3 Women Blinded After Stem Cell Therapy – Newser


Newser
3 Women Blinded After Stem Cell Therapy
Newser
CORRECTS FROM MD ANDERSON HOSPITAL TO MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER -Senior Clinical Cell Therapy Specialist Megan Raggio prepares stem cells from bone marrow before they are transplanted into sportscaster... (AP Photo/David J. Phillip).
Stem Cell Therapy Blinds Three Patients at Florida ClinicMedscape
Cutting-edge stem cell therapy proves safe, but will it ever be effective?Science Magazine
3 Women Blinded By Unproven Stem Cell TreatmentsNPR
CNN -New Vision -The New England Journal of Medicine -The New England Journal of Medicine
all 131 news articles »

See original here:
3 Women Blinded After Stem Cell Therapy - Newser

Three People Are Nearly Blind After Getting a Stem Cell Treatment – TIME

Rolando Caponi / EyeEmGetty Images/EyeEm

When doctors give their patients a difficult diagnosis, whether its for a condition like cancer or a rarer disease for which there is no standard treatment, they often refer them to clinicaltrials.gov . The National Institutes of Health and National Library of Medicine provide this web site as a service for people who want to find and participate in trials of experimental treatments. With so many new studies launched every day of promising therapies, it is a helpful resource for both doctors and patients eager to do everything they can to beat their disease.

But a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine highlights the dangers of some experimental trials, even ones listed on a government-supported site. Three women in their 70s and 80s who enrolled in a stem cell trial to treat age-related macular degeneration , caused by deterioration of the most sensitive part of the retina, were left with severe vision loss following the treatment they received in the trial. All three patients found the study, sponsored by BioHeart, Inc., on clinicaltrials.gov.

The women each had liposuction to remove fat tissue, and the fat cells were processed to extract stem cells that they were told would develop into cells that would replace the diseased ones in their eyes.

Instead, the injected solution caused inflammation, infection and detached retinas in all three women. Detached retinas require surgery to repair in order to prevent blindness. Within days of receiving the treatment, all three patients went to the hospital with vision loss, severe infections and bleeding.

BioHeart, now known as U.S. Stem Cell, issued the following statement on the results. We are unable to comment further on specific cases due to patient confidentiality or legal confidentiality obligations. Neither U.S. Stem Cell nor U.S. Stem Cell Clinic currently treats eye patients.

The study was conducted in several unusual ways, says Dr. Thomas Albini, from the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, who was not involved in the trial but treated two of the women after they developed complications. First, all three women had both eyes treated at the same time, which Albini says isn't typical for an untested therapy. When testing something experimental for the eye, doctors usually treat only one eye at a time, in case adverse events occur or the treatment proves too dangerous or toxic to the patient.

He says that the patients only signed what appears to be a one-page surgical consent form for the procedure. The form may have indicated that the procedure they would receive was experimental and had not been approved, but clinical trial consent forms are usually lengthy documents that detail the procedure and the risks and potential benefits involved. The two women told Albini that they did not recall signing documents other than the single page form.

The patients also learned that the trial was being funded by payments they and others made. Each patient who enrolled paid $5,000 to receive the experimental treatment in both eyes, according to the women. The vast majority of legitimate clinical trials do not require payment. In fact, most tests and therapieseven transportation to the facility, in some casesare generally covered by the study.

The unfortunate outcome is a reminder of the burden put on patients to vet trials, even if they appear on clinicaltrials.gov. That may be challenging for people without any medical background, especially since clinicaltrials.gov is maintained by what most believe to be reliable and ethical government health institutes. But the site doesn't vet every trial posted; it performs minimal review of study designs to ensure they are scientifically sound and have received ethical and scientific approval from what are called institutional review boards (IRBs). These boards include both scientific experts as well as ethicists to analyze a study to make sure participants won't be exploited. Without mandatory requirements for such board approvals, any investigator can technically post a trial on the site. And while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves drugs and medical treatments, it doesnt have direct oversight over clinicaltrials.gov. Patients confuse FDA approval of a treatment, which does indicate that a treatment has met certain standards like it has demonstrated efficacy and safety, with just being listed on the web site, says Albini.

The site does state that ClinicalTrials.gov does not independently verify the scientific validity or relevant of the submitted information beyond a limited quality control review for apparent errors, deficiencies or inconsistencies. But, Albini says, the web site could probably do a better job of making that disclaimer more prominent.

Albini says the incident should reinforce to doctors that simply sending their patients to clinicaltrials.gov isnt enough. Patients need help from the medical community or public health officials to navigate sites like these and make sense of the information they find, he says.

Read more from the original source:
Three People Are Nearly Blind After Getting a Stem Cell Treatment - TIME

American Academy of Ophthalmology Statement on Stem Cell Therapy for Treating Eye Disease – PR Newswire (press release)

American Academy of Ophthalmology Statement on Stem Cell Therapy for Treating Eye Disease
PR Newswire (press release)
The Academy has previously issued clinical guidance that covers the appropriate use of stem cell therapy in eye care. These recent cases confirm the Academy's belief that the FDA should thoroughly investigate and level regulatory action against ...

Read the original:
American Academy of Ophthalmology Statement on Stem Cell Therapy for Treating Eye Disease - PR Newswire (press release)

Strategy shift: Stem cell research uses donor cells to cut tumor risks … – Genetic Literacy Project

Scientists can create [induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells] from any cell in the body. [But while they]can be reprogrammed to become any type of cell, from skin to liver to nerve cells,[iPS cells] can also give rise to potentially dangerous mutations, possibly including ones that lead to cancerous tumors. Thus, iPS cells are a double-edged swordBut now Japanese researchers are trying a different approach.

When Kyoto University researcher Shinya Yamanaka announced in 2006 that his lab had created iPS cells from mouse skin cells for the first time, biologists were stunnedA decade after the Yamanaka teams groundbreaking discoveries, however, iPS cells have retreated from the headlines.

All eyes, however, are back on Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, which is resuming its retina trialthis time with iPS cells from donors instead of cells from patients themselves.Using the Cell Research and Application (CiRA)s bank of iPS cells, there are significant time and cost savingsit could be one fifth the cost of cell preparation and patient transplant or less.

Regenerative medicine and drug discovery are the two key applications for iPS cells, Yamanaka says. With the use of iPS cell stock, we are now able to work quicker and cheaper, so thats the challenge going forward.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:Waiting to Reprogram Your Cells? Dont Hold Your Breath

Go here to read the rest:
Strategy shift: Stem cell research uses donor cells to cut tumor risks ... - Genetic Literacy Project

Two more retractions for stem cell researcher appealing her dismissal – Retraction Watch (blog)

Susana Gonzalez

Susana Gonzalez, a rising star in stem cell research, has had a rough year.

In addition to being fired from her former research institute (which she is now appealing), one of her grants (totaling nearly 2 million Euros) was suspended. Most recently, she has received two new retractions in Nature Communications over figure duplications and missing raw data. By our count, she has a total of three retractions.

Both of the new noticessay the papers contained figures duplicated in other papers by Gonzalez, and neither includes Gonzalez among the list of co-authors who agreed to the retraction.

Gonzalez was dismissed from her position at the National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC) in Spain last February over allegations of misconduct. According to the head of basic research at CNIC, Gonzalez is still embroiled in a legal battle with the Centerover her dismissal. Vicente Andrscould not go into detail because of the ongoinglitigation, but he told us:

I can only confirm that the court has decided in favor of CNIC and upheld the sacking of Dr. Gonzalez, but the decision is not final and is being appealed.

The legal proceedings appear to have prompted Gonzalezs first retractionof a 2012 paper, which we reportedlast month, after Cell Cyclebecame aware of certain irregularities in several figures, according to the notice:

We have been advised that, during the course of an internal inquiry and subsequent legal proceedings, corresponding author Dr. Susana Gonzalez was not able to provide original raw data or laboratory notes for any of the experiments represented in these figures to explain or justify the results reported in the article.

Similar concerns with image duplication and missing raw data have continued to plague Gonzalez in these two new retractions in Nature Communications. Antonio Herrera-Merchan, a former postdoctoral researcher in Gonzalezs lab at CNIC who co-authored the Cell Cycle paper and one of the two newly retracted papers in Nature Communications, told us he does not know what happened to the raw data after he left the lab at the end of 2013 for a new position:

I dont know why Susana was unable to supply raw data. This is a question for her.

All the experiments that I performed, original data and lab note, were [left] in CNIC.

Herrera-Merchan describedhow the lab workedwhile he was there, specifically how Gonzalez designed experiments and stored data (we translated his e-mail from Spanish to English using One Hour Translation):

Susana and I met to discuss how to do the experiments. I did them and the data were stored in general folders in each computer (next to the cytometer, to the qPCR) and the CNIC (Spanish National Center for Cardiovascular Research) specifically connected to each laboratory and made back-up copies every 24 hours. Both Susana and I had access from the computer we each had in our workplace to these folders. I also had a copy in the computer that the CNIC provided in my workplace of all the data produced.

I also took notes and kept my results in laboratory notebooks.

I left both these data and the laboratory notebooks in the CNIC when I left. The CNIC also prevented me from taking these documents.

Herrera-Merchan left the lab for a new position at the University of Granada at the beginning of 2014. He addedthat he played norole in writing orpreparing the papers:

Regarding the editing, writing and design of the articles, Ive never been involved in the editing, writing or selection of images, nor have I ever been sent a draft for an article for review prior to sending it to the journal.

We emailed Gonzalez, but did not hear back. We askedJose F. de Celis, head of theCentre for Molecular Biology Severo Ochoa (CBMSO), where Gonzalez currentlyworks, if he had any updates since we last spoke to him in February. He told us:

I do not have any additional information. Her position is at CBMSO and she is on sick leave.

Heres the retraction notice for Ectopic expression of the histone methyltransferase Ezh2 in haematopoietic stem cells causes myeloproliferative disease published in 2012andcited 67 times, according toClarivate Analytics Web of Science, formerly part of Thomson Reuters:

We the authors are retracting this Article as it has come to our attention that there has been inappropriate duplication of images between different figures of the published paper, and between figures in the paper and those in work previously published by the corresponding author (Arranz et al., 2012, Herrera-Merchan et al., 2010). The figure panels affected are Figs 2c, 3d, 4e, 5g, 7a, Supplementary Figs 2b, 3b and 5d. The corresponding author, S. Gonzalez, was unable to supply a complete set of raw data on which the Article is based. The Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and the first author A. Herrera-Merchan, together with the co-authors L. Arranz, J.M. Ligos, A. de Molina and O. Dominguez, agree with retraction of the Article.

Arranz, L. et al. Bmi1 is critical to prevent Ikaros-mediated lymphoid priming in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Cycle 11, 6578 (2012).

Herrera-Merchan, A. et al. miR-33-mediated downregulation of p53 controls hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Cycle 9, 32973305 (2010).

Heres the retraction notice for Bmi1 limits dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure by inhibiting cardiac senescence published in 2015 and cited five times:

We the authors are retracting this Article as it has come to our attention that there has been inappropriate duplication of images between different figures of the published paper, and between figures in the paper and those in work previously published by the corresponding author (Hidalgo, I. et al. 2012). The figure panels affected are Figure 1d, Figure 3c, Figure 4e, Figures 6a, g, and Supplementary Figure 1b. The corresponding author, S. Gonzalez, was unable to supply a complete set of raw data on which the Article is based. The Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and the first author I. Gonzalez-Valdes, together with the co-authors I. Hidalgo, A. Bujarrabal, E. Lara-Pezzi, L. Padron-Barthe, P. Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Gmez-del Arco, J.M. Redondo, J.M. Ruiz-Cabello, L.J. Jimenez-Borreguero, J.A. Enriquez, J.L. de la Pompa, and A. Hidalgo, agree with retraction of the Article.

Hidalgo, I. et al. Ezh1 is required for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and prevents senescence-like cell cycle arrest. Cell Stem Cell 11, 649662 (2012).

Several of Gonzalezs other papers have been questioned on PubPeer.Leonid Schneider has also coveredGonzalezs retractions and legal battle.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making atax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow uson Twitter, like uson Facebook, add us to yourRSS reader, sign up on ourhomepagefor an email every time theres a new post, or subscribe to ourdaily digest. Clickhere to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what were working on,click here.

View post:
Two more retractions for stem cell researcher appealing her dismissal - Retraction Watch (blog)

Ralph Shortey, Oklahoma Lawmaker, Hit With Child Prostitution Charges – NBCNews.com

Oklahoma state Senator Ralph Shortey, speaks during a Senate committee meeting in Oklahoma City on Feb. 22, 2017. Sue Ogrocki / AP

Later, they discovered an online conversation between Shortey and JM.

"Would you be interested in sexual stuff?" Shortey allegedly wrote.

"Yes," JM allegedly replied.

From there, the conversation as described in DA's charging papers veered off from logistics to graphic lewdness and included a "smiley face emoji."

Both Shortey and JM admitted to police that they met a year ago through a Craigslist "personal encounter ad," the papers state. And police also found an "open box of condoms" in a backpack.

When asked what he was doing at the motel with the teen, Shortey said they were "just hanging out." according to a Moore Police report.

This is not the first time Shortey made national news. Back in 2012, he proposed a bill

"There are companies that are using embryonic stem cells to research and basically cause a chemical reaction to determine whether or not something tastes good or not," he told

"As a pro-life advocate, it kind of disturbed me that we would use aborted embryos or aborted human fetuses to extract stem cells and use them for research to basically make things taste better."

The bill, which could have been lifted from the 1973 science fiction movie "Soylent Green," was referred to the Agriculture and Rural Development committee where it died, according to The Daily Oklahoman.

Shortey, who identifies himself as a member of the Rosebud Sioux Indian Tribe on his

The rest is here:
Ralph Shortey, Oklahoma Lawmaker, Hit With Child Prostitution Charges - NBCNews.com

Immune cell may turn heart inflammation into heart failure – Medical News Today

Heart inflammation, or myocarditis, is a disorder usually caused by an infection reaching the heart. Although the condition is rare, it can sometimes lead to dilated cardiomyopathy - a leading cause of heart failure in younger adults. New research helps to explain why this happens in some cases and not others, by examining an immune cell that appears to cause heart failure in mice.

Myocarditis occurs when an infection has reached the heart. During an infection, the body's immune system produces disease-fighting cells - but in heart inflammation, these cells enter the heart and can damage its muscle.

The condition is not often diagnosed; it rarely causes severe symptoms and detecting it requires a heart biopsy - a rather invasive procedure of moderate risk.

In some cases, myocarditis progresses into inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMi) - a disorder in which the heart's muscle dilates, weakens, and can no longer properly pump blood. In the United States, DCMi is one of the leading causes of heart failure among younger adults, with a prevalence of between 300 and 400 patients per million U.S. adults.

New research, led by Dr. Daniela Cihakova from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, MD - set out to understand why in some cases the heart heals from the inflammation, while in others it progresses into DCMi.

As the authors of the new paper mention, previous studies have pointed to the role of eosinophils - a specific type of immune cell - in the development of heart disease. As Dr. Cihakova explains, the new research "provide[s] more details about how these immune system cells may lead to deterioration of heart muscle function in mice in a way that lets us draw some parallels to human disease processes."

The findings were published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine.

Dr. Cihakova and colleagues genetically modified a group of mice to have a deficiency of eosinophils. They then induced myocarditis in this group, using a technique called experimental autoimmune myocarditis. In this procedure, mice receive a peptide from their heart muscle cells, which makes the body's immune system attack the heart.

The researchers also induced myocarditis in another group of normal mice, with a healthy level of eosinophils. After 21 days, the scientists measured the inflammation in the hearts of both groups of mice.

They also analyzed the hearts for fibrosis or scar tissue - both signs of dying heart muscles in mammals. Scar tissue is also present in cases of DCMi.

The scientists found similarly acute inflammation in both groups.

However, when the scientists examined the groups for signs of heart failure, they found drastic differences between the eosinophil-deficient group and the normal group.

The mice with normal levels of eosinophils went on to develop heart failure, whereas the mice with eosinophil deficiency displayed no signs of heart malfunction.

The team also found scar tissue in both groups to a similar degree. However, the normal mice had DCMi, while the eosinophil-deficient ones were not affected.

To see if they could replicate their findings, the team designed an additional experiment in which they genetically modified mice to have an excess of an eosinophil-producing protein called IL5.

The IL5-excessive mice developed more inflammation and more scar tissue in the heart's upper chambers (or atria) compared with normal mice.

Mice with excessive IL5 protein also had more heart-infiltrating cells. As much as 60 percent of these cells were eosinophils in the IL5-excessive mice, compared with only 3 percent in the normal mice.

Additionally, the researchers examined the mice's hearts 45 days after the experiment and found severe DCMi in the mice with too much IL5 protein.

Finally, to account for the possibility that it is the IL5 protein and not the eosinophils that drive DCMi development, the team genetically modified eosinophil-deficient mice to have an excess of the protein.

The researchers found no reduction in the heart function of these IL5-excessive, eosinophil-deficient mice, compared with normal mice. This confirms that it is the immune cells, not the protein, that causes DCMi.

In an attempt to understand exactly how eosinophils are responsible for DCMi, the researchers investigated further and managed to isolate a protein called IL4, which is produced by eosinophils.

Using yet another mouse model, Dr. Cihakova and team established that it is indeed the IL4 that facilitates the development of DCMi, and which is triggered by eosinophils.

"The take-home message is that inflammation severity does not necessarily determine long-term disease progression, but specific infiltrating cell types - eosinophils, in this case - do."

Dr. Daniela Cihakova

The study's senior author points out that their study is the first one to investigate the role of eosinophils in the onset of heart inflammation, and in its development from inflammation to DCMi.

Nicola Diny, a Ph.D. student in the Bloomberg School of Public Health and the study's first author, also comments on the findings:

"Our studies show that the presence of eosinophils in the heart makes mice more likely to get DCMi following myocarditis. And if there are a lot of eosinophils, the mice develop even more severe heart failure," Diny says. "It will be important to test if the same is true in patients. That way, we may be able to intervene early and prevent DCMi."

The researchers hope that their study will help to develop IL4-targeting medicines that could one day treat people with myocarditis, thus potentially halting its progression into DCMi.

Learn how marijuana use may temporarily weaken heart muscle.

Link:
Immune cell may turn heart inflammation into heart failure - Medical News Today

Stressed out by politics? It could be making your body age faster, too – Quartz

The globe is like one big biological cell, each part intricately interdependent. This is true not just of our physical world but for our social world, too: Water, natural resources, pollution, economies, and politics are more interconnected than ever, but our emotional lives are also intertwined with these factors.

Primates like us Homo sapiens have mirror neurons, meaning that our brain responds to seeing other peoples actions as though they were happening to us. We feel peoples joy, but also their pain. In this way, emotions are contagious. A smile at a stranger has an effect on their emotional state. Interacting with close ones can bring your nervous system in synchrony with theirs. Mothers pass on feelings of threat or of calmness to their babies, and this is reflected in the babies nervous system stress arousal levels.

What does this say for our microscopic cells reactions to the worlds current state of affairs? We are witnesses and thus we vicariously experience local and global events. Innocent black men are being harmed by armed police at three times the rate than whites. The horror and pain felt by families trapped in Aleppo, Syria. The shock waves echoing around the world as people see the personal impact of the US president Donald Trumps immigration ban. The uncertainties of whether millions will lose health care coverage.

Our cells are listening to it all. And theyre not liking what theyre hearing.

For over a decade, we and other researchers have been studying a system in our cells that controls one of the ways we age: telomeres. These structures act as protective caps at the ends of chromosomes and shield our genes from damagekind of like the plastic tips at the ends of shoelaces. When telomeres are long, the cell can replenish itself indefinitely, but when they shorten too much, the cell dies. The more telomeres shorten as we age, the less cells can go on dividing and replenishing our tissues, and the more vulnerable we are to the vast range of burdensome diseases of aging. And the effects are not saved up just for the elderlyeven young people with short telomeres are more likely to catch the common cold.

But telomeres dont just shrink as the years passtheyre also affected by stress levels. Unlike the more sturdy genes inside the chromosomes, the tips of our DNA are sensitive to their surrounding environment. Under extreme and chronic psychological stress, they shorten more quickly than they should for ones age. Social factors are associated with the length and strength of our telomeres, such as whether we are in a long-term marriage, the quality of our social relationships, the quality of our neighborhoods, and how much education we received. Discrimination, bullying, and exposure to violence also shorten our telomeres. In short, feeling threatened trumps telomeres.

A recent APA poll showed that around 60% of Americans are stressed out by our political climate. We are now in a period where social culture is darkening with toxic stress. By the very definition of stresssituations that cause loss of control, loss of predictability, and threat to ones sense of self or physical selfthe majority of Americans are under tremendous strain. A recent APA poll showed that around 60% of Americans are stressed out by our political climate. Then there are the post-Brexit shockwaves still rippling through Britain, the fear of far-right rationalists winning elections all over mainland Europe, and the recent impeachment of heads of state in Asia and South America. This only compounds when you consider the precarious conditions in which the roughly 20 million global refugees are currently living. Its hard for our minds to comprehend this scale of human suffering. We are absorbing social and political tumult on top of the usual stressors from work, relationships, and financial strain; ones we were already intimate with, but yet never seem to master.

And its not just your own health youre potentially harming. Telomere science suggests that expectant parents who have severely shortened telomeres can pass them on to their offspring, independent of classic genetics. A parents telomeres might be very short from the wear and tear of decades of chronic stress and poor lifestyle. The next generation could start off with a little less ability for cell replenishment, which means they could be that much closer to developing aging diseases from their first day of life.

The good news is that there are many things we can do to protect our telomeres. These include the usual suspectswhat we eat, how well we sleep, how active we arebut also, more relevant to today, how we respond to stressful situations.

We can only thrive if we do this together. Because of the invisible but pervasive connections between us that science doesnt yet fully understandincluding the mirror-neuron effect and well-documented social-contagion effectsit is truly up to all of us to help control global social stress levels. This goes way beyond political parties to focusing on the fundamental values that most of us share through our common humanity and same basic needs. We can help set the emotional tone for our own lives, relationships, families, and workplaces. Rememberour emotional state is contagious.

Meanwhile, our telomeres are listening. We unknowingly transmit negative emotions inward to our cells, and outward to those around us. Caring for ourselves and our communities better sets positive-feedback cycles between our emotional well-being and our cell renewal.

So think of your telomeres as you react to whatever news pops up todayand every new day as 2017 unfolds.

Elissa and Elizabeth are the co-authors of the New York Times best seller The Telomere Effect: A Revolutionary Approach to Living Younger, Healthier, Longer (Grand Central Publishing). Learn how to write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.

Here is the original post:
Stressed out by politics? It could be making your body age faster, too - Quartz

Cell Medica raises 60M to push cancer therapies into clinic – FierceBiotech

Cell Medica has raised 60 million ($74 million) to expand its clinical pipeline of cancer cellular immunotherapies. The latest fundraising round, which was again backed by heavyweights of the British biotech investment scene, will equip Cell Medica to move new assets into the clinic while wrapping up a phase 2 of its lead candidate.

Touchstone Innovationsthe company formerly known as Imperial Innovationsparticipated in the Series C alongside Neil Woodfords funds and those managed by his former employer, Invesco Perpetual. Those three organizations also drove Cell Medica to a 50 million Series B round late in 2014.

Since then, Cell Medica has begun treating patients with advanced lymphomas associated with the Epstein Barr virus (EBV) with its lead candidate CMD-003also known as baltaleucel-Tin a phase 2 trial, and expanded its technology base through the acquisition of Delenex Therapeutics and collaborations with Baylor College of Medicine and University College London.

The Series C is intended to enable Cell Medica to build on this platform by diversifying its pipeline.

With the strong support of our key shareholders, Cell Medica will implement the next phase of our development programme, bringing a new generation of cell-based immunotherapy products into phase 1 clinical trials as well as completing our phase 2 program for baltaleucel-T, Cell Medica CEO Gregg Sando said in a statement.

Lead candidate CMD-003 is made up of autologous EBV-specific T cells that are extracted from a patients blood before being activated and expanded. Cell Medica thinks the approach can treat advanced lymphomas with minimal side effects.

Cell Medica developed CMD-003 with Baylor College of Medicine and it has since returned to the same source in search of other pipeline prospects. Last year, Cell Medica struck and then expanded an agreement with Baylor to apply CAR technology to natural killer T cells. In between forming and expanding the Baylor deal, Cell Medica bought Swiss biotech Delenex. The takeover gave Cell Medica a targeting system for the therapies it had recently begun working on with Baylor

More here:
Cell Medica raises 60M to push cancer therapies into clinic - FierceBiotech

In the Coming Decade, Off-the-Shelf Cell Therapy will Become a Reality – Labiotech.eu (blog)

David Sourdive, co-founder of Cellectis, discusses his pioneering work developing off-the-shelf CAR-T for cancer and the future directions of cell therapy.

Last week I had the opportunity to attend the World ADOPT Summit and hear from some of the world leaders in cell therapy. There I met David Sourdive, co-founder and VP of Cellectis, a French company that is leading the development of the first off-the-shelf CAR-T therapy.

CAR-T therapy consists in the infusion of T-cells engineered to better identify and kill cancer cells. The most advanced approaches, which could be approved as soon as by the end of this year, use an autologous approach by engineering cells from the own patient.Cellectis is taking the technology a step further and developing an allogeneic CAR-T therapy that uses cells from healthy donors instead.

The company uses TALEN gene editing to develop off-the-shelf products that could make this miracle cancer therapy faster, cheaper and accessible to a wider patient population. Its first therapy, UCART19, now licensed to Servier and Pfizer, has shown striking results in two babies with leukemia. A second one, UCART123, recently received approval from the FDA to start clinical trials.

With his company positioned at the forefront of innovation in cell therapy, I decided to ask David Sourdive how he thinks new technologies will change the scene.

Cell therapy is now transitioning from the world of grafts, where it has been confined for decades, to the world of products. This happened with antibodies. People used to give their blood and antibodies. Then it became possible to manufacture antibodies from cells in an industrial setting, and then it became a product. I think that were going in that direction with cell therapy.

In the coming decade, off-the-shelf cell therapy will become a reality. That is a revolution and is going to change a lot of things. We will need to establish standards and regulations.Cells usually have not been regarded as products, so its a big leap. We have to discuss with regulators how to define the products.

The immune system is going to start being tweaked like it has never been and we will be able to take advantage of it to address very difficult diseases. For example, solid tumors.We think UCARTs can also target solid tumors. To that end, we work with two pharma partners that have strong capability to tackle these complicated tumors.

We are the first ones to do [allogeneic CAR-Ts] and theres no precedent. We have to invent everything. We have to figure out all the possibilities, all the solutions, and theres no real way to predict how things are going to behave in patients because historically, the one kind of cell nobody has ever used is an allogeneic unmatched situation is T-cells, by definition.

Its very exciting because every week we have to do something for the first time, its challenging.I think this year is the year when we will know better how allogeneic products behave in patients.

We have shown that gene editing can really be transformative in the CAR-T space. With gene editing, you can make the cells overcome the defense mechanisms of tumors. You can, for example, knock out genes such as PD1 so that CAR T-cells become capable of killing PDL1-bearing tumors.

Tumors that succeed in the body are tumors that have found a way to evade the immune system.You need to put additional features to empower the T-cells to do what normal T-cells fail to do. People will realize the transformative power of gene editing. We think it will take over the industry.

I think globally, gene editing is going to be a strong power because we are going to be able to tweak cells like weve never done before.We will be able to program cells to deliver a treatment locally. This is happening. Its not futuristic. Its now.

This is definitely going to be an exciting year, with the first CAR-T therapies approaching market approval and the first results from allogeneic CAR-Ts due soon. Keep tuned for the latest updates!

Images from Tyler Olson /Shutterstock; Cellectis;Fascinadora, ImageFlow /Shutterstock

Originally posted here:
In the Coming Decade, Off-the-Shelf Cell Therapy will Become a Reality - Labiotech.eu (blog)