Cell Expansion Market Size And Forecast | Top Key Players Thermo Fisher Scientific GE Healthcare (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of General Electric…

New Jersey, United States,-The latest research report provides a complete assessment of theCell ExpansionMarketfor the forecast year 2022-2029, which is beneficial for businesses regardless of their size and revenue. This survey report covers the key market insights and industry approach related to COVID-19 (Omicron) in the coming years. TheCell Expansionmarket report provides data and information on the development of the investment structure, technological improvements, market trends and developments, capabilities, and in-depth information on the major players of theCell Expansionmarket. The market strategies followed worldwide in relation to the current and future scenario of the industry have also been detailed in the study.

The report begins with a brief presentation and overview of theCell Expansionmarket, the current market landscape, market trends, key market players, product type, application, and region. It also covers the impact of COVID-19 (Omicron) on theCell ExpansionMarket Trends, Future Forecast, Growth Opportunities, End-User Industries, and Market Players. It also provides historical data, current market scenarios, and future insights into the Cell Expansionmarket. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of market value with the product price, demand, gross margin, and supply of theCell Expansionmarket. The Competitive Perspective section of the report provides a clear insight into the market share analysis of the major players in the industry.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=23777

Key Players Mentioned in the Cell Expansion Market Research Report:

Thermo Fisher Scientific GE Healthcare (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of General Electric Company), Lonza Group Ltd., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Corning Merck KGAA, Beckman Coulter, Inc. (Subsidiary of Danaher Corporation), MiltenyiBiotec, Stemcell Technologies, Terumo BCT, Inc. (A Subsidiary of Terumo Corporation).

The Cell Expansion market is segmented by product and type. All of these segments were examined individually. The detailed study helps to evaluate the factors affecting the Cell Expansion market. Experts analyzed the nature of development, investments in research and development, changing consumption patterns, and the growing number of applications. Furthermore, analysts have also assessed the development of the economy around the Cell Expansion market which is likely to impact its price.

Cell ExpansionMarket Segmentation:

Cell Expansion Market, By Product

Consumables Instruments Others

Cell Expansion Market, By Cell Type

Human Cells Animal Cells

Cell Expansion Market, By Application

Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Cancer and Cell-Based Research Others

Cell Expansion Market, By End-user

Research Institutes Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutical Companies Cell Banks Other End Users

The regional analysis section of the report allows players to focus on high-growth regions and countries that could help them to expand their presence in the Cell Expansion market. Besides expanding their presence in the Cell Expansion market, regional analysis helps players increase sales while gaining a better understanding of customer behavior in specific regions and countries. The report provides CAGR, revenue, production, consumption, and other important statistics and figures on global and regional markets. It demonstrates how different types, applications, and regional segments of the Cell Expansion market are progressing in terms of growth.

Get Discount On The Purchase Of This Report @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=23777

Cell Expansion Market Report Scope

Determining the pulse of the market becomes easy through this in-detail Cell Expansion market analysis. Key players can find all competitive data and market size of major regions like North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East. As part of the competitive analysis, certain strategies are profiled which are pursued by key players such as mergers, collaborations, acquisitions and new product launches. These strategies will greatly help industry players to strengthen their market position and grow their business.

Key questions answered in the report:

1. Which are the five top players of the Cell Expansion market?

2. How will the Cell Expansion market change in the next five years?

3. Which product and application will take a lions share of the Cell Expansion market?

4. What are the drivers and restraints of the Cell Expansion market?

5. Which regional market will show the highest growth?

6. What will be the CAGR and size of the Cell Expansion market throughout the forecast period?

For More Information or Query or Customization Before Buying, Visit @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/cell-expansion-market/

Visualize Cell Expansion Market using Verified Market Intelligence:-

Verified Market Intelligence is our BI-enabled platform for narrative storytelling of this market. VMI offers in-depth forecasted trends and accurate Insights on over 20,000+ emerging & niche markets, helping you make critical revenue-impacting decisions for a brilliant future.

VMI provides a holistic overview and global competitive landscape with respect to Region, Country, and Segment, and Key players of your market. Present your Market Report & findings with an inbuilt presentation feature saving over 70% of your time and resources for Investor, Sales & Marketing, R&D, and Product Development pitches. VMI enables data delivery In Excel and Interactive PDF formats with over 15+ Key Market Indicators for your market.

Visualize Cell Expansion Market using VMI @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/vmintelligence/

About Us: Verified Market Research

Verified Market Research is a leading Global Research and Consulting firm that has been providing advanced analytical research solutions, custom consulting and in-depth data analysis for 10+ years to individuals and companies alike that are looking for accurate, reliable and up to date research data and technical consulting. We offer insights into strategic and growth analyses, Data necessary to achieve corporate goals and help make critical revenue decisions.

Our research studies help our clients make superior data-driven decisions, understand market forecast, capitalize on future opportunities and optimize efficiency by working as their partner to deliver accurate and valuable information. The industries we cover span over a large spectrum including Technology, Chemicals, Manufacturing, Energy, Food and Beverages, Automotive, Robotics, Packaging, Construction, Mining & Gas. Etc.

We, at Verified Market Research, assist in understanding holistic market indicating factors and most current and future market trends. Our analysts, with their high expertise in data gathering and governance, utilize industry techniques to collate and examine data at all stages. They are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

Having serviced over 5000+ clients, we have provided reliable market research services to more than 100 Global Fortune 500 companies such as Amazon, Dell, IBM, Shell, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Siemens, Microsoft, Sony and Hitachi. We have co-consulted with some of the worlds leading consulting firms like McKinsey & Company, Boston Consulting Group, Bain and Company for custom research and consulting projects for businesses worldwide.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

Verified Market Research

US: +1 (650)-781-4080 UK: +44 (753)-715-0008 APAC: +61 (488)-85-9400 US Toll-Free: +1 (800)-782-1768

Email: sales@verifiedmarketresearch.com

Website:- https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/

See the rest here:
Cell Expansion Market Size And Forecast | Top Key Players Thermo Fisher Scientific GE Healthcare (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of General Electric...

Bristol Myers Squibb to Demonstrate the Strength of its Growing Cardiovascular Portfolio at the American College of Cardiology’s 71st Annual…

Relatlimab is the third immune checkpoint inhibitor from Bristol Myers Squibb, adding to the Company's growing and differentiated oncology portfolio

Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) today announced that Opdualag TM (nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw), a new, first-in-class, fixed-dose combination of nivolumab and relatlimab, administered as a single intravenous infusion, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. 1 The approval is based on the Phase 2/3 RELATIVITY-047 trial, which compared Opdualag (n=355) to nivolumab alone (n=359). 1,2

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220304005561/en/

Opdualag Logo, Bristol Myers Squibb

The trial met its primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), and Opdualag more than doubled the median PFS when compared to nivolumab monotherapy, 10.1 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 6.4 to 15.7) versus 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.4 to 5.6); (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.92, P =0.0055). 1 The Opdualag safety profile was similar to that previously reported for nivolumab. 1,2 No new safety events were identified with the combination when compared to nivolumab monotherapy. 1,2 Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events were 18.9% in the Opdualag arm compared to 9.7% in the nivolumab arm. 2 Drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were 14.6% in the Opdualag arm compared to 6.7% in the nivolumab arm. 2

"Since the approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor more than 10 years ago, we've seen immunotherapy, alone and in combination, revolutionize the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma," said F. Stephen Hodi, M.D., director of the Melanoma Center and the Center for Immuno-Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 3 "Today's approval is particularly significant, as it introduces an entirely new combination of two immunotherapies that may act together to help improve anti-tumor response by targeting two different immune checkpoints LAG-3 and PD-1." 1,2

Opdualag is associated with the following Warnings & Precautions: severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions (IMARs) including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, nephritis with renal dysfunction, dermatologic adverse reactions, myocarditis and other immune-mediated adverse reactions; infusion-related reactions; complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); and embryo-fetal toxicity. 1 Please see Important Safety Information below.

"While we have made great progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma over the past decade, we are committed to expanding dual immunotherapy treatment options for these patients," said Samit Hirawat, chief medical officer, global drug development, Bristol Myers Squibb. 3 "Inhibiting LAG-3 with relatlimab, in a fixed-dose combination with nivolumab, represents a new treatment approach that builds on our legacy of bringing innovative immunotherapy options to patients. The approval of a new medicine that includes our third distinct checkpoint inhibitor marks an important step forward in giving patients more options beyond monotherapy treatment."

Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) are two distinct inhibitory immune checkpoints that are often co-expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, thus contributing to tumor-mediated T-cell exhaustion. 2 The combination of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and relatlimab (anti-LAG-3) results in increased T-cell activation compared to the activity of either antibody alone. 1 Relatlimab (in combination with nivolumab) is the first LAG-3-blocking antibody to demonstrate a benefit in a Phase 3 study. 1 It is the third checkpoint inhibitor (along with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4) for Bristol Myers Squibb.

"Today's approval is exciting news and offers new hope to the melanoma community. The availability of this treatment combination may enable patients to potentially benefit from a new, first-in-class dual immunotherapy," said Michael Kaplan, president and CEO, Melanoma Research Alliance.

The FDA-approved dosing for adult patients and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older who weigh at least 40 kg is 480 mg nivolumab and 160 mg relatlimab administered intravenously every four weeks. 1 The recommended dosage for pediatric patients 12 years of age or older who weigh less than 40 kg, and pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age, has not been established. 1

This application was approved under the FDA's Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) pilot program, which aims to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available to patients as early as possible. 4 The review was also conducted under the FDA's Project Orbis initiative, which enabled concurrent review by the health authorities in Australia, Brazil and Switzerland, where the application remains under review.

About RELATIVITY-047

RELATIVITY-047 is a global, randomized, double-blind Phase 2/3 study evaluating the fixed-dose combination of nivolumab and relatlimab versus nivolumab alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma. 1,2 The trial excluded patients with active autoimmune disease, medical conditions requiring systemic treatment with moderate or high dose corticosteroids or immunosuppressive medications, uveal melanoma, and active or untreated brain or leptomeningeal metastases. 1 The primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival (PFS) determined by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). 1 The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). 1 A total of 714 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a fixed-dose combination of nivolumab (480 mg) and relatlimab (160 mg) or nivolumab (480 mg) by intravenous infusion every four weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 1

Select Safety Profile From RELATIVITY-047

Adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag occurred in 18% of patients. 1 Opdualag was interrupted due to an adverse reaction in 43% of patients. 1 Serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients treated with Opdualag. 1 The most frequent (1%) serious adverse reactions were adrenal insufficiency (1.4%), anemia (1.4%), colitis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.4%), acute myocardial infarction (1.1%), back pain (1.1%), diarrhea (1.1%), myocarditis (1.1%), and pneumonitis (1.1%). 1 Fatal adverse reactions occurred in three (0.8%) patients treated with Opdualag and included hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, acute edema of the lung, and pneumonitis. 1 The most common (20%) adverse reactions were musculoskeletal pain (45%), fatigue (39%), rash (28%), pruritus (25%), and diarrhea (24%). 1 The Opdualag safety profile was similar to that previously reported for nivolumab. 1,2 No new safety events were identified with the combination when compared to nivolumab monotherapy. 1,2 Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events were 18.9% in the Opdualag arm compared to 9.7% in the nivolumab arm. 2 Drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were 14.6% in the Opdualag arm compared to 6.7% in the nivolumab arm. 2

About Melanoma

Melanoma is a form of skin cancer characterized by the uncontrolled growth of pigment-producing cells (melanocytes) located in the skin. 5 Metastatic melanoma is the deadliest form of the disease and occurs when cancer spreads beyond the surface of the skin to other organs. 5,6 The incidence of melanoma has been increasing steadily for the last 30 years. 5,6 In the United States, approximately 99,780 new diagnoses of melanoma and about 7,650 related deaths are estimated for 2022. 5 Melanoma can be mostly treatable when caught in its very early stages; however, survival rates can decrease as the disease progresses. 6

OPDUALAG INDICATION

Opdualag TM (nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw) is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDUALAG IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Immune-mediated adverse reactions (IMARs) listed herein may not include all possible severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions.

IMARs which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. IMARs can occur at any time after starting treatment with a LAG-3 and PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. While IMARs usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur after discontinuation of Opdualag. Early identification and management of IMARs are essential to ensure safe use. Monitor patients closely for symptoms and signs that may be clinical manifestations of underlying IMARs. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment. In cases of suspected IMARs, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue Opdualag depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). In general, if Opdualag requires interruption or discontinuation, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose IMARs are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Toxicity management guidelines for adverse reactions that do not necessarily require systemic steroids (e.g., endocrinopathies and dermatologic reactions) are discussed below.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis, which may be fatal. In patients treated with other PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies, the incidence of pneumonitis is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.7% (13/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 3 (0.6%), and Grade 2 (2.3%) adverse reactions. Pneumonitis led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 0.8% and withholding of Opdualag in 1.4% of patients.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated colitis, defined as requiring use of corticosteroids and no clear alternate etiology. A common symptom included in the definition of colitis was diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies.

Immune-mediated diarrhea or colitis occurred in 7% (24/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (4.5%) adverse reactions. Colitis led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 2% and withholding of Opdualag in 2.8% of patients.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated hepatitis, defined as requiring the use of corticosteroids and no clear alternate etiology.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 6% (20/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 4 (0.6%), Grade 3 (3.4%), and Grade 2 (1.4%) adverse reactions. Hepatitis led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 1.7% and withholding of Opdualag in 2.3% of patients.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

Opdualag can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus, which can be present with diabetic ketoacidosis. Withhold or permanently discontinue Opdualag depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

For Grade 2 or higher adrenal insufficiency, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. In patients receiving Opdualag, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 4.2% (15/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 3 (1.4%) and Grade 2 (2.5%) adverse reactions. Adrenal insufficiency led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 1.1% and withholding of Opdualag in 0.8% of patients.

Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism; initiate hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Hypophysitis occurred in 2.5% (9/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 3 (0.3%) and Grade 2 (1.4%) adverse reactions. Hypophysitis led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 0.3% and withholding of Opdualag in 0.6% of patients.

Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism; initiate hormone replacement or medical management as clinically indicated. Thyroiditis occurred in 2.8% (10/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 2 (1.1%) adverse reactions. Thyroiditis did not lead to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag. Thyroiditis led to withholding of Opdualag in 0.3% of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 6% (22/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 2 (1.4%) adverse reactions. Hyperthyroidism did not lead to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag. Hyperthyroidism led to withholding of Opdualag in 0.3% of patients. Hypothyroidism occurred in 17% (59/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 2 (11%) adverse reactions. Hypothyroidism led to the permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 0.3% and withholding of Opdualag in 2.5% of patients.

Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes; initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated. Diabetes occurred in 0.3% (1/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, a Grade 3 (0.3%) adverse reaction, and no cases of diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes did not lead to the permanent discontinuation or withholding of Opdualag in any patient.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis with Renal Dysfunction

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated nephritis, which is defined as requiring use of steroids and no clear etiology. In patients receiving Opdualag, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2% (7/355) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (0.8%) adverse reactions. Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 0.8% and withholding of Opdualag in 0.6% of patients.

Withhold or permanently discontinue Opdualag depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis, defined as requiring use of steroids and no clear alternate etiology. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and Drug Rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms has occurred with PD-1/L-1 blocking antibodies. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate non-exfoliative rashes.

Withhold or permanently discontinue Opdualag depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

Immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (33/355) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.6%) and Grade 2 (3.4%) adverse reactions. Immune-mediated rash did not lead to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag. Immune-mediated rash led to withholding of Opdualag in 1.4% of patients.

Immune-Mediated Myocarditis

Opdualag can cause immune-mediated myocarditis, which is defined as requiring use of steroids and no clear alternate etiology. The diagnosis of immune-mediated myocarditis requires a high index of suspicion. Patients with cardiac or cardio-pulmonary symptoms should be assessed for potential myocarditis. If myocarditis is suspected, withhold dose, promptly initiate high dose steroids (prednisone or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/day) and promptly arrange cardiology consultation with diagnostic workup. If clinically confirmed, permanently discontinue Opdualag for Grade 2-4 myocarditis.

Myocarditis occurred in 1.7% (6/355) of patients receiving Opdualag, including Grade 3 (0.6%), and Grade 2 (1.1%) adverse reactions. Myocarditis led to permanent discontinuation of Opdualag in 1.7% of patients.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

The following clinically significant IMARs occurred at an incidence of ardiac/Vascular: pericarditis, vasculitis; Nervous System: meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis (including exacerbation), Guillain-Barr syndrome, nerve paresis, autoimmune neuropathy; Ocular: uveitis, iritis, and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur. Some cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other IMARs, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Haradalike syndrome, as this may require treatment with systemic steroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss; Gastrointestinal: pancreatitis including increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue: myositis/polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis (and associated sequelae including renal failure), arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica; Endocrine: hypoparathyroidism; Other (Hematologic/Immune) : hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection.

Infusion-Related Reactions

Opdualag can cause severe infusion-related reactions. Discontinue Opdualag in patients with severe or life-threatening infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with mild to moderate infusion-related reactions. In patients who received Opdualag as a 60-minute intravenous infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 7% (23/355) of patients.

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before or after being treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 receptor blocking antibody. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for evidence of transplant-related complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit versus risks of treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 receptor blocking antibody prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on its mechanism of action and data from animal studies, Opdualag can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Opdualag for at least 5 months after the last dose of Opdualag.

Lactation

There are no data on the presence of Opdualag in human milk, the effects on the breastfed child, or the effect on milk production. Because nivolumab and relatlimab may be excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in a breastfed child, advise patients not to breastfeed during treatment with Opdualag and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Relativity-047, fatal adverse reaction occurred in 3 (0.8%) patients who were treated with Opdualag; these included hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, acute edema of the lung, and pneumonitis. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients treated with Opdualag. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in 1% of patients treated with Opdualag were adrenal insufficiency (1.4%), anemia (1.4%), colitis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.4%), acute myocardial infarction (1.1%), back pain (1.1%), diarrhea (1.1%), myocarditis (1.1%), and pneumonitis (1.1%).

Common Adverse Reactions and Laboratory Abnormalities

The most common adverse reactions reported in 20% of the patients treated with Opdualag were musculoskeletal pain (45%), fatigue (39%), rash (28%), pruritus (25%), and diarrhea (24%).

The most common laboratory abnormalities that occurred in 20% of patients treated with Opdualag were decreased hemoglobin (37%), decreased lymphocytes (32%), increased AST (30%), increased ALT (26%), and decreased sodium (24%).

Please see U.S. Full Prescribing Information for Opdualag .

OPDIVO + YERVOY INDICATIONS

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO + YERVOY IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed herein may not include all possible severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. While immune-mediated adverse reactions usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur after discontinuation of OPDIVO or YERVOY. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of OPDIVO and YERVOY. Monitor for signs and symptoms that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment with OPDIVO and before each dose of YERVOY. In cases of suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). In general, if OPDIVO or YERVOY interruption or discontinuation is required, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose immune-mediated adverse reactions are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Toxicity management guidelines for adverse reactions that do not necessarily require systemic steroids (e.g., endocrinopathies and dermatologic reactions) are discussed below.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. The incidence of pneumonitis is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (

In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 7% (31/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.0%), and Grade 2 (4.4%).

Immune-Mediated Colitis

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated colitis, which may be fatal. A common symptom included in the definition of colitis was diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.7%) and Grade 2 (1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 25% (115/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.4%), Grade 3 (14%) and Grade 2 (8%).

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis and Hepatotoxicity

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (1.3%), and Grade 2 (0.4%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 15% (70/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (2.4%), Grade 3 (11%), and Grade 2 (1.8%).

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis. Withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). For Grade 2 or higher adrenal insufficiency, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism; initiate hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism; initiate hormone replacement or medical management as clinically indicated. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes; initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994), including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.6%).In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 8% (35/456), including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (4.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 8% (35/456), including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (4.2%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (0.3%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (42/456), including Grade 3 (2.4%) and Grade 2 (6%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (163/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (4.8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypothyroidism occurred in 20% (91/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (11%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.3%), and 2 cases of diabetic ketoacidosis.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis with Renal Dysfunction

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated nephritis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (

Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) has occurred with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate nonexfoliative rashes.

YERVOY can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis, including bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, SJS, TEN, and DRESS. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate non-bullous/exfoliative rashes.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (2.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated rash occurred in 28% (127/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.8%) and Grade 2 (10%).

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of ocular: uveitis, iritis, and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis to include increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; musculoskeletal and connective tissue: myositis/polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, and associated sequelae including renal failure, arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica; endocrine: hypoparathyroidism; other (hematologic/immune): hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection.

In addition to the immune-mediated adverse reactions listed above, across clinical trials of YERVOY monotherapy or in combination with OPDIVO, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in nervous system: autoimmune neuropathy (2%), myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis, motor dysfunction; cardiovascular: angiopathy, temporal arteritis; ocular: blepharitis, episcleritis, orbital myositis, scleritis; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis (1.3%); other (hematologic/immune): conjunctivitis, cytopenias (2.5%), eosinophilia (2.1%), erythema multiforme, hypersensitivity vasculitis, neurosensory hypoacusis, psoriasis.

Some ocular IMAR cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Haradalike syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and YERVOY, as this may require treatment with systemic corticosteroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Read more:
Bristol Myers Squibb to Demonstrate the Strength of its Growing Cardiovascular Portfolio at the American College of Cardiology's 71st Annual...

Global Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Services Market to 2030 – by Type of Therapy, Therapeutic Area, Scale of Operation and Geography – PR Newswire

DUBLIN, March 21, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Services Market by Type of Therapy, Therapeutic Area, Scale of Operation and Geography: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2021-2030" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This report features an extensive study of the current landscape and the likely future potential of cell and gene therapy bioassay service providers, over the next decade. The study also features an in-depth analysis, highlighting the capabilities of various industry stakeholders engaged in this field.

Given the various advantages of cell and gene therapies and their ability to address the underlying causes of serious clinical conditions, the preference for such therapeutic modalities has increased over the years. As a result, several cell and gene therapies have been developed and approved for the treatment of a wide range of disease indications. In fact, at the time of this report's publication, more than 30 such therapies had been approved and over 1,200 therapeutic leads are under evaluation in different stages.

Owing to their rising popularity, these upcoming advanced therapeutic products are on the verge of becoming one of the highest valued therapeutic segments within the biopharmaceutical industry. Having said that, as is the case for all biological products, the development of cell and gene therapies is a complex, challenging and cost intensive process. Outsourcing is, therefore, a preferred operational model, with cell and gene therapy innovators relying heavily on specialty contract service providers to handle various aspects of their product development and manufacturing operations. In fact, over three quarters of the biopharmaceutical companies prefer to outsource their operations to the contract service providers and a large part of their expenditure goes to outsourcing services.

Amongst the various operations, the outsourcing of analytical testing services, including environment testing, bioanalytical testing, analytical testing, chemistry and stability testing, method development and validation, and product characterization, has witnessed significant rise in recent years.

The rising demand for outsourcing bioanalytical services has prompted the emergence of several contract research organizations that claim to offer bioassay services for cell and gene therapies. These companies usually have relatively more experience and are well equipped with the instruments and technological platforms to offer both pre-developed and customized bioassays.

In fact, these companies assist in bringing out the maximum efficiency of study design by offering several cost benefits and reducing the associated timelines. Given the benefits of outsourcing the bioassay services and the ongoing efforts of service providers to further improve / expand their respective offerings, we believe that the cell and gene therapy bioassay services market is likely to evolve at a steady pace, till 2030.

In addition to other elements, the study includes:

Key Questions Answered

Key Topics Covered:

1. PREFACE

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS 5.1. Chapter Overview 5.2. Methodology 5.3. Key Parameters 5.4. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Services in North America 5.5. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Services in Europe and Asia-Pacific

6. CELL AND GENE THERAPY BIOASSAY SERVICE PROVIDERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES 6.1. Chapter Overview 6.2. CCRM 6.2.1. Company Overview 6.2.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 6.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 6.3. Nexelis 6.3.1. Company Overview 6.3.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 6.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 6.4. Pacific BioLabs 6.4.1. Company Overview 6.4.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 6.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 6.5. PPD Laboratories 6.5.1. Company Overview 6.5.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 6.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 6.6. WuXi Advanced Therapies 6.6.1. Company Overview 6.6.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 6.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

7. CELL AND GENE THERAPY BIOASSAY SERVICE PROVIDERS IN EUROPE AND ASIA-PACIFIC: COMPANY PROFILES 7.1. Chapter Overview 7.2. AnaBioTec 7.2.1. Company Overview 7.2.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 7.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.3. Intertek Pharmaceutical Services 7.3.1. Company Overview 7.3.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 7.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.4. Lonza 7.4.1. Company Overview 7.4.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 7.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook 7.5. Porton Bio 7.5.1. Company Overview 7.5.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Portfolio 7.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

8. MARKET TREND ANALYSIS

9. GLOBAL EVENT AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVE ANALYSIS

10. CASE STUDY: MARKET LANDSCAPE OF CELL AND GENE THERAPIES 10.1. Chapter Overview 10.2. Cell Therapy Market 10.2.1. T-Cell Immunotherapies: Development Pipeline 10.2.1.1. Analysis by Type of Product 10.2.2. CAR-T Cell Therapies: Development Pipeline 10.2.2.1. Analysis by Phase of Development 10.2.2.2. Analysis by Therapeutic Area 10.2.2.3. Analysis by Type of Developer 10.2.2.4. Key Industry Players: Analysis by Number of CAR-T Cell Therapies in Development 10.2.3. TCR-based Therapies: Development Pipeline 10.2.3.1. Analysis by Phase of Development 10.2.3.2. Analysis by Therapeutic Area 10.2.3.3. Analysis by Type of Developer 10.2.3.4. Key Industry Players: Analysis by Number of TCR-based Therapies in Development 10.2.4. TIL-based Therapies: Development Pipeline 10.2.4.1. Analysis by Phase of Development 10.2.4.2. Analysis by Therapeutic Area 10.2.4.3. Analysis by Type of Developer 10.2.4.4. Key Industry Players: Analysis by Number of TIL-based Therapies in Development 10.3. Gene Therapy Market 10.3.1. Gene Therapy Market: Clinical and Commercial Pipeline 10.3.1.1. Analysis by Phase of Development 10.3.1.2. Analysis by Therapeutic Area 10.3.2. Gene Therapy Market: Development Pipeline 10.3.2.1. Analysis by Phase of Development 10.3.2.2. Analysis by Therapeutic Area

11. LIKELY PARTNERS FOR CELL THERAPY BIOASSAY SERVICE PROVIDERS 11.1. Chapter Overview 11.2. Scope and Methodology 11.3. Potential Strategic Partners for Cell Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 11.3.1. Likely Partner Opportunities for Stem Cell Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 11.3.2. Likely Partner Opportunities for CAR-T Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 11.3.3. Likely Partner Opportunities for Dendritic Cell Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 11.3.4. Likely Partner Opportunities for Tumor Cell Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 11.3.5. Likely Partner Opportunities for NK Cell Therapy Bioassay Service Providers

12. LIKELY PARTNERS FOR GENE THERAPY BIOASSAY SERVICE PROVIDERS 12.1. Chapter Overview 12.2. Scope and Methodology 12.3. Potential Strategic Partners for Gene Therapy Bioassay Service Providers 12.3.1. Likely Partner Opportunities in North America 12.3.2. Likely Partner Opportunities in Europe 12.3.3. Likely Partner Opportunities in Asia-Pacific

13. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS

14. CONCLUSION

15. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS

16. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA

17. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/5d7pa0

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

Visit link:
Global Cell and Gene Therapy Bioassay Services Market to 2030 - by Type of Therapy, Therapeutic Area, Scale of Operation and Geography - PR Newswire

Home | Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration …

In more than 140 labs across UCSF, scientists are carrying out studies in cell culture and animals with the goal of understanding and developing treatment strategies for such conditions as heart disease, diabetes, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons disease, Lou Gehrigs disease, spinal cord injury and cancer.

The Broad Center is structured around eight research pipelines aimed at driving discoveries from the lab bench to the patient. Each pipeline focuses on a different organ system, including the blood, pancreas, liver, heart, reproductive organs, nervous system, musculoskeletal tissues, skin and eyes. Each of these pipelines is overseen by two leaders of international standing one representing the basic sciences and one representing clinical research. This approach has proven successful in the private sector for driving the development of new therapies.

Like all of UCSF, the Center fosters a highly collaborative culture, encouraging the cross-pollination of ideas between scientists of different disciplines and years of experience. Researchers studying pancreatic beta cells damaged in diabetes collaborate with those studying nervous system diseases, because at the heart of their research are stem cells that undergo similar molecular signaling on the way to becoming both cell types. The opportunity to work in this culture has drawn some of the countrys premier scientists to the center.

UCSF Mourns the Loss of EliBroad(1933-2021)

The UC San Francisco community is deeply saddened to learn of the passing of EliBroad, a renowned entrepreneur and philanthropist whose generosity supported scientific and medical research, the arts, and high-quality educational opportunities for students across the U.S.

The Eli and EdytheBroadCenter of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCSF will be forever grateful to Mr.Broadfor his extraordinary vision and generosity. His investments in UCSFs stem cell endeavors have enabled our scientists to accelerate our research, by bringing some of the worlds leading stem cell scientists together under one roof and providing them with a setting that promotes collaboration and an exchange of ideas, both key to making clinical advances to improve human health. His legacy will live on through the breakthroughs and improvements in patient care made possible by his support of our work.

In fact, Mr.Broads impact on stem cell science at UCSF and beyond will be felt for generations to come. Along with his wife of over 60 years, Edye, Mr.Broadsupported stem cell research at a time when the country most needed national leadership in this area of scientific inquiry. Eager to leverage his philanthropic dollars for maximum impact, Mr.Broadsaw an opportunity to fund stem cell research when Californians passed a proposition funding $3 billion in bonds to support stem cell research and research facilities in 2004. Shortly after President George W. Bush vetoed a bill that would have supported federal funding of stem cell research, the couples philanthropic organization, The Eli and EdytheBroadFoundation, made an initial investment of $65 million to create three newBroadStem Cell Centers at UCSF, UCLA, and the University of Southern California. The Foundation has since made supplemental gifts bringing their total contribution to these centers to $113 million. The efforts have made California a leading center of stem cell research in the country.

To learn more about the remarkable life of EliBroad, please visitthis link.

In Memoriam: Katja Brueckner, PhD

In Memoriam: Zena Werb, MD, PhD

See the article here:
Home | Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration ...

MS in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine

Discover the future of medicine

The Master of Science degree program invites you to chart the course for the medicine of the futureregenerative medicine. This is one of the first masters programs in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine in the United States.

Our one-year program offers courses in cutting-edge biomedical science, including developmental biology, human embryology, regenerative medicine, and the translational and therapeutic aspects of stem cell technology. The program also provides practical hands-on laboratory experience with the growth and differentiation of stem cells. Although not required, students are encouraged to engage in laboratory research during the year, with one of the 80+ lab groups that constitute USC Stem Cell. At the completion of the first year, students may informally continue to conduct research in their labs after receiving the MS diploma, or can petition to continue research with a guided and structured second research year culminating in a capstone thesis project.

After completing this program, you will be poised to apply to medical or PhD programs, enter the growing stem cell pharmaceutical domain, or engage in other academic, clinical or business efforts. You will possess a unique understanding of how the bodys own developmental and repair mechanisms can restore damaged cells, tissues and organsproviding new opportunities to treat conditions ranging from blindness to cancer, from organ failure to HIV/AIDS.

To apply, visit gradadm.usc.edu.

Please note that the application portal for Fall 2022 will open October 15th, 2021. The deadline to apply will be April 1st, 2022.

For questions, e-mail us at scrm@usc.edu or call (323) 865 1266.

Originally posted here:
MS in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine

Rising Focus on Exploring Potential of Stem Cells as Therapeutic Tools in Drug Targeting and Regenerative Medicine to Fuel Revenue Growth of Stem…

NEW YORK, Jan. 10, 2022 /PRNewswire/ --Reports and Data has published its latest report titled "Stem Cells Market By Product (Adult Stem Cells, Human Embryonic Stem Cells, IPS Cells, and Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells), By Technology (Cell Acquisition, Cell Production, Cryopreservation, and Expansion & Sub-Culture), By Therapies (Allogeneic Stem Cell Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Therapy), and By Application (Regenerative Medicine and Drug Discovery & Discovery), and By Region Forecast To 2028."

According to the latest report by Reports and Data, the global stem cells market size was USD 10.13 billion in 2020 and is expected to reach USD 19.31 Billion in 2028 and register a revenue CAGR of 8.4% during the forecast period, 2021-2028.

Request a Sample Reporthttps://www.reportsanddata.com/sample-enquiry-form/2981

Drivers, Restraints, & Opportunities

Stem cells are cells that have the potential to differentiate into different types of cells in the body. Stem cells have the ability of self-renewal and differential into specialized adult cell types. Stems cells are being explored for their potential in tissue regeneration and repair and in treatment of chronic diseases. Increasing number of clinical trials are underway to assess and establish safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for various diseases and disorders. Rapid advancement in stem cell research, rising investment to accelerate stem cell therapy development, and increasing use of stem cells as therapeutic tools for treatment of neurological diseases and malignancies are some key factors expected to drive market revenue growth over the forecast period. in addition, growing incidence of type 1 diabetes, spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's diseases, and Alzheimer's disease, among others have further boosted adoption of stem cell therapies and is expected to fuel revenue growth of the market going ahead.

Stem cells are basic cells in the body from which cells with specialized functions are generated such as heart muscle cells, brain cells, bone cells, or blood cells. Maturation of stem cells into specialized cells have enabled researchers and doctors better understand the pathophysiology of diseases and conditions. Stem cells have great potential to be grown to become new tissues for transplant and in regenerative medicine. Stem cells that are programmed to differentiate into tissue-specific cells are widely being used to test new drugs that target specific diseases, such as nerve cells can be generated to test safety and efficacy of drugs that are being developed for nerve disorders and diseases. Stem cells are of two major types: pluripotent cells that can differentiate into any cells in the adult body and multipotent cells that are restricted to differentiate into limited population of cells. Increasing clinical research is being carried out to advance stem cell therapy to improve cardiac function and to treat muscular dystrophy and heart failure. Recent progress in preclinical and clinical research have expanded application scope of stem cell therapy into treating diseases for which currently available therapies have failed to be effective. This is expected to continue to drive revenue growth of the market going ahead.

However, immunity-related concerns associated with stem cell therapies, increasing incidence of abnormalities in adult stem cells, and rising number of ethical issues associated with stem cell research such as risk of harm during isolation of stem cells, therapeutic misconception, and concerns surrounding safety and efficacy of stem cell therapies are some key factors expected to restrain market growth to a certain extent over the forecast period.

To identify the key trends in the industry, research study at https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/stem-cells-market

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Rising use of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine to Drive Market Growth:

Human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) segment is expected to register significant revenue growth over the forecast period attributable to increasing use of human embryonic stem cells in regenerative medicine and tissue repair, rising application in drug discovery, and growing importance of embryonic stem cells as in vitro models for drug testing.

Cryopreservation Segment to Account for Largest Revenue Share:

Cryopreservation segment is expected to dominate other technology segments in terms of revenue share over the forecast period. Cryopreservation techniques are widely used in stem cell preservation and transport owing to its ability to provide secure, stable, and extended cell storage for isolated cell preparations. Cryopreservation also provides various benefits to cell banks and have numerous advantages such as secure storage, flexibility and timely delivery, and low cost and low product wastage.

Regenerative Medicine Segment to Lead in Terms of Revenue Growth:

Regenerative medicine segment is expected to register robust revenue CAGR over the forecast period attributable to significant progress in regenerative medicine, increasing research and development activities to expand potential of stem cell therapy in treatment of wide range of diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and cancers, among others, and rapid advancement in cell-based regenerative medicine.

Buy Premium Research Report @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/checkout-form/2981

North America to Dominate Other Regions in Terms of Revenue Share:

North America is expected to dominate other regional markets in terms of revenue share over the forecast period attributable to increasing adoption of stem cell therapy to treat chronic diseases, rising investment to accelerate stem cell research, approval for clinical trials and research studies, growing R&D activities to develop advanced cell-based therapeutics, and presence of major biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies in the region.

Asia Pacific Market Revenue to Expand Significantly:

Asia Pacific is expected to register fastest revenue CAGR over the forecast period attributable to increasing R&D activities to advance stem cell-based therapies owing to rapidly rising prevalence of chronic diseases such as cancer and diabetes, rising investment to accelerate development of state-of-the-art healthcare and research facilities, establishment of a network of cell banks, increasing approval for regenerative medicine clinical trials, and rising awareness about the importance of stem cell therapies in the region.

Major Companies in the Market Include:

Download Report Summary @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/download-summary-form/2981

Market Segmentation:

For the purpose of this report, Reports and Data has segmented the stem cells market based on product, technology, therapies, application, and region:

Product Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2018-2028)

Technology Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2018-2028)

Therapy Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2018-2028)

Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2018-2028)

Ask for Customize Research Report @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/request-customization-form/2981

Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion, 2018-2028)

Some points on how the report benefits stakeholders:

Explore Trending Research Reports by Reports and Data:

Genotyping assay marketsize was USD 17.7 Billion in 2020 and is expected to register a robust CAGR of 22.4% during the forecast period. Key factors driving market revenue growth are increasing prevalence of genetic disorders such as Turner syndrome, Alzheimer's, hemophilia, and Parkinson's, and rising demand for genotyping assays globally.

Nurse call system marketsize was USD 1.61 Billion in 2020 and is expected to register a revenue CAGR of 8.8% during the forecast period. Increasing need to improve communication among doctors and nurses, growing focus on reducing patient disturbances, and higher adoption of real-time location systems are key factors expected to drive market revenue growth over the forecast period. Moreover, increasing need to improve patient response time is another factor expected to drive market growth in the near future.

Cellular health screening marketsize was USD 2.84 billion in 2020 and is expected to register a CAGR of 10.3% during the forecast period. Increasing application of cellular health screening in precision medicine, rising emphasis on preventive healthcare, rapidly and growing geriatric population globally are key factors expected to drive market revenue growth over the forecast period.

Live cell encapsulation marketsize was USD 269 million in 2020 and is expected to register a CAGR of 3.6% during the forecast period. Key factors, such as increasing awareness about cell encapsulation techniques to treat several chronic disorders and growing need for clinical potency of cell encapsulation techniques, are escalating global market revenue growth.

Blood preparation marketsize was USD 41.30 billion in 2020 and is expected to register a CAGR of 5.8% during the forecast period. The global market is projected to gain rapid traction in the upcoming years owing to various favorable factors.

About Reports and Data

Reports and Data is a market research and consulting company that provides syndicated research reports, customized research reports, and consulting services. Our solutions purely focus on your purpose to locate, target, and analyze consumer behavior shifts across demographics, across industries, and help clients to make smarter business decisions. We offer market intelligence studies ensuring relevant and fact-based research across multiple industries, including Healthcare, Touch Points, Chemicals, Products, and Energy. We consistently update our research offerings to ensure our clients are aware of the latest trends existent in the market. Reports and Data has a strong base of experienced analysts from varied areas of expertise. Our industry experience and ability to develop a concrete solution to any research problems provides our clients with the ability to secure an edge over their respective competitors.

Contact:

John W Head of Business Development Reports And Data | Web: http://www.reportsanddata.com Direct Line: +1-212-710-1370 E-mail: [emailprotected] LinkedIn | Twitter | Blogs

Read Latest Press Release @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/press-release/global-stem-cells-market

SOURCE Reports And Data

Read more here:
Rising Focus on Exploring Potential of Stem Cells as Therapeutic Tools in Drug Targeting and Regenerative Medicine to Fuel Revenue Growth of Stem...

Wealth of Newer Treatment Options Span the Scope of Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis – OncLive

Tomer Mark, MD, discusses the emerging role of minimal residual disease as a surrogate end point in multiple myeloma, treatment selection for patients with newly diagnosed, early relapsed, and late relapsed disease, and the importance of daratumumab being introduced to the treatment paradigm of amyloidosis.

Treatment selection for patients with newly diagnosed, early relapsed, and late relapsed multiple myeloma requires consideration of patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors, said Tomer Mark, MD, who added that the need for minimal residual disease (MRD) as a surrogate end point for survival is stronger now with optimal sequencing strategies remaining uncertain.

Multiple myeloma is moving very fast right now. There are a lot of new agentsthat are exciting, including oral options. There is an embarrassment of riches in terms of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma, so we have to sift through this treasure to find the best treatment for the right patient at the right time, said Mark in an interview with OncLive during an Institutional Perspectives in Cancer (IPC) webinar on multiple myeloma.

During the interview, Mark, an associate professor of medicine, clinical director of the Plasma Cell Disorders Program, and clinical director of the Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Program, in the Department of Medicine-Hematology, at the University of Colorado (UC) School of Medicine, of UCHealth, discussed the emerging role of MRD as a surrogate end point in multiple myeloma, treatment selection for patients with newly diagnosed, early relapsed, and late relapsed disease, and the importance of daratumumab (Darzalex) being introduced to the treatment paradigm of amyloidosis.

Mark: We are seeing the continued theme of MRD and how important it is as an end point. Although not quite universally accepted as a surrogate marker for survival, it certainly is much closer than what we had before with the IMWG [International Myeloma Working Group] criteria. It is good to see that more studies are using MRD as an end point. Also, its good that more patients are reaching that end point, even in the relapsed/refractory setting. We are seeing that in the CAR T-cell therapy studies with idecabtagene vicleucel [ide-cel; Abecma] and ciltacabtagene autoleucel [cilta-cel] that close to 50% of patients are reaching MRD negativity. Extended results with the use of monoclonal antibodies in the up-front setting, like the GRIFFIN study [NCT02874742], also show continued MRD negativity with continued treatment. Getting these very deep responses is the theme now, which is refreshing. Now our problem returns full circle to sequencing, which used to be a big issue a few years ago.

The message is that incorporation of a monoclonal antibody as part of induction therapy provides a great benefit that is durable to patients. Incorporating the monoclonal antibodies [into frontline treatment] is going to become the standard of care. The data we saw at [the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition] simply reinforced those results.

The ICARIA-MM [NCT02990338] and IKEMA [NCT03275285] studies looking at isatuximab-irfc [Sarclisa] in combination with either carfilzomib [Kyprolis] or pomalidomide [Pomalyst] showed outstanding results in terms ofnearly a halving of the risk of progression at any point in time. The hazard ratio was between 0.5 and 0.6 in both studies.

Subgroup analyses were refreshing in that age and cytogenetics didnt seem to have much of an effect [on survival] or at least not as much of an effect as they used to with older agents. The theme continues of using monoclonal antibodies early on in therapy. One point to make about that is that sequential CD38-directed antibodies, no matter the order of daratumumab or isatuximab first followed by the other, does not seem to be an effective strategy. There needs to be a period between those sorts of therapies.

That is the major question [in this setting]. There are clinical trials looking at moving CAR T-cell therapy, as well as bispecific antibodies, closer to the frontline [setting]. We are still learning how to manage toxicities from these therapies, like cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cellassociated neurotoxicity syndrome. As we gather more data, these things are getting more predictable and we are managing them better; however, we are keeping patients in the hospital for 2 weeks to get their CAR T cells because we just dont know what will happen. With bispecific antibodies, we have step-up dosing because we just dont know what will happen. We need more experience with these agents.

That said, eventually, CAR T-cell therapy will become part of the standard of care at some point. Just like autologous stem cell transplant, [CAR T-cell therapy] requires some planning, so CAR T-cell therapy may be used in a more elective situation, not as a rescue therapy for patients. Perhaps, the decision will be made based on MRD status after induction. That has yet to be determined.

In emergent situations, we can use bispecific antibodies, which are the off-the-shelf T-cell harnessing therapies. There are practical reasons for using [bispecific antibodies] vs [CAR T-cell therapy].

One nice thing we saw is that we can give sequential antiBCMA-directed therapy, which is the opposite of what we know about [sequential] monoclonal antibodies. That means that we dont have to be as careful in terms of planning whether we are going to give belantamab mafodotin followed by antiBCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy vs the other way around. Of course, there are some issues with belantamab mafodotin, such as corneal toxicities. The results of belantamab mafodotin in combination with dexamethasone were disappointing, although the later DREAMM trials [evaluating belantamab mafodotin] in combination with bortezomib [Velcade] showed much better results.

It seems that belantamab mafodotin is not destined to be a single-agent therapy and it will be used in combination. It is off-the-shelf, so that is a plus given that we need an ophthalmologic exam before each dose, which is a big minus. In an academic or large hospital where the ophthalmologist is down the hall, that isnt a problem, but in the community clinics where the ophthalmologist is across town, that isnt as practical. These things get baked into the equation.

When we look at comparisons over time, it seems that cilta-cel is a bit more effective than ide-cel. Id like to exercise caution [comparing] apples and oranges. The ide-cel population [comprised] sicker patients in general with higher-risk cytogenetics and higher-risk multiple myeloma. I imagine that if ide-cel were used in a very similar patient population to [the one in which] cilta-cel [was evaluated] this difference might not be so great. We are comparing 2 amazing therapies. For ide-cel, we have seen response rates around 80% with durations of response [DOR] lasting close to 1 year. With cilta-cel, we are looking at 90% to 100% response rates in some studies and a DOR not yet reached.

I get asked this question all the time: Which therapy should I give to give to my patients? The answer is whichever is available. There are manufacturing and supplier problems, as well as slot allocation problems for apheresis and lymphocyte collection. We are grabbing whatever opportunity we get.

It was amazing to perform such a large, randomized trial in AL amyloidosis. I am proud to have participated in this study. It has probably set the world record for the fastest accrual to an amyloidosis trial. That shows the faith that we have in daratumumab working.

The addition of daratumumab to [AL amyloidosis] treatment is probably as significant as the first use of proteasome inhibitors in amyloid treatment. It really is a sea change, and the difference in terms of progression-free survival and organ recovery is so profound that there is no question that daratumumab should be part of frontline care for AL amyloidosis. This is especially [true] for patients who are not transplant eligible.

In transplant-eligible patients, it is more of a question of whether we should transplant patients more up front and then [continue] later with antibody therapy. That is going to be a practical matter in terms of [evaluating] plasma-cell burden, how sick are they, and how many organs are affected. Overall, outcomes for [patients with] amyloidosis are much better now that we have this treatment.

We are working on developing an ex-vivo drug testing platform for patients with multiple myeloma. It is well known that myeloma is not one disease, it is many diseases, which accounts for the variety of outcomes we can see with therapy. This is an effort to tailor the therapy to that patients particular myeloma phenotype, meaning how it behaves in real life. This is opposed to risk-adapted therapy where we make guesses based on high-risk cytogenetics or mutations.

Of course, this only accounts for one aspect of a disease in which there are multiple mutations and clones going on at the same time. Our institution is focused on getting primary patient myeloma samples, real myeloma cells as opposed to cell lines, putting them in cultures with various drugs being tested, and making a prescription for the patient based on this. This is all experimental and more work needs to be done. We are just now doing our translational studies where we are testing this principle out in a clinical trial setting.

Go here to read the rest:
Wealth of Newer Treatment Options Span the Scope of Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis - OncLive

Companies In The Regenerative Medicine For Cartilage Market Increase R&D On Gene Therapy Technique As Per – Benzinga

LONDON, Jan. 11, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- According to The Business Research Company's research report on the regenerative medicine for cartilage market, gene therapies are most promising technique to effectively treat and regenerate the damaged cartilage in case of bone and joint injuries and severe bone deformities. Gene therapy is defined as the treatment and management of disease by the introduction of foreign genes or sequences of encoded proteins into different type of cells by using gene transfer technique. Many manufacturers constantly evaluate the feasibility and safety of this technique in clinical trials.

For instance, in 2017, Kolon TissueGene, Inc received marketing authorization for its gene therapy product Invossa (TissueGene-C) a cell mediated gene therapy that contains non-transduced human chondrocytes (hChonJ) and transduced (hChonJb#7) human allogeneic chondrocytes. The hChonJb#7 cells were transduced with TGF-1 gene by using retroviral vector and irradiated with gamma-ray, in South Korea, based on Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical studies treating patients with moderate knee OA. In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed the continuation of the Phase 3 clinical trial of Invossa, gene therapy for osteoarthritis, in the US.

The global regenerative medicine for cartilage market reached a value of nearly $4.83 billion in 2021 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.10%. Regenerative medicine for cartilage market growth is mainly due to the companies resuming their operations and adapting to the new normal while recovering from the COVID-19 impact. The market is expected to reach $6.56 billion in 2025 at a CAGR of 7.94%.

LAST WEEK of our huge market research report sale! Grab your deal now.

The global regenerative medicine for cartilage market is fragmented, with a few large players constituting significant market share. The top ten competitors in the market made up to 24.69% of the total market in 2020. The market consolidation can be attributed to the high barriers to entry in terms of high costs associated with the production of regenerative medicine for cartilage. Major players in the regenerative medicine for cartilage market are B. Braun Melsungen AG, Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc., Vericel Corporation, Stryker Corporation, Smith & Nephew plc, Arthrex Inc., CONMED Corporation, Collagen Solutions PLC, BioTissue Technologies, CellGenix, Osiris Therapeutics Inc., and DePuy Synthes.

Request for a sample of the global regenerative medicine for cartilage market report

TBRC's regenerative medicine for cartilage market analysis report segments the market by treatment modality into cell-based, and non-cell-based; by treatment type into palliative, intrinsic repair stimulus, and others; by site into knee cartilage repair, ribs, and others; by application into hyaline cartilage repair and regeneration, elastic cartilage repair and regeneration, and fibrous cartilage repair and regeneration; by end use into ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals & clinics, and others.

Pharmaceutical companies and federal governments are increasingly working together in partnerships and collaborations to provide funding and implement incentive programs for the research and development (R&D) of regenerative medicine for cartilage. These partnerships provide financial and technical assistance across different clinical development phases to pharmaceutical companies. As per the regenerative medicine for cartilage market trends, in 2021, Government of Canada along with various provincial government have announced multiple investment initiative to setup flexible biomanufacturing capacity and new biotech innovation hubs.

As per TBRC's regenerative medicine for cartilage market research, North America was the largest region in the regenerative medicine for cartilage market, accounting for 52.4% of the total in 2021. It was followed by the Western Europe, Asia Pacific and then the other regions. Going forward, the fastest-growing regions in the regenerative medicine for cartilage market will be Middle East and Africa where growth will be at CAGRs of 31.9% and 30.7% respectively during 2021-2026. These will be followed by Eastern Europe and Asia Pacific.

Regenerative Medicine For Cartilage Market Global Report 2022: Market Size, Trends, And Global Forecast 2022 - 2026 is one of a series of new reports from The Business Research Company that provide regenerative medicine for cartilage market overviews, regenerative medicine for cartilage market analyze and forecast market size and growth for the whole market, regenerative medicine for cartilage market segments and geographies, regenerative medicine for cartilage market trends, regenerative medicine for cartilage market drivers, regenerative medicine for cartilage market restraints, regenerative medicine for cartilage market leading competitors' revenues, profiles and market shares in over 1,000 industry reports, covering over 2,500 market segments and 60 geographies.

The report also gives in-depth analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the market. The reports draw on 150,000 datasets, extensive secondary research, and exclusive insights from interviews with industry leaders. A highly experienced and expert team of analysts and modelers provides market analysis and forecasts. The reports identify top countries and segments for opportunities and strategies based on market trends and leading competitors' approaches.

Not the market you are looking for? Check out some similar market intelligence reports:

Stem Cell Therapy Global Market Report 2021 - By Type (Allogeneic Stem Cell Therapy, Autologous Stem Cell Therapy), By Cell Source (Adult Stem Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Embryonic Stem Cells), By Application (Musculoskeletal Disorders, Wounds And Injuries, Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders), By End-User (Hospitals, Clinics), COVID-19 Growth And Change

Gene Therapy Global Market Report 2021 - By Gene Type (Antigen, Cytokine, Suicide Gene), By Vector (Viral Vector, Non-Viral Vector), By Application (Oncological Disorders, Rare Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Neurological Disorders, Infectious Diseases), By End Users (Hospitals, Homecare, Specialty Clinics), COVID-19 Growth And Change

Orthobiologics Devices And Equipment Global Market Report 2021 - By Product Type (Demineralized Bone Matrix, Synthetic Bone Substitutes, Stem Cell Therapy, Plasma-Rich Protein, Viscosupplementation, Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Synthetic Orthobiologics), By Application (Osteoarthritis And Degenerative Arthritis, Soft-Tissue Injuries, Fracture Recovery, Maxillofacial And Dental Applications, Spinal Fusion, Trauma Repair, Reconstructive Surgery), By End Use (Hospitals, Orthopedic Clinics), COVID-19 Impact And Recovery

Interested to know more about The Business Research Company?

The Business Research Company is a market intelligence firm that excels in company, market, and consumer research. Located globally it has specialist consultants in a wide range of industries including manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, chemicals, and technology.

The World's Most Comprehensive Database

The Business Research Company's flagship product, Global Market Model, is a market intelligence platform covering various macroeconomic indicators and metrics across 60 geographies and 27 industries. The Global Market Model covers multi-layered datasets which help its users assess supply-demand gaps.

See the rest here:
Companies In The Regenerative Medicine For Cartilage Market Increase R&D On Gene Therapy Technique As Per - Benzinga

Regenerative Medicine: The Promise Of Undoing The Ravages Of Time – Hackaday

In many ways, the human body is like any other machine in that it requires constant refueling and maintenance to keep functioning. Much of this happens without our intervention beyond us selecting what to eat that day. There are however times when due to an accident, physical illness or aging the automatic repair mechanisms of our body become overwhelmed, fail to do their task correctly, or outright fall short in repairing damage.

Most of us know that lizards can regrow tails, some starfish regenerate into as many new starfish as the pieces which they were chopped into, and axolotl can regenerate limbs and even parts of their brain. Yet humans too have an amazing regenerating ability, although for us it is mostly contained within the liver, which can regenerate even when three-quarters are removed.

In the field of regenerative medicine, the goal is to either induce regeneration in damaged tissues, or to replace damaged organs and tissues with externally grown ones, using the patients own genetic material. This could offer us a future in which replacement organs are always available at demand, and many types of injuries are no longer permanent, including paralysis.

Our level of understanding of human physiology and that of animals in general has massively expanded since the beginning of the 20th century when technology allowed us to examine the microscopic world in more detail than ever before. Although empirical medical science saw its beginnings as early as the Sumerian civilization of the 3rd millennium BCE, our generalized understanding of the processes and components that underlie the bodys functioning are significantly more recent.

DNA was first isolated in 1869 by Friedrich Miescher, but its structure was not described until 1953. This discovery laid the foundations for the field of molecular biology, which seeks to understand the molecular basis for biological activity. In a sense this moment can be seen as transformative as for example the transition from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics, in that it changed the focus from macroscopic observations to a more fundamental understanding of these observations.

This allowed us to massively increase our understanding of how exactly the body responds to damage, and the molecular basis for regenerative processes, as well as why humans are normally not able to regrow damaged limbs. Eventually in 1999 the term regenerative medicine was coined by William A. Haseltine, who wrote an article in 2001 on what he envisions the term to include. This would be the addressing of not only injuries and trauma from accidents and disease, but also aging-related conditions, which would address the looming demographic crisis as the average age of the worlds populations keeps increasing.

The state of the art in regenerative medicine back in 2015 was covered by Angelo S. Mao et al. (2015). This covers regenerative methods involving either externally grown tissues and organs, or the stimulating of innate regenerative capabilities. Their paper includes the biomedical discipline of tissue engineering due to the broad overlap with the field of regenerative medicine. Despite the very significant time and monetary requirement to bring a regenerative medicine product to market, Mao et al. list the FDA-approved products at that time:

While these were not miracle products by any stretch of the imagination, they do prove the effectiveness of these approaches, displaying similar or better effectiveness as existing products. While getting cells to the affected area where they can induce repair is part of the strategy, another essential part involves the extracellular matrix (ECM). These are essential structures of many tissues and organs in the body which provide not only support, but also play a role in growth and regeneration.

ECM is however non-cellular, and as such is seen as a medical device. They play a role in e.g. the healing of skin to prevent scar tissue formation, but also in the scaffolding of that other tantalizing aspect of regenerative medicine: growing entire replacement organs and body parts in- or outside of the patients body using their own cells. As an example, Mase Jr, et al. (2010) report on a 19-year old US Marine who had part of his right thigh muscle destroyed by an explosion. Four months after an ECM extracted from porcine (pig) intestinal submucossa was implanted in the area, gradual regrowth of muscle tissue was detected.

An important research area here is the development of synthetic ECM-like scaffolding, as this would make the process faster, easier and more versatile. Synthetic scaffolding makes the process of growing larger structures in vitro significantly easier as well, which is what is required to enable growing organs such as kidneys, hearts and so on. These organs would then ideally be grown from induced pluropotent stem cells (iPS), which are a patients own cells that are reverted back to an earlier state of specialization.

It should come as little surprise that as a field which brings together virtually every field that touches upon (human) biology in some fashion, regenerative medicine is not an easy one. While its one thing to study a working system, its a whole different level to get one to grow from scratch. This is why as great as it would be to have an essentially infinite supply of replacement organs by simply growing new ones from iPS cells, the complexity of a functional organ makes this currently beyond our reach.

Essentially the rule is that the less complicated the organ or tissue is, the easier it is to grow it in vitro. Ideally it would just consist out of a single type of cell, and happy develop in some growth medium without the need for an ECM. Attractive targets here are for example the cornea, where the number of people on a waiting list for a corneal transplant outnumber donor corneas significantly.

In a review by Mobaraki et al. (2019), the numerous currently approved corneal replacements as well as new methods being studied are considered. Even though artificial corneas have been in use for years, they suffer from a variety of issues, including biocompatibility issues and others that prevent long-term function. Use of donor corneas comes with shortages as the primary concern. Current regenerative research focuses on the stem cells found in the limbus zone (limbal stem cells, LSC). These seem promising for repairing ocular surface defects, which has been studied since 1977.

LSCs play a role in the regular regenerative abilities of the cornea, and provide a starting point for either growing a replacement cornea, or to repair a damaged cornea, along with the addition of an ECM as necessary. This can be done in combination with the inhibiting of the local immune response, which promotes natural wound healing. Even so, there is still a lot more research that needs to be performed before viable treatments for either repairing the cornea in situ, or growing a replacement in vitro can be approved the FDA or national equivalent.

A similar scenario can be seen with the development of artificial skin, where fortunately due to the large availability of skin on a patients body grafts (autografts) are usually possible. Even so, the application of engineered skin substitutes (ESS) would seem to be superior. This approach does not require the removal of skin (epidermis) elsewhere, and limits the amount of scar formation. It involves placing a collagen-based ECM on the wound, which is optionally seeded with keritanocytes (skin precursor cells), which accelerates wound closure.

Here the scaffolding proved to be essential in the regeneration of the skin, as reported by Tzeranis et al. (2015). This supports the evidence from other studies that show the cell adhesion to the ECM to be essential in cell regulation and development. With recent changes, it would seem that both the formation of hair follicles and nerve innervation may be solved problems.

It will likely still be a long time before we can have something like a replacement heart grown from a patients own iPS cells. Recent research has focused mostly on decellularization (leaving only the ECM) of an existing heart, and repopulating it with native cells (e.g. Glvez-Montn et al., 2012). By for example creating a synthetic scaffold and populating it with cells derived from a patients iPS cells, a viable treatment could be devised.

Possibly easier to translate into a standard treatment is the regrowth of nerves in the spinal cord after trauma, with a recent article by lvarez et al, (2021) (press release) covering recent advances in the use of artificial scaffolds that promotes nerve regeneration, reduces scarring and promotes blood vessel formation. This offers hope that one day spinal cord injures may be fully repairable.

If we were to return to the body as a machine comparison, then the human body is less of a car or piece of heavy machinery, and more of a glued-together gadget with complex circuitry and components inside. With this jump in complexity comes the need for a deeper level of understanding, and increasingly more advanced tools so that repairs can be made efficiently and with good outcomes.

Even so, regenerative medicine is already saving the lives of for example burn victims today, and improving the lives of countless others. As further advances in research continue to translate into treatments, we should see a gradual change from youll have to learn to live with that, to a more optimistic give it some time to grow back, as in the case of an injured veteran, or the victim of an accident.

See the original post:
Regenerative Medicine: The Promise Of Undoing The Ravages Of Time - Hackaday

Fertilis medical advance uses automation to support cells – Healthcare Global – Healthcare News, Magazine and Website

An Australian medtech startup, Fertilis, has announced Horizons Ventures as its lead investor, following an AUS$2.75mn seed round.

Founded in 2019, Fertilis is headquartered in Adelaide, Australia and develops medical technology which transforms the IVF process by increasing IVF success rates. The company hopes that this technology will make the discovery of new treatments easier for a range of other chronic conditions, including cancer, diabetes and Cystic Fibrosis.

Infertility impacts one in seven couples in the USA and IVF has a success rate of 11% - 30%.

Despite being carried out by trained professionals, IVF is a complicated process, subject to external variables. Even human errors can have consequences for anxious patients, who must bear the financial and emotional toll.

With Fertilis automation technology, some of these variables are removed, which can improve pregnancy rates.

The Fertilis technology includes a new class of 3D printed micro-medical device (0.01 to 1.0 mm across, the width of a human hair) which can hold a single cell through to a small group of cells. This allows for the culturing of cells - such as an embryo - in micro environments, that resemble the conditions in the human body. Via monitoring and automation, the cells environment can be altered in a controlled manner, by removing the need for specialists to move the cells several times throughout the process.

Fertilis' technology reduces the number of cycles required to get pregnant, by 30-40%. Women usually need three cycles of IVF in order to become pregnant, but Fertilis' technology can reduce this to two.

The funding will permit the Fertilis team to expand its scientific development and in 2022, it will enter global IVF clinical trials, to market the application of cell culture automation.

Fertilis hopes to enter the IVF market in 2023 and then enter other parts of the healthcare sector, including gene therapy.

Due to its ability to significantly increase the accuracy and productivity of cell culture laboratory processes, we believe Fertilis' technology will have a transformative impact on a wide range of healthcare applications that ranges from diagnostics and treatment to the creation of specific cell culture products, said Chris Liu, Horizons Ventures. We look forward to working closely with Fertilis as the company begins clinical trials next year and scales internationally thereafter.

IVF can be an incredibly difficult and stressful experience, fraught with anxiety and uncertainty, said Professor Jeremy Thompson, Founder, CSO and Lead Researcher. Every failed attempt is devastating for aspiring parents and its heartbreaking for them to know that an IVF cycle is still more likely to fail than succeed. IVF is a fragile and complicated process with many variables; things like handling and transferring embryos from dish to dish, even the air quality in a lab can affect the result. Our technology allows for much greater precision and consistency, meaning we can offer women and couples with fertility issues a better chance of getting pregnant and having a healthy baby.

We believe our technology represents the most significant development in cell culture precision and consistency in over 30 years, said Marty Gauvin, Co-Founder and CEO. Starting with IVF, we will work with clinics and labs to build solutions that occupy the same space as their incubators do today. We are partnering with IVF facilities around the world to conduct full scale clinical trials; a crucial step in making this medical breakthrough available to couples and individuals dealing with infertility. For the clinics themselves we believe our offering is compelling; our technology is easy to adopt, its more reliable and transparent, giving lab technicians better control. This unique enabling technology is the future of IVF treatment and cell culture."

More:
Fertilis medical advance uses automation to support cells - Healthcare Global - Healthcare News, Magazine and Website