MorphoSys and Incyte Announce the Acceptance of the Swissmedic Marketing Authorization Application f – PharmiWeb.com

DGAP-News: MorphoSys AG / Key word(s): Miscellaneous 05.01.2021 / 08:00 The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Media Release

MorphoSys and Incyte Announce the Acceptance of the Swissmedic Marketing Authorization Application for Tafasitamab

- The Swissmedic MAA seeks approval for tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PLANEGG/MUNICH, Germany and MORGES, Switzerland - January 5, 2021 - MorphoSys AG (FSE: MOR; Prime Standard Segment; MDAX & TecDAX; NASDAQ:MOR) and Incyte (NASDAQ:INCY) today announced that the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic) has accepted the marketing authorization application (MAA) for tafasitamab, a humanized Fc-modified cytolytic CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody. The MAA seeks approval for tafasitamab, in combination with lenalidomide, followed by tafasitamab monotherapy, for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The MAA will now enter the formal review process by Swissmedic.

The Swissmedic MAA for tafasitamab will be reviewed as part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) modified Project Orbis, which provides a framework for concurrent submission and review of oncology drug applications among the FDA's international collaborators. Collaboration among international regulators may allow patients with cancer to receive earlier access to products in other countries.

"Currently about 40% of DLBCL patients do not respond to initial therapy or relapse thereafter leading to a high medical need for new, effective therapies," said Peter Langmuir, M.D., Group Vice President, Targeted Therapeutics, Incyte. "The acceptance of the MAA for tafasitamab for review by Swissmedic is a pivotal step towards bringing tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide to eligible patients in Switzerland."

"Tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide may represent an important new targeted treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL," said Mike Akimov, M.D., Ph.D., Head of Global Clinical Development, MorphoSys. "We look forward to continuing to work with the regulatory authorities alongside our partners at Incyte to bring this novel therapeutic option to eligible patients with a high unmet medical need."

The Swissmedic application, submitted by Incyte in collaboration with MorphoSys, is supported by data from the L-MIND study evaluating tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and data from the RE-MIND study, an observational retrospective study in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. If approved, Incyte will hold the marketing authorization, and have exclusive commercialization rights for tafasitamab in Switzerland.

Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights for tafasitamab outside the United States.

About Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) DLBCL is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults worldwide[1], characterized by rapidly growing masses of malignant B-cells in the lymph nodes, spleen, liver, bone marrow or other organs. It is an aggressive disease with about 40% of patients not responding to initial therapy or relapsing thereafter[2]. In Europe, each year approximately 16,000 patients are diagnosed with relapsed or refractory DLBCL[3],[4],[5].

About L-MIND The L-MIND trial is a single arm, open-label, multicenter Phase 2 study (NCT02399085) investigating the combination of tafasitamab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have had at least one, but no more than three prior lines of therapy, including an anti-CD20 targeting therapy (e.g. rituximab), who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy or refuse subsequent autologous stem cell transplant. The study's primary endpoint is Overall Response Rate (ORR). Secondary outcome measures include Duration of Response (DoR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). In May 2019, the study reached its primary completion.

For more information about L-MIND, visit https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02399085

About RE-MIND RE-MIND, an observational retrospective study (NCT04150328), was designed to isolate the contribution of tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide and to prove the combinatorial effect. The study compares real-world response data of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received lenalidomide monotherapy with the efficacy outcomes of the tafasitamab-lenalidomide combination, as investigated in MorphoSys' L-MIND trial. RE-MIND collected the efficacy data from 490 relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients in the U.S. and the EU. Qualification criteria for matching patients of both studies were pre-specified. As a result, 76 eligible RE-MIND patients were identified and matched 1:1 to 76 of 80 L-MIND patients based on important baseline characteristics. Objective Response Rates (ORR) were validated based on this subset of 76 patients in RE-MIND and L-MIND, respectively. The primary endpoint of RE-MIND was met and shows a statistically significant superior best ORR of the tafasitamab-lenalidomide combination compared to lenalidomide monotherapy.

For more information about RE-MIND, visit https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04150328.

About Tafasitamab Tafasitamab is a humanized Fc-modified cytolytic CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody. In 2010, MorphoSys licensed exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize tafasitamab from Xencor, Inc. Tafasitamab incorporates an XmAb(R) engineered Fc domain, which mediates B-cell lysis through apoptosis and immune effector mechanism including Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Antibody-Dependent Cellular Phagocytosis (ADCP).

Monjuvi(R) (tafasitamab-cxix) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s).

In January 2020, MorphoSys and Incyte entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement to further develop and commercialize tafasitamab globally. Monjuvi is being co-commercialized by Incyte and MorphoSys in the United States. Incyte has exclusive commercialization rights outside the United States.

Tafasitamab is being clinically investigated as a therapeutic option in B-cell malignancies in a number of ongoing combination trials.

Monjuvi(R) is a registered trademark of MorphoSys AG.

XmAb(R) is a registered trademark of Xencor, Inc.

About MorphoSys MorphoSys (FSE & NASDAQ: MOR) is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of exceptional, innovative therapies for patients suffering from serious diseases. The focus is on cancer. Based on its leading expertise in antibody, protein and peptide technologies, MorphoSys, together with its partners, has developed and contributed to the development of more than 100 product candidates, of which 27 are currently in clinical development. In 2017, Tremfya(R), developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and marketed by Janssen Biotech, Inc., for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, became the first drug based on MorphoSys' antibody technology to receive regulatory approval. In July 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval of MorphoSys' proprietary product Monjuvi(R) (tafasitamab-cxix) in combination with lenalidomide in patients with a certain type of lymphoma.

Headquartered near Munich, Germany, the MorphoSys group, including the fully owned U.S. subsidiary MorphoSys US Inc., has ~500 employees. More information at http://www.morphosys.com or http://www.morphosys-us.com.

Monjuvi(R) is a registered trademark of MorphoSys AG.

Tremfya(R) is a registered trademark of Janssen Biotech, Inc.

About Incyte Incyte is a Wilmington, Delaware-based, global biopharmaceutical company focused on finding solutions for serious unmet medical needs through the discovery, development and commercialization of proprietary therapeutics. For additional information on Incyte, please visit Incyte.com and follow @Incyte.

MorphoSys Forward-looking Statements This communication contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the MorphoSys group of companies, including the expectations regarding Monjuvi's ability to treat patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the further clinical development of tafasitamab-cxix, including ongoing confirmatory trials, additional interactions with regulatory authorities and expectations regarding future regulatory filings and possible additional approvals for tafasitamab-cxix as well as the commercial performance of Monjuvi. The words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict," "project," "would," "could," "potential," "possible," "hope" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. The forward-looking statements contained herein represent the judgment of MorphoSys as of the date of this release and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which might cause the actual results, financial condition and liquidity, performance or achievements of MorphoSys, or industry results, to be materially different from any historic or future results, financial conditions and liquidity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, even if MorphoSys' results, performance, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which it operates are consistent with such forward-looking statements, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods. Among the factors that may result in differences are MorphoSys' expectations regarding risks and uncertainties related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to MorphoSys' business, operations, strategy, goals and anticipated milestones, including its ongoing and planned research activities, ability to conduct ongoing and planned clinical trials, clinical supply of current or future drug candidates, commercial supply of current or future approved products, and launching, marketing and selling current or future approved products, the global collaboration and license agreement for tafasitamab, the further clinical development of tafasitamab, including ongoing confirmatory trials, and MorphoSys' ability to obtain and maintain requisite regulatory approvals and to enroll patients in its planned clinical trials, additional interactions with regulatory authorities and expectations regarding future regulatory filings and possible additional approvals for tafasitamab-cxix as well as the commercial performance of Monjuvi, MorphoSys' reliance on collaborations with third parties, estimating the commercial potential of its development programs and other risks indicated in the risk factors included in MorphoSys' Annual Report on Form 20-F and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these uncertainties, the reader is advised not to place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of publication of this document. MorphoSys expressly disclaims any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements in this document to reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, unless specifically required by law or regulation.

Incyte Forward-looking Statements Except for the historical information set forth herein, the matters set forth in this press release, including statements regarding whether or when tafasitamab might be approved in Switzerland for the treatment of, and whether or when tafasitamab might provide a successful treatment option for, in combination with lenalidomide, certain patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and the L-MIND and RE-MIND clinical trial programs. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current expectations and subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including unanticipated developments in and risks related to: unanticipated delays; further research and development and the results of clinical trials possibly being unsuccessful or insufficient to meet applicable regulatory standards or warrant continued development; the ability to enroll sufficient numbers of subjects in clinical trials; determinations made by European regulatory authorities or other regulatory authorities, including the U.S. FDA; the Company's dependence on its relationships with its collaboration partners; the efficacy or safety of the Company's products and the products of the Company's collaboration partners; the acceptance of the Company's products and the products of the Company's collaboration partners in the marketplace; market competition; sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution requirements; greater than expected expenses; expenses relating to litigation or strategic activities; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2020. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. # # #

Contacts:

References [1] Sarkozy C, et al. Management of relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Best Practice Research & Clinical Haematology. 2018 31:209-16. doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2018.07.014. [2] Skrabek P, et al. Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Current Oncology. 2019 26(4): 253-265. doi.org/10.3747/co.26.5421. [3] DRG Epidemiology data. [4] Kantar Market Research (TPP testing 2018). [5] Friedberg, Jonathan W. Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2011; 2011:498-505. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.498.

05.01.2021 Dissemination of a Corporate News, transmitted by DGAP - a service of EQS Group AG. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

The DGAP Distribution Services include Regulatory Announcements, Financial/Corporate News and Press Releases. Archive at http://www.dgap.de

Read more from the original source:
MorphoSys and Incyte Announce the Acceptance of the Swissmedic Marketing Authorization Application f - PharmiWeb.com

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with proteasome inhibitors in…

This article was originally published here

J Med Econ. 2021 Jan 4:1. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1867469. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with different proteasome inhibitors (PIs) for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Germany.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical chart review of treatment patterns, outcomes, and HRU for patients with RRMM treated with bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib in second- or third-line (2L or 3L) therapy in Germany. Data were collected between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2017. Costs were calculated based on drug prices and unit costs in Germany.

RESULTS: Physicians provided data on 302 patients. Mean monthly total direct costs per patient receiving PI-based therapy were 7,925 and 10,693 for 2L and 3L, respectively, of which approximately 90% was anti-myeloma drug costs. Overall, the highest costs were associated with patients receiving 3L therapy. Regardless of treatment line, costs were higher for patients who had received a stem cell transplant (SCT) in a previous treatment line than for those who had not; the data suggest that this reflects the use of triplet regimens following a SCT. Patients with a complete response (CR) experienced no unplanned hospitalizations during the study period, whereas patients with progressive disease experienced the highest number of unplanned and planned hospitalizations. In 2L therapy, the highest proportion of patients with a CR was observed in those receiving carfilzomib (12% carfilzomib; 4% bortezomib; 0% ixazomib).

LIMITATIONS: Patients with missing or incomplete follow-up data were included in the study and were accounted for using monthly cost estimates.

CONCLUSIONS: Anti-myeloma drugs were the main contributor to total HRU costs associated with RRMM in Germany. Improved treatment response was associated with lower costs and reduced hospitalizations.

PMID:33390079 | DOI:10.1080/13696998.2020.1867469

Read more:
Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with proteasome inhibitors in...

Global Circulating Tumor Cells and Cancer Stem Cells Market To Reach A New Threshold of Growth By 2026 – The Courier

The globalCirculating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Marketresearch report gives point to point breakdown along with the data of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) markets analytical study, regional analysis, growth factors and leading companies. The research report about the market provides the data about the aspects which drive the expansion of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) industry. The market consists of large key companies who play a vital role in the production, manufacturing, sales and distribution of the products so that the supply & demand chain are met. A complex examination of the worldwide market share of past as well as future with certain trends is catered to in current report.

Our Research Analyst implemented a Free PDF Sample Report copy as per your Research Requirement, also including impact analysisofCOVID-19 on Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Market Sales

Request for a FREE sample of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market research report@https://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-and-cancer-stem-276519#RequestSample

Scope of Global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Market Research Report

The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market research report provides crucial info related to overall global market in conjunction with segmentation, regional and statistical data that helps in indentifying the suitable business intelligence essentials.

The segmentation of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market CellSearch, Oncoquick, ISET, MACS, Others is primarily based on market size, application, end use industry, type, and various other factors.

The major players Aviva Biosciences Corporation, ApoCell, BioView, Janssen, IVDiagnostics, Silicon Biosystems, Creatv MicroTech, Gilupi, ScreenCell, Miltenyi Biotec, Qiagen, Fluidigm, Biofluidica, YZY Bio, Ikonisys, Clearbridge Biomedics, AdnaGen, Cynvenio, On-chip, Fluxion, Celsee, CytoTrack, Advanced Cell Diagnostics who are currently ruling the Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market are included in the report.

The report gives the aspects which will propel the growth of worldwide Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market.

The analytical investigation given in the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market research report provides comprehensive info about regional growth of the industry along with capital acquired through the development and growth of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market.

Multiple business models have been used in the study of the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market.

Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Market COVID-19 Impact Analysis

As the world is still dealing with COVID-19 situation, many of the countries have slowly started to revive its economic situation by starting its trade and businesses. There has been enormous loss in these few months both in terms of economy and human lives. As the WHO has already suggested that there are very less chances that the virus will completely go, hence we will have start living with it. Many of the drug companies are getting positive response of their COVID-19 vaccines, but there is still time for its availability in the global market.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study at::https://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-and-cancer-stem-276519

Summary

The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market research report gives a comprehensive data and analysis about the worldwide market. The Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) report further gives the data that one could rely on; which comes with in-depth analysis of market. Different factors like in-depth description of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market, growth factors, segmentation, regional analysis, sales, supply, demand, manufacture analysis, recent trends, and competing companies are included in the report. The exquisite data provided in global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market research report is explanatory in terms of quantity as well as quality.

There are 15 Sections to show the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) market

Sections 1, Definition, Specifications and Classification of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS), Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS), Market Segment by Regions; Section 2, Assembling Cost Structure, Crude Material and Providers, Assembling Procedure, Industry Chain Structure; Sections 3, Technical Data and Manufacturing Plants Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS), Capacity and Commercial Production Date, Manufacturing Plants Distribution, R&D Status and Technology Source, Raw Materials Sources Analysis; Sections 4, Generally Market Analysis, Limit Examination (Organization Fragment), Sales Examination (Organization Portion), sales Value Investigation (Organization Section); Sections 5 and 6, Regional Market Investigation that incorporates United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea and Taiwan, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) segment Market Examination (by Sort); Sections 7 and 8, The Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Segment Market Analysis (by Application) Major Manufacturers Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) ; Sections 9, Market Trend Analysis, Regional Market Trend, Market Trend by Product Type CellSearch, Oncoquick, ISET, MACS, Others Market Trend by Application Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Other Cancers Diagnosis and Treatment; Sections 10, Regional Promoting Type Investigation, Worldwide Exchange Type Examination, Inventory network Investigation; Sections 11, The Customers Examination of global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS); Sections 12, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, system and information source; Sections 13, 14 and 15, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCS) deals channel, wholesalers, merchants, traders, Exploration Discoveries and End, appendix and data source.

Enquire Here Get customization & check discount for report::https://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-and-cancer-stem-276519#InquiryForBuying

Excerpt from:
Global Circulating Tumor Cells and Cancer Stem Cells Market To Reach A New Threshold of Growth By 2026 - The Courier

The Worldwide Cell Isolation/Cell Separation Industry is Expected to Grow at a CAGR of 16.8% Between 2020 to 2025 – PRNewswire

DUBLIN, Jan. 4, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Cell Isolation/Cell Separation Market by Product (Reagents, Beads, Centrifuge), Cell Type (Human, Animal), Cell Source (Bone Marrow, Adipose), Technique (Filtration), Application (Cancer, IVD), End-User (Hospitals, Biotechnology) - Global Forecast to 2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global cell isolation market is expected to reach USD 14,995.98 million by 2025 from USD 6894.32 million in 2020, at a CAGR of 16.8% during the forecast period.

Market growth is driven by factors The growing investments in personalized medicine can primarily be attributed to the growing demand for advanced treatments with minimal side-effects and the rising prevalence of diseases such as cancer. With the rising focus on the development of personalized medicine, the number of personalized medications available in the market has steadily increased over the last decade, and this trend is expected to continue in the coming years.

The consumables accounted for the highest growth rate in the cell isolation market, by product during the forecast period

Based on the product, the cell isolation market is segmented into consumables and instruments. The consumables segment accounted for the largest share in the cell isolation market in the forecasted period. The increasing investments by companies to develop technologically advanced products as well as the repetitive use of consumables as compared to instruments are the major factors driving the growth of this segment.

Human cells segment accounted for the highest CAGR

Based on cell type, the cell isolation market is segmented into human cells and animal cells. The human cells segment accounted for the largest share of the global cell isolation market in the forecasted period. The increasing investments by public and private organizations for research on human cells, growing application areas of human stem cells, and the high and growing incidence of diseases such as cancer are the major factors driving this segment's growth.

Biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies segment accounted for the highest CAGR

The cell isolation market is segmented into hospitals and diagnostic laboratories, biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies, research laboratories and institutes, and other end users based on end users. In 2019, the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies segment accounted for the largest share. The widespread adoption of advanced instruments in cell-based experiments and cancer research in biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies, as well as the increasing number of R&D facilities globally, are the major factors driving this segment's growth.

Asia Pacific: The fastest-growing region cell isolation market

The global cell isolation market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the world. The Asia Pacific region is projected to register the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Growth in this region is expected to be centered on China and Japan. Factors such as the expansion by key market players in emerging Asian countries and the increasing trend of pharmaceutical outsourcing to Asian countries like India and China are driving the growth of the cell isolation market in this region.

Key Topics Covered:

1 Introduction

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Premium Insights 4.1 Cell Isolation: Market Overview 4.2 North America: Cell Isolation Market, by Product (2019) 4.3 Geographical Snapshot of the Cell Isolation Market

5 Market Overview 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Market Dynamics 5.2.1 Drivers 5.2.1.1 Increasing Government Funding for Cell-Based Research 5.2.1.2 Increasing Number of Patients Suffering from Cancer and Infectious Diseases 5.2.1.3 Technological Advancements 5.2.1.4 Growing Focus on Personalized Medicine 5.2.2 Restraints 5.2.2.1 Ethical Issues Related to Embryonic Stem Cell Isolation 5.2.2.2 High Cost of Cell-Based Research 5.2.3 Opportunities 5.2.3.1 Emerging Markets 5.3 COVID-19 Impact on the Cell Isolation/Cell Separation Market

6 Cell Isolation Market, by Product 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Consumables 6.2.1 Reagents, Kits, Media, and Sera 6.2.1.1 Owing to the Disposable Nature of Reagents and Assay Kits, this Market is Driven by Their Consistent Usage and Frequent Purchases 6.2.2 Beads 6.2.2.1 Growing Demand for Magnetic Beads in T-Cell and Stem Cell Isolation is a Major Factor Driving Growth in this Product Segment 6.2.3 Disposables 6.2.3.1 Increasing Investments in Research by Governments and Companies are a Major Factor Boosting the Growth of the Cell Isolation Disposables Market 6.3 Instruments 6.3.1 Centrifuges 6.3.1.1 Growing Use of Centrifuges in the Pharma-Biotech Industry and Multi-Functionality Options Offered by These Instruments are Driving the Growth of this Product Segment 6.3.2 Flow Cytometers 6.3.2.1 Launch of Innovative and Cost-Effective Flow Cytometers is Likely to Drive the Growth of the Market 6.3.3 Magnetic-Activated Cell Separator Systems 6.3.4 Filtration Systems 6.3.4.1 Increasing Research Activities in Cell Biology to Boost the Market

7 Cell Isolation Market, by Cell Type 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Human Cells 7.2.1 Differentiated Cells 7.2.1.1 Growing Investments by Market Players to Develop New and Innovative Products is Expected to Support the Growth of the Differentiated Cell Isolation Market 7.2.2 Stem Cells 7.2.2.1 Rising Government Initiatives Focused on Supporting Stem Cell Research Expected to Drive Market Growth 7.3 Animal Cells 7.3.1 Biopharmaceutical Companies are the Major End-users of Isolated Animal Cells

8 Cell Isolation Market, by Cell Source 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Bone Marrow 8.2.1 a Number of Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells Have Been Commercialized in the Last Decade 8.3 Adipose Tissue 8.3.1 Adipose Stem/Stromal Cells Can Generate a Variety of Other Cell Types 8.4 Cord Blood/Embryonic Stem Cells 8.4.1 Market Growth is Driven by the High Therapeutic Potency of These Stem Cells

9 Cell Isolation Market, by Technique 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Centrifugation-Based Cell Isolation 9.2.1 Cost-Effectiveness of this Technique in Both Small-Scale and Large-Scale Operations - A Major Driver 9.3 Surface Marker-Based Cell Isolation 9.3.1 Wide Usage of this Technique in Biopharmaceutical and Biotech Industries is a Major Reason for the Growth of this Market 9.4 Filtration-Based Cell Isolation 9.4.1 The Major Factor Driving the Growth of this Market Segment is the Low Cost of the Filtration Technique

10 Cell Isolation Market, by Application 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Biomolecule Isolation 10.2.1 Biomolecule Isolation Dominates the Cell Isolation Applications Market 10.3 Cancer Research 10.3.1 High Disease Incidence Has Fuelled the Demand for Advanced Treatment 10.4 Stem Cell Research 10.4.1 Increasing Funding in Stem Cell Research to Support Market Growth 10.5 Tissue Regeneration & Regenerative Medicine 10.5.1 Funding for Regenerative Medicine Initiatives Has Risen 10.6 in Vitro Diagnostics 10.6.1 Rising Disease Incidence Has Driven Demand for Innovative Therapies and Diagnostics

11 Cell Isolation Market, by End-user 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Biotechnology & Biopharmaceutical Companies 11.2.1 Favorable Investments Have Boosted Overall Pace of Research 11.3 Research Laboratories & Institutes 11.3.1 Rising Funding for Cell-Based Research to Drive Market Growth 11.4 Hospitals & Diagnostic Laboratories 11.4.1 Increasing Number of Hospitals in Emerging Countries Will Contribute to Market Growth 11.5 Other End-users

12 Cell Isolation Market, by Region 12.1 Introduction 12.2 North America 12.3 Europe 12.4 Asia-Pacific 12.5 Row

13 Competitive Landscape 13.1 Overview 13.2 Market Ranking Analysis, 2019 13.3 Key Strategies 13.3.1 Product Launches, 2017-2020 13.3.2 Expansions, 2017-2020 13.3.3 Partnerships, 2017-2020 13.3.4 Acquisitions, 2017-2020 13.4 Competitive Leadership Mapping (2019) 13.4.1 Stars 13.4.2 Emerging Leaders 13.4.3 Pervasive Players 13.4.4 Participants

14 Company Profiles 14.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. 14.2 Becton, Dickinson and Company 14.3 Beckman Coulter Inc. (Subsidiary of Danaher Corporation) 14.4 Merck KGaA 14.5 Terumo Bct (Subsidiary of Terumo Corporation) 14.6 GE Healthcare 14.7 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. 14.8 Corning Incorporation 14.9 Roche Diagnostics (A Division of F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.) 14.10 Alfa Laval 14.11 Miltenyi Biotec 14.12 Pluriselect Life Science Ug (Haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. Kg 14.13 Stemcell Technologies, Inc. 14.14 Akadeum Life Sciences 14.15 Bio-Techne 14.16 Biolegend 14.17 Biolegend

15 Appendix 15.1 Insights of Industry Experts 15.2 Discussion Guide

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/7h0fcv

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1904 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Go here to see the original:
The Worldwide Cell Isolation/Cell Separation Industry is Expected to Grow at a CAGR of 16.8% Between 2020 to 2025 - PRNewswire

Catheters Market: Europe and North America Emerge as Leading Regional Market with Well-established Healthcare Infrastructure – BioSpace

Catheters Market: Snapshot

A catheter refers to a thin tube inserted in the human body for performing a surgical procedure or during the treatment of several diseases. In healthcare sector, catheters are used for a wide range of purposes. These devices are used in numerous medical procedures including cardiac electrophysiology, neurosurgery, and angioplasty. Thus, these are considered integral part of healthcare industry worldwide.

Read Report Overview - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/catheters-market.html

Catheters are manufactured using various medical materials such as silicon rubber, plastic, nylon, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Based on the end-use, the companies working in the catheters market make essential changes to the material used while manufacturing their products.

Depending on the purpose of use, catheters are named as urological, cardiovascular, neurovascular, ophthalmic, and gastrointestinal catheters. Among all product types, the vendors working in the global catheters market experience extensive demand for cardiovascular catheters. Key factors for this scenario are the increased number of patients living with cardiovascular health issues and increased heart surgeries in all worldwide locations. Apart from this, the global catheters market witnesses remarkable demand for urological catheters.

Request Brochure of Report - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=109

The enterprises working in the global catheters market are growing focus toward the development of high quality products. Many enterprises in the market for catheters are strengthening their product portfolio. At the same time, several enterprises in the global catheters market are concentrating on expanding their regional presence.

Due to recent COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare industry is experiencing remarkable drop in number of surgeries carried out in all worldwide locations. The hospitals from all across the globe were focused on performing emergency surgical procedures. As a result, there was sudden plunge in demand for catheters. However, with the considerable improvement in the pandemic situation, the healthcare sector is now getting back to regular activities. As a result, the global catheters market is expected to experience upward graph of sales in the forthcoming years.

Request for Analysis of COVID-19 Impact on Catheters Market - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=109

Global Catheters Market: Snapshot

The demand for catheters is expected to remain high in the coming years observes Transparency Market Research. Development and commercialization of various types of catheters for a wide range of applications has significantly propelled the global market in recent years. Catheterization is an important procedure before performing major surgeries. Thus, growing incidences of cardiovascular diseases, kidney disorders, urinary tract procedures, and increasing demand for minimally invasive surgeries has drastically spiked the demand for catheters in the recent years. Growing geriatric population is also projected to be an integral factor in driving the demand for catheters in the near future. According to the research report, the global catheters market is projected to be worth US$55,985.1 mn by the end of 2025. During the forecast years of 2017 and 2025, the global catheters market is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 7.4%.

Hospitals to Remain Key Users of Catheters over Forecast Period

On the basis of end users, the global catheters market is segmented into ambulatory surgical center, hospitals, and dialysis centers amongst others. Out of these, the hospitals segment dominates the global market as they are obvious key users of catheters. The ambulatory services segment follows this one closely. The report points out that hospitals segment will continue to dominate throughout the forecast period due to growing number of private and government-run hospitals that are expected to come up in the near future. Furthermore, efforts taken by government initiatives to reduce the hospital-related expenditure are also projected to work in the favor of catheters market in the near future.

Request for Custom Research - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=CR&rep_id=109

Cardiovascular Catheters to Dominate Global Market as Cardiovascular Treatments Remain on the Rise

The various types of catheters available in the global market are cardiovascular catheters, urology catheters, intravenous catheters, specialty catheters, and neurovascular catheters. Out of these, the demand for cardiovascular catheters is projected to remain the highest. The high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and the rising number of surgeries pertaining to treating the same are stoking the demand for cardiovascular catheters. The World Health Organization states that the cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of deaths across the world. Statistics revealed by WHO states that 17.7 million met a fatal end due to cardiovascular diseases in 2015. These alarming figures are projected to be the primary growth driver for the cardiovascular catheters segment. Furthermore, the increasing demand for minimally-invasive procedures has also supplemented the growth of the market.

Europe and North America Emerge as Leading Regional Market with Well-established Healthcare Infrastructure

Geographically, the global catheters market is segmented into Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. Out of this, the North America catheters market is expected to lead the way. This regional segment will be driven by the well-established healthcare infrastructure in the region. This has definitely augmented the number of catheterization procedures, thereby boost the regional markets revenue earnings. Europe is projected to follow North Americas lead in the coming years. The growing pool of geriatrics, high incidences of lifestyle disorders, and tremendous technological advancements and acceptance of the same are expected to keep these two regional markets motivated throughout the forecast period.

Buy Catheters Market Report - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=109&ltype=S

On the other hand, the Asia Pacific catheters market too is expected to show rapid growth rate in the coming years. Rise of medical tourism, increasing efforts by the governments of the developing countries to better the healthcare infrastructure, and technological advancements are expected to offer many lucrative opportunities to this regional market.

Some of the leading players operating in the global catheters market are Abbott Laboratories, Dickinson and Company, Becton, C. R. Bard, Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, Medtronic plc., Teleflex Incorporated, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Cook Group Incorporated, and Boston Scientific Corporation.

Browse More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research:

Stem Cell Gun Devices Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/stem-cell-gun-devices-market.html

Revascularization Devices Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/revascularization-devices-market.html

Anesthesia Disposables Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/anesthesia-disposables-market.html

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision.

Contact Mr. Rohit Bhisey Transparency Market Research State Tower, 90 State Street, Suite 700, Albany NY - 12207 United States USA - Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453 Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.com Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

Read more:
Catheters Market: Europe and North America Emerge as Leading Regional Market with Well-established Healthcare Infrastructure - BioSpace

Near-infrared oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor integrates acute myeloid leukemiatargeted imaging and therapy – Science Advances

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a deadly hematological malignancy with frequent disease relapse. The biggest challenge for AML therapy is the lack of methods to target and kill the heterogeneous leukemia cells, which lead to disease relapse. Here, we describe a near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye, IR-26, which preferentially accumulates in the mitochondria of AML cells, depending on the hyperactive glycolysis of malignant cell, and simultaneously impairs oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to exert targeted therapeutic effects for AML cells. In particular, IR-26 also exhibits potential for real-time monitoring of AML cells with an in vivo flow cytometry (IVFC) system. Therefore, IR-26 represents a novel all-in-one agent for the integration of AML targeting, detection, and therapy, which may help to monitor disease progression and treatment responses, prevent unnecessary delays in administering upfront therapy, and improve therapeutic efficiency to the residual AML cells, which are responsible for disease relapse.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a deadly hematological malignancy, comprising the genetically and morphologically heterogeneous groups of aggressive malignant cells (1, 2). Although deep sequencing and recent molecular discoveries have provided tremendous insights into the underlying biology of AML, the long-term survival for AML patients is still unsatisfactory. This is due to the current treatment strategies failing to eliminate all malignant cells, which will eventually lead to disease relapse (3). Disease relapse is the most common cause of death in AML patients, and the lack of subsequent treatment strategies after relapse makes the cure of AML more challenging. Recent studies indicate the heterogeneous constitution of AML containing different types of leukemia cells with variable responses to chemotherapies. Among them, a rare population of residual chemotherapy-resistant leukemia cells is thought to drive the AML relapse after therapy (4, 5). Techniques such as real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or multiparameter flow cytometry have been used to assess malignant cells in AML based on specific mutations, which have provided prognostic information for patient outcomes and profoundly affect clinical decision-making for disease management (3, 6). However, most AML patients fail to present enough typical mutations for current detection due to genetic abnormal heterogeneity and genomic complexity (7, 8). The residual leukemia cells are a rare population of cells responsible for reinitiating and maintaining disease, which are infeasible to be collected to enough events at the right time to evaluate valid disease information using current techniques. Therefore, developing new AML-targeting methods based on the common vulnerability of malignant cells is urgently needed to accurately detect and eliminate the heterogeneous malignant cells in AML patients. Especially, strategies combining targeted therapy with on-time treatment response monitoring and real-time detection of residual cells will help to prevent unnecessary delays in administering upfront therapy in AML, improve treatment efficiency, and reduce disease relapse (9, 10). Thus, a new strategy simultaneously achieving malignant cells targeting detection and therapy is of particular significance in reducing AML relapse and is emerging as the next important direction for AML treatment.

Recently, studies on the fundamental roles of cellular metabolism reprogramming in tumor development and progression are given more emphasis (11). In particular, the increase of glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen, known as aerobic glycolysis, is reported as an important hallmark for cancer cells. AML is no exception to the general rule that increased glycolysis is the basic metabolic characteristic of leukemia cells, and hyperactive glycolysis is a common vulnerability for AML targeting and treatment (12). However, previous therapeutic strategies merely based on glycolytic inhibition fail to achieve satisfactory results in AML treatment. Treatment failure with glycolysis inhibitor occurs because increasing research studies have emphasized that, in addition to glycolysis, some tumors like brain cancer and AML depend more on enhanced mitochondria-specific oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for bioenergetic and biosynthetic processes (13). In particular, residual chemotherapy-resistant leukemia cells are demonstrated to show increased mitochondrial mass, retain active polarized mitochondria, and rely more on mitochondrial OXPHOS for survival (14). Therefore, current studies on the treatment vulnerability toward mitochondrial OXPHOS in leukemia cells are given more emphasis. Several strategies through inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis or inhibition of electron transport chain (ETC) complexes may hold great therapeutic potential in AML treatment (13, 15, 16). However, mitochondrion is the central checkpoint of cell metabolism and is involved in energetic and biosynthetic processes of cells; the integrity and functions of mitochondria are comparably important for almost all cells. The present application of OXPHOS inhibitors in anticancer therapy limits our understanding of mitochondria in cancer cells and the lack of tumor-targeting accumulation strategies, which may result in OXPHOS inhibitors not sufficiently reaching the tumors (17) and inducing unacceptable side effects, like neurotoxicity (18, 19) and nausea/vomiting (20). Thus, the development of new strategies with both malignant cell targeting property and mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibiting ability would hold great therapeutic promise in improving AML treatment efficacy and reducing side effects. In previous work, we have synthesized a class of heptamethine cyanine dyes with structure-inherent near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence and solid tumor targeting ability (21, 22). The heptamethine cyanine dyes are preferentially retained in the mitochondria of different kinds of solid tumor cells, relying on the hyperactivity of hypoxia-inducible factor1 (HIF-1)/glycolysis metabolism and the increase of SLCO1B3 transporters activity in tumor cells (2325). Because aerobic glycolysis is the basic metabolic characteristic of malignant cells and has profound effects on tumor genesis and progression, these dyes provide a new mechanism for tumor-targeting strategy based on the inherent functional properties of tumor cell metabolism. In this study, we aim to characterize a candidate NIR dye for hematological malignancy targeting and therapy by modifying with water-soluble amino acid ester groups in heptamethine cyanine dyes. Of the newly synthesized dyes, we have identified IR-26 as an all-in-one NIR dye for integrating AML targeting, detection, and therapy simultaneously. The newly designed IR-26 dye retains the preferential accumulation ability in the mitochondria of hematological malignant cells rather than normal cells depending on the same mechanism as in solid tumors. The water solubility of IR-26 is greatly improved by inhibiting the intermolecular hydrogen bond formation, which would decrease J1 aggregates and the serum protein binding rate of IR-26, favoring hematological malignant cell targeting. IR-26 also has the NIR fluorescent ability with the absorption and emission peak in the range of 700 to 900 nm, which has great advantages for cancer cell imaging with deep tissue penetration and low-background autofluorescent interference (26, 27). Therefore, IR-26 is demonstrated to dynamically detect the circulating malignant cells in vivo in a noninvasive way using a NIR in vivo flow cytometry (IVFC) system established previously (28), which holds significance in continuously monitoring of disease progression, treatment responses, and disease relapse. IR-26 is demonstrated to target the ETC proteins, SDHA, and ATP5B and inhibit the complex II and complex V activities to impair mitochondrial OXPHOS functions, resulting in increased apoptosis in AML cells. IR-26 exerts its excellent therapeutic efficiency in AML by selectively inhibiting the leukemia cell population and prolonging the survival of AML mice without inducing obvious side effects. Overall, our work may provide an entirely new mechanism for AML targeting based on the hyperactive glycolytic metabolism of malignant cells and a rational therapeutic strategy for integrating AML targeting, detection, and treatment by a glycolysis-dependent mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibitor, IR-26, which indicates a new opportunity to improve AML clinical treatment efficiency and reduce disease relapse.

On the basis of previous structure-activity studies, we have characterized that heptamethine core with lipophilic cationic property is essential for tumor targeting in heptamethine cyanine dyes (29, 30). In this study, we have synthesized a series of derivatives by modifying with various N-alkyl side chains on the heptamethine core to obtain new dyes that target AML cells. Eight candidate mitochondria-targeted dyes were chosen to study their AML cell-targeting properties. As shown in fig. S1A, IR-26 exhibited the highest NIR fluorescence contrast index values when compared with other dyes, suggesting a good preferential accumulation ability to AML cells. Moreover, IR-26 showed the highest cytotoxicity in AML cells (fig. S1B), with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of only 2.660 M. The synthetic route and chemical structure of IR-26 are shown in fig. S2 and Fig. 1A. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of IR-26 were investigated in methanol (MeOH), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Fig. 1, B and C) and indicated that the absorption and emission peak of IR-26 were in the NIR region (700 to 900 nm). IR-26 showed good stability in 10% serum and was easy to disperse in the PBS solution without disturbing serum albumin (fig. S3). All these features make IR-26 a promising NIR dye for hematological malignancy biomedical imaging. Then, human AML cells, HL-60, or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were incubated with IR-26 at similar conditions; cellular NIR fluorescence was detected by confocal microscopy. Figure 1D shows that IR-26 accumulated in HL-60 cells increasingly in a time-dependent manner, indicating its preferential accumulation ability in AML cells. This AML-targeted property was also observed in different types of AML cell lines (HL-60, NB4, and THP-1; Fig. 1E) when compared with the normal PBMCs. Last, athymic nude mice with green fluorescent protein (GFP)labeled HL-60 (lentiviral transfection) tumor xenografts at subcutaneous spaces were imaged after a single administration of IR-26 at 0.2 mg/kg through intravenous injection. Figure 1F and fig. S4A show that intense NIR signals can be clearly visualized, associated with the implanted GFP-labeled HL-60 tumor sites using Kodak In-Vivo Imaging System FX Pro. Histopathologic analysis of tumor frozen section indicated that NIR fluorescence was colocalized with GFP fluorescence in cancer cells (fig. S4B), further demonstrating the preferential accumulation of IR-26 in AML cells. Thus, IR-26 may be a promising NIR dye for hematological malignancy targeting and biomedical imaging based on our results.

(A) Chemical structure of IR-26. (B) Absorption spectra of 2 M IR-26 in 10% FBS, methanol (MeOH), and PBS. (C) Fluorescence emission spectra of IR-26 in 10% FBS, methanol (MeOH), and PBS. a.u., arbitrary units. (D) NIR fluorescence intensity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and HL-60 cells was compared after incubation with the same concentration of IR-26 for various times (n = 3). MitoTracker Green was used to avoid the impact of cell size in comparing fluorescence of PBMCs to AML cells. (E) PBMCs and AML cell lines (HL-60, NB4, and THP-1) were incubated with IR-26 for the same condition and imaged by a laser confocal scanning microscope (Leica) with 633-nm excitation. (F) Preferential accumulation of IR-26 in athymic tumor-bearing nude mice preestablished with GFP-labeled HL-60 tumor xenografts. The animals were subjected to fluorescence imaging and x-ray imaging using Kodak In-Vivo Imaging System FX Pro (New Haven, CT). Photo credit: Tao Liu, Institute of Rocket Force Medicine, Third Military Medical University. Error bars denote means SD. *P < 0.05.

To further investigate whether the leukemia-targeted IR-26 could be used to detect AML cells in peripheral blood, PBMCs and preestablished GFP-labeled HL-60 cells were mixed to mimic the complex cellular components in peripheral blood and incubated with 5 M IR-26 under 37C. Then, the mixed cells were detected using flow cytometry, and the results showed that IR-26 could easily distinguish the HL-60 cells from PBMCs by NIR fluorescence (Fig. 2A). IR-26 could recognize the same population of leukemia cells as GFP-labeled cells in the mixed cells (Fig. 2, B and C) with a good accuracy in targeting AML cells. Under confocal microscopy, all GFP-labeled AML cells could be detected by IR-26 (Fig. 2D). The NIR fluorescent cell population was a little bigger than the GFP fluorescent cell population (Fig. 2E), indicating a better sensitivity of NIR fluorescent dye in AML cell detection than GFP. Impressively, IR-26 could also be used to detect AML cells from clinical patients when compared with PBMCs from healthy donor (Fig. 2F). To further investigate the detection property of IR-26 in leukemia cells in vivo, a mouse model of human AML was established by intravenous injection of GFP-labeled human AML cells into sublethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 2G). Histological examination and immunohistochemistry assay revealed that extensive infiltration of GFP-labeled leukemia blast cells was shown in the hematopoietic organs (fig. S5, A and B), and the spleens from the transplantation group were much heavier than those from the control group (fig. S5C). In addition, we have established a NIR IVFC that treats blood flow as the natural sheath flow for tracking of specific cells in the circulatory system noninvasively. The IVFC was used to observe, in the long term, GFP fluorescent cells in animal peripheral blood and showed that GFP-labeled HL-60 cells continuously existed in the circulatory system of transplanted mouse for more than 20 days (fig. S5D), further confirming the stability of AML animal models. To test whether IR-26 could be used to monitor AML cells in real time, the dual-channel (GFP and NIR fluorescence) IVFC was used to detect the NIR fluorescent leukemia cells in vivo after mice were intravenously injected with IR-26 (0.2 mg/kg), with GFP fluorescence as the internal reference of GFP-labeled HL-60 cells. Figure 2H shows a representative data trace of leukemia cells with both GFP and NIR fluorescence signal in the AML animal model, indicating that IR-26 could be used to specifically detect AML cells in vivo using the IVFC system. After 10 min of detection, the number of peaks per minute in GFP channel, NIR channel, or dual channel showed no statistical significance (Fig. 2I), suggesting the good sensitivity and accuracy of IR-26 in detecting AML cells in vivo. To further validate the leukemia targeting property of IR-26 in vivo, bone marrow, spleen frozen section, and peripheral blood were detected by confocal microscopy after mice were sacrificed. As shown in Fig. 2J, the NIR fluorescence signal overlapped with GFP-labeled leukemia cells in all these organs, which confirmed the targeting and detection property of IR-26 in AML cells. Last, we studied the indicated mechanisms for the leukemia-targeting property of IR-26. As shown in fig. S6A, inhibition of cellular glycolysis by 150 mM 2-deoxy-d-glucose or inhibition of SLCO1B3 transporters activity by 250 M sulfobromophthalein reduced the uptake of IR-26 in AML cells, which was similar to our previous studies in solid tumor targeting. In addition, the cellular level of HIF-1 was also demonstrated to be responsible for the preferential uptake of IR-26 in leukemia cells (fig. S6B). We further observed that the expression of SLCO1B3 was positively correlated with HIF-1 level in AML cells (fig. S6C). The expression of SLCO1B3 was also demonstrated to be up-regulated in AML patients (fig. S6, D and E), which was analyzed from the public data GSE9476. In conclusion, IR-26 was demonstrated to directly target AML cells based on the hyperactivity of HIF-1/glycolysis metabolism and increased SLCO1B3 transporters activity in leukemia cells, which was similar to the previous targeting mechanism in solid tumors (23). This entirely new AML-targeting mechanism may greatly help to improve AML treatment strategy in disease detection and therapy.

(A) Flow cytometry (BD FACSVerse, BD Biosciences) analysis of the AML-targeting property of IR-26 in PBMCs and GFP-labeled HL-60 mixed cells; NIR fluorescence was detected with 633-nm excitation and 780-nm emission after mixed cells were incubated with IR-26 or PBS. (B and C) Flow cytometry analyzing the accuracy of IR-26 in targeting the GFP-labeled leukemia cell population in the mixed cells. (D) Confocal microscope detected the colocalization of NIR fluorescence with GFP fluorescence after the mixed cells were incubated with IR-26. (E) Pie chart showing a better sensitivity of NIR fluorescent dye in detecting AML cells than GFP fluorescence. (F) Colocalization of IR-26 with AML cells in the clinical AML patient sample after incubation with 5 M IR-26 for 20 min. Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Leica) with 633-nm excitation. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). (G) Schematic representation of the experimental design (see also Materials and Methods) for AML cell detection in vivo by IR-26. (H) Data showing fluorescence peaks in IVFC of GFP channel (green) and IR-26 channel (red) and representative dual positive peak in both channels, indicating the accurate tracing of GFP-labeled AML cells in peripheral blood. (I) Statistical histogram showing the number of peaks per minute in the GFP channel, the NIR channel, and the dual channel detected using IVFC in peripheral blood of AML mouse model (P > 0.05). (J) Histopathologic analysis of peripheral blood, spleen, and bone marrow frozen sections of the AML mouse model by confocal microscope. Nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue). Error bars denote means SD.

In consideration of the AML targeting and detection property of IR-26, further investigation of anti-leukemia effects of IR-26 may help to improve AML treatment strategies by integrating AML continuous detection and targeted treatment. IR-26 showed the highest cytotoxicity for AML cells among the eight candidate dyes. Further studies indicated that IR-26 effectively killed different types of AML cell lines (HL-60 and THP-1) in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values of 2.629 and 2.351 M, respectively (Fig. 3A). Western blot analysis indicated that IR-26 induced mitochondrial apoptosis in HL-60 and THP-1 cells by inducing PARP [poly(adenosine diphosphateribose) polymerase], caspase-3, and caspase-9 cleavages (Fig. 3B). Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining by flow cytometry detection also indicated that IR-26 induced apoptosis in AML cells (Fig. 3C). To examine the potency of IR-26, which is widely used across species, the response of IR-26 to mouse and human leukemia cell lines (C1498, P388D1, HL-60, and THP-1) was assessed using oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and galactose viability assay. Figure S7 showed that IR-26 was similarly active in mouse (average IC50 = 4.788 M) and human cells (average IC50 = 2.913 M). Then, the cytotoxicity of IR-26 on AML cells and normal PBMCs was compared, and Fig. 3D shows that IR-26 induced HL-60 cell death with no obvious cytotoxic effects on human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), suggesting the targeted killing effects of IR-26 on AML cells. Moreover, IR-26 was also demonstrated to inhibit cell colony formation in HL-60 cells (Fig. 3E) and decreased the CD34+CD38 subset of HL-60 cells with the increase of IR-26 (Fig. 3F), suggesting the inhibition effects of IR-26 on AML stem-like cells, which are responsible for chemotherapy resistance in AML. In summary, these studies indicated that IR-26 selectively induced apoptosis in AML cells and even in chemotherapy-resistant subset of cells, while the concentrations that appear pharmacologically achievable did not have similar negative effects on normal cells.

(A) Human AML cell lines (HL-60 and THP-1) were treated with various concentrations of IR-26 for 48 hours, and IC50 values were calculated. (B) HL-60 and THP-1 cells were treated with various concentrations of IR-26, and apoptosis-related markers were detected using Western blot. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was taken as the loading control. (C) HL-60 and THP-1 cells were treated with IR-26 for 24 hours and stained with annexin V/PI to detect cell apoptosis by flow cytometry. (D) HL-60 cells and human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were treated with different concentrations of IR-26 for 48 hours, and cell viability was measured and compared. (E) HL-60 cells were treated with IR-26 (5 M) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 6 hours; 800 cells per well were seeded in the methylcellulose medium and cultured for 2 weeks; cells colonies were imaged and counted under inverted microscope. (F) Flow cytometry analysis and percentage of CD34+CD38 cell subset after HL-60 cells were treated with different concentrations of IR-26. Error bars denote means SD. **P < 0.01.

To further assess the anti-leukemia treatment effects of IR-26 in vivo, two AML mouse models were established and used. First, the AML xenograft mouse models were established by subcutaneous injection of HL-60 cells in the nude mice. After tumors became palpable, the mice were randomly divided into three groups and received intraperitoneal injection of PBS, cytarabine (50 mg/kg), and IR-26 (5.0 mg/kg). As shown in Fig. 4A, a distinct inhibition of tumor growth was observed after IR-26 treatment, while the treatment effect of cytarabine was limited. Tumor weight, which was measured after mice sacrifice, also indicated the marked anti-leukemia effect of IR-26 in vivo (Fig. 4B). Compared with the control group, IR-26 treatment did not cause body weight change (Fig. 4C) and obvious pathologic changes in vital organs (fig. S8), indicating its satisfactory safety for in vivo treatment. To evaluate the anti-leukemia effects of IR-26 at different doses, nude mice bearing HL-60 subcutaneous xenografts received IR-26 at doses of 0, 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Figure S9 indicated that treatment with IR-26 at doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg were all effective and led to significant tumor regression with no obvious body weight loss. Moreover, nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice were engrafted with GFP-labeled human AML cells HL-60 by tail vein injection to establish orthotopic AML mouse model. One week after primary transplant of GFP-labeled AML cells, mice were treated with cytarabine (50 mg/kg) or IR-26 (5.0 mg/kg) every other day by intraperitoneal injection for five times (Fig. 4D; n = 12). At day 25, Kodak In-Vivo Imaging System FX Pro showed that dissected organs from IR-26treated group displayed no obvious GFP fluorescence, while organs from other groups showed strong GFP fluorescence (Fig. 4E), suggesting that nearly all GFP-labeled AML cells disappeared after mice were treated with IR-26. Moreover, IR-26 markedly prolonged the median survival of mice in Kaplan-Meier analysis when compared with the cytarabine-treated group (Fig. 4F; P = 0.0075). IR-26 treatment remarkably reduced tumor burden, manifested with a prominent decrease in percentage of hCD45+ cells in the bone marrow (Fig. 4G). Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed significantly reduced infiltration of leukemic cells and increased preservation of normal tissue structures in the bone marrow and other organs of mice treated with IR-26 when compared with the control group mice (Fig. 4H and fig. S10). The pharmacokinetic profiles are important for drug effectiveness and biosafety. The blood curve of IR-26 was also determined after intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg (fig. S11), and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (t1/2 = 56.43 6.38 hours, Cmax = 115.23 6.73 g/liter, Tmax = 4 1.73 hours).

(A) IR-26 effectively inhibits tumor growth in nude mice inoculated with HL-60 cells. Mice were treated with IR-26 (5 mg/kg every third day by intraperitoneal injection), cytarabine (50 mg/kg), or vehicle control; tumor volumes were calculated as length (width)2/2. n = 5, **P < 0.01 compared with the control group. (B) Tumor weights of mice were measured and compared (n = 5, **P < 0.01 compared with the control group). (C) Mice body weights were measured and compared (n = 5). (D) Schematic representation of the experimental design (see also in Materials and Methods) for anti-leukemia assay in mouse model, which is established by intravenous injection of GFP-labeled HL-60 cells into NOD/SCID mice. Mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with IR-26 (5 mg/kg), cytarabine (50 mg/kg), or PBS as vehicle control. (E) Detached liver, heart, spleen, and kidney were subjected to GFP and NIR imaging at day 25 after treatment, indicating a distinct decrease of GFP-labeled AML cells in IR-26treated mice. Photo credit: Yang Wang, Institute of Rocket Force Medicine, Third Military Medical University. (F) Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a survival advantage for mice treated with IR-26 (n = 12, P = 0.0075). (G) Chimerism of human HL-60 cells in the mouse bone marrow was quantified and compared by detecting cells that express human CD45 at day 25. (H) Pathologic analysis of bow marrow morphologic information in control and IR-26treated mouse. Error bars denote means SD.

Because of the effective therapeutic benefits of IR-26 in AML, further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of IR-26induced cell death is needed. Our previous studies have indicated that this kind of lipophilic cationic heptamethine dyes is more ready to reach a higher concentration in mitochondria due to the negative charge (21), and some mitochondrial membrane transporters may also help to transport into mitochondria (25). A subcellular location assay was performed, and it indicated that IR-26 specifically accumulated in the mitochondria of AML cells by colocalization with the mitochondria-specific probe MitoTracker Green (Fig. 5A). Moreover, transmission electron microscopy showed that IR-26 treatment induced mitochondria swelling and vacuolation in AML cells (Fig. 5B). IR-26 treatment also decreased mitochondrial membrane potential in AML cells (Fig. 5C). All these mitochondrial changes after IR-26 treatment suggested that mitochondria might be an important therapeutic target of IR-26. Our data further showed that IR-26 treatment increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in AML cells (Fig. 5D), and the mitochondrial ROS-specific scavenger MitoTEMPO significantly reversed IR-26induced ROS production and cell death (Fig. 5E). Real-time analysis of mitochondrial respiration profiles using a seahorse XF96 analyzer indicated that IR-26 reduced the basal mitochondrial OCRs and the maximal respiration of mitochondria in HL-60 cells (Fig. 5F). In addition, the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production was significantly decreased after cells were treated with increasing concentrations of IR-26 (Fig. 5G). These data suggested that mitochondrial OXPHOS of AML cells was markedly destroyed by IR-26 treatment. The adenosine monophosphateactive protein kinase (AMPK) is a key susceptor in the regulation of energy metabolism. IR-26 treatment significantly increased phospho-AMPK in AML cells, indicating the activated AMPK signaling in response to OXPHOS inhibition (Fig. 5H). All these data indicate that mitochondria are the important therapeutic target of IR-26, and directly impairing mitochondrial OXPHOS functions is the key mechanism of IR-26 to induce cell death in AML.

(A) Specific accumulation of IR-26 in the mitochondria of HL-60 cells by colocalization with the mitochondria-specific probe (MitoTracker Green). (B) Transmission electron microscopy observation of mitochondrial morphologies in HL-60 cells. Black arrow indicates mitochondria. (C) Mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by the JC-1 aggregate/monomer fluorescence ratio in HL-60 cells. (D) Mitochondrial ROS productions in HL-60 cells were detected using MitoSOX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) after cells were treated with IR-26 for 1 hour (n = 3). (E) HL-60 cell viabilities were detected after cells were treated with increasing concentrations of IR-26 in the presence or absence of the mitochondrial ROS-specific inhibitor MitoTEMPO. (F) Real-time analysis of mitochondrial respiration profile of HL-60 cells using a seahorse XF96 analyzer after cells were treated with 10 M IR-26 for 1 hour. (G) HL-60 cells ATP production were detected after treatment with 10 M IR-26 for different times. (H) Western blot analysis of the energy metabolism regulating protein and AMPK signaling expression in HL-60 and THP-1 cells after treatment with different concentrations of IR-26. Error bars denote means SD. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

To further explore the molecular mechanism through which IR-26 disrupts mitochondrial functions and OXPHOS in AML cells, metabolomic and molecular target analyses were performed in IR-26treated HL-60 cells. First, HL-60 cells were treated with different concentrations of IR-26 for 12 hours, and cell lysates were subjected to TSQ Quantiva (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA) analysis to measure metabolites from central carbon metabolism. Figure 6A shows that IR-26 treatment elevated the level of mitochondrial complex II substrate, succinate, but reduced the levels of downstream metabolites, fumarate and malate, in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. These changes are consistent with mitochondrial complex II activity inhibition. Moreover, after HL-60 cells were treated with different concentrations of IR-26, all activities of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes were detected using a MitoTox OXPHOS complex activity assay kit (Abcam), indicating that complex II and complex V activities were distinctly inhibited by IR-26 treatment (Fig. 6B). We then identified the potential interactive proteins of mitochondrial respiratory chain with IR-26 using a previously established method (31) and indicated that SDHA and ATP5B might be the interactive proteins of IR-26. The pull-down assay using the specific antibodies of SDHA and ATP5B further determined that IR-26 interacted with complex II and complex V proteins, SDHA and ATP5B (Fig. 6C). Therefore, the data suggested that IR-26 directly targeted the mitochondrial ETC proteins SDHA and ATP5B to inhibit complex II and complex V activities and disturbed mitochondrial OXPHOS functions to induce targeted killing effects in AML cells.

(A) After treatment with different concentrations of IR-26, HL-60 cell lysates were subjected to TSQ Quantiva (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA) analysis to measure the metabolites from tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the levels of TCA cycle intermediates, -ketoglutarate (-KG), succinate, fumarate, and malate after treatment with IR-26. AU, arbitrary units; CoA, coenzyme A. (B) Mitochondrial complex activities were measured after treatment with IR-26 using a commercially available kit (Abcam). (C) Pull-down assay was performed using mitochondrial protein ATP5B, SDHA, and NDUFS1 antibodies in IR-26treated cancer cell lysates, showing that ATP5B and SDHA antibodies pulled down proteins with NIR fluorescence, but NDUFS1 antibody pulled down proteins with no NIR fluorescence, indicating that IR-26 directly targets mitochondrial proteins ATP5B and SDHA. Error bars denote means SD. *P < 0.05. IgG, immunoglobulin G; IP, immunoprecipitation.

AML is one of the most common acute leukemia in adults. Standard chemotherapy treatment for AML with 7 days of cytarabine followed by 3 days of anthracycline has been used for more 30 years, but the novel targeted therapies for AML are very limited (32). Despite the fact that reduction of leukemic cells can be achieved with conventional chemotherapy in most AML patients, disease relapse is not solved and the long-term outcomes of AML patients have not significantly improved. This is due to the fact that heterogeneous organization of AML contains a rare subpopulation of leukemia cells that are resistant to the present chemotherapy. The subset of resistant AML cells with dormancy and self-renewal properties could initiate and maintain the disease; thus, even a rare number of residual cells could drive disease relapse after chemotherapy (33). However, current strategies fail to specifically target leukemic cells and eliminate all chemotherapy-resistant cells. Accurately targeting and determining how leukemic cells behave in vivo have significant impact for the early diagnosis of leukemia, for monitoring treatment response, and for detecting how minimal residual leukemia cells lead to disease relapse after treatment (34). Techniques such as real-time qPCR or multiparameter flow cytometry have been used to assess specific malignant cells in AML and have been proven to positively affect the clinical decision-making for disease management, providing prognostic information for patient outcomes. These methods could not collect enough events at the right time to evaluate valid disease information because the residual leukemia cells are a rare population of cells. Furthermore, these strategies aim at specific genetic mutations in leukemia cells, such as FLT3, NPM1, DNMP3A, and IDH1/2 (35, 36), to detect malignant cells. However, most AML patients do not present typical mutations because of the complexity of genomic mutation and the abnormal heterogeneity in different leukemia cells. Therefore, developing a new AML-targeting strategy based on the common vulnerability of malignant cells is urgently needed. In this study, the identified NIR fluorescence dye IR-26 is demonstrated to specifically target leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo based on the mechanism of hyperactive HIF-1/glycolysis metabolism and increased SLC1B3 transporters activity, which is similar to our previous studies in solid tumor targeting (19, 21). Because aerobic glycolysis is known as the basic metabolic characteristic and an important hallmark of malignant cells, our studies may represent an entirely new AML-targeting strategy based on the common vulnerability of malignant cells. IR-26 also has an intrinsic NIR fluorescent property with the absorption and emission peak in the NIR region (700 to 900 nm). With advantages of low background interference and deep tissue penetration, the NIR fluorescence imaging has already been dedicated immense attention in tumor detection. We have established a dual-channel (GFP and NIR) fluorescence IVFC system to treat blood flow as natural sheath flow for identifying and quantifying specific cells in circulatory system without extracting blood samples (28). Using the IVFC system, the NIR fluorescence dye IR-26 is demonstrated to specifically detect and continuously monitor hematologic malignant cells in peripheral blood of transplanted AML mouse model in a noninvasive way. Thus, our studies may set out a new strategy with AML cell-specific targeting and detection to continuously monitor AML disease progression and treatment response, which will greatly help to prevent unnecessary delays in administering upfront therapy and improve treatment efficiency. Especially, IR-26 could continuously detect the rare population of residual leukemia cells to monitor disease relapse in a noninvasive way, which is of particular significance for AML clinical treatment.

Considering that the rare residual leukemia cells in the heterogeneous constitution of AML are demonstrated as the key factor responsible for chemotherapy resistance and disease relapse, identifying the common therapeutic vulnerability of chemotherapy-resistant leukemia cells should be important for AML therapy. Current studies have indicated that chemotherapy-resistant AML cells have unique mitochondrial characteristics of increased mitochondrial biogenesis and prevailingly dependent on OXPHOS for energy production and survival. Targeting the AML-specific alterations of mitochondria may emerge as intriguing targets for AML treatment strategies, especially for the chemotherapy-resistant AML or relapse of AML (37, 38). The OXPHOS metabolic pathway is known to have a critical function in mitochondria by generating a sequential redox reaction within ETC pumping protons across the mitochondrial membrane to generate a gradient for ATP production. Thus, targeting the mitochondrial ETC complexes that directly affect the mitochondrial OXPHOS functions is definitely a theoretically potential target for tumor therapy. The anti-diabetic agent metformin, also known as an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiratory complex I, was evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies for solid tumor treatment and also showed promising results in AML treatment (39). The F0F1 ATP synthase inhibitor Gboxin was used to inhibit the growth of glioblastoma cells in a recent research (40). The inhibitor of complex I, IACS-010759, was identified as a clinical-grade small molecule for phase 1 clinical trials of relapsed/refractory AML, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and solid tumors (13). However, mitochondrion is the central checkpoint of cell metabolism, which is involved in energetic and biosynthetic processes for almost all cells; the integrity and functions of mitochondria are also comparably important for normal cells. Most of the present OXPHOS inhibitors are limited in anticancer therapy for the lack of tumor-targeting ability and potential severe side effects. Only Gboxin has been reported to accumulate in malignant cells depending on the high mitochondrial membrane potential and to exert cytotoxicity in glioblastoma (40). However, mitochondrial membrane potential is not the inherent characteristic of malignant cells and is much susceptible to many factors. In the study, we have characterized an AML-targeted dye, IR-26, that selectively accumulates in the mitochondria of AML cells based on the hyperactivity of HIF-1/glycolysis, which is the common metabolic vulnerability and a hallmark of malignant cells. IR-26 robustly inhibited human leukemia cells in both OCR and galactose viability assay with similar IC50 values (average IC50 values were 3.632 and 2.913 M; fig. S7), indicating that OXPHOS inhibition is an important mechanism for the anti-leukemia effect of IR-26 in human cells. IR-26 is also demonstrated to target the mitochondrial complex II protein SDHA and complex V protein ATP5B, decrease the functional activity of complexes II and V simultaneously to impair mitochondrial OXPHOS functions in AML cells, and exert targeted therapeutic effects in AML cells. In particular, IR-26 treatment has benefits for decreasing disease relapse and increasing the long-term survival in AML animal models. Therefore, the glycolysis-dependent OXPHOS inhibitor IR-26 may represent a new AML-targeted therapeutic strategy based on the common metabolic vulnerability of AML cells and may provide an opportunity for targeted killing of residual malignant cells by directly impairing mitochondrial OXPHOS functions.

In summary, our study reveals a new leukemia-targeted mechanism depending on the basic metabolic characteristic of hyperactive glycolysis in AML cells and provides a rational AML therapeutic strategy by integrating simultaneous AML cells detection and targeted treatment. Continuous detection of AML cells in vivo helps to monitor the rare population of residual chemotherapy-resistant leukemia cell behaviors in patients, which may indicate an opportunity for reducing the disease relapse. The AML-targeted therapy based on mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibition has great advantages in selective killing of AML cells rather than normal cells to improve the treatment efficiency in AML without inducing obvious side effects. The multifunctional mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibitor IR-26 represents a new all-in-one agent for the integration of AML targeting, detection, and therapy, which may help to monitor disease progression and treatment responses and improve therapeutic efficiency to the residual cells that are responsible for disease relapse.

The synthetic route of compound IR-26 was shown in fig. S2. Compounds 2 and 4 were prepared according to the previously reported methods (41). Next, compound 5 was synthesized by an amidation reaction between compound 2 (2.12 g, 10 mmol) and compound 4 (1.25 g, 10 mmol) in the presence of triethylamine (Et3N, 10 mmol) with a yield of 60%, white solid, and melting point of 51 to 52C. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR; 400 MHz, CDCl3) : 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.86 (m, 2H), 2.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 4.06 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 5.99 (s, 1H). Subsequently, alkylation reaction between 2,3,3-trimethyl-3H indole and 5 was carried out under 110C for 10 hours in 1,2-dichlorobenzene to obtain compound 6 in the form of indole quaternary ammonium salt. Without purification of 6, it was reacted with 7 (1.03 g, 6 mmol) by a condensation reaction in 40 ml of absolute ethanol solution of sodium acetate (0.49 g, 6 mmol) to finally synthesize IR-26 (1.63 g, yield 30%, green sticky solid). Structural characterization was determined by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and high resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS).

Human leukemia cell lines HL-60, NB4, and THP-1 were cultured in RPMI 1640 culture media supplemented with 10% FBS. All cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and incubated at 37C with 5% CO2. Lentiviral vector harboring the GFP gene was used to stably labeled HL-60 cells. The expression of GFP in antibiotic-resistant transfected cells was isolated by flow cytometry based on GFP fluorescence signals. HSCs were isolated from human cord blood with CD34+ cells and cultured in serum-free medium with recombinant human stem cell factor (rhSCF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), and FLT3.

To determine the preferential accumulation of IR-26 in leukemia cells, PBMCs from normal peripheral blood and different leukemia cells were incubated with 5 M IR-26 at 37C for 15 min. Cells were placed into a petri dish, and NIR fluorescence intensities were detected and compared by confocal microscopy (Leica) with 633-nm excitation and 780-nm emission. Moreover, GFP-labeled HL-60 cells were mixed with PBMCs and incubated with IR-26 at the same conditions. After washing with PBS, flow cytometry (BD FACSVerse, BD Biosciences) or confocal microscopy was used to determine the distribution of NIR fluorescence in GFP and non-GFP cells.

Animal protocols were in accordance with the Animal Care and Committee Guidelines of the Third Military Medical University. For the subcutaneous xenograft tumor models, male athymic nude mice (4 to 6 weeks old) were used. GFP-labeled HL-60 cells (5 106) were suspended in Dulbeccos minimum essential medium with the same volume of Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and subcutaneously injected into the flank of each mouse. For mouse model of human AML, male C57BL/6 mice (6 to 8 weeks old) were exposed to a sublethal irradiation at a dose of 6 Gy using a cobalt-60 source. GFP-labeled HL-60 cells (5 106) suspended in 300 l of PBS were injected into mice through the tail vein. GFP-labeled malignant cells in peripheral blood were monitored by IVFC for 20 days, and leukemia blasts infiltrated in peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleens, and liver were detected to confirm that leukemia mouse models were established successfully. NOD/SCID mice engrafted with GFP-labeled human AML cells by tail vein injection were used to detect anti-leukemia efficacy of IR-26 in vivo.

Athymic nude mice bearing tumor xenografts were injected intravenously with IR-26 at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg (n = 3). Whole body of mouse optical imaging was taken at day 2 after injection using Kodak In-Vivo Imaging System FX Pro (New Haven, CT) equipped with fluorescent filter sets (excitation/emission, 770/830 nm); all settings were applied as described previously (21). After mice were sacrificed, dissected organs and tumors were obtained for NIR fluorescent imaging at the day of sacrifice.

The NIR IVFC system used in this study was established by ourselves and equipped with two lasers: a 785-nm laser used to excite NIR fluorescent dyes, and a 488-nm laser used to excite GFP. Once a fluorescence cell in the blood passed through the laser slit, the fluorescence of both channels would be excited and detected at the same time. After the GFP-labeled leukemia cells were transplanted in the mice for 5 days, the mice were injected with IR-26 by tail vein. IVFC for tracking fluorescent cells in peripheral blood of mice was performed according to our previous protocols (24). Briefly, after the mouse was anesthetized with 1% sodium pentobarbital solution, it was placed on the platform, and the GFP and NIR fluorescence information in peripheral blood of mouse was recorded and analyzed using IVFC. The first measurements were acquired within 15 min after the first injection of IR-26. Additional measurements were acquired at the same vessel location.

To detect the anti-AML effects of IR-26 in vivo, xenograft tumor models, established by subcutaneous injection of HL-60 cells in the right flank of athymic nude mice (4 to 6 weeks old), were used. Drug treatment was started when tumor sizes reached 5 mm in diameter. The IR-26 treatment group (n = 5) received IR-26 (5.0 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection, and the cytarabine treatment group (n = 5) received cytarabine (50 mg/kg), whereas the control group (n = 5) received saline only. The compounds were injected three times a week. Tumor volumes were calculated as length (width)2/2. NOD/SCID mice (8 to 10 weeks old) were intravenously injected with 5 106 GFP-labeled HL-60 cells to establish human AML mouse model. The mice were kept in microisolators and fed with sterile food and acidified water. One week after injection of HL-60 cells, the IR-26 treatment group (n = 12) received IR-26 (5.0 mg/kg) in saline by intraperitoneal injection, and the cytarabine treatment group (n = 12) was intraperitoneally injected with cytarabine (5.0 mg/kg), whereas the control group (n = 12) received saline only. Leukemia cell distribution, pathological histology of vital organs, and mice survival rates were detected.

Cellular OCR was measured using XF96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica, MA). Briefly, HL-60 cells were seeded in XF96-well plates (20,000 cells per well in 80 l). After 1 hour, cells were incubated overnight at 37C, 5% CO2. The XF96 sensor cartridge was hydrated with 200 l of calibration buffer per well overnight at 37C. Cells were preincubated with or without IR-34 (5 M) for 1 hour before the bioenergetic profile was determined. Then, cells were washed twice with 200 l of prewarmed base medium containing 10 mM sodium pyruvate and 25 mM glucose. The sensor cartridge was loaded with assay media (ports A, B, and C) to measure basal OCR or with oligomycin (2.0 M, port A), carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (2.0 M, port B), and rotenone (0.5 M, port C) to measure the bioenergetic profiles of different cells.

Pull-down assay using IR-26labeled AML cells were performed to detect IR-26specific interaction proteins. Briefly, HL-60 cells were incubated with 1.25 M IR-26 for 15 min. After washing with PBS, the cells were lysed to obtain the total protein. Then, the protein lysate was incubated with SDHA and ATP5B antibodies overnight at 4C. A total of 100 l of streptavidin-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature, and the immunoglobulin G antibody was used as control. After the protein complex was centrifuged and washed, it was analyzed by SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and imaging using Kodak In-Vivo Imaging System FX Pro to determine whether ATP5B or SDHA proteins were combined with the NIR fluorescence small-molecule IR-26 and then immunoblotted using anti-ATP5B or anti-SDHA antibodies to further verify the interactions.

The HL-60 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 culture media supplemented with 10% FBS for 2 days. Next, 1 107 cells were seeded in 75 culture dishes and treated with different concentrations of IR-26 (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 M). After 8 hours, cells in different groups were harvested and counted. After centrifugation, cells were kept in liquid nitrogen for 30 s and stored under 80C condition. Then, metabolites were immediately extracted and subjected to targeted metabolomic analysis for central carbon metabolism. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (cation) or Agilent 6460 Triple Quad LC/MS (anion) was conducted by Biotree.

Data were presented as means SD from at least three independent experiments. SPSS 13.0 statistical software was used to conduct all statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine significance among groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Acknowledgments: Funding: This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation Programs (81130026 and 81773352), Innovation Team Building Program of Chongqing University (CXTDG201602020), and Outstanding Youth Development Program of Third Military Medical University. Author contributions: C.Z., Yang Wang, T.L., and P.L. performed experiments. L.G. collected patient samples. L.M., Z.J., and Z.Y. helped to perform in vitro experiments. D.L., X.L., and Q.J. helped to perform in vivo experiments. X.T. and Yu Wang helped with optical imaging. S.L. contributed to design and synthesis of compounds and preparation of the manuscript. Yang Wang and C.S. contributed to study design, manuscript writing, and project supervision. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

See the rest here:
Near-infrared oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor integrates acute myeloid leukemiatargeted imaging and therapy - Science Advances

Groundbreaking Treatment for Severe COVID-19 Using Stem Cells It’s Like Smart Bomb Technology in the Lung – SciTechDaily

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells naturally migrate directly to the lung where they begin repair to COVID-19 damage. Credit: Dr. Camillo Ricordi

Study looked at treating severe COVID-19 with umbilical-cord derived mesenchymal stem cells.

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine researchers led a unique and groundbreaking randomized controlled trial showing umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cell infusions safely reduce risk of death and quicken time to recovery for the severest COVID-19 patients, according to results published inSTEM CELLS Translational Medicinein January 2021.

The studys senior author, Camillo Ricordi, M.D., director of the Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Cell Transplant Center at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, said treating COVID-19 with mesenchymal stem cells makes sense.

The paper describes findings from 24 patients hospitalized at University of Miami Tower or Jackson Memorial Hospital with COVID-19 who developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Each received two infusions given days apart of either mesenchymal stem cells or placebo.

It was a double-blind study. Doctors and patients didnt know what was infused, Dr. Ricordi said. Two infusions of 100 million stem cells were delivered within three days, for a total of 200 million cells in each subject in the treatment group.

Researchers found the treatment was safe, with no infusion-related serious adverse events.

Camillo Ricordi, M.D., director of the Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Cell Transplant Center at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. Credit: University of Miami Health System

Patient survival at one month was 91% in the stem cell treated group versus 42% in the control group. Among patients younger than 85 years old, 100% of those treated with mesenchymal stem cells survived at one month.

Dr. Ricordi and colleagues also found time to recovery was faster among those in the treatment arm. More than half of patients treated with mesenchymal stem cell infusions recovered and went home from the hospital within two weeks after the last treatment. More than 80% of the treatment group recovered by day 30, versus less than 37% in the control group.

The umbilical cord contains progenitor stem cells, or mesenchymal stem cells, that can be expanded and provide therapeutic doses for over 10,000 patients from a single umbilical cord. Its a unique resource of cells that are under investigation for their possible use in cell therapy applications, anytime you have to modulate immune response or inflammatory response, he said. Weve been studying them with our collaborators in China for more than 10 years in Type 1 Diabetes, and there are currently over 260 clinical studies listed in clinicaltrials.gov for treatment of other autoimmune diseases.

Mesenchymal cells not only help correct immune and inflammatory responses that go awry, they also have antimicrobial activity and have been shown to promote tissue regeneration.

Our results confirm the powerful anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory effect of UC-MSC. These cells have clearly inhibited the cytokine storm, a hallmark of severe COVID-19, said Giacomo Lanzoni, Ph.D, lead author of the paper and assistant research professor at the Diabetes Research Institute. The results are critically important not only for COVID-19 but also for other diseases characterized by aberrant and hyperinflammatory immune responses, such as autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes.

When given intravenously, mesenchymal stem cells migrate naturally to the lungs. Thats where therapy is needed in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a dangerous complication associated with severe inflammation and fluid buildup in the lungs.

It seemed to me that these stem cells could be an ideal treatment option for severe COVID-19, said Dr. Ricordi, Stacy Joy Goodman Professor of Surgery, Distinguished Professor of Medicine, and professor of biomedical engineering, microbiology and immunology. It requires only an intravenous (IV) infusion, like a blood transfusion. Its like smart bomb technology in the lung to restore normal immune response and reverse life-threatening complications.

When the pandemic emerged, Dr. Ricordi asked collaborators in China if they had studied mesenchymal stem cell treatment in COVID-19 patients. In fact, they and Israeli researchers reported great success treating COVID-19 patients with the stem cells, in many cases with 100% of treated patients surviving and recovering faster than those without stem cell treatment.

But there was widespread skepticism about these initial results, because none of the studies had been randomized, where patients randomly received treatment or a control solution (placebo), to compare results in similar groups of patients.

We approached the FDA and they approved our proposed randomized controlled trial in one week, and we started as quickly as possible, Dr. Ricordi said.

Dr. Ricordi worked with several key collaborators at the Miller School, the University of Miami Health System, Jackson Health System, and collaborated with others in the U.S. and internationally, including Arnold I. Caplan, Ph.D., of Case Western Reserve University, who first described mesenchymal stem cells.

The next step is to study use of the stem cells in COVID-19 patients who have not yet become severely ill but are at risk of having to be intubated, to determine if the infusions prevent disease progression.

The findings have implications for studies in other diseases, too, according to Dr. Ricordi.

Hyper-immune and hyper-inflammatory responses in autoimmune diseases might share a common thread with why some COVID-19 patients transition to severe forms of the disease and others dont.

Autoimmunity is a big challenge for healthcare, as is COVID-19. Autoimmunity affects 20% of the American population and includes over 100 disease conditions, of which Type 1 Diabetes can be considered just the tip of the iceberg. What we are learning is that there may be a common thread and risk factors that can predispose to both an autoimmune disease or to a severe reaction following viral infections, such as SARS-CoV-2, he said.

The DRI Cell Transplant Center is planning to create a large repository of mesenchymal stem cells that are ready to use and can be distributed to hospitals and centers in North America, he said.

These could be used not only for COVID-19 but also for clinical trials to treat autoimmune diseases, like Type 1 Diabetes, Dr. Ricordi said. If we could infuse these cells at the onset of Type 1 Diabetes, we might be able to block progression of autoimmunity in newly diagnosed subjects, and progression of complications in patients affected by the disease long-term. We are planning such a trial specifically for diabetes nephropathy, a kidney disease that is one of the major causes of dialysis and kidney transplantation. We are also planning to do a study on umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in combination with pancreatic islets to see if you can modulate the immune response to an islet transplant locally.

Funding by The Cure Alliance made launching the initial trial possible, while a $3 million grant from North Americas Building Trades Unions (NABTU) allowed Dr. Ricordi and colleagues to complete the clinical trial and expand research with mesenchymal stem cells.

North Americas Building Trades Unions (NABTU) has been a major supporter of the Diabetes Research Institute since 1984, when they started a campaign to fund, and build, our state-of-the-art research and treatment facility. NABTU has continued to support our work through the years, including our mesenchymal stem cell research that helped lead the way to this clinical trial, he said.

Reference: 5 January 2021, STEM CELLS Translational Medicine.

All the organizations funding the research are nonprofit entities, including the Barilla Group and Family, The Fondazione Silvio Tronchetti Provera, the Simkins Family Foundation and the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation. The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences also provided funding.

Coauthors on the NEJM paper include: Giacomo Lanzoni, Ph.D., assistant research professor, DRI; Elina Linetsky, Ph.D., DRI director of quality assurance and regulatory affairs; Diego Correa, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor (Research) Dept. of Orthopaedics and the DRI, adjunct assistant professor of biology at Case Western Reserve University; Shari Messinger Cayetano, Ph.D., associate professor of Public Health Sciences at the Miller School; Roger A. Alvarez, D.O., M.P.H., a pulmonologist with UHealth Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine; Antonio C Marttos, M.D., a UHealth general surgeon; Ana Alvarez Gil, DRI; Raffaella Poggioli, M.D., DRI; Phillip Ruiz, M.D., Ph.D., department of Surgery at the Miller School and the UHealth Anatomic Pathology department; Khemraj Hirani, M.Pharm., Ph.D., R.Ph., CCRP, CIP, RAC, M.B.A., director of regulatory affairs and quality assurance at the DRI; Crystal A. Bell, department of medicine at the Miller School; Halina Kusack, department of Medicine, Miller School; Lisa Rafkin, research assistant professor, DRI; Rodolfo Alejandro, M.D., professor of Medicine at the Miller School, co-director of the Cell Transplant Center, and director/attending physician of the Clinical Cell Transplant Program at the DRI; David Baidal, M.D., assistant professor of Medicine in the division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism at the Miller School and member of the DRIs Clinical Islet Transplant Program; Andrew Pastewski, M.D., Jackson Health System; Kunal Gawri, Miller School and University of Miami Health System; Dimitrios Kouroupis, postdoctoral research fellow at the Miller School; Clarissa Leero, DRI; Alejandro M.A. Mantero, Ph.D., lead research analyst, department of Health Sciences at the Miller School; Xiaojing Wang, DRI; Luis Roque, DRI; Burlett Masters, DRI; Norma S. Kenyon, Ph.D., deputy director and the Martin Kleiman professor of Surgery, Microbiology and Immunology and Biomedical Engineering at the DRI; Enrique Ginzburg, M.D., chief of Surgery at University of Miami Hospital and Trauma Medical Director at Jackson South Community Hospital; Xiumin Xu, DRI; Jianming Tan, M.D., Ph.D., Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian, China; Arnold I. Caplan, Ph.D., professor of Biology at Case Western Reserve University; and Marilyn Glassberg, M.D., division chief of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine at the University of Arizona College of Medicine.

Follow this link:
Groundbreaking Treatment for Severe COVID-19 Using Stem Cells It's Like Smart Bomb Technology in the Lung - SciTechDaily

New combo therapy offered against refractory T-cell lymphoma – Korea Biomedical Review

() () URL()

Medical doctors wrestling with recurrent, non-reactive T-cell lymphoma, an intractable disease with no standard treatments, have recently got a green light.

A research team, led by Professor Yang Deok-hwan of the Department of Hematology at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (CNUHH), said it has developed a new treatment method. For the first time in the world, they proved that the combined therapy of Copanlisib and Gemcitabine cell chemotherapeutic treatment showed high efficacy in treating the disease.

They conducted phase 1 and 2 clinical trials on 28 patients with P13K signal transduction inhibitor, Copanrai combining with Gemcitabine chemotherapy. The former inhibitor controls the P13K signal, and the latter suppresses the proliferation of malignant B cells, selectively blocking P13K subtypes.

Six other hospitals Seoul National University Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Yonsei Severance Hospital, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Busan National University Hospital, and Kyungbuk National University Hospital also participated in the study.

Researchers found that 72 percent of patients showed favorable reactions to the treatment with minor adverse effects, and developed a new therapy that supplements old therapy using single P12K with the combined inhibitor treatment.

Recurring and non-reactive peripheral T-cell lymphoma is regarded as incurable cancer, which does not have a standardized treatment yet. In the past, salvage chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplants after high-dose chemotherapy were conducted to treat such disease after the first treatment failed; however, patients were non-reactive or lived for less than five months after the treatment.

The new method is receiving attention for using the next generation sequencing (NGS) approach to classify gene abnormalities or mutations in peripheral T-cell lymphoma in therapeutic and non-response groups.

We are conducting additional predictive systems for blood cancer patients using AI to research on developing prognosis prediction programs, Professor Yang said.

The study results will be published in the Annals of Oncology.

See more here:
New combo therapy offered against refractory T-cell lymphoma - Korea Biomedical Review

Are metabolic hormones the next frontier in cancer treatment? – MedCity News

Conceptual vector illustration. Human diseases. Stop cancer

Its now well established that obesity, visceral (belly) fat and type 2 diabetes (i.e., metabolic dysfunction) increase a persons risk for developing certain cancers. What is only beginning to be appreciated is that cancer patients that have underlying metabolic dysfunction have much worse outcomes and seriously increased mortality rates. This suggests that metabolic hormones play an important role in cancer progression, and could be valuable targets in cancer treatment.

A variety of chronic, adverse health issues are associated with metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimers, and most notably cancer. Metabolic dysfunction is linked with worse outcomes for at least 13 types of cancers and is associated with a 33% elevated risk of death from cancer in the US. Of all the various cancer types, some of the most common are highly sensitive to dysregulated metabolic hormones (insulin, leptin, adiponectin) and chronic inflammation stemming from overweight/obesity, pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. An estimated 630,000 patients in the United States alone were diagnosed in 2014 with an obesity-related cancer, including breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Yet, only now are oncologists and researchers beginning to pay close attention to the profound influence systemic metabolic dysfunction has on cancer progression and patient outcomes.

The nexus of cancer and metabolic dysfunctionMetabolic dysfunction leads to dysregulated hormones that impact known oncogenic pathways causing tumors to grow faster with greater metastatic potential, and may even be implicated in cancer treatment resistance. The metabolic hormone insulin, as well as leptin and adiponectin (aka adipokines), signal through validated oncogenic pathways, including PI3K/Akt/mTOR, MAPK, ERK, JNK, Notch, and STAT3, and trigger deleterious downstream effects such as cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, stem cell protection, and metastatic potential. Ultimately, these downstream effects drive tumor growth and metastasis. Moreover, systemic metabolic dysfunction dysregulates the tumor immune microenvironment leading to immune suppression possibly rendering the tumor resistant to cancer treatment.

Sadly, you dont have to be overweight to have metabolic dysfunction. People who maintain a healthy weight according to their body mass index (or BMI) can still have systemic metabolic dysfunction, depending on how their body fat is distributed. These individuals are also at a higher risk of developing cancer, one major example of this being in post-menopausal women and breast cancer. Furthermore, cancer therapies themselves can induce metabolic dysfunction (e.g., hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, weight gain, insulin resistance) which can impact the patients quality of life and even lead to treatment failure.

Why targeting gene mutations isnt enoughCurrent cancer treatments tend to target specific mutations or dysregulated pathways in tumor cells with the goal of blocking cell proliferation and reducing tumor burden. However, as long as metabolic dysfunction is stimulating key oncogenic pathways, oncologists administering these treatments will be fighting a losing battle. Studies with diet and exercise suggest that standard treatments may be more effective if they are administered simultaneously with measures to reduce metabolic dysfunction in cancer patients. This approach addresses the disease on two fronts: molecularly targeted chemotherapeutics arrest cell proliferation and can shrink the tumor size, while restoring normal metabolic hormone levels relieves the external stimulation on oncogenic signaling pathways. Not only does this combination approach impede multiple cancer drivers at both the systemic and cellular levels, but it also improves patients quality of life by boosting their strength and possibly lessening side effects from treatment.

It is now more important than ever that standard cancer treatments account for the critical role that metabolic dysfunction plays in patients prognosis. Rates of obesity, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes are on the rise worldwide, driven by poor diets, sedentary lifestyles, and even reduced activity during the Covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, metabolic dysfunction and cancer are associated with aging, and retiring baby boomers make up a massive aging segment of our population. This growing population of aging individuals combined with an increase in metabolic dysfunction creates the perfect storm in which many more people are likely to develop highly aggressive forms of cancer in the coming years.

How to treat a cancer patient with metabolic dysfunction?When a person with metabolic dysfunction discovers they have cancer, they can work with an endocrinologist or dietician to develop healthier lifestyle habits, such as weight loss, better diabetes control, improved nutrition, and regular physical activity all of which help the patient better tolerate chemotherapy, and improve the treatment outcomes. However, sticking to a rigorous diet and exercise regimen can be challenging for patients, especially while they are undergoing chemotherapy. While adopting healthy habits should always be a goal, cancer patients could benefit from pharmacological options that treat systemic metabolic dysfunction more predictably and reliably to provide a complementary, one-two punch with standard of care cancer therapies so they have a better shot at working. Although there are no drugs on the market specifically targeting this population, the type 2 diabetes drug metformin has been clinically studied in this population, with mixed results.

Treating the patient, not just the cancerWeinbergs The Hallmarks of Cancer got it right a multi-faceted approach to treating cancer is the way forward. Metabo-oncology is the emerging area of research dedicated to understanding and developing treatments for cancers that are sensitive to metabolic dysfunction. A steadily-growing body of clinicians are speaking out on the role of metabolic dysfunction and its implications on cancer patient treatment and clinical outcomes.

Justin Brown PhD, assistant professor and director of the Cancer Metabolism Program at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana is a leader in the field researching how metabo-oncology principles can be put into clinical practice. From Dr. Browns perspective, the diagnosis of cancer triggers two reactions: on one hand, an individual becomes motivated to do everything in their power to maximize the probability for a good outcome; on the other hand, the diagnosis is overwhelming, stressful, and terrifying. Most patients experience some combination of both reactions, and this is where healthy lifestyle habits can be a powerful, enabling tool.

Dr. Brown believes that oncologists should provide the right information about lifestyle choices to the right patient at the right time. When a patient indicates that they are ready, physicians could then initiate a patient-centered discussion about the benefits of pursuing a healthy lifestyle. Once a patient decides they want to adopt a healthier lifestyle, doctors should put the patients in contact with experts (endocrinologists, dieticians) to help improve clinical success.

In reality, however, while oncologists and their patients generally recognize the importance of healthy lifestyle habits, in a 2019 survey conducted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, oncologists only reported counselling patients about weight management, healthful eating, and physical activity about 40-60% of the time, due to a lack of training, limited referral options, and lack of third-party reimbursement for diet and exercise counseling.

Thats why treating cancer patients with concomitant metabolic dysfunction remains a major challenge for oncologists. The work of a key opinion leader in this field, Emily Gallagher, MD, PhD demonstrates this well. Dr. Gallagher is an endocrinologist at Mount Sinai in New York who specializes in treating cancer patients with metabolic dysfunction. When Dr. Gallagher treats her patients, she never takes a one-size-fits-all approach to addressing their metabolic issues. Instead, she considers the underlying medical reason patients were referred to her, the type of cancer they have, and the type of treatment they are receiving. She considers pre-existing conditions, like type 2 diabetes, current lifestyle, and disease symptoms when devising a treatment regimen that she believes will be most effective. She sets short-term and long-term goals for her patients and follows up regularly to help keep them on track, and encourages them to see a diabetes educator/dietitian to further encourage positive lifestyle changes.

From Dr. Gallaghers perspective, when patients have metastatic cancer, their non-cancer background conditions often go under-treated. But, by ignoring systemic metabolic dysfunction, clinical oncologists may inadvertently be contributing to their patients disease progression. Therefore, its important that oncologists pay close attention to the metabolic health of their cancer patients and monitor for endocrine side effects (hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, obesity/weight gain) induced by the cancer drugs they prescribe. This is why it makes sense to refer these patients to endocrinologists who may have already developed strategies to address these problems. Whats more, by having the oncology team reinforce the importance of systemic metabolic health, it communicates to the patients that their treatment strategy is being administered by a team of doctors using a whole-patient strategy.

While treating physicians know that obesity/systemic metabolic dysfunction leads to worse outcomes for their cancer patients, they face multiple challenges in addressing it: limited pharmacologic interventions that can effectively treat patients metabolic issues, lack of training in the methods endocrinologists use to address these issues, and no payer incentives to encourage better lifestyle choices. While we wait for effective pharmaceutical interventions that can reliably address these issues, anti-diabetic medications and diet and exercise will have to do. Addressing systemic metabolic dysfunction in cancer patients requires communication between diverse medical experts and scientific disciplines. Incorporating a multi-disciplined approach to treating cancer should help foster better clinical practices for cancer patients and improved outcomes for patients with cancers sensitive to metabolic hormones.

Photo: Main_sail, Getty Images

Link:
Are metabolic hormones the next frontier in cancer treatment? - MedCity News

Hair Growth Treatment Secrets Bollywood Will Never Tell You About – Times of India

Hair loss just creeps on you; it often begins with finding a few strands on the pillow (hair fall) and accelerates to the hair hair everywhere (hair loss) situation before you have even had the chance to blink. The good news is that hair loss treatments have made a quantum leap from uncomfortable sweaty wigs, or hiding the scalp under a cap or a scarf, or going through painful hair transplants. Here are the top three hair growth treatment secrets and the best hair treatments in India that Bollywood is not telling you: Hair Transplant May Not be a One Time Process & May Have Issues Hair transplant is a surgical process, which essentially just uses hair from the healthy portion at the back of the scalp and translocates them on the balding area. The hair transplant procedure does not impact the hair loss process itself and one may have to undergo repeat sessions, as the hair loss continues. This almost always leads to thinning months to years post the hair transplant and hence may necessitate multiple repeat procedures. This makes the treatment invasive and expensive. Many top celebs have claimed to not having benefited from this costly and painful hair treatment process.

Apart from the side effects such as bleeding at the transplant site, crusting, facial edema, infection, swelling, headaches, and scarring at the graft site; recently there have been a few well reported cases globally, in which these procedures have even proven to be fatal.

PRP Therapy For Hair Fall Treatment Has Not Demonstrated Effective Results In Randomised Controlled Trials

The Platelet Rich Plasma therapy (PRP) is an outdated & clinically unproven clinical procedure that uses the natural growth factor present in the patients own blood to boost the scalp follicles. Patients blood is drawn and spun through a centrifuge to separate the rich plasma. PRP is injected in the deep layers of the scalp with the help of needles. The cost of each PRP session can be upward of 6000 to 12000.

The large variability in results of PRP is because there is no standardization in the injection and treatment method. While cosmetologists all over the world continue to use the PRP treatment in their clinics for their patients, surprisingly for something so ubiquitously used, the PRP treatment has never been patented nor have its results been demonstrated in Randomised Controlled Trials. PRP treatment may take up to 3 to 6 months to show minimal increase in hair density. Booster dose is also needed every six months to maintain the results. Side Effects

Tenderness, soreness on the injected area, tightness of scalp, headaches, scar tissue formation, and calcification of injected points are common side effects of the PRP treatment.

These are the new millenniums answer to traditional hair growth treatments. Safe, easy, and highly effective, non-surgical hair fall treatments like the novel QR 678 are the new favourites for hair fall control in Bollywood and Hollywood.

QR 678 is a USA patented, plant derived, natural hair rejuvenation therapy, that has proven to be very effective in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men and women, female pattern hair loss because of PCOS, alopecia caused because of chemotherapy, seborrheic dermatitis and alopecia areata.

Developed, produced and marketed in India, QR 678 is a true Made in India product that has gained an international reputation in producing most effective, efficient results faster than any other surgical and non-surgical hair regrowth treatment known today.

To see how QR 678 works, See the below video-

The name QR 678 means Quick Response to a disease which earlier had no answer. The Esthetic Clinics Research & Development team have introduced this hair formulation in the commercial market after a decade of extensive research and studies. QR 678 has already been awarded a patent from USA and India and is FDA approved for commercial production as an effective hair fall treatment.

QR 678 contains a mix of six plant based essential growth factors that mimic those already present in the scalp. These hair growth factors combined with vitamins, minerals and growth peptides replenish the scalp follicles and increase the blood supply to the hair follicles leading to a healthier and denser hair growth.

How Does This Revolutionary Hair Loss Solution Work?

The balding areas of the scalp are identified and the QR 678 solution is administered by your doctor, to the scalp. The whole process takes a few minutes to complete and is almost painless. The sessions are repeated every month, for eight to twelve months.

The Results

QR 678 has been tested extensively on people from all over the world and all age groups to prove its efficacy. Over 12000+ patients have received the QR 678 treatment and it has clinically proven to cause more than 80% hair regrowth.

Clinical data published in top American peer reviewed Journals shows the following:

QR 678 has minimal risk, is nonsurgical, non-invasive, and a pocket friendly treatment that costs patients approximately 200 a day i.e. 6000 a month is required, to delay balding, reverse hair loss and keep a healthy mop of hair on the head, throughout life.

QR 678 hair loss treatment has almost no side effects and does not disturb the existing hair in any way. The Esthetic Clinics invented and started this therapy at its centers in Mumbai, New Delhi, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Kolkata & Ahmedabad, but this treatment is now being used by the top plastic surgeons, cosmetologists and dermatologists globally in their patients.

Disclaimer: Content Produced by Global Cosmetic Surgery

Originally posted here:
Hair Growth Treatment Secrets Bollywood Will Never Tell You About - Times of India