Diverse Birth Defects Research and the Science of Tomorrow to Be Recognized by the Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention – PR Web

BDRP Virtual Annual Meeting

RESTON, Va. (PRWEB) June 16, 2020

Some of the worlds leading scientists will be recognized for their research on birth defects, including alcohol and cannabinoid exposure on brain development, caffeine exposure during pregnancy, and gene-environmental interactions in autism. The special lectures and awards will be presented at the Society for Birth Defects Research and Preventions (BDRP) first-ever Virtual Annual Meeting June 25, 29 and 30, as well as July 1 and 2, 2020.

At a fraction of the cost of its traditional in-person Annual Meeting, the BDRP virtual presentations will also cover other hot topics such as the latest birth defects research surrounding opioids, gene therapy, and obesity in pregnancy. For the full Virtual Annual Meeting schedule, including opportunities for Continuing Medical Education credits, please visit https://birthdefectsresearch.org/meetings/2020/.

The Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention is an international and multidisciplinary group of scientists including researchers, clinicians, epidemiologists, and public health professionals from academia, government, and industry who study birth defects, reproduction, and disorders of developmental origin. Through its 2020 awards, the unique diversity of the birth defects research field is underscored. Our foundation as a multi-disciplinary society led the way for innovative research that continues to move us toward a healthier future, said Chris Curran, PhD, BDRP President. As scientists, we have always recognized the transformative power of diversity in the many disciplines represented in the Society and we hope to inspire more scientists of all backgrounds to get involved in this rewarding research.

The 2020 Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention award recipients and special lecturers include:

Keynote Lecture Diana W. Bianchi, MD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Scheduled Presentation: Prenatal Genomic Medicine: Transforming Obstetric Practice and Delivering New Biological Insights

Josef Warkany Lecture Linda S. Birnbaum, PhD, DABT, ATS, Scientist Emeritus and Former Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program Scheduled Presentation: POPs: A Plethora of Developmental Effects

Robert L. Brent Lecture: Teratogen Update Karen W. Gripp, MD, FAAP, FACMG, A.I. duPont Hospital for Children/Nemours Scheduled Presentation: From Dysmorphology to Next-Generation Phenotyping

F. Clarke Fraser New Investigator Award Joshua F. Robinson, PhD, University of California, San Francisco Scheduled Presentation: Establishing a Research Program in Developmental Toxicology Utilizing In Vitro Models and Big Data Approaches

Agnish Fellowship Elaine M. Faustman, PhD, University of Washington Scheduled Presentation: Educating Future Birth Defects Researchers: Opportunities in the Era of Personalized Medicine, Systems Biology, and CRISPR Technologies

James G. Wilson Publication Award for the best paper published in the journal Birth Defects Research Kristen R. Breit, PhD, San Diego State University The effects of alcohol and cannabinoid exposure during the brain growth spurt on behavioral development in rats; Birth Defects Research 111.12: 760-774 (2019)

Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention Innovator Award Finalists

Title: ReproTracker: A Human Stem Cell-Based Biomarker Assay for In Vitro Assessment of Developmental Toxicity.

Title: Studying Gene-Environmental Interactions in Autism with iPSC-derived BrainSpheres: microRNA and Metabolic Biomarkers of the Synergy.

Edward W. Carney Distinguished Service Award Alan M. Hoberman, PhD, DABT, ATS, Charles River

Marie W. Taubeneck Award Bevin Blake, PhD, NTPL/NIEHS

Edward W. Carney Trainee Awards

FASEB Howard Garrison Public Affairs Fellowship Mona Dai, PhD Student, Harvard University

Birth Defects Research Distinguished Scholar Awards

For a full list of Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention awards and recipients, please visit: https://www.birthdefectsresearch.org/meetings/2020/am-awards.asp

About the Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention The Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention (BDRP) is made up of nearly 700 members worldwide specializing in a variety of disciplines, including developmental biology and toxicology, reproduction and endocrinology, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, nutritional biochemistry, and genetics as well as the clinical disciplines of prenatal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, neonatology, medical genetics, and teratogen risk counseling. Scientists interested in BDRP membership are encouraged to visit http://www.BirthDefectsResearch.org.

Media Contact: Nicole Chavez, 619-368-3259, nchavez@birthdefectsresearch.org

See the original post here:
Diverse Birth Defects Research and the Science of Tomorrow to Be Recognized by the Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention - PR Web

Biological Safety Testing Market Research, Developments and Precise Outlook 2020 to 2026 – 3rd Watch News

Biological Safety Testing Market Scenarios and Brief Analysis with size, status and forecast 2020-2026

The global research report titled Biological Safety Testing Market has recently published by The Research Insights which helps to provide guidelines for the businesses. It has been aggregated on the basis of different key pillars of businesses such as drivers, restraints and global opportunities. This research report has been compiled by using primary and secondary research techniques. While curating this research report several dynamic aspects of businesses such as definition, classification, application, and industrial chain structure have been studied in detail. It sheds light on dynamic aspects of the businesses such as the clients needs and feedback of the various customers. Finally, researchers direct its focus on some significant points to give a gist about investment, profit margin, and revenue.

Get Free Sample Copy of This Report: https://www.theresearchinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=87190

The report presents the market competitive landscape and a corresponding detailed analysis of the major vendor/key players in the market. Top Companies in the Global Biological Safety Testing Market: Lonza Group, SGS SA, WuXiPharmaTech, BSL Bioservice, Merck KGaA, Cytovance Biologics, Toxikon Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, Avance Biosciences

Global Biological Safety Testing Market Split by Product Type and Applications:

This report segments the global Biological Safety Testing Market on the basis of Types are:

Adventitious Agents Detection Test

Cell Line Authentication and Characterization tests

Bioburden Testing

Endotoxin Tests

Sterility Testing

Residual Host Contaminant Detection Tests

Others

On the basis of Application, the Global Biological Safety Testing Market is segmented into:

Blood Products

Stem Cell Products

Cellular and Gene Therapy Products

Tissue Products

Others

Browse the report description and TOC:

https://www.theresearchinsights.com/life-science/Biological-Safety-Testing-Market-Research-Global-StatusForecast-by-Geography-TypeApplication-2016-2026-87190

Regional analysis of Global Biological Safety Testing Market:

Geographically, the global Biological Safety Testing market has been fragmented into several regions such as North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Europe on the basis of productivity of several companies. Each and every segment along with its sub-segments are analyzed in the research report. The competitive landscape of the market has been elaborated by studying numerous factors such as top manufacturers, prices and revenue.

The information on the global Biological Safety Testing market is accessible to readers in logical chapter wise format. Driving and restraining factors have been listed in this research report which helps to provide the understanding of positive as well as negative aspects in front of the businesses.

Key questions answered in this report:

-What are the top key players of the global Biological Safety Testing market?

-What are the strengths of the global Biological Safety Testing market?

-What are the trends, challenges, threats, and opportunities in front of the businesses?

-What are the effective sales methodologies?

-what are the different marketing and distribution channels?

Buy Exclusive Report :

https://www.theresearchinsights.com/checkout?id=87190

Some major points from Table of Content:

Global Biological Safety Testing Market Research Report 2020-2026

Chapter 1: Industry Overview

Chapter 2: Biological Safety Testing Market International and China Market Analysis

Chapter 3: Analysis of Revenue by Classifications

Chapter 4: Analysis of Revenue by Regions and Applications

Chapter 5: Analysis of Biological Safety Testing Industry Key Manufacturers

Chapter 6: Sales Price and Gross Margin Analysis

Chapter 7: Development Trend of Market 2020-2026.

Continued ..

About us:

The Research Insights A global leader in analytics, research and advisory that can assist you to renovate your business and modify your approach. With us, you will learn to take decisions intrepidly. We make sense of drawbacks, opportunities, circumstances, estimations and information using our experienced skills and verified methodologies. Our research reports will give you an exceptional experience of innovative solutions and outcomes. We have effectively steered businesses all over the world with our market research reports and are outstandingly positioned to lead digital transformations. Thus, we craft greater value for clients by presenting advanced opportunities in the global market.

Contact us :

Robin

Sales manager

Contact number: +91-996-067-0000

[emailprotected]

https://www.theresearchinsights.com

Go here to see the original:
Biological Safety Testing Market Research, Developments and Precise Outlook 2020 to 2026 - 3rd Watch News

FDA Approves Second Biomarker-Based Indication for Merck’s KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), Regardless of Tumor Type – The Baytown Sun

KENILWORTH, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun 17, 2020--

Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved KEYTRUDA, Mercks anti-PD-1 therapy, as monotherapy for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) [10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] solid tumors, as determined by an FDA-approved test, that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials. The safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA in pediatric patients with TMB-H central nervous system cancers have not been established.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur with KEYTRUDA, including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, nephritis and renal dysfunction, severe skin reactions, solid organ transplant rejection, and complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, KEYTRUDA should be withheld or discontinued and corticosteroids administered if appropriate. KEYTRUDA can also cause severe or life-threatening infusion-related reactions. Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. For more information, see Selected Important Safety Information below.

For the second time, KEYTRUDA monotherapy is now approved based on a biomarker rather than the location in the body where the tumor originated, said Dr. Scot Ebbinghaus, vice president, clinical research, Merck Research Laboratories. TMB-H, defined as 10 mutations per megabase or more, can help identify patients most likely to benefit from KEYTRUDA. Were pleased that our collaborative efforts to advance biomarker research have resulted in our ability to provide a new treatment option that addresses a high unmet medical need for these patients with cancer.

As physicians, we are always looking to find new options for patients, especially in the second-line or higher treatment setting, said Roy S. Herbst, M.D., Ph.D., ensign professor of medicine (medical oncology) and professor of pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine; chief of medical oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; and associate cancer center director for translational research, Yale Cancer Center. Its great to see the use of innovative biomarkers and immunotherapy come together with this approval and encouraging that we now have an option for patients with TMB-H tumors across cancer types, including rare cancers.

The FDA also approved FoundationOne CDx test as the companion diagnostic to identify patients with solid tumors that are TMB-H (10 mutations/ megabase) who may benefit from immunotherapy treatment with KEYTRUDA monotherapy.

These approvals stem from years of research into how TMB levels may influence a patients response to immunotherapy, said Brian Alexander, M.D., M.P.H., chief medical officer, Foundation Medicine. Its critical that healthcare professionals have access to a validated genomic test to measure TMB in clinical tumor assessments and pinpoint those who are more likely to respond. Were proud to be collaborating with Merck to help match appropriate patients to this important treatment.

Data Supporting the Approval

The accelerated approval was based on data from a prospectively-planned retrospective analysis of 10 cohorts (A through J) of patients with various previously treated unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with TMB-H, who were enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067), a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label trial evaluating KEYTRUDA (200 mg every three weeks). The trial excluded patients who previously received an anti-PD-1 or other immune-modulating monoclonal antibody, or who had an autoimmune disease, or a medical condition that required immunosuppression. TMB status was assessed using the FoundationOne CDx assay and pre-specified cutpoints of 10 and 13 mut/Mb, and testing was blinded with respect to clinical outcomes. Tumor response was assessed every nine weeks for the first 12 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) in the patients who received at least one dose of KEYTRUDA as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of five target lesions per organ.

In KEYNOTE-158, 1,050 patients were included in the efficacy analysis population. TMB was analyzed in the subset of 790 patients with sufficient tissue for testing based on protocol-specified testing requirements. Of the 790 patients, 102 (13%) had tumors identified as TMB-H, defined as TMB 10 mut/Mb. The study population characteristics of these 102 patients were: median age of 61 years (range, 27 to 80); 34% age 65 or older; 34% male; 81% White; and 41% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0 and 58% ECOG PS of 1. Fifty-six percent of patients had at least two prior lines of therapy.

In the 102 patients whose tumors were TMB-H, KEYTRUDA demonstrated an ORR of 29% (95% CI, 21-39), with a complete response rate of 4% and a partial response rate of 25%. After a median follow-up time of 11.1 months, the median DOR had not been reached (range, 2.2+ to 34.8+ months). Among the 30 responding patients, 57% had ongoing responses of 12 months or longer, and 50% had ongoing responses of 24 months or longer.

In a pre-specified analysis of patients with TMB 13 mut/Mb (n=70), KEYTRUDA demonstrated an ORR of 37% (95% CI, 26-50), with a complete response rate of 3% and a partial response rate of 34%. After a median follow-up time of 11.1 months, the median DOR had not been reached (range, 2.2+ to 34.8+ months). Among the 26 responding patients, 58% had ongoing responses of 12 months or longer, and 50% had ongoing responses of 24 months or longer. In an exploratory analysis in 32 patients whose cancer had TMB 10 mut/Mb and <13 mut/Mb, the ORR was 13% (95% CI, 4-29), including two complete responses and two partial responses.

The median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA was 4.9 months (range, 0.03 to 35.2 months). The most common adverse reactions for KEYTRUDA (reported in 20% of patients) were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, decreased appetite, pruritus, diarrhea, nausea, rash, pyrexia, cough, dyspnea, constipation, pain and abdominal pain.

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection, 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is an anti-PD-1 therapy that works by increasing the ability of the bodys immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

Merck has the industrys largest immuno-oncology clinical research program. There are currently more than 1,200 trials studying KEYTRUDA across a wide variety of cancers and treatment settings. The KEYTRUDA clinical program seeks to understand the role of KEYTRUDA across cancers and the factors that may predict a patient's likelihood of benefitting from treatment with KEYTRUDA, including exploring several different biomarkers.

Selected KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Indications

Melanoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph node(s) following complete resection.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

KEYTRUDA, in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

KEYTRUDA, in combination with carboplatin and either paclitaxel or paclitaxel protein-bound, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 [tumor proportion score (TPS) 1%] as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations, and is stage III where patients are not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation, or metastatic.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 (TPS 1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA.

Small Cell Lung Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least 1 other prior line of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

KEYTRUDA, in combination with platinum and fluorouracil (FU), is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or with unresectable, recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or with unresectable, recurrent HNSCC whose tumors express PD-L1 [combined positive score (CPS) 1] as determined by an FDA-approved test.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), or who have relapsed after 3 or more prior lines of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or who have relapsed after 2 or more prior lines of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. KEYTRUDA is not recommended for treatment of patients with PMBCL who require urgent cytoreductive therapy.

Urothelial Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and whose tumors express PD-L1 [combined positive score (CPS) 10], as determined by an FDA-approved test, or in patients who are not eligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive, high-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors who are ineligible for or have elected not to undergo cystectomy.

Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)

This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials. The safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA in pediatric patients with MSI-H central nervous system cancers have not been established.

Gastric Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 1) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression on or after two or more prior lines of therapy including fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Esophageal Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 10) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression after one or more prior lines of systemic therapy.

Cervical Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with disease progression on or after chemotherapy whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 1) as determined by an FDA-approved test. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Renal Cell Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA, in combination with axitinib, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Tumor Mutational Burden-High Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) [10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] solid tumors, as determined by an FDA-approved test, that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options.

This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials. The safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA in pediatric patients with TMB-H central nervous system cancers have not been established.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis, including fatal cases. Pneumonitis occurred in 3.4% (94/2799) of patients with various cancers receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 1 (0.8%), 2 (1.3%), 3 (0.9%), 4 (0.3%), and 5 (0.1%). Pneumonitis occurred in 8.2% (65/790) of NSCLC patients receiving KEYTRUDA as a single agent, including Grades 3-4 in 3.2% of patients, and occurred more frequently in patients with a history of prior thoracic radiation (17%) compared to those without (7.7%). Pneumonitis occurred in 6% (18/300) of HNSCC patients receiving KEYTRUDA as a single agent, including Grades 3-5 in 1.6% of patients, and occurred in 5.4% (15/276) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with platinum and FU as first-line therapy for advanced disease, including Grades 3-5 in 1.5% of patients.

Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated colitis. Colitis occurred in 1.7% (48/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 2 (0.4%), 3 (1.1%), and 4 (<0.1%). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis (KEYTRUDA) and Hepatotoxicity (KEYTRUDA in Combination With Axitinib)

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. Hepatitis occurred in 0.7% (19/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 2 (0.1%), 3 (0.4%), and 4 (<0.1%). Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hepatotoxicity in Combination With Axitinib

KEYTRUDA in combination with axitinib can cause hepatic toxicity with higher than expected frequencies of Grades 3 and 4 ALT and AST elevations compared to KEYTRUDA alone. With the combination of KEYTRUDA and axitinib, Grades 3 and 4 increased ALT (20%) and increased AST (13%) were seen. Monitor liver enzymes before initiation of and periodically throughout treatment. Consider more frequent monitoring of liver enzymes as compared to when the drugs are administered as single agents. For elevated liver enzymes, interrupt KEYTRUDA and axitinib, and consider administering corticosteroids as needed.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

KEYTRUDA can cause adrenal insufficiency (primary and secondary), hypophysitis, thyroid disorders, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Adrenal insufficiency occurred in 0.8% (22/2799) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.3%), 3 (0.3%), and 4 (<0.1%). Hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (17/2799) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%), 3 (0.3%), and 4 (<0.1%). Hypothyroidism occurred in 8.5% (237/2799) of patients, including Grade 2 (6.2%) and 3 (0.1%). The incidence of new or worsening hypothyroidism was higher in 1185 patients with HNSCC (16%) receiving KEYTRUDA, as a single agent or in combination with platinum and FU, including Grade 3 (0.3%) hypothyroidism. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 3.4% (96/2799) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.8%) and 3 (0.1%), and thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (16/2799) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.3%). Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 0.2% (6/2799) of patients.

Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism), thyroid function (prior to and periodically during treatment), and hyperglycemia. For adrenal insufficiency or hypophysitis, administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 adrenal insufficiency or hypophysitis and withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or Grade 4 adrenal insufficiency or hypophysitis. Administer hormone replacement for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA and administer antihyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated nephritis. Nephritis occurred in 0.3% (9/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 2 (0.1%), 3 (0.1%), and 4 (<0.1%) nephritis. Nephritis occurred in 1.7% (7/405) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions

Immune-mediated rashes, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) (some cases with fatal outcome), exfoliative dermatitis, and bullous pemphigoid, can occur. Monitor patients for suspected severe skin reactions and based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold or permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. For signs or symptoms of SJS or TEN, withhold KEYTRUDA and refer the patient for specialized care for assessment and treatment. If SJS or TEN is confirmed, permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue in patients receiving KEYTRUDA and may also occur after discontinuation of treatment. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% (unless otherwise indicated) of 2799 patients: arthritis (1.5%), uveitis, myositis, Guillain-Barr syndrome, myasthenia gravis, vasculitis, pancreatitis, hemolytic anemia, sarcoidosis, and encephalitis. In addition, myelitis and myocarditis were reported in other clinical trials, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and postmarketing use.

Treatment with KEYTRUDA may increase the risk of rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. Consider the benefit of treatment vs the risk of possible organ rejection in these patients.

Infusion-Related Reactions

KEYTRUDA can cause severe or life-threatening infusion-related reactions, including hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis, which have been reported in 0.2% (6/2799) of patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Immune-mediated complications, including fatal events, occurred in patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT after treatment with KEYTRUDA. Of 23 patients with cHL who proceeded to allogeneic HSCT after KEYTRUDA, 6 (26%) developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (1 fatal case) and 2 (9%) developed severe hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after reduced-intensity conditioning (1 fatal case). Cases of fatal hyperacute GVHD after allogeneic HSCT have also been reported in patients with lymphoma who received a PD-1 receptorblocking antibody before transplantation. Follow patients closely for early evidence of transplant-related complications such as hyperacute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), Grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD, steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), and other immune-mediated adverse reactions.

In patients with a history of allogeneic HSCT, acute GVHD (including fatal GVHD) has been reported after treatment with KEYTRUDA. Patients who experienced GVHD after their transplant procedure may be at increased risk for GVHD after KEYTRUDA. Consider the benefit of KEYTRUDA vs the risk of GVHD in these patients.

Increased Mortality in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

In trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of KEYTRUDA to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of these patients with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in this combination is not recommended outside of controlled trials.

Embryofetal Toxicity

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise women of this potential risk. In females of reproductive potential, verify pregnancy status prior to initiating KEYTRUDA and advise them to use effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions

In KEYNOTE-006, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 9% of 555 patients with advanced melanoma; adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation in more than one patient were colitis (1.4%), autoimmune hepatitis (0.7%), allergic reaction (0.4%), polyneuropathy (0.4%), and cardiac failure (0.4%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) with KEYTRUDA were fatigue (28%), diarrhea (26%), rash (24%), and nausea (21%).

In KEYNOTE-002, KEYTRUDA was permanently discontinued due to adverse reactions in 12% of 357 patients with advanced melanoma; the most common (1%) were general physical health deterioration (1%), asthenia (1%), dyspnea (1%), pneumonitis (1%), and generalized edema (1%). The most common adverse reactions were fatigue (43%), pruritus (28%), rash (24%), constipation (22%), nausea (22%), diarrhea (20%), and decreased appetite (20%).

In KEYNOTE-054, KEYTRUDA was permanently discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 509 patients; the most common (1%) were pneumonitis (1.4%), colitis (1.2%), and diarrhea (1%). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 25% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA. The most common adverse reaction (20%) with KEYTRUDA was diarrhea (28%).

In KEYNOTE-189, when KEYTRUDA was administered with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 20% of 405 patients. The most common adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were pneumonitis (3%) and acute kidney injury (2%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) with KEYTRUDA were nausea (56%), fatigue (56%), constipation (35%), diarrhea (31%), decreased appetite (28%), rash (25%), vomiting (24%), cough (21%), dyspnea (21%), and pyrexia (20%).

In KEYNOTE-407, when KEYTRUDA was administered with carboplatin and either paclitaxel or paclitaxel protein-bound in metastatic squamous NSCLC, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 15% of 101 patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. Adverse reactions observed in KEYNOTE-407 were similar to those observed in KEYNOTE-189 with the exception that increased incidences of alopecia (47% vs 36%) and peripheral neuropathy (31% vs 25%) were observed in the KEYTRUDA and chemotherapy arm compared to the placebo and chemotherapy arm in KEYNOTE-407.

In KEYNOTE-042, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 19% of 636 patients with advanced NSCLC; the most common were pneumonitis (3%), death due to unknown cause (1.6%), and pneumonia (1.4%). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were pneumonia (7%), pneumonitis (3.9%), pulmonary embolism (2.4%), and pleural effusion (2.2%). The most common adverse reaction (20%) was fatigue (25%).

In KEYNOTE-010, KEYTRUDA monotherapy was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 8% of 682 patients with metastatic NSCLC; the most common was pneumonitis (1.8%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) were decreased appetite (25%), fatigue (25%), dyspnea (23%), and nausea (20%).

Adverse reactions occurring in patients with SCLC were similar to those occurring in patients with other solid tumors who received KEYTRUDA as a single agent.

In KEYNOTE-048, KEYTRUDA monotherapy was discontinued due to adverse events in 12% of 300 patients with HNSCC; the most common adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation were sepsis (1.7%) and pneumonia (1.3%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) were fatigue (33%), constipation (20%), and rash (20%).

In KEYNOTE-048, when KEYTRUDA was administered in combination with platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and FU chemotherapy, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 16% of 276 patients with HNSCC. The most common adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were pneumonia (2.5%), pneumonitis (1.8%), and septic shock (1.4%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) were nausea (51%), fatigue (49%), constipation (37%), vomiting (32%), mucosal inflammation (31%), diarrhea (29%), decreased appetite (29%), stomatitis (26%), and cough (22%).

In KEYNOTE-012, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 17% of 192 patients with HNSCC. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were pneumonia, dyspnea, confusional state, vomiting, pleural effusion, and respiratory failure. The most common adverse reactions (20%) were fatigue, decreased appetite, and dyspnea. Adverse reactions occurring in patients with HNSCC were generally similar to those occurring in patients with melanoma or NSCLC who received KEYTRUDA as a monotherapy, with the exception of increased incidences of facial edema and new or worsening hypothyroidism.

Here is the original post:
FDA Approves Second Biomarker-Based Indication for Merck's KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), Regardless of Tumor Type - The Baytown Sun

Orca Bio Emerges With Nearly $300 Million to Transform Allogeneic Cell Therapy – Stockhouse

Company aims to safely and effectively regenerate a healthy blood and immune system for patients with hematological malignancies, genetic diseases and autoimmune disorders

High precision cell therapies manufactured by Orca Bio have the potential to replace conventional bone marrow transplants and expand the eligible patient population

$192 million Series D financing strengthens the company with resources to propel lead product candidate to completion of clinical development

MENLO PARK, Calif. , June 17, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Orca Bio, a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing high precision allogeneic cell therapies, today announced a Series D financing that brings its total capital raised since its 2016 launch to nearly $300 million. The company creates precisely controlled cell therapies by building each dose cell-by-cell from another person’s blood. Each therapy is constructed by formulating a proprietary mixture of cells that aims to cure the patient’s disease and eliminate dangerous side effects.

Orca Bio’s $192 million Series D financing was co-led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and an undisclosed investor. Other new and existing blue-chip investors also participated in the latest round, including 8VC, DCVC Bio, ND Capital, Mubadala Investment Company, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Kaiser Permanente Group Trust and IMRF.

The financing will support the continued advancement of Orca Bio’s cell therapy pipeline and its novel manufacturing platform, which sorts blood with single-cell precision and a high level of purity and speed to create optimal therapeutic mixtures of immune and stem cells. These proprietary mixtures have the potential to revolutionize allogeneic cell therapy for hematological and other cancers, as well as many other diseases and disorders.

A conventional bone marrow transplant relies on naturally occurring T cells. However, the uncontrolled cellular composition often results in life-threatening complications. The company’s most advanced program, TRGFT-201, is evaluating a highly controlled formulation of T cells that includes subsets of regulatory T cells, in a Phase I/II clinical study in patients with certain blood cancers. The company’s second program, OGFT-001, is evaluating a fully controlled cell product candidate that contains a next-generation formulation of T cells, in a Phase I study, also in patients with blood cancers. Orca Bio’s two ongoing clinical studies are among the largest Phase I cell therapy trials ever conducted. Each product candidate has the potential to deliver curative outcomes for the initial indications Orca Bio is pursuing, as well as the promise to significantly expand the eligible patient population by substantially reducing the severe toxicities associated with conventional bone marrow transplants.

The capital we have raised has formed the launch pad for a world-class, fully integrated allogeneic cell therapy company differentiated from all others,” said Ivan Dimov, PhD, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Orca Bio. Replacing bone marrow transplants is a logical first step in next-generation allogeneic cell therapy. While a conventional bone marrow transplant administers an uncontrolled cell product, Orca Bio has been the first to deliver a high precision cell therapy. We are initially focused on advancing two clinical programs in patients with blood cancers and have successfully treated the largest-ever number of patients with a high precision cell therapy. We believe our approach has the potential to transform allogeneic cell therapy, and thus the treatment of not only blood cancer, but also many other diseases with significant unmet need, such as a variety of genetic diseases and autoimmune disorders.”

With precise reconstitution using highly defined cell preps and a swift reboot of the patient’s immune system, Orca Bio’s product candidates have the potential to eliminate fatal side effects, such as graft-versus-host disease, and infections commonly associated with bone marrow transplants while maintaining or enhancing anti-tumor efficacy,” said Rick Klausner, MD, an investor and member of Orca Bio’s advisory board. The possibility of improving cure rates and minimizing toxicity holds the promise of expanding the eligible patient population for successful bone marrow transplantation in cancer.”

Orca Bio’s visionary leadership team, seasoned advisors, solid financial foundation and novel technology make the company uniquely suited to develop truly differentiated, scalable allogeneic cell therapies,” said Jonathan MacQuitty, PhD, Venture Partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners. I look forward to the Orca Bio team’s continued development and commercialization of revolutionary allogeneic cell therapies.”

Internationally Recognized Experts and Leaders

Orca Bio’s leadership, Ivan Dimov, PhD, Chief Executive Officer, Nate Fernhoff, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer, and Jeroen Bekaert, PhD, Chief Operating Officer, met at Stanford University and launched the company in 2016. Orca Bio’s board of directors and advisory board are comprised of renowned scientific leaders and seasoned biotech executives with extensive experience in drug discovery and cell-based therapeutics, including:

About Orca Bio

Established in 2016, Orca Bio is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing a pipeline of high precision allogeneic cell therapy products that are designed to safely and effectively replace a patient’s blood and immune system with a healthy one. The company’s proprietary therapeutic and manufacturing platforms are exclusively licensed from Stanford University. The manufacturing platform sorts donor blood with single-cell precision and a high level of purity and speed, enabling the creation of proprietary, optimal therapeutic mixtures of immune and stem cells that have the potential to transform allogeneic cell therapy. The company’s lead product candidate is being evaluated in a multi-center Phase I/II clinical trial in patients with blood cancers. For more information, please visit http://www.orcabio.com.

Media Contact: media@orcabio.com

More:
Orca Bio Emerges With Nearly $300 Million to Transform Allogeneic Cell Therapy - Stockhouse

UCLA receives nearly $14 million from NIH to investigate gene therapy to combat HIV – Mirage News

NIAID/Flickr

Researchers will focus on an immunotherapy known as CAR T, which uses genetically modified stem cells to target and destroy HIV-infected cells like this one.

UCLA researchers and colleagues have received a $13.65 million grant from the National Institutes of Health to investigate and further develop an immunotherapy known as CAR T, which uses genetically modified stem cells to target and destroy HIV.

The five-year grant, part of an NIH effort to develop gene-engineering technologies to cure HIV/AIDS, will fund a collaboration among UCLA; CSL-Behring, a biotechnology company in the United States and Australia; and the University of WashingtonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Scott Kitchen, an associate professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology, and Irvin Chen, director of the UCLA AIDS Institute at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, are leading the effort. The project will build on their previous research using CAR T therapy to combat the virus, which is constantly mutating and difficult to beat.

The overarching goal of our proposed studies is to identify a new gene therapy strategy to safely and effectively modify a patients own stem cells to resist HIV infection and simultaneously enhance their ability to recognize and destroy infected cells in the body in hopes of curing HIV infection, said Kitchen, who also directs the humanized mouse core laboratory for UCLAs Center for AIDS Research and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. It is a huge boost to our efforts at UCLA and elsewhere to find a creative strategy to defeat HIV.

The only known cure of an HIV-infected person was announced in 2008. The famous Berlin patient received a stem cell transplant from a donor whose cells naturally lacked a crucial receptor that HIV binds to in order to kill cells and destroy the immune system. The main problems with this approach, the researchers say, are that the donor and recipient have to be highly matched often a rare event and that it often fails to produce a sufficient amount of HIV-protected cells that can clear the virus from the body.

Transplantation of blood-forming stem cells has been the only treatment strategy that has resulted in a functional cure for HIV infection, Kitchen said. Over 13 years after the first successfully cured HIV-infected patient, there is a substantial need to develop strategies that are capable of being used on everyone with HIV infection.

One of those strategies, CAR T, has been the subject of ongoing research at UCLA by Chen, Kitchen and others. This approach involves genetically engineering a patients own blood-forming stem cells to carry genes for chimeric antigen receptors, or CARs. Once these stem cells are modified and transplanted back into the patient, they form specialized infection-fighting white blood cells known as T cells in this case, CAR T cells that specifically seek out and kill HIV-infected cells. In a recent study, the UCLA scientists found that engineered CAR T cells not only destroyed infected cells but also lived for more than two years the length of the study.

The thinking behind the NIH-funded project, the researchers say, is that a combination of CARs and broadly neutralizing antibodies may be a long-lasting, perhaps permanent, cure for HIV.

Our work under the NIH grant will provide a great deal of insight into ways the immune response can be modified to better fight HIV infection, said Chen, who is a professor of medicine and of microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics at the Geffen School of Medicine. The development of this unique strategy that allows the body to develop multiple ways to attack HIV could have an impact on other diseases as well, including the development of similar approaches targeting other types of chronic viral infections and cancers.

Here is the original post:
UCLA receives nearly $14 million from NIH to investigate gene therapy to combat HIV - Mirage News

UChicago working on COVID-19 saliva test Pandemic energizes health care unions Rehab hospital to be built in Libertyville – Crain’s Chicago Business

TRUMP ADMIN TOSSES ANTI-GENDER DISCRIMINATION RULE:TheTrump administration on Friday overturned anObama-era rule that banned discriminationagainst patients based on gender identity.The regulation from the HHS' Office for Civil Rights drops protections based on gender identity from the ACA's chief anti-discrimination provision,Modern Healthcare reports.

Pharmacies, insurers and other covered organizations also won't have to make their healthcare and insurance mailings available in 15 or more languages.

STEM CELL RESEARCHERS GET FDA EMERGENCY APPROVAL FOR COVID-19 TREATMENT:The Global Institute of Stem Cell Therapy and Research, or GIOSTAR,has receiveda compassionate useFDA approval to treathospitalizedCOVID-19patientswith acute inflammation of the lungswith stem cell therapy, the company said in a statement.Researchers with the company, which hasits Midwest headquarters in Glenview, hope the stem cell therapy couldtreatsevere COVID-19 cases and bridge the gap before a vaccine is developed, the statement said.

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH GROUP PARTNERS WITH COMMUNITY REFERRAL NETWORK:Illinois Health Practice Alliance, abehavioral health networkwithmore than 90 providers, is partnering with community service networkNowPowto build a statewide coordinated networkfor social services for peoplebehavioral health needs, the groups said in a statement.

Were seeing a significant rise in the number of Illinoisans experiencing behavioral health issues like mental health and substance abuse in tandem with a rise in social risk factors like housing instability, justice involvement and unemployment, David Berkey,CEO of the practice alliance.IHPA will integrateNowPowinto its population health platform, Health EC, rolling it out at first to 15,000 Medicaid beneficiaries, the statement said.

COMPANIES FORMING ANTI-CYBER ATTACK OPERATIONS CENTER:Evanston Technology Partners andAppGuardInc.are partnering to form a jointHealthcare Asset Operations Center tohelp hospitalssecurecritical medical devices and infrastructure, including ventilators, operational technology and network-connected devices, the companies said in a statement.

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE SAGA JUST HOW SCIENCE WORKS?:The hydroxychloroquine saga shouldnt erode public trust in science though it should serve as a reminder not to take any individual scientist or study too seriously, according to a Bloomberg opinion piece. Science never finds absolute truth, and it sometimes trips, but it can right itself and move on.READ MORE.

PEOPLE ON THE MOVE:

Kenneth C. Hoffmannhas beenpromotedtopartnerat the law firmBrennanBurtker.Hoffmann has represented individuals, businesses, hospital networks and other healthcareproviders throughall phases of investigation and litigation.

The rest is here:
UChicago working on COVID-19 saliva test Pandemic energizes health care unions Rehab hospital to be built in Libertyville - Crain's Chicago Business

Zaia Draws on Decades of Innovation in Infectious Disease for Breakthroughs in Gene Therapy – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Interview by Maggie L. Shaw

Known as a gene therapy pioneer, Zaia has spent almost40 years at City of Hope, in Duarte, California. He was first drawnby the promise of studying cytomegalovirus. Over the decades, hisgroundbreaking research has encompassed HIV/AIDS, cellular gene transfer therapy, immunotherapy, bispecific antibodies, andnow hyperimmune globulin for workers on the frontlines of thecoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Known as a gene therapy pioneer, Zaia has spent almost40 years at City of Hope, in Duarte, California. He was first drawnby the promise of studying cytomegalovirus. Over the decades, hisgroundbreaking research has encompassed HIV/AIDS, cellular gene transfer therapy, immunotherapy, bispecific antibodies, andnow hyperimmune globulin for workers on the frontlines of thecoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Zaia was recentlyawarded $750,000 from the California Institute for RegenerativeMedicine to study the potential use of convalescent plasmain patients with COVID-19, as well as to create the COVID-19 Coordination Program to aid in this effort.1

Zaia spoke at length about the crucial connections betweenbasic research in HIV/AIDS and developments in gene therapy.This interview has been edited slightly for clarity.

EVIDENCE-BASED ONCOLOGY (EBO): We know that HIV does notelicit a protective immune response in the body. Do you think itis possible to overcome nature in this regard, to trick the immunesystem into fighting HIV to the degree that it can overcome it, suchas interrupting the binding of the virus to the CD4 receptor?

ZAIA: So, lets take that question apart. There is an immuneresponse in the body to HIV, but its just not protective. Thequestion is, why isnt it protective? And could you overcome thatdeficiency? So, one aspect to understand is the ability of the virusto continuously mutate.

If youre familiar with RNA replication, it doesnt have highfidelity, meaning that mistakes occur while copying the newstrand of RNA. Whereas DNA replication has high fidelity, meaningthat once you copy it, its virtually word-for-word precise with onlyan occasional mutation. So, whenever the virus makes 10,000 basepair copies, theres 1 mistake. But the virus is actually only 10,000base pairs long in terms of its RNA. So that means theres about 1naturally occurring mistake in every new virus. And since therecould be billions of new viruses made, there will be literally allthese mutations a day, some of which could help the virus survive.Since the barriers that put up against the virus for continuing itsreplication are limited (eg, immune response, antiviral medications),its not that hard to imagine that a mutation could occurthat gets around a specific barrier When this occurs, it is calledantigen escape or drug resistance.

The deeper understanding of this question is, in the immunerecognition of the virus, the T lymphocytes have a receptor forthe virus called the T-cell receptor; its really an antigen receptorthat can see a specific peptide on the surface of the virus or onthe infected cell. So, the T-cell receptor itself is the problem. Itsexerting this selection, but it is not very flexibleits rigid. Its anall-or-none thing. If the virus can mutate its protein slightly, thenthat peptide never fits into the receptor. Its kind of like a lock andkey. So, we need a T-cell receptor thats more resistant to antigenescape. Could you make an artificial receptor, called a chimericantigen receptor (CAR), that would better resist antigen escape?At City of Hope, weve been trying to make a T-cell receptor thatyou [could] paste on to the T cells genetically so they are better atresisting this inability to detect the mutated part of the virus.Is there a part of the virus that is resistant to mutation? Thereprobably is. The key surface protein is called gp120. And someantibodies are very broadly reactive to all viruses, all HIV viruses.So, a broadly neutralizing antibody can detect multiple different gp120s, all of which are slightly differentbut theres somecommon feature thats recognized by the broadly neutralizingantibodies. If you put that on a T cell, as a chimeric antigenreceptor, the T cell might be more resistant to antigen escape bythe mutating virus.

The other possibility is, what if you use the CD4 receptor? Thatsan almost immutable part of the virus biology, because if thevirus didnt bind to the CD4 receptor, it probably wouldnt be HIV.It would be a different virus, a different lentivirus. But there areCAR T-cell receptors that utilize not the antibody to find the virus,but the CD4 receptor itself to find the virus. In other words, if youput CD4 on the surface of a CD8 cell, it would find all the gp120because the CD4 and gp120 would bind to each other. So that isactually another concept that can be utilized, and thats currentlyin clinical trials at the University of Pennsylvania.2

So, in summary, I think the trick would be to utilize a modificationof a T-cell receptor that would avoid the ability of the virus tomutate around the classical T-cell receptor and allow the immunesystem to see the virus and to control it.

EBO: The holy grail of HIV research for nearly 40 years has beento produce a vaccine. The Thai trial (RV144)3 has been the onlytrial thus far to show that a preventive HIV vaccine is possible.What have been the barriers to reproducing these results? Why hasachieving the goal of developing an AIDS vaccine been so elusive?

ZAIA: Those are good questions. I dont think anyone knows [theanswers] for sure. But 2 factors are probably important. Again,you go back to the virus mutation issue. Its continuous, and now[its] in the presence of immune pressure placed on the virus bythe vaccine. Youll get selection for these mutations. So, I guessthe question is, did the vaccine make an immune response to themost immutable parts of the virus? Probably notvirus mutationis not the only answer to why vaccines fail. It seems to be somethingmore basic than that.

For example, do vaccines induce mucosal immunity? We have amucosal immunity to many viruses that come in contact with ourmucous membranes via nose, throat, etc. Well, HIV would be inthe mucous membranes of the genital tract and rectum, [usually].So, are these vaccines really making a mucosal immunity where its needed? Thats a possible explanation for why the vaccinesare not working.

An area that people just dont understand at the present timeis why you can make a vaccine for certain viruses that wouldnormally come through the respiratory tract and not be able tomake a vaccine for others. Its relevant to COVID. Will we be ableto make an immune response to COVID when we know that theinitial entry point is through the nasal passages? Thatll be themillion-dollar question.

EBO:Can you explain what a lentiviral vector is? Why is it that HIVcan be inactivated outside the body to be used as a safe lentiviralgene therapy, but we cant do the same with the virus internally?

ZAIA: A lentivirus has a certain structure and is made of RNA andprotein. And it fulfills the requirements from some taxonomiccommittee that defines what a lentivirus is. Basically,it is a virus that can do 1 thing very usefully: it canreverse the RNA to DNA, and the DNA can then beintegrated into the host DNA, become part of the host. And that integration is due to an enzyme calledintegrase. So, it has an RNA that also encodes for thisintegrase as well as reverse transcriptase; it turns RNA into DNA. That was a famous discovery at onepoint; it won the Nobel Prize. And so thats whatmakes it a lentivirus.

Now, you can inactivate it in the sense of makingit safe. It has only 9 major proteins, and thoseproteins are important in those elements that Ijust mentioned and in leading to its pathogenicity.You can remove them and still have some of theelements that you need. For example, you couldleave the integrase but remove other things, whichmay make the virus able to replicate and lead toAIDS. But now youd have an incomplete virus thatyou can put a gene into, and it can be delivered to the cell, because the virus can still get into the cell.And it can still have an integrase, which can helpyou integrate that message or that gene into the hostcell. But the virus cant replicate. It has all the otherparts of it that are needed, but replication has beenremoved. You basically neuter the virus by removingcritical genes. Its still allowed to be a good virusfor your useit can get it into the cell, deliver itspayloadbut it just cant replicate.

The question is, why cant we inactivate certainof these critical genes that are important forreplication? And, in fact, you canin vitro. You cancertainly put in inhibitors of all the various proteinsof a virus. Some of those are called small inhibitoryRNAs (siRNA), which are known to block specificallydifferent proteins of a virus and almost any virus.The question is, how do you deliver that siRNA to allcells that are infected? If you have trillions of cellsinfected, how would you get to the last one? Thatsthe issue. So, you can do it in a test tube, but you justcant do it in a human organism.

Now, you might ask, why are you able to getcertain things to work for acute lymphoblasticleukemia but not for HIV?

Well, I think its because the virus can becomelatent and invisible to most systems and theleukemia cannot. The leukemia is robustly growingand expressing all of its proteins and enzymes,and so we [can fight it with] chemicals and otherthings like CAR T cells, and they will destroy thosecells. The HIV is holed up in an inactive form, aso-called reservoir, and that reservoir is the problem.Once its in there, its like a snake in its hole. Youcannot get to it.

EBO: In a 2016 commentary,4 you discuss thefindings by Yang et al that the immune-mobilizingmonoclonal T-cell receptor, or ImmTAV, couldbe an effective new agent against HIV/AIDS dueto its bispecific antibodybindingproperties. It was shown to haveactivity against both p17-expressingactivated and resting CD4 cells. Is theagent proposed by Yang possible andwithout neurotoxicity?

See more here:
Zaia Draws on Decades of Innovation in Infectious Disease for Breakthroughs in Gene Therapy - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Mayo Clinic Study of Humanigen’s Lenzilumab Shows Rapid Recovery and Discharge in Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients – Business Wire

BURLINGAME, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Humanigen, Inc., (HGEN) (Humanigen), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on preventing and treating cytokine storm with lenzilumab, the companys proprietary Humaneered anti-human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) monoclonal antibody, announced data on the first clinical use of lenzilumab in 12 COVID-19 patients. The manuscript, titled First Clinical Use of Lenzilumab to Neutralize GM-CSF in Patients with Severe and Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia was published online at medRxiv.org (www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369v1). Patients showed rapid clinical improvement with a median time to recovery of five days, median time to discharge of five days and 100% survival to the data cut-off date. Patients also demonstrated rapid improvement in oxygenation, temperature, inflammatory cytokines and key hematological parameters consistent with improved clinical outcomes.

Dr. Zelalem Temesgen, Professor of Medicine at Mayo Clinic and one of the key authors of the study, said, Lenzilumab use was associated with improved clinical outcomes and oxygen requirement, with no reported mortality. We did not observe any treatment-emergent adverse events attributable to lenzilumab and it was well-tolerated. Based on the pathophysiology of cytokine storm following SARS-CoV-2 infection, along with work conducted at Mayo Clinic on GM-CSF depletion in CAR-T therapy, lenzilumab may offer a rational approach to ameliorate the consequences of cytokine storm in COVID-19.

Dr. Cameron Durrant, chief executive officer of Humanigen, stated, It is extremely encouraging to see this initial group of high-risk patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia show clinical improvement on lenzilumab, and at the data cut-off point, 11 of them discharged from the hospital. All 12 patients had at least one risk factor associated with poor outcomes, such as age, smoking history, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, chronic lung disease, high BMI, and elevated inflammatory markers, with several patients having multiple such risk factors.

All patients were hospitalized in the Mayo Clinic system and had severe or critical pneumonia as a result of COVID-19. They were also viewed as being at high risk of further disease progression. All patients required oxygen supplementation and had elevation in at least one inflammatory biomarker prior to receiving lenzilumab. All patients had at least one co-morbidity associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 and several patients had multiple co-morbidities: 58% had diabetes mellitus, 58% had hypertension, 58% had underlying lung diseases, 50% were obese (defined as a BMI greater than 30), 17% had chronic kidney disease and 17% had coronary artery disease. The median age was 65 years.

More details on the companys programs in COVID-19 can be found on the companys website at http://www.humanigen.com under the COVID-19 tab, and details of the Phase III potential registration study can be found at clinicaltrials.gov using ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04351152.

About COVID-19

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 has become a global pandemic, with almost 8 million confirmed cases and almost 450,000 deaths reported to date. Patients with severe cases of COVID-19 experience severe viral pneumonia that can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure and death.

In severe and critical patients with COVID-19, published research suggests GM-CSF as the key link between pathogenic Th1 cells and inflammatory monocytes, which secrete additional GM-CSF1. Lenzilumab is a late clinical-stage, monoclonal antibody targeting GM-CSF, a pro-inflammatory cytokine up-regulated in the serum of COVID-19 patients2. The percentages of certain GM-CSF-expressing cells are significantly higher in the blood of ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients compared with healthy controls and are more pronounced in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients versus non-ICU patients2.

1. Zhou Y, Fu B, Zheng X, et al. Aberrant pathogenic GM-CSF+ T cells and inflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocytes in severe pulmonary syndrome patients of a new coronavirus. Pre-Print. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.945576.

2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5.

About Humanigen, Inc.

Humanigen, Inc. is developing its portfolio of clinical and pre-clinical therapies for the treatment of inflammation and cancers via its novel, cutting-edge GM-CSF neutralization and gene-knockout platforms. We believe that our GM-CSF neutralization and gene-editing platform technologies have the potential to reduce the inflammatory cascade associated with coronavirus infection as well as the serious and potentially life-threatening CAR-T therapy-related side effects while preserving and potentially improving the efficacy of the CAR-T therapy itself, thereby breaking the efficacy/toxicity linkage. The companys immediate focus is to prevent or minimize the cytokine storm that precedes severe lung dysfunction and ARDS in serious cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and also in combining FDA-approved and development stage CAR-T therapies with lenzilumab, the companys proprietary Humaneered anti-human-GM-CSF immunotherapy, which is its lead product candidate. A potential registrational Phase III study in COVID-19 patients is currently enrolling. The company is also exploring the effectiveness of its GM-CSF neutralization technologies (either through the use of lenzilumab as a neutralizing antibody or through GM-CSF gene knockout) in combination with other CAR-T, bispecific or natural killer (NK) T- cell engaging immunotherapy treatments to break the efficacy/toxicity linkage, including to prevent and/or treat graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For more information, visit http://www.humanigen.com

Forward-Looking Statements

This release contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current knowledge, assumptions, judgment and expectations regarding future performance or events. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such statements are reasonable, they give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct and you should be aware that actual events or results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Words such as "will," "expect," "intend," "plan," "potential," "possible," "goals," "accelerate," "continue," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations for the Phase III study and the potential future development of lenzilumab to minimize or reduce the severity of lung dysfunction associated with severe and critical COVID-19 infections or to be approved by FDA for such use or to help CAR-T reach its full potential or to deliver benefit in preventing GvHD. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the risks inherent in our lack of profitability and potential need for additional capital to conduct the Phase III study and grow our business; our dependence on partners to further the development of our product candidates; the uncertainties inherent in the development and launch of any new pharmaceutical product; the outcome of pending or future litigation; and the various risks and uncertainties described in the "Risk Factors" sections and elsewhere in the Company's periodic and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements made in this press release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.

Read the rest here:
Mayo Clinic Study of Humanigen's Lenzilumab Shows Rapid Recovery and Discharge in Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients - Business Wire

Cirmtuzumab Plus Ibrutinib Shows Activity and Tolerability in MCL and CLL – OncLive

The combination of the first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody cirmtuzumab and the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) was found to be an active, well-tolerated regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and treatment-nave or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to data from a phase 1b/2 study (NCT03088878).

The trial enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, or relapsed/refractory or treatment-nave CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who had measurable disease and had either limited or no prior treatment with BTK inhibitors. The trial is comprised of 3 parts: a phase 1 dose-escalation phase with cirmtuzumab (part 1), an expansion cohort (part 2), and phase 2 randomization of the cirmtuzumab/ibrutinib combination versus ibrutinib alone (part 3).

As of January 29, 2020, 12 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL were enrolled onto part 1 of the trial. All patients had stage III/IV disease at diagnosis and 25% had bulky tumor at the time of study entry. Fifty-eight percent of these patients had Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index risk scores of intermediate or high, and 83% had received 2 prior regimens. Additionally, a total of 34 patients with CLL were enrolled onto either part 1 of the trial (n = 18) or the part 2 expansion phase (n = 16).

Results presented during the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program by lead author HunJuLee, MD, showed a high tumor response rate with the combination in those with MCL, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 83% and a complete response (CR) rate of 58%. The initial median progression-free survival with the regimen was 17.5 months. Those who had received 1 to 10 months of prior ibrutinib also responded well to the combination; 2 patients achieved CRs and 2 achieved partial responses (PRs).

In patients with CLL/SLL, treatment with the combination led to an overall best response rate of 88% and a clinical benefit rate of 100%. One patient experienced a CR and has since remained in remission for over 8 months and off all CLL treatment. Three other patients achieved PRs with the regimen.

With regard to safety, the most common adverse effects (AEs) potentially related to the combination were fatigue, diarrhea, and contusion. One patient with MCL and 8 patients with CLL reported treatment-related severe AEs. However, the events were thought to be related to ibrutinib or the combination rather than cirmtuzumab alone. Grade 3 or higher AEs included atrial fibrillation (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 3), pericardial hemorrhage, pleural effusion, pyrexia, hyperkalemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and staph infection (n = 1, each).

In terms of medium follow up, it's very short so I don't want to get too excited. The median follow-up was 8 months and the median PFS is 17 months, said Lee. We are very happy with the results we have, and we look forward to building on top of this. There are ways to get rid of MCL but some of the ways that you take have a lot of toxicities involved. It is really exciting that all of my patients did not have any toxicity.

In an interview with OncLive, Lee, an assistant professor of medicine in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma and the Jessica and Jeffrey Brue Endowed Professor of Lymphoma Research at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, further discussed the interim results of the study examining cirmtuzumab plus ibrutinib and the next steps with this research in MCL and CLL/SLL.

OncLive: Could you provide some background oncirmtuzumaband the rationale to explore it in combination withibrutinibin this setting?

Lee: As you know,the holy grail of cancer therapy is to find a target on the cancer cell that is not expressed on normal cells. Ideally, with lymphomas we're looking for a target on the lymphoma cell that is different from the proteins expressed on the surface of normal B cells. We would like to treat the lymphoma without harming normal B cells. Preclinical studies have examined ROR1, a family of proteins that are expressed in embryonic protein during early life and [then] disappear. [Investigators have] found [that these proteins] were expressed on the lymphoma cells and leukemia cells.[Investigators thought that] if [ROR1] was expressed on malignant lymphoma and leukemia cells and not expressed on normal cells, then it would serve as a great target [for therapy].

Rituximab (Rituxan)was developed in the early 90s and it targets CD20, which is expressed on normal cells. As such, when you give treatments like rituximab, even though the agent is well-tolerated, it does have some collateral damage. Rituximab decreases lymphocyte counts and we do have patients who require intravenous immunoglobulin therapyfollowing prolonged rituximab maintenance [if they have] lowlymphocyte counts.When they observed this finding, investigators questioned whether this is something that can be targetable. However, before we can develop a treatment [we have to understand] what it does.

What they found was that it is 1 of the proliferative survival signals, that are complementary to another system of proteins called immunoglobulin and that is the B-cell receptor. We know that B-cell receptor targeting has been tremendous with the targeting of BTK with ibrutinib and idelalisib (Zydelig). In all these pathways, targeting has generated great treatment options for many of our patients. However, we know that the difficulty withibrutinib, idelalisib, the PI3K inhibitors, and BTK inhibitors, is that they don't [lead to an] 100% complete remission.

Where is it? How are these B cells surviving? What about the patients who are primary refractory? What about the patients who respond initially and then relapse? Where are these cells coming from and where's the survival? We're almost trying to play chess with these lymphoma cells because we know that they're using biological mechanisms to achieve a survival advantage.

[When the BTK is being blocked, these lymphoma cells] reroute the survival signal through another survival channel. We believe one of the mechanisms that this drug works by, is by blocking the ROR1, which is one of the other survival signals. When we gave ibrutinib in preclinical studies, [it was found to] increase the signaling pathway in the ROR1 pathway. If you block the BTK, the cells find an alternative route. The lymphoma and leukemia cells are very smart. They are able to take advantage of alternate sources of growth signals.That's where the idea came in, combined with the results from preclinical studies demonstrating that patients who had high levels of ROR1 had lower survival.

I'm not saying this is the only way that the lymphoma cells escape mechanism. We know that there's mutations in the BTK and so forth and so on. However, this may be one of the contributing factors that help these lymphoma and leukemia cells become resistant to BTK inhibition. Therefore, we feel that blocking this pathway will block both pathways, thus, leading to a deeper response, meaning more CRs.

Could you discuss the design of the trial and the dosing schedules that were investigated?

This was designed as an open-label, phase 1/2 study. We knew that BTK inhibition and the ROR1 works in a complimentary fashion. We already knew the dosing schedule for ibrutinib, but we did multiple-dose escalations to try to find the right recommended dose [forcirmtuzumab] in the phase 2 [portion of the] study. We had 2 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg, 16 mg, 3 kg, and a flat dosing of 300 mg and 600 mg. Ultimately, after the phase 1 study, went with the 600 mg flat dosing, and that was found to be very well tolerated.

This goes right into the safety issue. We're looking for any toxicity. One of the remarkable things about this protein is that many of the antibody-driven therapies have been very well tolerated, andcirmtuzumabhas also been very well tolerated. We did not see any grade 3 toxicity forcirmtuzumab.

Do anti-ROR1 antibodies have an established toxicity profile or is it still under investigation?

That is still under investigation, but in combination with the ibrutinib, we did not have any signal in terms of dose-limiting toxicities with the doses that we gave. Here, at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, we gave the 2 mg through 18 mg per kilograms and the high and low flat dosing, and it was found to be very tolerated.

What did we see with efficacy?

The efficacy seen with the combination was very interesting. Two histologies were studied: MCL and CLL. I am leading the MCL side and Michael Choi, MD, of the University of California, San Diego Medical Center, is leading the CLL portion of this study.

The MCL portion showed tremendous, exciting signal on phase 1 and 2 of this study. The ORRs were north of 80%, and the real kicker, knock-your-socks-off data are the CR rates. We were able to get 58% CR rates for many of these very heavily pretreated patients. We had approximately 40% of patients who had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation; we have patients who failed ibrutinib; and we have patients who had received [prior] CAR T-cell therapy and responded. Those findings gets people excited. I was surprised at how good the response was, given that usually toxicity and response go hand in hand. When you get more responses, you usually have very high toxicity. However, we really did not see any grade 3 toxicities.

Tons of CAR T-cells are being developed, but they come with fairly heavy prices. The headlines are big, but I know behind [the scenes], because I take care of these patients. It's not easy; if a patient is 70 years of age, theyre barely getting into the clinic. [When they ask for a CAR T], I get nervous; it is tough. But with this [combination], the majority of my patients [did not even feel that they were on a treatment]. This is very exciting for our patients.

The ORRs were north of 80%, and there was a 58% CR rate. We have 12 patients treated. Part 2 is open and it's accruing very nicely so we're trying to get more patients to enroll. This space is very tight; I'm sure you're aware that MCL is a tough place now because of the success achieved by Michael Wang, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, with ibrutinib and CAR T. We're competing against some big agents, which are very effective. However, it's [a good thing] for our patients, because they have many treatment options that are available.

In terms of CLL, we did see high response rates; however, we did not see the robust CR rates that we saw in MCL; thats one thing to note. They're up to part 2 and that part of the trial is enrolling much faster than MCL. CLL is the most common lymphoid malignancy in North America so investigators are readily finding patients. We're hoping that the enrollment for the MCL portion can get going and will show robust data.

Is there anything that you would like to add?

There was a rapid attainment of CR rates observed. Many of these patients have had hyper-CVAD, autologous stem cell transplantation, and CAR T-cell therapies, among others. [These were not patients who had only received 1 line of prior] therapy. If you start using ibrutinib earlier in treatment, you get higher levels of CRs and higher levels of PFS. However, these are patients that are heavily pretreated with fairly aggressive histologies and behavior. If you look at the waterfall plot, you can clearly see a rapid drop in the tumor sizes of the patients with MCL.

Many more patients were included in the CLL [portion of the study] and they do have a response, but the majority of these responses were PR, so they were not able to attain CR. Although they do have a response, it is not as dramatic as the MCL population.

If you look at the PFS curves for MCL they look nice. It's a very limited population with very limited follow up, so this will need to be followed up for much longer.

This is going to be leading to a very exciting time forcirmtuzumab and ibrutinib as we enroll for part 2 [of the trial], which is going to be the efficacy signal that we will be seeing moving forward. Additionally, other agents are being developed for the ROR1 targets, but the efficacy that we saw in our study with our limited number of patients is very exciting.

Lee HJ, Choi MY, Siddiqi T, et al. Clinical activity of cirmtuzumab, an anti-ROR1 antibody, in combination with ibrutinib: interim results of a phase Ib/II study in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). J Clin Oncol.2020;38(suppl 15):8036. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8036

Originally posted here:
Cirmtuzumab Plus Ibrutinib Shows Activity and Tolerability in MCL and CLL - OncLive

EHA25Virtual: Adult Patients With Sickle Cell Disease May Be at Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes From COVID-19 – Yahoo Finance

THE HAGUE, Netherlands, June 13, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia are severe inherited blood disorders, often referred to as "hemoglobinopathies." They predominantly affect the Black and Asian ethnic minority populations in England. To ensure good standards and equitable access to care, the National Health Service in England has recently commissioned a model of regional care networks overseen by a new body, the National Haemoglobinopathy Panel. This organizational structure has enabled a rapid response to the COVID-19 epidemic and enabled collection of national data on new cases and outcomes to determine if hemoglobinopathy patients are at risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

EHA Logo (PRNewsfoto/European Hematology Association)

We present an analysis on data collected up to June 5th indicating that the majority of cases have been mild, and in particular children do not appear to be at increased risk. However, the data suggests that adults with SCD may be more vulnerable to adverse outcomes. Therefore, we recommend that isolation precautions should be lifted cautiously, and that new therapies and vaccination for COVID-19, when available, should be prioritized for this patient group.

Presenter: Dr Paul Telfer Affiliation:Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK Abstract:#LB2606 REAL-TIME NATIONAL SURVEY OF COVID-19 IN HEMOGLOBINOPATHY AND RARE INHERITED ANEMIA PATIENTS

About the EHA Annual Congress: Every year in June, EHA organizes its Annual Congress in a major European city. This year due to the COVID19 pandemic, EHA transformed its physical meeting into a Virtual Congress. The Congress is aimed at health professionals working in or interested in the field of hematology. The scientific program topics range from stem cell physiology and development to leukemia; lymphoma; diagnosis and treatment; red blood cells; white blood cells and platelet disorders; hemophilia and myeloma; thrombosis and bleeding disorders; as well as transfusion and stem cell transplantation. Embargo: Please note that our embargo policy applies to all selected abstracts in the Press Briefings. For more information, see our EHA Media and Embargo policy here.

Website: ehaweb.org

Logo - https://media.zenfs.com/en/prnewswire.com/b19270e94cffa3b03349741d8b8900b6

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/eha25virtual-adult-patients-with-sickle-cell-disease-may-be-at-increased-risk-of-adverse-outcomes-from-covid-19-301075093.html

SOURCE European Hematology Association (EHA)

More:
EHA25Virtual: Adult Patients With Sickle Cell Disease May Be at Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes From COVID-19 - Yahoo Finance