Immatics and Molmed become the subjects of very different deals – Vantage

How do companies seal a deal when executives cannot shake hands? Maybe the management teams of Arya Sciences and Immatics bumped elbows when the latter was bought by the blank cheque company on Tuesday in a deal worth $252m. As for the Japanese group AGCs 240m ($267m) offer for Italys Molmed, presumably execs could not meet in person at all given that Italy is still locked down.

Be that as it may an acquisition and a bid have been arranged somehow, proving that though the Covid-19 pandemic has had a deadening effect on deal-making it has not annihilated it altogether. The interesting aspect is how Immatics and Molmed both cell therapy players, albeit of different kinds will develop from here.

A stark mission

Arya Sciences Acquisition Corp was set up to do what its name suggests: its sole purpose is to effect a merger or similar combination with one or more businesses. It is controlled by the hedge fund Perceptive Advisors, and floated on Nasdaq in October 2018, raising $144m.

Immatics will receive $148m of cash from Aryas trust account, which holds the IPO proceeds plus interest, when the deal closes in the second quarter. Perceptive and other institutional investors, including Redmile and Wellington Partners, have committed a further $104m more in pipe funding.

Arya saysImmatics T-cell receptor-based candidates for solid tumours hold the kind of disruptive potential the investment vehicle was looking for. Immatics has two main product classes, adoptive cell therapies, which use natural or engineered T cells against cancer, and T-cell receptor bispecifics, which bind to tumour-specific peptides and to immunomodulating T-cell surface proteins.

Gaining access to the US capital markets will allow Immatics to advance its projects through the clinic. The group expects topline phase I/II data from three TCR projects and one bispecific by the end of this year.

Going public represents a long-held goal for Immatics. The company was already eyeing the US exchanges two years ago (Why Immatics could soon become the next listed cell therapy player, July 16, 2018).

Long term

Molmed could take a very different route if AGCs bid for it is accepted, becoming a part of a much larger whole. Japans AGC is the largest glass company in the world, but is also active in the fields of ceramics, electronics and chemicals.

AGC considers its life sciences business a strategic priority, and aims to get the units sales above 100bn by 2025. Buying Molmed it is offering 0.518 per Molmed share, at a premium of 110% will allow ACG to move into gene and cell therapies.

It will not get there fast. Molmed withdrew Zalmoxis, designed to reduce the risk or rejection of an imperfectly matched stem cell transplant, from sale in Europe after a confirmatory phase III trial failed last summer. Its next most advanced product is its Car-T project CAR44v6, in a phase I/II trial for acute myeloid leukaemia and multiple myeloma. This looks unlikely to yield data before 2023.

Molmed does have another string to its bow that could appeal to AGC: it is the first company in Europe to have obtained GMP manufacturing authorisation for cell and gene therapies ex vivo, and offers this to other groups. For example, it produces Strimvelis, Orchard Therapeutics gene therapy for the immunodeficiency disorder ADA-SCID.

Closure is odds-on, since Molmeds largest shareholder, Fininvest the holding company of the family of the former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi has agreed to tender its 23% stake. Hopefully, in buying this very specialised company, AGC knows what it is doing.

Here is the original post:
Immatics and Molmed become the subjects of very different deals - Vantage

Claudia Rodrigues is removed from the clinic where she was hospitalized because of the coronavirus – Crypto Dictation

The new coronavirus is spreading all over the world and, after arriving in Brazil, has changed the lives of most Brazilians. The government's recommendation is that people stay at home and take all recommended hygiene care, thus preventing the virus from spreading in the country.

The greatest concern of the government is with the people who are part of the group considered at risk, which are the elderly and people who already have some type of chronic disease. These people are the ones most likely to have complications if they become infected with the virus.

Actress Claudia Rodrigues is one of those people who are part of the risk group and who must have redoubled health care so that it does not become contaminated with covid-19. The actress has been battling multiple sclerosis for 20 years, which is an autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system.

The actress has already been hospitalized several times in a serious condition in times of crisis of multiple sclerosis and at the moment was hospitalized in a clinic in the state of So Paulo, following the autoimmune treatment.

Due to government recommendations and fearing contamination by covid-19, the actress was taken home.

The treatment that actress Claudia Rodrigues performed at the clinic in So Paulo is very delicate, due to her health condition in relation to multiple sclerosis, and for that reason, extra care is needed with the artist, as she already has low immunity due to disease.

Due to the situation faced by the actress, her doctors and family members chose to redouble the artist's health care and for this very reason, they decided that it was better that she be taken home and that she should remain in isolation at her residence.

Adriane Bonato, who is Claudia Rodrigues' businesswoman, revealed that the actress is at her home and that she is performing exercises on the spot. The businesswoman reaffirmed that the artist has low immunity due to having undergone stem cell transplantation and that, for this very reason, she runs a very high risk in relation to the new virus.

According to Adriane, Claudia Rodrigues will remain at home for the next 30 days, preventing herself from being infected by the new coronavirus.

Like most Brazilians, many Celebrity are at home complying with government resolutions on social isolation to prevent the mass spread of the new coronavirus. Many artists are taking advantage of the large number of followers in their profiles to try to make the population aware of the importance of following the recommendations of the Ministry of Health and especially the recommendation to be quarantined at home.

Big names like Luciano Huck, Ana Maria Braga and many others have posted videos asking Brazilians for empathy and to remain in social isolation. The artists Preta Gil and Fernanda Paes Leme, who were diagnosed with the disease, are sharing their experiences with the new coronavirus. They are keeping followers informed about how the isolation is going and the symptoms they are feeling about the coronavirus.

Don't miss our Facebook page!

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Read the rest here:
Claudia Rodrigues is removed from the clinic where she was hospitalized because of the coronavirus - Crypto Dictation

Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Demand with Global Forecast by Top Leading Players: Osiris Therapeutics, Medipost Co., Anterogen Co., Pharmicell Co.,…

New Jersey, United States: A qualitative research study accomplished by Verified Market Research titled 2020-2026 Global and Regional Stem Cell Therapy Market: Industry Production, Sales and Consumption Status and Prospects Professional Market Research Report is the most up to date report which comprises the latest trends that influence the market competition in the forecast period from 2020 to 2026. The report presents different market predictions related to market size, revenue, production, CAGR, Consumption, gross margin, price, and other substantial factors. Primarily, the report introduces market demands and the present position of the Stem Cell Therapy market.The report completes the value chain and downstream and upstream essentials.

Global Stem Cell TherapyMarketwas valued at USD 86.62 million in 2016 and is projected to reach USD 221.03million by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 10.97% from 2017 to 2025.

Our expert analyst has categorized the market into product type, application/end-user, and geography. All the segments are analyzed based on their market share, growth rate, and growth potential. The growth potential, market share, size, and prospects of each segment and sub-segment are portrayed in the report. This thorough evaluation of the segments would help the players to focus on revenue-generating areas of the Stem Cell Therapy Market.

A number of leading manufacturers mention in the Stem Cell Therapy Market research report are focusing on expanding operations in regions, as they exhibit potential business opportunities. The Stem Cell Therapy Market report classifies the market dynamics and trends in the global and regional market considering several aspects including technology, supplies, capacity, production, profit, and price.

Stem Cell Therapy Market: Research Methodology

1. Primary Research:

2. Secondary Research:

During our Secondary research, we collect information from different sources such as databases, regulatory bodies, gold and silver-standard websites, articles by recognized authors, certified publications, white papers, investor presentations and press releases of companies, and annual reports.

Data collection module is used for data collection and analysis of the base year. The market data is analyzed and estimated using statistical models and systematic market. The main research methodology used for the preparation of reports, including data mining, primary (industry experts) validation and top-down analysis, market overview and guidance, the company market share analysis, measurement standards, and analysis of the stock sellers.

Vendor Competitive Analysis:

The report focuses on the strategies considered by the market participants to gain a major share in the Stem Cell Therapy market. Through this, the competitors will get an overview of the competitive landscape so they can make business decisions. Leading players working in the global market are analyzed with their company information, product profile, product specification, picture, capacity, production, price, cost, global investment plans, and supply-demand scenarios.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Regional Coverage

The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt)North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada)South America (Brazil etc.)Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Ask For Discount @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=24113&utm_source=PN24&utm_medium=002

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Stem Cell Therapy Market

1.1 Overview of the Market1.2 Scope of Report1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research

3.1 Data Mining3.2 Validation3.3 Primary Interviews3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Stem Cell Therapy Market Outlook

4.1 Overview4.2 Market Dynamics4.2.1 Drivers4.2.2 Restraints4.2.3 Opportunities4.3 Porters Five Force Model4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Solution6.1 Overview

7 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Vertical

7.1 Overview

8 Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Geography8.1 Overview8.2 North America8.2.1 U.S.8.2.2 Canada8.2.3 Mexico8.3 Europe8.3.1 Germany8.3.2 U.K.8.3.3 France8.3.4 Rest of Europe8.4 Asia Pacific8.4.1 China8.4.2 Japan8.4.3 India8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific8.5 Rest of the World8.5.1 Latin America8.5.2 Middle East

9 Stem Cell Therapy Market Competitive Landscape

9.1 Overview9.2 Company Market Ranking9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles

10.1.1 Overview10.1.2 Financial Performance10.1.3 Product Outlook10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix

11.1 Related Research

Complete Report is Available @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/Stem-Cell-Therapy-Market/?utm_source=PN24&utm_medium=002

We also offer customization on reports based on specific client requirement:

1- Free country level analysis for any 5 countries of your choice.

2- Free Competitive analysis of any market players.

3- Free 40 analyst hours to cover any other data points

About us:

Verified market research partners with the customer and offer an insight into strategic and growth analyzes; Data necessary to achieve corporate goals and objectives. Our core values are trust, integrity and authenticity for our customers.

Analysts with a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyze data in all phases. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne FernandesCall: +1 (650) 781 4080Email: [emailprotected]

Tags: Stem Cell Therapy Market Size, Stem Cell Therapy Market Trends, Stem Cell Therapy Market Forecast, Stem Cell Therapy Market Growth, Stem Cell Therapy Market Analysis, Stem Cell Therapy Market Business Opportunities and Stem Cell Therapy Market Outlook

Continued here:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2020 Demand with Global Forecast by Top Leading Players: Osiris Therapeutics, Medipost Co., Anterogen Co., Pharmicell Co.,...

Forty Seven, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights – BioSpace

MENLO PARK, Calif., March 20, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Forty Seven Inc., (Nasdaq:FTSV), a clinical-stage, immuno-oncology company focused on developing therapies to activate macrophages in the fight against cancer, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2019 and provided a business update.

In 2019, Forty Seven transformed into a multi-asset, late-stage development company with clear paths to registration in two distinct, underserved patient populations. In parallel, we entered into several new partnerships designed to accelerate the development of magrolimab and FSI-174, and allow us to evaluate both compounds more rapidly across a range of indications and combination paradigms, said Mark McCamish, M.D., Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Forty Seven. Following the recently announced acquisition by Gilead, and with the benefit of their resources and capabilities, we are even better positioned to build on this momentum and deliver on our foundational vision of developing novel immunotherapies that help patients defeat their cancers.

Dr. McCamish continued, Like so many others, we are closely monitoring COVID-19, and have recently instituted a number of proactive measures to mitigate the spread of the virus and protect the safety, health and well-being of the patients, families and healthcare professionals involved in our clinical development programs, as well as our employees. While we are working diligently to limit the impact of COVID-19 on our ongoing clinical trials, we, together with our contract research organization, decided to delay the initiation of our Phase 1 trial of FSI-174 in healthy volunteers in order to support physicians and hospitals in devoting their resources to treating COVID-19 patients, and avoid exposing healthy volunteers to unnecessary risk. We will continue to evaluate the pandemic and expect to re-visit the timing of potential trial initiation in the second quarter.

Fourth Quarter and Recent Business Highlights:

Magrolimab Clinical Programs:Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Solid Tumors

FSI-174:

FSI-189:

Corporate:

Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results:

About Forty Seven, Inc.Forty Seven, Inc.is a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company that is developing therapies targeting cancer immune evasion pathways and specific cell targeting approaches based on technology licensed fromStanford University. Forty Sevens lead program, magrolimab, is a monoclonal antibody against the CD47 receptor, a dont eat me signal that cancer cells commandeer to avoid being ingested by macrophages. This antibody is currently being evaluated in multiple clinical studies in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. In March 2020, Forty Seven entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Gilead Sciences, Inc., which is expected to close during the second quarter of 2020.

Additional Information and Where to Find It

This communication is for informational purposes only and is neither an offer to purchase nor a solicitation of an offer to sell shares of Forty Seven, nor is it a substitute for any tender offer materials that Gilead, its acquisition company or Forty Seven has or will file with the SEC. A solicitation and an offer to buy shares of Forty Seven will be made only pursuant to an offer to purchase and related materials that Gilead has filed with the SEC. At the time the tender offer was commenced, Gilead filed a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO with the SEC, and Forty Seven filed a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 with the SEC with respect to the tender offer. FORTY SEVENS STOCKHOLDERS AND OTHER INVESTORS ARE URGED TO READ THE TENDER OFFER MATERIALS (INCLUDING AN OFFER TO PURCHASE, A RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL AND CERTAIN OTHER TENDER OFFER DOCUMENTS) AND THE SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHICH SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE ANY DECISION IS MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE TENDER OFFER. The Offer to Purchase, the related Letter of Transmittal and certain other tender offer documents, as well as the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement, has been sent to all stockholders of Forty Seven at no expense to them. The Tender Offer Statement and the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement are available for free at the SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov. Additional copies may be obtained for free by contacting Gilead or Forty Seven. Free copies of these materials and certain other offering documents will be made available by Gilead by mail to Gilead Sciences, Inc., 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA 94404, attention: Investor Relations, by phone at 1-800-GILEAD-5 or 1-650-574-3000, or by directing requests for such materials to the information agent for the offer, which will be named in the Tender Offer Statement. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by Forty Seven will be available free of charge under the Investors section of Forty Sevens internet website at ir.fortyseveninc.com.

Forward-Looking Statements:

Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expect, potential, plans, will, believe, and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions, or circumstances) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include those related to the timing and outcome of results from the Phase 1b trial evaluating magrolimab in combination with azacitidine for the treatment of MDS and AML, the potentially-registration enabling clinical development program for magrolimab in higher-risk MDS, the single-arm, registration enabling trial evaluating the combination of magrolimab and rituximab in heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients, and other ongoing trials of 5F9 for the treatment of ovarian and colorectal cancer; the timing of and quality of results from investigational new drug-application enabling studies for FSI-189 and FSI-174 and their respective potential for approval by the FDA; the timing and success of research and development plans for Rockets and Forty Sevens respective platforms, product candidates and collaboration; the timing and success of research and development plans for bluebirds and Forty Sevens respective platforms, product candidates and collaboration; the business combination with Gilead and related matter; post-closing operations and the outlook for the companies respective businesses, including, without limitation, the ability of Gilead to advance Forty Sevens product pipeline, including magrolimab, FSI-174 and FSI-189; filings and approvals relating to the transaction; the expected timing of the completion of the transaction; the ability to complete the transaction considering the various closing conditions; difficulties or unanticipated expenses in connection with integrating the companies; Forty Sevens ability to fund its clinical programs and the sufficiency of its cash and short-term investments, and Forty Sevens financial outlook; and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ from expectations contemplated by such forward-looking statements include: the potential product candidates that Forty Seven develops may not progress through clinical development or receive required regulatory approvals within expected timelines or at all; clinical trials may not confirm any safety, potency or other product characteristics described or assumed in this press release; such product candidates may not be beneficial to patients or successfully commercialized; uncertainties as to the timing of the business combination with Gilead; the possibility that various closing conditions for the business combination may not be satisfied or waived, including that a governmental entity may prohibit, delay or refuse to grant approval for the consummation of the transaction; the effects of the business combination on relationships with employees, other business partners or governmental entities; the difficulty of predicting the timing or outcome of FDA approvals or actions, if any; the impact of competitive products and pricing; other business effects, including the effects of industry, economic or political conditions outside of the companies control; transaction costs; actual or contingent liabilities; and other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the companies periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including current reports on Form 8-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K, as well as the Schedule 14D-9 filed by Forty Seven and the Schedule TO and related tender offer documents filed by Gilead and Toro Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Gilead. All forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to Gilead and Forty Seven, and Gilead and Forty Seven assume no obligation and disclaim any intent to update any such forward-looking statements.

For more information please visit http://www.fortyseveninc.com or contactinfo@fortyseveninc.com.

For journalist enquiries please contact Sarah Plumridge atfortyseven@hdmz.comor phone (312) 506-5218.

For investor enquiries please contact Hannah Deresiewicz at Stern Investor Relations Inc. athannah.deresiewicz@sternir.comor phone (212) 362-1200.

Forty Seven Inc.Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Data(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Forty Seven Inc.Selected Balance Sheet Data(in thousands)

Read the rest here:
Forty Seven, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights - BioSpace

Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market : Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Threats (2019-2025) – Packaging News 24

Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Report 2019 Market Size, Share, Price, Trend and Forecast is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of the global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment industry.

The report also covers segment data, including: type segment, industry segment, channel segment etc. cover different segment market size, both volume and value. Also cover different industries clients information, which is very important for the manufacturers.

There are 4 key segments covered in this report: competitor segment, product type segment, end use/application segment and geography segment.

Request For Discount On This Report @ https://www.mrrse.com/checkdiscount/18928?source=atm

For competitor segment, the report includes global key players of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment as well as some small players.

Companies Mentioned in the Report

The report also profiles major players operating in the global platelet rich plasma & stem cell alopecia treatment market based on various attributes, such as company overview, financial overview, pipeline portfolio, product portfolio, business strategies, and recent developments. The players covered in the report include Kerastem, Eclipse, Regen Lab SA, Stemcell Technologies, Inc., RepliCel Life Sciences, Histogen, Inc., and Glofinn Oy.

The global platelet rich plasma & stem cell alopecia treatment market has been segmented as below:

Request Sample Report @https://www.mrrse.com/sample/18928?source=atm

Important Key questions answered in Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market report:

What will the market growth rate, Overview, and Analysis by Type of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment in 2024?

What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the drivers, challenges, and business risks in Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market?

What is Dynamics, This Overview Includes Analysis of Scope and price analysis of top Manufacturers Profiles?

Who Are Opportunities, Risk and Driving Force of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market? Knows Upstream Raw Materials Sourcing and Downstream Buyers.

Who are the key manufacturers in space? Business Overview by Type, Applications, Gross Margin, and Market Share

What are the opportunities and threats faced by manufacturers in the global market?

Buy This Report @ https://www.mrrse.com/checkout/18928?source=atm

The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 15 chapters:

Chapter 1, to describe Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force and market risks.

Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment , with price, sales, revenue and global market share of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment in 2019 and 2015.

Chapter 3, the Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment competitive situation, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.

Chapter 4, the Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales, revenue and growth by regions, from 2019 to 2025.

Chapter 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales, revenue and market share for key countries in the world, from 2019 to 2025.

Chapter 10 and 11, to segment the sales by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2019 to 2025.

Chapter 12, Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2019 to 2025.

Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion, appendix and data source.

Read the original:
Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market : Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Threats (2019-2025) - Packaging News 24

Disruptions in Cancer Care in the Era of COVID-19 – Medscape

Editor's note: Find the latest COVID-19 news and guidance in Medscape's Coronavirus Resource Center.

Even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care must go on, but changes may need to be made in the way some care is delivered.

"We're headed for a time when there will be significant disruptions in the care of patients with cancer," said Len Lichtenfeld, MD, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society (ACS), in a statement. "For some it may be as straightforward as a delay in having elective surgery. For others it may be delaying preventive care or adjuvant chemotherapy that's meant to keep cancer from returning or rescheduling appointments."

Lichtenfeld emphasized that cancer care teams are going to do the best they can to deliver care to those most in need. However, even in those circumstances, it won't be life as usual. "It will require patience on everyone's part as we go through this pandemic," he said.

"The way we treat cancer over the next few months will change enormously," writes a British oncologist in an article published in the Guardian.

"As oncologists, we will have to find a tenuous balance between undertreating people with cancer, resulting in more deaths from the disease in the medium to long term, and increasing deaths from COVID-19 in a vulnerable patient population. Alongside our patients we will have to make difficult decisions regarding treatments, with only low-quality evidence to guide us," writes Lucy Gossage, MD, consultant oncologist at Nottingham University Hospital, UK.

The evidence to date (from reports from China in Lancet Oncology) suggests that people with cancer have a significantly higher risk of severe illness resulting in intensive care admissions or death when infected with COVID-19, particularly if they recently had chemotherapy or surgery.

"Many of the oncology treatments we currently use, especially those given after surgery to reduce risk of cancer recurrence, have relatively small benefits," she writes.

"In the current climate, the balance of offering these treatments may shift; a small reduction in risk of cancer recurrence over the next 5 years may be outweighed by the potential for a short-term increase in risk of death from COVID-19. In the long term, more people's cancer will return if we aren't able to offer these treatments," she adds.

One thing that can go on the back burner for now is routine cancer screening, whichcan bepostponed for now in order to conserve health system resources and reduce contact with healthcare facilities, says the ACS.

"Patients seeking routine cancer screenings should delay those until further notice," said Lichtenfeld. "While timely screening is important, the need to prevent the spread of coronavirus and to reduce the strain on the medical system is more important right now."

But as soon as restrictions to slow the spread of COVID-19 are lifted and routine visits to health facilities are safe, regular screening tests should be rescheduled.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has issued new guidance on caring for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 outbreak.

First and foremost, ASCO encourages providers, facilities, and anyone caring for patients with cancer to follow the existing guidelines from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when possible.

ASCO highlights the CDC's general recommendation for healthcare facilities that suggests "elective surgeries" at inpatient facilities be rescheduled if possible, which has also been recommended by the American College of Surgeons.

However, in many cases, cancer surgery is not elective but essential, it points out. So this is largely an individual determination that clinicians and patients will need to make, taking into account the potential harms of delaying needed cancer-related surgery.

Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy, leave cancer patients vulnerable to infection, but ASCO says there is no direct evidence to support changes in regimens during the pandemic. Therefore, routinely stopping anticancer or immunosuppressive therapy is not recommended, as the balance of potential harms that may result from delaying or interrupting treatment versus the potential benefits of possibly preventing or delaying COVID-19 infection remains very unclear.

Clinical decisions must be individualized, ASCO emphasized, and suggestedthe following practice points be considered:

For patients already in deep remission who are receiving maintenance therapy, stopping treatment may be an option.

Some patients may be able to switch from IV to oral therapies, which would decrease the frequency of clinic visits.

Decisions on modifying or withholding chemotherapy need to consider both the indication and goals of care, as well as where the patient is in the treatment regimen and tolerance to the therapy. As anexample, the riskbenefit assessment for proceeding with chemotherapy in patients with untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer is quite different than proceeding with maintenance pemetrexed for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer.

If local coronavirus transmission is an issue at a particular cancer center, reasonable options may include taking a 2-week treatment break or arranging treatment at a different facility.

Evaluate if home infusion is medically and logistically feasible.

In some settings, delaying or modifying adjuvant treatment presents a higher risk of compromised disease control and long-term survival than in others, but in cases where the absolute benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may be quite small and other options are available, the risk of COVID-19 may be considered an additional factor when evaluating care.

For patients who are candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, a delay may be reasonable if the patient is currently well controlled with conventional treatment, ASCO comments. It also directs clinicians to follow the recommendations provided by the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation regarding this issue.

Finally, there is also the question of prophylactic antiviral therapy: Should it be considered for cancer patients undergoing active therapy?

The answer to that question is currently unknown, says ASCO, but "this is an active area of research and evidence may be available at any time."

For more from Medscape Oncology, join us on Twitter and Facebook.

Read this article:
Disruptions in Cancer Care in the Era of COVID-19 - Medscape

In vivo Comparison of the Biodistribution and Toxicity of InP/ZnS Quan | IJN – Dove Medical Press

Li Li,1,2 Yajing Chen,1 Gaixia Xu,2,3 Dongmeng Liu,1 Zhiwen Yang,1 Tingting Chen,1 Xiaomei Wang,1 Wenxiao Jiang,1 Dahui Xue,1 Guimiao Lin1

1Base for International Science and Technology Cooperation: Carson Cancer Stem Cell Vaccines R&D Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronics Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education/Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples Republic of China; 3Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples Republic of China

Correspondence: Guimiao LinSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Health Sciences Center, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples Republic of ChinaTel/ Fax +86-755-86671903Email gmlin@szu.edu.cn

Introduction: Indium phosphide (InP) quantum dots (QDs) have shown a broad application prospect in the fields of biophotonics and nanomedicine. However, the potential toxicity of InP QDs has not been systematically evaluated. In particular, the effects of different surface modifications on the biodistribution and toxicity of InP QDs are still unknown, which hinders their further developments. The present study aims to investigate the biodistribution and in vivo toxicity of InP/ZnS QDs.Methods: Three kinds of InP/ZnS QDs with different surface modifications, hQDs (QDs-OH), aQDs (QDs-NH2), and cQDs (QDs-COOH) were intravenously injected into BALB/c mice at the dosage of 2.5 mg/kg BW or 25 mg/kg BW, respectively. Biodistribution of three QDs was determined through cryosection fluorescence microscopy and ICP-MS analysis. The subsequent effects of InP/ZnS QDs on histopathology, hematology and blood biochemistry were evaluated at 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days post-injection.Results: These types of InP/ZnS QDs were rapidly distributed in the major organs of mice, mainly in the liver and spleen, and lasted for 28 days. No abnormal behavior, weight change or organ index were observed during the whole observation period, except that 2 mice died on Day 1 after 25 mg/kg BW hQDs treatment. The results of H&E staining showed that no obvious histopathological abnormalities were observed in the main organs (including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and brain) of all mice injected with different surface-functionalized QDs. Low concentration exposure of three QDs hardly caused obvious toxicity, while high concentration exposure of the three QDs could cause some changes in hematological parameters or biochemical parameters related to liver function or cardiac function. More attention needs to be paid on cQDs as high-dose exposure of cQDs induced death, acute inflammatory reaction and slight changes in liver function in mice.Conclusion: The surface modification and exposure dose can influence the biological behavior and in vivo toxicity of QDs. The surface chemistry should be fully considered in the design of InP-based QDs for their biomedical applications.

Keywords: InP/ZnS quantum dots, surface chemistry, in vivo, biodistribution, nanotoxicology

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

See more here:
In vivo Comparison of the Biodistribution and Toxicity of InP/ZnS Quan | IJN - Dove Medical Press

Edited Transcript of SRPT earnings conference call or presentation 26-Feb-20 9:30pm GMT – Yahoo Finance

BOTHELL Mar 21, 2020 (Thomson StreetEvents) -- Edited Transcript of Sarepta Therapeutics Inc earnings conference call or presentation Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 9:30:00pm GMT

* Alexander G. Cumbo

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Executive VP & Chief Commercial Officer

* Douglas S. Ingram

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - President, CEO & Director

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Executive VP of R&D and Chief Medical Officer

* Ian M. Estepan

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Senior VP of Corporate Affairs & Chief of Staff

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - SVP of Gene Therapy

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Executive VP, CFO & Chief Business Officer

* Christopher N. Marai

Nomura Securities Co. Ltd., Research Division - MD & Senior Analyst of Biotechnology

* Debjit D. Chattopadhyay

H.C. Wainwright & Co, LLC, Research Division - MD of Equity Research & Senior Healthcare Analyst

* Peter B. Kim

Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC., Research Division - VP

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Sarepta Therapeutics Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, today's program may be recorded.

I would now like to introduce your host for today's program, Ian Estepan, Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff and Corporate Affairs. Please go ahead, sir.

Ian M. Estepan, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Senior VP of Corporate Affairs & Chief of Staff [2]

Thank you so much, John, and thank you all for joining today's call. Earlier today, we released our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2019. The press release is available on our website at http://www.sarepta.com, and our 10-K was filed with the SEC earlier this afternoon. Joining us on the call today are Doug Ingram, Sandy Mahatme, Bo Cumbo, Dr. Gilmore O'Neill and Dr. Louise Rodino-Klapac. After our formal remarks, we'll open up the call for Q&A.

I'd like to note that during this call, we will be making a number of forward-looking statements. Please take a moment to review our slide on the webcast, which contains our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, any of which are beyond Sarepta's control. Actual results could materially differ from these forward-looking statements, and any and such risks can materially and adversely affect the business, the results of operations and trading prices for Sarepta's common stock. For a detailed description of applicable risks and uncertainties, we encourage you to review the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the company's other SEC filings. The company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements, including any financial projections provided today based on subsequent events or circumstances.

And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Doug Ingram for our corporate update.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Douglas S. Ingram, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - President, CEO & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Ian. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining Sarepta Therapeutics Fourth Quarter 2019 Conference Call.

In 2018, we defined our vision to become one of the world's leaders in precision genetic medicine to treat rare disease, founded both on our precise and efficient RNA platform and on the build of a gene therapy engine capable of rapidly advancing multiple constructs through development into the patient community. In 2019, we executed, further matured and brought that vision into greater focus. And in 2020 -- through 2020 we will, if successful, realize much of that vision.

We have an enormous number of milestones in 2020. But before we discuss them, let us review the progress that we have made in 2019. I will begin with our RNA platform.

As we announced at the JPMorgan conference in January, our fourth quarter 2019 revenue stands at $100 million. In our third full year since launch, our 2019 revenue was $381 million, a 26% increase over prior year. I will remind you that we have never taken a price increase since launch, so our growth comes from continuing to serve the Duchenne community.

Our 2020 guidance for EXONDYS is $420 million to $430 million. As we are just launching VYONDYS, we will wait until later this year before providing revenue guidance, but you can expect the launch curve similar to that of EXONDYS.

In the fourth quarter, we obtained FDA approval for our second RNA therapy, VYONDYS 53. The approval of VYONDYS was a win for objective evidence-based decision-making. It was a win for hard-working professionals at the FDA neurology division that was responsible for this review, and most importantly, it was a win for exon 53 amenable patients.

With regulatory pathway reconfirmed, we submitted our rolling NDA for casimersen, having announced positive results earlier in 2019. Assuming casimersen is approved, we will have 3 therapies capable of treating approximately 30% of the Duchenne community in the United States. We will have doubled the number of patients who may benefit from our PMO technology versus EXONDYS alone, and we will be among the exceedingly small number of biotechnology companies who have internally discovered, developed and brought to the patient community 3 or more medicines.

In 2019, we commenced our multi-ascending dose study for our next-generation PMO technology, the peptide-conjugated PMO or PPMO for short.

Now let's move on to our gene therapy engine. There, we've made great progress in 2019 as well. Starting with SRP-9001, our gene therapy for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy using our microdystrophin construct. We have completed all dosing in what became a 41-patient, placebo-controlled trial, Study 102. Patients are now crossing over at the end of their 48-week period. By now, between our first proof-of-concept study, our main study for 102 and our crossover, we have dosed more than 30 Duchenne boys with active gene therapy. The study continues uninterrupted, and the last patient last visit should occur in December of this year.

We have designed our next placebo-controlled trial using our commercial process material, and we've taken initial feedback from the agency. This trial, which we call Study 301 is designed as a global placebo-controlled, multi-center trial. We have made significant progress on manufacturing. With our partners Thermo Fisher and Catalent, we have built significant capacity with a dedicated facility completed in Lexington, Massachusetts and even greater capacity than that built at Catalent. Our hybrid manufacturing approach is taking shape with ADPD expertise at our Columbus site and a dedicated ADPD site in Burlington, Massachusetts. This intellectual hub has been responsible for some of our most meaningful advances in 2019.

Consider that we have now achieved at scale, commercially viable yields for SRP-9001, we announced at JPMorgan that we had commenced engineering runs. By now, I can tell you that we have commenced our GMP runs for SRP-9001, and we're making great progress on assay development as well.

We've made great progress on our limb-girdle pipeline in 2019. To remind you, LGMD, or limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, is an umbrella name for a collection of serious, often fatal neuromuscular diseases. None of these diseases have available therapies, so the opportunity to bring a better life for these patients is compelling. In the first quarter of 2019, we exercised our option and acquired Myonexus, gaining access to its 5 LGMD programs. And then we later entered into a license option with NCH to gain access to Dr. Zarife Sahenk's LGMD candidate for LGMD2A. These 6 programs together have the potential of providing treatments for over 70% of patients with LGMD.

In the first quarter of 2019, we presented expression and safety data from our first 3 patient proof-of-concept cohort for LGMD2E, and it was impressive. Expression was 50% on IHC and 30% -- 37% abnormal on Western blot. We came back in the fourth quarter, and we updated with 9-month functional data, indicating that every child was improving on every functional end point.

We commenced 1 additional higher-dose, 3-patient cohort in 2019 at a 4x higher dose with the goal of making a dose selection in 2020 this year.

Moving on to the rest of our gene therapy engine. 2019 was equally consequential. With our partner, Lysogene, we commenced a gene therapy trial for MPS IIIA or Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A devastating neurological lysosomal storage disease. We built out our gene therapy center of excellence in Columbus, Ohio. Our center of excellence is already building new constructs and advancing the science of gene therapy.

We entered into 14 transactions in 2019, and we in-licensed or purchased 18 new constructs, bringing the total number of research and development programs to 42 across our 2 platforms. And we have employed a clever incubation strategy that allows us to build an enormously large pipeline while still permitting us to remain laser-focused on our near-term objectives and milestones.

And of course, we entered into a transformational alliance with Roche in the fourth quarter of 2019 where Roche will take SRP-9001 to patients outside the United States. This alliance, by far, the largest ex-U. S. single candidate, license and biopharmaceutical history, validates our approach, our progress and the value of our program, but it also serves our mission. If SRP-9001 proves successful, Roche, with its very impressive ex-U. S. resources and international expertise, will bring our therapy to far more patients far faster than we could have ever done on our own. And it places us in an enviable position with the resources to drive our vision and to execute our plans. With the close of our alliance this quarter, we have well over $2 billion of cash on our balance sheet today; add to that the fact that we have just entered into an agreement to sell our VYONDYS priority review voucher for $111 million; add again to that our revenue this year for EXONDYS and VYONDYS, and it should become clear that we are well positioned with the resources, the assets and the talent to drive our ambitious strategy to fruition.

Looking forward, you will see that 2020 is dense with milestones. So starting with our gene therapy portfolio for 2020, with respect to SRP-9001, we will continue to execute Study 102 with our 48-week last patient last visit in December of this year. We will unblind, evaluate and release those results, which should occur in the first quarter of 2021.

We are preparing to commence our commercial supply trial, Study 301. Broadly, we have 3 work streams for Study 301. We must complete site initiation and training. We must complete our assay work, our engineering work and our GMP runs. And if all goes well, we should have GMP material released this July. We need to work with the division to obtain their concurrence on the commencement of Study 301. So of course, there's a lot to do here, but the team is making exceptional progress to date.

With respect to our LGMD pipeline, we have dosed all 3 patients now in our high-dose cohort for LGMD2E. We will have expression and safety results available in the second quarter, and we anticipate announcing that data at an appropriate medical meeting in the second quarter. We will make a formal dose selection decision in the third quarter. We will complete the assay and process development work for LGMD2E with the goal of having GMP material available in time to commence a trial in early 2021. We will also begin the ADPD work for other of our LGMD constructs as well.

We will continue our dialogue with the FDA and come to a view on the development and regulatory pathway for LGMD2E and then the remainder of the LGMD pipeline. Our goal is to have all of that completed by year-end, so we could commence a trial with commercial process material early next year.

We've also dosed 17 patients on our MPS IIIA gene therapy program and intend to complete all the dosing by the middle of the year. Our collaborator on CMT, otherwise known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth, Dr. Zarife Sahenk at Nationwide Children's Hospital, had intended to commence our proof-of-concept study for CMT last year but did not have NCH released material, enabling her to do that. That material should be available this year, and Dr. Sahenk intends to commence that study in 2020.

In addition to our gene therapy center of excellence in Columbus, Ohio, we are also building a separate gene-editing innovation center under the guidance of Dr. Charlie Gersbach of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina and should have that largely complete this year.

We have also significant milestones for our RNA platform this year. We should complete our rolling submission for casimersen in the second quarter of 2020. We plan to result -- to release the results from our PROMOVI study at the MDA Scientific Conference in March. These results from patients that met the enrollment criteria for 201/202, that's the study, which formed the basis for the eteplirsen approval, are consistent with the 201/202 data set. And we will have dosing and safety insight on our next-generation RNA platform, the PPMO, this year as well. If the PPMO is successful, it could be a significant advancement in our RNA technology and platform.

In summary, we have an enormous amount of work to do this year. But that work will be profoundly consequential for Sarepta and, of course, more importantly, for the patients that we serve. To those who may say our plans are ambitious, I would agree. But they are not driven by hubris. They are formed instead by the binding conviction founded on objective evidence that the science of genetic medicine has come of age, that a revolution in health care is upon us now, and that Sarepta is playing a leading role in translating that science to practical therapies that improve countless lives otherwise stolen by serious, rare genetic diseases. And it is in that spirit that I would invite you to join Sarepta and rare disease patients in the U.S. and around the world in recognizing Rare Disease Day this Saturday, February 29, as we continue to bring awareness about rare diseases and the work that remains to bring therapies to patients fighting those diseases every day.

And with that, I will turn the call over to Sandy to provide an update on the financials. Sandy?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandesh Mahatme, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Executive VP, CFO & Chief Business Officer [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, Doug. Good afternoon, everyone. Over the course of 2019, we advanced the business in several significant ways: we beat revenue guidance for EXONDYS 51; launched another of our RNA medicines, VYONDYS 53; significantly bolstered our financial position; and struck several new licensing deals, bringing our total number of development programs up to 42. We also started a partnership with Roche that closed earlier this month and that brought in $1.15 billion into the company. This collaboration brings significant capital to fully fund our pipeline, including our sharing payments, and it provides us access to Roche's significant expertise and greatly expand the global opportunity for our lead gene therapy program, SRP-9001.

Now moving to the financials. This afternoon's press release provided details for the fourth quarter of 2019 on a non-GAAP basis as well as a GAAP basis. The press release is available on Sarepta's website. Please refer to it for full reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP.

Net product revenue for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $100.1 million compared to $84.4 million for the same period of 2018. The increase primarily reflects higher demand for EXONDYS 51. On a GAAP basis, the company reported a net loss of $235.7 million and $140.9 million or $3.16 and $2.05 for basic and diluted shares for the fourth quarter of 2019 and '18, respectively.

We reported a non-GAAP net loss of $116.9 million or $1.57 per basic and diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $58.7 million or $0.85 per basic and diluted shares in the fourth quarter of 2018.

In the last quarter of 2019, we recorded approximately $15.6 million in cost of sales compared to $13.1 million in the same period of last year. The increase was driven by royalties due to BioMarin Pharmaceuticals and University of Western Australia as well as higher production costs as a result of increasing demand for EXONDYS 51.

On a GAAP basis, we recorded $223.1 million and $146.2 million in R&D expenses for the fourth quarters of 2019 and 2018, respectively, which is a year-over-year increase of $76.9 million. This increase is primarily related to $40 million of increasing expenses in clinical and manufacturing, a $10.8 million increase in compensation and other personnel expenses as well as a $10.4 million increase in milestone cadence.

On a non-GAAP basis, R&D expenses were $135.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to $77 million for the same period in 2018, an increase of $58.4 million. The year-over-year growth in non-GAAP R&D expenses was driven primarily due to a continuing ramp-up of our micro-dystrophin distribution program, our ESSENCE program and initiation of certain post-market studies for EXONDYS 51.

Turning to SG&A. On a GAAP basis, we recorded $81.4 million and $64.2 million of expenses in the fourth quarters of 2019 and 2018, respectively, a year-over-year increase of $17.2 million. On a non-GAAP basis, the SG&A expenses were $65.8 million for the fourth quarter of last year compared to $52.9 million for the same period of 2018, an increase of $12.9 million. The year-over-year increase was driven by significant organizational growth and expansion, supporting our commercial launch as well as 40 therapies in various stages of development across several therapeutic modalities.

On a GAAP basis, we recorded $4.8 million in other expenses for the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to $2.3 million of expenses for the same period of 2018. The unfavorable change is primarily driven by increase in interest expense, which is recognized for our new term loans that was received by the company in December of 2019.

We had approximately $1.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments as of the end of last year. In addition to the closing of our alliance with Roche this quarter, we have well over $2 billion in cash on our balance sheet today.

With that, I would like to turn the call over to Bo for a commercial update. Bo?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alexander G. Cumbo, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - Executive VP & Chief Commercial Officer [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Sandy. Good afternoon, everyone. Toward our 2019 objectives around execution and our commitment to deliver on our stated goals, I am pleased to report the following on behalf of the organization. We exceeded revenue consensus expectations for both the fourth quarter and the full year of 2019, totaling $100.1 million and $380.8 million, respectively. As Doug mentioned, our 2020 guidance for EXONDYS 51 is $420 million to $430 million. In terms of continuing to serve the community, we know that there are additional patients who may benefit from EXONDYS 51, and we will continue to overcome access and reimbursement challenges to get patients on therapy.

golodirsen, or VYONDYS 53, received accelerated approval by the FDA on December 12, 2019. VYONDYS 53 treats Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients who are amenable to skipping exon 53. Acting with urgency and the knowledge that patients were waiting, we launched VYONDYS 53 within 24 hours of FDA approval, just as we did with EXONDYS 51. We submitted all of our compendia, contracting and reporting requirements, and vyondys53.com, a critically important resource for families, went live. While we are leveraging our deep knowledge and expertise for the EXONDYS 51 launch, it is important to understand that there will be standard procedures and required reimbursement policies associated with launching a new drug with a unique NDC or National Drug Code. Our team is prepared to work through these requirements as we have in the past, and we anticipate a measured and steady launch trajectory for VYONDYS 53, resembling the launch curve for EXONDYS 51. The only difference is that we are preparing and planning for the amenable exon 53 space to be competitive.

In support of our goal to increase access for VYONDYS 53, we are pursuing a multi-pronged strategy. Although commercial and state Medicaid plans now have a much better understanding of Duchenne, we are continuing to educate about disease progression and the benefits of treatment. Our goal is to work towards coverage to be all-inclusive regardless of ambulation status, age or gender. We do expect commercial payers to have medical policies in place faster than Medicaid. We also understand that from our previous launch that the mix of commercial to Medicaid patients will adjust over time, and we believe it will eventually move towards a 50-50 mix or higher for Medicaid.

Further, we are continuing to engage with state Medicaid plans regarding the CMS guidance letter on the obligation of state Medicaid to make accelerated approval treatments available to patients. As you know, this is critically important for Duchenne based on the percent of patients covered under Medicaid plans.

While the launch over Christmas holiday did delay some physician and patients seeking treatment during that period of time, we have been receiving START Forms from top-tier centers across the U.S. and are working with health care providers to ensure they are educated around amendability for skipping exon 53, as this population is different from exon 51 with some exceptions. Epidemiology suggests that VYONDYS 53 can serve approximately 8% of the Duchenne community. But we will have to take into consideration that there are a number of patients already enrolled in or being recruited for clinical trials, or have a deletion that would be amenable to exon 51 and, therefore, could already be on EXONDYS 51.

With that said, we continue to have conversations with health care providers about the number of patients within their clinics and with payers about the number of patients eligible for treatment under their plan. We are working with both health care providers and payers to get all amenable patients on VYONDYS 53 as soon as possible. Our mission to be the global leader in precision-genetic medicine started with EXONDYS 51 and have continued with the approval and launch of VYONDYS 53. We are now preparing for the potential launch of casimersen for patients amenable to skipping exon 45. Behind these important medicines is an industry-leading pipeline of programs, 42 in all, driven by new modalities designed to treat complex rare diseases, including MPS IIIA and neuromuscular dystrophy. Sarepta is working with urgency and is focused on understanding the epidemiology and global prevalence of these diseases.

We are continuing to refine our analysis and uncover additional insights while collaborating with top neuromuscular specialists. Each day, we are learning more about these diseases. And with each piece of evidence that we gather, we are able to apply these insights to our disease awareness and patient identification efforts that are already underway.

2019 was a great -- was a year of great accomplishments, not only for the commercial organization but the company overall. Looking to the future, patient care will continue to be our driving force as we translate scientific innovations into medicines designed to improve the lives of patients around the world.

And with that, I'll turn the call back over to Doug.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Douglas S. Ingram, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - President, CEO & Director [6]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, Bo, and thank you, Bo and Sandy. With that, let's open the call for questions.

================================================================================

Questions and Answers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operator [1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Ritu Baral from Cowen.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ritu Subhalaksmi Baral, Cowen and Company, LLC, Research Division - MD & Senior Biotechnology Analyst [2]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Doug, can you let us know when the last patients for gene therapy was dosed? Basically, what is the shortest follow-up period, both for microdystrophin as well as limb-girdle? And can you talk about the safety profile, especially liver, especially platelets, that you've seen in that time period for both programs?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Douglas S. Ingram, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. - President, CEO & Director [3]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, I can just tell you very broadly that as I sort of backward engineer, we're going to have the -- for the 41-patient study, 102, the last patient last visit will be in December. So if you work backwards, you'll see that the last patient was right at -- I think it actually might have been the very first weekend in 2020. So that was the first 41 patients dosed. We're continuing on an ongoing basis to those patients on crossover as well. There's a significant number, as I've mentioned to you now. But in the Study 102, between the proof-of-concept 101, between the main 41-patient study and between the crossovers, we've dosed over 30 patients with active therapy. We have now dosed 6 patients with limb-girdle, both the previous dose and now the higher dose in limb-girdle. And of course, a lot of that's blinded, so that we'll all see together both the safety and -- the full safety and efficacy. But broadly speaking, I will say, again, consistent with our preclinical models, we have never seen anything that looks like a complement or reductions in platelet counts below the normal level. So things continue as they were. Study 102 continues, completely uninterrupted, making great progress there. The exciting thing about 102 is that we'll have last patient in December, and we'll have a readout in the first quarter of 2021. And I will remind you that is a readout, not merely on expression and on safety but also on function using NSAA. Thank you for that question.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operator [4]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our next question comes from the line of Tazeen Ahmad from Bank of America.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continue reading here:
Edited Transcript of SRPT earnings conference call or presentation 26-Feb-20 9:30pm GMT - Yahoo Finance

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Booming by Size, Revenue and Top Growing Companies APEX Biologix, Belgravia Center, RepliCel, Riken Research…

Verified Market Research offers an overarching research and analysis-based study on the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market, covering growth prospects, market development potential, profitability, supply and demand, and other important subjects. The report presented here comes out as a highly reliable source of information and data on the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market. The researchers and analysts who have prepared the report used an advanced research methodology and authentic primary and secondary sources of market information and data. Readers are provided with clear understanding on the current and future situations of the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market based on revenue, volume, production, trends, technology, innovation, and other critical factors.

Get | Download Sample Copy @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=15102&utm_source=MSN&utm_medium=003

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Leading Players:

The report offers an in-depth assessment of key market dynamics, the competitive landscape, segments, and regions in order to help readers to become better familiar with the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market. It particularly sheds light on market fluctuations, pricing structure, uncertainties, potential risks, and growth prospects to help players to plan effective strategies for gaining successful in the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market. Importantly, it allows players to gain deep insights into the business development and market growth of leading companies operating in the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market. Players will also be able to anticipate future market challenges, sales scenarios, product price changes and other related factors.

Ask for Discount @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=15102&utm_source=MSN&utm_medium=003

Table of Contents :

Executive Summary: It includes key trends of the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market related to products, applications, and other crucial factors. It also provides analysis of the competitive landscape and CAGR and market size of the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market based on production and revenue.

Production and Consumption by Region: It covers all regional markets to which the research study relates. Prices and key players in addition to production and consumption in each regional market are discussed.

Key Players: Here, the report throws light on financial ratios, pricing structure, production cost, gross profit, sales volume, revenue, and gross margin of leading and prominent companies competing in the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market.

Market Segments: This part of the report discusses about product type and application segments of the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market based on market share, CAGR, market size, and various other factors.

Research Methodology: This section discusses about the research methodology and approach used to prepare the report. It covers data triangulation, market breakdown, market size estimation, and research design and/or programs.

Why to Buy this Report?

The report is a perfect example of a detailed and meticulously prepared research study on the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market. It can be customized as per the requirements of the client. It not only caters to market players but also stakeholders and key decision makers looking for extensive research and analysis on the Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market.

Complete Report is Available @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/stem-cell-alopecia-treatment-market/?utm_source=MSN&utm_medium=003

About us:

Verified market research partners with the customer and offer an insight into strategic and growth analyzes; Data necessary to achieve corporate goals and objectives. Our core values are trust, integrity and authenticity for our customers.

Analysts with a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyze data in all phases. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne FernandesCall: +1 (650) 781 4080Email: [emailprotected]

Tags: Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Size, Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Trends, Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Forecast, Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Growth, Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Analysis

Our Trending Reports

Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Read the original post:
Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Booming by Size, Revenue and Top Growing Companies APEX Biologix, Belgravia Center, RepliCel, Riken Research...

Platelets trigger perivascular mast cell degranulation to cause inflammatory responses and tissue injury – Science Advances

Abstract

Platelet responses have been associated with end-organ injury and mortality following complex insults such as cardiac surgery, but how platelets contribute to these pathologies remains unclear. Our studies originated from the observation of microvascular platelet retention in a rat cardiac surgery model. Ensuing work supported the proximity of platelet aggregates with perivascular mast cells (MCs) and demonstrated that platelet activation triggered systemic MC activation. We then identified platelet activating factor (PAF) as the platelet-derived mediator stimulating MCs and, using chimeric animals with platelets defective in PAF generation or MCs lacking PAF receptor, defined the role of this platelet-MC interaction for vascular leakage, shock, and tissue inflammation. In application of these findings, we demonstrated that inhibition of platelet activation in modeled cardiac surgery blunted MC-dependent inflammation and tissue injury. Together, our work identifies a previously undefined mechanism of inflammatory augmentation, in which platelets trigger local and systemic responses through activation of perivascular MCs.

More than 225,000 cardiac surgeries are performed annually in the United States (1). While these procedures provide life-saving corrections of coronary blood flow or valvular abnormalities, the inherent combination of surgical trauma, extracorporeal perfusion, and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury often evoke harmful systemic inflammatory responses (2). These inflammatory responses prominently manifest as acute loss of vascular tone (approximately 25% of patients) (3) but are also linked to an ongoing, high incidence of end-organ damage such as acute kidney injury [up to 54% for all stages (4)]. As a consequence, anti-inflammatory interventions have been identified as a key to improve disease outcomes. Since the underlying basis for inflammatory activation remains poorly defined, appropriate ways to modify inflammation during cardiac surgery have remained elusive.

Platelets are increasingly recognized as circulating immune cells, which intimately associate with activated microvascular endothelia (5) and which have the capacity to markedly influence inflammation through direct cell-cell communications and the secretion of inflammatory mediators [reviewed in (6)]. The occurrence of platelet activation during cardiac surgery is a well-established phenomenon (7), and there is mounting evidence that platelet-dependent inflammatory responses are relevant to patient outcomes. Hence, we have recently observed that platelet responses, measured as a drop in platelet count, are an independent risk factor to acute kidney injury and mortality following coronary bypass grafting surgery (4). However, how platelets contribute to the harmful responses elicited by cardiac surgery remains undefined. Here, we sought to investigate whether platelets have a specific role in activating mast cells (MCs) and to depict the implications of such an interaction in a preclinical model of extracorporeal circulation.

In our previous work, which focused on the early events following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), we established that MCs are critical effector cells for injurious and inflammatory responses in a rat model (8) as well as in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (9). These observations linked perioperative inflammatory responses to a cell type that is increasingly recognized as a master regulator of early inflammation (10). Strategically located at endothelial and epithelial interfaces, MCs assume a critical role in organizing responses to pathogens and tissue stress such as I/R through the release of powerful preformed and de-novo synthesized effector molecules, which promote recruitment of inflammatory cells and facilitate their tissue infiltration [reviewed in (10)]. Dysregulated, widespread activation of MCs is a critical determinant of mortality, e.g., in anaphylaxis (11) and hemorrhagic fever (12), by causing shock and vascular leakage. What defines the role of MCs in these pathologies is their close association with blood vessels, which ensures that MC productsbeyond their local tissue effectsact directly on endothelial cells and can enter the circulation to rapidly propagate systemic and distant-site inflammation. The significant MC activation observed during cardiac surgery therefore constitutes an important event, which may lead toward an augmented systemic inflammatory response and singles out MC activation as a novel therapeutic target in the ongoing attempt to blunt harmful inflammation in these patients. However, what causes initial activation of MCs within the complex sequence of events elicited by cardiac surgery remains unknown, limiting our understanding of cardiac surgeryassociated inflammation and, specifically, our ability to develop new therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes.

In the present study, we sought to identify the factor(s) contributing to MC activation during cardiac surgery using CPB circulation. Since MCs have a perivascular location, we investigated the possibility that the MC-activating factor acts from within the circulation.

The rat deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) model recapitulates several pathophysiologic stimuli present during cardiac surgery such as (nonpulsatile) CPB, blood contact to artificial surfaces of the extracorporeal circulation, cooling, and whole-body I/R. Using this DHCA model, we have previously demonstrated that one of the earliest signs of tissue injury is evidenced in the intestines and that MCs at this site are crucial effectors of pathology through release of preformed mediators (8). Therefore, we examined this site for signs of increased platelet aggregation after DHCA and observed in hematoxylin and eosin staining several platelet-rich thrombi in small and large intestinal sections (Fig. 1A). This observation was confirmed by immunostaining for the platelet-specific marker CD41 in samples obtained 2 hours after completion of CPB (Fig. 1, B to D). Aggregation of platelets was specifically associated with tissue experiencing injury because no platelet aggregation was observed in the lung and brain, where no appreciable tissue injury was observed at this early time point [(8) and fig. S1]. As a consequence, these findings motivated a more detailed investigation into a possible link between platelet deposition and early MC-mediated injury.

(A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of rat colons 2 hours after completion of the DHCA model. Arrow indicates platelet-rich thrombus in a small submucosal vessel. Immunofluorescence staining for CD41 (green) in sham (B) or experimental (C and D) animals 2 hours after completion of DHCA model (4,6 diamidino-2-phenylindole nuclear counterstain). Representative images of n = 4 per condition; magnification, 200. (D) Insert in (C) in 600. (E) Z-stack confocal laser scanning micrographs of whole-mount sections (ear) taken from Mcpt5-Cre tdTomatofl/fl mice 60 min after intravenous injection of a collagen and epinephrine mixture. Endogenously expressed tdTomato (red) outlines MCs with additional staining performed against CD41 (green) and CD31 (blue). An animated three-dimensional reconstruction can be viewed in the Supplementary Materials. (F) MC granule staining [tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)avidin, red; arrows indicate released MC granules] reveals activated MCs in close vicinity to intravascular (anti-CD31, blue) platelet aggregates (anti-CD41, green). Representative images of n = 4 per condition. (G) Rectal temperature following collagen and epinephrine injection (CollE) in comparison to anaphylaxis after sensitization with trinitrophenol (TNP)specific IgE and exposure to TNP-conjugated ovalbumin (TNP OVA) or vehicle control treatment. In addition, platelets were activated with a monoclonal antibody against mouse integrin IIb, clone MWReg30 (MWReg). A subset of animals was platelet-depleted before receiving collagen and epinephrine (CollE Plt dplt) or MWReg (MWReg Plt dplt). n = 6 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle control, two-way ANOVA. (H) Plasma chymase levels following collagen and epinephrine, or MWReg injection or TNP OVA anaphylaxis. Data are represented as the means SD. n = 4 to 6 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle control and #P < 0.05 versus respective treatment group, one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test.

Platelets, like MCs, can release large amounts of preformed inflammatory mediators; thus, they have the potential to rapidly initiate responses upon activation (6). We hypothesized that platelets may trigger early MC-mediated tissue injury in the DHCA model through their capacity to directly activate MCs. Since platelets are typically intravascular while MCs are extravascular, we sought to examine how this purported interaction could occur. Using microscopy of whole-mount vascular beds, we examined the spatial relationship between activated platelets and perivascular MCs following platelet activation in Mcpt5-Cre tdTomatofl/fl mice. In these animals, MCs harbor a red fluorescent dye, which allows for direct microscopic visualization. We induced specific activation of platelets in these mice by intravenous administration of a cocktail of collagen and epinephrine, carefully titered to cause systemic platelet activation but not mortality. We then examined the vasculature of the mouse ear for microvascular platelet aggregation using microscopy. We found numerous platelet aggregates at the inner walls of blood vessels in close proximity to perivascular MCs (Fig. 1E). Because the genetic elements of Mcpt5 drive tdTomato expression in MCs, red fluorescence is mostly cytoplasmic and does not readily denote degranulation. Therefore, to evaluate the actual degranulation of MCs, we stained MC granules by using avidin, which is routinely used for MC granule staining (8, 13), and found that several of these MCs showed signs of degranulation (Fig. 1F). To confirm that significant MC activation occurred following platelet activation, we examined collagen and epinephrinetreated mice for signs of shock, a classical manifestation of systemic MC activation. It is known that when mice are subjected to immunoglobulin E (IgE)mediated MC activation, they experience anaphylaxis, which is indicated by a sharp drop in core body temperature (13). We observed that collagen and epinephrinetreated mice experienced a sharp drop in core body temperature, which was attributable to MC activation based on the high levels of chymasea major prestored MC mediator (10)detected in the plasma of these mice (Fig. 1, G and H). To confirm the contribution of platelets to this MC-mediated anaphylaxis response, we depleted platelets before administration of the collagen and epinephrine cocktail and found that it abrogated the hypothermic response (Fig. 1G). Thus, specific activation of platelets results in degranulation of perivascular MCs.

We next investigated the mechanism of platelet-mediated MC activation. The close spatial relationship between platelet aggregates and perivascular MCs on apposing sides of the vasculature raised the possibility that activated platelets release bioactive agents that traverse the endothelial barrier to stimulate MC degranulation. Therefore, we examined whether any secreted products of platelets had MC-activating properties by applying conditioned medium from activated human platelets on to two different human MC lines [ROSA (14) and LAD2 (15)]. Cell-free conditioned medium from platelets activated by either thrombin, collagen, or convulxin, but not from resting platelets, evoked a comparable MC degranulation response from both MC lines (Fig. 2A). The magnitude of the MC responses was dependent on the concentration of platelets in the conditioned medium and the duration of time that the platelets were activated (Fig. 2A). To further define the nature of the platelet factor(s), we ultracentrifugated the conditioned medium after platelet activation and observed that MC-stimulating activity was contained in the supernatant and not in the microparticle pellet. Furthermore, the soluble portion obtained from freeze-thawed resting platelets (to release their cellular content without activation) only marginally activated MCs, suggesting that the MC-activating factor(s) was not stored in significant quantities as a preformed mediator. Together, these in vitro observations suggest that MC activation is not dependent on direct contact and that soluble factors formed after platelet activation can directly trigger MC degranulation.

(A) Isolated platelets were activated for indicated periods (5, 15, and 30 min) and at indicated concentrations (1 107, 5 106, 2.5 106, and 1 106 platelets/ml) with thrombin (or convulxin where indicated). Two MC lines [ROSA (R) and LAD2 (L)] were then exposed to cell-free supernatant from this reaction and MC degranulation measured by tryptase activity assay. In addition, supernatant from activated platelets was ultracentrifuged, and the pelletresuspended in Tyrodes buffer (MP, microparticle pellet)or the supernatant (MPS, microparticle supernatant) was added to MCs. Last, resting platelets (1 107) were freeze-thawed and centrifuged, and debris-free supernatant was tested on MCs (Rest F/T). T, Tyrodes buffer; I, ionomycin positive control; R, resting platelet supernatant. (B) For biochemical characterization of MC-activating effect, LAD2 cells were exposed to supernatant from activated platelets without further treatment (AP), after boiling for 30 min (APb), incubation on activated charcoal (APc), or following isolation of lipid fraction (AP-l). T-l, lipid fraction from Tyrodes buffer; R-I, lipid fraction from resting platelet supernatant. (C) LAD2 cells were pretreated with antagonists against various lipid mediators [BAY-u 3405 (10 M): Bay; L798,106 (100 nM): L798; Ex26 (10 M): Ex; AH 6809 (10 M): AH; montelukast (100 M): Mo; WEB2086 (0.1 to 100 M): Web] before exposure to heat-treated activated-platelet supernatant. Purified PAF was added at 0.1 to 10 M. Degranulation was measured using -hexosaminidase assay. NS, not significant. (D) Quantitative determination of PAF in supernatants from resting and activated platelets and activated platelet supernatant absorbed with activated charcoal. Data are represented as the means SD. *P < 0.05 versus resting platelet supernatant and #P < 0.05 versus respective activated platelet supernatant, one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test. All data derived from four independent experiments were performed in triplicate wells. PRP, platelet-rich plasma.

We next sought to determine the identity of the MC-activating factor(s) in the platelet-conditioned medium. Notably, boiling of the platelet supernatant did not reduce MC-activating activity, whereas absorption with activated charcoal abrogated it, suggesting that the active component was a lipid compound (Fig. 2B). We confirmed this by preparing a lipid extract of the conditioned medium and observed that MC-activating activity was largely contained in this extract. Since platelets are already known to produce several prominent bioactive lipid mediators, we undertook a screening experiment of possible MC-activating candidates. Using antagonists to leukotriene receptors (montelukast: 1 to 100 nM), the prostaglandin EP1/EP2 receptor (AH 6809: 1 to 100 M), the EP3 receptor (L-798,1016: 1 to 100 nM), the dual thromboxane TP/prostaglandin DP2 receptor (BAY-u 3405: 0.1 to 10 M), or the shingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (Ex-26: 1 to 100 M) before exposure to the activated platelet-conditioned medium, we observed no appreciable decline in MC activation (Fig. 2C). However, when we pretreated MCs with WEB2086, an inhibitor of the platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor, we observed a dose-dependent inhibition of MC activation. To verify that PAF is the active factor in the platelet-conditioned medium, we conducted liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LC-MS) lipid quantification of the medium and found that platelet activation caused the release of significant amounts of PAF C16 and C18 (Fig. 2D). Consistent with the functional properties of PAF, absorption of platelet medium with activated charcoal significantly reduced PAF levels. Last, we exposed MCs to increasing doses of purified PAF and observed dose-dependent MC degranulation (Fig. 2C and fig. S2). Together, our data indicate that PAF is the predominant platelet product responsible for MC degranulation.

These findings led us to question whether platelet-derived PAF can directly act on MCs, which are found on the apposing side of the endothelium. We therefore applied PAF at concentrations shown previously to cause MC activation to the apical side of human umbilical vein endothelium cells (HUVECs) grown on semipermeable supports. Starting from a transendothelial resistance (TEER) of 146.9 22.7 ohmcm2, we observed that PAF itself significantly but transiently disrupted endothelial integrity. However, when PAF was added to HUVECs in the presence of human MCs (ROSA) in the basal compartment of the Transwell system, the drop in TEER did not reverse during the experiment (Fig. 3A). At the same time, we observed that these basal MCs degranulated after addition of apical PAF and that the extent of degranulation was comparable to that when PAF was added to Transwell inserts without a HUVEC cell layer (Fig. 3B). Together, these results suggest that intravascular PAF can act on perivascular MCs and that this contact is made possible likely by a collaborative effort of PAF and MC products on endothelial barrier tightness. Moreover, endothelial cells do not appear to directly participate in the signaling events.

(A) HUVEC cells were grown to confluency on permeable supports, and then 1 106 ROSA cells were added to some of the basal compartments (ROSA HUVEC) followed by addition of PAF at 1 or 10 M or vehicle control to the apical compartment. TEER was measured for 1 hour. *P < 0.05 versus untreated ROSA/HUVEC cocultures by two-way ANOVA. (B) -Hexosaminidase from supernatants of HUVEC endothelial cells, ROSA MC cells, and cocultured HUVEC/ROSA cells with or without addition of PAF (at 1 or 10 M) to the apical side of the endothelia. n = 8 per condition. Results shown as average SD, *P < 0.05 versus untreated ROSA/HUVEC cocultures.

In view of our in vitro results, we now sought to determine whether the platelet-mediated MC activation in vivo was dependent on PAF. We therefore first examined the systemic response to collagen and epinephrine injection after pretreatment with the PAF inhibitor WEB2086. Although we noticed a marked blunting of the shock response, it was not totally abolished (Fig. 4A), and thus, we could not readily infer that this response was fully PAF-mediated. A possible explanation for this finding is that collagen and epinephrine injections cause systemic thrombosis and thus evoke temperature changes independent of inflammatory reactions. Therefore, we next examined a second, distinct model of systemic platelet activation (16). This model achieves platelet activation with a monoclonal antibody against mouse integrin IIb (clone MWReg30), which causes thrombocytopenia within a few minutes (Fig. 4, B and C). We found that platelet activation in this manner also resulted in a sharp drop in core body temperature, which was abrogated in mice pretreated with WEB2086, indicating that it was PAF dependent (Fig. 4D). We further confirmed that this severe inflammatory response was platelet dependent by showing that depletion of platelets in these mice before MWReg30 antibody administration protected from shock. Further support for the notion that the shock response following platelet activation was PAF dependent was provided by the finding that phospholipase A2 knockout (Pla2-KO) mice, which display a significantly reduced PAF production (17), failed to succumb to shock. Similarly, deficiency of PAF sensing, as observed in PAF receptor knockout (Pafr-KO) mice (18), also protected from shock following MWReg30 antibody administration (Fig. 4D). In agreement, injection of purified PAF was sufficient to cause shock in wild-type (WT) and Pla2-KO mice but not in Pafr-KO mice (Fig. 4E). Together, in vivo platelet activation and systemic release of platelet-derived PAF results in shock.

(A) Temperature measurement following intravenous administration of collagen and epinephrine with (CollE WEB) or without (CollE) pretreatment with the PAF inhibitor WEB2086; control animals received intravenous phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Administration of antiintegrin aIIb (MWReg30) antibody caused significant thrombocytopenia [representative anti-glycoprotein IX (GPIX) stain versus forward scatter (FSC) before (B) and after (C) treatment]. (D) Temperature measurement following intravenous administration of MWReg30 in untreated mice (WT), in WEB2086-pretreated (WT-WEB) and platelet-depleted (WT-PLT deplete) mice, and in phospholipase A2(Pla2-KO) and PAF receptor(Pafr-KO) knockout animals. (E) Temperature measurement after administration of purified PAF (2 mg/g bodyweight) in WT, Pla2, or Pafr-knockout (Pafr-KO) mice. Adoptive platelet transfer was performed in hIL-4R/GPIbtransgenic mice. These were platelet-depleted through administration of antiIL-4R antibody (F) and repleted with platelets from either Pla2-KO or WT mice (G) before administration of MWReg30 (H). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) data are shown as anti-GPIX stain versus forward scatter and is representative of experimental findings. Systemic response to MWReg30 was measured as change in body temperature (I) and by quantification of plasma levels of MC-specific chymase (J) and TNF (K). Data are represented as the means SD. n = 4 to 6 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus control-treated animals and #P <0.05 versus respective stimulated WT or WT-repleted animals. (A, B, and G) Two-way ANOVA; (H and I) one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test.

Because PAF is released by various immune cells into the circulation (19), we sought to verify that it is indeed platelet-secreted PAF that causes MC activation and shock in vivo. For this, we used an adoptive transfer model where platelets were infused into human interleukin-4 receptor alpha/platelet glycoprotein Ib (hIL-4R/GPIb) transgenic mice whose endogenous platelets had been depleted by administration of antiIL-4R antibody as described previously (20). This allowed repletion with platelets from either WT or Pla2-KO mice that lack the ability to generate PAF (17). We then administered MWReg30 antibody to activate platelets in both of these repleted groups and examined the mice for MC activation and shock. Here, the exposure of the WT-platelet reconstituted mice to MWReg30 elicited an overall blunted systemic response compared to our previous experiments, likely due to the reduced platelet numbers achieved after reconstitution (Fig. 4, F to H). However, this response was altogether absent in mice reconstituted with Pla2-KO platelets (Fig. 4I). Furthermore, only mice reconstituted with WT platelets displayed increases in plasma-chymase and plasmatumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels, which are indicators of MC activation (Fig. 4, J and K). These results support that the PAF responsible for MC activation and shock following administration of MWReg30 antibody is specifically platelet derived.

Since shock as indicted previously is a characteristic inflammatory response linked to MCs, we aimed to further define the specific role of MCs in the propagation of PAF-mediated platelet responses. We compared MWReg30 antibodyinduced shock responses in WT and MC-deficient Sash mice and in Mcpt5-cre+iDTR+ mice depleted of MCs (21). We found that whereas MC-competent mice evoked a significant shock response to MWReg30 administration, both groups of MC-deficient mice experienced blunted shock response (Fig. 5A). Since shock is preceded by vascular leakage, another well-known MC-mediated inflammatory response, we compared vascular leakage in WT and MC-deficient mice following MWReg30 administration. We found that WT mice experienced severe vascular leakage but not MC-deficient or MC-depleted mice (Fig. 5, B to E). Last, products of activated perivascular MCs can also significantly affect the organ they are proximal to. To demonstrate the potential of PAF-activated MCs to affect surrounding tissue responses, we examined expression of inflammatory genes in the intestines of MC-deficient Sash mice reconstituted with bone marrowderived MCs (BMMCs) from WT or Pafr-KO mice following administration of MWReg30. BMMC injection into Sash mice does not reconstitute tissue MC uniformly but achieves good reconstitution in the intestines (22). For comparison, we also included MC-deficient Sash mice that were not reconstituted in this assay. As shown in Fig. 5F, animals reconstituted with WT BMMC, but not unreconstituted mice or mice reconstituted with BMMCs from Pafr-KO animals, demonstrated a significant increase in tissue inflammatory gene expression in intestinal samples, suggesting that PAFR (PAF receptor)competent MCs are necessary for platelets to promote tissue inflammation. Thus, platelet-induced MC degranulation serves to amplify platelet-initiated inflammatory signals and translate these into tissue responses.

(A) Temperature measurement following intravenous administration of MWReg30 in WT mice and in MC-deficient KitW-sh/W-sh (Sash) or MC-depleted Mcpt5-cre + iDTR + (Mcpt-DTR) mice. n = 6 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus MWReg30-treated WT, two-way ANOVA. (B) Extravasation of Evans blue after intravenous administration of MWReg30 in control or MC-depleted Mcpt-DTR mice. OD, optical density. n = 5 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus unchallenged WT; #P < 0.05 versus MWReg30-treated WT, one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test. Immunofluorescence in whole-mount tissue (ear) in animals administered 150 kDa of TRITC-dextran intravenously before MWReg30 administration [blue, endothelium (anti-CD31); green, MCs (fluorescein isothiocyanateavidin)] shows tracer extravasation (arrows) in WT mice (C and D) but not in Sash mice (E). (F) Transcriptional analysis of small intestinal tissue expression of inflammatory markers in Sash mice or in Sash mice reconstituted with Pafr-KO (Pafr-KO reconstituted) or WT (WT reconstituted) bone marrowderived MCs and treated with MWReg30. Data are represented as the means SD. n = 4 to 6 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus nonreconstituted and #P < 0.05 versus WT-reconstituted animals. One-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test.

In view of the potential for platelets to trigger MC-mediated inflammatory responses, we investigated the consequences of blocking platelet activation in the rat DHCA model, and specifically the impact of such platelet inhibition on subsequent MC activation. Because of the close correlation between the site of tissue damage and deposition of aggregated platelets during DHCA, we first sought to map the major sites of platelet deposition following this procedure. For these studies, we isolated platelets from donor rats and labeled them with NIR78 (23), a near-infrared label, and then intravenously administered these cells immediately after completion of the CPB. After 2 hours of recovery, the major organs of the rats were harvested and imaged for platelet deposition. We found that a major deposition site of platelets following DHCA was the intestines (Fig. 6A). This observation supports our earlier finding indicating preferential deposition in the intestines as a primary site of tissue damage following DHCA (8). As confirmed by immunofluorescence using a platelet-specific marker, imaging revealed platelet deposition also in the kidneys (fig. S3). However, as reported previously, we found no histological (8) or biochemical (urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) (fig. S3) evidence of renal injury at this time point. Kidneys feature a similar susceptibility to hypoxia as the gut (24) but contain very few MC in their parenchyme (25).

In vivo platelet labeling documents significant tissue platelet retention in vehicle-pretreated animals (A) but not in clopidogrel-pretreated animals (B) or in sham animals (C). Organs are identified in (C): stomach (S), colon (Co), caecum (Cae), brain (B), lungs (L), kidney (K), and liver (Li). (D) Platelet count before and after CPB in clopidogrel-pretreated (gray lines) or vehicle-pretreated (black lines) animals. To account for dilutional effects during extracorporeal circulation, data are presented as the ratio of platelet over red blood cell (RBC) count. #P < 0.05 versus DHCA-Vh, by unpaired Students t test of delta baseline values. Each line represents one animal. Representative images of the macroscopic intestinal phenotype in vehicle-pretreated (E) and in clopidogrel-pretreated animals (F). (G) Microscopic injury score in sham and DHCA-treated vehicle control (DHCA-Vh) or clopidogrel-pretreated (DHCA-Clop) animals. (H) Plasma PAF and (I) plasma chymase levels (normalized to plasma protein to adjust for on-bypass dilution effects) at baseline (T0), after CPB (T1), and after a 2-hour recovery period (T2). (J) Plasma TNF levels after a 2-hour recovery period. Data are represented as the means SD. n = 4 per condition and n = 3 for sham. *P < 0.05 versus sham and #P < 0.05 versus DHCA-Vh, one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparisons test. Plasma PAF (K) and chymase (L) levels were determined by ELISA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with DHCA. Samples were collected after induction of anesthesia (baseline: pre) or after completion of CPB perfusion (post-CPB). To account for dilution effects, values are normalized for plasma protein content. (M) Platelet counts were obtained from medical records at time of baseline or post-CPB blood draw and normalized to hemoglobin (Hb) concentration to account for perioperative blood loss and dilution. n = 20, values shown with median, *P < 0.01 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Photo credit: Jrn Karhausen, Duke University.

We found that when we pretreated animals with clopidogrel, a potent P2Y12 inhibitor that has been extensively studied in systemic conditions involving platelet activation (26), we could completely block platelet deposition in the intestines and other sites after DHCA (Fig. 6B and fig. S3). Consistent with this finding, rats pretreated with clopidogrel maintained their platelet count throughout the experiment, whereas in control animals, we observed a drop in platelet numbers after completing CPB (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, clopidogrel pretreatment significantly reduced intestinal pathology compared to vehicle-treated DHCA mice as evidenced by both macroscopic (Fig. 6, E and F) and microscopic (Fig. 6G) examination. Plasma PAF levels, which displayed a sharp rise after DHCA in control animals, did not change significantly in the clopidogrel-treated group (Fig. 6H). Supporting the notion that abrogation of platelet activation also blocks MC activation, we observed limited levels of circulating chymase and TNF levels in the clopidogrel-treated rats compared to controls (Fig. 6, I and J). Thus, during modeled DHCA, platelet activation and aggregation are critical preceding events to MC activation and the severe inflammation and tissue injury in the intestines. To provide clinical support to our findings, we measured PAF- and MC-specific chymase in 20 consecutive patients undergoing DHCA for repair of proximal aortic pathologies. Consistent with our findings in the rat model, we observed a significant increase of plasma PAF {median baseline (plasma protein), 0.154 ng/g [interquartile range (IQR), 0.138 to 0.169 ng/g] versus post-CPB, 0.213 ng/g (IQR, 0.174 to 0.236 ng/g); P < 0.01; Fig. 6K} and chymase levels [baseline (plasma protein), 1.038 pg/g (IQR, 0.502 to 2.085 pg/g) versus post-CPB, 6.322 pg/g (IQR, 3.630 to 8.929 pg/g); P < 0.01; Fig. 6L]. During the same period, platelet numbers significantly decreased relative to the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration [baseline, 1344.5 platelets/mg Hb (IQR, 1226.2 to 1482.4 platelets/mg Hb) versus post-CPB, 1045.6 platelets/mg Hb (IQR, 855.3 to 1251.0 platelets/mg Hb); P < 0.01], which suggests that the drop in platelet numbers was not due to bleeding or dilution but potentially due to concurrent platelet activation (Fig. 6M). These observations document that our experimental data align with events observed in patients undergoing comparable procedures.

Rapid activation of multiple, powerful inflammatory pathways during and after cardiac surgery has been identified as a key to the ongoing, high incidence of end-organ injury associated with these procedures. To elucidate the critical factors that shape decisions of tissue inflammation and injury in this setting, we focused on early events, reasoning that by limiting our studies to this window, we would identify mediators that are initiators of the inflammatory cascade and prime candidates for therapeutic intervention. This approach revealed a critical role of MCs and linked MC activation to early tissue injury and inflammation in a rat model (8) and to intraoperative hypotension in cardiac surgical patients (9). However, a major obstacle to further develop the therapeutic potential of MC modulation is that it currently remains unclear how MCs are activated in this setting. Therefore, we further examined the injury phenotype of the intestine as a primary site of tissue injury and MC activation in the setting of extracorporeal circulation (8, 27) and found significant platelet deposition on the luminal sides of small blood vessels. This microvascular placement positions platelets in close proximity to perivascular MCs, and indeed, our ensuing work demonstrated that platelets, through release of the lipid mediator PAF, actively triggered MC activation and thus caused shock, vascular leakage, and tissue inflammation. Hence, our results outline a powerful, previously undefined mechanism of inflammatory augmentation by establishing the collaboration of two cell types that have, relatively recently, come into focus as important immune sentinel cellsplatelets within the intravascular compartment (6) and MCs at the tissue/microvascular interface (10).

What determines the preferential platelet deposition in the gut in our model is unclear, but evidence exists demonstrating that changes of splanchnic blood flow during nonpulsatile CPB result in substantial intestinal hypoperfusion [reviewed in (24)]. In agreement, we and others had shown intestinal I/R injury and intestinal MC activation to be the earliest signs of end-organ injury in rat and porcine models of extracorporeal circulation (8, 27). Following I/R, endothelial cell surfaces undergo significant changes, resulting in the rapid and sustained adherence of platelets to postcapillary venules upon reperfusion (5). Consequently, it is likely that the particularly hypoperfusion-prone intestinal vasculature provides a unique locale that facilitates the inflammatory collaboration between platelets and perivascular MCs thus making the gut a hotspot for the generation of inflammatory mediators in conditions such as cardiac surgery.

Platelets are increasingly appreciated as central immune regulatory cells that directly interact with both endothelium and intravascular immune cells and perform multifaceted inflammatory functions such as regulating neutrophil recruitment, extracellular trap formation, or cytokine release [reviewed in (6)]. In our work, the close spatial relationship between platelet aggregates and perivascular MCs on apposing sides of the vasculature raised the possibility that activated platelets release bioactive agents that traverse the endothelium to stimulate MC degranulation. Consequently, through a series of fractionation studies and biochemical assays, we established that platelets can activate MCs through secretion of PAF, a potent proinflammatory phospholipid implicated in various pathological reactions including anaphylaxis (28). PAF is released by various cells of the host defense system with neutrophils, basophils, endothelial cells, and MCs previously identified as major producers (19). Consistent with our results, platelet-dependent release of PAF has been described (29), but the relative contribution of platelets to overall PAF levels and whether PAF from other sources (e.g., endothelia) contributes to platelet-triggered responses remain to be further defined.

Consistent with our findings, PAF is not stored in the preformed state but rather is rapidly synthesized in response to cell-specific stimuli by remodeling of cellular phosphatidylcholine (30). Receptor-induced activation of the key enzyme, cytosolic phospholipase A2 (PLA2), is crucial for the acute lipid membrane remodeling during platelet activation and not only constitutes the first step in generating lipid mediators such as PAF but also provides important substrates required to support the energetic demands during platelet activation (31). PLA2 functions are not exclusive to PAF metabolism and Pla2-knockout (Pla2-KO) mice appear to have abnormalities, e.g., in thromboxane A2 synthesis (32). However, our studies involving the specific PAF antagonist WEB2086 and chimeric mice, in which we reconstituted platelet-depleted mice with platelets lacking PLA2 and therefore PAF production, strongly suggest that platelet-derived PAF causes MC activation. Conversely, we also provide evidence on the specific role of MC sensing of such platelet-derived PAF by use of MC-deficient and MC-depleted animals as well as of MC-deficient animals repleted with Pla2-knockout (Pla2-KO) BMMC. Together, these experiments support our notion that platelet-derived PAF triggers MC activation. Although the bioavailability of PAF in the circulation is very limited (33), it is conceivable that platelets create a protective microenvironment where PAF, because of its lipid nature, is able to traverse the endothelial walls and reach MCs. Consistent with reported evidence (34), we showed that platelet-derived PAF significantly alters endothelial barrier integrity and can thus act on MCs on the apposing side of the endothelium. In vivo, such contact may further be facilitated by the fact that MCs appear to form protrusions across the endothelial cell layer to directly survey intravascular events (35).

MC differentiation is highly tissue specific, and PAF receptors have been found in lung MCs and peripheral bloodderived but not skin MCs (36). Therefore, while our work demonstrates that a platelet-specific stimulus can cause release of PAF and resultant perivascular MC activation, these responses may vary in different tissues depending on the receptor equipment of local MC populations. In addition, MCs are not only sensors of PAF but also an important source of this mediator. During anaphylaxis, high levels of PAF are detected (28), and it is believed that hematogenous dissemination of this agent may be pivotal for rapid systemic MC activation after localized allergen exposure (36). This highlights that similarly following platelet-triggered MC activation, MC-autocrine production of PAF (37), as well as of further powerful mediators, may be instrumental in spreading and magnifying an initially limited response.

While our work identifies MC stimulation through platelet-derived PAF as an important, previously unknown proinflammatory mechanism, a limitation of our study is that it remains difficult to ascertain its relative contribution in complex conditions such as cardiac surgery. As highlighted by the work of Cloutier et al. (38) and, more recently, of Mauler et al. (39), PAF-independent mechanisms exist by which platelets trigger systemic responses. These mechanisms appear to have overlapping and distinct effects, e.g., platelet serotonin release after FcRIIA receptor activation (38) caused vasodilatation and shock but not vascular leakage as observed in our anti-gpIIb/IIIa model. Furthermore, systemic responses in our model were independent of serotonin effects, as previously shown (16) and as documented by the fact that shock was fully prevented by pretreatment with a PAF receptor antagonist, or in Pafr- and Pla2-KO mice. However, we did not test the role of serotonin in systemic responses in the rat model and cannot exclude that, in this more complex preclinical model, multiple platelet-dependent mechanisms contributed.

Last, our finding that platelet activation following rat DHCA is responsible for much of the subsequent early pathology suggests that targeting platelet-dependent inflammatory responses may be an effective strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality. Platelet activation is not routinely determined but has been inferred from the drop in platelet count often observed after cardiac surgery. The possibility that such thrombocytopenia occurs in the context of increased platelet reactivity has been suggested by its association with blood clot formation leading to stroke (40). A drop in platelet count is associated with inflammatory derangements in various conditions including cardiac surgery (4). Evidence from our rat DHCA model that the platelet antagonist clopidogrel stopped microvascular platelet deposition, prevented the associated drop in platelet count, and reduced MC-mediated inflammatory and tissue injurious responses thus is of significant translational interest. Hence, our data add important mechanistic insights to clinical observations, suggesting beneficial effects from controlling the platelet contribution to tissue injury and systemic inflammatory derangements in cardiac surgery (41). However, an inherent problem with these approaches is both the variable pharmacodynamic efficacy of commonly used antiplatelet agents and the fact that, especially in the perioperative setting, more potent inhibitors pose a substantial bleeding risk. As suggested by our data using a MC inhibitor in modeled DHCA (8), targeting downstream events, such as MC activation, may be a safer approach to improve outcomes.

All procedures performed for this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Duke University and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, respectively, and conformed to National Institutes of Health guidelines for animal care.

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (436.5 34 g, 10 to 12 weeks old) underwent deep hypothermic arrest in association with CPB (referred to in this paper as DHCA for simplicity) as described previously (8). For imaging purposes, animals were transitioned to an alfalfa-free diet (LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) 7 days before the start of the experiment and were randomized to receive two oral doses of either clopidogrel (3 mg/kg bodyweight) (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA) or normal saline 12 hours before and immediately after induction of anesthesia.

Anesthesia was induced with isoflurane (2 to 2.5 volume %), and animals were intubated and mechanically ventilated (45% O2/balance N2 and 35 to 45 mmHg of PaCO2). The tail artery and right external jugular vein were then cannulated, and 150 IU of heparin and 5 g of fentanyl were administered. Physiologic measurements, including mean arterial pressure, pericranial and rectal temperature, and blood gases [adjusted to the measured temperature (pH strategy) and maintaining 31 to 40 mmHg of PaCO2], were recorded (table S1). After initiation of CPB, animals were cooled for 30 min, and at a pericranial temperature of 16 to 18C, the bypass machine was stopped for a circulatory arrest period of 45 min. CPB was then reinitiated for rewarming and stopped at a pericranial temperature of 35.5C. Animals recovered under anesthesia for 2 hours until euthanasia.

For platelet labeling, we modified the technique of Flaumenhaft et al. (23) using two donor rats per experimental animal, which were pretreated as the experimental animal, i.e., with clopidogrel or vehicle. Donors were anesthetized with isoflurane, and whole blood in a volume of approximately 10% of the total donor blood volume was removed. Platelets were then isolated by centrifugation in the presence of apyrase (0.2 U/ml) and prostaglandin E1 (1 M) (MilliporeSigma) throughout. The targeted platelet count was approximately 1.8 108. Platelets were washed in Tyrodes buffer and labeled with 2 M IR-786 (H.W. Sands Corp., Jupiter, FL) for 30 min at 37C. After additional washing, these platelets were brought up in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and an aliquot was tested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to verify absence of surface expression of the platelet activation marker CD62P. Labeled platelets were transfused to recipient rats at the time point of reperfusion after circulatory arrest.

For imaging and tissue harvest, animals were euthanized by isoflurane overdose and perfused with 200 ml of PBS to wash out circulating platelets. Organs were removed, and tissue retention of labeled platelets was visualized using the IVIS Kinetic in vivo imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA) by setting the excitation to 795 to 815 nm and absorption to 760 to 780 nm.

Six- to 8-week-old mice were used for our experiments. Mcpt5-cre+iDTR+ mice were from A. Roers, University of Technology, Dresden (21). In these mice, MCs were conditionally depleted through intravenous injections of 200 ng of diphtheria toxin per mouse every other day for 2 weeks (13). Pla2/ (17) and Pafr/ (18) mice were provided by Shimizu (University of Tokyo) through the RIKEN BioResource Research Center (RBRC01733 and RBRC05641) and were rederived by the Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, Duke University Medical Center. In addition, the following strains were used: C57BL/6, KitW-sh/W-sh, and Mcpt5-Cre tdTomatofl/fl (42).

Systemic platelet activation was induced in two ways. First, we used a systemic mouse thrombosis model with collagen and epinephrine as platelet stimulants. Second, we examined the systemic response elicited by a monoclonal antibody that targets platelet integrin IIb receptor as previously published (16). Following anesthesia with isoflurane, animals received either 0.275 g collagen/g bodyweight (MilliporeSigma) together with 1.2 g of epinephrine (MilliporeSigma) in 200 l of PBS or 3 g/g bodyweight of the antiintegrin IIb receptor antibody clone MWReg30 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Animals were then recovered at room temperature, and the rectal temperature was measured in regular intervals.

Mice (hIL-4R/GPIbTg) (43) were rendered thrombocytopenic by retro-orbital injection of antihIL-4R (2.5 g/g body weight, clone 25463; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Platelet depletion was verified 16 hours after antibody injection by flow cytometry analysis (Accuri C6, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) of whole blood stained with Alexa Fluor 647labeled antibodies against glycoprotein IX (GPIX) (2 g/ml; R&D Systems). Platelet repletion was performed as previously published (20). In short, blood was drawn into heparinized tubes from the retro-orbital plexus of sedated Pla2-KO or WT animals (7.7 l/g body weight). Platelets were purified by successive centrifugation at 100g for 5 min (to obtain platelet-rich plasma) and at 700g in the presence of PGI2 (2 g/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. Pelleted platelets were resuspended in modified Tyrodes buffer [137 mM NaCl, 0.3 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KCl, 12 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid, and 5 mM glucose (pH 7.3)]. Platelets from several donor mice were pooled, and the platelet count was adjusted to 5 109 platelets/ml in 100 l of Tyrodes buffer for transfusion. Posttransfusion platelet counts were determined by flow cytometry 30 min after injecting platelets before MWReg30 administration.

BMMCs were obtained from bone marrow of WT and Pafr/ mice and cultured for 8 to 12 weeks as previously described (13). For repletion, 1 107 BMMCs were injected intravenously into KitW-sh/W-sh mice and allowed to mature in the tissues for another 8 weeks.

Whole blood (40 ml) was collected in acid-citrate-dextrose sodium citrate (1:9, v/v) from healthy individuals under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research at Duke University and centrifuged at 120g for 8 min. To prevent platelet activation, 1 M prostaglandin E1 and apyrase (0.2 U/ml) (MilliporeSigma) were added to the platelet-rich plasma and at each of the following steps. Platelets were obtained by centrifugation at 650g for 8 min, washed in buffer containing 36 mM citric acid, 5 mM glucose, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 103 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, bovine serum albumin (3.5 g/liter), and resuspended in standard Tyrodes buffer. Platelet activation was performed with either thrombin (0.2 U/ml), collagen (10 g/ml), type I solution from rat tail (both MilliporeSigma), or convulxin (0.3 ng/ml) (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). To verify platelet activation, a platelet aliquot was fixed in 4% formalin for each condition, washed in PBS, and stained with an antiCD62-allophycocyanin antibody (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Isotype controltreated samples were used for comparison (BD Biosciences). The remaining sample was centrifuged to obtain cell-free conditioned media. In a subset of experiments, this supernatant was further processed by incubating on activated charcoal (MilliporeSigma), boiling for 30 min, or ultracentrifugating for 30 min at 20,000g to isolate microparticles. Lipid extraction was performed using the method of Bligh and Dyer (44). In brief, the platelet supernatant was mixed with chloroform-methanol (2:1, v/v), and then successively, chloroform and water were added before centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The lower phase was then carefully harvested, dried under airflow, and resolubilized in Tyrodes buffer.

PAFs were extracted and analyzed by LC-MS essentially as described earlier with minor modifications (45). Briefly, the samples were extracted for PAF by methyl tert-butyl ether, and the extracts were fractionated using aminopropyl silica to isolate the PAF fraction. The PAFs coelute with lysophosphatidylcholine in this method. They were resolved by high-performance liquid chromatography using a Luna C18(2) column (2 150 mm, 3 ; Phenomenex) before detecting by LCtandem MS with unique multiple reaction monitoring combinations as described (45). PAFs were quantified by internal standard quantitation method using PAF C16-d4 as the internal standard added to the sample before processing.

The human MC lines ROSA (14) were provided by M. Arock (Laboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie Applique, CNRS) and LAD2 (15) by A. S. Kirshenbaum (National Institutes of Health). The ROSA cells were maintained in Iscoves modified Dulbeccos medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and LAD2 cells in StemPro-34 (Invitrogen) supplemented with recombinant human stem cell factor (100 ng/ml), penicillin and streptomycin (100 U/ml), and 1 GlutaMAX (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). MC degranulation was examined by measuring the activity either of tryptase using a commercially available kit (MilliporeSigma) or of -hexosaminidase as published. In both cases, results were calculated as the percent activity in supernatant versus activity in cell lysate. The following agonists and antagonists were tested at concentrations indicated in Results: WEB2086, montelukast, AH 6809, BAY-u 3405, L798.106, and Ex26 (all Tocris, Bristol, UK); PAF C16 and pertussis toxin (both MilliporeSigma). For IgE-antigen activation, LAD2 cells were passively sensitized by incubating with biotinylated human IgE for 16 hours. Sensitized LAD2 cells were stimulated with different doses of streptavidin as indicated for 1 hour. Supernatant was collected and analyzed for -hexosaminidase activity. To determine viability, LAD2 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PAF for 1 hour, and reduction of MTS tetrazolium compound was measured according to the manufacturers instructions. Results were calculated as % viable cells.

HUVECs were maintained as described (46). For experiments, 1 105 cells were seeded on 0.4-m polyethylene permeable supports (Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA) and left to adhere until TEER reached approximately 120 ohmcm2, and then medium was exchanged to Tyrodes buffer. The basal compartment of the Transwell system was loaded with either buffer or 1 106 ROSA cells, and TEER was recorded before and during 1 hour after addition of 0, 1, or 10 M PAF to the apical surface of the HUVECs. Degranulation of basal ROSA cells was determined at the end of the experiment by -hexosaminidase assay.

RNA was isolated (Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA) from snap-frozen tissue. After deoxyribonuclease digestion and reverse transcription (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad), with -actin (NM_007393; F: cccaacttgatgtatgaagg and R: tttgtgtaaggtaaggtgtgc) serving as internal standard. The following primers were used and amplified at 60C: Cxcl2 (NM_009140.2; F: cagactccagccacacttca and R: ttcagggtcaaggcaaactt), Tnfa (NM_013693; F: ctgaacttcggggtgatcgg and R: ggcttgtcactcgaattttga), Il6 (NM_031168; F: gatggatgctaccaaactgga and R: tgaaggactctggctttgtct), and Il1b (NM_008361.3; F: tgtaatgaaagacggcacacc and R: tcttctttgggtattgcttgg).

Plasma samples were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using rat chymase (LifeSpan Biosciences, Seattle, WA), rat TNF, mouse MC protease 1, mouse TNF (all ThermoFisher), and PAF (Lifeome BioLabs, Oceanside, CA) ELISA kits. To account for dilution during bypass, rat samples were normalized to each samples protein level (DC Protein Assay, Bio-Rad).

For whole-mount staining, the inner parts of the ear skin were peeled away from the intervening cartilage and fixed for 1 hour in 1% paraformaldehyde. Ear skin segments were then washed, permeabilized, and blocked in a solution containing 10% donkey serum, 0.3% Triton X, and 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Then tissue was incubated with anti-CD31 (BD Biosciences) and anti-CD41 (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO) antibody overnight, washed, and stained with fluorescent-labeled secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 2 hours at room temperature. MC granules were visualized with tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)avidin (MilliporeSigma). Samples were mounted with ProLong antifade with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole as counterstain (ThermoFisher).

Embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized, and heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed in sodium citrate buffer. After blocking at room temperature, sections were labeled with antibodies targeting CD41 and E-cadherin (Invitrogen), and binding was visualized with fluorescent-labeled secondary antibody.

To examine vascular permeability, mice were injected with 200 l of dextran-TRITC (10 mg/ml) (150 kDa; MilliporeSigma) at the time of platelet activation (13). After 90 min, animals were euthanized, and whole mounts were prepared and processed as outlined above. In vivo vascular leakage was quantified using the Evans blue dye extravasation technique (13). Briefly, Evans blue (20 mg/kg; MilliporeSigma) was injected intravenously 60 min before euthanasia. Tissue was then harvested, air-dried, weighed, and incubated in tissue formamide (25 l/mg) at 55C for 48 hours. The absorption of extracted Evans blue was then measured at 610 nm.

Hematoxylin and eosinstained sections from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were scored by independent observers blinded to treatment modalities according to the method of Chiu et al. (47).

Plasma samples were obtained in the course of an ongoing, Institutional Review Boardapproved clinical study investigating effects of temperature on cognitive function after DHCA procedures for repair of ascending aortic arch pathologies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02834065). Plasma samples from 20 consecutively enrolled patients after induction of anesthesia (baseline) and following completion of the circulatory arrest and CPB period were retrieved and analyzed by ELISA for PAF (Cusabio, Houston, TX) and chymase levels (Cloud Clone Corp., Wuhan, China). Platelet count at corresponding times was obtained from clinical records. Because CPB entails significant blood dilution, measurements were normalized either to plasma protein content (for ELISAs, determined by RC DC Protein Assay, Bio-Rad) or to hemoglobin concentration (for platelet count, from patient electronic records with corresponding time stamp).

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v.8 (GraphPad Software). Unpaired Students t test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and one-way ANOVA with Tukeys multiple comparisons tests were used to calculate statistical significance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Measured values of PAF, chymase, and platelet count in patients were compared with baseline values using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Experimental data are presented as median SD. Patient data are shown as median (IQR).

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/12/eaay6314/DC1

Fig. S1. Platelet deposition following rat DHCA model occurs in tissues that are particularly sensitive to I/R injury.

Fig. S2. EC50 and LD50 of PAF on cultured MCs.

Fig. S3. Clopidogrel prevents tissue platelet retention after DHCA.

Table S1. Physiologic variables during rat DHCA.

Movie S1. Platelets aggregate in close proximity to perivascular MCs after activation with collagen and epinephrine.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.

Acknowledgments: We thank J. Fowler for technical assistance. Funding: This work was funded by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants 1R56HL126891-01 to J.K.; 1R35 HL144976-01 to W.B.; R01-AI096305, R56-DK095198, and U01-AI082107 to S.N.A.; T32HL007149 to R.H.L.; and 1R01HL130443 to J.K. and J.P.M. Further support came from National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health grant S10RR027926 to K.R.M., the American Heart Association grant 15SDG25080046 to J.K., and a Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute grant (UL1TR002553) to J.K. Author contributions: J.K., W.B., and S.N.A. were involved with conceptualization, development of methodology, and preparation of original draft and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. J.K., H.W.C., Q.M., Y.B., R.H.L., and J.P.M. performed the investigation. K.R.M. performed methodology development and analyses. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Read the original post:
Platelets trigger perivascular mast cell degranulation to cause inflammatory responses and tissue injury - Science Advances