Q Stock; The Rise of BioRestorative Therapies Inc (OTCMKTS: BRTXQ) – MicroCap Daily

Post Views: 221

BioRestorative Therapies Inc (OTCMKTS: BRTXQ) is heating up fast in recent trading and heading northbound again after several weeks of choppy waters. BioRestorative is among the most exciting stories in small caps that has attracted legions of new shareholders after the Company partnered on a new bankruptcy reorganization plan with one of its creditors Auctus Capital in which it would emerge from bankruptcy with the commons intact, ready to begin phase 2 trials and get BioRestorative back on a national stock exchange.

Penny stock speculators are accumulating BRTXQ as they wait for Judge Grossman to say the word EFFECTIVE. There is a lot of speculation on exactly when this will hapen considering the Judges schedule with holidays, COVID-19, and a logjam of cases on the docket. Interested shareholders are monitoring the developments on PACER.

BioRestorative Therapies Inc (OTCMKTS: BRTXQ) operating out of Melville, New York is a life sciences company focused on the development of regenerative medicine products and therapies using cell and tissue protocols, primarily involving adult (non-embryonic) stem cells. We develop therapeutic products using cell and tissue protocols, primarily involving adult stem cells. Our two core programs are: Disc/Spine Program (brtxDISCTM): Our lead cell therapy candidate, BRTX-100, is a product formulated from autologous cultured mesenchymal stem cells collected from bone marrow. The Company intends that the product will be used for the non-surgical treatment of protruding and bulging lumbar discs in patients suffering from chronic lumbar disc disease. The treatment is intended for patients whose pain has not been alleviated by non-invasive procedures and who potentially face the prospect of surgery. The Company has received clearance from the Food and Drug Administration to commence a Phase 2 clinical trial using BRTX-100 to treat chronic lower back pain due to degenerative disc disease related to protruding/bulging discs. Metabolic Program (ThermoStem): BioRestorative is developing a cell-based therapy to target obesity and metabolic disorders using brown adipose (fat) derived stem cells to generate brown adipose tissue (BAT). BAT is intended to mimic naturally occurring brown adipose depots that regulate metabolic homeostasis in humans. Initial preclinical research indicates that increased amounts of brown fat in the body may be responsible for additional caloric burning as well as reduced glucose and lipid levels. Researchers have found that people with higher levels of brown fat may have a reduced risk for obesity and diabetes.

BioRestorative Therapies is developing a cell-based therapy candidate to target obesity and metabolic disorders using brown adipose (fat) derived stem cells, or BADSC, to generate brown adipose tissue, or BAT. BAT is intended to mimic naturally occurring brown adipose depots that regulate metabolic homeostasis in humans. Initial preclinical research indicates that increased amounts of brown fat in animals may be responsible for additional caloric burning, as well as reduced glucose and lipid levels. Researchers have found that people with higher levels of brown fat may have a reduced risk for obesity and diabetes.

To Find out the inside Scoop on BioRestorative Subscribe to Microcapdaily.com Right Now by entering your Email in the box below

BioRestorative owns a valuable intelectual property portfolio including unique international Stem Cell patents as well as 8 patents issued, in the United States and other countries, for the Companys brown fat technology related to BioRestoratives metabolic program (ThermoStem Program).

On March 20 BioRestorative filed a voluntary petition commencing a case under chapter 11 of title 11 of the U.S. Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Companys chapter 11 case is being administered under the caption, In re: BioRestorative Therapies, Inc., Case No. 8-20-71757.

Initially intellectual property lawyer John Desmarais entered into a stalking horse agreement to buy the company. He would pay $500,000 to acquire the company, along with their assets (including the intellectual property). The deal with Desmarais fell apart in July when Auctus Capital partnered with the Company on a new bankruptcy reorganization plan in which the Company would emerge from bankruptcy with the commons intact, ready to begin their phase 2 trials and get BioRestorative back on a national stock exchange. On September 10th, a hearing was held for confirmation of the bankruptcy reorganization plan submitted jointly by the company and Auctus Capital Partners. Further detail will be added upon review of the judges order, but the plan and disclosure statement are available to Pacer or Pacermonitor subscribers.

We have a Monster Pick Coming. Subscribe Right Now!

Currently on the move and running northbound again after several weeks of choppy waters BRTXQ is an exciting story developing in small caps; BioRestorative filed for bankruptcy protection in March but has partnered on a new bankruptcy reorganization plan with one of its creditors Auctus Capital in which the Company would emerge from bankruptcy with the commons intact, ready to begin their phase 2 trials and get BioRestorative back on a national stock exchange. Penny stock speculators are accumulating BRTXQ as they wait for Judge Grossman to say the word EFFECTIVE. There is a lot of speculation on exactly when this will happen considering the Judges schedule with holidays, COVID-19, and a logjam of cases on the docket. Interested shareholders are monitoring the developments on PACER.We will be updating on BioRestorative when more details emerge so make sure you are subscribed to Microcapdaily so you know whats going on with BioRestorative.

Disclosure: we hold no position in BRTXQ either long or short and we have not been compensated for this article.

Share.

View original post here:
Q Stock; The Rise of BioRestorative Therapies Inc (OTCMKTS: BRTXQ) - MicroCap Daily

A Uniquely Patient-Focused Take on Treating AML in Older Adults – Medscape

A diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is particularly challenging in older adults, whose age makes them highly susceptible to the disease and treatment-related toxicity. To help patients and practitioners navigate the clinical decision-making process, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) convened an panel of experts who conducted a thorough review of the literature. The result of their work can be found in a new set of guidelines for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML in older adults.

Dr Mikkael Sekeres

Medscape spoke with Mikkael Sekeres, MD, chair of the ASH AML guideline panel and director of the Leukemia Program at Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute. Sekeres shared the rationale behind the panel's key recommendations and the importance of keeping the patient's goals in mind.

Medscape: What is the average life expectancy of a 75-year-old developing AML compared with someone of the same age without AML?

Dr Sekeres: A 75-year-old developing AML has an average life expectancy measured in fewer than 6 months. Somebody who is 75 without leukemia in the United States has a life expectancy that can be measured in a decade or more. AML is a really serious diagnosis when someone is older and significantly truncates expected survival.

What is the median age at AML diagnosis in the United States?

About 67 years.

What are the biological underpinnings for poor outcomes in older AML patients?

There are a few of them. Older adults with AML tend to have a leukemia that has evolved from a known or unknown previous bone marrow condition such as myelodysplastic syndrome. Older adults also have worse genetics driving their leukemia, which makes the leukemia cells more resistant to chemotherapy. And the leukemia cells may even have drug efflux pumps that extrude chemotherapy that tries to enter the cell. Finally, older adults are more likely to have comorbidities that make their ability to tolerate chemotherapy much lower than for younger adults.

In someone who is newly diagnosed with AML, what initial options are they routinely given?

For someone who is older, we divide those options into three main categories.

The first is to take intensive chemotherapy, which requires a 4-6 week hospitalization and has a chance of getting somebody who is older into a remission of approximately 50% to 60%. But this also carries with it significant treatment-related mortality that may be as high as 10% to 20%. So, I have to look my older patients in the eyes when I talk about intensive chemotherapy and say, "There is a 1 in 10 or 1 in 5 chance that you might not make it out of the hospital alive."

The second prong is lower-dose therapy. While the more-intensive therapy requiring hospitalization does have a low, but real, chance of curing that person, less-intensive therapy is not curative. Our best hope with less-intensive therapy is that our patients enter a remission and live longer. With less-intensive therapy, the chance that someone will go into remission is probably around 20%, but again it is not curative. The flip side to that is that it improves a person's immediate quality of life, because they're not in the hospital for 4 to 6 weeks.

The final prong is to discuss palliative care or hospice upfront. We designed these guidelines to be focused on a patient's goals of therapy and to constantly revisit those goals to make sure that the treatment options we are offering are aligning with them.

The panel's first recommendation is to offer antileukemic therapy over best supportive care in patients who are appropriate candidates. Can you provide some context for this recommendation?

Doesn't that strike you as funny that we even have to make a recommendation about getting chemotherapy? Some database studies conducted over the past two decades show that, as recently as 15 years ago, only one third of patients who were over the age of 65 received any type of chemotherapy for AML. More recently, as we have had a few more drugs available that allow us to use lower-dose approaches, that number has crept up to probably about 50%. We still have half the patients offered no therapy at all. So, we felt that we had to deliberately make a recommendation saying that, if it aligns with a patient's goals, he or she should be offered chemotherapy.

The second recommendation is that patients considered candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy should receive it over less-intensive antileukemic therapy. How did you get to that recommendation?

There is a debate in our field about whether older adults should be offered intensive inpatient chemotherapy at all or whether we should be treating all of them with less-intensive therapy. There are not a huge amount of high-quality studies out there to answer some of these questions, in particular whether intensive chemotherapy should be recommended over less-intensive therapy. But with the available evidence, what we believe is that patients live longer if they are offered intensive antileukemic chemotherapy. So, again, if it aligns with a patient's goals, we support that patient receiving more-intensive therapy in the hospital.

What does the panel recommend for patients who achieve remission after at least a single cycle of intensive antileukemic therapy and who are not candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Once again, this may seem at first blush to be an obvious recommendation. The standard treatment of someone who is younger with AML is to offer intensive inpatient chemotherapy to induce remission. This is followed by a few cycles of chemotherapy, mostly in an outpatient setting, to consolidate that remission.

What is the underlying philosophy for this approach?

Every time we give chemotherapy, we probably get about a 3 to 4 log kill of leukemia cells. Imagine when a person first presents with AML, they may have 10 billion leukemia cells in his or her body. We are reducing that 3 to 4 log with the first course of chemotherapy.

When we then look at a bone marrow biopsy, it may appear to be normal. When leukemia is at a lower level in the body, we simply can't see it using standard techniques. But that doesn't mean the leukemia is gone. For younger patients, we give another cycle of chemotherapy, then another, then another, and then even another to reduce the number of leukemia cells left over in the body until that person has a durable remission and hopefully cure.

For someone who is older, the data are less clear. While some studies have shown that if you give too much chemotherapy after the initial course, it doesn't help that much, there is a paucity of studies that show that any chemotherapy at all after the first induction course is helpful. Consequently, we have to use indirect data. Older people who are long-term survivors from their acute leukemia always seem to have gotten more than one course of chemotherapy. In other words, the initial course of chemotherapy that a patient receives in the hospital isn't enough. They should receive more than that.

What about older adults with AML considered appropriate for antileukemic therapy but not for intensive antileukemic therapy?

This again gets to the question of what are a patient's goals. It takes a very involved conversation with a person at the time of their AML diagnosis to determine whether he or she would want to pursue an aggressive approach or a less-aggressive approach. If a person wants a less-aggressive approach, and wants nothing to do with a hospital stay, then he or she is also prioritizing initial quality of life. In this recommendation, based on existing studies, we didn't have a preference for which of the available less-aggressive chemotherapies a person selects.

There's also debate about what to do in those considered appropriate for antileukemic therapy, such as hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) or low-dose cytarabine, but not for intensive antileukemic therapy. What did the available evidence seem to indicate about this issue?

There have been a lot of studies trying to add two drugs together to see if those do better than one drug alone in patients who are older and who choose less-intensive therapy. The majority of those studies have shown no advantage to getting two drugs over one drug.

Our recommendation is that in these situations a patient gets one drug, not two, but there are a couple of caveats. One caveat is that there has been a small study showing the effectiveness of one of those low-dose chemotherapies combined with the drug glasdegib. The second caveat is that there have been results presented combining one of these low-dose chemotherapies with the drug venetoclax. One of those was a negative study, and another was a positive study showing a survival advantage to the combination vs the low-dose therapy alone. We had to couch our recommendation a little bit because we knew this other study had been presented at a conference, but it hadn't come out in final form yet. It did recently, however, and we will now revisit this recommendation.

The other complicated aspect to this is that we weren't 100% convinced that the combination of venetoclax with one of these lower-dose therapies is truly less-intensive therapy. We think it is starting to creep up toward more-intensive chemotherapy, even though it is commonly given to patients in the outpatient setting. It gets into the very complicated area of what are we defining as more-intensive therapy and less-intensive therapy.

Is there a recommended strategy for older adults with AML who achieve a response after receiving less-intensive therapy?

This is also challenging because there are no randomized studies in which patients received less-intensive therapy for a finite period of time vs receiving those therapies ad infinitum. Given the lack of data and also given a lot of anecdotal data out there about patients who stopped a certain therapy and relapsed thereafter, we recommended that patients continue the less-intensive therapy ad infinitum. So as long as they are receiving a response to that therapy, they continue on the drug.

Of course, there are also unique considerations faced by older patients who are no longer receiving antileukemic therapy, and have moved on to receiving end-of-life care or hospice care. What advice do the guidelines offer in this situation?

There are a lot of aspects of these recommendations that I think are special. The first is the focus on patient goals of care at every point in these guidelines. The second is that the guidelines follow the real disease course and a real conversation that doctors and patients have at every step of the way to help guide the decisions that have to be made in real time.

A problem we have in the United States is that once patients enter a hospice, most will not allow blood transfusions. One reason is that some say it is antithetical to their philosophy and consider it aggressive care. The second reason is that, to be completely blunt, economically it doesn't make sense for hospices to allow blood transfusions. The amount that they are reimbursed by Medicare is much lower than the cost of receiving blood in an infusion center.

We wanted to make a clear recommendation that we consider transfusions in a patient who is in a palliative care or hospice mode to be supportive and necessary, and that these should be provided to patients even if they are in hospice, and as always if consistent with a patient's goals of care.

How does a patient's age inform the discussion surrounding what intensity treatment to offer?

With younger adults, this is not as complicated a conversation. A younger person has a better chance of being cured with intensive chemotherapy and is much more likely to tolerate that intensive chemotherapy. For someone who is younger, we offer intensive chemotherapy and the chance of going into remission is higher, at 70% to 80%. The chance of dying is lower, usually less than 5%. It is an easy decision to make.

For an older adult, the riskbenefit ratio shifts and it becomes a more complicated option. Less-intensive therapy or best supportive care or hospice become viable.

Are there other factors confounding the treatment decision-making process in older adults with AML that practitioners should consider?

Someone who is older is making a different decision than I would. I have school-aged children and believe that my job as a parent is to successfully get them to adulthood, so I would take any treatment under the sun to make sure that happens. People who have lived a longer life than I have may have children and even grandchildren who are adults, and they might have different goals of care. My goals are not going to be the same as my patient's goals.

It is also harder because someone who is older may feel that he or she has lived a good life and doesn't need to go through heroic measures to try to be around as long as possible, and those goals may not align with the goals of that person's children who want their parent to be around as long as possible. One of the confounding factors in this is navigating the different goals of the different family members.

Dr Sekeres has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Kate O'Rourke is a freelance writer in Portland, Maine. She has covered the field of oncology for over 10 years.

For more news, follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, andYouTube.

Read more:
A Uniquely Patient-Focused Take on Treating AML in Older Adults - Medscape

VERIFY: Was the antibody cocktail used to treat President Trump developed using human embryonic stem cells? – CBS News 8

Social media is buzzing with the claim President Trump, who is pro-life, used an antibody cocktail developed using human embryonic stem cells.

The antibody cocktail used to treat President Donald Trump for COVID-19 is getting a lot of attention on social media.

Some users are claiming Regeneron - the company that developed the treatment - used human embryonic stem cells to create it, but is this true?

News 8 reached out to Regeneron for comment.

"This particular discovery program (regn-cov2) did not involve human stem cells or embryonic stem cells," wrote Regeneron spokesperson Alexandra Bowie in a statement.

So, where did that claim about human embryonic stem cells come from?

It appears to have developed from this statement Regeneron issued back in April 2020 regarding stem cell research:

"As is the case with many other science-focused biotechnology companies, Regeneron uses a wide variety of research tools and technologies to help discover and develop new therapeutics. stem cells are one such tool. the stem cells most commonly used at Regeneron are mouse embryonic stem cells and human blood stem cells. currently, there are limited research efforts employing human-induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from adult human cells and human embryonic stem cells that are approved for research use by the national institutes of health and created solely through in vitro fertilization."

According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, here's what the antibody cocktail used to treat the president is made of:

"One antibody comes from a human who had recovered from a SARS-COV-2 infection; a B cell that makes the antibody was harvested from the person's blood and the genes for the immune protein isolated and copied. The other antibody is from a mouse, which was engineered to have a human immune system, that had the spike protein injected into it."

Bowie also told News 8 the statement about stem cell research on its website reflects the company's general position on stem cell research, but does not mean human embryonic stem cells were used in creating the antibody cocktail used to treat the president.

Nevertheless, some said the company's position on using stem cells in general contradicts President Trump's pro-life stance and that of Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

But the bottom line, were human embryonic stem cells used in Regeneron's antibody cocktail to treat the president? News 8 can verify the answer is no.

More:
VERIFY: Was the antibody cocktail used to treat President Trump developed using human embryonic stem cells? - CBS News 8

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trend and Forecast to 2025 – re:Jerusalem

MarketsandResearch.biz has published the latest market research study on Global Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 by Company, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 which investigates a few critical features of the market such as industry condition, division examination, market insights. The report studies the global Stem Cell Therapy market share, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels. The report has referenced down to earth ideas of the market in a straightforward and unassuming way in this report. The research contains the categorization of the market by top players/brands, region, type, and end-user. The report exhaustive essential investigation of current market trends, opportunities, challenges, and detailed competitive analysis of the industry players in the market.

The research report has comprehensively included numbers and figures with the help of graphical and pictorial representation which embodies more clarity on the global Stem Cell Therapy market. Then the report delivers key information about market players such as company overview, total revenue (financials), market potential, global presence, as well as market share, prices, production sites and facilities, products offered, and strategies adopted by them. Market status and outlook of global and major regions, from angles of players, countries, product types, and end industries have been analyzed.

NOTE: Our report highlights the major issues and hazards that companies might come across due to the unprecedented outbreak of COVID-19.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.marketsandresearch.biz/sample-request/95817

Key strategic manufacturers included in this report: Osiris Therapeutics, Molmed, JCR Pharmaceutical, NuVasive, Anterogen, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Medi-post, Pharmicell, Takeda (TiGenix)

Market Potential:

Key market vendors have been predicted to obtain the latest opportunities as there has been an increased emphasis on spending more on the work of research and development by many of the manufacturing companies. Also, many of the market contenders are forecasted to make a foray into the emerging economies to find new opportunities. The global Stem Cell Therapy market has gone through rapid business transformation by good customer relationships, drastic and competitive growth, significant changes within the market, and technological advancement in this market.

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key countries, with market size, growth rate, import and export of in these countries from 2015 to 2020, which covering: North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia), South America (Brazil, Argentina), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt and South Africa)

The market can be segmented into product types as: Autologous, Allogeneic

The market can be segmented into applications as: Musculoskeletal Disorder, Wounds & Injuries, Cornea, Cardiovascular Diseases, Others

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.marketsandresearch.biz/report/95817/global-stem-cell-therapy-market-2020-by-company-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

Reasons for Buying Market Report:

Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@marketsandresearch.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Marketsandresearch.biz is a leading global Market Research agency providing expert research solutions, trusted by the best. We understand the importance of knowing what global consumers watch and buy, further using the same to document our distinguished research reports. Marketsandresearch.biz has worldwide presence to facilitate real market intelligence using latest methodology, best-in-class research techniques and cost-effective measures for worlds leading research professionals and agencies. We study consumers in more than 100 countries to give you the most complete view of trends and habits worldwide. Marketsandresearch.biz is a leading provider of Full-Service Research, Global Project Management, Market Research Operations and Online Panel Services.

Contact Us Mark Stone Head of Business Development Phone: +1-201-465-4211 Email: sales@marketsandresearch.biz Web: http://www.marketsandresearch.biz

See the article here:
Global Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trend and Forecast to 2025 - re:Jerusalem

Taking Gene Editing to the Brain, the Immune System, and More – Tufts Now

One of the most remarkable recent advances in biomedical research has been the development of highly targeted gene-editing methods such as CRISPR that can add, remove, or change a gene within a cell with great precision. The method is already being tested or used for the treatment of patients with sickle cell anemia and cancers such as multiple myeloma and liposarcoma, and today, its creators Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna received the Nobel Prize in chemistry.

While gene editing is remarkably precise in finding and altering genes, there is still no way to target treatment to specific locations in the body. The treatments tested so far involve removing blood stem cells or immune system T cells from the body to modify them, and then infusing them back into a patient to repopulate the bloodstream or reconstitute an immune responsean expensive and time-consuming process.

Building on the accomplishments of Charpentier and Doudna, Tufts researchers have for the first time devised a way to directly deliver gene-editing packages efficiently across the blood brain barrier and into specific regions of the brain, into immune system cells, or to specific tissues and organs in mouse models. These applications could open up an entirely new line of strategy in the treatment of neurological conditions, as well as cancer, infectious disease, and autoimmune diseases.

A team of Tufts biomedical engineers, led by associate professor Qiaobing Xu, sought to find a way to package the gene editing kit so it could be injected to do its work inside the body on targeted cells, rather than in a lab.

They used lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)tiny bubbles of lipid molecules that can envelop the editing enzymes and carry them to specific cells, tissues, or organs. Lipids are molecules that include a long carbon tail, which helps give them an oily consistency, and a hydrophilic head, which is attracted to a watery environment.

There is also typically a nitrogen, sulfur, or oxygen-based link between the head and tail. The lipids arrange themselves around the bubble nanoparticles with the heads facing outside and the tails facing inward toward the center.

Xus team was able to modify the surface of these LNPs so they can eventually stick to certain cell types, fuse with their membranes, and release the gene-editing enzymes into the cells to do their work.

Making a targeted LNP takes some chemical crafting.

By creating a mix of different heads, tails, and linkers, the researchers can screen first in the laba wide variety of candidates for their ability to form LNPs that target specific cells. The best candidates can then be tested in mouse models, and further modified chemically to optimize targeting and delivery of the gene-editing enzymes to the same cells in the mouse.

We created a method around tailoring the delivery package for a wide range of potential therapeutics, including gene editing, said Xu. The methods draw upon combinatorial chemistry used by the pharmaceutical industry for designing the drugs themselves, but instead we are applying the approach to designing the components of the delivery vehicle.

In an ingenious bit of chemical modeling, Xu and his team used a neurotransmitter at the head of some lipids to assist the particles in crossing the blood-brain barrier, which would otherwise be impermeable to molecule assemblies as large as an LNP.

The ability to safely and efficiently deliver drugs across the barrier and into the brain has been a long-standing challenge in medicine. In a first, Xus lab delivered an entire complex of messenger RNAs and enzymes making up the CRISPR kit into targeted areas of the brain in a living animal.

Some slight modifications to the lipid linkers and tails helped create LNPs that could deliver into the brain the small molecule antifungal drug amphotericin B (for treatment of meningitis) and a DNA fragment that binds to and shuts down the gene producing the tau protein linked to Alzheimers disease.

More recently, Xu and his team have created LNPs to deliver gene-editing packages into T cells in mice. T cells can help in the production of antibodies, destroy infected cells before viruses can replicate and spread, and regulate and suppress other cells of the immune system.

The LNPs they created fuse with T cells in the spleen or liverwhere they typically resideto deliver the gene-editing contents, which can then alter the molecular make-up and behavior of the T cell. Its a first step in the process of not just training the immune system, as one might do with a vaccine, but actually engineering it to fight disease better.

Xus approach to editing T cell genomes is much more targeted, efficient, and likely to be safer than methods tried so far using viruses to modify their genome.

By targeting T cells, we can tap into a branch of the immune system that has tremendous versatility in fighting off infections, protecting against cancer, and modulating inflammation and autoimmunity, said Xu.

Xu and his team explored further the mechanism by which LNPs might find their way to their targets in the body. In experiments aimed at cells in the lungs, they found that the nanoparticles picked up specific proteins in the bloodstream after injection.

The proteins, now incorporated into the surface of the LNPs, became the main component that helped the LNPs to latch on to their target. This information could help improve the design of future delivery particles.

While these results have been demonstrated in mice, Xu cautioned that more studies and clinical trials will be needed to determine the efficacy and safety of the delivery method in humans.

Mike Silver can be reached at mike.silver@tufts.edu.

Read this article:
Taking Gene Editing to the Brain, the Immune System, and More - Tufts Now

Citius Pharmaceuticals Signs an Exclusive Worldwide Licensing Agreement with Novellus Therapeutics for Unique iMSC-Therapy for Acute Inflammatory…

CRANFORD, N.J., Oct. 7, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Citius" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: CTXR), a specialty pharmaceutical company developing and commercializing critical care drug products, announced that it has signed an exclusive agreement with Novellus Therapeutics Limited ("Novellus") to license iPSC-derived mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs), and has created a new subsidiary, NoveCite, that will be focused on developing cellular therapies.

NoveCite has a worldwide exclusive license from Novellus, an engineered cellular medicines company, to develop and commercialize NoveCite mesenchymal stem cells ("NC-iMSCs") to treat acute respiratory conditions with a near term focus on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ("ARDS") associated with COVID-19. Several cell therapy companies using donor-derived MSC therapies in treating ARDS have demonstrated that MSCs reduce inflammation, enhance clearance of pathogens and stimulate tissue repair in the lungs. Almost all these positive results are from early clinical trials or under the emergency authorization program.

NC-iMSCs are the next generation mesenchymal stem cell therapy. They are believed to be differentiated and superior to donor-derived MSCs. Human donor-derived MSCs are sourced from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, placenta, umbilical tissue, etc. and have significant challenges (e.g., variable donor and tissue sources, limited supply, low potency, inefficient and expensive manufacturing). iMSCs overcome these challenges because they:

Globally, there are 3 million cases of ARDS every year out of which approximately 200,000 cases are in the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic has added significantly to the number of ARDS cases. Once the COVID patients advance to ARDS, they are put on mechanical ventilators. Death rate among patients on ventilators can be as high as 50% depending on associated co-morbidities. There are no approved treatments for ARDS, and the current standard of care only attempts to provide symptomatic relief.

"NoveCite iMSCs have the potential to be a breakthrough in the field of cellular therapy for acute respiratory conditions because of the high potency seen in Novellus' pre-clinical studies, and because iMSCs are iPSC-derived, and therefore overcome the manufacturing challenges associated with donor derived cells," said Myron Holubiak, Chief Executive Officer of Citius.

"We are excited to be part of this effort because of the promise to save lives and reduce long term sequelae in patients with devastating respiratory diseases such as ARDS caused by COVID-19," said Dr. Matthew Angel, Chief Science Officer of Novellus. "Our iMSC technology has multimodal immunomodulatory mechanisms of action that make it potentially promising therapy to treat acute respiratory diseases."

About Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Citius is a late-stage specialty pharmaceutical company dedicated to the development and commercialization of critical care products, with a focus on anti-infectives and cancer care. For more information, please visit http://www.citiuspharma.com.

About Novellus, Therapeutics, Limited

Novellus is a pre-clinical stage biotechnology company developing engineered cellular medicines using its patented non-immunogenic mRNA high specificity gene editing, mutation-free & footprint-free cell reprogramming and serum insensitive mRNA lipid delivery technologies. Novellus is privately held and is headquartered in Cambridge, MA. For more information, please visit http://www.novellus-inc.com.

About NoveCite iMSC (NC-iMSC)

NoveCite's mesenchymal stem cell therapy product is derived from a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line generated using a proprietary mRNA-based (non-viral) reprogramming process. The NC-iMSCs produced from this clonal technique are differentiated from human donor-derived MSCs (bone marrow, placenta, umbilical cord, adipose tissue, or dental pulp) by providing genetic homogeneity. In in-vitro studies, NC-iMSCs exhibit superior potency and high cell viability. NC-iMSCs secrete immunomodulatory proteins that may reduce or prevent pulmonary symptoms associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with COVID-19. NC-iMSC is an allogeneic (unrelated donor) mesenchymal stem-cell product manufactured by expanding material from a master cell bank.

First generation (human donor-derived) MSCs are isolated from donated tissue followed by "culture expansion". Since only a relatively small number of cells are isolated from each donation, first generation MSCs are increased by growing the cells in culture. Unfortunately, these type of MSCs start to lose potency, and ultimately become senescent. Each donation produces a limited number of MSCs, so a continuous supply of new donors is needed to produce commercial scale. The number and quality of MSCs that can be isolated from different donors can vary substantially.

About Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

ARDS is an inflammatory process leading to build-up of fluid in the lungs and respiratory failure. It can occur due to infection, trauma and inhalation of noxious substances. ARDS accounts for approximately 10% of all ICU admissions and almost 25% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Survivors of ARDS are often left with severe long-term illness and disability. ARDS is a frequent complication of patients with COVID-19. ARDS is sometimes initially diagnosed as pneumonia or pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs from heart disease). Symptoms of ARDS include shortness of breath, rapid breathing and heart rate, chest pain (particularly while inhaling), and bluish skin coloration. Among those who survive ARDS, a decreased quality of life is relatively common.

Safe Harbor

This press release may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting Citius. You can identify these statements by the fact that they use words such as "will," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "should," and "may" and other words and terms of similar meaning or use of future dates. Forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could negatively affect our business, operating results, financial condition and stock price. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated are: the risks associated with developing the NoveCite technology as a treatment for ARDS; risks associated with developing any of our product candidates, including any licensed from Novellus, Inc., including that preclinical results may not be predictive of clinical results and our ability to file an IND for such candidates; our need for substantial additional funds; the estimated markets for our product candidates, including those for ARDS, and the acceptance thereof by any market; risks relating to the results of research and development activities; uncertainties relating to preclinical and clinical testing; the early stage of products under development, including the NoveCite technology; our ability to obtain, perform under and maintain licensing, financing and strategic agreements and relationships; our ability to attract, integrate, and retain key personnel; risks related to our growth strategy; our ability to identify, acquire, close and integrate product candidates and companies successfully and on a timely basis; government regulation; patent and intellectual property matters; competition; as well as other risks described in our SEC filings. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based, except as required by law.

Contact: Andrew Scott Vice President, Corporate Development (O) 908-967-6677 x105 (M) 646-522-8410 ascott@citiuspharma.com

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/citius-pharmaceuticals-signs-an-exclusive-worldwide-licensing-agreement-with-novellus-therapeutics-for-unique-imsc-therapy-for-acute-inflammatory-respiratory-conditions-including-covid-19-related-acute-respiratory-distress-syndrom-301147409.html

SOURCE Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Company Codes: NASDAQ-SMALL:CTXR

Follow this link:
Citius Pharmaceuticals Signs an Exclusive Worldwide Licensing Agreement with Novellus Therapeutics for Unique iMSC-Therapy for Acute Inflammatory...

Heidelberg Pharma AG: Interim Management Statement on the First Nine Months of 2020 – PharmiWeb.com

DGAP-News: Heidelberg Pharma AG / Key word(s): Quarterly / Interim Statement 08.10.2020 / 07:12 The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Heidelberg Pharma AG: Interim Management Statement on the First Nine Months of 2020

- IND application to the FDA for the Phase I/IIa clinical trial of HDP-101 in preparation

- Private placement with gross proceeds of EUR 14.4 million and further financing commitment of EUR 15 million by majority shareholder dievini received

- Expansion of own ATAC pipeline leads to increased expenses and adjustment of forecast

- Milestone payment received from partner Magenta in September

- Encouraging first data from partner RedHill with upamostat in COVID-19

Ladenburg, Germany, 8 October 2020 - Heidelberg Pharma AG (FSE: HPHA) today reported on the first nine months of fiscal year 2020 (1 December 2019 - 31 August 2020) and the Group's financial figures.

Dr. Jan Schmidt-Brand, CEO and CFO of Heidelberg Pharma AG, commented: "We are very relieved that we have mastered the past months without major restrictions despite the difficult COVID-19 situation. Our own research and development work continued as planned. However, there were delays with partners, which affected expected milestone payments and the duration of early-stage research. The maintenance of personal contacts with scientific partners and investors was significantly limited by the pandemic measures and could largely only take place virtually.

The focus continues to be on our ATAC candidate HDP-101, but the expansion of our pipeline is also becoming increasingly important. Thanks to the financing commitment of our main shareholder dievini in July, we were able to intensify the development of further product candidates and initiate important work in recent weeks. As a result, our expenses have increased significantly, and we have already adjusted our forecast for 2020. This broadening of our own pipeline is an important step to further exploit the potential of our ATAC platform technology and increase the value of the company."

Important operational developments and achievements

- HDP-101 (BCMA ATAC) development program: The preclinical development of HDP-101, a BCMA Antibody Targeted Amanitin Conjugate for treating multiple myeloma, has now been completed. The first batch of the development candidate HDP-101 was tested in the final GLP toxicity study, and the preclinical study was recently successfully completed. The clinical team has finalized the study protocol of the Phase I/IIa study of the clinical development program for HDP-101 and is in contact with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to resolve any final questions. The company expects to be able to submit the IND application for the study to the FDA in the near future. Coordination with the German regulatory authority, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, will follow.

- Execution of a capital increase and financing commitment by majority shareholder dievini: In April 2020, Heidelberg Pharma AG carried out a private placement with gross proceeds of EUR 14.4 million. At an issue price of EUR 5.10, 2,820,961 new shares were issued from authorized capital, which corresponded to just under 10% of the share capital at that time. In July 2020, Heidelberg Pharma received a further financing commitment of up to EUR 15 million from its main shareholder dievini Hopp Biotech holding GmbH & Co. KG, Walldorf, Germany, (dievini). This commitment enabled Heidelberg Pharma to advance further development candidates from its proprietary project portfolio and start the necessary work. The financing range until mid-2021 will thus be maintained despite the expanded pipeline.

- Virtual Annual General Meeting and election of a new Supervisory Board: The Annual General Meeting of Heidelberg Pharma AG was held in virtual format on 22 July 2020 in accordance with the COVID-19 Act. The Annual General Meeting approved all resolutions proposed by the management by a large majority (between 98.65% and 99.99%). Among other items on the agenda, the Supervisory Board of Heidelberg Pharma AG was elected for a five-year term. Professor Christof Hettich, Dr. Georg F. Baur, Dr. Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach, Dr. Birgit Kudlek and Dr. Mathias Hothum were re-elected to the Supervisory Board.

Update of partner programs

- Progress with licensing partner Magenta: In January 2020, the partner Magenta Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA, (Magenta) (NASDAQ: MGTA) announced MGTA-117, utilizing ATAC technology, as a clinical development candidate for the targeted preparation (conditioning) of patients for stem cell transplants or gene therapy. MGTA-117 consists of a CD117 antibody in combination with the toxin Amanitin and was developed based on an ATAC technology license granted by Heidelberg Pharma. Initial preclinical data were presented by Magenta at various conferences in the first half of the year. Magenta is currently conducting further preclinical studies and preparing the manufacturing and clinical development of MGTA-117, which is expected to be in the clinic in 2021.

Magenta is also working on the preclinical validation of the second candidate, a CD45-ATAC, for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

- Progress with partner Telix: Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited, Melbourne, Australia, (Telix) (ASX: TLX) has been conducting a Phase III study (ZIRCON) with TLX250-CDx (89Zr-Girentuximab) since 2019 for the imaging diagnosis of kidney cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) in Australia and Europe. In early 2020, the IND in the U.S. was approved for this study and patient recruitment for the trial started. Due to the COVID-19 lockdown, patient recruitment had to be suspended, but was resumed in Europe in mid-June and in Australia in September. Telix expects recruitment to commence in the United States and Canada during October, with completion of recruitment for the entire study anticipated during the first quarter of 2021.

On 1 July 2020, Telix received a Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US FDA for TLX250-CDx. This status offers a number of significant benefits to Telix, including eligibility for fast track designation, more frequent and intensive interactions with the FDA, and the opportunity to submit a "rolling" Biological License Application (BLA) for TLX250-CDx, where the application can be submitted in separate modules to streamline the FDA review process for approval.

In parallel to the ZIRCON trial, a Phase I/II bridging study (ZIRDAC-JP) with TLX250-CDx is being conducted in Japan to demonstrate that the pharmacology and dosage in Japanese patients are comparable to the already available results. The first Japanese patient was enrolled in August and treated with TLX250-CDx.

Events after the reporting period

- Milestone payment received from partner Magenta: Heidelberg Pharma AG announced in mid-September that it has received a milestone payment from its cooperation partner Magenta associated with the initiation of the GLP toxicology study for the development candidate MGTA-117.

- Progress with the out-licensed product candidate upamostat: The partner RedHill Biopharma Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel and Raleigh, NC, USA, (RedHill) (Nasdaq: RDHL) announced in September 2020 that it has conducted an in vitro study with the development candidate RHB-107 (upamostat) against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The study showed potent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral replication by RHB-107. A Phase II/III study with RHB-107 in patients with COVID-19 is planned to be initiated later this year.

Additionally, RedHill announced in August 2020 that recent pre-clinical findings, presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting, demonstrated that treatment with RHB-107 in combination with its novel drug candidate, Opaganib, resulted in tumor regression and that the combination of both drugs was potent and well tolerated in animal models. In light of these findings, RedHill plans to add an additional cohort to its ongoing Phase IIa study of Opaganib in advanced cholangiocarcinoma, evaluating Opaganib in combination with RHB-107, subject to discussions with the FDA.

Results of operations, financial position and net assets

The Heidelberg Pharma Group - as of the reporting date comprising Heidelberg Pharma AG and its subsidiary Heidelberg Pharma Research GmbH - reports consolidated figures. The reporting period referred to below concerns the period from 1 December 2019 to 31 August 2020 (9M 2020).

In the first nine months of the 2020 fiscal year, the Group generated sales revenue and income totaling EUR 8.3 million (previous year: EUR 6.7 million). This figure includes sales revenue of EUR 7.5 million, an increase from the previous year's total of EUR 6.2 million, that stems from the collaboration agreements including the supply of Amanitin linkers for the ATAC technology (EUR 7.0 million), the service business (EUR 0.3 million) and income from license agreements signed by the parent company (EUR 0.2 million).

At EUR 0.8 million, other income was up slightly on the prior-year figure of EUR 0.6 million. It primarily consisted of the charging on of patent costs, of German and European grants and of the reversal of unutilized accrued liabilities and provisions.

Operating expenses including depreciation and amortization amounted to EUR 20.7 million in the reporting period (previous year: EUR 12.4 million). Cost of sales rose to EUR 4.5 million (previous year: EUR 2.8 million) due to the ATAC collaborations including material supply.

Research and development costs in the amount of EUR 13.5 million increased as planned compared to the prior-year period (EUR 7.2 million) due to external Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) production, and preclinical and regulatory preparations for the clinical trial with HDP-101. In addition, first payments for the production of antibodies for HDP-102 and HDP-103 had been made to a CDMO. R&D costs continue to represent the largest cost block with 65% of operating expenses.

Administrative costs edged up slightly to EUR 2.4 million compared to the prior-year period (EUR 2.2 million). Among others, this figure includes holding company costs and costs related to the stock market listing.

Other expenses for business development and marketing of the technology in the reporting period totaled EUR 0.3 million (previous year: EUR 0.2 million) due to an expansion of activities.

The net loss for the first nine months of the fiscal year increased to EUR 12.5 million (previous year: EUR 5.6 million) as a result of the items described above. Earnings per share fell from EUR -0.20 in the previous year to EUR -0.42.

Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the third quarter amounted to EUR 9.2 million (30 November 2019: EUR 9.9 million; 31 August 2019: EUR 12.7 million). This represents an average monthly cash outflow of EUR 1.66 million in the first nine months of the fiscal year (previous year: EUR 0.75 million), excluding the capital increase carried out in April.

Total assets as of 31 August 2020 increased to EUR 25.4 million compared to the 30 November 2019 reporting date (EUR 23.0 million). At EUR 18.6 million, equity was higher compared to the end of fiscal year 2019 (EUR 16.3 million).

The capital increase in the first half of the financial year as well as the exercise of stock options in the first third quarter resulted in 2,837,461 new shares that increased the share capital of Heidelberg Pharma AG from EUR 28,209,611 to EUR 31,047,072, divided into 31,047,072 no par value bearer shares.

Financial outlook for 2020

The forecast for the current financial year issued in mid-March 2020 was adjusted for the Heidelberg Pharma Group in September 2020. This is due to increased operating expenses for the validation and manufacturing of the next two ATAC development candidates, which will be incurred during the year, as well as a better predictability for the expected sales and the overall result.

The Heidelberg Pharma Group expects operating expenses between EUR 26.0 million and EUR 28.0 million (previously: EUR 20.0 million to EUR 24.0 million). Sales and other income will continue to range between EUR 9.0 million and EUR 10.0 million (previously: EUR 8.0 million to EUR 10.0 million). Based on these adjustments, an operating result (EBIT) between EUR -16.0 million and EUR -19.0 million is expected (previously: EUR -11.0 million to EUR -15.0 million).

For 2020, Heidelberg Pharma anticipates cash requirements of EUR 18.0 million to EUR 20.0 million (previously: EUR 11.0 million to EUR 15.0 million). Monthly cash consumption is expected to range between EUR 1.5 million and EUR 1.7 million per month (previously: EUR 0.9 million and EUR 1.3 million). Based on the updated planning and the financing commitment of the main shareholder dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH & Co. KG, Walldorf, the company's financing is still secured until mid-2021.

Heidelberg Pharma will not host a conference call on this interim management statement. The complete figures for the interim financial statements can be downloaded from http://www.heidelberg-pharma.com/ "Press & Investors > Financial Reports > Interim Management Statement of 8 October 2020".

Key figures for the Heidelberg Pharma Group

1 The reporting period begins on 1 December and ends on 31 August 2 Equity / total assets 3 Including members of the Executive Management Board Rounding of exact figures may result in differences.

About Heidelberg Pharma Heidelberg Pharma AG is a biopharmaceutical company based in Ladenburg, Germany. Heidelberg Pharma is an oncology specialist and the first company to develop the toxin Amanitin into cancer therapies using its proprietary Antibody Targeted Amanitin Conjugate (ATAC) technology and to advance the biological mode of action of the toxin as a novel therapeutic principle. This proprietary technology platform is being applied to develop the Company's proprietary therapeutic ATACs as well as in third-party collaborations to create a variety of ATAC candidates. The proprietary lead candidate HDP-101 is a BCMA ATAC for multiple myeloma.

Heidelberg Pharma AG has entered into partnerships to further develop and commercialize its clinical assets upamostat (formerly MESUPRON(R)) and TLX250-CDx (formerly REDECTANE(R)). The Company is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange: ISIN DE000A11QVV0 / WKN A11QVV / Symbol HPHA. More information is available at http://www.heidelberg-pharma.com/.

This communication contains certain forward-looking statements relating to the Company's business, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "estimates", "believes", "expects", "may", "will", "should", "future", "potential" or similar expressions or by a general discussion of the Company's strategy, plans or intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results of operations, financial condition, performance, achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors and partners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.

08.10.2020 Dissemination of a Corporate News, transmitted by DGAP - a service of EQS Group AG. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

The DGAP Distribution Services include Regulatory Announcements, Financial/Corporate News and Press Releases. Archive at http://www.dgap.de

Read more:
Heidelberg Pharma AG: Interim Management Statement on the First Nine Months of 2020 - PharmiWeb.com

NDA Partners Expert Consultant Ellen Areman, Receives AABB Award for Major Contributions to the Field of Cellular Therapies – PR Web

I am honored to receive this award for my work in the exciting field of cellular therapies and look forward to continuing to contribute in any way I can to this rapidly growing field and to supporting companies who are developing new cell therapy and regenerative medicine products.

ROCHELLE, Va. (PRWEB) October 07, 2020

NDA Partners Chief Executive Officer Earle Martin announced today that Ellen Areman, one of the firms prominent Expert Consultants, was recently honored by AABB, formerly the American Association of Blood Banks, with the 2020 Emily Cooley Memorial Award and Lectureship. The award recognizes an individual who has demonstrated teaching ability and has made a major contribution to the field of transfusion medicine or cellular therapies. Ms. Areman was recognized for her pioneering work spanning more than 30 years in the field of cellular therapies and for serving as a role model and teacher to several generations of technologists, clinicians, and researchers.

Throughout her career, Ms. Aremans contributions to cellular therapies have been numerous including her career at the US Food and Drug Administrations Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapy as an Expert Biologist and Product Reviewer, co-chair of the Cord Blood Standards subgroup of the Center for Biologics Research and Evaluations Hematopoietic Stem Cell Task Group, and the FDA- CBER/NIH-NHLBI Cell Therapy Working Group. She was also the coordinator of the cell processing section of the National Institutes of Healths Clinical Center Department of Transfusion Medicine, and has worked as the Laboratory Manager for both the Georgetown University/ NHLBI (COBLT) Cord Blood Bank and Pediatric Cancer and Stem Cell Research Program, as well as Technical Director of Georgetowns Cellular Engineering/Molecular and Cellular Hematotherapy Laboratory. She joined NDA Partners as an Expert Consultant in 2015 and provides regulatory strategy and CMC support to companies developing biological products including hematopoietic, immunologic, and stem cell therapies.

I am honored to receive this award for my work in the exciting field of cellular therapies and look forward to continuing to contribute in any way I can to this rapidly growing field and to supporting companies who are developing new cell therapy and regenerative medicine products, said Ms. Areman.

Ms. Areman earned her masters degree in pathology from Georgetown University, bachelors degree from The State University of New York at Albany, and specialist certification in blood banking from the National Institutes of Health. She is a member of AABB and a founding member of the International Society for Cell Therapies. She has also published extensively on biological products including serving as editor of Cellular Therapy: Principles, Methods and Regulations.

About NDA Partners NDA Partners is a life sciences management consulting and contract development organization (CDO) focused on providing product development and regulatory services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries worldwide. The highly experienced Principals and Expert Consultants in NDA Partners include three former FDA Center Directors; the former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer at the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP); an international team of more than 100 former pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agency senior executives; and an extensive roster of highly proficient experts in specialized areas including nonclinical development, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, CMC, medical device design control and quality systems, clinical development, regulatory submissions, and development program management. Services include product development and regulatory strategy, expert consulting, high-impact project teams, and contract management of client product development programs.

Contact Earle Martin, Chief Executive Officer Office: 540-738-2550 MartinEarle@ndapartners.com

Share article on social media or email:

Read this article:
NDA Partners Expert Consultant Ellen Areman, Receives AABB Award for Major Contributions to the Field of Cellular Therapies - PR Web

The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% – PRNewswire

NEW YORK, Oct. 7, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% during the forecast period. Increasing adoption of SUBs among small companies and startups, reduced automation complexity, ease in the cultivation of marine organisms, reduced energy and water consumption, the growing biologics market, technological advancements in SUBs, and increasing Biopharmaceutical R&D are factors driving the growth of this market.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04208113/?utm_source=PRN

By type, the stirred-tank SUBs segment accounted for the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market The single-use bioreactors market is categorized into major four types, wave-induced SUBs, stirred-tank SUBs, bubble-column SUBs, and other bioreactors.The stirred-tank SUBs segment dominated the single-use bioreactors market in 2019.

The large share of this segment can be attributed to factors such as the high preference for stirred-tank SUBs in the cultivation of aerobic microbial cultures due to its abilty to provide greater oxygen transfer and reduced engineering challenges such as heat removal, mass transfer, and higher agitation rates.

Asia Pacific: The fastest-growing region in the single-use bioreactors market.

The Asia Pacific market is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period, mainly due to the growing biopharmaceutical industry, increasing life science research, rising investments by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and the growing number of CROs and CMOs in several APAC countries contribute to its growth.

North America: the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market North America accounted for the largest share of the single-use bioreactors market. Factors such as the to the presence of an established biopharmaceutical industry and the presence of major players operating in the single-use bioreactors market in the region are the major factors driving the market growth.

Breakdown of primaries The study contains insights from various industry experts, ranging from component suppliers to Tier 1 companies and OEMs. The break-up of the primaries is as follows: By Respondent Supply Side- 70%, Demand Side- 30% By Designation Executives- 25%, CXOs, Directors- 20%, Managers - 55% By Region North America - 50%, Europe - 20%, APAC 20%, RoW- 10%

The single-use bioreactors market is dominated by a few globally established players such as C Sartorius Stedim Biotech (France), Thermo Fisher Scientific (US), Danaher Corporation (US), Merck Millipore (Germany). Other players in this market includes, Getinge (Sweden), Eppendorf AG (Germany), Parker Hannifin Corporation (US), Pierre Gurin (France), Meissner Filtration Products, Inc. (US), Solida Biotech GmbH (Germany), Satake Chemical Equipment Mfg., Ltd. (Japan), Able Corporation & Biott Corporation (Japan), ABEC, Inc. (US), Distek, Inc. (US), PBS Biotech, Inc. (US), CESCO Bioengineering Co. Ltd. (Taiwan), New Horizon Biotechnology, Inc. (US), bbi-biotech GmbH (Germany), Celltainer Biotech BV (Netherlands), Cellexus (UK), Stobbe Pharma GmbH (Switzerland), G&G Technologies, Inc. (US), CerCell A/S (Denmark), Charter Medical Ltd. (US), Solaris Biotech USA (US) and OmniBRx Biotechnologies Pvt. Ltd. (India).

Research Coverage: The report segments the single-use bioreactors market based on region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa), products (Single-use bioreactor systems (up to 10L, 11100L, 101500L, 011500L, above 1500L), single-use media bags (2D bags, 3D bags, other bags), single-use filtration assemblies, and other products), type (Stirred-tank SUBs, wave-induced SUBs, bubble-column SUBs, and other SUBs), Type of Cell (Mammalian cells, bacterial cells, yeast cells, and other cells), Molecule Type (Monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, gene-modified cells, stem cells, and other molecules), application (Research & development, process development, and bioproduction), end users (Pharmaceutical & biopharmaceutical companies, CROs and CMOs, and academic & research Institutes).

The report also provides a comprehensive review of market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the single-use bioreactors market

Key Benefits of Buying the Report: The report will help the leaders/new entrants in this market with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall market and the sub-segments.This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies.

The report also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the single-use bioreactors market and provides them information on key market drivers, challenges, and opportunities.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04208113/?utm_source=PRN

About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________ Contact Clare: [emailprotected] US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001

SOURCE Reportlinker

http://www.reportlinker.com

Continue reading here:
The global single-use bioreactors market is projected to reach USD 3.9 billion by 2025 from USD 1.7 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 18.0% - PRNewswire

Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded – PharmaLive

Five years after the companys portfolio bottomed out, Bristol-Myers Squibb markets three of the worlds six best-selling pharma brands.

By Joshua Slatko [emailprotected]

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

430 E. 29th Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10016 Phone: 212-546-4000 Website: bms.com

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

(All figures are in millions of dollars, except EPS)

2019

Revenue $26,145

Net income $3,460

Diluted EPS $2.01

R&D expense $6,148

1H 2020

Revenue $20,910

Net income $(846)

Diluted EPS $(0.38)

R&D expense $4,894

BEST-SELLING Rx PRODUCTS

(All sales are in millions of dollars)

2019

Eliquis $7,929

Opdivo $7,204

Orencia $2,977

Sprycel $2,110

Yervoy $1,489

Revlimid $1,299*

Baraclude $555

* Sales with BMS after completion of the Celgene acquisition in November 2019.

1H 2020

Revlimid $5,799

Eliquis $4,804

Opdivo $3,419

Orencia $1,464

Pomalyst/Imnovid $1,458

Sprycel $1,032

Yervoy $765

Abraxane $608

Vidaza $284

Outcomes Creativity Index Score: 0 Manny Awards N/A Cannes Lions N/A LIA: Health & Wellness N/A Clio Health N/A One Show: HW&P N/A MM&M Awards N/A Global Awards N/A Creative Floor Awards N/A

When Giovanni Caforio, MD, took over as CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb in May 2015, the companys annual top-line revenue had just fallen below $16 billion and its leading product, the $2 billion Abilify, had gone generic the month before. But the seeds of future success had already been planted. Opdivo earned the drugs first approval from FDA in December 2014, sales of Eliquis had just more than quadrupled to $774 million, and BMS was starting to look like it might really be what the leadership team had been starting to call it: an Immuno-Oncology company. Having risen through the companys oncology divisions, Dr. Caforio was the man for the moment. Five years later, Opdivo is the worlds third-best-selling oncologic, Eliquis is the worlds leading cardiovascular brand, and BMS acquisition of Celgene a move that would have been barely conceivable back in 2015 has brought the $10 billion oncology brand Revlimid into the fold as well, alongside Pomalyst (tracking towards $3 billion in annual sales), the recently approved products Reblozyl, Zeposia and Onureg, and the high-potential developmental CAR T compounds liso-cel and ide-cel, among others. For this extraordinary turnaround, for the courageous and ultimately successful all-in bets on Opdivo and Eliquis, and for the aggressive pursuit and capture of Celgene to firm up both the top line and the pipeline, Med Ad News is pleased to name Bristol-Myers Squibb as Company of the Year.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, said Giovanni Caforio, MD, CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, Dr. Caforio said at the end of 2019. With an expanded portfolio of high-performing brands, eight potential commercial launch opportunities, a deep and broad early pipeline, and the financial flexibility to continue to invest in innovation, the company enters 2020 uniquely positioned to transform patients lives through science and create long-term sustainable growth.

Helped along by a month and change of legacy Celgene revenue, BMS top line in 2019 was $26.15 billion, an improvement of 15.9 percent compared with the previous year. Due in part to the impact of amortization of acquired intangible assets and other costs from the Celgene transaction, though, net income for the year declined 30.1 percent to $3.46 billion and diluted earnings per share were down a dollar to $2.01. In the first half of 2020, the first full half of legacy Celgene, top-line sales were up by 71.5 percent to $20.91 billion. However, due to more amortization of acquired intangible assets $4.67 billion of it and other Celgene-related costs, net income fell into the red at negative $846 million and EPS was -$0.38. BMS executives are estimating that full-year EPS for 2020 will fall between -$0.06 and $0.09; without all the one-time Celgene charges and costs, though, they are projecting full-year 2020 EPS at between $6.10 and $6.25.

Acquisitions &partnerships

In January, BMS and Nektar Therapeutics announced a new joint development plan to advance bempegaldesleukin (bempeg) plus Opdivo into multiple new registrational trials.

The revision to the companies strategic collaboration agreement includes a new joint development plan under which Nektar and Bristol-Myers Squibb will expand the active clinical development program for bempeg plus nivolumab from three ongoing registrational trials in first-line metastatic melanoma, first-line cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer and first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to include two additional registrational trials in adjuvant melanoma and in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition, a Phase I/II dose escalation and expansion study will be initiated to evaluate bempeg plus nivolumab in combination with axitinib in first-line RCC in order to support a future registrational trial. The costs for these studies will be shared based upon the cost-sharing outlined in the terms of the original collaboration agreement. Also as part of the new strategic collaboration agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb will independently conduct and fund a Phase I/II dose optimization and expansion study in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer with bempeg and nivolumab.

In February, BMS and BioMotiv, a mission-driven drug development accelerator associated with The Harrington Project for discovery and development, that advances breakthrough discoveries from research institutions into therapeutics, announced the launch of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, a biotechnology company focused on developing a new class of drugs for fibrotic and other inflammatory diseases. The intellectual property behind Anteros was first developed by Yale University and in-licensed by Bristol-Myers Squibb and subsequently assigned to Anteros. This is the first company BioMotiv and Bristol-Myers Squibb have launched since executing their Strategic Partnership Agreement, as previously announced in September 2019.

Under the terms of the partnership, Bristol-Myers Squibb is contributing the IP, data, and reagents for a series of small molecules against an undisclosed mechanism, and BioMotiv, through the formation of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, working in close partnership with Yale, is solely responsible for research and development. Once Anteros nominates a pre-clinical candidate, Bristol-Myers Squibb has the option to acquire the company from BioMotiv under pre-agreed terms.

During March, Bristol-Myers Squib and Voluntis announced a collaboration agreement to create and investigate digital therapeutic solutions that will support cancer patients. Taking advantage of Theraxium Oncology, Voluntis core platform for digital therapeutics in oncology, the collaboration is evaluating potential solutions that will support management of patient symptoms and remote monitoring by healthcare providers.

According to company leaders, the goal is that the digital therapeutic, once researched and developed, would provide patients access to a mobile app that would support treatment and track symptoms. The app will be developed to embed evidence-based algorithms intended to provide patients with real-time recommendations for self-management of symptoms related to their therapy. The parties will also investigate how the solution could enable patients to more effectively communicate with their health care providers, capture and track symptoms, and receive a personalized supportive care plan.

In August 2020, BMS and Forbius, a privately held, clinical-stage protein engineering company that designs and develops biotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer and fibrotic diseases, announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would acquire Forbius. The acquisition was completed during September.

Forbius has developed a portfolio of highly selective and potent inhibitors of TGF-beta 1 and 3, which are key mediators of immunosuppression and fibrosis. The transaction included an upfront payment and future success-based milestone payments. Prior to closing, Forbius non-TGF-beta assets were transferred to a newly formed private company, which is retained by Forbius existing shareholders.

Under this transaction, Bristol-Myers Squibb acquired Forbius TGF-beta program, including the programs lead investigational asset, AVID200. TGF-beta is a key cytokine that regulates various cell processes, including regulation of the immune system. Selective inhibition of TGF-beta 1 and 3 may enhance anti-tumor efficacy by acting synergistically with immunotherapy. AVID200 is undergoing Phase 1 development for oncology and fibrosis.

Also in August, BMS and Dragonfly Therapeutics Inc. announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would be granted the global exclusive license to Dragonflys interleukin-12 (IL-12) investigational immunotherapy program, including its extended half-life cytokine DF6002. DF6002 is a monovalent IL-12 immunoglobulin Fc fusion protein proposed to achieve strong anti-tumor efficacy by establishing an inflammatory tumor microenvironment necessary for productive anti-tumor responses.

Under the agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb is responsible for the development and any subsequent commercialization of DF6002 and its related products worldwide, including strategic decisions, regulatory responsibilities, funding, and manufacturing. Dragonfly will receive $475 million in near-term upfronts, and is eligible to receive performance-based development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments. In addition, Dragonfly will receive up to 24 percent royalties on worldwide net sales.

The Opdivo development train continued to roll during 2020, with two additional FDA approvals in NSCLC and another in HCC.

Dragonfly received FDA clearance in May 2020 for its investigational new drug application to develop DF6002. In addition, Dragonfly has an ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors, which began in July 2020. BMS intends to advance the research and development of DF6002 in oncology and hematology.

Opdivo

Sales of the oncologic Opdivo rose 7 percent in 2019 to $7.2 billion. While international sales were up by 15 percent due to higher demand as a result of approvals for additional indications in 2018 and launches in Europe and Asia, sales growth in the United States was 2 percent, primarily due to a smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market and increased competition for the Opdivo+Yervoy combination in kidney cancer. Company leaders expect this trend to continue until the market stabilizes or new indications are approved and launched. In the first half of 2020 sales of Opdivo declined by 5.7 percent to $3.42 billion. According to company leaders, this was again due to the smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market, as well as lower demand due to COVID-19, primarily lower new patient starts and patient visits.

In February, BMS announced five-year follow-up results from the Phase III CheckMate -025 study, which continue to demonstrate that treatment with Opdivo delivers superior overall survival (OS) rate and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to those treated with everolimus.

With an extended minimum follow-up of 64 months, patients treated with Opdivo continued to demonstrate OS benefit with 26 percent of patients alive compared to 18 percent of patients treated with everolimus. Additionally, the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response was 23 percent for Opdivo versus 4 percent for everolimus and the median duration of response for Opdivo was also maintained longer than for everolimus (18.2 months versus 14 months, respectively).

Also in February, BMS announced updated results from the Phase III CheckMate -214 study evaluating the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With a minimum follow-up of 42 months, the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to show superior OS, ORR, duration of response, and complete response rates.

Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million.

A significant OS benefit was observed in both patients from the intermediate- and poor-risk and the intent-to-treat populations treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to those treated with sunitinib alone. Of the patients treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy who experienced a complete response, per independent review, that response was ongoing in 84 percent and 86 percent of patients in the IP and ITT populations, respectively.

More than half of advanced RCC patients treated with the Opdivo plus Yervoy combination were alive after four years across the entire study population of the Phase 3 CheckMate -214 trial, as reported by Bristol-Myers Squibb in September 2020. With the longest follow-up for an immunotherapy-based combination in previously untreated advanced RCC, Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to demonstrate superior, long-term OS and durable responses versus sunitinib. These sustained benefits were observed across the primary patient population, those with intermediate- and poor-risk prognostic factors, and in the intention-to-treat (ITT, i.e. all randomized) patient population.

During March, FDA approved Opdivo 1 mg/kg plus Yervoy 3 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who have been previously treated with sorafenib. Approval for this indication was granted under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response seen in the Opdivo + Yervoy cohort of the Phase I/II CheckMate -040 trial. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Opdivo + Yervoy is the only dual immunotherapy approved by FDA in this setting. The therapy features a potentially synergistic mechanism of action that targets two different checkpoints (PD-1 and CTLA-4) and works in complementary ways.

In the CheckMate -040 cohort of HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib, after a minimum follow up of 28 months, 33 percent of patients responded to treatment with Opdivo + Yervoy; 8 percent had a complete response, and 24 percent had a partial response. Duration of responses ranged from 4.6 to 30.5-plus months, with 88 percent lasting at least six months, 56 percent at least 12 months, and 31 percent at least 24 months. Overall response rate and DOR were assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. ORR assessed by BICR using modified RECIST was 35 percent, with a CR reported in 12 percent of patients and a PR reported in 22 percent of patients.

In April, BMS and Exelixis Inc. announced that CheckMate -9ER, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx compared to sunitinib in previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) at final analysis, as well as the secondary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis, and ORR.

CheckMate -9ER results were reported in September in which Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx showed superior OS and doubled median PFS and ORR with a favorable safety profile compared to sunitinib.

In May, FDA approved Opdivo 360 mg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) given with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. The therapy was approved for patients with squamous or non-squamous disease and regardless of PD-L1 expression. This application was reviewed under FDAs Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program, which aims to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available to patients as early as possible.

This approval for Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy was based on the pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase III CheckMate -9LA trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy combined with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression or tumor histology (minimum 8.1 months follow up). Median OS was 14.1 months versus 10.7 months, respectively. In a follow-up analysis at 12.7 months, the hazard ratio improved numerically to 0.66, with mOS of 15.6 months and 10.9 months. At one year, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy and 47 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive.

Also in May, FDA approved Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) for the first-line treatment of adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors express PD-L1 (1 percent) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

This approval was based on Part 1a of the Phase III CheckMate -227 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor histology with a minimum follow up of 29.3 months. The median OS was 17.1 months versus 14.9 months. In the trial, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 56 percent treated with chemotherapy were alive at one year, and 40 percent and 33 percent at two years, respectively. At three years (median 43.1 months follow up), 33 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 22 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive. As assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review, the confirmed overall response rate with a minimum follow up of 28.3 months was 36 percent with Opdivo + Yervoy (5.8 percent complete response and 30.1 percent partial response) and 30 percent with chemotherapy (1.8 percent CR and 28.2 percent PR). Among patients who responded, the median duration of response was 23.2 months for patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 6.2 months for chemotherapy.

In June, FDA approved Opdivo for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. This application was granted Priority Review Designation by FDA, and the approval was based on the Phase III ATTRACTION-3 trial in which Opdivo demonstrated superior OS versus taxane chemotherapy (investigators choice of docetaxel or paclitaxel). The median OS was 10.9 months for Opdivo compared to 8.4 months for docetaxel or paclitaxel. Opdivo is the first approved immunotherapy in this setting regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression level.

In August 2020, BMS announced that the Phase III CheckMate -577 trial evaluating Opdivo as an adjuvant therapy for patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer met its primary endpoint of disease-free survival at a pre-specified interim analysis. In the trial, treatment with Opdivo following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and complete surgical resection demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) compared to placebo in the all-randomized population. The safety profile of Opdivo was consistent with previously reported studies. This is the second tumor, in addition to melanoma, where Opdivo has demonstrated a benefit in the adjuvant setting.

Bristol-Myers Squibb announced results in September from the Phase 3 CheckMate -577 trial in which adjuvant treatment with Opdivo demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS compared to placebo in patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and tumor resection.

BMS announced during August that CheckMate -649, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma, met both primary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis and progression-free survival at final analysis in patients whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score 5. The OS benefit was also observed in the all-randomized population. Opdivo is the first PD-1 inhibitor to demonstrate superior OS and PFS in combination with chemotherapy when compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with gastric cancer, GEJ, cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Bristol Myers Squibb reported in September primary results from CheckMate -649 in which first-line treatment with Opdivo plus chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to treatment with chemotherapy alone.

In early October 2020, Opdivo 360 mg every three weeks plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg every six weeks was approved by the U.S. FDA for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The U.S. approval is based on a pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase 3 CheckMate -743 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy (n=303) demonstrated superior overall survival versus the platinum-based standard of care chemotherapy, with a median OS of 18.1 months (95 percent CI: 16.8 to 21.5) versus 14.1 months (95 percent CI: 12.5 to 16.2), respectively. These results were observed after 22.1 months of minimum follow-up, according to Bristol-Myers Squibb. At two years, 41 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy were alive and 27 percent with chemotherapy.

Eliquis took over as the worlds top-selling cardiovascular medicine in 2019 with sales of $7.93 billion.

Opdivo + Yervoy is the first new systemic therapy in more than 15 years to be approved by the FDA in this setting. The marketing approval marks the third indication for Opdivo + Yervoy-based treatments in thoracic cancers and seventh indication overall.

Other productperformances

The cardiovascular drug Eliquis took over as BMS leading brand by revenue in 2019 with growth of 23.2 percent and sales of $7.93 billion for the year, passing Xarelto to become the worlds No. 1 cardiovascular brand. According to BMS executives, U.S. sales of Eliquis increased due to higher demand, partially offset by higher Medicare Part D coverage gap cost share, while international sales rose due to higher demand. In the first half of 2020 sales of Eliquis rose another 21.1 percent to $4.8 billion. Eliquis is indicated for the prevention of stroke in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism disorders.

The autoimmune product Orencia generated sales of $2.98 billion for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 9.9 percent. According to company leaders, this was driven by higher demand and higher average net selling price. Sales of Orencia in the first half of 2020 edged up by 3.2 percent to $1.46 billion, slowed by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Orencia is indicated for adult patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis and is also indicated for reducing signs and symptoms in certain pediatric patients with moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

In June, BMS announced results from the open-label switch period of Early AMPLE, a Phase IV exploratory biomarker study assessing the differences by which Orencia and another treatment, adalimumab, interfere with disease progression in moderate-to-severe early rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive (seropositive) for certain autoantibodies. Findings of the open-label switch period showed that early seropositive RA patients treated with Orencia demonstrated substantial clinical improvements at week 48, sustaining the level of responses achieved at week 24 compared to adalimumab. In seropositive patients switching from adalimumab to Orencia, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period to week 48.

The efficacy responses observed at 24 weeks with Orencia were sustained at week 48 in the patients who continued on Orencia. At week 48, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia in the non-switch arm were 78, 63, and 50, respectively. At week 24, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia were 83, 73, and 50, respectively; ACR 20/50/70 scores for adalimumab at week 24 were 63, 45, and 30, respectively.

In the patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia, while the trial was not powered to show superiority or non-inferiority, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period through week 48. ACR 20/50/70 scores for patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia were 75, 63, and 38, respectively, at week 48.

Overall, patients with a well-known genetic marker of RA prognosis, called the Shared Epitope, who continued on Orencia achieved numerically higher responses than the broader seropositive patient population at week 48, indicating the potential importance of SE as a predictor of response to Orencia. ACR 20/50/70 responses were 77, 67 and 53, respectively, for SE+ patients continuing on Orencia.

Sales of the leukemia drug Sprycel rose by 5.5 percent in 2019 to $2.11 billion. Company leaders said this was due to higher average net selling price and higher demand in the United States. In the first half of 2020, Sprycel sales rose 2.9 percent to $1.03 billion, with demand declining in the United States and generic competition internationally. Sprycel is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and the treatment of adults with chronic, accelerated, or myeloid or lymphoid blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.

The oncologic Yervoy generated $1.49 billion in sales for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 12 percent. According to company executives, this was due to higher demand and higher average net selling price in the United States and approvals for additional indications and launches primarily in Europe and Japan in 2018 internationally. Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million, held back by increased competition for the Opdivo + Yervoy combination for kidney cancer.

After joining the BMS portfolio via the Celgene acquisition, the oncologic Revlimid is trending towards more than $11 billion in revenue in 2020.

While they did not have time to add much to BMS 2019 numbers since the Celgene deal closed in November, two legacy Celgene products are going to have a major impact on BMS top line in 2020: Revlimid and Pomalyst/Imnovid. Revlimid, the worlds leading oncology drug by revenue in 2018, generated $10.82 billion in sales and growth of 11.7 percent between Celgene and BMS in 2019, losing its oncology crown only because Mercks Keytruda grew faster. In the first half of 2020 sales of Revlimid were $5.8 billion, up 9.2 percent compared with the medicines first-half 2019 amount while still under the Celgene umbrella. The multiple myeloma drug Pomalyst generated sales of more than $2.16 billion in 2019 the numbers are a bit unclear due to the timing of the Celgene acquisition and brought in another $1.46 billion in the first half of 2020, up 24 percent compared with the drugs first-half 2019 performance at Celgene. Revlimid is indicated in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and as a single agent as a maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pomalyst is indicated for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy.

In May, FDA approved Pomalyst for patients with AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma whose disease has become resistant to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), or in patients with Kaposi sarcoma who are HIV-negative. Pomalyst was granted accelerated approval, Breakthrough Therapy designation and Orphan Drug designation in these indications based on overall response rates observed in a Phase I/II open label, single-arm clinical trial (12-C-0047). Continued approval may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial. Pomalyst is the first new treatment option available for those with Kaposi sarcoma in more than 20 years.

The legacy Celgene oncologic Pomalyst enjoyed sales growth of nearly a quarter in the first half of 2020 and earned a new indication from FDA for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.

Original post:
Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded - PharmaLive