The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% – PRNewswire

NEW YORK, Oct. 7, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% during the forecast period. Increasing adoption of SUBs among small companies and startups, reduced automation complexity, ease in the cultivation of marine organisms, reduced energy and water consumption, the growing biologics market, technological advancements in SUBs, and increasing Biopharmaceutical R&D are factors driving the growth of this market.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04208113/?utm_source=PRN

By type, the stirred-tank SUBs segment accounted for the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market The single-use bioreactors market is categorized into major four types, wave-induced SUBs, stirred-tank SUBs, bubble-column SUBs, and other bioreactors.The stirred-tank SUBs segment dominated the single-use bioreactors market in 2019.

The large share of this segment can be attributed to factors such as the high preference for stirred-tank SUBs in the cultivation of aerobic microbial cultures due to its abilty to provide greater oxygen transfer and reduced engineering challenges such as heat removal, mass transfer, and higher agitation rates.

Asia Pacific: The fastest-growing region in the single-use bioreactors market.

The Asia Pacific market is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period, mainly due to the growing biopharmaceutical industry, increasing life science research, rising investments by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and the growing number of CROs and CMOs in several APAC countries contribute to its growth.

North America: the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market North America accounted for the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market. Factors such as the to the presence of an established biopharmaceutical industry and the presence of major players operating in the single-use bioreactors market in the region are the major factors driving the market growth.

Breakdown of primaries The study contains insights from various industry experts, ranging from component suppliers to Tier 1 companies and OEMs. The break-up of the primaries is as follows: By Respondent Supply Side- 70%, Demand Side- 30% By Designation Executives- 25%, CXOs, Directors- 20%, Managers - 55% By Region North America - 50%, Europe - 20%, APAC 20%, RoW- 10%

The single-use bioreactors market is dominated by a few globally established players such as C Sartorius Stedim Biotech (France), Thermo Fisher Scientific (US), Danaher Corporation (US), Merck Millipore (Germany). Other players in this market includes, Getinge (Sweden), Eppendorf AG (Germany), Parker Hannifin Corporation (US), Pierre Gurin (France), Meissner Filtration Products, Inc. (US), Solida Biotech GmbH (Germany), Satake Chemical Equipment Mfg., Ltd. (Japan), Able Corporation & Biott Corporation (Japan), ABEC, Inc. (US), Distek, Inc. (US), PBS Biotech, Inc. (US), CESCO Bioengineering Co. Ltd. (Taiwan), New Horizon Biotechnology, Inc. (US), bbi-biotech GmbH (Germany), Celltainer Biotech BV (Netherlands), Cellexus (UK), Stobbe Pharma GmbH (Switzerland), G&G Technologies, Inc. (US), CerCell A/S (Denmark), Charter Medical Ltd. (US), Solaris Biotech USA (US) and OmniBRx Biotechnologies Pvt. Ltd. (India).

Research Coverage: The report segments the single-use bioreactors market based on region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa), products (Single-use bioreactor systems (up to 10L, 11100L, 101500L, 011500L, above 1500L), single-use media bags (2D bags, 3D bags, other bags), single-use filtration assemblies, and other products), type (Stirred-tank SUBs, wave-induced SUBs, bubble-column SUBs, and other SUBs), Type of Cell (Mammalian cells, bacterial cells, yeast cells, and other cells), Molecule Type (Monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, gene-modified cells, stem cells, and other molecules), application (Research & development, process development, and bioproduction), end users (Pharmaceutical & biopharmaceutical companies, CROs and CMOs, and academic & research Institutes).

The report also provides a comprehensive review of market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the single-use bioreactors market

Key Benefits of Buying the Report: The report will help the leaders/new entrants in this market with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall market and the sub-segments.This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies.

The report also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the single-use bioreactors market and provides them information on key market drivers, challenges, and opportunities.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04208113/?utm_source=PRN

About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________ Contact Clare: [emailprotected] US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001

SOURCE Reportlinker

http://www.reportlinker.com

Continue reading here:
The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% - PRNewswire

Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded – PharmaLive

Five years after the companys portfolio bottomed out, Bristol-Myers Squibb markets three of the worlds six best-selling pharma brands.

By Joshua Slatko [emailprotected]

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

430 E. 29th Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10016 Phone: 212-546-4000 Website: bms.com

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

(All figures are in millions of dollars, except EPS)

2019

Revenue $26,145

Net income $3,460

Diluted EPS $2.01

R&D expense $6,148

1H 2020

Revenue $20,910

Net income $(846)

Diluted EPS $(0.38)

R&D expense $4,894

BEST-SELLING Rx PRODUCTS

(All sales are in millions of dollars)

2019

Eliquis $7,929

Opdivo $7,204

Orencia $2,977

Sprycel $2,110

Yervoy $1,489

Revlimid $1,299*

Baraclude $555

* Sales with BMS after completion of the Celgene acquisition in November 2019.

1H 2020

Revlimid $5,799

Eliquis $4,804

Opdivo $3,419

Orencia $1,464

Pomalyst/Imnovid $1,458

Sprycel $1,032

Yervoy $765

Abraxane $608

Vidaza $284

Outcomes Creativity Index Score: 0 Manny Awards N/A Cannes Lions N/A LIA: Health & Wellness N/A Clio Health N/A One Show: HW&P N/A MM&M Awards N/A Global Awards N/A Creative Floor Awards N/A

When Giovanni Caforio, MD, took over as CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb in May 2015, the companys annual top-line revenue had just fallen below $16 billion and its leading product, the $2 billion Abilify, had gone generic the month before. But the seeds of future success had already been planted. Opdivo earned the drugs first approval from FDA in December 2014, sales of Eliquis had just more than quadrupled to $774 million, and BMS was starting to look like it might really be what the leadership team had been starting to call it: an Immuno-Oncology company. Having risen through the companys oncology divisions, Dr. Caforio was the man for the moment. Five years later, Opdivo is the worlds third-best-selling oncologic, Eliquis is the worlds leading cardiovascular brand, and BMS acquisition of Celgene a move that would have been barely conceivable back in 2015 has brought the $10 billion oncology brand Revlimid into the fold as well, alongside Pomalyst (tracking towards $3 billion in annual sales), the recently approved products Reblozyl, Zeposia and Onureg, and the high-potential developmental CAR T compounds liso-cel and ide-cel, among others. For this extraordinary turnaround, for the courageous and ultimately successful all-in bets on Opdivo and Eliquis, and for the aggressive pursuit and capture of Celgene to firm up both the top line and the pipeline, Med Ad News is pleased to name Bristol-Myers Squibb as Company of the Year.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, said Giovanni Caforio, MD, CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, Dr. Caforio said at the end of 2019. With an expanded portfolio of high-performing brands, eight potential commercial launch opportunities, a deep and broad early pipeline, and the financial flexibility to continue to invest in innovation, the company enters 2020 uniquely positioned to transform patients lives through science and create long-term sustainable growth.

Helped along by a month and change of legacy Celgene revenue, BMS top line in 2019 was $26.15 billion, an improvement of 15.9 percent compared with the previous year. Due in part to the impact of amortization of acquired intangible assets and other costs from the Celgene transaction, though, net income for the year declined 30.1 percent to $3.46 billion and diluted earnings per share were down a dollar to $2.01. In the first half of 2020, the first full half of legacy Celgene, top-line sales were up by 71.5 percent to $20.91 billion. However, due to more amortization of acquired intangible assets $4.67 billion of it and other Celgene-related costs, net income fell into the red at negative $846 million and EPS was -$0.38. BMS executives are estimating that full-year EPS for 2020 will fall between -$0.06 and $0.09; without all the one-time Celgene charges and costs, though, they are projecting full-year 2020 EPS at between $6.10 and $6.25.

Acquisitions &partnerships

In January, BMS and Nektar Therapeutics announced a new joint development plan to advance bempegaldesleukin (bempeg) plus Opdivo into multiple new registrational trials.

The revision to the companies strategic collaboration agreement includes a new joint development plan under which Nektar and Bristol-Myers Squibb will expand the active clinical development program for bempeg plus nivolumab from three ongoing registrational trials in first-line metastatic melanoma, first-line cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer and first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to include two additional registrational trials in adjuvant melanoma and in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition, a Phase I/II dose escalation and expansion study will be initiated to evaluate bempeg plus nivolumab in combination with axitinib in first-line RCC in order to support a future registrational trial. The costs for these studies will be shared based upon the cost-sharing outlined in the terms of the original collaboration agreement. Also as part of the new strategic collaboration agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb will independently conduct and fund a Phase I/II dose optimization and expansion study in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer with bempeg and nivolumab.

In February, BMS and BioMotiv, a mission-driven drug development accelerator associated with The Harrington Project for discovery and development, that advances breakthrough discoveries from research institutions into therapeutics, announced the launch of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, a biotechnology company focused on developing a new class of drugs for fibrotic and other inflammatory diseases. The intellectual property behind Anteros was first developed by Yale University and in-licensed by Bristol-Myers Squibb and subsequently assigned to Anteros. This is the first company BioMotiv and Bristol-Myers Squibb have launched since executing their Strategic Partnership Agreement, as previously announced in September 2019.

Under the terms of the partnership, Bristol-Myers Squibb is contributing the IP, data, and reagents for a series of small molecules against an undisclosed mechanism, and BioMotiv, through the formation of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, working in close partnership with Yale, is solely responsible for research and development. Once Anteros nominates a pre-clinical candidate, Bristol-Myers Squibb has the option to acquire the company from BioMotiv under pre-agreed terms.

During March, Bristol-Myers Squib and Voluntis announced a collaboration agreement to create and investigate digital therapeutic solutions that will support cancer patients. Taking advantage of Theraxium Oncology, Voluntis core platform for digital therapeutics in oncology, the collaboration is evaluating potential solutions that will support management of patient symptoms and remote monitoring by healthcare providers.

According to company leaders, the goal is that the digital therapeutic, once researched and developed, would provide patients access to a mobile app that would support treatment and track symptoms. The app will be developed to embed evidence-based algorithms intended to provide patients with real-time recommendations for self-management of symptoms related to their therapy. The parties will also investigate how the solution could enable patients to more effectively communicate with their health care providers, capture and track symptoms, and receive a personalized supportive care plan.

In August 2020, BMS and Forbius, a privately held, clinical-stage protein engineering company that designs and develops biotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer and fibrotic diseases, announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would acquire Forbius. The acquisition was completed during September.

Forbius has developed a portfolio of highly selective and potent inhibitors of TGF-beta 1 and 3, which are key mediators of immunosuppression and fibrosis. The transaction included an upfront payment and future success-based milestone payments. Prior to closing, Forbius non-TGF-beta assets were transferred to a newly formed private company, which is retained by Forbius existing shareholders.

Under this transaction, Bristol-Myers Squibb acquired Forbius TGF-beta program, including the programs lead investigational asset, AVID200. TGF-beta is a key cytokine that regulates various cell processes, including regulation of the immune system. Selective inhibition of TGF-beta 1 and 3 may enhance anti-tumor efficacy by acting synergistically with immunotherapy. AVID200 is undergoing Phase 1 development for oncology and fibrosis.

Also in August, BMS and Dragonfly Therapeutics Inc. announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would be granted the global exclusive license to Dragonflys interleukin-12 (IL-12) investigational immunotherapy program, including its extended half-life cytokine DF6002. DF6002 is a monovalent IL-12 immunoglobulin Fc fusion protein proposed to achieve strong anti-tumor efficacy by establishing an inflammatory tumor microenvironment necessary for productive anti-tumor responses.

Under the agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb is responsible for the development and any subsequent commercialization of DF6002 and its related products worldwide, including strategic decisions, regulatory responsibilities, funding, and manufacturing. Dragonfly will receive $475 million in near-term upfronts, and is eligible to receive performance-based development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments. In addition, Dragonfly will receive up to 24 percent royalties on worldwide net sales.

The Opdivo development train continued to roll during 2020, with two additional FDA approvals in NSCLC and another in HCC.

Dragonfly received FDA clearance in May 2020 for its investigational new drug application to develop DF6002. In addition, Dragonfly has an ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors, which began in July 2020. BMS intends to advance the research and development of DF6002 in oncology and hematology.

Opdivo

Sales of the oncologic Opdivo rose 7 percent in 2019 to $7.2 billion. While international sales were up by 15 percent due to higher demand as a result of approvals for additional indications in 2018 and launches in Europe and Asia, sales growth in the United States was 2 percent, primarily due to a smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market and increased competition for the Opdivo+Yervoy combination in kidney cancer. Company leaders expect this trend to continue until the market stabilizes or new indications are approved and launched. In the first half of 2020 sales of Opdivo declined by 5.7 percent to $3.42 billion. According to company leaders, this was again due to the smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market, as well as lower demand due to COVID-19, primarily lower new patient starts and patient visits.

In February, BMS announced five-year follow-up results from the Phase III CheckMate -025 study, which continue to demonstrate that treatment with Opdivo delivers superior overall survival (OS) rate and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to those treated with everolimus.

With an extended minimum follow-up of 64 months, patients treated with Opdivo continued to demonstrate OS benefit with 26 percent of patients alive compared to 18 percent of patients treated with everolimus. Additionally, the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response was 23 percent for Opdivo versus 4 percent for everolimus and the median duration of response for Opdivo was also maintained longer than for everolimus (18.2 months versus 14 months, respectively).

Also in February, BMS announced updated results from the Phase III CheckMate -214 study evaluating the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With a minimum follow-up of 42 months, the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to show superior OS, ORR, duration of response, and complete response rates.

Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million.

A significant OS benefit was observed in both patients from the intermediate- and poor-risk and the intent-to-treat populations treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to those treated with sunitinib alone. Of the patients treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy who experienced a complete response, per independent review, that response was ongoing in 84 percent and 86 percent of patients in the IP and ITT populations, respectively.

More than half of advanced RCC patients treated with the Opdivo plus Yervoy combination were alive after four years across the entire study population of the Phase 3 CheckMate -214 trial, as reported by Bristol-Myers Squibb in September 2020. With the longest follow-up for an immunotherapy-based combination in previously untreated advanced RCC, Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to demonstrate superior, long-term OS and durable responses versus sunitinib. These sustained benefits were observed across the primary patient population, those with intermediate- and poor-risk prognostic factors, and in the intention-to-treat (ITT, i.e. all randomized) patient population.

During March, FDA approved Opdivo 1 mg/kg plus Yervoy 3 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who have been previously treated with sorafenib. Approval for this indication was granted under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response seen in the Opdivo + Yervoy cohort of the Phase I/II CheckMate -040 trial. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Opdivo + Yervoy is the only dual immunotherapy approved by FDA in this setting. The therapy features a potentially synergistic mechanism of action that targets two different checkpoints (PD-1 and CTLA-4) and works in complementary ways.

In the CheckMate -040 cohort of HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib, after a minimum follow up of 28 months, 33 percent of patients responded to treatment with Opdivo + Yervoy; 8 percent had a complete response, and 24 percent had a partial response. Duration of responses ranged from 4.6 to 30.5-plus months, with 88 percent lasting at least six months, 56 percent at least 12 months, and 31 percent at least 24 months. Overall response rate and DOR were assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. ORR assessed by BICR using modified RECIST was 35 percent, with a CR reported in 12 percent of patients and a PR reported in 22 percent of patients.

In April, BMS and Exelixis Inc. announced that CheckMate -9ER, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx compared to sunitinib in previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) at final analysis, as well as the secondary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis, and ORR.

CheckMate -9ER results were reported in September in which Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx showed superior OS and doubled median PFS and ORR with a favorable safety profile compared to sunitinib.

In May, FDA approved Opdivo 360 mg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) given with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. The therapy was approved for patients with squamous or non-squamous disease and regardless of PD-L1 expression. This application was reviewed under FDAs Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program, which aims to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available to patients as early as possible.

This approval for Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy was based on the pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase III CheckMate -9LA trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy combined with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression or tumor histology (minimum 8.1 months follow up). Median OS was 14.1 months versus 10.7 months, respectively. In a follow-up analysis at 12.7 months, the hazard ratio improved numerically to 0.66, with mOS of 15.6 months and 10.9 months. At one year, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy and 47 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive.

Also in May, FDA approved Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) for the first-line treatment of adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors express PD-L1 (1 percent) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

This approval was based on Part 1a of the Phase III CheckMate -227 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor histology with a minimum follow up of 29.3 months. The median OS was 17.1 months versus 14.9 months. In the trial, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 56 percent treated with chemotherapy were alive at one year, and 40 percent and 33 percent at two years, respectively. At three years (median 43.1 months follow up), 33 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 22 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive. As assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review, the confirmed overall response rate with a minimum follow up of 28.3 months was 36 percent with Opdivo + Yervoy (5.8 percent complete response and 30.1 percent partial response) and 30 percent with chemotherapy (1.8 percent CR and 28.2 percent PR). Among patients who responded, the median duration of response was 23.2 months for patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 6.2 months for chemotherapy.

In June, FDA approved Opdivo for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. This application was granted Priority Review Designation by FDA, and the approval was based on the Phase III ATTRACTION-3 trial in which Opdivo demonstrated superior OS versus taxane chemotherapy (investigators choice of docetaxel or paclitaxel). The median OS was 10.9 months for Opdivo compared to 8.4 months for docetaxel or paclitaxel. Opdivo is the first approved immunotherapy in this setting regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression level.

In August 2020, BMS announced that the Phase III CheckMate -577 trial evaluating Opdivo as an adjuvant therapy for patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer met its primary endpoint of disease-free survival at a pre-specified interim analysis. In the trial, treatment with Opdivo following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and complete surgical resection demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) compared to placebo in the all-randomized population. The safety profile of Opdivo was consistent with previously reported studies. This is the second tumor, in addition to melanoma, where Opdivo has demonstrated a benefit in the adjuvant setting.

Bristol-Myers Squibb announced results in September from the Phase 3 CheckMate -577 trial in which adjuvant treatment with Opdivo demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS compared to placebo in patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and tumor resection.

BMS announced during August that CheckMate -649, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma, met both primary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis and progression-free survival at final analysis in patients whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score 5. The OS benefit was also observed in the all-randomized population. Opdivo is the first PD-1 inhibitor to demonstrate superior OS and PFS in combination with chemotherapy when compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with gastric cancer, GEJ, cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Bristol Myers Squibb reported in September primary results from CheckMate -649 in which first-line treatment with Opdivo plus chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to treatment with chemotherapy alone.

In early October 2020, Opdivo 360 mg every three weeks plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg every six weeks was approved by the U.S. FDA for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The U.S. approval is based on a pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase 3 CheckMate -743 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy (n=303) demonstrated superior overall survival versus the platinum-based standard of care chemotherapy, with a median OS of 18.1 months (95 percent CI: 16.8 to 21.5) versus 14.1 months (95 percent CI: 12.5 to 16.2), respectively. These results were observed after 22.1 months of minimum follow-up, according to Bristol-Myers Squibb. At two years, 41 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy were alive and 27 percent with chemotherapy.

Eliquis took over as the worlds top-selling cardiovascular medicine in 2019 with sales of $7.93 billion.

Opdivo + Yervoy is the first new systemic therapy in more than 15 years to be approved by the FDA in this setting. The marketing approval marks the third indication for Opdivo + Yervoy-based treatments in thoracic cancers and seventh indication overall.

Other productperformances

The cardiovascular drug Eliquis took over as BMS leading brand by revenue in 2019 with growth of 23.2 percent and sales of $7.93 billion for the year, passing Xarelto to become the worlds No. 1 cardiovascular brand. According to BMS executives, U.S. sales of Eliquis increased due to higher demand, partially offset by higher Medicare Part D coverage gap cost share, while international sales rose due to higher demand. In the first half of 2020 sales of Eliquis rose another 21.1 percent to $4.8 billion. Eliquis is indicated for the prevention of stroke in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism disorders.

The autoimmune product Orencia generated sales of $2.98 billion for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 9.9 percent. According to company leaders, this was driven by higher demand and higher average net selling price. Sales of Orencia in the first half of 2020 edged up by 3.2 percent to $1.46 billion, slowed by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Orencia is indicated for adult patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis and is also indicated for reducing signs and symptoms in certain pediatric patients with moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

In June, BMS announced results from the open-label switch period of Early AMPLE, a Phase IV exploratory biomarker study assessing the differences by which Orencia and another treatment, adalimumab, interfere with disease progression in moderate-to-severe early rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive (seropositive) for certain autoantibodies. Findings of the open-label switch period showed that early seropositive RA patients treated with Orencia demonstrated substantial clinical improvements at week 48, sustaining the level of responses achieved at week 24 compared to adalimumab. In seropositive patients switching from adalimumab to Orencia, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period to week 48.

The efficacy responses observed at 24 weeks with Orencia were sustained at week 48 in the patients who continued on Orencia. At week 48, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia in the non-switch arm were 78, 63, and 50, respectively. At week 24, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia were 83, 73, and 50, respectively; ACR 20/50/70 scores for adalimumab at week 24 were 63, 45, and 30, respectively.

In the patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia, while the trial was not powered to show superiority or non-inferiority, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period through week 48. ACR 20/50/70 scores for patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia were 75, 63, and 38, respectively, at week 48.

Overall, patients with a well-known genetic marker of RA prognosis, called the Shared Epitope, who continued on Orencia achieved numerically higher responses than the broader seropositive patient population at week 48, indicating the potential importance of SE as a predictor of response to Orencia. ACR 20/50/70 responses were 77, 67 and 53, respectively, for SE+ patients continuing on Orencia.

Sales of the leukemia drug Sprycel rose by 5.5 percent in 2019 to $2.11 billion. Company leaders said this was due to higher average net selling price and higher demand in the United States. In the first half of 2020, Sprycel sales rose 2.9 percent to $1.03 billion, with demand declining in the United States and generic competition internationally. Sprycel is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and the treatment of adults with chronic, accelerated, or myeloid or lymphoid blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.

The oncologic Yervoy generated $1.49 billion in sales for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 12 percent. According to company executives, this was due to higher demand and higher average net selling price in the United States and approvals for additional indications and launches primarily in Europe and Japan in 2018 internationally. Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million, held back by increased competition for the Opdivo + Yervoy combination for kidney cancer.

After joining the BMS portfolio via the Celgene acquisition, the oncologic Revlimid is trending towards more than $11 billion in revenue in 2020.

While they did not have time to add much to BMS 2019 numbers since the Celgene deal closed in November, two legacy Celgene products are going to have a major impact on BMS top line in 2020: Revlimid and Pomalyst/Imnovid. Revlimid, the worlds leading oncology drug by revenue in 2018, generated $10.82 billion in sales and growth of 11.7 percent between Celgene and BMS in 2019, losing its oncology crown only because Mercks Keytruda grew faster. In the first half of 2020 sales of Revlimid were $5.8 billion, up 9.2 percent compared with the medicines first-half 2019 amount while still under the Celgene umbrella. The multiple myeloma drug Pomalyst generated sales of more than $2.16 billion in 2019 the numbers are a bit unclear due to the timing of the Celgene acquisition and brought in another $1.46 billion in the first half of 2020, up 24 percent compared with the drugs first-half 2019 performance at Celgene. Revlimid is indicated in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and as a single agent as a maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pomalyst is indicated for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy.

In May, FDA approved Pomalyst for patients with AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma whose disease has become resistant to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), or in patients with Kaposi sarcoma who are HIV-negative. Pomalyst was granted accelerated approval, Breakthrough Therapy designation and Orphan Drug designation in these indications based on overall response rates observed in a Phase I/II open label, single-arm clinical trial (12-C-0047). Continued approval may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial. Pomalyst is the first new treatment option available for those with Kaposi sarcoma in more than 20 years.

The legacy Celgene oncologic Pomalyst enjoyed sales growth of nearly a quarter in the first half of 2020 and earned a new indication from FDA for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.

Original post:
Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded - PharmaLive

TreeFrog Therapeutics and Invetech Expand Partnership to Transition High-throughput Stem Cell Encapsulation Technology to GMP System for…

Since January 2019, TreeFrog Therapeutics has been collaborating with Invetech to turn its R&D encapsulation set-up into an automated single-use device for industrial bioproduction. "Our C-StemTM technology bridges stem cell biology and biophysics," explained Kevin Alessandri, CEO and CTO of TreeFrog Therapeutics. "We found in Invetech a team eager to confront a new technology, with strong execution capacities, supported by a step-by-step methodology to de-risk the project. As a matter of fact, they managed to deliver the prototype in time in April 2020, right in the middle of the COVID crisis."

The beta encapsulation system designed by Invetech meets its technical specifications with a throughput of 1,000 stem cell capsules per second. The first benefit of cell encapsulation is protection against hydrodynamic damages. This is instrumental to amplifying and differentiating fragile cells such as pluripotent stem cells in large-scale bioreactors. The second benefit of the capsule lies in the recapitulation of a biomimetic stem cell niche. In this micro-environment, pluripotent stem cells self-organize in a biomimetic 3D conformation, which promotes fast growth and accurate chromosome segregation.

"Today, our C-StemTM technologyreduces manufacturing costs by ten-fold, while dramatically improving batch-size, yields and genomic quality. All our efforts are now focused on bringing this technology to the clinic as fast as possible, by advancing a pipeline of cell therapies in co-development with leading pharmaceutical companies. In this context, our partnership with Invetech is critical to secure our roadmap to GMP compliance and to enhance even further the functionality, yield and processing conditions of our encapsulation device," said Maxime Feyeux, co-founder, CEO & CSO of TreeFrog Therapeutics.

"TreeFrog approached us with a very novel, early-stage technology that has progressed extremely fast and shows incredible promise," remarked David Kneen, Invetech's Vice President, Cell Therapy. "In under 18 months, our combined teams have transitioned C-StemTM from a bench-top proof-of-concept, to a closed and automated beta production system. It's been a great collaboration driven by our shared vision of commercializing this technology to enable the mass-production of cell therapies for patients in need."

Watch video

Download image

Press contacts

TreeFrog Therapeutics treefrog.fr

Pierre-Emmanuel Gaultier, Marketing & Communication Manager [emailprotected]+ 33 645 77 42 58

Invetech invetechgroup.com

Eeva Routio, Marketing Manager, Brand and Thought Leadership [emailprotected]+1858688 7136

SOURCE Invetech

https://www.invetechgroup.com

Here is the original post:
TreeFrog Therapeutics and Invetech Expand Partnership to Transition High-throughput Stem Cell Encapsulation Technology to GMP System for...

Props to you, Californians: A preview of what’s on your November ballot – Palo Alto Online

by Ben Christopher / CalMatters

Uploaded: Tue, Oct 6, 2020, 10:57 am

After a bit of last-minute legislative maneuvering, here's the final list of propositions that Californians are being asked to weigh in on.

They address matters as vital and/or esoteric as rent control, property tax law, dialysis clinic staffing requirements, stem cell research funding and the preservation or final dispatch of cash bail in California.

Lawmakers added four measures: two to expand voting rights, one that ends a 22-year-old ban on affirmative action, and one that is a tortuously complicated property tax measure that somehow ropes in Realtors, wildland firefighters and "The Dude" from the Big Lebowski.

(Below you'll find a quick overview of the dozen measures on your ballot. If you're trying to decide how to vote, you'll want to check out our updated November 2020 voter guide. It includes our Props-in-a-Minute videos, interactive Gimme Props game, and pages explaining what each measure would do, how it got on the ballot, who supports and opposes, how much campaign money is underwriting both sides, and what the latest polls show plus a curated content list for voters who want to delve even deeper.)

These three measures, all placed on the ballot by the Legislature, had been introduced before protests against racism and police brutality swept the country. But as California lawmakers look for ways to play a role in the national debate about institutional barriers to equity and the meaning of citizenship, many legislators see these as particularly potent causes.

Prop. 16: Ending the ban on affirmative action

Who put it there: The Legislature, via a bill by San Diego Democrat Assemblymember Shirley Weber

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Allow schools and public agencies to take race and other immutable characteristics into account when making admission, hiring or contracting decisions.

In 1996 California voters passed Proposition 209, a constitutional amendment banning affirmative action at state institutions. The result was an immediate drop in Black and Latino enrollment at the state's elite public universities. Some civil rights organizations have been trying to repeal Prop. 209 ever since.

Each of those attempts has been stymied by a coalition of Republicans, moderate Democrats and some progressive legislators who represent districts with large Asian American voting populations. This year, as in previous years, some of the most vocal and persistent opponents of the effort to reintroduce affirmative action have been Chinese-American political activists. They argue that boosting enrollment of students from underrepresented racial groups would come at the expense of "overrepresented" Asian American students.

Prop. 17: Restoring the right to vote to people on parole

Who put it there: The Legislature, via a bill by Sacramento Democrat Assemblymember Kevin McCarty.

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Allow Californians who are currently on parole to vote.

In 1974, California voters passed a ballot measure giving people who have committed felonies the right to vote once they complete their sentences and are no longer on parole.

Thanks to that law, there are some 40,000 Californians who are not in prison but unable to legally cast a ballot. But as with any criminal justice debate, this is also one about race. According to an estimate from 2016, two thirds of people on parole in the state are Latino or Black.

Prop. 18: Letting (some) 17 year olds vote (some of the time)

Who put it there: The Legislature, with a bill introduced by San Mateo Democrat Assemblymember Kevin Mullin.

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Allow 17-year-old U.S. citizens to vote in a primary and special election as long as they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.

California Democrats have been on a decade-long tear increasing voting access. Same-day voter registration, automatic registration at the DMV and pre-registration of 16- and 17-year-olds are among the recent pro-vote innovations to come out of the Capitol.

Letting people under 18 vote would be yet another extension. Already 23 states let 17- year-olds vote in certain circumstances.

Democratic legislators have tried to do this six times before; this is the first to make the ballot.

This wouldn't be a California election without at least a few wildy contentious ballot measures about housing and property taxes.

Prop. 15: Split roll

Who put it there: Citizens. Campaign largely funded by the California Teachers Association, SEIU California and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Tax some commercial property based on its market value, rather than the price at which it was purchased. This would raise property taxes on many large businesses across the state, increasing funding for schools and local government.

In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, placing a cap on property taxes, kicking off a nationwide anti-tax revolt and placing city and county budgets in a generation-spanning straitjacket.

By tying a landlord's property tax payments to the original purchase price, Prop. 13 has been the gift that keeps on giving to property owners, particularly those lucky enough to have bought cheap real estate decades ago. There's been bipartisan reluctance among lawmakers to touch it ever since, lest they incur the wrath of irate homeowners.

This initiative attempts to divide and conquer that political problem by repealing the property tax protections only for commercial landlords with more than $3 million in holdings. If this measure passes, those landowners would have to make tax payments based on the current value of their properties a tax hike for most resulting in an estimated $6.5 to $11.5 billion more for cities, counties and school districts.

Prop. 19: Property tax breaks and closing the "Lebowski loophole"

Who put it there: The Legislature, via a bill by San Mateo Democrat Assemblymember Kevin Mullin, but sponsored by the California Realtors.

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Allow homeowners who are over 55, disabled or victims of natural disaster to take a portion of their property tax base with them when they sell their home and buy a new one. It would also limit the ability of new homeowners who inherit properties to keep their parents' or grandparents' low property tax payments. Most of the additional money raised would go into a state fire response fund.

We've seen this one before half of it, anyway. In 2018, the California Association of Realtors put a measure on the ballot allowing older or disabled homeowners to keep a portion of their Prop. 13 tax break. The Realtors argued that the current property tax rules disincentivize longtime homeowners from moving, "trapping" empty-nesters in houses that are too big for them and locking out new families. But because the measure would cost schools, counties and cities, it was opposed by organized labor and local government groups and failed by 20 points.

The Realtors tried again this year, but with an added fiscal sweetener. Under this proposal, anyone who inherits a home from their parents or grandparents would only be allowed to keep the low property taxes if they use the home as their primary residence and only on the first $1 million between the home's original purchase price and its market value. Inspiration for that caveat may have come from the Los Angeles Times, which tracked down a number of California scions, including "The Big Lebowski" star Jeff Bridges, who are still paying 1970-era property tax levels on their rental properties.

And then there was a last-minute wrinkle. In the final weeks of June, the Realtors sprang a deal: designating that most of the funding generated by the measure would go to fighting wildfires. That won the support of the influential California Professional Firefighters union. It also means the measure will be funding a public need that might be on many voters' minds come November.

That bargain was struck after the Realtors had submitted their signatures, so with the help of Assemblyman Mullin, they passed it through the Legislature, pulling their original proposal just before the deadline.

Prop. 21: Rent Control (Again)

Who put it on the ballot: Signatures, collected via an effort mostly funded by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.

Type: Statute

What it would do: Allow cities to introduce new rent control laws, or expand existing ones.

Despite a 20-percentage point, 56-out-of-58 county defeat in 2018, a statewide rent control measure is back on the ballot.

Polling from that election season suggested that California voters generally liked rent control as a concept, but worried about the specifics of the proposal. Accordingly, this new initiative makes a few tweaks.

Under this one, cities would be allowed to apply new rent control ordinances only to homes that are at least 15 years old. And it exempts single-family homes owned by landlords with no more than two properties.

Just like last time, the measure is being pushed by the Los Angeles-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation and its pugnacious president Michael Weinstein. State lawmakers by passing a law last year that set a ceiling of roughly 7% on how much landlords can raise rents each year had hoped to ward off another attempt by Weinstein and company. They had no such luck.

California, the home of three-strikes sentencing, has spent the last decade rethinking its approach to criminal justice. Two measures on the November ballot, channeling the spirit of the 90s, are pushing to reverse that reversal.

Prop. 25: Ditch or keep cash bail

Who put it there: Signatures, via a campaign largely funded by the bail bond industry.

Type: Referendum

What it would do: Ask voters to either approve or strike down a state law that banished money bail from the state criminal justice system.

In 2018, acting on the advice of state Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, legislators passed a bill ending cash bail in California. Rather than letting people pay their way out of jail while they await trial, the law gives judges the right to determine whether someone who is arrested should be kept behind bars based on the risk they are deemed to pose to themselves or others.

Moving quickly, the bail bond industry mounted a campaign to put the question on the ballot as a referendum. Voters will vote either "Yes" to keep the state law and end cash bail for good, making California the first state to do so, or "No" to keep the bail system.

Prop. 20: Rolling back Brown-era "leniency"

Who put it there: Signatures, via a campaign largely funded by law enforcement agencies.

Type: Constitutional amendment

What it would do: Allow prosecutors to charge repeat or organized petty theft as a felony, require probation officers to seek tougher penalties for those who violate the term of their parole three times, and exclude those who have been convicted of domestic violence and certain nonviolent crimes from early parole consideration.

Gov. Jerry Brown was famously allergic to talk of his "legacy" while in office. But if the former governor has one, it might be the effort he spent in his final two terms as governor supporting efforts to reverse the "tough on crime" policies he helped introduce during his first two terms in the 1970s and 80s.

In 2011, California legislators reduced punishments for parole violators. In 2014, voters passed Proposition 47, recategorizing some non-violent crimes as misdemeanors. In 2016, voters passed Proposition 57, giving inmates convicted of certain non-violent offenses a shot at early release.

This ballot measure would partially undo each of those.

Usually standoffs between employees and their bosses take place behind closed doors. In California, you often find them on the ballot.

Prop. 22: Self-employment for ride-hail and other app-drivers

Who put it there: Signatures, via a campaign mostly funded by Lyft, Uber and Doordash

Type: Statute

What it would do: Turn "app-based" drivers into independent contractors, exempting companies such as Lyft and Uber from standard wage and hour restrictions. It would also guarantee these drivers an earnings floor, a stipend to purchase health insurance and other minimum benefits.

Unless you happen to be an anti-vaccine protestor, the most controversial law of the 2019 legislative session was Assembly Bill 5. On its face, the law simply codified a state Supreme Court ruling, making it much harder for companies to treat their workers as independent contractors, rather than full-fledged employees. In practice, it upended the business models of Uber, Lyft, Doordash, Postmates and Instacart, all of which rely on an army of phone-toting gig-workers to provide their various services.

In the months since, all attempts at legislative compromise have fizzled, California's Attorney General has sued Uber and Lyft for violating the new law and California regulators declared their drivers to be employees.

As a last-ditch effort, the various companies implicated have poured $110 million and counting to push a ballot measure that would simply exclude their drivers from the law. And throwing a bone to critics who say their drivers are mistreated, the measure also imposes some worker benefits and protections.

Prop. 23: Regulating dialysis clinics

Who put it there: Signatures, via an effort funded entirely by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West

Type: Statute

What it would do: Require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician on site at all times and to report patient infection data to California health officials.

DaVita Kidney Care and Fresenius Medical Care own the majority of the for-profit dialysis clinics in the state. For years, the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers union has been at war with them.

After unsuccessful efforts to unionize clinic staff, the union sponsored legislation to cap reimbursement rates to clinics and floated an array of possible ballot measures to boost their staff spending and cut their profits. In 2018, the union finally got one on the ballot: Prop 8, which would have set a cap on clinic profit margins.

The measure was soundly defeated, but only after the two companies spent over $111 million, making it the most expensive ballot campaign ever. This one isn't likely to be much cheaper.

Two measures on this year's ballot aim to bolster laws and programs already on the books. Both campaigns are led by Bay Area real estate developers with a penchant for ballot box policymaking.

Prop. 24: Stronger consumer privacy laws (again)

Who put it there: Signatures, via a campaign funded entirely by Alastair and Celine Mactaggart.

Type: Statute

What it would do: Strengthen California's already strongest-in-the-nation consumer privacy law and establish a California Privacy Protection Agency

In 2018, California lawmakers passed the California Consumer Privacy Act, giving consumers the right to find out what data companies are collecting about them, to opt out of having it collected and to have that data scrubbed. It was and remains the only law like it in the country. It was also a compromise. San Francisco real estate developer Alastair MacTaggart had been pushing for an even stricter ballot measure, but the Legislature stepped in, brokering a deal between MacTaggart and the tech industry.

Now MacTaggart is back. Along with setting up a state agency tasked with enforcing state privacy law, the measure would beef up financial penalties for violators and allow consumers to demand that personal information not be shared at all, rather than simply not sold.

Prop. 14: Borrowing for stem cell research

Who put it there: Signatures via an effort mostly funded by Robert Klein, JDRF International and Open Philanthropy

Type: Bond

What it would do: Borrow $5.5 billion to fund stem cell research

In 2004, voters passed Proposition 71 to create the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. The institute exists to channel state money toward stem cell research. Prop 71 also let the state borrow $3 billion to do that.

That pot of cash is now almost empty. Robert Klein, a Silicon Valley real estate developer who led the Prop. 71 effort and became the institute's first board chair, is leading the campaign for more.

Email Ben Christopher at [emailprotected].

CALmatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California's policies and politics.

Link:
Props to you, Californians: A preview of what's on your November ballot - Palo Alto Online

A Painless Future Provides the Incentive Behind Cytonics – InvestorPlace

Thanks to the advent of equity crowdfunding, theres never been a better time for retail investors seeking new opportunities. Innovative companies that may not have traditional venture capital backing can now market their solutions to a wider demographic. And thats the case with Cytonics. But its the promising nature of the treatment platform that has many excited about Cytonics stock.

Source: Shutterstock

Cytonics is a biotechnology firm specializing in regenerative medicine for osteoarthritis patients. According to Cytonics SeedInvest.com investor profile, over 27 million people in the U.S. suffer from arthritis-related pain, imposing a $180 billion burden on our health care system and economy.

However, this number is understated, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which states that 32.5 million American adults suffer from osteoarthritis. Right there, the case for Cytonics stock theoretically improves by 20%.

Setting that aside, the osteoarthritis profile in this country makes this biotech firm a compelling equity crowdfunding opportunity. For instance, one of the risk factors for this condition is old age. As you know, the U.S. experienced a baby boom following the end of World War II to sometime in the early 1960s. But that increase in baby-making now means we have a massive population of older people.

Logically, this dynamic increases the probabilities of osteoarthritis, presenting a growing case for Cytonics stock. In addition, obesity is a risk factor because according to the CDC, Extra weight puts more stress on joints, particularly weight-bearing joints like the hips and knees.

You only need to go outside to see our national expanding waistline.

Although we can talk all day about the plentiful and still-expanding market size for osteoarthritis solutions, it wont mean a darn thing if the underlying science backing Cytonics stock was lacking. Fortunately, this biotech firm is all about the science.

What separates Cytonics from other therapies is the discovery of alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), which may hold the key for many osteoarthritis sufferers because multiple tests confirm this blood serum protein protects cartilage. Further, the presence of A2M may halt the progression of osteoarthritis.

Therefore, the catalyst behind Cytonics stock came from an idea: what if bioengineers can inject A2M at the source of trouble, providing both pain relief and preventative therapy? And thats exactly the concept here. Under a three-step process, Cytonics take blood from patients, run it through a centrifuge to increase the level of platelets, and then reinject the A2M-rich solution to the source of pain.

In this manner, patients can enjoy relief essentially through their own blood. However, the present technology of platelet-rich plasma injections may not produce enough A2M to restore damaged joints. This is where the second catalyst of Cytonics stock comes into play.

The biotech firm is presently developing a synthetic version of A2M called CYT-108. Based on its hypothesis, Cytonics believes that its synthetic version is more effective, perhaps between two to three times more effective than naturally occurring A2M.

Now, this is the key factor that has many excited about the potential of Cytonics stock. If the Food and Drug Administration approves CYT-108, this may be the only therapy that addresses osteoarthritis root cause, perhaps leading to a cure.

What lends credibility for the biotech firm is that its natural A2M therapy has treated over 7,000 people in the U.S., leading to encouraging results.

While the science of osteoarthritis treatments makes this equity crowdfunding opportunity distinct, its not without risks you must consider. As with all private investing ventures, youve got to do your due diligence. Remember, most startups fail this is just a harsh fact.

But experimental biotech firms are probably among the wildest investments. Yes, if a company passes advanced-stage clinical trials, the target security could fly to the moon. But such successes are rare, as evidenced by the wasteland of failed biotechs. In addition, you should keep in mind that for decades, the FDA has approved relatively few drugs/treatments.

To be fair, the platelet-rich plasma therapy which Cytonics technology is based off has few major demerits. Thats according to a 2018 study exploring the pros and cons of regenerative medicine and published by the National Institutes of Health. Still, under certain circumstances, PRP applications can result in injection-site morbidity, infection or injury to nerves or blood vessels. Scar tissue formation and calcification at the injection site have also been reported.

Also, the report notes that patients with compromised immune system or with predisposed diseases are more susceptible to infection at the injured area.

Are these acceptable risks for Cytonics stock? Possibly. Nevertheless, according to a study on platelet-rich plasma therapy for knee disorders, many methods have been utilized to treat osteoarthritis but with limited success. Plus, this report states that variables such as centrifugation prep work can negative the effectiveness of plasma-based regenerative therapies.

Im not trying to dissuade you from Cytonics stock. Rather, Im pointing out that theres a reason why successful therapies havent been found yet: this is a tough condition to address.

Personally, Im a gun shy regarding most biotech plays. There are so many variables involved, each one levering a possible negative impact. And I dont think Cytonics stock is any different in that sense.

However, the underlying science is very compelling. Thus, if you can handle the heat, plenty of justification exists for taking a shot. To learn more about this equity crowdfunding opportunity, please visit Cytonics SeedInvest profile.

On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article.

A former senior business analyst for Sony Electronics, Josh Enomoto has helped broker major contracts with Fortune Global 500 companies. Over the past several years, he has delivered unique, critical insights for the investment markets, as well as various other industries including legal, construction management, and healthcare.

Investing through equity and real estate crowdfunding or asset tokenization requires a high degree of risk tolerance. Despite what individual companies may promise, theres always the chance of losing a portion, or the entirety, of your investment. These risks include:

1) Greater chance of failure2) Risk of fraudulent activity3) Lack of liquidity4) Economic downturns5) Dearth of investor education

Read more:Private Investing Risks

See original here:
A Painless Future Provides the Incentive Behind Cytonics - InvestorPlace

Why some COVID-19 survivors are losing their hair – 13WMAZ.com

Doctors say they see hair loss like this in other situations.

GREENSBORO, N.C. Patients recovering from COVID-19 are now grappling with the aftermath. For some, the shock to the system causes hair to fall out in handfuls. The shedding is temporary but can continue for months.

At the Cleveland Clinic, dermatologist Shilpi Khetarpal has been seeing 20 to 25 patients a month with significant hair loss. This phenomenon of hair loss is called telogen effluvium, and all it means is that a large portion of the hair that's normally in the growing phase gets shifted to the shedding phase as a result of some major shock, she says.

The problem isnt unique to COVID. It can be triggered by any shock to the system, physical or psychological, and generally begins two to three months after the trauma. In the midst of the pandemic, COVID is the major trigger.

People are seeing hair everywhere, like in their combs, on their pillows, on their clothes, on the floor. The hair is just everywhere, Dr. Khetarpal says. She says the shedding should end within six months and the hair will start to regrow. She suggests managing stress through yoga and meditation to help speed the process, or using over-the-counter minoxidil.

Colleen Gaffney spent two days in the hospital in March fighting COVID-19 and pneumonia. Recovering over the summer, she noticed her hair was falling out in clumps. When I would brush my hair after the shower, the brush would just be full of hair, Gaffney says. By September, she'd lost about 50% of her hair. All through the front I can feel it, and the actual thickness of my braids were much thinner overall, Gaffney says.

Gaffney also takes vitamin supplements and uses platelet-rich plasma injections to stimulate hair follicles. I got through COVID, I'm feeling great, and now this, it's like its a little extra reminder of what I went through, Gaffney says. If hair loss is the only lingering symptom of the coronavirus, she says she feels fortunate, knowing it could have been even worse.

This type of hair loss typically has no other symptoms. For people who also have itching or pain, the doctor recommends coming in to have it looked at.

View original post here:
Why some COVID-19 survivors are losing their hair - 13WMAZ.com

Tendinitis Treatment Market 2020 Global Growth Rate by Recent Developments, Market Trends, Size, Share and Latest Technology, Forecast Research Report…

The Global Tendinitis Treatment Market is segmented on the lines of its technology, treatment, application and regional. Based on Type analysis it consists of Achilles tendinitis, supraspinatus tendinitis, tennis or golfers elbow, De Quervains tenosynovitis, and others. On the basis of treatment analysis includes diagnosis, therapy, shock wave therapy or surgery, medical devices, devices, and others. Diagnosis is again classified as physical examination, imaging tests, ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans, and others. Therapy is further segmented as non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy. Non-pharmacological therapy includes rest therapy, heat & cold therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and others. Pharmacological therapy includes OTC drugs or pain relievers, corticosteroids injections, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and others. Medical devices segment is again segmented as mechanical band, support tape, pre-cut strips, continuous rolls, and others. On the basis of end user analysis it covers hospitals, clinics, medical research centers, academic institutes, and others. The Global Tendinitis Treatment Market on geographic segmentation covers various regions such as North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. Each geographic market is further segmented to provide market revenue for select countries such as the U.S., Canada, U.K. Germany, China, Japan, India, Brazil, and GCC countries.

The Global Tendinitis Treatment Market is expected to exceed more than US$8066.0 Million by 2024 at a CAGR of 7% in the given forecast period.

You Can Browse Full Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/tendinitis-treatment-market

The scope of the report includes a detailed study of global and regional markets on Tendinitis Treatment Market with the reasons given for variations in the growth of the industry in certain regions.

Tendinitis is the irritation of the ligament, thick strings that attache the muscles deep down. The aggravation happens because of sudden damage to the ligament, monotonous development or sickness condition, for example, diabetes, rheumatoid joint pain, gout, Reiters disorder or lupus. If there should be an occurrence of patients with gout, the uric corrosive precious stones show up in the ligament sheath prompting rubbing. Tendinitis is observed to be pervasive among competitors and is one of the normal game wounds in wear players, particularly tennis, golf and others. Different pharmacological and non-pharmacological medications are accessible for the treatment of tendinitis. Non-Steroidal Anti-incendiary Drugs (NSAIDs) constitute the preparatory treatment alternatives. Different medicines including active recuperation, rest, and word related treatment. Surgery is the final resort for tendinitis, and is just prescribed if there should be an occurrence of extreme harm to the ligament that cant be dealt with utilizing pharmacological treatment alternatives.

The report covers detailed competitive outlook including the market share and company profiles of the key participants operating in the global market. Key players profiled in the report include Pfizer (U.S.), AstraZeneca (U.K), Bayer (Germany), Abbott (U.S.), Merck & Co. Inc. (Germany), GlaxoSmithKline plc (U.S.), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Germany), Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Israel). Company profile includes assign such as company summary, financial summary, business strategy and planning, SWOT analysis and current developments.

The Global Tendinitis Treatment Market has been segmented as below:

The Global Tendinitis Treatment Market is Segmented on the lines of Type Analysis, Treatment Analysis, End User Analysis and Regional Analysis. By Type Analysis this market is segmented on the basis of Achilles tendinitis, Supraspinatus tendinitis, Tennis or golfers elbow, De Quervains tenosynovitis and Others. By Treatment Analysis this market is segmented on the basis of Diagnosis its covers Physical examination, Imaging tests, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans & Others. Therapy its covers Non-pharmacological therapy likes Rest therapy, Heat & cold therapy, Occupational therapy, Physical therapy & Others. Pharmacological therapy likes OTC drugs or pain relievers, Corticosteroids injections, Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) & Others. Shock wave therapy or surgery its covers Medical devices, Mechanical band, Support tape, Pre-cut strips & Others. Devices like Others.

By End User Analysis this market is segmented on the basis of Hospitals sector, Clinics sector, Medical research centers sector, Academic institutes sector and Others sector. By Regional Analysis this market is segmented on the basis of North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World.

This report provides:

1) An overview of the global market for Tendinitis Treatment Market and related technologies. 2) Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2015, estimates for 2016 and 2017, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024. 3) Identifications of new market opportunities and targeted promotional plans for Global Tendinitis Treatment Market. 4) Discussion of research and development, and the demand for new products and new applications. 5) Comprehensive company profiles of major players in the industry.

Request Sample Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/tendinitis-treatment-market

Reasons to Buy this Report:

1) Obtain the most up to date information available on all Global Tendinitis Treatment Market. 2) Identify growth segments and opportunities in the industry. 3) Facilitate decision making on the basis of strong historic and forecast of Global Tendinitis Treatment Market data. 4) Assess your competitors refining portfolio and its evolution.

The major driving factors of Global Tendinitis Treatment Market are as follows:

The restraining factors of Global Tendinitis Treatment Market are as follows:

Other Related Market Research Reports:

Tissue Regeneration Market is Expected to Grow US$ 60 Billion By 2022

Hyaluronic Acid Based Dermal Fillers Market is expected to exceed more than US$ 14.9 Billion by 2024

Sample Preparation Market Key Enhancement, Product Overview and Share Forecasted to 2024

Media Contact

Company Name: Market Research Engine

Contact Person: John Bay

Email: [emailprotected]

Phone: +1-855-984-1862

Country: United States

Website: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/

Link:
Tendinitis Treatment Market 2020 Global Growth Rate by Recent Developments, Market Trends, Size, Share and Latest Technology, Forecast Research Report...

Joint Pain Injections Market Top Manufactures, Regions, Trends, Breakdown, Types, Applications, Market Size and Forecasts 2020-2027 – Crypto Daily

This study offers a complete assessment of the industry, as it comprises statistically supported and industry-validated market data, facts, crucial insights, and historical data. It also contains forecasts predicted by using an appropriate set of methodologies to give accurate values. The market analysis offers information according to categories determined through market segmentation, which includes the type of product, geographies, and applications.

The worldwide Joint Pain Injections market growth analysis is offered for both regional and global markets including insights on business strategy, development trends, opportunity, and important regions developmental status.

Get a Sample Copy of This Report @ https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-sample-65228?utm_source=cdn/ly

COVID-19 Market Impact Analysis

As the outbreak of the Coronavirus, a pandemic has worsened, the operations of various industries have been temporarily halted temporarily. The pandemic has caused disruptions in almost every aspect of life. As the world struggles to combat the crisis, the market players fear of the unknown and uncertainties have toppled the global financial markets, resulting in volatile stock markets. The virus has changed the market scenario and this may have a long-lasting impact.

This study covers the supply chain analysis, which was evidently disrupted in the wake of the pandemic. The study on the Joint Pain Injections market size growth rate and future prospects in a changing world includes the procedures undertaken by corporations in response to the COVID-19 epidemic.

Major Features of the Market Study

market study Outlook:

The market study offers first-hand information from analysts with expert opinions, along with industry participants across the value chain. The market study offers a profound analysis of macro-economic indicators, market developments, and prevailing factors that are driving the segments growth. The market study also maps various factors that are benefiting the market in various geographies.

Insights on Market Study:

The market study also helps in understanding the Global Joint Pain Injections market dynamics and structure, by analyzing the market segments and by projecting the Global Joint Pain Injections market size. Financial position, competitive analysis of key players by product portfolio, price, type, regional presence, and growth strategies in the market offer valuable insights.

The market study also presents a comprehensive analysis of the Global Joint Pain Injections market including all the stakeholders of the industry. Internal and External factors that are influencing the industry either positively or negatively have been extensively analyzed, which will present a futuristic outlook of the market for the decision makers.

Segments in Market Study

The market study assesses the segments projected to register lucrative growth along with the leading segment of the market. The Global Joint Pain Injections market segmentation includes By Type of Injection (Steroid Joint Injections, Hyaluronic Acid Injections, Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Injections, Placental Tissue Matrix (PTM) Injections)By Application (Shoulder & Elbow, Knee & Ankle, Spinal Joints, Hip Joint) The study also defines market sizes for various segments in the previous years and also projects market forecast and values up to the next five years.

Get ToC for the overview of the premium report @ https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-toc-65228?utm_source=cdn/ly

Regional Evaluation:

Geographically, the global Joint Pain Injections market is segmented into several regions, namely, North America, Latin America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia-Pacific Excluding Japan, Japan, Middle East, and Africa.

Prominent Players:

The upcoming opportunities due to research and development activities will open new avenues for companies. The major Joint Pain Injections market producers studied in the report are Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bioventus, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi, Zimmer Biomet.

Key Highlights

The complete study for the Joint Pain Injections market gives you an analysis of market size, share, growth, marketplace, technological innovations, trends, cost structure, revenue, and statistical and comprehensive data of the global market. Besides providing information regarding the key players in the market, the study also recalibrates the impact of macroeconomic and microeconomic factors that have the potential to impact the growth of the market.

If You Have Any Query, Ask Our Experts @ https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/ enquiry-before-buying/enquiry-before-buying-65228?utm_source=cdn/ly

About Us:

With industry expertise, QMI offers multifaceted insights on various aspects of the market in numerous domains. We help companies in evaluating market conditions to build an efficient strategy that offers an edge over their competitors. In our reports, we offer trustable insights for gaining market access with studies that provide leading business solutions.

Contact Us:

Quince Market Insights

Office No- A109,

Pune, Maharashtra 411028

Phone: APAC +91 706 672 4848 / US +1 208 405 2835 / UK +44 1444 39 0986

Email:[emailprotected]

Web: http://www.quincemarketinsights.com

More:
Joint Pain Injections Market Top Manufactures, Regions, Trends, Breakdown, Types, Applications, Market Size and Forecasts 2020-2027 - Crypto Daily

NMDP/Be The Match partners with M Health Fairview and Duke University cryopreservation labs to launch Be The Match BioBank – Watauga Democrat

MINNEAPOLIS, Oct. 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match today announced a collaboration with the Minnesota health system M Health Fairview and Marcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3)/Carolinas Cord Blood Bank at Duke University (Duke) to offer cryopreservation services to transplant centers through the Be The Match BioBank. The collaboration brings together industry-leading expertise in cryopreservation and storage of patient-directed donor blood stem cell products to improve donor availability, collection quality, and ultimately, to provide a more reliable path to transplant for patients.

Through the Be The Match BioBank, blood stem cell donors will be able to donate bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for an intended patient on a timeline that is convenient for the donor. The cells are then cryopreserved and stored for the transplant center at no cost to them and shipped to coincide with initiation of the patient's conditioning regimen and optimal treatment timeline.

"We're excited to expand our partnership with Duke University by adding the expertise of physicians and researchers at M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center to continue to overcome logistical barriers to blood and marrow transplantation that might otherwise disrupt optimal patient care. Through the flexibility offered by the Be The Match BioBank, we believe we can provide transplant centers with a well-matched, available donor more often, and allow the transplant to occur at the best time for the patient," explained Steven Devine, MD, Chief Medical Officer, NMDP/Be The Match, and Associate Scientific Director, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research). "The team at the Duke University lab was instrumental in the development of the Be The Match BioBank, as well as supporting donor product cryopreservation during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure patients can continue to receive the transplants they need."

"We are proud to extend our partnership with the NMDP/Be The Match in a new way. Be The Match BioBank is an innovative way to remove barriers that otherwise may stand in the way of a patient's transplant," said Joanne Kurtzberg, MD, who leads the Marcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3)/Carolinas Cord Blood Bank at Duke University.

"We are thrilled to be working with the NMDP/Be The Match to offer Be The Match BioBank. Through this partnership, transplant physicians can have confidence a high-quality bone marrow or PBSC product will be available from the donor they requested in the timeframe that works best for their patient," said David McKenna, MD, who leads the Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics program at M Health Fairview.

Be The Match BioBank can be used by any transplant center in the NMDP/Be The Match Network of more than 180 transplant centers worldwide. Blood stem cell donors are informed that the transplant center is requesting cryopreservation and provide consent prior to collection. Donors can also consent to having their donated cells made available to other searching patients in the unlikely event the intended patient is unable to proceed to transplant as planned.

To learn more about Be The Match BioBank, visit Network.BeTheMatchClinical.org/BioBank.

About the National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match The National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match is the global leader in providing a cure to patients with life-threatening blood and marrow cancers like leukemia and lymphoma, as well as other diseases. The organization manages the world's largest registry of potential blood stem cell donors and cord blood units. The NMDP/Be The Match partners with a global network to connect patients to their donor match for a transplant, and provides education and support for patients. Through Be The Match BioTherapies, the NMDP/Be The Match partners with cell and gene therapy companies to support the development and delivery of new therapies. The organization conducts research through its research program, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), in collaboration with Medical College of Wisconsin.

About M Health Fairview M Health Fairview is the newly expanded collaboration betweenthe University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Physicians,and Fairview Health Services. The healthcare system combines the best of academic and community medicine expanding access to world-class, breakthrough care through its 10 hospitals and 60 clinics.

Link:
NMDP/Be The Match partners with M Health Fairview and Duke University cryopreservation labs to launch Be The Match BioBank - Watauga Democrat

What Will Be Driving Growth of Alpha Thalassemia market Near Future By Top Vendors Like | Bluebird Bio, Novartis, Kiadis Pharma, Acceleron Pharma ,…

Reports Monitor has recently added a new report to its vast depository titledGlobal Alpha Thalassemia Market. The report studies vital factors about theGlobal Alpha Thalassemia Marketthat are essential to be understood by existing as well as new market players. The report highlights the essential elements such as market share, profitability, production, sales, manufacturing, advertising, technological advancements, key market players, regional segmentation, and many more crucial aspects related to theGlobal Alpha Thalassemia Market.

Important factors like strategic developments, government regulations, market analysis, end users, target audience, distribution network, branding, product portfolio, market share, threats and barriers, growth drivers, latest trends in the industry are also mentioned.

The following Top manufacturers are evaluated in this report: Bluebird Bio, Novartis, Kiadis Pharma, Acceleron Pharma & amp; More.

More Insightful information | Request a sample copy @ https://www.reportsmonitor.com/request_sample/1005566

Product Type Segmentation Iron Chelating Drugs Gene Therapy

Industry Segmentation Hospitals Private clinics

Some of the main geographic regions included in this report are: 1. North America (United States and Canada and rest of North America) 2. Europe (Germany, France, Italy and the rest of Europe) 3. Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea and the rest of Asia-Pacific) 4. LAMEA (Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and the rest of LAMEA)

Grab Your Report at an Impressive Discount ! Please click Here @https://www.reportsmonitor.com/check_discount/1005566

The study objectives of this report are:

To study and forecast the market size of the Alpha Thalassemia in the global market.

To analyze the global key players, SWOT analysis, value and global market share for top players.

To define, describe and forecast the market by type, end-use, and region.

To analyze and compare the market status and forecast among global major regions.

To analyze the global key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.

To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting market growth.

To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.

To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market

To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Get the full report with TOC Please click here @ https://www.reportsmonitor.com/report/1005566/Alpha-Thalassemia-Market

To conclude, the Alpha Thalassemia report mentions the key geographies, the market landscapes as well as the product price, revenues, volume, production, supply, demand, rate of market growth and forecasts etc. This report also provides a SWOT analysis, an investment feasibility analysis and a return on investment. analysis.

Contact us Jay Matthews Direct: +1 513 549 5911 (U.S.) +44 203 318 2846 (U.K.) Email: sales@reportsmonitor.com

The rest is here:
What Will Be Driving Growth of Alpha Thalassemia market Near Future By Top Vendors Like | Bluebird Bio, Novartis, Kiadis Pharma, Acceleron Pharma ,...