Global CAR-T Pipeline Insight Report 2020: Overview, Landscape, Therapeutic Assessment, Current Treatment Scenario and Emerging Therapies -…

December 30, 2020 04:38 ET | Source: Research and Markets

Dublin, Dec. 30, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "CAR-T - Pipeline Insight, 2020" drug pipelines has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The "CAR-T - Pipeline Insight, 2020," report provides comprehensive insights about 250+ companies and 250+ pipeline drugs in CAR-T pipeline landscape. It covers the pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and nonclinical stage products. It also covers the therapeutics assessment by product type, stage, route of administration, and molecule type. It further highlights the inactive pipeline products in this space.

CAR-T: Overview

CAR-T is a type of treatment in which a patient's T cells (a type of immune system cell) are changed in the laboratory so they will attack cancer cells. T cells are taken from a patient's blood. Then the gene for a special receptor that binds to a certain protein on the patient's cancer cells is added to the T cells in the laboratory. The special receptor is called a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Large numbers of the CAR T cells are grown in the laboratory and given to the patient by infusion. CAR T-cell therapy is used to treat certain blood cancers, and it is being studied in the treatment of other types of cancer. Also called chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Potential Mechanisms of CAR-T Cell-Mediated Toxicity

Significant progress has been made in the field of cancer immunotherapy, and CAR-T cells have shown outstanding efficacy in clinical trials. As with all technologies, CAR-T technologies also need to go through a long process of development, and CAR-T cell therapy has related acute and chronic toxicities that have become a roadblock on the developmental path. If these setbacks are not overcome, it will be difficult to make a more significant breakthrough.

Cytokine Release Syndrome

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common toxic side effect in CAR-T cell therapy. CRS is a systemic inflammatory response caused by the significant increase in cytokines accompanied by the rapid in vivo activation and proliferation of CAR-T cells, usually occurring within a few days after the first infusion. CRS is a clinical condition with mild symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, rash, joint pain, and myalgia. Severe CRS cases are characterized by tachycardia, hypotension, and high fever. Mild to moderate CRS is usually self-limiting and can be managed through close observation and supportive care. Severe CRS must be treated with tocilizumab or steroids alone for intensive treatment.

Advances in Research of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors

Although early CAR-T cell trials of solid tumors did not show the same success as observed in leukemia trials, a better understanding of the multiple barriers seen in solid tumors could promote the design of clinical trials for CAR-T cells. In this early stage of clinical development, CAR-T cells offer much hope. The ability of genetic manipulation techniques to modify CAR-T cells provides almost unlimited opportunities for other changes and improvements, thus providing a strong desire for future success.

Global Landscape of CAR-T Cell Therapy

At present, CAR-T cells are widely used in cellular immunotherapy for various tumors. According to statistics, more than 300 clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapies have been approved by many national drug regulatory agencies, including the FDA of the United States. Statistical data from these clinical trials show that although the effects of various clinical trials vary due to the use of different sources and the preparation techniques of CARs and T cells, as well as differences in pretreatment and combinations of drugs, overall, CAR-T cells are effective in treating tumors with an effective rate of 30% to 70% or even more than 90%. For example, the complete remission rate for r/r ALL treated with the Novartis drug CTL0l9, which the FDA has approved, is 93%. Perhaps CAR-T cell therapy will ultimately remedy the fate of human cancer.

CAR-T Emerging Drugs Chapters

This segment of the CAR-T report encloses its detailed analysis of various drugs in different stages of clinical development, including phase II, I, preclinical and Discovery. It also helps to understand clinical trial details, expressive pharmacological action, agreements and collaborations, and the latest news and press releases.

CAR-T: Therapeutic Assessment

This segment of the report provides insights about the different CAR-T drugs segregated based on following parameters that define the scope of the report, such as:

Major Players in CAR-T

There are approx. 250+ key companies which are developing the therapies for CAR-T. The companies which have their CAR-T drug candidates in the most advanced stage, i.e. phase III include, Janssen Research & Development, ViiV Healthcare, Sorrento Therapeutics, Celgene, Novartis, Abbott etc.

Report Highlights

Current Treatment Scenario and Emerging Therapies:

Key Players

Key Products

For more information about this drug pipelines report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/c6ze76

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Go here to see the original:
Global CAR-T Pipeline Insight Report 2020: Overview, Landscape, Therapeutic Assessment, Current Treatment Scenario and Emerging Therapies -...

Versiti Blood Centers and Noodles & Company Serve Up Thanks to Blood Donors – PRNewswire

MILWAUKEE, Dec. 30, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Versiti Blood Centers and premier partner Noodles & Company are dishing out discounts for life-saving donations during National Blood Donor Month this January.

Since 2016, Noodles & Company has supported Versiti's mission by aligning as a community partner and donating over $1.3 million in discounts and coupons to blood donors. Throughout January 2020, all attempting blood donors will receive a coupon redeemable for $4 off their order when they donate at a Versiti donor center or select community blood drive.

January is National Blood Donor Month, which highlights the critical need for blood during winter when donations often decline. Donors of all blood types are needed, but especially O negative blood donors who carry the universal blood type given to people in emergency situations.

To schedule an appointment, visit versiti.org.

About Versiti Blood Centers Versiti is a not-for-profit organization headquartered in Milwaukee that specializes in blood services, esoteric diagnostic testing, organ, tissue and stem cell donation, medical services and leading-edge research. Founded in 1947, Versiti is the primary provider of blood products and services for more than 250 hospitals in five midwestern states: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. Versiti collects more than 602,000 units of blood each year at 35 permanent donation sites and more than 12,000 community blood drives. For more, visit versiti.org.

SOURCE Versiti, Inc.

https://www.versiti.org

Read the original:
Versiti Blood Centers and Noodles & Company Serve Up Thanks to Blood Donors - PRNewswire

2020 health care year in review – Crain’s Cleveland Business

While COVID-19 was no doubt the story of the year, Northeast Ohio's health care scene grabbed headlines for several other reasons.

Cleveland Clinic and Aetna, a CVS Health Company (NYSE: CVS), announced they would launch a co-branded insurance plan. And Massachusetts-based Devoted Health launched in Ohio, offering Medicare Advantage plans across Cleveland, Akron, Canton and North-Central Ohio.

Also this year, Bravo Wellness became a wholly owned subsidiary of Medical Mutual at the start of January. Bravo, a Cleveland-based provider of employee wellness programs, this summer acquired Chicago-based PUSH Wellness.

The region's health systems continued their growth and consolidation trends of past decades.

Lake Health, which in early 2020 announced its search for a strategic partnership, reached an agreement to join University Hospitals, pending regulatory approval, the two announced in December.

The news came a month after UH announced it would gain a minority interest in Western Reserve Hospital, an independent, physician-owned hospital in Cuyahoga Falls. It will be UH's first inpatient presence in Summit County where hospital ownership has shifted dramatically in the past few years, including in 2015 when Cleveland Clinic acquired Akron General Health System.

At the start of 2020, Summa Health was taking steps toward becoming a subsidiary of Southfield, Mich.-based Beaumont Health, but the deal fell apart. After pausing the process to focus on COVID-19, Beaumont ultimately walked away from partnership plans in May.

Though the pandemic initially slowed down the due diligence process, Cleveland Clinic ultimately reached an agreement with Sisters of Charity for Mercy Medical Center in Canton to become a full member of Cleveland Clinic. The deal is expected to be finalized Feb. 1, pending regulatory approval.

The Clinic also worked to grow its research capacity, establishing two new research centers in April following more than a year of planning: The Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology and the Center for Global and Emerging Pathogens Research. This summer, the system also opened its 107,000-square-foot Florida Research and Innovation Center in Port St. Lucie, Fla., which will collaborate with researchers in Cleveland.

Meanwhile, MetroHealth continued its own expansions this year. Alongside the ongoing construction for its nearly $1 billion campus transformation, the system this year announced a $42 million project to expand the number of behavioral health beds in Cleveland Heights and a $9 million investment into its Old Brooklyn campus.

MetroHealth also received a $42 million gift the largest in its history from JoAnn and Bob Glick to support programs that aim to reverse health inequities and improve community health in Greater Cleveland.

In addition to the growth of its health systems, Northeast Ohio's health care options expanded with several newcomers to the region as the market and demand for outpatient health care continues to grow.

NewVista Healthcare, based in Blue Ash (outside Cincinnati), announced plans to open two new substance use disorder (SUD) treatment centers in the Cleveland area. Cincinnati-based Queen City Hospice announced plans to enter the Cleveland market with the launch of Miracle City Hospice. Nashville-based Spero Health opened three Northeast Ohio locations to offer addiction treatment services. This summer, Miami-based ChenMed began opening three planned facilities in the Cleveland area. And Chicago-based Oak Street Health, which began opening primary care centers in Northeast Ohio a couple of years ago, has continued its growth in the region in 2020.

This year has presented what we all hope will be once-in-a-lifetime challenges. It has also sparked collaborations and innovation across the health care industry and beyond. With a vaccine offering a light at the end of the tunnel, health care leaders are beginning to think about how to draw on deepened relationships in the next normal. In the meantime, they continue to ask everyone to wear their masks, practice social distancing. wash their hands and stay safe, especially this holiday season.

View post:
2020 health care year in review - Crain's Cleveland Business

The Top 10 FDA Oncology Drug Approvals of 2020 – Curetoday.com

While 2020 had its share of negative healthcare headlines, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continued to push through approvals on a large number of oncology therapies throughout the year, from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to breast cancer and beyond.

Heres a look back at 2020s top 10 most popular FDA drug approvals in the oncology space, as determined by CURE readers.

In August, the FDA approved the expansion of Kyprolis (carfilzomib) in combination to with Darzalex (daratumumab) plus dexamethasone in once- and twice-weekly dosing regimens for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received a maximum of three prior lines of therapy.

After granting it an accelerated approval in 2018, the Food and Drug Administration fully approved Venclexta (venetoclax) in combination with Vidaza (azacytidine), Dacogen (decitabine) or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) in newly diagnosed patients with AML aged 75 years or older in October.

The combination of Monjuvi (tafasitamab-cxix) and Revlimid (lenalidomide), approved in August, fills an unmet need for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are also unable to undergo autologous stem cell transplant, said Dr. Gilles Salles.

The targeted drug Qinlock (ripretinib), which interferes with the activity of proteins that drive gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), was approved by the FDA in May for patients with advanced disease that has progressed despite treatment with other kinase inhibitors.

The FDAs approval of Braftovi (encorafenib) and Erbitux (cetuximab) with or without Mektovi (binimetinib) for adults with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a BRAF V600E mutation is a welcomed approval, according to Dr. Richard Goldberg, because patients with this mutation have a poorer than average prognosis and more limited treatment options than other colorectal cancer patients. Having an effective, rationally designed regimen for them that attacks multiple points in the pathway that drives their tumor was sorely needed, said Goldberg.

In May, the FDA approved Retevmo (selpercatinib), the first of its kind, to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid cancer and other types of thyroid cancers with rearranged during transfection, or RET, alterations. The kinase inhibitor blocks a type of enzyme and helps prevent cancer cells from growing.

The FDA approved and granted priority review in September to Gavreto (pralsetinib) for the treatment of patients with metastatic, RET fusion-positive NSCLC. The FDA approval of Gavreto for RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer is an important step towards our goal of providing an effective treatment option for every person diagnosed with lung cancer, no matter how rare or hard-to-treat their type of disease, said Dr. Levi Garraway, Genentechs chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development, in a statement.

The Food and Drug Administrations May approval of the first antibody-drug conjugate to treat patients with pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer was a major milestone, according to Dr. Aditya Bardia, a breast medical oncologist at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

This approval in April was big news for patients with a variety of adult cancers. The important social distancing measures for COVID-19 have created a number of challenges for people with cancer, including keeping to planned treatment schedules, Dr. Roy Baynes, senior vice president, head of global clinical development and chief medical officer at Merck Research Laboratories, said in a press release. Todays approval of an every-six-weeks dosing schedule for Keytruda gives doctors an option to reduce how often patients are at the clinic for their treatment.

Our most popular approval coverage for the combination of Nerlynx and Xeloda in February comes off the heels of the phase 3 NALA trial that looked at the efficacy of Nerlynx in combination with Xeloda, which found a significant improvement in patients progression free survival (the time from treatment to disease progression or worsening) compared to Tykerb (lapatinib) in combination with Xeloda.

View post:
The Top 10 FDA Oncology Drug Approvals of 2020 - Curetoday.com

Numerous Indian American STEM Researchers Named Fellows of American Association for the Advancement of Sciences – India West

The American Association for the Advancement of Sciences recently announced its group of 2020 AAAS Fellows, which included several Indian Americans and South Asian Americans.

Nearly 500 AAAS members earned the lifetime distinction, according to the associations news release.

AAAS Fellowsare elected each year by their peers serving on theCouncil of AAAS, the organizations member-run governing body. The title recognizes important contributions to STEM disciplines, including pioneering research, leadership within a given field, teaching and mentoring, fostering collaborations and advancing public understanding of science, the release said.

Among the Fellows were ShailajaK.Mani of theBaylor College of Medicinefor distinguished contributions to molecular and cellular neuroscience focused on molecular transcriptional regulation of steroid hormone receptors, signal transduction pathways and role of the microbiome; K. RajaReddyof Mississippi State Universityfor distinguished contributions to the field environmental plant physiology and agricultural systems modeling and applications; and SureshK.Alahariof Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine for distinguished contributions in cancer research and teaching, with a focus on signal transduction.

Additionally, SwathiArurof The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for discovery of Dicer1 phosphorylation by RAS/ERK signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans and implications for human fertility and cancer metastasis;

HitenD.Madhaniof U.C. San Francisco for distinguished contributions to the fields of molecular biology and genetics, particularly for developing fungal systems to uncover mechanisms of chromatin modifications and RNA splicing; TuliMukhopadhyayof Indiana University for distinguished contributions to the field of virology, particularly in structure and assembly of arthropod-borne viruses; RamaNatarajanof the City of Hope National Medical Center for distinguished contributions to the field of diabetes and its vascular complications, particularly for studies showing the roles of epigenetics and non-coding RNAs; and P. HemachandraReddyof Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center For pioneering contributions to the fields of Alzheimer's disease and mitochondrial neurobiology, particularly in discovering key role of mitochondria in neurodegenerative diseases and their treatment, were among the newly elected members

Additional members elected included RohitBhargavaof the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaignfor pioneering contributions to chemical imaging, including infrared spectroscopic imaging theory, development of instrumentation, and its applications to realize all-digital cancer pathology; VishvaDixitof Genentech Inc.for pioneering studies defining the biochemical framework illuminating many of the key components of the cell death pathway; PrashantK.Jain of theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for distinguished contributions to the field of nanomaterial chemistry leading to atomistic understanding of artificial photosynthesis, multielectron transfer, catalysis and phase transitions; ManishChhowallaof the University of Cambridge (United Kingdom) for distinguished contributions to the field of two-dimensional materials, particularly using phase engineering to study their electronic, electrocatalytic and energy storage properties; VistaspM.Karbhariof TheUniversity of Texas at Arlington for distinguished contributions to the field of composites in civil infrastructure particularly in low-cost processing, durability and damage tolerance, rehabilitation and multi-threat mitigation; and SanjayKumarof U.C. Berkeley for distinguished contributions to the field of bioengineering, particularly the development of biomaterial and single-cell technologies to investigate mechanobiological signaling in health and disease.

SudipK.Mazumderof the University of Illinois at Chicago,for distinguished contributions to the field of multi-scale control and analysis of power-electronic systems; UdayB.Palof Boston University,for pioneering work providing novel materials-based solutions in the field of green engineering as applied to energy conversion and primary production of materials; HrideshRajanof Iowa State University,for distinguished contributions to data driven science, particularly to modularity and modular reasoning in computer software and the development of the Boa language and infrastructure; SureshK.Bhargavaof RMIT University (Australia),for an exceptional contribution to the fields of industrial chemistry and technology, particularly for molecular engineering, catalysis and nanotechnology bringing innovative solutions to the industries; MunindarP.Singhof North Carolina State University, for distinguished contributions to the field of computer science, particularly to foundations of multiagent systems and their applications in service-oriented computing, sociotechnical systems and governance; AnujSrivastavaof Florida State University,for distinguished contributions to the field of statistical pattern recognition, particularly for development of differential geometric approaches to statistical shape analysis; and SenduraiManiof The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,for demonstrating that cancer can make its own cancer stem cells and promote plasticity, resulting in metastasis and chemoresistance by activating latent embryonic epithelial-mesenchymal transition, were among the newly elected members.

Also named were D.NageshwarReddyof the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (India),for pioneering work in gastroenterology, particularly advances in therapeutic pancreatic biliary endoscopy and innovations in transgastric endoscopic surgery; and for service to international gastroenterology societies; Debomoy (Deb)K.Lahiriof Indiana University, for distinguished contributions to the field of molecular and translational neuroscience, particularly roles of epigenetics and microRNA on neuronal physiology and eventually treating human neurodegenerative diseases; NiraoM.Shahof Stanford University,for exceptional contributions to the field of behavioral neuroscience, particularly the dissection of neural circuits and transcriptomics controlling social behaviors.

Also named Fellows were M.N.V.RaviKumarof Texas A&M University,for distinguished contributions to the field of drug delivery, particularly the next-generation polyesters and non-competitive targeting strategies are of profound significance to the human health; and BulbulChakrabortyof Brandeis University, for important theoretical contributions to diverse areas of condensed matter physics, particularly disordered systems including frustrated magnets and granular materials.

TalatShahnazRahmanUniversity of Central Florida, for distinguished contributions to computational and theoretical nanoscience, in predictions of chemical, vibrational, and structural properties of low-dimensional systems, together with diversity in STEM; NandiniTrivediof The Ohio State University,for her contributions to the theoretical understanding of quantum matter, characterized by innovative use of quantum Monte Carlo techniques and close experimental collaborations; RamananLaxminarayanof the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy/Princeton University,for distinguished contributions to the field of economic epidemiology, with particular reference to the spread and control of antimicrobial resistance; and SudiptoBanerjeeof UCLA,for innovative contributions to Bayesian methodology with focus on spatially indexed information, for high-impact applications, for educational and mentoring excellence, professional service and academic administration were named.

A virtual induction ceremony for the 489 newly elected Fellows will take place on Feb. 13, 2021, the Saturday following the AAAS Annual Meeting.

The honorees will receive official certificates and rosette pins in gold and blue, colors symbolizing science and engineering, by mail.

The tradition of electing AAAS Fellows began in 1874. Since then, the recognition has gone to thousands of distinguished scientists, such as inventor Thomas Edison, elected in 1878, sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois (1905), anthropologist Margaret Mead (1934), computer scientist Grace Hopper (1963), physicist Steven Chu (2000), and astronaut Ellen Ochoa (2012). The 2020 group contains members of each ofAAASs 24 sections, the release notes.

Link:
Numerous Indian American STEM Researchers Named Fellows of American Association for the Advancement of Sciences - India West

Gut microbiota: How does it interact with the brain? – Medical News Today

Through studies in mice, researchers find evidence that having a healthful balance of gut microorganisms is important for good health.

Researchers from the Institut Pasteur, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), and Inserm have found evidence that gut microbiota also plays a role in mood regulation and brain function.

Gut microbiota is the community of bacteria, fungi, and viruses that live in the digestive tract.

These findings in mice suggest that changes to gut bacterial communities may lead or contribute to depression. If humans have a similar mechanism, doctors might be able to use bacteria strains to treat mood disorders, such as depression.

A group of 16 researchers from several prominent French research institutions conducted the study, which appears in Nature Communications.

Studies have found that some people with depression experience dysbiosis, which is an imbalance or change in their intestinal microbiota.

Research conducted on rodents also shows that gut dysbiosis has associations with neurological changes linked with depression, such as:

Animal studies also show that gut microbiota helps regulate anxiety. It may also influence the development of neurological conditions caused by circuit dysfunctions, such as Parkinsons disease, Alzheimers disease, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Researchers think this is because gut bacteria release metabolites, tiny bits of food broken down by digestion that influence brain function. Metabolites may impact mood regulation by acting on the endocannabinoid system.

The endocannabinoid system is a complex cell-signaling system consisting of lipid (fat)-based neurotransmitters and their receptors.

It is found throughout the body and plays a role in important aspects of health, such as immune and nervous system function and cellular communication in the nervous system. It also regulates emotions, moods, and stress responses by activation of the systems main receptor, CB1.

Previous research supports the idea that restoring gut microbial health may help treat depression. In animal studies, prebiotic treatment influenced emotional behavior. In human studies, prebiotic supplementation also improved mood in people with depression.

But despite educated theories, researchers still do not know precisely how gut bacteria impact brain function.

Researchers in the recent study set out to find the mechanisms linking gut microbiota and mood disorders. A team of researchers from some of these same French institutions published a report earlier this year, which found that stress-induced changes in gut microbiota reduced the efficacy of the antidepressant fluoxetine in mice.

In the study, researchers submitted genetically identical mice to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS), a mouse model of stress-induced depression, for 8 weeks.

This treatment caused the mice to develop depressive-like behaviors, such as reduced eating, grooming, weight loss, and hippocampal neurogenesis. The hippocampus is responsible for learning and memory and is heavily affected by several psychiatric and neurological conditions.

Researchers then transplanted fecal samples containing gut microbiota from control and UCMS-exposed mice into healthy mice. To serve as a control, mice that received fecal transplants were germ-free mice or received treatment with antibiotics for 6 days.

After 8 weeks, mice that received transplants from UCMS mice developed depression-like symptoms. The mice also experienced a reduction in the number of new brain stem cells and neurons in their hippocampus.

These findings show that transferring gut microbiota from stress-induced depressive mice to healthy mice induced depression-like behaviors.

Surprisingly, simply transferring the microbiota from an animal with mood disorders to an animal in good health was enough to bring about biochemical changes and confer depressive-like behaviors in the latter.

Pierre-Marie Lledo, head of the Perception and Memory Unit at the Institut Pasteur (CNRS/Institut Pasteur), joint last author of the study

To figure out how this occurred, researchers explored the possibility that UCMS-exposed microbiota may trigger depression by altering metabolism. They found that mice with UCMS microbiota had significantly reduced levels of certain fatty acids in their blood and brain.

The reduced fatty acids included monoacylglycerols (MAG), diacylglycerols (DAG), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and linoleic acid. monoacylglycerols (MAG), diacylglycerols (DAG), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and linoleic acid. Variations of two of these fatty acids, DAD and PUFA, are converted into endocannabinoids (eCB).

The researchers speculate that gut dysbiosis may cause these changes in fatty acid levels. Studies link the dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system and its central receptor, CB1, with depression in both UCMS-model mice and humans.

In the study, the researchers found that mice with UCMS microbiota had greatly reduced levels of eCBs in their hippocampus and blood. They also found that mice with UCMS microbiota had reduced levels of Lactobacillus bacteria.

The researchers were able to reduce the depressive impact of the UCMS microbiota by enhancing CB1 levels and giving the mice a strain of Lactobacillus bacteria orally.

These findings suggest that chronic stress, diet, and the gut microbiota contribute to the development of depression-like behaviors via the endocannabinoid system.

This discovery shows the role played by the gut microbiota in normal brain function, says Grard Eberl, Head of the Microenvironment and Immunity Unit (Institut Pasteur/Inserm) and joint last author of the study.

More specifically, imbalances in the gut bacterial community that reduce fatty acid levels vital to the endocannabinoid system and brain function seem to encourage the development of depression-like behaviors.

These findings mean certain bacteria could act as a natural antidepressant, treating mood disorders by restoring gut microbial health. And this is promising news, considering the slew of potential adverse side effects and relatively low efficacy rate of most current antidepressants.

To confirm their results, the researchers will need to test their findings in humans. The researchers say that new research will also need to explore whether changes to the gut microbiota impact other brain targets of the endocannabinoid system in the same way.

Read this article:
Gut microbiota: How does it interact with the brain? - Medical News Today

2020 Highlights the Disparities and Discrepancy of Sickle Cell Care – MD Magazine

Medicine is a mirror for the racial injustice in our society; it is a field riddled with racial disparities in everything from research funding to patient care to life expectancy.

These words appear in an article published last month in The New Journal of Medicine. Co-authors Alexandra Power-Hays, MD, and Patrick McGann, MD, underscore this intrinsicand perhaps under-appreciatedassociation between medicine and societal woes.

The authors argue, in far from oblique terms, that these medical-social relationships and issues of healthcare disparity"from research funding to patient care to life expectancyare poignantly felt in the realm of sickle cell care.

It is perhaps safe to acknowledge that the events of this past yearwhether that may be stringent lockdowns or the racial reckoning across the UShave augmented conversations and controversies surrounding healthcare access and related social inequalities.

Since sickle cell disease primarily affects people of color, most prominently African Americans, a group already at increased risk of socio-economic hardships, these conversations are especially relevant for this long-underserved patient community.

And yet, there is another layer to this issue of healthcare accessa problem that stems from new and innovative therapeutic options on the docket or horizon.

Medications like voxelotor (Oxbryta) and emerging technologies in gene therapy have no doubt offered hope in mitigating disease symptoms and ultimately curing it. But, with the promise of innovation comes the concern over access.

In an interview with HCPLive, Admiral Brett Giroir, MD, United States Assistant Secretary for Health, expressed this unfortunate reality for much of the sickle cell community.

All the science in the world is not going to help if you dont have a care-delivery system that can meet the needs of patients, Giroir said.

In order for these advancements to truly mean something, in order to ensure the sickle cell community at large can receive the most optimal outcomes, these underlying disparities in care-delivery, research funding, and resourcing cannot be overlooked.

The story of sickle cell disease, especially of this past year, dovetails with this increasing awakening to the gaps in healthcare access and the importance of equity.

As such, appreciating the therapeutic promises within this domain without acknowledging the inequities that plague sickle cell care would be a disingenuous reading of the narrative.

The Gap in Research and Healthcare

A cross-sectional study published this year by researchers at Stony Brook University Hospital and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine noted that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only 4 medications for sickle cell diseasecompared with 15 for cystic fibrosis, a condition that is likewise inherited, progressive, and life-threatening.

Even more, between 2008-2018, mean federal funding per person for sickle cell disease was $812 versus $2804 for cystic fibrosis.

The study concluded that government funding of sickle cell disease research roughly equaled research for cystic fibrosis, despite the formers greater demand.

However, after the investigators factored in disease-specific private foundation funding, which significantly skewed towards cystic fibrosis, this disparity became even more pronounced.

When it comes to research, inadequate or disproportionate funding isnt the only barrier that investigators face.

Similarly essential and worrisome are the challenges in patient recruitment. Certain barriersincluding distrust of research, pain, difficult social situations, to name a fewmay preclude individuals with sickle cell disease from participation.

Various formal analyses have sought to assess the effectiveness of diverse strategiesfrom recruiting through clinics and affiliated sites to participating in community eventsin order to ensure study population size needs are met.

On the clinical side, healthcare providers have expressed dismay, recorded through investigator-led focus groups and questionnaires, over the lack of resources and support.

Many of these clinics, which are typically located in urban centers with diverse populations, may allocate funds in such a way that underserves the sickle cell population.

Further, issues stemming from lack of education on both the side of the patient and provider/staff as well as basic unmet patient needs (food, transportation, etc.) are underlying factors that can decrease the quality of care.

While challenges and disparities exist in various forms and degrees across the whole of sickle cell communities, issues with access to healthcare have tended to skew towards the adult population.

I think there has been good access to care in pediatrics, and where there have been limitations has been on the adult side, said Alan Anderson, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist based in South Carolina and director of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Disease Program at Prisma Health-Upstate.

We have seen that these strides to improve access to care, number of patients on modifying therapies, using preventative health guidelines that are put out by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), ASH, and others, have really been pioneered on the pediatric side, he noted.

As for adult care, Anderson cited that many medical providers have historically received inadequate education or training in sickle cell disease.

Additionally, there are few dedicated medical homes for these patients that can best serve their specific needs. In fact, many adults with sickle cell disease end up in medical homes that are predominantly for cancer treatment.

Even when patients are seen for their disease, they can end up in a model of care where the primary focus of treatment tends to be on symptom and pain management, as opposed to education and disease modification.

What weve seen on the adult is that many patients end up in the emergency department or hospitals to receive their care, Anderson said.

An Exacerbation of the Issues

These disparities long existed before the pandemic, but, as with most other healthcare-related issues, the lockdowns and ensuing restrictions have only exacerbated what has long been broiling.

From the summertime protests after the killing of George Floyd to growing and recurring conversations around race, this concern over healthcare disparity in sickle cell care has further become the focal point for the specialty. It can no longer be ignored.

I think if we look at sickle cell disease as really being a health diagnosis that is a microcosm of the race-relations issues and socioeconomic issues associated with race that weve seen in our country historically, then you would expect this disease process would be very hard hit by COVID-19, Anderson said.

The pandemic has meant restricting resources in an already resource-limited space. The shift to telehealth has placed a greater burden on those with limited access to technologies. And the at-risk nature of the population has revealed that the only way to receive COVID-19 testing is through an emergency department setting.

This is the reality that many struggling patients within the sickle cell population face.

If anythingand as noted by Andersonthis year has only pushed and tested that which is already fragile for these patients and the healthcare systems they turn to.

Mending the Gap: An Admirals Charge

The cure for these social and systemic ailments must be a product of the synergy among individual, community, and top-down efforts.

When Admiral Giroir, MD, took office as Assistant US Secretary for Health in 2018, he made sickle cell disease a top priority.

Although a pediatrician by trade, Giroir made it his mission to ensure all sickle cell patients are able to receive the standard of care. By current estimates, they are received by only 10-15% of the population.

Being the Assistant Secretary for our health, as the senior public health person in the government, I wanted to do this not only for sickle cell, for people living with that, but for all people in the country who have diseases that are below the radar, he said.

Under his tenure, he oversaw programs to increase awareness for the disease, education, and understanding of care, which included first national report of sickle cell for all those covered by Medicaid and CHIP this year.

This year, the NIH has invested $120 million dollars into the Cure Sickle Cell Disease Initiative.

Furthermore, government health agencies have teamed up with the World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank, and other organizations like the American Society of Hematology (ASH), as well as pharmaceutical companies, to develop a program that promotes screening in newborns, an essential aspect of sickle cell care.

And finally, under Giroir, the federal health agencies sponsored and tasked the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine task with developing a sickle cell disease treatment roadmap, a document which was published this September, during Sickle Cell Disease Awareness Month.

The roadmap lays out a comprehensive plan for treating patients in this populationand other similar disease populations with few casesespecially those who are members of underserved communities subject to discrimination.

Im very proud of that, and we cant implement that tomorrow, but we have a team working to implement that right now, Giroir said.

While efforts at the top are moving forward to help mitigate social, systemic, and racial barriers to sickle cell care across the country, community-based programs and strategies are just asif not moreessential to combating these multi-layered shortcomings.

With the support of local and federal governments, healthcare systems and communities have the potential to develop a comprehensive care network that can help mend the socioeconomic, psychosocial, and racial gapsa sentiment shared by Giroir, Anderson, Power-Hays, and McGann.

If patients of underserved communities are empowered to overcome basic physical and emotional needs; if healthcare systems are provided the support to meet these needs and reduce systemic/racial barriers; and if all parties are appropriately educated on the novel therapeutic options and the disease itself, then the domain of sickle cell care for all ages would assuredly take a grand leap forward.

But, in light of the history of sickle cell care and the tragedies of this year, such a task seems almost insurmountableand all the more crucial.

Read the original:
2020 Highlights the Disparities and Discrepancy of Sickle Cell Care - MD Magazine

Gene Therapy Market 2020: Demand Analysis, Key Players, Trends, Sales, Supply, Deployment Model, Segments, Organization Size, Production, Revenue Data…

Worldwide Gene Therapy Market Analysis to 2027 is a specialized and in-depth study of the Gene Therapy Industry with a focus on the global market trend. The report aims to provide an overview of global Gene Therapy Market with detailed market segmentation by product/application and geography. The global Gene Therapy Market is expected to witness high growth during the forecast period. The report provides key statistics on the market status of the players and offers key trends and opportunities in the market.

Request for sample PDF Copy @ https://www.theinsightpartners.com/sample/TIPHE100001165/

The report also includes the profiles of key gene therapy market companies along with their SWOT analysis and market strategies. In addition, the report focuses on leading industry players with information such as company profiles, components and services offered, financial information of last 3 years, key development in past five years.

Whats included

Research report has been compiled by studying the market in-depth along with drivers, opportunities, restraints & other strategies as well as new-developments that can help a reader to understand the exact situation of the market along with the factors that can limit or hamper the market growth and the report also has been updated with Impacts & effects of Coronavirus pandemic and how it has influenced consumer behavior & the growth of the market as well as industries.

Global Gene Therapy market Witness Most Promising Rise in Demand

The Gene Therapy market is anticipated to grow with a significant rate in the coming 2027s, owing to factors such as, rising incidence and prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing healthcare expenses toward growth of eHealth, telemedicine, telehealth. Rapid growth in delivery of services to patients, several technological enlargements in the healthcare industry in Asia Pacific and Europe are expected to offer growth opportunities for the players operating in the market.

The global Gene Therapy market is segmented on the basis of component, application, end user and geography. The component segment includes, system and software, services and medical device. Based on application, the Gene Therapy market is segmented as, eHealth and others. Based on end user, the market is segmented as, hospitals and clinics, clinical research organization, research and diagnostic laboratories and others.

The COVID-19 outbreak is currently going the world over, the Gene Therapy Market report covers the impact of the corona-virus on top companys growth. This research report categorizes as the key players in the Gene Therapy market and also gives a comprehensive study of Covid-19 impact analysis of the market by regions like (Americas, Europe APAC, and EMEA).

The report offers key drivers that propel the growth in the global Gene Therapy market. These insights help market players in devising strategies to gain market presence. The research also outlined the restraints of the market. Insights on opportunities are mentioned to assist market players in taking further steps by determining the potential in untapped regions.

This report focuses on the global Gene Therapy market with the future forecast, growth opportunity, key market, and key players. The study objectives are to present the Gene Therapy market development in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India, and Central & South America.

Purchase Copy of This Report at https://www.theinsightpartners.com/buy/TIPHE100001165/

About us:

The Insight Partners is a one stop industry research provider of actionable intelligence. We help our clients in getting solutions to their research requirements through our syndicated and consulting research services. We are a specialist in Technology, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Automotive and Defense.

Contact us:

Call: +1-646-491-9876

Email: [emailprotected]

Continue reading here:
Gene Therapy Market 2020: Demand Analysis, Key Players, Trends, Sales, Supply, Deployment Model, Segments, Organization Size, Production, Revenue Data...

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Research Study including Growth Factors, New Top Players, Competitive Analysis by regions from 2020 to 2027 -…

Data Bridge Market Research has recently added a concise research on the Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market to depict valuable insights related to significant market trends driving the industry. This Report potentially presents with the numerous insights and business solutions that will help you stay ahead of the competition. The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market report is the best to know the trends and opportunities in industry. The precise and state-of-the-art information provided via this report helps businesses get aware about the types of consumers, consumers demands and preferences, their point of view about the product, their buying intentions, their response to particular product, and their varying tastes about the specific product already existing in the market. This market research report is formulated with the most excellent and superior tools of collecting, recording, estimating and analysing market data of industry.

This market research report serves a great purpose of better decision making and achieving competitive advantage. Two of the most widely used techniques namely SWOT analysis and Porters Five Forces Analysis have been used while generating this report. The report not only saves valuable time but also adds credibility to the work that has been done to grow the business. The report aids in identifying and analysing the rising trends along with major drivers, inhibitors, challenges and opportunities in the market. Market research analysis report is really a backbone for every business that wishes to boom in the market.

The Global Stem Cell manufacturing Market is expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027. Data Bridge Market Research analyses the market to account to USD 18.59 billion by 2027 growing at a CAGR of 6.42% in the above-mentioned forecast period. The growing awareness towards diseases like cancer, hematopoietic disorders and degenerative disorders is going to drive the growth of the stem cell manufacturing market.

Download FREE PDF sample copy of this research [emailprotected] http://databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-artificial-intelligence-market

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market, By Product (Stem Cell Line, Instruments, Culture Media, Consumables), Application (Research Applications, Clinical Applications, Cell and Tissue Banking), End Users (Hospitals and Surgical Centers, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies, Clinics, Community Healthcare, Others), Country (U.S., Canada, Mexico, Germany, Italy, U.K., France, Spain, Netherland, Belgium, Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, Rest of Europe, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East & Africa) Industry Trends and Forecast to 2027

Healthcare Infrastructure growth Installed base and New Technology Penetration

Stem cell manufacturing market also provides you with detailed market analysis for every country growth in healthcare expenditure for capital equipment, installed base of different kind of products for stem cell manufacturing market, impact of technology using life line curves and changes in healthcare regulatory scenarios and their impact on the stem cell manufacturing market. The data is available for historic period 2010 to 2018.

The Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market is highly fragmented and the major players have used various strategies such as new product launches, expansions, agreements, joint ventures, partnerships, acquisitions, and others to increase their footprints in this market. The report includes market shares of stem cell manufacturing market for global, Europe, North America, Asia Pacific and South America.

Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Scope and Market Size

Stem cell manufacturing market is segmented on the basis of product, application and end users. The growth amongst these segments will help you analyse meagre growth segments in the industries, and provide the users with valuable market overview and market insights to help them in making strategic decisions for identification of core market applications.

Major Market competitors/players:Global Stem Cell manufacturing Market

Some of the major players operating in the stem cell manufacturing market are Thermo Fisher Scientific. Merck Group, Becton, Dickinson and Company. Holostem Advanced Therapies, JCR Pharmaceuticals, Organogenesis Inc, Osiris Therapeutics, Osiris Therapeutics, Vericel Corporation, AbbVie, American CryoStem, AM-Pharma, Anterogen.Co.,Ltd, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Apceth Biopharma, Cellular Dynamics International, Rheacell, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. ViaCyte, VistaGen Therapeutics Inc, Translational Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, among others.

Market Definition:

This market report defines the market trends and forecast the upcoming opportunities and threats of the stem cell manufacturing market in the next 8 years. Stem cell manufacturing is a process of extracting the cells either from bone marrow or peripheral blood cells and culturing the cells in the culture dish containing nutrient media. Stem cells can be isolated from umbilical cord blood, placenta, amniotic sac, amniotic fluid, adipose tissue and menstrual blood. Stem cell manufacturing is used in the cell therapy as well as in gene therapy. Stem cell therapy is under research for many diseases like degenerative diseases and hematopoietic disorders like sickle cell anemia, storage disorders. Now stem cells are also used in making the cell and tissue bank. Some of the cell culture banks are National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition and World Federation for Culture Collections.

Key Insights in the report:

Inquire about this report from our experts @ https://databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-stem-cell-manufacturing-market

Opportunities in the market

Major Market Drivers:

Note: If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Contact:

Data Bridge Market Research

Tel: +1-888-387-2818

Email: [emailprotected]

Excerpt from:
Global Stem Cell Manufacturing Market Research Study including Growth Factors, New Top Players, Competitive Analysis by regions from 2020 to 2027 -...

‘He was very honored in his work’ – Mercer Island Reporter

Dr. Sen-itiroh Hakomori was honored as a hometown hero at the Mercer Island Summer Celebration Parade in 2000. Courtesy photo

Pioneering scientist Dr. Sen-itiroh Hakomori dies at age 91.

Dr. Sen-itiroh Hakomori couldnt leave his lab work alone. He would often log 13-hour days, seven days a week, and even spend some time at his job on Christmas morning, intensely focused on his glycosphingolipid medical and biochemical research.

I realized fairly recently that all of the cells are just like a pet. You have to check up on them and make sure that things are going well because theyre alive, said his daughter Naoko Vaughn. As children, we did not understand why he went to work every single day. I realized that he had to.

Vaughns father, who she said had a heart of gold and would help anybody, died of natural causes at the age of 91 on Nov. 10 at his home on Mercer Island.

Roger Laine, a colleague and friend who was the last professor to visit Hakomori, said that he was truly a pioneering scientist in glycobiology, a field in which he spent seven decades participating in groundbreaking studies.

He worked most of his career showing differences between cancer cells and normal cells that could be targeted for therapy. If you asked him what was his goal in life, he would answer, cure cancer, said Laine, a professor, scientist and researcher at Louisiana State University.

Hakomori is survived by his wife, Mitsuko (they were married for 74 years); Vaughn; sons, Yoichiro and Kenjiro; four grandchildren and two great-grandchildren; two brothers and a sister.

A native of Japan, professor Hakomori made crucial contributions to new cancer-cell studies at the Cancer Research Institute at Tohoku Pharmaceutical University, and continued his vast research in the field when the family immigrated to the United States to the Boston area.

The family moved from Boston to Bellevue in the late 1960s and set up their new home on Mercer Island 46 years ago. Hakomori relocated his family to the Pacific Northwest to become involved with the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and served as University of Washington professor of pathobiology and professor of microbiology. He was named a UW professor emeritus of pathobiology and global health in 2006.

Hakomori retired at the age of 88, finishing his career working at the Pacific Northwest Cancer Center in Seattle. During a celebration in Japan three years ago, Hakomori who was a member of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences spoke to the attendees and noted, We are all globally connected with research and science.

His two sons reflected on their fathers vital contribution to their lives.

Dad was passionate about his work and a great mentor to many of his younger colleagues. He has inspired me to try to emulate that passion in the work I do as an architect and professor, said Yoichiro.

Added Kenjiro: Dad taught me by example to work hard on trying to find out and work on resolving research questions it is a lifelong passion.

Vaughn added that her father instilled a high-level work ethic in his children, telling them, Whatever you do, whatever you choose to do, whatever your passion is, you do it 120 percent.

Hakomori made a worldwide impact with his research and was nominated five times for the Nobel Prize in chemistry. He received numerous awards, including the Philip Levine Immunohematology Award, the Karl Meyer Award from the Society of Glycobiology and the Rosalind Kornfield Award for Lifetime Achievement in Glycobiology.

He published 585 articles in peer-reviewed journals, and a pair of his many major scientific achievements were methylation analysis of glycoconjugates with mass spectrometry, and cell adhesion based on carbohydrate-carbohydrate interaction, particularly through GSL clusters at the embryonic stem cell surface.

He was very honored in his work, and he did not do it for money. He was very much just trying to help, which is rare these days, said Vaughn, adding that a host of his students and colleagues from around the world are assembling a memorial for her father to be published in a glycosphingolipid journal.

He was just a wonderful person. I think the most important thing is his colleagues really admired him. He made them successful in their lives, Vaughn added.

When Sarah Spiegel was a graduate student, she was drawn to Hakomoris papers and reviews on the role of glycoconjugates in cancer. Those documents sparked her imagination and inspired her to pursue a career in sphingolipids, she wrote on the Evergreen Washelli Funeral Home & Cemetery memorial page.

He was a champion of advancing careers of young female scientists and his generous spirit influenced my generation and generations to come, said Spiegel, Ph.D., professor and chair in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine. His legacy will live on through the works of countless researchers who continue working in the field of sphingolipids and many colleagues throughout the world will miss him tremendously.

In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, weve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing editor@mi-reporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.mi-reporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (Well only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we wont ask you to shorten it.

Go here to read the rest:
'He was very honored in his work' - Mercer Island Reporter