One stem cell treatment stabilizes macular degeneration, another blinds 3 patients – CNN

The macula is the spot in the center of your eye's retina. When that tissue begins to thin and break down, this is referred to as macular degeneration, a blurring of the sharp central vision necessary for driving, reading and other close-up work. Most people develop this disease as they age.

For the latest study, researchers led by Dr. Michiko Mandai of the laboratory for retinal regeneration at RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Japan tested an experimental stem cell treatment on a 77-year-old woman diagnosed with "wet," or neovascular age-related, macular degeneration.

The "wet" form of the disease involves blood vessels positioned underneath the pigment epithelium (a layer of retinal cells) growing through the epithelium and harming the eye's photoreceptor cells. In Japan, wet age-related macular degeneration is the most common form, but in Caucasian populations, only about 10% of people with age-related macular degeneration gets that form.

The "dry" form involves the macula breaking down without growth of blood vessels where they're not supposed to be.

To stop the progress of wet macular degeneration, the researchers performed surgery to transplant a sheet of retinal pigment epithelial cells under the retina in one of the patient's eye.

The transplanted cells had been derived from autologous induced pluripotent stem cells, which are reprogrammed cells. They were created using cells from the connective tissue of the woman's skin.

One year after surgery, the transplanted sheet remained intact, and there was no evidence of lasting adverse effects. Although the patient showed no evidence of improved eyesight, her vision had stabilized.

"This research serves multiple purposes," wrote Peter Karagiannis, a science writer, in an email on behalf of Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, the Nobel Prize-winning co-author of the study and director of the Center for iPS Cell Research and Application at Kyoto University. From the patient's perspective, the study shows that induced pluripotent stem cells can alleviate the problems associated with age-related macular degeneration.

"From a greater medical perspective, however, the bigger impact is that it shows iPS cells can be used as cell therapies," the email said, adding that newly initiated stem cell research applications at the center include Parkinson's disease and thrombocytopenia, a lack of platelets in the blood.

The American story, like the Japanese story, begins with patients slowly losing their sight as a result of macular degeneration -- in this case, three women ages 72 to 88, two of whom had the "dry" form.

Each patient paid $5,000 for the procedure at an unnamed clinic in Florida, the authors noted. Some of the patients, including two of the three women described in the paper, learned of the so-called clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov, a registry database run by the US National Library of Medicine. However, the consent form and other written materials did not mention a trial.

The procedure took less than an hour and began with a standard blood draw and the removal of fat cells from each patient's abdomen. To obtain stem cells, the fat tissue was processed with enzymes, while platelet-dense plasma was isolated from the blood. The stem cells were mixed with the plasma and injected into both eyes.

Complications may have been caused by contamination during stem cell preparation, or the stem cells might have changed into myofibroblasts, a type of cell associated with scarring, after injection, the authors wrote.

Before the surgery, the women's vision ranged from 20/30 to 20/200. After treatment and complications, the patients were referred in June 2015 to two university-based ophthalmology practices, including the University of Miami, where lead author Dr. Ajay E. Kuriyan was practicing.

"Many stem-cell clinics are treating patients with little oversight and with no proof of efficacy," Kuriyan and his co-authors wrote in the paper, acknowledging that it is difficult for patients to know whether a stem cell therapy -- or a clinical trial -- is legitimate.

One red flag is that the patients were required to pay for their procedure; another is that both eyes were treated at once, the authors said. Legitimate clinical trials do not require payment, and for any experimental treatment of the eyes, a good doctor would observe how one eye responds before attempting the second eye.

Another problem for unsavvy patients: Listings on ClinicalTrials.gov are not fully scrutinized for scientific soundness, noted the authors.

Today, the clinic is no longer performing these eye injections, the authors said, but it is still seeing patients. In October 2015, months after the procedures had been performed, the Food and Drug Administration released more specific guidelines for stem cell treatments.

Writing on behalf of the FDA in an editorial alongside the paper, Drs. Peter W. Marks, Celia M. Witten and Robert M. Califf say there's an absence of compelling evidence, yet some practitioners argue that stem cells have a unique capacity to restore health because of their ability to differentiate into whatever cell is necessary for repairing a defect. Another argument is that clinical trials are too complex for all except large industrial sponsors.

Despite the shadow cast by some stem cell experiments, the Japanese study earned praise from the scientific community.

Michael P. Yaffe, vice president of scientific programs at the New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, said the RIKEN study was "incredibly thorough, careful and well-documented."

"Many experts in the field of regenerative medicine believe that the treatment of macular degeneration and other retinal diseases will be among the first areas of success in the use of stem cell-derived tissues," said Yaffe, whose foundation was not involved in the RIKEN study.

Yaffe said this optimism stems from preliminary studies using retinal cells derived from stem cells in animals. Scientists are also hopeful because the procedures to generate pure cells of the correct type and surgical techniques necessary for transplantation have already been developed.

"A number of research groups are moving toward developing stem cell-based treatments for age-related macular degeneration and other retinal diseases," Yaffe said.

The National Eye Institute at the National Institutes of Health is planning a similar study using patient-specific pluripotent stem cells, according to Kapil Bharti, a Stadtman Investigator in the Unit on Ocular Stem Cell & Translational Research at the institute. After getting approval to conduct a phase I safety trial, the institute will treat 10 to 12 patients to check safety and tolerability of stem cell-based eye tissue transplants.

"Data from 10 to 12 patients is needed to show that the implanted cells are indeed safe," he said, adding that the trial is likely to begin in 2018.

"While researchers have used embryonic stem cell derived cells to treat age-related macular degeneration, (the RIKEN study) is the first study that used induced pluripotent stem cells," said Bharti, who was not involved in the research.

Both induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells can be used to make other kinds of cells of the body, explained Bharti. However, induced pluripotent stem cells can be derived from adult skin or blood cells, rather than from embryos.

"Another big scientific advantage with induced pluripotent stem cells is that they can be made patient-specific (because it's the patient's own cells), reducing the chances of tissue rejection," he said.

P. Michael Iuvone, a professor of ophthalmology and director of vision research at Emory University School of Medicine, also noted the importance of using the patient's own stem cells.

Past studies have used embryonic stem cells to treat age-related macular degeneration, but there were problems related to rejection, when the body refuses to accept a transplant or graft, explained Iuvone, who was not involved in the latest study. In the new RIKEN study, the researchers took the patient's own cells and converted them into retinal cells to avoid these complications.

"The results from the standpoint of the graft taking and surviving without any signs of any kind of toxicity or tumorigenicity are very positive," Iuvone said. "But the weakness is, they only had one patient, and it's very difficult to make any conclusions from one patient."

He noted that the RIKEN researchers planned to work with more patients, but in 2014, the Japanese government passed a law that said regenerative medicine clinical trials could be performed only at medical institutions, not at research institutions such as RIKEN.

Though the experiment was performed on a woman with wet age-related macular degeneration, it also might be useful for "dry" age-related macular degeneration, which is more common in the United States, according to Iuvone.

Currently, there are some effective treatments for age-related macular degeneration.

"The standard of care in most cases is to give injections of drugs that inhibit the growth hormones that is called vascular epithelial growth factor, or VEGF," Iuvone said. "For most people, it at least slows the progression and in some cases actually improves visual acuity."

Laser treatments have also been used but are on the decrease because of side effects. "Given the fact that the VEGF treatments seem to be effective, I think that most clinicians have turned to that," Iuvone said.

Bharti believes the RIKEN study is a major milestone in the field. "We and others are learning from the Japan study," he said.

Susan L. Solomon, CEO of the New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, agrees.

"This study represents a fundamental advance in regenerative medicine, in the use of stem cell-derived tissues and in the treatment of eye disease," she said. However, additional work and many more studies are needed, she said, before a safe and efficacious stem cell-based treatment will be available "to the broad and growing population with retinal disease" -- all of us, growing older.

The rest is here:
One stem cell treatment stabilizes macular degeneration, another blinds 3 patients - CNN

Transform 815: Xue Jun-Li’s stem cell research in Rockford sheds light on motor neuron diseases – Rockford Register Star

By Isaac GuererroStaff writer

Xue-Jun Li spends her days studying motor neurons, the cells that send signals from the brain to the body's voluntary muscles.

Motor neuron diseases are degenerative, which means that the muscles don't stop working all at once. When the motor neurons begin to fail, one slowly loses control of the arms and legs, the ability to swallow and, eventually, to breathe.

Scientists know very little about the human nervous system and what causes the motor neurons to stop functioning. Li has published more than 37 peer-reviewed manuscripts and has developed human stem cell models for spastic paraplegias and spinal muscular atrophy, which is the leading genetic cause of death for infants.

Li joined the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford as an associate professor in the Biomedical Sciences Department last May. Her research is supported by the National Institute of Health and ALS Association, among others.

I love the satisfaction of new discoveries, new ideas you get from working in the lab, the interaction with students, she said. But any breakthrough you make is a collaboration.

Her stem cell research is concerned with, among other things, an attempt to better understand microtubule defects that disrupt signals from the brain to motor neurons along the spinal cord. Mitochondrial defects the mitochondria are the energy factories of the cells are another focus.

This fall, Li will teach a class that's a first for the university: stem cells and regenerative engineering.

Isaac Guerrero: 815-987-1361; iguerrero@rrstar.com;@isaac_rrs

More:
Transform 815: Xue Jun-Li's stem cell research in Rockford sheds light on motor neuron diseases - Rockford Register Star

Strip mall stem cells – HealthNewsReview.org

Michael Joyce is a multimedia producer with HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce.

If you had been in Salt Lake City last month, savoringyour morningcoffee, and watching this channel 4 morning show, you might have been treated to this videopromising a revolutionary treatment that assures you dont have to live with back pain.

Youd also be assured that the doctor being interviewed, Dr. Kahn, works at the only place in Utah that does this particular type of stem cell procedure.

But had you found this story online as Dr. Leigh Turner did, and tweeted it our way you might have noticed, tucked way down atthe bottom of the page, thislonely line: This story includes sponsored content (the video didnt mention this at any point during its 5-minute run time, though its possible the broadcast version was preceded by a disclaimer).

Dr. Turner is a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota who, along with studying direct-to-consumer marketing and medical tourism, has a special interest in unproven stem cell therapies. Last summer he co-authored a paper which documented 351 companies across the United States marketing unapproved & unlicensed stem cell procedures. Dr. Khans Wasatch Pain Solutions is one of these businesses. A quick glance at the companys websiteoffers this:

If that is the case then why is Dr. Kahn using an unlicensed, non-FDA-approved treatment that is not supported by controlled research?

The market for these unregulated, unapproved, and unproven stem cell therapies is expanding, says Dr. Leigh Turner. And the list of conditions they claim to treat has expanded to 30 or 40 different diseases. In reflecting on the promotionalcontent of the video, Turner also noticed something else disturbing:

What strikes me in watching the video is just how commonplace a video like thishas become. These businesses and their claims are everywhere, and people dont even seem to blink anymore. Its just become part of the consumer landscape.

And what about the media landscape? A quick glance at the KUCW/KTVX- Channel 4 website reveals foursponsored videos in just the past fourmonths from Dr. Khans Wasatch Pain Solutions ALL promoting the use of the Regenexx stem cell procedures. I ask Turner what he thinks of the media coverage of stem cell interventionsin general.

The media coverage of these unproven stem cell treatments has been highly variable, says Turner. Ive seen insightful and critical examples of investigative reporting that deserve credit. But then there are videos like this one that can lead to misinformation. Its not asking the questions that need to be asked. You cant just sit back and allow someone to make these claims and assertions and not ask the questions that might help your viewers.

And Turner is right. There is some great writing out there. Like this piece by Julia Belluz of Vox warning of the consequences of hyping unproven stem cell research. And another compelling read published today by BuzzFeed which takes on the issue of harm head-on. News storiesthat dont do such a great job tend toward the anecdotal and feature some of the more wildly speculative uses of stem cells in treating things like Alzheimers disease, multiple sclerosis, or even the damaged throwing arms of major league pitchers. But even some of these articles do well in bringing up important issues likeoutrageous treatment costs, lack of FDA approval, possible placebo effects, pervasive skepticism within the medical community at large, and the availability ofwell-established alternative therapies. But many reporterscould do a much better job in simply asking for data. Asking about conflicts of interest. Asking about risks. And simplyfollowing the money. We offer a primer to help journalists address many of these issues.

But beyond the strip mall stem cell injectionsfor whatever ails you, and journalists asking tough questions or not asking any, is perhaps something even more disconcerting. Again, Dr. Leigh Turner:

If this was just about a few businesses here and there I could see them flying under the radar. But when you have 351 of them as our study shows then it suggests a much bigger problem that raises bigger questions. Where is the FDA? Where is the FTC? What about assuring truthfulness, accuracy and honesty in advertising toconsumers? And where are the state medical boards? When you have doctors making promotional claims not backed up by evidence, and who are performing procedures that are not part of the contemporary, evidence-based practice of medicine, then we clearly need external regulators involved who are making decisions based on evidence and not based on financial gain. Where are they?

Lets be fair here.Whether the setting is strip malls or ivory towers is not the issue; the issue is evidence. I think the strip mall settings of many of these businesses speak more to the burgeoning commodification of stem cell therapies than anything else. But the evidence that these stem cells as many practitioners claim are somehow intrinsically capable of sensing the environment they are injected into, and precisely targetwhatever functions require repair, is not proven. Complex cellular systems dont operate that way, as correctly pointed out by FDA scientists in this opinion piece published in todays New England Journal of Medicine.

It is possible some of these stem cell therapies may eventually prove to be safe. Or even efficacious. But until that is clarified with high quality research, the 5 Ws &1H of journalism should be applied to every single story about these unproven stem cell therapies: WHERE is the data? WHATare the real risks and benefits of this therapy? WHY arent alternative therapies being discussed? WHO is making the money here and are there conflicts of interest at play? WHEN will see scientific studies backing revolutionaryclaims and why dont you have them now?

And we end with HOW? How can our state and federal regulators ignore this? How can journalists not give into the hyperbole for clicks and ratings, and instead choose hard questions seekingreal information? And how can we as consumers stop falling for this misleading infotainment and go about demanding more integrity from our health care providers and regulators?

I dont think the answers will come from your local strip mall.

The segment on the WFAA-TV, Dallas, Good Morning Texas program, was headlined "The latest on

Joy Victory is deputy managing editor of HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @thejoyvictory. At this moment,

Joy Victory is deputy managing editor of HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @thejoyvictory. Lastweek about a

Excerpt from:
Strip mall stem cells - HealthNewsReview.org

Some genetic variations difficult to evaluate using current stem cell modeling techniques – Science Daily

Some genetic variations difficult to evaluate using current stem cell modeling techniques
Science Daily
Some heritable but unstable genetic mutations that are passed from parent to affected offspring may not be easy to investigate using current human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) modeling techniques, according to research conducted at The Icahn ...

and more »

Link:
Some genetic variations difficult to evaluate using current stem cell modeling techniques - Science Daily

Stem-Cell Clinic’s Treatments Left Three Patients Blind, Doctors Say – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Stem-Cell Clinic's Treatments Left Three Patients Blind, Doctors Say
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Three patients who underwent what they believed were stem-cell treatments for macular degeneration lost their vision as a result of the procedures at a Florida clinic, according to doctors who treated the patients afterward. The cases underscore the ...

Read the rest here:
Stem-Cell Clinic's Treatments Left Three Patients Blind, Doctors Say - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

At 6th Annual Clinical Trial Supply New England 2017 Conference in Boston Asymmetrex Introduces A First Specific … – Benzinga

On March 8-9 in Boston, stem cell medicine biotechnology start-up Asymmetrex led attendees at the 6th Annual Clinical Trials Supply New England 2017 conference in discussions about the need for quality controls for the supply of tissue stem cells used for treatments in either FDA-approved clinical trials or unregulated private stem cell clinics. Though these two stem cell treatment settings are often contrasted regarding their safety and effectiveness, Asymmetrex stressed that patient care and research progress is compromised in both because of the lack of essential quality control tests for the number and quality of transplanted tissue stem cells.

Boston, MA (PRWEB) March 14, 2017

At the 6th Annual Clinical Trials Supply New England 2017 conference, held in Boston from March 8-9, James Sherley, M.D., Ph.D., director of Asymmetrex, led discussions that evaluated the quality of U.S. supplies of stem cells used in clinical trials compared to private stem cell clinics. Private stem cell clinics have been criticized for not employing research standards that are necessary to establish the therapeutic effectiveness of treatments with statistical confidence. In part because of this difference in practice, they are also often accused of making unproven claims about the effectiveness of their therapies.

Sherley presented comparisons of key operational elements to argue that, given good intent in both settings, the two different settings of stem cell treatments had both distinct and shared shortcomings. He noted, however, that the most significant shortcoming, which stem cell clinical trials and private stem cell clinics share, was perennially overlooked.

Based on the number of reported stem cell clinical trials and private stem cell clinics, Sherley estimated that close to a quarter-million patients in the U.S. now receive stem cell treatments each year. Though many of these occur within FDA-approved clinical trials, their number is dwarfed nearly 10 times by the number of treatments that occur in private stem cell clinics. It shocked the audience of clinical trial suppliers to learn that there was no stem cell quality control test performed for any of these many treatments.

Even for approved stem cell medicine treatments like bone marrow transplantation and umbilical cord blood transplant, there is no stem cell-specific quality control test available. Counts of total cells are made, but these do not adequately predict stem cell number or function. Biomarkers designated for tissue stem cells are also expressed by stem cells' more abundant non-stem cell products. So, the biomarkers lack sufficient specificity to be used to count and monitor tissue stem cell function.

Without a quality control test for tissue stem cell number, stem cell treatments in all settings proceed without knowing the dose of treating tissue stem cells. This previously unavoidable therapeutic blind spot creates an instant treatment risk. It also precludes effective analyses to optimize treatment procedures, to compare different treatments, or to relate treatment outcomes to tissue stem cell dose. Without knowing stem cell dose, the interpretation of any stem cell treatment in terms of stem cells as the responsible agents is compromised.

In this context, Sherley announced briefly to attendees that Asymmetrex's new AlphaSTEM Test for counting adult tissue stem cells and providing data on their viability and tissue cell renewal function represented the needed first quality control test for tissue stem cell treatments, whether in clinical trials, in private stem cell clinics, or approved therapies. In particular, he indicated that both stem cell treatment patients and progress in stem cell medicine would benefit from existing clinical trial supply companies developing into future private stem cell clinic supply companies to insure the quality of stem cell treatment preparations. Sherley said that, of course, their partnership with Asymmetrex to implement its new stem cell-specific quality control test was an all around best solution for accelerating progress in stem cell transplantation medicine.

About Asymmetrex

Asymmetrex, LLC is a Massachusetts life sciences company with a focus on developing technologies to advance stem cell medicine. Asymmetrex's founder and director, James L. Sherley, M.D., Ph.D. is an internationally recognized expert on the unique properties of adult tissue stem cells. The company's patent portfolio contains biotechnologies that solve the two main technical problems production and quantification that have stood in the way of successful commercialization of human adult tissue stem cells for regenerative medicine and drug development. In addition, the portfolio includes novel technologies for isolating cancer stem cells and producing induced pluripotent stem cells for disease research purposes. Currently, Asymmetrex's focus is employing its technological advantages to develop and market facile methods for monitoring adult stem cell number and function in stem cell transplantation treatments and in pre-clinical assays for drug safety.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/03/prweb14146903.htm

Read more:
At 6th Annual Clinical Trial Supply New England 2017 Conference in Boston Asymmetrex Introduces A First Specific ... - Benzinga

Scientists create first 3D structure of active DNA – The Indian Express


The Indian Express
Scientists create first 3D structure of active DNA
The Indian Express
3D structures, invidual cells, DNA, mouse embryonic stem cell, master cells, A genome's structure controls when and how strongly genes particular regions of the DNA are switched 'on' or 'off'. ( Image for representation, Source: Thinkstock ...
These 3D Images Are Our First Ever Look at How DNA Shapes Itself Inside CellsScienceAlert
Cambridge scientists create first 3D DNA structuresITV News

all 5 news articles »

See the original post:
Scientists create first 3D structure of active DNA - The Indian Express

Waiting to Reprogram Your Cells? Don’t Hold Your Breath – Scientific American

Guiding a recent tour of a Kyoto University lab, a staff member holds up a transparent container. Inside are tiny pale spheres, no bigger than peas, floating in a clear liquid. This is cartilage, explains the guide, Hiroyuki Wadahama. It was made here from human iPS cells.

A monitor attached to a nearby microscope shows a mass of pink and purple dots. This is the stuff from which the cartilage was grown: induced pluripotent stem cells, often called iPS cells. Scientists can create these seemingly magical cells from any cell in the body by introducing four genes, in essence turning back the cellular clock to an immature, nonspecialized state. The term pluripotent refers to the fact iPS cells can be reprogrammed to become any type of cell, from skin to liver to nerve cells. In this way they act like embryonic stem cells and share their revolutionary therapeutic potentialand as such, they could eliminate the need for using and then destroying human embryos. Also, iPS cells can proliferate infinitely.

They can also give rise, however, to potentially dangerous mutations, possibly including ones that lead to cancerous tumors. Thus, iPS cells are a double-edged swordtheir great promise is tempered by risk. Another problem is the high cost of treating a patient with his or her own newly reprogrammed cells. But now Japanese researchers are trying a different approach.

When Kyoto University researcher Shinya Yamanaka announced in 2006 that his lab had created iPS cells from mouse skin cells for the first time, biologists were stunned. In 2007, along with James Thomson of the University of WisconsinMadison, Yamanaka repeated the feat with human skin cells. Many hailed the opening of an entirely new field of personalized regenerative medicine. Need new liver cells? No problem. Patients could benefit from having their own cells reprogrammed into ones that could help treat disease, potentially eliminating the prospect of immune rejection. In 2012 Yamanaka shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with John Gurdon for discovering that mature cells can be converted to stem cells. By reprogramming human cells, scientists have created new opportunities to study diseases and develop methods for diagnosis and therapy, the Nobel judges wrote. To capitalize on the discovery, Kyoto University set up the $40-million Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), which Yamanaka directs.

A decade after the Yamanaka teams groundbreaking discoveries, however, iPS cells have retreated from the headlines; to the layperson, progress seems scant. There has only been one clinical trial involving iPS cells, and it was halted after a transplant operation on just one patienta Japanese woman in her 70s with macular degeneration, a condition that can lead to blurry vision or partial blindness. Doctors at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital used her skin cells to grow iPS cells, which were reprogrammed into retinal cells and implanted in her eye. The treatment stopped the degeneration but the trial was halted in 2015 because genetic mutations were detected in another batch of iPS cells intended for another patient. Regulatory changes, under which the Japanese government allowed the distribution of iPS cells for clinical use, also prompted researchers to switch the study to a more efficient process of using cells from third-party donors instead of using a patients own cells. The Japanese government has a lot of incentives to considerwere developing a new science, a new technology and also a new economic market, says CiRA spokesperson Peter Karagiannis. So theres the ethical issues, but theres also money to be made. How do we balance the two?

The Kobe clinical trial had a lot riding on it. And the setback followed a major stem cell scandal in which biologist Haruko Obokata of the Riken Center for Developmental Biology was found to have falsified data in studies, published in 2014, that claimed a new method of achieving pluripotency. Then, earlier this year, Yamanaka had to apologize at a news conference after it was discovered that a reagent used to create iPS cells at CiRA was mislabeled, which could mean the wrong reagent was used. Although the mix-up is being examined, the center has halted supplies of some of its iPS cells to researchers across Japan; the error also set back by a few years a CiRA project to produce clinical-grade platelets from iPS cells.

But Yamanaka says he remains focused on the bigger picture of iPS cells and is still optimistic they can not only help researchers but may be key to transformative clinical therapies. CiRA still has a bank of tens of millions of iPS cells that have already been reset and checked for safety, so they can be used in patient applications. In terms of regenerative medicine, things have gone quicker than I expected, Yamanaka says, adding, iPS cells have exceeded expectations because of their potential for disease modeling, which allows us to elucidate unknown disease mechanisms, and drug discovery.

Those hoping for quick clinical success should remember it takes time for revolutionary treatments to go from lab bench to bedside, says Andras Nagy, a stem cell researcher at Mount Sinai Hospitals LunenfeldTanenbaum Research Institute in Toronto, who has not been directly involved in Yamanakas work. If you fully appreciate the paradigm-shifting nature of iPS cells, tremendous progress has in fact been made over the past 10 years, says Nagy, who in 2009 established a method of creating stem cells without using viruses (which had initially been used to deliver reprogramming genes into targeted cells). By comparison, penicillin was discovered as an antibiotic in 1928, but it was not available in the clinic until the early 1940s.

Researchers in Japan are meanwhile using iPS cell technology to pave the way to better drugs. For instance, CiRAs Kohei Yamamizu recently reported developing a cellular model of the bloodbrain barrier made entirely from human iPS cells. It could become a useful tool for testing drugs for brain diseases.

All eyes, however, are back on Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, which is resuming its retina trialthis time with iPS cells from donors instead of cells from patients themselves. Using CiRAs bank of iPS cells, there are significant time and cost savingsit could be one fifth the cost of cell preparation and patient transplant or less. The initial study, with its personalized approach, reportedly cost about $875,000 for just one patient. We plan to evaluate the efficacy of transplanting the [donor] cells and consider the feasibility of using this method as a routine treatment in the future, accessible to the wider society, study co-leader Masayo Takahashi of the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology said at a February press conference in Kobe. Her husband Jun Takahashi, a researcher at CiRA, is also planning to use donor-derived iPS cells for a clinical applicationto help treat patients with Parkinsons disease.

Nagy admits the promise of personalized cell regeneration is probably too costly for mainstream use, and he believes genomic editingin which DNA is inserted or deletedis key to safe iPS cell implants. For his part, Yamanaka is cautiously optimistic about iPS cells as a therapeutic tool.

Regenerative medicine and drug discovery are the two key applications for iPS cells, Yamanaka says. With the use of iPS cell stock, we are now able to work quicker and cheaper, so thats the challenge going forward.

Visit link:
Waiting to Reprogram Your Cells? Don't Hold Your Breath - Scientific American

Antibody Therapy Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Study – The Scientist


The Scientist
Antibody Therapy Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Study
The Scientist
Carla Kim, an expert in stem cells, cancer, and lung biology at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the study, acknowledged the importance of the research. One nice thing about this is that they're studying EGFR-mutant tumors, she said ...

and more »

Read more:
Antibody Therapy Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Study - The Scientist

Antibody fights pediatric brain tumors in preclinical testing | News … – Stanford Medical Center Report

The most exciting aspect of our findings is that no matter what kind of brain tumor we tested it against, this treatment worked really well in the animal models, said Cheshier, who is also a pediatric neurosurgeon at Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital Stanford. In mice that had been implanted with both normal human brain cells and human brain cancer cells, there was no toxicity to normal human cells but very, very active tumor-killing in vivo, he said.

Given the encouraging results of the new study and the ongoing research on anti-CD47 antibodies in adults, the antibodies are expected to reach clinical trials in children with brain cancer in one to two years, he added.

The anti-CD47 antibodies help the immune system to detect an important difference between cancerous and healthy cells: Cancer cells make eat me signals that are displayed on their cell surfaces, while healthy cells do not. However, cancer cells hide these eat me signals by producing large quantities of CD47, a dont eat me protein that is found on the surface of both healthy and malignant cells. When CD47 is blocked by antibodies, immune cells called macrophages can detect the cancer cells eat me signals. Macrophages then selectively target, engulf and destroy the cancer cells without harming healthy cells, because normal cells lack the eat me signals.

The Stanford team conducted a long series of experiments using different combinations of tumor cells and healthy cells in culture, as well as in various mouse models in which human brain cancer cells had been implanted in mice. Highlights of their experiments included the following:

The anti-CD47 antibodies did not completely eliminate all tumors, suggesting that the antibodies may not be able to completely penetrate large tumors, the researchers noted.

To maximize their effects, the antibodies will likely need to be combined with other forms of cancer treatment, a concept the researchers plan to investigate further, Cheshier said. In the future, patients may receive combinations of immune therapies and lower doses of standard cancer treatments, he said, adding, The question is: Can we wisely combine immune therapies and other approaches to make cancer treatment more efficacious and less toxic?

Anti-CD47 antibodies also may have an advantage over other immunotherapies in that they activate macrophages, which completely engulf and eat cancer cells, Cheshier noted. In many forms of immunotherapy, the cells you target die and spill their contents, which can cause dysregulated immune responses, he said. Anti-CD47 antibodies may produce fewer such side effects, though the idea remains to be tested.

Other Stanford co-authors of the paper are medical students Abdullah Feroze, Rogelio Esparza and Michael Zhang; postdoctoral scholars Suzana Kahn, PhD, Anne Volkmer, MD and Stephen Willingham, PhD; research assistants Anitha Ponnuswami, Theresa Storm, Cyndhavi Narayanan and Pauline Chu; senior research associate Jie Liu, MD, PhD; undergraduate research associate Chase Richard; Aaron McCarthy, a former life sciences research professional and animal colony manager; Patricia Lovelace, research and development engineer; Simone Schubert, life science researcher; visiting scholar Gregor Hutter, MD, PhD; Griffith Harsh, MD, professor of neurosurgery; Michelle Monje, MD, PhD, assistant professor of neurology; Yoon-Jae Cho, MD, a former assistant professor of neurology and neurological sciences; Ravi Majeti, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine; senior scientist Jens Volkmer, MD; Paul Fisher, MD, professor of pediatrics; Gerald Grant, MD, associate professor of neurosurgery; Gary Steinberg, MD, PhD, professor of neurosurgery; Hannes Vogel, MD, professor of pathology and of pediatrics; and Michael Edwards, MD, professor of neurosurgery.

Cheshier, Monje, Majeti, Fisher, Grant and Edwards are members of Stanfords Child Health Research Institute. Cheshier, Weissman, Harsh, Monje, Majeti, Fisher, Grant, Vogel and Edwards are members of the Stanford Cancer Institute. Weissman is the director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and of the Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research and Medicineat Stanford.

Scientists from SickKids, the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto; University Hospital, Dusseldorf; and Johns Hopkins University also contributed to the study.

The study was funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant NINDSK08NS070926); the National Cancer Institute (grant P30CA006973); the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine; the Price Family Charitable Fund; the Center for Childrens Brain Tumors at Stanford; St. Baldricks Foundation; the American Brain Tumor Foundation; the Seibel Stem Cell Institute; the Pew Charitable Trusts; the Dr. Mildred-Scheel Foundation/German Cancer Aid; the German Research Foundation; the McKenna Claire Foundation; the Matthew Larson Foundation; Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation; The Cure Starts Now; the Lyla Nsouli Foundation; the Dylan Jewett, Connor Johnson, Zoey Ganesh, Dylan Frick, Abigail Jensen, Wayland Villars and Jennifer Kranz memorial funds; the Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research; the Lucile Packard Foundation for Childrens Health; the National Institutes of Health (grant UL1TR001085); the Tashia and John Morgridge Endowed Pediatric Faculty Scholar and Fellowships Awards; and the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Endowed Faculty Scholarship in Pediatric Cancer and Blood Diseases. The study was also funded by gifts from George Landegger; Rider and Victoria McDowell; Charles Comey and Judith Huang; and Colin and Jenna Fisher.

Stanfords Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences also supported the work.

Here is the original post:
Antibody fights pediatric brain tumors in preclinical testing | News ... - Stanford Medical Center Report