Role of Stem Cell Reprogramming Factor Uncovered – Technology Networks

A little over 10 years ago, the first reprogramming of adult cells into undifferentiated stem cells was achieved. These induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the ability to become almost any cell type and can divide indefinitely, so share many features with embryonic stem cells. Such characteristics enable iPSCs to be used in several applications of regenerative medicine, particularly because they can be derived from an individuals own cells so tissue rejection problems are not encountered. They can also be programmed to develop into rare or inaccessible cell types, used to screen novel drugs, and studied to understand the cellular basis of disease or reprogramming.

However, while the genetic factors responsible for reprogramming are well known, the mechanisms underlying the responses to induced gene expression changes are not as clear.

Now, research led by the University of Tsukuba has solved the mystery surrounding one of the reprogramming factors, KLF4.

KLF4 together with other reprogramming transcription factors is used in the lab to force the expression of genes in somatic cells (adult non-germline cells) in the development of iPSCs. Somatic cells generate their energy in an oxygen-fueled process called oxidative phosphorylation, which takes place in the mitochondria, also known as cellular powerhouses.

In contrast, stem cells have small mitochondria and use glycolysis as an alternative biochemical pathway to generate energy. This series of reactions can be anaerobic, so more suited to their typically low-oxygen environment, but also provides the supply of metabolic intermediates necessary for rapid growth and division.

University of Tsukuba researchers developed a gene transfer system that allowed iPSC reprogramming to only occur in the presence of KLF4, thus focusing exclusively on its role in the process. They then used genome-wide analysis to search for genes switched on by KLF4 at a late stage of reprogramming.

"We found that the Tcl1 gene was upregulated by KLF4 binding to its enhancer and promoter regions," study co-first author Ken Nishimura says. "KLF4 also caused the binding of another reprogramming factor, OCT4, to the Tcl1 promoter."

The team discovered that the TCL1 protein played a key role in increasing glycolysis by activating a different metabolic pathway that is important for the self-renewal of stem cells.

"We also showed that TCL1 inhibits a mitochondrial enzyme required for in oxidative phosphorylation, leading to a reduction in oxygen consumption of the cells", co-first author Shiho Aizawa explains. "This was matched by increased glucose uptake for glycolysis, revealing that TCL1 promotes the metabolic switch in energy generation necessary for cells to acquire pluripotency."

Reference:

Nishimura, K., Aizawa, S., Nugroho, F. L., Shiomitsu, E., Tran, Y. T., Bui, P. L., . . . Hisatake, K. (2017). A Role for KLF4 in Promoting the Metabolic Shift via TCL1 during Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Generation. Stem Cell Reports. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.026

This article has been republished frommaterialsprovided byUniversity of Tsukuba. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

More here:
Role of Stem Cell Reprogramming Factor Uncovered - Technology Networks

New Medical Procedure Promises Hope for Sickle Cell Patients – Face2Face Africa

In the United States, about 90,000 people, mostly blacks, suffer from the sickle cell disease, and worldwide, an estimated 275,000 babies are born with it each year. Photo credit: the Guardian

A new groundbreaking medical procedure by a team of researchers at Necker Childrens Hospitalin France promises hope for sickle cell disease patients.

Using pioneering treatment, scientists at Necker Childrens Hospital in Paris have succeeded in reversing the disease in a French teenager, reports BBC.

According to the doctors, they were successfully able to alter the genetic instructions in the bone marrow of the teenager to get it to produce healthy red blood cells.

Doctors removed his bone marrow, which manufactures blood. They then genetically altered it in a lab to compensate for the defect in his DNA that caused the disease.

The teenager now 15 underwent the procedure at the hospital in 2014, and scientists say the results so far have been very encouraging with about half of his red blood cells having normal haemoglobin.

Results published by the researchers in the New England Journal of Medicine show the teenager has been making normal blood in the months following the procedure.

Professor Philippe Leboulch, one of the lead scientists on the groundbreaking medical procedure, said that while it is too early to call the procedure a cure for sickle cell disease, it does provide a necessary respite for the teenager.

So far the patient has no sign of the disease, no pain, no hospitalization. He no longer requires a transfusion so we are quite pleased with that.

But of course we need to perform the same therapy in many patients to feel confident that it is robust enough to propose it as a mainstream therapy.

Before the treatment, the teen had to visit the hospital every month to have a transfusion to dilute his defective blood. He also suffered significant internal damage that caused his spleen to be removed and his hips to be replaced.

Dr. Deborah Gill, gene researcher at the University of Oxford, believes the results are a huge step forward and opens new frontiers in treatment for sickle cell sufferers.

Ive worked in gene therapy for a long time and we make small steps and know theres years more work.

But here you have someone who has received gene therapy and has complete clinical remission thats a huge step forward, Dr. Gill said.

Another reported setback is the fact that the expensive procedure can only be carried out in cutting-edge hospitals and laboratories far away from the countries in sub-Saharan Africa where the majority of sickle cell sufferers live with Keith Wailooadding in the New England Journal of Medicine that vexing questions of race and stigma have shadowed the history of the medical treatment of the disease.

Sickle cell disease mainly affects people with African, Caribbean, or Middle Eastern ancestry. In the United States, mostly African Americans are affected, and worldwide, about 275,000 babies are born with it each year.

Illustration showing the difference between normal and sickled red blood cell formations. Photo credit: General Health

In sickle cell sufferers, normally round red blood cells, which carry oxygen around the body, are defective and shaped like a sickle. Those cells can sometimes lock together, clogging tiny blood vessels and causing bouts of extreme pain, organ damage, and even death.

Excerpt from:
New Medical Procedure Promises Hope for Sickle Cell Patients - Face2Face Africa

University of Miami’s Miami project successfully completes SCI clinical trial – Medical Xpress

March 8, 2017 University of Miami's Miami Project to Cure Paralysis surgical team preparing for a Schwann cell transplantation. Credit: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine / Miami Project to Cure Paralysis

The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, today announced the publication of its first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Phase I clinical trial involving human nerve cells used to repair the damaged spinal cord, in the February issue of the Journal of Neurotrauma. The cells, known as Schwann cells, are essential for the repair of nerve damage, and long thought to be able to increase recovery after spinal cord injury. The trial, performed at University of Miami / Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, is the first in a series designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transplanting autologous human Schwann cells to treat individuals with spinal cord injuries.

The trial enrolled subjects with the least chance of natural recovery in order to firstly establish the safety of the cell transplant procedure; specifically, it targeted people with new SCI, less than 30 days after injury, having sustained a trauma-induced lesion between thoracic levels T3-T11 and who were neurologically complete. This was a dose escalation treatment trial testing 3 different doses: 5 million, 10 million, and 15 million Schwann cells. There were a total of 39 people screened for eligibility, 9 were enrolled, and 6 participants were transplanted. The first two participants received the 5 million cell dose, the second two received the 10 million cell dose, and the final two received the 15 million cell dose. Because the Schwann cells, which reside in peripheral nerves, are obtained from a nerve biopsy from each participant, there is reduced concern of immune rejection and immunosuppressant medication is not required. Demonstrating the feasibility of a program involving an autologous cell therapy is critical, given the reduced risk associated with autologous versus allogeneic "off-the-shelf" cell products. Once the cells are removed from the participant, they have to be handled in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Because the cells are eventually injected into the spinal cord, this process is required to ensure that the cells are prepared consistently and without contaminants. Each participant was followed intensively for one year after receiving the transplantation surgery, and their neurologic status, medical status, pain symptoms, and muscle spasticity were evaluated. All participants will continue to be monitored for a total of five years after the transplantation.

Subjects enrolled came from both South Florida, the Caribbean, and Latin America reflecting the importance of Miami as a hub for medical advances in these regions. The enrolled subjects did not experience any severe complications as a result of the therapy or the surgery and one subject recovered sufficient neurological function to be classified as incomplete, whereas upon trial entry, he had complete injury. The clinical trial used advanced cell culture methods, expert surgery, and a strong complement of evaluation techniques to study the impact of the cell transplantation. Importantly, the trial successfully determined safety and feasibility for performing a peripheral nerve harvest within 5-30 days of injury followed by an intra-spinal transplantation of autologous cells within 4-7 weeks of injury, even in individuals having sustained severe spinal injury.

This first trial, using cells grown from the subject's own nerves is an important validation of decades of prior work and animal studies. Scientific reviewers commented that "This is a very carefully executed study and the authors are leading the field as the first non-commercial, i.e. purely academic group, in North America to develop a cell preparation for SCI transplantation and to execute on a cell transplantation trial in humans". It is a key milestone for The Miami Project's integrated program that studies spinal cord injury from multiple perspectives. Having now established the safety of Schwann cell transplantation in this initial group of subjects, it will be possible to combine other exciting therapies to amplify neurological recovery.

The video will load shortly

Explore further: Regenerating nerve tissue in spinal cord injuries

More information: Kimberly D Anderson et al, Safety of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Subacute Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury, Journal of Neurotrauma (2017). DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4895

Researchers at Rush University Medical Center are exploring a new therapy using stem cells to treat spinal cord injuries within the first 14 to 30 days of injury. Rush is only the second center in the country currently studying ...

Researchers at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) recently enrolled their first subject in a national clinical research trial ...

Physicians at Rush University Medical Center became the first in Illinois to inject AST-OPC1 (oligodendrocyte progenitor cells), an experimental treatment, into the damaged cervical spine of a recently paralyzed man as part ...

Research published today, 30th January 2017 online in the Journal of Cell Biology, has for the first time identified how a bodily protein allows nerves of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) to repair following injury.

A study carried out at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine for "The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis" has found that transplanting self-donated Schwann cells (SCs, the principal ensheathing cells of the nervous ...

It takes a villageof neuronsthat is, to process sensory inputs in the brain. For example, when a line appears in our visual field, networks of neurons fire together and send messages throughout the brain to identify ...

Precise knowledge of the connections in the brain the links between all the nerve cells is a prerequisite for better understanding this most complex of organs. Researchers from Heidelberg University have now developed ...

The human brain has the ability to recognise and process a very wide range of sensory stimuli, from which it builds a mental representation. But do these representations change over time? Can we learn to classify and interpret ...

A foray into plant biology led one researcher to discover that a natural molecule can repair axons, the thread-like projections that carry electrical signals between cells. Axonal damage is the major culprit underlying disability ...

Fragile X syndrome is the most common cause of autism. Even though the single gene that's responsible for it was discovered in 1991, and the disease is detected by a simple blood test, there's no treatment or cure.

Like the junctions in an electronic circuit between two semiconductors in an integrated computer chip, synapses in the brain constitute the logic of information flow. Simply put, neurons form functional synapses every time ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

See original here:
University of Miami's Miami project successfully completes SCI clinical trial - Medical Xpress

US Market Report for Orthopedic Cell Therapy 2017 – MedCore – PR Newswire (press release)

LONDON, March 7, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Description

Download the full report: https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/4759855/

General Report Contents - Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends - Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment - Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment - Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

There has been much greater interest in bone marrow concentration for use in spinal fusions compared to platelet-rich plasma. The platelet-rich plasma market, on the other hand, is expanding into soft tissue indications. While bone graft substitutes can be soaked in PRP or bone marrow concentrate as an application, the most rapidly growing application, especially for platelet-rich plasma, is for injectables. Such products are directly injected into the site, for example, in a ligament repair or wound operation. Competition over price is the reason the market values for these segments are not growing as quickly as might be expected. Arthrex significantly brought down the ASP for the market when they introduced their ACP platelet concentration system, but prices have now largely stabilized in the PRP segment. Test-tube-based products allow for concentration of smaller volumes; these systems reduce ASP further as customers can shift away from higher ASP disposable bucket products.

Abstract The scope of the orthopedic cell therapy market in this report covers platelet-rich plasma and concentrated bone marrow aspirate. The platelet and bone marrow concentration market consists of centrifuge equipment that separates and concentrates platelets and cells based on their various densities. The majority of companies participating in this market provide the centrifuges on loan and sell only the disposable components, such as the spin buckets. Typically, one bucket is required per procedure.

Scope: 2013-2023 Download the full report: https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/4759855/

About Reportbuyer Reportbuyer is a leading industry intelligence solution that provides all market research reports from top publishers http://www.reportbuyer.com

For more information: Sarah Smith Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com Email: query@reportbuyer.com Tel: +44 208 816 85 48 Website: http://www.reportbuyer.com

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-market-report-for-orthopedic-cell-therapy-2017---medcore-300419889.html

SOURCE ReportBuyer

http://www.reportbuyer.com

See the original post:
US Market Report for Orthopedic Cell Therapy 2017 - MedCore - PR Newswire (press release)

Researchers Study Cure for Type 1 Diabetes in Stem Cell Transplantations – Business Wire (press release)

DUARTE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Some type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients can be cured from the disease, at least for a number of years, with a stem cell transplant those were the results of a clinical trial monitored by City of Hopes Bart Roep, Ph.D., the Chan Soon-Shiong Shapiro Distinguished Chair in Diabetes and professor/founding chair, Department of Diabetes Immunology. The results were published recently in the journal, Frontiers in Immunology.

This means we can cure type 1 diabetes, be it with a risky therapy although one that is also very successful in cancer, and one for which City of Hope is a world-renowned expert, with more than 13,000 patients having received similar treatment for blood cancers, said Roep, director of The Wanek Family Project for Type 1 Diabetes, which aims to find a cure for T1D in six years. We now understand stem cell transplants can succeed in treating diabetes for some, but not in others, and we can predict either outcome before the therapy is administered by reading the immune signature of the patient with a novel nanotechnology that I developed.

An international team of researchers, including Roep, conducted the trial in Brazil. It showed that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), which uses a persons own stem cells, increases C-peptide levels that show how much insulin is being made by the pancreas and induces insulin independence in patients with T1D. This is possible because the transplanted stem cells are able to balance the immune system. The study also aimed to understand why some patients saw long-term clinical benefit from the transplantation while others did not.

Twenty-one T1D patients who received AHSCT were monitored and assessed every six months. Most patients became insulin free for an average of 3.5 years after transplantation, and C-peptide levels remained higher than initial values for at least four years post-AHSCT, indicating temporary immunological balance and preservation of insulin-secreting beta cells.

One patient is free of insulin for more than eight years now, without any major side effects, Roep said. But he also points out that some participants had little to no benefit. However, we discovered the immune signature predicting these outcomes either favorable or not which is the first step toward personalized medicine in type 1 diabetes. We have a foot in the door.

Because stem cell transplants involve severe immunosuppression prior to transplantation, the procedure is risky and will unlikely become the first line of defense for T1D, Roep added. However, the lessons learned from this and other trials will inform new paths for potential treatments.

The trials findings will aid in the development of new strategies of AHSCT that could lead to even better outcomes for more patients, and will guide future research protocols on immunotherapies for T1D.

This study paves the way for personalized therapy in type 1 diabetes, Roep said. Understanding why it sometimes fails will allow us to design new treatment strategies for those less fortunate patients. Also, it is the first definitive proof that T1D can be cured.

The work described in the Frontiers in Immunology paper was also supported by the So Paulo Research Foundation. The paper is titled Immunological Balance is Associated with Clinical Outcome after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes.

About City of Hope

City of Hope is an independent research and treatment center for cancer, diabetes and other life-threatening diseases. Designated as one of only 47 comprehensive cancer centers, the highest recognition bestowed by the National Cancer Institute, City of Hope is also a founding member of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, with research and treatment protocols that advance care throughout the world. City of Hope is located in Duarte, California, just northeast of Los Angeles, with communityclinics throughout Southern California. It is ranked as one of "Americas Best Hospitals" in cancer by U.S. News & World Report. Founded in 1913, City of Hope is a pioneer in the fields of bonemarrowtransplantation, diabetes and numerous breakthrough cancer drugs based on technology developed at the institution. For more information about City of Hope, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or Instagram.

Visit link:
Researchers Study Cure for Type 1 Diabetes in Stem Cell Transplantations - Business Wire (press release)

New Method Rescues Donor Organs to Save Lives – Laboratory Equipment

A multidisciplinary team led by Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, Mikati Foundation Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Sciences at Columbia Engineering, and Matt Bacchetta, associate professor of surgery at Columbia University Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian has--for the first time--maintained a fully functional lung outside the body for several days. In a study published today on Nature Biomedical Engineering's website, the researchers describe the cross-circulation platform that maintained the viability and function of the donor lung and the stability of the recipient over 36 to 56 hours. They used the advanced support system to fully recover the functionality of lungs injured by ischemia (restricted blood supply), and made them suitable for transplant.

The team was inspired by the critical need to expand the pool of donor lungs. Transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease, but the number of donor lungs is much smaller than the number of patients in need, and many patients die while on the wait list. In addition, lungs quickly lose their function outside the body and during transport: four out of five lungs evaluated at transplant centers are rejected. If these lungs could be kept viable outside the body long enough, it would be possible to improve their function and use them for transplantation.

Over the past five years, Vunjak-Novakovic has been collaborating with Bacchetta and Hans Snoeck, professor of medicine, to investigate how to improve low-quality donor lungs and possibly bioengineer lungs for transplantation. Rather than attempting to build new lungs, they developed strategies to rescue damaged donor lungs. One approach was to use a stem cell therapy of the lung to replace defective cells with new therapeutic cells derived from the transplant recipient. While this technique was applicable to low-quality lungs that are rejected for transplantation, there was a problem: the support of the lung outside the body was too short for the therapeutic cells to start improving lung function.

As often happens, unmet clinical needs inspire new ideas and drive the development of new technologies. The Columbia team realized that "cross circulation"--an abandoned surgical procedure used in the 1960s to exchange blood flow between two patients--could enable long-term support of living organs outside the body by providing critical systemic and metabolic factors that are missing from all current technologies. The team embraced this idea and devised an entirely new approach to support lungs outside the body long enough to enable therapeutic interventions needed to recover their health and normal function.

"This is the most complex study we have ever done, and the one with the highest potential for clinical translation," Vunjak-Novakovic said. "The lung is a masterpiece of 'engineering by nature,' with its more than 40 cell types, and a gas exchange surface area of 100 square meters - half a tennis court. It is amazing that such an intricate organ can be maintained outside the body and even recovered following injury."

"Our team worked hard to innovate a suite of imaging and targeted delivery technologies and ultimately completed this challenging, paradigm-shifting study in less than a year. This was only possible because of our uniquely talented team of bioengineers and surgeons, and the highly collaborative environment at Columbia that fosters innovation," Vunjak-Novakovic said.

The team's breakthrough was realizing that cross-circulation could be re-configured to help recover damaged donor organs. The study's lead authors, Ph.D. candidate John O'Neill and postdoctoral research fellow Brandon Guenthart, looked at clinical studies from the 1960s that used cross-circulation of blood between a healthy individual and a patient suffering from a critical but potentially reversible illness. Working in Vunjak-Novakovic's Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, they developed a radically new technology to support fully functional lung outside the body for several days.

"Our cross-circulation platform will likely allow us to extend the duration of support to a week or longer if needed, potentially enabling the recovery of severely damaged organs," observed O'Neill. "Beyond prolonging support time, we also demonstrated several therapeutic interventions that vastly improve and accelerate recovery."

As the team was developing their cross-circulation platform, they overcame many challenges to keep the lungs viable outside the body much longer than any platform had before. To prevent the outer surface of the lung from drying out and to provide normal body temperature, they designed a humidification system with ambient temperature control and a re-circulating warm water organ basin to provide normal body temperature to mimic the chest cavity.

Then they needed to tackle the perfusion circuit. To allow for adequate blood flow into and out of the lungs during cross-circulation, they developed new components and techniques and used a donor vessel as a "bio-bridge." They engineered a dynamic system capable of height and hydrostatic pressure adjustments and feedback-regulated pressure-controlled flow. They also developed image-guided techniques for the controlled delivery of drugs and cells in precisely targeted regions of the lung without the need for repeated lung biopsies.

"As our work progressed, we continued to innovate out of necessity and refine and streamline our cross-circulation setup and procedure," said Guenthart.

The researchers say their new platform could be readily extended to recover other organs that are in high demand for transplant or in need of repair, including livers and kidneys, and they have already begun studies in these directions.

"Cross-circulation has proven to be a valuable tool for investigation and has fostered interdisciplinary collaborations," Bacchetta said. "Our study is giving researchers new opportunities to investigate donor-recipient immunologic interactions, therapeutic cell delivery, stem cell differentiation, acute lung injury, and the development of new pulmonary theranostics."

Vunjak-Novakovic added, "Our goal was to develop a platform that harnesses the full potential of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine toward organ rescue. We hope that our unique technology will benefit the many patients in need and help them live fuller and happier lives."

The rest is here:
New Method Rescues Donor Organs to Save Lives - Laboratory Equipment

Artificial mouse embryo created out of stem cells – BioNews

Stem cells from an adult mouse have been used to grow a structure resembling a mouse embryo in vitro for the first time.

The ability to study the early stages of embryo development outside the womb may one day help explain why a significant number of human pregnancies fail. This breakthrough in developmental research originated from the same team at University of Cambridge which recently developed a technique that allows human embryos to develop in the lab up to the legal limit of 14 days in the UK.

'We are very optimistic that this will allow us to study key events of this critical stage of human development without actually having to work on (IVF) embryos,'said lead researcher Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetzof the University of Cambridge.

The development of a fertilised egg into a fetus is a complex and poorly understood process of self-assembly and intricate cell-to-cell interaction. In a few days a small ball of undifferentiated cells develops into a blastocyst consisting of three different types of embryonic stem cell. Previous attempts to grow embryos using only one kind of stem cell proved unsuccessful because the cells would not assemble into their correct positions.

The researchers placed both placental andembryonic stem cellsinto a three-dimensional scaffold and discovered that within 96 hoursthe cells had begun to communicate, forming two distinct clusters of cells at each end and a cavity in the middle.

'We knew that interactions between the different types of stem cell are important for development, but the striking thing that our new work illustrates is that this is a real partnership these cells truly guide each other,' said Professor Zernicka-Goetz.

The scientists' goal was not to grow mice outside of the womb, but to open a new window on embryonic development just prior to implantation the so-called 'black box' of embryonic development,later than human embryos can be studiedin vitrobut earlier than ultrasound imaging can be used to view the embryo in the womb. About two-thirds of pregnancies are thought to fail during this stage, but because it is so difficult to study, the reasons are poorly understood.

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge of The Crick Institute, who was not involved in the research,lauded the findings as 'permitting study of events that normally take place within the uterus and are therefore difficult to observe, but in this case with an essentially unlimited supply of starting material'.

If used in human embryology, this methodology could make scientists less dependent on fertilised eggs;using artificial embryos could speed up research and potentially sidestep some ethical concerns.

Some critics fear that the technique could be used irresponsibly however. Dr David King, director of Human Genetics Alert,told the Telegraph: 'What concerns me about the possibility of artificial embryos is that this may become a route to creating GM or even cloned babies.'

The research was published in the journal Science.

Read more here:
Artificial mouse embryo created out of stem cells - BioNews

Scottish universities link to develop stem cell therapies – PharmaTimes

Researchers at the Universities of Dundee and Edinburgh in Scotland are looking to work with the pharmaceutical industry to improve understanding of the biological processes that could form the basis of new therapies to support tissue regeneration or repair.

The National Phenotypic Screening Centre (NPSC) at the University of Dundee and the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Regenerative Medicine (CRM) at the University of Edinburgh have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to work more closely together on translating novel biological discoveries into new stem cell therapies that could address a wide range of conditions.

The UK Regenerative Medicine Platform-funded Engineering and exploiting the stem cell niche Hub, led by the CRM, is dedicated to increase understanding of the biology of stem cell niches and to exploiting this knowledge therapeutically to improve organ regeneration through endogenous repair and cell transplantation.

Finding new drugs which can activate endogenous regenerative pathways requires the development of cell-based assays able to reproduce the complex behaviour of the cells and tissues in patients; the NPSC specialises in developing such assays so they can be systematically screened using large libraries of drug-like molecules to uncover agents that can alter cell and tissue behaviour.

The alliance between the two centres will allow novel biological discoveries from CRM to benefit from the expertise and industrial drug screening infrastructure provided by the NPSC, which, it is hoped, will lead to new therapies.

Stem cell medicine is coming of age. This is a great opportunity for Scottish Universities to partner with industry to ensure we can translate excellent science to new therapies that can help patients with chronic disease, noted Professor Stuart Forbes, Director of the Centre for Regenerative Medicine and co-director of the Niche Hub.

Read more:
Scottish universities link to develop stem cell therapies - PharmaTimes

Asymmetrex’s Head Will Lead Discussion on Supplying Private Stem Cell Clinics at the 6th Annual Clinical Trial … – PR Web (press release)

Time to Supply Private Stem Cell Clinics?

Boston, MA (PRWEB) March 07, 2017

Recent scientific reports put the number of private clinics offering stem cell medical treatments in the U.S. at greater than 400. More than 300 of these clinics emerged since 2009. They mirror the rapid increase in FDA-approved clinical trials during the same period at a rate of about 300 new therapy-focused adult tissue stem cell trials each year. However, because of the inherently small number of patients enrolled in early clinical trials and the much larger number of patients seen in medical clinics, the number of stem cell treatments performed in private clinics dwarfs the number in clinical trials by more than 10-fold.

In both settings, treatment cell transplants per se appear generally safe, as long as proper care is given to other routine safety factors, which include mainly keeping treatments free of infectious agents and chemical contaminants and avoiding immune reactions. These safety procedures fall well within the training and expertise of physicians in private clinics, as well as in hospital-based clinical trials.

The rapid growth of private stem cell clinics has alarmed some stem cell scientists and their member organizations. The clinics are accused of making false claims, exploiting patients pain and distress for financial gain, and generally harming the reputation of stem cell science. In contrast, in FDA-approved clinical trials, patient volunteers are necessarily informed that their treatments are experimental, and therefore may bring them no medical benefit. Generally, trial subjects do not pay for their treatment, though often treatment costs are covered by their personal health insurance.

Asymmetrexs founder and director, James L. Sherley, M.D., Ph.D., recently began a public discourse, in which he argues that in the important respects private stem cell clinics are not all that different than FDA-approved clinical trials. First, he says that glibly painting all several hundred or more private stem cell clinics as exploitive is an unsubstantiated claim itself. Generally, physicians in both settings are diligently looking for ways to improve the health of patients clinical trial physicians in the more distant future and private clinic physicians immediately. Sherley, a physician scientist, stresses the importance of recognizing medical empiricism as an important contributor to the advance of modern medicine and medical science.

At the conference, Sherley is scheduled to lead a panel discussion on the topic on March 8 at 15:50 PM (EDT) and give a talk on March 9 at 13:30 PM (EDT). A major new position he will present is that the volume of stem cell treatments now occurring in private clinics is much too large to simply disparage and attempt to shut down. Working to improve the quality of private stem cell clinic treatments for patients and to improve their documentation towards accelerating progress in stem cell medicine is a better goal.

To attendees at this weeks Clinical Trials Supply conference, Sherley will suggest that the supply of private stem cell clinics with high quality, certified sources of stem cells is an underappreciated crucial need for advancing stem cell medicine. The companies that are able to mobilize to fill in this supply gap could have a 10-fold greater impact on advancing stem cell medicine compared to their current minimal impact in FDA-approved stem cell clinical trials.

About Asymmetrex

Asymmetrex, LLC is a Massachusetts life sciences company with a focus on developing technologies to advance stem cell medicine. Asymmetrexs founder and director, James L. Sherley, M.D., Ph.D. is an internationally recognized expert on the unique properties of adult tissue stem cells. The companys patent portfolio contains biotechnologies that solve the two main technical problems production and quantification that have stood in the way of successful commercialization of human adult tissue stem cells for regenerative medicine and drug development. In addition, the portfolio includes novel technologies for isolating cancer stem cells and producing induced pluripotent stem cells for disease research purposes. Currently, Asymmetrexs focus is employing its technological advantages to develop and market facile methods for monitoring adult stem cell number and function in stem cell transplantation treatments and in pre-clinical assays for drug safety.

Share article on social media or email:

Read more here:
Asymmetrex's Head Will Lead Discussion on Supplying Private Stem Cell Clinics at the 6th Annual Clinical Trial ... - PR Web (press release)

A Cure for Cancer? How CAR-T Therapy is Revolutionizing Oncology – Labiotech.eu (blog)

CAR-T has been hailed as a cure for cancer, butwhat really is this miraculous technology and what can we actually expect when it reaches the market?

The field of immuno-oncology is booming with billions of euros in investment. The ability to rewire our own immune system to fight cancer has certainly created huge expectations. After the success of the first checkpoint inhibitorson the market, many are turning their attention to CAR-T therapy,the next big cancer therapy to hit the market.

But is CAR-T therapy really a cure for cancer, as many seem to believe? Can the technology meet such high expectations? Are the recent deaths in clinical trials a sign that CAR-T is not ready for commercialization? What will the future bring?

To answer some of the most burning questions, Italked with some of the leaders in this field to draw an overview of the current state of the field.

CAR therapy is at the same time cell therapy, gene therapy, and immunotherapy.It represents a radical departure from all forms of medicine in existence until now, Michel Sadelain, co-founder of Juno Therapeutics, told The Scientist.

A CAR-T therapy consists in the infusion of engineered T-cells that express a Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) on their cell membrane. This receptor counts with an externaltarget-binding domain designed to recognize a specific tumor antigen and an internalactivation domain responsible for activating the T-cell when the CAR-T binds its target. Second and third generation CAR-Ts have additional costimulatory domains that further enhance the immune response.

The most common procedure for CAR-T therapy consists in the extraction of T-cells from the own patient, which are then genetically modified and expanded in vitro. Finally, they are reinfused into the patient ready to fight the tumor.

Checkpoint inhibitors have already been incredibly successful. The drugs inhibitthe mechanism that tumor cells use to inhibit T-cell activity and overcome the immune system. CAR-T goes one step further and engineers the T-cell itself to enhance the immune response against a specific tumor antigen.

CAR-T clinical trials have shown huge remission rates, of up to 94% in severe forms of cancer, which is particularly impressive considering most of the trials recruit patients that have not responded to all other available treatments for their form of cancer.These preliminary results have fed the expectations of patients and investors alike, but its important to remember that the therapy also has flaws.

Im just trying to be realistic, CAR-T is not the miracle cure for cancer, Andr Choulika, CEO of Cellectis,told us.CAR-T therapy has in fact been linked tosevere side-effects, such as neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome.The recent report of several deaths in CAR-T trials made many realize that the technology might not be as perfect as many had originally expected.

These results mostly come from the most studied application of CAR-T, which targets the CD19 antigen found in B-cells.The companies leading the development of CAR-T all target the CD19 antigen to treat B-cell malignancies, which include several forms of lymphoma and leukemia.

The initial furor and excitement of CAR-T hasled to extensive and rapid clinical development in the CD19 target space, saysDavid Gilham, R&D VP at Celyad. Research is busy catching up at the moment, in particular concerning toxicity. The lack of good preclinical models hampers this work, but with clinical samples available, ongoing investigations are now closer to identifying the underlying mechanisms and further refining the approach.

There are several companies competingto be the first tomarket. Competition is tight and the results of a clinical trial can change everything.Juno Therapeutics, whichused to lead the race has just announced the termination of its lead CAR-T program after a total of 5 patients died of cerebral edema caused by the therapy. The company had created huge expectations, and itmarket cap reached over 2.5Bn only 3 years after its inception.

In terms of clinical development, Novartis seems to be leading now. In November, the company recently presented results from a Phase II trial with its CAR-T candidate CTL019 for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which achieved remission in 82% of patients after 3 months. The company is preparing to submit applications to the FDA and EMA this year, despite 50% of patients in the trial were reported to present severe side-effects.

Kite Pharmajustreportedresults from a Phase II clinical trial with its lead candidate, axicabtageneciloleucel, previously KTE-C19. The therapy managed to keep 36% of patients with lymphoma clear of the disease after 6months, which made Kites shares jump by 16%. However, this ongoing trial has already reported three deaths, two of them linked to the CAR-T therapy.Hoping to get ahead of Novartis, Kite Pharmastarted regulatory submissions with the FDAin December.

Despitesevere side-effects and several deaths in clinical trials, some argue that CAR-T therapy is worth the risk when a patient has not responded to any other available treatments. But others are already developing improved versions of CAR-T that are safer for the patients.

Cellectis originally developed UCART19, now licensed to Servier and Pfizer. Its a CAR-T therapy with a switch control system that only activates the engineered cells when rapamycin is present. The therapy is in Phase I and has already saved two babies with aggressive forms of leukemia. Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, in the US, is developing a similar technologycalled GoCAR-T that requiresrimiducid for CAR-T cell activation.

For its part, Celyad is developing a version of CAR-T that makes T-cells express Natural Killer Receptors (NKRs).Its disruptive because NKR-2 binds to 8 different ligands that are expressed on above 80% of solid and hematological malignancies, said Christian Homsy, CEO and co-founder of Celyad.Weve started one of the largest and broadesttrials in the sector, targeting 7 indications.

Targeting solid tumors is a big challenge in the field of immuno-oncology. Low T-cell infiltration and an immunosuppressive environment prevent the immune system from effectively attacking solid tumors. Bluebird bio and Celgene are developing their own CAR-T technology for solid tumors from the US.

Others think that the way to go for CAR-T is combination therapies. We are excited about combining checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-1 inhibitors and anti-CTLA4 drugs with CAR-T cells, said Zelig Eshhar, pioneer of the CAR-T technology at the NIH, for The Scientist.

Most approaches to CAR-T engineer the patients own cells, but this process requires several weeks and is expensive. Some estimates for the therapys price go over 500,000. A possible solution is allogeneic CAR-T therapy, i.e. sourced from a healthy donor and ready to go when the patient needs it.

Cellectis and Celyad are developing their ownallogeneic CAR-T each, and theres friction between them both. In this area, Celyad is still in preclinical phase, while Cellectis UCART123 recently received FDA approval to start clinical trials, making it the first study for allogeneic CAR-T in humans.

The technology promises a faster and cheaper approach to CAR-T, but developing an off-the-shelf therapyis a scientifically challenging avenue according to Celyads CEOChristian Homsy.

I doubt that allogeneic CAR-T can be a real off-the-shelf therapy, he commented. There are still some significant scientific challengeswith regards to immunology, as well as manufacturing, transportation, traceability and banking solutions necessary to reach the scale needed for widespread patient treatment.

As you can appreciate, theres plenty going on in the CAR-T space. The technology is not perfect yet, but it offers hope for patients that had none before. Whoever makes it first to the market will open the way for better alternatives to come in the next years.

Images from CI Photos /Shutterstock; Kite Pharma;Klebanoff et al. (2014) Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 11, 685686;Bellicum Pharmaceuticals

Excerpt from:
A Cure for Cancer? How CAR-T Therapy is Revolutionizing Oncology - Labiotech.eu (blog)