Addenbrooke’s becomes first regional centre to offer CAR-T cell treatment for cancer patients – Cambridge Network

The decision to offer the therapy puts Cambridge University Hospitals in the premier league of world class cancer centres.

It also supports progress of the new Cambridge Cancer Research Hospital on the Addenbrookes site, which the Government confirmed in October is included in the second wave of the Hospital Infrastructure Programme (HIP2).

To begin with, the pioneering treatment will be offered to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) who have relapsed or not responded well to chemotherapy or stem cell treatment.

It is also likely to be offered to cancer patients aged over 70 who are considered to be too high risk to have stem cell transplants.

CAR-T cell therapy can have extremely positive results, but because it can cause unpleasant side effects, it tends to be used when there are few other treatment options available.

CAR-T cell therapy works by re-engineering the patients own immune cells.

Our immune cells, which are called T-cells, circulate around the bloodstream seeking out and destroying any alien intruders, such as infections.

But because cancer cells evolve from our own cells, sometimes our T-cells do not identify them as intruders, and leave them alone.

The new CAR-T cell therapy works by harvesting a patients own T-cells. These are sent to a specialist lab, where they are reprogrammed to express a molecule on their surface, called a Chimeric Antigen Receptor, or CAR, that targets them to the cancer. The reprogrammed cells are grown in a huge numbers over a few weeks and then infused back into the patients body, where they seek out and destroy the cancer. Its a bit like giving immune cells a sat nav.

Until now patients in the east of England needing CAR-T cell therapy have had to make frequent trips to London in preparation for the treatment, which can take another month to administer.

One such patient was Steve Johnson from Bourne who underwent CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed leukaemia at the University College Hospital in London as part of a clinical trial.

Steve explained: "Having the treatment is not pleasant I had a number of fevers and temperature spikes for two weeks after the CAR-T cells were put back in, but I have absolutely no doubt this treatment saved my life and without it I would not be here today."

Steve added: I was lucky for me the trial came at the right time. Having the option to explore and provide revolutionary treatments at places like Addenbrookes and the soon to be built Cambridge Cancer Research Hospital, is vital if we are going to rewrite the story of this devastating illness.

The first patients to be approved for CAR-T cell treatment at Addenbrookes will start having their cells harvested from this week.

Ben Uttenthal, consultant haematologist specialising in CAR-T cell therapy at Addenbrookes, said: This is an exciting new way of treating patients that attacks cancer in a different way from previously available medicines.

"Being able to offer CAR-T cell therapy in our armoury against cancer puts us in the premier league of cancer centres.

It is also a testament to the expertise available across many different specialties in Addenbrookes. Through offering treatments like this, now and in the new Cambridge Cancer Research Hospital, we will be able to benefit cancer patients locally, regionally and nationally.

Initially, the hospital expects to be able to offer CAR-T cell therapy to around 40 patients a year. In the future, treatment is likely to be expanded to include patients with other cancers.

The rest is here:
Addenbrooke's becomes first regional centre to offer CAR-T cell treatment for cancer patients - Cambridge Network

Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Industry Size, Trends, Global Growth, Insights And Forecast Research Report 2025 – The Daily Philadelphian

A new Business Intelligence report on the global Stem Cell Therapy Market has recently been added to the Dynamic Report Repository and has been published to provide an exclusive hands-on reference to the various market dynamics that will enable high potential growth in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market. The report presents a market summary, sophisticated TOC, a variety of unique research methodologies, and a research database composed of multiple data sources. This report has been prepared to encourage and guide investor investment with details of the five forces analysis of SWOT, PESTEL and PORTER. This report has been designed with current and past developments in mind that are critical to utilizing profitable predictive developments to ensure steady market growth and uninterrupted survival despite fierce competition in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Sample PDF Brochure with Covid-19 Updates @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/691?utm_source=re

A closer look at all growth catalysts and a systematic understanding of the key deterrents that stunt growth. In addition to a global perspective, this report contains identifiable information on growth estimates defined in volume and value-based indices. By carefully measuring the competitive landscape of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market, it categorizes the key players in the sector and encourages novice market participants to set their footholds in the rapid market competition.

This report on the global Stem Cell Therapy Market provides an easily accessible roadmap to assess the league of factors and influencers such as untapped market opportunities and trends pioneering a growth timeline favorable for this market. The thorough and precise market research explanation of this market has awarded a variety of market growth diplomacy and techniques utilized by industry veterans to generate maximum profits in the Stem Cell Therapy Market even in a pandemic such as COVID-19.

The report on the global Stem Cell Therapy Market sets up a detailed overview with relevant references to the market dynamics. Extensive references to the market segment organized by market type and application have been extensively discussed in the report. The volume and value-based growth estimates of the market have been detailed in the report.

Access full research report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/stem-cell-therapy-market?utm_source=re

Five-Pointer Guide for Report Investment

1. A rigorous, end-to-end review and analysis of the Stem Cell Therapy Market events and their implications 2. A thorough compilation of broad market segments 3. A complete demonstration of best in-industry practices, mindful business decisions and manufacturer activities that steer revenue sustainability in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market 4. A complete assessment of competition spectrum, inclusive of relevant details about key and emerging players 5. A pin-point review of the major dynamics and dominant alterations that influence growth in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Segmentation

Type Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy Market:

Based on cell source, the market has been segmented into,

Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Embryonic SCs Other Sources

Applications Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy Market:

Based on therapeutic application, the market has been segmented into,

Musculoskeletal Disorders Wounds & Injuries Cardiovascular Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Immune System Diseases Other Applications

Reasons to Purchase the report:

1. This report provides insights into the global Stem Cell Therapy Market along with the latest market trends and future forecasts to illustrate the future investment pockets. 2. The potential of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market is determined by understanding the effective trends to increase the companys position in the market. 3. This market report provides insights and detailed impact analysis on key influencers, constraints and opportunities. 4. Five Porter strengths analysis to demonstrate the strengths of suppliers and buyers. 5. The latest developments, market shares and strategies used by key market players

Make An Enquiry About This Report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/691?utm_source=re

About Us :

Contact Us :

Ryan Johnson Account Manager Global 3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas, TX75204, U.S.A. Phone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199/ +91 9665341414

Original post:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Industry Size, Trends, Global Growth, Insights And Forecast Research Report 2025 - The Daily Philadelphian

Mesenchymal stem cells in therapy of coronavirus disease 2019 – a review – DocWire News

This article was originally published here

Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2020 Oct 25;36(10):1979-1991. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.200355.

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread widely on a large scale in the whole world at present, seriously endangering human health. There are still no effective and specific drugs, so it is urgent to find safe and effective therapeutic methods. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have many biological functions of powerful immunomodulation and tissue repair and regeneration. As a stem cell therapy, it has the potential to reduce the tissue injury and mortality in severe patients infected with novel coronavirus. At present, many research institutions in China and abroad have started a number of clinical research projects about MSCs in the treatment of COVID-19. In addition, those projects have initially confirmed the safety and effectiveness of this therapy. Therefore, this research field has been proved to have a very good clinical therapy prospect.

PMID:33169564 | DOI:10.13345/j.cjb.200355

See the article here:
Mesenchymal stem cells in therapy of coronavirus disease 2019 - a review - DocWire News

Global cryotherapy market size to reach USD 6.72 billion by 2026 – GlobeNewswire

November 16, 2020 05:04 ET | Source: Market Study Report, LLC.

Selbyville, Delaware, Nov. 16, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- According to industry experts, worldwide cryotherapy market is projected to register a y-o-y growth rate of 9.8% during 2020-2026, subsequently accumulating USD 6.72 billion by the end of the forecast period. Increasing burden of cancer globally, growing preference towards minimally invasive procedures, technological advancements, along with expansion of fitness, wellness, and beauty industries are catalyzing the industry growth.

Proceeding further, the research literature offers an expansive view of the overall industry through a country-level analysis of the regional markets. Moreover, in-depth segmentation studies including device type, therapy type, and application scope are provided to identify the top areas for investments that may yield strong returns in the coming years. Besides, it profiles the top players in this field and uncovers the strategies adopted by them to fortify their position at a global level.

For the uninitiated, cryotherapy is a low temperature application for treating malignant tissues or tissue damage called lesions. This therapy is commonly used in treating sprains, muscle pain, swelling, postoperative swelling, and soft tissue damage. It is also considered to have a high efficacy in cancer treatment. Growing demand of the procedure for aforementioned applications is strengthening global cryotherapy industry outlook.

Request Sample copy of this Report @ https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2963767/

Procedural effectiveness in treating arthritis, rheumatoid conditions, and cardiovascular ailments, in consort with constant advancements are impelling the market expansion.

On the contrary, lack of clinical evidences regarding the use of argon gas and crypto probes as a definitive standard negatively impacts the cryotherapy business landscape. Moreover, high risk linked with cryogenic gases, and strict regulatory policies will restrain global cryotherapy market expansion. However, benefits like higher success rate over traditional surgery, minor scars, less pain, and reduced hospitalization time will bolster the industry growth in the coming years.

Device type overview:

Global cryotherapy market, based on type, is fragmented into cryogun, gas cylinders, cryoprobes, cryochambers, thermocouple devices, and gas pressure gauges. Cryoprobes and cryoguns segments are likely to showcase strong growth over the forecast period as the proper application of cryogenic gases like carbon dioxide, liquid nitrogen, argon, and dimethyl ether-propane require the utilization of these devices in pain management therapies.

Therapy type outline:

Global cryotherapy industry is categorized into cryosurgery, cryo chamber therapy, and icepack therapy, among which, the foremost segment currently holds majority of the industry share. Paradigm shift towards minimally invasive procedure is fostering the demand for cryosurgery. Further, lower side-effects and faster recovery time are likely to boost segmental share in the coming years.

Application scope:

Global cryotherapy market end-user scope is split into cardiology, oncology, dermatology, ophthalmology, pain management, and gynecology. According to trusted records, oncology segment captured majority industry share in recent past and will continue to showcase strong growth trends over 2020-2026, attributable to escalating number of cancer patients and associated deaths across the globe.

To access a sample copy or view this report in detail along with the table of contents, please click the link below:

https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/cryotherapy-market-size-share-trends-industry-analysis-report-by-device-type-cryoguns-cryoprobes-gas-cylinders-cryochambers-gas-pressure-gauges-thermocouple-devices-by-therapy-type-cryosurgery-icepack-therapy-chamber-therapy-by-application-type-and-by-regions-segment-forecast-2020-2026

Regional outlook:

At present, North America is the leading contributor to global cryotherapy market remuneration, owing to presence of a well-established healthcare infrastructure, high per capita expenditure, and huge government investment in healthcare. In fact, national healthcare expenditure of the United States was USD 3 trillion in 2014.

Meanwhile, Asia Pacific cryotherapy market is slated to grow exponentially over the projected timeline. Rising awareness regarding cryotherapy, improving healthcare infrastructure, low treatment cost, and rising accessibility to treatment are contributing to the regional industry expansion.

Global Cryotherapy Market Device Type Sub-Segments (Revenue, USD Million, 2015-2026)

Global Cryotherapy Market Therapy Type Sub-Segments (Revenue, USD Million, 2015-2026)

Global Cryotherapy Market Application Sub-Segments (Revenue, USD Million, 2015-2026)

Global Cryotherapy Market Regional Bifurcation (Revenue, USD Million, 2015-2026)

North America

Europe

Asia Pacific

Latin America

Middle East & Africa

Global Cryotherapy Market Competitive Dashboard (Revenue, USD Million, 2015-2026)

Table of Contents

1. Overview and Scope

1.1. Research goal & scope

1.2. Research assumptions

1.3. Research Methodology

1.3.1. Primary data sources

1.3.2. Secondary data sources

1.4. Key take-aways

1.5. Stakeholders

2. Executive Summary

2.1. Market Definition

2.2. Market Segmentation

3. Industry Insights

3.1. Cryotherapy Market - Industry snapshot

3.2. Cryotherapy Market - Ecosystem analysis

3.3. Cryotherapy Market - Market dynamics

3.3.1. Cryotherapy Market - Market Forces

3.4. Industry analysis - Porter's five force

3.5. Cryotherapy Market PEST analysis, 2019

3.6. Value Chain Analysis

3.7. Cryotherapy Market Industry trends

4. Cryotherapy Market Size and Forecast by Device Type

4.1. Key findings

4.2. Cryoguns

4.2.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

4.3. Cryo Probes

4.3.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

4.4. Gas Cylinders

4.4.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

4.5. Cryo Chambers

4.5.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

4.6. Gas Pressure Gauges

4.6.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

4.7. Thermocouple Devices

4.7.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

5. Cryotherapy Market Size and Forecast by therapy type

5.1. Key Findings

5.2. Cryosurgery

5.2.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

5.3. Icepack Therapy

5.3.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

5.4. Chamber Therapy

5.4.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6. Cryotherapy Market Size and Forecast by Application Type

6.1. Key Findings

6.2. Oncology

6.2.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6.3. Cardiology

6.3.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6.4. Dermatology

6.4.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6.5. Pain Management

6.5.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6.6. Ophthalmology

6.6.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

6.7. Gynecology

6.7.1. Global market estimates and forecasts, 2015 - 2026

7. Cryotherapy Market Size and Forecast by Regions

Related Report:

Stem Cell Therapy Market, Technology Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2019 2025 Stem Cell Therapy Market will exceed USD 15 billion by 2025, as per a new research report. Increasing research on developing novel therapies and personalized medicines will foster stem cell therapy market growth. For instance, scientists are extensively researching on methods to regenerate healthy heart cells from placenta that can be used in patients after myocardial infarction. This discovery will help to cure patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases and reduce mortality rates. Researchers are further examining different aspects of stem cell therapy for its applications in neurological disorders. Thus, increasing R&D activities to promote developments in stem cell therapy will positively impact the industry growth.

About US:

Market Study Report, LLC. is a hub for market intelligence products and services.

We streamline the purchase of your market research reports and services through a single integrated platform by bringing all the major publishers and their services at one place.

Our customers partner with Market Study Report, LLC. to ease their search and evaluation of market intelligence products and services and in turn focus on their company's core activities.

If you are looking for research reports on global or regional markets, competitive information, emerging markets and trends or just looking to stay on top of the curve then Market Study Report, LLC. is the platform that can help you in achieving any of these objectives.

More here:
Global cryotherapy market size to reach USD 6.72 billion by 2026 - GlobeNewswire

Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Future Growth Factors and Opportunities by 2025 – PRnews Leader

This new study of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market added to the burgeoning repositories focuses primarily on decisive market influencing factors such as emerging opportunities, striking end-user profiles, supplier environment, technological innovation and supply advanced business intelligence. This is a reference material. Chain management, including production details, demand cycles and the entire manufacturing cycle collectively affecting the growth. The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report shows the relevant data on segment performance, growth potential over the next few years, supplier and manufacturer activity, and is appropriately aligned with consumption and production development. In addition to adding sub-segments to encourage optimal reader understanding, this report clearly identifies types, applications, and technology categories as key segments. In addition, this Stem Cell Therapy Market report allows readers to understand the absolute monetization potential of each segment, thus identifying one segment to demand the greatest investors interest in high returns.

Sample PDF Brochure with Covid-19 Updates @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/691?utm_source=re

A thorough assessment of the segment specifications is also elaborately included in the report, clearly highlighting the most dominant segments expected to deviate from revenue maximization in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market through the 2020-25 forecast range. The report also includes details about the assessment presentation by segment. The market has been specifically diversified into dual segments of type and application to maximize the convenience of the reader.

This research representation of the Stem Cell Therapy Market is a thorough combination of important primary and secondary research assumptions. In addition to all this specific developments, the report illuminates the dynamic segmentation of the Stem Cell Therapys market systematically segmented into prominent segments including diversification by type, application, technology, and region. Stem Cell Therapy Market.

The report on the global Stem Cell Therapy Market sets up a detailed overview with relevant references to the market dynamics. Extensive references to the market segment organized by market type and application have been extensively discussed in the report. The volume and value-based growth estimates of the market have been detailed in the report.

Access full research report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/stem-cell-therapy-market?utm_source=re

Understanding regional growth development

Pursuing regional assessments and growth potential for each of the mentioned sectors, the report on this global Stem Cell Therapy Market identifies not only specific regional hubs in the five key regions highlighted in the report, but also the remarkable growth advances prevalent across the country.

We closely tracked the monetization trends of each segment highlighted in a specific country to derive actionable insights that effectively steer future-ready investment decisions in the global Stem Cell Therapy Market place.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Segmentation

Type Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy Market:

Based on cell source, the market has been segmented into,

Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Embryonic SCs Other Sources

Applications Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy Market:

Based on therapeutic application, the market has been segmented into,

Musculoskeletal Disorders Wounds & Injuries Cardiovascular Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Immune System Diseases Other Applications

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020-26: Competitive Landscape Analytical Review

Reasons to Purchase the report:

1. This report provides insights into the global Stem Cell Therapy Market along with the latest market trends and future forecasts to illustrate the future investment pockets. 2. The potential of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market is determined by understanding the effective trends to increase the companys position in the market. 3. This market report provides insights and detailed impact analysis on key influencers, constraints and opportunities. 4. Five Porter strengths analysis to demonstrate the strengths of suppliers and buyers. 5. The latest developments, market shares and strategies used by key market players

Make An Enquiry About This Report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/691?utm_source=re

About Us :

Contact Us :

Ryan Johnson Account Manager Global 3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas, TX75204, U.S.A. Phone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199/ +91 9665341414

Continued here:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Future Growth Factors and Opportunities by 2025 - PRnews Leader

Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Trends, Growth Insight, Share, Competitive Analysis, Statistics, Regional and Global Industry Forecast To 2025 – PRnews…

Adroit Market Research delivers well-researched industry-wide information on the Stem Cell Therapy market. It provides information on the markets essential aspects such as top participants, factors driving Stem Cell Therapy market growth, precise estimation of the Stem Cell Therapy market size, upcoming trends, changes in consumer behavioral pattern, markets competitive landscape, key market vendors, and other market features to gain an in-depth analysis of the market. Additionally, the report is a compilation of both qualitative and quantitative assessment by industry experts, as well as industry participants across the value chain. The report also focuses on the latest developments that can enhance the performance of various market segments.

This report strategically examines the micro-markets and sheds light on the impact of technology upgrades on the performance of the Stem Cell Therapy market. The report presents a broad assessment of the market and contains solicitous insights, historical data, and statistically supported and industry-validated market data. The report offers market projections with the help of appropriate assumptions and methodologies. The research report provides information as per the market segments such as geographies, products, technologies, applications, and industries.

A sample of report copy could be downloaded by visiting the site: https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/691?utm_source=PT

Competitive Landscape: The global Stem Cell Therapy market is highly consolidated due to the presence of a large number of companies across this industry. The report discusses the current market standing of these companies, their past performances, demand and supply graphs, production and consumption patterns, sales network, distribution channels, and growth opportunities in the market. Moreover, it highlights the strategic approaches of the key players towards expanding their product offerings and reinforcing their market presence.

The report analyzes the key elements such as demand, growth rate, cost, capacity utilization, import, margin, and production of the global market players. A number of the factors are considered to analyze the global Stem Cell Therapy Market. The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report demonstrates details of different sections and sub-sections of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market on the basis of topographical regions. The report provides a detailed analysis of the key elements such as developments, trends, projections, drivers, and market growth of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market. It also offers details of the factors directly impacting on the growth of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market. It covers the fundamental ideas related to the growth and the management of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market.

Enquire for in-depth information before buying this report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/691?utm_source=PT

Global Stem Cell Therapy market is segmented based by type, application and region. Based on Type, the market has been segmented into:

Based on cell source, the market has been segmented into,

Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal SCs Embryonic SCs Other Sources

Based on Application, the market has been segmented into:

Based on therapeutic application, the market has been segmented into,

Musculoskeletal Disorders Wounds & Injuries Cardiovascular Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Immune System Diseases Other Applications

Stem Cell Therapy Industry Report addresses different regions like North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa and Latin America. The production value, gross margin analysis, development trend, and Stem Cell Therapy market positioning is explained. The industrial chain study, potential buyers, distributors and traders details are explained. The challenges to the growth and market restraints are explained. The market maturity study, investment scope and gross margin study are profiled. The production process structure, market share, manufacturing cost and Stem Cell Therapy saturation analysis is covered. This will helps the industry aspirants to analysis growth feasibility and development plans. A special highlight on cost structure, import-export scenario and sales channels of Stem Cell Therapy industry is presented. The benchmarking products, dynamic market changes, upstream raw material and downstream buyers analysis are presented. The business trends, key players analysis and product segment study are explained. The regional SWOT analysis, gross margin analysis, application analysis and industry barriers are explained. The value, volume and consumption from 2019-2024 is portrayed. All the essential details like pricing structure of raw materials, labour cost, sales channels and downstream buyers are presented.

Browse complete Stem Cell Therapy market report description and TOC @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/stem-cell-therapy-market?utm_source=PT

Key Questions Answered in the Report: 1. What is the size of the overall Stem Cell Therapy Market and its segments? 2. What are the key segments and sub-segments in the market? 3. What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges of the Stem Cell Therapy Market and how they are expected to impact the market? 4. What are the attractive investment opportunities within the Market? 5. What is the Stem Cell Therapy Market size at the regional and country-level? 6. Who are the key market players and their key competitors? 7. Market value- chain and key trends impacting every node with reference to companies 8. What are the strategies for growth adopted by the key players in Stem Cell Therapy Market? 9. How does a particular company rank against its competitors with respect to revenue, profit comparison, operational efficiency, cost competitiveness, and market capitalization? 10. How financially strong are the key players in Stem Cell Therapy Market (revenue and profit margin, market capitalization, expenditure analysis, investment analysis)? 11. What are the recent trends in Stem Cell Therapy Market? (M&A, partnerships, new product developments, expansions)

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Stem Cell Therapy Market Overview Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Industry Chapter 3 Global Market Competition by Manufacturers Chapter 4 Global Production, Revenue (Value) by Region Chapter 5 Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions Chapter 6 Global Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type Chapter 7 Global Market Analysis by Application Chapter 8 Manufacturing Cost Analysis Chapter 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis Chapter 12 Global Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecast

Adroit Market Research is an India-based business analytics and consulting company. Our target audience is a wide range of corporations, manufacturing companies, product/technology development institutions and industry associations that require understanding of a markets size, key trends, participants and future outlook of an industry. We intend to become our clients knowledge partner and provide them with valuable market insights to help create opportunities that increase their revenues. We follow a code Explore, Learn and Transform. At our core, we are curious people who love to identify and understand industry patterns, create an insightful study around our findings and churn out money-making roadmaps.

Ryan Johnson Account Manager Global 3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas, TX 75204, U.S.A Phone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199 / +91 9665341414

Go here to read the rest:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Trends, Growth Insight, Share, Competitive Analysis, Statistics, Regional and Global Industry Forecast To 2025 - PRnews...

BeyondSpring Announces Positive Topline Results from its PROTECTIVE-2 Phase 3 Registrational Trial of Plinabulin in Combination with Pegfilgrastim for…

November 16, 2020 07:00 ET | Source: BeyondSpring, Inc.

NEW YORK, Nov. 16, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BeyondSpring(the Company or BeyondSpring) (NASDAQ: BYSI), a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of innovative cancer therapies, today announced positive topline data from its PROTECTIVE-2 Phase 3 registrational study showing that plinabulin in combination with pegfilgrastim met the primary endpoint with statistically significant improvement in the rate of prevention of Grade 4 neutropenia in Cycle 1 (31.5% vs 13.6%, p=0.0015), as well as achieving statistical significance in all key secondary endpoints, including duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir.

The PROTECTIVE-2 Phase 3 study is a double-blind, active-controlled, global study that enrolled a total of 221 patients. Patients in the trial were treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC, Day 1 dose) in a 21-day cycle with plinabulin (40 mg, Day 1 dose) + pegfilgrastim (6 mg, Day 2 dose) versus a single dose of pegfilgrastim (6 mg, Day 2 dose). The primary efficacy endpoint was rate of prevention of Grade 4 neutropenia.

Plinabulin in combination with pegfilgrastim showed a statistically significant improvement compared to pegfilgrastim alone, with topline data summarized below. Data from all 221 patients were analyzed (combination arm n=111, pegfilgrastim arm n=110).

These data clearly demonstrate the potential for this combination to offer superior therapy compared to standard of care in the prevention of CIN, said Douglas W. Blayney, M.D., Professor of Medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and the global principal investigator for plinabulin's CIN studies. With current therapy, Grade 4 neutropenia still occurs in more than 80% of patients after chemotherapy, primarily in Week 1 after chemotherapy, which increases Emergency Room visits and hospitalizations due to infection and febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia is also associated with increased mortality and reduced long-term survival due to reduction, delay, or interruption of chemotherapy. I would like to thank the participating patients, their families and the BeyondSpring team for their dedicated work to advance this combination therapy for the prevention of CIN in chemotherapy patients.

Ramon Mohanlal, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President of Research and Development at BeyondSpring noted, We are pleased to have received Breakthrough Therapy designation from both the U.S. FDA and China NMPA for the plinabulin combination in CIN, underscoring the unmet medical need and potential benefit of the combination. We are working with regulatory agencies on the NDA submission, which is expected in Q1 2021 and have also begun preparation for commercialization. In addition to Plinabulin being developed as a treatment option for the prevention of CIN, it is also being investigated as a direct anticancer agent in a global Phase 3 trial of plinabulin + docetaxel for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with final data read-out in 1H 2021.

Conference Call and Webcast Information BeyondSprings management will host a conference call and webcast today at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The dial-in numbers for the conference call are 1-877-451-6152 (U.S.) or 1-201-389-0879 (international). Please reference conference ID: 13713406. A live webcast will be available on BeyondSprings website atwww.beyondspringpharma.comunderEvents & Presentationsin the Investors section. An archived replay of the webcast will be available for 30 days.

1 Bodey et al. Ann Intern Med 64(2): 328 (1966); 2 Bodey et al. Cancer 41(4): 1610 (1978)

About Plinabulin in PROTECTIVE-2 (Study 106) CIN Study The Phase 3 portion of PROTECTIVE-2 is a double-blind and active controlled global study. It was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy in breast cancer, treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC, Day 1 dose) in a 21-day cycle with plinabulin (40 mg, Day 1 dose) + Pegfilgrastim (6 mg, Day 2 dose) versus a single dose of Pegfilgrastim (6 mg, Day 2 dose). TAC is an example of high febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy; all G-CSF biosimilar studies use TAC in the pivotal studies.

Plinabulin and G-CSFs such as Pegfilgrastim are believed to have complementary mechanisms in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). This is a superiority study in CIN efficacy in the rate of prevention of Grade 4 neutropenia, comparing the combination head-to-head against Pegfilgrastim alone. Literature shows that the Grade 4 neutropenia rate for TAC and Pegfilgrastim at 6 mg is 83 to 93 percent, which presents severe unmet medical needs.

The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) data, which are used to calculate these endpoints, were obtained through central laboratory assessments by Covance Bioanalytical Methods using standardized and validated analytical tests. Covance was the clinical contract research organization (CRO) for patient recruitment and monitoring of global sites for this study.

About Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia (CIN) Patients receiving chemotherapy typically develop CIN, a severe side effect that increases the risk of infection with fever (also called febrile neutropenia, or FN), which necessitates ER/hospital visits. The updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines expanded the use of prophylactic G-CSFs, such as Pegfilgrastim, from only high risk patients (chemo FN rate >20%) to intermediate risk patients (FN rate between 10-20%) to avoid hospital/ER visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. The revision of the NCCN guidelines effectively increases the addressable market of patients who may benefit from treatment with plinabulin, if approved, to approximately 440,000 cancer patients in the U.S. annually. Plinabulin is designed to provide protection against the occurrence of CIN and its clinical consequences in week 1, or early onset action after chemotherapy.

About Plinabulin Plinabulin, BeyondSprings lead asset, is an investigational differentiated immune and stem cell modulator. Plinabulin is currently in late-stage clinical development to increase overall survival in cancer patients, as well as to alleviate CIN. Plinabulin had received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from China NMPA in CIN. The U.S. FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to plinabulin for concurrent administration with myelosuppressive chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with non-myeloid malignancies for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The durable anticancer benefits of plinabulin observed to date have been associated with its effect as a potent antigen-presenting cell (APC) inducer (through dendritic cell maturation) and T-cell activation (ChemandCell Reports, 2019). Plinabulins CIN data highlight the ability to boost the number of hematopoietic stem / progenitor cells (HSPCs), or lineage-/cKit+/Sca1+ (LSK) cells in mice. Effects on HSPCs could explain the potential ability of plinabulin to not only treat CIN with a rapid onset, but also to reduce chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and increase circulating CD34+ cells in patients.

Plinabulin currently is in an Expanded Access Program in the U.S.

About BeyondSpring BeyondSpring is a global, clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of innovative cancer therapies. BeyondSprings lead asset, plinabulin, a first-in-class agent as an immune and stem cell modulator, is in a Phase 3 global clinical trial as a direct anticancer agent in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and Phase 3 clinical programs in the prevention of CIN. BeyondSpring has strong R&D capabilities with a robust pipeline in addition to plinabulin, including three immuno-oncology assets and a drug discovery platform using the protein degradation pathway, which is being developed in a subsidiary company, Seed Therapeutics, Inc. The Company also has a seasoned management team with many years of experience bringing drugs to the global market. BeyondSpring is headquartered in New York City.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes forward-looking statements that are not historical facts. Words such as "will," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," "believe," "design," "may," "future," "estimate," "predict," "objective," "goal," or variations thereof and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on BeyondSpring's current knowledge and its present beliefs and expectations regarding possible future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors including, but not limited to, difficulties raising the anticipated amount needed to finance the Company's future operations on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all, unexpected results of clinical trials, delays or denial in regulatory approval process, results that do not meet our expectations regarding the potential safety, the ultimate efficacy or clinical utility of our product candidates, increased competition in the market, and other risks described in BeyondSprings most recent Form 20-F on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements made herein speak only as of the date of this release and BeyondSpring undertakes no obligation to update publicly such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as otherwise required by law.

Investor Contact: Ashley R. Robinson LifeSci Advisors, LLC +1 617-430-7577 arr@lifesciadvisors.com

Media Contact: Darren Opland, Ph.D. LifeSci Communications +1 646-627-8387 darren@lifescicomms.com

See original here:
BeyondSpring Announces Positive Topline Results from its PROTECTIVE-2 Phase 3 Registrational Trial of Plinabulin in Combination with Pegfilgrastim for...

California’s Stem Cell Agency Will Get A Funding Boost From Prop 14. Here’s A Look At Its History. – Capital Public Radio News

After a week of being too close to call, Californias Proposition 14 has passed, allowing the state to issue $5.5 billion in bonds for stem cell research.

The measure flew under the radar early in the election season, with almost no opposition and $15 million spent by proponents. But Californians were split on the measure, with just 51% of residents voting yes as of Nov. 12 when the race was called.

Proposition 14 was brought forward by real estate developer Robert Klein, who formerly served as board chairman of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). The agency was created by another ballot proposition in 2004, and remains one of the only state-funded stem cell research agencies in the United States.

John Matsusaka, a University of Southern California economist with a focus on the ballot process, says this measure put a tough decision on voters.

Theres many useful things you might want to do research on, is this the one you want to put so much money into, he asked. This was an interest group who said they wanted to carve out one thing for themselves which raises some questions.

CIRM was envisioned as a mecca of biological discovery that would make California a leader in curing diseases such as Alzheimers, cancer and diabetes. Proponents say a new injection of state funding will help them continue this important work.

But the agency has faced criticism over the years from those who feel the promised research hasnt materialized, and that conflicts of interest have compromised the institutes integrity.

David Jensen, author of a book about the Institute called Californias Great Stem Cell Experiment, says even with the passage of Proposition 14, doubts about the agencys future remain.

[In 2004], people were led to believe that stem cell therapies and cures were right around the corner. That did not turn out to be the case, he said. It's very important to finance stem cell research. The question is, should the state do that?

Controversial Beginnings

California voters were first asked to weigh in on stem cell funding in 2004. At the time, George W. Bush was in the White House and had banned federally funded embryonic stem cell research.

That meant California scientists investigating HIV/AIDS treatments, Parkinson's cures and more were fighting over a trickling well of funding. So they took to the ballot with Proposition 71, which passed with 59% of the votes. That allowed the state to issue $3 billion in bonds for the creation of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

Because of the timing, it was a shot in the arm to the field, said Zach Hall, who served as the first president of CIRM.

Proposition 14 opponents argue that because former President Barack Obama lifted restrictions on embryonic stem cell research, California scientists can now lean on federal grants and private industry funding to carry their work through.

The NIH could support most of the work that CIRM has funded in the past 10 years, and so the rationale for having a new proposition and increasing the amount of money is unclear, Hall said. You could say just as well why dont we have a state agency to fund CRISPR research?

But supporters argue that federal grants are competitive, and there isnt enough money in the national cache or in private industry to backfill what CIRM provides for researchers across the state.

Robert Klein, former chairman of the Institutes board and leader of the campaign supporting Proposition 14, said that without new bond funding, the Institutes existing research projects would be out of money once they reach the ends of their current grant cycles.

Those trials will not have any funding available to take them forward, he said. And we have a pent-up demand waiting for these new funds from Prop 14 for dozens of new trials for new therapies.

Last summer CIRM told researchers it would stop accepting new grant applications, with the exception of $5 million in emergency funding it set aside for COVID-19 research.

Where Did The First $3 Billion Go?

Supporters of Proposition 14 say the work that CIRM has done over the years has brought California to the forefront in stem cell research, and laid the groundwork for cures to hundreds of diseases.

The agency has distributed hundreds of research grants to public and private universities, medical research institutions and for-profit companies.

Nearly 40%of that money has gone into basic research that helps scientists understand stem cells and how they might be used in medicine, according to a San Francisco Chronicle analysis of CIRM spending. The list of conditions researchers have focused on is long, and includes heart disease, Huntingtons, leukemia, Alzheimers and glioblastoma, to name just a few.

CIRM put 16% of the money into building infrastructure, including about a dozen stem cell research centers, according to the analysis. Another $388 million went toward taking research out of the lab and applying it to humans.

Of the 90 clinical trials the Institute has funded, two drugs have earned FDA approval for fatal forms of blood cancer, according to the campaign supporting the proposition.

The campaign reports CIRM-funded researchers have published 2,900 medical discoveries.

From Sacramento to San Francisco to LA to San Diego, these world eminent scientist leaders in this field came together and said we have to have this funding to go forward, Klein said. We cant attract and hold the best scientists in the world unless we can show them that the therapies they work on are going to actually be able to get to patients.

Supporters also argue that Proposition 71 was an economic boon for the Golden State. A 2019 study from the University of Southern California (commissioned by CIRM) estimates that the Institutes impact on Californias economy is $10.7 billion in gross output, $641.3 million in tax revenue and nearly 56,000 jobs created.

But Matsusaka, a USC economics professor who was not affiliated with that study, says hes doubtful that the $5.5 billion that Proposition 14 will inject into stem cell research will be the job-generator California needs now.

This is money thats channeling into research, into scientists, into highly skilled white collar workers who are very fully employed already, he said. If you were pouring money into restaurant workers or something like that I think there could be a stimulating effect because thats where theres a big pool of people who are unemployed right now. Its hard for me to see how pouring money into this could have a stimulating effect.

And he says pulling money out of other sectors to support this work could do harm to the states economy more broadly.

Conflicts of Interest

At several points during its 16-year history, CIRM has been criticized for conflicts of interest between its board and the researchers it supports.

An analysis from the California Stem Cell Report, which has been tracking the agency since its inception, found that Stanford University, UCLA and UC San Diego are the top recipients of CIRM funding, and they all have representatives on the CIRM board.

Far too many board members represent organizations that receive CIRM funding or benefit from that funding, wrote the National Academy of Medicine in a 2012 study of the agency. These competing personal and professional interests compromise the perceived independence of the ICOC (the CIRM governing board), introduce potential bias into the boards decision making, and threaten to undermine confidence in the board.

In 2014, a former CIRM president left his job and almost immediately took a high-paying position at an agency that receives research funding from the Institute. David Jensen with California Stem Cell Report has tracked several other conflict of interest issues within the organization.

He says Proposition 14 changes some legal definitions and increases the number of people on the board from 29 to 35, but does not do anything to ameliorate those problems.

If youve got the dean of the medical school at UC Davis sitting on that board, voting on programs that might benefit his or her institution, legally or not thats still a conflict of interest, he said.

The agency has historically argued that the relationships between its board members and the scientists it supports are in line with its established conflict of interest policies.

After Proposition 14 was declared successful, the campaign supporting it called the measure one of the most important investments our state can make.

Over the past decade, California has made incredibly thoughtful and impactful investments in developing stem cell therapies and cures for diseases and conditions like diabetes, cancer, blindness, Parkinsons, paralysis and many more, wrote Robert and Danielle Klein, with the Californians for Stem Cell Research, Treatments and Cures campaign, in a statement. Now we know this progress and work to mitigate human suffering, restore health and improve the human condition will continue.

The measure will ultimately result in California taking on $7.8 billion dollars in debt, including interest.

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you. As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

See more here:
California's Stem Cell Agency Will Get A Funding Boost From Prop 14. Here's A Look At Its History. - Capital Public Radio News

Gene-edited monkey embryos give researchers new way to study HIV cure – University of Wisconsin-Madison

A gene that cured a man of HIV a decade ago has been successfully added to developing monkey embryos in an effort to study more potential treatments for the disease.

Timothy Brown, known for years as the Berlin Patient, received a transplant of bone marrow stem cells in 2007 to treat leukemia. The cells came from a donor with a rare genetic mutation that left the surfaces of their white blood cells without a protein called CCR5. When Browns immune system was wiped out and replaced by the donated cells, his new immune systems cells carried the altered gene.

This mutation cuts a chunk out of the genome so that it loses a functional gene, CCR5, that is a co-receptor for HIV, says Ted Golos, a University of WisconsinMadison reproductive scientist and professor of comparative biosciences and obstetrics and gynecology. Without CCR5, the virus cant attach to and enter cells to make more HIV. So, in Timothy Browns case, his infection was eliminated.

In 2019, a second cancer patient Adam Castillejo, initially identified as the London patient was cleared of his HIV by a stem cell transplant conferring the same mutation.

Thats very exciting, and there have been some follow up studies. But its been complicated, to say the least, Golos says.

Between the two transplants came a more infamous application of the mutation, when in 2018 Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui announced he had used the DNA-editing tool CRISPR to write the mutation into the DNA of a pair of human embryos. His work drew criticism from scientists concerned with the ethics of altering genes that can be passed down to human offspring, and he was jailed by the Chinese government for fraud.

The promise of the CCR5 mutation remains, but not without further study. The mutation occurs naturally in fewer than 1 percent of people, suggesting that it may not be associated only with positive health outcomes. An animal model for research can help answer open questions.

Given interest in moving forward gene-editing technologies for correcting genetic diseases, preclinical studies of embryo editing in nonhuman primates are very critical, says stem cell researcher Igor Slukvin, a UWMadison professor of pathology and laboratory medicine.

Golos, Slukvin and colleagues at UWMadisons Wisconsin National Primate Research Center and schools of Veterinary Medicine and Medicine and Public Health employed CRISPR to edit the DNA in newly fertilized embryos of cynomolgus macaque monkeys. They published their work recently in the journal Scientific Reports.

Slukvins lab had already established a method for slicing the CCR5-producing gene out of the DNA in human pluripotent stem cells, which can be used to generate immune cells resistant to HIV.

We used that same targeting construct that we already knew worked in cells, and delivered it to one-cell fertilized embryos, says Jenna Kropp Schmidt, a Wisconsin National Primate Research Center scientist. The thought is that if you make the genetic edit in the early embryo that it should propagate through all the cells as the embryo grows.

Primate Center scientist Nick Strelchenko found that as much as one-third of the time the gene edits successfully deleted the sections of DNA in CRISPRs crosshairs base pairs in both of the two copies of the CCR5 gene on a chromosome and were carried on into new cells as the embryos grew.

The goal now is to transfer these embryos into surrogates to produce live offspring who carry the mutation, Schmidt says.

Cynomolgus macaques are native to Southeast Asia, but a group of the monkeys has lived in isolation on the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius for about 500 years. Because the entire Mauritian monkey line descends from a small handful of founders, they have just seven variations of the major histocompatibility complex, the group of genes that must be matched between donor and recipient for a successful bone marrow transplant. There are hundreds of MHC variations in humans.

With MHC-matched monkeys carrying the CCR5 mutation, the researchers would have a reliable way to study how successful the transplants are against the simian immunodeficiency virus, which works in monkeys just like HIV does in humans.

Anti-retroviral drugs have really positively changed the expectation for HIV infection, but in some patients, they may not be as effective. And theyre certainly not without long-term consequences, says Golos, whose work is funded by the National Institutes of Health. So, this is potentially an alternative approach, which also allows us to expand our understanding of the immune system and how it might protect people from HIV infection.

The animal model could lead to the development of gene-edited human hematopoietic stem cells the type that work in bone marrow to produce many kinds of blood cells that Slukvin and Golos say could be used as an off-the-shelf treatment for HIV infection.

This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R24OD021322, P51OD011106, K99 HD099154-01, RR15459-01 and RR020141-01).

Share via Facebook

Share via Twitter

Share via Linked In

Share via Email

Read more here:
Gene-edited monkey embryos give researchers new way to study HIV cure - University of Wisconsin-Madison

Lineage Cell Therapeutics Proudly Supports Patients’ Access to Innovative Cell Therapy Treatments and Research Through Passage of Proposition 14 -…

CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (NYSE American and TASE: LCTX), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel cell therapies for unmet medical needs, strongly endorses the recent passing of Proposition 14 in California. This bill will enhance patients access to groundbreaking stem cell therapy treatments by authorizing the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) the ability to fund up to $5.5 billion in grants to support therapeutic development, medical research, and facilities based on stem cell technologies. This initiative builds upon the success of Proposition 71, which issued approximately $3 billion for the funding of stem cell research and led to important medical advances, including functional cures in some patients receiving cell therapy treatments. The development of Lineages OPC1 oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI), was one of the first clinical trials supported by CIRM and has showed durable and encouraging results in some patients.

At Lineage, the patients and their families inspire us to advance cell therapy products and this recent approval of Proposition 14 ensures that access to cutting edge cell-based therapies can continue from companies like ours, stated Brian M. Culley, Lineage CEO. Cell therapy has the ability to make a profound impact on millions of lives and the passage of Proposition 14 reflects Californias serious commitment to supporting innovative local companies through the expensive and time-consuming process required to discover and test new cell-based therapies and will drive further innovation in stem cell development and research. Of note, our clinical study of OPC1 for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury was one of the first cell therapy clinical trials supported by CIRM under Prop 71. It was tremendously meaningful for some of our patients success stories to be featured in the Prop 14 campaign this year, along with others who have experienced life-changing benefits from stem cell therapy innovation in California. We are extremely thankful to CIRM for their partnership and valuable contributions, not only to Lineage, but also for other companies working in this exciting and rapidly growing field. We believe that all three of our clinical-stage programs could be considered for future grant funding under this new initiative.

About OPC1

OPC1 is an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) transplant therapy designed to provide clinically meaningful improvements to motor recovery in individuals with acute spinal cord injuries (SCI). OPCs are naturally occurring precursors to the cells which provide electrical insulation for nerve axons in the form of a myelin sheath. SCI occurs when the spinal cord is subjected to a severe crush or contusion injury and typically results in severe functional impairment, including limb paralysis, aberrant pain signaling, and loss of bladder control and other body functions. There are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries annually in the U.S. and there currently are no FDA-approved drugs specifically for the treatment of SCI. The OPC1 program has been partially funded by a $14.3 million grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. OPC1 has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation and Orphan Drug designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

About the OPC1 Clinical Study

The SCiStar Study of OPC1 is an open-label, 25-patient, single-arm trial testing three sequential escalating doses of OPC1 which was administered 21 to 42 days post-injury, at up to 20 million OPC1 cells in patients with subacute motor complete (AIS-A or AIS-B) cervical (C-4 to C-7) acute spinal cord injuries (SCI). These individuals had experienced severe paralysis of the upper and lower limbs. The primary endpoint in the SCiStar study was safety as assessed by the frequency and severity of adverse events related to OPC1, the injection procedure, and immunosuppression with short-term, low-dose tacrolimus. Secondary outcome measures included neurological functions measured by upper extremity motor scores (UEMS) and motor level on International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examinations through 365 days post-treatment. Enrollment is complete in this study; patients will continue to be evaluated on a long-term basis.

About Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel cell therapies for unmet medical needs. Lineages programs are based on its robust proprietary cell-based therapy platform and associated in-house development and manufacturing capabilities. With this platform Lineage develops and manufactures specialized, terminally differentiated human cells from its pluripotent and progenitor cell starting materials. These differentiated cells are developed to either replace or support cells that are dysfunctional or absent due to degenerative disease or traumatic injury or administered as a means of helping the body mount an effective immune response to cancer. Lineages clinical programs are in markets with billion dollar opportunities and include three allogeneic (off-the-shelf) product candidates: (i) OpRegen, a retinal pigment epithelium transplant therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration, a leading cause of blindness in the developed world; (ii) OPC1, an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries; and (iii) VAC, an allogeneic dendritic cell therapy platform for immuno-oncology and infectious disease, currently in clinical development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. For more information, please visit http://www.lineagecell.com or follow the Company on Twitter @LineageCell.

Forward-Looking Statements

Lineage cautions you that all statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this press release, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, in some cases, can be identified by terms such as believe, may, will, estimate, continue, anticipate, design, intend, expect, could, plan, potential, predict, seek, should, would, contemplate, project, target, tend to, or the negative version of these words and similar expressions. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to Lineages expected eligibility for grants. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Lineages actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this press release, including risks and uncertainties inherent in Lineages business and other risks in Lineages filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Lineages forward-looking statements are based upon its current expectations and involve assumptions that may never materialize or may prove to be incorrect. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further information regarding these and other risks is included under the heading Risk Factors in Lineages periodic reports with the SEC, including Lineages Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2020 and its other reports, which are available from the SECs website. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. Lineage undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as required by law.

Excerpt from:
Lineage Cell Therapeutics Proudly Supports Patients' Access to Innovative Cell Therapy Treatments and Research Through Passage of Proposition 14 -...