of colon cancer. The scientists identified effective drugs and drug combinations many of which are medications approved for treating other cancers that they subsequently validated using organoid cultures and organoids transplanted into mice.

Specifically, the researchers discovered that the combination of two breast cancer drugs could treat one of the uterine cancer cases. For the other, one of the top treatments was a combination of a breast cancer drug and a lymphoma drug.

The investigators found that a colon cancer drug combined with one approved for metastatic melanoma could treat one of the colon cancer cases; they believe their results could establish a basis for a clinical trial. For the other colon cancer case, the scientists identified a therapy that combines a lung cancer drug with one approved for treating blood cancers such as lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

"At the moment, there is no standard to guide a clinician's decision of when to give a patient a drug that's not recommended by the FDA," Rubin said. "With this study, we're trying to establish a standard that uses a patient's cells to answer that question."

Explore further: Gene mutation found to drive prostate cancer subtype

More information: Chantal Pauli et al. PersonalizedandCancer Models to Guide Precision Medicine, Cancer Discovery (2017). DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1154

A newly discovered genetic mutation that is found in a subtype of prostate cancer is integral to the disease's development and growth, according to research from Weill Cornell Medicine scientists. Their findings could pave ...

Much of precision medicine and cancer care focuses on targeting the genomes of specific tumors or metastases. A Weill Cornell Medical College research team has now shown that a more global look at the body using next-generation ...

The development of a new method to grow three-dimensional organoid cultures of pancreatic tumors directly from patients' surgical tissue offers a promising opportunity for testing targeted therapies and drug responses and ...

Mount Sinai researchers have discovered that a rheumatoid arthritis drug can block a metabolic pathway that occurs in tumors with a common cancer-causing gene mutation, offering a new possible therapy for aggressive cancers ...

Chemotherapy is indicated as the first line of treatment for advanced bladder cancer. New research by Weill Cornell Medicine and University of Trento scientists shows that while chemotherapy kills the most common type of ...

Research led by investigators at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has shown for the first time that organoids derived from human prostate cancer tumors can be grown in the laboratory, giving researchers an exciting ...

Telomeres are regions of repetitive DNA at the end of human chromosomes, which protect the end of the chromosome from damage. Whilst shorter telomeres are hypothesized biological markers of older age and have been linked ...

Combining genetic information from a patient's tumor cells with three-dimensional cell cultures grown from these tumors and rapidly screening approved drugs can identify the best treatment approaches in patients for whom ...

(Medical Xpress)From the time it first comes online during development the nervous system begins to exact precise control over many biologic functions. In some cases, too much control. When it does, a little nerve-squelching ...

For decades, scientists and doctors have looked for ways to stop the damage that viruses cause to humans.

Discovery of the BRCA genetic mutation in the mid-90s represented a breakthrough in breast and ovarian cancer prevention. About 5-10% of breast cancer cases and 10-18% of ovarian cancer cases can be attributed to two BRCA ...

Faced with the negative quality-of-life effects from surgery and radiation treatments for prostate cancer, low risk patients may instead want to consider active surveillance with their physician, according to a study released ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Continue reading here:
Three-pronged approach is key to precision medicine - Medical Xpress

Childhood leukemia cured with genetically engineered T-cell therapy using donor cells – Genetic Literacy Project

Three months after the birth of a child, most parents are worried about getting the baby to sleep through the night or wondering when to start solid food. But Layla Richards parents had bigger concerns. Their daughter suddenly became ill and stopped eating. Thats when doctors discovered that Layla had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). None of the standard treatments worked. Even the heroic treatments couldnt quell her cancer. But parents Lisa and Ashleigh Richards refused to give up. From the Guardian:

Despite several rounds of intensive chemotherapy, Layla still had leukemia cells in her body when the transplant was performed, and seven weeks later the disease returned. Soon after, doctors told the family there were no other treatments that might cure Layla and suggested palliative care. But Laylas parents, Lisa and Ashleigh, insisted that the doctors keep trying. We didnt want to accept palliative care and give up on our daughter, so we asked the doctors to try anything for our daughter, even if it hadnt been tried before, Lisa said.

So doctors at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London gave Layla an experimental treatment that had only been tested in mice. They transfused Layla with genetically engineered immune cells from a female donor. Within 28 days she was cancer free. A second child was also treated a few months later. She also is cancer free. Kristen Brown at Gizmodo details the procedure:

The treatment entailed collecting blood from donors, isolating healthy immune T-cells, and then using a genetic engineering tool known as TALENs to deactivate certain T-cell genes that would normally cause them to be rejected once transplanted into a leukemia patient. The T-cells were also engineered to attack cancer cells directly.

This kind of engineered T-cell immunotherapy has been around for a few years. There are several, small human clinical trials ongoing. One trial was canceled earlier this year because of the deaths of three patients caused by side effects of the treatment. However, these therapies all rely on taking T-cells from the patient, engineering them to attack cancer, and reintroducing them into the patients system. The process is tedious and takes a relatively long time. But the girls in London got their engineered T-cells from a donor. And gene editing was used not just to put cancer-receptors on the T-cells, but also to erase the immunological signature that causes rejection when cells are transplanted from donor to patient. That significantly cuts the work, and potentially the costs, of this kind of treatment, writes Antonio Regalado at Technology Review:

The ready-made approach could pose a challenge to companies including Juno Therapeutics and Novartis, each of which has spent tens of millions of dollars pioneering treatments that require collecting a patients own blood cells, engineering them, and then re-infusing them.In the off-the-shelf approach, blood is collected from a donor and then turned into hundreds of doses that can then be stored frozen, says Smith. We estimate the cost to manufacture a dose would be about $4,000, she says. Thats compared to a cost of around $50,000 to alter a patients cells and return them.

The study also highlights an interesting paradox. T-cell immunotherapy is consideredone of the most advanced forms of precision medicine. Taking an individuals cells, engineering them to fight their specific cancer type then giving them back to the patient are all ways of matching genes to treatment. The safe use of donor cells used to cure these girls could be a back step for precision medicine. The more universal approach worked better in this case. And that begs the question, have we become overly focused on the individualized nature of precision medicine and missed easier, better and cheaper solutions along the way?

The treatment did have some side effects which the doctors described as limited. The second child who was treated developed graft versus host disease. The team did note that the first young patient did indeed have a bad immune reaction to the treatment two months after it took place, but after a round of steroids and some bone marrow transplantation, shes now doing well, IFL Science reported.

The girls will be closely monitoredfor signs that their cancers are returning or that there is some residual side effect of the T-cell treatment. But as of late January 2017, both children remained cancer-free 18 months and 12 months after the treatment.

Meredith Knight is a frequent contributor to the Genetic Literacy Project and freelance science and health writer based in Austin, Texas. Follow her @meremereknight.

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia.

Continued here:
Childhood leukemia cured with genetically engineered T-cell therapy using donor cells - Genetic Literacy Project

American Academy of Ophthalmology Statement on Stem Cell … – PR Newswire (press release)

The Academy has called on both the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to take steps to better ensure public safety associated with treatments outside of FDA-approved clinical trials. Good research is being performed under FDA-approved trials by innovative clinician-scientists and tragedy associated with non-approved use of stem cells threatens the conduct and impact of this high-quality science.

The public and patients canlearn more about stem cells and eye careby visiting the Academy's EyeSmartpublic education website. EyeSmart is the leading online source for ophthalmic information. The content is written and approved by Academy member eye physicians and surgeons.

About the American Academy of OphthalmologyThe American Academy of Ophthalmology is the world's largest association of eye physicians and surgeons. A global community of 32,000 medical doctors, we protect sight and empower lives by setting the standards for ophthalmic education and advocating for our patients and the public. We innovate to advance our profession and to ensure the delivery of the highest-quality eye care. Our EyeSmart program provides the public with the most trusted information about eye health. For more information, visit aao.org.

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-academy-of-ophthalmology-statement-on-stem-cell-therapy-for-treating-eye-disease-300426643.html

SOURCE American Academy of Ophthalmology

http://www.aao.org

Link:
American Academy of Ophthalmology Statement on Stem Cell ... - PR Newswire (press release)

Is Alzheimer’s treatment of injecting stem cells into the brain a breakthrough or quackery? – The Keene Sentinel

IRVINE, Calif. More than eight years after he realized something was wrong, after, as he described it, My brain went ... whats the word? ... Foggy, Jack Sage finally said after several seconds of silently coaxing his synapses to fire.

More than eight years after his brain went foggy, four years after he was diagnosed with Alzheimers disease and two years since he began an innovative and extremely invasive therapy, Sage said he is being flooded by memories that seem new, or, at the very least, feel easier to retrieve. His daughter, Kate, thought Sage had suddenly begun to open up about his past because he knew his time was growing short.

He should not know who I am at this point, Kate said.

His doctor, Christopher Duma, hopes Jack Sage goes down in history as the one-man turning point in the treatment of Alzheimers disease, while others are skeptical about what Duma has done to Sages brain. Everyone agrees that Alzheimers disease is an exploding problem.

According to the Alzheimers Association, more than 5 million Americans are living with the disease, and 1 in 3 seniors die with Alzheimers or another form of dementia.

On a cool recent night, Sage, a handsome, fit, 82-year-old, sat next to his wife Gloria talking about his children (It is significant that Sage remembers their names James, 46, Kate, 50, and Kelly, 56), recalling when he and Gloria moved into the Newport Beach house with a view of the Pacific Ocean (1990), laughing about their first date at the Bel-Air Country Club (1979), recounting his years as a labor negotiator and executive for Del Monte, Allied Chemical and Continental Airlines (1970s and 60s) and going all the way back to the jack hammering he did in the nickel mines in the mid-1950s in Northern Ontario, Canada.

At this point in his illness, his doctor said he should be having more trouble remembering the perilous tunnels of the Sudbury nickel mine.

You drill into the granite, Sage said. You put dynamite in the rock. You dynamite it. Then you shovel out whats left.

And mining, you might say, is what is happening in Jack Sages brain.

Sages series of recollections, including his exploits on the golf course in Indian Wells where he has a second home and plays several days a week flashbacks representing the three main components of long-term memory: semantic (recalling the meaning of words), episodic (recalling autobiographic milestones) and procedural (recalling how to accomplish tasks) prompted a grin from Duma, the brain surgeon who, for $10,000 per treatment and without insurance coverage, cut a hole in the back of Sages head and injected a stem cell serum that had been sucked out of Sages love handles.

Is this the Alzheimers breakthrough the world has been waiting for? Or, is this unproven medical procedure what University of Minnesota bioethicist Leigh Turner calls quackery and flimflam? Is this an unsafe, money-grab it is being conducted outside the approval process of the Food and Drug Administration preying on the most vulnerable among us?

Turner has written extensively and critically about the Cell Surgical Network (CSN), for which Duma, whose home hospital is Hoag in Newport Beach, is listed as a network physician. The CSN promotes the stem cell revolution, which its literature claims, is an appropriate treatment for people suffering from a variety of inflammatory and degenerative conditions in other words, for cancer, diabetes, bad knees and hips as well as multiple uses in cosmetic surgery.

You dont just start dumping things into peoples brains, Turner said. The problem is people may spend a lot of money and find there is no benefit. He (Duma) is exposing people to serious harm. Fat cells dont belong in peoples brains.

Sage is the first patient in Phase I of a clinical study officially called Intracerebroventricular injection of autologous abdominal fat-derived, non-genetically altered stem cells. Sage was the first Alzheimers patient anywhere to have his own liposuctioned cells injected directly into his brain. He has received eight injections (about two months apart) since November 2014.

Duma quickly offers a qualifier. It is far too early to tell if what he has done to Sage will indeed change the world. He said Sage and, later, 19 other patients have not been harmed by the procedure, and that safety is the only criteria in Phase I. Whether the treatment is effective is a question for Phase II, for which Duma is hoping to attract private funding. Also, he wrote a letter to the national Alzheimers Association asking for $700,000 to continue his work. He was instructed to apply officially later this year. If he gets the grant, the fees for his patients would be waived.

Early in the process, Duma is excited by Sages results.

Sages most recent cognition scores have risen from 45 on the 100-point Memory Performance Index in March 2015 to 54 in September 2015. The volume of his hippocampus the memory center of the brain has grown from the fifth percentile before his first treatment to the 28th percentile after his fourth treatment to the 48th percentile after his eighth treatment.

My golf game is getting better, said Sage, who, heart permitting, plays several times per week. Sages brain isnt his only problem. He has a long history of heart ailments that have required the insertion of 12 stents to keep his arteries open.

You cant make a global conclusion based on one patient, but its a huge turning point, Duma said with the confidence of someone who probes brains for a living.

Duma is somewhat of a maverick in the medical world, a brain surgeon who regularly shuns a scalpel for the gamma knife, a futuristic laser for removing brain tumors. He is known outside the operating room for playing keyboards in bands that specialize in 1970s-era covers of groups such as Genesis, Yes and Emerson, Lake and Palmer. As a child, he was a classmate of John F. Kennedy Jr. at The Browning School in New York City. We called him John John, Duma said.

Duma realizes he will face opposition to his stem cell/brain injection therapy. But, as in all breakthroughs, someone has to be first.

I could have harmed people, he said. I took an enormous leap.

Not much hope

Alzheimers patients dont get better.

They get diagnosed, lose their dignity and die.

The speed at which death occurs is the only variable.

In the depressing world of Alzheimers treatment, Sage and Duma represent equal parts hope and skepticism. The Orange County Register contacted universities and research centers across the country, including Stanford, Harvard, Duke, Florida International, UC Davis, and some of the interview requests were denied while other calls were not returned. Very few medical experts want to talk about the combination of stem cells and Alzheimers disease, apparently because they know so little about it.

An Alzheimers patient improving because of therapy? Im hopeful its true. Im hopeful its true for all patients, said Joshua Grill, the co-director of the Memory Impairments Neurological Disorders (MIND) institute at UC Irvine. We are in dire need.

But, Grill continued, One study does not a revolution make. Ive never read anything about this (Dumas work), and I dont know what science is behind it.

Dean Hartley, Director of Science Initiatives at the Alzheimers Association, knew about Dumas work.

This is new territory, Hartley said. But with one patient, No, you cannot say this is a game-changer.

Hartley said many studies fail at the Phase II level, where more and more people are exposed to the therapy.

Still, Hartley said Dumas work is encouraging.

We want to see things like this happen, Hartley said.

Its not as if Duma is conducting his research in secret. He spoke about his study in public forums twice last year Sept. 28 at the Congress of Neurological Surgeons in San Diego, and Oct. 1 at the International Society for Cellular Therapy in Memphis.

Duma said he is nearly finished writing a paper about his work that he hopes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

THE STEM CELL IDEA

In 1993, Christopher Duma was working at Good Samaritan Hospital in Los Angeles when he and his colleagues began injecting stem cells into the brains of patients with Parkinsons disease. They were making some progress, he said, but politics intervened. Some of the stem cells they were using came from aborted fetuses. Pressure from anti-abortion groups shut that program down.

Fifteen years later, Duma was assisting plastic surgeon Michael Elam on a face-lift on a Parkinsons patient when Elam said, We need to talk about stem cells.

Elam introduced Duma to Drs. Mark Berman and Elliot Lander, the founders of the Cell Surgical Network.

Berman and Lander had been separating stem cells from fat by using a centrifuge (which they own the patent for) and injecting them into knees and hips and other places where injuries had occurred. Their work had passed an Institutional Review Board after 1,524 patients were treated with no adverse effects, Berman said.

If you want to repair an injury, Berman said, the best tissue is the stem cell.

In 2013, Duma suggested a new target for stem cell therapy: the brain.

Duma, with Berman, Lander and Elam as co-authors, tried to begin a study of brain/stem cell injections. But their first attempt at Institutional Review Board approval was denied because they hadnt done animal testing. So they got Dr. Oleg Kopyov at Cal State Northridge to conduct tests on rats.

With the help of Kopyovs work, Duma got Institutional Review Board approval. They chose not to take the usual next step FDA approval.

The Institutional Review Board was expecting us to go through the FDA, Lander said. But there are hundreds of obstructions. The FDA approval process usually takes between eight and 12 years, according to the online journal Medscape.com.

Duma said stem cells present a quandary for the FDA because stem cells are not a drug, and theyre not food. Clinics that take stem cells out of the body and put them back in without additives argue that they are exempt from FDA mandates.

We have been harvesting fat from abdomens and putting them in the brain during brain surgeries since the 1920s, Duma said. We do it nearly on every case for pituitary tumors, acoustic and skull base tumors and for conditions of spinal fluid leakage ... since the 1920s. If the FDA ruled that harvested autologous fat cannot be used in the brain, then it would change nearly a century of neurosurgical standard of care.

Someday, Duma said he hopes the FDA will recognize his work.

The work cant wait, he said.

Read this article:
Is Alzheimer's treatment of injecting stem cells into the brain a breakthrough or quackery? - The Keene Sentinel

Wandiligong MS sufferer undergoes stem cell treatment in India – The Border Mail

23 Mar 2017, 4:30 p.m.

A Wandiligong MS sufferer has started treatment she hopes will change her life

LOCKDOWNS, an asthma attackand 17 million stem cells have formed part of a Wandiligong womans ongoing medical experience in India.

Emma Bennett and her mother Gail are now unable to leave Artemis Hospital in Gurgaon for seven days as part of the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Miss Bennett, who has multiple sclerosis, could not access this procedure in Australia and so her family and community raised about $45,000 to make her trip possible.

Ms Bennett said on Thursday her daughter was in her third day of chemotherapy after the medical team retrieved 17 million stem cells earlier this week.

That was good, now they finish the chemo then reintroduce her own cells and hopefully that will go well, she said.

We have had hundreds of messagesfrom home and we have your readers to thank as well for getting us here.

Emmas sister Penny, speaking from her Wangaratta workplace, said the trip encountered a problem when a planned wheelchair on arrival didnt eventuate.

To the familys relief, airline staff provided extra assistance, staying with the pair as they went through customs and security and then helping them find an English-speaking taxi driver.

The day after flying into Delhi, Miss Bennett and her mother visited the Taj Mahal.

That was Emmas one request because when she was younger she used to travel a lot and (MS) put a stop to that, Penny said.

Early in the trip Ms Bennett suffered an asthma attack, possibly brought on by stress and pollution, but the hospital staff cared for her as well as her daughter.

Penny said Miss Bennetts treatment had produced some side effects, such as fever chills and not feeling well.

Nothing has stopped her eating yet, but knowing my sister, nothing will, Penny said with a laugh.

Im probably still very nervous for the next few sections because chemo is a huge thing for anybody, but the doctors are saying its going really well.

They seem like they quite genuinely really care and theyre being really good with her and she seems quite happy, its been good.

Miss Bennetts progress can be followed on the Ems MS Journey Facebook page while donations can still be made at gofundme.com/ems-ms-journey.

More:
Wandiligong MS sufferer undergoes stem cell treatment in India - The Border Mail

The Amazing Power of Stem Cells – Miami’s Community Newspapers

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Two days ago, I read a letter from my colleagues at the American Association of Pain Management Physicians, which reported that as of July 2016 (in the state of Oregon), blockages to control pains were denied coverage by several insurance companies. Instead, the Oregon health authorities have recommended the use of therapeutic massages and acupuncture in lieu of blockages.

This decision is unfortunately no joke, but rather only one of many examples of an oblivious and retrograde type mentality, and basically serves to clearly demonstrate how our great country continues to lose ground every day in the healthcare arena. Regrettably, this antiquated mindset ultimately causes mediocrity to take over many of our medical institutions, under the indifference of many and under the complicity of others.

With all due respect to the ancient art of acupuncture and the technique of therapeutic massages, these treatments are only proven to represent a viable (temporary) alternative for moderate pain control, but never as a true solution to treat any type of chronic pain.

I have spent almost 15 years researching new alternatives for the treatment of chronic and perennial pain. I have explored many treatments from blockages, therapies, pills and injections, to what I now call: The Medical Revolution of the 21st Century: Stem Cells.

If someone would ask me: Why use stem cells? I would explain to them that it is a very effective way to control pain, and is a medical treatment alternative that is basically unparalleled nowadays. These incredibly powerful cells, of which our body is organically armed with from birth, have the important function of regenerating and repairing damaged tissue, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or even age.

For example, last week I met with Berthy, a 65-year-old woman treated with a successful marrow and fat stem cell transplant to treat her severe arthritis related knee pain we conducted about four months ago. During her visit, Berthy recounted that she had recently accompanied her husband to a renowned clinic in South Florida, where the issue of stem cell use had arisen, and the doctor at the medical institution had told her: they only work on patients up to 50 years old. She immediately showed him her knee and told him that at age 67, she was perfectly fine after her recent stem cell transplant. The doctor was astonished, and with a shrug he replied, they must know more and have more experience than we do in that area. Berthy is currently arranging a trip with her husband to travel to Asia and realize their dream of walking The Great Wall of China.

We as a society must begin to think big, and focus on the future and support the latest advances of modern medicine. Also, we as patients should demand the right to be offered the most advanced treatments and not simply resign ourselves to a health authority mandate or a medical professional that would impose an ineffective or mediocre type treatment.

We could speculate on the reasons behind the Oregon insurance situation, but the reality is that it is far better to look to the future and demand the option of extensive stem cell application, recognizing it as a feasible and true solution to treat arthritis of the joints and the spine. To that fight, which is really thinking big we must all unite!

So if you, a family member, or friend need to be evaluated to find out if Stem cell treatments are a viable option, please call us at 305-598-7777. Remember that by mentioning this article the first consultation is free. If you want to contact the doctor directly, please do so via email: stemdoc305@gmail.com or for more information visit our website: http://www.stemcellmia.com or follow us on our Facebook Page and Twitter @StemCellMia or you can also watch our amazing testimonial videos on our YouTube channel.

Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business

See the original post here:
The Amazing Power of Stem Cells - Miami's Community Newspapers