Michael Schumacher is reportedly getting another stem-cell surgery; Journalist alleged it will be an experimental procedure – EconoTimes

Michael Schumacher is still surviving as he continues to battle complications from the near-fatal head injury he sustained while skiing in 2013. It was reported that the F1 legend is set to undergo another round of stem cell procedure that will help regenerate his nervous system.

Facts about the reported new operation on Schumi

With this surgery, his family and doctors are hoping that he will be able to recover functions in parts of his body. This is because it is aimed at his sensory system that was affected by his injuries.

The Daily Mail reported that currently, Michael Schumacher is being treated and cared for by French cardiologist Dr. Philippe Menasche, a medical expert specializing in stem cell research. It was revealed that a series of surgeries are needed for this treatment, so this is just one of the racing champs operations for his recovery.

In an article that appeared in an Italian publication Le Dauphine, it was reported that Dr. Menasche will do seminal heart surgery on Schumi in his next surgery schedule. It was added that this will take place soon, but the exact date was not revealed.

It is also believed that this will be the second time that the said doctor is operating on Michael Schumacher. The first procedure was said to have been done in September 2019, and Schumi was in the hospital for about three days. At any rate, in this operation, his damaged cells will be replaced with healthy ones that will be taken from his bone marrow.

An experimental stem-cell surgery?

Michael Schumacher has not recovered from his accident that happened more than six years ago. He is currently being treated in his own home in Switzerland, but his exact condition is still a mystery since his family continues to keep everything related to his health a secret.

Dr. Nicola Acciari, a leading neurosurgeon, previously claimed that Michael Schumacher has osteoporosis and suffering from muscle atrophy since he is unable to move for years. The goal is to regenerate Michaels nervous system, The Sun quoted him as saying in connection to the stem cell therapy.

However, Jean-Michel Dcugis, a French journalist, shared to British daily national newspaper, The Times, that the procedure is experimental at this point since Dr. Menasche is actually a cardiologist.

"Our sources say that Michael Schumacher is receiving stem cell perfusions that produce a systemic anti-inflammatory effect, The Sun quoted Dcugis as saying. "It's quite mysterious as Menasch works only on the heart. He is carrying out experiments with secretome that is made by a laboratory from new stem cells and injected into veins, until now only on animals.

Read the original post:
Michael Schumacher is reportedly getting another stem-cell surgery; Journalist alleged it will be an experimental procedure - EconoTimes

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay Market Valuation 2020 | Key Trends, Growth Drivers, In Depth Analysis, Solution and Businesss Opportunities – Apsters…

The orbisresearch.com has published Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay market 2020 global trends and analysis report to its store

The Global Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay market report is deep study of the present market dynamics. It consists of the detailed study of current market trends along with the past statistics. The past years are considered as reference to get the predicted data for the forecasted period. Various important factors such as market trends, revenue growth patterns market shares and demand and supply are included in almost all the market research report for every industry. A significant development has been recorded by the market of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay, in past few years. It is also for it to grow further. Various important factors such as market trends, revenue growth patterns market shares and demand and supply are included in almost all the market research report for every industry. A systematized methodology is used to make a Report on the Global Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay market. For the analysis of market on the terms of research strategies, these techniques are helpful. All the information about the Products, manufacturers, vendors, customers and much more is covered in research reports.

Request a pdf sample at

https://www.orbispharmareports.com/sample-request/19372

Browse the full report at

https://www.orbispharmareports.com/global-human-embryonic-stem-cell-assay-market-2020-2026-report-by-type-applications-manufacturers-and-regional-overview/

Key Segmentation:

Key Players: Thermo Fisher Scientific Merck GE Healthcare Bio-Rad Laboratories Promega Corporation Agilent Technologies Perkinelmer Miltenyi Biotec Cell Biolabs Hemogenix Stemcell Technologies Bio-Techne Corporation Cellular Dynamics International (CDI)

Types: Viability/Cytotoxicity Isolation & Purification Cell Identification Proliferation Differentiation Function Apoptosis

Key Applications: Biopharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies Research Institutes

There are different marketing strategies that every marketer looks up to in order to ace the competition in the Global market. Some of the primary marketing strategies that is needed for every business to be successful are Passion, Focus, Watching the Data, Communicating the value To Your Customers, Your Understanding of Your Target Market. There is a target set in market that every marketing strategy has to reach. The study is done with the help of analysis such as SWOT analysis and PESTEL analysis. SWOT analysis includes the study of Threats, weaknesses, strengths and opportunities that the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay market. Whereas PESTEL analysis is the study concerning Economic, Technological, legal political, social, environmental matters. For the analysis of market on the terms of research strategies, these techniques are helpful.

Have any inquiries on purchasing the report? If yes, then contact us @

https://www.orbispharmareports.com/enquiry-before-buying/19372

Potential consumers, market values, and the future scope for the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay market are explained thoroughly to the users in this report. The key players of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay industry, their product portfolio, market share, industry profiles is studied in this report. It is very important for the vendors to provide customers with new and improved product/ services in order to gain their loyalty. The study of various segments of the global market are also covered in the research report. In addition to that, for the forecast periods determination of factors like market size and the competitive landscape of the market is analyzed in the report. Due to the increasing globalization and digitization, there are new trends coming to the market every day. The research report provides the in-depth analysis of all these trends.

About Us:

Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Us: Hector Costello Senior Manager Client Engagements 4144N Central Expressway, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75204, U.S.A. Phone No.: USA: +1 (972)-362-8199 | IND: +91 895 659 5155 Email ID: [emailprotected]

Original post:
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assay Market Valuation 2020 | Key Trends, Growth Drivers, In Depth Analysis, Solution and Businesss Opportunities - Apsters...

Bone Marrow Transplantation Market Size : Technological Advancement and Growth Analysis with Forecast to 2028 – Owned

New York City, United States The effect of the coronavirus pandemic and the lockdown it activated is unmistakably obvious in budgetary markets. Yet, there is still no clearness on the more profound effect that it is having across organizations and modern areas. In view of evaluations made by various examiners and industry body Ficci, here is an effect investigation in human services area.

In addition to rapid expansion of bone marrow donor registry, increasing commercialization of cellular therapy and tissue engineering, increased survival rate post bone marrow transplant procedures, and easier access to treatment will be some of the most prominent factors driving thebone marrow transplantation market.

According to the latest research by Persistence Market Research, the global bone marrow transplantation market is expected to exceed US$ 12 Bn by the end of 2028. The bone marrow transplantation market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 3.6% through the forecast period 2018-2028.

Get Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/4288

Company Profile

North America Will Continue to Lead the Pack in Bone Marrow Transplantation Market

Increasing per-capita healthcare and private insurance expenditure is a major factor that is expected to maintain the high demand for technologically advanced treatment procedures, such as bone marrow transplantation, over the forecast period. Increasing blood cancer cases and geriatric population are among the key factors expected to boost the demand for bone marrow transplantation in North America.

The increasing prevalence of myeloma in the region is leading to an increase in the execution of bone marrow transplantation procedures through the allogeneic method. Companies engaged in stem cell therapies are expanding their product portfolio to offer sound treatment solutions for diseases caused while undergoing the allogeneic transplant method.

The availability of more than 90% unrelated donors and high healthcare expenditure are among the factors driving the overall bone marrow transplantation market in North America at present.

The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant reported an increasing prevalence of leukemia and lymphoma in patients aged 65 years and above, and this age group constituted 25-30% of the total number of bone marrow transplantation recipients in 2014.

In 2015, the Senate and House of Representatives of the US reauthorized the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, which led to an increase in the US unrelated donors registry to 200,000 donors.

Germany Will Steer Europes Market for Bone Marrow Transplantation

Rise in per capita GDP is expected to improve the healthcare expenditure in countries such as Germany and Spain. Government policymakers are forcing healthcare providers and public payers to disclose the cost charged and reimbursed to maintain price transparency. Healthcare organizations in Germany spend most of their research funding on adult stem cell research.

Furthermore, Germany spends 11.3% of its GDP on healthcare, which is above the global average. This, in turn, has led to the presence of better healthcare facilities and more advanced research findings on various healthcare issues such as bone marrow transplantation.

Among the 680 centers throughout the Europe, 226 (35%) centers are dedicated to autologous bone marrow transplantation in 2014, with most of the transplants intended for non-malignant disorders. These factors are expected to drive the bone marrow transplantation market in Europe.

Get To Know Methodology of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/4288

APAC Reflects Lucrative Potential for Penetration of Bone Marrow Transplantation Procedures

Rise in the number of bone marrow transplantation centers and expanding donor registry are among the factors expected to reduce the gap between bone marrow transplantation providers and recipients in the Asia Pacific bone marrow transplantation market.

The availability of modern healthcare amenities, along with the presence of several companies engaged in stem cell therapies in China, Australia, and Japan, is expected to be a key factor driving the overall bone marrow transplantation market in Asia Pacific.

After the introduction of alleviating procedures for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) transplant, there has been an increase in the number of allogeneic HSCT procedures using PBSC (64% of the total HSCT) in Australia & New Zealand, which is another factor contributing to the growth of the bone marrow transplantation market in the region.

A survey by the Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplant (EMBMT) Group suggests that non-malignant indications accounted for a 36.5% share of the total bone marrow transplantation activities carried out in the MEA region. Countries such as Dubai and Qatar are undertaking initiatives to develop national bone marrow registries to enhance bone marrow transplantation rates.

Access Full Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/checkout/4288

The report offers a comprehensive taxonomy of the bone marrow transplantation market based on the transplantation type, indication, end user, and region.

Report Highlights:

Explore Extensive Coverage of PMR`sLife Sciences & Transformational HealthLandscape

Feminine Hygiene Product Market Feminine Hygiene Products Market Segmented By Sanitary Pads/Napkins, Tampons, Panty Liners, Menstrual Cups, and Feminine Hygiene Wash.For More Information

Persistence Market Research (PMR) is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics andmarket research methodologyto help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At PMR, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Our client success stories feature a range of clients from Fortune 500 companies to fast-growing startups. PMRs collaborative environment is committed to building industry-specific solutions by transforming data from multiple streams into a strategic asset.

Contact us:

Ashish Kolte Persistence Market Research Address 305 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York City, NY 10007 United States U.S. Ph. +1-646-568-7751 USA-Canada Toll-free +1 800-961-0353 Sales[emailprotected] Websitehttps://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

Continue reading here:
Bone Marrow Transplantation Market Size : Technological Advancement and Growth Analysis with Forecast to 2028 - Owned

Global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells Market 2020 Newest Industry Data, Future Trends and Forecast 2025 – 3rd Watch News

Heres a recently issued report titled Global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025offers a brief analysis of the market size, demand, supply chain, futuristic trends, and market growth elements. The report highlights restraints, thoughtful insights, and current growth drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. The report on the global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells market includes segments by type & application, region, and major players. It explains the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the forecast period from 2020 to 2025. The report studies the market dynamics such as drivers, restraints, opportunities, supply chain, and competitive landscape.

Market segment by manufacturers, this report covers:Thermo Fisher Scientific, praxair, Charter Medicals, Linde Gas Cryoservices

NOTE: Our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe explains that the market will generate remunerative prospects for producers post COVID-19 crisis. The report aims to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario, economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.marketandresearch.biz/sample-request/131028

The report simply demonstrates accurate statistics and analytical data through graphs, diagrams, pie charts, and other pictorial illustrations. The markets high growth potential will also encourage more start-ups and large firms to enter this market, which will escalate the competitive environment among the players. It also encompasses the analysis of the technical barriers, other issues, and cost-effectiveness affecting the global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells market. The research study delivers a detailed study of top players, their product description, business overview, and business strategy, as well as future demand, and required raw material.

Regional Analysis:

Regional analysis is presented in the report. This section sheds light on the sales growth of different regional and country-level Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells markets. For the historical and forecast period 2015 to 2025, it provides detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global market. The report offers a comprehensive assessment of the growth and other aspects of the market in important countries (regions), including: North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, etc.), Middle East& Africa (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

On the basis of product, the global market is studied across: Liquid Phase, Vapor Phase,

On the basis of the distribution channel, the global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells market is studied across: Totipotent Stem Cell, Pluripotent Stem Cell,

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.marketandresearch.biz/report/131028/global-cryopreservation-equipment-in-stem-cells-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

Key Takeaways of The Market Report:

Customization of the Report: This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team ([emailprotected]), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Marketandresearch.biz is a leading global Market Research agency providing expert research solutions, trusted by the best. We understand the importance of knowing what global consumers watch and buy, further using the same to document our distinguished research reports. Marketandresearch.biz has worldwide presence to facilitate real market intelligence using latest methodology, best-in-class research techniques and cost-effective measures for worlds leading research professionals and agencies. We study consumers in more than 100 countries to give you the most complete view of trends and habits worldwide. Marketsandresearch.biz is a leading provider of Full-Service Research, Global Project Management, Market Research Operations and Online Panel Services.

Contact Us Mark Stone Head of Business Development Phone:+1-201-465-4211 Email:[emailprotected] Web:www.marketandresearch.biz

See original here:
Global Cryopreservation Equipment in Stem Cells Market 2020 Newest Industry Data, Future Trends and Forecast 2025 - 3rd Watch News

2025 Growth: Biotechnology Reagents Market 2020 Research on Import-Export Details, Business Standards and Forecast to 2025 – 3rd Watch News

The study on the Biotechnology Reagents Marketby Brand Essence Market Research is a compilation of systematic details in terms of market valuation, market size, revenue estimation, and geographical spectrum of the business vertical. The study also offers a precise analysis of the key challenges and growth prospects awaiting key players of the Biotechnology Reagents market, including a concise summary of their corporate strategies and competitive setting.

In 2018, the Global Biotechnology Reagents Market size was xx million US$ and it is expected to reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, with a CAGR of xx% during 2019-2025.

Download Premium Sample of the Report: https://industrystatsreport.com/Request/Sample?ResearchPostId=12804&RequestType=Sample

Global Biotechnology Reagents Market is valued at USD 71.25 Billion in 2018 and expected to reach USD 121.06 Billion by 2025 with the CAGR of 7.86% over the forecast period.

Increasing prevalence of diseases such as hepatitis B with growing research and development expenditure bybiotechnologytherapeutics and rising number of biotechnology firms globally are expected to boost the market over the forecast period.

Biotechnology reagents are the substances or compounds used to detect or create an additional substance in order to provide a test reading. Hence, the biotechnologies are used in research fields of genetics, molecular biology, diagnosis, immunology, bioscience and in education. The various uses of biotechnology reagents are; fluorescent microscopy, DNA analysis, immuno phenotyping and cell cycle analysis. The biotechnology reagents industry depends on the growth of biotechnology instrumentation market. Biotechnology reagents market includes technologies such as IVD, PCR, transfection, gene expression and cell culture. The basis of technology market is section into analytical reagents and life science reagents. The Life science technologies include in vitro diagnostics, unit culture, polymerase chain reaction and analytical technologies includes flow cytometry, electrophoresis, mass spectrometry and chromatography. The healthcare biotechnology is usually to improve medicines due to the advantages and pieces of knowledge it provides such as understanding the genetic composition of the human species, foundational structure of hereditary diseases manipulation and repairing of damaged genes to cure diseases. As the researchers might see the engineering of a supercharged flu virus as a perfectly reasonable way to better understand and thus fight the flu, the public might see the drawbacks as equally obvious the virus could escape, or someone could weaponize the research and the advanced genetic tools that some are considering for mosquito control could have unforeseen effects, possibly leading to environmental damage. Although the risks of biotechnology have been fretted over for decades, the increasing pace of progress from low cost DNA sequencing to rapid gene synthesis to precision genome editing suggests biotechnology is entering a new realm of maturity regarding both beneficial relevance and more worrisome risks.

Global Biotechnology Reagents Market report is segmented on the basis of type, application, and by regional & country level. Based on type, global biotechnology reagents market is classified as the Life science and analytical. Based upon application, global biotechnology reagents are classified into protein synthesis and purification, gene expression, DNA and RNA analysis and drug testing.

The regions covered in this biotechnology reagents market report are North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World. On the basis of country level, market of biotechnology reagents is sub divided into U.S., Mexico, Canada, U.K., France, Germany, Italy, China, Japan, India, South East Asia, GCC, Africa, etc.

Key Players for Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Report-

Some major key players for Global Biotechnology Reagents Market are Life Technologies, Bio-Rad, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Water Corporation, Sigma-Aldrich Agilent Technologies Inc., Beckman Coulter, Roche, Abbott and others.

Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Dynamics

The rapidly increasing use of biotechnology reagents in therapeutics, basic research and its commercialization are the major factors responsible for the growth of this market. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017, prevalence of hepatitis B estimated about 27 million people 10.5% of all people estimated to be living with hepatitis B were aware of their infection, while 4.5 million around 16.7% of the people diagnosed were on treatment. Hence, the rising prices of DNA sequencing is predictable to serve this sector as a high impact rendering growth is expected to encourage researchers and manufacturers to increase R&D initiatives targeted at understanding genetic variations and developing therapeutic solutions for chronic diseases with large global prevalence such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015, the estimates that in 257 million people were living with chronic hepatitis B infection as surface antigen positive, the hepatitis B resulted in an estimated 887 000 deaths, mostly from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is primary liver cancer. In addition, the high investments in R&D activities, growing biomedical research, increasing number of biotechnology firms and advancement in stem cell research have contributed to the growth of the biotechnology reagents market.

The biotechnology organizations such as the department of biotechnology (DBT) with government funded institutions and other autonomous organizations representing the biotechnology sector, promote funding to support R&D and innovative produce development endeavors. One of the major challenges faced by this market use of biotechnology reagents in the field of drug discovery is an emerging market where proteomics, DNA chips, combinatorial chemistry, and high throughput screening enjoy the spotlight. In addition, high price of biopharmaceuticals may likely to restrain the growth of the biotechnology reagents market. Moreover, increase in the number of biotechnology firms around the globe and increase in research and development expenditure by the biotechnology corporation can provide various opportunities for the further growth of the market. The technological advancements and new product launches in health care and life science industries to life science reagents are an integral part of any clinical diagnostic laboratory and pharmaceutical & biotechnology industry. The recent technological advancements in molecular biology, life sciences, and biotechnology has brought about drastic changes in various fields such as medical diagnostics, drug discovery, personalized medicines, forensic sciences, and clinical research & development of the biotechnology reagents market.

Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Regional Analysis

Geographically,North America dominates the global biotechnology reagents market & incurs the highest expenditure for global R&D. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2018, the chronic diseases in the United States are about 133 million Americans 45% of the population have at least one chronic disease. In addition, rising ongoing research in biological sciences considerable investments by various biotechnology companies and the consistently increasing utilization of biotechnology reagents in the market due to the continuing research and outsourcing activities in the field of life science in this region are also supplementing the market growth.

TheAsia Pacific is expected to show a lucrative growth rate during the forecast period due to increasing research and outsourcing activities in life science field. However, the regionlarge population, presence of emerging economies such as China and India, large number of elderly individuals in Japan presents significant opportunities for global players in these countries. Adoption of technologically advanced products in Japan, China, South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore are likely to fuel the growth of the life science reagents market in this region. Moreover, increased investment by leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in India and China, and rapidly increasing number of hospitals and diagnostic laboratories in the region boost the growth of the biotechnology reagents market in the region.

Key Benefits for Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Report

Global market report covers in depth historical and forecast analysis.Global market research report provides detail information about Market Introduction, Market Summary, Global market Revenue (Revenue USD), Market Drivers, Market Restraints, Market opportunities, Competitive Analysis, Regional and Country Level.Global market report helps to identify opportunities in market place.Global market report covers extensive analysis of emerging trends and competitive landscape.

By Type

By Application

By Regional & Country Analysis

Table of Contents

1 Report Overview 1.1 Study Scope 1.2 Key Market Segments 1.3 Players Covered 1.4 Market Analysis by Type 1.4.1 Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2014-2025) 1.4.2 Topical Products 1.4.3 Botulinum 1.4.4 Dermal Fillers 1.4.5 Chemical Peels 1.4.6 Microabrasion Equipment 1.4.7 Laser Surfacing Treatments 1.5 Market by Application 1.5.1 Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Share by Application (2014-2025) 1.5.2 Hospitals 1.5.3 Dermatology Clinics 1.6 Study Objectives 1.7 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends 2.1 Biotechnology Reagents Market Size 2.2 Biotechnology Reagents Growth Trends by Regions 2.2.1 Biotechnology Reagents Market Size by Regions (2014-2025) 2.2.2 Biotechnology Reagents Market Share by Regions (2014-2019) 2.3 Industry Trends 2.3.1 Market Top Trends 2.3.2 Market Drivers 2.3.3 Market Opportunities

3 Market Share by Key Players 3.1 Biotechnology Reagents Market Size by Manufacturers 3.1.1 Global Biotechnology Reagents Revenue by Manufacturers (2014-2019) 3.1.2 Global Biotechnology Reagents Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2014-2019) 3.1.3 Global Biotechnology Reagents Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI) 3.2 Biotechnology Reagents Key Players Head office and Area Served 3.3 Key Players Biotechnology Reagents Product/Solution/Service 3.4 Date of Enter into Biotechnology Reagents Market 3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

Read More: https://industrystatsreport.com/Lifesciences-and-Healthcare/Dynamic-Rsearch-on-Biotechnology-Reagents-Market/Summary

About us: Brandessence Market Research and Consulting Pvt. ltd.

Brandessence market research publishes market research reports & business insights produced by highly qualified and experienced industry analysts. Our research reports are available in a wide range of industry verticals including aviation, food & beverage, healthcare, ICT, Construction, Chemicals and lot more. Brand Essence Market Research report will be best fit for senior executives, business development managers, marketing managers, consultants, CEOs, CIOs, COOs, and Directors, governments, agencies, organizations and Ph.D. Students. We have a delivery center in Pune, India and our sales office is in London.

Contact us at: +44-2038074155 or mail us at [emailprotected]

See the rest here:
2025 Growth: Biotechnology Reagents Market 2020 Research on Import-Export Details, Business Standards and Forecast to 2025 - 3rd Watch News

Trending: Viral Inactivation Market Research Report: Probable Key Development To Be Observed Market States And Outlook Across By 2026| Danaher, Merck,…

LOS ANGELES, United States: QY Research has recently published a report, titled Global Viral Inactivation Market Report, History and Forecast 2015-2026, Breakdown Data by Companies, Key Regions, Types and Application.The market research report is a brilliant, complete, and much-needed resource for companies, stakeholders, and investors interested in the global Viral Inactivation market. It informs readers about key trends and opportunities in the global Viral Inactivation market along with critical market dynamics expected to impact the global market growth. It offers a range of market analysis studies, including production and consumption, sales, industry value chain, competitive landscape, regional growth, and price. On the whole, it comes out as an intelligent resource that companies can use to gain a competitive advantage in the global Viral Inactivation market.

Key companies operating in the global Viral Inactivation market include Danaher, Merck, Parker Hannifin, Sartorius, SGS, Charles River Laboratories International, Clean Cells, Rad Source Technologies, Texcell, Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems, Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman)

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :

https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1603397/global-viral-inactivation-market

Segmental Analysis

Both developed and emerging regions are deeply studied by the authors of the report. The regional analysis section of the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the global Viral Inactivation market on the basis of region. Each region is exhaustively researched about so that players can use the analysis to tap into unexplored markets and plan powerful strategies to gain a foothold in lucrative markets.

Global Viral Inactivation Market Segment By Type:

Kits and Reagents, Services, Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories

Global Viral Inactivation Market Segment By Application:

, Blood and Blood Products, Cellular and Gene Therapy Products, Stem Cell Products, Tissue and Tissue Products, Vaccines and Therapeutics

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global Viral Inactivation market.

Key companies operating in the global Viral Inactivation market include Danaher, Merck, Parker Hannifin, Sartorius, SGS, Charles River Laboratories International, Clean Cells, Rad Source Technologies, Texcell, Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems, Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman)

Key questions answered in the report:

For Discount, Customization in the Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1603397/global-viral-inactivation-market

TOC

Table of Contents 1 Market Overview of Viral Inactivation 1.1 Viral Inactivation Market Overview 1.1.1 Viral Inactivation Product Scope 1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook 1.2 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size Overview by Region 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 1.3 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size by Region (2015-2026) 1.4 Global Viral Inactivation Historic Market Size by Region (2015-2020) 1.5 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026) 1.6 Key Regions Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.1 North America Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.2 Europe Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.3 China Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.4 Rest of Asia Pacific Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.5 Latin America Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 1.6.6 Middle East & Africa Viral Inactivation Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 2 Viral Inactivation Market Overview by Type 2.1 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size by Type: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 2.2 Global Viral Inactivation Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 2.3 Global Viral Inactivation Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 2.4 Kits and Reagents 2.5 Services 2.6 Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories 3 Viral Inactivation Market Overview by Type 3.1 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 3.2 Global Viral Inactivation Historic Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 3.3 Global Viral Inactivation Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 3.4 Blood and Blood Products 3.5 Cellular and Gene Therapy Products 3.6 Stem Cell Products 3.7 Tissue and Tissue Products 3.8 Vaccines and Therapeutics 4 Global Viral Inactivation Competition Analysis by Players 4.1 Global Viral Inactivation Market Size (Million US$) by Players (2015-2020) 4.2 Global Top Manufacturers by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Viral Inactivation as of 2019) 4.3 Date of Key Manufacturers Enter into Viral Inactivation Market 4.4 Global Top Players Viral Inactivation Headquarters and Area Served 4.5 Key Players Viral Inactivation Product Solution and Service 4.6 Competitive Status 4.6.1 Viral Inactivation Market Concentration Rate 4.6.2 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 5 Company (Top Players) Profiles and Key Data 5.1 Danaher 5.1.1 Danaher Profile 5.1.2 Danaher Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.1.3 Danaher Products, Services and Solutions 5.1.4 Danaher Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.1.5 Danaher Recent Developments 5.2 Merck 5.2.1 Merck Profile 5.2.2 Merck Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.2.3 Merck Products, Services and Solutions 5.2.4 Merck Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.2.5 Merck Recent Developments 5.3 Parker Hannifin 5.5.1 Parker Hannifin Profile 5.3.2 Parker Hannifin Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.3.3 Parker Hannifin Products, Services and Solutions 5.3.4 Parker Hannifin Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.3.5 Sartorius Recent Developments 5.4 Sartorius 5.4.1 Sartorius Profile 5.4.2 Sartorius Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.4.3 Sartorius Products, Services and Solutions 5.4.4 Sartorius Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.4.5 Sartorius Recent Developments 5.5 SGS 5.5.1 SGS Profile 5.5.2 SGS Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.5.3 SGS Products, Services and Solutions 5.5.4 SGS Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.5.5 SGS Recent Developments 5.6 Charles River Laboratories International 5.6.1 Charles River Laboratories International Profile 5.6.2 Charles River Laboratories International Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.6.3 Charles River Laboratories International Products, Services and Solutions 5.6.4 Charles River Laboratories International Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.6.5 Charles River Laboratories International Recent Developments 5.7 Clean Cells 5.7.1 Clean Cells Profile 5.7.2 Clean Cells Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.7.3 Clean Cells Products, Services and Solutions 5.7.4 Clean Cells Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.7.5 Clean Cells Recent Developments 5.8 Rad Source Technologies 5.8.1 Rad Source Technologies Profile 5.8.2 Rad Source Technologies Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.8.3 Rad Source Technologies Products, Services and Solutions 5.8.4 Rad Source Technologies Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.8.5 Rad Source Technologies Recent Developments 5.9 Texcell 5.9.1 Texcell Profile 5.9.2 Texcell Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.9.3 Texcell Products, Services and Solutions 5.9.4 Texcell Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.9.5 Texcell Recent Developments 5.10 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems 5.10.1 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems Profile 5.10.2 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.10.3 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems Products, Services and Solutions 5.10.4 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.10.5 Viral Inactivated Plasma Systems Recent Developments 5.11 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) 5.11.1 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) Profile 5.11.2 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) Main Business and Companys Total Revenue 5.11.3 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) Products, Services and Solutions 5.11.4 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) Revenue (US$ Million) (2015-2020) 5.11.5 Wuxi Pharmatech (Cayman) Recent Developments 6 North America Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 6.1 North America Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 6.2 North America Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 7 Europe Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 7.1 Europe Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 7.2 Europe Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 8 China Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 8.1 China Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 8.2 China Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 9 Rest of Asia Pacific Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 9.1 Rest of Asia Pacific Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 9.2 Rest of Asia Pacific Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 10 Latin America Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 10.1 Latin America Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 10.2 Latin America Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 11 Middle East & Africa Viral Inactivation by Players and by Application 11.1 Middle East & Africa Viral Inactivation Market Size and Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 11.2 Middle East & Africa Viral Inactivation Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 12 Viral Inactivation Market Dynamics 12.1 Industry Trends 12.2 Market Drivers 12.3 Market Challenges 12.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 13 Research Finding /Conclusion 14 Methodology and Data Source 14.1 Methodology/Research Approach 14.1.1 Research Programs/Design 14.1.2 Market Size Estimation 14.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 14.2 Data Source 14.2.1 Secondary Sources 14.2.2 Primary Sources 14.3 Disclaimer 14.4 Author List

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.

Link:
Trending: Viral Inactivation Market Research Report: Probable Key Development To Be Observed Market States And Outlook Across By 2026| Danaher, Merck,...

Takeda takes a $200M hit after Novartis is forced to yank its marketing application for Xiidra – Endpoints News

Now that the EMA has elbowed Novartis application for Xiidra off the table, the reverberations are being felt at Takeda.

The pharma giant noted early Monday that it will recognize a loss of $200 million for the current quarter after the news hit late last week that the European regulator had decided that the eye drug they sold to Novartis for $3.4 billion in cash and $1.9 billion in milestones hadnt made its case on efficacy. The drug has been marketed in the US now for 4 years, and Takeda picked it up in the $62 billion Shire buyout and then promptly sold it off to Novartis.

That decision at the EMA is hitting the $1.9 billion in potential sales milestones, now that the European market is off the table. The continental regulator was clearly unimpressed by the data for Xiidra, and became skeptical over the way the control arm was handled by Shire.

In explaining the withdrawal, the EMA noted:

The Agency considered that the effectiveness of Xiidra was not demonstrated across different symptoms of dry eye disease. Although some effect was seen in the reduction of eye dryness, the improvement was not considered clinically significant. In addition, although Xiidra was intended to be used in patients with more severe disease in whom artificial tears had not been sufficient in improving the condition, the Agency had some concerns about how these patients were to be selected, and noted that the studies had compared Xiidra with the vehicle, and had not used artificial tears in an optimal way. The Agency also noted that there were no data on the effect of long-term treatment with Xiidra despite eye dryness being a chronic (long-lasting) disease.

The drug, as Novartis explained, is designed to block the interaction between LFA-1 1 and ICAM-1 2, inhibiting T cell recruitment and activation and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine release.

Original post:
Takeda takes a $200M hit after Novartis is forced to yank its marketing application for Xiidra - Endpoints News

COVID-19: Plasma therapy vs stem cell therapy, what’s the difference? – Gulf News

Image Credit: Gulf News

DUBAI: Plasma and stem cell (SC) therapies are two of the emerging star treatments being used in the fight against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Against COVID-19, they're considered stop-gap measures, while the world awaits a vaccine. Both, however, have proven effective against severe cases infections caused by the novel coronavirus, which has already killed over 502,000 and infected 10.1 million as of Monday (June 29, 2020).

Plasma and SC therapies have similarities, as well as obvious differences. We outline them below:

Both plasma and stem cell therapies rely on rejuvenating damaged body tissue. Theyboth form part of what's described as regenerative medicine, a fast-emerging branch of medical science involving techniques thathelp restore the functionof tissues or organs.

Being regenerative treatments (or therapies), they encourage your body to use its natural abilities to heal injuries or other types of tissue damage or inflammation.

The journal Platelets refer to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell (SC) therapies as the "mainstream medical technologies" to repair and rejuvenate a damaged tissue or organ caused by injury or chronic diseases.

Plasma-rich platelets are components of blood that contain platelet concentrations above the normal level.

Platelets are the frontline workers in carrying out a healing response to injuries. They release growth factors for tissue repair.Plasma therapy uses the liquid portion of blood (plasma, yellowish) which includes a higher concentration of platelets the part of blood that contributes to clotting and healing.

Stem cells, on the other hand, are generic cells. They are the prime cells -- unspecialised, undifferentiated, immature cells. Based on specific stimuli, they can divide and differentiate into specific type of cells and tissues.

Stem cells are the basic, generic building blocks of life. In a sense, they unspecialised, undifferentiated, immature cells. They can divide and differentiate into specific type of cells and tissues, based on based on specific stimuli.

Its this ability to differentiate into other types of cell that make stem cells interesting to medical science.

In adults, they are usually obtained from bone marrow. In infants, stem cells are usually taken from the umbilical cord.

Scientists have found stem cells present in blood vessels, the brain, skeletal muscles, skin and the liver.

They can be difficult to find and work with. Stem cells are also categorised by their potential to differentiate into different cell types. These include, pluripotent and multipotent stem cells.

SCs are generic (or primitive) cells obtained either from embryos or from the adult tissues, that have the capacity of self-renewal and can differentiate into as many as 200 different cell types of the adult body.

SC also produces certain growth factors and cytokines that accelerate the healing process at the site of tissue damage. Cytokines are secreted by certain cells of the immune system and have an effect on other cells. SC is used to treat degenerative and inflammatory conditions by replacing the damaged cells in virtually any tissue or organ, where PRP applications serve no benefit.

In the UAE, a medical research team has developed a first-in-the-world technique using inhaled stem cells that harvestedfrom the patients themselves. Following the initial success of the technique in 73 patients, the procedure has been ramped up.

In May, the ADSCC team, led by Dr Yendry Ventura, unveiled the new treatment. The UAECell19 is an autologous (cells obtained from the same individual)stem cells therapy which helped cut hospital stay from 22 days to six, relative to patients who were given standard treatment.

According to the Abu Dhabi team, patients given the stem cell therapy were up to 3.1x more likely to recover in less than seven days compared to those given standard treatment.

Researchers also stated that 67% of the patients who received the stem cells treatment owed this recovery to the new treatment.

ADSCC has secured a patent for UAECell19. Protection of the intellectual property rights for the therapy opens doors for it tobe shared more widely so more patients can benefit.

Plasma is the liquid portion of whole blood. It is composed largely of water and proteins, and it provides a medium for red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets to circulate through the body.

Convalescent refers to a person recovering from an illness or medical treatment.

Convalescent plasma, also known as immunoglobulins, is plasma taken from the blood of a person who has recovered from a disease.

Research shows that recovered COVID-19 patients develop antibodies in the blood against the virus. Antibodies are proteins that might help fight the infection.

Platelets, a component of the blood, are repair agents. They are frontliners in the healing response to injuries. Platelets are also called thrombocytes, blood cells that trigger blood clotting and other necessary growth healing functions.

PLATELET FACTS

[] When the platelet count is less than 50,000, bleeding is likely to be more serious if you're cut or bruised.

[] Some people make too many platelets. They can have platelet counts from 500,000 to more than 1 million.

PRP is a component of blood that contains platelet concentrations above the normal level -- usually five times higher concentrations of platelets above the normal values. It includes platelet-related growth factors and plasma-derived fibrinogen (a blood plasma protein that's made in the liver), among others.

Yes. Convalescent plasma hasbeen used as a last resort to improve the survival rates of patients with SARS (2003), as well as the "Spanish Flu" (1918-1920), as well as other infectious diseases.The Lancetcitesseveral studies that showed a shorter hospital stay and lower mortality in patients treated with convalescent plasma than those who were not treated with it.

It's been gaining ground in the COVID-19 fight around the world. In the last few weeks, convalescent plasma therapy has helped treat at least 170 patients at the Infectious Disease Department at Rashid Hospital in Dubai.

THROMBOCYTOPENIA

[] This can be caused by many conditions by medicines, cancer, liver disease, pregnancy, infections (including COVID-19), and an abnormal immune system.

If you are one of the thousands of patients fully-recovered from COVID-19, you may be able to help patients currently fighting the infection by donating your plasma. That's because you fought the infection, your plasma now contains COVID-19 antibodies.

These antibodies provided one way for your immune system to fight the virus when you were sick, so your plasma may be able to be used to help others fight off the disease.

Yes, you are. Health authorities, including the US Food and Drug Administration, encourage people who have fully recovered from COVID-19 for at least two weeks to consider donating plasma.

You can help save the lives of other patients.

However, you must first undergo some tests to check if you're eligible to meet donor criteria. Doctors will determine that. COVID-19 convalescent plasma must only be collected from recovered individuals if you are eligible.

A lab test must document a prior diagnosis of COVID-19. In general, FDA protocol requires individuals to have complete resolution of symptoms for at least 14 days prior to donation.

No. The FDA guideline states: A negative lab test for active COVID-19 disease is not necessary to qualify for donation.

You shouldconsider donating blood. One blood donation can save up to three lives.

View post:
COVID-19: Plasma therapy vs stem cell therapy, what's the difference? - Gulf News

Novel coronavirus infection might trigger type-1 diabetes – The Hindu

Diabetes poses one of the key risk factors for developing severe COVID-19, and chances of dying are elevated in people with diabetes. Now, there is growing evidence that novel coronavirus might actually be triggering diabetes in some people who have so far remained free of it. These patients typically develop type-1 diabetes. The virus seems to be causing diabetes spontaneously in people.

These patients typically develop type-1 diabetes, which is caused when the bodys immune system plays rogue and begins to attack and destroy the beta cells, which produce the hormone insulin in the pancreas. With the destruction of beta cells, the amount of insulin produced is reduced, and hence, the ability of the body to control blood sugar is compromised leading to type-1 diabetes.

The 2002 SARS coronavirus, too, caused acute-onset diabetes in patients. Like the 2002 SARS coronavirus, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, too, binds to ACE2 receptors that are found on many organs involved in controlling blood sugar, including the liver and pancreatic beta cells, and subsequently infects the cells in the organs.

In a letter published in The New England Journal of Medicine, the researchers write: There is a bidirectional relationship between COVID-19 and diabetes. On the one hand, diabetes is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19. On the other hand, new-onset diabetes and severe metabolic complications of preexisting diabetes have been observed in patients with COVID-19.

However, more evidence is needed to conclusively prove that COVID-19 indeed causes type-1 diabetes. It is also not clear if the acute-onset diabetes in COVID-19 patients will be permanent or transient. The is no clarity whether people who are borderline type-2 develop the disease.

The COVID-19 patients who develop diabetes have extremely high levels of blood sugar and ketones. When there is insufficient insulin produced, breaking down the sugar present in the blood is compromised leading to high levels of sugar. At the same time, the body begins to turn to alternative sources of fuel, which in this case are ketones. A study found 42 of 658 patients presented with ketosis on admission. Patients with ketosis were younger (median age 47). Ketosis increased the length of hospital stay and mortality, the researchers found.

Using human pluripotent stem cells, researchers grew miniature liver and pancreas and found that both the organs were permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In particular, they found the pancreatic beta cells were infected by coronavirus. ACE2 is expressed in human adult alpha and beta cells. While the beta cells produce insulin which reduces the sugar level in the blood, the alpha cells produce glucagon, which increases the blood sugar. A fine balance between the two helps maintain the blood sugar level.

The researchers transplanted the miniature pancreatic endocrine cells produced using human stem cells into mice. Two months later, they examined the xenografted pancreas and found ACE2 receptors on beta and alpha cells. When the mice were infected with coronavirus, they found the beta cells were infected by the virus. Thus the virus is capable of damaging the cells that control blood sugar thus triggering acute-onset of type-1 diabetes.

According to Nature News, a global database to collect information on people with COVID-19 and high blood-sugar levels who previously do not have a history of elevated blood sugar levels has been initiated. The researchers hope to use the cases to understand whether SARS-CoV-2 can induce type 1 diabetes or a new form of the disease, Nature News says. Researchers want to use the database to understand if the acute-onset diabetes is permanent and people who are borderline type-2 develop the disease.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Not convinced? Know why you should pay for news.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad mobile applications and print. Our plans enhance your reading experience.

Read this article:
Novel coronavirus infection might trigger type-1 diabetes - The Hindu

Label-free sensing of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 for tracking metabolic reprogramming and malignant progression in glioma – Science Advances

INTRODUCTION

Glioma is the most common type of brain cancer that predominantly originates from neuroglial stem cells (1). Accumulating evidence has revealed that a key hallmark during the malignant progression of glioma is metabolic reprogramming toward aerobic glycolysis, known as the Warburg effect (2). Consequently, malignant glioma cells (GMs) increase glucose consumption and lactate production through rapid glycolysis to meet the high demand of energy substrates, biosynthetic precursors, and signaling molecules, by which their growth and migration are promoted (3). Malignant GMs enhance the levels of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) and cluster of differentiation 147 (CD147) as well as their localization at the plasma membrane to remove intracellular lactate out of cells for the maintenance of continuous glycolysis. This leads to the accumulation of lactate in the tumor microenvironment (TME) (4). This extracellular lactate can also be taken up by surrounding fasting GMs and stromal cells in the hypoxic TME to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP), eventually establishing the metabolic coupling among heterogeneous neighboring cells (5). Recent reports have demonstrated that lactate in the TME can serve not only as an energy substrate and biosynthetic precursor but also as a signaling molecule in promoting tumor progression (6). However, the exact role of lactate as a signaling molecule in glioma progression remains largely elusive.

MCT1, a major MCT in the central nervous system (7), has been known to play a crucial role in the proton-linked transport of lactate and ketone bodies across the cell membrane by cooperative action with its binding protein, CD147 (8). In particular, MCT1 and CD147 in various tumors, including glioma, are significantly up-regulated during malignant progression of the tumor. Therefore, their levels and distribution in glioma tissues have been considered as crucial indicators to determine glioma malignancy, particularly that associated with metabolic adaptation (9). Blocking the function of MCT1 and CD147, genetically or chemically, has been shown to suppress the growth, metastasis, and invasion of GMs as well as angiogenesis in in vitro and in vivo experimental models (10). Such findings have led to the ongoing development of their inhibitors as anticancer agents via controlling tumor metabolism.

Increased glycolysis is an important survival mechanism of GMs in the metabolically stressful TME. GMs in the hypoxic TME enhance the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)dependent glycolytic genes, including MCT1 and CD147, which produces high levels of ATP and lactate (9). A recent study has demonstrated that hypoxic cancer cells, including malignant GMs, also promote the release of a substantial number of exosomes, a major type of extracellular vesicles (EVs), which facilitates tumor progression (11). However, it remains largely unknown how up-regulated MCT1 and CD147 in malignant GMs are associated with the increased release of exosomes and the production of pro-oncogenic exosomes for glioma progression.

Most cells, including cancer cells, release exosomes, by which functional molecules can be delivered to neighboring or distal cells (12). Malignant GMs release a significantly high number of exosomes, partly by which their invasion, metastasis, and growth can be promoted (11, 13). GMs-derived exosomes contain tumor-associated proteins and microRNA (13). For example, they contain tumor-specific mRNA and microRNAs, including mRNA of c-Myc, mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, mutant epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), and microRNA-21 (14, 15).

GMs-derived exosomes with a size ranging from 30 to 200 nm (16) can spread into systemic bio-fluids, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (17) and blood (18) by crossing the blood-CSF barrier (BCSFB) and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, GMs-derived exosomes have been proposed as great platforms for the discovery of effective biomarkers to track glioma progression (19). Conventionally, the diagnosis and prognosis of glioma have been mainly dependent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans, as well as intracranial biopsies (20, 21). However, the detection of precise molecular signatures of glioma progression and metabolic adaptation has been difficult to ascertain. Therefore, the development of additional diagnostic tools with precise biomarkers has been in high demand to better monitor the metabolic reprogramming and malignant progression of glioma. While recent studies have suggested that highly sensitive detection of exosomes and exosomal components can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis of tumors such as glioma (11, 22, 23), the detailed characterization of GMs-derived exosomes requires additional investigation to provide a more thorough understanding of how to track glioma progression and metabolic adaptation. For example, differential biophysical properties, such as zeta potential, adhesiveness, stiffness, and roughness, as well as the release amount of daughter exosomes have been proposed as informative indicators to better understand and determine the malignant transition of parent GMs (24). In particular, the surface proteins of GM-derived exosomes can be reliable diagnostic biomarkers that can be measured by cost-effective, label-free, real-time, and highly sensitive detection tools such as localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) biosensors (25). LSPR biosensing is a powerful biocompatible technique with a high sensitivity, allowing it to detect single molecular interactions, such as antigen-antibody interactions. It also has high spatial resolution owing to the change of the dielectric property of surroundings in the functionalized sensing chip (26). AFM, on the other hand, is a versatile scanning probe microscope that can measure single molecular interactions with nanoscale spatial resolution achieved through the detection of the adhesive force between functionalized probe tips and the sample on the discs (27). The capability of imaging for soft samples in air and liquid without causing much damage makes AFM a powerful tool for the analysis of biological samples, including exosomes (28). Therefore, the quantitative detection of exosomal surface proteins by LSPR and AFM biosensors could provide the needed insights into the development of diagnostic and prognostic tools with precise biomarkers for glioma as a liquid biopsy.

In the present study, MCT1 and CD147, two major proteins associated with the glycolytic reprogramming and malignant progression of glioma, were first identified in the surface of GM-derived exosomes, and exosomal MCT1 and CD147 were quantitatively detected by label-free sensitive LSPR and AFM biosensors.

To determine whether hypoxia could promote cancer progression, U251 and U87 GMs were exposed to low oxygen tension (1% O2) in the hypoxic chamber, or they were treated with CoCl2 (100 M) for 24 hours in the regular chamber. As reported previously (2, 3), the effect of hypoxia on the phenotypic change of GMs was significant in proliferation and migration assays. Transwell cell migration and Scratch assays revealed that hypoxia significantly promoted the migration of U251 (fig. S1, A to C and M to Q) and U87 (fig. S2, A to C) GMs. In addition, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) cell proliferation assays demonstrated that hypoxia enhanced their proliferation as well (figs. S1, J and L, and S2J).

GMs malignant progression is associated with metabolic reprogramming by the increased expression of glycolytic genes, such as MCT1 and CD147 (9, 10). To determine whether enhanced MCT1 and CD147 in GMs could induce their phenotypic change, the effect of gain of MCT1 or CD147 function on their migration and proliferation was tested by the expression of Lenti-MCT1cDNAinternal ribosome entry sequence (IRES)enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) or Lenti-CD147cDNA-IRES-eGFP in GMs (see Materials and Methods). Enhanced expression of MCT1 or CD147 in GMs (Fig. 1, D1 to S1, and fig. S3, S1 to T1, V1, and W1) promoted their migration and proliferation (figs. S1, D, E, G, I, and K, and S2, D, E, G, I, and K), mimicking the effect of hypoxia on GMs and indicating the crucial role of MCT1 and CD147 in the malignant progression of GMs. In addition, the effect of loss of MCT1 or CD147 function on GMs migration and proliferation was investigated by the expression of Lenti-H1-MCT1shRNA-CMV-eGFP for MCT1 or antisense locked nucleic acid (LNA) GapmeR for CD147 in GMs. Notably, MCT1 or CD147 knockdown (KD) in GMs (fig. S3, S1 to T1, V1, and W1) reduced their migration and proliferation (figs. S1, D, F, H, I, and K, and S2, D, F, H, I, and K), further demonstrating the crucial role of MCT1 and CD147 in tumor progression.

(A to E) Change in the mRNA expression of HIF-1, HK-2, LDH, MCT1, and CD147 in GMs in response to hypoxia (1% O2) (n = 3), as determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). (F to I) Protein-level change of HIF-1, MCT1, and CD147 in GMs in response to hypoxia (1% O2) (n = 3), as determined by Western blot (WB). (J to Z and A1) Immunofluorescent staining for HIF-1, MCT1, and CD147 in GMs under normoxia and hypoxia. (B1) A representative graph of ECAR outputs from the XF24 analyzer for normoxic and hypoxic GMs and their response to glucose, oligomycin, and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) in the measurement of the status of glycolytic metabolism. (C1) Comparison of glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve between normoxic and hypoxic GMs (n = 3). Immunofluorescent staining for MCT1 in GMs treated with (D1 to G1) empty backbone lentivirus (control 1) and (H1 to K1) MCT1 OE lentivirus for 24 hours. Immunofluorescent staining for CD147 in GMs treated with (L1 to O1) empty backbone lentivirus (control 1) and (P1 to S1) CD147 OE lentivirus for 24 hours. All data were shown as the means SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, hypoxia versus normoxia.

To determine the effect of hypoxia on tumor progression, GMs were exposed to hypoxic chamber (1% O2), or CoCl2 (100 M), by which the expression of HIF-1 and its nuclear localization were significantly enhanced (Fig. 1, A, F, G, and J to O). Furthermore, glycolytic genes, including hexokinase-2 (HK-2), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), MCT1, and CD147, were markedly up-regulated in hypoxic GMs (Fig. 1, B to F, H to I, P to Z, and A1, and fig. S3, A to R and A1 to R1). Enhanced glycolysis in hypoxic GMs was also observed in the measurement of the output of extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) from the Seahorse XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Fig. 1, B1 and C1).

Glycolytic reprogramming of GMs is crucial for their survival. A recent report demonstrated that hypoxic GMs released a large quantity of exosomes, supporting their survival through the autologous or heterologous interactions with GMs or surrounding cells in the TME (11). To investigate the correlation between the malignant transition of hypoxic GMs and their production and release of exosomes, a secretion assay for exosomes was conducted using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). As compared with normoxic U251 GMs, hypoxic U251 GMs released a significantly higher number of exosomes (248.9% increase) (Fig. 2, A to C). Enhanced exosome release was also observed in hypoxic U87, U118, A172, C6, GL261 GMs, SF7761 glioma stem cells (GSCs), and adult GSCs (67.52, 163.61, 138.16, 80, 200, 270, and 226.07% increase compared to that of normoxic GMs, respectively) (figs. S4, A to C, Y, Z, and A1 to D1, and S5, A to C and M to O).

(A and B) Size distribution and quantity of exosomes released from normoxic and hypoxic GMs for 24 hours (NTA analysis). (C) Enhanced release of exosomes from hypoxic GMs (versus normoxic GMs). (D) Analysis of exosome release from GMs treated with control 1, MCT1 OE, MCT1 KD, CD147 OE (all lentivirus), and control 2 and CD147 KD (antisense oligonucleotides) constructs. (E to P) Representative images of Fura Red calcium dye- loaded- hypoxic (versus normoxic), MCT1 OE- or MCT1 KD- (versus control 1) induced, CD147 OE- or CD147 KD- (versus control 1 & 2) induced, and BAPTA-AM (20 M)-treated GMs. (Q) Enhanced exosome release from MCT1 OE and CD147 OEinduced (versus control 1) GMs, followed by a marked decline in exosome release by treatment with BAPTA-AM (20 M, 100 l). (R) Enhanced intracellular Ca2+ levels in GMs by treatment with sodium-l-lactate (20 mM, 100 l), followed by distinctive decline in intracellular Ca2+ level by treatment with BAPTA-AM (20 M, 100 l). (S) NTA exosome release assay from GMs exposed to four different conditions for 10 min described in Materials and Methods. Briefly, a, Exofetal bovine serum (FBS) medium; b, sodium-l-lactate (20 mM), c, BAPTA-AM; d, BAPTA-AM with the pretreatment of sodium-l-lactate (20 mM). All chemicals were dissolved in the Exo-FBS medium containing 1% dimethyl sulfoxide. All data were shown as the means SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, hypoxia versus normoxia, BAPTA-AM versus control, MCT1 KD lentivirus versus empty backbone lentivirus (control 1), and CD147 antisense oligonucleotides versus antisense control oligonucleotides (control 2).

To determine whether MCT1 and CD147 in GMs could be involved in regulating exosome release, the effect of gain or loss of MCT1 or CD147 functions in the release of exosomes from U251 GMs was investigated under normoxia and hypoxia. Under normoxic condition, MCT1 or CD147 overexpression (OE) in U251 GMs significantly increased exosome release (92.57 and 381.16%, respectively, compared to that of control). In contrast, MCT1 or CD147 KD in U251 GMs reduced exosome release (73.84 and 82.49%, respectively), indicating the essential role of MCT1 and CD147 in controlling exosome release from normoxic U251 GMs (Fig. 2D). MCT1 or CD147 KD in hypoxic U251 GMs significantly reduced hypoxia-induced exosome release; however, MCT1 or CD147 OE in hypoxic U251 GMs did not alter hypoxia-induced exosome release much (fig. S4V), suggesting that hypoxia in this condition enhanced the amount of MCT1 and CD147 for the maximum release of exosomes. In addition, to investigate the effect of mutual interaction between MCT1 and CD147 on exosome secretion, rescue experiments with MCT1 OE or CD147 OE in hypoxic U251 GMs were performed to reverse reduced exosome release by MCT1 KD or CD147 KD, respectively. NTA analysis revealed that both MCT1 OE and CD147 OE in hypoxic GMs reversed MCT1 or CD147 KD-dependent reduced exosome release, suggesting that the interaction between MCT1 and CD147 in GMs was important in the regulation of exosome release (fig. S4, W and X). Furthermore, the combinatorial additive rescue effect of MCT1 and CD147 OE in exosome release was also observed after MCT1 KD, but not CD147 KD in the condition (fig. S4, W and X), indicating the possible presence of an MCT1-independent CD147 pathway for exosome secretion.

GSCs in the TME were known to be crucial in glioma malignancy and recurrence. Therefore, it was wondered whether their response to hypoxia and exosome release was similar to that of other GMs lines, such as U251 and U87 GMs. NTA analysis indicated that hypoxic SF7761 GSCs and adult GSCs released 3 times and 3.26 times more exosomes, respectively (fig. S5, A to C and M to O). Furthermore, hypoxic SF7761 GSC and adult GSCderived exosomes contained significantly higher amounts of MCT1 and CD147 compared to normoxic cells (fig. S5, D to K and P to W). Moreover, MCT1 or CD147 KD in SF7761 GSCs and adult GSCs reduced exosome release, indicating their important role in controlling exosome release (fig. S5, L and X).

To further investigate whether the change of intracellular Ca2+ levels could be associated with hypoxia-induced enhancement of exosome release, Fluo Red acetoxymethyl (AM) Ca2+ imaging and Fluo-4 AM Ca2+ assay were conducted with normoxic and hypoxic U251 GMs, as previously performed (29). Hypoxia increased both exosome release and intracellular Ca2+ levels in U251 GMs (Fig. 2, A to C, E, F, and H) and, furthermore, chelating intracellular Ca2+ with 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA)AM blocked the enhanced release of exosomes from U251 GMs (Fig. 2, G and H), suggesting the regulatory role of intracellular Ca2+ in exosome release. In addition, to determine whether MCT1 and CD147 in GMs could influence levels of intracellular Ca2+, Fluo Red AM Ca2+ imaging was conducted with the MCT1- or CD147-enriched or -deficient U251 GMs by expressing Lenti-CMVP-MCT1cDNA-IRES-eGFP, Lenti-CMVP-CD147cDNA-IRES-eGFP, Lenti-H1-MCT1shRNA-CMV-eGFP, or CD147 antisense LNA GapmeR, respectively. The result revealed that MCT1 or CD147 OE in GMs enhanced intracellular Ca2+ levels and exosome release (Fig. 2, I, J, L to N, and P), whereas MCT1 or CD147 KD in GMs reduced both, demonstrating a strong positive correlation for each other (Fig. 2, I, K, L, M, O, and P). These findings indicated that MCT1 and CD147 in GMs could regulate exosome release in a calcium-dependent manner. The increase in exosome release by MCT1 or CD147 OE in GMs was reversed by treatment with BAPTA-AM (Fig. 2Q), further suggesting that the enhanced release of exosomes from GMs by MCT1 and CD147 is calcium dependent.

To recapitulate hypoxia-induced acidic TME (30), sodium-l-lactate (20 mM) was applied to the culture medium of GMs. High levels of extracellular lactate enhanced intracellular Ca2+ levels in GMs as determined by Fluo-4 AM Ca2+ assay (Fig. 2R). Increased intracellular Ca2+ levels further stimulated exosome release, which was blocked by BAPTA-AM (Fig. 2S), demonstrating that accumulated lactate in the TME could promote exosome release in a calcium-dependent manner.

Exosomes from normoxic and hypoxic U251 GMs were further characterized by NTA and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. Both exosomes from normoxic and hypoxic GMs were mainly round-shaped nanovesicles ranging from 30 to 200 nm in size, as determined by NTA and TEM analysis (Figs. 2, A and B, and 3, A and B). Most GMs-derived exosomes were also positive for CD63, a major exosome marker, which was first revealed by immunogold EM, and exosomal CD63 levels were then further quantified by Western blot (WB) (Fig. 3, C, D, I, and J), ensuring the reliability of their isolation and characterization. MCT1 and CD147 in malignant GMs are enriched in the plasma membrane, thus incorporating them into the membrane of daughter exosomes. Therefore, to determine whether MCT1 and CD147 were present in the membrane of GMs-derived exosomes, immunogold EM was conducted. Both MCT1 and CD147 were present in the membrane of exosomes from all investigated GMs lines, including U251, U87, U118, and A172 GMs lines (Fig. 3, E to H, and fig. S4, D to U). In addition, quantitative analysis was conducted with normoxic and hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes to determine whether levels of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 could reflect their quantity in parent GMs. MCT1 and CD147 levels in parent GMs and their daughter exosomes were detected and measured by immunogold EM, WB, ICC, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Figs. 1, F, H, I, P to Z, and A1, and 3, E to L, and fig. S3, A to R, A1 to R1, and U1). MCT1 and CD147 levels in parent U251 GMs were positively correlated with those levels in daughter exosomes, revealing that exosomal MCT1 and CD147 could be reliable surrogate biomarkers to monitor their levels in parent GMs, which were related with malignant progression. Most notably, in the validation experiments, MCT1 and CD147 OE in parent U251 GMs showed increased levels in their daughter exosomes; in contrast, MCT1 and CD147 KD in parent U251 GMs displayed reduced levels in their daughter exosomes (fig. S3, S1, T1, and V1 to Y1).

(A and B) TEM images of exosomes derived from normoxic and hypoxic GMs. (C to H) Representative immunogold EM images for CD63, MCT1, and CD147 in exosomes from normoxic and hypoxic GMs. (I) Determining the quantity of CD63, MCT1, and CD147 in exosomes from normoxic and hypoxic GMs by WB. (J to L) Bar graphs showing the relative quantity of CD63, MCT1, and CD147 in exosomes from normoxic and hypoxic GMs (n = 4) as detected by ELISA. All data were shown as the mean SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01; ns, not significant, hypoxia versus normoxia.

As noted above, MCT1 and CD147 levels in GMs-derived exosomes were proportional to those of parent GMs. Therefore, enhanced levels of MCT1 and CD147 in hypoxic GMs might change the biophysical properties of daughter exosomes, suggesting that they could influence their uptake into recipient cells, such as endothelial cells (ECs). Therefore, daughter exosomes biophysical properties were investigated by measuring the zeta potential of hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes, as compared to normoxic GMs-derived exosomes, with Zetasizer Nano ZS. The zeta potential value of hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes was significantly lower than that of normoxic GMs-derived exosomes (fig. S6A), indicating the increased instability associated with the coagulation, membrane fusion, and uptake of exosomes into recipient cells. Next, to investigate whether MCT1 and CD147 levels in parent GMs could be directly associated with the zeta potential change in daughter exosomes, MCT1 and CD147 KD or OE in parent GMs were conducted as noted above, wherein results showed reduced or increased levels of MCT1 or CD147 in their corresponding daughter exosomes. Increased MCT1 or CD147 levels in exosomes made their zeta potential lower, recapitulating hypoxia-driven reduction of exosomal zeta potential. In contrast, decreased MCT1 or CD147 levels in exosomes made their zeta potential higher (fig. S6B), thereby presumably reducing their fusion into recipient cells. AFM analysis further revealed significant changes in biophysical properties, including roughness, Youngs modulus (elasticity and stiffness), and adhesion force, of hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes as compared with those of normoxic ones. The roughness, stiffness, and adhesion force in hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes were approximately 1.3 times bigger, 7 times smaller, and 3 times bigger, respectively (fig. S6, C, E, and G), demonstrating that their values could be informative to track GMs hypoxic and malignant status. Theoretically, enhanced adhesion force and increased zeta potential in hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes might facilitate their uptake into recipient cells. The uptake of hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes by ECs was much higher after incubation for 24 hours (fig. S7, A to U). This resulted in the promotion of their tube formation, which was determined by the quantification of number of branches, branching intervals, junctions, meshes, and segments (fig. S7, V to Z, A1, and B1), suggesting that the hypoxic GMs-derived exosomes have a crucial impact on angiogenesis. Increased or decreased MCT1 and CD147 levels in parent GMs by genetic modifications also produced altered roughness, stiffness, and adhesion force properties of daughter exosomes (fig. S6, D, F, and H), recapitulating hypoxia-induced biophysical alterations in exosomes, further supporting the potential role of MCT1 and CD147 in controlling the uptake of GMs-derived exosomes into recipient cells as well as controlling their release in the TME.

Recent reports demonstrated that exosomes could cross the BBB and BCSFB, supporting that their components, including membrane proteins and microRNAs, could be used as promising surrogate markers and systemic biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of brain disorders, including glioma (1719). Therefore, MCT1 and CD147 in GMs-derived exosomes could be potential biomarkers to monitor the metabolic and malignant status of parent GMs. As shown in the analysis of immunogold EM, MCT1 and CD147 were present mainly in the membrane of exosomes (Fig. 3, E to H, and fig. S4, F to I, L to O, and R to U). In addition, the analysis of SF7761 GSCs-derived exosomes and adult GSC-derived exosomes by immunogold EM and ELISA revealed the presence of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 as well (fig. S5, D to K and P to W). Thus, sensitive label-free LSPR and AFM biosensors were used to noninvasively detect exosomal MCT1 and CD147 with the functionalized self-assembly gold nanoislands (SAM-AuNIs) chip and silicon nitride cantilever tip with the antibody (AB) toward MCT1 or CD147. For the quantitative assessment of detection sensitivity and specificity for exosomal MCT1 and CD147 by two biosensors, reduced or increased levels of GMs-derived exosomes were first produced by genetic modifications such as OE or KD of MCT1 or CD147 in parent GMs (Fig. 1, D1 to S1, and fig. S3, S1, T1, V1, and W1). In summary, increased levels of MCT1 or CD147 in parent GMs enhanced MCT1 or CD147 levels in their daughter exosomes as well. In the same way, decreased levels of MCT1 or CD147 in parent GMs directly reduced MCT1 or CD147 levels in their daughter exosomes (fig. S3, X1 and Y1).

The noninvasive LSPR biosensor with the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sensing chip with anti-MCT1 AB (Fig. 5A) or anti-CD147 AB (Fig. 5B) was sensitive enough to quantitatively detect exosomal MCT1 or CD147 (Fig. 4, A, B, E, and F). The specificity of LSPR biosensing was demonstrated by the correlated LSPR phase response to the levels of exosomal MCT1 and CD147. For example, the higher their levels were, the bigger their LSPR response (Fig. 5, C and D). In particular, the LSPR biosensor precisely detected enhanced MCT1 or CD147 levels in exosomes from hypoxic GMs (Fig. 5, E and F). Furthermore, exosomal MCT1 and CD147 were accurately detected by a high-resolution AFM biosensor. To quantitatively measure them, the spring constant of silicon nitride cantilever of the AFM biosensor was calibrated to be 0.3744 N/m. It was first shown that the ScanAsyst-fluid mode of AFM imaging for exosomes captured on the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sample discs with anti-CD63 AB could produce great resolution for two-dimensional and three-dimensional AFM topographic images, facilitating better analysis of their biophysical properties (Fig. 5, I and J). Height profile analysis in the three-dimensional AFM topographic image also showed captured exosomes in the sample discs (Fig. 5, K and L). After the immobilization of exosomes on discs, the AFM biosensor was used to quantitatively detect exosomal MCT1 and CD147 by the functionalized cantilever tip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB (fig. S8, A to D). This was the first consecutive capture and sensing method to detect exosomal surface proteins by AFM. Conclusively, a high degree of sensitivity and specificity of previously unreported AFM biosensing was established and validated by using MCT1- or CD147-deficient or -enriched exosomes (Fig. 4, C, D, G, and H). Last, the AFM biosensor precisely detected enhanced MCT1 or CD147 levels in exosomes from hypoxic GMs (Fig. 5, M to P).

(A and B) Representative phase responses of the LSPR biosensor with the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sensing chip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB and (C and D) separation force responses of the AFM biosensor with the functionalized silicon nitride tip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB toward equal amount of daughter exosomes (50 g/ml) from parent U251 GMs with no treatment (control), MCT1 OE, MCT1 KD, CD147 OE, and CD147 KD. (E to H) Bar graph showing the relative strength of LSPR responses (n = 3) or AFM forces (n = 12) toward exosomal MCT1 [from (A) and (C)] and CD147 [from (B) and (D)]. (I and J) Correlation curve between MCT1 or CD147 levels in parent GMs and the strength of LSPR responses toward exosomal MCT1 or CD147, respectively [for MCT1, coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.9247, and for CD147, R2 = 0.9654], or the strength of AFM forces toward exosomal MCT1 or CD147, respectively (for MCT1, R2 = 0.9996, and for CD147, R2 = 0.9952). The correlation analysis was performed based on the data obtained from (A) to (D). All data were shown as the means SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, MCT1 OE and MCT1 KD group versus control. CD147 OE and CD147 KD group versus control.

(A and B) Baseline phase response of the LSPR biosensor with the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sensing chip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB after sequential treatment with 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). (C and D) Phase response of the LSPR biosensor toward three different concentrations (serial dilution of 1300 g/ml exosome solution: 1000, 100, and 10) of U251 GM-derived exosomes. Standard curve fitting for phase responses toward anti-MCT1 AB (R2 = 0.9871) or anti-CD147 AB (R2 = 0.9969). (E and F) Representative phase response of the LSPR biosensor toward equal amount of normoxic and hypoxic GM-derived exosomes (50 g/ml). (G and H) Bar graph showing the relative strength of LSPR responses toward exosomal MCT1 (E) and CD147 (F) from normoxic or hypoxic GMs (n = 3). (I to K) Two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and high resolution of three-dimensional AFM topographic images for U251 GM-derived exosomes immobilized on the SAM-AuNIs sensing chip. (L) Height profile of single U251 GM-derived exosome by AFM scanning. (M and N) Representative separation force responses of the AFM biosensor with the functionalized cantilever sensing tip with anti-MCT1 AB, or anti-CD147 AB toward equal amount (50 g/ml) of normoxic and hypoxic GM-derived exosomes captured on the SAM-AuNIs sample discs. (O and P) Bar graph showing the relative strength of AFM separation force responses toward exosomal MCT1 (M) and CD147 (N) from normoxic or hypoxic GMs (n = 12). All data were shown as the means SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, hypoxia versus normoxia.

Overall, a strong positive correlation between the levels of cellular MCT1 and CD147 and the response strength of LSPR [for MCT1, coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.9247, and for CD147, R2 = 0.9654] and AFM (for MCT1, R2 = 0.9996, and for CD147, R2 = 0.9952) for exosomal MCT1 and CD147 was observed (Fig. 4, I and J), strongly supporting the potential application of noninvasive LSPR- and AFM-based detection for exosomal MCT1 and CD147 to monitor GMs glycolytic metabolism associated with their malignant progression.

MRI scans have been used as a major diagnostic method for glioma as well as an in vivo glioma study. In addition, MRI has also been applied to discover glioma pathologies in patients (20, 21, 31). However, new techniques have been demanded to help detect molecular and metabolic signatures of glioma even at its early stage to aid in a more precise diagnosis. Therefore, the noninvasive liquid biopsy for detecting metabolic biomarkers of glioma has been investigated. In this study, exosomal MCT1 and CD147 in blood serum were investigated in the course of glioma formation by using label-free LSPR and AFM biosensors. To do so, an in vivo mouse model of glioma was first established by the intracranial implantation of U251 or U87 GMs in immunodeficient mice as described in Materials and Methods. In the course of glioma formation, an MRI scan for each mouse was conducted, and blood from each mouse was then consecutively obtained for the isolation of serum-derived exosomes. Glioma formation was identified by an MRI scan at approximately 10 days after the implantation of U251 and U87 GMs into the brain (with a size range of 0.7 to 1.1 mm3) (Fig. 6, A to C). Characterization of isolated serum-derived exosomes from each mouse was conducted by NTA, TEM, ELISA, and immunogold EM (fig. S9, A to P). NTA demonstrated that the number of serum-derived exosomes from a mouse model of glioma was significantly higher (fig. S9, A to D), indicating the systemic impact of glioma formation in the body. TEM results showed the heterogeneous morphology and size of serum-derived exosomes (fig. S9, E to G). ELISA and immunogold EM revealed a higher amount of MCT1 and CD147 in serum-derived exosomes from a mouse model of glioma as compared to those of wild-type mice (fig. S9, H to P). Last, LSPR and AFM responses toward exosomal MCT1 and CD147 in serum-derived exosomes from a mouse model of glioma were significantly greater compared to those from control mice (Fig. 6, D to K). These data strongly suggested that, together with MRI images, label-free sensitive detection of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 in serum-derived exosomes could be supportive for the better diagnosis and prognosis of glioma.

(A to C) Representative MRI images for the brain of sham-operated mice and U251 and U87 mouse models of glioma. (D and E) Representative phase responses of the LSPR biosensor with the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sensing chip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB and (F and G) representative separation force curves of the AFM biosensor with the functionalized silicon nitride cantilever tip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB toward serum-derived exosomes from sham-operated mice and U251 and U87 mouse models of glioma. (H to K) Bar graph summarizing the relative strength of LSPR responses (n = 3) or AFM forces (n = 3) toward exosomal MCT1 [e.g., (D) and (E)] and CD147 [e.g., (F) and (G)]. Detailed processes of LSPR and AFM biosensing were described in Materials and Methods. All data were expressed as the means SD. Significance level: **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, U251 or U87 mouse model of glioma versus sham-operated severe combined immunodeficient mouse. WT, wild type.

It has been well known that cancer cells in the hypoxic TME can survive through their metabolic reprogramming, in which glycolysis-related genes, such as MCT1 and CD147, are up-regulated (32, 33). The present study demonstrated that hypoxia increased levels of MCT1 and CD147 in U251 (Fig. 1, A to Z and A1), U87 (fig. S3, A to F and A1 to F1), U118 (fig. S3, G to L and G1 to L1), and A172 (fig. S3, M to R and M1 to R1) GMs, which partly promoted their migration and proliferation as well, and further loss- and gain-of-function studies confirmed the essential role of MCT1 and CD147 in GMs survival and migration (figs. S1 and S2), supporting that they could be druggable targets for glioma therapy.

Malignant hypoxic GMs also release a tremendous number of exosomes, containing unique pro-oncogenic components such as mRNA of c-Myc and microRNA 221 and 128, which supports their survival by facilitating communication with neighboring cells (11, 13, 34). Therefore, increased exosome release has been proposed as a biomarker for determining tumor malignancy (11, 13). However, it has been difficult to ascertain whether metabolic reprogramming, such as up-regulation of MCT1 and CD147, in malignant GMs is directly associated with increased exosome release. To test this, loss- and gain-of-function studies were conducted with genetic modifications for MCT1 and CD147. The OE of MCT1 or CD147 in GMs recapitulated hypoxia-induced enhanced exosome release, whereas their KD in GMs reduced exosome release (Fig. 2D and fig. S3, S1, T1, V1, and W1). In particular, we discovered that up-regulation of MCT1 and CD147 enhanced exosome release from GMs, which was dependent on intracellular calcium levels. GMs with hypoxia exposure or lactate treatment enhanced exosome release by increased intracellular calcium, which was blocked by treatment with BAPTA-AM as well as MCT1 or CD147 KD (Fig. 2, A to C and E to P), implying that the effects of MCT1 and CD147 expression was dependent on intracellular calcium levels. High levels of extracellular lactate, common in the hypoxic TME (5), also increased intracellular Ca2+-dependent release of exosomes from GMs (Fig. 2, Q to S). One potential mechanism might be that extracellular lactate could be a signal for GMs to increase intracellular Ca2+ through interaction with a lactate receptor (35), facilitating exosome release. Another possibility might be that extracellular lactate can induce MCT1 expression (33), promoting exosome release.

The increased uptake of exosomes by surrounding cells or GMs in the TME is important for cancer survival; however, an in depth look at the underlying mechanisms has not been thoroughly investigated in GMs. Nonetheless, accumulated evidence has revealed that exosome release is promoted in malignant cancer and the uptake of tumor-derived exosomes into surrounding cells is significantly enhanced. In this study, we demonstrated that GM-derived exosomes had unique biophysical properties for the promotion of their uptake into surrounding cells. Exosomes from GMs with hypoxia exposure or OE for MCT1 or CD147 showed a much smaller zeta potential and stiffness, but displayed more roughness and a higher adhesion force (fig. S6, A to H). Presumably this is one of the means that drive their higher uptake into ECs, further enhancing tube formation (fig. S7). Our results additionally demonstrated that biophysical properties of exosomes could also be informative biomarkers to reflect the malignant status of GMs associated with MCT1 and CD147 expression, either directly or indirectly.

Precise detection of the malignant progression of glioma, which is predominantly associated with its metabolic reprogramming, is critical in the development of anti-glioma agents and glioma therapy, as well as in its diagnosis and prognosis. Malignant GMs release large amounts of exosomes within 30 to 200 nm in size, which can spread into the peripheral fluids, suggesting that they can be not only systemic functional mediators but also great platforms for the identification of biomarkers and fingerprints as a liquid biopsy for glioma. Therefore, it is important to find a link between exosome components and glioma malignancy. In the present study, two major proteins involved in the metabolic adaptation of GMs, MCT1 and a binding protein, CD147, were found mainly in the membrane of GM-derived exosomes and their exosomal levels recapitulated their levels in parent GMs (Fig. 3 and fig. S4, D to U). Thus, exosomal MCT1 and CD147 were studied to determine their feasibility as surrogate biomarkers for monitoring glioma progression and metabolism using label-free sensitive LSPR and AFM biosensors (2628). Compared with general techniques used in the analysis of exosomes, such as flow cytometry, WB, immunogold EM, ELISA, as well as omics, label-free LSPR and AFM biosensing is simple, sensitive, and cost-effective. In our previous work, label-free LSPR and AFM biosensors were successfully used to characterize tumor-derived exosomes and MVs (16) and detect glioma-specific EGFRvIII in exosomes (36). In the present work, the functionalized SAM-AuNIs sensing chip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB was used in LSPR biosensing, and it provided a great specificity and sensitivity of LSPR response toward exosomal MCT1 and CD147, whereas the functionalized AFM sensing tip with anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB generated a magnificent response of AFM separation force with high-resolution image toward MCT1 and CD147 in the exosomes captured on the SAM-AuNIs sample discs coated with anti-CD63 AB (Fig. 5). The novel AFM biosensing with SAM-AuNIs sample disc-based consecutive capture and sensing of exosomes provided a potential great opportunity to characterize a specific population of disease-specific exosomes in a future study. In the test of specificity, LSPR and AFM biosensors quantitatively detected reduced or increased MCT1 and CD147 in daughter exosomes with genetic modifications, supporting their accurate detection for exosomal proteins as well as the strong quantitative correlation between their cellular and exosomal amount (Fig. 4), leading to the conclusion that LSPR and AFM biosensors had great capability to detect exosomal MCT1 and CD147, faithful biomarkers for monitoring GMs malignant progression and metabolic adaptation. In addition, LSPR and AFM biosensors precisely detected their increased amount in hypoxic GM-derived exosomes (quantity per same protein amount), even without consideration of a marked increase of exosomes by stimulation, proving its great capability in sensitive biosensing (Fig. 5).

As described above, one of challenges in glioma therapy is how to carry out affordable early detection of its molecular and metabolic changes as a liquid biopsy because MRI- and CT scanbased diagnosis primarily only determines later stages of glioma. Therefore, analysis of exosomes from blood and CSF of animal models and patients of glioma have become more and more important in the basic and clinical research of glioma. In the present study, we demonstrated that the quantity of serum-derived exosomes from a mouse model of glioma was much higher when the glioma became enlarged, as detected by MRI scanning (Fig. 6, A to C, and fig.S9, A to D). In terms of the morphology and size of serum-derived exosomes, their parent cells might be diverse, suggesting that glioma formation in the brain could have a systemic effect on the periphery and the quantity of exosomes in the peripheral circulation as well. Nonetheless, the origin of serum-derived exosomes was not clear; many of them had MCT1 and CD147 in their membranes (fig. S9, I to P). Using label-free sensitive LSPR and AFM biosensors, we precisely detected significantly higher levels of MCT1 and CD147 in serum-derived exosomes from the mouse model of glioma (Fig. 6, D to K). Notably, their LSPR and AFM response in the detection was positively correlated with glioma formation and progression, implying that MCT1 and CD147 from serum-derived exosomes could provide additive information to track glioma progression together with currently available MRI scans (Fig. 6 and fig. S9). However, it might be more informative to analyze pure GM-derived exosomes directly. Therefore, in the future, the development of isolation techniques and the enrichment of GM-derived exosomes from CSF of a mouse model of glioma and/or patients, along with precise detection of MCT1 and CD147 with those exosomes by LSPR and AFM biosensors, will serve as a requisite advancement in tracking glioma metabolism and progression.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that hypoxia promoted GMs malignant progression and that calcium-dependent exosome release was associated with enhanced MCT1 and CD147. Moreover, we revealed that hypoxic GM-derived exosomes had unique biophysical properties that promoted their uptake into ECs. In particular, we first found that GM-derived exosomes contained both MCT1 and CD147, the quantity of which was proportional to those of parent GMs, and exosomal MCT1 and CD147 could be precisely detected by noninvasive sensitive LSPR and AFM biosensors, demonstrating that they are likely to be promising surrogate biomarkers for tracking glioma metabolic malignancy. The present study supported the hypothesis that MCT1 and CD147 in GMs can also control the release, composition, and uptake of exosomes, providing great insights into the additional mechanism of MCT1 and CD147 inhibitors as anticancer agents in preventing glioma progression through exosome shuttling among neighboring cells (fig. S10).

All animal experiments followed the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUA) guidelines and were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Sub-Committee at City University of Hong Kong and Department of Health, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Implantation experiments with U257 and U87 GMs were performed using 6-week-old female severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Laboratory Animal Services Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong). Mice had free access to water and food ad libitum under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle.

U251, U87, U118, A172, GL261, and C6 GMs and bEnd.3 ECs (Guangzhou Cellcook Biotech Co. Ltd., China) were cultured in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium with high glucose (DMEM-H) (Invitrogen, catalog no. 10569-010) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, catalog no. 10270-106) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Pen-Strep) (Gibco, catalog no. 15140-122). Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Pen-Strep. Human pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine SF7761 GSCs were cultured in the specific medium, StemPro NSC SFM (catalog no. A10509-01, Invitrogen). Human adult GSCs (catalog no. 36104-41, Celprogen) were cultured in human GSC serum-free colony-forming unit media (catalog no. M36104-40CF). Cell cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37C.

For the induction of hypoxia with low oxygen, GMs were incubated in the chamber (Smartor 118 hypoxia chamber) flushed with a gas mixture, containing 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2 at 2 pounds per square inch, at 37C for 24 hours. For the induction of hypoxia with a chemical, GMs were treated with 100 M cobalt chloride (CoCl2) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. 232696) at 37C for 24 hours. In control experiments, GMs were exposed to normoxia (21% oxygen) at 37C for 24 hours. When validating hypoxia, nuclear trafficking and localization of HIF-1 were used.

Migration of GMs was examined by both Transwell cell migration and Scratch assays (37). In brief, GMs (1 105 cells/100 l of medium per well) were seeded in the upper chamber of Transwell Permeable Support chambers (Costar, catalog no. 3422) with a pore size of 8.0-m mesh separating the upper and lower chambers, and 500 l of complete GM culture medium was added to the lower chamber. GMs were allowed to migrate for 24 hours at 37C to the lower chamber. Next, GMs in the lower chamber were fixed for 10 min by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and then were stained with 0.1% Crystal Violet solution for 20 min. Last, pictures were taken by using an inverted microscope at 10 magnification. The number of GMs that migrated between chambers was counted using ImageJ software. Scratch assays were conducted following the standard protocol (37).

The proliferation of GMs was assessed by Vybrant MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. V13154) and a BrdU Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (colorimetric) (ab126556) per the manufacturers guidelines.

Total RNA was extracted from GMs using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, catalog no. 15596018), according to the manufacturers instructions, and its concentration was determined with a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reverse transcription (RT) was performed with total RNA using a SuperScript IV First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Life Technologies). The mRNA expression of HIF-1, MCT1, CD147, LDH, HK, and -actin was examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR kit Master Mix (2) Universal (catalog no. KK4650). The thermal cycling conditions involved denaturation at 95C for 3 min and proceeded with 40 cycles of denaturation at 95C for 15 s, annealing at 60C for 1 min, and extension at 72C for 30 s. All reactions of qRT-PCR were performed in triplicate and Ct values of target genes were normalized to that of -actin.

Identification and quantification of HIF-1, CD-63, MCT1, and CD147 in both GMs and GM-derived exosomes were conducted by WB (36). Briefly, GM (20 g) and exosome (50 to 100 g) lysates were separated by 12 and 8% SDS-gel electrophoresis, respectively, and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After its incubation with 5% skim milk in tris-buffered saline (TBS) (blocking buffer) for 1 hour, the membrane was further incubated with specific primary ABs (anti-MCT1 AB 1:200, anti-CD147 AB 1:1000 dilution for GMs; anti-MCT1 AB 1:100, anti-CD147 AB 1:200 dilution for exosomes) in blocking buffer (5% skim milk for GMs, 1% skim milk for exosomes) overnight at 4C, followed by washing three times with TBST and further incubation with goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) H&L [horseradish peroxidase (HRP)] secondary AB (12000 dilution for GMs, 1:1000 dilution for exosomes) for 2 hours at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Bio-Rad) and imaged using the Azure Biosystems Gel Documentation system (C600).

Following the manufacturers guidelines, 50 l of GM lysates (200 g/ml) and exosomes (400 g/ml) were added to the wells of an ELISA micro-titer plate, incubated for 2 hours at 37C, and further incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with primary ABs, anti-MCT1 AB and anti-CD147 AB (both 1:100 dilution) for GMs and exosomes, and anti-CD63 AB (1:100 dilution) only for exosomes. After washing three times, primary ABtreated samples were further incubated with anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary AB (1:5000 dilution) for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing three times, tetramethyl-benzidine substrates were applied to secondary ABtreated samples and further incubated in a dark place for 30 min at room temperature. After washing three times, the absorbance at 450 nm, via a microplate reader, was recorded within 2 min after the addition of Stop Solution to the wells. Control was the absorbance value obtained from the well without any sample. The kits used are ExoELISA kit (System Biosciences, catalog no. EXOEL-CD63A-1), Human MCT1 ELISA Kit (LifeSpan Biosciences, catalog no. LS-F9108), and Human CD147 ELISA Kit (Abcam, catalog no. ab219631).

GMs were grown on poly-d-lysine (Merck, catalog no. A-003-E)coated coverslips until 60 to 70% confluence before conducting the experiments with specific conditions, including exposure to normoxic and hypoxic condition; transduction of lenti-eGFP (control), MCT1 KD, MCT1 OE, and CD147 OE lentiviral particles; and transfection of antisense control and CD147 antisense LNA GapmeR. Next, the GMs were fixed with 4% PFA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min on ice. After washing with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBST) three times, the fixed GMs were further incubated in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBST for 1 hour (for MCT1 staining, the fixed GMs were incubated in 1% BSA-PBST). After washing with PBS three times, the blocked GMs were incubated with primary ABs in 0.1% BSA-PBS (dilution: anti HIF-1 AB at 1:200, anti-MCT1 AB at 1:50, and anti-CD147 AB at 1:100) overnight at 4C in a dark humidified chamber, and followed by the incubation with goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 secondary AB in 0.1% BSA-PBS (dilution at 1:500) for 2 hours at room temperature after washing with PBS. Last, immunostained GMs were counterstained and mounted by the medium with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories, catalog no. H-1200). Images were taken on a Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscopy LSM 880 NLO with Airyscan. The ABs used in the experiment were rabbit polyclonal antiHIF-1 AB (Abcam, catalog no. ab82832), rabbit polyclonal anti-MCT1 AB (Alomone Labs, catalog no. AMT-011), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD147 AB (Abcam, catalog no. ab64616), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD63 AB (Abcam, catalog no. ab68418), rabbit polyclonal anti-actin AB (Abcam, catalog no. ab16039), goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) secondary AB (Abcam, catalog no. ab6721), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor 488 secondary AB (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. A11034).

Glycolysis was measured by using the Agilent seahorse XF glycolysis stress test kit (Seahorse Biosciences; catalog no. 103020-100) according to the manufacturers guidelines. The value of basal glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve from normoxic and hypoxic GMs was obtained by the analysis of ECAR after the sequential addition of glucose, oligomycin, and 2-deoxyglucose to the Agilent seahorse XF24 flux analyzer. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate.

Calcium imaging for U251 GMs was performed by using Fura Red AM fluorescent indicator dye (catalog no. F3020, Invitrogen) with its detection by Nikon Eclipse Ti-S Calcium imaging system (38). In brief, cultured GMs in a 24-well plate was loaded with 10 M Fura Red AM in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Gibco, catalog no. 14175095) for 1 hour and kept free from light, followed by washing three times with HBSS buffer. The Fura Red AMlabeled GMs were maintained in HBSS buffer during calcium imaging. The intracellular Ca2+ levels in GMs were quantified using ImageJ software.

For calcium assay, U251 GMs were grown to 90% confluence in a 96-well plate. After washing them with HBSS buffer, GMs were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator, 50 l of 4 M Fluo-4 AM (Invitrogen, catalog no. F14201), in HBSS buffer. Next, GMs were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour and kept under dark conditions. After washing them with HBSS buffer, the continuous measurement of fluorescence kinetics was performed (excitation, 485 nm; emission, 525 nm) in a microplate reader. The results were plotted for an average reading over each kinetics cycle done in six replicates. BAPTA-AM (20 M; Thermo Scientific, catalog no. B6769) was used to chelate intracellular Ca2+. Sodium-l-lactate (20 mM; Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. 7022) was used to evaluate the effect of extracellular lactate on the intracellular Ca2+ levels in GMs.

Lentiviral particles for MCT1 OE, MCT1 KD, and CD147 OE were produced in HEK 293T cells via the co-transfection of Lenti-8.9 and Lenti-VSVG with Lenti-CMV promoter (CMVP)MCT1 cDNA-IRES-eGFP, Lenti-H1promoter (H1P)MCT1 shRNA-CMVP-eGFP, and Lenti-CMVP-CD147 cDNA-IRES-eGFP, respectively. Lentiviral particles that only expressed CMVP-eGFP were used as a negative control. A standard protocol for the transduction of lentiviral particles into GMs was used as follows:

1) Lenti-CMVP-MCT1 cDNA-IRES-eGFP and Lenti-CMVP-CD147 cDNA-IRES-eGFP: IRES oligonucleotides were first inserted into the lenti-FUGW-CMVP-eGFP backbone construct. Then, mMCT1 cDNA (1482 bp) and mCD147 cDNA (816 bp) were amplified by PCR and inserted into the lenti-FUGW-CMVP-IRES-eGFP backbone construct (7). All sequences and their expression were validated.

2) Lenti-H1P-MCT1 shRNA-CMVP-eGFP: Based on previous work (7), the following MCT1 shRNA sense oligonucleotides and antisense oligonucleotides were subcloned into the lenti-FUGW-backbone construct. All sequences, their expression, and their KD efficiency were validated.

5-GATCCCCGTATCATGCTTTACGATTATTCAAGAGATAATCGTAAAGCATGATACTTTTTTC-3

5-TCGAGAAAAAAGTATCATGCTTTACGATTATCTCTTGAATAATCGTAAAGCATGATACGGG-3

3) CD147 LNA GapmeR antisense oligonucleotides: Antisense oligonucleotides LNA GapmeR and antisense control oligonucleotides (Bio-stations Ltd.; positive control, catalog no. 300632-101; negative control, catalog no. 300610; and for CD147, catalog no. 300600) were transfected directly into GMs (Gymnosis method) as per the manufacturers guidelines. GMs were maintained in Opti-MEM medium (Gibco, catalog no. 31985070) with oligonucleotides for 24 hours before further analysis. Efficiency of CD147 KD in GMs with antisense oligonucleotides LNA GapmeR was validated by WB analysis.

Exosomes were isolated either by a modified differential ultracentrifugation method with filtration (16) or by a low-speed centrifugation method with a total exosome isolation reagent (Invitrogen, catalog no. 4478359) as per the manufacturers protocol. Briefly, in the ultracentrifugation method, extracellular medium from cultured GMs within exosome-isolation medium for 24 hours was first centrifuged at 300g for 10 min. The resultant supernatant was further centrifuged at 16,500g for 20 min, followed by the consecutive filtration of supernatant through a 0.22-m filter (Jet Biofil, catalog no. FPE-204-030). The filtered solution was ultracentrifuged at 120,000g for 70 min. The resultant supernatant was aspirated and discarded to obtain exosome pellets.

In the low-speed centrifugation method with a total exosome isolation reagent, extracellular medium from cultured GMs within exosome-isolation medium for 24 hours was first centrifuged at 2000g for 30 min. Then, the resultant supernatant was mixed with 0.5 volumes of a total exosome isolation reagent. The mixture was incubated at 4C overnight, followed by its centrifugation at 10,000g for 1 hour at 4C. The resultant supernatant was aspirated and discarded and the remaining exosome pellet was diluted with 1 PBS for NTA or with 1 radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer for WB, or fixed with PFA for TEM and immunogold EM.

The number and size distribution of GM-derived exosomes were characterized by NTA by using a Malvern NanoSight NS300 instrument (16). In brief, a monochromatic laser beam at 405 nm was applied to 500 ml of exosome solutions loaded into the sample chamber. Three video captures for exosome movements within a 30-s duration were recorded and further analyzed by NTA software (version 2.2, NanoSight) through the optimization for the identification and tracking of exosomes on a frame-by-frame basis. The released number of exosomes from GMs with various conditions was calculated by NTA analysis.

The size and morphology of GM-derived exosomes were detected by TEM analysis (16). Briefly, exosomes were fixed with 2.5% PFA for 30 min, washed twice with PBS, dissolved in PBS/0.5% BSA, deposited onto formvar carbon-coated EM grids (catalog no. BZ1102XX, Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology Co., Ltd), and exposed for 10 min in a dry environment. Then, exosomes on the grids were washed five times (3 min each) with PBS/0.5% BSA. Afterward, fixed exosomes on the grid were washed twice with PBS/50 mM glycine (3 min each) and lastly with PBS/0.5% BSA (10 min), stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 5 min, and then viewed by an electron microscope (FEI/Philips Tecnai 12 BioTWIN at City University of Hong Kong EM core facility). For the immunogold labeling with ABs, fixed exosomes on the grid were incubated with 5% BSA for 30 min at room temperature, washed five times with PBS/0.5% BSA (3 min), transferred to a drop of the AB (1:50 dilution for anti-CD63 AB, anti-MCT1 AB, and anti-CD147 AB) in PBS/0.5% BSA, and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Afterward, exosomes in the grids were washed five times with PBS/0.5% BSA (3 min), incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L Gold (10 nm) preadsorbed (Abcam, catalog no. ab27234) in PBS/0.5% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature, and then washed five times (3 min) with PBS/0.5% BSA. Last, exosomes on the grids were stained with 2% uranyl acetate and then viewed under an electron microscope.

bEnd.3 ECs (approximately 30,000 cells per well) were cultured on the chamber slide (Lab-Tek, Thermo Scientific, USA) for 24 hours with normal growth medium at 37C in a 5% CO2 incubator. On the next day, the cells were washed twice with PBS and replenished again with normal growth medium supplemented with normoxic or hypoxic GM-derived exosomes (250 g), which were labeled with Exo-Green Exosome Protein Fluorescent Label (System Biosciences, catalog no. EXOG200A-1) (100 l), and further maintained for 24 hours. Afterward, bEnd.3 ECs were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA on ice for 30 min. Fixed bEnd.3 ECs on the slide were stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin AB (1:200 dilutions) (catalog no. R415, Invitrogen) at room temperature for 1 hour to detect their actin cytoskeleton protein, followed by washing with PBS. Then, stained bEnd.3 ECs on the slide were mounted with Vectashield medium containing DAPI and observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope.

Twenty-fourwell culture plates were coated with 125 l of GeltrexTM (Gibco, no. A1413201) per well to induce the formation of a monolayer of bEND.3 ECs in the medium containing 0.2% FBS. When bEND.3 ECs reached 80 to 90% confluence after seeding (7 104 cells per well), the medium was replaced with one containing normoxic or hypoxic GM-derived exosomes (approximately 250 g/250 l medium plus 0.2% FBS). After leaving the culture for an additional 24 hours, tube formation of bEND.3 ECs was examined under a bright-field microscope and its representative pictures were taken at 10 magnification.

The functionalization of gold nanoparticles for LSPR biosensing has been well established in our laboratory and others (39). In brief, dry SAM-AuNIs sensing chips were sequentially rinsed with absolute ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated in 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) solution (10 mM) for 30 min, and followed by rinsing off excess MUA molecules with absolute ethanol. Then, 2-(N-morpholino)ethane sulfonic acid (MES) was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 0.4 M 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and 0.15 M N-hydroxysuccinimide, and then the freshly prepared MES solution was added to the SAM-AuNIs sensing chip for 20 min to activate the MUA carboxyl functional group. Afterward, 300 l of polyclonal primary ABs in PBS (2 g/ml; anti-MCT1 AB; dilution 1:100, and anti-CD147 AB; dilution 1:200) was applied to the SAM-AuNIs sensing chip for 40 min for the immobilization of ABs. Excessive ABs were rinsed away by PBS buffer, and nonspecific sites were further blocked by treatment with 1 M ethanolamine. The common-path interferometric sensing system and differential phase detection method were used to monitor the baseline phase responses during the functionalization process by adding each chemical and ABs to the chip, sequentially, and thereafter we performed the label-free detection of exosomal proteins with the LSPR biosensor with the functionalized chip as described in our previous work (36). For the detection of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 via LSPR biosensing, PBS was used as a basic running buffer. After rinsing SAM-AuNIs sensing chips with PBS, exosome solutions (50 g/ml PBS) were introduced over the AB-functionalized surface of the sensing chip by using a peristaltic pump at a constant rate of 30 l/min. The SAM-AuNIs sensing chip was subsequently flushed again by PBS to check the binding affinity and removal of the nonspecific binding of exosomes to ABs. LSPR experiments with exosomes in each experiment were performed three times independently.

Biosensing single molecular interaction between surface antigens of immobilized exosomes in SAM-AuNIs discs and anti-MCT1 or anti-CD147 AB functionalized in the sensing tip was conducted by using BioScope Catalyst AFM (Bruker). The spring constant of AFM silicon nitride cantilever was calibrated to be 0.3756 N/m in the detection of exosomal proteins. To capture exosomes, the surface of SAM-AuNIs sample discs of AFM was functionalized with anti-CD63 AB as described above (16). Two hundred microliters of exosome solution [PBS (50 g/ml)] was first added to the sample discs, incubated for 10 min, and replaced with 1 ml of fresh PBS by mild decantation. Immunocaptured exosomes on the surface of the discs were further confirmed and analyzed by AFM scanning.

To determine exosomal MCT1 and CD147 levels by the measurement of intermolecular force between antigens and ABs, the silver nitride AFM tip (ScanAsyst-Fluid, TELTEC semiconductor pacific limited) was functionalized with either anti-MCT1 AB or anti-CD147 AB. In brief, primary ABs (anti-MCT1 AB; dilution 1:100, and anti-CD147 AB; dilution 1:200) were covalently attached to the Si3N4 tip of AFM via thiol ester linkage (Bruker). The probe tip was washed with PBS, incubated in blocking solution (1% BSA-PBS) for 1 hour, followed by a series of washing with PBS.

All measurements of exosomal proteins with AFM were recorded in PBS. Separation forces between MCT1 or CD147 in exosomes on SAM-AuNIs discs and anti-MCT1 or anti-CD147 AB on the sensing tips were measured by AFM ramp mode. Exosomal MCT1 and CD147 levels were determined and analyzed by the maximum peak of the AFM force-distance curve. Biophysical properties, including roughness, Youngs modulus, and adhesion force, were recorded for exosomes captured on the SAM-AuNIs discs by single ramping mode by using a bare AFM sensing tip with a spring constant of 0.3801 N/m (40). A bare SAM-AuNIs sample disc was used as a control in the experiment. Each AFM force curve was obtained from at least three independent experiments.

Zeta potential of exosomes was measured and analyzed by Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS using equally diluted samples prepared with equal amount of exosomes (50 g/ml) within PBS for each group (16).

Six-week-old female SCID mice were anesthetized by 1 to 2% isoflurane mixed in oxygen and fixed in a stereotactic frame. The injection coordinates for GM implantation into the brain were 0.2 mm anterior and 2.2 mm lateral from the bregma and 2.3 to 2.8 mm deep from the outer border of the cranium, respectively. In brief, a hole was drilled into the mouse skull in the cortex of the right frontal lobe. Then, 10 l of 3 104 U251 or U87 GMs was injected through the hole by a Hamilton syringe with a 26-gauge needle at a flow rate of 0.5 l/min using a microinjector.

All MRI images were acquired with a horizontal bore 3-T preclinical Bruker MRI system (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) with a 23-mm-diameter surface coil. Mice were anesthetized with 1 to 2% isoflurane carried in oxygen. After anesthesia induction, mice were placed on the animal bed with a warm pad to keep body temperature at 37C. During an MRI scan, continuous monitoring of mouse respiration was conducted (SA Instrumentation). T2-weighted MRI for the brain was performed on days 5 and 10 after GM implantation to check glioma size, and the blood was then collected for the isolation of exosomes. The parameters of T2-weighted images were as follows: repetition time/echo time = 2146/16 ms, field of view = 16 16 mm, data acquisition matrix = 256 256, number of averages = 8, and rare acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) factor = 10. The size of a tumor was calculated using ImageJ software.

All graphs were made, and statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, or Microsoft Excel 2010. Statistical significance was analyzed by either an unpaired, two-tailed Students t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons by Dunnetts test, or two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis. A respective control for each experimental group was precisely chosen and used for all statistical comparisons. Statistical analyses indicated *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 as significance level. All quantitative data from multiple independent experiments were calculated and presented as the means SD as described in the legend of each figure.

Acknowledgments: We thank C. C. Fong (BMS, City University of Hong Kong) for technical support, K. M. Chan (BMS, City University of Hong Kong) for providing SF7761 GSCs, J. S. Yoo (HTI, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) for providing the GL261 GMs, and R. G. Jesky (BMS, City University of Hong Kong) for editing the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by City University of Hong Kong (grant nos. 9610340 and 7200472), Early Career Scheme (ECS)UGC (grant no. 21102517), and General Research Fund (GRF)UGC (grant no. 11103918) awarded to Y.L. at City University of Hong Kong. Author contributions: Y.L. designed the whole experiments. A.T. conducted most of the experiments. G.Q. and C.X. performed the LSPR-related experiments. G.Q., C.X., S.P.N., and C.M.L.W. analyzed the LSPR-related data. X.H. established the mouse model of glioma and performed MRI analysis. X.H. and K.W.Y.C. analyzed the MRI-related data. A.T. and Y.L. drafted the manuscript. All the authors revised and approved the content of the manuscript. Competing interests: A.T., G.Q., C.X., T.Y., S.P.N., C.M.L.W., and Y.L. are inventors on a patent to be filed with the USPTO related to this work for the LSPR- and AFM-based detection of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 for monitoring glioma progression. This work has also been submitted as part of the Ph.D. thesis of A.T. at City University of Hong Kong. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Link:
Label-free sensing of exosomal MCT1 and CD147 for tracking metabolic reprogramming and malignant progression in glioma - Science Advances