Tevogen Bio Announces Partnership With Preeminent Scientist Professor Neal Flomenberg, MD, to Investigate Proprietary T-Cell Therapy for Treatment of…

METUCHEN, N.J., Aug. 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Tevogen Bio announces a joint partnership with renowned bone-marrow transplant expertNeal Flomenberg, M.D., Professor and Chair of the Department of Medical Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University, with the intent to evaluate Tevogen' s proprietary antigen-specific T cell technology as a potential treatment for COVID-19 and influenza-A patients.

This collaboration aims to harness Tevogen's proprietary immunotherapy platform and Dr. Flomenberg's expertise and research prowess to investigate potential treatments for viral infections.

Dr. Flomenberg has been at the forefront of immunogenetics and immunology for more than four decades. "Tevogen's technology resonated with me as there have been several groups who have used T cells to treat patients after bone-marrow transplants. The idea of utilizing T cell therapies to potentially treat COVID-19 and other viruses is truly remarkable," Flomenberg said. "I'm enthusiastic about moving forward with an investigation of Tevogen's technologies."

Tevogen CEO Ryan Saadi, M.D., M.P.H., is leading the new biotech's efforts. "Our work has been to pioneer T cell therapies that can be abundantly and efficiently reproduced to develop an affordable and scalable cellular treatment for the biggest global health threats, including COVID-19, influenza, and a variety of cancers. We are very excited about Dr. Flomenberg's contribution to our efforts and hope to initiate our investigational study soon."

In addition to developing its potential therapies, Tevogen is committed to organizational and manufacturing efficiency. This should allow it to engage in affordable innovation to the benefit of all patients.

About Tevogen Bio

Tevogen Bio was formed after decades of research by its contributors to concentrate and leverage their expertise, spanning multiple sectors of the health care industry, to help address some of the most common and deadly illnesses known today. The company's mission is to provide curative and preventative treatments that are affordable and scalablein order to positively impact global public health.

About Dr. Neal Flomenberg

Dr. Neal Flomenberg is the Chairman of Medical Oncology at Jefferson University in Philadelphia and also heads the Hematologic Malignancies, Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Program. Throughout his more than four decades of practice, he has maintained a longstanding interest in the immunogenetics and immunology of stem cell transplantation, with the goal of making transplantation safer and more widely available. Dr. Flomenberg developed an approach to bone-marrow transplants that uses half-matched relatives as donors, a breakthrough that assures that the majority of blood and bone-marrow cancer patients can benefit from this potentially curative treatment.

Media Contacts:

Mark Irion [emailprotected]

Katelyn Petroka [emailprotected]

SOURCE Tevogen Bio

See the article here:
Tevogen Bio Announces Partnership With Preeminent Scientist Professor Neal Flomenberg, MD, to Investigate Proprietary T-Cell Therapy for Treatment of...

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2027 – Owned

Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market: Competitive Landscape

This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019.

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market: Segment Analysis

The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by company, by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2019 to 2027. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth.

Global Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market, By Indication

Male Pattern Baldness Female Pattern Baldness Others

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market: Regional Analysis

The research report includes a detailed study of regions of North America, Europe, Asia, and South America. The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, sales, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region.

North America(United States, Canada, and Mexico) Europe(Germany, France, UK, Russia, and Italy) Asia-Pacific(China, Japan, Korea, India, and Southeast Asia) South America(Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, etc.) The Middle East and Africa(Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa)

Why purchase this report

About us:

Verified Market Research is a leading Global Research and Consulting firm servicing over 5000+ customers. Verified Market Research provides advanced analytical research solutions while offering information enriched research studies. We offer insight into strategic and growth analyses, Data necessary to achieve corporate goals, and critical revenue decisions.

Our 250 Analysts and SMEs offer a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyze data on more than 15,000 high impact and niche markets. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise, and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

US: +1 (650)-781-4080 UK: +44 (203)-411-9686 APAC: +91 (902)-863-5784 US Toll-Free: +1 (800)-7821768

Email: [emailprotected]

View original post here:
Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2027 - Owned

New Report: Regenerative Medicine & Advanced Therapies Sector Thriving Despite COVID-19 – PharmiWeb.com

Cell, Gene & Tissue-Based Therapy Developers Poised to Break Year-Over-Year Global Financing Records

WASHINGTON, D.C. August 6, 2020 The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine (ARM), the leading international advocacy organization dedicated to realizing the promise of regenerative medicines and advanced therapies, today announces the publication of its H1 2020 Global Sector Report, Innovation in the Time of COVID-19. The report provides an in-depth look at trends and metrics in the gene, cell, and tissue-based therapeutic sector in the midst of the pandemic.

As the voice of the sector globally, ARM regularly publishes sector data reports to showcase clinical and scientific progress, as well as advancements and remaining challenges in the policy environment surrounding cell, gene and tissue-based therapies. The report also includes updated metrics on fundraising and clinical trials from more than 1,000 therapeutic developers worldwide.

Highlights from the H1 2020 Global Sector Report include:

Janet Lambert, CEO of ARM, commented: The regenerative medicine and advanced therapy sector has shown remarkable resilience in the face of many new challenges posed by COVID-19. Most importantly, were continuing to see patients benefit from the profound therapeutic effects of both approved products and those currently in clinical development. ARM will continue to work with our membership and with policymakers in the second half of 2020 to further advance these transformative technologies. We are committed to bringing these life-changing therapies to patients in need.

This report is the latest in ARMs series of global regenerative medicine sector reports, providing up-to-date metrics on financings and the clinical landscape, as well as expert commentary on key trends and progress in the field. The full report is available online here, with key sector metrics and infographics available here. For more information, please visit http://www.alliancerm.org or contact Kaitlyn (Donaldson) Dupont at kdonaldson@alliancerm.org.

About the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine

The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine (ARM) is the leading international advocacy organization dedicated to realizing the promise of regenerative medicines and advanced therapies. ARM promotes legislative, regulatory and reimbursement initiatives to advance this innovative and transformative sector, which includes cell therapies, gene therapies and tissue-based therapies. Early products to market have demonstrated profound, durable and potentially curative benefits that are already helping thousands of patients worldwide, many of whom have no other viable treatment options. Hundreds of additional product candidates contribute to a robust pipeline of potentially life-changing regenerative medicines and advanced therapies. In its 11-year history, ARM has become the voice of the sector, representing the interests of 360+ members worldwide, including small and large companies, academic research institutions, major medical centers and patient groups. To learn more about ARM or to become a member, visit http://www.alliancerm.org.

See the original post here:
New Report: Regenerative Medicine & Advanced Therapies Sector Thriving Despite COVID-19 - PharmiWeb.com

Advanced Wound Care Management Market: Chronic wounds to be highly lucrative segment – BioSpace

Transparency Market Research (TMR) has published a new report titled, Advanced Wound Care Management Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast, 20182026. According to the report, theglobal advanced wound care management marketwas valued at US$ 8.5 Bn in 2016 and is projected to expand at a CAGR of 5.8% from 2018 to 2026. Surge in incidence of chronic wounds and trauma cases is anticipated to boost the demand for advanced wound care management during the forecast period. North America and Europe are projected to dominate the global advanced wound care management market owing to higher rate of adoption and awareness regarding wound care management. Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa are potential markets for advanced wound care management. The market in Asia Pacific is expected to expand at a CAGR of 6.3% from 2018 to 2026.

Request Brochure of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=16139

Cost-effective advanced wound care management to treat complex wounds to drive global market

Increase in trauma and accident cases across the globe drives the advanced wound care management market. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), road accidents account for around 1.25 million deaths across the globe each year. Additionally, the number of patients with chronic wounds is rising rapidly across the world. This is likely to increase the number of surgical procedures; consequently, propelling the global advanced wound care management market.

Request for Analysis of COVID19 Impact on Advanced Wound Care Management Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=16139

Chronic wounds to be highly lucrative segment

Chronic wounds is an emerging segment of the advanced wound care management market. In the chronic wounds segment, the ulcers sub-segment holds a prominent share. Venous leg ulcers account for 80% of all leg ulcers. Moreover, the chronic wounds segment is likely to hold major share due to high cost of therapy across the globe. As per a paper published by NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information), in May 2014, the annual burden of venous leg ulcers in the U.S. is nearly US$ 14.9 Bn, which includes indirect costs (productivity loss) as well. The diabetic foot ulcer sub-segment of the advanced wound care products market is expanding at a significant CAGR.

Request for Custom Research: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=CR&rep_id=16139

Hospitals & clinics to be notably promising segment

In terms of end-user, the global advanced wound care management market has been segmented into hospitals & clinics, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), home health care, and others. The hospitals & clinics segment held major share of the global market in 2017. Expansion of the segment can be attributed to the availability of multiple service options and devices and tie-ups with health care companies in order to enhance health care product and service offerings. Moreover, hospitals are the preferred choice due to availability of advanced technology and better health care services. The home health care segment is expanding at a high growth rate, especially in developed economies, due to rise in geriatric population and increasing health care infrastructure and support. Moreover, rise in demand for advanced wound care management in home care settings for geriatric patients is projected to drive the segment.

Buy Advanced Wound Care Management Market Report at https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=16139&ltype=S

North America expected to dominate global market

In terms of region, the global advanced wound care management market has been segmented into five major regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. North America dominated the global advanced wound care management market in 2017. The market in North America was valued at US$ 3.2 Bn in 2017 owing to a highly developed health care sector, increase in awareness among health care providers about advanced wound care management, and continuous evolution of wound care management. Advanced wound care management market offers significant growth potential in the region. The advanced wound care management market in Asia Pacific is anticipated to expand at a CAGR of 6.3% during the forecast period due to increase in awareness about advanced wound care products and expansion of the health care sector in countries such as China, Japan, and India. Moreover, technological advancements and increase in rate of adoption of advanced wound care management products are expected to propel the market in the region during the forecast period.

Smith & Nephew plc, Acelity L.P., Inc. and Mlnlycke Health Care AB anticipated to lead global market

The global advanced wound care management market is highly fragmented in terms of number of players providing different products. Key players in the global advanced wound care management market include Smith & Nephew plc, Acelity L.P., Inc., Mlnlycke Health Care AB, ConvaTec Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, Coloplast A/S, 3M Healthcare, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Cardinal Health, PAUL HARTMANN AG, BSN Medical, Hollister Incorporated, Organogenesis Inc., and Medline Industries, Inc. Expansion of product portfolio through mergers and acquisitions is a key strategy followed by several global players. In December 2015, Acelity L.P., Inc. announced the acquisition of Spiracur, Inc., expanding its offering in disposable, portable, mechanical NPWT (Negative-pressure wound therapy) technology, and allowing sales and service channels to boost the expansion of the SNaP therapy system to patients and their care teams across the world who need access to NPWT devices.

Browse More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research:

Pharmaceutical Lipids Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/respiratory-pathogen-testing-market.html

Respiratory Pathogen Testing Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/retinal-gene-therapy-market.html

Retinal Gene Therapy Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pharmaceutical-lipids-market.html

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision.

Contact

Mr. Rohit Bhisey Transparency Market Research

State Tower,

90 State Street,

Suite 700,

Albany NY - 12207

United States

USA - Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453

Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.com

Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

See original here:
Advanced Wound Care Management Market: Chronic wounds to be highly lucrative segment - BioSpace

Investigation and management of erythrocytosis – CMAJ

KEY POINTS

Primary erythrocytosis or autonomous production of excess erythrocytes most commonly occurs due to polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplastic process that may be asymptomatic or may present with thrombosis, constitutional or vasomotor symptoms, or splenomegaly.

Secondary erythrocytosis, which is more common than PV, has a broad differential diagnosis that includes hypoxic lung disease, cyanotic congenital heart disease, medications (e.g., testosterone) and erythropoietin-producing malignant disorders.

Differentiating between PV and secondary erythrocytosis requires clinical evaluation and specialized investigations including measurement of the serum erythropoietin level and Janus kinase 2 mutation testing.

To reduce the risk of thrombosis, most patients with PV are treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and phlebotomy to achieve a target hematocrit value of less than 0.45, whereas patients at high risk for thrombosis may receive cytoreductive therapy.

Treatment of secondary erythrocytosis should be directed at the underlying cause, and phlebotomy is not routinely recommended.

Erythrocytosis refers to an erythrocyte count above the sex-specific normal range and can be subclassified into relative erythrocytosis, caused by a reduction in plasma volume (hemoconcentration), or absolute erythrocytosis, caused by increased erythrocyte mass. Primary erythrocytosis refers to autonomous production of erythrocytes, typically from a myeloproliferative neoplasm (polycythemia vera [PV]). In contrast, secondary erythrocytosis is caused by a physiologically appropriate response to elevated serum erythropoietin levels.

Up to 4% of ambulatory men and 0.4% of ambulatory women in Canada have erythrocytosis, based on hemoglobin levels greater than 165 g/L or 160 g/L, respectively.1 Differentiating PV from other causes of erythrocytosis is critical because early recognition and treatment of PV can prevent many of its vasomotor and thrombotic complications. Polycythemia vera is rare, with an incidence and prevalence of 0.84 and 22 per 100 000, respectively.2,3 Although the prevalence of secondary erythrocytosis is difficult to estimate, it is higher than that of PV. Secondary erythrocytosis affects 6%8% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4 and 2%8% of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.5,6

In this review, we summarize a contemporary approach to differentiating PV from other causes of erythrocytosis, and review the natural history, diagnosis and management of PV (Box 1).

We reviewed current guidelines on the management of polycythemia vera. For questions regarding the diagnostic investigation of erythrocytosis and the utility of specific laboratory tests such as the erythropoietin level, we searched MEDLINE to January 2020 for terms such as polycythemia vera, erythrocytosis or secondary erythrocytosis AND diagnosis, erythropoietin level, bone marrow biopsy and JAK2. We considered original research and review articles published between 2010 and January 2020, and searched reference lists of selected articles to identify additional studies of interest. We specifically reviewed landmark randomized trials in polycythemia vera such as the Cytoreductive Therapy in Polycythemia Vera (CYTO-PV) study,7 the European Collaboration on Low-Dose Aspirin in Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) study,8 the Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety in Polycythemia Vera with JAK Inhibitor INCB018424 versus Best Supportive Care (RESPONSE),9 the RESPONSE-210 and older studies conducted by the Polycythemia Vera Study Group.

Relative erythrocytosis results from any condition that reduces plasma volume, such as gastrointestinal fluid losses or diuretic use. Absolute erythrocytosis can be driven by a clonal bone marrow disease (PV) or be secondary to another disease, including a physiologic response to increased erythropoietin secondary to hypoxia, drugs11 or erythropoietin-producing solid tumours12,13 (Box 2). Congenital causes of erythrocytosis include high-oxygenaffinity hemoglobins, erythropoietin receptor mutations and alterations in oxygen-sensing molecular pathways.

Hypoxia-driven

Generalized tissue hypoxia

Smoking

Carbon monoxide poisoning

Hypoxic lung disease

Obstructive sleep apnea

Right to left cardiopulmonary shunt (e.g., cyanotic congenital heart disease)

High altitude

Local renal hypoxia

Drug-associated

Testosterone

Erythropoietin

Pathologic erythropoietin production

Miscellaneous

Erythrocytosis after renal transplantation

Idiopathic erythrocytosis*

Polycythemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by increased erythrocyte mass, thrombosis and vasomotor symptoms. A gain-of-function mutation in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) underlies 98% of PV cases.15

The history-taking and physical examination should be directed toward ruling out relative erythrocytosis and then distinguishing between primary and secondary erythrocytosis. For secondary erythrocytosis, this includes a review of cardiac, respiratory and abdominal signs and symptoms. Patients should be asked about tobacco smoking, medications (especially androgenic steroids, including testosterone11), exposure to carbon monoxide and symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea. A full cardiopulmonary examination should be completed, and the abdomen should be examined for organomegaly or erythropoietin-producing intraabdominal tumours (e.g., hepatocellular or renal cell carcinoma).

Oxygen saturation less than 92% on room air by pulse oximetry suggests that erythrocytosis is secondary to hypoxic cardiopulmonary disease.14 Some causes of hypoxia may present with a normal or falsely elevated oxygen saturation value (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, high-oxygen-affinity hemoglobins, or carboxyhemoglobinemia from tobacco smoking or carbon monoxide poisoning).

The World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for PV were updated in 2016 (Box 3).16 Patients with PV may have symptoms of splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms or vasomotor symptoms such as headache, visual disturbances or light-headedness. Two specific symptoms for myeloproliferative neoplasms are pruritus and erythromelalgia.15 Pruritus is often aquagenic and may be debilitating. Erythromelalgia is a recurrent burning sensation accompanied by erythema and warmth, most commonly affecting the hands.

Diagnosis of polycythemia vera requires all 3 major criteria OR the first 2 major criteria and the minor criterion

Major criteria

Hemoglobin level > 165 g/L in men, > 160 g/L in women OR hematocrit > 0.49 in men, > 0.48 in women OR increased erythrocyte mass

Bone marrow biopsy showing hypercellularity for age with trilineage growth (panmyelosis) including prominent erythroid, granulocytic and megakaryocytic proliferation with pleomorphic, mature megakaryocytes*

Presence of JAK2 V617F or JAK2 exon 12 mutation

Minor criterion

* Bone marrow biopsy is not required for patients with sustained absolute erythrocytosis, defined as a hemoglobin level greater than 185 g/L in men (hematocrit 0.55) or greater than 165 g/L in women (hematocrit 0.50) if the third major criterion and the minor criterion are met.

Initial tests to differentiate primary from secondary erythrocytosis include a complete blood count, peripheral blood film, renal and liver function tests, and determination of the ferritin level.14 Erythrocyte mass can be measured directly to confirm absolute erythrocytosis by nuclear isotope dilution, but this test is not widely available in Canada.1 As PV is associated with panmyelosis (expansion of all myeloid elements of the bone marrow), patients often have mild to moderate leukocytosis and thrombocytosis rather than isolated erythrocytosis.15 Many patients with PV are iron deficient at diagnosis owing to erythroid expansion and altered iron metabolism. 17 A low mean erythrocyte volume and low ferritin level (< 3545 ng/mL) support a diagnosis of iron deficiency.18 Baseline abdominalpelvic imaging is indicated when the clinical examination for splenomegaly gives equivocal findings or when endogenous erythropoietin production is suspected.19

The serum erythropoietin level can differentiate between primary and secondary erythrocytosis. In a cohort study of 125 patients, a low erythropoietin level (< 2.9 mU/mL) was specific (92%) and moderately sensitive (64%) for the diagnosis of PV.20 A high erythropoietin level (> 15.1 mU/mL) was specific (98%) but had poor sensitivity (47%) for the diagnosis of secondary erythrocytosis.20

Ninety-five percent of patients with PV have a V617F point mutation in exon 14 of JAK2.21 JAK2 V617F-negative PV is rare, and mutations in exon 12 of JAK2 account for most of these cases.22 The JAK2 V617F mutation is not specific to PV; it can also be seen in other myeloproliferative neoplasms including essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis.21 Some cases of PV with iron deficiency may resemble essential thrombocythemia. 17 In these cases, erythrocytes are microcytic, the hemoglobin level is low or within normal limits, and there is marked thrombocytosis.

Our approach to sequencing investigations is adapted from Canadian consensus recommendations1 and a British guideline for the diagnosis and management of PV14 (Figure 1). Front-line tests are selected based on the pretest probability of PV and the availability of JAK2 mutation testing.

Practical diagnostic approach to erythrocytosis. *Some clinicians order determination of the erythropoietin level and JAK2 V617F mutation testing concurrently in settings when there is a high probability of diagnosing polycythemia vera. Bone marrow biopsy is required to meet the World Health Organization 2016 diagnostic criteria16 if the hemoglobin level is less than 185 g/L (hematocrit 0.55) in men or less than 165 g/L (hematocrit 0.50) in women.

In the primary care setting, where the probability of PV is low, clinical evaluation for secondary causes of erythrocytosis paired with a high erythropoietin level can rule out PV in most patients. In hematology clinics, where the probability of PV is higher, erythropoietin level and JAK2 V617F mutation testing are done concurrently. Patients with a low or normal erythropoietin level and no JAK2 V617F mutation are further evaluated with JAK2 exon 12 mutation testing (on peripheral blood or marrow aspirate, based on local practice) and a bone marrow biopsy.14 Findings on bone marrow biopsy in a patient with PV are shown in Figure 2.

Bone marrow biopsy specimen of a patient with polycythemia vera. (A) Hypercellularity for age and panmyelosis (expansion of all myeloid elements of the bone marrow) (hematoxylineosin, 40 magnification). (B) Panmyelosis and pleomorphic megakaryocytes (hematoxylineosin, 200 magnification). Images courtesy of Dr. Catherine Ross, Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario.

When no diagnosis is made, selected patients with onset of erythrocytosis at a young age or compatible family history should undergo testing for high-oxygen-affinity hemoglobins, and gene sequencing for mutations involving the erythropoietin receptor or oxygen-sensing pathways.14,23 Idiopathic erythrocytosis is a diagnosis of exclusion.

Investigations for secondary erythrocytosis should be symptom-directed and may include chest radiography, overnight oximetry for suspected sleep apnea, pulmonary function tests for hypoxic lung disease, venous blood gas sampling (carboxyhemoglobin level) and echocardiography to rule out right to left cardiac shunting. Abdominalpelvic imaging can help exclude an erythropoietin-producing tumour or conditions associated with local renal hypoxia (Box 2). Neuroimaging to rule out meningioma or cerebellar hemangioblastoma should be ordered for patients with unexplained neurologic symptoms as these tumours have been associated with autonomous erythropoietin production.14

There are no established criteria for referral to a hematologist. Patients with a low or normal erythropoietin level and negative findings on investigation for secondary erythrocytosis are typically referred to a general internist or hematologist to arrange additional investigations starting with JAK2 V617F testing (Figure 1). Internists or hematologists often manage patients who require phlebotomy. Referral to a hematologist is warranted for women with PV who desire pregnancy, patients who are refractory or intolerant to treatment with hydroxyurea, and patients with no diagnosis despite extensive appropriate investigations.

The goals of treatment of PV are to reduce the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism, and minimize symptoms.14 Unfortunately, existing treatments do not successfully reduce the risk of transformation to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia.

Thrombosis in PV is common and highly morbid. Up to 15% of patients with newly diagnosed PV have a history of arterial or venous thromboembolism.15,24 Patients with PV have venous thrombosis at unusual sites, such as the splanchnic or cerebral veins.25 A meta-analysis of observational studies showed that more than 15% of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis or BuddChiari syndrome are later diagnosed with a myeloproliferative neoplasm.26

In a cohort of 1638 patients with PV, cardiovascular mortality accounted for 45% of all deaths over more than 4000 person-years of follow-up.27 The 2 most important predictors of cardiovascular events were age greater than 65 years and prior thromboembolism. Patients with neither, 1 or both risk factors experienced 2.5, 5.0 and 10.9 cardiovascular events per 100 person-years, respectively. Treatment guidelines classify patients as being at high risk for thromboembolism if they are more than 60 or 65 years old or have a history of thrombosis, or both.14,28 Patients who meet neither of these criteria are considered to be at low risk.

Patients with PV are treated with daily low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and phlebotomy to achieve a target hematocrit value of less than 0.45 based on the results of 2 randomized trials.14,28 Patients are monitored regularly (every 36 mo) for symptoms, treatment complications, cardiovascular events and disease progression.

In the European Collaboration on Low-Dose Aspirin in Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) study,8 518 patients with PV were randomly allocated to receive low-dose ASA (100 mg/d) or placebo. Acetylsalicylic acid reduced the composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, venous thrombosis or death from cardiovascular causes by 60% (relative risk [RR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.180.91), with no statistically significant increase in major bleeding.

In the Cytoreductive Therapy in Polycythemia Vera (CYTO-PV) study, 365 adults with PV were randomly allocated to a low hematocrit target (< 0.45) or a less-intensive hematocrit target (0.450.50).7 The primary outcome of death from cardiovascular causes or major thrombotic events was observed in 5 of 182 patients (2.7%) in the low-hematocrit group compared to 18 of 183 patients (9.8%) in the higher-hematocrit group (RR 3.91, 95% CI 1.196.12), with no significant difference in adverse events between the groups.

Most patients with an indication for anticoagulation therapy should receive an anticoagulant in place of ASA. A multicentre observational study of 2510 patients with PV showed that patients who received both an anticoagulant and ASA had a fourfold increased risk of bleeding (95% CI 2.576.94) compared to those who received either treatment alone or no treatment.29 We could not identify any high-quality data comparing warfarin to direct anticoagulants for oral use in PV.30 The British guideline recommends that cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, lipid control, and counselling around smoking cessation and weight loss, be addressed in all patients.14

Observational studies suggest that patients with high-risk PV benefit from cytoreductive therapy in addition to low-dose ASA therapy and phlebotomy.14,28 In North America, hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide), an orally administered antimetabolite chemotherapy drug that causes myelosuppression, is used owing to its known efficacy, low cost, oral formulation and acceptable toxicity profile (discussed below). A study showed that 51 patients with PV treated with hydroxyurea had a lower incidence of thrombosis at 2 years than historical controls treated with phlebotomy alone (7% v. 14%).31 Some clinicians titrate the dosage of hydroxyurea to achieve peripheral blood count remission (hematocrit < 45% without phlebotomy, platelet count 400 109/L and leukocyte count < 10 109/L).32 Response definitions for PV have been created for use in clinical trials, but their routine application to clinical practice is not evidence-based.32 Other clinicians titrate the dosage of hydroxyurea to minimize the need for phlebotomy. An observational study showed that patients receiving hydroxyurea who needed 3 or more phlebotomy procedures per year had a significantly higher rate of thrombosis than those who required fewer phlebotomy procedures (21% v. 5% at 3 yr, p < 0.001).33

Alternatives to hydroxyurea include pegylated interferon or busulfan. The former can be used safely during pregnancy and induces molecular remission in some patients; for these reasons, it is often used as front-line therapy for young patients or women desiring pregnancy.34

Ruxolitinib, an orally administered JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, is a second-line agent for patients who are refractory or intolerant to hydroxyurea.9,10 The Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety in Polycythemia Vera with JAK Inhibitor INCB018424 versus Best Supportive Care (RESPONSE) investigators randomly allocated 222 such patients with splenomegaly to ruxolitinib versus best available therapy.9 The composite primary outcome of hematocrit control and at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume was achieved in 20.9% of the patients in the ruxolitinib arm, compared to 0.9% of those in the best-available-therapy arm (p < 0.001). The RESPONSE-2 investigators enrolled similar patients without splenomegaly and found that a higher proportion of ruxolitinib-treated patients than patients who received best available therapy achieved hematocrit control (62% v. 19%, p < 0.001).10

Hydroxyurea is well tolerated, but common adverse effects include complications from cytopenia, oral and leg ulcers, gastrointestinal upset, drug fever, and skin and nail changes. An international retrospective cohort study of 1545 patients with PV showed that hydroxyurea does not increase the incidence of leukemia.15

Ruxolitinib is the most effective treatment for pruritus in PV. A phase III randomized trial showed that patients treated with ruxolitinib were more likely to experience alleviation of pruritus than those who received hydroxyurea (54% v. 32%, p = 0.03).35 Other treatments for pruritus are supported by lower-quality evidence, mostly from case series. These include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, interferon , psoralen and ultraviolet A, and antihistamines.36

The prevalence of PV among females of reproductive age is less than 0.3 per 100 000,37 so management recommendations are based on case series or extrapolated from essential thrombocythemia. 5,34 The hematocrit is maintained in the normal range for gestation.5 Women without a contraindication receive low-dose ASA throughout pregnancy, and interferon is used for women who require cytoreductive therapy. Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin, in addition to ASA, may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.5,28

Treatment should be directed at the underlying cause. There is no definitive evidence that the risk of thromboembolism is increased in patients with secondary erythrocytosis, and, therefore, phlebotomy is not recommended routinely.38 We direct the reader to a recently published guideline on the management of secondary erythrocytosis,5 which recommends the following approach:

Long-term oxygen therapy should be considered in patients with hypoxic lung disease.

Testosterone should be discontinued in patients with moderate to severe testosterone-induced erythrocytosis and can be resumed at lower dosages once the hematocrit normalizes11,39

Erythrocytosis after renal transplantation should be treated with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker.

Patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease or high-oxygen-affinity hemoglobins have physiologic erythrocytosis and should be under specialist care. These patients are at risk for thrombosis, although optimal target hematocrit values are unknown.

Idiopathic erythrocytosis is a diagnosis of exclusion that carries a low risk of thrombosis and bleeding.40 However, some experts recommend an arbitrary target hematocrit value of 0.450.55 for patients with symptomatic hyperviscosity or a history of thrombosis.5

Secondary erythrocytosis can be distinguished from PV in most patients with a focused clinical evaluation and, where available, determination of the erythropoietin level and JAK2 V617F mutation testing. Goals of treatment in PV are to alleviate symptoms, reduce the risk of thromboembolism, and monitor patients for transformation to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia. The majority of patients with PV should be treated with low-dose ASA and phlebotomy to achieve a target hematocrit value of less than 0.45. Cytoreduction, most commonly with hydroxyurea, should be considered in patients at high risk for thrombosis. Treatment of secondary erythrocytosis should be directed at the underlying cause.

Competing interests: Christopher Hillis received grant funding from Novartis Oncology and personal fees from Novartis Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene outside the submitted work. Mark Crowther serves on the advisory boards of Servier Canada, Asahi Kasei Corporation and Precision BioLogic, and the data safety and monitoring board of Bayer. He has received speaking fees from Pfizer, CSL Behring and Diagnostica Stago. He has equity ownership in Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. He is also the Leo Pharma Chair in Thromboembolism Research at McMaster University. No other competing interests were declared.

This article has been peer reviewed.

Contributors: Siraj Mithoowani conceived of the work. Siraj Mithoowani and Marissa Laureano drafted the manuscript, and Mark Crowther and Christopher Hillis revised it critically for important intellectual content. All of the authors made substantial contributions to the design of the work, approved the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding: Siraj Mithoowani is supported by a CanVECTOR fellowship. The CanVECTOR Network receives grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (funding reference CDT-142654).

See the original post here:
Investigation and management of erythrocytosis - CMAJ

Eli Lilly teams with Pieris on HER2+ tumors; Opdivo + Yervoy best chemo in mesothelioma – Endpoints News

Despite the FDA putting a partial clinical hold on its lead program only a few weeks ago, Boston-based Pieris Pharmaceuticals is plowing forward with a new collaboration.

Pieris will work with Eli Lilly to further advance studies on PRS-343, a 4-1BB/HER2 bispecific for HER2-positive tumors, in combination with the latters ramucirumab and paclitaxel for the second-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer in a single-arm, Phase II study.

At the time of the hold, regulators determined that the biotech could continue dosing patients already in the studies, but couldnt add patients until after it conducted an additional in-use and compatibility study of PRS-343 with various infusion materials under specific conditions to confirm suitability of PRS-343 for administration in clinical settings.

The FDA did not cite any adverse effects and the Phase II is still on track for later this year should the hold be lifted.

Under the terms of the new agreement, Eli Lilly will supply the additional compounds and collaborate on data while Pieris prepares to initiate Phase II. Max Gelman

A combination of Opdivo and Yervoy has proven more effective than chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for a form of mesothelioma in a Phase III study of 600 patients. In the study, one of numerous, Bristol Myers Squibb is running to test whether the two forms of checkpoint inhibitors can be complementary, 40.8% of patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma who received the immunotherapy cocktail survived for two years, compared with 27% of patients on the chemotherapy arm.

Just over 30% of patients in both arms of the trial experienced grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events, but patients were twice as likely to drop out as a result in the combination arm: 15%, compared with 7.4%.

Results were presented Saturday at the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Virtual Presidential Symposium. Jason Mast

In a Phase III trial announced Friday, patients given Hong Kong-based Xcoverys lead ALK inhibitor responded for twice as long as patients given Pfizers Xalkori. ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients given Xcoverys ensartinib had a progression-free survival time of 25.8 months, compared to 12.7 months for the patients on Xalkori. The response rate was also higher for ensartinib, 75% compared to 67%.

The results are a positive sign for Xcovery but they are not necessarily surprising: Xalkori was the first ALK-inhibitor approved in 2011, but since then, other inhibitors have come out and proven far more durable. Late last year, Takedas Alunbrig showed a similar rate of progression-free survival. Jason Mast

Just a week and a half after signing a deal with Massachusetts-based Harbour BioMed to help incubate new startups, Viva Biotech has continued its march with a new acquisition.

The Chinese company a half-incubator, half-drug discovery business announced the purchase of 80% of Langhua Pharmaceutical for about $367 million. With the acquisition, Viva expects to expand its R&D capabilities and begin offering CDMO services.

We have steady confidence towards the business prospects and potential future growth of Langhua Pharmaceutical, Viva Biotech CEO Chen (Cheney) Mao said in a statement.

Viva offers both equity for service and cash for service models to US and Chinese biopharmas looking for outsourcing services. Max Gelman

More:
Eli Lilly teams with Pieris on HER2+ tumors; Opdivo + Yervoy best chemo in mesothelioma - Endpoints News

Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market-Industry Analysis and forecast 2019 2027: By Application, Type, and Region. – Good Night, Good Hockey

Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Marketsize was valued US$ XX Mn. in 2019 and the total revenue is expected to grow at 11.34% from 2019 to 2027, reaching nearly US$ XX Mn.

The report study has analyzed the revenue impact of COVID -19 pandemic on the sales revenue of market leaders, market followers, and market disrupters in the report, and the same is reflected in our analysis.

Multiple myeloma, also known as Kahlers disease, is a type of blood cancer of plasma cells that are found in the bone marrow. Multiple myeloma causes cancer cells to accrue in the bone marrow, where they attack the strong blood cells.

Multiple myeloma treatments have developed significantly above the last decade. New multiple myeloma treatments have provided efficient survival rates between myeloma patients. It has been also observed that the future drug pipeline of multiple myeloma is promising, biological drugs and stem cell-based therapies are likely to fuel the multiple myeloma treatment market in the upcoming years. On the other hand, the costs of radiotherapeutic equipment implementation, a limited number of target patients population, strict legal regulations are expected to hamper the market growth. Likewise, the MMR report contains a detailed study of factors that will drive and restrain the growth of the multiple myeloma treatment market globally.

Multiple Myeloma accounts for approximately 2.5% of the cancer-related deaths globally and is the second most major type of blood cancer next to Hodgkins Lymphoma. According to the World Cancer Research Fund, in 2018, above 159500 cases of multiple myeloma were diagnosed with the condition, where the occurrence rate among women and men was found in the ratio 1.2:1. The onset of the disease occurs after the age of 60. In recent times, the age of onset is drastically decreasing. In the year 2001, only two medications were available for treating multiple myeloma but now in 2020, 18 medicines are available. Moreover, there are over 25 FDA-approved drugs for treating multiple myeloma with therapeutics such as pomalidomide, carfilzomib, panobinostat, and ixazomib. The availability of new medications has given new hope for better treatments and better results and thus affecting the growth of the market as well. However, the survival of patients with a limited response while receiving treatment with primary immunodeficiency therapy remains poor and is one of the major challenges.

The MMR report covers the segments in the multiple myeloma treatment market such as type and application. By application, the hospital is expected to continue to hold the largest XX.85% share in multiple myeloma treatments market thanks to growing specialist doctors providing the best chance of long term survival.

North Americas multiple myeloma treatments market was valued at US$ XX.26 Mn. in 2019 and is expected to reach a value of US$ XX.13 Mn. by 2027, with a CAGR of 9.3%. The number of patients in the U.S is growing YoY with nearly 14600 new cases diagnosed annually. In 2017 alone there were approximately 142000 patients diagnosed for multiple myeloma.

Europe and the South African population are prone to develop multiple myeloma when compared with Asian economies. Though, the population in the APAC region outwits Europe and Africa. Further, growing the adoption rate of novel therapies, coupled with the support from the government along with non-government organizations and improving the survival of multiple myeloma patients.

The research study includes the profiles of leading players operating in the global multiple myeloma treatment market. Eli Lilly Company acquired ARMO Biosciences to develop immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, hypercholesterolemia, inflammatory, and fibrosis diseases.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive analysis of the Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market including all the stakeholders of the industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market size and trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers all the aspects of the industry with a dedicated study of key players that includes market leaders, followers, and new entrants. PORTER, SVOR, PESTEL analysis with the potential impact of micro-economic factors of the market has been presented in the report. External as well as internal factors that are supposed to affect the business positively or negatively have been analyzed, which will give a clear futuristic view of the industry to the decision-makers. The report also helps in understanding Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market dynamics, structure by analyzing the market segments and projects the Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market size. Clear representation of competitive analysis of key players by Application, price, financial position, Product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence in the Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market make the report investors guide. Scope of the Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market

Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market, by Applications

Hospitals Clinics Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation Centers Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market, by Type

Proteasome Inhibitors Immunomodulatory Agents (IMiDs) Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors Immunotherapy Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market, by Region

Asia Pacific North America Europe South America Middle East & Africa Key players operating in Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market

Celgene Corporation Janssen Biotech, Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Novartis AG Cellectar Biosciences Inc. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Amgen, Inc. bbVie Genzyme Corporation Juno Therapeutics Eli Lilly and Company Glenmark Pharma

Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market Request For View Sample Report Page : @https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/65671 About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info: Name: Vikas Godage Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD. Email: sales@maximizemarketresearch.com Contact: +919607065656 / +919607195908 Website:www.maximizemarketresearch.com

Excerpt from:
Global Multiple Myeloma Treatment Market-Industry Analysis and forecast 2019 2027: By Application, Type, and Region. - Good Night, Good Hockey

Vida Ventures co-leads Dyne’s $115M megaround for next-gen oligo therapies aimed squarely at muscles – Endpoints News

Dyne Therapeutics started out last April with a modest $50 million to mine targeted muscle disease therapies from its in-house conjugate technology. The biotech has now convinced more investors that its got gems on its hands, closing $115 million in fresh financing to push its next-gen oligonucleotide drugs into the clinic.

Vida Ventures and Surveyor Capital led the round, joined by a group of other new backers including Wellington Management Company, Logos Capital and Franklin Templeton.

Atlas where Dyne was incubated also returned alongside Forbion and MPM.

Stefan Vitorovic, who co-founded Vida with Arie Belldegrun and others, took the lead on this one. Dynes FORCE platform matches exactly their appetite for bold visions in the future of medicine, with the potential to deliver life-changing outcomes for patients with muscle diseases, he said.

This is how the biotech plans to do it: By linking an antibody to an oligonucleotide, Dynes therapies are engineered to hone in on muscle cells and degrade only disease-causing RNA, thereby avoiding systemic toxicity issues.

Romesh Subramanian, a co-founder of what is now Translate Bio, helped launch the operations as an entrepreneur-in-residence at Atlas. Hes since handed the CEO baton to Joshua Brumm and moved to the CSO post.

When you deliver a naked oligo, very little gets to the muscle, he told C&EN back in 2019.

That means a lack of specificity and potential safety problems for drugs like Sareptas controversial Exondys 51. While Dyne is aiming directly at that market with its Duchenne muscular dystrophy program, its initial focus is on myotonic dystrophy.

Trailing closely is a third therapy for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, followed by discovery work in the cardiac and metabolic arenas.

How would the approach compare to gene therapies, which are cropping up at Sarepta and other newer players focused on muscle diseases? We didnt get a chance to ask Dyne, which is shying away from interviews this morning perhaps a sign of upcoming plans in a booming biotech IPO market.

Under Braum, Dyne has been on a bit of a hiring spree recently, poaching Susanna High from bluebird to be COO, appointing ex-Celgene exec Daniel Wilson as VP of intellectual property, and scooping Debra Feldman from Sage Therapeutics as head of regulatory.

Continued here:
Vida Ventures co-leads Dyne's $115M megaround for next-gen oligo therapies aimed squarely at muscles - Endpoints News

Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market Outlook 2020: Company Profiles of Key Players Axogen, Baxter, Nevro, Nuvectra, Polyganics and Stryker -…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug 10, 2020--

The "Nerve Repair and Regeneration - Global Market Outlook (2018-2027)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration market accounted for $6.46 billion in 2018 and is expected to reach $21.68 billion by 2027 growing at a CAGR of 14.4% during the forecast period. Some of the key factors propelling the market growth are technological developments for nerve repair and regeneration and an increase in healthcare expenses by government with sympathetic policies. However, elevated prices associated with devices is a restraining factor for the growth of the market.

By product, the neurostimulation and neuromodulation devices segment is expected to grow at a significant market share during the forecast period due to mounting incidence of peripheral nerve injuries, technological development in the field. Sympathetic reimbursement policies are expected to drive the growth of this market segment in the next five years. On the basis of geography, Asia Pacific is anticipated to hold considerable market share during the forecast period due to increasing numbers of patients suffering from chronic diseases, and an increase in government initiatives for the development of healthcare services in the region.

What the report offers:

Key Topics Covered:

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

3 Market Trend Analysis

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Drivers

3.3 Restraints

3.4 Opportunities

3.5 Threats

3.6 Product Analysis

3.7 Application Analysis

3.8 End User Analysis

3.9 Emerging Markets

3.10 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers

4.2 Bargaining power of buyers

4.3 Threat of substitutes

4.4 Threat of new entrants

4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market, By Product

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Neurostimulation and Neuromodulation Devices

5.2.1 Internal Neurostimulation Devices

5.2.1.1 Deep Brain Stimulation

5.2.1.2 Gastric Electrical Stimulation

5.2.1.3 Sacral Nerve Stimulation

5.2.1.4 Spinal Cord Stimulation

5.2.1.5 Vagus Nerve Stimulation

5.2.2 External Neurostimulation Devices

5.2.2.1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

5.2.2.2 Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

5.3 Biomaterials

5.3.1 Nerve Wraps

5.3.2 Nerve Connectors

5.3.3 Nerve Conduits

5.3.4 Nerve Protectors

6 Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market, By Application

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Nerve Grafting

6.2.1 Autografts

6.2.2 Allografts

6.2.3 Xenografts

6.3 Neurostimulation and Neuromodulation Surgeries

6.3.1 Internal Neurostimulation and Neuromodulation Surgeries

6.3.2 External Neurostimulation and Neuromodulation Surgeries

6.4 Direct Nerve Repair/Neurorrhaphy

6.4.1 Epineural Repair

6.4.2 Group Fascicular Repair

6.4.3 Perineural Repair

6.5 Stem Cell Therapy

7 Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market, By End User

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Ambulatory Surgery Centers

7.3 Clinics

7.4 Hospitals

8 Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market, By Geography

8.1 Introduction

8.2 North America

8.3 Europe

8.4 Asia Pacific

8.5 South America

8.6 Middle East & Africa

9 Key Developments

9.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures

9.2 Acquisitions & Mergers

9.3 New Product Launch

9.4 Expansions

9.5 Other Key Strategies

10 Company Profiling

10.1 Abbott Laboratories

10.2 Axogen

10.3 Baxter

10.4 Boston Scientific

10.5 Integra Lifesciences

10.6 Livanova

10.7 Medtronic

10.8 Neuropace

10.9 Nevro

10.10 Nuvectra

10.11 Orthomed

10.12 Polyganics

10.13 Stryker

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/f3k098

About ResearchAndMarkets.com

ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200810005339/en/

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.com

Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

KEYWORD:

INDUSTRY KEYWORD: GENERAL HEALTH HEALTH MEDICAL DEVICES

Excerpt from:
Global Nerve Repair and Regeneration Market Outlook 2020: Company Profiles of Key Players Axogen, Baxter, Nevro, Nuvectra, Polyganics and Stryker -...

Regenerative Medicine & Stem Cell Practice in Medical Spas …

In todays video, we talk about how medical spas and medical practices handle some of the legal issues with regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapies.

Im Michael H. Cohen, founding attorney of the Cohen Healthcare Law Group. Weve advised hundreds of healthcare industry clients on healthcare and FDA legal issues. Our clients include medical spas and healthcare companies that work with stem cell therapies and regenerative medicine.

Weve also gotten a lot of client questions about use of stem cell therapies, whether by medical doctors, naturopathic physicians, or midlevel practitioners such as RNs. As healthcare and FDA attorneys working in regulatory territory, we receive many deep-in-the-weeds questions.

For example, what about injecting stem cells for beauty and cosmetic treatments?

Using stem cells in IV infusions?

Are stem cell therapies covered within state law on nonsurgical medical cosmetic procedures?

Do stem cell therapies require an initial, in-person exam by an MD or under MD supervision by a PA or in collaboration by an NP?

What about procedures such as micro-needling, do these require medical supervision and a good faith exam?

Let me give you three tips to help you keep you in mind when youre looking to get a healthcare lawyer to address these kinds of legal questions.

First, a lot of the law simply says no. It doesnt tell you what you can do, only in broad terms what you cant do. So, when youre looking for legal advice, youre really asking for a professional read by an attorney, between the yes and the no. Obviously, either extreme is unsatisfying and doesnt give you any real guidance.

What you want in a healthcare lawyer is knowledge, skill and experience. A good healthcare lawyer can tell you, this particular scenario is more likely to get you in regulatory trouble, that scenario is more likely not going to be the biggest enforcement priority.

This week, one of our clients, a medical doctor who also runs a medical spa, told me that his biggest competitors were marketing and advertising their services, using advertising copy that he considered deceptive and misleading. He was at wits end trying to compete with these industry players who just dont follow the rules. Its not fair.

We talked through some of the strategies they were using and the legal risks that they were undertaking. Finally, he listened, and concluded: dont poke the bear. In a way, the process of mapping out the regulatory landscape helped him clarify his own business decision.

Second, a lot of these questions come under state law and they have to do with what licensing statutes, regulations, and Board policy statements say.

The federal government doesnt regulate the practice of medicine, or the healthcare practice of other licensed professionals. Rather, the United States Constitution leaves the regulation of health, safety and welfare up to the States.

And so, each State will have different laws and rules about what medical spas can do; about who can do what kinds of therapies; about whether you need a doctor to perform therapy X or Y or whether this can be done by an RN under MDs supervision; or, whether some services can and cant be performed by a licensed esthetician, because for example, they might constitute the practice of medicine.

Depending on your legal budget, it often doesnt make sense to research the law in all states, or even a lot of states. If youre a medical spa in one location, then obviously, your state law matters; and if your business is multi-state, sometimes we focus on key states or we get a small sampling of the ones with the toughest rules.

My third tip is, dont rely on advice which you got from someone else, because it is often incorrect, and based on facts and circumstances that dont necessarily apply to your situation.

As an example, recently, one medical spa came to our Firm with all of these questions swirling around in their minds. They were worried, because a medical spa in the same neighborhood had been visited by a very, very, super friendly medical board investigator, who was asking too many questions, in too friendly a way; and across town, medical spas had been raided by enforcement officials in a very heavy-handed way.

Up till then, the medical spa had thought it was legally safe, because, after all, it had a HIPAA-compliant software platform, and had its doctor making remote Skype calls with patients, before the RN would initiate a whole host of regenerative medicine therapies.

This kind of scenario in fact created much regulatory jeopardy.

The medical spa client basically told us: we use stem cells we get here from Company X, we mix them up in the back of our office with formula Y, then we inject them here and there as the doctor emails us, were only doing it for beauty, we think its ok, we just want some clarification on the laws.

OK, so if the speed limit is 55 and Im going 90, but Im telling you its ok because Im driving an old Chevy, my seat belt if fastened, I have a radar detector, and Ive also surrounded myself with white light and asked the angels to protect me which by the way is not a bad idea, but dont rely on it when you go 90 because if I drive too fast and I have a long way to go and I want to get there quickly all I want to know is, i just want to know if am I legally ok I mean, my cousins lawyers half-sisters friend, who swears by this and also asked a lawyer, said it was ok, as long as I dont go over 90 miles an hour .

I know it sounds really silly, but its the sort of thing we hear, in one form or another all the time.

And thats why you cant take excuses, and your healthcare lawyers experience and professional lens can help you interpret the law.

Thanks for watching. Heres to the success of your healthcare venture, we look forward to speaking with you soon.

See the original post here:
Regenerative Medicine & Stem Cell Practice in Medical Spas ...