IL-22induced cell extrusion and IL-18induced cell death prevent and cure rotavirus infection – Science

RESULTS IL-22 and IL-18 activate their receptors on epithelial cells to protect against RV

We previously reported that systemic administration of bacterial flagellin elicits TLR5-mediated production of IL-22 and NLRC4-mediated generation of IL-18 that can act in concert to prevent or treat RV and some other enteric viral infections (5). Specifically, as shown in fig. S1 and our previous work, chronic RV infections that developed in RV-inoculated immune-deficient C57BL/6 Rag-1/ mice were cured by combined systemic treatment with IL-18 and IL-22, whereas injection of either cytokine alone reduced RV loads but did not clear the virus, regardless of cytokine dose and duration of administration. In these particular experiments, RV infection was assayed by measuring fecal RV antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), but measurement of RV genomes in the intestine yields similar results (5). In wild-type (WT) mice, a sufficiently high doses of recombinant IL-22 can, by itself, fully prevent RV infection, whereas lower doses of exogenously administered IL-22 and IL-18 markedly reduced the extent of RV infection, while the combination of these cytokines eliminated evidence of infection (Fig. 1A). The central goal of this study was to elucidate mechanisms by which these cytokines act in concert to control and prevent RV infection.

Mice were administered PBS, IL-22 (2 g), and/or IL-18 (1 g) via intraperitoneal injection, 2 hours before, or 2, 4, 6, or 8 days after (indicated by arrows) oral inoculation with mRV. Fecal RV levels were measured over time by ELISA. (A) C57BL/6 mice n = 4. (B) IL-22/ mice, n = 5 and 7 for PBS and IL-18, respectively. (C) IL-18/ mice, n = 5. * indicates significantly different from PBS by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), P < 0.0001. dpi, days post-inoculation.

In the context of parasitic infection, both IL-18 and IL-22 promote expression of each other, and loss of either impairs immunity to Toxoplasma gondii (6). We thus hypothesized that administration of IL-18 might impede RV as a result of its ability to induce IL-22 expression. This hypothesis predicted that the ability of IL-18 to protect against RV infection would be largely absent in IL-22/ mice. However, administration of IL-18 upon RV inoculation clearly reduced the extent of RV infection in IL-22/ mice, which argued strongly against this hypothesis (Fig. 1B). We considered the converse hypothesis, namely, that IL-22 might impede RV infection by elicitation of IL-18, but we observed that recombinant IL-22 markedly prevented RV infection in IL-18/ mice (Fig. 1C). Although IL-18 and IL-22 may play important roles in inducing each others expression, our results indicate that they each activate distinct signaling pathways that cooperate to impede RV infection.

Next, we examined the extent by which IL-18 and IL-22 acted upon the hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic compartment to impede RV infection. We used WT, IL-18-R/, and IL-22-R/ mice to generate irradiated bone marrow chimeric mice that expressed the receptors for IL-22 or IL-18 in only bone marrowderived or radioresistant cells. Such mice were inoculated with RV, treated with recombinant IL-22 or IL-18, and RV infection was monitored via measuring fecal RV antigens by ELISA. Figure 1 used a relatively low dose of cytokine that highlighted the cooperativity of IL-18 and IL-22, but successive experiments used fivefold higher doses to enable a robust effect that could be dissected via bone marrow chimeric mice. Mice that expressed the IL-22 receptor only in bone marrowderived cells were not protected from RV infection by treatment with IL-22 (Fig. 2A), whereas mice with IL-22 receptor only in radioresistant cells were almost completely protected by this cytokine (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that IL-22 protects mice from RV infection by acting on IEC, which are known to be populated from radioresistant stem cells and responsive to IL-22 (7). In accord with this notion, we observed that multiple IEC cell lines are responsive to IL-22 in vitro via STAT3 phosphorylation, although IL-22, like flagellin and IL-18, did not affect RV infection in vitro (fig. S2). Studies with IL-18-R chimeric mice similarly revealed that expression of this receptor in only bone marrowderived cells conferred only a modest nonsignificant reduction (12 3.8%) in the extent of RV infection upon IL-18 administration (Fig. 2C). In contrast, in mice that expressed IL-18-R in only radioresistant cells, IL-18 reduced extent of RV infection by 76 8.7% (Fig. 2D). Together, these results suggest that agonizing IL-18 and IL-22 receptors on IEC result in generation of signals that impede RV in vivo but not in vitro.

Indicated bone marrowirradiated chimeric mice were administered PBS (control), IL-22 (10 g), or IL-18 (2 g) via intraperitoneal injection, 2 hours before or 2, 4, 6, or 8 days after oral inoculation with mRV. Fecal RV levels were measured over time by ELISA. Differences between control and cytokine groups for each chimera/panel were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. (A) n = 7, P = 0.7715. (B) n = 4 and 7 for PBS and IL-22, respectively. (C) n = 7 and 6 for PBS and IL-18, respectively. (D) n = 4 and 6 for PBS and IL-18, respectively. * indicates significantly different from PBS by two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001.

In cell culture and organoid models, IL-22 promotes IEC proliferation, migration, and stem cell regeneration (810), which together are thought to contribute to ability of IL-22 to promote healing in response to an array of insults, including exposure to radiation and dextran sodium sulfate in vivo (1114). In contrast to such severe injuries, RV infection is generally characterized by a lack of overt intestinal inflammation (15, 16). We hypothesized that IL-22 may promote IEC proliferation and/or migration that might reduce the extent of RV infection by increasing the rate of IEC turnover, especially near villus tips, which is the predominant site of RV infection (24). We further reasoned that IL-18 might trigger the same kind of response and further increase IEC proliferation and turnover. Mice were administered 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and treated with IL-22 and/or IL-18. Sixteen hours later, mice were euthanized, and intestines were subjected to fluorescence microscopy to measure rates at which IEC migrated toward villus tips (17). In accord with our hypothesis, administration of IL-22 approximately doubled the rate at which IEC migrated toward villus tips (Fig. 3, A and B). IL-18 administration also increased the rate of IEC migration to a lesser extent. The combination of these cytokines did not result in a faster rate of IEC migration relative to IL-22 alone. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is known to promote IEC proliferation and migration (18, 19), so we tested whether this cytokine might protect against RV infection. In accord with EGF promoting proliferation in a variety of tissues, EGF treatment induced IEC migration up the crypt villus axis (Fig. 3, C and D), albeit not quite as robustly as IL-22 (1.43- versus 1.95-fold increase respectively). Moreover, EGF had the ability to reduce the extent of RV infection (Fig. 3E), but not as completely as IL-22. Together, these results support the hypothesis that IL-22 and IL-18 promote IEC replication and migration, which contributes to protection against RV infection.

Mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS, IL-22, (10 g) IL-18 (2 g), both cytokines, or mEGF. One hour later, mice were administered BrdU. Mice were euthanized 16 hours after BrdU administration, and BrDU was visualized (A and C) and migration was measured (B and D) by microscopy and image analysis, respectively. Images shown in (A) and (C) are representative. Scale bar equals 50 m. For (B) and (D), sections were scored at least from 50 villus per group of mice (n = 5). Distance of the foremost migrating cells along the crypt-villus axis was measured with ImageJ software. Results are presented as means SEM. Statistical significance was evaluated by Students t test (****P < 0.0001). (E) Mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or EGF (10 g) mEGF 2 hours before or 2, 4, 6, or 8 days after oral inoculation with mRV. Fecal RV levels were measured over time by ELISA. Data are means SEM, n = 5 * indicates significantly different from PBS by two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001.

We next considered how promoting IEC proliferation might impede RV infection. Increased extrusion of IEC into the lumen is a likely consequence of increased IEC proliferation/migration, which is thought to occur such that cells remain alive until extrusion is completed to preserve the gut barrier (20). We hypothesized that increased proliferation/migration induced by IL-22 and/or IL-18 treatments might result in increased extrusion of villus tip cells, which are the site of RV infection. We investigated this hypothesis using a previously described method (21) in which cross sections of hematoxylin and eosinstained pieces of ileum are examined for visual evidence of cell shedding. We were unable to consistently distinguish IEC from other luminal contents, so we visualized cells using the DNA stain. This approach suggested a greater presence of IEC in the lumen of mice treated with cytokines, particularly IL-22 (Fig. 4A), but it was difficult to quantitate such a difference via cell counting, so we sought to evaluate levels of host cells via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of 18S DNA in the ileum. The highly degradative environment of the intestine would likely degrade IEC shed into the lumen, but because such cells are extruded in a relatively intact state, their DNA might survive long enough to enable quantitation by qPCR. Small intestinal contents were extracted, and 18S DNA quantitated and expressed as number of cells per 100 mg of luminal content using known numbers of mouse epithelial cells to generate a standard curve. This approach indicated that IL-22 treatment markedly increased the level of IEC present in the lumen (Fig. 4B), suggesting increased IEC shedding. IL-18 induced only a modest level of IEC shedding that appeared to be additive to the shedding induced by IL-22. A generally similar pattern was observed in the cecum (Fig. 4C). In contrast, these cytokines did not affect levels of 18S DNA present in the lumen of the colon (Fig. 4D), perhaps reflecting that the impact of these cytokines on IEC shedding is specific to the ileum/cecum and/or that the DNA of shed IEC is quickly degraded in the bacterial-dense colon. An even greater amount of shedding of IEC into the ileum was induced by treating mice with flagellin, although two treatments of IL-18/22 could match this level, which suggested that production of these cytokines might be sufficient to recapitulate the IEC shedding induced by flagellin (Fig. 4E). The greater potency of flagellin may reflect ability of IL-18 and IL-22 to promote each others expression. Use of IL-22/ and IL-18/ mice revealed that these cytokines, both of which are necessary for flagellins anti-RV action (5), were both necessary for flagellin-induced cell shedding (Fig. 4F). Collectively, these results support the notion that increased extrusion of IEC, particularly in response to IL-22, might be central to this cytokines ability to impede RV infection, but these data did not offer insight into how IL-22 and IL-18 cooperate to offer stronger protection against this virus.

Mice [WT or indicated knockout (KO) strain] received a single (except where indicated otherwise) intraperitoneal injection of PBS, IL-22, (10 g), IL-18 (2 g), both cytokines or bacterial flagellin, FliC (15 g). Eight hours later, mice were euthanized, intestine was isolated, and luminal content was collected. (A) Microscopic appearance of DAPI-stained section to visualize shed cells in lumen. Scale bar equals 50 m. (B to F) Measurements of shed cells in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract via 18s by q-PCR (B, E, and F) small intestine, (C) cecum, (D) colon [double doses of IL-22 and IL-18 in (E) were 12 hours apart]. Data in (B) to (F) are means SEM (B), with significance assessed by Students t test, n = 5 to 15 mice as indicated by number of data points. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. n.s., not significant; SI, small intestine.

Next, we examined how IL-22 and IL-18 might affect IEC in the presence of an active RV infection. We used WT mice 3 days after inoculation with RV, a time approaching peak levels of RV shedding (Fig. 1A). RV-infected and uninfected mice were administered IL-22 and/or IL-18 and euthanized 6 hours later, and small intestinal content was isolated. Like IL-18/22 administration, RV infection up-regulated IEC extrusion, with a marked further increase in IEC extrusion being observed by administration of IL-18/22 to RV-infected mice (Fig. 5A). This suggests that increased IEC extrusion may normally contribute to innate defense against RV (2) and that exogenously administered IL-18/22 (or flagellin) may enhance this protective mechanism. Yet, like the case in uninfected mice, the promotion of IEC extrusion appeared to be driven by IL-22 and not IL-18 (Fig. 5B).

Mice were orally inoculated with mRV, or not(sham?) and were intraperitoneally injected at 3 dpi with PBS, IL-22, (10 g) IL-18 (2 g), or both cytokines. Mice were euthanized 6 hours later and following assays were carried out. (A and B) Assay of cell extrusion (i.e., measure of cells in lumen) as performed in response to cytokines in Fig. 4. (C and D) Assay cleaved caspase-3 in IEC was assayed by SDS-PAGE immunoblotting. (E and F) Visualization of cell death by TUNEL staining, counterstained with DAPI. (G) Quantitation of TUNEL-positive cells at villus tip region based on visual counts. Data in (A), (B), and (G) are means SEM. Panels (A) and (B) used five mice per condition to generate one value per mouse. Panel (G) used five mice per condition and assayed 6 to 10 villi per mouse, which are indicated by data points. Significance was determined by Students t test. *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001.

Next, we sought to investigate events in IEC that remained part of the small intestine at the time of increased IEC extrusion. Specifically, we examined whether IL-18 and/or IL-22 might affect cell death. We observed that IL-18/22 or RV induced modest and variable induction of cleaved caspase-3. In contrast, administration of these cytokines to RV-infected mice induced marked elevations in cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 5C). Caspase-3 cleavage was also observed in response to IL-18 but not IL-22 (Fig. 5D). Quantitation of cell death by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) yielded a similar pattern of results. Specifically, both IL-18/22 and RV by themselves resulted in a modest increase in TUNEL-positive cells, which appeared sporadically throughout the villi (Fig. 5E and fig. S3, A and B). In contrast, treating RV-infected mice with IL-18 or the combination of IL-18 and IL-22, but not IL-22 itself, resulted in notable TUNEL positivity at the villus tips (Fig. 5, E to G), known sites of RV infection. Cytokine-induced TUNEL positivity, which did not occur in the absence of RV, appeared to localize in the villus tip, where RV was localized before cytokine treatment, thus suggesting that IL-18 was promoting cell death in RV-infected cells (fig. S3C).

Cell death can occur via numerous pathways, so we hypothesized that IL-18induced cell death might occur via pyroptosis, which appears to be a frequent form of cell death for infected cells (22). In accord with this possibility, IL-18 administration to RV-infected mice results in cleaved gasdermin D (Fig. 6A), whose activity is essential for pyroptosis. To test the role of gasdermin D activation in IL-18induced cell death, we performed experiments in mice lacking gasdermin D and gasdermin E, the latter of which is thought to compensate for lack of gasdermin D in some scenarios. Our initial experiments found that gasdermin-deficient mice were highly resistant to RV infection (fig. S4). However, such resistance was associated with high levels of segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), which we have recently shown drives spontaneous resistance to RV in Rag1/ mice (23). Cross-fostering on gasdermin-deficient mice removed SFB and restored susceptibility to RV infection, thus extending our recent findings to mice with functional adaptive immunity. This model could also address if the IL-18induced cell death that associates with clearance of RV is mediated by pyroptosis. IL-18 administration did not induce cleaved gasdermin D in mice lacking this gene (Fig. 6A), thus verifying the specificity of the antibody we used. IL-18induced cell death of RV-infected mice proceeded at least as robustly as had been observed in WT mice (Fig. 6B). Specifically, although gasdermin-deficient mice had mild elevations in basal caspase-3, they still up-regulated this caspase in response to IL-18, albeit at markedly lower levels compared with WT mice. IL-18 induced marked TUNEL positivity in these mice (Fig. 6, C and D) and fully protected gasdermin-deficient mice against RV infection (Fig. 6E). These results argue that IL-18induced cell death and associated clearance of RV are not mediated by pyroptosis.

(A to D) Gasdermin-deficient, or WT, mice were administered PBS or IL-18 (2 g) 3 days after mRV inoculation. Mice were euthanized 6 hours later and jejunums were analyzed. (A and B) IEC were analyzed by SDS-PAGE immunoblotting for detection of gasdermin D, cleaved gasdermin D, and cleaved caspase-3, respectively. (C) Cell death by TUNEL, counterstained with DAPI. (D) Quantitation of TUNEL-positive cells at villus tip region based on visual counts. Experiments included five mice per condition. Data in (D) was based on assay 6 to 8 villi per mouse, which are indicated by data points ****P < 0.0001 by Students t test. (E) Gasdermin-deficient mice were administered PBS or IL-18 (2 g) via intraperitoneal injection, 2 hours before, or 2, 4, 6 or 8 days after (indicated by arrows), oral inoculation with mRV. Fecal RV levels were measured over time by ELISA. Data are means SEM. n = 5. * indicates significantly different from control by two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001.

We examined the extent by which IL-22induced IEC extrusion and IL-18induced IEC death were associated with RV reduction in the ileum at 6 and 24 hours after administration of these cytokines. We measured the levels of RV genomes and the ratio of positive to negative (+/) RV strands in both the lumen and IEC, which reflects levels of active replication because most positive strands encode RV proteins and do not get incorporated into virions (24). In accord with our previous work, we observed that, in the epithelium, both IL-22 and IL-18 led to a clear reduction in both the level of RV genomes and RV replication by 6 hours (Fig. 7, A and B). In contrast, the small intestinal lumen had a marked but variable increase in the level of RV genomes and a stark increase in RV +/ strand ratios 6 hours after administration of IL-18 with the combination of IL-18 and IL-22 but not IL-22 alone (Fig. 7, C and D). By 24 hours, levels of RV in the lumen had dropped markedly, whereas the miniscule levels of remaining virus appeared to not be actively replicating (Fig. 7, E and F). Collectively, these results support a model wherein IL-18induced cell death interrupts active RV replication, spewing incompletely replicated virus into the lumen while IL-22 induces IEC migration and subsequent extrusion of the mature IEC that RV targets, thus together working in concert to resolve RV infection.

mRV-infected mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS, IL-22 (10 g), IL-18 (2 g), or both cytokines on day 3 post-mRV inoculation. Six or 24 hours later, mice were euthanized, and contents of jejunums were isolated. RNA was extracted and used to measure of mRV genomes and replication status as reflected by NSP3 RNA levels and the ratio of NSP3 (+) RNA strand to complimentary NSP3 () RNA strand. (A and B) The overall mRV genome and efficacy of virus replication in small intestinal epithelial cells. (C to F) The overall mRV genome and efficacy of virus replication in luminal content from small intestine (one-way ANOVA, n = 5 to 10, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001).

The central focus of this study was to determine the mechanisms by which IL-18 and IL-22, which are elicited by bacterial flagellin, contribute to preventing or curing RV infection. We initially considered that the ability of IL-18 and IL-22 to promote each others expression allowed them to use a shared mechanism to promote RV clearance. We found that irrespective of such mutual promotion, IL-18 and IL-22 both impeded RV independent of each other and did so by distinct mechanisms, which is illustrated in Fig. 8. Specifically, IL-22 drove IEC proliferation and migration toward villus tips, thus accelerating the ongoing process of extrusion of highly differentiated IEC at the major site of RV replication. In contrast, administration of IL-18 to RV-infected mice induced rapid cell death, as defined by TUNEL, at villus tips where RV is localized. Such induction of TUNEL positivity, which is not typically seen at significant levels in the intestine, was associated with rapid abortion of the RV replication cycle followed by a marked reduction of RV antigens in the intestinal tract. These actions of IL-22 and IL-18 together resulted in rapid and complete expulsion of RV, thus providing a mechanism that explains how this combination of cytokines prevents and cures RV infection.

IL-22 increases epithelial proliferation thus increasing extrusion of epithelial cells, including RV-infected cells. Into lumen the intestinal lumen, i.e., anoikis. IL-18 induces rapid cell death, associated with loss of cell rupturing of RV-infected cells.

RV does not induce detectable increases in IL-22 expression nor does genetic deletion of IL-22 appear to markedly augment RV infection (5), thus arguing that IL-22 does not normally play a major role in clearance of this pathogen. The known cooperation of IL-22 and interferon- in activating antiviral gene expression (3) suggests the possibility that RV may have evolved strategies to deliberately avoid or block IL-22 induction. Nonetheless, the downstream action of IL-22, particularly its promotion of IEC turnover, may be shared by endogenous anti-RV host defense mechanisms. The role of adaptive immune-independent host defense against RV is most easily appreciated in immune compromised mice wherein RV loads decline markedly from their peak levels, but it may also play a role in protecting against RV even in immune competent mice. Innate host defense against RV is likely multifactorial and may involve type III interferon (3), particularly in neonate mice. Our observations in adult mice indicate that RV infection increases IEC extrusion, and this mechanism combined with previous observations that RV infection activates intestinal stem cell proliferation suggests that increased IEC turnover may limit RV infection (2). We do not think that such a mechanism is necessarily unique to IL-22 as EGF has ability to drive similar events. Moreover, we recently showed that SFB also drives enterocyte proliferation independent of IL-22 and is not required for adaptive immunity (23). Hence, we presume that IL-22 can activate a primitive mechanism of host defense against a variety of challenges, especially those affecting IEC.

IEC are rapidly proliferating cells with average lifetimes of about 3 days (24), which means that the intestine must eliminate vast numbers of cells continuously. The overwhelming majority of IEC are eliminated via cell extrusion at villus tips through a process termed anoikis. A central tenet of anoikis is that cells remain alive at the time of extrusion followed by the lack of attachment to other cells resulting in induction of a programmed death process (25). A key aspect of this process is that cells can be eliminated without comprising gut barrier function, thus avoiding infection and inflammation that might otherwise occur. Accordingly, administration of IL-22 is associated with few adverse effects and has been shown to resolve inflammation in several different scenarios. (26). Moreover, IL-22 plays a broad role of maintaining gut health in the intestinal tract, including mediating microbiota-dependent impacts of dietary fiber (27). It is possible that increasing anoikis via IL-22 results in extrusion of RV-containing cells in a manner that prevents viral escape and, consequent infection of other IEC. However, inability of IL-22 to induce detectable increases in luminal RV argues against this possibility. Rather, we envisage that the cell death process after IEC extrusion might result in destruction of RV in these cells. We also hypothesize that the accelerated IEC turnover induced by IL-22 may result in villus IEC being less differentiated and less susceptible to RV infection. In accord with this possibility, we observed that that flagellin administration resulted in an IL-22dependent increase in CD44+26 IEC (fig. S5), which are known to be RV resistant (28). It is difficult to discern the relative importance of IL-22 in the induction of IEC extrusion versus its impact on differentiation state of villus IEC. IL-22induced reduction in RV levels in chronically infected Rag-1/ mice occurs over a course of several days that supports a role for the latter mechanism. Use of IL-22 receptor bone marrow chimera mice demonstrated that IL-22 acts directly on IEC to affect RV infection. (7). IL-22induced signaling is generally thought to be mediated by STAT3 (5, 10), and IL-22 induced phosphorylation of STAT3 in IEC in vivo. However, we observed that IEC-specific STAT3-knockout mice could still be protected against RV by IL-22, suggesting that this mechanism of action may not proceed by a characterized signaling mechanism (fig. S6). Thus, how the IL-22 receptor signals to affect IEC phenotype remains incompletely understood.

In contrast to IL-22, recent work indicates that induction of IL-18 plays a role in endogenous immunity against RV, wherein caspase-1mediated IL-18 production results from activation of the NLR9pb inflammasome. Such IL-18 induction paralleled gasdermin-dependent cell death, the absence of which resulted in delayed clearance of RV (29, 30). On the basis of this work, we hypothesized that exogenously administered IL-18 might enhance RV-induced death of RV-infected cells and/or increase IEC turnover analogous to IL-22. Administration of IL-18 in the absence of RV elicited a modest increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells as well as a modest increase in IEC proliferation/migration that was not accompanied by increased IEC extrusion, suggesting the increased proliferation compensated for cell death. However, TUNEL-positive cells were scattered along the villus. In RV-infected mice, IL-18 led to TUNEL-positive cells at the villus tips, which is also the primary site of RV infection. It is tempting to envisage localized impacts of IL-18 reflect the pattern of expression of the IL-18 receptor, including localization to villus tips and/or induced by RV, but limited knowledge of the determinants of its expression and lack of available reagents to study it render these ideas as speculative.

The manner of IL-18induced cell death, namely, its notable TUNEL induction, which was associated with spewing of RV replication intermediates, suggested pyroptotic cell death. However, we found that lack of gasdermin D and E, which are thought to be essential for pyroptosis, did not impede IL-18induced cell death in RV-infected cells thus arguing such cell death does not fit perfectly into any known cell death pathways. Induction of IL-18 receptor-mediated signaling by itself is not sufficient to induce cell death in villus tip epithelial cells but triggers death in cells primed as a result of RV infection. The nature of such priming is not understood but may involve IEC signaling pathways, including NLR9pb, TLR3, and RNA-activated protein kinase, which are capable of recognizing RV components and/or responding to intracellular stress in general (3032). In this context, the ability of IL-22 to enhance IL-18induced TUNEL positivity in RV-infected cells may reflect an intersection of IL-22-R and IL-18-R signaling or be a manifestation of these cytokines to promote each others expression.

The central limitation in our study was that our approaches were largely correlative. Specifically, we lacked modalities to specifically block IEC migration or cell death in response to IL-22 and IL-18, respectively. Another limitation is that we were not able to demonstrate that the TUNEL-positive cells actually contained RV. Our attempts to do so via double-staining were not successful, possibly reflecting that the disappearance of RV after cytokine treatment likely occurs early in the cell death process while the DNA fragmentation that underlies TUNEL positivity is considered a late event in the cell death process. Thus, more specific identification of processes that mediate cell death of RV-infected IEC in response to IL-18 is an important target of future studies.

The improved understanding of the mechanism by which IL-18/22 controls RV infection reported herein should inform use of these cytokines to treat viral infection in humans. Chronic RV infections can occur in immune compromised humans, suggesting that IL-18/22 may be explored as a possible treatment for this and other chronic viral infections. Our results suggest that this cytokine treatment may be effective for viruses that preferentially infect villus epithelial cells and possibly other epithelia that have high cell turnover rates. In contrast, this combination of cytokines seems unlikely to affect viruses that inhabit more long-lived cells, including hematopoietic cells that are generally not responsive to IL-22. We observed that flagellin and IL-18/22 has some efficacy against reovirus, particularly early in infection when it infects gut epithelial cells, as well as some efficacy against influenza, which initially infects lung epithelial cells, but did not show any impact on hepatitis C virus as assayed in mice engrafted with human hepatocytes, which are thought to be long-lived cells. IL-18/22 can protect mice against norovirus infection, which infects B cells and tuft cells (33, 34), but human norovirus is thought to primarily infect epithelial cells, particularly in immunocompromised persons who develop chronic norovirus infections (35). SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has also been observed to replicate in IEC (36), and like RV, appears to replicate in mature IEC, which express the SARS-CoV-2 receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Intestinal replication of SARS-CoV-2 is thought to contribute to extrarespiratory pathologies associated with COVID-19 (37). As such, the use of IL-18/22based therapy may be a potential strategy to treat chronic RV and/or norovirus infections in person with immune dysfunction and, moreover, might serve to mitigate severe cases of COVID-19.

This study sought to ascertain the mechanism by which IL-22 and IL-18 prevent and cure RV infection. Mice were orally administered RV. Extent of infection was assayed my measuring viral genomes and proteins in the intestine. IL-18 and or IL-22 were administered to mice with various genetic deficiencies. Cell extrusion and cell death were measured. All procedures involving mice were approved by GSUs animal care and use committee (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee no.17047).

All mice used herein were adults (i.e., 4 to 8 weeks old) on a C57BL/6 background bred at Georgia State University (GSU) (Atlanta, GA). RV-infected mice were housed in an animal biosafety level 2 facility. WT, Rag-1/, IL-18/, IL-18-R/, Stat3flox, and Villin-cre were purchased from the Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). NLRC4/, IL-22/, and IL-22-R/ mice were provided by Genentech (South San Francisco, CA, USA). TLR5/ and TLR5//NLRC4/ and WT littermates were maintained as previously described (5). Gasdermin D/E/ mice, whose generation and initial characterization were previously described (22), were shipped to GSU and studied in original and cross-fostered state as indicated in results.

Murine Fc-IL-22 was provided by Genentech Inc. Murine IL-18 was purchased from Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China). Procedures for isolation of flagellin and verification of purity were described previously (5). Recombinant murine EGF (mEGF) was purchased from PeproTech.

Age- and sex-matched adult mice (8 to 12 weeks of age) were orally administered 100 l of 1.33% sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich) and then inoculated with 105 SD50 of murine RV EC strain. Approach used to determine SD50 has been described previously (5).

Five-week-old Rag-1/ mice were infected with murineRV (same infection procedure as described in the Acute models section). Feces were collected 3 weeks after RV inoculation to confirm the establishment of chronic infection.

Cell culture-adapted rhesus RV (RRV) was trypsin-activated [trypsin (10 g/ml)] in serum-free RPMI-1640 (cellgro) at 37C for 30 min. The basolateral side of the polarized Caco-2 cells was stimulated with cytokines, 1.5 hours before expose to RRV infection as previously described (5). The upper chamber of transwells was infected with trypsin-pretreated RRV and allowed to adsorb at 37C for 40 min before being washed with serum-free medium. The presence of cytokines was maintained at a constant level throughout the experiment.

Fecal pellets were collected daily from individual mouse on days 0 to 10 after RV inoculation. Samples were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) [10% (w/v)], after centrifugation, supernatants of fecal homogenates were analyzed by ELISA, and after multiple serial dilutions, more detailed descriptions of experimental procedures are previously described (5).

Mice were subjected to x-ray irradiation using an 8.5 gray (Gy) equivalent followed by injection of 2 107 bone marrow cells administered intravenously as previously described (5). All mice were afforded an 8-week recovery period before experimental use. For the first 2 weeks after transfer, mice were maintained in sterile cages and supplied with drinking water containing neomycin (2 mg/ml) (Mediatech/Corning).

Intestinal sections were fixed in methanol-Carnoys fixative solution (60% methanol, 30% chloroform, and 10% glacial acetic acid) for 48 hours at 4C. Fixed tissues were washed two times in dry methanol for 30 min each, followed by two times in absolute ethanol for 20 min each, and then incubated in two baths of xylene before proceeding to paraffin embedding. Thin sections (4 m) were sliced from paraffin-embedded tissues and placed on glass slides after floating on a water bath. The sections were dewaxed by initial incubation at 60C for 20 min, followed by two baths in prewarmed xylene substitute solution for 10 min each. Deparaffinized sections were then hydrated in solutions with decreasing concentration of ethanol (100, 95, 70, 50, and 30%) every 5 min in each bath. Last, slides allowed to dry almost completely and were then mounted with ProLong antifade mounting media containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) before analysis by fluorescence microscopy.

Intestinal sections were fixed in 10% buffered formalin at room temperature for 48 hours and then embedded in paraffin. Tissues were sectioned at 4 m thickness, and IEC death was detected by TUNEL assay using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein (Roche) according to the manufacturers instructions.

IECs lysate (20 g per lane) was separated by SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis through 4 to 20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX gel (Bio-Rad, USA), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and analyzed by immunoblot, as previously described (5). Briefly, isolated IEC was incubated with radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, cell lysates were homogenized by pipette and subjected to full-speed centrifugation. Protein bands were detected for cleaved caspase-3, phosphor-STAT3, and anti-actin (Cell Signaling Technology) and incubated with horseradish peroxidaseconjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody. Immunoblotted proteins were visualized with Western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare) and then imaged using the ChemiDoc XRS+ system (Bio-Rad).

The entire small intestine was harvested from mice according to indicated experimental design and sliced longitudinally before being washed gently in PBS to remove the luminal content. Tissues were processed and maintained at 4C throughout. Cleaned tissue samples were further minced into 1- to 2-mm3 pieces and shaken in 20 ml of Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing 2 mM EDTA and 10 mM Hepes for 30 min. An additional step of vigorous vortexing in fresh HBSS (10 mM Hepes) after EDTA incubation facilitated cell disaggregation. IECs were then filtered through 70-m nylon mesh strainer (BD Biosciences), centrifuged, and resuspended in PBS.

Bulk leukocytes and IECs isolated above were incubated with succinimidyl esters (NHS ester)Alexa Fluor 430, which permitted determination of cell viability. Cells were then blocked by incubation with anti-CD16/anti-CD-32 (10 g/ml) (clone 2.4G2, American Type Culture Collection). Twenty minutes later, cells were stained with fluorescently conjugated antibodies: CD26-PE (clone H194-112, eBioscience), CD44-PECy7 (clone IM7, eBioscience), CD45fluorescein isothiocyanate (clone, 30-F11, eBioscience), and CD326-allophycocyanin (clone G8.8, eBioscience). Last, stained cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min before whole-cell population was analyzed on a BD LSR II flow cytometer. Collected data were analyzed using FlowJo.

Host DNA was quantitated from 100 mg of luminal content (100 mg) from small intestine by using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit (Qiagen) and subjected to qPCR using QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR kit (Bio-Rad) in a CDX96 apparatus (Bio-Rad) with specific mouse 18S oligonucleotides primers. The sense and antisense oligonucleotides primers used were: 18s-1F: 5-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3 and 18s-1R: 5-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3. PCR results were expressed as actual numbers of IEC shedding per 100 mg of luminal content, calculated using a standard curve, which was generated using twofold serial dilutions of mouse colon carcinoma cell line MC26. DNA was extracted from each vial with known number of MC26 cells after serial dilutions, and then real-time qPCR was performed. The cycle quantification (Cq) values (x axis) are inversely proportional to the amount of target genes (18S) (y axis), and a standard curve is applied to estimate the numbers of cell shedding from luminal content based on the quantity of target copies (18S) from each sample.

To extract RNA, cell pellets were homogenized with TRIzol (Invitrogen), and chloroform was added to the homogenate to separate RNA (an upper aqueous layer) from DNA and proteins (a red lower organic layer). Isopropanol facilitated the precipitation of RNA out of solution, and after centrifugation, the impurities were removed by washing with 75% ethanol. RNA pellets were resuspended in ribonuclease-free water and underwent quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Total RNA from luminal content was purified from the RNeasy PowerMicrobiome Kit according to the manufacturers instructions. Primers that target non-structural protein 3 region: EC.C (+) (5-GTTCGTTGTGCCTCATTCG-3 and EC.C () (5-TCGGAACGTACTTCTGGAC-3) were applied to quantify viral genomes from IEC and luminal content. RV replication was quantitated as previously described (38).

A pulse-chase experimental strategy was used to label intestinal enterocytes with BrdU to estimate the IEC migration rate along the crypt-villus axis over a defined period of time. Briefly, 8-week-old mice were intraperitoneally injected with either PBS or cytokine(s) (IL-22 and/or IL-18) 1 hour before BrdU treatment (50 g/mg of mice body weight, ip). After 16 hours, mice were euthanized, and a segment of the jejunum were resected, immediately embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT) (Sigma-Adrich) and then underwent tissue sectioning. Tissue sections (4 m) were firstly fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and then washed three times in PBS. DNA denaturation was performed by incubating the sections in prewarmed 1.5 N HCl for 30 min at 37C, and then acid was neutralized by rinsing sections three times in PBS. Before BrdU immunostaining, sections were blocked with rabbit serum (BioGenex, Fremont, CA) for 1 hour at room temperature, then incubated with anti-BrdU (Abcam) 2 hours at 37C, and counterstained with DAPI. The BrdU-labeled cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

The proximal jejunum was imbedded into OCT compound, and then sliced into 6-m-thin sections. Tissue slides were incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, followed by 5 min washing of PBS twice. Autofluorescence caused by free aldehydes was quenched by incubating slides in 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS or 0.1 M glycine in PBS for 14 min at room temperature, followed by 5 min PBS washing three times. Bovine serum albuminPBS (3%) was used to block the tissue samples for 1 hour at room temperature. The slides were then washed with PBS for 5 min, followed by incubation with primary antibody (1:100; hyperimmune guinea pig anti-RRV serum) in blocking buffer overnight at 4C. After slides were washed three times with PBS, secondary antibody (donkey antiguinea pig immunoglobulin G, Jackson ImmunoResearch, 706-586-148) was applied to the sample slides for 1 to 2 hours at room temperature. The fluorescence emission of mRV antigen was detected by fluorescence microscopy.

Significance was determined using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or students t test (GraphPad Prism software, version 6.04). Differences were noted as significant *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

Funding: This work was supported by NIH grants DK083890 and DK099071 (to A.T.G.). J.Z. is supported by career development award from American Diabetes Association. B.C. is supported by a Starting Grant from the European Research Council, an Innovator Award from the Kenneth Rainin Foundation, and a Chaire dExcellence from Paris University. Author contributions: Z.Z. led performance of all experiments. J.Z. and Z.S. helped with specimen analysis. B.Z., L.E.-M., Y.W., and B.C. advised in experimental design and data interpretation. X.S. and F.S. provided advice and key reagents. A.G. helped design study and drafted manuscript. Competing interests: A.T.G. and B.Z. are inventors on patent application (WO2015054386A1 WIPO) held by GSU that covers Prevention and treatment of rotavirus infection using IL-18 and IL-22. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Materials. All mice are either commercially available or available under a material transfer agreement.

Read the original post:
IL-22induced cell extrusion and IL-18induced cell death prevent and cure rotavirus infection - Science

Here’s what is known about Trump’s COVID-19 treatment – Science Magazine

President Donald Trump has maintained a steady schedule of campaign rallies, which may have exposed him to SARS-CoV-2.

By Jon CohenOct. 2, 2020 , 9:25 PM

Sciences COVID-19 reporting is supported by the Pulitzer Center and the Heising-Simons Foundation.

This afternoon, the White House announced that President Donald Trump received an experimental antibody treatment after a test revealed he'sinfected with SARS-CoV-2. He reportedly has mild COVID-19 symptoms, including fever and congestion, and he was transferred to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Later, the president's medical team confirmed he had started a course of remdesivir, an antiviral drug shown to modestly help hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

What is the antibody cocktail Trump received?

Its a combination of two antibodies directed against a key protein of the virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2. They bind to a region on the main surface spike protein that helps the virus attach to a receptor on human cells called angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The targeted region is dubbed the receptor binding domain. One antibody comes from a human who had recovered from a SARS-CoV-2 infection; a B cell that makes the antibody was harvested from the persons blood and the genes for the immune protein isolated and copied. The other antibody is from a mouse, which was engineered to have a human immune system, that had the spike protein injected into it.

Are there any data showing that the cocktail works and is safe?

Experiments in both golden hamsters and rhesus macaque monkeys that intentionally were infected with SARS-CoV-2 showed that the cocktail could reduce viral levels and disease pathology.

Regeneron, the maker of the cocktail, earlier this week presented preliminary data from its ongoing clinical trial in people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but were asymptomatic or, in the most extreme cases, had moderate diseasea group that would appear to mirror Trumps current condition. No serious safety concerns surfaced, and the treatment reduced viral load and shortened symptomatic disease in patients who did not have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the trials start. Its unclear whether the treatment can prevent severe disease, but there were hints that it might: Participants who received a placebo had more medical visits.

A separate trial is assessing the impact of the treatment on hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but Regeneron has yet to report any results from that study.

Do the preliminary clinical trial data match the presidents treatment scheme?

Not exactly. Trump received an 8-gram infusion of the treatment. Regenerons data showed that a 2.4-gram infusion worked as well as the higher dose at reducing SARS-CoV-2 levels in people. This was widely seen as good news because monoclonals are difficult and expensive to produce, and a lower dose means that more people ultimately can receive it.

Why did the president receive the higher dose of the antibodies?

Likely out of an abundance of caution by the presidents medical team, says George Yancopoulos, the co-founder and chief scientific officer of Regeneron. Yancopoulos does not directly know why Trump'sphysicians chose to use 8 grams, but says the companys data indicate theres very, very limited risk that the antibodies will cause harm at either dose. The higher dose might last longer, he said, and at some time points in the companys study, Regeneron did see trends suggesting that the higher dose more powerfully beats back the virusthe company used the amount of viral genetic material found with nose swabs as a proxy for SARS-CoV-2 levels in the entire body.

If I had to treat one patient, Id give the high dose, Yancopoulos says. From a societal point of view and the need to treat as many people as possible, Id give the lower dose.

Did Trump match the patients in the study who benefited from the treatment?

The Regeneron study found that the treatment only worked in people who did not have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the start of the study. It also worked best in people who had higher levels of the virus. Whether the president had those antibodies and a high viral load has not been made public. I couldnt speculate because it has to do with an individual patient, Yancopoulos says.

The memorandum from the presidents physician said Trump was receivingRegenerons polyclonal antibody cocktail. Are these antibodies polyclonal?

No. The treatment consisted of two monoclonal antibodiesmeaning each was produced by making identical copies, or clones, of an antibody gene in a single B cell. Polyclonal antibody cocktails refer to antibodies made by mixtures of B cells.

What was the regulatory mechanism that allowed the president to receive the experimental Regeneron antibodies?

The antibodies are typically only available to people who participate in clinical trials. Trump theoretically could have enrolled in the ongoing treatment study that reported preliminary data this week, but that trial randomly assigns half the participants to receive the antibodies; the other half serves as a control group and receives infusions of an inactive placebo. A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation called expanded accesstechnically known as 21 CFR 312.310allows physicians to request compassionate use of experimental treatments through an investigational new drug pathway used for individual patients or for emergencies. These are designed to be used in these rare and special circumstances, Yancopoulos says. This is not the first time weve done compassionate use for these monoclonal antibodies. This is not a mechanism for widespread distribution.

Could Regenerons monoclonal antibody treatment become more widely available through the FDAs emergency use authorization (EUA) pathway?

Yes. Both Regeneron and Eli Lilly, which similarly reported encouraging preliminary clinical trial data last month from a single SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody, are discussing the possibility of an EUA with FDA. Lilly reported signs that its antibody reduced the need for hospitalization, but as with Regeneron, too few participants have so far become seriously ill to reach a convincing conclusion to this critical question.

What's the evidence for using remdesivir in COVID-19 patients?

Remdesivir is an antiviral drug developed by Gilead Sciences, originally to treat the hepatitis C virus. It did not perform well against that pathogen but has been tried against Ebola and other viruses, after showing some activity in cells and animal models. The drug inhibits a viral enzyme used for replication of the pathogen. Earlier this year, it demonstrated a modest clinical benefit in a trial with hospitalized COVID-19 patients, leading FDA to grant Gilead an emergency use authorization for the drug. That EUA has since been expanded for use in patients with mild disease although its benefit in them is not clear. The drug has become widely used for COVID-19 patients despite continuing skepticism that it has a major clinical benefit. Since it and the monoclonal antibodies target different parts of the virus, administering them together may have a synergistic effect. One COVID-19 clinical trial is testing remdesivir and Lilly's antibody, for example.

Is the president receiving any other COVID-19 treatments?

The statement released today by the presidents physician said that in addition to the antibodies, Trump has been taking zinc, vitamin D, famotidine, melatonin and a daily aspirin. That wording leaves unclear whether he was taking those substances before his diagnosed infection. Notably, the statement does not indicate whetherTrump was or is taking hydroxychloroquine, the antimalarial he controversially pushed as a COVID-19 treatment.

Famotidine has been suggested to be a treatment for COVID-19, but its also a popular heartburn remedy, sold widely under the name Pepcid. A clinical trial testing it in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in New York was not able to recruit enough patients to properly evaluate its impact. The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, which initiated that trial, released a statement today citing evidence it was helpful for COVID-19 but also saying, We have yet to prove [famotidines] efficacy. The institute says its eagerly awaiting FDA approval of a trial that will evaluate whether famotidine can help people who are not hospitalized.

*Updated, 3 October, 6 a.m.: Information about Trumps's use of remdesivir was added to the story.

The rest is here:
Here's what is known about Trump's COVID-19 treatment - Science Magazine

Election Guide: Here’s What You Need to Know About Proposition 14 – NBC Bay Area

Proposition 14 on the November ballot asks voters to approve $5.5 billion to continue funding stem cell research in California.

Supporters said the research has already lead to important medical breakthroughs, including for COVID-19 victims. Opponents said the proposition is more "shameless overpromising" with money that could be better spent elsewhere.

California voters have been though this before.

In 2004, state voters approved Proposition 71, which meant $3 billion for stem cell research and to establish the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, or CIRM. The group's chairman and Proposition 14's financial backer, Robert Klein, said that money has lead to significant medical breakthroughs.

But now, CIRM is almost out of money, and Proposition 14 asks voters for $5.5 more for stem cell research.

"If 70 different patient advocacy organizations, from the Michael J. Fox Foundation to the American Diabetes Foundation and the American Association of Cancer Researchers all endorse us -- could they all be wrong?" Klein asked.

Longtime AIDS activist Jeff Sheehy is on the CIRM board and said residents are still paying $325 million a year for Proposition 71.

"We're going to add another $300 million on top of that -- that's two-thirds of $1 billion for stem cell research," Sheehy said. "We don't have a single FDA approved product yet."

Sheehy said taxpayer funding of stem cell research was needed back in 2004 when California was on its own, but now the feds and private industry are spending billions on it every year.

"So we're just duplicating," Sheehy said.

Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, opposes Proposition 14 because of CIRM's quote "Shameless overpromising and hype set the stage for hundreds of underregulated commercial stem cell clinics now offering unapproved treatments that have caused tumors and blindness."

"All those people who survive COVID-19, they are finding up to 50% have heart damage and other organ damage," Darnovsky said. "How are you going to regenerate those tissues? Regenerative medicine is still cell therapy."

Dr. Michael Matthay professor of critical care medicine at UCSF, said CIRM has provided grant money to help research COVID-19 treatments.

"We are using cell based therapy to reduce injury to longs from COVID-19 and to accelerate the recovery process," Matthay said.

It should be pointed out everyone interviewed for this story are in favor of stem cell research -- Darnovsky and Sheehy believe that the billions of dollars being asked of taxpayers could be better spent on education, healthcare, housing and jobs.

See the article here:
Election Guide: Here's What You Need to Know About Proposition 14 - NBC Bay Area

ASX up 2.3%, banks and energy outperform – The Sydney Morning Herald

ASX-listed biopharma Opthea Limited has named Ovid Therapeutics founder and chief executive Dr Jeremy Levin as its new chairman.

Dr Levin, who concurrently chairs the Biotechnology Innovation Organisation, the largest trade organisation in the world that represents the biotechnology industry, will replace outgoing chair Geoffrey Kempler at the firms annual general meeting on October 13.

Opthea said Dr Levins track record and experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry will be instrumental as the company advances its Phase 3-ready product candidate, OPT-302, for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema conditions.

Prior to founding Ovid, the South African-born Dr Levin was president and chief executive of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and before Teva, was a member of the executive committee of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

He has served on the board of directors of various public and private biopharmaceutical companies, including Biocon Ltd and is currently on the board of directors of Lundbeck.

Shares in Opthea were 0.7 per cent lower at $2.81 at 11am against a 2 per cent rise for the ASX200. The companys share price has dipped 5.7 per cent in 2020. The wider index has fallen 11.5 per cent.

Continued here:
ASX up 2.3%, banks and energy outperform - The Sydney Morning Herald

Primary Cells Market worth $1,613 million by 2025 – Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets – PR Newswire UK

CHICAGO, Oct. 1, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- According to the new market research report "Primary Cells Marketby Origin (Human Primary Cells, Animal Primary Cells), Type (Hematopoietic, Dermatocytes, Gastrointestinal, Hepatocytes, Lung, Renal, Musculoskeletal, Heart), End User, Region - Global Forecast to 2025",published by MarketsandMarkets, the market is projected to reach USD 1,613 million by 2025 from USD 970 million in 2020, at a CAGR of 10.7%

Browse and in-depth TOC on "Primary Cells Market" 108 - Tables 34 - Figures 179 - Pages

Download PDF Brochure: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=32854960

The Growth in this market is largely driven by the rising prevalence of cancer, increasing focus on the development of novel cancer therapies, and rising adoption of primary cells over cell lines. Emerging economies such as China and Japan are providing lucrative opportunities for the players operating in the Primary Cells Market.

The human primary cells segment accounted for the largest share of the Primary Cells Market, by origin segment, in 2019

Based on origin, the Primary Cells Market is segmented into human and animal primary cells. The human primary cells segment accounted for the largest share in the Primary Cells Market in 2019. The growing application areas of human stem cells and the rising incidence of cancer are the major factors driving the growth of this segment.

Hepatocytes segment to register the highest growth rate during the forecast period

Based on type, the Primary Cells Market is segmented into hematopoietic cells, dermatocytes, gastrointestinal cells, hepatocytes, lung cells, renal cells, heart cells, musculoskeletal cells, and other primary cells. In 2019, the hepatocytes segment accounted for the highest growth rate. This can be attributed to the increasing incidence of liver cancer & pediatric liver diseases across the globe, increasing research funding by key pharma players, and the emergence of new companies dedicated to liver therapeutics research.

The life science research companies segment accounted for the largest share of the Primary Cells Market, by end user segment, in 2019

Based on end-users, the Primary Cells Market is segmented into life science research companies and research institutes. In 2019, the life science research companies segment for the largest share in the Primary Cells Market. Increasing cancer research in life science research companies, the increasing number of R&D facilities, high adoption of primary cells in cell-based experiments, and the increasing investments of companies in cell-based research are the major factors driving the growth of this segment.

Get 10% Customization Research Report: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestCustomizationNew.asp?id=32854960

North America is the largest regional market for Primary Cells Market

The Primary Cells Market is segmented into four major regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World (RoW). In 2019, North America accounted for the largest share in the Primary Cells Market. The growth in the North American Primary Cells Market can be attributed to increasing funding for cancer research, growing life science research sector, expansion of the healthcare sector, and the high adoption of stem cell therapy & cell immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and chronic diseases.

The major players operating in Primary Cells Market are Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (US), Merck KGaA (Germany), Lonza (Switzerland), Cell Biologics, Inc. (US), PromoCell GmbH (Germany), HemaCare Corporation (US), ZenBio, Inc. (US), STEMCELL Technologies, Inc. (Canada), Corning Incorporated (US), AllCells (US), American Type Culture Collection (US), Axol Bioscience Ltd. (UK), iXCells Biotechnologies (US), Neuromics (US), StemExpress (US), BioIVT (US), ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc. (US), PPA Research Group, Inc. (US), Creative Bioarray (US), BPS Bioscience, Inc. (US), Epithelix Srl (Switzerland), ReachBio LLC (US), AcceGen (US), Sekisui XenoTech, LLC (US), and Biopredic International (France).

Browse Adjacent Markets @ Biotechnology Market Research Reports & Consulting

Get Special Pricing on Bundle Reports: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/RequestBundleReport.asp?id=32854960

Browse Related Reports:

3D Cell Culture Market by Product (Hydrogel, Hanging Drop, Bioreactor, Microfluidics, Magnetic Levitation), Application (Cancer, Stem Cell, Toxicology, Tissue Engineering), End User (Pharmaceutical, Biotech, Cosmetics), Region - Global Forecast to 2024

https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/3d-cell-culture-market-191072847.html

Cell Expansion Market by Product (Reagent, Media, Flow Cytometer, Centrifuge, Bioreactor), Cell Type (Human, Animal), Application (Regenerative Medicine & Stem Cell Research, Cancer & Cell-based Research), End-User, and Region - Global Forecast to 2025

https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/cell-expansion-market-194978883.html

About MarketsandMarkets

MarketsandMarkets provides quantified B2B research on 30,000 high growth niche opportunities/threats which will impact 70% to 80% of worldwide companies' revenues. Currently servicing 7500 customers worldwide including 80% of global Fortune 1000 companies as clients. Almost 75,000 top officers across eight industries worldwide approach MarketsandMarkets for their painpoints around revenues decisions.

Our 850 fulltime analyst and SMEs at MarketsandMarkets are tracking global high growth markets following the "Growth Engagement Model GEM". The GEM aims at proactive collaboration with the clients to identify new opportunities, identify most important customers, write "Attack, avoid and defend" strategies, identify sources of incremental revenues for both the company and its competitors. MarketsandMarkets now coming up with 1,500 MicroQuadrants (Positioning top players across leaders, emerging companies, innovators, strategic players) annually in high growth emerging segments. MarketsandMarkets is determined to benefit more than 10,000 companies this year for their revenue planning and help them take their innovations/disruptions early to the market by providing them research ahead of the curve.

MarketsandMarkets's flagship competitive intelligence and market research platform, "Knowledgestore" connects over 200,000 markets and entire value chains for deeper understanding of the unmet insights along with market sizing and forecasts of niche markets.

Contact: Mr. Aashish MehraMarketsandMarkets INC. 630 Dundee Road Suite 430 Northbrook, IL 60062 USA: 1-888-600-6441 Email: sales@marketsandmarkets.com Research Insight: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/ResearchInsight/primary-cells-market.asp Content Source: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/primary-cells.asp

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/660509/MarketsandMarkets_Logo.jpg

SOURCE MarketsandMarkets

Excerpt from:
Primary Cells Market worth $1,613 million by 2025 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets - PR Newswire UK

Vitro Biopharma 3rd Quarter ended July 31st 2020 Financial Results of Operations – Stockhouse

GOLDEN, CO / ACCESSWIRE / October 1, 2020 / Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. (OTCQB:VODG), dba Vitro Biopharma, announced its 3rd quarter, ended July 31st 2020, financial results of operations.

Vitro Biopharma recorded 3rd quarter revenues of $132,066 vs $225,191 a decrease of 41% over the comparative quarter last year.Revenues were up slightly from the prior quarter which were $128,631. The decrease in revenue is directly attributed to the COVID 19 pandemic. Lockdown extensions and business opening limitations have pushed our expectations of growth and revenue recovery out to the first half of 2021. Feedback from our customers and our partner clinic in the Cayman Islands http://www.DVCstem.com are that patients awaiting treatments are not dropping off, but merely postponing their treatments and as such, a significant backlog is building. The cosmetic clinics http://www.Infinivive.com have started to open up but only with lower occupancy and variations by state, resulting in reduced revenue into the 4th quarter with expectations of a revival of revenue into the first half of 2021.

Gross profit declined 3% from the comparative quarter last year primarily due to the reduced higher margin stem cell product sales versus the mid margin stem cell research and development products.

Overall operating expenses increased in the quarter ended July 31st 2020 by $180,326 to $336,442 from $194,682 in the prior year's comparative quarter. The increase in expenses reflects the increased costs of FDA regulatory, legal, consulting, and audit costs. We engaged the audit firm of MaloneBailey LLP to get the company fully reporting around January of 2021.

Vitro Biopharma Announces MaloneBailey L.L.P. as its new Auditors

The company added extra resources to turn its attention to the world-wide challenge of finding therapies to fight COVID-19. Vitro filed an Investigational New Drug ("IND") application and through its collaboration with GIOSTAR, received FDA authorization to treat COVID 19 patients under the Expanded Access Program with its AlloRx Stem Cells ®. A single patient was treated successfully with no adverse events and the patient showed evidence of improved lung, liver and kidney function while also recovering from a stroke-induced coma.

Critically ill COVID-19 Patient Successfully Treated with Vitro Biopharma’s AlloRx Stem Cells®

The company entered into an MOU with GIOSTAR, a leading global stem cell research company, who operates multiple international stem cell clinics. The supply agreement provides GIOSTAR with the use of our AlloRx® Stem Cells to treat COVID 19 patients through FDA-pre and post-market approval.

Vitro Biopharma Signs MOU with GIOSTAR for COVID-19 IND Using AlloRx Stem Cells

During and subsequent to the quarter the company achieved and pursed the following objectives:

During the quarter and subsequent to the quarter, the company continued with its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock offering to accredited investors under the SEC Regulation D exemption. The preferred Stock is priced at $25 per share which is convertible at $0.25 cents per share for a total of 100 shares. The minimum investment is $50,000 per unit. The company has sold $1.0 million of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock during and subsequent to the quarter. The offering was sold out at $1.0 million and the company has expanded it to a total of up to $3.5 million to ensure sufficient working capital during the Coronavirus pandemic and to start the regulatory process of current reporting audits and funding for its expanded clinical trial activities with the FDA.

As a part of our overall strategy to target both global and US stem cell markets, Vitro submitted a Phase I IND application to the FDAto assess the safety of AlloRx Stem Cells® in the treatment of COVID-19. We have established strong communication channels with FDA officials to facilitate our IND review and are providing additional information to the FDA to complete the approval of our IND. Several clinical centers have expressed interest in our stem cell therapy and we continue to enlist multi-center sites to conduct our Phase 1 trial. We are also pursuing other avenues for emergency use under the Expanded Access Program. No adverse events were reported and the patient who had various comorbidities stabilized and exhibited enhanced pulmonary, liver and renal function during the six weeks following AlloRx Stem Cell® Therapy. The patient has now recovered and is at home from the hospital after 3 months of intensive care. We are currently pursuing additional emergency use authorizations under expanded access provision applications through our collaboration with GIOSTAR. MSCs have been shown to block the cytokine storm that occurs in COVID-19 patients in acute respiratory distress through their powerful anti-inflammatory effects. The cytokine storm leads to the need for assisted breathing by ventilators, transfer to ICU and related burdens on the US health care system. It is important to note that AlloRx Stem Cells® are a possible therapy for other viral attacks including influenza. Stem cells may block acute respiratory distress and may repair damage to other major organs including cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic and renal systems. AlloRx Stem Cells® have been shown to assist in recovery from failure of various organ systems in COVID-19 survivors, as our case study and results from several other labs are demonstrating.

The Company entered into an exclusive Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Global Institute of Stem Cell Therapy and Research, Inc. ("GIOSTAR") a leading stem cell research institute based in San Diego, California. GIOSTAR has filed for a separate IND application using Vitro Biopharma's umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell product AlloRx Stem Cells in a clinical trial to treat COVID-19 patients. GIOSTAR has already obtained emergency use authorization under expanded access provisions from the FDA for severe COVID-19 hospitalized patients using AlloRx Stem Cells®.

Vitro continues to seek FDA authorization of its pending IND. As the approval process proceeds, Vitro will seek AlloRx Stem Cells® FDA approval through Phase 2/3 IND filings for other indications such as osteoarthritis while at the same time continuing to supply GIOSTAR AlloRx Stem Cells® for treatment of COVID-19 patients in global markets.

The company has delayed the expansion of its laboratory and manufacturing facilities to better reflect the delays in revenue brought on by the pandemic. This new facility is expected to be operating in the second half of 2021. Our present facility has approximately $6M of AlloRx Stem Cell Vitro Biopharma revenue capacity per year. Furthermore, the completion of the 2nd clean room processing facility would expand our potential capacity to approximately 100 Billion AlloRx Stem Cell s a month or approximately $1.7 Million of AlloRx Stem Cell revenue capacity per month. This would give Vitro Biopharma a revenue run rate capacity of $20M a year.

Our increased capacity is rigorously controlled by our Quality Management System, now certified to the ISO9001 Quality Standard and the ISO13485 Medical Device Standard as well. This provides cGMP-compliant manufacturing of the highest quality stem cells/medical devices for clinical trial testing to provide further evidence of safety and efficacy for treatment of a wide variety of indications. Highly regulated cGMP biologics manufacturing within a BLA-compliant facility provides numerous opportunities to the Company to drive strong revenue growth. We are presently focused on our partnerships in the Caribbean with DVC Stem in Grand Cayman Island, InfiniVive MD in the US and emerging opportunities in the The Medical Pavilion of the Bahamas We are actively pursuing other partnership opportunities as well.

We have reformulated with our contract manufacturer to produce STEMulize in large quantity manufacturing runs. STEMulize contains natural substances that activate the body's own stem cells to enhance recovery from injury such as TBI, stroke, MS, PD and other autoimmune, inflammatory and neurological diseases. The STEMulize product will be offered as a private label product to Infinivive MD clinics and is being implemented as supplemental support to clinical treatments now ongoing in the Cayman Islands. Patients report positive benefits fromSTEMulize therapy following stem cell transplants including increased overall energy and enhancement of improved motor function in MS patients. We are currently pursing licensing arrangements with nutraceutical companies that can scale our formulation under their own private label.

The Company's cosmetic stem cell serum private labelled as Infinivive MD is being applied as a topical cosmetic serum in medical spas and plastic surgery offices. Infinivive MD revenue was reduced by the Coronavirus pandemic and as a result, revenues declined by 52% in the current quarter to approximately $50,000 vs $105,000 in the prior comparative quarter in 2019. This revenue has been flat from the prior quarter reflecting the reduced treatments due to the pandemic capacity limitations of various states.

Infinivive MD Cosmetic Serum is revolutionizing the cosmetic industry. Patients are experiencing unparalleled improvements in the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles. This is one of the fastest growing revenue streams for Vitro Biopharma.. We work with a variety of regulatory experts to assist us in the appropriate regulatory pathways.

http://www.jackzamoramd.comwww.infinivivemd.com

Vitro Biopharma's OEM cosmetic topical serum is being distributed exclusively by Infinivive MD into cosmetic clinics that are providing the topical treatment as a beautification product. To date the company's product is being offered in a number of clinics throughout the United States and soon internationally,; but with the clinics just opening again for business and with limited occupancy rules we do not expect this revenue to recover back to peak levels with growth until the first half of 2021.

The company has brought on Dr. Jack Zamora as its chief medical officer (C.M.O.) and together we have developed a new exosome product, Infinivive MD's Cosmetic Exosome Serum.

Vitro Biopharma Announces Jack Zamora M.D. as it’s Chief Medical Advisor

The product will be distributed by InfiniveMD along with the topical stem cell serum. The product is also used as a topical application for beautification. The product is a compliment to the topical stem cell serum and will provide the customer with a more competitive price point per application depending on the particular clinic. The new Exosome product

is being marketed and sold into the clinics in the first half of 2021. We are jointly working

on a topical Daily Serum. The Exosome market is part of the billion-dollar cosmetic market in the United States. These products will also be sold offshore around the world.

Update on the Clinical Trial of Musculoskeletal Conditions in the Bahamas

This initiative broadens Vitro Biopharma's expansion into highly regulated stem cell trials in collaboration with the Nassau-based Medical Pavilion of the Bahamas (TMPB).

Home

We will now be able to extend stem cell therapy based on our novel, patent-pending AlloRx Stem Cell product to a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. These include OA of any joint, ACL/MCL tear, Achilles tendon rupture, rotator cuff injury, tennis elbow and herniated disc that are highly prevalent and have few disease-modifying options. It is important to note that many stem cell treatments now performed are problematic due to limited potency and failure to meetbasic criteria of stem cells. Vitro Biopharma operates a highly regulated, FDA-compliant commercial biologics manufacturing operation for several years and is cGMP compliant, ISO 9001Certified, ISO 13485 Certified, CLIA Certified and FDA registered and BLA-compliant. All manufacturing occurs in a certified sterile clean room with extensive and advanced testing to assure the absence of contamination. Furthermore, in numerous patients treated to date by IV infusion of AlloRx Stem Cells there have been no significant adverse events. The company is partnered with Dr. Conville Brown, MD, MBBS, FACC, FESC, PhD, the founder and CEO of the Medical Pavilion of the Bahamas who is the Principal Investigator of this trial and director of its clinical administration. Dr Brown was instrumental in the establishment of the NSCEC in the Bahamas.

About the Medical Pavilion of the Bahamas: TMPB operates within a 40,000 square foot building as a partnered care specialty medical facility with 10 different centers in various areas including cardiology, cancer, clinical research and kidney disease. One of the centers is the Partners Stem Cell Centre, where the present trial will be conducted. The Partners Stem Cell Centre provides an environment to conduct stem cell research and clinical trials under the model of ''FDA rigor in a Non-FDA Jurisdiction'' TMPB employs 20 medical specialists in various fields. See http://www.tmp-bahamas.com for additional information.

The company has entered into an operating agreement with the Partner's Stem Cell Centre and expects to begin patient enrollment for the clinical trial in QI/QII of 2021 once

the Bahamas opens up without quarantine restrictions.

Due to the Corona virus pandemic the Cayman Islands closed itself and its businesses down for the majority of the quarter and next quarter, the current status is listed as locked down until Oct. 1st 2020. However, our partner reports that customers are staying on the waiting list and will return for their treatments as soon as the island opens back up. There currently is a pending backlog of over 70 patients seeking treatment which exceeds all of the treatments performed in 2019 by over 200%. We expect to see a surge in revenues from this backlog to bring back our revenue stream in the into the first half of 2021.

The Company has 11 patent applications pending in the US and foreign jurisdictions. These patents cover our AlloRx Stem Cell® line and various aspects of our STEMulize® stem cell activation products and processes as well as specific diagnostic tests of stem cell activity and therapeutic effectiveness. During the quarter, the Company has responded to office actions and continues to vigorously prosecute & expand its patent filings.

Dr. Jim Musick, CEO of Vitro Biopharma, said, "We are pleased to report our activities in fighting the COVID-19 with filings of our eIND, INDs and partnership with GIOSTAR. While we are disappointed in the extraordinary events of the Corona Virus pandemic and its results on our operations, we have taken the time to advance our clinical applications, partnerships and new product development in further preparation for realized growth in 2021 as a result of these activities. In addition, with have started the intense process of organizing the company for audits and fully reporting status with the SEC targeted for January 2021.

We believe our stem cell products are distinctly superior to stem cell treatments offered in the USA. The latter usually involve use of impure products lacking validation as stem cells and containing insufficientnumbers of stem cells to achieve therapeutic benefits. These are produced without regulatory oversight and have been known to cause serious adverse effects. Hence the use of highly purified and well characterized stem cells (AlloRx Stem Cells) is needed to provide safety and efficacy in regenerative medicine therapies.

In summary, Vitro Biopharma is advancing as a key player in regenerative medicine with 10+ years' experience in the development and commercialization of stem cell products for research, recognized by a Best in Practice Technology Innovation Leadership award for Stem Cell Toolsand Technology and a growing track record of successful translation to therapy. We plan to leverage our proprietary technology platform to the establishment of international Stem Cell Centers of Excellence and regulatory approvals in the US and worldwide.

Vitro Biopharma has supplied major biopharmaceutical firms, elite university laboratories and clinical trials worldwide with its Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AlloRx Stem Cells), and it's MSC-Grow Brand of cell culture media along with advanced stem cell diagnostic services. http://www.vitrobiopharma.com"

Sincerely yours,

James R. Musick, PhD.

President, CEO & Chairman of the Board

http://www.vitrobiopharma.com

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements herein regarding financial performance have not yet been reported to the SEC nor reviewed by the Company's auditors. Certain statements contained herein and subsequent statements made by and on behalf of the Company, whether oral or written may contain "forward-looking statements". Such forward looking statements are identified by words such as "intends,"

"anticipates," "believes," "expects" and "hopes" and include, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's plan of business operations, product research and development activities, potential contractual arrangements, receipt of working capital, anticipated revenues and related expenditures.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, among others, acceptability of the Company's products in the market place, general economic conditions, receipt of additional working capital, the overall state of the biotechnology industry and other factors set forth in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Most of these factors are outside the control of the Company. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Except as otherwise required by applicable securities statutes or regulations, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

CONTACT:

Dr. James Musick 4621 Technology Drive Golden, CO 80403 (303) 999-2130 x1 http://www.vitrobiopharma.com

Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.

Quarter Ended July 31st;

Income Statement

Stem Cell Therapies and Treatments

Stem Cell Products

Other Services

Total Revenues

COGS

Gross Profit

SGA Expenses

Office Expenses

Consulting,Accounting,Legal and Banking Fees

Laboratory R&D & Quality Control

Total Operating Expenses

Net Operating Profit (Loss) EBITDA

Non Cash Depreciation and Amortization

Non Cash Stock for Services

Non Cash Interest on Shareholder Debt

Non Cash Interest on Secured Notes Payable

Net Income (Loss)

The company provides its financial information for investor purposes only, the results published are not audited or necessarily SEC or GAAP compliant.

Vitro Diagnositics Inc.

Quarter Ended July 31st;

Balance Sheet

ASSETS

Cash

Accounts Receivable

Inventory

Notes Receivable and Prepaids

Current Assets

Fixed Assets

Intangible and other Assets

Total Assets

LIABILITIES

Trade Accounts Payable

Bank Credit Cards

Capital Lease Obligaitons

Current Liabiities

Secured Convertible Notes with discount

Capital Lease Obligations

Shareholder Accrued Comp. Payable

Shareholder Debts Payable

Long Term Liabilities

Total Liabilities

SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

Series A Convertible Preferred

Common Stock

Paid in Capital

Treasury Stock

Retained Earnings

Read more:
Vitro Biopharma 3rd Quarter ended July 31st 2020 Financial Results of Operations - Stockhouse

Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market Expected to Witness High Growth over the Forecast 2027 – The Daily Chronicle

TheAdipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Marketresearch report thoroughly explains each and every aspect related to the Global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market, which facilitates the reports reader to study and evaluate the upcoming market trend and execute the analytical data to promote the business.

The Global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market research report assembles data collected from different regulatory organizations to assess the growth of the segments. In addition, the study also appraises the global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market on the basis of topography. It reviews the macro- and microeconomic features influencing the growth of the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market in each region. Various methodological tools are used to analyze the growth of the worldwide Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market.

Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCS) market is expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027. Data Bridge Market Research analyses the market to account grow at a CAGR of 6.1% in the above-mentioned forecast period. The accelerating application of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCS) in the regenerative medicines research, development of cell linage, tissue engendering, bone and cartilage regeneration are driving the exponential growth of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCS) market during the forecast period of 2020 to 2027.

Get Free Sample PDF (including COVID19 Impact Analysis) of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market[emailprotected] https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-adipose-tissue-derived-stem-cells-adscs-market&utm_source=&kA

Prominent Key Players Covered in the report:

Antria Inc., CELGENE CORPORATION, pluristem, Tissue Genesis, Cytori Therapeutics Inc., PRECIGEN, Mesoblast Ltd, CORESTEM, Inc, among other domestic and global players.

Major Regions as Follows:

A complete value chain of the global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market is presented in the research report. It is associated with the review of the downstream and upstream components of the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market. The market is bifurcated on the basis of the categories of products and customer application segments. The market analysis demonstrates the expansion of each segment of the global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market. The research report assists the user in taking a decisive step that will be a milestone in developing and expanding their businesses in the global Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market.

The Objectives of the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market Report:

How Does This Market Insights Help?

Get Table Of Contents of This Premium Research For Free: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-adipose-tissue-derived-stem-cells-adscs-market&utm_source=&KA

Market Dynamics:The Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) report also demonstrates the scope of the various commercial possibilities over the coming years and the positive revenue forecasts in the years ahead. It also studies the key markets and mentions the various regions i.e. the geographical spread of the industry.

Why choose us:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part 01:Executive Summary

Part 02:Scope of the Report

Part 03:Research Methodology

Part 04:Market Landscape

Part 05:Pipeline Analysis

Part 06:Market Sizing

Market Definition

Market Sizing

Market Size And Forecast

Part 07:Five Forces Analysis

Bargaining Power Of Buyers

Bargaining Power Of Suppliers

Threat Of New Entrants

Threat Of Substitutes

Threat Of Rivalry

Market Condition

Part 08:Market Segmentation

Segmentation

Comparison

Market Opportunity

Part 09:Customer Landscape

Part 10:Regional Landscape

Part 11:Decision Framework

Part 12:Drivers and Challenges

Part 13:Market Trends

Part 14:Vendor Landscape

Part 15:Vendor Analysis

Vendors Covered

Vendor Classification

Market Positioning Of Vendors

Part 16:Appendix

In conclusion, the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market report is a reliable source for accessing the research data that is projected to exponentially accelerate your business. The report provides information such as economic scenarios, benefits, limits, trends, market growth rates, and figures. SWOT analysis is also incorporated in the report along with speculation attainability investigation and venture return investigation.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis:

The report seeks to track the evolution of the market growth pathways and publish a medical crisis in an exclusive section publishing an analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market. The new analysis on COVID-19 pandemic provides a clear assessment of the impact on the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market and the expected volatility of the market during the forecast period. Various factors that can affect the general dynamics of the Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) market during the forecast period (2020-2026), including current trends, growth opportunities, limiting factors, etc., are discussed in detail in this market research.

Else, Place an Enquiry Before Buying Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-adipose-tissue-derived-stem-cells-adscs-market&utm_source=&KA

Thank you for reading this article. You can also get chapter-wise sections or region-wise report coverage for North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa.

Customization of the Report:

Data Bridge Market Research also provides customization options to tailor the reports as per client requirements. This report can be personalized to cater to your research needs. Feel free to get in touch with our sales team, who will ensure that you get a report as per your needs.

Contact:

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

[emailprotected]

Read more from the original source:
Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCS) Market Expected to Witness High Growth over the Forecast 2027 - The Daily Chronicle

Global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Market Latest Innovations and Forecast 2021-2026 : Qiagen, Advanced Cell…

The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Market report comprises a valuable bunch of information that enlightens the most imperative sectors of the Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market. The data available in the report delivers comprehensive information about the Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market, which is understandable not only for an expert but also for a layman. The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report provides information regarding all the aspects associated with the market, which includes reviews of the final product, and the key factors influencing or hampering the market growth. Moreover, the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report, particularly emphasizes on the key market players Qiagen, Advanced Cell Diagnostics, ApoCell, Biofluidica, Clearbridge Biomedics, CytoTrack, Celsee, Fluxion, Gilupi, Cynvenio, On-chip, YZY Bio, BioView, Creatv MicroTech, Fluidigm, Ikonisys, AdnaGen, IVDiagnostics, Miltenyi Biotec, Aviva Biosciences Corporation, ScreenCell, Silicon Biosystems that are competing with each other to acquire the majority of share in the market, financial circumstances, actual certainties, and geographical analysis.

Click Here To Access The Sample Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Market Report

For in-depth analysis and thorough understanding, the report presents a demand for individual segment in each region. It demonstrates various segmentsCellSearch, Otherand sub-segmentsBreast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Other Cancers Diagnosis and Treatmentof the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market. The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report explains in-depth about the quantitative as well as the qualitative scenario of the market. The global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report delivers the precise analytical information that explains the future growth trend to be followed by the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market, based on the past and current situation of the market.

In addition, the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report delivers concise information about the federal regulations and policies that may indirectly affect market growth as well as the financial state. The situation of the global market at the global and regional level is also described in the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report through geographical segmentation.

Read Detailed Index Of Full Research Study @::https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/market-analysis/circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-and-cancer-stem-cells-cscs-market.html

The information available in the global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) market report is not only based on the facts but also on the case studies, which analysts have included to deliver appropriate information to the clients in a well-versed manner. Moreover, for better understanding, the report includes statistical figures, graphs, tables, and charts related to the information mentioned in textual form.

Chapter 1,Definition, Specifications and Classification of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) , Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) , Market Segment by Regions; Chapter 2,Manufacturing Cost Structure, Raw Material and Suppliers, Manufacturing Process, Industry Chain Structure; Chapter 3,Technical Data and Manufacturing Plants Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) , Capacity and Commercial Production Date, Manufacturing Plants Distribution, R&D Status and Technology Source, Raw Materials Sources Analysis; Chapter 4,Overall Market Analysis, Capacity Analysis (Company Segment), Sales Analysis (Company Segment), Sales Price Analysis (Company Segment); Chapter 5 and 6,Regional Market Analysis that includes United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea & Taiwan, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Segment Market Analysis (by Type); Chapter 7 and 8,The Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Segment Market Analysis (by Application) Major Manufacturers Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) ; Chapter 9,Market Trend Analysis, Regional Market Trend, Market Trend by Product Type CellSearch, Other, Market Trend by Application Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Other Cancers Diagnosis and Treatment; Chapter 10,Regional Marketing Type Analysis, International Trade Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis; Chapter 11,The Consumers Analysis of Global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) ; Chapter 12,Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source; Chapter 13, 14 and 15,Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and data source.

Enquire Here Get customization & check discount for report @:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/inquiry/circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-and-cancer-stem-cells-cscs-market

This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics It provides a forward looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth It provides a six-year forecast assessed on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

At Syndicate Market Research, we provide reports about a range of industries such as healthcare & pharma, automotive, IT, insurance, security, packaging, electronics & semiconductors, medical devices, food & beverage, software & services, manufacturing & construction, defense aerospace, agriculture, consumer goods & retailing, and so on. Every aspect of the market is covered in the report along with its regional data. Syndicate Market Research committed to the requirements of our clients, offering tailored solutions best suitable for strategy development and execution to get substantial results. Above this, we will be available for our clients 247.

Syndicate Market Research 244 Fifth Avenue, Suite N202 New York, 10001, United States Email ID:[emailprotected] Website:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/ Blog:Syndicate Market Research Blog

Originally posted here:
Global Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) Market Latest Innovations and Forecast 2021-2026 : Qiagen, Advanced Cell...

Asia Pacific Tissue Engineering Market Forecast to 2027 – COVID-19 Impact and Regional Analysis By Material Type, Applications, and Country -…

October 01, 2020 17:56 ET | Source: ReportLinker

New York, Oct. 01, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Asia Pacific Tissue Engineering Market Forecast to 2027 - COVID-19 Impact and Regional Analysis By Material Type, Applications, and Country" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p05974344/?utm_source=GNW High cost associated to the tissue engineering process is one of the major factors restraining the growth of the market.

Additionally, increasing financial contributions by government and private sector are likely to fuel the growth of the APAC tissue engineering market during the forecast period. Tissue engineering is a blend of material methods and cellular activities.This approach involves the use of physicochemical and biochemical attributes of humans to replace the biological tissues and strengthen them.

It is an innovative technology that works either separately or in conjunction with scaffolds, stem cells, regenerative medicine, and growth factors or negotiators. The process utilizes molecular and cellular processes in combination with the principles of material engineering to surgically repair and restore tissue. The Asia Pacific market is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period on the back of the increase in research activities, growing demand for organ transplants, rising number of initiatives by market players for expanding their presence in the region, and higher adoption of stem cell research in several APAC countries. China and India hold significant growth opportunities for players operating in the 3D bioprinting market, owing to the growing support from government bodies, increasing demand for cosmetic surgeries, and presence of less stringent regulations and data requirements than healthcare systems in developed countries. In July 2019, the Government of India collaborated with the US for the research and development of 3D bioprinting regenerative medicine.This collaboration involves the exchange of faculty members and students for the trade of scientific ideas/information and technologies, as well as the joint use of scientific infrastructure for research, especially in the field of 3D bioprinting.

The Government of South Korea announced plans to invest ~USD 37 million to boost the development of 3D bioprinting across the country. The countrys Ministry of Science announced plans to spend a considerable portion of its budget on a plethora of 3D bioprinting applications to strengthen its competitiveness and ability to meet demand. In APAC, due to an increasing number of COVID-19 infected patients, healthcare professionals and leading organizations are rechanneling the flow of healthcare resources from R&D to primary care, which is slowing down the process of innovation.Further, the COVID-19 pandemic is also hindering the conduct of clinical trials and drug development, and the operations of diagnostic industry in the region.

For instance, Stryker Corporation, a well-known player in the tissue engineering industry, has diverted operations to manufacture COVID-19 diagnostics and PPE kits.Moreover, according to a recent survey by Medscape in July 2020, substantial disruption has been witnessed in routine research activities that include tissue engineering and regenerative medicines as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The rapid increase in the number of the infected patients in the India and China is likely to result in the slowdown of the market growth in the near future. In 2019, the biologically derived material segment accounted for the largest share of the APAC tissue engineering market.The growth of the market for this segment is attributed to the rising adoption of biomaterials due to their natural regenerative potential to restore tissue functioning and ability to facilitate the on demand release of chemokines with the procedure.

Further, the synthetic material segment is likely to register the highest CAGR in the market during the forecast period. A few of the significant secondary sources associated with the Asia Pacific tissue engineering market report are the World Health Organization (WHO), Government of India, Government of South Korea, and US Food and Drug Administration. Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05974344/?utm_source=GNW

About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________

Lyon, FRANCE

Formats available:

More:
Asia Pacific Tissue Engineering Market Forecast to 2027 - COVID-19 Impact and Regional Analysis By Material Type, Applications, and Country -...

Cell Separation Market 2020 Size Analysis by Growth Trends, Share, Opportunities and Business Strategy Forecast to 2024 – The Daily Chronicle

The Cell Separation market report explores exhaustive estimation of each vital aspect of the global Cell Separation industry that relates to market size, share, revenue, demand, sales volume, and development in the market. The Cell Separation market report provides key market segments along with sub-segments, market dynamics, and key players analysis. The research study also offers data on product types, market competitive scenario, recent trends, the growth rate of the industry.

About Cell Separation Market:

Cell Separation Market analysis considers sales from academic institutions and research laboratories, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and hospitals and clinical testing laboratories end-users. Our study also finds the sales of cell separation in Asia, Europe, North America, and ROW. In 2019, the academic institutions and research laboratories segment had a significant market share, and this trend is expected to continue over the forecast period. Factors such as demand for cell separation to carry out research studies related to cell enumeration and cell functional assays will play a significant role in the academic institutions and research laboratories segment to maintain its market position. Also, our global cell separation market report looks at factors such as growing adoption of cell separation techniques in research and clinical applications, increasing use of cell separation in cancer research, and high prevalence of HIV/AIDS. However, presence of inconsistent reagents and other ancillary products, exposure risks faced by laboratory personnel, and risk of sample contamination may hamper the growth of the cell separation industry over the forecast period.

Get a Sample Copy of the Report https://www.industryresearch.co/enquiry/request-sample/14966977

Market Dynamics of Cell Separation Market:

Driver: Increasing Use Of Cell Separation In Cancer Research

Trends: Growing Focus On Personalized Medicine

Challenges: Presence Of Inconsistent Reagents

Increasing use of cell separation in cancer research

Cell separation helps the identification and characterization of cancer stem cells. The analysis of single cancer cells by medical practitioners can aid in the early diagnosis of tumors, the monitoring of circulating tumor cells, and the evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity. It can also aid the determination of the need for chemotherapeutic treatments. Also, the incidence of cancer is increasing rapidly, especially amongst women. Cervical and breast cancers are the most common types in the world. The rising incidence of cancer is encouraging further research in the field. Moreover, advances in computer techniques, optics, and lasers introduced a new generation of cell separation techniques which are capable of high speed processing of single cell suspensions. This use of cell separation in cancer research will lead to the expansion of the global cell separation market at a CAGR of over 17% during the forecast period.

Growing focus on personalized medicine

The high number of adverse drug reactions, rising awareness about early diagnosis, and advancements in genetic science are driving the growth of personalized medicines. Genome mapping studies are crucial for the development of personalized medicines, and they could only be achieved if cell separation is performed adequately in studies and research projects. The focus on analyzing DNA synthesis is increasing during cell separation, which can be used for the development of personalized medicines against targets. This development is expected to have a positive impact on the overall market growth.

Some Key Players of Cell Separation Market Are:

To Understand How Covid-19 Impact is Covered in This Report https://www.industryresearch.co/enquiry/request-covid19/14966977

Cell Separation Market Segmentation Analysis:

By Type:

Cell Separation Market Report Highlights:

Cell Separation Market Segment by Regions:

For More Information or Query or Customization Before Buying, Visit at https://www.industryresearch.co/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/14966977

Some Points from Cell Separation Market Report TOC:

PART01:EXECUTIVESUMMARY

PART02:SCOPEOFTHEREPORT

PART03:MARKETLANDSCAPE

PART04:MARKETSIZING

PART05:FIVEFORCESANALYSIS

PART06:MARKETSEGMENTATIONBYTECHNOLOGY

PART07:MARKETSEGMENTATIONBYFURNACETYPE

PART08:CUSTOMERLANDSCAPE

PART09:GEOGRAPHICLANDSCAPE

PART 10: DRIVERS AND CHALLENGES

PART 11: MARKET TRENDS

PART 12: VENDOR LANDSCAPE

PART 13: VENDOR ANALYSIS

Purchase this Report (Price 2500 USD for single user license) https://www.industryresearch.co/purchase/14966977

Contact Us:

Name: Ajay More

Phone: US +14242530807/ UK +44 20 3239 8187

Email: [emailprotected]

Our Other Reports:

E Ink Market, Shellac Market, Global 3-Hexyn-2-Ol Market

Vehicle Tracking Systems Market, Commercial Aircraft Angle of Attack Sensors Market, Organic Acid Products Market

Solar PV Tracker Market, Global IoT Telecom Services Market, Vapor Pressure Osmometer Market

Nucleating And Clarifying Agents Market, Furniture Adhesives Market, Penicillin Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Market

KN95 Medical Face Masks Market, WiFi Smart Garage Door Controllers Market, Convention Centers Design Market

, ,

Here is the original post:
Cell Separation Market 2020 Size Analysis by Growth Trends, Share, Opportunities and Business Strategy Forecast to 2024 - The Daily Chronicle