Investments in Innovation to Drive the Animal stem cell therapy Market between 2017 and 2025 – Industry Today

Animal stem cell therapy is a usage of animals stem cell to treat a disease or disorder. The ability of stem cell is to divide and differentiate into a cell with specialized function useful for repairing body tissues damaged by injury or disease.

Animal stem cell therapy is a usage of animals stem cell to treat a disease or disorder. The ability of stem cell is to divide and differentiate into a cell with specialized function useful for repairing body tissues damaged by injury or disease. The animal stem cell therapy process involve three steps which include collection of stem cell sample from animals and preparing the sample to concentrate the stem cells. Finally, the therapy includes transferring the stem cells into the injured site for treatment. Animal stem cell therapy increases the expectancy of life in animals with no side effects. It is available for the treatment of arthritis, degenerative joint disorders, tendon, and ligaments injuries in animals. Stem cell therapy is most often used to treat dogs, cats, and horses. But recent developments made it possible to use animal stem cell therapy in tiger, pig, etc. Present animal stem cell therapy is studied in treatments of the inflammatory bowel, kidney, liver, heart and immune-mediated diseases respectively.

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Drivers and Restraints

Increasing prevalence of disease in animals with growing population and to increase the animals quality of life, the companies focus shifting towards animal stem cell therapies. Along with increasing government funding for the protection of animals and fast approvals of FDA contributing towards the rapid growth of the animal stem cell therapy. The research in animal stem cells offers great promise for understanding underlying mechanisms of animal development; it gives great opportunities to treat a broad range of diseases and conditions in animals. Animal stem cell therapy is increasingly recognized as critical translational models of human disease for treatment. All these factors act as drivers for the robust growth of the animal stem cell therapy market.

To remain ahead of your competitors, request for a samplehere@

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/14941

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Segmentation

Segmentation based on Applications

Segmentation based on End-user

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Market Overview

Studies in the animal stem cell therapy continue at a breathtaking pace due to increasing demand and treatment cost covered in reimbursements. And animal stem cell therapy is more effective than traditional treatment available in the market which is boosting the companies to increase the spending in the R&D for innovative methods. Because of the novelty and complexity of animal stem cell therapy, FDA encourages individuals, universities and drug companies for further innovations. The future expected with double CAGR during the forecasted period.

To receive extensive list of important regions, Request Methodology here @

https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/14941

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Region-wise Overview

Regarding geographies, North America is dominating the global animal stem cell therapy market due to the increased incidence rate and awareness about the therapy. U.S represents the largest market share in the North America due to the increasing demand for the therapy. Europe and Asia-Pacific are showing a significant growth rate during the forecasted period due to the growing adoption of the animal stem cell therapy. The animal stem cell therapy market in underdeveloped countries is slow when compared to the developed countries.

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Key Participants

The key participants in the animal stem cell therapy market are Magellan Stem Cells, ANIMAL CELL THERAPIES, Abbott Animal Hospital, VETSTEM BIOPHARMA, Veterinary Hospital and Clinic Frisco, CO, etc. The companies are entering into the collaboration and partnership to keep up the pace of the innovations.

You Can Request for TOC Here @https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/toc/14941

Explore Extensive Coverage of PMR`s

Life Sciences & Transformational HealthLandscape

About us:

Persistence Market Research (PMR) is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics andmarket research methodologyto help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At PMR, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Our client success stories feature a range of clients from Fortune 500 companies to fast-growing startups. PMRs collaborative environment is committed to building industry-specific solutions by transforming data from multiple streams into a strategic asset.

Contact us:

Naved Beg Persistence Market Research Address 305 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York City, NY 10007 United States U.S. Ph. +1-646-568-7751 USA-Canada Toll-free +1 800-961-0353 Salessales@persistencemarketresearch.com Websitehttps://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

See the original post here:
Investments in Innovation to Drive the Animal stem cell therapy Market between 2017 and 2025 - Industry Today

Fred Hutch Evergreen Fund awards six grants to promising projects – Fred Hutch News Service

Six Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center teams have been selected as this years recipients of grants from the Evergreen Fund, which supports early research projects thought to have enough commercial potential to attract future business partners.

Since 2017, the donor-supported Evergreen Fund has awarded over $4 million to projects proposed by scientists seeking a well-timed financial boost to translate their ideas into lifesaving advances for patients.

Despite the disruption of COVID-19, the Evergreen Fund once again offers our researchers the opportunity to complete the critical experiments that venture capital and pharma partners expect to see when evaluating a partnership opportunity, said Hilary Hehman, the Hutchs associate vice president of Strategic Partnerships & Alliances.

The Hutch program also provides researchers feedback on their research, funded or not, from a group of seasoned investors who evaluated their proposals.

This year, the Evergreen Fund distributed three pilot grants of $50,000 each that are designed to give big and bold ideas with commercial application an infusion of funds to demonstrate the projects potential within a six-month period. Another trio of projects were awarded $200,000 each to accelerate their research over a two-year period. The goal of these larger, so-called Beyond Pilot grants is to help researchers whose ideas are further along. These scientists have shown promising data and a commercial path forward, but their projects need more development to attract external financial support.

Drs. Kristin Anderson and Lucas Sullivan received a Beyond Pilot grant for their project to boost the viability of T cells engineered to destroy pancreatic tumors, malignancies stubbornly resistant to therapies. Andersons T cells, designed with receptors that zero in on specific molecular markers on the pancreatic tumor cell surface, have shown promise in preclinical studies.

Yet these living drugs cannot survive for long in the toxic microenvironment of pancreatic tumors. The team is experimenting with new approach they call metabolic reprogramming, which involves a second bit of T-cell engineering. It equips the T cells with an enzyme that allows them to make their own supply of aspartate, a critical amino acid they are starved of inside these tumors.

Both tumor and healthy cells alike need aspartate, but within these toxic tumors, T cells are outcompeted by cancer cells for the raw material both need to make it. By engineering an aspartate-making enzyme into their T cells, the researchers hope to give them the extra oomph needed to survive. If they stay alive, these T cells may have a fighting chance against a cancer known to researchers as the beast of all beasts.

Drs.Irv Bernsteinand Suzanne Furuyama are studying whether they can reverse the ability of solid tumors to evade immunotherapy. Their focus is on the tumor microenvironment, where a tug-of-war is underway for control of the bodys immune response. Key to winning is to turn on an intercellular signaling system called Notch, which shifts the balance of immune cells from a tumor-protective to an anti-tumor state.

But simply flipping the Notch switch on can set inflammation loose against healthy cells as well. Bernsteins team has engineered a switch-flipper that recognizes both tumor cells and Notch to ramp up the inflammatory response of immune cells only in the right places. Their project will involve studies in mice to determine if the Notch-induced, anti-tumor immune cell state enhances solid tumor susceptibility to immunotherapies.

Drs. Justin Taylor and Jim Boonyaratanakornkit are developing a laboratory-designed antibody, a type of immune protein, capable of blocking four different respiratory viruses. Each of these common viruses poses a significant threat to the lives of cancer patients recovering from blood stem cell transplants. The four targeted viruses respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and two common strains of human parainfluenzavirus are among the deadliest for these patients and afflict vulnerable children and the elderly as well. Previously, the Taylor Lab has been able to isolate antibodies capable of protecting against at least two such viruses at the same time. The aim of this project is to engineer and test in animal models an antibody that can neutralize all four targeted viruses, leading to a new type of drug capable of saving thousands of lives each year.

Drs. Jarrod Dudakov and Sinad Kinsella study age-related decline of the thymus, the gland responsible for generating the diverse selection of T-cell receptors needed for a successful response to vaccines or pathogens. In their search for ways to stimulate regeneration of the thymus, they have identified two proteins, known as FOXN1 and DLL4, that are critical to regenerating thymus cells. The goal of their pilot project is to create a screening test for molecules that drive production of either of those proteins. Such protein-inducing molecules might serve as the basis for new clinical approaches that boost T- cell reconstitution. They could help restore immune function in transplant recipients as well as in patients whose thymus glands have been decimated by age, infection or chemotherapies.

Dr. Stephen Tapscott has joined with Dr. Robert Bradley, holder of the McIlwain Family Endowed Chair in Data Science, on a pilot project to explore the therapeutic potential of their discoveries of one way tumors may evade destruction by our immune system. Their focus is on a protein called DUX4, which may be used by a developing embryo and fetus to shield its cells from a mothers immune system. Shut down during childhood, the DUX4 gene is reawakened by some tumor cells, which use the ensuing shower of DUX4 proteins as an invisibility cloak against assault by cancer-attacking T cells. The researchers will develop an inventory of tumor cells that ramp up production of DUX4, explore what mutations enable this reawakening and establish strategies to disrupt it.

Drs. Ming Yu and William Grady are developing a highly sensitive test for early detection of both a deadly form of esophageal cancer and a precursor condition of abnormal cell growth known as high grade dysplasia, or HGD. Their testing panel, which picks up three distinctive genetic markers in patient specimens, has been shown to detect either HGD or the cancer esophageal adenocarcinoma in samples from biopsies or endoscopies. However, those procedures are invasive and expensive.

The pilot project aims to validate their test panel for use in a low-cost device that probes the esophagus with a pill-sized balloon rather than an endoscope. A less-expensive early detection test is expected to reduce mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma, which is diagnosed in nearly 20,000 Americans each year.

Note:Scientists at Fred Hutch played a role in developing these discoveries, and Fred Hutch and certain of its scientists may benefit financially from this work in the future

More:
Fred Hutch Evergreen Fund awards six grants to promising projects - Fred Hutch News Service

Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market Research (2015-2026): In-depth Assessment of the Growth and other Aspects – Internet Shots

Stem Cells are a class of cells that have unlimited or immortal self-renewal ability, capable of producing at least one type of highly differentiated progeny cells. Primary Cells are cells that are cultured immediately after removal from the body. Stem Cell and Primary Cell Cultures are specialized systems, and as such developing and manufacturing media for these systems come with inherent complexities.

The global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market is valued at US$ xx million in 2020 is expected to reach US$ xx million by the end of 2026, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2021-2026.

Access more details about this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/global-stem-cell-and-primary-cell-culture-medium-market-research-report

(This is our latest offering and this report also analyzes the impact of COVID-19 on Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market and updated by the current situation, especially the forecast)

The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the markets growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of production about the global market and also about each type from 2015 to 2026. This section mentions the volume of production by region from 2015 to 2026. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2015 to 2026, manufacturer from 2015 to 2020, region from 2015 to 2020, and global price from 2015 to 2026.

A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market experts opinions have been taken to understand the market better.

The major players in the market include Merck, STEMCELL Technologies, Irvinesci, Cell Applications, Inc, Biological Industries, Miltenyi Biotec, Swiss Medica Clinic, Promocell, Creative Biolabs, Lifeline Cell Technology, ScienCell Research Laboratories, Osiris Therapeutics, NuVasive, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, JCR Pharmaceutical, Pharmicell, Medi-post, Anterogen, Molmed, Takeda (TiGenix), etc.

Purchase this exclusive research report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/buy-now/1546660

Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market: Regional Analysis

The report offers in-depth assessment of the growth and other aspects of the Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium market in important regions, including the U.S., Canada, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Southeast Asia, Mexico, and Brazil, etc. Key regions covered in the report are North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America.

The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, production, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region.

Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market: Competitive Landscape

This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and production by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019.

Inquire for more details / sample / customization about this report at: https://www.themarketreports.com/report/ask-your-query/1546660

See more here:
Global Stem Cell and Primary Cell Culture Medium Market Research (2015-2026): In-depth Assessment of the Growth and other Aspects - Internet Shots

Cellular Therapy Products Market 2020 2025 analysis examined in new C – News by aeresearch

The report, titled Cellular Therapy Products Market, is a comprehensive document that provides valuable insights into market elements like drivers, restraints, competitive landscape, and technology evolution. For a better understanding of the market, the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the key segments and future growth prospects. The current COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed market dynamics and the global economy. The report provides an impact analysis of the pandemic on the entire market. It also provides an analysis of the current and future impact. The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic changes in trends and requirements due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The report also includes a post-COVID scenario and prospects for future growth.

The research report on Cellular Therapy Products market encloses a complete examination of present and future scenario of this industry domain. It mentions the growth driving factors and opportunities which will help in industry expansion, as well as the challenges that will hamper the market growth.

The report offers historic as well as current data on various market segmentations to determine key products, applications, and end-users impacting the business revenue. It also highlights and market share and growth rate of the industry over the analysis period. Besides, the study contains pricing models and consumption patterns of this business space.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/308835

Questions about the regional terrain that are answered in the Cellular Therapy Products market report:

Other vital pointers in the Cellular Therapy Products market report:

Key Reasons to Purchase

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/308835

Read more from the original source:
Cellular Therapy Products Market 2020 2025 analysis examined in new C - News by aeresearch

Actinium Pharmaceuticals Successfully Completes First Dosing Cohort in the Phase 1 Study of Actimab-A and Venetoclax Combination Therapy in…

NEW YORK, Sept. 23, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE AMERICAN: ATNM) (the "Company" or "Actinium") today announced that it has successfully completed the first dosing cohort in the Actimab-A and venetoclax combination, multi-center Phase 1 trial for patients with Relapsed or Refractory ("R/R") Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) age 18 and above. All patients from the first dosing cohort (0.50 uCi/kg of Actimab-A) completed treatment and cleared their initial safety evaluation, thus allowing the study to proceed to the second dose cohort of 1.0 uCi/kg Actimab-A added to venetoclax. In a poster presentation at the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2019, Actimab-A was shown to be synergistic with venetoclax in venetoclax resistant cell lines, by depleting MCL-1, a protein shown to mediate resistance to venetoclax. The ongoing Phase 1 study was planned to replicate this synergy in a clinical setting. Actinium plans to report study proof of concept results in 2021.

Venetoclax is a B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor jointly developed and marketed by AbbVie and Genentech that is approved in combination with hypomethylating agents ("HMAs") for patients with AML. The use of venetoclax has become widespread in the treatment of fit and unfit patients with R/R AML following its inclusion in the recently expanded National Comprehensive Cancer Network ("NCCN") guidelines. Actinium's preclinical research has demonstrated that by adding Actimab-A to venetoclax, the targeted internalized radiation from Actimab-A can deliver potent AML cell killing, as well as effectively deplete MCL-1 levels. The overexpression of MCL-1, a member of the BCL-2 family which venetoclax does not inhibit, promotes resistance to venetoclax. Thus, Actimab-A reverses resistance to venetoclax and has independent anti-leukemic activity mediated by CD33 as well.

"We are pleased to confirm that the second combination trial in our CD33 program is advancing through the dose escalation study as planned. Despite approval in multiple blood cancers, including AML, most AML patients are not cured with venetoclax regimens and eventually relapse. Based on the preclinical data, synergy with venetoclax and Actimab-A should lead to higher remission rates in R/R AML," said Dr. Mark Berger, Actinium's Chief Medical Officer. "We continue to generate promising data from our broader combination program. For example, the Actimab-A combination trial with chemotherapy agent CLAG-M increased the complete response rate compared to CLAG-M alone in R/R AML patients by 60%. We expect to complete the proof of concept Actimab-A venetoclax combination trial in 2021."

This Phase 1 study is a multicenter, open label trial of Actimab-A added to venetoclax for patients with CD33 positive R/R AML. The study will continue to enroll patients that have been previously treated with venetoclax as well as venetoclax nave patients. Gary Schiller, MD, Professor, Hematology-Oncology and Director, Hematologic Malignancy/Stem Cell Transplant Program at the UCLA Medical Center is the Principal Investigator for this study. The trial is also active at the University of Louisville.

Sandesh Seth, Actinium's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, said, "We continue to advance the CD33 program for fit and unfit R/R AML patients as there is still a significant unmet need despite multiple recently approved agents. These therapeutic agents are not curative and patients continue to experience low response rates and/or high relapse rates. Our CD33 program, which also includes the Actimab-A CLAG-M combination trial, is anchored in leveraging mechanistic synergies of Actimab-A with approved or novel therapeutic agents in order to improve patient outcomes. We look forward to multiple clinical trial updates by year-end from our three ongoing trials in R/R AML, including our Iomab-B SIERRA Phase 3 pivotal trial."

Rationale for Actimab-A Venetoclax Combination Trial

This Phase 1/2 trial is a multicenter, open label trial of Actimab-A (lintuzumab-Ac225) added to venetoclax for patients with CD33 positive relapsed/refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia. The Phase 1 portion of the study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Actimab-A added to venetoclax for R/R AML. The Phase 2 portion of the trial will assess the percentage of patients with CR, CRh, or Overall Response (CR + CRh), up to six months after the start of the treatment without receiving other AML therapies. The trial will enroll R/R AML patients who have been treated with venetoclax as well as venetoclax-nave patients. At the 1.0 uCi/kg dose, Actimab-A is administered on Day 1 of each cycle for four cycles and venetoclax is taken on Days 1-21 of each cycle for up to 4 cycles. Each cycle is 28 days, with a potential to expand to 42 days to allow for full hematologic recovery. Gary Schiller, MD, Professor, Hematology-Oncology and Director, Hematologic Malignancy/Stem Cell Transplant Program at the UCLA Medical Center is the Principal Investigator for this study.

More information on the clinical trial design is available at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03867682).

About Actinium's CD33 Program (Actimab-A)

Antibody Radiation Conjugate (ARC) Actimab-A targets the CD33 antigen that is expressed on virtually all AML cells with the antibody lintuzumab which delivers potent alpha radiation via its Actinium-225 radioisotope payload. Blood cancers like AML are highly sensitive to radiation but cannot treated with the current standard of external beam delivery because the disease is too widespread throughout the body. The combination of targeted radiation with Actimab-A potentially allows for greater cancer cell death than a standalone chemotherapy regimen such as CLAG-M or venetoclax, which are frequently used in the treatment of fit and unfit patients with relapsed or refractory AML per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Prior clinical results in over 100 patients treated with Actimab-A, including a Phase 1/2 trial of 58 patients, demonstrated a safety profile with minimal non-hematologic toxicities and an unmatched ability to deliver attenuated doses of radiation internally to CD33 expressing cancer cells. In the Phase 1/2 trial, Actimab-A as a single agent produced a 69% remission rate (CR, CRi, CRp) at high doses in patients with newly diagnosed AML but Actinium elected to pursue low dose combination trials for therapeutic development based on observed myelosuppression. In the Actimab-A CLAG-M Phase 1 combination trial, the second cohort with CLAG-M plus the 0.50 uCi/kg dose showed that 86% (6/7) of patients achieved complete remission (CR/CRi) after receiving the 0.50 uCi/kg dose of Actimab-A. This is a nearly 60% increase over the remission rate reported in a trial of seventy-four patients with relapsed or refractory AML who received CLAG-M alone. The company expects trial results, including the third dose cohort, in 2020. The Actimab-A Venetoclax Phase 1 trial continues to enroll patients in a maximum tolerated dose and expects to announce proof-of-concept results in 2021.

About Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE: ATNM)

Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing ARCs or Antibody Radiation-Conjugates, which combine the targeting ability of antibodies with the cell killing ability of radiation. Actinium's lead application for our ARCs is targeted conditioning, which is intended to selectively deplete a patient's disease or cancer cells and certain immune cells prior to a BMT or Bone Marrow Transplant, Gene Therapy or Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT) such as CAR-T to enable engraftment of these transplanted cells with minimal toxicities. With our ARC approach, we seek to improve patient outcomes and access to these potentially curative treatments by eliminating or reducing the non-targeted chemotherapy that is used for conditioning in standard practice currently. Our lead product candidate, I-131 apamistamab (Iomab-B) is being studied in the ongoing pivotal Phase 3 Study of Iomab-B in Elderly Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SIERRA) trial for BMT conditioning. The SIERRA trial is over fifty percent enrolled and positive single-agent, feasibility and safety data has been highlighted at ASH, TCT, ASCO and SOHO annual meetings. I-131 apamistamab will also be studied as a targeted conditioning agent in a Phase 1/2 anti-HIV stem cell gene therapy with UC Davis and is expected to be studied with a CAR-T therapy in 2020. In addition, we are developing a multi-disease, multi-target pipeline of clinical-stage ARCs targeting the antigens CD45 and CD33 for targeted conditioning and as a therapeutic either in combination with other therapeutic modalities or as a single agent for patients with a broad range of hematologic malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma. Ongoing combination trials include our CD33 alpha ARC, Actimab-A, in combination with the salvage chemotherapy CLAG-M and the Bcl-2 targeted therapy venetoclax. Underpinning our clinical programs is our proprietary AWE (Antibody Warhead Enabling) technology platform. This is where our intellectual property portfolio of over 100 patents, know-how, collective research and expertise in the field are being leveraged to construct and study novel ARCs and ARC combinations to bolster our pipeline for strategic purposes. Our AWE technology platform is currently being utilized in a collaborative research partnership with Astellas Pharma, Inc. Website: https://www.actiniumpharma.com/

Forward-Looking Statements for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

This press release may contain projections or other "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company which the Company undertakes no obligation to update. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or estimated future results, including the risks and uncertainties associated with preliminary study results varying from final results, estimates of potential markets for drugs under development, clinical trials, actions by the FDA and other governmental agencies, regulatory clearances, responses to regulatory matters, the market demand for and acceptance of Actinium's products and services, performance of clinical research organizations and other risks detailed from time to time in Actinium's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including without limitation its most recent annual report on form 10-K, subsequent quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q and Forms 8-K, each as amended and supplemented from time to time.

Contacts:

Investors: Clayton Robertson Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. crobertson@actiniumpharma.com

Hans Vitzthum LifeSci Advisors, LLC Hans@LifeSciAdvisors.com (617) 535-7743

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/actinium-pharmaceuticals-successfully-completes-first-dosing-cohort-in-the-phase-1-study-of-actimab-a-and-venetoclax-combination-therapy-in-relapsedrefractory-aml-patients-301136354.html

SOURCE Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Company Codes: AMEX:ATNM

See more here:
Actinium Pharmaceuticals Successfully Completes First Dosing Cohort in the Phase 1 Study of Actimab-A and Venetoclax Combination Therapy in...

Advances in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma are Greatly Improving the Long-Term Outlook for Patients – Curetoday.com

When James Landon received a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) diagnosis in 2017, he was told his disease was indolent, meaning it was slow growing and didnt need to be treated right away, especially since he was feeling fine.

But that changed in 2019. Landon, 50, an attorney in Tucson, Arizona, started to feel tired all the time. His physicians discovered that his white blood cell count was sky-high and his spleen was enlarged.

The first-line treatment for MCL has long been high doses of chemotherapy, often followed by a stem cell transplant. But when Landon traveled to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston to explore his options, he was offered an alternative: an experimental regimen combining the drugs Imbruvica (ibrutinib) and Rituxan (rituximab). Imbruvica blocks a protein called Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), which is a driver of MCL, and Rituxan is an antibody that targets overactive B cells of the immune system that have been implicated in the disease.

Five months after starting the combination four Imbruvica pills every morning and once-weekly infusions of Rituxan Landons positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed no evidence of disease. If he stays clear, hell undergo a short course of chemotherapy and then move to a maintenance therapy of one year of Ibrutinib and two of Rituxan.

Having this option has been fantastic, in my opinion, because the drugs so far have worked well for me, with no toxicity, says Landon, who adds that he has plenty of energy to work full time and play with his 10-year-old son.

BTK inhibitors and immunotherapy are among the newer therapeutic options for patients with MCL that are greatly improving the outlook for long-term survival. In addition to these targeted drugs, Tecartus (brexucabtagene autoleucel) the first cell-based gene therapy for MCL in patients who havent responded to or who have relapsed following other kinds of treatment was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July and is a one-time personalized treatment made from patients own immune cells.

We now have several good nonchemotherapy options for treating MCL, says Dr. Anthony Nguyen, a professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine and a medical oncologist at Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada. We may be able to tell patients we can treat them without toxic chemotherapy, which can be reassuring, particularly for older patients.

MCL is a subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) thats characterized by the overproduction of a protein called cyclin D1. In about 85% of patients, that overproduction is caused by a genetic abnormality called reciprocal chromosomal translocation, which can be detected with diagnostic testing of tumor samples. MCL accounts for about 6% of all NHL diagnoses and is more common in men than in women, according to the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

The standard first-line treatment for MCL is high-dose chemotherapy, often with a four-medicine regimen called hyper-CVAD, followed by a stem cell transplant with a patients own cells or with those from a donor. The regimen often puts patients into long-term remissions, but the side effects including nausea, mouth ulcers and kidney damage can be difficult or even dangerous, particularly for patients with other illnesses.

The newer medicines and cell therapy were approved by the FDA to treat patients with MCL who dont respond to chemotherapy and transplants or who relapse. But as physicians gain more experience with these therapies, theres a growing interest in using them earlier in the treatment process to not only improve the chances of long-term remissions, but also to improve the quality of life for patients by sparing them from harsh side effects.

The FDA approved the first BTK inhibitor to treat MCL, Imbruvica, in 2013, based on a study showing an overall response rate (meaning the disease responded to treatment) of 68% and a complete response rate (the disappearance of all signs of cancer) of 21%. The average period that patients lived without their disease progressing was more than a year, and side effects were mild stomach upset and fatigue.

The more recently approved BTK inhibitors Calquence (acalabrutinib) and Brukinsa (zanubrutinib) have improved on those response rates. Patients receiving Brukinsa in a late-stage trial, for example, had an overall response rate of 89% and a complete response rate of 59%.

Another targeted treatment, Venclexta (venetoclax) is also being studied in MCL. Venclexta targets the protein BCL2, which promotes cell survival and is abnormally elevated in MCL helping to drive progression of the disease. In a small trial of Venclexta, 75% of patients with relapsed MCL responded to the drug, 21% of whom had complete responses. Theres even more interest in studying BCL2 inhibition in combination with BTK blockers. In a recent study of Venclexta combined with Imbruvica, the median progression-free survival time was 29 months.

This is an extremely promising combination, says Dr. Abhijeet Kumar, assistant professor in the division of hematology and oncology at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. Kumar is an investigator in an ongoing trial of Venclexta and Imbruvica in MCL.

There is, however, a risk of increased side effects when targeted treatments are combined. Imbruvica can cause bleeding, for example, and both drugs can lower neutrophil (a type of white blood cell) counts. Venclexta is also known to cause tumor lysis syndrome, a rapid release of tumor cells into the bloodstream that can endanger the kidneys and other organs. Still, so far, the combination seems to be well-tolerated, Kumar says.

Another two-drug treatment for MCL that has generated enthusiasm among oncologists treating the disease is dubbed R-squared because it combines Rituxan with Revlimid (lenalidomide), a drug that works by boosting the immune systems T cells and natural killer cells, which work together to attack cancer.

In a study of R-squared in 38 patients with newly diagnosed MCL, the progression-free survival rate after three years was 80% and overall survival reached 90%. The response is durable, says Dr. Bijal Shah, an associate member in the department of malignant hematology at Moffitt Cancer Center and one of the study investigators. During the R-squared trial, patients typically stayed on the combination for three years and then took Revlimid alone as long as the disease remained stable.

Similar benefits have been seen with a combination of Velcade (bortezomib), Revlimid and chemotherapy, a regimen called VR-CAP. Velcade is a targeted drug that works by disrupting the growth of MCL cells and prompting them to die.

In a trial of patients with untreated MCL, adding Velcade to Revlimid and chemotherapy extended progression-free survival by 37%. The addition of Velcade more than doubled the median duration of response to 41 months.

Both R-squared and VR-CAP have moved into the frontline treatment setting, Shah says. With that, were able to see really pronounced clinical benefits. Weve seen very long remissions, he says.

Several other combination strategies also are being investigated for MCL, including some that incorporate the drug Treanda (bendamustine), which works by causing DNA damage to cancer cells. In one study, combining Treanda with Rituxan improved progression-free survival rates over chemotherapy in patients with MCL or indolent NHL. More than 15 studies are now underway combining Treanda with Rituxan and other MCL treatments.

Even though targeted and combination treatments have extended survival times in MCL, most patients eventually relapse. Now theres a new option for those patients: Tecartus, a personalized therapy made from a patients own immune cells. The one-time treatment was approved by the FDA to treat patients who have not responded or have relapsed following other kinds of treatment.

Tecartus is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy similar to Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel), a CAR-T cell therapy approved by the FDA in 2017 to treat some types of large B-cell lymphomas. Like Yescarta, Tecartus targets CD19, a protein thats prevalent in cancerous B cells. Tecartus is made by extracting T cells from the blood of the patient with MCL and genetically modifying those cells to recognize and attack the cancer. In addition, the cells are put through an enrichment process designed to prevent them from wearing down before they are infused back into the patient.

In the clinical trial that led up to the approval, 87% of patients responded to Tecartus and 62% went into remission. Side effects, which included the immune overreaction known as cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, were manageable during the clinical trial, says Dr. Michael Wang, a professor in the department of lymphoma and myeloma at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and one of the clinical trial investigators.

Experience with previously approved CAR-T cell treatments led to the widespread use of anti-inflammatory medications such as interleuken-6 inhibitors and steroids to treat cytokine release syndrome, Wang says. We have a variety of supportive measures to manage the side effects, he says.

With the approval of Tecartus, Wang says oncologists can envision a flattening of the survival curve in MCL. Its an option for people who become resistant to targeted therapies and chemotherapy, he says. Its very possible we will be able to put some people into long- term remissions.

Bob Brixner, a 20-year survivor of MCL, has been watching all the new developments with interest. When he received an MCL diagnosis in 2000, he had no choice but to endure chemotherapy followed by a stem cell transplant with his own cells. When he relapsed in 2004, he was prescribed a more intense chemotherapy regimen, followed by a stem cell transplant from an unrelated donor.

Hes grateful the second treatment put him in a long-term remission, but he still remembers the brutal side effects, which included extreme fatigue and a bout with pneumonia. And with the transplants, my immune system didnt come back 100%, says Brixner, 70, a retired Chicago public schoolteacher. Nowadays if I catch a cold, instead of lasting a week, it will last three.

Brixner advises all newly diagnosed patients to ask a lot of questions about their treatment choices and to get a second opinion. I think its really important to be an informed patient, he says, especially since there are so many new choices. Some patients may not have to go through what I did, he says. Im delighted.

View original post here:
Advances in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma are Greatly Improving the Long-Term Outlook for Patients - Curetoday.com

CytoDyn’s Phase 2 Study of Leronlimab for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Selected for Oral Presentation at the Special isirv-AVG Virtual Conference on…

VANCOUVER, Washington, Sept. 22, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) CytoDyn Inc. (OTC.QB: CYDY), (CytoDyn or the Company), a late-stage biotechnology company developing leronlimab (PRO 140), a CCR5 antagonist with the potential for multiple therapeutic indications, announced today the Phase 2 study of leronlimab for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients has been selected for an oral presentation at the upcoming Special isirv-Antiviral Group Conference on Therapeutics for COVID-19. The Conference is sponsored by the International Society for Influenza and other Respiratory Virus Diseases, an independent and international scientific professional society promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus disease.

Details of the presentation are as follows:

Abstract Title:A Phase 2 Study of Leronlimab for Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Abstract Confirmation Number:AAVGV0010 Presenter:Harish Seethamraju, M.D., Medical Director, Advanced Lung Failure and Lung Transplant, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. Presentation Date and Time:October 6-8, 2020 12.00-4.00pm GMT and will be available on demand.

Additional details can be found on the conference web sitehere

The acceptance of this oral abstract by this highly regarded scientific organization is very rewarding for all of the medical professionals who provided care and treatment to the COVID-19 patients during our Phase 2 trial. We also view this acceptance as a validation of leronlimab as a potential therapeutic for this disease and we look forward to the upcoming interim analysis from our Phase 3 trial for severe-to-critical COVID-19 patients, said Nader Pourhassan, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of CytoDyn.

About Coronavirus Disease 2019 CytoDyn completed its Phase 2 clinical trial (CD10) for COVID-19, a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial for mild-to-moderate patients in the U.S. which produced statistically significant results for NEWS2. Enrollment continues in its Phase 3 randomized clinical trial for the severe-to-critically ill COVID-19 population in several hospitals throughout the U.S.; an interim analysis on the first 195 patients will be announced by mid-October.

About Leronlimab (PRO 140) The FDA has granted a Fast Track designation to CytoDyn for two potential indications of leronlimab for critical illnesses. The first indication is a combination therapy with HAART for HIV-infected patients and the second is for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Leronlimab is an investigational humanized IgG4 mAb that blocks CCR5, a cellular receptor that is important in HIV infection, tumor metastases, and other diseases, including NASH.Leronlimab has completed nine clinical trials in over 800 people and met its primary endpoints in a pivotal Phase 3 trial (leronlimab in combination with standard antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients).

In the setting of HIV/AIDS, leronlimab is a viral-entry inhibitor; it masks CCR5, thus protecting healthy T cells from viral infection by blocking the predominant HIV (R5) subtype from entering those cells. Leronlimab has been the subject of nine clinical trials, each of which demonstrated that leronlimab could significantly reduce or control HIV viral load in humans. The leronlimab antibody appears to be a powerful antiviral agent leading to potentially fewer side effects and less frequent dosing requirements compared with daily drug therapies currently in use.

In the setting of cancer, research has shown that CCR5 may play a role in tumor invasion, metastases, and tumor microenvironment control. Increased CCR5 expression is an indicator of disease status in several cancers. Published studies have shown that blocking CCR5 can reduce tumor metastases in laboratory and animal models of aggressive breast and prostate cancer. Leronlimab reduced human breast cancer metastasis by more than 98% in a murine xenograft model. CytoDyn is, therefore, conducting a Phase 1b/2 human clinical trial in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and was granted Fast Track designation in May 2019.

The CCR5 receptor appears to play a central role in modulating immune cell trafficking to sites of inflammation. It may be crucial in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and other inflammatory conditions. Clinical studies by others further support the concept that blocking CCR5 using a chemical inhibitor can reduce the clinical impact of acute GvHD without significantly affecting the engraftment of transplanted bone marrow stem cells.CytoDyn is currently conducting a Phase 2 clinical study with leronlimab to support further the concept that the CCR5 receptor on engrafted cells is critical for the development of acute GvHD, blocking the CCR5 receptor from recognizing specific immune signaling molecules is a viable approach to mitigating acute GvHD. The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to leronlimab for the prevention of GvHD.

About CytoDyn CytoDyn is a late-stage biotechnology company developing innovative treatments for multiple therapeutic indications based on leronlimab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the CCR5 receptor. CCR5 appears to play a critical role in the ability of HIV to enter and infect healthy T-cells. The CCR5 receptor also appears to be implicated in tumor metastasis and immune-mediated illnesses, such as GvHD and NASH.

CytoDyn has successfully completed a Phase 3 pivotal trial with leronlimab in combination with standard antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients. The FDA met telephonically with Company key personnel and its clinical research organization and provided written responses to the Companys questions concerning its recent Biologics License Application (BLA) for this HIV combination therapy in order to expedite the resubmission of its BLA filing for this indication.

CytoDyn has completed a Phase 3 investigative trial with leronlimab as a once-weekly monotherapy for HIV-infected patients. CytoDyn plans to initiate a registration-directed study of leronlimab monotherapy indication. If successful, it could support a label extension. Clinical results to date from multiple trials have shown that leronlimab can significantly reduce viral burden in people infected with HIV. No drug-related serious site injection reactions reported in about 800 patients treated with leronlimab and no drug-related SAEs reported in patients treated with 700 mg dose of leronlimab. Moreover, a Phase 2b clinical trial demonstrated that leronlimab monotherapy can prevent viral escape in HIV-infected patients; some patients on leronlimab monotherapy have remained virally suppressed for more than six years.

CytoDyn is also conducting a Phase 2 trial to evaluate leronlimab for the prevention of GvHD and a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial with leronlimab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. More information is atwww.cytodyn.com.

Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Words and expressions reflecting optimism, satisfaction or disappointment with current prospects, as well as words such as believes, hopes, intends, estimates, expects, projects, plans, anticipates and variations thereof, or the use of future tense, identify forward-looking statements, but their absence does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements specifically include statements about leronlimab, its ability to have positive health outcomes, the possible results of clinical trials, studies or other programs or ability to continue those programs, the ability to obtain regulatory approval for commercial sales, and the market for actual commercial sales. The Companys forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance, and actual results could vary materially from those contained in or expressed by such statements due to risks and uncertainties including: (i) the sufficiency of the Companys cash position, (ii) the Companys ability to raise additional capital to fund its operations, (iii) the Companys ability to meet its debt obligations, if any, (iv) the Companys ability to enter into partnership or licensing arrangements with third parties, (v) the Companys ability to identify patients to enroll in its clinical trials in a timely fashion, (vi) the Companys ability to achieve approval of a marketable product, (vii) the design, implementation and conduct of the Companys clinical trials, (viii) the results of the Companys clinical trials, including the possibility of unfavorable clinical trial results, (ix) the market for, and marketability of, any product that is approved, (x) the existence or development of vaccines, drugs, or other treatments that are viewed by medical professionals or patients as superior to the Companys products, (xi) regulatory initiatives, compliance with governmental regulations and the regulatory approval process, (xii) general economic and business conditions, (xiii) changes in foreign, political, and social conditions, and (xiv) various other matters, many of which are beyond the Companys control. The Company urges investors to consider specifically the various risk factors identified in its most recent Form 10-K, and any risk factors or cautionary statements included in any subsequent Form 10-Q or Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, the Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this press release.

CYTODYN CONTACTS Investors: Michael Mulholland Office: 360.980.8524, ext. 102 mmulholland@cytodyn.com

The rest is here:
CytoDyn's Phase 2 Study of Leronlimab for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Selected for Oral Presentation at the Special isirv-AVG Virtual Conference on...

Opdivo (nivolumab) Demonstrated Superior Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Compared to…

Details Category: Antibodies Published on Tuesday, 22 September 2020 10:41 Hits: 601

Adjuvant Opdivo doubled disease-free survival; is the first therapeutic option to show statistically significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival benefit in these patients, regardless of tumor histology, following chemoradiation therapy and resection

Results from Phase 3 CheckMate -577 trial selected for presentation during a Presidential Symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology Virtual Congress 2020

PRINCETON, NJ, USA I September 21, 2020 I Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) today announced first results from the Phase 3 CheckMate -577 trial in which adjuvant treatment with Opdivo (nivolumab) showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS), the trials primary endpoint, compared to placebo in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and tumor resection. The current standard of care for patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer following neoadjuvant CRT and tumor resection is surveillance. These results signify the first time an adjuvant therapeutic option has significantly prolonged DFS for patients in this setting.

Median DFS was doubled in patients receiving Opdivo [22.4 months; (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 16.6 to 34.0)] compared to those receiving placebo after surgery [11.0 months; (95% CI: 8.3 to 14.3)] (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.69; 96.4% CI: 0.56 to 0.86; p=0.0003). The median duration of treatment for patients in the Opdivo arm was just over 10 months [10.1 months (<0.1 to 14.2)] versus nine months for patients in the placebo arm [9.0 months (<0.1 to 15)]. The safety profile of Opdivo in CheckMate -577 was consistent with previously reported studies of Opdivo monotherapy.

While about 25% to 30% of patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer achieve a complete response following chemoradiation therapy and surgery, the remaining 70% to 75% do not, and there is currently no adjuvant treatment option available for these patients with the potential to improve their outcomes, said Ronan J. Kelly M.D., MBA, Director, Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center at Baylor University Medical Center. Adjuvant treatment with nivolumab in the CheckMate -577 trial doubled patients time without disease recurrence, representing the first adjuvant treatment advancement for these patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Opdivo was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile relative to placebo. The majority of patients in the Opdivo arm (89%) were able to receive a relative dose intensity of 90%. The incidence of any treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), including any grade and Grade 3-4, was 71% and 13% among patients treated with Opdivo compared to 46% and 6% among patients receiving placebo. Serious TRAEs of any grade and Grade 3-4 occurred in less than 10% of patients treated with Opdivo (any grade in 8%, Grade 3-4 in 5%) compared to 3% and 1% of patients receiving placebo, with a low rate of any grade treatment-related discontinuations in both arms (9% for Opdivo vs. 3% in placebo).

These results make esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer the second cancer type following melanoma where Opdivo has demonstrated a benefit in the adjuvant setting, indicating the potential for Opdivo to become a new standard of care for these patients, said Ian M. Waxman, M.D., development lead, Gastrointestinal Cancers, Bristol Myers Squibb. This advancement showcases our commitment to evaluating our therapies in earlier stages of disease where we may be able to have a greater impact on preventing disease recurrence and improving patient outcomes. We look forward to discussing these encouraging results from CheckMate -577 with global health authorities in the coming months.

These data (Presentation #LBA9) will be featured in a Presidential Symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Congress 2020 on September 21 from 19:31-19:43 CEST.

About CheckMate -577

CheckMate -577 is a Phase 3 randomized, multi-center, double-blind study evaluating Opdivo as an adjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal or GEJ cancer who have received neoadjuvant CRT therapy and have not achieved a pathological complete response. The primary endpoint of the trial is DFS and the secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Following neoadjuvant CRT therapy and complete tumor surgical resection (also known as trimodality therapy), a total of 794 patients were randomized to receive placebo (n=262) or Opdivo (n=532) 240 mg by intravenous infusion every two weeks for 16 weeks followed by Opdivo 480 mg every four weeks until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent, with a maximum of one year total treatment duration.

About Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide, with approximately 572,000 new cases and over 508,000 deaths in 2018. The two most common types of esophageal cancer are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, which account for approximately 85% and 15% of all esophageal cancers, respectively, though esophageal tumor histology can vary by region with the highest rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma occurring in North America (65%). The majority of cases are diagnosed in the advanced setting and impact a patients daily life, including their ability to eat and drink.

About Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with over 1,000,000 new cases and approximately 783,000 deaths in 2018. There are several cancers that can be classified as gastric cancer, including certain types of cancers that form in the GEJ, the area of the digestive tract where the esophagus and stomach connect. While GEJ cancer has a lower prevalence than gastric cancer, it continues to rise.

Bristol Myers Squibb: Advancing Cancer Research

At Bristol Myers Squibb, patients are at the center of everything we do. The goal of our cancer research is to increase patients quality of life, long-term survival and make cure a possibility. We harness our deep scientific experience, cutting-edge technologies and discovery platforms to discover, develop and deliver novel treatments for patients.

Building upon our transformative work and legacy in hematology and Immuno-Oncology that has changed survival expectations for many cancers, our researchers are advancing a deep and diverse pipeline across multiple modalities. In the field of immune cell therapy, this includes registrational CAR T cell agents for numerous diseases, and a growing early-stage pipeline that expands cell and gene therapy targets, and technologies. We are developing cancer treatments directed at key biological pathways using our protein homeostasis platform, a research capability that has been the basis of our approved therapies for multiple myeloma and several promising compounds in early- to mid-stage development. Our scientists are targeting different immune system pathways to address interactions between tumors, the microenvironment and the immune system to further expand upon the progress we have made and help more patients respond to treatment. Combining these approaches is key to delivering potential new options for the treatment of cancer and addressing the growing issue of resistance to immunotherapy. We source innovation internally, and in collaboration with academia, government, advocacy groups and biotechnology companies, to help make the promise of transformational medicines a reality for patients.

About Opdivo

Opdivo is a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor that is designed to uniquely harness the bodys own immune system to help restore anti-tumor immune response. By harnessing the bodys own immune system to fight cancer, Opdivo has become an important treatment option across multiple cancers.

Opdivos leading global development program is based on Bristol Myers Squibbs scientific expertise in the field of Immuno-Oncology, and includes a broad range of clinical trials across all phases, including Phase 3, in a variety of tumor types. To date, the Opdivo clinical development program has treated more than 35,000 patients. The Opdivo trials have contributed to gaining a deeper understanding of the potential role of biomarkers in patient care, particularly regarding how patients may benefit from Opdivo across the continuum of PD-L1 expression.

In July 2014, Opdivo was the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval anywhere in the world. Opdivo is currently approved in more than 65 countries, including the United States, the European Union, Japan and China. In October 2015, the Companys Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen was the first Immuno-Oncology combination to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and is currently approved in more than 50 countries, including the United States and the European Union.

INDICATIONS

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab) and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other line of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy.

CheckMate Trials and Patient Populations

Checkmate 037previously treated metastatic melanoma; Checkmate 066previously untreated metastatic melanoma; Checkmate 067previously untreated metastatic melanoma, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 227previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 9LApreviously untreated recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in combination with YERVOY and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy by histology; Checkmate 017second-line treatment of metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer; Checkmate 057second-line treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer; Checkmate 032small cell lung cancer; Checkmate 025previously treated renal cell carcinoma; Checkmate 214previously untreated renal cell carcinoma, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 205/039classical Hodgkin lymphoma; Checkmate 141recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; Checkmate 275urothelial carcinoma; Checkmate 142MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 040hepatocellular carcinoma, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 238adjuvant treatment of melanoma; Attraction-3esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

About the Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Collaboration

In 2011, through a collaboration agreement with Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb expanded its territorial rights to develop and commercialize Opdivo globally, except in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, where Ono had retained all rights to the compound at the time. On July 23, 2014, Ono and Bristol Myers Squibb further expanded the companies strategic collaboration agreement to jointly develop and commercialize multiple immunotherapies as single agents and combination regimens for patients with cancer in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

About Bristol Myers Squibb

Bristol Myers Squibb is a global biopharmaceutical company whose mission is to discover, develop and deliver innovative medicines that help patients prevail over serious diseases. For more information about Bristol Myers Squibb, visit us at BMS.com or follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.

Celgene and Juno Therapeutics are wholly owned subsidiaries of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. In certain countries outside the U.S., due to local laws, Celgene and Juno Therapeutics are referred to as, Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company and Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

SOURCE: Bristol-Myers Squibb

Go here to see the original:
Opdivo (nivolumab) Demonstrated Superior Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Compared to...

Coming of Age: New Research Efforts are Improving Treatment of Childhood Blood Cancers – Curetoday.com

Over Mothers Day weekend 2011, Kimberly Schuetz took her 2-year-old son on a road trip from their hometown of Fall River, Wisconsin, to visit family in Illinois. Leading up to the journey, Austin had been his normal, energetic self.

He was eating like a horse and being very active, very playful. No sicknesses, fevers, or anything like that, Schuetz says.

On Saturday, Schuetzs father-in-law noticed something alarming while tickling his grandson. One of Austins lymph nodes on his neck had swollen to the size of a golf ball. As an oncology nurse, Schuetz immediately had a sick feeling in her stomach. Her mind went straight to thoughts of cancer.

While her gut reaction told her to take Austin to the emergency department, Schuetz decided to wait until Monday to visit his pediatrician back home. After all, her son was acting fine.

A week later, after visits to two pediatricians, the emergency department at their local hospital and pediatric hematologists at a childrens hospital, a bone marrow biopsy confirmed that Austin had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A cancer of the blood and bone marrow, ALL is the most common type of cancer that occurs in children.

I literally felt like I was living somebody elses life, like I was watching a movie. I remember sitting there and listening to the doctor, but I also felt like I was floating above myself, Schuetz says. I was numb and couldnt cry. Your brain just goes into this state of shock.

Omar Durani, a family physician in Dallas, Texas, went through similar feelings when his 9-month-old daughter Kenza received an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) diagnosis. In 2016, her swollen lymph nodes signaled to Durani and his wife that something wasnt right.

As a physician and dad, its kind of difficult to figure out what hat to wear when, and how much to worry about things like that, he says. When the swelling worsened, we started advocating for blood work, but all the doctors we visited only kept giving her antibiotics.

Finally, an emergency department physician who Durani knew personally listened to their concerns and performed blood testing. The results came back with white cell counts through the roof, confirming the familys worst fears: Kenza had cancer.

Both ALL and AML are treated initially with chemotherapy, and for the vast majority of children, it works. More than 95% of children with ALL and about 85% to 90% of those with AML enter remission after the first phase of chemotherapy. However, remission does not necessarily mean a cure.

Austin relapsed in October 2012 after two phases of chemotherapy, and despite receiving a bone marrow transplant, his ALL came back a third time in May 2013. About 10% to 20% of children with ALL have a disease that relapses or is resistant to treatment. At that point, with no treatment options left, Austins parents were told he had three to six months to live.

We live 45 minutes away from the hospital, and our doctor ended up driving to our house, not to offer any solutions, because we didnt have a plan, but just to sit and cry with us, because she was so heartbroken and, in such disbelief, Schuetz says.

Some cancer in children does not respond to chemotherapy. After three rounds of chemotherapy, doctors told Durani that his daughters only hope would be a bone marrow transplant. But as a child of Asian descent and mixed ethnic background, Kenza had a less than 2% chance of finding a bone marrow donor match.

While research in adult blood cancers has led to an explosion of new targeted therapies and immunotherapies, such progress has been slower for younger patients. This can leave children such as Austin and Kenza without a path forward. Even for patients who do achieve long-term survival, the lingering toxicity of chemotherapy can lower their quality of life as adults.

Only four cancer treatments have been approved for first use in children in the last 40 years, compared with hundreds approved for treating adults during this same time frame, said Dr. Gwen Nichols, chief medical officer of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS).

Out of all the federal funding that goes into cancer research, only 4% goes toward pediatric cancer research, said Dr. Deepa Bhojwani, director of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Program

at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles in California. That being said, I would say within the last five to 10 years, there has been a lot more progress in terms of targeted treatment and immunotherapy than there was in the past.

But the tide may be turning for this young, vulnerable population with new research initiatives dedicated to applying precision medicine to pediatric blood cancers. Much of todays research in pediatric blood cancers aims to find tailored alternatives to chemotherapy that could prove just as or more effective with fewer harmful side effects.

Cancer is still the leading cause of death from disease among children and adolescents in the United States. From 2012 to 2016, leukemia and lymphoma accounted for 38.7% of all cancer types for patients under age 20. Approximately 40% of children with AML and 20% of those with ALL experience a relapse of their disease. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the most common type of lymphoma in children under age 14, that is resistant to first-line therapy has a very poor prognosis.

Before joining LLS, Nichols worked for a pharmaceutical company. She says that getting pediatric drugs tested and approved may be difficult because they typically do not bring in as much revenue as adult therapies.

As a result, upon arriving at LLS she was determined to figure out a faster, more efficient way to bring new agents and therapies to children with blood cancers.

In 2016, LLS launched the Beat AML Master Trial for adults with AML. It represented a paradigm shift in the format of clinical trials by testing several different targeted therapies in individual study arms instead of only one drug or combination of drugs at a time. Patients had a genomic screening to determine whether they had one of the genetic mutations that would make them eligible for one of the study arms to test a particular targeted therapy.

Its about 50% less expensive to do a master trial than it is to do one drug at a time. So, we needed to do something similar in pediatrics to make it more cost-efficient. But even more than that, if you want to get targeted therapies to kids, you have to have the right kids to test the drug, Nichols said. If youre doing one drug at a time, you have to screen thousands of kids to find the five that fit your drug, which costs time and money.

In 2019, LLS announced a collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the Childrens Oncology Group called LLS PedAL (Pediatric Acute Leukemia), a global precision medicine master clinical trial in the same vein as the Beat AML trial. Children with relapsed acute leukemia will undergo genomic screening to match the specific abnormalities driving their cancer with one of several targeted therapies.

As part of The LLS Childrens Initiative: Cures and Care for Children, a $100 million, multiyear effort to take on pediatric blood cancers, LLS PedAL will test multiple agents simultaneously at up to 200 sites worldwide. Trials will follow the same format so that data from multiple institutions can be shared and consolidated.

Nichols and her colleagues hoped to begin the trial this year, but with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, LLS PedALs start date has been pushed back to early 2021.

Another inspiring research project is the Pediatric Cancer Genome Project (PCGP), a joint initiative from St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine. Since 2010, the two insti- tutions have pioneered efforts to define the genomic landscape of pediatric cancer by sequencing the genomes of normal and cancer cells from 800 patients.

That work really filled in much of the landscape of mutations that drive ALL, AML and many of the other kinds of pediatric cancer, says Dr. James R. Downing, president and CEO of St. Jude, who was instrumental in launching the PCGP. In particular, important fundamental discoveries came out for ALL in terms of new understandings related to the identification of new genetic subtypes, amplifications, fusions and chromosomal translocations of the disease.

For instance, the PCGP pinpointed genes linked to an ALL subtype with a poor prognosis known as Philadelphia chromosome-like ALL (Ph-like ALL). In 2009, St. Jude scientists were among the first to describe Ph-like ALL in children. Five years later, next-generation sequencing revealed the genetic alterations that give rise to Ph-like ALL, which could be targeted with drugs widely used to treat other types of leukemia more common in adults.

A 2017 study from the PCGP identified potential targets for immunotherapies in pediatric cancers, finding that 88% of leukemias have at least one that could be exploited. A 2018 pan-cancer analysis that examined commonalities and differences among various cancer types, including ALL and AML, suggest that half of the cancers studied may have a targeted treatment available or under development.

The second phase of the genome project is moving all that technology into frontline diagnostics, Downing says. So now were getting the whole genome, whole exome and RNA sequencing of every patient, and we gain insight that can be funneled into a protocol that allows them to be treated.

St. Judes frontline ALL protocol includes an unparalleled level of genomic sequencing on the patient, on both cancer and normal cells, which allows physicians to make personalized therapeutic decisions. Downing hopes that collecting such a wealth of data will help usher in new therapies and lead to a further improvement in outcomes.

So the momentum is there, the studies are ongoing, and hopefully five years from now, we will have a huge variety of therapies to offer our kids instead of just one, Bhojwani says.

Bhojwani participates in the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma (TACL) consortium, which has its headquarters at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. TACL brings together childrens hospitals and universities to accelerate the progress of new therapies for pediatric leukemia and lymphoma. The consortium includes 31 institutions in the United States and Australia that collaborate on clinical trials of new drugs and novel therapy combinations in the hopes of expanding the number of treatments available.

Both Kenza and Austin were saved by an experimental treatment called chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy administered in a clinical trial. It involves engineering the bodys T cells, a type of white blood cell, to produce receptors on their surface called chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). The engineered cells are infused back into the patient, where they can recognize and kill cancer cells.

The Duranis couldnt find a bone marrow donor match for Kenza, despite having more than 60 donor drives inspired by her diagnosis that registered more than 5,000 new potential bone marrow donors around the country. At that point, they decided to move forward with CAR-T cell therapy coupled with a haploidentical, or partially matched, stem cell transplant in August 2016.

It was a no-brainer for us since there were no other therapies available besides a standard bone marrow transplant, Durani says. Now Kenzas been in remission for four years, and shes doing fantastic. Shes a thriving, spunky 5-year-old.

After his third relapse, Austins parents enrolled him in a clinical trial to receive CAR-T cell therapy as a last- ditch effort to save their son. He received the treatment at the beginning of October, and on Halloween which also happens to be his mothers birthday they received the good news that his biopsy showed no traces of cancer.

I immediately started screaming and crying. I was just elated. It was the best birthday present that I could ever, ever have. Nothing will ever top that, Schuetz says.

Today, Austin is a typical 12-year-old boy who enjoys video games, swimming with his friends and complaining about household chores. He and Kenza are living proof that innovations such as CAR-T cell therapy give children who have run out of options another chance at life.

Read more here:
Coming of Age: New Research Efforts are Improving Treatment of Childhood Blood Cancers - Curetoday.com

Guide to Voting on Propositions and the City of San Bernardino’s Measure S – Black Voice News

Local Measure

San Bernardino Measure S

NO on Measure S in San Bernardino: It would raise taxes so the mayor can pay for sexual harassment lawsuits and give tax dollars to employees who work for the city but do not live in the city. Currently only 10% of the employees working for the city are Black and only 5% work in the police department. Only 8% of the sworn police officers live in the city and the city has never hired a Black as chief of police in 115 years. Blacks make up 13.8% of the city population and pay taxes.

Propositions

Proposition 14

NO on Prop 14: Taxpayers will be on the hook for $5.5 billion in bonds aimed at reviving the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), a program created in 2004 to boost stem cell research.

Proposition 15

NO on Prop 15: It would leave Californias Prop13 tax rules unchanged, which is a benefit to older Black homeowners. Small businesses will see their rents increase. This will hurt in the long run and the County Assessors offices up and down the state said it is unworkable.

Proposition 16

YES on Prop 16: It would be a giant step to help undo the results of long-standing institutionalized race and gender discrimination that have been key to economic and social inequality. This would put California back in step with Federal Laws governing Equal Opportunity in Employment, access to educational institutions of higher learning and provide fair access to government contracts for women and minority owned businesses.

Proposition 17

YES on Prop 17: It would make it legal for people who have paid their debt to society to vote while on parole for a felony conviction.

Proposition 18

YES on Prop 18: It would make it legal for people who will turn 18 in time for the general election to vote, even while still 17, at the time of that years primary.

Proposition 19

NO on Prop 19: Currently, a parent or grandparent can bestow their low tax rate while passing on a rental home or vacation property. This feature would be eliminated under Prop 19.

Proposition 20

NO on Prop 20: This initiative is being bankrolled by the states prison guards union and they are trying to keep the prisons full to protect their jobs. Plus, it will be unjust to Blacks and Hispanic people by adding stiffer penalties for those who violate the terms of their parole three times and require DNA samples be taken from people convicted of misdemeanors.

Proposition 21

NO on Prop 21: Some say it could make a dent in homelessness, a problem that is a crisis in our community. However, rent control does not work as some have learned and a rent board would be in charge of the owners property.

Proposition 22

YES on Prop 22: This initiative is about independent thinking people who use their own cars and cell phones to work when they want to, depending on their personal life situation. A yes vote will provide new benefits such as healthcare and a minimum wage. Plus, we have a lot of Black people who love working for themselves.

Proposition 23

NO on Prop 23: This legislation would require at least one physician to be on site at an operating dialysis clinic adding more expense to those who need the service. There are not enough doctors to do this work and the cost would eliminate many clinics in Black and Brown communities.

Proposition 24

NO on Prop 24: This measure would expand and add to Californias two-year-old law on consumer data privacy and create another layer to an already confusing system.

Proposition 25

NO on Prop 25: This is a risk assessment system that would replace cash bail and is biased because it uses a computer program that is inflexible to human special needs in this special time of need.

Hardy Brown Sr. is Publisher Emeritus of the Black Voice News.

Visit link:
Guide to Voting on Propositions and the City of San Bernardino's Measure S - Black Voice News